<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_11_1635204</id>
	<title>Junior-Sized Supernova Discovered By New York Teen</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1244739060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://spacefellowship.com/" rel="nofollow">Matt\_dk</a> writes <i>"In November 2008, Caroline Moore, a 14-year-old student from upstate New York, <a href="http://spacefellowship.com/News/?p=9017">discovered a supernova in a nearby galaxy</a>, making her the youngest person ever to do so. Additional observations determined that the object, called SN 2008ha, is a new type of stellar explosion, 1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova. Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Matt \ _dk writes " In November 2008 , Caroline Moore , a 14-year-old student from upstate New York , discovered a supernova in a nearby galaxy , making her the youngest person ever to do so .
Additional observations determined that the object , called SN 2008ha , is a new type of stellar explosion , 1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova .
Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Matt\_dk writes "In November 2008, Caroline Moore, a 14-year-old student from upstate New York, discovered a supernova in a nearby galaxy, making her the youngest person ever to do so.
Additional observations determined that the object, called SN 2008ha, is a new type of stellar explosion, 1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova.
Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296933</id>
	<title>Re:No light pollution there</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1244746380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It seems like this kid didn't have to worry about light pollution.</p></div><p>She didn't have to worry about heavy pollution either!</p><p>(cricket noises)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like this kid did n't have to worry about light pollution.She did n't have to worry about heavy pollution either !
( cricket noises )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like this kid didn't have to worry about light pollution.She didn't have to worry about heavy pollution either!
(cricket noises)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28300493</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>Cytotoxic</author>
	<datestamp>1244715480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pet Peeve Alert:</p><p>Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?</p></div><p>They can tell the difference between a Nova and a Supernova by the light curves.  The two distinctly different events have different brightening curves as the explosion proceeds, so they can tell which one it is no matter how far away or how bright or dim, as long as they catch it early enough in the process.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pet Peeve Alert : Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA ? They can tell the difference between a Nova and a Supernova by the light curves .
The two distinctly different events have different brightening curves as the explosion proceeds , so they can tell which one it is no matter how far away or how bright or dim , as long as they catch it early enough in the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pet Peeve Alert:Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?They can tell the difference between a Nova and a Supernova by the light curves.
The two distinctly different events have different brightening curves as the explosion proceeds, so they can tell which one it is no matter how far away or how bright or dim, as long as they catch it early enough in the process.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297697</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244748900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it kind of a sad statement on Slashdot that stupidity like this gets modded up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it kind of a sad statement on Slashdot that stupidity like this gets modded up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it kind of a sad statement on Slashdot that stupidity like this gets modded up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1244749380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> There's small chance of seeing even the moon, let alone the milkyway [cosmosmagazine.com] in any major US city.</p></div><p>Huh?  Which city have you been to where the ambient light pollution is brighter than the moon?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's small chance of seeing even the moon , let alone the milkyway [ cosmosmagazine.com ] in any major US city.Huh ?
Which city have you been to where the ambient light pollution is brighter than the moon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> There's small chance of seeing even the moon, let alone the milkyway [cosmosmagazine.com] in any major US city.Huh?
Which city have you been to where the ambient light pollution is brighter than the moon?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28301989</id>
	<title>Re:Sky coverage + Observing Time = Discoveries</title>
	<author>fletchzip</author>
	<datestamp>1244721660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's interesting, the story is far less compelling if it turns out that Caroline works with a parent or other adult and has been credited on this discovery because her mentor(s) let her file the paperwork.</p><p>We might see a batch of recording breaking discoveries as astronomers let their kids do the reporting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's interesting , the story is far less compelling if it turns out that Caroline works with a parent or other adult and has been credited on this discovery because her mentor ( s ) let her file the paperwork.We might see a batch of recording breaking discoveries as astronomers let their kids do the reporting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's interesting, the story is far less compelling if it turns out that Caroline works with a parent or other adult and has been credited on this discovery because her mentor(s) let her file the paperwork.We might see a batch of recording breaking discoveries as astronomers let their kids do the reporting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299151</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1244753940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It'll light up the night sky.</p></div></blockquote><p>Finally, the <b>flying car</b> promised by sci-fi is here! Just a few minor kinks to work out.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll light up the night sky.Finally , the flying car promised by sci-fi is here !
Just a few minor kinks to work out .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll light up the night sky.Finally, the flying car promised by sci-fi is here!
Just a few minor kinks to work out.
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28309087</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244825220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You music example fails, whats the difference between E sharp and F flat, or B sharp and C flat? Just to be a musical nazi (hey that sounds kinda fun).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You music example fails , whats the difference between E sharp and F flat , or B sharp and C flat ?
Just to be a musical nazi ( hey that sounds kinda fun ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You music example fails, whats the difference between E sharp and F flat, or B sharp and C flat?
Just to be a musical nazi (hey that sounds kinda fun).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299077</id>
	<title>Re:I can do one better</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1244753640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>She may be the youngest to find a supernova in another galaxy, but I'll do better yet by watching for the first supernova in our solar system. We'll see who's laughing then!</p></div></blockquote><p>Just power up the ol' LHC...</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>She may be the youngest to find a supernova in another galaxy , but I 'll do better yet by watching for the first supernova in our solar system .
We 'll see who 's laughing then ! Just power up the ol ' LHC.. .    </tokentext>
<sentencetext>She may be the youngest to find a supernova in another galaxy, but I'll do better yet by watching for the first supernova in our solar system.
We'll see who's laughing then!Just power up the ol' LHC...
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297129</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296479</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244744820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would much prefer a "How many Librarys of Congress can the explosion blow up" System.

So for example this Nova can blow up 1000 times more librarys of congress than a regular Nova.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would much prefer a " How many Librarys of Congress can the explosion blow up " System .
So for example this Nova can blow up 1000 times more librarys of congress than a regular Nova .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would much prefer a "How many Librarys of Congress can the explosion blow up" System.
So for example this Nova can blow up 1000 times more librarys of congress than a regular Nova.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296787</id>
	<title>Wow, that's pretty impressive!</title>
	<author>Nerdposeur</author>
	<datestamp>1244745900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...for a girl.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...for a girl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for a girl.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298049</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>sFurbo</author>
	<datestamp>1244750100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But they are different physical phenomenons, in the nova, only hydrogen burns, in a type Ia supernova, carbon burns (type Ia, Ic and II doesn't come from whote dwarves). So it makes sense to distinguish between powerful novae and weak supernovae, even if they can have the same luminosity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But they are different physical phenomenons , in the nova , only hydrogen burns , in a type Ia supernova , carbon burns ( type Ia , Ic and II does n't come from whote dwarves ) .
So it makes sense to distinguish between powerful novae and weak supernovae , even if they can have the same luminosity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they are different physical phenomenons, in the nova, only hydrogen burns, in a type Ia supernova, carbon burns (type Ia, Ic and II doesn't come from whote dwarves).
So it makes sense to distinguish between powerful novae and weak supernovae, even if they can have the same luminosity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297415</id>
	<title>Supernova Junior</title>
	<author>Absolut187</author>
	<datestamp>1244747760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Supernova Junior: now only $0.99 at Burger King</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Supernova Junior : now only $ 0.99 at Burger King</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Supernova Junior: now only $0.99 at Burger King</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298001</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244749920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might mean that novae and supernovae have pretty established theories about what they are and how they work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might mean that novae and supernovae have pretty established theories about what they are and how they work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might mean that novae and supernovae have pretty established theories about what they are and how they work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296431</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297783</id>
	<title>Is she sure...</title>
	<author>Drone69</author>
	<datestamp>1244749200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>it was a supernova exploding when she waslooking through her, undoubtly pink, telescope? Or was her next door neighbor, Mr. Reamus, 'exploding' near his bedroom window?</htmltext>
<tokenext>it was a supernova exploding when she waslooking through her , undoubtly pink , telescope ?
Or was her next door neighbor , Mr. Reamus , 'exploding ' near his bedroom window ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it was a supernova exploding when she waslooking through her, undoubtly pink, telescope?
