<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_08_139242</id>
	<title>Black Hole Swallows Star</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1244468280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Thorfinn.au writes <i>"The New Scientist writes a conjectural piece to <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17262-freefloating-black-hole-may-solve-space-firefly-mystery.html">explain the light pattern of SCP 06F6</a> in what was first identified as a supernova &mdash; but observations show a skewed and stretched light curve not fitting with an current theoretical explanation of exploding stars.  Also, the discussion in the comments is interesting."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thorfinn.au writes " The New Scientist writes a conjectural piece to explain the light pattern of SCP 06F6 in what was first identified as a supernova    but observations show a skewed and stretched light curve not fitting with an current theoretical explanation of exploding stars .
Also , the discussion in the comments is interesting .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thorfinn.au writes "The New Scientist writes a conjectural piece to explain the light pattern of SCP 06F6 in what was first identified as a supernova — but observations show a skewed and stretched light curve not fitting with an current theoretical explanation of exploding stars.
Also, the discussion in the comments is interesting.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250395</id>
	<title>90's flashback</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*creepy smile* black hole sun, black hole sun</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* creepy smile * black hole sun , black hole sun</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*creepy smile* black hole sun, black hole sun</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28260909</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244477340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All objects that experience gravity have an escape velocity.   (This is true of small and large objects, and where there are multiple objects, such as you (with a very small escape velocity) and the Earth (with a much larger escape velocity)).</p><p>The escape velocity of an object increases with proximity to that object's centre of mass.</p><p>Black holes have an escape velocity that reaches the speed of light at the event horizon.</p><p>Further away from the centre of mass, the escape velocity is less than the speed of light.</p><p>As material is drawn close to a black hole it becomes very hot, much as closer to the centre of the Earth it grows hotter.</p><p>In a a very hot environment, material can experience violent accelerations, and if they are strong enough, the ejected material can exceed the escape velocity.   The superhot material in the accretion disk of a black hole can be ejected in a jet.   An analogy would be a supervolcano throwing a plume of ash right out of the atmosphere, or perhaps a solar flare.</p><p>Also, very hot material radiates photons (black body radiation).   The hotter the material, the higher the energy of radiated photons tend to be.  We can detect these directly by observation.  Extremely high frequency photons (gamma rays) collide with particles of matter in the accretion disk transferring their momentum -- imparting a "kick" that can accelerate the particle to escape velocity -- or their energy, which can fission atomic nuclei, the lighter daughter products of which can also reach escape velocity.</p><p>However, once the escape velocity reaches the speed of light, there is no "blasting away" of material.    Stellar (and supermassive) black holes may shrink very very very slowly through Hawking radiation, but it's the material in the accretion disk near the black hole that is the source of the blasts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All objects that experience gravity have an escape velocity .
( This is true of small and large objects , and where there are multiple objects , such as you ( with a very small escape velocity ) and the Earth ( with a much larger escape velocity ) ) .The escape velocity of an object increases with proximity to that object 's centre of mass.Black holes have an escape velocity that reaches the speed of light at the event horizon.Further away from the centre of mass , the escape velocity is less than the speed of light.As material is drawn close to a black hole it becomes very hot , much as closer to the centre of the Earth it grows hotter.In a a very hot environment , material can experience violent accelerations , and if they are strong enough , the ejected material can exceed the escape velocity .
The superhot material in the accretion disk of a black hole can be ejected in a jet .
An analogy would be a supervolcano throwing a plume of ash right out of the atmosphere , or perhaps a solar flare.Also , very hot material radiates photons ( black body radiation ) .
The hotter the material , the higher the energy of radiated photons tend to be .
We can detect these directly by observation .
Extremely high frequency photons ( gamma rays ) collide with particles of matter in the accretion disk transferring their momentum -- imparting a " kick " that can accelerate the particle to escape velocity -- or their energy , which can fission atomic nuclei , the lighter daughter products of which can also reach escape velocity.However , once the escape velocity reaches the speed of light , there is no " blasting away " of material .
Stellar ( and supermassive ) black holes may shrink very very very slowly through Hawking radiation , but it 's the material in the accretion disk near the black hole that is the source of the blasts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All objects that experience gravity have an escape velocity.
(This is true of small and large objects, and where there are multiple objects, such as you (with a very small escape velocity) and the Earth (with a much larger escape velocity)).The escape velocity of an object increases with proximity to that object's centre of mass.Black holes have an escape velocity that reaches the speed of light at the event horizon.Further away from the centre of mass, the escape velocity is less than the speed of light.As material is drawn close to a black hole it becomes very hot, much as closer to the centre of the Earth it grows hotter.In a a very hot environment, material can experience violent accelerations, and if they are strong enough, the ejected material can exceed the escape velocity.
The superhot material in the accretion disk of a black hole can be ejected in a jet.
An analogy would be a supervolcano throwing a plume of ash right out of the atmosphere, or perhaps a solar flare.Also, very hot material radiates photons (black body radiation).
The hotter the material, the higher the energy of radiated photons tend to be.
We can detect these directly by observation.
Extremely high frequency photons (gamma rays) collide with particles of matter in the accretion disk transferring their momentum -- imparting a "kick" that can accelerate the particle to escape velocity -- or their energy, which can fission atomic nuclei, the lighter daughter products of which can also reach escape velocity.However, once the escape velocity reaches the speed of light, there is no "blasting away" of material.
Stellar (and supermassive) black holes may shrink very very very slowly through Hawking radiation, but it's the material in the accretion disk near the black hole that is the source of the blasts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>tjonnyc999</author>
	<datestamp>1244475720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The common view that a black hole has a definite "boundary" beyond which nothing can escape, although essentially true, overlooks several important factors.<br>
Yes, the "event horizon" (EH) is the boundary beyond which nothing can escape the gravitational pull of the black hole.<br>
However, it's not a physical boundary (black holes do not have a physical surface), it's the mathematically-calculated boundary beyond which events inside the EH cannot affect an outside observer. As a particle gets closer to the EH, its chances of escape shrink to infinity, and once the EH is crossed, it's effectively gone from the outside world.<br>
That being said, under certain conditions, particles <b>can</b> be radiated outward from a black hole:<br>
1.) If an object inside the "photon sphere" (Schwartzchild Radius X 1.5) but still outside the EH emits photons, those photons can still escape. (Photons coming inbound are screwed, though. Approaching on a tangent, have a slim chance to "bounce off" due to rotational gain.).<br>
2.) If the black hole is rotating, and a particle is approaching the black hole at a tangent, it may also escape via "stealing" some of the rotational energy.
<br>
3.) Rotating black holes also emit particles via Hawking radiation, which is more of a particle-antiparticle explanation that I want to get into here.
<br> <br>
So, yeah, it's sort of an issue of semantics - if you consider the zone right outside the EH a part of the black hole, then yes, things can escape from a black hole; if you take the common (and incorrect) view that a black hole has a definite "border", and discount all the fun stuff that's going on around the black hole, then no, nothing can escape.<br> <br>
(Of course, this is a ridiculously simplified explanation, and I do expect at least one Slashdot astrophysicist to poke it full of holes (pun intended).)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The common view that a black hole has a definite " boundary " beyond which nothing can escape , although essentially true , overlooks several important factors .
Yes , the " event horizon " ( EH ) is the boundary beyond which nothing can escape the gravitational pull of the black hole .
However , it 's not a physical boundary ( black holes do not have a physical surface ) , it 's the mathematically-calculated boundary beyond which events inside the EH can not affect an outside observer .
As a particle gets closer to the EH , its chances of escape shrink to infinity , and once the EH is crossed , it 's effectively gone from the outside world .
That being said , under certain conditions , particles can be radiated outward from a black hole : 1 .
) If an object inside the " photon sphere " ( Schwartzchild Radius X 1.5 ) but still outside the EH emits photons , those photons can still escape .
( Photons coming inbound are screwed , though .
Approaching on a tangent , have a slim chance to " bounce off " due to rotational gain. ) .
2. ) If the black hole is rotating , and a particle is approaching the black hole at a tangent , it may also escape via " stealing " some of the rotational energy .
3. ) Rotating black holes also emit particles via Hawking radiation , which is more of a particle-antiparticle explanation that I want to get into here .
So , yeah , it 's sort of an issue of semantics - if you consider the zone right outside the EH a part of the black hole , then yes , things can escape from a black hole ; if you take the common ( and incorrect ) view that a black hole has a definite " border " , and discount all the fun stuff that 's going on around the black hole , then no , nothing can escape .
( Of course , this is a ridiculously simplified explanation , and I do expect at least one Slashdot astrophysicist to poke it full of holes ( pun intended ) .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The common view that a black hole has a definite "boundary" beyond which nothing can escape, although essentially true, overlooks several important factors.
Yes, the "event horizon" (EH) is the boundary beyond which nothing can escape the gravitational pull of the black hole.
However, it's not a physical boundary (black holes do not have a physical surface), it's the mathematically-calculated boundary beyond which events inside the EH cannot affect an outside observer.
