<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_11_2319259</id>
	<title>Web Servers Getting Naked, For Weight Savings</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244721960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.gamehostingguide.com/" rel="nofollow">1sockchuck</a> writes <i>"Cloud computing is causing servers to get naked. HP today announced a <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/06/10/hp-scales-out-with-new-cloud-servers/">'skinless' server</a> optimized for customers packing thousands of servers into cloud or HPC environments. This follow the lead of SGI/Rackable, which ditched the cover when it introduced bare bones servers for its <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/03/19/1329222/The-100-Degree-Data-Center">CloudRack (previously discussed here)</a>. HP says the skinless design makes servers far lighter, which is apparently an issue when shipping them by the rackload."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>1sockchuck writes " Cloud computing is causing servers to get naked .
HP today announced a 'skinless ' server optimized for customers packing thousands of servers into cloud or HPC environments .
This follow the lead of SGI/Rackable , which ditched the cover when it introduced bare bones servers for its CloudRack ( previously discussed here ) .
HP says the skinless design makes servers far lighter , which is apparently an issue when shipping them by the rackload .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1sockchuck writes "Cloud computing is causing servers to get naked.
HP today announced a 'skinless' server optimized for customers packing thousands of servers into cloud or HPC environments.
This follow the lead of SGI/Rackable, which ditched the cover when it introduced bare bones servers for its CloudRack (previously discussed here).
HP says the skinless design makes servers far lighter, which is apparently an issue when shipping them by the rackload.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302587</id>
	<title>It's about time!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244725740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I can slashdot naked, a webserver can host pages naked!</p><p>Oh damn, dropped the remote on the floor. Let me bend over and pick it up. BRB.</p><p>(enjoy that hairy mental image<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I can slashdot naked , a webserver can host pages naked ! Oh damn , dropped the remote on the floor .
Let me bend over and pick it up .
BRB. ( enjoy that hairy mental image : P )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I can slashdot naked, a webserver can host pages naked!Oh damn, dropped the remote on the floor.
Let me bend over and pick it up.
BRB.(enjoy that hairy mental image :P )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303545</id>
	<title>Re:Blade?</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244733900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And you can quit calling it "cloud" now... they're just hosting providers and you know it.</p></div><p>Hmmmm.....actually that reminds me.  While eating breakfast this morning, I had this crazy idea:  if you were doing compute/web hosting with whitebox servers, would that be "White Cloud computing"?  Just wondering.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And you can quit calling it " cloud " now... they 're just hosting providers and you know it.Hmmmm.....actually that reminds me .
While eating breakfast this morning , I had this crazy idea : if you were doing compute/web hosting with whitebox servers , would that be " White Cloud computing " ?
Just wondering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you can quit calling it "cloud" now... they're just hosting providers and you know it.Hmmmm.....actually that reminds me.
While eating breakfast this morning, I had this crazy idea:  if you were doing compute/web hosting with whitebox servers, would that be "White Cloud computing"?
Just wondering.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28307173</id>
	<title>Interesting concept</title>
	<author>Millennium</author>
	<datestamp>1244817120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But of more importance to trolls: is the server also petrified?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But of more importance to trolls : is the server also petrified ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But of more importance to trolls: is the server also petrified?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699</id>
	<title>This is similar to an old school BBS trick</title>
	<author>Optic7</author>
	<datestamp>1244726400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My friend used to run a BBS way back when, and he told me he would just hang the motherboards and other components on a pegboard on the wall. Similar idea, but I think he was doing it to save money on cases and possibly to save space as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My friend used to run a BBS way back when , and he told me he would just hang the motherboards and other components on a pegboard on the wall .
Similar idea , but I think he was doing it to save money on cases and possibly to save space as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My friend used to run a BBS way back when, and he told me he would just hang the motherboards and other components on a pegboard on the wall.
Similar idea, but I think he was doing it to save money on cases and possibly to save space as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304449</id>
	<title>Protection</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1244742240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If someone comes by to fix just one server on a live rack, it helps prevent stuff like screwdrivers etc from falling into the other servers. Or cables from tangling with the wrong stuff...<br><br>Skinless is fine when you can treat each server/blade as a "card" in the "computer" (rack). Or you're running one of those massive sites that only changes stuff "by the rack". Then you just wheel out the entire rack and replace it with a new one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).<br><br>It's not so good in "messier" and more heterogeneous server rooms - where someone might stack an el-cheapo 8 port gigabit switch on the server, instead of waiting for that new expensive rack-mount switch to arrive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If someone comes by to fix just one server on a live rack , it helps prevent stuff like screwdrivers etc from falling into the other servers .
Or cables from tangling with the wrong stuff...Skinless is fine when you can treat each server/blade as a " card " in the " computer " ( rack ) .
Or you 're running one of those massive sites that only changes stuff " by the rack " .
Then you just wheel out the entire rack and replace it with a new one : ) .It 's not so good in " messier " and more heterogeneous server rooms - where someone might stack an el-cheapo 8 port gigabit switch on the server , instead of waiting for that new expensive rack-mount switch to arrive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If someone comes by to fix just one server on a live rack, it helps prevent stuff like screwdrivers etc from falling into the other servers.
Or cables from tangling with the wrong stuff...Skinless is fine when you can treat each server/blade as a "card" in the "computer" (rack).
Or you're running one of those massive sites that only changes stuff "by the rack".
Then you just wheel out the entire rack and replace it with a new one :).It's not so good in "messier" and more heterogeneous server rooms - where someone might stack an el-cheapo 8 port gigabit switch on the server, instead of waiting for that new expensive rack-mount switch to arrive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303295</id>
	<title>marketing speak and buzz words grind the skin</title>
	<author>johncandale</author>
	<datestamp>1244731200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Cloud computing is causing servers to..."</p></div><p>What's with calling everything by near meaningless terns like 'cloud computing' all the time now?.   The coverless servers are not due to 'cloud computing', they are just a different technic for server farms.  It could be for databases, large analysis, supercomputing, regular network hosting, etc.  There is nothing about this that makes it exclusively meant for 'cloud computing' , it's just an idea for large arrays.  Unless you a a marketing tool stop saying cloud computing just because it's the hot new phrase.  Save it for when it's relevant</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Cloud computing is causing servers to... " What 's with calling everything by near meaningless terns like 'cloud computing ' all the time now ? .
