<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_08_2054258</id>
	<title>Acer To Launch 3D Notebook In October?</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1244457840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Acer is planning to announce a <a href="http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20090608PD206.html">3D notebook</a> computer by end of October. If Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it'll be the world's first manufacturer to do so. The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it requires no special glasses. The 15.6-inch notebook features built-in software which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D and directly support 3D movies."</i> <b>Update: 06/08 23:18 GMT</b> by <b> <a href="http://www.monkey.org/~timothy/">T</a> </b>: According to the linked story, the no-glasses version is still in the works; the current iteration does still require special glasses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Acer is planning to announce a 3D notebook computer by end of October .
If Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it 'll be the world 's first manufacturer to do so .
The most interesting thing about Acer 's machine is that it requires no special glasses .
The 15.6-inch notebook features built-in software which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D and directly support 3D movies .
" Update : 06/08 23 : 18 GMT by T : According to the linked story , the no-glasses version is still in the works ; the current iteration does still require special glasses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Acer is planning to announce a 3D notebook computer by end of October.
If Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it'll be the world's first manufacturer to do so.
The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it requires no special glasses.
The 15.6-inch notebook features built-in software which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D and directly support 3D movies.
" Update: 06/08 23:18 GMT by  T : According to the linked story, the no-glasses version is still in the works; the current iteration does still require special glasses.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259277</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244468340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not "true" surround sound, it doesn't mystically divine information that isn't there anymore. That is, when you turn your head you don't hear what you would have heard if you've done so with the actual source, if applicable.</p><p>So, no, it's impossible for them to have something that can guess to any believable sight what depth every part of an image it should be.</p><p>I second that call on bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not " true " surround sound , it does n't mystically divine information that is n't there anymore .
That is , when you turn your head you do n't hear what you would have heard if you 've done so with the actual source , if applicable.So , no , it 's impossible for them to have something that can guess to any believable sight what depth every part of an image it should be.I second that call on bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not "true" surround sound, it doesn't mystically divine information that isn't there anymore.
That is, when you turn your head you don't hear what you would have heard if you've done so with the actual source, if applicable.So, no, it's impossible for them to have something that can guess to any believable sight what depth every part of an image it should be.I second that call on bullshit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258317</id>
	<title>Sharp produced a 3D laptop in 2005</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244462400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sharp produced a 3D laptop in early 2005.</p><p>http://www.pcworld.com/article/115348/sharps\_3d\_notebook.html</p><p>http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/22/042253</p><p>with a no-glasses display, even.  I saw one at a conference expo,<br>it worked pretty well for molecular graphics/viz stuff.  But they never<br>caught on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sharp produced a 3D laptop in early 2005.http : //www.pcworld.com/article/115348/sharps \ _3d \ _notebook.htmlhttp : //tech.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 05/03/22/042253with a no-glasses display , even .
I saw one at a conference expo,it worked pretty well for molecular graphics/viz stuff .
But they nevercaught on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sharp produced a 3D laptop in early 2005.http://www.pcworld.com/article/115348/sharps\_3d\_notebook.htmlhttp://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/22/042253with a no-glasses display, even.
I saw one at a conference expo,it worked pretty well for molecular graphics/viz stuff.
But they nevercaught on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258203</id>
	<title>Summary grossly incorrect.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244461800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<br> <br>"Currently, <b>users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses</b> for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted."<br> <br>Suddenly, that 'most interesting thing' isn't that interesting at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " Currently , users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective , however , Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses , although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome , Kan noted .
" Suddenly , that 'most interesting thing ' is n't that interesting at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: "Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted.
" Suddenly, that 'most interesting thing' isn't that interesting at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258185</id>
	<title>Cue Mind Numbing Headache and Eye Strain in</title>
	<author>bobstreo</author>
	<datestamp>1244461740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>3d</p><p>I can barely stand  staring at my 2d monitor  all day.</p><p>Will it stop working after a while so you can take a break like the Nintendo VR Boy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>3dI can barely stand staring at my 2d monitor all day.Will it stop working after a while so you can take a break like the Nintendo VR Boy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3dI can barely stand  staring at my 2d monitor  all day.Will it stop working after a while so you can take a break like the Nintendo VR Boy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258595</id>
	<title>Re:Sharp produced a 3D laptop in 2005</title>
	<author>Areyoukiddingme</author>
	<datestamp>1244463840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew Sharp had made the no-glasses 3D display LCD panel.  Didn't know they'd made an integrated version.  As I recall, they use an integrated lenticular lens sheet.  Unfortunately for Sharp, they're completely and utterly clueless about how to find a tolerable price point.  People might pay a premium for a native 3D display, but they sure as hell won't pay as much of a premium as Sharp asked.  So they didn't sell.</p><p>Worse, it's not hard to find out what lenticular lens sheets cost.  They're the same things given away for free on cereal boxes for motion effects, and the same things used in promotional materials for motion and 3D effects.  "Motion" Valentine's Day cards for children to distribute at school were available for a few dollars at Walmart.  Meaning they're dirt cheap per square foot.  For a corporation as large as Sharp, buying the extrusion machine capable of producing them at precisely the pitch they need should have been trivial, the PET plastic cost IS trivial, and so ultimately the price point they chose was absurd.  They tried to play the "over price it so people think it's worth something" game and failed.</p><p>A shame, really.  Reviewers said the effect worked quite nicely, without any headache inducing effect whatsoever.  A far cry from every glasses-based effect ever tried.  Of course what they trade off for 3D is resolution, rather than framerate.  There's always something...</p><p>It's too bad "HD" flat-panel TVs have utterly destroyed the computer flat panel market.  Manufacturers find it much more lucrative to crank out tons of crap-resolution TVs than to try to produce high resolution computer monitors anymore.  If not for TVs, production processes might have pushed past the 30" widescreen at 2560x1600 resolution, getting us ready for built-in stereoscopic displays.  Instead, average resolution has declined, crippling any idea to spend pixels for stereo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew Sharp had made the no-glasses 3D display LCD panel .
Did n't know they 'd made an integrated version .
As I recall , they use an integrated lenticular lens sheet .
Unfortunately for Sharp , they 're completely and utterly clueless about how to find a tolerable price point .
People might pay a premium for a native 3D display , but they sure as hell wo n't pay as much of a premium as Sharp asked .
So they did n't sell.Worse , it 's not hard to find out what lenticular lens sheets cost .
They 're the same things given away for free on cereal boxes for motion effects , and the same things used in promotional materials for motion and 3D effects .
" Motion " Valentine 's Day cards for children to distribute at school were available for a few dollars at Walmart .
Meaning they 're dirt cheap per square foot .
For a corporation as large as Sharp , buying the extrusion machine capable of producing them at precisely the pitch they need should have been trivial , the PET plastic cost IS trivial , and so ultimately the price point they chose was absurd .
They tried to play the " over price it so people think it 's worth something " game and failed.A shame , really .
Reviewers said the effect worked quite nicely , without any headache inducing effect whatsoever .
A far cry from every glasses-based effect ever tried .
Of course what they trade off for 3D is resolution , rather than framerate .
There 's always something...It 's too bad " HD " flat-panel TVs have utterly destroyed the computer flat panel market .
Manufacturers find it much more lucrative to crank out tons of crap-resolution TVs than to try to produce high resolution computer monitors anymore .
If not for TVs , production processes might have pushed past the 30 " widescreen at 2560x1600 resolution , getting us ready for built-in stereoscopic displays .
Instead , average resolution has declined , crippling any idea to spend pixels for stereo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew Sharp had made the no-glasses 3D display LCD panel.
Didn't know they'd made an integrated version.
As I recall, they use an integrated lenticular lens sheet.
Unfortunately for Sharp, they're completely and utterly clueless about how to find a tolerable price point.
People might pay a premium for a native 3D display, but they sure as hell won't pay as much of a premium as Sharp asked.
So they didn't sell.Worse, it's not hard to find out what lenticular lens sheets cost.
They're the same things given away for free on cereal boxes for motion effects, and the same things used in promotional materials for motion and 3D effects.
"Motion" Valentine's Day cards for children to distribute at school were available for a few dollars at Walmart.
Meaning they're dirt cheap per square foot.
For a corporation as large as Sharp, buying the extrusion machine capable of producing them at precisely the pitch they need should have been trivial, the PET plastic cost IS trivial, and so ultimately the price point they chose was absurd.
They tried to play the "over price it so people think it's worth something" game and failed.A shame, really.
Reviewers said the effect worked quite nicely, without any headache inducing effect whatsoever.
A far cry from every glasses-based effect ever tried.
Of course what they trade off for 3D is resolution, rather than framerate.
There's always something...It's too bad "HD" flat-panel TVs have utterly destroyed the computer flat panel market.
Manufacturers find it much more lucrative to crank out tons of crap-resolution TVs than to try to produce high resolution computer monitors anymore.
If not for TVs, production processes might have pushed past the 30" widescreen at 2560x1600 resolution, getting us ready for built-in stereoscopic displays.
