<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_08_0755256</id>
	<title>7-inch Android Netbook From GNB</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244452140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Netbooknews.com has scored a video of a <a href="http://www.netbooknews.com/172/google-android-netbook-from-gnb/">7-inch Google Android netbook</a> from a company called GNB during Computex. The device is powered by a Freescale iMX31 CPU. The design might not be to everyone's taste, but it could turn out to be a super cheap Android netbook."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Netbooknews.com has scored a video of a 7-inch Google Android netbook from a company called GNB during Computex .
The device is powered by a Freescale iMX31 CPU .
The design might not be to everyone 's taste , but it could turn out to be a super cheap Android netbook .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Netbooknews.com has scored a video of a 7-inch Google Android netbook from a company called GNB during Computex.
The device is powered by a Freescale iMX31 CPU.
The design might not be to everyone's taste, but it could turn out to be a super cheap Android netbook.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249193</id>
	<title>Carte di credito</title>
	<author>Carte di credito</author>
	<datestamp>1244463840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That controller is able to limit the current to the motor too, which is nice, and all you have to do is plug it into your computer or laptop and you can program everything. The best feature is to limit the amps to the motor at least to test it out and set it gradually higher and higher to determine how much the motor can take without getting too hot under abuse. Hmmm one of these is rated at 7000 watts, for the price of 3 its about 450 dollars, but you get 21000 watts, the etek is about half that. Now thats value! lo
<a href="http://www.carte-di-credito-online.com/" title="carte-di-c...online.com" rel="nofollow">Carte di credito</a> [carte-di-c...online.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>That controller is able to limit the current to the motor too , which is nice , and all you have to do is plug it into your computer or laptop and you can program everything .
The best feature is to limit the amps to the motor at least to test it out and set it gradually higher and higher to determine how much the motor can take without getting too hot under abuse .
Hmmm one of these is rated at 7000 watts , for the price of 3 its about 450 dollars , but you get 21000 watts , the etek is about half that .
Now thats value !
lo Carte di credito [ carte-di-c...online.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That controller is able to limit the current to the motor too, which is nice, and all you have to do is plug it into your computer or laptop and you can program everything.
The best feature is to limit the amps to the motor at least to test it out and set it gradually higher and higher to determine how much the motor can take without getting too hot under abuse.
Hmmm one of these is rated at 7000 watts, for the price of 3 its about 450 dollars, but you get 21000 watts, the etek is about half that.
Now thats value!
lo
Carte di credito [carte-di-c...online.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248797</id>
	<title>True netbook</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1244458920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice to see another "proper" netbook being brought to market - 7" devices are what started the ball rolling. Ultra-portability combined with a cheap price is what defines a netbook. The term has become so diluted that it's being applied to 12" machines, and machines which cost as much as a traditional laptop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice to see another " proper " netbook being brought to market - 7 " devices are what started the ball rolling .
Ultra-portability combined with a cheap price is what defines a netbook .
The term has become so diluted that it 's being applied to 12 " machines , and machines which cost as much as a traditional laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice to see another "proper" netbook being brought to market - 7" devices are what started the ball rolling.
Ultra-portability combined with a cheap price is what defines a netbook.
The term has become so diluted that it's being applied to 12" machines, and machines which cost as much as a traditional laptop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248637</id>
	<title>GNB = ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244457000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Goliath National Bank?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Goliath National Bank ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Goliath National Bank?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907</id>
	<title>I've got one already...</title>
	<author>Pembers</author>
	<datestamp>1244460480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...or something very much like it.</p><p>It's called a CnMBook. Have a look at <a href="http://194.150.201.35/cnmlifestyle/cnmbook.htm" title="194.150.201.35">this page</a> [194.150.201.35]. (Yeah, I know - bare IP address looks suspicious. I don't think the manufacturer's quite got the hang of this Internet thing. Google is your friend if you don't trust me.) It's sold under a lot of different names.</p><p>The specs are similar to the gadget on show here. Mine has a slower CPU, less memory and no touch screen. Battery life is 2.5-3 hours. The OS is a heavily-customised Debian. I love the small size and low weight. I can fit it into my coat pocket. The screen is nice and clear. The keyboard is reasonable, but is prone to registering phantom keystrokes - running vi is therefore not recommended. I don't know if it's just mine that does this, or if it's a design flaw.</p><p>The main app I run on it is a text editor. It's a bit slow for anything else.</p><p>I paid &#194;&pound;139 for mine just before Christmas. I bought it from Maplin, who are now selling them off for &#194;&pound;99 - probably because they were evasive about it not running Windows. They now have a Windows CE version of it, which has "Windows CE" in the product name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...or something very much like it.It 's called a CnMBook .