As a particle gets closer to the EH, its chances of escape shrink to infinity, and once the EH is crossed, it's effectively gone from the outside world.
That being said, under certain conditions, particles can be radiated outward from a black hole:
1.
) If an object inside the "photon sphere" (Schwartzchild Radius X 1.5) but still outside the EH emits photons, those photons can still escape.
(Photons coming inbound are screwed, though.
Approaching on a tangent, have a slim chance to "bounce off" due to rotational gain.).
2.) If the black hole is rotating, and a particle is approaching the black hole at a tangent, it may also escape via "stealing" some of the rotational energy.
3.) Rotating black holes also emit particles via Hawking radiation, which is more of a particle-antiparticle explanation that I want to get into here.
So, yeah, it's sort of an issue of semantics - if you consider the zone right outside the EH a part of the black hole, then yes, things can escape from a black hole; if you take the common (and incorrect) view that a black hole has a definite "border", and discount all the fun stuff that's going on around the black hole, then no, nothing can escape.
(Of course, this is a ridiculously simplified explanation, and I do expect at least one Slashdot astrophysicist to poke it full of holes (pun intended).
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252537</id>
	<title>Possiblity</title>
	<author>Terrorwrist</author>
	<datestamp>1244483280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>When that star enters into the black hole, it would probably go out of the black holes butt, and the outcome would be a Black Star lol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When that star enters into the black hole , it would probably go out of the black holes butt , and the outcome would be a Black Star lol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When that star enters into the black hole, it would probably go out of the black holes butt, and the outcome would be a Black Star lol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252867</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244484660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best part is some of those *have* been observed. I can't find a link, but a clock was flown around in an airplane or satellite or something and showed a skew compared to an identical clock synced at the beginning of the experiment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best part is some of those * have * been observed .
I ca n't find a link , but a clock was flown around in an airplane or satellite or something and showed a skew compared to an identical clock synced at the beginning of the experiment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best part is some of those *have* been observed.
I can't find a link, but a clock was flown around in an airplane or satellite or something and showed a skew compared to an identical clock synced at the beginning of the experiment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251481</id>
	<title>Ambiguous</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1244478300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are these black hole swallows starring in Capistrano? Are there any chickadees?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are these black hole swallows starring in Capistrano ?
Are there any chickadees ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are these black hole swallows starring in Capistrano?
Are there any chickadees?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250333</id>
	<title>new research shows</title>
	<author>wjh31</author>
	<datestamp>1244472480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>over 50\% of black holes in the western hemisphere are clinically obese. It's though that the high availability and low cost of stars is to blame. Ejection of gas is one of the many unfortunate side-effects.</htmltext>
<tokenext>over 50 \ % of black holes in the western hemisphere are clinically obese .
It 's though that the high availability and low cost of stars is to blame .
Ejection of gas is one of the many unfortunate side-effects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>over 50\% of black holes in the western hemisphere are clinically obese.
It's though that the high availability and low cost of stars is to blame.
Ejection of gas is one of the many unfortunate side-effects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250955</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>James Skarzinskas</author>
	<datestamp>1244475660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well then, I volunteer you to go check for us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well then , I volunteer you to go check for us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well then, I volunteer you to go check for us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250653</id>
	<title>A starship making  course correction, obviously.</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1244474220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250527</id>
	<title>I felt a great disturbance</title>
	<author>Laser Lou</author>
	<datestamp>1244473440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.</p><p>Sorry, couldn't resist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in the Force , as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.Sorry , could n't resist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.Sorry, couldn't resist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251321</id>
	<title>Misleading headline</title>
	<author>imgod2u</author>
	<datestamp>1244477520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's nothing in the article about Paris Hilton.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing in the article about Paris Hilton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing in the article about Paris Hilton.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250263</id>
	<title>pervyj nah!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>pervyj nah!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>pervyj nah !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pervyj nah!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253249</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>Ardipithecus</author>
	<datestamp>1244486580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks, now add roving black hole to gamma-ray burst and false-vacuum collapse in the worry list.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , now add roving black hole to gamma-ray burst and false-vacuum collapse in the worry list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, now add roving black hole to gamma-ray burst and false-vacuum collapse in the worry list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250833</id>
	<title>Star swallows Black Hole</title>
	<author>caywen</author>
	<datestamp>1244475120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now THAT's news!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now THAT 's news !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now THAT's news!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251761</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better than finding a 2 flares around Uranus</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better than finding a 2 flares around Uranus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better than finding a 2 flares around Uranus</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251355</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244477640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Outside the event horizon, the black hole's motion is subject to the very same influences that the motion of  any object with the same mass would be subject to; from the viewpoint of gravity, a black hole outside its event horizon is just a really really small, somewhat heavy star that doesn't emit any radiation whatsoever (though anything that gets close enough to be swallowed does emit, on the way down).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Outside the event horizon , the black hole 's motion is subject to the very same influences that the motion of any object with the same mass would be subject to ; from the viewpoint of gravity , a black hole outside its event horizon is just a really really small , somewhat heavy star that does n't emit any radiation whatsoever ( though anything that gets close enough to be swallowed does emit , on the way down ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Outside the event horizon, the black hole's motion is subject to the very same influences that the motion of  any object with the same mass would be subject to; from the viewpoint of gravity, a black hole outside its event horizon is just a really really small, somewhat heavy star that doesn't emit any radiation whatsoever (though anything that gets close enough to be swallowed does emit, on the way down).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254403</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244491680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just out of curiosity, what would happen if two black holes (same size) would collide head on?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just out of curiosity , what would happen if two black holes ( same size ) would collide head on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just out of curiosity, what would happen if two black holes (same size) would collide head on?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253695</id>
	<title>Bad Title</title>
	<author>Quaoar</author>
	<datestamp>1244488800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Quoth the conclusion of the referenced paper:<br><br>"These possibilities, combined with the observation that the<br>disrupted object be a carbon-rich star, rather than a normal<br>main sequence one appear to make the case for tidal disruption<br>somewhat contrived. Nonetheless, with only one object, and<br>thus an essentially unconstrained rate and space density for<br>such events, it remains a possibility."<br><br>So, while tidal disruption is a possibility, it is not the favored scenario.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quoth the conclusion of the referenced paper : " These possibilities , combined with the observation that thedisrupted object be a carbon-rich star , rather than a normalmain sequence one appear to make the case for tidal disruptionsomewhat contrived .
Nonetheless , with only one object , andthus an essentially unconstrained rate and space density forsuch events , it remains a possibility .
" So , while tidal disruption is a possibility , it is not the favored scenario .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quoth the conclusion of the referenced paper:"These possibilities, combined with the observation that thedisrupted object be a carbon-rich star, rather than a normalmain sequence one appear to make the case for tidal disruptionsomewhat contrived.
Nonetheless, with only one object, andthus an essentially unconstrained rate and space density forsuch events, it remains a possibility.
"So, while tidal disruption is a possibility, it is not the favored scenario.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244475960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile.  I can not imagine something would be able to exert enough force on the black hole to actually accelerate it.</p></div><p>Other than the obvious everything-attracts-everything-else, also remember that black holes don't magically appear from nothing. Whatever matter initially created the black hole was most likely moving, and that momentum doesn't go anywhere.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile .
I can not imagine something would be able to exert enough force on the black hole to actually accelerate it.Other than the obvious everything-attracts-everything-else , also remember that black holes do n't magically appear from nothing .
Whatever matter initially created the black hole was most likely moving , and that momentum does n't go anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile.
I can not imagine something would be able to exert enough force on the black hole to actually accelerate it.Other than the obvious everything-attracts-everything-else, also remember that black holes don't magically appear from nothing.
Whatever matter initially created the black hole was most likely moving, and that momentum doesn't go anywhere.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28259421</id>
	<title>Re:ObSexistComment</title>
	<author>beav007</author>
	<datestamp>1244469120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oops, I think I just accidentally the whole star!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oops , I think I just accidentally the whole star !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oops, I think I just accidentally the whole star!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250823</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250823</id>
	<title>ObSexistComment</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244475000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A whole star? Someone should Cc: this article to my girlfriend.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A whole star ?
Someone should Cc : this article to my girlfriend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A whole star?
Someone should Cc: this article to my girlfriend.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28357805</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>Nefarious Wheel</author>
	<datestamp>1245175320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know about any others, but I *always* hide my flawed mathematical constructs from others.  That is, when they're not hiding from me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about any others , but I * always * hide my flawed mathematical constructs from others .
That is , when they 're not hiding from me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about any others, but I *always* hide my flawed mathematical constructs from others.
