<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_11_214240</id>
	<title>Linux To Be First OS To Support USB 3.0</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244713620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from Neowin.net <i>"Sarah Sharp, a self-styled 'geekess' and Linux developer at Intel's Open Source Technology Center who has recently been working on the Linux USB subsystem, announced on her blog that support of USB 3.0 will soon be integrated into the Linux kernel. This makes Linux the <a href="http://www.neowin.net/news/main/09/06/11/linux-is-first-os-to-support-usb-30">first operating system</a> to support the standard. If you can't wait and have the expertise necessary, she includes instructions on how to get USB 3.0 support in Linux now."</i> Here's <a href="http://sarah.thesharps.us/2009-06-09-13-30.cherry">Sharp's post</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from Neowin.net " Sarah Sharp , a self-styled 'geekess ' and Linux developer at Intel 's Open Source Technology Center who has recently been working on the Linux USB subsystem , announced on her blog that support of USB 3.0 will soon be integrated into the Linux kernel .
This makes Linux the first operating system to support the standard .
If you ca n't wait and have the expertise necessary , she includes instructions on how to get USB 3.0 support in Linux now .
" Here 's Sharp 's post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes with an excerpt from Neowin.net "Sarah Sharp, a self-styled 'geekess' and Linux developer at Intel's Open Source Technology Center who has recently been working on the Linux USB subsystem, announced on her blog that support of USB 3.0 will soon be integrated into the Linux kernel.
This makes Linux the first operating system to support the standard.
If you can't wait and have the expertise necessary, she includes instructions on how to get USB 3.0 support in Linux now.
" Here's Sharp's post.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302739</id>
	<title>Re:It's Not The First...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244726640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>whay:<br><a href="http://www.isorm.com/product\_info.php?products\_id=3336" title="isorm.com">http://www.isorm.com/product\_info.php?products\_id=3336</a> [isorm.com]</p><p>Windows 7 will support USB 3.0</p><p><a href="http://www.vista123.net/content/microsoft-talkes-about-windows-7-and-usb-30" title="vista123.net">http://www.vista123.net/content/microsoft-talkes-about-windows-7-and-usb-30</a> [vista123.net]</p><p>Of course its MS, so USB 3.0 probably won't be fully implement until SP3</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>whay : http : //www.isorm.com/product \ _info.php ? products \ _id = 3336 [ isorm.com ] Windows 7 will support USB 3.0http : //www.vista123.net/content/microsoft-talkes-about-windows-7-and-usb-30 [ vista123.net ] Of course its MS , so USB 3.0 probably wo n't be fully implement until SP3</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whay:http://www.isorm.com/product\_info.php?products\_id=3336 [isorm.com]Windows 7 will support USB 3.0http://www.vista123.net/content/microsoft-talkes-about-windows-7-and-usb-30 [vista123.net]Of course its MS, so USB 3.0 probably won't be fully implement until SP3</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301013</id>
	<title>She's a looker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Like a Ferengi without the big ears. But what's she doing off of the homeworld?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Like a Ferengi without the big ears .
But what 's she doing off of the homeworld ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like a Ferengi without the big ears.
But what's she doing off of the homeworld?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301871</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244721120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure we have the ability to many things "unencumbered" by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media (so far).</p></div><p>Yeah you can't do that on Windows. Oh, wait..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure we have the ability to many things " unencumbered " by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media ( so far ) .Yeah you ca n't do that on Windows .
Oh , wait. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure we have the ability to many things "unencumbered" by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media (so far).Yeah you can't do that on Windows.
Oh, wait..
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302229</id>
	<title>Re:Even worse than you can imagine</title>
	<author>hkz</author>
	<datestamp>1244723400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I installed the Super Server flavor of the Firebird database some weeks ago at work. Came in a FirebirdSS.tar.gz package and was referred to in the docs as the 'SS' (as opposed to the 'CS', or classic server). I swear, the initial reaction in Holland, where I'm located, is immediately on the Schutsstaffel. When some crazy loon committed suicide some months ago by driving his Suzuki Swift into the crowds at the Queen's Day parade, media were quick to point out that the guy might have been a right radical, given the "SS" of his car. Okay, that's obviously nonsense, but that's the knee-jerk reaction to the abbreviation SS here. (Or to NSB, which is why the Dutch national skating federation (formerly known as... ) changed its name to *Royal* national skating etc (or KNSB) straight after the war<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I installed the Super Server flavor of the Firebird database some weeks ago at work .
Came in a FirebirdSS.tar.gz package and was referred to in the docs as the 'SS ' ( as opposed to the 'CS ' , or classic server ) .
I swear , the initial reaction in Holland , where I 'm located , is immediately on the Schutsstaffel .
When some crazy loon committed suicide some months ago by driving his Suzuki Swift into the crowds at the Queen 's Day parade , media were quick to point out that the guy might have been a right radical , given the " SS " of his car .
Okay , that 's obviously nonsense , but that 's the knee-jerk reaction to the abbreviation SS here .
( Or to NSB , which is why the Dutch national skating federation ( formerly known as... ) changed its name to * Royal * national skating etc ( or KNSB ) straight after the war : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I installed the Super Server flavor of the Firebird database some weeks ago at work.
Came in a FirebirdSS.tar.gz package and was referred to in the docs as the 'SS' (as opposed to the 'CS', or classic server).
I swear, the initial reaction in Holland, where I'm located, is immediately on the Schutsstaffel.
When some crazy loon committed suicide some months ago by driving his Suzuki Swift into the crowds at the Queen's Day parade, media were quick to point out that the guy might have been a right radical, given the "SS" of his car.
Okay, that's obviously nonsense, but that's the knee-jerk reaction to the abbreviation SS here.
(Or to NSB, which is why the Dutch national skating federation (formerly known as... ) changed its name to *Royal* national skating etc (or KNSB) straight after the war :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28307051</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1244816460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it, and the icon has a matching "SS"</p><p>Who keeps on doing this!! Being a relative term, you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.
Ditto for fast ethernet.</p></div><p>Oh, I thought you were referring to the use of an acronym shared by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzstaffel" title="wikipedia.org">Nazis</a> [wikipedia.org]. Don't they have someone there who can check out their acronyms to verify that they are not associated with any notorious hate groups?<br> <br>

But you do have a point about relative speed designations. I remember the days of double density floppies, follwed by "high density".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase " superspeed " on it , and the icon has a matching " SS " Who keeps on doing this ! !
Being a relative term , you 'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5 .
Ditto for fast ethernet.Oh , I thought you were referring to the use of an acronym shared by Nazis [ wikipedia.org ] .
Do n't they have someone there who can check out their acronyms to verify that they are not associated with any notorious hate groups ?
But you do have a point about relative speed designations .
I remember the days of double density floppies , follwed by " high density " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it, and the icon has a matching "SS"Who keeps on doing this!!
Being a relative term, you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.
Ditto for fast ethernet.Oh, I thought you were referring to the use of an acronym shared by Nazis [wikipedia.org].
Don't they have someone there who can check out their acronyms to verify that they are not associated with any notorious hate groups?
But you do have a point about relative speed designations.