Have a look at this page [ 194.150.201.35 ] .
( Yeah , I know - bare IP address looks suspicious .
I do n't think the manufacturer 's quite got the hang of this Internet thing .
Google is your friend if you do n't trust me .
) It 's sold under a lot of different names.The specs are similar to the gadget on show here .
Mine has a slower CPU , less memory and no touch screen .
Battery life is 2.5-3 hours .
The OS is a heavily-customised Debian .
I love the small size and low weight .
I can fit it into my coat pocket .
The screen is nice and clear .
The keyboard is reasonable , but is prone to registering phantom keystrokes - running vi is therefore not recommended .
I do n't know if it 's just mine that does this , or if it 's a design flaw.The main app I run on it is a text editor .
It 's a bit slow for anything else.I paid     139 for mine just before Christmas .
I bought it from Maplin , who are now selling them off for     99 - probably because they were evasive about it not running Windows .
They now have a Windows CE version of it , which has " Windows CE " in the product name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or something very much like it.It's called a CnMBook.
Have a look at this page [194.150.201.35].
(Yeah, I know - bare IP address looks suspicious.
I don't think the manufacturer's quite got the hang of this Internet thing.
Google is your friend if you don't trust me.
) It's sold under a lot of different names.The specs are similar to the gadget on show here.
Mine has a slower CPU, less memory and no touch screen.
Battery life is 2.5-3 hours.
The OS is a heavily-customised Debian.
I love the small size and low weight.
I can fit it into my coat pocket.
The screen is nice and clear.
The keyboard is reasonable, but is prone to registering phantom keystrokes - running vi is therefore not recommended.
I don't know if it's just mine that does this, or if it's a design flaw.The main app I run on it is a text editor.
It's a bit slow for anything else.I paid Â£139 for mine just before Christmas.
I bought it from Maplin, who are now selling them off for Â£99 - probably because they were evasive about it not running Windows.
They now have a Windows CE version of it, which has "Windows CE" in the product name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250921</id>
	<title>Sounds like a joke</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1244475480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A guy walks into a bar with a tiny piano and a 7-inch Android...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A guy walks into a bar with a tiny piano and a 7-inch Android.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A guy walks into a bar with a tiny piano and a 7-inch Android...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248553</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244456160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>do you have to pay the SCO license fee for Linux for that one, too ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do you have to pay the SCO license fee for Linux for that one , too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do you have to pay the SCO license fee for Linux for that one, too ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249683</id>
	<title>Re:OK, saw it and my likes and dislikes are:</title>
	<author>Ren.Tamek</author>
	<datestamp>1244468460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree there. Once I saw the battery life, it was end of discussion about the device for me. 5 hours battery during full use is my absolute minimum for a portable device like this, anything else is borderline pointless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree there .
Once I saw the battery life , it was end of discussion about the device for me .
5 hours battery during full use is my absolute minimum for a portable device like this , anything else is borderline pointless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree there.
Once I saw the battery life, it was end of discussion about the device for me.
5 hours battery during full use is my absolute minimum for a portable device like this, anything else is borderline pointless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28256285</id>
	<title>Re:OK, saw it and my likes and dislikes are:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244454480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love my touchpad! I've had 2 different eeePC models, and I think the touchpad on my 9" model is a good enough size (the touchpad on the 7" was too small).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love my touchpad !
I 've had 2 different eeePC models , and I think the touchpad on my 9 " model is a good enough size ( the touchpad on the 7 " was too small ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love my touchpad!