Instead, average resolution has declined, crippling any idea to spend pixels for stereo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258339</id>
	<title>will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel gm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244462520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel gma card?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel gma card ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel gma card?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258563</id>
	<title>Re:Cue Mind Numbing Headache and Eye Strain in</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1244463660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I rented the Virtual Boy when it came out, and played it all that (long, Thanksgiving) weekend.  I do not recall it shutting off and making me take a break.  I do remember there were warnings about taking a break, which I completely ignored.</p><p>The VB was awesome.  Too damned bad it was monochrome.  The price (and weight) were just way too much at the time for them to go full color.  And now that they already have the failure on record, there's no chance in hell they'll pursue a full color version anytime in the near future.</p><p>While the system was a failure and most of the games were shitty, the visual effect was actually pretty fucking cool, and remains one of the best implementations of 3D I've seen.  I never had any problems with headaches / eye strain / etc., either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I rented the Virtual Boy when it came out , and played it all that ( long , Thanksgiving ) weekend .
I do not recall it shutting off and making me take a break .
I do remember there were warnings about taking a break , which I completely ignored.The VB was awesome .
Too damned bad it was monochrome .
The price ( and weight ) were just way too much at the time for them to go full color .
And now that they already have the failure on record , there 's no chance in hell they 'll pursue a full color version anytime in the near future.While the system was a failure and most of the games were shitty , the visual effect was actually pretty fucking cool , and remains one of the best implementations of 3D I 've seen .
I never had any problems with headaches / eye strain / etc. , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rented the Virtual Boy when it came out, and played it all that (long, Thanksgiving) weekend.
I do not recall it shutting off and making me take a break.
I do remember there were warnings about taking a break, which I completely ignored.The VB was awesome.
Too damned bad it was monochrome.
The price (and weight) were just way too much at the time for them to go full color.
And now that they already have the failure on record, there's no chance in hell they'll pursue a full color version anytime in the near future.While the system was a failure and most of the games were shitty, the visual effect was actually pretty fucking cool, and remains one of the best implementations of 3D I've seen.
I never had any problems with headaches / eye strain / etc., either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258667</id>
	<title>Re:Inaccurate summary</title>
	<author>CaseCrash</author>
	<datestamp>1244464200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Wishful thinking makes for a good press release, but not such a good Slashdot story.</p></div><p>Wishful thinking makes for <b>every</b> slashdot story</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wishful thinking makes for a good press release , but not such a good Slashdot story.Wishful thinking makes for every slashdot story</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wishful thinking makes for a good press release, but not such a good Slashdot story.Wishful thinking makes for every slashdot story
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258275</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28262765</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>idigitallDotCom</author>
	<datestamp>1244539440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm just thinking.... how would you plug a usb drive into a sheet of paper?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just thinking.... how would you plug a usb drive into a sheet of paper ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just thinking.... how would you plug a usb drive into a sheet of paper?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643</id>
	<title>Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244464080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay.. so on one hand, you've got...<br>- red/green red/cyan red/blue<br>- polarized<br>- shutter<br>- chromadepth<br>- etc.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...glasses.  Nobody likes these, because you have to wear them.</p><p>On the other hand, you've got..<br>- lenticular<br>- uhm.  nope, that's pretty much it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...displays.  Which most people don't like either, as you practically have to sit in a single spot to make it work well.  There -are- displays where you can view from a few more angles (any 'tween' angles show ghosting), but always at a loss of (horizontal) resolution, as more and more images get displayed at the same time.</p><p>This only counts -stereographic- 3D methods.  So a bunch of panels behind eachother (medical imaging-look, and your laptop would be as thick as a printed encyclopedia..), or displays that track where your face is so as to show a different viewpoint (doesn't give depth cues except for the illusion when you move your head side to side like some sort of pigeon on drugs), don't count.</p><p>Neither of the above 2 methods are very appealing, but if I had to take my pick, I'll take glasses *any* time.  Combined with the head tracker, all the more awesome.  Displays that don't take glasses simply aren't there yet for any extended use.</p><p>( See an older post of mine for various other '3d display' methods; though I'm sure wikipedia's got 'm all covered, too )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay.. so on one hand , you 've got...- red/green red/cyan red/blue- polarized- shutter- chromadepth- etc .
...glasses. Nobody likes these , because you have to wear them.On the other hand , you 've got..- lenticular- uhm .
nope , that 's pretty much it .
...displays. Which most people do n't like either , as you practically have to sit in a single spot to make it work well .
There -are- displays where you can view from a few more angles ( any 'tween ' angles show ghosting ) , but always at a loss of ( horizontal ) resolution , as more and more images get displayed at the same time.This only counts -stereographic- 3D methods .
So a bunch of panels behind eachother ( medical imaging-look , and your laptop would be as thick as a printed encyclopedia.. ) , or displays that track where your face is so as to show a different viewpoint ( does n't give depth cues except for the illusion when you move your head side to side like some sort of pigeon on drugs ) , do n't count.Neither of the above 2 methods are very appealing , but if I had to take my pick , I 'll take glasses * any * time .
Combined with the head tracker , all the more awesome .
Displays that do n't take glasses simply are n't there yet for any extended use .
( See an older post of mine for various other '3d display ' methods ; though I 'm sure wikipedia 's got 'm all covered , too )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay.. so on one hand, you've got...- red/green red/cyan red/blue- polarized- shutter- chromadepth- etc.
...glasses.  Nobody likes these, because you have to wear them.On the other hand, you've got..- lenticular- uhm.
nope, that's pretty much it.
...displays.  Which most people don't like either, as you practically have to sit in a single spot to make it work well.
There -are- displays where you can view from a few more angles (any 'tween' angles show ghosting), but always at a loss of (horizontal) resolution, as more and more images get displayed at the same time.This only counts -stereographic- 3D methods.
So a bunch of panels behind eachother (medical imaging-look, and your laptop would be as thick as a printed encyclopedia..), or displays that track where your face is so as to show a different viewpoint (doesn't give depth cues except for the illusion when you move your head side to side like some sort of pigeon on drugs), don't count.Neither of the above 2 methods are very appealing, but if I had to take my pick, I'll take glasses *any* time.
Combined with the head tracker, all the more awesome.
Displays that don't take glasses simply aren't there yet for any extended use.
( See an older post of mine for various other '3d display' methods; though I'm sure wikipedia's got 'm all covered, too )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260191</id>
	<title>Re:Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1244473860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always thought that LCD (uh.. displays...) would be a natural fit for polarized lenses.  How hard would it be to stick an additional perpendicular layer and drive it in such a way as to have different levels at each pixel depending on the polarization angle?</p><p>Sure, you couldn't do circular polarization, but that doesn't really help much anyway, as you really need to keep your head pretty level for it to work, anyway.  Personally, I don't find wearing <em>sunglasses</em> to be all that bad of a proposition, for the benefit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought that LCD ( uh.. displays... ) would be a natural fit for polarized lenses .
How hard would it be to stick an additional perpendicular layer and drive it in such a way as to have different levels at each pixel depending on the polarization angle ? Sure , you could n't do circular polarization , but that does n't really help much anyway , as you really need to keep your head pretty level for it to work , anyway .
Personally , I do n't find wearing sunglasses to be all that bad of a proposition , for the benefit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought that LCD (uh.. displays...) would be a natural fit for polarized lenses.
How hard would it be to stick an additional perpendicular layer and drive it in such a way as to have different levels at each pixel depending on the polarization angle?Sure, you couldn't do circular polarization, but that doesn't really help much anyway, as you really need to keep your head pretty level for it to work, anyway.
Personally, I don't find wearing sunglasses to be all that bad of a proposition, for the benefit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263881</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm... Possibly something like...</title>
	<author>dkf</author>
	<datestamp>1244553000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies. Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best...</p></div><p>Works great for movies with Roger Moore.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies .
Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best...Works great for movies with Roger Moore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies.
Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best...Works great for movies with Roger Moore.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258533</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259661</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm... Possibly something like...</title>
	<author>merreborn</author>
	<datestamp>1244470500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/15/fotowoosh-will-turn-any-picture-into-3d-image/" title="techcrunch.com">Fotowoosh?</a> [techcrunch.com]</p></div> </blockquote><p>lol, I love this snippet from that post:</p><blockquote><div><p>The 3D image is constructed in Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML) format, meaning you currently need a VRML reader to see it (<i>future browsers will likely build this functionality in</i>)</p></div></blockquote><p>Wow, apparently Arrington is completely unaware that VRML is a 15 year old spec that's been ignored by "future browsers" for over a decade because it's crap, and is practically unused.</p><p>Just what "future browsers" need -- a bloated 3d presentation format that targets a problem that no one has, and is less capable than already supported technologies like flash and java applets.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fotowoosh ?