Or was her next door neighbor, Mr. Reamus, 'exploding' near his bedroom window?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297473</id>
	<title>Kilonova, Meganova</title>
	<author>Captain Spam</author>
	<datestamp>1244748060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Additional observations determined that the object, called SN 2008ha, is a new type of stellar explosion, 1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova.</p></div><p>Well, I'm glad to see celestial phenomena follow the metric system, at least.  I propose we name this a kilonova and rename the supernova to a meganova.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Additional observations determined that the object , called SN 2008ha , is a new type of stellar explosion , 1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova.Well , I 'm glad to see celestial phenomena follow the metric system , at least .
I propose we name this a kilonova and rename the supernova to a meganova .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Additional observations determined that the object, called SN 2008ha, is a new type of stellar explosion, 1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova.Well, I'm glad to see celestial phenomena follow the metric system, at least.
I propose we name this a kilonova and rename the supernova to a meganova.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297317</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>niktemadur</author>
	<datestamp>1244747520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?</p><p>I'm mean seriously, a star exploding is a star exploding</p></div><p>When you've seen one redwood, you've seen 'em all, eh?<br>Here's a quote from the first article a Google search turned up:  <i>But if SN2008ha is a Type II supernova, where did the hydrogen go?  The answer might be mass loss.  Some stars are so massive and luminous that they lose their outer hydrogen layers in strong outflowing stellar winds.  And because they're so massive, their cores collapse into a black hole without transfering energy to the outer layers of the star, which may explain the low luminosity of the explosion.</i>  I've never read anything quite like this before.</p><p>The headline should have read along the lines of:  <b>Teen May Have Discovered Most Massive, Least Luminous Supernova</b></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA ? I 'm mean seriously , a star exploding is a star explodingWhen you 've seen one redwood , you 've seen 'em all , eh ? Here 's a quote from the first article a Google search turned up : But if SN2008ha is a Type II supernova , where did the hydrogen go ?
The answer might be mass loss .
Some stars are so massive and luminous that they lose their outer hydrogen layers in strong outflowing stellar winds .
And because they 're so massive , their cores collapse into a black hole without transfering energy to the outer layers of the star , which may explain the low luminosity of the explosion .
I 've never read anything quite like this before.The headline should have read along the lines of : Teen May Have Discovered Most Massive , Least Luminous Supernova</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?I'm mean seriously, a star exploding is a star explodingWhen you've seen one redwood, you've seen 'em all, eh?Here's a quote from the first article a Google search turned up:  But if SN2008ha is a Type II supernova, where did the hydrogen go?
The answer might be mass loss.
Some stars are so massive and luminous that they lose their outer hydrogen layers in strong outflowing stellar winds.
And because they're so massive, their cores collapse into a black hole without transfering energy to the outer layers of the star, which may explain the low luminosity of the explosion.
I've never read anything quite like this before.The headline should have read along the lines of:  Teen May Have Discovered Most Massive, Least Luminous Supernova
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296103</id>
	<title>supernova vs nova</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>supernova:nova = 1000000:1<br><br>And things between wasn't discovered?<br><br>The universe is wonderful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>supernova : nova = 1000000 : 1And things between was n't discovered ? The universe is wonderful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>supernova:nova = 1000000:1And things between wasn't discovered?The universe is wonderful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</id>
	<title>Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244744160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pet Peeve Alert:</p><p>Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?</p><p>I'm mean seriously, a star exploding is a star exploding. Mario or Super Mario. He's still a fat plumber who eats shrooms...</p><p>I bet if the highly paid scientists found it they'd be touting the "Strongest NOVA ever see discovered" where as some plucky kid finds it they're like "umm weakest Super nova ever...."</p><p>Word play is fun...</p><p>It is almost like asking "Is it an A- or a B+" or the musical types the whole sharp flat deal...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pet Peeve Alert : Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA ? I 'm mean seriously , a star exploding is a star exploding .
Mario or Super Mario .
He 's still a fat plumber who eats shrooms...I bet if the highly paid scientists found it they 'd be touting the " Strongest NOVA ever see discovered " where as some plucky kid finds it they 're like " umm weakest Super nova ever.... " Word play is fun...It is almost like asking " Is it an A- or a B + " or the musical types the whole sharp flat deal.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pet Peeve Alert:Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?I'm mean seriously, a star exploding is a star exploding.
Mario or Super Mario.
He's still a fat plumber who eats shrooms...I bet if the highly paid scientists found it they'd be touting the "Strongest NOVA ever see discovered" where as some plucky kid finds it they're like "umm weakest Super nova ever...."Word play is fun...It is almost like asking "Is it an A- or a B+" or the musical types the whole sharp flat deal...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</id>
	<title>Statement on Society</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1244744040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"If a normal supernova is a nuclear bomb, then SN 2008ha is a bunker buster..."<br> <br>
I find it kind of a sad statement on society that a scientist finds a comparison to weapons of war to be the best way to describe an event to people. It's a good analogy because it explains the situation well but it says a lot about society that that's the analogy-of-choice...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" If a normal supernova is a nuclear bomb , then SN 2008ha is a bunker buster... " I find it kind of a sad statement on society that a scientist finds a comparison to weapons of war to be the best way to describe an event to people .
It 's a good analogy because it explains the situation well but it says a lot about society that that 's the analogy-of-choice.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If a normal supernova is a nuclear bomb, then SN 2008ha is a bunker buster..." 
I find it kind of a sad statement on society that a scientist finds a comparison to weapons of war to be the best way to describe an event to people.
It's a good analogy because it explains the situation well but it says a lot about society that that's the analogy-of-choice...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945</id>
	<title>If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>GreatAntibob</author>
	<datestamp>1244742840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It'll light up the night sky.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'll light up the night sky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'll light up the night sky.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296257</id>
	<title>It goes both ways!</title>
	<author>dword</author>
	<datestamp>1244743980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen.</p></div><p>Or the strongest nova..</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen.Or the strongest nova. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen.Or the strongest nova..
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296041</id>
	<title>Hanz and Franz are here to *CLAP* PAHMP U AHP!</title>
	<author>Chas</author>
	<datestamp>1244743200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Caroline!  You have a flabby little girly supernova!</p><p>Yah!  That's so weak!</p><p>Sorry, it just the duality of being the first to find something being classified as sub-par is funny in a schadenfreude-kinda way.</p><p>Still, I think it's great someone this young was able to participate and actually was able to contribute something like this to science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Caroline !
You have a flabby little girly supernova ! Yah !
That 's so weak ! Sorry , it just the duality of being the first to find something being classified as sub-par is funny in a schadenfreude-kinda way.Still , I think it 's great someone this young was able to participate and actually was able to contribute something like this to science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caroline!
You have a flabby little girly supernova!Yah!
That's so weak!Sorry, it just the duality of being the first to find something being classified as sub-par is funny in a schadenfreude-kinda way.Still, I think it's great someone this young was able to participate and actually was able to contribute something like this to science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244747280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A note on geography: upstate New York <i> <b>is not</b> </i> NYC.  It's the rest of the state, some of it is far enough away from the <a href="http://www.darksky.org/" title="darksky.org">light polution</a> [darksky.org] that there is a chance see stars.  There's small chance of seeing even the moon, let alone <a href="http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/2797/one-fifth-us-have-lost-sight-milky-way" title="cosmosmagazine.com">the milkyway</a> [cosmosmagazine.com] in any major US city.  </p><p>
It's a shame.  There's no good reason we have to spend good money shining light up into the sky, rather than keeping it on the ground where we paid for it to be.  In a lot of areas a good case could be made to put the streetlights on timers and cut out after 11pm or midnight.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A note on geography : upstate New York is not NYC .
It 's the rest of the state , some of it is far enough away from the light polution [ darksky.org ] that there is a chance see stars .
There 's small chance of seeing even the moon , let alone the milkyway [ cosmosmagazine.com ] in any major US city .
It 's a shame .