The coverless servers are not due to 'cloud computing ' , they are just a different technic for server farms .
It could be for databases , large analysis , supercomputing , regular network hosting , etc .
There is nothing about this that makes it exclusively meant for 'cloud computing ' , it 's just an idea for large arrays .
Unless you a a marketing tool stop saying cloud computing just because it 's the hot new phrase .
Save it for when it 's relevant</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Cloud computing is causing servers to..."What's with calling everything by near meaningless terns like 'cloud computing' all the time now?.
The coverless servers are not due to 'cloud computing', they are just a different technic for server farms.
It could be for databases, large analysis, supercomputing, regular network hosting, etc.
There is nothing about this that makes it exclusively meant for 'cloud computing' , it's just an idea for large arrays.
Unless you a a marketing tool stop saying cloud computing just because it's the hot new phrase.
Save it for when it's relevant
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28309997</id>
	<title>Been done and it's cool in more ways than one</title>
	<author>WebCowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1244828520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The concept you describe is implemented in some data centres--the rack contains not only shared cooling smaller number of much larger sized fans) but also the power supply, where AC goes in and the DC goes out to all the machines in the rack.</p><p>On a smaller scale I've done this at home:  At the telephone demarc point where the electrical panel is I mount my DSL modem, a switch and an old FlexATX board to perform router/firewall functions.  Instead of a PC power supply and multiple "wall warts" there is one power supply to feed single-rail 12V power to all the devices, thus only requiring one power outlet for the whole works.  The whole thing will run off one 12V sealed lead-acid battery as well, for about an hour on the old battery I tried I'd estimate, but I've yet to incorporate it into the setup permanently.  The old mainboard uses a CF card plugged into the first IDE connector (CF cards have an IDE-mode operation--the adapters are for the most part just re-arranging the physical connector for the same signals), and to accomodate single-rail power I use the "Pico PSU" that takes in unregulated 12V on 2 wires and puts out all the ATX power required.  It plugs into the ATX power socket and isn't all that much bigger than a typical ATX power connector inside your PC, except not attached to all those wires.</p><p>If you're starting with new hardware, you can forego the PicoPSU and use MiniITX boards with single-rail power.  VIA offers some models that take simple 12VDC which are tailored to mobile and industrial markets (an elegant choice for Automotive PCs).</p><p>In a larger application requiring multiple hosts I envisioned a setup that would forego proprietary blade setups or expensive racks and a significant amount of sheet metal:</p><p>* very simple metal frame to allow a completely standard ATX board to be mounted vertically into "slide in" tracks of a mini-chassis<br>* mini-chassis would have a 500W or higher normal ATX power supply and a couple of larger-sized fans to pull air from bottom to top, with room for drive bays, KVMs or whatever along the bottom.<br>* Such a mini-chassis could be made to fit in 8U of space in a 19" rack and could house 5 standard ATX boards with enough room to allow for low-profile PCI cards to be installed.  The depth would be less than 1/2 standard rack depth (perhaps about 30cm) such that two of these units could fit in the same 8U space, for a density of 10 boards per 8U space.  Not the most density but still better than one system per rack unit.  Many more boards could fit if room for PCI cards is not required.  Of course, the chassis need not be rack mounted--it could just sit on a desk.<br>* boards would be mounted with the "back panel" facing front, and "internal connections" routed out the back--perhaps with connectors mounted for HDD and power fixed to the mini-chassis so that the frames with boards mounted can be simply "plugged in"<br>* A second mini-chassis could share PSU with the first to make more efficient use of power.</p><p>Not rocket science but that sort of "mini-rack" case would use common ATX hardware without proprietary form factors involved, and no more than one PSU per 5 PC boards.  This isn't a new concept--it isn't that much different from the SGI Origin systems with multi-node bricks mentioned in another post--the only fundamental difference is that it is based on standard form factors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The concept you describe is implemented in some data centres--the rack contains not only shared cooling smaller number of much larger sized fans ) but also the power supply , where AC goes in and the DC goes out to all the machines in the rack.On a smaller scale I 've done this at home : At the telephone demarc point where the electrical panel is I mount my DSL modem , a switch and an old FlexATX board to perform router/firewall functions .
Instead of a PC power supply and multiple " wall warts " there is one power supply to feed single-rail 12V power to all the devices , thus only requiring one power outlet for the whole works .
The whole thing will run off one 12V sealed lead-acid battery as well , for about an hour on the old battery I tried I 'd estimate , but I 've yet to incorporate it into the setup permanently .
The old mainboard uses a CF card plugged into the first IDE connector ( CF cards have an IDE-mode operation--the adapters are for the most part just re-arranging the physical connector for the same signals ) , and to accomodate single-rail power I use the " Pico PSU " that takes in unregulated 12V on 2 wires and puts out all the ATX power required .
It plugs into the ATX power socket and is n't all that much bigger than a typical ATX power connector inside your PC , except not attached to all those wires.If you 're starting with new hardware , you can forego the PicoPSU and use MiniITX boards with single-rail power .
VIA offers some models that take simple 12VDC which are tailored to mobile and industrial markets ( an elegant choice for Automotive PCs ) .In a larger application requiring multiple hosts I envisioned a setup that would forego proprietary blade setups or expensive racks and a significant amount of sheet metal : * very simple metal frame to allow a completely standard ATX board to be mounted vertically into " slide in " tracks of a mini-chassis * mini-chassis would have a 500W or higher normal ATX power supply and a couple of larger-sized fans to pull air from bottom to top , with room for drive bays , KVMs or whatever along the bottom .
* Such a mini-chassis could be made to fit in 8U of space in a 19 " rack and could house 5 standard ATX boards with enough room to allow for low-profile PCI cards to be installed .
