<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_09_2352244</id>
	<title>One-Tweet Wonders</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1244549580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:theodp@aol.com" rel="nofollow">theodp</a> writes <i>"TIME has <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1902604,00.html">seen-the-future-and-it-is-Twitter</a>. Slate, on the other hand, is more fascinated with the phenomenon of <a href="http://slate.com/id/2219995/">orphaned tweets</a>, the messages left by people who sign up for Twitter, post once, then never return (not unlike <a href="http://1post1der.blogspot.com/">one-blog-post wonders</a>). While some orphan tweets betray skepticism about microblogging ('<a href="http://twitter.com/ben\_pursell">I don't get it... what's the point of this thing?</a>'), other one-and-done Twitterers demonstrate keen enthusiasm  before disappearing ('<a href="http://twitter.com/sk8ie/">I'm here!</a>'), and some tweets hint that tragedy has cut a promising Twittering-life short ('<a href="http://twitter.com/Phillyrules">it hurts to breathe. should I go to the hospital?</a>'). Slate notes that studies of Twitter accounts by <a href="http://blogs.harvardbusiness.org/cs/2009/06/new\_twitter\_research\_men\_follo.html">Harvard</a> and <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online\_mobile/twitter-quitters-post-roadblock-to-long-term-growth/">Nielsen</a> suggest the service has been better at signing up users than keeping them, including the one-tweet wonders."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " TIME has seen-the-future-and-it-is-Twitter .
Slate , on the other hand , is more fascinated with the phenomenon of orphaned tweets , the messages left by people who sign up for Twitter , post once , then never return ( not unlike one-blog-post wonders ) .
While some orphan tweets betray skepticism about microblogging ( 'I do n't get it... what 's the point of this thing ?
' ) , other one-and-done Twitterers demonstrate keen enthusiasm before disappearing ( 'I 'm here !
' ) , and some tweets hint that tragedy has cut a promising Twittering-life short ( 'it hurts to breathe .
should I go to the hospital ? ' ) .
Slate notes that studies of Twitter accounts by Harvard and Nielsen suggest the service has been better at signing up users than keeping them , including the one-tweet wonders .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "TIME has seen-the-future-and-it-is-Twitter.
Slate, on the other hand, is more fascinated with the phenomenon of orphaned tweets, the messages left by people who sign up for Twitter, post once, then never return (not unlike one-blog-post wonders).
While some orphan tweets betray skepticism about microblogging ('I don't get it... what's the point of this thing?
'), other one-and-done Twitterers demonstrate keen enthusiasm  before disappearing ('I'm here!
'), and some tweets hint that tragedy has cut a promising Twittering-life short ('it hurts to breathe.
should I go to the hospital?').
Slate notes that studies of Twitter accounts by Harvard and Nielsen suggest the service has been better at signing up users than keeping them, including the one-tweet wonders.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280779</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter's not completely useless</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1244653620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is also an example of no compelling reason to use twitter for this. Email or text would both work in this situation.</p></div><p>How so?  Say 100 people wanted to get the live scores without waiting for the web page to update.  The OP could've created a special-purpose mailing list, walked everyone through signing up, and then deleted it afterward.  With texting, I suppose he could've stored all their numbers and texted each one every time someone won a match.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Honestly the only difference I see between twitter and email/text is a lack of security. The information originator cannot control who has access to the feed.</p></div><p>Well, openness and the fact that email and text are one-to-one channels while Twitter (and Facebook) are one-to-many.  But other than the access model and the difference between direct communication and broadcasting, yes, they're very much alike.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is also an example of no compelling reason to use twitter for this .
Email or text would both work in this situation.How so ?
Say 100 people wanted to get the live scores without waiting for the web page to update .
The OP could 've created a special-purpose mailing list , walked everyone through signing up , and then deleted it afterward .
With texting , I suppose he could 've stored all their numbers and texted each one every time someone won a match.Honestly the only difference I see between twitter and email/text is a lack of security .
The information originator can not control who has access to the feed.Well , openness and the fact that email and text are one-to-one channels while Twitter ( and Facebook ) are one-to-many .
But other than the access model and the difference between direct communication and broadcasting , yes , they 're very much alike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is also an example of no compelling reason to use twitter for this.
Email or text would both work in this situation.How so?
Say 100 people wanted to get the live scores without waiting for the web page to update.
The OP could've created a special-purpose mailing list, walked everyone through signing up, and then deleted it afterward.
With texting, I suppose he could've stored all their numbers and texted each one every time someone won a match.Honestly the only difference I see between twitter and email/text is a lack of security.
The information originator cannot control who has access to the feed.Well, openness and the fact that email and text are one-to-one channels while Twitter (and Facebook) are one-to-many.
But other than the access model and the difference between direct communication and broadcasting, yes, they're very much alike.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28285211</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244628060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.  When the likes of old politicians get on the bandwagon it's time for tweens to violently eject from the new shiny thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
When the likes of old politicians get on the bandwagon it 's time for tweens to violently eject from the new shiny thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
When the likes of old politicians get on the bandwagon it's time for tweens to violently eject from the new shiny thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278085</id>
	<title>the reason</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244641320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>the reason these people sign up in the first place is to follow tweets of others. be it someone famous and worthless like ashton kutcher, or to follow news tweets like cnn.com

regardless, you can't subscribe to someone's tweet stream unless you have signed up. people probably sign up for that reason, post once just because they feel that urge to push the shiny red button. then they just dip back into the shadows to lurk and watch other people's lives unfold.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the reason these people sign up in the first place is to follow tweets of others .
be it someone famous and worthless like ashton kutcher , or to follow news tweets like cnn.com regardless , you ca n't subscribe to someone 's tweet stream unless you have signed up .
people probably sign up for that reason , post once just because they feel that urge to push the shiny red button .
then they just dip back into the shadows to lurk and watch other people 's lives unfold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the reason these people sign up in the first place is to follow tweets of others.
be it someone famous and worthless like ashton kutcher, or to follow news tweets like cnn.com

regardless, you can't subscribe to someone's tweet stream unless you have signed up.
people probably sign up for that reason, post once just because they feel that urge to push the shiny red button.
then they just dip back into the shadows to lurk and watch other people's lives unfold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278725</id>
	<title>Re:Tweet = Prott</title>
	<author>OzRoy</author>
	<datestamp>1244644980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a digg user who keeps "accidentally the whole thing".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a digg user who keeps " accidentally the whole thing " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a digg user who keeps "accidentally the whole thing".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277961</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279085</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the hate...</title>
	<author>Push Latency</author>
	<datestamp>1244646480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This service is popular because it has removed the technology-related aspects of a function that has basically been around for decades.  Now that folks can make use of the internet without needing to know *anything* at all, it's acceptible to the masses. Even BBCode was too much to ask; RSS is not really simple to simpletons; e-mail has spam, scary header data, etc.  Twits want something with a dickhead name that lets them move on with pure use-ability, and no background tech-noise.
<br>
<br>
It provides a "turn-key" CMS.
<br> <br>
I'd write a novel in Twits, just to piss-off the service, but I just can't stand it enough to want to use it to foil it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This service is popular because it has removed the technology-related aspects of a function that has basically been around for decades .
Now that folks can make use of the internet without needing to know * anything * at all , it 's acceptible to the masses .
Even BBCode was too much to ask ; RSS is not really simple to simpletons ; e-mail has spam , scary header data , etc .
Twits want something with a dickhead name that lets them move on with pure use-ability , and no background tech-noise .
It provides a " turn-key " CMS .
I 'd write a novel in Twits , just to piss-off the service , but I just ca n't stand it enough to want to use it to foil it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This service is popular because it has removed the technology-related aspects of a function that has basically been around for decades.
Now that folks can make use of the internet without needing to know *anything* at all, it's acceptible to the masses.
Even BBCode was too much to ask; RSS is not really simple to simpletons; e-mail has spam, scary header data, etc.
Twits want something with a dickhead name that lets them move on with pure use-ability, and no background tech-noise.
It provides a "turn-key" CMS.
I'd write a novel in Twits, just to piss-off the service, but I just can't stand it enough to want to use it to foil it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280455</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the hate...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244652360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I don't understand the hate"<br> <br>

It's because of all the hype and buzz about a tool that is exactly as you described:  niche.<br>
This causes confusion and frustration among the more tech savvy readers of slashdot who know there are better tools out there to accomplish the same tasks.  So for them it's like "US" magazine of the web for slobbering fans who want to know what the stars of "The Hills" think about what they are having for lunch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I do n't understand the hate " It 's because of all the hype and buzz about a tool that is exactly as you described : niche .
This causes confusion and frustration among the more tech savvy readers of slashdot who know there are better tools out there to accomplish the same tasks .
So for them it 's like " US " magazine of the web for slobbering fans who want to know what the stars of " The Hills " think about what they are having for lunch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I don't understand the hate" 