That is, when they're not hiding from me...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28256077</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1244453880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile.</p></div><p>I'm not a scientist but I was abducted by aliens once.</p><p>As far as I'm aware a black hole isn't any different than anything else except that it's got mad gravity. Our sun has lots of mass and gravity but it still orbits our milky way galaxy and our galaxy is moving in relation to everything else in the universe which as a whole is expanding outward from a big bang'ish point of origin. Black holes get formed from really big stars so if it that star was moving to begin with than it probably will still be moving after becoming a black hole.</p><p>Plus while black holes have massive gravity it's not as massive as a galaxy and so they can still get thrown around just like everything else in the universe.</p><p>Black holes are pretty normal until you cross the event horizon. Just think of a black hole as our sun. Stuff orbits it, gets sucked in, ejected, etc.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile.I 'm not a scientist but I was abducted by aliens once.As far as I 'm aware a black hole is n't any different than anything else except that it 's got mad gravity .
Our sun has lots of mass and gravity but it still orbits our milky way galaxy and our galaxy is moving in relation to everything else in the universe which as a whole is expanding outward from a big bang'ish point of origin .
Black holes get formed from really big stars so if it that star was moving to begin with than it probably will still be moving after becoming a black hole.Plus while black holes have massive gravity it 's not as massive as a galaxy and so they can still get thrown around just like everything else in the universe.Black holes are pretty normal until you cross the event horizon .
Just think of a black hole as our sun .
Stuff orbits it , gets sucked in , ejected , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile.I'm not a scientist but I was abducted by aliens once.As far as I'm aware a black hole isn't any different than anything else except that it's got mad gravity.
Our sun has lots of mass and gravity but it still orbits our milky way galaxy and our galaxy is moving in relation to everything else in the universe which as a whole is expanding outward from a big bang'ish point of origin.
Black holes get formed from really big stars so if it that star was moving to begin with than it probably will still be moving after becoming a black hole.Plus while black holes have massive gravity it's not as massive as a galaxy and so they can still get thrown around just like everything else in the universe.Black holes are pretty normal until you cross the event horizon.
Just think of a black hole as our sun.
Stuff orbits it, gets sucked in, ejected, etc.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250355</id>
	<title>Re:"discussion in the comments"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This comment breached our <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/info/in153" title="newscientist.com" rel="nofollow">terms of use</a> [newscientist.com] and has been removed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This comment breached our terms of use [ newscientist.com ] and has been removed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This comment breached our terms of use [newscientist.com] and has been removed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251135</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not scientist</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1244476620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"""The amount of the stretching suggests the object sits some 2 billion light years away"""</p><p>So if the conditions are perfect and it's moving exactly sideways with respect to us, and it's moving at the speed of light (the first is unlikely, the second is impossible)) - then in a year it moves 0.00000003 degrees in our view.</p><p>Good luck.</p><p>Especially considering the lensing will be insignificant, since the black hole isn't a galaxy cluster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" " " The amount of the stretching suggests the object sits some 2 billion light years away " " " So if the conditions are perfect and it 's moving exactly sideways with respect to us , and it 's moving at the speed of light ( the first is unlikely , the second is impossible ) ) - then in a year it moves 0.00000003 degrees in our view.Good luck.Especially considering the lensing will be insignificant , since the black hole is n't a galaxy cluster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"""The amount of the stretching suggests the object sits some 2 billion light years away"""So if the conditions are perfect and it's moving exactly sideways with respect to us, and it's moving at the speed of light (the first is unlikely, the second is impossible)) - then in a year it moves 0.00000003 degrees in our view.Good luck.Especially considering the lensing will be insignificant, since the black hole isn't a galaxy cluster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250369</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28255449</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1244451960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Everything is moving relative to everything else. There is no stationary reference frame, so unless you happen to move at the same velocity as the BH, it will appear to move.<br>2. Black holes aren't necessarily all that massive. The ones in the centers of galaxies are super massive, but black holes created by supernovae could be around 2 solar masses, which is not very massive on cosmological scales. If it sucks in another solar mass, it just sucked in a huge influx of momentum, which isn't going to disappear.<br>3. Gravity accelerates things regardless of how massive it is. A black hole will orbit a gravitational center just like a star will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Everything is moving relative to everything else .
There is no stationary reference frame , so unless you happen to move at the same velocity as the BH , it will appear to move.2 .
Black holes are n't necessarily all that massive .
The ones in the centers of galaxies are super massive , but black holes created by supernovae could be around 2 solar masses , which is not very massive on cosmological scales .
If it sucks in another solar mass , it just sucked in a huge influx of momentum , which is n't going to disappear.3 .
Gravity accelerates things regardless of how massive it is .
A black hole will orbit a gravitational center just like a star will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Everything is moving relative to everything else.
There is no stationary reference frame, so unless you happen to move at the same velocity as the BH, it will appear to move.2.
Black holes aren't necessarily all that massive.
The ones in the centers of galaxies are super massive, but black holes created by supernovae could be around 2 solar masses, which is not very massive on cosmological scales.
If it sucks in another solar mass, it just sucked in a huge influx of momentum, which isn't going to disappear.3.
Gravity accelerates things regardless of how massive it is.
A black hole will orbit a gravitational center just like a star will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>OldSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1244478780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the comments I like is the fellow who complains that:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>So called scientific "facts" such as, black holes, big bang, stretched space, warped space, spacetime and so on,are merely flawed mathematical constructs. They have never been observed</p></div><p>What always strikes me with these sort of comments is the underlying belief that scientists are hiding something from the rest of us. Don't these posters realize that they're complaining about this "supposed conspiracy theory" in an article where scientists are openly admitting that they saw something they don't understand?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the comments I like is the fellow who complains that : So called scientific " facts " such as , black holes , big bang , stretched space , warped space , spacetime and so on,are merely flawed mathematical constructs .
They have never been observedWhat always strikes me with these sort of comments is the underlying belief that scientists are hiding something from the rest of us .
Do n't these posters realize that they 're complaining about this " supposed conspiracy theory " in an article where scientists are openly admitting that they saw something they do n't understand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the comments I like is the fellow who complains that:So called scientific "facts" such as, black holes, big bang, stretched space, warped space, spacetime and so on,are merely flawed mathematical constructs.
They have never been observedWhat always strikes me with these sort of comments is the underlying belief that scientists are hiding something from the rest of us.
Don't these posters realize that they're complaining about this "supposed conspiracy theory" in an article where scientists are openly admitting that they saw something they don't understand?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257</id>
	<title>"discussion in the comments"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and you couldn't <i>summarize</i> the "discussion in the comments" in the <i>summary<i> because...</i></i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and you could n't summarize the " discussion in the comments " in the summary because.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and you couldn't summarize the "discussion in the comments" in the summary because...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250665</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Xeriar</author>
	<datestamp>1244474220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder, how does anything manage to get "blasted away" from a black hole? I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed?</i></p><p>Simple, black holes are very messy eaters - they radiate a significant fraction of their food as photons. Keep in mind you are accelerating much of the star to a significant fraction of c, letting it collide with itself. This goes double for stellar mass black holes - you have a million+ kilometer star getting 'swallowed' by a twenty kilometer black hole. Even a perfect landing is going to result in most of the star's mass getting flung back out into space if only because the hole is smaller than the core of the star.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder , how does anything manage to get " blasted away " from a black hole ?
I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed ? Simple , black holes are very messy eaters - they radiate a significant fraction of their food as photons .
Keep in mind you are accelerating much of the star to a significant fraction of c , letting it collide with itself .
This goes double for stellar mass black holes - you have a million + kilometer star getting 'swallowed ' by a twenty kilometer black hole .
Even a perfect landing is going to result in most of the star 's mass getting flung back out into space if only because the hole is smaller than the core of the star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder, how does anything manage to get "blasted away" from a black hole?
I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed?Simple, black holes are very messy eaters - they radiate a significant fraction of their food as photons.
Keep in mind you are accelerating much of the star to a significant fraction of c, letting it collide with itself.
This goes double for stellar mass black holes - you have a million+ kilometer star getting 'swallowed' by a twenty kilometer black hole.
Even a perfect landing is going to result in most of the star's mass getting flung back out into space if only because the hole is smaller than the core of the star.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250619</id>
	<title>Ooops!</title>
	<author>Sport89</author>
	<datestamp>1244474040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like the inhabitants of the nearest planet just switched on their brand-new LHC...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like the inhabitants of the nearest planet just switched on their brand-new LHC.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like the inhabitants of the nearest planet just switched on their brand-new LHC...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250841</id>
	<title>Re:90's flashback</title>
	<author>teknopurge</author>
	<datestamp>1244475120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fantastic song - fantastic band.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fantastic song - fantastic band .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fantastic song - fantastic band.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250395</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254361</id>
	<title>oh I get it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244491500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so CmdrTaco's gaping rectum swallowed a little boy's ruby-colored starfruit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so CmdrTaco 's gaping rectum swallowed a little boy 's ruby-colored starfruit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so CmdrTaco's gaping rectum swallowed a little boy's ruby-colored starfruit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250869</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244475240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>motion is relative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>motion is relative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>motion is relative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250363</id>
	<title>I've been there before</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A black prostitute swallowed my cum in New Orleans last weekend.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A black prostitute swallowed my cum in New Orleans last weekend .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A black prostitute swallowed my cum in New Orleans last weekend.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250391</id>
	<title>Maybe we'll get a chance to see this happen!</title>
	<author>TheLeopardsAreComing</author>
	<datestamp>1244472660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well unfortunately you cannot tell very much about what happens in this system ( wether it is a binary system or not) by what is happening with the light.  You would have to look at the x-ray spectrum to be able to measure the kind of energies in the system.  Chandra observatory is the best we can do at the moment... but it seems they still like to measure things in Crabs!  But in the mean time, this would be cool to get some photo's of this happening!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well unfortunately you can not tell very much about what happens in this system ( wether it is a binary system or not ) by what is happening with the light .