I remember the days of double density floppies, follwed by "high density".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302469</id>
	<title>Anybody remember that USB 3 was demoed on Linux?</title>
	<author>thatkid\_2002</author>
	<datestamp>1244724840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was an article almost half a year ago about a demonstration of <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/12/13/2032211" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">USB 3.0 throughput on Linux?</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was an article almost half a year ago about a demonstration of USB 3.0 throughput on Linux ?
[ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was an article almost half a year ago about a demonstration of USB 3.0 throughput on Linux?
[slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28304867</id>
	<title>Re:Even better on my Linux box...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244749080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You misread your Linux box: it's not really 11, it's 1.1!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You misread your Linux box : it 's not really 11 , it 's 1.1 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You misread your Linux box: it's not really 11, it's 1.1!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301041</id>
	<title>Wasn't it also the first for USB too?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Linux the first for the original USB too? Well that, or USB 2.0</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct me if I 'm wrong , but was n't Linux the first for the original USB too ?
Well that , or USB 2.0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Linux the first for the original USB too?
Well that, or USB 2.0</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302057</id>
	<title>completely irrelevant unless people write drivers</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1244722080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't matter who's first (just think: which company produced the first commercial TV set, or SLR camera - much good did it do them today). What does matter is who has the best support.
<p>
Given that Linux can't even support the vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there, since none of the hardware manufacturers think it's worth spending the time and money to write drivers, provide a support channel and publicise the fact, just slapping a USB 3 stack into the kernel means nothing.
</p><p>
Let's see how many peripheral manufacturers bring out linux drivers for their kit, before they bring out Windows X drivers. That's the only thing that would make a difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't matter who 's first ( just think : which company produced the first commercial TV set , or SLR camera - much good did it do them today ) .
What does matter is who has the best support .
Given that Linux ca n't even support the vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there , since none of the hardware manufacturers think it 's worth spending the time and money to write drivers , provide a support channel and publicise the fact , just slapping a USB 3 stack into the kernel means nothing .
Let 's see how many peripheral manufacturers bring out linux drivers for their kit , before they bring out Windows X drivers .
That 's the only thing that would make a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't matter who's first (just think: which company produced the first commercial TV set, or SLR camera - much good did it do them today).
What does matter is who has the best support.
Given that Linux can't even support the vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there, since none of the hardware manufacturers think it's worth spending the time and money to write drivers, provide a support channel and publicise the fact, just slapping a USB 3 stack into the kernel means nothing.
Let's see how many peripheral manufacturers bring out linux drivers for their kit, before they bring out Windows X drivers.
That's the only thing that would make a difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302893</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>fast turtle</author>
	<datestamp>1244727720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nope. USB 4.0 will have <b>"OMG Ponies"</b> as it's moniker</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
USB 4.0 will have " OMG Ponies " as it 's moniker</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
USB 4.0 will have "OMG Ponies" as it's moniker</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301417</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>Chabo</author>
	<datestamp>1244719020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see the "Superspeed", but I don't see an "SS". Do you mean the red and blue arrows?</p><p>USB 2.0 was called "Hi-Speed", so if you don't like that designation, just use the version number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see the " Superspeed " , but I do n't see an " SS " .
Do you mean the red and blue arrows ? USB 2.0 was called " Hi-Speed " , so if you do n't like that designation , just use the version number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see the "Superspeed", but I don't see an "SS".
Do you mean the red and blue arrows?USB 2.0 was called "Hi-Speed", so if you don't like that designation, just use the version number.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302211</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244723220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A miniature geek?</p><p>Geek is gender neutral. It's doesn't really need anything else. I mean, I might refer to my 8 years old child as a 'geekette'.</p><p>My she wants to be a scientistsess~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A miniature geek ? Geek is gender neutral .
It 's does n't really need anything else .
I mean , I might refer to my 8 years old child as a 'geekette'.My she wants to be a scientistsess ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A miniature geek?Geek is gender neutral.
It's doesn't really need anything else.
I mean, I might refer to my 8 years old child as a 'geekette'.My she wants to be a scientistsess~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301313</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</id>
	<title>The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>like Doctor or Actor.</p><p>Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek. Please, clearly you are all geek.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>like Doctor or Actor.Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek .
Please , clearly you are all geek .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like Doctor or Actor.Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek.
Please, clearly you are all geek.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302541</id>
	<title>It's Not The First...</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1244725380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not the first until it actually implements it.  Until then, any other system could still get there first.<br> <br>Of course with no USB 3.0 ports or hardware, it hardly matters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the first until it actually implements it .
Until then , any other system could still get there first .
Of course with no USB 3.0 ports or hardware , it hardly matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the first until it actually implements it.
Until then, any other system could still get there first.
Of course with no USB 3.0 ports or hardware, it hardly matters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</id>
	<title>It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1244718180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I may have to preface this with the fact that I am a hard core Linux user.  I run Mac OS on the wife's machines.  I have a WindowsXP VM.  That's about it for me personally.  I use Linux exclusively and favorably.  But what I have to say is the objective truth the way I see it... objectively.</p><p>It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers.  It only means something when they have something that Linux doesn't support.  Then they can point their fingers and say "Linux doesn't support my hardware [again]!"</p><p>Linux isn't entitled to bragging rights of any kind.  Sure we have snazzy 3D OpenGL desktops with cubes and spheres.  Sure we have the ability to many things "unencumbered" by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media (so far).  There are lots of games natively written for Linux though not the ones someone wants to play usually... (No WoW and no chance in hell of an OpenGL version of XWing vs. Tie Fighter....)</p><p>The point is what Linux has is completely unimportant to others... even when they DON'T have it.  What is important is what Linux doesn't have.</p><p>Still, I'll chalk this little bullet point up in Linux's favor... but at the same time, none of it matters until really useful USB 3.0 devices are available and at that time there WILL be Windows drivers and support and there WILL be Mac OS X support.  "Sure, you had it first... but what could you do with it?"</p><p>(I'll still get modded troll)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I may have to preface this with the fact that I am a hard core Linux user .
I run Mac OS on the wife 's machines .
I have a WindowsXP VM .
That 's about it for me personally .
I use Linux exclusively and favorably .
But what I have to say is the objective truth the way I see it... objectively.It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers .
It only means something when they have something that Linux does n't support .
Then they can point their fingers and say " Linux does n't support my hardware [ again ] !
" Linux is n't entitled to bragging rights of any kind .
Sure we have snazzy 3D OpenGL desktops with cubes and spheres .
Sure we have the ability to many things " unencumbered " by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media ( so far ) .
There are lots of games natively written for Linux though not the ones someone wants to play usually... ( No WoW and no chance in hell of an OpenGL version of XWing vs. Tie Fighter.... ) The point is what Linux has is completely unimportant to others... even when they DO N'T have it .
What is important is what Linux does n't have.Still , I 'll chalk this little bullet point up in Linux 's favor... but at the same time , none of it matters until really useful USB 3.0 devices are available and at that time there WILL be Windows drivers and support and there WILL be Mac OS X support .
" Sure , you had it first... but what could you do with it ?
" ( I 'll still get modded troll )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I may have to preface this with the fact that I am a hard core Linux user.
I run Mac OS on the wife's machines.
I have a WindowsXP VM.
That's about it for me personally.
I use Linux exclusively and favorably.
But what I have to say is the objective truth the way I see it... objectively.It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers.