There 's no good reason we have to spend good money shining light up into the sky , rather than keeping it on the ground where we paid for it to be .
In a lot of areas a good case could be made to put the streetlights on timers and cut out after 11pm or midnight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A note on geography: upstate New York  is not  NYC.
It's the rest of the state, some of it is far enough away from the light polution [darksky.org] that there is a chance see stars.
There's small chance of seeing even the moon, let alone the milkyway [cosmosmagazine.com] in any major US city.
It's a shame.
There's no good reason we have to spend good money shining light up into the sky, rather than keeping it on the ground where we paid for it to be.
In a lot of areas a good case could be made to put the streetlights on timers and cut out after 11pm or midnight.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297339</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>Deadstick</author>
	<datestamp>1244747580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>You wouldn't say "alittle", would you?</i> <p>
Give it another year.</p><p>
rj</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You would n't say " alittle " , would you ?
Give it another year .
rj</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You wouldn't say "alittle", would you?
Give it another year.
rj</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296579</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296321</id>
	<title>Re:No light pollution there</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244744220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Light had nothing to do with this. She's just another New York Jew using a <a href="http://img510.imageshack.us/i/smelloscope4963200rk4.png/" title="imageshack.us" rel="nofollow">smelloscope</a> [imageshack.us] in conjunction with her <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hornbill" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">hornbill</a> [wikipedia.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Light had nothing to do with this .
She 's just another New York Jew using a smelloscope [ imageshack.us ] in conjunction with her hornbill [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Light had nothing to do with this.
She's just another New York Jew using a smelloscope [imageshack.us] in conjunction with her hornbill [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297627</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>GreatAntibob</author>
	<datestamp>1244748600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, no love for the Futurama reference.  Ok.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , no love for the Futurama reference .
Ok .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, no love for the Futurama reference.
Ok.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298793</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1244752800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Had the fuel line nicked by the fan blade on my '72 RS Nova. Happened just as I pulled up to a 7-11. All this white mist/smoke came out from under the hood, I turned off the car, got out and opened up the hood.</p><p>Whoosh!</p><p>Nothing like nice cloud of fuel suddenly igniting. It burned itself out but I was enough to fry my eye brows/eye lashes.</p><p>So yeah, Nova's can be kinda' bright. Not so much the drivers, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Had the fuel line nicked by the fan blade on my '72 RS Nova .
Happened just as I pulled up to a 7-11 .
All this white mist/smoke came out from under the hood , I turned off the car , got out and opened up the hood.Whoosh ! Nothing like nice cloud of fuel suddenly igniting .
It burned itself out but I was enough to fry my eye brows/eye lashes.So yeah , Nova 's can be kinda ' bright .
Not so much the drivers , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had the fuel line nicked by the fan blade on my '72 RS Nova.
Happened just as I pulled up to a 7-11.
All this white mist/smoke came out from under the hood, I turned off the car, got out and opened up the hood.Whoosh!Nothing like nice cloud of fuel suddenly igniting.
It burned itself out but I was enough to fry my eye brows/eye lashes.So yeah, Nova's can be kinda' bright.
Not so much the drivers, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297571</id>
	<title>Re:Everything is relative</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1244748420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed; calling this the "weakest supernova ever seen" is like giving out an award for the "world's tallest midget".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed ; calling this the " weakest supernova ever seen " is like giving out an award for the " world 's tallest midget " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed; calling this the "weakest supernova ever seen" is like giving out an award for the "world's tallest midget".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296595</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296427</id>
	<title>Re:Neither Nova nor Supernova</title>
	<author>oodaloop</author>
	<datestamp>1244744520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's no supernova...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's no supernova.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's no supernova...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171</id>
	<title>Neither Nova nor Supernova</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is actually the first observed instance of a new class of objects... planets destroyed by Darth Vader's Death Star.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is actually the first observed instance of a new class of objects... planets destroyed by Darth Vader 's Death Star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is actually the first observed instance of a new class of objects... planets destroyed by Darth Vader's Death Star.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297889</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>SlashDev</author>
	<datestamp>1244749620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I disagree with your statement. A Supernova is the violent death of a star, a Nova is the sudden brightness of a star caused by a sudden temperature rise, the star itself doesn't die. At one point in history, Supernovas were thought to be brighter Novas (which is why it was name SuperNova), but that was proven to be wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree with your statement .
A Supernova is the violent death of a star , a Nova is the sudden brightness of a star caused by a sudden temperature rise , the star itself does n't die .
At one point in history , Supernovas were thought to be brighter Novas ( which is why it was name SuperNova ) , but that was proven to be wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree with your statement.
A Supernova is the violent death of a star, a Nova is the sudden brightness of a star caused by a sudden temperature rise, the star itself doesn't die.
At one point in history, Supernovas were thought to be brighter Novas (which is why it was name SuperNova), but that was proven to be wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296301</id>
	<title>Re:No light pollution there</title>
	<author>bhagwad</author>
	<datestamp>1244744100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, that's surprising. I wonder how she was able to do that. Was she in a really dark area, or did she go out on a trip to stargaze? I know you can't see jackshit when you're surrounded by light no matter what telescope you're using.

<br>Also, I'd like to know whether she actually SAW the transition happen, or did she notice something that wasn't there a few days ago? And then when she knew that something was different, did she call someone? Tell the papers? Tell her parents? (who must also need to know something about astronomy and give a shit).
<br>
Basically how did all this happen exactly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , that 's surprising .
I wonder how she was able to do that .
Was she in a really dark area , or did she go out on a trip to stargaze ?
I know you ca n't see jackshit when you 're surrounded by light no matter what telescope you 're using .
Also , I 'd like to know whether she actually SAW the transition happen , or did she notice something that was n't there a few days ago ?
And then when she knew that something was different , did she call someone ?
Tell the papers ?
Tell her parents ?
( who must also need to know something about astronomy and give a shit ) .
Basically how did all this happen exactly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, that's surprising.
I wonder how she was able to do that.
Was she in a really dark area, or did she go out on a trip to stargaze?
I know you can't see jackshit when you're surrounded by light no matter what telescope you're using.
Also, I'd like to know whether she actually SAW the transition happen, or did she notice something that wasn't there a few days ago?
And then when she knew that something was different, did she call someone?
Tell the papers?
Tell her parents?
(who must also need to know something about astronomy and give a shit).
Basically how did all this happen exactly?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297469</id>
	<title>Re:No light pollution there</title>
	<author>spiffmastercow</author>
	<datestamp>1244748000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's because it wasn't in the milky way!  The post you linked to says nothing about OTHER galaxies!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because it was n't in the milky way !
The post you linked to says nothing about OTHER galaxies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because it wasn't in the milky way!
The post you linked to says nothing about OTHER galaxies!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219</id>
	<title>Sky coverage + Observing Time = Discoveries</title>
	<author>AaronParsons</author>
	<datestamp>1244743860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The cool thing is that in astronomy, we're still miles from having full sky coverage 24/7.  This means that even if you have a (relatively) small telescope, you can still see things the big ones can't just by looking somewhere no one else is at a particular time.
<br> <br>
I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it.  She must have been with someone who really knew that the "new star" she saw there wasn't supposed to be there, and that person deserves some credit, too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The cool thing is that in astronomy , we 're still miles from having full sky coverage 24/7 .
This means that even if you have a ( relatively ) small telescope , you can still see things the big ones ca n't just by looking somewhere no one else is at a particular time .
I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it .
She must have been with someone who really knew that the " new star " she saw there was n't supposed to be there , and that person deserves some credit , too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cool thing is that in astronomy, we're still miles from having full sky coverage 24/7.
This means that even if you have a (relatively) small telescope, you can still see things the big ones can't just by looking somewhere no one else is at a particular time.
I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it.