I've had 2 different eeePC models, and I think the touchpad on my 9" model is a good enough size (the touchpad on the 7" was too small).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250603</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28252659</id>
	<title>must have been hard</title>
	<author>sgt scrub</author>
	<datestamp>1244483700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My ex-girl friend told me once that the 7" ones where difficult to find.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My ex-girl friend told me once that the 7 " ones where difficult to find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My ex-girl friend told me once that the 7" ones where difficult to find.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248771</id>
	<title>You killed the android server hosting the website!</title>
	<author>jsse</author>
	<datestamp>1244458680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But it doesn't matter. The story was just a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZlKnubPUbk" title="youtube.com">Youtube Video</a> [youtube.com] embedded in it and the following one-line message:<p><div class="quote"><p>The Google Android powered GL-750 from GNB is a 7-inch netbook that's powered by a Freescale iMX31 processor.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it does n't matter .
The story was just a Youtube Video [ youtube.com ] embedded in it and the following one-line message : The Google Android powered GL-750 from GNB is a 7-inch netbook that 's powered by a Freescale iMX31 processor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it doesn't matter.
The story was just a Youtube Video [youtube.com] embedded in it and the following one-line message:The Google Android powered GL-750 from GNB is a 7-inch netbook that's powered by a Freescale iMX31 processor.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250751</id>
	<title>Re:Some information would be nice.</title>
	<author>Gordonjcp</author>
	<datestamp>1244474640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for that.  I don't really have the attention span for videos<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for that .
I do n't really have the attention span for videos ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for that.
I don't really have the attention span for videos ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251623</id>
	<title>That keyboard...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244478960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I like the compactness, but it's so damn hard to type on these things. User input is kind of important to computing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the compactness , but it 's so damn hard to type on these things .
User input is kind of important to computing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the compactness, but it's so damn hard to type on these things.
User input is kind of important to computing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251669</id>
	<title>Netbooknews.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apologies about the site, we've re-allocated some more resources to it now and it should be running much faster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apologies about the site , we 've re-allocated some more resources to it now and it should be running much faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apologies about the site, we've re-allocated some more resources to it now and it should be running much faster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28256343</id>
	<title>7inches...cool...</title>
	<author>fostro1</author>
	<datestamp>1244454720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>right...I suppose there is some sort of market demand for something with a 7in screen?

Like, for gnomes...</htmltext>
<tokenext>right...I suppose there is some sort of market demand for something with a 7in screen ?
Like , for gnomes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>right...I suppose there is some sort of market demand for something with a 7in screen?
Like, for gnomes...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251091</id>
	<title>Giant National Bank</title>
	<author>maxbash</author>
	<datestamp>1244476440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I knew they were taking over as a major bank in New York. I missed the episode of "How I met your mother" were they branch into netbooks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew they were taking over as a major bank in New York .
I missed the episode of " How I met your mother " were they branch into netbooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew they were taking over as a major bank in New York.
I missed the episode of "How I met your mother" were they branch into netbooks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793</id>
	<title>OK, saw it and my likes and dislikes are:</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1244458860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all, it's a real netbook, with keyboard and touchpad (I wish it had the nipple, but ok) and all the connectors one can find on a number of (intel-based) netbooks. So this is good - this is the first real ARM-based netbook I have seen so far.</p><p>I like the weight - 650g! Amazingly light.</p><p>But battery consumption is not good. It will work for 2.5 hours on one charge. That's pathetic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , it 's a real netbook , with keyboard and touchpad ( I wish it had the nipple , but ok ) and all the connectors one can find on a number of ( intel-based ) netbooks .
So this is good - this is the first real ARM-based netbook I have seen so far.I like the weight - 650g !
Amazingly light.But battery consumption is not good .
It will work for 2.5 hours on one charge .
That 's pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, it's a real netbook, with keyboard and touchpad (I wish it had the nipple, but ok) and all the connectors one can find on a number of (intel-based) netbooks.
So this is good - this is the first real ARM-based netbook I have seen so far.I like the weight - 650g!
Amazingly light.But battery consumption is not good.
It will work for 2.5 hours on one charge.
That's pathetic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248737</id>
	<title>Windows Key?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244458260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone noticed the Windows Key on it ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone noticed the Windows Key on it ?
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone noticed the Windows Key on it ?
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250055</id>
	<title>Re:I fear...</title>
	<author>oodaloop</author>
	<datestamp>1244470800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you misspell a word like Qwerty?  Did you post to slashdot on your cellphone or something?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you misspell a word like Qwerty ?
Did you post to slashdot on your cellphone or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you misspell a word like Qwerty?