It only means something when they have something that Linux doesn't support.
Then they can point their fingers and say "Linux doesn't support my hardware [again]!
"Linux isn't entitled to bragging rights of any kind.
Sure we have snazzy 3D OpenGL desktops with cubes and spheres.
Sure we have the ability to many things "unencumbered" by DRM or other schemes while at the same time can play all media (so far).
There are lots of games natively written for Linux though not the ones someone wants to play usually... (No WoW and no chance in hell of an OpenGL version of XWing vs. Tie Fighter....)The point is what Linux has is completely unimportant to others... even when they DON'T have it.
What is important is what Linux doesn't have.Still, I'll chalk this little bullet point up in Linux's favor... but at the same time, none of it matters until really useful USB 3.0 devices are available and at that time there WILL be Windows drivers and support and there WILL be Mac OS X support.
"Sure, you had it first... but what could you do with it?
"(I'll still get modded troll)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28309977</id>
	<title>Re:Even worse than you can imagine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244828460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>667?  That's the guy across the street from the beast.</htmltext>
<tokenext>667 ?
That 's the guy across the street from the beast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>667?
That's the guy across the street from the beast.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302247</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301219</id>
	<title>But surely M$ will be a close second, very soon...</title>
	<author>Klistvud</author>
	<datestamp>1244718240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... filing for Chapter 7. Oops, I meant following with Windows 7.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... filing for Chapter 7 .
Oops , I meant following with Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... filing for Chapter 7.
Oops, I meant following with Windows 7.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301645</id>
	<title>Actually happens with USB2 now</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1244720040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was planning a iMac 24" and looking for a secondary display solution since I used 2 monitors even back in Windows 98. So, I checked the "real life solution" USB2 scene (e.g. not toasters) a bit.</p><p>First stuff to use USB3 will certainly be SSD drives and later, "secondary display" or even "main display" (e.g. opengl 2/3 capable) GPU stuff will start shipping.</p><p>So, if USB3 is supported under Linux but the GPU solution, likely from a Taiwan/China company doesn't have driver/GUI app... It will be a really ironic situation. I am not mocking Linux, same thing will likely happen to OS X too. I am somehow sure the actual working USB3 devices will run under Windows first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was planning a iMac 24 " and looking for a secondary display solution since I used 2 monitors even back in Windows 98 .
So , I checked the " real life solution " USB2 scene ( e.g .
not toasters ) a bit.First stuff to use USB3 will certainly be SSD drives and later , " secondary display " or even " main display " ( e.g .
opengl 2/3 capable ) GPU stuff will start shipping.So , if USB3 is supported under Linux but the GPU solution , likely from a Taiwan/China company does n't have driver/GUI app... It will be a really ironic situation .
I am not mocking Linux , same thing will likely happen to OS X too .
I am somehow sure the actual working USB3 devices will run under Windows first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was planning a iMac 24" and looking for a secondary display solution since I used 2 monitors even back in Windows 98.
So, I checked the "real life solution" USB2 scene (e.g.
not toasters) a bit.First stuff to use USB3 will certainly be SSD drives and later, "secondary display" or even "main display" (e.g.
opengl 2/3 capable) GPU stuff will start shipping.So, if USB3 is supported under Linux but the GPU solution, likely from a Taiwan/China company doesn't have driver/GUI app... It will be a really ironic situation.
I am not mocking Linux, same thing will likely happen to OS X too.
I am somehow sure the actual working USB3 devices will run under Windows first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28303301</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>bkaul</author>
	<datestamp>1244731260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(I'll still get modded troll)</p></div><p>Employing a bit of reverse psychology there?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( I 'll still get modded troll ) Employing a bit of reverse psychology there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(I'll still get modded troll)Employing a bit of reverse psychology there?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301885</id>
	<title>Years ahead and years behind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244721240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just tried to get GNU/Linux to work on my dual-monitor machine -- which is currently running Windows 2000 -- and it doesn't work! Seriously, it JustWorks(tm) in Windows <em>2000</em>, but doesn't work in GNU/Linux in <em>2009</em>.</p><p>So, yay for the Linux kernel getting USB3.0 support (despite the fact no-one outside the GNU/Linux geek world will notice), boo for not even support dual monitors, iPods, bluetooth, software RAID, Intel/ATi graphics cards (Ubuntu is regression city at the moment) or a single sound library (so it's not possible to run Skype, Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time, for example).</p><p>In fact, I'd say that there are far more important things to the GNU/Linux ecosystem than USB3.0 support. That's probably why GNU/Linux is a failure on the desktop though: you can't tell the developers what to work on. People should seriously stop advocating it as being ready for the desktop though (see reasons above), they're not going to earn any friends that way. Even Mark Shuttleworth hesitates to recommend Ubuntu!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tried to get GNU/Linux to work on my dual-monitor machine -- which is currently running Windows 2000 -- and it does n't work !
Seriously , it JustWorks ( tm ) in Windows 2000 , but does n't work in GNU/Linux in 2009.So , yay for the Linux kernel getting USB3.0 support ( despite the fact no-one outside the GNU/Linux geek world will notice ) , boo for not even support dual monitors , iPods , bluetooth , software RAID , Intel/ATi graphics cards ( Ubuntu is regression city at the moment ) or a single sound library ( so it 's not possible to run Skype , Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time , for example ) .In fact , I 'd say that there are far more important things to the GNU/Linux ecosystem than USB3.0 support .
That 's probably why GNU/Linux is a failure on the desktop though : you ca n't tell the developers what to work on .
People should seriously stop advocating it as being ready for the desktop though ( see reasons above ) , they 're not going to earn any friends that way .
Even Mark Shuttleworth hesitates to recommend Ubuntu !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tried to get GNU/Linux to work on my dual-monitor machine -- which is currently running Windows 2000 -- and it doesn't work!
Seriously, it JustWorks(tm) in Windows 2000, but doesn't work in GNU/Linux in 2009.So, yay for the Linux kernel getting USB3.0 support (despite the fact no-one outside the GNU/Linux geek world will notice), boo for not even support dual monitors, iPods, bluetooth, software RAID, Intel/ATi graphics cards (Ubuntu is regression city at the moment) or a single sound library (so it's not possible to run Skype, Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time, for example).In fact, I'd say that there are far more important things to the GNU/Linux ecosystem than USB3.0 support.
That's probably why GNU/Linux is a failure on the desktop though: you can't tell the developers what to work on.
People should seriously stop advocating it as being ready for the desktop though (see reasons above), they're not going to earn any friends that way.
Even Mark Shuttleworth hesitates to recommend Ubuntu!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301199</id>
	<title>Re:Another win for OSS community</title>
	<author>larry bagina</author>
	<datestamp>1244718120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Linux: more bleeding edge than a pussy on the rag.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux : more bleeding edge than a pussy on the rag .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux: more bleeding edge than a pussy on the rag.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301383</id>
	<title>You should be running Linux in 1990s</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244718840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To figure how huge thing this is, you should be running Linux in 1990s and tried to use USB early, practical devices such as mouse.</p><p>Windows 95 with "hacked in" USB support was working better with USB devices. We ended up struggling for hours and ending up with PS/2 adapter coming with USB mouse under Linux. Need to say more?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To figure how huge thing this is , you should be running Linux in 1990s and tried to use USB early , practical devices such as mouse.Windows 95 with " hacked in " USB support was working better with USB devices .