It's because of all the hype and buzz about a tool that is exactly as you described:  niche.
This causes confusion and frustration among the more tech savvy readers of slashdot who know there are better tools out there to accomplish the same tasks.
So for them it's like "US" magazine of the web for slobbering fans who want to know what the stars of "The Hills" think about what they are having for lunch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281435</id>
	<title>Re:That is the end of Twitter</title>
	<author>Hadlock</author>
	<datestamp>1244656020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is, it's artificially peaked, due to being pumped up by the media. People at my work, social gatherings, etc always mention/talk about facebook; I've never, ever heard someone say "twitter" or "tweet" out loud. It's only peaked (piqued?) in the social consiousness because of the media and it's use for advertising. For inter/intra personal communication it's a poor medium and that's why it will never take off like the media keeps saying it will. It has it's uses, but in general people don't need their own RSS feeds. Better tools exist, even if they don't use SMS to accomplish it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , it 's artificially peaked , due to being pumped up by the media .
People at my work , social gatherings , etc always mention/talk about facebook ; I 've never , ever heard someone say " twitter " or " tweet " out loud .
It 's only peaked ( piqued ?
) in the social consiousness because of the media and it 's use for advertising .
For inter/intra personal communication it 's a poor medium and that 's why it will never take off like the media keeps saying it will .
It has it 's uses , but in general people do n't need their own RSS feeds .
Better tools exist , even if they do n't use SMS to accomplish it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, it's artificially peaked, due to being pumped up by the media.
People at my work, social gatherings, etc always mention/talk about facebook; I've never, ever heard someone say "twitter" or "tweet" out loud.
It's only peaked (piqued?
) in the social consiousness because of the media and it's use for advertising.
For inter/intra personal communication it's a poor medium and that's why it will never take off like the media keeps saying it will.
It has it's uses, but in general people don't need their own RSS feeds.
Better tools exist, even if they don't use SMS to accomplish it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278347</id>
	<title>This was my initial tweet</title>
	<author>EdgeyEdgey</author>
	<datestamp>1244643000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28289811</id>
	<title>Tweets are to bloggers what blogs are to authors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244659800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://twitter.com/sonicoliver" title="twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/sonicoliver</a> [twitter.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //twitter.com/sonicoliver [ twitter.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://twitter.com/sonicoliver [twitter.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28289061</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1244652780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Twitter is a fad - and like all fads I loved it for a little while. There was one time I thought it worked great - there was a small explosion followed by a fire about 2 suburbs away (I could see the big smpoke-cloud from my work window). I tweeted to find out what building it was exactly. So did a number of other people. And then someone who was in a building nearer to the fire gave details. All of this happened in 10 mins, and before the radio was giving any information other than what I knew. As it turned out the twitter eye-witness information was accurate, too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter is a fad - and like all fads I loved it for a little while .
There was one time I thought it worked great - there was a small explosion followed by a fire about 2 suburbs away ( I could see the big smpoke-cloud from my work window ) .
I tweeted to find out what building it was exactly .
So did a number of other people .
And then someone who was in a building nearer to the fire gave details .
All of this happened in 10 mins , and before the radio was giving any information other than what I knew .
As it turned out the twitter eye-witness information was accurate , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter is a fad - and like all fads I loved it for a little while.
There was one time I thought it worked great - there was a small explosion followed by a fire about 2 suburbs away (I could see the big smpoke-cloud from my work window).
I tweeted to find out what building it was exactly.
So did a number of other people.
And then someone who was in a building nearer to the fire gave details.
All of this happened in 10 mins, and before the radio was giving any information other than what I knew.
As it turned out the twitter eye-witness information was accurate, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280613</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the hate...</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1244653020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not hate - backlash.
<p>
Mainly backlash against the arty, trendy, luvvy types who think tweeter is such a wonderful, novel concept and how they can't imagine why everyone isn't using it.
</p><p>
As an example, the BBC has gone twitter mad. Half the programmes - and I don't just mean those aimed at the under 10's, seem to want you to follow them. Most beeb journalists have blogs, which they promote and mention whenever they go on air.
</p><p>
Basically <b>WE DON'T CARE</b> If they're reporters, get on with reporting. Just face the camera and tell us stuff. Don't make us navigate to a website and then scroll through endless opinions from "Mavis, Doncaster. I thinl everyone should stop using oil. It's bad" and other such well thought out views.
While it might appear as democratisation to them, or "getting in touch with the audience", or "hearing what YOU have to say", they should remember that opnions are like a$$ h***s, everyone has one, but you don't want to know about the other guy's - keep them to yourself.
</p><p>
And that's the problem with twitter - people don't keep their lame, selfish, opinions to themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not hate - backlash .
Mainly backlash against the arty , trendy , luvvy types who think tweeter is such a wonderful , novel concept and how they ca n't imagine why everyone is n't using it .
As an example , the BBC has gone twitter mad .
Half the programmes - and I do n't just mean those aimed at the under 10 's , seem to want you to follow them .
Most beeb journalists have blogs , which they promote and mention whenever they go on air .
Basically WE DO N'T CARE If they 're reporters , get on with reporting .
Just face the camera and tell us stuff .
Do n't make us navigate to a website and then scroll through endless opinions from " Mavis , Doncaster .
I thinl everyone should stop using oil .
It 's bad " and other such well thought out views .
While it might appear as democratisation to them , or " getting in touch with the audience " , or " hearing what YOU have to say " , they should remember that opnions are like a $ $ h * * * s , everyone has one , but you do n't want to know about the other guy 's - keep them to yourself .
And that 's the problem with twitter - people do n't keep their lame , selfish , opinions to themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not hate - backlash.
Mainly backlash against the arty, trendy, luvvy types who think tweeter is such a wonderful, novel concept and how they can't imagine why everyone isn't using it.
As an example, the BBC has gone twitter mad.
Half the programmes - and I don't just mean those aimed at the under 10's, seem to want you to follow them.
Most beeb journalists have blogs, which they promote and mention whenever they go on air.
Basically WE DON'T CARE If they're reporters, get on with reporting.
Just face the camera and tell us stuff.
Don't make us navigate to a website and then scroll through endless opinions from "Mavis, Doncaster.
I thinl everyone should stop using oil.
It's bad" and other such well thought out views.
While it might appear as democratisation to them, or "getting in touch with the audience", or "hearing what YOU have to say", they should remember that opnions are like a$$ h***s, everyone has one, but you don't want to know about the other guy's - keep them to yourself.
And that's the problem with twitter - people don't keep their lame, selfish, opinions to themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278963</id>
	<title>If the "future" is Twitter, I'll miss out...</title>
	<author>Evil Shabazz</author>
	<datestamp>1244645940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Twitter is the biggest piece of crap on the internet.  Hooray for mass distribution of mind-numbingly mundane minutia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter is the biggest piece of crap on the internet .
Hooray for mass distribution of mind-numbingly mundane minutia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter is the biggest piece of crap on the internet.
Hooray for mass distribution of mind-numbingly mundane minutia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979</id>
	<title>I use twitter daily, but never tweet.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, I have not RTFA, but - I use twitter every single day but have only posted one tweet. I only follow a few interesting people but I now find it invaluable as a way of keeping track of them. I have stopped using facebook - I realise that I now am more interested in seeing what other people say than publishing my own content, I guess a lot of people are like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I have not RTFA , but - I use twitter every single day but have only posted one tweet .
I only follow a few interesting people but I now find it invaluable as a way of keeping track of them .
I have stopped using facebook - I realise that I now am more interested in seeing what other people say than publishing my own content , I guess a lot of people are like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I have not RTFA, but - I use twitter every single day but have only posted one tweet.
I only follow a few interesting people but I now find it invaluable as a way of keeping track of them.
I have stopped using facebook - I realise that I now am more interested in seeing what other people say than publishing my own content, I guess a lot of people are like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279679</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter's not completely useless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244648700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And you couldn't have done this on any other blogging/social networking sites that existed before Twitter.. why?  If you would use, facebook, for example, you could've taken some pictures of the event and uploaded them to a group along with results.

Twitter is a Facebook knockoff that does only one feature (status updates) halfway since it has a short maximum character length.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And you could n't have done this on any other blogging/social networking sites that existed before Twitter.. why ? If you would use , facebook , for example , you could 've taken some pictures of the event and uploaded them to a group along with results .
Twitter is a Facebook knockoff that does only one feature ( status updates ) halfway since it has a short maximum character length .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you couldn't have done this on any other blogging/social networking sites that existed before Twitter.. why?  If you would use, facebook, for example, you could've taken some pictures of the event and uploaded them to a group along with results.
Twitter is a Facebook knockoff that does only one feature (status updates) halfway since it has a short maximum character length.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278201</id>
	<title>Twitter</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1244642160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Twitter (n): </b></p><p><b>1: A service design to indulge the sense of self importance by posting information that history will care little for.</b></p><p><b>2: A web site and infrastructure for passing small messages out to an open ended communication channel in which people what are extremely bored and track the likewise boring activities of others.</b></p><p><b>3: A simple text exchange in which creative people and some regular expressions can generate a swarm-like information network to gauge personal activity. For instance: </b></p><p><i>"by following a demographic of X a researcher can key in on how people feel about Y topic."</i></p><p><i>"An automatic event scheduler system can be generated by people tweeting possible event dates in which subscribers through a script can vector in and select an event date in which all or a certain threshold of particpants can agree to."<br></i><br><b>4: A method by which information is exchanged into a open ended channel. <i>See Broadcast SMS 2.0 </i> </b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter ( n ) : 1 : A service design to indulge the sense of self importance by posting information that history will care little for.2 : A web site and infrastructure for passing small messages out to an open ended communication channel in which people what are extremely bored and track the likewise boring activities of others.3 : A simple text exchange in which creative people and some regular expressions can generate a swarm-like information network to gauge personal activity .
For instance : " by following a demographic of X a researcher can key in on how people feel about Y topic .
" " An automatic event scheduler system can be generated by people tweeting possible event dates in which subscribers through a script can vector in and select an event date in which all or a certain threshold of particpants can agree to .
" 4 : A method by which information is exchanged into a open ended channel .
See Broadcast SMS 2.0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter (n): 1: A service design to indulge the sense of self importance by posting information that history will care little for.2: A web site and infrastructure for passing small messages out to an open ended communication channel in which people what are extremely bored and track the likewise boring activities of others.3: A simple text exchange in which creative people and some regular expressions can generate a swarm-like information network to gauge personal activity.
For instance: "by following a demographic of X a researcher can key in on how people feel about Y topic.
""An automatic event scheduler system can be generated by people tweeting possible event dates in which subscribers through a script can vector in and select an event date in which all or a certain threshold of particpants can agree to.
"4: A method by which information is exchanged into a open ended channel.
See Broadcast SMS 2.0  </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28292263</id>
	<title>Re:the reason</title>
	<author>Elbowgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1244729820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Regarding the news Tweets, how is that any different than what RSS was supposed to do for us?  The only difference is that Tweets are limited to 140 characters, therefore a step back in terms of information available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Regarding the news Tweets , how is that any different than what RSS was supposed to do for us ?
The only difference is that Tweets are limited to 140 characters , therefore a step back in terms of information available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Regarding the news Tweets, how is that any different than what RSS was supposed to do for us?
The only difference is that Tweets are limited to 140 characters, therefore a step back in terms of information available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278967</id>
	<title>"A suspension bridge made of pebbles"</title>
	<author>adnonsense</author>
	<datestamp>1244646000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the end of TFA:</p><blockquote><div><p>Yes, it was built entirely out of 140-character messages, but the sum total of those tweets added up to something truly substantive, like a suspension bridge made of pebbles.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Yes... (backs away slowly...) I'm sure a suspension bridge made of pebbles is just what society needs, now you drive over it while I stand there with the camcorder and a direct line to YouTube.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the end of TFA : Yes , it was built entirely out of 140-character messages , but the sum total of those tweets added up to something truly substantive , like a suspension bridge made of pebbles .
Yes... ( backs away slowly... ) I 'm sure a suspension bridge made of pebbles is just what society needs , now you drive over it while I stand there with the camcorder and a direct line to YouTube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the end of TFA:Yes, it was built entirely out of 140-character messages, but the sum total of those tweets added up to something truly substantive, like a suspension bridge made of pebbles.
Yes... (backs away slowly...) I'm sure a suspension bridge made of pebbles is just what society needs, now you drive over it while I stand there with the camcorder and a direct line to YouTube.

