<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_11_1347219</id>
	<title>Chinese Govt Spyware Puts Computers At Risk</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1244728800000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Ihmhi writes <i>"China's mandatory 'Green Dam Youth Escort' web filter software apparently has a series of severe flaws. In addition to not working on Linux or MacOS, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8094026.stm">traffic between the software and its servers is unencrypted</a>."</i>
I'm sure it only gets better after that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ihmhi writes " China 's mandatory 'Green Dam Youth Escort ' web filter software apparently has a series of severe flaws .
In addition to not working on Linux or MacOS , traffic between the software and its servers is unencrypted .
" I 'm sure it only gets better after that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ihmhi writes "China's mandatory 'Green Dam Youth Escort' web filter software apparently has a series of severe flaws.
In addition to not working on Linux or MacOS, traffic between the software and its servers is unencrypted.
"
I'm sure it only gets better after that.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295947</id>
	<title>I have no problem with Big Brother...</title>
	<author>Macman408</author>
	<datestamp>1244742840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...it's the lack of encryption that really bothers me. After all, that could let some unknown party watch what I'm doing online!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...it 's the lack of encryption that really bothers me .
After all , that could let some unknown party watch what I 'm doing online !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it's the lack of encryption that really bothers me.
After all, that could let some unknown party watch what I'm doing online!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293393</id>
	<title>i first read that as "Green Day Youth Escort"</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1244733600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and i thought yeah i know they have a new album but this is ridiculous</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and i thought yeah i know they have a new album but this is ridiculous</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and i thought yeah i know they have a new album but this is ridiculous</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293563</id>
	<title>International competition for stupidest government</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1244734260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lately it's like all the countries of the world are engaged in an Olympic competition to see who can screw themselves up the most through acts of extreme stupidity and greed. What the fuck is wrong with people?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lately it 's like all the countries of the world are engaged in an Olympic competition to see who can screw themselves up the most through acts of extreme stupidity and greed .
What the fuck is wrong with people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lately it's like all the countries of the world are engaged in an Olympic competition to see who can screw themselves up the most through acts of extreme stupidity and greed.
What the fuck is wrong with people?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296085</id>
	<title>shame on you...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>shhhhhhhh... don't tell em.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>shhhhhhhh... do n't tell em .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shhhhhhhh... don't tell em.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383</id>
	<title>Your friendly Chinese government official here.</title>
	<author>BlueKitties</author>
	<datestamp>1244733540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "mandatory" software these computers will be shipped with is no different than a VChip inside of all modern American TVs; it's a feature people may use, but are allowed to uninstall at their sole discretion. Besides, this stuff runs on Windows, it's just one more straw on the pile of ways to hijack an unprotected computer. We also choose a tool that doesn't run on Linux because we're sick of typing 'sudo apt-get install wine' everytime we install a new Linux distro. This assures minimal typing for all Chinese Linux users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " mandatory " software these computers will be shipped with is no different than a VChip inside of all modern American TVs ; it 's a feature people may use , but are allowed to uninstall at their sole discretion .
Besides , this stuff runs on Windows , it 's just one more straw on the pile of ways to hijack an unprotected computer .
We also choose a tool that does n't run on Linux because we 're sick of typing 'sudo apt-get install wine ' everytime we install a new Linux distro .
This assures minimal typing for all Chinese Linux users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "mandatory" software these computers will be shipped with is no different than a VChip inside of all modern American TVs; it's a feature people may use, but are allowed to uninstall at their sole discretion.
Besides, this stuff runs on Windows, it's just one more straw on the pile of ways to hijack an unprotected computer.
We also choose a tool that doesn't run on Linux because we're sick of typing 'sudo apt-get install wine' everytime we install a new Linux distro.
This assures minimal typing for all Chinese Linux users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293359</id>
	<title>Re:Is the software available to download anywhere?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1244733420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But filtering in China is done at a level independent of the computer. This adds another layer of "protection" and enforcement but isn't really the full filtering of the internet. Think of this like a porn blocker that blocks a few sites compared to the "Golden Shield" which blocks all references to anti-communist or different forms of communist ideals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But filtering in China is done at a level independent of the computer .
This adds another layer of " protection " and enforcement but is n't really the full filtering of the internet .
Think of this like a porn blocker that blocks a few sites compared to the " Golden Shield " which blocks all references to anti-communist or different forms of communist ideals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But filtering in China is done at a level independent of the computer.
This adds another layer of "protection" and enforcement but isn't really the full filtering of the internet.
Think of this like a porn blocker that blocks a few sites compared to the "Golden Shield" which blocks all references to anti-communist or different forms of communist ideals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296649</id>
	<title>It *was* encrypted</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244745360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it won't be much longer, thanks to drawing their attention to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it wo n't be much longer , thanks to drawing their attention to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it won't be much longer, thanks to drawing their attention to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296047</id>
	<title>Re:It's a big country</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>now also the largest buttnet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>now also the largest buttnet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now also the largest buttnet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28302621</id>
	<title>Re:This software is legally mandated.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244725860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always wondered just how the Chinese government works. Yes, we all know it's authoritarian, but <i>who</i> or what group sets the agenda? As I know, the CCP has a congressional session every five years which lasts about a week. Is this the time laws are created and voted on? If so, I'm curious as to which generation voted and how. Was this law the idea of the older authoritarian members while the younger more liberal members compromised to only have the software supplied, but not installed?</p><p>As large as China is, I'm sure someone in the CCP reads Slashdot. I would be curious to hear the "inside baseball" of the overall attitude in place compared to say...the 1960s and before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wondered just how the Chinese government works .
Yes , we all know it 's authoritarian , but who or what group sets the agenda ?