She must have been with someone who really knew that the "new star" she saw there wasn't supposed to be there, and that person deserves some credit, too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28306913</id>
	<title>Re:Sky coverage + Observing Time = Discoveries</title>
	<author>Mjec</author>
	<datestamp>1244815740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I believe they find a supernova on 1 image out of 9000</p></div><p>You mean she looked at OVER 9000 IMAGES?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe they find a supernova on 1 image out of 9000You mean she looked at OVER 9000 IMAGES ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe they find a supernova on 1 image out of 9000You mean she looked at OVER 9000 IMAGES?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28302077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28324107</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>SL Baur</author>
	<datestamp>1244906160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Which city have you been to where the ambient light pollution is brighter than the moon?</p></div><p>Central Tokyo comes pretty close.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Which city have you been to where the ambient light pollution is brighter than the moon ? Central Tokyo comes pretty close .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which city have you been to where the ambient light pollution is brighter than the moon?Central Tokyo comes pretty close.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296913</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>kindbud</author>
	<datestamp>1244746320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A supernova entails core collapse and results in the destruction of the star.  A nova is an explosion occurring in the upper level of a star's atmosphere and does not destroy the star.  Novas recur in a more or less cyclic fashion, supernovas never recur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A supernova entails core collapse and results in the destruction of the star .
A nova is an explosion occurring in the upper level of a star 's atmosphere and does not destroy the star .
Novas recur in a more or less cyclic fashion , supernovas never recur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A supernova entails core collapse and results in the destruction of the star.
A nova is an explosion occurring in the upper level of a star's atmosphere and does not destroy the star.
Novas recur in a more or less cyclic fashion, supernovas never recur.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296431</id>
	<title>Awesome</title>
	<author>pluther</author>
	<datestamp>1244744580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the article, and many commenters so far have remarked on the irony of the youngest amateur astronomer finding the smallest supernova, it's pretty remarkable that what she actually found was a <i>completely new astronomical phenomenon</i>.</p><p>From what I understand, the mechanisms behind novae and supernovae are pretty well understood.  But this is something new altogether.  According to the article, they're not even sure it's an actual supernova.  Nobody has ever seen this exact behavior in a star before.  We're going to learn a lot from this, and it would be pretty damn remarkable even if the discoverer hadn't been a 14 year old amateur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the article , and many commenters so far have remarked on the irony of the youngest amateur astronomer finding the smallest supernova , it 's pretty remarkable that what she actually found was a completely new astronomical phenomenon.From what I understand , the mechanisms behind novae and supernovae are pretty well understood .
But this is something new altogether .
According to the article , they 're not even sure it 's an actual supernova .
Nobody has ever seen this exact behavior in a star before .
We 're going to learn a lot from this , and it would be pretty damn remarkable even if the discoverer had n't been a 14 year old amateur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the article, and many commenters so far have remarked on the irony of the youngest amateur astronomer finding the smallest supernova, it's pretty remarkable that what she actually found was a completely new astronomical phenomenon.From what I understand, the mechanisms behind novae and supernovae are pretty well understood.
But this is something new altogether.
According to the article, they're not even sure it's an actual supernova.
Nobody has ever seen this exact behavior in a star before.
We're going to learn a lot from this, and it would be pretty damn remarkable even if the discoverer hadn't been a 14 year old amateur.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296567</id>
	<title>Re:Neither Nova nor Supernova</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1244745120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just another planet firing up their LHC, nothing to see here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just another planet firing up their LHC , nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just another planet firing up their LHC, nothing to see here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299857</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>TheoMurpse</author>
	<datestamp>1244713320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed. Adirondack Park in upstate NY looks to be about 20\% of the entire state's surface area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
Adirondack Park in upstate NY looks to be about 20 \ % of the entire state 's surface area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
Adirondack Park in upstate NY looks to be about 20\% of the entire state's surface area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296245</id>
	<title>[transcript from Caroline's discovery]</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Welcome to McUniverse, would you like to try a black hole sundae?"
<br> <br>
"No thanks, could I just have a junior super nova salad, to go?"
<br> <br>
"Would you like to biggie size that?"
<br> <br>
"....."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Welcome to McUniverse , would you like to try a black hole sundae ?
" " No thanks , could I just have a junior super nova salad , to go ?
" " Would you like to biggie size that ?
" " ..... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Welcome to McUniverse, would you like to try a black hole sundae?
"
 
"No thanks, could I just have a junior super nova salad, to go?
"
 
"Would you like to biggie size that?
"
 
"....."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28301747</id>
	<title>Re:If it's anything like my old Chevy Nova...</title>
	<author>ArcadeNut</author>
	<datestamp>1244720640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Vegas?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Vegas ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vegas?
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>k.a.f.</author>
	<datestamp>1244747040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who modded this insightful?
<p>
An A- is quite distinct from a B+. Neighbouring, but different. An f sharp is quite different from a g flat in function, and only sounds identical if your hearing is mediocre. A supernova and a nova work on quite different lines, and in fact there are several types of each. And please, resist the temptation of tagging this as "mininova"... it's most definitely either a maxinova, or else a mini-supernova.
</p><p>
[obligatory lawn reference]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who modded this insightful ?
An A- is quite distinct from a B + .
Neighbouring , but different .
An f sharp is quite different from a g flat in function , and only sounds identical if your hearing is mediocre .
A supernova and a nova work on quite different lines , and in fact there are several types of each .
And please , resist the temptation of tagging this as " mininova " ... it 's most definitely either a maxinova , or else a mini-supernova .
[ obligatory lawn reference ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who modded this insightful?
An A- is quite distinct from a B+.
Neighbouring, but different.
An f sharp is quite different from a g flat in function, and only sounds identical if your hearing is mediocre.
A supernova and a nova work on quite different lines, and in fact there are several types of each.
And please, resist the temptation of tagging this as "mininova"... it's most definitely either a maxinova, or else a mini-supernova.
[obligatory lawn reference]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28309887</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>the\_other\_chewey</author>
	<datestamp>1244828220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It is almost like asking "Is it an A- or a B+" or the musical types the whole sharp flat deal...</p></div><p>
n-sharp and (n+1)-flat are only the same in some quite specific tunings. Admittedly, those are the most widely used<br>
nowadays, but by no means the only ones. Have a look at musical tuning theories before you make fun of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is almost like asking " Is it an A- or a B + " or the musical types the whole sharp flat deal.. . n-sharp and ( n + 1 ) -flat are only the same in some quite specific tunings .
Admittedly , those are the most widely used nowadays , but by no means the only ones .
Have a look at musical tuning theories before you make fun of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is almost like asking "Is it an A- or a B+" or the musical types the whole sharp flat deal...
n-sharp and (n+1)-flat are only the same in some quite specific tunings.
Admittedly, those are the most widely used
nowadays, but by no means the only ones.
Have a look at musical tuning theories before you make fun of them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033</id>
	<title>No light pollution there</title>
	<author>the\_arrow</author>
	<datestamp>1244743200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems like this kid didn't have to worry about <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/09/151223" title="slashdot.org">light pollution</a> [slashdot.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like this kid did n't have to worry about light pollution [ slashdot.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like this kid didn't have to worry about light pollution [slashdot.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297533</id>
	<title>New astronomic event label:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244748300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aboveaveragenova.   or Supernova-Sidekick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aboveaveragenova .
or Supernova-Sidekick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aboveaveragenova.
or Supernova-Sidekick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297611</id>
	<title>Re:Sky coverage + Observing Time = Discoveries</title>
	<author>cwills</author>
	<datestamp>1244748540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Within the amateur and professional astronomy circles there is a fairly wide known and standard method of reporting astronomical stuff (see <a href="http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html" title="harvard.edu">http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html</a> [harvard.edu] )
</p><p>
Many deepsky objects (galaxies, nebulae, star clusters) become "well known friends" by amateur astronomers.  For example, when ever I'm out observing I will usually do a quick peek at M13 in Hercules, M81, M82 in Ursa Major, or parts of the Veil nebulae in Cygnus when they are visible (just to name a few).  I suspect if there was a new supernova in M81 or M82, there is a chance that I would "catch it" by noticing something "odd" (think of it like noticing a new pimple on a friends face).  Once something "odd" is noticed, the next step would be to check recent and older photographs of that region.  If it's suspected to be "new" then the information is submitted to the IAU Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams according to the instructions listed above. Usually the next step that happens is that the pros might get involved to verify the finding.