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278063</id>
	<title>I switched...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244641140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use to twit now I twat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use to twit now I twat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use to twit now I twat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281865</id>
	<title>my fav from personal experience</title>
	<author>dannynono</author>
	<datestamp>1244657760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>sis-in-law's first (and last) tweet:

I'm such a beginner on Twitter! what are the cool things to do here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>sis-in-law 's first ( and last ) tweet : I 'm such a beginner on Twitter !
what are the cool things to do here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sis-in-law's first (and last) tweet:

I'm such a beginner on Twitter!
what are the cool things to do here?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280487</id>
	<title>shouldn't that be</title>
	<author>ILongForDarkness</author>
	<datestamp>1244652540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>one twit wonders?</htmltext>
<tokenext>one twit wonders ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>one twit wonders?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282617</id>
	<title>Re:Not News</title>
	<author>SwedishChef</author>
	<datestamp>1244660700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or bought a kayak and made one run down a river... yes I think the "one twit wonder" phenomenon is caused by this; at least in part. Plus, let's face it, most people really don't have that much to say. Interesting or not. Nothing you can do will prod them into actually saying something other than, "cool!".</p><p>I got a Twitter account for the sole purpose of following Lance Armstrong's return to cycling and, because Armstrong is a really dedicated tweeter, it was worth it. I found, to my astonishment, that a bunch of people began to follow me. Turns out that paddling friends (kayakers) follow me</p><p>Facebook, to me, is far more useful because my kids, their friends, and quite a few of my friends are on it and post frequently about what they're doing. So we can keep up easier than by making telephone calls. I even use it from my iphone (which I bought so I could do network stuff from my sport fishing boat anchored in the San Juans... at least I could once it was jailbroke).</p><p>Twitter is clearly a fad... but as a bicycle race fan I find Lance Armstrong's writing to be an interesting inside look into that sport's international scene.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or bought a kayak and made one run down a river... yes I think the " one twit wonder " phenomenon is caused by this ; at least in part .
Plus , let 's face it , most people really do n't have that much to say .
Interesting or not .
Nothing you can do will prod them into actually saying something other than , " cool !
" .I got a Twitter account for the sole purpose of following Lance Armstrong 's return to cycling and , because Armstrong is a really dedicated tweeter , it was worth it .
I found , to my astonishment , that a bunch of people began to follow me .
Turns out that paddling friends ( kayakers ) follow meFacebook , to me , is far more useful because my kids , their friends , and quite a few of my friends are on it and post frequently about what they 're doing .
So we can keep up easier than by making telephone calls .
I even use it from my iphone ( which I bought so I could do network stuff from my sport fishing boat anchored in the San Juans... at least I could once it was jailbroke ) .Twitter is clearly a fad... but as a bicycle race fan I find Lance Armstrong 's writing to be an interesting inside look into that sport 's international scene .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or bought a kayak and made one run down a river... yes I think the "one twit wonder" phenomenon is caused by this; at least in part.
Plus, let's face it, most people really don't have that much to say.
Interesting or not.
Nothing you can do will prod them into actually saying something other than, "cool!
".I got a Twitter account for the sole purpose of following Lance Armstrong's return to cycling and, because Armstrong is a really dedicated tweeter, it was worth it.
I found, to my astonishment, that a bunch of people began to follow me.
Turns out that paddling friends (kayakers) follow meFacebook, to me, is far more useful because my kids, their friends, and quite a few of my friends are on it and post frequently about what they're doing.
So we can keep up easier than by making telephone calls.
I even use it from my iphone (which I bought so I could do network stuff from my sport fishing boat anchored in the San Juans... at least I could once it was jailbroke).Twitter is clearly a fad... but as a bicycle race fan I find Lance Armstrong's writing to be an interesting inside look into that sport's international scene.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280025</id>
	<title>Sell Out Now!</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1244650320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just don't see this lasting more than another year</p></div><p>Exactly. If the people that own Twitter are smart, they are seriously looking for s buyout right now, before the value drops to IP fire-sale prices.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just do n't see this lasting more than another yearExactly .
If the people that own Twitter are smart , they are seriously looking for s buyout right now , before the value drops to IP fire-sale prices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just don't see this lasting more than another yearExactly.
If the people that own Twitter are smart, they are seriously looking for s buyout right now, before the value drops to IP fire-sale prices.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28286373</id>
	<title>I've been through the Twitter stages</title>
	<author>Mean Variance</author>
	<datestamp>1244632980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've successfully worked through the necessary stages of Twitter: Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance.</p><p>Some tricks I've learned to consume and produce to Twitter effectively:</p><p>1. Find some people or businesses to follow that you "might" be interested in. Be aware your choices are not carved in stone. Change them around. Suggestions: @LeoLaporte, @dane (know in the bay area), your local newspaper.</p><p>2. Install one of the many clients that make it easy to follow tweets without opening a browser but will not annoy. I used to use TwitterFox, an add-on for Firefox. Now I use the Digsby Twitter client.</p><p>3. Follow some businesses you like. I follow a few restaurants who post specials and other notes.</p><p>4. My local newspaper, The Fresno Bee, has some good Twitter users who post interesting links to local news, cultural events, etc.</p><p>5. If something you're following is starting to annoy (especially when they tweet 5 times in a row to build a thought), stop following them. I'm talking to you: PTI, Buy.com, LebatardShow.</p><p>6. If some stranger says they're following you, there's no reason you have to reciprocate.</p><p>I've learned to use it to get a collective feed of real-time events. As long as it's non-intrusive and I can control what's relevant, I'm fine with it. If it disappeared tomorrow, so what. Some other novel idea is waiting to take its place.</p><p>I'd like to see some more constructive use of the #hashtag concept, maybe some form of registry. Just today while sitting in traffic, I was thinking there could be hashtags for drivers to communicate the real state of traffic. I find traffic reporting even with sensors to be of marginal value.</p><p>@joe1 #bay101s tied up at Lawrence Expressway</p><p>@jane2 #bay880n Sunol Grade was fast at 3p today</p><p>Also would like the skiers to give real time snow reports.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've successfully worked through the necessary stages of Twitter : Denial , Anger , Bargaining , Depression , Acceptance.Some tricks I 've learned to consume and produce to Twitter effectively : 1 .
Find some people or businesses to follow that you " might " be interested in .
Be aware your choices are not carved in stone .
Change them around .
Suggestions : @ LeoLaporte , @ dane ( know in the bay area ) , your local newspaper.2 .
Install one of the many clients that make it easy to follow tweets without opening a browser but will not annoy .
I used to use TwitterFox , an add-on for Firefox .
Now I use the Digsby Twitter client.3 .
Follow some businesses you like .
I follow a few restaurants who post specials and other notes.4 .
My local newspaper , The Fresno Bee , has some good Twitter users who post interesting links to local news , cultural events , etc.5 .
If something you 're following is starting to annoy ( especially when they tweet 5 times in a row to build a thought ) , stop following them .
I 'm talking to you : PTI , Buy.com , LebatardShow.6 .
If some stranger says they 're following you , there 's no reason you have to reciprocate.I 've learned to use it to get a collective feed of real-time events .
As long as it 's non-intrusive and I can control what 's relevant , I 'm fine with it .
If it disappeared tomorrow , so what .
Some other novel idea is waiting to take its place.I 'd like to see some more constructive use of the # hashtag concept , maybe some form of registry .
Just today while sitting in traffic , I was thinking there could be hashtags for drivers to communicate the real state of traffic .
I find traffic reporting even with sensors to be of marginal value .
@ joe1 # bay101s tied up at Lawrence Expressway @ jane2 # bay880n Sunol Grade was fast at 3p todayAlso would like the skiers to give real time snow reports .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've successfully worked through the necessary stages of Twitter: Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance.Some tricks I've learned to consume and produce to Twitter effectively:1.
Find some people or businesses to follow that you "might" be interested in.
Be aware your choices are not carved in stone.
Change them around.
Suggestions: @LeoLaporte, @dane (know in the bay area), your local newspaper.2.
Install one of the many clients that make it easy to follow tweets without opening a browser but will not annoy.
I used to use TwitterFox, an add-on for Firefox.
Now I use the Digsby Twitter client.3.
Follow some businesses you like.
I follow a few restaurants who post specials and other notes.4.
My local newspaper, The Fresno Bee, has some good Twitter users who post interesting links to local news, cultural events, etc.5.
If something you're following is starting to annoy (especially when they tweet 5 times in a row to build a thought), stop following them.
I'm talking to you: PTI, Buy.com, LebatardShow.6.
If some stranger says they're following you, there's no reason you have to reciprocate.I've learned to use it to get a collective feed of real-time events.
As long as it's non-intrusive and I can control what's relevant, I'm fine with it.
If it disappeared tomorrow, so what.
Some other novel idea is waiting to take its place.I'd like to see some more constructive use of the #hashtag concept, maybe some form of registry.
Just today while sitting in traffic, I was thinking there could be hashtags for drivers to communicate the real state of traffic.
I find traffic reporting even with sensors to be of marginal value.
@joe1 #bay101s tied up at Lawrence Expressway@jane2 #bay880n Sunol Grade was fast at 3p todayAlso would like the skiers to give real time snow reports.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28290157</id>
	<title>wrong sections</title>
	<author>nikanth</author>
	<datestamp>1244663520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This belongs to idle not technology</htmltext>
<tokenext>This belongs to idle not technology</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This belongs to idle not technology</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280911</id>
	<title>what kind of donuts are you offering?</title>
	<author>Filter</author>
	<datestamp>1244654040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what kind of donuts are you offering?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what kind of donuts are you offering ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what kind of donuts are you offering?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28284137</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter's not completely useless</title>
	<author>jubei</author>
	<datestamp>1244667060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your scenario seems like an ideal use of twitter.</p><p>How did people know to follow you for scores?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your scenario seems like an ideal use of twitter.How did people know to follow you for scores ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your scenario seems like an ideal use of twitter.How did people know to follow you for scores?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279723</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the hate...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244648880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh well I would think people would be smarter than just hating on a tool b/c of two superficial reasons.</p></div><p>Doubt it. This is Slashdot, afterall.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh well I would think people would be smarter than just hating on a tool b/c of two superficial reasons.Doubt it .
This is Slashdot , afterall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh well I would think people would be smarter than just hating on a tool b/c of two superficial reasons.Doubt it.
This is Slashdot, afterall.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278975</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1244646000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly especially whenever you can simply subscribe to SMS Facebook status updates and update your status from your phone. Plus theres the upside that most sane people only update their status once or twice a day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly especially whenever you can simply subscribe to SMS Facebook status updates and update your status from your phone .
Plus theres the upside that most sane people only update their status once or twice a day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly especially whenever you can simply subscribe to SMS Facebook status updates and update your status from your phone.
Plus theres the upside that most sane people only update their status once or twice a day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279293</id>
	<title>Think of it as</title>
	<author>Geekthing</author>
	<datestamp>1244647320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I explain twitter as "Push" RSS.  Grandma totally got it when I put it like that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I explain twitter as " Push " RSS .
Grandma totally got it when I put it like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I explain twitter as "Push" RSS.
Grandma totally got it when I put it like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439</id>
	<title>Not News</title>
	<author>Chris\_Jefferson</author>
	<datestamp>1244643600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This existed pre-internet. How many bought a diary and wrote one entry? Went out for a run, swim or to the gym once? Read a few pages of War and Peace? Only went to one foreign language lesson? Only bothered with a couple of piano/guitar/trumpet lessons?</p><p>While twitter has many problems, the fact that the majority of people tend to play with a new thing and then stop isn't new, or news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This existed pre-internet .
How many bought a diary and wrote one entry ?
Went out for a run , swim or to the gym once ?
Read a few pages of War and Peace ?
Only went to one foreign language lesson ?
Only bothered with a couple of piano/guitar/trumpet lessons ? While twitter has many problems , the fact that the majority of people tend to play with a new thing and then stop is n't new , or news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This existed pre-internet.
How many bought a diary and wrote one entry?
Went out for a run, swim or to the gym once?
Read a few pages of War and Peace?
Only went to one foreign language lesson?
Only bothered with a couple of piano/guitar/trumpet lessons?While twitter has many problems, the fact that the majority of people tend to play with a new thing and then stop isn't new, or news.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277961</id>
	<title>Tweet = Prott</title>
	<author>Cornwallis</author>
	<datestamp>1244640300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A great old sci-fi story by Margaret St. Clair