As I know , the CCP has a congressional session every five years which lasts about a week .
Is this the time laws are created and voted on ?
If so , I 'm curious as to which generation voted and how .
Was this law the idea of the older authoritarian members while the younger more liberal members compromised to only have the software supplied , but not installed ? As large as China is , I 'm sure someone in the CCP reads Slashdot .
I would be curious to hear the " inside baseball " of the overall attitude in place compared to say...the 1960s and before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wondered just how the Chinese government works.
Yes, we all know it's authoritarian, but who or what group sets the agenda?
As I know, the CCP has a congressional session every five years which lasts about a week.
Is this the time laws are created and voted on?
If so, I'm curious as to which generation voted and how.
Was this law the idea of the older authoritarian members while the younger more liberal members compromised to only have the software supplied, but not installed?As large as China is, I'm sure someone in the CCP reads Slashdot.
I would be curious to hear the "inside baseball" of the overall attitude in place compared to say...the 1960s and before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28305223</id>
	<title>Re:Linux is not ready for the desktop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244797560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>First, it's incompatible with all of those Windows-only worms, now it won't run invasive government-mandated spyware.  At this rate, it will never be the year of the Linux desktop.</p></div><p>oh yea, you are a jusin.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , it 's incompatible with all of those Windows-only worms , now it wo n't run invasive government-mandated spyware .
At this rate , it will never be the year of the Linux desktop.oh yea , you are a jusin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, it's incompatible with all of those Windows-only worms, now it won't run invasive government-mandated spyware.
At this rate, it will never be the year of the Linux desktop.oh yea, you are a jusin.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293217</id>
	<title>It's chinese stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244733000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, it's Chinese stuff for god's sake, did you expect some quality out of it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , it 's Chinese stuff for god 's sake , did you expect some quality out of it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, it's Chinese stuff for god's sake, did you expect some quality out of it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087</id>
	<title>Linux people always complaining</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244732580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In addition to not working on Linux or MacOS</p></div></blockquote><p>FFS, just run it in Wine!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition to not working on Linux or MacOSFFS , just run it in Wine !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition to not working on Linux or MacOSFFS, just run it in Wine!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293983</id>
	<title>Linux is not ready for the desktop</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1244735880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>First, it's incompatible with all of those Windows-only worms, now it won't run invasive government-mandated spyware.  At this rate, it will never be the year of the Linux desktop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , it 's incompatible with all of those Windows-only worms , now it wo n't run invasive government-mandated spyware .
At this rate , it will never be the year of the Linux desktop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, it's incompatible with all of those Windows-only worms, now it won't run invasive government-mandated spyware.
At this rate, it will never be the year of the Linux desktop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293593</id>
	<title>When you buttume ...</title>
	<author>David Gerard</author>
	<datestamp>1244734440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"We have <a href="http://notnews.today.com/2008/10/12/universal-internet-filter-plans-detailed/" title="today.com">buttiduously canvbutted the industry</a> [today.com], buttessed what is available and buttembled the finest selection of contractors chosen in a completely open manner for this buttignment. Butterting free speech is one thing, but a triparbreaste committee considers that that does not justify mere pbuttive breastillation at the expense of others. The filters will buttociatively clbuttify all communications and filter then, I can butture you, rebuttemble them with surpbutting exacbreastude in any quanbreasty. Consbreastuents can be rebuttured that a mulbreastude of industry compebreastors will butture quality and keep our clbuttrooms safe. Green Dam will not embarbutt us!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We have buttiduously canvbutted the industry [ today.com ] , buttessed what is available and buttembled the finest selection of contractors chosen in a completely open manner for this buttignment .
Butterting free speech is one thing , but a triparbreaste committee considers that that does not justify mere pbuttive breastillation at the expense of others .
The filters will buttociatively clbuttify all communications and filter then , I can butture you , rebuttemble them with surpbutting exacbreastude in any quanbreasty .
Consbreastuents can be rebuttured that a mulbreastude of industry compebreastors will butture quality and keep our clbuttrooms safe .
Green Dam will not embarbutt us !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We have buttiduously canvbutted the industry [today.com], buttessed what is available and buttembled the finest selection of contractors chosen in a completely open manner for this buttignment.
Butterting free speech is one thing, but a triparbreaste committee considers that that does not justify mere pbuttive breastillation at the expense of others.
The filters will buttociatively clbuttify all communications and filter then, I can butture you, rebuttemble them with surpbutting exacbreastude in any quanbreasty.
Consbreastuents can be rebuttured that a mulbreastude of industry compebreastors will butture quality and keep our clbuttrooms safe.
Green Dam will not embarbutt us!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297287</id>
	<title>Re:It's chinese stuff</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244747460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If everything fails, just add some MSG and it'll at least seem great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If everything fails , just add some MSG and it 'll at least seem great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If everything fails, just add some MSG and it'll at least seem great.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296181</id>
	<title>Calling Super China Coders</title>
	<author>dave562</author>
	<datestamp>1244743740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems that China sent all of their super coders to participate in the NSA challenge, and they left the apprentices back at home writing the domestic software.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that China sent all of their super coders to participate in the NSA challenge , and they left the apprentices back at home writing the domestic software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that China sent all of their super coders to participate in the NSA challenge, and they left the apprentices back at home writing the domestic software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28299951</id>
	<title>Re:Security 101</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244713680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would suspect that the Dali Lama is likely to throw some money at skilled computer people in the Czech Republic or Belarus, so it won't be too long. Then it shouldn't be too hard to feed a lot of garbage data into China's new software toy. Something along the lines of "These are not the emails/files/IMs you're looking for, move along..."</p><p>When they achieve this, I think they'll stay pretty quiet about it. It will be best to let the China government still think they're in control while people are given yet more freedom. It's akin to having tunnels built amidst the contruction of yet another great wall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would suspect that the Dali Lama is likely to throw some money at skilled computer people in the Czech Republic or Belarus , so it wo n't be too long .