[ techcrunch.com ] lol , I love this snippet from that post : The 3D image is constructed in Virtual Reality Modeling Language ( VRML ) format , meaning you currently need a VRML reader to see it ( future browsers will likely build this functionality in ) Wow , apparently Arrington is completely unaware that VRML is a 15 year old spec that 's been ignored by " future browsers " for over a decade because it 's crap , and is practically unused.Just what " future browsers " need -- a bloated 3d presentation format that targets a problem that no one has , and is less capable than already supported technologies like flash and java applets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Fotowoosh?
[techcrunch.com] lol, I love this snippet from that post:The 3D image is constructed in Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML) format, meaning you currently need a VRML reader to see it (future browsers will likely build this functionality in)Wow, apparently Arrington is completely unaware that VRML is a 15 year old spec that's been ignored by "future browsers" for over a decade because it's crap, and is practically unused.Just what "future browsers" need -- a bloated 3d presentation format that targets a problem that no one has, and is less capable than already supported technologies like flash and java applets.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258533</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258525</id>
	<title>first 3d? then Actius RD3D from sharp was 0?</title>
	<author>dracovolans</author>
	<datestamp>1244463540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>first portable computer with 3d screen was a device from sharp, and, whatever acer will say - they can be just at best second. And - yes.... 3d from sharp works without any glasses.
what wrong is with this world? nvidia sells tehnology based on glasses and calls it "a new tehnology" - even if this kind of 3d is older than computers, and now acer comes with "first 3d laptop". they want to rewrite the history? or just sell the same sXXX one more time?</htmltext>
<tokenext>first portable computer with 3d screen was a device from sharp , and , whatever acer will say - they can be just at best second .
And - yes.... 3d from sharp works without any glasses .
what wrong is with this world ?
nvidia sells tehnology based on glasses and calls it " a new tehnology " - even if this kind of 3d is older than computers , and now acer comes with " first 3d laptop " .
they want to rewrite the history ?
or just sell the same sXXX one more time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>first portable computer with 3d screen was a device from sharp, and, whatever acer will say - they can be just at best second.
And - yes.... 3d from sharp works without any glasses.
what wrong is with this world?
nvidia sells tehnology based on glasses and calls it "a new tehnology" - even if this kind of 3d is older than computers, and now acer comes with "first 3d laptop".
they want to rewrite the history?
or just sell the same sXXX one more time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260109</id>
	<title>Bundling</title>
	<author>immakiku</author>
	<datestamp>1244473320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me, or does the article make it seem like Acer is merely bundling 3D software with their hardware. "Built-in software" really means nothing to me unless this is somehow part of the BIOS or it relies on special hardware they provide.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or does the article make it seem like Acer is merely bundling 3D software with their hardware .
" Built-in software " really means nothing to me unless this is somehow part of the BIOS or it relies on special hardware they provide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or does the article make it seem like Acer is merely bundling 3D software with their hardware.
"Built-in software" really means nothing to me unless this is somehow part of the BIOS or it relies on special hardware they provide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244463060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not? We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.</p><p>The eye is only stereo. Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not ?
We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.The eye is only stereo .
Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not?
We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.The eye is only stereo.
Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258837</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>linebackn</author>
	<datestamp>1244465400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I believe when I see one with my own eyes.</p></div></blockquote><p>

I second that. I'll believe it when I see it with my one good eye!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe when I see one with my own eyes .
I second that .
I 'll believe it when I see it with my one good eye !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe when I see one with my own eyes.
I second that.
I'll believe it when I see it with my one good eye!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258655</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244464080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this using Johnny Lee Chung's wii mote technology shown <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw" title="youtube.com">here</a> [youtube.com]?</p><p>I have no idea how a movie would be encoded to enable this, and of course, as Johnny points out it's only good for one viewer at a time... PERFECT for laptops, not so much for general displays. And... IMHO it's not really full 3-D but a damn good trick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this using Johnny Lee Chung 's wii mote technology shown here [ youtube.com ] ? I have no idea how a movie would be encoded to enable this , and of course , as Johnny points out it 's only good for one viewer at a time... PERFECT for laptops , not so much for general displays .
And... IMHO it 's not really full 3-D but a damn good trick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this using Johnny Lee Chung's wii mote technology shown here [youtube.com]?I have no idea how a movie would be encoded to enable this, and of course, as Johnny points out it's only good for one viewer at a time... PERFECT for laptops, not so much for general displays.
And... IMHO it's not really full 3-D but a damn good trick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258691</id>
	<title>Re:Been done.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244464380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They were also able to get High Res photos out of a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.</i></p><p>They stole the technology from Blade Runner. Bastards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.They stole the technology from Blade Runner .
Bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.They stole the technology from Blade Runner.
Bastards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258603</id>
	<title>Which one is the 3rd dimension?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244463900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lenght, Width and Smell. Those computers will stink. Alternatively the 3rd dimension could be time, and they rot (hey, biodegradable computers will be a very ecological solution, you can make a whole marketing campaign with that)<br><br>Or could be some of the extended strings teory dimensions... it will be there, believe us, but you wont be able to perceive it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lenght , Width and Smell .
Those computers will stink .
Alternatively the 3rd dimension could be time , and they rot ( hey , biodegradable computers will be a very ecological solution , you can make a whole marketing campaign with that ) Or could be some of the extended strings teory dimensions... it will be there , believe us , but you wont be able to perceive it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lenght, Width and Smell.
Those computers will stink.
Alternatively the 3rd dimension could be time, and they rot (hey, biodegradable computers will be a very ecological solution, you can make a whole marketing campaign with that)Or could be some of the extended strings teory dimensions... it will be there, believe us, but you wont be able to perceive it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259807</id>
	<title>Paradigm Shift</title>
	<author>Scroatzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1244471400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is awesome. First, notebooks. Then, netbooks.</p><p>Now, migrainebooks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is awesome .
First , notebooks .
Then , netbooks.Now , migrainebooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is awesome.
First, notebooks.
Then, netbooks.Now, migrainebooks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261357</id>
	<title>Re:Been done.</title>
	<author>cliffjumper222</author>
	<datestamp>1244480700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it is real - Sharp made them years ago - no glasses required, so if Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it'll be the world's <b>second</b> manufacturer to do so. Sharp even got to a second generation of them. Here's a link: <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news3296.html" title="physorg.com">http://www.physorg.com/news3296.html</a> [physorg.com]. It was so successful you can't buy them anymore. The problem was lack of content and you needed to hold you head in the hot-zone of 3D-ness. Even if Acer manages to release a decent 3D screen, and we start watching the latest 3D movies on it, I think they'll have a tough time overcoming the <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=GtCCIlpecBkC&amp;pg=PA343&amp;lpg=PA343&amp;dq=3d+tv+problem+puppet+theatre+effect&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=LvBgjj-zXJ&amp;sig=1TnHHTmCul5Zme30MgIcBtV\_Yts&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=vN4tSqjtHoeetgPGtNzKCA&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book\_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1" title="google.com">puppet theater effect</a> [google.com] on such a small screen. It's not such a problem in a huge cinema, but would be in this case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it is real - Sharp made them years ago - no glasses required , so if Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it 'll be the world 's second manufacturer to do so .
Sharp even got to a second generation of them .
Here 's a link : http : //www.physorg.com/news3296.html [ physorg.com ] .
It was so successful you ca n't buy them anymore .
The problem was lack of content and you needed to hold you head in the hot-zone of 3D-ness .
Even if Acer manages to release a decent 3D screen , and we start watching the latest 3D movies on it , I think they 'll have a tough time overcoming the puppet theater effect [ google.com ] on such a small screen .
It 's not such a problem in a huge cinema , but would be in this case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it is real - Sharp made them years ago - no glasses required, so if Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it'll be the world's second manufacturer to do so.
Sharp even got to a second generation of them.
Here's a link: http://www.physorg.com/news3296.html [physorg.com].
It was so successful you can't buy them anymore.
The problem was lack of content and you needed to hold you head in the hot-zone of 3D-ness.
Even if Acer manages to release a decent 3D screen, and we start watching the latest 3D movies on it, I think they'll have a tough time overcoming the puppet theater effect [google.com] on such a small screen.
It's not such a problem in a huge cinema, but would be in this case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258191</id>
	<title>Open sores</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244461800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can it cure my festering anal wound?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can it cure my festering anal wound ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can it cure my festering anal wound?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258533</id>
	<title>Hmm... Possibly something like...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1244463540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/15/fotowoosh-will-turn-any-picture-into-3d-image/" title="techcrunch.com">Fotowoosh?</a> [techcrunch.com]</p><p>Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies. Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fotowoosh ?
[ techcrunch.com ] Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies .
Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fotowoosh?
[techcrunch.com]Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies.
Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259273</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1244468340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Why not?</p><p>Because the information isn't there.</p><p>&gt; We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.</p><p>No we don't.  The information isn't there.</p><p>&gt; Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy.</p><p>The information isn't there.  What next, software to convert a still picture to a 90 minute movie?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Why not ? Because the information is n't there. &gt; We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.No we do n't .
The information is n't there. &gt; Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy.The information is n't there .