"Prott" is a "boring" alien race, who did nothing but bore humans. They looked like gigantic space-going fried eggs. The story begins with a Prott discovering a human in a spaceship; the Prott enthusiastically begins telling the human about "--ing the --." However, the man can't make out what the noun and verb in the telepathically transmitted phrase mean, so the Prott explains some more... and more... and brings equally enthusiastic friends who want to do nothing but talk about  "--ing the --" ad infinitum. Reminds me of Twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A great old sci-fi story by Margaret St. Clair " Prott " is a " boring " alien race , who did nothing but bore humans .
They looked like gigantic space-going fried eggs .
The story begins with a Prott discovering a human in a spaceship ; the Prott enthusiastically begins telling the human about " --ing the -- .
" However , the man ca n't make out what the noun and verb in the telepathically transmitted phrase mean , so the Prott explains some more... and more... and brings equally enthusiastic friends who want to do nothing but talk about " --ing the -- " ad infinitum .
Reminds me of Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A great old sci-fi story by Margaret St. Clair

"Prott" is a "boring" alien race, who did nothing but bore humans.
They looked like gigantic space-going fried eggs.
The story begins with a Prott discovering a human in a spaceship; the Prott enthusiastically begins telling the human about "--ing the --.
" However, the man can't make out what the noun and verb in the telepathically transmitted phrase mean, so the Prott explains some more... and more... and brings equally enthusiastic friends who want to do nothing but talk about  "--ing the --" ad infinitum.
Reminds me of Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282127</id>
	<title>Re:That is the end of Twitter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244658660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By the time I get with it and sign up for a Twitter account, Twitter will have already ended.</p><p>I just got this great new tape player called a "Walkman."  It's so new, I'm having trouble finding new content for it.</p><p>Gotta run - I have to pick up my powder blue tux at the cleaners.</p><p>Wow! Three tweets already and I'm not even a member.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By the time I get with it and sign up for a Twitter account , Twitter will have already ended.I just got this great new tape player called a " Walkman .
" It 's so new , I 'm having trouble finding new content for it.Got ta run - I have to pick up my powder blue tux at the cleaners.Wow !
Three tweets already and I 'm not even a member .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the time I get with it and sign up for a Twitter account, Twitter will have already ended.I just got this great new tape player called a "Walkman.
"  It's so new, I'm having trouble finding new content for it.Gotta run - I have to pick up my powder blue tux at the cleaners.Wow!
Three tweets already and I'm not even a member.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278763</id>
	<title>cjacobs001</title>
	<author>cjacobs001</author>
	<datestamp>1244645160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just because someone tweets, does that mean someone else sees it ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because someone tweets , does that mean someone else sees it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because someone tweets, does that mean someone else sees it ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28292307</id>
	<title>Re:Social Stuff</title>
	<author>Chiindi</author>
	<datestamp>1244730000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just can't get enough info in 140 characters for instructions and help in keeping your Lithium 6 Deuteride dry, or making a deal for those old Krypton switches on eBay.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just ca n't get enough info in 140 characters for instructions and help in keeping your Lithium 6 Deuteride dry , or making a deal for those old Krypton switches on eBay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just can't get enough info in 140 characters for instructions and help in keeping your Lithium 6 Deuteride dry, or making a deal for those old Krypton switches on eBay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278731</id>
	<title>I wasn't just one Tweet</title>
	<author>davmoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244644980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a Twitter account that I used mainly to follow IT industry talking heads that I like to keep up with.  I even managed to tweet every day or two myself.</p><p>I haven't been back to Twitter since the day Oprah sent her first Tweet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a Twitter account that I used mainly to follow IT industry talking heads that I like to keep up with .
I even managed to tweet every day or two myself.I have n't been back to Twitter since the day Oprah sent her first Tweet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a Twitter account that I used mainly to follow IT industry talking heads that I like to keep up with.
I even managed to tweet every day or two myself.I haven't been back to Twitter since the day Oprah sent her first Tweet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278419</id>
	<title>One-tweet-whores?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244643480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a strange kind of bird!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a strange kind of bird !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a strange kind of bird!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</id>
	<title>Long term?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just don't see this lasting more than another year --- and I think I'm being generous.  I honestly can't understand why anyone is fascinated with reading 
<br>
It might be different if the messages were more directed, or useful.  But sending messages so "my fans" (subscribers) can read them is just....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/shrug.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just do n't see this lasting more than another year --- and I think I 'm being generous .
I honestly ca n't understand why anyone is fascinated with reading It might be different if the messages were more directed , or useful .
But sending messages so " my fans " ( subscribers ) can read them is just.... /shrug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just don't see this lasting more than another year --- and I think I'm being generous.
I honestly can't understand why anyone is fascinated with reading 

It might be different if the messages were more directed, or useful.
But sending messages so "my fans" (subscribers) can read them is just.... /shrug.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281115</id>
	<title>Getting sick of it</title>
	<author>TheSync</author>
	<datestamp>1244654880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I hear one more person on television say "We're tweeting at..." I'm going to go mad!</p><p>I do, however, believe that Twitter is the IRC of the Web 2.0 generation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I hear one more person on television say " We 're tweeting at... " I 'm going to go mad ! I do , however , believe that Twitter is the IRC of the Web 2.0 generation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I hear one more person on television say "We're tweeting at..." I'm going to go mad!I do, however, believe that Twitter is the IRC of the Web 2.0 generation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081</id>
	<title>Twitter's not completely useless</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1244646480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recently discovered a very cool use for Twitter. I was at a state team wrestling meet, and there wasn't any live coverage of the event, but there was WiFi. So I fired up my iPod Touch and started tweeting match results &amp; team scores. They started using my tweets to update a statewide wrestling site. It was actually quite a neat experience, I had followers from all over the state who were interested in finding out the results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently discovered a very cool use for Twitter .
I was at a state team wrestling meet , and there was n't any live coverage of the event , but there was WiFi .
So I fired up my iPod Touch and started tweeting match results &amp; team scores .
They started using my tweets to update a statewide wrestling site .
It was actually quite a neat experience , I had followers from all over the state who were interested in finding out the results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recently discovered a very cool use for Twitter.
I was at a state team wrestling meet, and there wasn't any live coverage of the event, but there was WiFi.
So I fired up my iPod Touch and started tweeting match results &amp; team scores.
They started using my tweets to update a statewide wrestling site.
It was actually quite a neat experience, I had followers from all over the state who were interested in finding out the results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277873</id>
	<title>FR!ST?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244639700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did i got it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did i got it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did i got it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280013</id>
	<title>Surprised?</title>
	<author>Time Ed</author>
	<datestamp>1244650200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first time I heard about Twitter I thought, yeah, a public version of Slashdot sigs. It was only a matter of time...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first time I heard about Twitter I thought , yeah , a public version of Slashdot sigs .
It was only a matter of time.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first time I heard about Twitter I thought, yeah, a public version of Slashdot sigs.
It was only a matter of time...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280931</id>
	<title>Presented without comment</title>
	<author>levicivita</author>
	<datestamp>1244654100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My one and only twitter comment from months ago: <br> <br> <i> OMG twitter is like SOOO cool I will never use anything else EVER again It is now my home page I will log in every day and post everything </i></htmltext>
<tokenext>My one and only twitter comment from months ago : OMG twitter is like SOOO cool I will never use anything else EVER again It is now my home page I will log in every day and post everything</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My one and only twitter comment from months ago:    OMG twitter is like SOOO cool I will never use anything else EVER again It is now my home page I will log in every day and post everything </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277985</id>
	<title>If you don't read TFA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This says about all there is to say about Twitter:<p><div class="quote"><p>In at least one instance, two orphan tweets appear to have been in conversation.

    </p><p>marcbresseel getting ready for cannes - printing latest briefing - I hate folding my shirts <br>8:36 AM Jun 14th, 2008

    </p><p>Kolcott @Marcbresseel You fold your shirts?
    <br>9:13 AM Jul 10th, 2008

</p><p>A lone call followed by a lone response; a social network of two.</p></div><p>The best and worst of this new media, done and done.  We can all move along now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This says about all there is to say about Twitter : In at least one instance , two orphan tweets appear to have been in conversation .
marcbresseel getting ready for cannes - printing latest briefing - I hate folding my shirts 8 : 36 AM Jun 14th , 2008 Kolcott @ Marcbresseel You fold your shirts ?
9 : 13 AM Jul 10th , 2008 A lone call followed by a lone response ; a social network of two.The best and worst of this new media , done and done .
We can all move along now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This says about all there is to say about Twitter:In at least one instance, two orphan tweets appear to have been in conversation.
marcbresseel getting ready for cannes - printing latest briefing - I hate folding my shirts 8:36 AM Jun 14th, 2008

    Kolcott @Marcbresseel You fold your shirts?
9:13 AM Jul 10th, 2008

A lone call followed by a lone response; a social network of two.The best and worst of this new media, done and done.
We can all move along now.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277975</id>
	<title>Protected updates</title>
	<author>Emperor Tiberius</author>
	<datestamp>1244640360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Further proof as to why people should protect theirs: to prevent news agencies from analyzing them<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Further proof as to why people should protect theirs : to prevent news agencies from analyzing them : - ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Further proof as to why people should protect theirs: to prevent news agencies from analyzing them :-).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278687</id>
	<title>Re:Social Stuff</title>
	<author>johnlcallaway</author>
	<datestamp>1244644800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not all social stuff is retarded, just Twitter....I really don't give a damn what my friends are doing all day.  They'll tell me the important stuff next time I see them.

All twitter is for the most part are unimportant people thinking that other people beyond the 2 friends they have really care about all the boring stuff they do.