The depth would be less than 1/2 standard rack depth ( perhaps about 30cm ) such that two of these units could fit in the same 8U space , for a density of 10 boards per 8U space .
Not the most density but still better than one system per rack unit .
Many more boards could fit if room for PCI cards is not required .
Of course , the chassis need not be rack mounted--it could just sit on a desk .
* boards would be mounted with the " back panel " facing front , and " internal connections " routed out the back--perhaps with connectors mounted for HDD and power fixed to the mini-chassis so that the frames with boards mounted can be simply " plugged in " * A second mini-chassis could share PSU with the first to make more efficient use of power.Not rocket science but that sort of " mini-rack " case would use common ATX hardware without proprietary form factors involved , and no more than one PSU per 5 PC boards .
This is n't a new concept--it is n't that much different from the SGI Origin systems with multi-node bricks mentioned in another post--the only fundamental difference is that it is based on standard form factors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The concept you describe is implemented in some data centres--the rack contains not only shared cooling smaller number of much larger sized fans) but also the power supply, where AC goes in and the DC goes out to all the machines in the rack.On a smaller scale I've done this at home:  At the telephone demarc point where the electrical panel is I mount my DSL modem, a switch and an old FlexATX board to perform router/firewall functions.
Instead of a PC power supply and multiple "wall warts" there is one power supply to feed single-rail 12V power to all the devices, thus only requiring one power outlet for the whole works.
The whole thing will run off one 12V sealed lead-acid battery as well, for about an hour on the old battery I tried I'd estimate, but I've yet to incorporate it into the setup permanently.
The old mainboard uses a CF card plugged into the first IDE connector (CF cards have an IDE-mode operation--the adapters are for the most part just re-arranging the physical connector for the same signals), and to accomodate single-rail power I use the "Pico PSU" that takes in unregulated 12V on 2 wires and puts out all the ATX power required.
It plugs into the ATX power socket and isn't all that much bigger than a typical ATX power connector inside your PC, except not attached to all those wires.If you're starting with new hardware, you can forego the PicoPSU and use MiniITX boards with single-rail power.
VIA offers some models that take simple 12VDC which are tailored to mobile and industrial markets (an elegant choice for Automotive PCs).In a larger application requiring multiple hosts I envisioned a setup that would forego proprietary blade setups or expensive racks and a significant amount of sheet metal:* very simple metal frame to allow a completely standard ATX board to be mounted vertically into "slide in" tracks of a mini-chassis* mini-chassis would have a 500W or higher normal ATX power supply and a couple of larger-sized fans to pull air from bottom to top, with room for drive bays, KVMs or whatever along the bottom.
* Such a mini-chassis could be made to fit in 8U of space in a 19" rack and could house 5 standard ATX boards with enough room to allow for low-profile PCI cards to be installed.
The depth would be less than 1/2 standard rack depth (perhaps about 30cm) such that two of these units could fit in the same 8U space, for a density of 10 boards per 8U space.
Not the most density but still better than one system per rack unit.
Many more boards could fit if room for PCI cards is not required.
Of course, the chassis need not be rack mounted--it could just sit on a desk.
* boards would be mounted with the "back panel" facing front, and "internal connections" routed out the back--perhaps with connectors mounted for HDD and power fixed to the mini-chassis so that the frames with boards mounted can be simply "plugged in"* A second mini-chassis could share PSU with the first to make more efficient use of power.Not rocket science but that sort of "mini-rack" case would use common ATX hardware without proprietary form factors involved, and no more than one PSU per 5 PC boards.
This isn't a new concept--it isn't that much different from the SGI Origin systems with multi-node bricks mentioned in another post--the only fundamental difference is that it is based on standard form factors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28308457</id>
	<title>Re:Hottttt!</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1244822520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a difference between "naked" and "skinless".  I would prefer not to see the latter....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a difference between " naked " and " skinless " .
I would prefer not to see the latter... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a difference between "naked" and "skinless".
I would prefer not to see the latter....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28306125</id>
	<title>What goes around comes around</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1244808960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Back in the good old days we first had computers that were made out of cased modules. Then we made computers out of PC boards that fitted into racks with backplanes. Then (in our case) we combined 3 CPU/memory boards into one chassis, with common fans and PSU, only we were too young and ignorant back in 1981 to know that Marketing had to call it a "blade system".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in the good old days we first had computers that were made out of cased modules .
Then we made computers out of PC boards that fitted into racks with backplanes .
Then ( in our case ) we combined 3 CPU/memory boards into one chassis , with common fans and PSU , only we were too young and ignorant back in 1981 to know that Marketing had to call it a " blade system " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in the good old days we first had computers that were made out of cased modules.
Then we made computers out of PC boards that fitted into racks with backplanes.
Then (in our case) we combined 3 CPU/memory boards into one chassis, with common fans and PSU, only we were too young and ignorant back in 1981 to know that Marketing had to call it a "blade system".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304619</id>
	<title>Re:que the porn comments in .....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Que? What pron comments?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Que ?
What pron comments ?
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Que?
What pron comments?