Did you post to slashdot on your cellphone or something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248613</id>
	<title>Ultra Small Resolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244456940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I evaluated a freescale board for a major computer manufacture and we ended up deciding not to go with it. Sure its a fast ARM chip and the video processor supports multimedia acceleration but the resolution is tiny. The max resolution when we looked at it was 1024x768(I beleive this was it, we needed much higher). So don't except to be able to hook these things up to an external monitor unless they go with a different video card.</p><p>The good news about all these arm manufactures coming out with netbooks is they really try to support the Linux community and are actively submitting patches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I evaluated a freescale board for a major computer manufacture and we ended up deciding not to go with it .
Sure its a fast ARM chip and the video processor supports multimedia acceleration but the resolution is tiny .
The max resolution when we looked at it was 1024x768 ( I beleive this was it , we needed much higher ) .
So do n't except to be able to hook these things up to an external monitor unless they go with a different video card.The good news about all these arm manufactures coming out with netbooks is they really try to support the Linux community and are actively submitting patches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I evaluated a freescale board for a major computer manufacture and we ended up deciding not to go with it.
Sure its a fast ARM chip and the video processor supports multimedia acceleration but the resolution is tiny.
The max resolution when we looked at it was 1024x768(I beleive this was it, we needed much higher).
So don't except to be able to hook these things up to an external monitor unless they go with a different video card.The good news about all these arm manufactures coming out with netbooks is they really try to support the Linux community and are actively submitting patches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250603</id>
	<title>Re:OK, saw it and my likes and dislikes are:</title>
	<author>guisar</author>
	<datestamp>1244473920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah- two design features I don't get are the stupid touchpads and crappy batteries. Netbook manufacturers are you listening- DITCH THE DAMN TOUCHPADS. Hardly anyone uses them- it just ends up taking up very valuable keyboard real estate and periodically moving my cursor around in unexpected ways. I hate these damn things.</p><p>Secondly- 2.5hrs may be enough for regular laptop users who just use the thing as an overly expensive, delicate desktop anyway but netbooks are actually meant to be carried around and as such need to have much better battery life. I think five hours actual running time is mandatory. As a benchmark my 1000HA (with an aftermarket battery since ASUS hasn't grasped that people really, really care about battery life) has a TEN hour (that's 1-0) run time with Wi-fi. Come on netbook makers- take our cash- give us the option of getting decent batteries and don't waste our time and money on 2-3 hour runtimes. It's just not acceptable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah- two design features I do n't get are the stupid touchpads and crappy batteries .
Netbook manufacturers are you listening- DITCH THE DAMN TOUCHPADS .
Hardly anyone uses them- it just ends up taking up very valuable keyboard real estate and periodically moving my cursor around in unexpected ways .
I hate these damn things.Secondly- 2.5hrs may be enough for regular laptop users who just use the thing as an overly expensive , delicate desktop anyway but netbooks are actually meant to be carried around and as such need to have much better battery life .
I think five hours actual running time is mandatory .
As a benchmark my 1000HA ( with an aftermarket battery since ASUS has n't grasped that people really , really care about battery life ) has a TEN hour ( that 's 1-0 ) run time with Wi-fi .
Come on netbook makers- take our cash- give us the option of getting decent batteries and do n't waste our time and money on 2-3 hour runtimes .
It 's just not acceptable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah- two design features I don't get are the stupid touchpads and crappy batteries.
Netbook manufacturers are you listening- DITCH THE DAMN TOUCHPADS.
Hardly anyone uses them- it just ends up taking up very valuable keyboard real estate and periodically moving my cursor around in unexpected ways.
I hate these damn things.Secondly- 2.5hrs may be enough for regular laptop users who just use the thing as an overly expensive, delicate desktop anyway but netbooks are actually meant to be carried around and as such need to have much better battery life.
I think five hours actual running time is mandatory.
As a benchmark my 1000HA (with an aftermarket battery since ASUS hasn't grasped that people really, really care about battery life) has a TEN hour (that's 1-0) run time with Wi-fi.
Come on netbook makers- take our cash- give us the option of getting decent batteries and don't waste our time and money on 2-3 hour runtimes.