If something is so important I have to know right away, I have email and a cell phone already. At least those take some effort to use and keep the noise level down a bit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not all social stuff is retarded , just Twitter....I really do n't give a damn what my friends are doing all day .
They 'll tell me the important stuff next time I see them .
All twitter is for the most part are unimportant people thinking that other people beyond the 2 friends they have really care about all the boring stuff they do .
If something is so important I have to know right away , I have email and a cell phone already .
At least those take some effort to use and keep the noise level down a bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not all social stuff is retarded, just Twitter....I really don't give a damn what my friends are doing all day.
They'll tell me the important stuff next time I see them.
All twitter is for the most part are unimportant people thinking that other people beyond the 2 friends they have really care about all the boring stuff they do.
If something is so important I have to know right away, I have email and a cell phone already.
At least those take some effort to use and keep the noise level down a bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282149</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter's not completely useless</title>
	<author>niktemadur</author>
	<datestamp>1244658780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Tweets to update a statewide wrestling site.</i></p><p>Harkens back to the days before live radio broadcasts of sporting events, when townsfolk loitered in front of the telegraph office during World Series games, most places had a billboard updating scores every inning.  The luckier towns had a diamond-shaped mechanical board facing the street, some dude pulling levers to simulate the action for spectators.</p><p>Picture a couple of baseball/tech geeks in suits and bowler hats, discussing hot shit technology in between updates (This just in: Boston Braves score run in top of ninth to overtake Philadelphia Athletics 1-0), one of them dismissing television as vaporware and declaring "just you wait until smell-a-vision comes around", then a Model T roars by the unpaved street, leaving the boys covered in a fine coat of dust.  All very steampunk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tweets to update a statewide wrestling site.Harkens back to the days before live radio broadcasts of sporting events , when townsfolk loitered in front of the telegraph office during World Series games , most places had a billboard updating scores every inning .
The luckier towns had a diamond-shaped mechanical board facing the street , some dude pulling levers to simulate the action for spectators.Picture a couple of baseball/tech geeks in suits and bowler hats , discussing hot shit technology in between updates ( This just in : Boston Braves score run in top of ninth to overtake Philadelphia Athletics 1-0 ) , one of them dismissing television as vaporware and declaring " just you wait until smell-a-vision comes around " , then a Model T roars by the unpaved street , leaving the boys covered in a fine coat of dust .
All very steampunk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tweets to update a statewide wrestling site.Harkens back to the days before live radio broadcasts of sporting events, when townsfolk loitered in front of the telegraph office during World Series games, most places had a billboard updating scores every inning.
The luckier towns had a diamond-shaped mechanical board facing the street, some dude pulling levers to simulate the action for spectators.Picture a couple of baseball/tech geeks in suits and bowler hats, discussing hot shit technology in between updates (This just in: Boston Braves score run in top of ninth to overtake Philadelphia Athletics 1-0), one of them dismissing television as vaporware and declaring "just you wait until smell-a-vision comes around", then a Model T roars by the unpaved street, leaving the boys covered in a fine coat of dust.
All very steampunk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281607</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1244656740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
There are people that find it interesting to know how my personal life is going on a daily, sometimes hourly, basis.  On the other hand, I can communicate with them by causing alternating compressions and rarefactions in the atmosphere, in a completely non-electronic manner.  When that is impractical, I resort to a point-to-point protocol for electronically transmitting such compressions and rarefactions.  Should that be impractical, I've been known to send short text messages in a point-to-point protocol.  The advantage of the last two is that the people I need to communicate with are more likely to be carrying cell phones than monitoring an internet site.
</p><p>
Anybody else is interested in what I have to say only in the case of my witnessing some event, or because they like my insightful analysis or something.  For that, I either need context, or more words than Twitter will allow me on a tweet.
</p><p>
If I ever do wind up in a situation where lots of devoted fans are hanging on my every short message, and they don't pay attention to "Get a life!" or "Think for yourselves!" or similar messages, I'll have no choice but to become an electronic hermit to avoid the insanity.
</p><p>
So, I don't see what I could possibly want with Twitter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are people that find it interesting to know how my personal life is going on a daily , sometimes hourly , basis .
On the other hand , I can communicate with them by causing alternating compressions and rarefactions in the atmosphere , in a completely non-electronic manner .
When that is impractical , I resort to a point-to-point protocol for electronically transmitting such compressions and rarefactions .
Should that be impractical , I 've been known to send short text messages in a point-to-point protocol .
The advantage of the last two is that the people I need to communicate with are more likely to be carrying cell phones than monitoring an internet site .
Anybody else is interested in what I have to say only in the case of my witnessing some event , or because they like my insightful analysis or something .
For that , I either need context , or more words than Twitter will allow me on a tweet .
If I ever do wind up in a situation where lots of devoted fans are hanging on my every short message , and they do n't pay attention to " Get a life !
" or " Think for yourselves !
" or similar messages , I 'll have no choice but to become an electronic hermit to avoid the insanity .
So , I do n't see what I could possibly want with Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
There are people that find it interesting to know how my personal life is going on a daily, sometimes hourly, basis.
On the other hand, I can communicate with them by causing alternating compressions and rarefactions in the atmosphere, in a completely non-electronic manner.
When that is impractical, I resort to a point-to-point protocol for electronically transmitting such compressions and rarefactions.
Should that be impractical, I've been known to send short text messages in a point-to-point protocol.
The advantage of the last two is that the people I need to communicate with are more likely to be carrying cell phones than monitoring an internet site.
Anybody else is interested in what I have to say only in the case of my witnessing some event, or because they like my insightful analysis or something.
For that, I either need context, or more words than Twitter will allow me on a tweet.
If I ever do wind up in a situation where lots of devoted fans are hanging on my every short message, and they don't pay attention to "Get a life!
" or "Think for yourselves!
" or similar messages, I'll have no choice but to become an electronic hermit to avoid the insanity.
So, I don't see what I could possibly want with Twitter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277927</id>
	<title>I don't get it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tweeting seems like a great idea for people who want to start cults or for people who wish they had stalkers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tweeting seems like a great idea for people who want to start cults or for people who wish they had stalkers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tweeting seems like a great idea for people who want to start cults or for people who wish they had stalkers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28286967</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>chrismcb</author>
	<datestamp>1244636280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reading<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reading / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reading /.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281527</id>
	<title>Well for people like myself...</title>
	<author>HerculesMO</author>
	<datestamp>1244656440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who aren't famous or interesting (I guess), it's a good way to 'follow' those people whom interest you.</p><p>I follow the twitter updates of Kevin Rose (Digg), Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails), Paul Thurrott (WinSuperSite) and a handful of others. Often I'll get information that is kind of '0-day', rather than wait for the blogs or media to pick up on it, so it's nice to get that kind of realtime update.</p><p>That, and if you do tweet them something interesting, you actually can have a dialogue with them that would otherwise never exist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who are n't famous or interesting ( I guess ) , it 's a good way to 'follow ' those people whom interest you.I follow the twitter updates of Kevin Rose ( Digg ) , Trent Reznor ( Nine Inch Nails ) , Paul Thurrott ( WinSuperSite ) and a handful of others .
Often I 'll get information that is kind of '0-day ' , rather than wait for the blogs or media to pick up on it , so it 's nice to get that kind of realtime update.That , and if you do tweet them something interesting , you actually can have a dialogue with them that would otherwise never exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who aren't famous or interesting (I guess), it's a good way to 'follow' those people whom interest you.I follow the twitter updates of Kevin Rose (Digg), Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails), Paul Thurrott (WinSuperSite) and a handful of others.
Often I'll get information that is kind of '0-day', rather than wait for the blogs or media to pick up on it, so it's nice to get that kind of realtime update.That, and if you do tweet them something interesting, you actually can have a dialogue with them that would otherwise never exist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280021</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244650200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The irony of it.</p><p>On a microblog (there are better ones that twitter) I can listen to people I'm interested in, and not those I'm not. Here I get to hear your pointless opinion, which interests me not at all, just because some bozo decided to mod your insightless comment insightful.</p><p>So anyway, why are *you* (whoever the hell you are) sending these messages?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The irony of it.On a microblog ( there are better ones that twitter ) I can listen to people I 'm interested in , and not those I 'm not .
Here I get to hear your pointless opinion , which interests me not at all , just because some bozo decided to mod your insightless comment insightful.So anyway , why are * you * ( whoever the hell you are ) sending these messages ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The irony of it.On a microblog (there are better ones that twitter) I can listen to people I'm interested in, and not those I'm not.
Here I get to hear your pointless opinion, which interests me not at all, just because some bozo decided to mod your insightless comment insightful.So anyway, why are *you* (whoever the hell you are) sending these messages?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278275</id>
	<title>Name reservation?</title>
	<author>KlaymenDK</author>
	<datestamp>1244642580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One possible reason for people to have unused accounts is simple to reserve the name. That is to say, to ensure that nobody can go around tweeting "in their name".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One possible reason for people to have unused accounts is simple to reserve the name .
That is to say , to ensure that nobody can go around tweeting " in their name " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One possible reason for people to have unused accounts is simple to reserve the name.
That is to say, to ensure that nobody can go around tweeting "in their name".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279893</id>
	<title>Re:Not News</title>
	<author>owlnation</author>
	<datestamp>1244649600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While twitter has many problems, the fact that the majority of people tend to play with a new thing and then stop isn't new, or news.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Not sure that's the case. The Harvard study suggests that Twitter is different, or at least different from other flash-in-the-pan fads like MySpace, Facebook or blogging, in the it really is bleeding an enormous number of users compared to other social networking fads.<br> <br>