What next , software to convert a still picture to a 90 minute movie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Why not?Because the information isn't there.&gt; We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.No we don't.
The information isn't there.&gt; Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy.The information isn't there.
What next, software to convert a still picture to a 90 minute movie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261087</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>kumanopuusan</author>
	<datestamp>1244478540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the key pieces in video compression is detecting motion vectors automatically from video.  Once you have motion vectors, there are <a href="http://www.actapress.com/PaperInfo.aspx?PaperID=30942&amp;reason=500" title="actapress.com">algorithms to turn sequences of motion vectors into 3D models</a> [actapress.com].  I've seen video with an automatically generated wireframe on it before, but I couldn't find the link.
</p><p>
Small, 3D screens that don't require the use of glasses are already commercially available.  I saw ads for 3D screen cellphones all the time on Japanese TV and on the train.  I thought it was interesting, but not worth buying a new phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the key pieces in video compression is detecting motion vectors automatically from video .
Once you have motion vectors , there are algorithms to turn sequences of motion vectors into 3D models [ actapress.com ] .
I 've seen video with an automatically generated wireframe on it before , but I could n't find the link .
Small , 3D screens that do n't require the use of glasses are already commercially available .
I saw ads for 3D screen cellphones all the time on Japanese TV and on the train .
I thought it was interesting , but not worth buying a new phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the key pieces in video compression is detecting motion vectors automatically from video.
Once you have motion vectors, there are algorithms to turn sequences of motion vectors into 3D models [actapress.com].
I've seen video with an automatically generated wireframe on it before, but I couldn't find the link.
Small, 3D screens that don't require the use of glasses are already commercially available.
I saw ads for 3D screen cellphones all the time on Japanese TV and on the train.
I thought it was interesting, but not worth buying a new phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263489</id>
	<title>Re:Been done.</title>
	<author>Eudial</author>
	<datestamp>1244548740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obligatory PHD Comics reference: <a href="http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1156" title="phdcomics.com">If TV Science was more like REAL Science</a> [phdcomics.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory PHD Comics reference : If TV Science was more like REAL Science [ phdcomics.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory PHD Comics reference: If TV Science was more like REAL Science [phdcomics.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258935</id>
	<title>I hope...</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1244466000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope these notebooks come with three or four spare motherboards. Judging by their previous track record, that is what it takes to keep their notebooks running beyond the warranty.</p><p><a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=101&amp;threadID=243038&amp;start=0" title="com.com">http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=101&amp;threadID=243038&amp;start=0</a> [com.com]<br><a href="http://www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t-71394-Acer-5101-keyboard-usb-and-touchpad-are-dead.html" title="techspot.com">http://www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t-71394-Acer-5101-keyboard-usb-and-touchpad-are-dead.html</a> [techspot.com]<br><a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/51337-35-keyboard-mouse-work-vista-login-screen" title="tomshardware.com">http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/51337-35-keyboard-mouse-work-vista-login-screen</a> [tomshardware.com]<br>Google it, tons more...</p><p>Seems Acer preferred playing their customers along until the warranty ran out, then charged them for a new motherboard (that didn't fix the problem in most cases) rather then admit they had a pattern failure.</p><p>I don't care WHAT kind of product they have, from a purely moralistic point of view, I'll take my business elsewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope these notebooks come with three or four spare motherboards .
Judging by their previous track record , that is what it takes to keep their notebooks running beyond the warranty.http : //techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html ? forumID = 101&amp;threadID = 243038&amp;start = 0 [ com.com ] http : //www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t-71394-Acer-5101-keyboard-usb-and-touchpad-are-dead.html [ techspot.com ] http : //www.tomshardware.com/forum/51337-35-keyboard-mouse-work-vista-login-screen [ tomshardware.com ] Google it , tons more...Seems Acer preferred playing their customers along until the warranty ran out , then charged them for a new motherboard ( that did n't fix the problem in most cases ) rather then admit they had a pattern failure.I do n't care WHAT kind of product they have , from a purely moralistic point of view , I 'll take my business elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope these notebooks come with three or four spare motherboards.
Judging by their previous track record, that is what it takes to keep their notebooks running beyond the warranty.http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=101&amp;threadID=243038&amp;start=0 [com.com]http://www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t-71394-Acer-5101-keyboard-usb-and-touchpad-are-dead.html [techspot.com]http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/51337-35-keyboard-mouse-work-vista-login-screen [tomshardware.com]Google it, tons more...Seems Acer preferred playing their customers along until the warranty ran out, then charged them for a new motherboard (that didn't fix the problem in most cases) rather then admit they had a pattern failure.I don't care WHAT kind of product they have, from a purely moralistic point of view, I'll take my business elsewhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258181</id>
	<title>Hype</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1244461740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted.</p></div><p>So basically they're just throwing a pair of shutter glasses into the box.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Currently , users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective , however , Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses , although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome , Kan noted.So basically they 're just throwing a pair of shutter glasses into the box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted.So basically they're just throwing a pair of shutter glasses into the box.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>Vuojo</author>
	<datestamp>1244461860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. These "3D" systems have been coming for decades and in the end they have been total crap.

I believe when I see one with my own eyes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
These " 3D " systems have been coming for decades and in the end they have been total crap .
I believe when I see one with my own eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
These "3D" systems have been coming for decades and in the end they have been total crap.
I believe when I see one with my own eyes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260971</id>
	<title>Sharp</title>
	<author>Phylter</author>
	<datestamp>1244477640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A couple of years ago Sharp released a 15 inch 3d display and a notebook with the display built in. It wasn't the best but it was the first run of the technology. They even had a beautiful 19-inch 3d display that never made it to market, at least not in the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple of years ago Sharp released a 15 inch 3d display and a notebook with the display built in .
It was n't the best but it was the first run of the technology .
They even had a beautiful 19-inch 3d display that never made it to market , at least not in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple of years ago Sharp released a 15 inch 3d display and a notebook with the display built in.
It wasn't the best but it was the first run of the technology.
They even had a beautiful 19-inch 3d display that never made it to market, at least not in the US.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139</id>
	<title>Been done.</title>
	<author>0100010001010011</author>
	<datestamp>1244461500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CSI already has these. I know because I saw it on TV. They were also able to get High Res photos out of a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CSI already has these .
I know because I saw it on TV .
They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CSI already has these.
I know because I saw it on TV.
They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258581</id>
	<title>Re:Sharp produced a 3D laptop in 2005</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1244463780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck you.  This is a slashdot article.<br>Competence, precedence, and facts have no place here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck you .
This is a slashdot article.Competence , precedence , and facts have no place here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck you.
This is a slashdot article.Competence, precedence, and facts have no place here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258317</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28265689</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>rcamans</author>
	<datestamp>1244562540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, you've been giving your most valuable inputs to a sheet of paper ever since you were old enough to wipe your backside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , you 've been giving your most valuable inputs to a sheet of paper ever since you were old enough to wipe your backside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, you've been giving your most valuable inputs to a sheet of paper ever since you were old enough to wipe your backside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259165</id>
	<title>3D notebooks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244467680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it mean they have started to use a CRT for the screen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it mean they have started to use a CRT for the screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it mean they have started to use a CRT for the screen?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28273247</id>
	<title>Anyone Else?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244551560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone else hate 3-D? I don't understand why this 80's fad is back but it sucks. Almost as bad as a pet rock. I don't mean to troll but G. Lucas is behind this right now so you know it is a really bad idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else hate 3-D ?
I do n't understand why this 80 's fad is back but it sucks .
Almost as bad as a pet rock .
I do n't mean to troll but G. Lucas is behind this right now so you know it is a really bad idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else hate 3-D?
I don't understand why this 80's fad is back but it sucks.
Almost as bad as a pet rock.
I don't mean to troll but G. Lucas is behind this right now so you know it is a really bad idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263155</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>justleavealonemmmkay</author>
	<datestamp>1244544180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>aguably 2D: the thickness of the laptop has no useful purpose, just because the keyboard is not in the same plane as the display does not qualify it as 3D. You could represent any useful point of the laptop using just two coordinates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>aguably 2D : the thickness of the laptop has no useful purpose , just because the keyboard is not in the same plane as the display does not qualify it as 3D .
You could represent any useful point of the laptop using just two coordinates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aguably 2D: the thickness of the laptop has no useful purpose, just because the keyboard is not in the same plane as the display does not qualify it as 3D.
You could represent any useful point of the laptop using just two coordinates.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260209</id>
	<title>Re:Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244473920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose I *could* use those 3-d glasses, except I'd have to take off my existing ones. You know, the ones I need in order to actually see. So it wouldn't matter if the glasses let me see 3d, because it'd be too frickin' blurry to matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose I * could * use those 3-d glasses , except I 'd have to take off my existing ones .
You know , the ones I need in order to actually see .
So it would n't matter if the glasses let me see 3d , because it 'd be too frickin ' blurry to matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose I *could* use those 3-d glasses, except I'd have to take off my existing ones.