</p><p>There are "rules" on who discovers the object, based mainly on the chronological time that IAU receives the information.  Co-discovery of the same object can happen, usually the cut-off is when the IAU sends out the notice that there is a potential new object.  In other words, say that I notice a new brightness in M81, I record the information and at 10:15 GMT send it in to the IAU CBAT.  Someone else also notices the same object and sends in the information at 10:30 GMT.  There is a CBAT notice sent out to subscribers at 10:35 GMT.  Any observation after 10:35 would not be considered a discovery.
</p><p>BTW if you go out to <a href="http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/lists/RecentSupernovae.html" title="harvard.edu">http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/lists/RecentSupernovae.html</a> [harvard.edu] and look for 2008ha, you will find that there where 2 other people who are listed as discoverers of the same supernova, and it looks like Caroline Moore has been "working" with the same folks because she is also listed with at least one of them on two other recent supernova discoveries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Within the amateur and professional astronomy circles there is a fairly wide known and standard method of reporting astronomical stuff ( see http : //www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html [ harvard.edu ] ) Many deepsky objects ( galaxies , nebulae , star clusters ) become " well known friends " by amateur astronomers .
For example , when ever I 'm out observing I will usually do a quick peek at M13 in Hercules , M81 , M82 in Ursa Major , or parts of the Veil nebulae in Cygnus when they are visible ( just to name a few ) .
I suspect if there was a new supernova in M81 or M82 , there is a chance that I would " catch it " by noticing something " odd " ( think of it like noticing a new pimple on a friends face ) .
Once something " odd " is noticed , the next step would be to check recent and older photographs of that region .
If it 's suspected to be " new " then the information is submitted to the IAU Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams according to the instructions listed above .
Usually the next step that happens is that the pros might get involved to verify the finding .
There are " rules " on who discovers the object , based mainly on the chronological time that IAU receives the information .
Co-discovery of the same object can happen , usually the cut-off is when the IAU sends out the notice that there is a potential new object .
In other words , say that I notice a new brightness in M81 , I record the information and at 10 : 15 GMT send it in to the IAU CBAT .
Someone else also notices the same object and sends in the information at 10 : 30 GMT .
There is a CBAT notice sent out to subscribers at 10 : 35 GMT .
Any observation after 10 : 35 would not be considered a discovery .
BTW if you go out to http : //www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/lists/RecentSupernovae.html [ harvard.edu ] and look for 2008ha , you will find that there where 2 other people who are listed as discoverers of the same supernova , and it looks like Caroline Moore has been " working " with the same folks because she is also listed with at least one of them on two other recent supernova discoveries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Within the amateur and professional astronomy circles there is a fairly wide known and standard method of reporting astronomical stuff (see http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/cbat.html [harvard.edu] )

Many deepsky objects (galaxies, nebulae, star clusters) become "well known friends" by amateur astronomers.
For example, when ever I'm out observing I will usually do a quick peek at M13 in Hercules, M81, M82 in Ursa Major, or parts of the Veil nebulae in Cygnus when they are visible (just to name a few).
I suspect if there was a new supernova in M81 or M82, there is a chance that I would "catch it" by noticing something "odd" (think of it like noticing a new pimple on a friends face).
Once something "odd" is noticed, the next step would be to check recent and older photographs of that region.
If it's suspected to be "new" then the information is submitted to the IAU Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams according to the instructions listed above.
Usually the next step that happens is that the pros might get involved to verify the finding.
There are "rules" on who discovers the object, based mainly on the chronological time that IAU receives the information.
Co-discovery of the same object can happen, usually the cut-off is when the IAU sends out the notice that there is a potential new object.
In other words, say that I notice a new brightness in M81, I record the information and at 10:15 GMT send it in to the IAU CBAT.
Someone else also notices the same object and sends in the information at 10:30 GMT.
There is a CBAT notice sent out to subscribers at 10:35 GMT.
Any observation after 10:35 would not be considered a discovery.
BTW if you go out to http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/lists/RecentSupernovae.html [harvard.edu] and look for 2008ha, you will find that there where 2 other people who are listed as discoverers of the same supernova, and it looks like Caroline Moore has been "working" with the same folks because she is also listed with at least one of them on two other recent supernova discoveries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297089</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1244746860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, the standard dumbing down units is how many football fields long or how many libraries of congress worth of information. Nuclear bombs? meh!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , the standard dumbing down units is how many football fields long or how many libraries of congress worth of information .
Nuclear bombs ?
meh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, the standard dumbing down units is how many football fields long or how many libraries of congress worth of information.
Nuclear bombs?
meh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28302077</id>
	<title>Re:Sky coverage + Observing Time = Discoveries</title>
	<author>Kentari</author>
	<datestamp>1244722200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed, she is working on Tim Puckett's search team. Tim Puckett is a very driven amateur supernova hunter who collaborates with a number of other observers, like Jack Newton, who is the other co-discoverer listed. They collect massive amounts of data each night with semi and full automatic telescopes Basically they don't have the time to sift through all of it. Hence they created a search team of amateurs looking through their data. Caroline was part of this search team. Tim Puckett and his team have discovered hundreds of supernovae so far and show no sign of stopping.</p><p>She didn't spent hours on end in the dark staring through a telescope. She didn't put up her own supernova search (which is more or less impossible for a 14yo, due to the huge financial step you have to take and the amount of time it takes). She spent hours looking through images generated by automatic telescopes. It is great that she had the dedication to go through it but it isn't very hard. If you go through enough data it is certain you will find a supernova (I believe they find a supernova on 1 image out of 9000). The hard part is setting up a telescope to scan the sky, calibrate each image and present it to you.</p><p>It does disservice to the "co-discoverers" to not mention them in the summary. Without them Caroline Moore likely wouldn't have had data to sift through. I don't know the exact story but the part of each discoverer is probably: Tim Puckett coordinates the supernova search program, Jack Newton made the discovery image and Caroline Moore noticed the supernova. </p><p>References:<br>
<a href="http://www.cometwatch.com/" title="cometwatch.com" rel="nofollow">Tim Puckett's website</a> [cometwatch.com] <br>
<a href="http://www.jacknewton.com/sn.htm" title="jacknewton.com" rel="nofollow">Jack Newton's website</a> [jacknewton.com] <br>
<a href="http://deer-pond-observatorie.wetpaint.com/page/The+story+about+SN2008ha" title="wetpaint.com" rel="nofollow">Caroline's story</a> [wetpaint.com]
</p><p>As a last note. The days of amateur supernova hunting are quite numbered. Two large professional telescopes with aim to provide close to 24 hour surveillance of the sky will come online in the comming years. LSST and PanStarrs will sweep the skies with large apertures, huge CCD camera's and an impressive field of view. When those projects are running amateurs will have to aim for the holes that aren't observed...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed , she is working on Tim Puckett 's search team .
Tim Puckett is a very driven amateur supernova hunter who collaborates with a number of other observers , like Jack Newton , who is the other co-discoverer listed .
They collect massive amounts of data each night with semi and full automatic telescopes Basically they do n't have the time to sift through all of it .
Hence they created a search team of amateurs looking through their data .
Caroline was part of this search team .
Tim Puckett and his team have discovered hundreds of supernovae so far and show no sign of stopping.She did n't spent hours on end in the dark staring through a telescope .
She did n't put up her own supernova search ( which is more or less impossible for a 14yo , due to the huge financial step you have to take and the amount of time it takes ) .
She spent hours looking through images generated by automatic telescopes .
It is great that she had the dedication to go through it but it is n't very hard .
If you go through enough data it is certain you will find a supernova ( I believe they find a supernova on 1 image out of 9000 ) .
The hard part is setting up a telescope to scan the sky , calibrate each image and present it to you.It does disservice to the " co-discoverers " to not mention them in the summary .