I have to say, that while I know many technoliterate people, and many who use myspace or facebook, I know no-one whatsoever that is using, or has used, Twitter. It's seems to be at least 95\% hype and nothing else.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While twitter has many problems , the fact that the majority of people tend to play with a new thing and then stop is n't new , or news .
Not sure that 's the case .
The Harvard study suggests that Twitter is different , or at least different from other flash-in-the-pan fads like MySpace , Facebook or blogging , in the it really is bleeding an enormous number of users compared to other social networking fads .
I have to say , that while I know many technoliterate people , and many who use myspace or facebook , I know no-one whatsoever that is using , or has used , Twitter .
It 's seems to be at least 95 \ % hype and nothing else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While twitter has many problems, the fact that the majority of people tend to play with a new thing and then stop isn't new, or news.
Not sure that's the case.
The Harvard study suggests that Twitter is different, or at least different from other flash-in-the-pan fads like MySpace, Facebook or blogging, in the it really is bleeding an enormous number of users compared to other social networking fads.
I have to say, that while I know many technoliterate people, and many who use myspace or facebook, I know no-one whatsoever that is using, or has used, Twitter.
It's seems to be at least 95\% hype and nothing else.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278365</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>$1uck</author>
	<datestamp>1244643120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're officially old.  When did the change happen? was it gradual?  Are you shouting at kids to stay off your lawn?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're officially old .
When did the change happen ?
was it gradual ?
Are you shouting at kids to stay off your lawn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're officially old.
When did the change happen?
was it gradual?
Are you shouting at kids to stay off your lawn?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278289</id>
	<title>Re:I use twitter daily, but never tweet.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244642700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whether you're the pitcher (tweeter) or the catcher (tweetee), at the end of the day you're still gay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether you 're the pitcher ( tweeter ) or the catcher ( tweetee ) , at the end of the day you 're still gay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether you're the pitcher (tweeter) or the catcher (tweetee), at the end of the day you're still gay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278379</id>
	<title>Re:Social Stuff</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1244643180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Is basically Retarded</i></p><p>"It hurts to breathe, should I go to the hospital?"</p><p>That's too dumb to be real. Pranksters and <a href="http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/5/27/14337/5146" title="kuro5hin.org">trolls</a> [kuro5hin.org] are everywhere. But, you know, slashdot is a social site of sorts, so if you believe social sites are retarded, what does that say about you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is basically Retarded " It hurts to breathe , should I go to the hospital ?
" That 's too dumb to be real .
Pranksters and trolls [ kuro5hin.org ] are everywhere .
But , you know , slashdot is a social site of sorts , so if you believe social sites are retarded , what does that say about you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is basically Retarded"It hurts to breathe, should I go to the hospital?
"That's too dumb to be real.
Pranksters and trolls [kuro5hin.org] are everywhere.
But, you know, slashdot is a social site of sorts, so if you believe social sites are retarded, what does that say about you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281261</id>
	<title>Print media sometimes drops to Twitter level</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1244655420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
At least there's a length limit on Twitter.
</p><p>
Yesterday, <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2009/06/09/DDFH181QRQ.DTL" title="sfgate.com">this  article by Jon Caroll</a> [sfgate.com] appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle.  <b>This guy is a paid columnist.</b>
He wrote about forty column-inches about taking his car to a car wash. Nothing exciting happened; he just washed his car.  This is how far down the print media have come.
</p><p>
The Chronicle is considering shutting down their print version.  This guy may not have much of a career left.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least there 's a length limit on Twitter .
Yesterday , this article by Jon Caroll [ sfgate.com ] appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle .
This guy is a paid columnist .
He wrote about forty column-inches about taking his car to a car wash. Nothing exciting happened ; he just washed his car .
This is how far down the print media have come .
The Chronicle is considering shutting down their print version .
This guy may not have much of a career left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
At least there's a length limit on Twitter.
Yesterday, this  article by Jon Caroll [sfgate.com] appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle.
This guy is a paid columnist.
He wrote about forty column-inches about taking his car to a car wash. Nothing exciting happened; he just washed his car.
This is how far down the print media have come.
The Chronicle is considering shutting down their print version.
This guy may not have much of a career left.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278319</id>
	<title>Microblog</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1244642880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel like I'm just tweeting into the ether.  And I have little or no interest in the various tweets floating around.  Most regular blogs suck.  So do streams of tweets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel like I 'm just tweeting into the ether .
And I have little or no interest in the various tweets floating around .
Most regular blogs suck .
So do streams of tweets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel like I'm just tweeting into the ether.
And I have little or no interest in the various tweets floating around.
Most regular blogs suck.
So do streams of tweets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279837</id>
	<title>Website is to Blog as RSS is to Twitter</title>
	<author>Mandrel</author>
	<datestamp>1244649360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Twitter democratizes feeds, just as blogs democratized websites.
</p><p>
I never did like the polling aspect of RSS. At least Twitter allows updates to be pushed to a central server.
</p><p>
But is Twitter then just like email from whitelisted, default-no-reply addresses,
made low-latency with rapid server polling, where the message fits in the subject line,
plus an easy way to join and leave personal mailing lists.
</p><p>
The no-reply feature does allow people to talk without listening, which I'm not sure is a good thing.
But blogs are also often like that.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter democratizes feeds , just as blogs democratized websites .
I never did like the polling aspect of RSS .
At least Twitter allows updates to be pushed to a central server .
But is Twitter then just like email from whitelisted , default-no-reply addresses , made low-latency with rapid server polling , where the message fits in the subject line , plus an easy way to join and leave personal mailing lists .
The no-reply feature does allow people to talk without listening , which I 'm not sure is a good thing .
But blogs are also often like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Twitter democratizes feeds, just as blogs democratized websites.
I never did like the polling aspect of RSS.
At least Twitter allows updates to be pushed to a central server.
But is Twitter then just like email from whitelisted, default-no-reply addresses,
made low-latency with rapid server polling, where the message fits in the subject line,
plus an easy way to join and leave personal mailing lists.
The no-reply feature does allow people to talk without listening, which I'm not sure is a good thing.
But blogs are also often like that.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28290965</id>
	<title>Twitter has only one advantage</title>
	<author>dugeen</author>
	<datestamp>1244718600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Twitter is just like Facebook would be if it only had the status update. Its only other advantage is that you don't need to invent a real-sounding name to sign up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter is just like Facebook would be if it only had the status update .
Its only other advantage is that you do n't need to invent a real-sounding name to sign up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter is just like Facebook would be if it only had the status update.
Its only other advantage is that you don't need to invent a real-sounding name to sign up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278509</id>
	<title>Is anyone's life really that interesting</title>
	<author>Dr\_Ken</author>
	<datestamp>1244643900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay maybe Obama or someone like that but really who needs to communicate every damn detail of their daily existence to the world? Is is worth the effort? No wonder the huge drop off rate for this service.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay maybe Obama or someone like that but really who needs to communicate every damn detail of their daily existence to the world ?
Is is worth the effort ?
No wonder the huge drop off rate for this service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay maybe Obama or someone like that but really who needs to communicate every damn detail of their daily existence to the world?
Is is worth the effort?
No wonder the huge drop off rate for this service.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281341</id>
	<title>Re:That is the end of Twitter</title>
	<author>saforrest</author>
	<datestamp>1244655720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>JFK's dad was Joe Kennedy.  Here is an example of the story you mentioned (which I hadn't heard before):</p><p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune\_archive/1996/04/15/211503/index.htm" title="cnn.com">http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune\_archive/1996/04/15/211503/index.htm</a> [cnn.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>JFK 's dad was Joe Kennedy .
Here is an example of the story you mentioned ( which I had n't heard before ) : http : //money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune \ _archive/1996/04/15/211503/index.htm [ cnn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JFK's dad was Joe Kennedy.
Here is an example of the story you mentioned (which I hadn't heard before):http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune\_archive/1996/04/15/211503/index.htm [cnn.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435</id>
	<title>I don't understand the hate...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244643600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really its a tool.  Something like a cross between IM, a mailing list and a personal RSS feed.  It has its own niche.  If its not useful to you, don't use it.  I can only presume all the hate comes from its sudden popularity and the rather stupid name (both of which bring to mind obnoxious teenage fads).  Oh well I would think people would be smarter than just hating on a tool b/c of two superficial reasons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really its a tool .
Something like a cross between IM , a mailing list and a personal RSS feed .
It has its own niche .
If its not useful to you , do n't use it .
I can only presume all the hate comes from its sudden popularity and the rather stupid name ( both of which bring to mind obnoxious teenage fads ) .
Oh well I would think people would be smarter than just hating on a tool b/c of two superficial reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really its a tool.
Something like a cross between IM, a mailing list and a personal RSS feed.
It has its own niche.
If its not useful to you, don't use it.
I can only presume all the hate comes from its sudden popularity and the rather stupid name (both of which bring to mind obnoxious teenage fads).
Oh well I would think people would be smarter than just hating on a tool b/c of two superficial reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278939</id>
	<title>Re:Not News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244645880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, I can see wha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I can see wha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I can see wha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278143</id>
	<title>y6uo Fail it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244641800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>irc.secsup.org Or be in a scene and</htmltext>
<tokenext>irc.secsup.org Or be in a scene and</tokentext>
<sentencetext>irc.secsup.org Or be in a scene and</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280067</id>
	<title>Re:Universal Law of Twitter ...</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1244650440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps we should say more precisely: The mode of all twits is one tweet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps we should say more precisely : The mode of all twits is one tweet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps we should say more precisely: The mode of all twits is one tweet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278239</id>
	<title>Either you are, or you aren't</title>
	<author>Tyr\_7BE</author>