We ended up struggling for hours and ending up with PS/2 adapter coming with USB mouse under Linux .
Need to say more ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To figure how huge thing this is, you should be running Linux in 1990s and tried to use USB early, practical devices such as mouse.Windows 95 with "hacked in" USB support was working better with USB devices.
We ended up struggling for hours and ending up with PS/2 adapter coming with USB mouse under Linux.
Need to say more?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302831</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1244727300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it</p></div><p>At first glance, I read that as "superceded". Sounds about right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase " superspeed " on itAt first glance , I read that as " superceded " .
Sounds about right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on itAt first glance, I read that as "superceded".
Sounds about right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28337741</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245092160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because she knows it will produce MAD HITS on her website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because she knows it will produce MAD HITS on her website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because she knows it will produce MAD HITS on her website.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301583</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>mR.bRiGhTsId3</author>
	<datestamp>1244719680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm so prepared for ludicrous speed!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so prepared for ludicrous speed !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so prepared for ludicrous speed!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301519</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1244719500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At some point, they will rename it PC Plug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At some point , they will rename it PC Plug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At some point, they will rename it PC Plug.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302247</id>
	<title>Re:Even worse than you can imagine</title>
	<author>wampus</author>
	<datestamp>1244723460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was definitely Satan that was behind 667 MHz.  Without a doubt.  Or rounding 666.67 MHz up to 667 looked nicer.  One or the other.  But probably Satan.  Also, I think you are probably the kid in class who ate too much paste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was definitely Satan that was behind 667 MHz .
Without a doubt .
Or rounding 666.67 MHz up to 667 looked nicer .
One or the other .
But probably Satan .
Also , I think you are probably the kid in class who ate too much paste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was definitely Satan that was behind 667 MHz.
Without a doubt.
Or rounding 666.67 MHz up to 667 looked nicer.
One or the other.
But probably Satan.
Also, I think you are probably the kid in class who ate too much paste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302921</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1244728020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers. It only means something when they have something that Linux doesn't support. Then they can point their fingers and say "Linux doesn't support my hardware [again]!"</p></div><p>You must keep some pretty bad company. Most of the world has moved on from that mentality.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>(I'll still get modded troll)</p></div><p>Uh... why?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers .
It only means something when they have something that Linux does n't support .
Then they can point their fingers and say " Linux does n't support my hardware [ again ] !
" You must keep some pretty bad company .
Most of the world has moved on from that mentality .
( I 'll still get modded troll ) Uh... why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It means nothing to Windows pushers and nothing to Mac pushers.
It only means something when they have something that Linux doesn't support.
Then they can point their fingers and say "Linux doesn't support my hardware [again]!
"You must keep some pretty bad company.
Most of the world has moved on from that mentality.
(I'll still get modded troll)Uh... why?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301313</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244718600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay, what about geekette?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , what about geekette ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, what about geekette?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301387</id>
	<title>yuo fmail it..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244718900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">bunch of ret4rded In our group</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>bunch of ret4rded In our group [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bunch of ret4rded In our group [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302471</id>
	<title>Isn't this useless without USB 3.0 hardware?</title>
	<author>brentonboy</author>
	<datestamp>1244724900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't seen any USB 3.0 devices for sale yet. I suspect that they won't appear until sometime after Windows and Mac support USB 3. So, as cool as this is, there is no need to rush off and implement it on your own now. You can wait until your next kernel update.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't seen any USB 3.0 devices for sale yet .
I suspect that they wo n't appear until sometime after Windows and Mac support USB 3 .
So , as cool as this is , there is no need to rush off and implement it on your own now .
You can wait until your next kernel update .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't seen any USB 3.0 devices for sale yet.
I suspect that they won't appear until sometime after Windows and Mac support USB 3.
So, as cool as this is, there is no need to rush off and implement it on your own now.
You can wait until your next kernel update.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306345</id>
	<title>Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too?</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1244811660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, Windows beat Linux on USB 1.1 and 2.0. Although Linux was first with AMD64 support. I can't think of too many other Linux "firsts" though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , Windows beat Linux on USB 1.1 and 2.0 .
Although Linux was first with AMD64 support .
I ca n't think of too many other Linux " firsts " though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, Windows beat Linux on USB 1.1 and 2.0.
Although Linux was first with AMD64 support.
I can't think of too many other Linux "firsts" though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301611</id>
	<title>My God!</title>
	<author>xSurioNx</author>
	<datestamp>1244719860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've Gone Plad!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've Gone Plad !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've Gone Plad!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301457</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244719140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who the hell modded the above post "Interesting"?  Informative would be more accurate.</p><p>"Geekess" is equally as retarded as "webmistress".  Yes, because the term "webmaster" implies male gender.  Uhh, what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who the hell modded the above post " Interesting " ?
Informative would be more accurate .
" Geekess " is equally as retarded as " webmistress " .
Yes , because the term " webmaster " implies male gender .
Uhh , what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who the hell modded the above post "Interesting"?
Informative would be more accurate.
"Geekess" is equally as retarded as "webmistress".
Yes, because the term "webmaster" implies male gender.
Uhh, what?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302795</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244727060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will matter if, in 6 months, Linux ARM laptops are shipping with USB 3.0 enabled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It will matter if , in 6 months , Linux ARM laptops are shipping with USB 3.0 enabled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will matter if, in 6 months, Linux ARM laptops are shipping with USB 3.0 enabled.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301075</id>
	<title>yay</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I'll adopt it after it's been out for a while and everyone else works the bugs out.</p><p>I don't want first, I want stable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 'll adopt it after it 's been out for a while and everyone else works the bugs out.I do n't want first , I want stable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I'll adopt it after it's been out for a while and everyone else works the bugs out.I don't want first, I want stable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302767</id>
	<title>Re:You should be running Linux in 1990s</title>
	<author>gbarules2999</author>
	<datestamp>1244726760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Linux isn't the operating system it was in the 1990's, just like Windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is n't the operating system it was in the 1990 's , just like Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux isn't the operating system it was in the 1990's, just like Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301381</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>rcamans</author>
	<datestamp>1244718840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are already at ludicrous speed. Have you tried to launch or us any MS apps in Intel hardware that has less than dual core?<br>Ludicrously slow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are already at ludicrous speed .
Have you tried to launch or us any MS apps in Intel hardware that has less than dual core ? Ludicrously slow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are already at ludicrous speed.
Have you tried to launch or us any MS apps in Intel hardware that has less than dual core?Ludicrously slow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28303835</id>
	<title>Re:Even worse than you can imagine</title>
	<author>maglor\_83</author>
	<datestamp>1244735820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.</p></div><p>Why doesn't the Secret Service do that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.Why does n't the Secret Service do that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.Why doesn't the Secret Service do that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302043</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>cripeon</author>
	<datestamp>1244722020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, what would you say a "geekoid" is? A geeky android?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what would you say a " geekoid " is ?
A geeky android ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what would you say a "geekoid" is?