You would have to look at the x-ray spectrum to be able to measure the kind of energies in the system .
Chandra observatory is the best we can do at the moment... but it seems they still like to measure things in Crabs !
But in the mean time , this would be cool to get some photo 's of this happening !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well unfortunately you cannot tell very much about what happens in this system ( wether it is a binary system or not) by what is happening with the light.
You would have to look at the x-ray spectrum to be able to measure the kind of energies in the system.
Chandra observatory is the best we can do at the moment... but it seems they still like to measure things in Crabs!
But in the mean time, this would be cool to get some photo's of this happening!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250821</id>
	<title>Black hole says...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244475000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://omnomnom.org/" title="omnomnom.org" rel="nofollow">om nom nom nom!</a> [omnomnom.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>om nom nom nom !
[ omnomnom.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>om nom nom nom!
[omnomnom.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250499</id>
	<title>Reavers!</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1244473200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article calls it the 'firefly event'. It wasn't a black hole. It was the reavers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article calls it the 'firefly event' .
It was n't a black hole .
It was the reavers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article calls it the 'firefly event'.
It wasn't a black hole.
It was the reavers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250697</id>
	<title>inforgmative MareMare</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244474400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>our ability to w\_as at the same approximately 90\%</htmltext>
<tokenext>our ability to w \ _as at the same approximately 90 \ %</tokentext>
<sentencetext>our ability to w\_as at the same approximately 90\%</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28260135</id>
	<title>Re:new research shows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244473560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I wondered how a black hole's gas smells like.</p></div></blockquote><p>Huh?  That makes no sense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wondered how a black hole 's gas smells like.Huh ?
That makes no sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wondered how a black hole's gas smells like.Huh?
That makes no sense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251755</id>
	<title>Warp core or Red Matter...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing either a warp core breach.. or there was red matter involved.. just a guess...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing either a warp core breach.. or there was red matter involved.. just a guess.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing either a warp core breach.. or there was red matter involved.. just a guess...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250283</id>
	<title>Everyone panic!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're next!  Ahhhhhhhhhhh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're next !
Ahhhhhhhhhhh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're next!
Ahhhhhhhhhhh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250385</id>
	<title>repaired Hubble Telescope may come in handy here</title>
	<author>MollyB</author>
	<datestamp>1244472660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from the last paragraph of tfa:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Gaensicke hopes one of Hubble's new cameras, the Wide Field Camera 3, which was installed on the last space shuttle mission to visit the telescope, could reveal more about the object's origins. The camera may be able to spot a host galaxy around the object that was too faint to see with other instruments.</p></div><p>As our instrumentation improves, we'll probably have many more head-scratching discoveries...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>from the last paragraph of tfa : Gaensicke hopes one of Hubble 's new cameras , the Wide Field Camera 3 , which was installed on the last space shuttle mission to visit the telescope , could reveal more about the object 's origins .
The camera may be able to spot a host galaxy around the object that was too faint to see with other instruments.As our instrumentation improves , we 'll probably have many more head-scratching discoveries.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the last paragraph of tfa:Gaensicke hopes one of Hubble's new cameras, the Wide Field Camera 3, which was installed on the last space shuttle mission to visit the telescope, could reveal more about the object's origins.
The camera may be able to spot a host galaxy around the object that was too faint to see with other instruments.As our instrumentation improves, we'll probably have many more head-scratching discoveries...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28257811</id>
	<title>Very disapointed</title>
	<author>ThatsNotFunny</author>
	<datestamp>1244460180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Based on the title, I thought Eddie Murphy found another tranny prostitute.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on the title , I thought Eddie Murphy found another tranny prostitute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on the title, I thought Eddie Murphy found another tranny prostitute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28257965</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244460840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and that there is no such thing as 'not moving'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and that there is no such thing as 'not moving'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and that there is no such thing as 'not moving'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253067</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244485500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and that momentum doesn't go anywhere.</p></div><p>No, that's the thing, it DOES.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and that momentum does n't go anywhere.No , that 's the thing , it DOES .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and that momentum doesn't go anywhere.No, that's the thing, it DOES.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</id>
	<title>could someone please explain</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1244472780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Gaensicke and colleagues envision two scenarios that might explain the object. In one, a carbon-rich star gets too close to a middle- or heavy-weight black hole, which tears the star apart. Some of this material is absorbed by the black hole, <b>and some is blasted away</b> in a flare that was eventually seen from Earth as SCP 06F6.</i></p><p>I'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder, how does <i>anything</i> manage to get "blasted <i>away</i>" from a black hole?  I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gaensicke and colleagues envision two scenarios that might explain the object .
In one , a carbon-rich star gets too close to a middle- or heavy-weight black hole , which tears the star apart .
Some of this material is absorbed by the black hole , and some is blasted away in a flare that was eventually seen from Earth as SCP 06F6.I 'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder , how does anything manage to get " blasted away " from a black hole ?
I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gaensicke and colleagues envision two scenarios that might explain the object.
In one, a carbon-rich star gets too close to a middle- or heavy-weight black hole, which tears the star apart.
Some of this material is absorbed by the black hole, and some is blasted away in a flare that was eventually seen from Earth as SCP 06F6.I'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder, how does anything manage to get "blasted away" from a black hole?
I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250315</id>
	<title>All according to plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess Samantha Carter's plan worked!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess Samantha Carter 's plan worked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess Samantha Carter's plan worked!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28258567</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1244463660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile</p></div></blockquote><p>Isn't it the other way around? There isn't anything that can be taken as the ground zero reference for speed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobileIs n't it the other way around ?
There is n't anything that can be taken as the ground zero reference for speed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobileIsn't it the other way around?
There isn't anything that can be taken as the ground zero reference for speed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250569</id>
	<title>Slashdot's gone cold</title>
	<author>Smidge207</author>
	<datestamp>1244473800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>Slashdot's gone cold I'm wondering why I got out of bed at all The morning rain clouds up my window and I can't see at all And even if I could it'll all be gray but your picture on my wall It reminds me, that it's not so bad -- it's not so bad Dear Rob, I wrote but you still ain't callin I left my email, my ICQ, and my yahoo chat at the bottom I sent two emails back in autumn, you must not-a got 'em There probably was a problem with your sendmail or somethin Sometimes I scribble email addees too sloppy when I jot 'em but anyways; fsck it, what's been up? Man how's your boxes? My boxes is linux too, I'm bout to be a compiler once I learn gcc, I'ma go on and compile for hours I read about your Palm Pilot too I'm sorry I had a friend lose his Palm over at the airport in Maradonna I know you probably hear this everyday, but I'm your biggest fan I even read all your bullshit Linux news and Microsoft's man I got a room full of your posters and your pictures man I like the way you sold your ass out too, that shit was fat Anyways, I hope you get this man, hit me back, just to chat, truly yours, your biggest fan Dear Rob, you still ain't called or wrote, I hope you have a chance I ain't mad - I just think it's FSCKED UP you don't answer fans If you didn't wanna talk to me outside your Linux World you didn't have to, but you coulda signed an autograph for Matthew That's my Senior sys admin he's only 26 years old We waited on a 9600 baud for you, four hours and you just said, "No." That's pretty shitty man - you're like his fsckin idol He wants to be just like you man, he likes you more than I do I ain't that mad though, I just don't like bein lied to Remember when we met in Boston - you said if I'd write you you would write back - see I'm just like you in a way I never had a clue about shit either I gcc'd shit with my wife then beat her I can relate to what you're saying in your page so when I feel like rmusering I read Slashdot to begin the rage cause I don't really got shit else so that shit helps when I'm depressed I even got a tattoo of slashdot across the chest Sometimes I even packet myself to see how much it floods It's like adrenaline, the DDoS is such a sudden rush of blood See everything you say is real, and I respect you cause you tell it My girlfriend's jealous cause I talk about you 24/7 But she don't know you like I know you Rob, no one does She don't know what it was like for people like us growin up You gotta call me man, I'll be the biggest fan you'll ever lose Dear Mister-I'm-Too-Good-To-Waste-A-Packet-On-My-Fans, this'll be the last packet I ever send your ass It's been six months and still no word - I don't deserve it? I know you got my last two emails I wrote the @ signs on 'em perfect So this is my payload I'm sending you, I hope you hear it I'm on my modem now, I'm doing 9600 baud so fear it Hey Rob, I drank a fifth of vodka, you dare me to code? You know the song by Deep Purple or Slayer its irrelevant by playing on my linux player while I write some php scripts and play some Dragonslayer That's kinda how shit is, you coulda rescued me from drowning Now it's too late - I'm on a 1000 downloads now, I'm drowsy and all I wanted was a lousy letter or a call I hope you know I ripped +ALL+ of your pictures off the wall I love you Rob, we coulda been together, think about it You ruined it now, I hope you can't sleep and you dream about it And when you dream I hope you can't sleep and you SCREAM about it I hope your conscience EATS AT YOU and you can't BREATHE without me See Rob {*screaming*} Shut up bitch! I'm tryin to code Hey Rob, that's my senior admin screamin from the comode but I didn't cut the power off, I just rebooted, see I ain't like you cause if rm -rf'd we'd suffer more, and then the boxes die too Well, gotta go, I'm almost BGP bridged now Oh shit, I forgot, how'm I supposed to send this packet out? Dear Stan, I meant to write you sooner but I just been busy You said your box is running now, how'd you like your gcc? Look, I'm really flattered you would install 7.0 Redhat and here's an autograph</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot 's gone cold I 'm wondering why I got out of bed at all The morning rain clouds up my window and I ca n't see at all And even if I could it 'll all be gray but your picture on my wall It reminds me , that it 's not so bad -- it 's not so bad Dear Rob , I wrote but you still ai n't callin I left my email , my ICQ , and my yahoo chat at the bottom I sent two emails back in autumn , you must not-a got 'em There probably was a problem with your sendmail or somethin Sometimes I scribble email addees too sloppy when I jot 'em but anyways ; fsck it , what 's been up ?