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28306351</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Airflow OK?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244811660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>so what is lost on the swings may be gained on the roundabouts</i></p><p>Nope<br>we're losing on the swings, we're losing on the roundabouts,<br>we're losing on the swings, we're losing on the roundabouts,<br>too much, too soon, too far to go, to late to play<br>the game is over</p><p>10 points to whoever gets the reference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so what is lost on the swings may be gained on the roundaboutsNopewe 're losing on the swings , we 're losing on the roundabouts,we 're losing on the swings , we 're losing on the roundabouts,too much , too soon , too far to go , to late to playthe game is over10 points to whoever gets the reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so what is lost on the swings may be gained on the roundaboutsNopewe're losing on the swings, we're losing on the roundabouts,we're losing on the swings, we're losing on the roundabouts,too much, too soon, too far to go, to late to playthe game is over10 points to whoever gets the reference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303435</id>
	<title>Obligatory futurama reference</title>
	<author>DeadS0ul</author>
	<datestamp>1244732520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...You can see their bare circuits!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...You can see their bare circuits !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...You can see their bare circuits!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304215</id>
	<title>Re:This is similar to an old school BBS trick</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1244739360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm kinda doing the same thing right now, I've got my Mobo sitting in its box, the HD PSU and DVD are all sitting on the desk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm kinda doing the same thing right now , I 've got my Mobo sitting in its box , the HD PSU and DVD are all sitting on the desk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm kinda doing the same thing right now, I've got my Mobo sitting in its box, the HD PSU and DVD are all sitting on the desk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302585</id>
	<title>Hottttt!</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1244725680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Servers getting naked - IN YOUR EMAIL.</p><p>Just sign up for our newsletter, and all of those from our affiliates, co-conspirators, third party hordes, and lawyers...</p><p>Sure, you can find naked servers at google, but don't you prefer the personal touch?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Servers getting naked - IN YOUR EMAIL.Just sign up for our newsletter , and all of those from our affiliates , co-conspirators , third party hordes , and lawyers...Sure , you can find naked servers at google , but do n't you prefer the personal touch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Servers getting naked - IN YOUR EMAIL.Just sign up for our newsletter, and all of those from our affiliates, co-conspirators, third party hordes, and lawyers...Sure, you can find naked servers at google, but don't you prefer the personal touch?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303441</id>
	<title>Naked servers have been running for ages</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1244732640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Naked servers have been running for ages, motherboard disk etc. plugged together without any sort of case. Do not forget to correctly ground every component although.</p><p>Google even had their first stacks of hard drives running naked, they kept them in rack build of Lego blocks to allow air circulation I would presume. Motherboards were probably naked too although I can't tell for sure.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Naked servers have been running for ages , motherboard disk etc .
plugged together without any sort of case .
Do not forget to correctly ground every component although.Google even had their first stacks of hard drives running naked , they kept them in rack build of Lego blocks to allow air circulation I would presume .
Motherboards were probably naked too although I ca n't tell for sure .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naked servers have been running for ages, motherboard disk etc.
plugged together without any sort of case.
Do not forget to correctly ground every component although.Google even had their first stacks of hard drives running naked, they kept them in rack build of Lego blocks to allow air circulation I would presume.
Motherboards were probably naked too although I can't tell for sure.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302819</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Airflow OK?</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1244727180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given the fact that there don't seem to be any fans pictured in the chassis itself, and given that this is targeted at very large scale customers, I'd assume that the use case for these things is "inside a specially designed rack with power and cooling, with that specially designed rack completely full" which would allow the OEM to just validate against that case.<br> <br>
If you just put one of these on a table, it'd probably overheat; but, if you want to do that, HP wants to sell you a pedestal server instead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the fact that there do n't seem to be any fans pictured in the chassis itself , and given that this is targeted at very large scale customers , I 'd assume that the use case for these things is " inside a specially designed rack with power and cooling , with that specially designed rack completely full " which would allow the OEM to just validate against that case .
If you just put one of these on a table , it 'd probably overheat ; but , if you want to do that , HP wants to sell you a pedestal server instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the fact that there don't seem to be any fans pictured in the chassis itself, and given that this is targeted at very large scale customers, I'd assume that the use case for these things is "inside a specially designed rack with power and cooling, with that specially designed rack completely full" which would allow the OEM to just validate against that case.
If you just put one of these on a table, it'd probably overheat; but, if you want to do that, HP wants to sell you a pedestal server instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303195</id>
	<title>Not really new</title>
	<author>chuckymonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1244730480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Origin 3000 series servers did this a long time ago.  The bricks in the system were just fans on the front and a base plate to mount the hardware onto.  They were pretty easy to work on in this configuration, you could pull the brick out and replace anything inside within a couple minutes.  IRIX on the other hand.........</htmltext>
<tokenext>Origin 3000 series servers did this a long time ago .
The bricks in the system were just fans on the front and a base plate to mount the hardware onto .
They were pretty easy to work on in this configuration , you could pull the brick out and replace anything inside within a couple minutes .
IRIX on the other hand........ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Origin 3000 series servers did this a long time ago.
The bricks in the system were just fans on the front and a base plate to mount the hardware onto.
They were pretty easy to work on in this configuration, you could pull the brick out and replace anything inside within a couple minutes.
IRIX on the other hand.........</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302903</id>
	<title>Re:que the porn comments in .....</title>
	<author>ChrisMP1</author>
	<datestamp>1244727840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sorry... #28302585 beat you 16 minutes earlier...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry... # 28302585 beat you 16 minutes earlier.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry... #28302585 beat you 16 minutes earlier...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653</id>
	<title>Is the Airflow OK?</title>
	<author>Philip\_the\_physicist</author>
	<datestamp>1244726160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This makes sense, since the dust should already be filtered, which removes a large part of the need for a case. However, I do wonder about the airflow, since an ordinary case helps to direct the airflow  through the kit rather than over the top, which might be a problem. On the other hand, without a case, the ventilation will be much better, so what is lost on the swings may be gained on the roundabouts.
</p><p>This is a nice idea though, and would make sense for rackmount routers/switches, since these usually sit in an enclosed cupboard anyway.</p><p>bTW: first?/p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes sense , since the dust should already be filtered , which removes a large part of the need for a case .
However , I do wonder about the airflow , since an ordinary case helps to direct the airflow through the kit rather than over the top , which might be a problem .
On the other hand , without a case , the ventilation will be much better , so what is lost on the swings may be gained on the roundabouts .
This is a nice idea though , and would make sense for rackmount routers/switches , since these usually sit in an enclosed cupboard anyway.bTW : first ? /p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes sense, since the dust should already be filtered, which removes a large part of the need for a case.
However, I do wonder about the airflow, since an ordinary case helps to direct the airflow  through the kit rather than over the top, which might be a problem.
On the other hand, without a case, the ventilation will be much better, so what is lost on the swings may be gained on the roundabouts.