It's just not acceptable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28252093</id>
	<title>Re:Some information would be nice.</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1244481540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somehow I have the feeling that my phone has got better specs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow I have the feeling that my phone has got better specs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow I have the feeling that my phone has got better specs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250233</id>
	<title>Just what we need...</title>
	<author>Stenchwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1244472060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...more competition from another 7 inch robotic device. Like we geeks don't have enough problems getting dates.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...more competition from another 7 inch robotic device .
Like we geeks do n't have enough problems getting dates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...more competition from another 7 inch robotic device.
Like we geeks don't have enough problems getting dates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250787</id>
	<title>Re:I've got one already...</title>
	<author>ciderVisor</author>
	<datestamp>1244474820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a great user forum for this class of device <a href="http://linuxlaptopforum.ark2webdesign.co.uk/" title="ark2webdesign.co.uk">here</a> [ark2webdesign.co.uk]. One of the users, Wicknix, has created his own distro called 3MX, and has just completed a build of Debian Etch (for MIPSEL). I use the Elonex ONEt version with the default Linux OS and find it a lot of fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a great user forum for this class of device here [ ark2webdesign.co.uk ] .
One of the users , Wicknix , has created his own distro called 3MX , and has just completed a build of Debian Etch ( for MIPSEL ) .
I use the Elonex ONEt version with the default Linux OS and find it a lot of fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a great user forum for this class of device here [ark2webdesign.co.uk].
One of the users, Wicknix, has created his own distro called 3MX, and has just completed a build of Debian Etch (for MIPSEL).
I use the Elonex ONEt version with the default Linux OS and find it a lot of fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28292183</id>
	<title>Re:hang of the internet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244729520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps someone with the hang of this Internet thing could type "host 194.150.201.35" on his/her keyboard and find out that the reverese dns mapping is www.kmscomponents.com.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps someone with the hang of this Internet thing could type " host 194.150.201.35 " on his/her keyboard and find out that the reverese dns mapping is www.kmscomponents.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps someone with the hang of this Internet thing could type "host 194.150.201.35" on his/her keyboard and find out that the reverese dns mapping is www.kmscomponents.com.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248611</id>
	<title>SLASHDOTTED?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244456940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For how slow the website is running I'm guessing it's running from one of the devices.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For how slow the website is running I 'm guessing it 's running from one of the devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For how slow the website is running I'm guessing it's running from one of the devices.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248657</id>
	<title>GNB - Goliath National Bank?</title>
	<author>dvh.tosomja</author>
	<datestamp>1244457300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249679</id>
	<title>Re:Some information would be nice.</title>
	<author>hattig</author>
	<datestamp>1244468460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a proof of concept this device is neat, but as pointed out it needs to be thinner (looks like some of the ports are keeping it thick, so move the screen hinge forward with the ports behind taking up the base+lid width) and use the more up to date ARM SoC.</p><p>Or you could take the internals of the Palm Pre which outspec this device, and use that instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a proof of concept this device is neat , but as pointed out it needs to be thinner ( looks like some of the ports are keeping it thick , so move the screen hinge forward with the ports behind taking up the base + lid width ) and use the more up to date ARM SoC.Or you could take the internals of the Palm Pre which outspec this device , and use that instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a proof of concept this device is neat, but as pointed out it needs to be thinner (looks like some of the ports are keeping it thick, so move the screen hinge forward with the ports behind taking up the base+lid width) and use the more up to date ARM SoC.Or you could take the internals of the Palm Pre which outspec this device, and use that instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248877</id>
	<title>Pondering on power consumption...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244460000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've done quite a bit of work on ARM processors without an operating system and limited work using ARM9 devices with a Gentoo based distro and something I've wondered is if under Linux there's a way to conveniently enable low-power mode essentially putting the processor to sleep while allowing certain peripherals to remain running? An obvious example would be leaving the LCD controller running to display an e-book page while the CPU was in sleep mode or running at a low clock rate until a button is pressed. I know how to do that when programming most ARM CPUs natively, but are there any attempts out there to standardize some low power behaviour for the kernel?</p><p>It could really help some of these devices that are no doubt often used for a single task at a time. Perhaps it could even be in the form of some sort of system call that allowed a process to request the minimum slice of CPU time per second and wake-up latency required per task and the scheduler could determine the required clock frequency and possible sleep time required to fulfil the requirements of every process. Just seems to me it could be a way to extend the battery life and take advantange of some of the amazing low-power modes of newer ARM cores in a standard manner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've done quite a bit of work on ARM processors without an operating system and limited work using ARM9 devices with a Gentoo based distro and something I 've wondered is if under Linux there 's a way to conveniently enable low-power mode essentially putting the processor to sleep while allowing certain peripherals to remain running ?