	<datestamp>1244642400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried blogging, that fizzled out the night I started.  I tried microblogging using facebook and twitter, that petered out after a month or so.  I can only assume that once we have <a href="http://www.toothpastefordinner.com/022009/nanotech.gif" title="toothpastefordinner.com">nanoblogging</a> [toothpastefordinner.com], I won't be into that either.  Some people need a forum to sound off to the world.  Others, like me, are indifferent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried blogging , that fizzled out the night I started .
I tried microblogging using facebook and twitter , that petered out after a month or so .
I can only assume that once we have nanoblogging [ toothpastefordinner.com ] , I wo n't be into that either .
Some people need a forum to sound off to the world .
Others , like me , are indifferent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried blogging, that fizzled out the night I started.
I tried microblogging using facebook and twitter, that petered out after a month or so.
I can only assume that once we have nanoblogging [toothpastefordinner.com], I won't be into that either.
Some people need a forum to sound off to the world.
Others, like me, are indifferent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28288231</id>
	<title>Re:Universal Law of Twitter ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244645220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Blogging and Twitter follow along on a kind of trajectory based on positive emotional feedback. If the first tweets or blogs postings leave the person feeling emotionally flat, or with a negative emotion, like say if they feel that what they've said is not insightful or of little value, then they are unlikely to continue the act. Obviously millions of people apparently lack the sense of self reflection needed to make that assessment honestly. IMHO it's like a monkey pressing a button to get a reward. I think that's why within moments of signing up for twitter (out of curiosity) I had "people" who wanted to follow my tweets even before I had actually tweeted something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Blogging and Twitter follow along on a kind of trajectory based on positive emotional feedback .
If the first tweets or blogs postings leave the person feeling emotionally flat , or with a negative emotion , like say if they feel that what they 've said is not insightful or of little value , then they are unlikely to continue the act .
Obviously millions of people apparently lack the sense of self reflection needed to make that assessment honestly .
IMHO it 's like a monkey pressing a button to get a reward .
I think that 's why within moments of signing up for twitter ( out of curiosity ) I had " people " who wanted to follow my tweets even before I had actually tweeted something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Blogging and Twitter follow along on a kind of trajectory based on positive emotional feedback.
If the first tweets or blogs postings leave the person feeling emotionally flat, or with a negative emotion, like say if they feel that what they've said is not insightful or of little value, then they are unlikely to continue the act.
Obviously millions of people apparently lack the sense of self reflection needed to make that assessment honestly.
IMHO it's like a monkey pressing a button to get a reward.
I think that's why within moments of signing up for twitter (out of curiosity) I had "people" who wanted to follow my tweets even before I had actually tweeted something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280043</id>
	<title>Re:the reason</title>
	<author>manly\_15</author>
	<datestamp>1244650380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, you can subscribe to just about any stream of data from twitter with RSS. Of course, most non-techies won't know how to do that, but it's quite possible to be a pure twitter follower with nothing other than an RSS client.</p><p>Where twitter accounts do become useful is how they're a bridge between the informal aspects of IRC and IM and the persistence of email. Rather then spamming your friends with email or IM with a link to an interesting news story, you can just tweet it, and give them the control to follow up, ignore, or filter as they see fit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , you can subscribe to just about any stream of data from twitter with RSS .
Of course , most non-techies wo n't know how to do that , but it 's quite possible to be a pure twitter follower with nothing other than an RSS client.Where twitter accounts do become useful is how they 're a bridge between the informal aspects of IRC and IM and the persistence of email .
Rather then spamming your friends with email or IM with a link to an interesting news story , you can just tweet it , and give them the control to follow up , ignore , or filter as they see fit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, you can subscribe to just about any stream of data from twitter with RSS.
Of course, most non-techies won't know how to do that, but it's quite possible to be a pure twitter follower with nothing other than an RSS client.Where twitter accounts do become useful is how they're a bridge between the informal aspects of IRC and IM and the persistence of email.
Rather then spamming your friends with email or IM with a link to an interesting news story, you can just tweet it, and give them the control to follow up, ignore, or filter as they see fit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278085</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277925</id>
	<title>Ouch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It hurts to post, should I go to the hospital?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It hurts to post , should I go to the hospital ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It hurts to post, should I go to the hospital?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280571</id>
	<title>Re:useless</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1244652840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would be nice if the term "tweet" hurries up and finishes its one-hit wonder cycle, going back to what it used to mean: the sound a bird makes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would be nice if the term " tweet " hurries up and finishes its one-hit wonder cycle , going back to what it used to mean : the sound a bird makes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would be nice if the term "tweet" hurries up and finishes its one-hit wonder cycle, going back to what it used to mean: the sound a bird makes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281451</id>
	<title>140 characters</title>
	<author>andreatwork</author>
	<datestamp>1244656140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem is that 140 characters is not enough to write everything we are trying to convey n we all know that incomplete tweets may cause</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that 140 characters is not enough to write everything we are trying to convey n we all know that incomplete tweets may cause</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that 140 characters is not enough to write everything we are trying to convey n we all know that incomplete tweets may cause</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279091</id>
	<title>Errors</title>
	<author>MetinAustralia</author>
	<datestamp>1244646480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok so I haven't been on Twitter for about 6 weeks now, but have they fixed all their errors? I kept getting pop-ups asking me for my password even after I was logged in!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok so I have n't been on Twitter for about 6 weeks now , but have they fixed all their errors ?
I kept getting pop-ups asking me for my password even after I was logged in !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok so I haven't been on Twitter for about 6 weeks now, but have they fixed all their errors?
I kept getting pop-ups asking me for my password even after I was logged in!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280379</id>
	<title>Re:Name reservation?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244652000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then Jesus better get his name reserved, and quick.</p><p>Enough crap gets carried out 'in His name' as is, no need to add innane tweets to the list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then Jesus better get his name reserved , and quick.Enough crap gets carried out 'in His name ' as is , no need to add innane tweets to the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then Jesus better get his name reserved, and quick.Enough crap gets carried out 'in His name' as is, no need to add innane tweets to the list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278275</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279367</id>
	<title>Re:I use twitter daily, but never tweet.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244647500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find that Twitter is very useful in keeping me updated to breaking news. That is the main function of Twitter, to me. Another way I use twitter is as a journal for my spur-of-the-moment, concise ideas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find that Twitter is very useful in keeping me updated to breaking news .
That is the main function of Twitter , to me .
Another way I use twitter is as a journal for my spur-of-the-moment , concise ideas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find that Twitter is very useful in keeping me updated to breaking news.
That is the main function of Twitter, to me.
Another way I use twitter is as a journal for my spur-of-the-moment, concise ideas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280519</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the hate...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244652660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My experience so far is it's a great way to get short commentary or requests to busy professionals/celebs whom you typically can't find an e-mail address for.  Think about folks with 4,000 e-mails a week that they can't possibly respond to.  A memorable tweet that makes an important point may stick in their memory better.  It's certainly less intimidating than a full Inbox.<br>Also it is probably helping (a little) toward improving the collective societal wit, since a good zinger is what makes most of the people worth following, worth following.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My experience so far is it 's a great way to get short commentary or requests to busy professionals/celebs whom you typically ca n't find an e-mail address for .
Think about folks with 4,000 e-mails a week that they ca n't possibly respond to .
A memorable tweet that makes an important point may stick in their memory better .
It 's certainly less intimidating than a full Inbox.Also it is probably helping ( a little ) toward improving the collective societal wit , since a good zinger is what makes most of the people worth following , worth following .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My experience so far is it's a great way to get short commentary or requests to busy professionals/celebs whom you typically can't find an e-mail address for.
Think about folks with 4,000 e-mails a week that they can't possibly respond to.
A memorable tweet that makes an important point may stick in their memory better.
It's certainly less intimidating than a full Inbox.Also it is probably helping (a little) toward improving the collective societal wit, since a good zinger is what makes most of the people worth following, worth following.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277981</id>
	<title>well....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>   Duh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Duh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>   Duh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279635</id>
	<title>I'm a one-tweeter</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1244648580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I heard so much about the service, I finally signed up for it to see what all the hullabaloo was about.  I found a desert in which people were wholly absorbed in themselves (sad) or trying to bask in the reflected glory from other twitter users (sadder, if possible).  There were some worthwhile pieces there, but the signal-to-noise ratio was quite poor - nothing even close to the "quality" of slashdot's content.  What's really disturbing is seeing respected journalists tossing off references to twitter like it's some service the entire world is familiar with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard so much about the service , I finally signed up for it to see what all the hullabaloo was about .
I found a desert in which people were wholly absorbed in themselves ( sad ) or trying to bask in the reflected glory from other twitter users ( sadder , if possible ) .
There were some worthwhile pieces there , but the signal-to-noise ratio was quite poor - nothing even close to the " quality " of slashdot 's content .
What 's really disturbing is seeing respected journalists tossing off references to twitter like it 's some service the entire world is familiar with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard so much about the service, I finally signed up for it to see what all the hullabaloo was about.
I found a desert in which people were wholly absorbed in themselves (sad) or trying to bask in the reflected glory from other twitter users (sadder, if possible).
There were some worthwhile pieces there, but the signal-to-noise ratio was quite poor - nothing even close to the "quality" of slashdot's content.
What's really disturbing is seeing respected journalists tossing off references to twitter like it's some service the entire world is familiar with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043</id>
	<title>That is the end of Twitter</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1244640900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once it makes to the cover of Time, it is a sure sign it has peaked.