This is a nice idea though, and would make sense for rackmount routers/switches, since these usually sit in an enclosed cupboard anyway.bTW: first?/p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304201</id>
	<title>What about the RFI?</title>
	<author>Oloryn</author>
	<datestamp>1244739240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Running servers naked is likely to make them a larger spewer of RFI (Radio Frequency Interference).  All those computers are nice until the FCC comes along and says you have to shut it down because you're interfering with the neighbors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Running servers naked is likely to make them a larger spewer of RFI ( Radio Frequency Interference ) .
All those computers are nice until the FCC comes along and says you have to shut it down because you 're interfering with the neighbors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Running servers naked is likely to make them a larger spewer of RFI (Radio Frequency Interference).
All those computers are nice until the FCC comes along and says you have to shut it down because you're interfering with the neighbors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701</id>
	<title>que the porn comments in .....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244726400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>3<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...2<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....1</htmltext>
<tokenext>3 ...2 ....1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3 ...2 ....1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305237</id>
	<title>Re:marketing speak and buzz words grind the skin</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244797680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's with calling everything by near meaningless terns like 'cloud computing' all the time now?. The coverless servers are not due to 'cloud computing', they are just a different technic for server farms.</p></div><p>Uh, what's a "technic?"  Never heard that term before.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with calling everything by near meaningless terns like 'cloud computing ' all the time now ? .
The coverless servers are not due to 'cloud computing ' , they are just a different technic for server farms.Uh , what 's a " technic ?
" Never heard that term before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with calling everything by near meaningless terns like 'cloud computing' all the time now?.
The coverless servers are not due to 'cloud computing', they are just a different technic for server farms.Uh, what's a "technic?
"  Never heard that term before.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303295</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28309361</id>
	<title>Re:If it improves performance, why not?</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1244826420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It probably depends upon the cooling strategy. An external skin (i.e. case) can act as a sort of fan shroud to direct air over certain components within the chassis or force a general flow of air through the enclosed space that might not be as efficient or effective without the shrouding provided by the enclosing case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It probably depends upon the cooling strategy .
An external skin ( i.e .
case ) can act as a sort of fan shroud to direct air over certain components within the chassis or force a general flow of air through the enclosed space that might not be as efficient or effective without the shrouding provided by the enclosing case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It probably depends upon the cooling strategy.
An external skin (i.e.
case) can act as a sort of fan shroud to direct air over certain components within the chassis or force a general flow of air through the enclosed space that might not be as efficient or effective without the shrouding provided by the enclosing case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304015</id>
	<title>Just like every other server</title>
	<author>dilvish\_the\_damned</author>
	<datestamp>1244737320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except these are designed to arrive with the hoods "pre-lost", saving us the trouble.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except these are designed to arrive with the hoods " pre-lost " , saving us the trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except these are designed to arrive with the hoods "pre-lost", saving us the trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302901</id>
	<title>This might be a good idea</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1244727840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Makes the servers more serviceable, and in a server closet there isn't much that would require a skin to protect against.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes the servers more serviceable , and in a server closet there is n't much that would require a skin to protect against .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes the servers more serviceable, and in a server closet there isn't much that would require a skin to protect against.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302807</id>
	<title>Big deal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244727120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Company charges more for servers with less steel - film at eleven.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Company charges more for servers with less steel - film at eleven .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Company charges more for servers with less steel - film at eleven.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304069</id>
	<title>Re:This is similar to an old school BBS trick</title>
	<author>James Skarzinskas</author>
	<datestamp>1244738040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A chum of mine swore by running his computer "naked" in a somewhat modified Walmart mini-fridge for some unconventional cooling. Well, until he spilled a 1L of pepsi on his motherboard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A chum of mine swore by running his computer " naked " in a somewhat modified Walmart mini-fridge for some unconventional cooling .
Well , until he spilled a 1L of pepsi on his motherboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A chum of mine swore by running his computer "naked" in a somewhat modified Walmart mini-fridge for some unconventional cooling.
Well, until he spilled a 1L of pepsi on his motherboard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302629</id>
	<title>Blade?</title>
	<author>TopSpin</author>
	<datestamp>1244725920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The new 'blade'; 19" wide and 1.75" tall.</p><p>I see discrete Ethernet phys, VGA, USB, etc.; all the horrible stuff blades are supposed to consolidate away.  Turns out all the proprietary silicon, software and exotic backplanes necessary to make that real costs too much and is creepy.</p><p>And you can quit calling it "cloud" now... they're just hosting providers and you know it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The new 'blade ' ; 19 " wide and 1.75 " tall.I see discrete Ethernet phys , VGA , USB , etc .
; all the horrible stuff blades are supposed to consolidate away .
Turns out all the proprietary silicon , software and exotic backplanes necessary to make that real costs too much and is creepy.And you can quit calling it " cloud " now... they 're just hosting providers and you know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new 'blade'; 19" wide and 1.75" tall.I see discrete Ethernet phys, VGA, USB, etc.
; all the horrible stuff blades are supposed to consolidate away.
Turns out all the proprietary silicon, software and exotic backplanes necessary to make that real costs too much and is creepy.And you can quit calling it "cloud" now... they're just hosting providers and you know it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304167</id>
	<title>Re:If it improves performance, why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244738940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RF shielding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RF shielding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RF shielding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305401</id>
	<title>I can't see the transformer brick</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1244799900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this thing running on DC?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this thing running on DC ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this thing running on DC?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302967</id>
	<title>Naked?</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1244728320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would say skinless instead. Probably for servers "naked" should mean without OS installed, what looks specially attractive since you can choose to install on them open clothes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say skinless instead .
Probably for servers " naked " should mean without OS installed , what looks specially attractive since you can choose to install on them open clothes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say skinless instead.
Probably for servers "naked" should mean without OS installed, what looks specially attractive since you can choose to install on them open clothes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302989</id>
	<title>Since you are interested...</title>
	<author>symbolset</author>
	<datestamp>1244728560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The product page is <a href="http://www.hp.com/go/extremescale" title="hp.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [hp.com].  There are pictures.  And specifications.  And video.  I think we can skip the rest of the blogofrenzy and get our info from the source.