An obvious example would be leaving the LCD controller running to display an e-book page while the CPU was in sleep mode or running at a low clock rate until a button is pressed .
I know how to do that when programming most ARM CPUs natively , but are there any attempts out there to standardize some low power behaviour for the kernel ? It could really help some of these devices that are no doubt often used for a single task at a time .
Perhaps it could even be in the form of some sort of system call that allowed a process to request the minimum slice of CPU time per second and wake-up latency required per task and the scheduler could determine the required clock frequency and possible sleep time required to fulfil the requirements of every process .
Just seems to me it could be a way to extend the battery life and take advantange of some of the amazing low-power modes of newer ARM cores in a standard manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've done quite a bit of work on ARM processors without an operating system and limited work using ARM9 devices with a Gentoo based distro and something I've wondered is if under Linux there's a way to conveniently enable low-power mode essentially putting the processor to sleep while allowing certain peripherals to remain running?
An obvious example would be leaving the LCD controller running to display an e-book page while the CPU was in sleep mode or running at a low clock rate until a button is pressed.
I know how to do that when programming most ARM CPUs natively, but are there any attempts out there to standardize some low power behaviour for the kernel?It could really help some of these devices that are no doubt often used for a single task at a time.
Perhaps it could even be in the form of some sort of system call that allowed a process to request the minimum slice of CPU time per second and wake-up latency required per task and the scheduler could determine the required clock frequency and possible sleep time required to fulfil the requirements of every process.
Just seems to me it could be a way to extend the battery life and take advantange of some of the amazing low-power modes of newer ARM cores in a standard manner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249125</id>
	<title>7-Inch Android Netbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244462940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose I'm the only one who thought of a little robot with a netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose I 'm the only one who thought of a little robot with a netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose I'm the only one who thought of a little robot with a netbook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248809</id>
	<title>Goliath National Bank</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244459220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GNB = Goliath National Bank?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GNB = Goliath National Bank ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GNB = Goliath National Bank?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250121</id>
	<title>Re:OK, saw it and my likes and dislikes are:</title>
	<author>SpinyNorman</author>
	<datestamp>1244471220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>But battery consumption is not good. It will work for 2.5 hours on one charge.</i></p><p>That's amazingly bad! I thought Freescale = ARM (= low power), but maybe not.</p><p>Yesterday's article about the range of ARM based netbooks at Computex mentioned battery life of 8-12 hours, so this isn't even remotely in the ballpark.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But battery consumption is not good .
It will work for 2.5 hours on one charge.That 's amazingly bad !
I thought Freescale = ARM ( = low power ) , but maybe not.Yesterday 's article about the range of ARM based netbooks at Computex mentioned battery life of 8-12 hours , so this is n't even remotely in the ballpark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But battery consumption is not good.
It will work for 2.5 hours on one charge.That's amazingly bad!
I thought Freescale = ARM (= low power), but maybe not.Yesterday's article about the range of ARM based netbooks at Computex mentioned battery life of 8-12 hours, so this isn't even remotely in the ballpark.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249727</id>
	<title>More info from video.</title>
	<author>spaceturtle</author>
	<datestamp>1244468940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also has an Ethernet port. Estimated run time of 2.5 hours. Apparently will also come in 2GB SSD, 128MiB ram options.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also has an Ethernet port .
Estimated run time of 2.5 hours .
Apparently will also come in 2GB SSD , 128MiB ram options .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also has an Ethernet port.
Estimated run time of 2.5 hours.
Apparently will also come in 2GB SSD, 128MiB ram options.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251599</id>
	<title>I prefer a refurbished eee 900A for 165 USD</title>
	<author>maitas</author>
	<datestamp>1244478780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is more usefull an Asus Eee 900A that you can get it for 165 USD refurbished from ebay, including shipping.</p><p>
&nbsp; For more usefull I mean you can install Windows that runs shockwave... Why you might ask? My kids use online games that run on shockwave... unfortunatelly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is more usefull an Asus Eee 900A that you can get it for 165 USD refurbished from ebay , including shipping .