If you see the bull (or bear) dressed in a suit on the cover of Time or Newsweek that will be a 3 year high (or low) and if both mags have the bull (or bear) in the same week, it will be a five year high (or low).
<p>

It is much like that apocryphal story about a shoeshine boy (or a taxi driver) telling JFK's Dad (Patrick Kennedy?) to get into the stock market and JKF's dad figuring, if these guys are in, it is time to get out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once it makes to the cover of Time , it is a sure sign it has peaked .
If you see the bull ( or bear ) dressed in a suit on the cover of Time or Newsweek that will be a 3 year high ( or low ) and if both mags have the bull ( or bear ) in the same week , it will be a five year high ( or low ) .
It is much like that apocryphal story about a shoeshine boy ( or a taxi driver ) telling JFK 's Dad ( Patrick Kennedy ?
) to get into the stock market and JKF 's dad figuring , if these guys are in , it is time to get out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once it makes to the cover of Time, it is a sure sign it has peaked.
If you see the bull (or bear) dressed in a suit on the cover of Time or Newsweek that will be a 3 year high (or low) and if both mags have the bull (or bear) in the same week, it will be a five year high (or low).
It is much like that apocryphal story about a shoeshine boy (or a taxi driver) telling JFK's Dad (Patrick Kennedy?
) to get into the stock market and JKF's dad figuring, if these guys are in, it is time to get out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279007</id>
	<title>Re:That is the end of Twitter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244646120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously.</p><p>This is the same magazine that didn't have enough web savvy to stop the utter pwnage of their Top 100 most influential people of 2009 by a bunch of pimply kids from 4chan.</p><p>THIS is the magazine that declares Twitter the future?  Meh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously.This is the same magazine that did n't have enough web savvy to stop the utter pwnage of their Top 100 most influential people of 2009 by a bunch of pimply kids from 4chan.THIS is the magazine that declares Twitter the future ?
Meh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.This is the same magazine that didn't have enough web savvy to stop the utter pwnage of their Top 100 most influential people of 2009 by a bunch of pimply kids from 4chan.THIS is the magazine that declares Twitter the future?
Meh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889</id>
	<title>Social Stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244639820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is basically Retarded. Enough said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is basically Retarded .
Enough said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is basically Retarded.
Enough said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278291</id>
	<title>Re:Social Stuff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244642700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>And here you are posting in community forum.  How very social of you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And here you are posting in community forum .
How very social of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here you are posting in community forum.
How very social of you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279537</id>
	<title>Far more writers then readers</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1244648160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How many tweets never, ever get read?
<p>
I can't help the feeling that most twitters, tweets or whatever the hell they're called, are merely written to satisfy the writer (in the same way that some people write diaries) as a cathartic experience - never expecting, nor intending them to be read.I would venture further, and say that a large number of blogs are exactly the same - but written by people who can't organise their thoughts into SMS sized bytes (or, vice-versa: tweeterers haven't got the attention span to write blog articles).
</p><p>
Either way, once the initial ego-trip has been satisfied, and these people realise that no-one will ever bother to read their stuff, they come to terms with the obvious conclusion that nobody else cares what they think, as they never get any followers, or blog comments.
</p><p>
Maybe what we need is a website called<nobr> <wbr></nobr><b>/dev/null</b> where people can vent, in the certain knowledge that everthing is guaranteed to disappear as soon as it's written - thus removing the threat that when they grow up (if?) it won't come back to bite them in the bum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many tweets never , ever get read ?
I ca n't help the feeling that most twitters , tweets or whatever the hell they 're called , are merely written to satisfy the writer ( in the same way that some people write diaries ) as a cathartic experience - never expecting , nor intending them to be read.I would venture further , and say that a large number of blogs are exactly the same - but written by people who ca n't organise their thoughts into SMS sized bytes ( or , vice-versa : tweeterers have n't got the attention span to write blog articles ) .
Either way , once the initial ego-trip has been satisfied , and these people realise that no-one will ever bother to read their stuff , they come to terms with the obvious conclusion that nobody else cares what they think , as they never get any followers , or blog comments .
Maybe what we need is a website called /dev/null where people can vent , in the certain knowledge that everthing is guaranteed to disappear as soon as it 's written - thus removing the threat that when they grow up ( if ?
) it wo n't come back to bite them in the bum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many tweets never, ever get read?
I can't help the feeling that most twitters, tweets or whatever the hell they're called, are merely written to satisfy the writer (in the same way that some people write diaries) as a cathartic experience - never expecting, nor intending them to be read.I would venture further, and say that a large number of blogs are exactly the same - but written by people who can't organise their thoughts into SMS sized bytes (or, vice-versa: tweeterers haven't got the attention span to write blog articles).
Either way, once the initial ego-trip has been satisfied, and these people realise that no-one will ever bother to read their stuff, they come to terms with the obvious conclusion that nobody else cares what they think, as they never get any followers, or blog comments.
Maybe what we need is a website called /dev/null where people can vent, in the certain knowledge that everthing is guaranteed to disappear as soon as it's written - thus removing the threat that when they grow up (if?
) it won't come back to bite them in the bum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279937</id>
	<title>Re:Universal Law of Twitter ...</title>
	<author>TinBromide</author>
	<datestamp>1244649780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Recently, this Twit has one tweet on his account. I registered a while ago to save my name and tweeted. I think that may be the dynamic. If Harvard and Nielsen managed to get thier names and not squatters, they may have been doing the equivalent of protecting their tweet space name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Recently , this Twit has one tweet on his account .
I registered a while ago to save my name and tweeted .
I think that may be the dynamic .
If Harvard and Nielsen managed to get thier names and not squatters , they may have been doing the equivalent of protecting their tweet space name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recently, this Twit has one tweet on his account.
I registered a while ago to save my name and tweeted.
I think that may be the dynamic.
If Harvard and Nielsen managed to get thier names and not squatters, they may have been doing the equivalent of protecting their tweet space name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278179</id>
	<title>useless</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1244642040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we just say that Twitter is public masturbation and be done with it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we just say that Twitter is public masturbation and be done with it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we just say that Twitter is public masturbation and be done with it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281189</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter's not completely useless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244655120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, thank the Ether for Twitter, since you couldn't possibly have used any other medium to convey those scores.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , thank the Ether for Twitter , since you could n't possibly have used any other medium to convey those scores .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, thank the Ether for Twitter, since you couldn't possibly have used any other medium to convey those scores.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281301</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244655540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hint: you're not their market. therefore your opinions on it's longevity are going to be ridiculously skewed.</p><p>It'll probably be around another decade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hint : you 're not their market .
therefore your opinions on it 's longevity are going to be ridiculously skewed.It 'll probably be around another decade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hint: you're not their market.
therefore your opinions on it's longevity are going to be ridiculously skewed.It'll probably be around another decade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281003</id>
	<title>Re:Long term?</title>
	<author>GameboyRMH</author>
	<datestamp>1244654460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just don't see this lasting more than another year</p></div><p>You underestimate the need of the unwashed masses to say useless things to people. You know how some people are sending pointless banter in text messages constantly?
<br> <br>
Twitter is the evolution of idle texting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just do n't see this lasting more than another yearYou underestimate the need of the unwashed masses to say useless things to people .
You know how some people are sending pointless banter in text messages constantly ?
Twitter is the evolution of idle texting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just don't see this lasting more than another yearYou underestimate the need of the unwashed masses to say useless things to people.
You know how some people are sending pointless banter in text messages constantly?
Twitter is the evolution of idle texting.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280825</id>
	<title>Re:useless</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1244653740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that "masturbation" literally means "self-harm", I'd fully agree with calling tweets public masturbation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that " masturbation " literally means " self-harm " , I 'd fully agree with calling tweets public masturbation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that "masturbation" literally means "self-harm", I'd fully agree with calling tweets public masturbation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279217</id>
	<title>Re:I use twitter daily, but never tweet.</title>
	<author>mbenzi</author>
	<datestamp>1244647020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is exactly the use case that the critics still don't understand.  There are dozens (hundreds?) of ways to use Twitter that don't involve tweeting.  @cnn @AJEnglish @woot @wxseattle  @HouseFloor , etc.</p><p>People read websites all the time w/o posting comments, no one says those people have abandoned the web.  Just because Twitter allows for two-way conversions doesn't mean that is how you have to use it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is exactly the use case that the critics still do n't understand .
There are dozens ( hundreds ?
) of ways to use Twitter that do n't involve tweeting .
@ cnn @ AJEnglish @ woot @ wxseattle @ HouseFloor , etc.People read websites all the time w/o posting comments , no one says those people have abandoned the web .
Just because Twitter allows for two-way conversions does n't mean that is how you have to use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is exactly the use case that the critics still don't understand.
There are dozens (hundreds?
) of ways to use Twitter that don't involve tweeting.
@cnn @AJEnglish @woot @wxseattle  @HouseFloor , etc.People read websites all the time w/o posting comments, no one says those people have abandoned the web.
Just because Twitter allows for two-way conversions doesn't mean that is how you have to use it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891</id>
	<title>Universal Law of Twitter ...</title>
	<author>krou</author>
	<datestamp>1244639820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Krou's law: There is, on average, only one tweet per twit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Krou 's law : There is , on average , only one tweet per twit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Krou's law: There is, on average, only one tweet per twit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278039</id>
	<title>Whiners of all countries, unite!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For all the people who hate Twitter, don't get it, like to make remarks about using twitter to inform others of bowel movements, how trivial it is to build it, et cetera:</p><p><b>Please reply to this thread to contain the complaining</b></p><p>Every story even remotely connected to Twitter gets the trolls crawling under their stones, mumbling how much they hate it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For all the people who hate Twitter , do n't get it , like to make remarks about using twitter to inform others of bowel movements , how trivial it is to build it , et cetera : Please reply to this thread to contain the complainingEvery story even remotely connected to Twitter gets the trolls crawling under their stones , mumbling how much they hate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For all the people who hate Twitter, don't get it, like to make remarks about using twitter to inform others of bowel movements, how trivial it is to build it, et cetera:Please reply to this thread to contain the complainingEvery story even remotely connected to Twitter gets the trolls crawling under their stones, mumbling how much they hate it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279503</id>
	<title>Re:I don't understand the hate...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244648040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, don't hate a tool because you don't have a personal use for it.</p><p>I'm a mail courier (I don't have constant access to a computer and I don't have an iPhone).  I love twitter because it's like a open chat room where anyone can talk, but I get to choose who I listen to.  I get to have conversations with friends (who may not have cell phones) via sms, and they can even be private messages.  SMS has a much lower power cost than an always on java instant messenger.  Plus, they are all stored in a centralized location so if they send me a neat link I can't check out on my phone's awful browser, I don't have to go through a process to get it on my home computer later.  And while you may not care that I am announcing that I'm going to have lunch at Chipotle on Miramar rd, one of my friends may want to meet me there.</p><p>People are valid in complaining about spam or marketers and other dregs, but does that mean we should be complaining about email or snail mail because I get sunday saver coupon books and ads?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , do n't hate a tool because you do n't have a personal use for it.I 'm a mail courier ( I do n't have constant access to a computer and I do n't have an iPhone ) .
I love twitter because it 's like a open chat room where anyone can talk , but I get to choose who I listen to .
I get to have conversations with friends ( who may not have cell phones ) via sms , and they can even be private messages .
SMS has a much lower power cost than an always on java instant messenger .
Plus , they are all stored in a centralized location so if they send me a neat link I ca n't check out on my phone 's awful browser , I do n't have to go through a process to get it on my home computer later .
And while you may not care that I am announcing that I 'm going to have lunch at Chipotle on Miramar rd , one of my friends may want to meet me there.People are valid in complaining about spam or marketers and other dregs , but does that mean we should be complaining about email or snail mail because I get sunday saver coupon books and ads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, don't hate a tool because you don't have a personal use for it.I'm a mail courier (I don't have constant access to a computer and I don't have an iPhone).
I love twitter because it's like a open chat room where anyone can talk, but I get to choose who I listen to.
I get to have conversations with friends (who may not have cell phones) via sms, and they can even be private messages.
SMS has a much lower power cost than an always on java instant messenger.
Plus, they are all stored in a centralized location so if they send me a neat link I can't check out on my phone's awful browser, I don't have to go through a process to get it on my home computer later.
And while you may not care that I am announcing that I'm going to have lunch at Chipotle on Miramar rd, one of my friends may want to meet me there.People are valid in complaining about spam or marketers and other dregs, but does that mean we should be complaining about email or snail mail because I get sunday saver coupon books and ads?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277917</id>
	<title>Nothing too new here</title>
	<author>orta</author>
	<datestamp>1244639940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It happens with everything, people try it then forget to go back and continue. Personally I end up tweeting about once a month or two, I really don't care that much about the smaller details in peoples lives. And I've got a few friends who've done the whole orphan tweet thing. Nothing notably funny though, Kinda funny if they start posting now because so many people have started to follow them through the press =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It happens with everything , people try it then forget to go back and continue .
Personally I end up tweeting about once a month or two , I really do n't care that much about the smaller details in peoples lives .
And I 've got a few friends who 've done the whole orphan tweet thing .
Nothing notably funny though , Kinda funny if they start posting now because so many people have started to follow them through the press = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It happens with everything, people try it then forget to go back and continue.
Personally I end up tweeting about once a month or two, I really don't care that much about the smaller details in peoples lives.
And I've got a few friends who've done the whole orphan tweet thing.
Nothing notably funny though, Kinda funny if they start posting now because so many people have started to follow them through the press =)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278015</id>
	<title>Gerge J's first and last tweet:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244640660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Help!</p><p>Jane, how do you stop this crazy thing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Help ! Jane , how do you stop this crazy thing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Help!Jane, how do you stop this crazy thing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280213</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter's not completely useless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244651160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an example of a good use of twitter.</p><p>This is also an example of no compelling reason to use twitter for this.  Email or text would both work in this situation.</p><p>Honestly the only difference I see between twitter and email/text is a lack of security.  The information originator cannot control who has access to the feed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an example of a good use of twitter.This is also an example of no compelling reason to use twitter for this .
Email or text would both work in this situation.Honestly the only difference I see between twitter and email/text is a lack of security .
The information originator can not control who has access to the feed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an example of a good use of twitter.This is also an example of no compelling reason to use twitter for this.
Email or text would both work in this situation.Honestly the only difference I see between twitter and email/text is a lack of security.
The information originator cannot control who has access to the feed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281221</id>
	<title>Single Tweeter: AbrahamLincon</title>
	<author>GMFTatsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1244655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I created the <a href="http://twitter.com/abrahamlincon" title="twitter.com">AbrahamLincon</a> [twitter.com] user in response to a back-and-forth discussion on political rhetoric a friend and I were engaged in.  (Yeah, in my haste I dropped the 'l' in the last name.  Oops.)  He was using the Lincoln/Douglas debates as an example of the high quality of political debate that our country once valued, and from which we had fallen into sound bites.  He asked what possible message of political worth could be tweeted in 140 chars.</p><p>As an experiment, I created AbrahamLincon, reviewed the text of the Gettysburg address, and distilled it to 140 characters.  I won't say it succeeded or failed, but it was a fun experiment in high-density verbiage.</p><p>I might do the same with other speeches.  Or it might stay a one-tweet wonder.  It was fun, though, and I hope Mr. Lincoln wouldn't mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I created the AbrahamLincon [ twitter.com ] user in response to a back-and-forth discussion on political rhetoric a friend and I were engaged in .
( Yeah , in my haste I dropped the 'l ' in the last name .
Oops. ) He was using the Lincoln/Douglas debates as an example of the high quality of political debate that our country once valued , and from which we had fallen into sound bites .
He asked what possible message of political worth could be tweeted in 140 chars.As an experiment , I created AbrahamLincon , reviewed the text of the Gettysburg address , and distilled it to 140 characters .
I wo n't say it succeeded or failed , but it was a fun experiment in high-density verbiage.I might do the same with other speeches .
Or it might stay a one-tweet wonder .
It was fun , though , and I hope Mr. Lincoln would n't mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I created the AbrahamLincon [twitter.com] user in response to a back-and-forth discussion on political rhetoric a friend and I were engaged in.
(Yeah, in my haste I dropped the 'l' in the last name.
Oops.)  He was using the Lincoln/Douglas debates as an example of the high quality of political debate that our country once valued, and from which we had fallen into sound bites.
He asked what possible message of political worth could be tweeted in 140 chars.As an experiment, I created AbrahamLincon, reviewed the text of the Gettysburg address, and distilled it to 140 characters.
I won't say it succeeded or failed, but it was a fun experiment in high-density verbiage.I might do the same with other speeches.
Or it might stay a one-tweet wonder.
It was fun, though, and I hope Mr. Lincoln wouldn't mind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279217
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28292263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278085
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28288231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280379
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28286967
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28292307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277961
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281189
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28284137
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28285211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278291
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281607
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281003
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282149
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278975
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280025
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278289
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_09_2352244_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28289061
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278939
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28292263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280043
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278039
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277917
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277891
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28288231
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280067
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278763
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279081
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280213
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28284137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279503
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277985
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280021
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281003
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278975
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28289061
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280025
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28285211
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281301
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28286967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278239
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278289
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278687
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278291
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28292307
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279837
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28279007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28282127
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28281435
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280379
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28277873
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_09_2352244.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28278179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280825
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_09_2352244.28280571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