</p><p>BTW, this looks pretty much like a DL1000 installed backward.  It's probably different in some other meaningful way.  I didn't look too close.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The product page is here [ hp.com ] .
There are pictures .
And specifications .
And video .
I think we can skip the rest of the blogofrenzy and get our info from the source .
BTW , this looks pretty much like a DL1000 installed backward .
It 's probably different in some other meaningful way .
I did n't look too close .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The product page is here [hp.com].
There are pictures.
And specifications.
And video.
I think we can skip the rest of the blogofrenzy and get our info from the source.
BTW, this looks pretty much like a DL1000 installed backward.
It's probably different in some other meaningful way.
I didn't look too close.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302881</id>
	<title>Re:Wait...</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1244727600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn you Robbie Williams!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn you Robbie Williams !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn you Robbie Williams!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302957</id>
	<title>Re:que the porn comments in .....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244728320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>turns out the "extra weight" was needed to finish loading his comment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>turns out the " extra weight " was needed to finish loading his comment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>turns out the "extra weight" was needed to finish loading his comment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28311061</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA</title>
	<author>iamhigh</author>
	<datestamp>1244832780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ewwww, look at you!  All trying to live up this "NEWS for Nerds".  It's Friday, dammit, let us have our Gossip for Nerds!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ewwww , look at you !
All trying to live up this " NEWS for Nerds " .
It 's Friday , dammit , let us have our Gossip for Nerds !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ewwww, look at you!
All trying to live up this "NEWS for Nerds".
It's Friday, dammit, let us have our Gossip for Nerds!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304403</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28312231</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Airflow OK?</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1244837160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder about the structural integrity and the electrical grounding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder about the structural integrity and the electrical grounding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder about the structural integrity and the electrical grounding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303399</id>
	<title>Re:It would be awesome if...</title>
	<author>metallurge</author>
	<datestamp>1244732280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It has seemed to me for some time that there would be a market for somebody to manufacture a little VRM module that plugged into the ATX motherboard connector, and had two screw terminal inputs to hook up, say unregulated +12/24/48V as from say solar panels or batteries. A more deluxe model could also have auxiliary outputs for CDROM/HDD/FDD/VIDPWR connectors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It has seemed to me for some time that there would be a market for somebody to manufacture a little VRM module that plugged into the ATX motherboard connector , and had two screw terminal inputs to hook up , say unregulated + 12/24/48V as from say solar panels or batteries .
A more deluxe model could also have auxiliary outputs for CDROM/HDD/FDD/VIDPWR connectors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has seemed to me for some time that there would be a market for somebody to manufacture a little VRM module that plugged into the ATX motherboard connector, and had two screw terminal inputs to hook up, say unregulated +12/24/48V as from say solar panels or batteries.
A more deluxe model could also have auxiliary outputs for CDROM/HDD/FDD/VIDPWR connectors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303261</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Airflow OK?</title>
	<author>karbonKid</author>
	<datestamp>1244730900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>However, I do wonder about the airflow</p></div><p>The floor of the case above forms the roof of the case below when mounted in a rack.  Airflow problem solved. IIRC, Google was the first to implement this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>However , I do wonder about the airflowThe floor of the case above forms the roof of the case below when mounted in a rack .
Airflow problem solved .
IIRC , Google was the first to implement this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>However, I do wonder about the airflowThe floor of the case above forms the roof of the case below when mounted in a rack.
Airflow problem solved.
IIRC, Google was the first to implement this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302987</id>
	<title>Nice rack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244728560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice rack</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice rack</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice rack</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28308683</id>
	<title>Re:What about the RFI?</title>
	<author>Ohio Calvinist</author>
	<datestamp>1244823360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would think properly mounted in a rack that the rack iteself would provide sufficent RFI sheilding. The fronts and backs acting almost like a faraday cage, and sides being pure metal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think properly mounted in a rack that the rack iteself would provide sufficent RFI sheilding .
The fronts and backs acting almost like a faraday cage , and sides being pure metal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think properly mounted in a rack that the rack iteself would provide sufficent RFI sheilding.
The fronts and backs acting almost like a faraday cage, and sides being pure metal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302909</id>
	<title>As a conservative...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244727900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a ceonservative, I'm appauled! What if our children are exposed to this!? We need to enact legislation immediatly! I bet those liberals in our current government will just idly let this slide though...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a ceonservative , I 'm appauled !
What if our children are exposed to this ! ?
We need to enact legislation immediatly !
I bet those liberals in our current government will just idly let this slide though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a ceonservative, I'm appauled!
What if our children are exposed to this!?
We need to enact legislation immediatly!
I bet those liberals in our current government will just idly let this slide though...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303449</id>
	<title>Don't drop any screws...</title>
	<author>0x537461746943</author>
	<datestamp>1244732820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Things usually have covers for a reason.</p><p>I can see admins trying to install a new server and accidentally dropping one of the mounting screws into the rack.  Poof!  Admins would probably just try to RMA the unit.  I see this costing HP some money because of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Things usually have covers for a reason.I can see admins trying to install a new server and accidentally dropping one of the mounting screws into the rack .
Poof ! Admins would probably just try to RMA the unit .
I see this costing HP some money because of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Things usually have covers for a reason.I can see admins trying to install a new server and accidentally dropping one of the mounting screws into the rack.
Poof!  Admins would probably just try to RMA the unit.
I see this costing HP some money because of that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302931</id>
	<title>I've been thinking (and saying) this for a long</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244728080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>... time. It's cooler, faster, lighter, cheaper and better for the environment and it looks a hell of a lot bad ass when you open up a system that's got it's guts exposed and just start hot-swappin' like a mofo. Sad thing is that it's driven by $$$$ and the need for companies to shave even a few pennies off their TCO when I've been doing it to my systems for years now for the above-state reasons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... time. It 's cooler , faster , lighter , cheaper and better for the environment and it looks a hell of a lot bad ass when you open up a system that 's got it 's guts exposed and just start hot-swappin ' like a mofo .