Without them Caroline Moore likely would n't have had data to sift through .
I do n't know the exact story but the part of each discoverer is probably : Tim Puckett coordinates the supernova search program , Jack Newton made the discovery image and Caroline Moore noticed the supernova .
References : Tim Puckett 's website [ cometwatch.com ] Jack Newton 's website [ jacknewton.com ] Caroline 's story [ wetpaint.com ] As a last note .
The days of amateur supernova hunting are quite numbered .
Two large professional telescopes with aim to provide close to 24 hour surveillance of the sky will come online in the comming years .
LSST and PanStarrs will sweep the skies with large apertures , huge CCD camera 's and an impressive field of view .
When those projects are running amateurs will have to aim for the holes that are n't observed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed, she is working on Tim Puckett's search team.
Tim Puckett is a very driven amateur supernova hunter who collaborates with a number of other observers, like Jack Newton, who is the other co-discoverer listed.
They collect massive amounts of data each night with semi and full automatic telescopes Basically they don't have the time to sift through all of it.
Hence they created a search team of amateurs looking through their data.
Caroline was part of this search team.
Tim Puckett and his team have discovered hundreds of supernovae so far and show no sign of stopping.She didn't spent hours on end in the dark staring through a telescope.
She didn't put up her own supernova search (which is more or less impossible for a 14yo, due to the huge financial step you have to take and the amount of time it takes).
She spent hours looking through images generated by automatic telescopes.
It is great that she had the dedication to go through it but it isn't very hard.
If you go through enough data it is certain you will find a supernova (I believe they find a supernova on 1 image out of 9000).
The hard part is setting up a telescope to scan the sky, calibrate each image and present it to you.It does disservice to the "co-discoverers" to not mention them in the summary.
Without them Caroline Moore likely wouldn't have had data to sift through.
I don't know the exact story but the part of each discoverer is probably: Tim Puckett coordinates the supernova search program, Jack Newton made the discovery image and Caroline Moore noticed the supernova.
References:
Tim Puckett's website [cometwatch.com] 
Jack Newton's website [jacknewton.com] 
Caroline's story [wetpaint.com]
As a last note.
The days of amateur supernova hunting are quite numbered.
Two large professional telescopes with aim to provide close to 24 hour surveillance of the sky will come online in the comming years.
LSST and PanStarrs will sweep the skies with large apertures, huge CCD camera's and an impressive field of view.
When those projects are running amateurs will have to aim for the holes that aren't observed...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297611</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28305813</id>
	<title>Criminal</title>
	<author>Chiindi</author>
	<datestamp>1244805660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who are this girls parents? why did they allow her to run wild in a neighboring galaxy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who are this girls parents ?
why did they allow her to run wild in a neighboring galaxy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who are this girls parents?
why did they allow her to run wild in a neighboring galaxy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296781</id>
	<title>Would that make it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...a mininova?  Do they have good torrents?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...a mininova ?
Do they have good torrents ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...a mininova?
Do they have good torrents?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296487</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>OglinTatas</author>
	<datestamp>1244744820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The analogy of choice is generally a car analogy.  In this case they eschewed that for one more relevant, the largest explosion most humans can imagine.  I suppose they could have chosen something like eruptions of mega volcanoes like Krakatoa, but even those are generally compared to nuclear bombs for scale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The analogy of choice is generally a car analogy .
In this case they eschewed that for one more relevant , the largest explosion most humans can imagine .
I suppose they could have chosen something like eruptions of mega volcanoes like Krakatoa , but even those are generally compared to nuclear bombs for scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The analogy of choice is generally a car analogy.
In this case they eschewed that for one more relevant, the largest explosion most humans can imagine.
I suppose they could have chosen something like eruptions of mega volcanoes like Krakatoa, but even those are generally compared to nuclear bombs for scale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296595</id>
	<title>Everything is relative</title>
	<author>BlackPignouf</author>
	<datestamp>1244745180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen</p></div></blockquote><p>With no clear boundary between nova and supernova, this could also be the strongest nova.<br>Just like Australia being the biggest island : if it were bigger, it would be a continent....</p><p>I hereby declare that I have the biggest weenie on earth. Anything bigger should be called a penis!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seenWith no clear boundary between nova and supernova , this could also be the strongest nova.Just like Australia being the biggest island : if it were bigger , it would be a continent....I hereby declare that I have the biggest weenie on earth .
Anything bigger should be called a penis !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seenWith no clear boundary between nova and supernova, this could also be the strongest nova.Just like Australia being the biggest island : if it were bigger, it would be a continent....I hereby declare that I have the biggest weenie on earth.
Anything bigger should be called a penis!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299265</id>
	<title>Intentionaly and with a computer, not a telescope</title>
	<author>juggledean</author>
	<datestamp>1244711220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hearing that a 16 year old had found a supernova she pronounced<a href="http://deer-pond-observatorie.wetpaint.com/page/The+story+about+SN2008ha" title="wetpaint.com" rel="nofollow"> <i>"I could beat her".</i> </a> [wetpaint.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hearing that a 16 year old had found a supernova she pronounced " I could beat her " .
[ wetpaint.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hearing that a 16 year old had found a supernova she pronounced "I could beat her".
[wetpaint.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299415</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1244711700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But doesn't the supernova's material often fall back inward, creating some kind of a smaller star, such as a neutron star or a black hole? Thus, something remains in either case. I remember reading that the diff between a nova and a supernova is that a super results in a black-hole, while a nova only results in a small star or a neutron star. Perhaps the theory of star blasts is still in progress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does n't the supernova 's material often fall back inward , creating some kind of a smaller star , such as a neutron star or a black hole ?
Thus , something remains in either case .
I remember reading that the diff between a nova and a supernova is that a super results in a black-hole , while a nova only results in a small star or a neutron star .
Perhaps the theory of star blasts is still in progress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But doesn't the supernova's material often fall back inward, creating some kind of a smaller star, such as a neutron star or a black hole?
Thus, something remains in either case.
I remember reading that the diff between a nova and a supernova is that a super results in a black-hole, while a nova only results in a small star or a neutron star.
Perhaps the theory of star blasts is still in progress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296281</id>
	<title>Re:Neither Nova nor Supernova</title>
	<author>Mikkeles</author>
	<datestamp>1244744100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No; that was in a galaxy, far, far away.</p><p>This was in a nearby galaxy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No ; that was in a galaxy , far , far away.This was in a nearby galaxy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No; that was in a galaxy, far, far away.This was in a nearby galaxy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297129</id>
	<title>I can do one better</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1244746980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>discovered a supernova in a nearby galaxy, making her the youngest person ever to do so</p></div><p>She may be the youngest to find a supernova in <i>another galaxy</i>, but I'll do better yet by watching for the first supernova in our <i>solar sytem</i>. We'll see who's laughing then!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>discovered a supernova in a nearby galaxy , making her the youngest person ever to do soShe may be the youngest to find a supernova in another galaxy , but I 'll do better yet by watching for the first supernova in our solar sytem .
We 'll see who 's laughing then !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>discovered a supernova in a nearby galaxy, making her the youngest person ever to do soShe may be the youngest to find a supernova in another galaxy, but I'll do better yet by watching for the first supernova in our solar sytem.
We'll see who's laughing then!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297643</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>Princeofcups</author>
	<datestamp>1244748660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pet Peeve Alert:</p><p>Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?</p><p>I'm mean seriously, a star exploding is a star exploding. </p></div><p>Nova and Super Nova are completely different phenomena.  It is confusing that they are both called Nova, but that's the name they were given when they were just lights in the sky, and we didn't have proper models for what we were looking at.</p><p>A nova is a white dwarf in a binary system that collects gas from the neighbor and occasionally blows it top.  A supernova is a huge star collapsing down to a neutron star and releasing a lot of energy in the process.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pet Peeve Alert : Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA ? I 'm mean seriously , a star exploding is a star exploding .
Nova and Super Nova are completely different phenomena .