  For more usefull I mean you can install Windows that runs shockwave... Why you might ask ?
My kids use online games that run on shockwave... unfortunatelly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is more usefull an Asus Eee 900A that you can get it for 165 USD refurbished from ebay, including shipping.
  For more usefull I mean you can install Windows that runs shockwave... Why you might ask?
My kids use online games that run on shockwave... unfortunatelly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251687</id>
	<title>Re:Some information would be nice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244479320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sascha says it's not glossy, but you can see a fair bit of glare in the video</p></div><p>maybe related to the fact that he didn't remove the plastic foil...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sascha says it 's not glossy , but you can see a fair bit of glare in the videomaybe related to the fact that he did n't remove the plastic foil.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sascha says it's not glossy, but you can see a fair bit of glare in the videomaybe related to the fact that he didn't remove the plastic foil...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065</id>
	<title>I fear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244462280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... we have to go trough the whole miniaturization race again, that already happened with phones.</p><p>Remember when phones got smaller, and smaller, and lighter, and lighter.<br>Until people were unable to use them anymore.<br>It was even parodied. For example in the movie "Dodgeball", where a main character owned a phone that was roughly this size: <a href="http://www.unwiredview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/mds-mobile-projector.jpg" title="unwiredview.com">http://www.unwiredview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/mds-mobile-projector.jpg</a> [unwiredview.com]</p><p>Then the phones got bigger again. Even bigger PDAs came out. Etc.</p><p>A full qwertz keyboard only makes sense, if the keys are at least as wide, as the distance between your fingers. And then still, it's a real pain to type on them, unless the halves are split by an angle, and positioned correctly.</p><p>Luckily, I'm working on a nice thing, that might end the need for keyboards. (No, I can't give you details. Cry me a river.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... we have to go trough the whole miniaturization race again , that already happened with phones.Remember when phones got smaller , and smaller , and lighter , and lighter.Until people were unable to use them anymore.It was even parodied .
For example in the movie " Dodgeball " , where a main character owned a phone that was roughly this size : http : //www.unwiredview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/mds-mobile-projector.jpg [ unwiredview.com ] Then the phones got bigger again .
Even bigger PDAs came out .
Etc.A full qwertz keyboard only makes sense , if the keys are at least as wide , as the distance between your fingers .
And then still , it 's a real pain to type on them , unless the halves are split by an angle , and positioned correctly.Luckily , I 'm working on a nice thing , that might end the need for keyboards .
( No , I ca n't give you details .
Cry me a river .
: P )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... we have to go trough the whole miniaturization race again, that already happened with phones.Remember when phones got smaller, and smaller, and lighter, and lighter.Until people were unable to use them anymore.It was even parodied.
For example in the movie "Dodgeball", where a main character owned a phone that was roughly this size: http://www.unwiredview.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/mds-mobile-projector.jpg [unwiredview.com]Then the phones got bigger again.
Even bigger PDAs came out.
Etc.A full qwertz keyboard only makes sense, if the keys are at least as wide, as the distance between your fingers.
And then still, it's a real pain to type on them, unless the halves are split by an angle, and positioned correctly.Luckily, I'm working on a nice thing, that might end the need for keyboards.
(No, I can't give you details.
Cry me a river.
:P)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249979</id>
	<title>Re:I've got one already...</title>
	<author>subbyUK</author>
	<datestamp>1244470380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even at &#194;&pound;100 looks like a waste of money. 128 ram and 2 gig??

For the same price you could pick up a old school eeepc. 7", 512, 8 gig.

Mine runs Jaunty + XP, and can run Autocad 2009 (it's fine once its been loaded into RAM)

runs great with 2 gig ram upgade.

About the earlier ALT+dragging window advice, that saved me a few times.

Worth mentioning there is a compiz fusion setting that overrides it, constrain X/Y axis or something. If Alt-dragging won't let you drag past the top of the screen it might be worth checking this setting.

Anyhoo,

lee<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even at     100 looks like a waste of money .
128 ram and 2 gig ? ?
For the same price you could pick up a old school eeepc .
7 " , 512 , 8 gig .
Mine runs Jaunty + XP , and can run Autocad 2009 ( it 's fine once its been loaded into RAM ) runs great with 2 gig ram upgade .