Sad thing is that it 's driven by $ $ $ $ and the need for companies to shave even a few pennies off their TCO when I 've been doing it to my systems for years now for the above-state reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... time. It's cooler, faster, lighter, cheaper and better for the environment and it looks a hell of a lot bad ass when you open up a system that's got it's guts exposed and just start hot-swappin' like a mofo.
Sad thing is that it's driven by $$$$ and the need for companies to shave even a few pennies off their TCO when I've been doing it to my systems for years now for the above-state reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313</id>
	<title>If it improves performance, why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244731380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does a computer have an external skin anyways? It's helpful for desktops to prevent damage from spills, but in the rack mounted environment, unless the skin increases cooling somehow, it's actually worse than useless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does a computer have an external skin anyways ?
It 's helpful for desktops to prevent damage from spills , but in the rack mounted environment , unless the skin increases cooling somehow , it 's actually worse than useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does a computer have an external skin anyways?
It's helpful for desktops to prevent damage from spills, but in the rack mounted environment, unless the skin increases cooling somehow, it's actually worse than useless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302595</id>
	<title>Wait...</title>
	<author>gbarules2999</author>
	<datestamp>1244725740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Naked doesn't quite equal skinless, unless you're saying that you're naked of skin. Or...?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Naked does n't quite equal skinless , unless you 're saying that you 're naked of skin .
Or... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Naked doesn't quite equal skinless, unless you're saying that you're naked of skin.
Or...?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303889</id>
	<title>Re:This is similar to an old school BBS trick</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1244736240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My server boards and other pieces of kit are cable tied to Canadian Tire plastic shoe racks.</p><p>Now *that* is cheap...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My server boards and other pieces of kit are cable tied to Canadian Tire plastic shoe racks.Now * that * is cheap.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My server boards and other pieces of kit are cable tied to Canadian Tire plastic shoe racks.Now *that* is cheap...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305165</id>
	<title>Take out the disks. Put in 10G ethernet</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1244839980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you have a deal.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you have a deal .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you have a deal.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302931</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303133</id>
	<title>It would be awesome if...</title>
	<author>egcagrac0</author>
	<datestamp>1244729940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They added a 12V only power supply and a 12V battery, integrating the UPS as well.  All the 12V stepdown can happen on the mainboard!</p><p>Totally OK if the battery is an optional replacement for the second hard drive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They added a 12V only power supply and a 12V battery , integrating the UPS as well .
All the 12V stepdown can happen on the mainboard ! Totally OK if the battery is an optional replacement for the second hard drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They added a 12V only power supply and a 12V battery, integrating the UPS as well.
All the 12V stepdown can happen on the mainboard!Totally OK if the battery is an optional replacement for the second hard drive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303283</id>
	<title>Re:Blade?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244731080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems one of the big advantages of blades over 1u chassis is just getting rid of the dinky fans that fit in 1u.  Going to 2u allows reasonable size fans (blades bigger than the motor) that are more efficient.  This arrangement has reasonable space for the fans with out all the backplane funkyness you mention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems one of the big advantages of blades over 1u chassis is just getting rid of the dinky fans that fit in 1u .
Going to 2u allows reasonable size fans ( blades bigger than the motor ) that are more efficient .
This arrangement has reasonable space for the fans with out all the backplane funkyness you mention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems one of the big advantages of blades over 1u chassis is just getting rid of the dinky fans that fit in 1u.
Going to 2u allows reasonable size fans (blades bigger than the motor) that are more efficient.
This arrangement has reasonable space for the fans with out all the backplane funkyness you mention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303205</id>
	<title>Google Redux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244730540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google designed their own cloud servers as separate components (ie. naked).  Old news as its saves a ton of $$$ in cooling and energy costs</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google designed their own cloud servers as separate components ( ie .
naked ) . Old news as its saves a ton of $ $ $ in cooling and energy costs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google designed their own cloud servers as separate components (ie.
naked).  Old news as its saves a ton of $$$ in cooling and energy costs</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305009</id>
	<title>Stupid Question</title>
	<author>egcagrac0</author>
	<datestamp>1244838060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The blade itself is called an ExSO.</p><p>Is the frame it lives in called an ExSO Skeleton?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The blade itself is called an ExSO.Is the frame it lives in called an ExSO Skeleton ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The blade itself is called an ExSO.Is the frame it lives in called an ExSO Skeleton?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28306329</id>
	<title>Interesting layout</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244811420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a bit silly: for scalable, cheap, replaceable systems, it makes sense, especially by putting the IO in the front for both systems that are in that box. And it avoids some of the single point of failure and high add-on expenses of blade servers, especially the cost of the multiple internal switches and remote KVM capabilities. (Has anyone else run into the "turn off spashimage in grub" problem to get access to the serial port boot console? That is a royal pain.)</p><p>But I'm concerned that people will install both of their "high availability" servers inside their skinless server, not realize this is what their upstream site did, and be screwed when it loses power. And power supplies \_do\_ fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a bit silly : for scalable , cheap , replaceable systems , it makes sense , especially by putting the IO in the front for both systems that are in that box .
And it avoids some of the single point of failure and high add-on expenses of blade servers , especially the cost of the multiple internal switches and remote KVM capabilities .
( Has anyone else run into the " turn off spashimage in grub " problem to get access to the serial port boot console ?
That is a royal pain .
) But I 'm concerned that people will install both of their " high availability " servers inside their skinless server , not realize this is what their upstream site did , and be screwed when it loses power .
And power supplies \ _do \ _ fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a bit silly: for scalable, cheap, replaceable systems, it makes sense, especially by putting the IO in the front for both systems that are in that box.
And it avoids some of the single point of failure and high add-on expenses of blade servers, especially the cost of the multiple internal switches and remote KVM capabilities.
(Has anyone else run into the "turn off spashimage in grub" problem to get access to the serial port boot console?
That is a royal pain.
)But I'm concerned that people will install both of their "high availability" servers inside their skinless server, not realize this is what their upstream site did, and be screwed when it loses power.