A geeky android?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28337575</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245091260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have WoW, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have WoW , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have WoW, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301951</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244721540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That SS really confused me.. In Holland we have a not so positive meaning associated with those two letters (same for SA) they are the only two letter combination that is not allowed in license plates for example.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That SS really confused me.. In Holland we have a not so positive meaning associated with those two letters ( same for SA ) they are the only two letter combination that is not allowed in license plates for example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That SS really confused me.. In Holland we have a not so positive meaning associated with those two letters (same for SA) they are the only two letter combination that is not allowed in license plates for example.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244725620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WHy do you need to indicate a female noun?</p><p>For me it boils down to this:<br>It is an un-need divide in a culture. Instead of being a group of geeks, we end up creating geeks and geekess's. Which seems to lead to an US v THEM aspect in everything it touches.</p><p>True gender equality doesn't need this artificial line.</p><p>Also, I look at history:<br>Princess were inferior to prince, Goddess inferior to God.</p><p>I don't think we need that any more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WHy do you need to indicate a female noun ? For me it boils down to this : It is an un-need divide in a culture .
Instead of being a group of geeks , we end up creating geeks and geekess 's .
Which seems to lead to an US v THEM aspect in everything it touches.True gender equality does n't need this artificial line.Also , I look at history : Princess were inferior to prince , Goddess inferior to God.I do n't think we need that any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHy do you need to indicate a female noun?For me it boils down to this:It is an un-need divide in a culture.
Instead of being a group of geeks, we end up creating geeks and geekess's.
Which seems to lead to an US v THEM aspect in everything it touches.True gender equality doesn't need this artificial line.Also, I look at history:Princess were inferior to prince, Goddess inferior to God.I don't think we need that any more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301241</id>
	<title>Post to negate bad moderation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244718300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302635</id>
	<title>Re:completely irrelevant unless people write drive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244725980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Linux can't even support the <b>vast majority</b> of USB 1 devices</p></div></blockquote><p>
I fuckin' love Armchair Idiots. You're so clueless it's almost <i>cute</i>!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux ca n't even support the vast majority of USB 1 devices I fuckin ' love Armchair Idiots .
You 're so clueless it 's almost cute !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux can't even support the vast majority of USB 1 devices
I fuckin' love Armchair Idiots.
You're so clueless it's almost cute!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302057</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306997</id>
	<title>Re:Even better on my Linux box...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244816160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You better go to the doctor.  I think you may be pregnant.</p><p>Think about it before you mod me off-topic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You better go to the doctor .
I think you may be pregnant.Think about it before you mod me off-topic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You better go to the doctor.
I think you may be pregnant.Think about it before you mod me off-topic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301001</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765</id>
	<title>Even worse than you can imagine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244720700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>83 thousand workers all over the globe including Israel and they can't figure out why companies never use anything matching "SS"? Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.</p><p>We used a stylish logo with "SS" letters once at TV and we had our lesson. If Intel calls their Israel office, they can be surprised.</p><p>Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting "Satan Inside" logos on web? Yes, SS still sounds like the SS from WW2. It will be trouble. That is why companies like Apple, Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>83 thousand workers all over the globe including Israel and they ca n't figure out why companies never use anything matching " SS " ?
Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.We used a stylish logo with " SS " letters once at TV and we had our lesson .
If Intel calls their Israel office , they can be surprised.Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting " Satan Inside " logos on web ?
Yes , SS still sounds like the SS from WW2 .
It will be trouble .
That is why companies like Apple , Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>83 thousand workers all over the globe including Israel and they can't figure out why companies never use anything matching "SS"?
Perhaps they should also add original swastika and can explain they used it in terms of original meaning.We used a stylish logo with "SS" letters once at TV and we had our lesson.
If Intel calls their Israel office, they can be surprised.Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting "Satan Inside" logos on web?
Yes, SS still sounds like the SS from WW2.
It will be trouble.
That is why companies like Apple, Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28304783</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244747340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exactly, this means nothing because unlike linux, i KNOW my usb3 device will have working drivers for windows when i buy it.</p><p>i guess the linux crowd will take any victory they can....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly , this means nothing because unlike linux , i KNOW my usb3 device will have working drivers for windows when i buy it.i guess the linux crowd will take any victory they can... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly, this means nothing because unlike linux, i KNOW my usb3 device will have working drivers for windows when i buy it.i guess the linux crowd will take any victory they can....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306429</id>
	<title>Re:Years ahead and years behind</title>
	<author>LingNoi</author>
	<datestamp>1244812500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>or a single sound library (so it's not possible to run Skype, Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time, for example).</p></div></blockquote><p>Oh Mr Coward, how wrong you are. It's a simply matter of adding "padsp" to the beginning of the menu item. So "padsp skype" will make skype work in pulse audio.</p><p>The same can be done with WINE. "padsp winecfg", click on the audio tab and select the OSS driver, then exit. Now when starting your wine app type "padsp wine appname.exe"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>or a single sound library ( so it 's not possible to run Skype , Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time , for example ) .Oh Mr Coward , how wrong you are .
It 's a simply matter of adding " padsp " to the beginning of the menu item .
So " padsp skype " will make skype work in pulse audio.The same can be done with WINE .
" padsp winecfg " , click on the audio tab and select the OSS driver , then exit .
Now when starting your wine app type " padsp wine appname.exe "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or a single sound library (so it's not possible to run Skype, Flash and Rhythmbox at the same time, for example).Oh Mr Coward, how wrong you are.
It's a simply matter of adding "padsp" to the beginning of the menu item.
So "padsp skype" will make skype work in pulse audio.The same can be done with WINE.
"padsp winecfg", click on the audio tab and select the OSS driver, then exit.
Now when starting your wine app type "padsp wine appname.exe"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301105</id>
	<title>About time!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was waiting for USB3 support! Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows. Drivers? What are they? Oh and when can I buy a USB4 powered reading light?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was waiting for USB3 support !
Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows .
Drivers ? What are they ?
Oh and when can I buy a USB4 powered reading light ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was waiting for USB3 support!
Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows.
Drivers? What are they?
Oh and when can I buy a USB4 powered reading light?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301913</id>
	<title>Let me be the first of many who say:</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1244721300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sarah, will you please bear my children?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sarah , will you please bear my children ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sarah, will you please bear my children?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301881</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244721180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WoW runs on WINE, biznatch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WoW runs on WINE , biznatch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WoW runs on WINE, biznatch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28303329</id>
	<title>I remember...</title>
	<author>hotfireball</author>
	<datestamp>1244731560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Opera was also first browser that implements Acid 3. Apparently, Apple Safari 4 is <b>the only</b> browser <b>in production</b> right now available in the market.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera was also first browser that implements Acid 3 .
Apparently , Apple Safari 4 is the only browser in production right now available in the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera was also first browser that implements Acid 3.