Then it should n't be too hard to feed a lot of garbage data into China 's new software toy .
Something along the lines of " These are not the emails/files/IMs you 're looking for , move along... " When they achieve this , I think they 'll stay pretty quiet about it .
It will be best to let the China government still think they 're in control while people are given yet more freedom .
It 's akin to having tunnels built amidst the contruction of yet another great wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would suspect that the Dali Lama is likely to throw some money at skilled computer people in the Czech Republic or Belarus, so it won't be too long.
Then it shouldn't be too hard to feed a lot of garbage data into China's new software toy.
Something along the lines of "These are not the emails/files/IMs you're looking for, move along..."When they achieve this, I think they'll stay pretty quiet about it.
It will be best to let the China government still think they're in control while people are given yet more freedom.
It's akin to having tunnels built amidst the contruction of yet another great wall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293133</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28298201</id>
	<title>Re:Linux people always complaining</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244750580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thats what they get for using third party software.  Outsourcing to the private sector!!!  I thought these guys were communists.  Make your own snoop-ware!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats what they get for using third party software .
Outsourcing to the private sector ! ! !
I thought these guys were communists .
Make your own snoop-ware !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats what they get for using third party software.
Outsourcing to the private sector!!!
I thought these guys were communists.
Make your own snoop-ware!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28316033</id>
	<title>Re:This software is legally mandated.</title>
	<author>nobodie</author>
	<datestamp>1244813640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>from china: it is not illegal to buy a computer with linux installed in China, it is impossible. they don't exist except in the hands of a few computer nerds and geeks who are being watched carefully. As for Macs, i (regretfully) have to encourage their use here for average computer users despite their price point which is 3X the pp of similarly powered windows PCs. the virus/malware situation here is insane and completely out of control. Most computers have had their security breached and run unprotected while reporting that they are fully updated and protected. They are not updated because they use ghosted pirates of WinXP that come with the malware pre-installed. It is very bad here and nobody has a handle on it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>from china : it is not illegal to buy a computer with linux installed in China , it is impossible .
they do n't exist except in the hands of a few computer nerds and geeks who are being watched carefully .
As for Macs , i ( regretfully ) have to encourage their use here for average computer users despite their price point which is 3X the pp of similarly powered windows PCs .
the virus/malware situation here is insane and completely out of control .
Most computers have had their security breached and run unprotected while reporting that they are fully updated and protected .
They are not updated because they use ghosted pirates of WinXP that come with the malware pre-installed .
It is very bad here and nobody has a handle on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from china: it is not illegal to buy a computer with linux installed in China, it is impossible.
they don't exist except in the hands of a few computer nerds and geeks who are being watched carefully.
As for Macs, i (regretfully) have to encourage their use here for average computer users despite their price point which is 3X the pp of similarly powered windows PCs.
the virus/malware situation here is insane and completely out of control.
Most computers have had their security breached and run unprotected while reporting that they are fully updated and protected.
They are not updated because they use ghosted pirates of WinXP that come with the malware pre-installed.
It is very bad here and nobody has a handle on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183</id>
	<title>Is the software available to download anywhere?</title>
	<author>wjh31</author>
	<datestamp>1244732880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>after all the slating given to china over censorship, it would be interesting to be able to browse from behind such a filter and see how much it would affect the surfing of a typical westoner</htmltext>
<tokenext>after all the slating given to china over censorship , it would be interesting to be able to browse from behind such a filter and see how much it would affect the surfing of a typical westoner</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after all the slating given to china over censorship, it would be interesting to be able to browse from behind such a filter and see how much it would affect the surfing of a typical westoner</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297115</id>
	<title>Re:It's not supposed to work</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244746980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it much different in the so called 'free world'?</p><p>How many people remember the Commie craze in the 50s (and the years after, to a lesser degree)? How many dare to speak their mind on "touchy" subjects when they know that mob justice isn't as much a thing of the past as we wish it to be? That's not the government? Well, technically right, but how often do you see religious fanatics (I'm not talking about the Muslim kind here, ok?) being charged for the damage they do to various places and people that they deem 'sinful'?</p><p>A local animal rights group dared to go against a large clothing chain, and their members were arrested. Never charged with anything, just arrested for as long as they can be detained without charges (they were just accused of 'forming a criminal gang' or similar, without a proper definition of just what kind of crime they were supposed to commit), then everything was dropped.</p><p>Welcome to the free world, comrade. You're free to do as we tell you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it much different in the so called 'free world ' ? How many people remember the Commie craze in the 50s ( and the years after , to a lesser degree ) ?
How many dare to speak their mind on " touchy " subjects when they know that mob justice is n't as much a thing of the past as we wish it to be ?
That 's not the government ?
Well , technically right , but how often do you see religious fanatics ( I 'm not talking about the Muslim kind here , ok ?
) being charged for the damage they do to various places and people that they deem 'sinful ' ? A local animal rights group dared to go against a large clothing chain , and their members were arrested .
Never charged with anything , just arrested for as long as they can be detained without charges ( they were just accused of 'forming a criminal gang ' or similar , without a proper definition of just what kind of crime they were supposed to commit ) , then everything was dropped.Welcome to the free world , comrade .
You 're free to do as we tell you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it much different in the so called 'free world'?How many people remember the Commie craze in the 50s (and the years after, to a lesser degree)?
How many dare to speak their mind on "touchy" subjects when they know that mob justice isn't as much a thing of the past as we wish it to be?
That's not the government?