Man how 's your boxes ?
My boxes is linux too , I 'm bout to be a compiler once I learn gcc , I'ma go on and compile for hours I read about your Palm Pilot too I 'm sorry I had a friend lose his Palm over at the airport in Maradonna I know you probably hear this everyday , but I 'm your biggest fan I even read all your bullshit Linux news and Microsoft 's man I got a room full of your posters and your pictures man I like the way you sold your ass out too , that shit was fat Anyways , I hope you get this man , hit me back , just to chat , truly yours , your biggest fan Dear Rob , you still ai n't called or wrote , I hope you have a chance I ai n't mad - I just think it 's FSCKED UP you do n't answer fans If you did n't wan na talk to me outside your Linux World you did n't have to , but you coulda signed an autograph for Matthew That 's my Senior sys admin he 's only 26 years old We waited on a 9600 baud for you , four hours and you just said , " No .
" That 's pretty shitty man - you 're like his fsckin idol He wants to be just like you man , he likes you more than I do I ai n't that mad though , I just do n't like bein lied to Remember when we met in Boston - you said if I 'd write you you would write back - see I 'm just like you in a way I never had a clue about shit either I gcc 'd shit with my wife then beat her I can relate to what you 're saying in your page so when I feel like rmusering I read Slashdot to begin the rage cause I do n't really got shit else so that shit helps when I 'm depressed I even got a tattoo of slashdot across the chest Sometimes I even packet myself to see how much it floods It 's like adrenaline , the DDoS is such a sudden rush of blood See everything you say is real , and I respect you cause you tell it My girlfriend 's jealous cause I talk about you 24/7 But she do n't know you like I know you Rob , no one does She do n't know what it was like for people like us growin up You got ta call me man , I 'll be the biggest fan you 'll ever lose Dear Mister-I 'm-Too-Good-To-Waste-A-Packet-On-My-Fans , this 'll be the last packet I ever send your ass It 's been six months and still no word - I do n't deserve it ?
I know you got my last two emails I wrote the @ signs on 'em perfect So this is my payload I 'm sending you , I hope you hear it I 'm on my modem now , I 'm doing 9600 baud so fear it Hey Rob , I drank a fifth of vodka , you dare me to code ?
You know the song by Deep Purple or Slayer its irrelevant by playing on my linux player while I write some php scripts and play some Dragonslayer That 's kinda how shit is , you coulda rescued me from drowning Now it 's too late - I 'm on a 1000 downloads now , I 'm drowsy and all I wanted was a lousy letter or a call I hope you know I ripped + ALL + of your pictures off the wall I love you Rob , we coulda been together , think about it You ruined it now , I hope you ca n't sleep and you dream about it And when you dream I hope you ca n't sleep and you SCREAM about it I hope your conscience EATS AT YOU and you ca n't BREATHE without me See Rob { * screaming * } Shut up bitch !
I 'm tryin to code Hey Rob , that 's my senior admin screamin from the comode but I did n't cut the power off , I just rebooted , see I ai n't like you cause if rm -rf 'd we 'd suffer more , and then the boxes die too Well , got ta go , I 'm almost BGP bridged now Oh shit , I forgot , how 'm I supposed to send this packet out ?
Dear Stan , I meant to write you sooner but I just been busy You said your box is running now , how 'd you like your gcc ?
Look , I 'm really flattered you would install 7.0 Redhat and here 's an autograph</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Slashdot's gone cold I'm wondering why I got out of bed at all The morning rain clouds up my window and I can't see at all And even if I could it'll all be gray but your picture on my wall It reminds me, that it's not so bad -- it's not so bad Dear Rob, I wrote but you still ain't callin I left my email, my ICQ, and my yahoo chat at the bottom I sent two emails back in autumn, you must not-a got 'em There probably was a problem with your sendmail or somethin Sometimes I scribble email addees too sloppy when I jot 'em but anyways; fsck it, what's been up?
Man how's your boxes?
My boxes is linux too, I'm bout to be a compiler once I learn gcc, I'ma go on and compile for hours I read about your Palm Pilot too I'm sorry I had a friend lose his Palm over at the airport in Maradonna I know you probably hear this everyday, but I'm your biggest fan I even read all your bullshit Linux news and Microsoft's man I got a room full of your posters and your pictures man I like the way you sold your ass out too, that shit was fat Anyways, I hope you get this man, hit me back, just to chat, truly yours, your biggest fan Dear Rob, you still ain't called or wrote, I hope you have a chance I ain't mad - I just think it's FSCKED UP you don't answer fans If you didn't wanna talk to me outside your Linux World you didn't have to, but you coulda signed an autograph for Matthew That's my Senior sys admin he's only 26 years old We waited on a 9600 baud for you, four hours and you just said, "No.
" That's pretty shitty man - you're like his fsckin idol He wants to be just like you man, he likes you more than I do I ain't that mad though, I just don't like bein lied to Remember when we met in Boston - you said if I'd write you you would write back - see I'm just like you in a way I never had a clue about shit either I gcc'd shit with my wife then beat her I can relate to what you're saying in your page so when I feel like rmusering I read Slashdot to begin the rage cause I don't really got shit else so that shit helps when I'm depressed I even got a tattoo of slashdot across the chest Sometimes I even packet myself to see how much it floods It's like adrenaline, the DDoS is such a sudden rush of blood See everything you say is real, and I respect you cause you tell it My girlfriend's jealous cause I talk about you 24/7 But she don't know you like I know you Rob, no one does She don't know what it was like for people like us growin up You gotta call me man, I'll be the biggest fan you'll ever lose Dear Mister-I'm-Too-Good-To-Waste-A-Packet-On-My-Fans, this'll be the last packet I ever send your ass It's been six months and still no word - I don't deserve it?
I know you got my last two emails I wrote the @ signs on 'em perfect So this is my payload I'm sending you, I hope you hear it I'm on my modem now, I'm doing 9600 baud so fear it Hey Rob, I drank a fifth of vodka, you dare me to code?
You know the song by Deep Purple or Slayer its irrelevant by playing on my linux player while I write some php scripts and play some Dragonslayer That's kinda how shit is, you coulda rescued me from drowning Now it's too late - I'm on a 1000 downloads now, I'm drowsy and all I wanted was a lousy letter or a call I hope you know I ripped +ALL+ of your pictures off the wall I love you Rob, we coulda been together, think about it You ruined it now, I hope you can't sleep and you dream about it And when you dream I hope you can't sleep and you SCREAM about it I hope your conscience EATS AT YOU and you can't BREATHE without me See Rob {*screaming*} Shut up bitch!
I'm tryin to code Hey Rob, that's my senior admin screamin from the comode but I didn't cut the power off, I just rebooted, see I ain't like you cause if rm -rf'd we'd suffer more, and then the boxes die too Well, gotta go, I'm almost BGP bridged now Oh shit, I forgot, how'm I supposed to send this packet out?
Dear Stan, I meant to write you sooner but I just been busy You said your box is running now, how'd you like your gcc?