You know, the ones I need in order to actually see.
So it wouldn't matter if the glasses let me see 3d, because it'd be too frickin' blurry to matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258905</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>mkiwi</author>
	<datestamp>1244465880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably like one of those posters where you stare really hard and the desktop suddenly pops out at you.~  I was never very good at those.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably like one of those posters where you stare really hard and the desktop suddenly pops out at you. ~ I was never very good at those .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably like one of those posters where you stare really hard and the desktop suddenly pops out at you.~  I was never very good at those.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28273029</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>vuffi\_raa</author>
	<datestamp>1244550060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a 1 dimensional laptop at home, but I keep losing it</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a 1 dimensional laptop at home , but I keep losing it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a 1 dimensional laptop at home, but I keep losing it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</id>
	<title>"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244461620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264263</id>
	<title>On the third hand</title>
	<author>killmenow</author>
	<datestamp>1244555820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just have to cross your eyes</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just have to cross your eyes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just have to cross your eyes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258685</id>
	<title>Keep your glasses - autostereoscopic not there yet</title>
	<author>PhantomHarlock</author>
	<datestamp>1244464320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guys, you don't want an autostereoscopic display based on lenticular imaging - basically the same thing you see on cracker jack prizes.   There is no autostereoscopic display that looks anywhere near as good as polarized glasses or shutter glasses at 120hz or above. (60hz per eye) the resolution and viewing angles are simply too poor.</p><p>The current state of the art in personal 3D displays are LCD or plasma displays that have a polarizing layer on every other line, so you can view them with the nice, lightweight RealD style circularly polarized glasses - the same ones deployed with about 1,800 3D movie screens at the moment using the Sony XSRD digital cinema projectors.   They look absolutely stunning.  unfortunately for a 40" screen, it costs about $10,000.   Hopefully they can get the manufacturing process down so that it is less expensive in the future.  I imagine it is currently a very hands-on process of laying the strips down individually.</p><p>There is enough vertical resolution in full HD (1080 lines) that it looks DAMN good.  I could not tell that each eye was only looking at an image with 1/2 the vertical resolution.  The human brain is -very good- at putting together stereoscopic vision to give you something more than what you are looking at.</p><p>If they made a smaller version of the polarized LCD display that could fit on a laptop, it'd be a great thing for traveling demos.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guys , you do n't want an autostereoscopic display based on lenticular imaging - basically the same thing you see on cracker jack prizes .
There is no autostereoscopic display that looks anywhere near as good as polarized glasses or shutter glasses at 120hz or above .
( 60hz per eye ) the resolution and viewing angles are simply too poor.The current state of the art in personal 3D displays are LCD or plasma displays that have a polarizing layer on every other line , so you can view them with the nice , lightweight RealD style circularly polarized glasses - the same ones deployed with about 1,800 3D movie screens at the moment using the Sony XSRD digital cinema projectors .
They look absolutely stunning .
unfortunately for a 40 " screen , it costs about $ 10,000 .
Hopefully they can get the manufacturing process down so that it is less expensive in the future .
I imagine it is currently a very hands-on process of laying the strips down individually.There is enough vertical resolution in full HD ( 1080 lines ) that it looks DAMN good .
I could not tell that each eye was only looking at an image with 1/2 the vertical resolution .
The human brain is -very good- at putting together stereoscopic vision to give you something more than what you are looking at.If they made a smaller version of the polarized LCD display that could fit on a laptop , it 'd be a great thing for traveling demos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guys, you don't want an autostereoscopic display based on lenticular imaging - basically the same thing you see on cracker jack prizes.
There is no autostereoscopic display that looks anywhere near as good as polarized glasses or shutter glasses at 120hz or above.
(60hz per eye) the resolution and viewing angles are simply too poor.The current state of the art in personal 3D displays are LCD or plasma displays that have a polarizing layer on every other line, so you can view them with the nice, lightweight RealD style circularly polarized glasses - the same ones deployed with about 1,800 3D movie screens at the moment using the Sony XSRD digital cinema projectors.
They look absolutely stunning.
unfortunately for a 40" screen, it costs about $10,000.
Hopefully they can get the manufacturing process down so that it is less expensive in the future.
I imagine it is currently a very hands-on process of laying the strips down individually.There is enough vertical resolution in full HD (1080 lines) that it looks DAMN good.
I could not tell that each eye was only looking at an image with 1/2 the vertical resolution.
The human brain is -very good- at putting together stereoscopic vision to give you something more than what you are looking at.If they made a smaller version of the polarized LCD display that could fit on a laptop, it'd be a great thing for traveling demos.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258521</id>
	<title>Apple's marketing is better than Acer</title>
	<author>Cajun Hell</author>
	<datestamp>1244463480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple has spent the last few years getting people to think that switching from a 3D laptop to a 2D laptop is an <em>upgrade</em>.  Now Acer thinks they can make non-thin <em>cool</em> again?  Good luck with that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple has spent the last few years getting people to think that switching from a 3D laptop to a 2D laptop is an upgrade .
Now Acer thinks they can make non-thin cool again ?
Good luck with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple has spent the last few years getting people to think that switching from a 3D laptop to a 2D laptop is an upgrade.
Now Acer thinks they can make non-thin cool again?
Good luck with that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263037</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1244542800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If it's an animated movie, it was done in 3D anyway, so not removing the extra dimension is fairly trivial.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's an animated movie , it was done in 3D anyway , so not removing the extra dimension is fairly trivial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's an animated movie, it was done in 3D anyway, so not removing the extra dimension is fairly trivial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258969</id>
	<title>oh for the millioneth time..</title>
	<author>anonymousNR</author>
	<datestamp>1244466240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do these fucking stories make it to main page ?<br>Is there a bot net moderating slashdot firehouse, tagging all shitty stories as interesting , insightful and funny ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do these fucking stories make it to main page ? Is there a bot net moderating slashdot firehouse , tagging all shitty stories as interesting , insightful and funny ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do these fucking stories make it to main page ?Is there a bot net moderating slashdot firehouse, tagging all shitty stories as interesting , insightful and funny ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28273047</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>vuffi\_raa</author>
	<datestamp>1244550240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>actually, a true 2 dimensional laptop wouldn't be able to be put in an envelope since it has no mass- only shape</htmltext>
<tokenext>actually , a true 2 dimensional laptop would n't be able to be put in an envelope since it has no mass- only shape</tokentext>
<sentencetext>actually, a true 2 dimensional laptop wouldn't be able to be put in an envelope since it has no mass- only shape</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258945</id>
	<title>Ehem</title>
	<author>TheMightyFuzzball</author>
	<datestamp>1244466060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When last I checked all laptops are in three dimensions, I wouldn't want a 2D laptop., it'd be hard to type...</htmltext>
<tokenext>When last I checked all laptops are in three dimensions , I would n't want a 2D laptop. , it 'd be hard to type.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When last I checked all laptops are in three dimensions, I wouldn't want a 2D laptop., it'd be hard to type...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258463</id>
	<title>Sharp tech?</title>
	<author>EkriirkE</author>
	<datestamp>1244463180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they'll be using sharp's many-year-old technology?
2 LCD panels, one high res, the other lower behind it with something like a lenticular lens so one eye see only one panel</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 'll be using sharp 's many-year-old technology ?
2 LCD panels , one high res , the other lower behind it with something like a lenticular lens so one eye see only one panel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they'll be using sharp's many-year-old technology?
2 LCD panels, one high res, the other lower behind it with something like a lenticular lens so one eye see only one panel</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264997</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244559420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think 3D is the new way of saying "not a MacBook Air"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think 3D is the new way of saying " not a MacBook Air "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think 3D is the new way of saying "not a MacBook Air"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258735</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1244464740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe its a bit like those devices which claimed to convert mono sound to stereo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe its a bit like those devices which claimed to convert mono sound to stereo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe its a bit like those devices which claimed to convert mono sound to stereo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28279899</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>Ifandbut</author>
	<datestamp>1244649660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've been waiting for the electronic "paper" for like 15 years now.</p></div><p>Well then you only got 5 more years to wait.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been waiting for the electronic " paper " for like 15 years now.Well then you only got 5 more years to wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been waiting for the electronic "paper" for like 15 years now.Well then you only got 5 more years to wait.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263257</id>
	<title>Re:Finally, a laptop not from Flatland!</title>
	<author>xouumalperxe</author>
	<datestamp>1244545500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.25" thick at its thinnest point. That's nothing. My 2D laptop has 0 thickness!</p></div><p>You got it all mixed up, silly. "Nothing" is your 0-thickness laptop. the Air is <i>something</i>, to the tune of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.25".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being .25 " thick at its thinnest point .
That 's nothing .
My 2D laptop has 0 thickness ! You got it all mixed up , silly .
" Nothing " is your 0-thickness laptop .
the Air is something , to the tune of .25 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being .25" thick at its thinnest point.
That's nothing.
My 2D laptop has 0 thickness!You got it all mixed up, silly.