Well, technically right, but how often do you see religious fanatics (I'm not talking about the Muslim kind here, ok?
) being charged for the damage they do to various places and people that they deem 'sinful'?A local animal rights group dared to go against a large clothing chain, and their members were arrested.
Never charged with anything, just arrested for as long as they can be detained without charges (they were just accused of 'forming a criminal gang' or similar, without a proper definition of just what kind of crime they were supposed to commit), then everything was dropped.Welcome to the free world, comrade.
You're free to do as we tell you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28300573</id>
	<title>And In Other News . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244715720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Green Dam Youth Escort'  will ship with Windows 7 in Europe as part of the security software suite so as to replace the missing exploits caused by the removal of Internet Explorer 8.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Green Dam Youth Escort ' will ship with Windows 7 in Europe as part of the security software suite so as to replace the missing exploits caused by the removal of Internet Explorer 8 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Green Dam Youth Escort'  will ship with Windows 7 in Europe as part of the security software suite so as to replace the missing exploits caused by the removal of Internet Explorer 8.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294065</id>
	<title>It's not supposed to work</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After spending a number of years living/working in China, I've come to the conclusion that the government just doesn't care if this new "feature" works or not.  The goal isn't to really censor here, but to let people know that "the man" is watching.  In China, that is enough to keep the vast majority of people in line.  There are still tens (perhaps hundreds) of millions of people that have vivid memories of the Cultural Revolution.  They know all too well what happens to the squeaky wheel and tailor their activities accordingly.  Sad, but that's the way it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After spending a number of years living/working in China , I 've come to the conclusion that the government just does n't care if this new " feature " works or not .
The goal is n't to really censor here , but to let people know that " the man " is watching .
In China , that is enough to keep the vast majority of people in line .
There are still tens ( perhaps hundreds ) of millions of people that have vivid memories of the Cultural Revolution .
They know all too well what happens to the squeaky wheel and tailor their activities accordingly .
Sad , but that 's the way it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After spending a number of years living/working in China, I've come to the conclusion that the government just doesn't care if this new "feature" works or not.
The goal isn't to really censor here, but to let people know that "the man" is watching.
In China, that is enough to keep the vast majority of people in line.
There are still tens (perhaps hundreds) of millions of people that have vivid memories of the Cultural Revolution.
They know all too well what happens to the squeaky wheel and tailor their activities accordingly.
Sad, but that's the way it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149</id>
	<title>This software is legally mandated.</title>
	<author>Wonko the Sane</author>
	<datestamp>1244732760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So does that mean that selling computers with Linux or OSX installed is illegal? Or will they get away with "installing" the software on those computers even though it can not function?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So does that mean that selling computers with Linux or OSX installed is illegal ?
Or will they get away with " installing " the software on those computers even though it can not function ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So does that mean that selling computers with Linux or OSX installed is illegal?
Or will they get away with "installing" the software on those computers even though it can not function?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28299243</id>
	<title>bbc.co.uk says:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244711100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Others have reported that the system only runs on Microsoft Windows, allowing Mac and Linux users to bypass the software. "</p><p>thats pretty cool i.m.h.o.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Others have reported that the system only runs on Microsoft Windows , allowing Mac and Linux users to bypass the software .
" thats pretty cool i.m.h.o .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Others have reported that the system only runs on Microsoft Windows, allowing Mac and Linux users to bypass the software.
"thats pretty cool i.m.h.o.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293289</id>
	<title>What are you calling a "flaw"?</title>
	<author>Bander</author>
	<datestamp>1244733240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hardly consider the lack of Mac or Linux versions a "flaw". In fact, I consider that one of the few positive aspects of the software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hardly consider the lack of Mac or Linux versions a " flaw " .
In fact , I consider that one of the few positive aspects of the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hardly consider the lack of Mac or Linux versions a "flaw".
In fact, I consider that one of the few positive aspects of the software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28310831</id>
	<title>Re:Only Windows, only IE</title>
	<author>thexile</author>
	<datestamp>1244831880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>EU should implement a similar filter to tell people to switch from IE.</htmltext>
<tokenext>EU should implement a similar filter to tell people to switch from IE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EU should implement a similar filter to tell people to switch from IE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733</id>
	<title>It's a big country</title>
	<author>Vault\_of\_Thrones</author>
	<datestamp>1244734920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>China: home to the largest population and now also the largest botnet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>China : home to the largest population and now also the largest botnet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>China: home to the largest population and now also the largest botnet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294689</id>
	<title>Spyware Puts Computers At Risk</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1244738460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><strong>Spyware Puts Computers At Risk</strong></p><p>I nominate this for the most awesome headline ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spyware Puts Computers At RiskI nominate this for the most awesome headline ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spyware Puts Computers At RiskI nominate this for the most awesome headline ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293349</id>
	<title>Oh, God.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244733420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it was sending encrypted traffic, we'd all be bitching about how the Chinese were sending a bunch of super secret encrypted data to their servers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was sending encrypted traffic , we 'd all be bitching about how the Chinese were sending a bunch of super secret encrypted data to their servers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it was sending encrypted traffic, we'd all be bitching about how the Chinese were sending a bunch of super secret encrypted data to their servers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296149</id>
	<title>TROLJLKORE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>of HIV a8d other benefits of being</htmltext>
<tokenext>of HIV a8d other benefits of being</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of HIV a8d other benefits of being</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28302715</id>
	<title>Re:Your friendly Chinese government official here.</title>
	<author>DigiShaman</author>
	<datestamp>1244726460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*clap* *clap* *clap*</p><p>Spoken like a true American politician! Member of the CCP? Hah, you can't fool me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* clap * * clap * * clap * Spoken like a true American politician !
Member of the CCP ?