It is confusing that they are both called Nova , but that 's the name they were given when they were just lights in the sky , and we did n't have proper models for what we were looking at.A nova is a white dwarf in a binary system that collects gas from the neighbor and occasionally blows it top .
A supernova is a huge star collapsing down to a neutron star and releasing a lot of energy in the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pet Peeve Alert:Weakest Supernova or STRONGEST NOVA?I'm mean seriously, a star exploding is a star exploding.
Nova and Super Nova are completely different phenomena.
It is confusing that they are both called Nova, but that's the name they were given when they were just lights in the sky, and we didn't have proper models for what we were looking at.A nova is a white dwarf in a binary system that collects gas from the neighbor and occasionally blows it top.
A supernova is a huge star collapsing down to a neutron star and releasing a lot of energy in the process.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296365</id>
	<title>Co(s)mic classification</title>
	<author>Utilitygeek</author>
	<datestamp>1244744340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's not quite a supernova, but more than a regular nova, does that make it a sidekick?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's not quite a supernova , but more than a regular nova , does that make it a sidekick ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's not quite a supernova, but more than a regular nova, does that make it a sidekick?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296579</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1244745120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK - how else would you make a close analogy to a massive nuclear explosion in space?  Maybe use something that is, I don't know - <i>similar</i>?  Oh, no, we can't have that, now everything is a sad commentary on society.  Sir, I think it says more about <b>your</b> outlook that you always look for ways to find fault with others and then cluck your tongue reproachfully.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK - how else would you make a close analogy to a massive nuclear explosion in space ?
Maybe use something that is , I do n't know - similar ?
Oh , no , we ca n't have that , now everything is a sad commentary on society .
Sir , I think it says more about your outlook that you always look for ways to find fault with others and then cluck your tongue reproachfully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK - how else would you make a close analogy to a massive nuclear explosion in space?
Maybe use something that is, I don't know - similar?
Oh, no, we can't have that, now everything is a sad commentary on society.
Sir, I think it says more about your outlook that you always look for ways to find fault with others and then cluck your tongue reproachfully.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28303217</id>
	<title>JJ</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244730600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your nova throws off light like a girl.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your nova throws off light like a girl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your nova throws off light like a girl.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28306287</id>
	<title>subjekt</title>
	<author>G0N70</author>
	<datestamp>1244810940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>WHAT DOES THE SCOUTER SAY ABOUT HIS POWERLEVEL???????????


"1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova"

ITS OVER... wait, what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>WHAT DOES THE SCOUTER SAY ABOUT HIS POWERLEVEL ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
" 1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova " ITS OVER... wait , what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHAT DOES THE SCOUTER SAY ABOUT HIS POWERLEVEL???????????
"1000 times more powerful than a nova but 1000 times less powerful than a supernova"

ITS OVER... wait, what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296031</id>
	<title>It's misquoted</title>
	<author>ErikTheRed</author>
	<datestamp>1244743140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen.</p></div></blockquote><p>What actually happened is that the astronomers were told that a 14-year-old child found a supernova that they'd all missed, and they groaned "Oh, that's weak!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen.What actually happened is that the astronomers were told that a 14-year-old child found a supernova that they 'd all missed , and they groaned " Oh , that 's weak !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Astronomers say that it may be the weakest supernova ever seen.What actually happened is that the astronomers were told that a 14-year-old child found a supernova that they'd all missed, and they groaned "Oh, that's weak!
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296109</id>
	<title>So the weakest supernova to date ...</title>
	<author>0racle</author>
	<datestamp>1244743440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... was discovered by the weakest supernova discoverer to date.<br> <br>Neat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... was discovered by the weakest supernova discoverer to date .
Neat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... was discovered by the weakest supernova discoverer to date.
Neat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296945</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1244746380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't discovering the weakest more impressive than the strongest?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't discovering the weakest more impressive than the strongest ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't discovering the weakest more impressive than the strongest?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28303619</id>
	<title>Perhaps he meant New Moon?</title>
	<author>Animaether</author>
	<datestamp>1244734560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's very difficult to see the New Moon (most of the illumination of the thing being from 'Earth Shine'), especially when there's any light pollution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's very difficult to see the New Moon ( most of the illumination of the thing being from 'Earth Shine ' ) , especially when there 's any light pollution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's very difficult to see the New Moon (most of the illumination of the thing being from 'Earth Shine'), especially when there's any light pollution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296823</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>themightythor</author>
	<datestamp>1244745960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was going to post that relating one type of explosion to another type is a good analogy, but was beaten to the punch.  What I will ask is why are you complaining about it when you yourself admit that the analogy is a good one?  Can you think of a better one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to post that relating one type of explosion to another type is a good analogy , but was beaten to the punch .
What I will ask is why are you complaining about it when you yourself admit that the analogy is a good one ?
Can you think of a better one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to post that relating one type of explosion to another type is a good analogy, but was beaten to the punch.
What I will ask is why are you complaining about it when you yourself admit that the analogy is a good one?
Can you think of a better one?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297221</id>
	<title>Sunohara</title>
	<author>Delicious Loli</author>
	<datestamp>1244747280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's right. The strongest girl discovering my supernova. That would be the strongest supernova.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's right .
The strongest girl discovering my supernova .
That would be the strongest supernova .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's right.
The strongest girl discovering my supernova.
That would be the strongest supernova.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297311</id>
	<title>Re:Sky coverage + Observing Time = Discoveries</title>
	<author>thedonger</author>
	<datestamp>1244747520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it. She must have been with someone who really knew that the "new star" she saw there wasn't supposed to be there, and that person deserves some credit, too!</p></div></blockquote><p>Could be a new take on the over-bearing parent forcing the child to achieve: "Caroline, you <em>will</em> take credit for this astronomical discovery or it is right to bed with no dessert for you! Do you understand me?...No, I don't care if your father dragged you out against your will. College admissions will eat this story up...What? Well I have news for you: You love astronomy and you <em>are</em> going to college!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it .
She must have been with someone who really knew that the " new star " she saw there was n't supposed to be there , and that person deserves some credit , too ! Could be a new take on the over-bearing parent forcing the child to achieve : " Caroline , you will take credit for this astronomical discovery or it is right to bed with no dessert for you !
Do you understand me ? ...No , I do n't care if your father dragged you out against your will .
College admissions will eat this story up...What ?
Well I have news for you : You love astronomy and you are going to college !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it.
She must have been with someone who really knew that the "new star" she saw there wasn't supposed to be there, and that person deserves some credit, too!Could be a new take on the over-bearing parent forcing the child to achieve: "Caroline, you will take credit for this astronomical discovery or it is right to bed with no dessert for you!
Do you understand me?...No, I don't care if your father dragged you out against your will.
College admissions will eat this story up...What?
Well I have news for you: You love astronomy and you are going to college!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296681</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's an explosion dumbass.</p><p>Your tiger wants more tofu.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an explosion dumbass.Your tiger wants more tofu .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an explosion dumbass.Your tiger wants more tofu.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296157</id>
	<title>She got a raw deal...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>She discovered it and they didn't even name it after her???  Sue, Caroline, sue!</htmltext>
<tokenext>She discovered it and they did n't even name it after her ? ? ?
Sue , Caroline , sue !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She discovered it and they didn't even name it after her???