"Nothing" is your 0-thickness laptop.
the Air is something, to the tune of .25".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258179</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258517</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244463480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I count no less than four dimensions on my laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I count no less than four dimensions on my laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I count no less than four dimensions on my laptop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258599</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>PhantomHarlock</author>
	<datestamp>1244463840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have seen a demo of realtime conversion - it actually works, but only about 80\% good.   Occasionally you'll see some problems.   I saw a demo at NAB in April at Samsung's booth that blew my mind because it was actually that good, but it's still nothing compared to real stereoscopic capture.  Basically it looks like a series of parallax planes, a step down from the real thing.   But shockingly, it DOES work.   My best guess is that it takes into account a variety of factors including haze and color, detail, dimensions and inference from motion.</p><p>I consider it to be a gimmick that distracts from real 3D content.  It's -very- clever, but it is no substitute for real stereoscopic content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have seen a demo of realtime conversion - it actually works , but only about 80 \ % good .
Occasionally you 'll see some problems .
I saw a demo at NAB in April at Samsung 's booth that blew my mind because it was actually that good , but it 's still nothing compared to real stereoscopic capture .
Basically it looks like a series of parallax planes , a step down from the real thing .
But shockingly , it DOES work .
My best guess is that it takes into account a variety of factors including haze and color , detail , dimensions and inference from motion.I consider it to be a gimmick that distracts from real 3D content .
It 's -very- clever , but it is no substitute for real stereoscopic content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have seen a demo of realtime conversion - it actually works, but only about 80\% good.
Occasionally you'll see some problems.
I saw a demo at NAB in April at Samsung's booth that blew my mind because it was actually that good, but it's still nothing compared to real stereoscopic capture.
Basically it looks like a series of parallax planes, a step down from the real thing.
But shockingly, it DOES work.
My best guess is that it takes into account a variety of factors including haze and color, detail, dimensions and inference from motion.I consider it to be a gimmick that distracts from real 3D content.
It's -very- clever, but it is no substitute for real stereoscopic content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28262729</id>
	<title>Re:Been done.</title>
	<author>idigitallDotCom</author>
	<datestamp>1244538960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Currently stereoscopic glasses are needed to view the 3D content. Stereoscopic glasses [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy] work by exposing a "left" image to the left eye and a "right" image to the right eye - so that the brain puts the two together and it appears 3D.</p><p>How on earth is Acer planning to replace the stereoscopic glasses? Divide the screen in two and display the images in corresponding halves? Might be more possible if the images were replaced by interlaced panels with some sort of curved refractive screen sending the "left" and "right" images out at slight angles so that the right eye sees the right image and the left eye sees the left image. Of course that'd be highly specific to your head location, and if viewed at the wrong angle wont appear 3D. Maybe I'm just talking rubbish..</p><p>I think it CAN be done.... I'd Love to see it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Currently stereoscopic glasses are needed to view the 3D content .
Stereoscopic glasses [ http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy ] work by exposing a " left " image to the left eye and a " right " image to the right eye - so that the brain puts the two together and it appears 3D.How on earth is Acer planning to replace the stereoscopic glasses ?
Divide the screen in two and display the images in corresponding halves ?
Might be more possible if the images were replaced by interlaced panels with some sort of curved refractive screen sending the " left " and " right " images out at slight angles so that the right eye sees the right image and the left eye sees the left image .
Of course that 'd be highly specific to your head location , and if viewed at the wrong angle wont appear 3D .
Maybe I 'm just talking rubbish..I think it CAN be done.... I 'd Love to see it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Currently stereoscopic glasses are needed to view the 3D content.
Stereoscopic glasses [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy] work by exposing a "left" image to the left eye and a "right" image to the right eye - so that the brain puts the two together and it appears 3D.How on earth is Acer planning to replace the stereoscopic glasses?
Divide the screen in two and display the images in corresponding halves?
Might be more possible if the images were replaced by interlaced panels with some sort of curved refractive screen sending the "left" and "right" images out at slight angles so that the right eye sees the right image and the left eye sees the left image.
Of course that'd be highly specific to your head location, and if viewed at the wrong angle wont appear 3D.
Maybe I'm just talking rubbish..I think it CAN be done.... I'd Love to see it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258179</id>
	<title>Finally, a laptop not from Flatland!</title>
	<author>techmuse</author>
	<datestamp>1244461680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad that they are going to be shipping 3 dimensional laptops. Those 2 dimensional laptops that I've been using are really inconvenient.  The screen and the keyboard are on the same plane, and you can't push the buttons at all, because that would require a third dimension.  Even worse, my 2 dimensional laptop keeps falling through infinitely thin slots, and cut my arm off once when it fell perpendicularly to the floor while my arm was in the way.  It might be 2D, but it has mass after all, so it has an infinitely sharp edge.  Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.25" thick at its thinnest point.  That's nothing.  My 2D laptop has 0 thickness!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad that they are going to be shipping 3 dimensional laptops .
Those 2 dimensional laptops that I 've been using are really inconvenient .
The screen and the keyboard are on the same plane , and you ca n't push the buttons at all , because that would require a third dimension .
Even worse , my 2 dimensional laptop keeps falling through infinitely thin slots , and cut my arm off once when it fell perpendicularly to the floor while my arm was in the way .
It might be 2D , but it has mass after all , so it has an infinitely sharp edge .
Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being .25 " thick at its thinnest point .
That 's nothing .
My 2D laptop has 0 thickness !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad that they are going to be shipping 3 dimensional laptops.
Those 2 dimensional laptops that I've been using are really inconvenient.
The screen and the keyboard are on the same plane, and you can't push the buttons at all, because that would require a third dimension.
Even worse, my 2 dimensional laptop keeps falling through infinitely thin slots, and cut my arm off once when it fell perpendicularly to the floor while my arm was in the way.
It might be 2D, but it has mass after all, so it has an infinitely sharp edge.
Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being .25" thick at its thinnest point.
That's nothing.
My 2D laptop has 0 thickness!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258889</id>
	<title>We can finally put Angelina Jolie in 3D...</title>
	<author>TheTrollToll</author>
	<datestamp>1244465820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... 3d  that's my apartment number, I'll be waiting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>... 3d that 's my apartment number , I 'll be waiting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... 3d  that's my apartment number, I'll be waiting...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260613</id>
	<title>... and everything else in the universe</title>
	<author>javaObject</author>
	<datestamp>1244475720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it not our notebook and everything else in this universe are 3D?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it not our notebook and everything else in this universe are 3D ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it not our notebook and everything else in this universe are 3D?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258879</id>
	<title>Re:Been done.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244465700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They were also able to get High Res photos out of a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.</p></div><p>I've never heard of a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.5 megabyte resolution security camera. Could you please elaborate?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.I 've never heard of a .5 megabyte resolution security camera .
Could you please elaborate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.I've never heard of a .5 megabyte resolution security camera.
Could you please elaborate?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263213</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>Fred\_A</author>
	<datestamp>1244544840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyway, if anybody from Apple is reading this:  Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper!  Or ePaper, or whatever you want to call it.</p></div><p>But, but... Surely you can get an iHooker from the AppStore with your iPhone... Or at least a hooker locator app. Wasn't that what you were originally complaining about ?</p><p>See ? Apple *does* care !</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyway , if anybody from Apple is reading this : Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper !
Or ePaper , or whatever you want to call it.But , but... Surely you can get an iHooker from the AppStore with your iPhone... Or at least a hooker locator app .
Was n't that what you were originally complaining about ? See ?
Apple * does * care !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyway, if anybody from Apple is reading this:  Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper!
Or ePaper, or whatever you want to call it.But, but... Surely you can get an iHooker from the AppStore with your iPhone... Or at least a hooker locator app.
Wasn't that what you were originally complaining about ?See ?
Apple *does* care !
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1244464260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would love a 2 - dimensional laptop.  I envision something like a sheet of paper that accepts input from my fingertips or from a stylus or from a virtual keyboard.</p><p>Don't even worry about being able to fold it or roll it.  If I can just slip it into a folder among sheets of regular paper.</p><p>Yes, I know that a sheet of paper is still 3D, but I've been waiting for the electronic "paper" for like 15 years now.  I remember when I worked for a university as a director of computing and went out to Cupertino for a week.  This is back when Apple was still interested in the educational market, so they took real good care of us, put us up in a nice bed and breakfast.  But no hookers, damn it.</p><p>Anyway, they had some spooky Apple hardware developer talk to us about the things they were planning and told us we'd definitely have electronic paper by "2001".  I always thought that guy might have been on 'shrooms or something equally entheogenic.  When I asked him about the Newton, he developed a slight, but noticeable eye-twitch.  My guess is that today that very hardware developer is working at a Potbelly's sandwich shop after completing court-ordered rehab.</p><p>Anyway, if anybody from Apple is reading this:  Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper!  Or ePaper, or whatever you want to call it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would love a 2 - dimensional laptop .
I envision something like a sheet of paper that accepts input from my fingertips or from a stylus or from a virtual keyboard.Do n't even worry about being able to fold it or roll it .