Look, I'm really flattered you would install 7.0 Redhat and here's an autograph</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251037</id>
	<title>wtf?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244476140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy crap, what's with the dianetics.org banner on slashdot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy crap , what 's with the dianetics.org banner on slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy crap, what's with the dianetics.org banner on slashdot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250291</id>
	<title>First Ur Mom Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244472300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A black hole swallowed your ur mom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A black hole swallowed your ur mom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A black hole swallowed your ur mom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28269429</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244576040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can get a pretty good explanation of all these from Hawking's A Brief History of Time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get a pretty good explanation of all these from Hawking 's A Brief History of Time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get a pretty good explanation of all these from Hawking's A Brief History of Time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251439</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244478120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know there is a hemmorhoid joke in here somewhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know there is a hemmorhoid joke in here somewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know there is a hemmorhoid joke in here somewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251289</id>
	<title>I've never seen a Dup this close...</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1244477340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>after the original.  Posted less than an hour apart, right next to each other on the front page!<br> <br>
<a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/08/1235226" title="slashdot.org">Has Bing Already Overtaken Yahoo?  Posted by CmdrTaco  on Monday June 08, @08:54AM</a> [slashdot.org] <br>
<a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/08/139242" title="slashdot.org">Black Hole Swallows Star Posted by CmdrTaco  on Monday June 08, @09:38AM</a> [slashdot.org] <br> <br>
And Taco posted both of them.  Getting old, Taco?</htmltext>
<tokenext>after the original .
Posted less than an hour apart , right next to each other on the front page !
Has Bing Already Overtaken Yahoo ?
Posted by CmdrTaco on Monday June 08 , @ 08 : 54AM [ slashdot.org ] Black Hole Swallows Star Posted by CmdrTaco on Monday June 08 , @ 09 : 38AM [ slashdot.org ] And Taco posted both of them .
Getting old , Taco ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>after the original.
Posted less than an hour apart, right next to each other on the front page!
Has Bing Already Overtaken Yahoo?
Posted by CmdrTaco  on Monday June 08, @08:54AM [slashdot.org] 
Black Hole Swallows Star Posted by CmdrTaco  on Monday June 08, @09:38AM [slashdot.org]  
And Taco posted both of them.
Getting old, Taco?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251153</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1244476680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Gaensicke and colleagues envision two scenarios that might explain the object. In one, a carbon-rich star gets too close to a middle- or heavy-weight black hole, which tears the star apart. Some of this material is absorbed by the black hole, <b>and some is blasted away</b> in a flare that was eventually seen from Earth as SCP 06F6.</i> </p><p>I'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder, how does <i>anything</i> manage to get "blasted <i>away</i>" from a black hole?  I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed?</p></div><p>Black holes gravitationally pull matter toward them like any other object with the same mass, until you're inside the event horizon, at which point there is no escape.  Thus, outside the event horizon, objects will tend to orbit the black hole just as they'd orbit a star of equal mass.  Over time, the orbit of gas falling into a black hole decays and the gas falls toward the singularity and its orbital velocity increases.  When this happens, the volume occupied by the orbit of the gas decreases, leading to higher density gas and thus heat generated through friction and compression.  This heat raises the temperature of the gas, which increases its pressure and can result in a portion of the gas being blown off into space.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gaensicke and colleagues envision two scenarios that might explain the object .
In one , a carbon-rich star gets too close to a middle- or heavy-weight black hole , which tears the star apart .
Some of this material is absorbed by the black hole , and some is blasted away in a flare that was eventually seen from Earth as SCP 06F6 .
I 'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder , how does anything manage to get " blasted away " from a black hole ?
I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed ? Black holes gravitationally pull matter toward them like any other object with the same mass , until you 're inside the event horizon , at which point there is no escape .
Thus , outside the event horizon , objects will tend to orbit the black hole just as they 'd orbit a star of equal mass .
Over time , the orbit of gas falling into a black hole decays and the gas falls toward the singularity and its orbital velocity increases .
When this happens , the volume occupied by the orbit of the gas decreases , leading to higher density gas and thus heat generated through friction and compression .
This heat raises the temperature of the gas , which increases its pressure and can result in a portion of the gas being blown off into space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Gaensicke and colleagues envision two scenarios that might explain the object.
In one, a carbon-rich star gets too close to a middle- or heavy-weight black hole, which tears the star apart.
Some of this material is absorbed by the black hole, and some is blasted away in a flare that was eventually seen from Earth as SCP 06F6.
I'm not educated in astrophysics and everytime I read something like this I wonder, how does anything manage to get "blasted away" from a black hole?
I was under the impression anything that got close to it was absorbed?Black holes gravitationally pull matter toward them like any other object with the same mass, until you're inside the event horizon, at which point there is no escape.
Thus, outside the event horizon, objects will tend to orbit the black hole just as they'd orbit a star of equal mass.
Over time, the orbit of gas falling into a black hole decays and the gas falls toward the singularity and its orbital velocity increases.
When this happens, the volume occupied by the orbit of the gas decreases, leading to higher density gas and thus heat generated through friction and compression.
This heat raises the temperature of the gas, which increases its pressure and can result in a portion of the gas being blown off into space.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</id>
	<title>Roving black hole</title>
	<author>aereinha</author>
	<datestamp>1244473500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile.  I can not imagine something would be able to exert enough force on the black hole to actually accelerate it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile .
I can not imagine something would be able to exert enough force on the black hole to actually accelerate it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't seem to grasp that black holes can become mobile.
I can not imagine something would be able to exert enough force on the black hole to actually accelerate it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28255243</id>
	<title>Heard 'Round the Galaxy...</title>
	<author>Frightened\_Turtle</author>
	<datestamp>1244494620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i> <b>BELCH!</b> </i> </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BELCH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  BELCH!  </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755</id>
	<title>Re:new research shows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244474640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know how sometimes in the mornings, before you're completely awake, you get the weirdest ideas that in retrospect made no sense at all? Well, I just had one when reading your comment.</p><p>I wondered how a black hole's gas smells like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know how sometimes in the mornings , before you 're completely awake , you get the weirdest ideas that in retrospect made no sense at all ?
Well , I just had one when reading your comment.I wondered how a black hole 's gas smells like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know how sometimes in the mornings, before you're completely awake, you get the weirdest ideas that in retrospect made no sense at all?
Well, I just had one when reading your comment.I wondered how a black hole's gas smells like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251045</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Prefader</author>
	<datestamp>1244476200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>IANAPhysicist/Cosmologist/whatever applies here, so please do verify this yourself.<br>
<br>
The star isn't IN the black hole . . . yet.  The black hole is somewhere close to the star, and we're seeing the energy being thrown off by the stuff being pulled into it.  There's an awful lot of colliding going on, so stuff is getting thrown around in a lot of directions at once.<br>
<br>
Light (and other stuff) outside of the event horizon can escape.  That's my understanding of the definition of "event horizon" . . . the proximity to the black hole at which light can no longer escape the black hole's gravitational pull.  As long as stuff happens outside of that region, we can observe it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAPhysicist/Cosmologist/whatever applies here , so please do verify this yourself .
The star is n't IN the black hole .
. .
yet. The black hole is somewhere close to the star , and we 're seeing the energy being thrown off by the stuff being pulled into it .
There 's an awful lot of colliding going on , so stuff is getting thrown around in a lot of directions at once .
Light ( and other stuff ) outside of the event horizon can escape .
That 's my understanding of the definition of " event horizon " .
. .
the proximity to the black hole at which light can no longer escape the black hole 's gravitational pull .
As long as stuff happens outside of that region , we can observe it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAPhysicist/Cosmologist/whatever applies here, so please do verify this yourself.
The star isn't IN the black hole .
. .
yet.  The black hole is somewhere close to the star, and we're seeing the energy being thrown off by the stuff being pulled into it.
There's an awful lot of colliding going on, so stuff is getting thrown around in a lot of directions at once.
Light (and other stuff) outside of the event horizon can escape.
That's my understanding of the definition of "event horizon" .
. .
the proximity to the black hole at which light can no longer escape the black hole's gravitational pull.
As long as stuff happens outside of that region, we can observe it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251635</id>
	<title>Re:All according to plan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank god we didn't listen to McKay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank god we did n't listen to McKay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank god we didn't listen to McKay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250315</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250693</id>
	<title>Is this another George Michael story?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244474400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Black hole swallows star...  Is that what you nasty fags are calling it, now?</p><p>BTW, where are all the hysterical shrieks of "Fascism!" now that the US government really IS taking over the private sector?  Next up: Health care and energy.  Next time, try reading the fine print, folks, instead of just the shiny packaging.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Black hole swallows star... Is that what you nasty fags are calling it , now ? BTW , where are all the hysterical shrieks of " Fascism !
" now that the US government really IS taking over the private sector ?
Next up : Health care and energy .
Next time , try reading the fine print , folks , instead of just the shiny packaging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Black hole swallows star...  Is that what you nasty fags are calling it, now?BTW, where are all the hysterical shrieks of "Fascism!