Apparently, Apple Safari 4 is the only browser in production right now available in the market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306953</id>
	<title>Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware?</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1244815980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?</p></div><p>Mod me troll if you want, but the majority of the devices won't come until Windows has USB 3.0 support.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice to hear that , but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ? Mod me troll if you want , but the majority of the devices wo n't come until Windows has USB 3.0 support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?Mod me troll if you want, but the majority of the devices won't come until Windows has USB 3.0 support.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301333</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>Arcturax</author>
	<datestamp>1244718660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess they decided to go for a Godwin award this time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess they decided to go for a Godwin award this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess they decided to go for a Godwin award this time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301861</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244721120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Neither Amiga (Virtual desktops in 1985) or NeWS (tabbed windows and browsing, 1988) were open source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Neither Amiga ( Virtual desktops in 1985 ) or NeWS ( tabbed windows and browsing , 1988 ) were open source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neither Amiga (Virtual desktops in 1985) or NeWS (tabbed windows and browsing, 1988) were open source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305407</id>
	<title>Re:Another win for OSS community</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244800020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, sure, but, what about other drivers, like, uhmm, my cheap and, from a couple moths, out of vendor support, integrated ATI graphics?<br>The open source driver really sucks, and the official ATI driver isn't compatible with ubuntu jaunty, and it will be no updated for "old" graphics card, like mine (ATI 740G = Radeon 2100).<br>If you look at Ubuntu forums or IRC channels, you will see much more people with the same issue.<br>This is not necessarily the case of others driver developmen teams. For example: I had had recently another mobo (with integrated graphics, VIA P4M890) and really, I have seen what a good work has done the openchrome team with its driver.<br>Excuse me for being so hard, but I think there is some other things with much more priority than improving a graphics card performance, but I don't think that supporting unreleased devices is between them.<br>Obviously, all this was from the point of view of a (particular) linux desktop user.<br>(Please excuse me, English is not my birth language.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , sure , but , what about other drivers , like , uhmm , my cheap and , from a couple moths , out of vendor support , integrated ATI graphics ? The open source driver really sucks , and the official ATI driver is n't compatible with ubuntu jaunty , and it will be no updated for " old " graphics card , like mine ( ATI 740G = Radeon 2100 ) .If you look at Ubuntu forums or IRC channels , you will see much more people with the same issue.This is not necessarily the case of others driver developmen teams .
For example : I had had recently another mobo ( with integrated graphics , VIA P4M890 ) and really , I have seen what a good work has done the openchrome team with its driver.Excuse me for being so hard , but I think there is some other things with much more priority than improving a graphics card performance , but I do n't think that supporting unreleased devices is between them.Obviously , all this was from the point of view of a ( particular ) linux desktop user .
( Please excuse me , English is not my birth language .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, sure, but, what about other drivers, like, uhmm, my cheap and, from a couple moths, out of vendor support, integrated ATI graphics?The open source driver really sucks, and the official ATI driver isn't compatible with ubuntu jaunty, and it will be no updated for "old" graphics card, like mine (ATI 740G = Radeon 2100).If you look at Ubuntu forums or IRC channels, you will see much more people with the same issue.This is not necessarily the case of others driver developmen teams.
For example: I had had recently another mobo (with integrated graphics, VIA P4M890) and really, I have seen what a good work has done the openchrome team with its driver.Excuse me for being so hard, but I think there is some other things with much more priority than improving a graphics card performance, but I don't think that supporting unreleased devices is between them.Obviously, all this was from the point of view of a (particular) linux desktop user.
(Please excuse me, English is not my birth language.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301875</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>ksheff</author>
	<datestamp>1244721120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One would think that it wouldn't be odd to have a hardware manufacturer use an OS that they can change as they see fit in order to develop and test new hardware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One would think that it would n't be odd to have a hardware manufacturer use an OS that they can change as they see fit in order to develop and test new hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One would think that it wouldn't be odd to have a hardware manufacturer use an OS that they can change as they see fit in order to develop and test new hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301269</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244718420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.</p><p>My mother isn't a particularly progressive person, but she was quite clear when she told me that adding a feminine suffix to a professional noun is demeaning.</p><p>Geek isn't exactly a professional noun, but it's close enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed.My mother is n't a particularly progressive person , but she was quite clear when she told me that adding a feminine suffix to a professional noun is demeaning.Geek is n't exactly a professional noun , but it 's close enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.My mother isn't a particularly progressive person, but she was quite clear when she told me that adding a feminine suffix to a professional noun is demeaning.Geek isn't exactly a professional noun, but it's close enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301309</id>
	<title>Jade Raymond is more of a hottie and geek!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244718600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>title says it all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>title says it all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>title says it all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301553</id>
	<title>Re:Another win for OSS community</title>
	<author>mR.bRiGhTsId3</author>
	<datestamp>1244719620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't going to change much for anyone. I wasn't even aware there were consumer devices/computers that were shipping with USB 3 ports yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't going to change much for anyone .
I was n't even aware there were consumer devices/computers that were shipping with USB 3 ports yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't going to change much for anyone.
I wasn't even aware there were consumer devices/computers that were shipping with USB 3 ports yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305749</id>
	<title>Re:Poor naming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244805060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.</p></div><p>M-M-M-M Monster Speed...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>you 'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.M-M-M-M Monster Speed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.M-M-M-M Monster Speed...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301599</id>
	<title>Re:It means almost nothing</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1244719740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Open source did a lot of things first. Tabbed browsing, multiple desktops, there are probably a lot of things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Open source did a lot of things first .
Tabbed browsing , multiple desktops , there are probably a lot of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open source did a lot of things first.
Tabbed browsing, multiple desktops, there are probably a lot of things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302271</id>
	<title>Re:Years ahead and years behind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244723580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow. fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow .
fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow.
fail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301045</id>
	<title>bleeding edge</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bleeding edge<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bleeding edge ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bleeding edge ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305791</id>
	<title>Re:Wasn't it also the first for USB too?</title>
	<author>heffrey</author>
	<datestamp>1244805480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With pleasure.  You are wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With pleasure .
You are wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With pleasure.
You are wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301103</id>
	<title>Any USB 3.0 hardware?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice to hear that , but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice to hear that, but are there any USB 3.0 devices to plug ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302887</id>
	<title>Re:Even worse than you can imagine</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1244727660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting "Satan Inside" logos on web? Yes, SS still sounds like the SS from WW2. It will be trouble. That is why companies like Apple, Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems.</p></div><p>Speaking of Apple, they priced the Apple 1 at $666. So these companies aren't above finding humor in these things - of course, Apple was not a large corporation in those days. But it's particularly amusing when combined with the "bitten apple" representing knowledge (and the fall of mankind). Then there are other fun and provocative namings like "sosumi" and "BHA".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting " Satan Inside " logos on web ?
Yes , SS still sounds like the SS from WW2 .
It will be trouble .
That is why companies like Apple , Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems.Speaking of Apple , they priced the Apple 1 at $ 666 .
So these companies are n't above finding humor in these things - of course , Apple was not a large corporation in those days .
But it 's particularly amusing when combined with the " bitten apple " representing knowledge ( and the fall of mankind ) .
Then there are other fun and provocative namings like " sosumi " and " BHA " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember they jumped to 667 Mhz instead of natural 666 in Pentium since people were already putting "Satan Inside" logos on web?
Yes, SS still sounds like the SS from WW2.
It will be trouble.
That is why companies like Apple, Microsoft have huge databases for naming products and even filenames in their operating systems.Speaking of Apple, they priced the Apple 1 at $666.
So these companies aren't above finding humor in these things - of course, Apple was not a large corporation in those days.
But it's particularly amusing when combined with the "bitten apple" representing knowledge (and the fall of mankind).