Hah , you ca n't fool me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*clap* *clap* *clap*Spoken like a true American politician!
Member of the CCP?
Hah, you can't fool me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295123</id>
	<title>Re:This software is legally mandated.</title>
	<author>starglider29a</author>
	<datestamp>1244740080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't it be funny if this sparked a "MacOS to Windows hardware" hack that worked, spread like "<a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/06/10/1614227/Online-Vigilantes-Or-Crowdsourced-Justice?art\_pos=1" title="slashdot.org">kitten killer video</a> [slashdot.org]" and then seeped back into the West and shut up the whiners (not to be confused with the Winers).<br> <br>
Then, Chinese could buy a compliant windows machine, hack it to MacOS, and the DamWare wouldn't know. Or will they require that all machines stay on all the time, such that silence is a violation?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it be funny if this sparked a " MacOS to Windows hardware " hack that worked , spread like " kitten killer video [ slashdot.org ] " and then seeped back into the West and shut up the whiners ( not to be confused with the Winers ) .
Then , Chinese could buy a compliant windows machine , hack it to MacOS , and the DamWare would n't know .
Or will they require that all machines stay on all the time , such that silence is a violation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it be funny if this sparked a "MacOS to Windows hardware" hack that worked, spread like "kitten killer video [slashdot.org]" and then seeped back into the West and shut up the whiners (not to be confused with the Winers).
Then, Chinese could buy a compliant windows machine, hack it to MacOS, and the DamWare wouldn't know.
Or will they require that all machines stay on all the time, such that silence is a violation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293147</id>
	<title>Tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244732760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>defective by design.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>defective by design .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>defective by design.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295271</id>
	<title>Re:Is the software available to download anywhere?</title>
	<author>koxkoxkox</author>
	<datestamp>1244740500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe this plugin for Firefox is what you want ? I didn't try it though<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p><a href="http://chinachannel.hk/" title="chinachannel.hk" rel="nofollow">http://chinachannel.hk/</a> [chinachannel.hk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe this plugin for Firefox is what you want ?
I did n't try it though ...http : //chinachannel.hk/ [ chinachannel.hk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe this plugin for Firefox is what you want ?
I didn't try it though ...http://chinachannel.hk/ [chinachannel.hk]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28298655</id>
	<title>mogd down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244752320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>An2d i7s long term</htmltext>
<tokenext>An2d i7s long term</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An2d i7s long term</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293607</id>
	<title>Only Windows, only IE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:

"One blogger posted a screenshot of the software purportedly blocking an attempt to visit a porn site using Microsoft's Internet Explorer.

But, he said, there was no problem accessing the site using the Firefox web browser. "</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : " One blogger posted a screenshot of the software purportedly blocking an attempt to visit a porn site using Microsoft 's Internet Explorer .
But , he said , there was no problem accessing the site using the Firefox web browser .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:

"One blogger posted a screenshot of the software purportedly blocking an attempt to visit a porn site using Microsoft's Internet Explorer.
But, he said, there was no problem accessing the site using the Firefox web browser.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294169</id>
	<title>Green Dam lays ground for the worlds biggest</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1244736540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b> Government controlled botnet! A technological "Cultural Revolution" seems to be the obvious goal, under the guise of Greater Good and "thinking about the children". </b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Government controlled botnet !
A technological " Cultural Revolution " seems to be the obvious goal , under the guise of Greater Good and " thinking about the children " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Government controlled botnet!
A technological "Cultural Revolution" seems to be the obvious goal, under the guise of Greater Good and "thinking about the children". </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293919</id>
	<title>Re:It's chinese stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or do the little "virtual police patrol" cartoons about halfway down the article look just like the characters from Fallout?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or do the little " virtual police patrol " cartoons about halfway down the article look just like the characters from Fallout ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or do the little "virtual police patrol" cartoons about halfway down the article look just like the characters from Fallout?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293217</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297963</id>
	<title>Re:So this is a good thing</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1244749800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The first result will be that more people will use Linux.</i> </p><p>Does the Chinese parent [who can turn the filter off] object to limiting his kid's access to porn?</p><p>If the answer is "No," then the take-up of Linux is likely to be <b>less</b>, not more.</p><p>The geek has a remarkably parochial mind.</p><p> Nothing outside the values of his own culture ever seems quite real.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first result will be that more people will use Linux .
Does the Chinese parent [ who can turn the filter off ] object to limiting his kid 's access to porn ? If the answer is " No , " then the take-up of Linux is likely to be less , not more.The geek has a remarkably parochial mind .
Nothing outside the values of his own culture ever seems quite real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first result will be that more people will use Linux.
Does the Chinese parent [who can turn the filter off] object to limiting his kid's access to porn?If the answer is "No," then the take-up of Linux is likely to be less, not more.The geek has a remarkably parochial mind.
Nothing outside the values of his own culture ever seems quite real.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293965</id>
	<title>Re:This software is legally mandated.</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1244735880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's mandated that it be sold with all new computers. It doesn't need to be installed, just supplied with the PC.<br> <br>Think of it as an AOL Free Trial CD. You remember, the free coaster they shipped.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's mandated that it be sold with all new computers .
It does n't need to be installed , just supplied with the PC .
Think of it as an AOL Free Trial CD .
You remember , the free coaster they shipped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's mandated that it be sold with all new computers.
It doesn't need to be installed, just supplied with the PC.
Think of it as an AOL Free Trial CD.
You remember, the free coaster they shipped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293133</id>
	<title>Security 101</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1244732760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not write any code that could intentionally be used to DDOS your ass.<br>But seriously, this is great. It's going to be one hell of a show <strong>when</strong> it gets cracked.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not write any code that could intentionally be used to DDOS your ass.But seriously , this is great .