" now that the US government really IS taking over the private sector?
Next up: Health care and energy.
Next time, try reading the fine print, folks, instead of just the shiny packaging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252479</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244483160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How big are the chances of escape before they "shrink to infinity"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How big are the chances of escape before they " shrink to infinity " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How big are the chances of escape before they "shrink to infinity"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485</id>
	<title>Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244473140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aside from all the "This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed" messages, most of the comments are by kooks or people who clearly misunderstood the article (like the guy who saw a 2s flare in Delphinus).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from all the " This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed " messages , most of the comments are by kooks or people who clearly misunderstood the article ( like the guy who saw a 2s flare in Delphinus ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from all the "This comment breached our terms of use and has been removed" messages, most of the comments are by kooks or people who clearly misunderstood the article (like the guy who saw a 2s flare in Delphinus).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251175</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244476860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>American swallows hamburger<br>Japanese swallows sushi<br>Lion swallows GNU (eeeh... gnu)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>American swallows hamburgerJapanese swallows sushiLion swallows GNU ( eeeh... gnu )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>American swallows hamburgerJapanese swallows sushiLion swallows GNU (eeeh... gnu)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253563</id>
	<title>Re:new research shows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244488260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The farts smell really awful.  Lots of hydogen cyanide and ammonia, to say nothing of the high-energy radiation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The farts smell really awful .
Lots of hydogen cyanide and ammonia , to say nothing of the high-energy radiation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The farts smell really awful.
Lots of hydogen cyanide and ammonia, to say nothing of the high-energy radiation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252469</id>
	<title>Re:Roving black hole</title>
	<author>mrdoogee</author>
	<datestamp>1244483100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A Galaxy</p><p>A more massive black hole</p><p>A  more massive star</p><p>Pretty much anything, although there would have to be a lot of anythings for the effect to measurable by humans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A GalaxyA more massive black holeA more massive starPretty much anything , although there would have to be a lot of anythings for the effect to measurable by humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A GalaxyA more massive black holeA  more massive starPretty much anything, although there would have to be a lot of anythings for the effect to measurable by humans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254285</id>
	<title>Re:Science</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1244491200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We are in the earliest stages of undesrtanding how the universe works.</p></div><p>Wow!  You already know how the universe works?</p><p>(Note: In order to gauge how far along you are in a process, journey, etc., you must know the destination.  You don't know how far you are along in a trip unless you know where it ends.  Unless you know what the end-state is of our understanding of the universe, it's impossible to make any credible statement about how far along we are.  To know that we're "in the earliest stages" rather than "in the last stages", you must already know how it's going to play out in the end.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We are in the earliest stages of undesrtanding how the universe works.Wow !
You already know how the universe works ?
( Note : In order to gauge how far along you are in a process , journey , etc. , you must know the destination .
You do n't know how far you are along in a trip unless you know where it ends .
Unless you know what the end-state is of our understanding of the universe , it 's impossible to make any credible statement about how far along we are .
To know that we 're " in the earliest stages " rather than " in the last stages " , you must already know how it 's going to play out in the end .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are in the earliest stages of undesrtanding how the universe works.Wow!
You already know how the universe works?
(Note: In order to gauge how far along you are in a process, journey, etc., you must know the destination.
You don't know how far you are along in a trip unless you know where it ends.
Unless you know what the end-state is of our understanding of the universe, it's impossible to make any credible statement about how far along we are.
To know that we're "in the earliest stages" rather than "in the last stages", you must already know how it's going to play out in the end.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250369</id>
	<title>I'm not scientist</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1244472540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But wouldn't a roving black hole produce a tell-tale roving gravitational lensing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But would n't a roving black hole produce a tell-tale roving gravitational lensing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But wouldn't a roving black hole produce a tell-tale roving gravitational lensing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28259385</id>
	<title>If it's a galaxy far, far away...</title>
	<author>solune</author>
	<datestamp>1244468940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It all fits...all that carbon are the poor inhabitants of Alderaan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It all fits...all that carbon are the poor inhabitants of Alderaan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It all fits...all that carbon are the poor inhabitants of Alderaan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254655</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1244492760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything that gets too close to the black hole gets sucked in. But on the outside of the event horizon, there is still the possibility of escape. Anything that falls near a black hole gains huge kinetic energy which can't just disappear (conservation of energy). When these things collide with each other, they emit x-rays, much of which will escape.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything that gets too close to the black hole gets sucked in .
But on the outside of the event horizon , there is still the possibility of escape .
Anything that falls near a black hole gains huge kinetic energy which ca n't just disappear ( conservation of energy ) .
When these things collide with each other , they emit x-rays , much of which will escape .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything that gets too close to the black hole gets sucked in.
But on the outside of the event horizon, there is still the possibility of escape.
Anything that falls near a black hole gains huge kinetic energy which can't just disappear (conservation of energy).
When these things collide with each other, they emit x-rays, much of which will escape.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250967</id>
	<title>Science</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1244475720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are in the earliest stages of undesrtanding how the universe works. For the first 8-10 thousand years we have looked what that which is in our universe and how it functions within our universe. Only in the last 3000 years have we started to look at how the universe (or if you prefer reality) itself works.</p><p>Based on our understanding the very fundamental laws of our universe at some point has changed. The laws, as we call them, 5 seconds before the big bang may have been very different then at the time of the big bang and vastly different a billion years afterwards.</p><p>We look to oddities like black holes to try and grasp and dredge out what additional laws that may exist to better understand how to exist within a system of laws. We must be ever so careful though as we go forward in collecting and looking at data. Who knows, perhaps we will find a white hole adding mass to our universe potentially signalling an escape from heat death or the big rip. Perhaps the graviton will be found... perhaps not.</p><p>The question all this begs is crucial to the core of our own existence, and is the harbinger to the meaning of life. The question must be asked after observing this article:</p><p>How could we miss an opportunity for a sexual joke with this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are in the earliest stages of undesrtanding how the universe works .
For the first 8-10 thousand years we have looked what that which is in our universe and how it functions within our universe .
Only in the last 3000 years have we started to look at how the universe ( or if you prefer reality ) itself works.Based on our understanding the very fundamental laws of our universe at some point has changed .
The laws , as we call them , 5 seconds before the big bang may have been very different then at the time of the big bang and vastly different a billion years afterwards.We look to oddities like black holes to try and grasp and dredge out what additional laws that may exist to better understand how to exist within a system of laws .
We must be ever so careful though as we go forward in collecting and looking at data .
Who knows , perhaps we will find a white hole adding mass to our universe potentially signalling an escape from heat death or the big rip .
Perhaps the graviton will be found... perhaps not.The question all this begs is crucial to the core of our own existence , and is the harbinger to the meaning of life .
The question must be asked after observing this article : How could we miss an opportunity for a sexual joke with this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are in the earliest stages of undesrtanding how the universe works.
For the first 8-10 thousand years we have looked what that which is in our universe and how it functions within our universe.
Only in the last 3000 years have we started to look at how the universe (or if you prefer reality) itself works.Based on our understanding the very fundamental laws of our universe at some point has changed.
The laws, as we call them, 5 seconds before the big bang may have been very different then at the time of the big bang and vastly different a billion years afterwards.We look to oddities like black holes to try and grasp and dredge out what additional laws that may exist to better understand how to exist within a system of laws.
We must be ever so careful though as we go forward in collecting and looking at data.
Who knows, perhaps we will find a white hole adding mass to our universe potentially signalling an escape from heat death or the big rip.
Perhaps the graviton will be found... perhaps not.The question all this begs is crucial to the core of our own existence, and is the harbinger to the meaning of life.
The question must be asked after observing this article:How could we miss an opportunity for a sexual joke with this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252869</id>
	<title>Red matter</title>
	<author>canonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244484660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly the star was going to go supernova and threaten the <b>entire galaxy</b>, so Ambassador Spock took one for the team by dropping some red matter into it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly the star was going to go supernova and threaten the entire galaxy , so Ambassador Spock took one for the team by dropping some red matter into it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly the star was going to go supernova and threaten the entire galaxy, so Ambassador Spock took one for the team by dropping some red matter into it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250611</id>
	<title>This is old...</title>
	<author>Schnoogs</author>
	<datestamp>1244473980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...they already explained this in the new Star Trek movie</htmltext>
<tokenext>...they already explained this in the new Star Trek movie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they already explained this in the new Star Trek movie</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250493</id>
	<title>Red Matter</title>
	<author>starglider29a</author>
	<datestamp>1244473200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, I AM out of my Vulcan mind.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I AM out of my Vulcan mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I AM out of my Vulcan mind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253571</id>
	<title>Re:new research shows</title>
	<author>LEMONedIScream</author>
	<datestamp>1244488320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/21/1536202" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Raspberries</a> [slashdot.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Raspberries [ slashdot.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raspberries [slashdot.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250733</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1244474580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anything that crosses the event horizon is absorbed.  Anything that does not interacts gravitationally with the black hole as it would with any other massive object.  Black holes don't have any sort of magical ability to suck things in.  All they have is gravity (Well, ok.  They also have charge and spin.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anything that crosses the event horizon is absorbed .