Sue, Caroline, sue!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299099</id>
	<title>to make an important contribution to</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1244753700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>chemistry, physics, biochemistry, computer science, mathematics, etc.</p><p>you need to slave almost your whole life, be at the top of your mental game, have tons of education under your belt, and you need extremely expensive instruments (well, not math)</p><p>but to make an important contribution to astronomy, you just need to look up with a cheap introductory level hobbyist telescope available at walmart, and some passion</p><p>that's amazing</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>chemistry , physics , biochemistry , computer science , mathematics , etc.you need to slave almost your whole life , be at the top of your mental game , have tons of education under your belt , and you need extremely expensive instruments ( well , not math ) but to make an important contribution to astronomy , you just need to look up with a cheap introductory level hobbyist telescope available at walmart , and some passionthat 's amazing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>chemistry, physics, biochemistry, computer science, mathematics, etc.you need to slave almost your whole life, be at the top of your mental game, have tons of education under your belt, and you need extremely expensive instruments (well, not math)but to make an important contribution to astronomy, you just need to look up with a cheap introductory level hobbyist telescope available at walmart, and some passionthat's amazing</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28303029</id>
	<title>I propose calling it...</title>
	<author>jea6</author>
	<datestamp>1244728920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I propose calling it a giganova.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I propose calling it a giganova .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I propose calling it a giganova.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28300251</id>
	<title>Re:Sky coverage + Observing Time = Discoveries</title>
	<author>ortholattice</author>
	<datestamp>1244714700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it. She must have been with someone who really knew that the "new star" she saw there wasn't supposed to be there, and that person deserves some credit, too!</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

She shares the hobby with her dad.
There's some more on that part of the story, along with a picture
of her rig, here:

<a href="http://www.areavoices.com/astrobob/?blog=37663" title="areavoices.com">http://www.areavoices.com/astrobob/?blog=37663</a> [areavoices.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it .
She must have been with someone who really knew that the " new star " she saw there was n't supposed to be there , and that person deserves some credit , too !
She shares the hobby with her dad .
There 's some more on that part of the story , along with a picture of her rig , here : http : //www.areavoices.com/astrobob/ ? blog = 37663 [ areavoices.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish they described how the discovered got funneled up to the supernova scientists on the paper published on it.
She must have been with someone who really knew that the "new star" she saw there wasn't supposed to be there, and that person deserves some credit, too!
She shares the hobby with her dad.
There's some more on that part of the story, along with a picture
of her rig, here:

http://www.areavoices.com/astrobob/?blog=37663 [areavoices.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296287</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1244744100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>North Korea Conducts New Nuke Test
<br> <br>
From TFA:<i>The peculiar object effectively bridged the gap between a nova (a nuclear explosion on the surface of an old, compact star called a white dwarf) and a type Ia supernova (the destructive death of a white dwarf caused by a runaway nuclear reaction starting deep in the star). SN 2008ha likely was a failed supernova where the explosion was unable to destroy the entire star. &#226;oeIf a normal supernova is a nuclear bomb, then SN 2008ha is a bunker buster,&#226; said team leader Ryan Foley</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>North Korea Conducts New Nuke Test From TFA : The peculiar object effectively bridged the gap between a nova ( a nuclear explosion on the surface of an old , compact star called a white dwarf ) and a type Ia supernova ( the destructive death of a white dwarf caused by a runaway nuclear reaction starting deep in the star ) .
SN 2008ha likely was a failed supernova where the explosion was unable to destroy the entire star .
  oeIf a normal supernova is a nuclear bomb , then SN 2008ha is a bunker buster ,   said team leader Ryan Foley</tokentext>
<sentencetext>North Korea Conducts New Nuke Test
 
From TFA:The peculiar object effectively bridged the gap between a nova (a nuclear explosion on the surface of an old, compact star called a white dwarf) and a type Ia supernova (the destructive death of a white dwarf caused by a runaway nuclear reaction starting deep in the star).
SN 2008ha likely was a failed supernova where the explosion was unable to destroy the entire star.
âoeIf a normal supernova is a nuclear bomb, then SN 2008ha is a bunker buster,â said team leader Ryan Foley</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296845</id>
	<title>Re:She got a raw deal...</title>
	<author>Q-bert][</author>
	<datestamp>1244746080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They didn't even put her name on the paper, for shame!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did n't even put her name on the paper , for shame !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They didn't even put her name on the paper, for shame!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297185</id>
	<title>Re:Statement on Society</title>
	<author>thedonger</author>
	<datestamp>1244747160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>OK - how else would you make a close analogy to a massive nuclear explosion in space?</p></div></blockquote><p>Kirstey Alley inside the Astrodome on an ice cream binge?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK - how else would you make a close analogy to a massive nuclear explosion in space ? Kirstey Alley inside the Astrodome on an ice cream binge ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK - how else would you make a close analogy to a massive nuclear explosion in space?Kirstey Alley inside the Astrodome on an ice cream binge?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296579</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298505</id>
	<title>Not the same note?</title>
	<author>professorguy</author>
	<datestamp>1244751720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>An f sharp is quite different from a g flat in function, and only sounds identical if your hearing is mediocre</p></div><p>
So if I hear middle F# (369.99 Hz) and middle Gb (369.99 Hz) as the same note (when
<a href="http://www.phy.mtu.edu/~suits/notefreqs.html" title="mtu.edu">middle C=261.63Hz</a> [mtu.edu]), my hearing is mediocre?
<br>
<br>
Wow, that's just... wow.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An f sharp is quite different from a g flat in function , and only sounds identical if your hearing is mediocre So if I hear middle F # ( 369.99 Hz ) and middle Gb ( 369.99 Hz ) as the same note ( when middle C = 261.63Hz [ mtu.edu ] ) , my hearing is mediocre ?
Wow , that 's just... wow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An f sharp is quite different from a g flat in function, and only sounds identical if your hearing is mediocre
So if I hear middle F# (369.99 Hz) and middle Gb (369.99 Hz) as the same note (when
middle C=261.63Hz [mtu.edu]), my hearing is mediocre?
Wow, that's just... wow.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296657</id>
	<title>Re:Neither Nova nor Supernova</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow. Really?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow .
Really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow.
Really?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298415</id>
	<title>Re:Weakest Supernova?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244751420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FYI: A- and B+ were referring to grades, not music notes. B+ = [86 2/3, 90), A- = [90, 93 1/3), +/- rounding method used by the prof. In practice, the difference is usually "does the prof think you deserve an A or a B?"</p><p>And as for music notes: your statement may be true in some systems like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean\_tuning" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Pythagorean tuning</a> [wikipedia.org]. However, in the more common <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12\_equal\_temperament" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">12-TET</a> [wikipedia.org] system, F# and Gb are defined as the exact same note. Hint: The piano has 12 keys per octave; they're the integer values of 440 * 2^(n/12) Hz, with n=0 being middle A.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI : A- and B + were referring to grades , not music notes .
B + = [ 86 2/3 , 90 ) , A- = [ 90 , 93 1/3 ) , + /- rounding method used by the prof. In practice , the difference is usually " does the prof think you deserve an A or a B ?
" And as for music notes : your statement may be true in some systems like Pythagorean tuning [ wikipedia.org ] .
However , in the more common 12-TET [ wikipedia.org ] system , F # and Gb are defined as the exact same note .
Hint : The piano has 12 keys per octave ; they 're the integer values of 440 * 2 ^ ( n/12 ) Hz , with n = 0 being middle A .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI: A- and B+ were referring to grades, not music notes.
B+ = [86 2/3, 90), A- = [90, 93 1/3), +/- rounding method used by the prof. In practice, the difference is usually "does the prof think you deserve an A or a B?
"And as for music notes: your statement may be true in some systems like Pythagorean tuning [wikipedia.org].
However, in the more common 12-TET [wikipedia.org] system, F# and Gb are defined as the exact same note.
Hint: The piano has 12 keys per octave; they're the integer values of 440 * 2^(n/12) Hz, with n=0 being middle A.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28303619
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297129
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28301747
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28309887
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28300251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28324107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28301989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28309087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296657
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28306913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28302077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296595
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299857
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296431
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28300493
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1635204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297415
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296657
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296031
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299077
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28295945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297203
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297827
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28301747
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28324107
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28303619
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299857
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296219
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297611
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28302077
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28306913
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28301989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28300251
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299099
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296933
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296321
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296787
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296245
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296431
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297089
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296487
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296579
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297339
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296479
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296845
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28300493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297143
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298415
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28309087
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297317
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296945
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296913
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28299415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28309887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28298049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28297643
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1635204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1635204.28296257
</commentlist>
</conversation>