It 's going to be one hell of a show when it gets cracked .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not write any code that could intentionally be used to DDOS your ass.But seriously, this is great.
It's going to be one hell of a show when it gets cracked.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296999</id>
	<title>Re:This software is legally mandated.</title>
	<author>Ohio Calvinist</author>
	<datestamp>1244746560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is just like the free gun-lock they provide when you buy a new firearm. It isn't required (in many places) but it is always given.<br> <br>
They want the tool to be available for people that want to use it. Before everyone says OMG the Chinese are at it again, remember that the US Government (via the Childrens Internet Protection Act) mandates schools and libraries in the public K12 system install filters, and it will be really interesting how that applies to school-furnished laptops. It is the exact same lame "protect the childrens!" mandate only the Chinese expand the scope but make it optional for the equipment owner to implement.<br> <br>
While I abhor censorship, from an implementation perspective it seems like an ISP as an opt-in/opt-out filter that is easy to immediately enable/disable would be far more effective, and easier to implement and has no additional vectors for attack/expoitation than normal HTTP traffic does.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just like the free gun-lock they provide when you buy a new firearm .
It is n't required ( in many places ) but it is always given .
They want the tool to be available for people that want to use it .
Before everyone says OMG the Chinese are at it again , remember that the US Government ( via the Childrens Internet Protection Act ) mandates schools and libraries in the public K12 system install filters , and it will be really interesting how that applies to school-furnished laptops .
It is the exact same lame " protect the childrens !
" mandate only the Chinese expand the scope but make it optional for the equipment owner to implement .
While I abhor censorship , from an implementation perspective it seems like an ISP as an opt-in/opt-out filter that is easy to immediately enable/disable would be far more effective , and easier to implement and has no additional vectors for attack/expoitation than normal HTTP traffic does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just like the free gun-lock they provide when you buy a new firearm.
It isn't required (in many places) but it is always given.
They want the tool to be available for people that want to use it.
Before everyone says OMG the Chinese are at it again, remember that the US Government (via the Childrens Internet Protection Act) mandates schools and libraries in the public K12 system install filters, and it will be really interesting how that applies to school-furnished laptops.
It is the exact same lame "protect the childrens!
" mandate only the Chinese expand the scope but make it optional for the equipment owner to implement.
While I abhor censorship, from an implementation perspective it seems like an ISP as an opt-in/opt-out filter that is easy to immediately enable/disable would be far more effective, and easier to implement and has no additional vectors for attack/expoitation than normal HTTP traffic does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296211</id>
	<title>No Linux?</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1244743860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't want to sound like a troll, but considering all the oppressive crap we see coming out of China, it seems pretty petty to whine that their mandatory web filter software does not have a Linux version (or Mac)...Now if you want to talk about why China is so Microsoft-friendly, that one thing, but when someone installs a mandatory net nanny on a cheaply assembled PC and connects to a watered down approximation of the internet, where one thing internet users do best, "bitch about stuff", could possibly get them arrested, the inability to run Linux is not their biggest problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to sound like a troll , but considering all the oppressive crap we see coming out of China , it seems pretty petty to whine that their mandatory web filter software does not have a Linux version ( or Mac ) ...Now if you want to talk about why China is so Microsoft-friendly , that one thing , but when someone installs a mandatory net nanny on a cheaply assembled PC and connects to a watered down approximation of the internet , where one thing internet users do best , " bitch about stuff " , could possibly get them arrested , the inability to run Linux is not their biggest problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to sound like a troll, but considering all the oppressive crap we see coming out of China, it seems pretty petty to whine that their mandatory web filter software does not have a Linux version (or Mac)...Now if you want to talk about why China is so Microsoft-friendly, that one thing, but when someone installs a mandatory net nanny on a cheaply assembled PC and connects to a watered down approximation of the internet, where one thing internet users do best, "bitch about stuff", could possibly get them arrested, the inability to run Linux is not their biggest problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296559</id>
	<title>Looks like the Dam's cracked</title>
	<author>Techmeology</author>
	<datestamp>1244745060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to the BBC website, Linux (and Mac) machines don't require this censorware (they're just allowed on). In any case what's to stop you from uninstalling it when you get a new computer, if computers only have to be sold with this software?</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to the BBC website , Linux ( and Mac ) machines do n't require this censorware ( they 're just allowed on ) .
In any case what 's to stop you from uninstalling it when you get a new computer , if computers only have to be sold with this software ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to the BBC website, Linux (and Mac) machines don't require this censorware (they're just allowed on).
In any case what's to stop you from uninstalling it when you get a new computer, if computers only have to be sold with this software?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297375</id>
	<title>Great moments in brand equity</title>
	<author>Presto Vivace</author>
	<datestamp>1244747700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft must be so proud.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft must be so proud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft must be so proud.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293721</id>
	<title>nig@6a</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244734920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">As fittingly BSD's acclaimed are abtout 7000/5</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>As fittingly BSD 's acclaimed are abtout 7000/5 [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As fittingly BSD's acclaimed are abtout 7000/5 [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294101</id>
	<title>Re:Your friendly Chinese government official here.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244736300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're an idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're an idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're an idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296419</id>
	<title>Re:Is the software available to download anywhere?</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1244744520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...see how much it would affect the surfing of a typical we<b>stoner</b></p> </div><p>Really?! Is that all we're known for?!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...see how much it would affect the surfing of a typical westoner Really ? !
Is that all we 're known for ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...see how much it would affect the surfing of a typical westoner Really?!
Is that all we're known for?