Then there are other fun and provocative namings like "sosumi" and "BHA".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301001</id>
	<title>Even better on my Linux box...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Linux box goes to USB 11</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Linux box goes to USB 11</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Linux box goes to USB 11</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28313401</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Chabo</author>
	<datestamp>1244798100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I'd be more scared of an Evil Sorceress than an Evil Sorcerer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I 'd be more scared of an Evil Sorceress than an Evil Sorcerer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I'd be more scared of an Evil Sorceress than an Evil Sorcerer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305049</id>
	<title>Re:You should be running Linux in 1990s</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1244838720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the other hand, while talking about the 1990s and things Linux had first (compared to Windows):</p><p>
&nbsp; - Linux actually existed before Windows 95 (1991 and 1995, respectively - if you want to include NT, that was 1993 IIRC)<br>
&nbsp; - Thus, features that are shared among early Linux and early Windows (32-bit, long file names, multitasking,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...) were actually first in Linux<br>
&nbsp; - Multi-user<br>
&nbsp; - Filesystem with permissions (ok, Windows had "read only"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...)<br>
&nbsp; - A useful degree of POSIX-compatibility (OTOH, Windows had useful win16-compatibility - I don't think Linux's was very good)<br>
&nbsp; - Lots of GNU utilities (familiar to those familiar with Unix, and often preferred over their proprietary Unix counterparts)<br>
&nbsp; - Remote acccess (telnet, X11)<br>
&nbsp; - Multiple desktop environments to choose from<br>
&nbsp; - Virtual desktops<br>
&nbsp; - Development tools either included with the system or available for free (or did Windows have that, too?)<br>
&nbsp; - Source code either included or available for free<br>
&nbsp; - Support for multiple machine architectures</p><p>I'm sure the list isn't even exhaustive, but it serves to show that Linux having something before Windows is not exactly rare. Of course, there are tons of things that Windows has gotten before Linux<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... widespread consumer acceptance being one obvious and important item.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the other hand , while talking about the 1990s and things Linux had first ( compared to Windows ) :   - Linux actually existed before Windows 95 ( 1991 and 1995 , respectively - if you want to include NT , that was 1993 IIRC )   - Thus , features that are shared among early Linux and early Windows ( 32-bit , long file names , multitasking , ... ) were actually first in Linux   - Multi-user   - Filesystem with permissions ( ok , Windows had " read only " ... )   - A useful degree of POSIX-compatibility ( OTOH , Windows had useful win16-compatibility - I do n't think Linux 's was very good )   - Lots of GNU utilities ( familiar to those familiar with Unix , and often preferred over their proprietary Unix counterparts )   - Remote acccess ( telnet , X11 )   - Multiple desktop environments to choose from   - Virtual desktops   - Development tools either included with the system or available for free ( or did Windows have that , too ?
)   - Source code either included or available for free   - Support for multiple machine architecturesI 'm sure the list is n't even exhaustive , but it serves to show that Linux having something before Windows is not exactly rare .
Of course , there are tons of things that Windows has gotten before Linux ... widespread consumer acceptance being one obvious and important item .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the other hand, while talking about the 1990s and things Linux had first (compared to Windows):
  - Linux actually existed before Windows 95 (1991 and 1995, respectively - if you want to include NT, that was 1993 IIRC)
  - Thus, features that are shared among early Linux and early Windows (32-bit, long file names, multitasking, ...) were actually first in Linux
  - Multi-user
  - Filesystem with permissions (ok, Windows had "read only" ...)
  - A useful degree of POSIX-compatibility (OTOH, Windows had useful win16-compatibility - I don't think Linux's was very good)
  - Lots of GNU utilities (familiar to those familiar with Unix, and often preferred over their proprietary Unix counterparts)
  - Remote acccess (telnet, X11)
  - Multiple desktop environments to choose from
  - Virtual desktops
  - Development tools either included with the system or available for free (or did Windows have that, too?
)
  - Source code either included or available for free
  - Support for multiple machine architecturesI'm sure the list isn't even exhaustive, but it serves to show that Linux having something before Windows is not exactly rare.
Of course, there are tons of things that Windows has gotten before Linux ... widespread consumer acceptance being one obvious and important item.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302717</id>
	<title>Linux is full of fail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244726460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux is the first to support one of the most geekness things like USB 3.0, but things that real people needs like Blu-ray support Linux is the last.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is the first to support one of the most geekness things like USB 3.0 , but things that real people needs like Blu-ray support Linux is the last .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is the first to support one of the most geekness things like USB 3.0, but things that real people needs like Blu-ray support Linux is the last.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28309259</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>hmar</author>
	<datestamp>1244826060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In what society that worshipped both gods and goddesses were goddesses inferior to gods? The "Earth Mother" in many religions was the most important deity, and in Greek mythology, Athena (goddess of wisdom) was a tactically superior general over Aries (god of war)
To actively deny the differences between male and female is to call attention to them. Use the word you are comfortable with, don't try to change the language of others, as you will never come accross as more than an asshole.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In what society that worshipped both gods and goddesses were goddesses inferior to gods ?
The " Earth Mother " in many religions was the most important deity , and in Greek mythology , Athena ( goddess of wisdom ) was a tactically superior general over Aries ( god of war ) To actively deny the differences between male and female is to call attention to them .
Use the word you are comfortable with , do n't try to change the language of others , as you will never come accross as more than an asshole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what society that worshipped both gods and goddesses were goddesses inferior to gods?
The "Earth Mother" in many religions was the most important deity, and in Greek mythology, Athena (goddess of wisdom) was a tactically superior general over Aries (god of war)
To actively deny the differences between male and female is to call attention to them.
Use the word you are comfortable with, don't try to change the language of others, as you will never come accross as more than an asshole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302765</id>
	<title>Re:completely irrelevant unless people write drive</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244726760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It does matter whose firt. At least to some of uis. Does that mean that person will reap the monitory rewards? no.</p><p>"vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there, "<br>such as...?</p><p>Of course had you read it, you would know she implemented for a hardware reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does matter whose firt .
At least to some of uis .
Does that mean that person will reap the monitory rewards ?
no. " vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there , " such as... ? Of course had you read it , you would know she implemented for a hardware reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does matter whose firt.
At least to some of uis.
Does that mean that person will reap the monitory rewards?
no."vast majority of USB 1 devices that are out there, "such as...?Of course had you read it, you would know she implemented for a hardware reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302057</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306749</id>
	<title>Re:About time!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244814900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I was waiting for USB3 support! Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows.</p></div><p>No because nobody will make devices that only work on a useless OS. When 7 gets USB3 support, then devices will come out.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was waiting for USB3 support !
Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows.No because nobody will make devices that only work on a useless OS .
When 7 gets USB3 support , then devices will come out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was waiting for USB3 support!
Now all my USB3 devices will work in Linux but not in Windows.No because nobody will make devices that only work on a useless OS.
When 7 gets USB3 support, then devices will come out.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301105</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067</id>
	<title>Another win for OSS community</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chalk one up for Intel and Linux kernel OSS support!  IMHO, a big milestone in the fact that Linux kernel development is always teetering on the bleeding edge.  This isn't going to change much for the novice user unless distro's do their part and package in the kernel support for it, but for the more savvy users and testers, it's going to help USB 3.0 mature very quickly and get the bugs worked out faster.  I dig it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chalk one up for Intel and Linux kernel OSS support !