If I can just slip it into a folder among sheets of regular paper.Yes , I know that a sheet of paper is still 3D , but I 've been waiting for the electronic " paper " for like 15 years now .
I remember when I worked for a university as a director of computing and went out to Cupertino for a week .
This is back when Apple was still interested in the educational market , so they took real good care of us , put us up in a nice bed and breakfast .
But no hookers , damn it.Anyway , they had some spooky Apple hardware developer talk to us about the things they were planning and told us we 'd definitely have electronic paper by " 2001 " .
I always thought that guy might have been on 'shrooms or something equally entheogenic .
When I asked him about the Newton , he developed a slight , but noticeable eye-twitch .
My guess is that today that very hardware developer is working at a Potbelly 's sandwich shop after completing court-ordered rehab.Anyway , if anybody from Apple is reading this : Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper !
Or ePaper , or whatever you want to call it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would love a 2 - dimensional laptop.
I envision something like a sheet of paper that accepts input from my fingertips or from a stylus or from a virtual keyboard.Don't even worry about being able to fold it or roll it.
If I can just slip it into a folder among sheets of regular paper.Yes, I know that a sheet of paper is still 3D, but I've been waiting for the electronic "paper" for like 15 years now.
I remember when I worked for a university as a director of computing and went out to Cupertino for a week.
This is back when Apple was still interested in the educational market, so they took real good care of us, put us up in a nice bed and breakfast.
But no hookers, damn it.Anyway, they had some spooky Apple hardware developer talk to us about the things they were planning and told us we'd definitely have electronic paper by "2001".
I always thought that guy might have been on 'shrooms or something equally entheogenic.
When I asked him about the Newton, he developed a slight, but noticeable eye-twitch.
My guess is that today that very hardware developer is working at a Potbelly's sandwich shop after completing court-ordered rehab.Anyway, if anybody from Apple is reading this:  Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper!
Or ePaper, or whatever you want to call it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264191</id>
	<title>Tailcoat riders still need "something" to ride...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244555400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the fact that acer is even pushing 3d is indicative of the trend, is it not?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...for what tech can separate the masses from their money in this doldrum of 2d we find ourselves in?  3d, of course!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...but I doubt acer will be on the forefront of it -- just a tailcoat rider, as usual.  Does this mean ubiquitous 3d is finally here and ready to be ridden?  When we see an i3d laptop from Apple, we will know for sure =)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the fact that acer is even pushing 3d is indicative of the trend , is it not ?
...for what tech can separate the masses from their money in this doldrum of 2d we find ourselves in ?
3d , of course !
...but I doubt acer will be on the forefront of it -- just a tailcoat rider , as usual .
Does this mean ubiquitous 3d is finally here and ready to be ridden ?
When we see an i3d laptop from Apple , we will know for sure = )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the fact that acer is even pushing 3d is indicative of the trend, is it not?
...for what tech can separate the masses from their money in this doldrum of 2d we find ourselves in?
3d, of course!
...but I doubt acer will be on the forefront of it -- just a tailcoat rider, as usual.
Does this mean ubiquitous 3d is finally here and ready to be ridden?
When we see an i3d laptop from Apple, we will know for sure =)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28315615</id>
	<title>cheap wow gold</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244810100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Weekends to people<a href="http://www.ig2t.net/" title="ig2t.net" rel="nofollow">ig2t</a> [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day <a href="http://www.wowgold4europe.net/" title="wowgold4europe.net" rel="nofollow">wowgold4europe</a> [wowgold4europe.net] good rest. For example&#239;&#188;OE people <a href="http://www.gameusd.org/" title="gameusd.org" rel="nofollow">gameusd</a> [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get <a href="http://www.meinwowgold.com/" title="meinwowgold.com" rel="nofollow">meinwowgold</a> [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each <a href="http://www.storeingame.net/" title="storeingame.net" rel="nofollow">storeingame</a> [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the <a href="http://www.speebie.org/" title="speebie.org" rel="nofollow">speebie</a> [speebie.org] whole family.<br>Everyone spends <a href="http://www.agamegold.org/" title="agamegold.org" rel="nofollow">agamegold</a> [agamegold.org] weekends in his own<a href="http://www.mmofly.org/" title="mmofly.org" rel="nofollow">mmofly</a> [mmofly.org] way. Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music&#239;&#188;OE reading novels&#239;&#188;OEor watching<a href="http://www.ogeworld.org/" title="ogeworld.org" rel="nofollow">ogeworld</a> [ogeworld.org] films. Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball&#239;&#188;OEwimming or<a href="http://www.mmorpgvip.net/" title="mmorpgvip.net" rel="nofollow">mmorpgvip</a> [mmorpgvip.net] dancing. Different people have different <a href="http://www.gamesavor.net/" title="gamesavor.net" rel="nofollow">gamesavor</a> [gamesavor.net] relaxations.<br>I often spend weekends with<a href="http://www.oggsale.net/" title="oggsale.net" rel="nofollow">oggsale</a> [oggsale.net] my family or my friends. Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends. Sometimes<a href="http://www.gamersell.net/" title="gamersell.net" rel="nofollow">gamersell</a> [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books to<a href="http://www.mmovirtex.net/" title="mmovirtex.net" rel="nofollow">mmovirtex</a> [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge. I also go to see various exhibition to broaden<a href="http://www.rpg-trader.net/" title="rpg-trader.net" rel="nofollow">rpg trader</a> [rpg-trader.net] my vision. An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends. Weekends are always enjoyable for me.<br><a href="http://www.igxe.org/" title="igxe.org" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [igxe.org] <a href="http://www.swagvault.org/" title="swagvault.org" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.org] oforu <a href="http://www.wowgold-usa.org/" title="wowgold-usa.org" rel="nofollow">wowgold-usa</a> [wowgold-usa.org] <a href="http://www.ignmax.org/" title="ignmax.org" rel="nofollow">ignmax</a> [ignmax.org] <a href="http://www.wowgoldlive.net/" title="wowgoldlive.net" rel="nofollow">wowgoldlive</a> [wowgoldlive.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.net/" title="brogame.net" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.net]  <a href="http://www.thsale.org/" title="thsale.org" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.org] <a href="http://www.goldrocku.net/" title="goldrocku.net" rel="nofollow">GoldRockU</a> [goldrocku.net] <a href="http://www.brogame.us/" title="brogame.us" rel="nofollow">brogame</a> [brogame.us]<br>
&nbsp; <a href="http://www.swagvault.us/" title="swagvault.us" rel="nofollow">swagvault</a> [swagvault.us] <a href="http://www.goldsoon.us/" title="goldsoon.us" rel="nofollow">goldsoon</a> [goldsoon.us] <a href="http://www.oforu.us/" title="oforu.us" rel="nofollow">oforu</a> [oforu.us] <a href="http://www.igxe.us/" title="www.igxe.us" rel="nofollow">igxe</a> [www.igxe.us] <a href="http://www.thsale.us/" title="thsale.us" rel="nofollow">thsale</a> [thsale.us]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ ig2t.net ] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [ wowgold4europe.net ] good rest .
For example     OE people gameusd [ gameusd.org ] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [ meinwowgold.com ] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [ storeingame.net ] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [ speebie.org ] whole family.Everyone spends agamegold [ agamegold.org ] weekends in his ownmmofly [ mmofly.org ] way .
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to music     OE reading novels     OEor watchingogeworld [ ogeworld.org ] films .
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketball     OEwimming ormmorpgvip [ mmorpgvip.net ] dancing .
Different people have different gamesavor [ gamesavor.net ] relaxations.I often spend weekends withoggsale [ oggsale.net ] my family or my friends .
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends .
Sometimesgamersell [ gamersell.net ] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [ mmovirtex.net ] gain much knowledge .
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [ rpg-trader.net ] my vision .
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends .
Weekends are always enjoyable for me.igxe [ igxe.org ] swagvault [ swagvault.org ] oforu wowgold-usa [ wowgold-usa.org ] ignmax [ ignmax.org ] wowgoldlive [ wowgoldlive.net ] brogame [ brogame.net ] thsale [ thsale.org ] GoldRockU [ goldrocku.net ] brogame [ brogame.us ]   swagvault [ swagvault.us ] goldsoon [ goldsoon.us ] oforu [ oforu.us ] igxe [ www.igxe.us ] thsale [ thsale.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weekends to peopleig2t [ig2t.net] mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe [wowgold4europe.net] good rest.
For exampleï¼OE people gameusd [gameusd.org] can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold [meinwowgold.com] together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame [storeingame.net] other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie [speebie.org] whole family.Everyone spends agamegold [agamegold.org] weekends in his ownmmofly [mmofly.org] way.
Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to musicï¼OE reading novelsï¼OEor watchingogeworld [ogeworld.org] films.
Others perhaps are more active by playing basketballï¼OEwimming ormmorpgvip [mmorpgvip.net] dancing.