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28304515</id>
	<title>Re:Easy to Beat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244743380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Step 4: Answer door to meet party officials curious about the activities of the long-ignored VM that's long since been subverted and turned into a low-CPU relay node for a horse porn swapping ring.<br>Step 5: Explain to said officials how the easily-wiped partition now filled with filth is actually only there to evade monitoring...<br>Step 6: ????<br>Step 7: Prof--pshht who am I kidding?  It's off to tossed-salad prison for you.  And they don't provide maple syrup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 4 : Answer door to meet party officials curious about the activities of the long-ignored VM that 's long since been subverted and turned into a low-CPU relay node for a horse porn swapping ring.Step 5 : Explain to said officials how the easily-wiped partition now filled with filth is actually only there to evade monitoring...Step 6 : ? ? ?
? Step 7 : Prof--pshht who am I kidding ?
It 's off to tossed-salad prison for you .
And they do n't provide maple syrup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 4: Answer door to meet party officials curious about the activities of the long-ignored VM that's long since been subverted and turned into a low-CPU relay node for a horse porn swapping ring.Step 5: Explain to said officials how the easily-wiped partition now filled with filth is actually only there to evade monitoring...Step 6: ???
?Step 7: Prof--pshht who am I kidding?
It's off to tossed-salad prison for you.
And they don't provide maple syrup.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297661</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293893</id>
	<title>Elephant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244735580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Excuse me, and no offense to the submitter of this story; But since when did the question begin to revolve around the security issues with the actual program the government uses to control your webhabits and not the actual attempt to control free speech?</p><p>I know, we are geeks and we like to talk about this stuff, but let's not forget the elephant in the room here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me , and no offense to the submitter of this story ; But since when did the question begin to revolve around the security issues with the actual program the government uses to control your webhabits and not the actual attempt to control free speech ? I know , we are geeks and we like to talk about this stuff , but let 's not forget the elephant in the room here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me, and no offense to the submitter of this story; But since when did the question begin to revolve around the security issues with the actual program the government uses to control your webhabits and not the actual attempt to control free speech?I know, we are geeks and we like to talk about this stuff, but let's not forget the elephant in the room here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297661</id>
	<title>Easy to Beat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244748720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Step 1: Install Virtual PC, or other VM Software<br>Step 2: Install the Mandatory Software INSIDE the VM<br>Step 3: Leave the VM running in the background and never touch it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 1 : Install Virtual PC , or other VM SoftwareStep 2 : Install the Mandatory Software INSIDE the VMStep 3 : Leave the VM running in the background and never touch it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 1: Install Virtual PC, or other VM SoftwareStep 2: Install the Mandatory Software INSIDE the VMStep 3: Leave the VM running in the background and never touch it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295153</id>
	<title>mod 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244740140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>house.^.. pathetic. JOIN THE GNAA!! OS I do, b3cause conversations where</htmltext>
<tokenext>house. ^ .. pathetic. JOIN THE GNAA ! !
OS I do , b3cause conversations where</tokentext>
<sentencetext>house.^.. pathetic. JOIN THE GNAA!!
OS I do, b3cause conversations where</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295167</id>
	<title>Probably easier ways to do it...</title>
	<author>mdm-adph</author>
	<datestamp>1244740140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but is the Chinese government just creating their own personal, huge botnet to use in DDOS attacks in the CYBERWARS OF THE FUTURE?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but is the Chinese government just creating their own personal , huge botnet to use in DDOS attacks in the CYBERWARS OF THE FUTURE ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but is the Chinese government just creating their own personal, huge botnet to use in DDOS attacks in the CYBERWARS OF THE FUTURE?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293907</id>
	<title>are US computers built in China safe?</title>
	<author>wiredpasture</author>
	<datestamp>1244735640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, so it's a pretty ham-handed first attempt.

My question is:  with all the US computer companies outsourcing to China, will my US PC or Apple eventually be affected?

Perhaps we should stop buying US PCs made in China.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so it 's a pretty ham-handed first attempt .
My question is : with all the US computer companies outsourcing to China , will my US PC or Apple eventually be affected ?
Perhaps we should stop buying US PCs made in China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so it's a pretty ham-handed first attempt.
My question is:  with all the US computer companies outsourcing to China, will my US PC or Apple eventually be affected?
Perhaps we should stop buying US PCs made in China.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293847</id>
	<title>Re:Your friendly Chinese government official here.</title>
	<author>forand</author>
	<datestamp>1244735340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except for the part where the software causes your machine to be more accessible to attackers, yup other than that perfect analog.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except for the part where the software causes your machine to be more accessible to attackers , yup other than that perfect analog .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except for the part where the software causes your machine to be more accessible to attackers, yup other than that perfect analog.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293385</id>
	<title>Bad move ...</title>
	<author>oldspewey</author>
	<datestamp>1244733540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&quot;We found a series of software flaws,&quot; explained Isaac Mao, a blogger and social entrepreneur in China</p></div><p>... when contacted later for further comment, it was discovered that Mao had been assigned to 18 years of reeducation through labour in the coal-mining provinces.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We found a series of software flaws , " explained Isaac Mao , a blogger and social entrepreneur in China... when contacted later for further comment , it was discovered that Mao had been assigned to 18 years of reeducation through labour in the coal-mining provinces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We found a series of software flaws," explained Isaac Mao, a blogger and social entrepreneur in China... when contacted later for further comment, it was discovered that Mao had been assigned to 18 years of reeducation through labour in the coal-mining provinces.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294487</id>
	<title>But if the EU mandates it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244737800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>"While the justification may be pitched as protecting children and mostly concerning pornography, once the architecture is set up it can be used for broader purposes, such as the filtering of political ideas."
<br>
In particular, the system could be used to report citizens' web habits.
<br>
"It creates log file of all of the pages that the users tries to access," Mr Maclay told BBC News.