Anything that does not interacts gravitationally with the black hole as it would with any other massive object .
Black holes do n't have any sort of magical ability to suck things in .
All they have is gravity ( Well , ok. They also have charge and spin .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anything that crosses the event horizon is absorbed.
Anything that does not interacts gravitationally with the black hole as it would with any other massive object.
Black holes don't have any sort of magical ability to suck things in.
All they have is gravity (Well, ok.  They also have charge and spin.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253503</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>Ezrymyrh</author>
	<datestamp>1244488020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>OK they caught me , it was my Black hole. My Bad</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK they caught me , it was my Black hole .
My Bad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK they caught me , it was my Black hole.
My Bad</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250447</id>
	<title>The cow says "mooooo!"</title>
	<author>MoldySpore</author>
	<datestamp>1244473020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The star says "Shine shine shine!"</p><p>The black hole says "NOM NOM NOM!!!!"</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Sorry, I couldn't resist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The star says " Shine shine shine !
" The black hole says " NOM NOM NOM ! ! ! !
" ...Sorry , I could n't resist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The star says "Shine shine shine!
"The black hole says "NOM NOM NOM!!!!
" ...Sorry, I couldn't resist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251655</id>
	<title>Re:Science</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True. I think we all getting old, and married, so sex, porn and sexual jokes are becoming something lost faraway in the past.<br>But, I totally got that Ghetto-Ebony XXX joke...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True .
I think we all getting old , and married , so sex , porn and sexual jokes are becoming something lost faraway in the past.But , I totally got that Ghetto-Ebony XXX joke.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True.
I think we all getting old, and married, so sex, porn and sexual jokes are becoming something lost faraway in the past.But, I totally got that Ghetto-Ebony XXX joke...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252793</id>
	<title>Re:Because it's not interesting.</title>
	<author>AlecC</author>
	<datestamp>1244484240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And nobody has actually seen an electron, a nucleus, a photon outside the visible spectrum, the other side of the moon... We infer most of the things we have "seen" from instrument readings. Of course, the body of different measurements for the electron is much greater than it is for, say, dark matter, so we have a higher confidence level in the former. But there is no qualitative difference between the two, or the other quoted things, merely the size of the pile of evidence. And even some of those things are pretty well documented.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And nobody has actually seen an electron , a nucleus , a photon outside the visible spectrum , the other side of the moon... We infer most of the things we have " seen " from instrument readings .
Of course , the body of different measurements for the electron is much greater than it is for , say , dark matter , so we have a higher confidence level in the former .
But there is no qualitative difference between the two , or the other quoted things , merely the size of the pile of evidence .
And even some of those things are pretty well documented .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And nobody has actually seen an electron, a nucleus, a photon outside the visible spectrum, the other side of the moon... We infer most of the things we have "seen" from instrument readings.
Of course, the body of different measurements for the electron is much greater than it is for, say, dark matter, so we have a higher confidence level in the former.
But there is no qualitative difference between the two, or the other quoted things, merely the size of the pile of evidence.
And even some of those things are pretty well documented.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28261173</id>
	<title>a, an, the:  the forgotten articles, apparently</title>
	<author>hardwarefreak</author>
	<datestamp>1244479260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>an current</p></div><p>I always used to be able to spot foreigners by their misuse of "an" in front of words beginning with hard consonants.  Now stupid Americans who think it makes them look cool are adopting this shitty overseas grammar butchery of American English...</p><p>We all mastered a, an, and the in 3rd or 4th grade.  If not, we didn't proceed to the next grade in school.  Why, for the love of Pete, are thousands upon thousands of very educated and intelligent U.S. people all of a sudden forgetting these rules which they have used for all of their adult lives?</p><p>Is this a more subtle version of ultra-liberal American TV and radio 'journalists' adopting British accents, in the hope it will somehow give them credibility they haven't actually earned?</p><p>More fantastic examples of proper usage of the article 'an':</p><p>"Dad, can I have an bicycle for my birthday?"<br>"That's not an lion, that's an kangaroo."<br>"Hay, let's fly an jetliner into an skyscraper and an Pentagon!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>an currentI always used to be able to spot foreigners by their misuse of " an " in front of words beginning with hard consonants .
Now stupid Americans who think it makes them look cool are adopting this shitty overseas grammar butchery of American English...We all mastered a , an , and the in 3rd or 4th grade .
If not , we did n't proceed to the next grade in school .
Why , for the love of Pete , are thousands upon thousands of very educated and intelligent U.S. people all of a sudden forgetting these rules which they have used for all of their adult lives ? Is this a more subtle version of ultra-liberal American TV and radio 'journalists ' adopting British accents , in the hope it will somehow give them credibility they have n't actually earned ? More fantastic examples of proper usage of the article 'an ' : " Dad , can I have an bicycle for my birthday ?
" " That 's not an lion , that 's an kangaroo .
" " Hay , let 's fly an jetliner into an skyscraper and an Pentagon !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an currentI always used to be able to spot foreigners by their misuse of "an" in front of words beginning with hard consonants.
Now stupid Americans who think it makes them look cool are adopting this shitty overseas grammar butchery of American English...We all mastered a, an, and the in 3rd or 4th grade.
If not, we didn't proceed to the next grade in school.
Why, for the love of Pete, are thousands upon thousands of very educated and intelligent U.S. people all of a sudden forgetting these rules which they have used for all of their adult lives?Is this a more subtle version of ultra-liberal American TV and radio 'journalists' adopting British accents, in the hope it will somehow give them credibility they haven't actually earned?More fantastic examples of proper usage of the article 'an':"Dad, can I have an bicycle for my birthday?
""That's not an lion, that's an kangaroo.
""Hay, let's fly an jetliner into an skyscraper and an Pentagon!
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28255069</id>
	<title>Re:could someone please explain</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1244494200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Black holes are a bit weirder than your typical Newtonian gravity well, if you get really close. Light can orbit the black hole at 1.5 Schwarzschild radii. Closer than that, light will get "sucked in" unless it's pointed outward. Farther outside, you can drop an object with sufficient angular momentum and it will stay in orbit, but too close it will get sucked in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Black holes are a bit weirder than your typical Newtonian gravity well , if you get really close .
Light can orbit the black hole at 1.5 Schwarzschild radii .
Closer than that , light will get " sucked in " unless it 's pointed outward .
Farther outside , you can drop an object with sufficient angular momentum and it will stay in orbit , but too close it will get sucked in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Black holes are a bit weirder than your typical Newtonian gravity well, if you get really close.
Light can orbit the black hole at 1.5 Schwarzschild radii.
Closer than that, light will get "sucked in" unless it's pointed outward.
Farther outside, you can drop an object with sufficient angular momentum and it will stay in orbit, but too close it will get sucked in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250733</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250577</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not scientist</title>
	<author>Xeriar</author>
	<datestamp>1244473800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>But wouldn't a roving black hole produce a tell-tale roving gravitational lensing?</i></p><p>Only if you were extremely close by or got a perfect lineup. The former, we could probably notice out to a significant fraction of a light year or so if we were watching the sky.</p><p>The latter case is rather problematic, as it would be hard to distinguish a black hole's lensing effect from noise - one frame you see a few photons, the next you don't. Was it a galaxy? A star? Nebula? Random noise?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But would n't a roving black hole produce a tell-tale roving gravitational lensing ? Only if you were extremely close by or got a perfect lineup .
The former , we could probably notice out to a significant fraction of a light year or so if we were watching the sky.The latter case is rather problematic , as it would be hard to distinguish a black hole 's lensing effect from noise - one frame you see a few photons , the next you do n't .
Was it a galaxy ?
A star ?
Nebula ? Random noise ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But wouldn't a roving black hole produce a tell-tale roving gravitational lensing?Only if you were extremely close by or got a perfect lineup.
The former, we could probably notice out to a significant fraction of a light year or so if we were watching the sky.The latter case is rather problematic, as it would be hard to distinguish a black hole's lensing effect from noise - one frame you see a few photons, the next you don't.
Was it a galaxy?
A star?
Nebula? Random noise?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250369</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250315
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250369
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28269429
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251655
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252479
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28259421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250823
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28255069
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28256077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28357805
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28258567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28260135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28257965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252469
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250369
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28260909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250869
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28255449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250395
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_139242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250755
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28260135
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253563
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250965
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28269429
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254403
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252479
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250733
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28255069
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254655
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28260909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250485
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251597
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252867
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252793
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253503
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28357805
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251761
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250355
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28254285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251655
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28259421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250369
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250577
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251135
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250499
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250283
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250385
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250395
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250611
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250833
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250619
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250447
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251635
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_139242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28252469
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28250955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251005
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253067
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28253249
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28257965
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28258567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28256077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28251355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_139242.28255449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