Different people have different gamesavor [gamesavor.net] relaxations.I often spend weekends withoggsale [oggsale.net] my family or my friends.
Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends.
Sometimesgamersell [gamersell.net] I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex [mmovirtex.net] gain much knowledge.
I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader [rpg-trader.net] my vision.
An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends.
Weekends are always enjoyable for me.igxe [igxe.org] swagvault [swagvault.org] oforu wowgold-usa [wowgold-usa.org] ignmax [ignmax.org] wowgoldlive [wowgoldlive.net] brogame [brogame.net]  thsale [thsale.org] GoldRockU [goldrocku.net] brogame [brogame.us]
  swagvault [swagvault.us] goldsoon [goldsoon.us] oforu [oforu.us] igxe [www.igxe.us] thsale [thsale.us]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258621</id>
	<title>3drealms no carrier</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244463960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>can't wait to run dnf on it! oh.. wait!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ca n't wait to run dnf on it !
oh.. wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can't wait to run dnf on it!
oh.. wait!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264121</id>
	<title>OMFG</title>
	<author>chord.wav</author>
	<datestamp>1244554920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jenna Jameson in full 3D glory! Prepare your Biff's sidekick 3D glasses. We are about to live interesting times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jenna Jameson in full 3D glory !
Prepare your Biff 's sidekick 3D glasses .
We are about to live interesting times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jenna Jameson in full 3D glory!
Prepare your Biff's sidekick 3D glasses.
We are about to live interesting times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258539</id>
	<title>Re:Summary grossly incorrect.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244463540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even with glasses, it's still going to be useful. One word: pR0n!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even with glasses , it 's still going to be useful .
One word : pR0n !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even with glasses, it's still going to be useful.
One word: pR0n!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258275</id>
	<title>Inaccurate summary</title>
	<author>Theaetetus</author>
	<datestamp>1244462220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it requires no special glasses.</p></div><p>Wow, that is interesting... oh, wait:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted.</p></div><p>What's next? "The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it runs on a hyperdimensional fuel cell weighing only two ounces but able to supply power for six months on a single charge... (but not currently, and it has quite a few technological obstacles to overcome)."<br>
Wishful thinking makes for a good press release, but not such a good Slashdot story.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most interesting thing about Acer 's machine is that it requires no special glasses.Wow , that is interesting... oh , wait : Currently , users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective , however , Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses , although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome , Kan noted.What 's next ?
" The most interesting thing about Acer 's machine is that it runs on a hyperdimensional fuel cell weighing only two ounces but able to supply power for six months on a single charge... ( but not currently , and it has quite a few technological obstacles to overcome ) .
" Wishful thinking makes for a good press release , but not such a good Slashdot story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it requires no special glasses.Wow, that is interesting... oh, wait:Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted.What's next?
"The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it runs on a hyperdimensional fuel cell weighing only two ounces but able to supply power for six months on a single charge... (but not currently, and it has quite a few technological obstacles to overcome).
"
Wishful thinking makes for a good press release, but not such a good Slashdot story.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261151</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've got something like that, except you can fold it and roll it as well... It's quite amazing stuff. You just use an "ink pen" and you "write" on it. It's quite a device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've got something like that , except you can fold it and roll it as well... It 's quite amazing stuff .
You just use an " ink pen " and you " write " on it .
It 's quite a device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've got something like that, except you can fold it and roll it as well... It's quite amazing stuff.
You just use an "ink pen" and you "write" on it.
It's quite a device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261119</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>hot soldering iron</author>
	<datestamp>1244478660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I played a "no glasses" arcade game back in 1991. No scan lines, flicker, or color bleed, just high def that puts my 43 incher to shame. Of course, it was in the PX at the Army Signal School. More geeks per square foot than anyplace else I've ever seen. Literally THOUSANDS, and not an English major to be seen!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I played a " no glasses " arcade game back in 1991 .
No scan lines , flicker , or color bleed , just high def that puts my 43 incher to shame .
Of course , it was in the PX at the Army Signal School .
More geeks per square foot than anyplace else I 've ever seen .
Literally THOUSANDS , and not an English major to be seen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I played a "no glasses" arcade game back in 1991.
No scan lines, flicker, or color bleed, just high def that puts my 43 incher to shame.
Of course, it was in the PX at the Army Signal School.
More geeks per square foot than anyplace else I've ever seen.
Literally THOUSANDS, and not an English major to be seen!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261535</id>
	<title>Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D"</title>
	<author>cdhgee</author>
	<datestamp>1244482260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The eye is only stereo</p></div><p>When did eyes start processing sound as well as light?!? Or is this some sort of next-generation eye that will work with these glasses we won't need for the 3D laptops which don't yet exist?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The eye is only stereoWhen did eyes start processing sound as well as light ? ! ?
Or is this some sort of next-generation eye that will work with these glasses we wo n't need for the 3D laptops which do n't yet exist ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The eye is only stereoWhen did eyes start processing sound as well as light?!?
Or is this some sort of next-generation eye that will work with these glasses we won't need for the 3D laptops which don't yet exist?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261081</id>
	<title>Re:Been done.</title>
	<author>dindi</author>
	<datestamp>1244478480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you are referring to "which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D "<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... I also kept wondering about that feature! Must be like one of the virtual surround sound devices that can take mono and turn it into a nice effect which makes you feel like sitting in a coke can...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you are referring to " which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D " .... I also kept wondering about that feature !
Must be like one of the virtual surround sound devices that can take mono and turn it into a nice effect which makes you feel like sitting in a coke can.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you are referring to "which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D " .... I also kept wondering about that feature!
Must be like one of the virtual surround sound devices that can take mono and turn it into a nice effect which makes you feel like sitting in a coke can...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261785</id>
	<title>Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>kramulous</author>
	<datestamp>1244485140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That comment is pretty two dimensional.  Don't be so shallow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That comment is pretty two dimensional .
Do n't be so shallow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That comment is pretty two dimensional.
Don't be so shallow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143</id>
	<title>WTH is a 3D Laptop???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244461560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are all the other laptops on the market existing in only two dimensions? I am pretty sure all laptops are currently three dimensional.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are all the other laptops on the market existing in only two dimensions ?
I am pretty sure all laptops are currently three dimensional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are all the other laptops on the market existing in only two dimensions?
I am pretty sure all laptops are currently three dimensional.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28266075</id>
	<title>All Acers are no-glasses laptops</title>
	<author>m\_frankie\_h</author>
	<datestamp>1244563920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is, if you spill a glass of water (anywhere in the house), or just bring a glass (maybe even empty, but this has not been tested),  the keyboard dies.</p><p>Really, just try it. And then buy a real laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is , if you spill a glass of water ( anywhere in the house ) , or just bring a glass ( maybe even empty , but this has not been tested ) , the keyboard dies.Really , just try it .
And then buy a real laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is, if you spill a glass of water (anywhere in the house), or just bring a glass (maybe even empty, but this has not been tested),  the keyboard dies.Really, just try it.
And then buy a real laptop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28265605</id>
	<title>Not the first?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244562180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure this isn't the first 3d laptop available. I was at a trade show (IAAPA) about 5 years ago, and one of the exhibitors happened to have a laptop with a lenticular screen, running a 3d demo. If you positioned yourself in exactly the right position, then you would see the image in 3d. Now, I'm not saying that the 3d effect was really pronounced, or even good. And if you were off-center by even a little bit then it just looked bad. But the laptop existed, and I'm pretty sure it was available on the consumer market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure this is n't the first 3d laptop available .
I was at a trade show ( IAAPA ) about 5 years ago , and one of the exhibitors happened to have a laptop with a lenticular screen , running a 3d demo .
If you positioned yourself in exactly the right position , then you would see the image in 3d .
Now , I 'm not saying that the 3d effect was really pronounced , or even good .
And if you were off-center by even a little bit then it just looked bad .
But the laptop existed , and I 'm pretty sure it was available on the consumer market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure this isn't the first 3d laptop available.
I was at a trade show (IAAPA) about 5 years ago, and one of the exhibitors happened to have a laptop with a lenticular screen, running a 3d demo.
If you positioned yourself in exactly the right position, then you would see the image in 3d.
Now, I'm not saying that the 3d effect was really pronounced, or even good.
And if you were off-center by even a little bit then it just looked bad.
But the laptop existed, and I'm pretty sure it was available on the consumer market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28273047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260209
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28279899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28262765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28262729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261119
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28273029
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258179
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261081
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264263
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258317
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261785
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258517
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258691
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258275
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258735
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28265689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_2054258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258275
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258667
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258139
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28262729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258691
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261081
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264121
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263257
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258517
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258673
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28279899
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28265689
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261151
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28273047
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28262765
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263213
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263155
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28273029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258339
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258157
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258445
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261535
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259273
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258213
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264997
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258837
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258533
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263881
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28259661
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258599
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258905
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28261087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28263037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258735
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258643
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28264263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28260209
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258317
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258595
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258655
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_2054258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_2054258.28258685
</commentlist>
</conversation>