And power supplies \_do\_ fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28316599</id>
	<title>The rock, the rope, the axe, and a few scientists.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244818680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The building, however, will need shielding or - depending on scale - birds will fall out of the sky and the electronic blackout might cover a square mile or six (for starters). Carrying chocolate or milk around might not be a fun idea. Actually...</p><p>Well then, carbon-boron shielding, perhaps ? And the random standing-wave artifacts ought to be really fun to pinpoint. They might consider using damping-rods, as in traditional reactors. MHD ? Salts ? Plus, they'd look really, er, cool. And they're also really useful, when the plot calls for some suspense, for example.</p><p>Reminds me of the Manhattan Project. A gaggle of Nobel-grade scientists manned the axe and the deuterium-filled buckets, just in case the first rod and graphite reactor also became the world's first china syndrome - or just blew up (some weren't to sure). The rock hanging from a rope was a last-ditch 'safety measure'.</p><p>It might put a bit of a strain - on the supply of deltas, you know...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The building , however , will need shielding or - depending on scale - birds will fall out of the sky and the electronic blackout might cover a square mile or six ( for starters ) .
Carrying chocolate or milk around might not be a fun idea .
Actually...Well then , carbon-boron shielding , perhaps ?
And the random standing-wave artifacts ought to be really fun to pinpoint .
They might consider using damping-rods , as in traditional reactors .
MHD ?
Salts ?
Plus , they 'd look really , er , cool .
And they 're also really useful , when the plot calls for some suspense , for example.Reminds me of the Manhattan Project .
A gaggle of Nobel-grade scientists manned the axe and the deuterium-filled buckets , just in case the first rod and graphite reactor also became the world 's first china syndrome - or just blew up ( some were n't to sure ) .
The rock hanging from a rope was a last-ditch 'safety measure'.It might put a bit of a strain - on the supply of deltas , you know.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The building, however, will need shielding or - depending on scale - birds will fall out of the sky and the electronic blackout might cover a square mile or six (for starters).
Carrying chocolate or milk around might not be a fun idea.
Actually...Well then, carbon-boron shielding, perhaps ?
And the random standing-wave artifacts ought to be really fun to pinpoint.
They might consider using damping-rods, as in traditional reactors.
MHD ?
Salts ?
Plus, they'd look really, er, cool.
And they're also really useful, when the plot calls for some suspense, for example.Reminds me of the Manhattan Project.
A gaggle of Nobel-grade scientists manned the axe and the deuterium-filled buckets, just in case the first rod and graphite reactor also became the world's first china syndrome - or just blew up (some weren't to sure).
The rock hanging from a rope was a last-ditch 'safety measure'.It might put a bit of a strain - on the supply of deltas, you know...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304403</id>
	<title>RTFA</title>
	<author>adolf</author>
	<datestamp>1244741520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see a few confused posts here about "WTF? Cooling?"</p><p>Just RTFA, folks.  It's a blade server arrangement, not a standalone computer.  These "naked" computers are nothing more than a pair of dual-proc computers, in a 1U-ish chassis without a lid, <i>which needs to slide into the appropriate rack-mounted housing</i> in order to work.  This housing includes all of the cooling and power supply goodness one would expect, and (of course) includes a top panel to promote useful airflow and limit RFI.</p><p>I don't see much "new" about these things at all, since AFAICT most/all "blade servers" were already naked since their inception.</p><p>Color me unimpressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a few confused posts here about " WTF ?
Cooling ? " Just RTFA , folks .
It 's a blade server arrangement , not a standalone computer .
These " naked " computers are nothing more than a pair of dual-proc computers , in a 1U-ish chassis without a lid , which needs to slide into the appropriate rack-mounted housing in order to work .
This housing includes all of the cooling and power supply goodness one would expect , and ( of course ) includes a top panel to promote useful airflow and limit RFI.I do n't see much " new " about these things at all , since AFAICT most/all " blade servers " were already naked since their inception.Color me unimpressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a few confused posts here about "WTF?
Cooling?"Just RTFA, folks.
It's a blade server arrangement, not a standalone computer.
These "naked" computers are nothing more than a pair of dual-proc computers, in a 1U-ish chassis without a lid, which needs to slide into the appropriate rack-mounted housing in order to work.
This housing includes all of the cooling and power supply goodness one would expect, and (of course) includes a top panel to promote useful airflow and limit RFI.I don't see much "new" about these things at all, since AFAICT most/all "blade servers" were already naked since their inception.Color me unimpressed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305441</id>
	<title>Re:It would be awesome if...</title>
	<author>SnowZero</author>
	<datestamp>1244800560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mini-box has an assortment of very small <a href="http://www.mini-box.com/DC-DC" title="mini-box.com">DC-DC ATX power supplies</a> [mini-box.com].  Look for ones with "wide input" that can handle a range of voltages.  I have used an older, slightly larger module on some battery powered robots to run a mini-ITX computer, and I've been quite happy with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mini-box has an assortment of very small DC-DC ATX power supplies [ mini-box.com ] .
Look for ones with " wide input " that can handle a range of voltages .
I have used an older , slightly larger module on some battery powered robots to run a mini-ITX computer , and I 've been quite happy with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mini-box has an assortment of very small DC-DC ATX power supplies [mini-box.com].
Look for ones with "wide input" that can handle a range of voltages.
I have used an older, slightly larger module on some battery powered robots to run a mini-ITX computer, and I've been quite happy with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303175</id>
	<title>Re:Is the Airflow OK?</title>
	<author>PhantomHarlock</author>
	<datestamp>1244730360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So essentially, the whole data center or the rack itself becomes the cooling case.   I like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So essentially , the whole data center or the rack itself becomes the cooling case .
I like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So essentially, the whole data center or the rack itself becomes the cooling case.
I like it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302819</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28309361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303399
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304619
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303295
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28308457
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302931
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28311061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304403
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28306351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28309997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28308683
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304201
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28312231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_2319259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303889
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28308683
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302957
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303313
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28309361
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302653
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302819
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28306351
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28312231
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28308457
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305237
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28309997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28303399
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302987
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28306329
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302807
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28304403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28311061
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302587
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_2319259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28302931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_2319259.28305165
</commentlist>
</conversation>