IMHO , a big milestone in the fact that Linux kernel development is always teetering on the bleeding edge .
This is n't going to change much for the novice user unless distro 's do their part and package in the kernel support for it , but for the more savvy users and testers , it 's going to help USB 3.0 mature very quickly and get the bugs worked out faster .
I dig it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chalk one up for Intel and Linux kernel OSS support!
IMHO, a big milestone in the fact that Linux kernel development is always teetering on the bleeding edge.
This isn't going to change much for the novice user unless distro's do their part and package in the kernel support for it, but for the more savvy users and testers, it's going to help USB 3.0 mature very quickly and get the bugs worked out faster.
I dig it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28308807</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1244823900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>WHy do you need to indicate a female noun?</p></div><p>Because it is either shorter, or less confusing to write: "One of the actors (unidentified male member of the cats) had sex with one of the actresses (unidentified female member of the cast)", then: "One of the male actors (unidentified male member of the cast) had sex with one of the female actors (unidentified female member of the cast)", or "One of the actors (unidentified member of the cast) had sex with another one of the actors (unidentified member of the cast)". As you can see that last sentence tends to be interpreted significantly differently than the first. <br>
Second a princess was not inferior to a prince because the title was different, but because that society considered females inferior to males. Additionally, I know of no mythological pantheon where gods were inherently more powerful than goddesses.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WHy do you need to indicate a female noun ? Because it is either shorter , or less confusing to write : " One of the actors ( unidentified male member of the cats ) had sex with one of the actresses ( unidentified female member of the cast ) " , then : " One of the male actors ( unidentified male member of the cast ) had sex with one of the female actors ( unidentified female member of the cast ) " , or " One of the actors ( unidentified member of the cast ) had sex with another one of the actors ( unidentified member of the cast ) " .
As you can see that last sentence tends to be interpreted significantly differently than the first .
Second a princess was not inferior to a prince because the title was different , but because that society considered females inferior to males .
Additionally , I know of no mythological pantheon where gods were inherently more powerful than goddesses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHy do you need to indicate a female noun?Because it is either shorter, or less confusing to write: "One of the actors (unidentified male member of the cats) had sex with one of the actresses (unidentified female member of the cast)", then: "One of the male actors (unidentified male member of the cast) had sex with one of the female actors (unidentified female member of the cast)", or "One of the actors (unidentified member of the cast) had sex with another one of the actors (unidentified member of the cast)".
As you can see that last sentence tends to be interpreted significantly differently than the first.
Second a princess was not inferior to a prince because the title was different, but because that society considered females inferior to males.
Additionally, I know of no mythological pantheon where gods were inherently more powerful than goddesses.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301043</id>
	<title>Too bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244717580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That they'll break 50 other things adding USB 3.0 support. Probably in the final -rc, just to make sure they don't get fixed before the "release".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That they 'll break 50 other things adding USB 3.0 support .
Probably in the final -rc , just to make sure they do n't get fixed before the " release " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That they'll break 50 other things adding USB 3.0 support.
Probably in the final -rc, just to make sure they don't get fixed before the "release".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301565</id>
	<title>The worst part about this naming scheme</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244719680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This naming scheme invites shady marketing. You know we're going to see USB3.0 mice. They'll be USB3.0 alright, just implementing the low-speed part of the spec. It doesn't matter in case of mice, but users will not expect USB3.0 external hard disks to just implement "hi-speed", yet we will see this kind of up-labeling again: "USB3.0 Hi-Speed."</p><p>(The Superspeed logo does not have SS in it - that would have been a major marketing faux-pas.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This naming scheme invites shady marketing .
You know we 're going to see USB3.0 mice .
They 'll be USB3.0 alright , just implementing the low-speed part of the spec .
It does n't matter in case of mice , but users will not expect USB3.0 external hard disks to just implement " hi-speed " , yet we will see this kind of up-labeling again : " USB3.0 Hi-Speed .
" ( The Superspeed logo does not have SS in it - that would have been a major marketing faux-pas .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This naming scheme invites shady marketing.
You know we're going to see USB3.0 mice.
They'll be USB3.0 alright, just implementing the low-speed part of the spec.
It doesn't matter in case of mice, but users will not expect USB3.0 external hard disks to just implement "hi-speed", yet we will see this kind of up-labeling again: "USB3.0 Hi-Speed.
"(The Superspeed logo does not have SS in it - that would have been a major marketing faux-pas.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301451</id>
	<title>i won't be touching it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244719140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>sorry, i'm heterosexual. i can't use linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>sorry , i 'm heterosexual .
i ca n't use linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sorry, i'm heterosexual.
i can't use linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301419</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Reality Master 201</author>
	<datestamp>1244719020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek.</p></div></blockquote><p>Why exactly?  Although not productive anymore, the -ess morpheme is used in English words like actress to indicate a female noun.</p><p>Why does her choice of neologism mean she's a "sub geek?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek.Why exactly ?
Although not productive anymore , the -ess morpheme is used in English words like actress to indicate a female noun.Why does her choice of neologism mean she 's a " sub geek ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geekess would mean you are just a sub geek.Why exactly?
Although not productive anymore, the -ess morpheme is used in English words like actress to indicate a female noun.Why does her choice of neologism mean she's a "sub geek?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301559</id>
	<title>Re:Any USB 3.0 hardware?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244719620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Devices, I would be more concerned about finding a hardware adaptor to install into your computer first.  The devices come after you have something you can plug them into.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Devices , I would be more concerned about finding a hardware adaptor to install into your computer first .
The devices come after you have something you can plug them into .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Devices, I would be more concerned about finding a hardware adaptor to install into your computer first.
The devices come after you have something you can plug them into.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301103</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119</id>
	<title>Poor naming</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1244717820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it, and the icon has a matching "SS"</p><p>Who keeps on doing this!! Being a relative term, you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.<br>Ditto for fast ethernet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase " superspeed " on it , and the icon has a matching " SS " Who keeps on doing this ! !
Being a relative term , you 'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.Ditto for fast ethernet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The official USB 3 logo has the phrase "superspeed" on it, and the icon has a matching "SS"Who keeps on doing this!!
Being a relative term, you'll be up to ludicrous speed by USB 5.Ditto for fast ethernet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301285</id>
	<title>Re:The word 'Geek' is gender neutral</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244718480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe you are thinking of the word, "Actress".  Try to pick better examples next time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe you are thinking of the word , " Actress " .
Try to pick better examples next time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe you are thinking of the word, "Actress".
Try to pick better examples next time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28303835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28308807
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28309977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301457
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28337575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302229
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301241
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28337741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28313401
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302057
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28304867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28304783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302739
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301103
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28303301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28309259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301105
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301199
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301001
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28307051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305749
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_214240_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306953
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301559
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302057
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302635
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306429
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302271
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301105
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302739
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28304867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306997
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302717
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301765
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302247
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28309977
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302229
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28303835
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302831
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301381
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28307051
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301417
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28306345
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301117
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301313
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301419
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302569
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28337741
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28308807
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28309259
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28313401
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301457
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301269
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305407
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301075
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301013
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28337575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301645
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301599
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28304783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28303301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301565
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302471
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_214240.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28301383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28302767
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_214240.28305049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