<br>
"At the moment it's unclear whether that is reported back, but it could be." </em>
<br>
<br>
The EU's data retention directives already mandate that ISPs log such things. And then it is a good thing??!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" While the justification may be pitched as protecting children and mostly concerning pornography , once the architecture is set up it can be used for broader purposes , such as the filtering of political ideas .
" In particular , the system could be used to report citizens ' web habits .
" It creates log file of all of the pages that the users tries to access , " Mr Maclay told BBC News .
" At the moment it 's unclear whether that is reported back , but it could be .
" The EU 's data retention directives already mandate that ISPs log such things .
And then it is a good thing ? ? !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"While the justification may be pitched as protecting children and mostly concerning pornography, once the architecture is set up it can be used for broader purposes, such as the filtering of political ideas.
"

In particular, the system could be used to report citizens' web habits.
"It creates log file of all of the pages that the users tries to access," Mr Maclay told BBC News.
"At the moment it's unclear whether that is reported back, but it could be.
" 


The EU's data retention directives already mandate that ISPs log such things.
And then it is a good thing??!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293307</id>
	<title>This all seems most responsible to me as...</title>
	<author>bothemeson</author>
	<datestamp>1244733240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:-<p>
The Chinese government said that the Green Dam Youth Escort software, as it is known, was intended to push forward the "healthy development of the internet" and "effectively manage harmful material for the public and prevent it from being spread."</p><p>

Surely "effectively managing", as they do with the economy, growth in "harmful material" might limit said growth to, say, only 5\% per annum - well within the the scope of our fine Western tradition of the  "healthy development of the internet"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)  Hiweed anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : - The Chinese government said that the Green Dam Youth Escort software , as it is known , was intended to push forward the " healthy development of the internet " and " effectively manage harmful material for the public and prevent it from being spread .
" Surely " effectively managing " , as they do with the economy , growth in " harmful material " might limit said growth to , say , only 5 \ % per annum - well within the the scope of our fine Western tradition of the " healthy development of the internet " : - ) Hiweed anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:-
The Chinese government said that the Green Dam Youth Escort software, as it is known, was intended to push forward the "healthy development of the internet" and "effectively manage harmful material for the public and prevent it from being spread.
"

Surely "effectively managing", as they do with the economy, growth in "harmful material" might limit said growth to, say, only 5\% per annum - well within the the scope of our fine Western tradition of the  "healthy development of the internet" :-)  Hiweed anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296871</id>
	<title>Re:It's a big country</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244746140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A huge step forwards. So far, they only controlled the largest botnets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A huge step forwards .
So far , they only controlled the largest botnets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A huge step forwards.
So far, they only controlled the largest botnets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293197</id>
	<title>So this is a good thing</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1244732940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first result will be that more people will use Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first result will be that more people will use Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first result will be that more people will use Linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293263</id>
	<title>Of course</title>
	<author>drunken\_boxer777</author>
	<datestamp>1244733180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps I am cynical, but do you think the Chinese government would require this software to be distributed with every new computer if there wasn't a backdoor to monitor citizens?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps I am cynical , but do you think the Chinese government would require this software to be distributed with every new computer if there was n't a backdoor to monitor citizens ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps I am cynical, but do you think the Chinese government would require this software to be distributed with every new computer if there wasn't a backdoor to monitor citizens?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296305</id>
	<title>Re:It's a big country</title>
	<author>Ant P.</author>
	<datestamp>1244744160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That assumes they weren't the largest botnet before now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That assumes they were n't the largest botnet before now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That assumes they weren't the largest botnet before now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293915</id>
	<title>U.N. Declaration of Rights</title>
	<author>Alzheimers</author>
	<datestamp>1244735640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny. The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism. <b>Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.</b>"</p><p>
&nbsp; Pravin Lal, Alpha Centauri</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth 's final century , free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny .
The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality , but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism .
Beware of he who would deny you access to information , for in his heart he dreams himself your master .
"   Pravin Lal , Alpha Centauri</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century, free flow of information is the only safeguard against tyranny.
The once-chained people whose leaders at last lose their grip on information flow will soon burst with freedom and vitality, but the free nation gradually constricting its grip on public discourse has begun its rapid slide into despotism.
Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
"
  Pravin Lal, Alpha Centauri</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296833</id>
	<title>Re:Only Windows, only IE</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1244746020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That could essentially be a good thing. If you're using IE on Windows to browse the web, you need all the protection you could possibly get. After all, you explicitly showed that you have no idea about security or any concern about it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That could essentially be a good thing .
If you 're using IE on Windows to browse the web , you need all the protection you could possibly get .
After all , you explicitly showed that you have no idea about security or any concern about it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That could essentially be a good thing.
If you're using IE on Windows to browse the web, you need all the protection you could possibly get.
After all, you explicitly showed that you have no idea about security or any concern about it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293729</id>
	<title>american warrantless</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1244734920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>data mining and wiretaps found still patriotastic and OKAY for your computer and facebook...film at 11.</htmltext>
<tokenext>data mining and wiretaps found still patriotastic and OKAY for your computer and facebook...film at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>data mining and wiretaps found still patriotastic and OKAY for your computer and facebook...film at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28299951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293133
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296833
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297963
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28302621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28310831
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297287
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28305223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28302715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28316033
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28298201
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293217
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28304515
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297661
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_11_1347219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293217
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293893
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295271
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296419
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28304515
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297963
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293263
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296871
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293965
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28302621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28316033
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296999
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28299951
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293593
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28298201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293983
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28305223
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296559
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293385
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293383
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28302715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294101
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28294065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28297115
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28293607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28296833
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28310831
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_11_1347219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_11_1347219.28295167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