About the earlier ALT + dragging window advice , that saved me a few times .
Worth mentioning there is a compiz fusion setting that overrides it , constrain X/Y axis or something .
If Alt-dragging wo n't let you drag past the top of the screen it might be worth checking this setting .
Anyhoo , lee : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even at Â£100 looks like a waste of money.
128 ram and 2 gig??
For the same price you could pick up a old school eeepc.
7", 512, 8 gig.
Mine runs Jaunty + XP, and can run Autocad 2009 (it's fine once its been loaded into RAM)

runs great with 2 gig ram upgade.
About the earlier ALT+dragging window advice, that saved me a few times.
Worth mentioning there is a compiz fusion setting that overrides it, constrain X/Y axis or something.
If Alt-dragging won't let you drag past the top of the screen it might be worth checking this setting.
Anyhoo,

lee :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249565</id>
	<title>Re:Ultra Small Resolution</title>
	<author>ColaMan</author>
	<datestamp>1244467500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fucking hell. 1024x768 is "Ultra small resolution"?</p><p>The cpu is relatively slow, most users in this range run only one app full-screen at any one time and 1024x768 is perfectly fine on a 15-21" monitor.</p><p>Don't get all pixel-snobby here, or I'll be forced to mention my mis-spent youth programming Coco II games and the oddball CGA resolutions like 160x100 - which, coincidentally, is about the resolution of my basic Samsung phone at present.</p><p>So I'll do you a deal - once your phone is routinely capable of 1024x768 on its display, <b>that's</b> when you can call 1024x768 "Ultra small resolution"</p><p>(kids these days. geez.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-p)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fucking hell .
1024x768 is " Ultra small resolution " ? The cpu is relatively slow , most users in this range run only one app full-screen at any one time and 1024x768 is perfectly fine on a 15-21 " monitor.Do n't get all pixel-snobby here , or I 'll be forced to mention my mis-spent youth programming Coco II games and the oddball CGA resolutions like 160x100 - which , coincidentally , is about the resolution of my basic Samsung phone at present.So I 'll do you a deal - once your phone is routinely capable of 1024x768 on its display , that 's when you can call 1024x768 " Ultra small resolution " ( kids these days .
geez. : -p )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fucking hell.
1024x768 is "Ultra small resolution"?The cpu is relatively slow, most users in this range run only one app full-screen at any one time and 1024x768 is perfectly fine on a 15-21" monitor.Don't get all pixel-snobby here, or I'll be forced to mention my mis-spent youth programming Coco II games and the oddball CGA resolutions like 160x100 - which, coincidentally, is about the resolution of my basic Samsung phone at present.So I'll do you a deal - once your phone is routinely capable of 1024x768 on its display, that's when you can call 1024x768 "Ultra small resolution"(kids these days.
geez. :-p)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249269</id>
	<title>Re:Some information would be nice.</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244464560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like it's not capable of running a webserver.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like it 's not capable of running a webserver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like it's not capable of running a webserver.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249331</id>
	<title>Re:I fear...</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1244465220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>A full qwertz keyboard only makes sense if you're German</p></div> </blockquote><p>Fixed that for you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><blockquote><div><p>if the keys are at least as wide, as the distance between your fingers.</p></div> </blockquote><p>If you're a crappy typist like me, hunt and peck works even on an undersized keyboard.  As a former Psion 3 &amp; 5 user, I speak from experience.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A full qwertz keyboard only makes sense if you 're German Fixed that for you ; - ) if the keys are at least as wide , as the distance between your fingers .
If you 're a crappy typist like me , hunt and peck works even on an undersized keyboard .
As a former Psion 3 &amp; 5 user , I speak from experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A full qwertz keyboard only makes sense if you're German Fixed that for you ;-)if the keys are at least as wide, as the distance between your fingers.
If you're a crappy typist like me, hunt and peck works even on an undersized keyboard.
As a former Psion 3 &amp; 5 user, I speak from experience.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249845</id>
	<title>Re:I've got one already...</title>
	<author>david.given</author>
	<datestamp>1244469600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's called a CnMBook.</p></div><p>That looks like a rebadged <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skytone\_Alpha-400" title="wikipedia.org">SkyTone Alpha 400</a> [wikipedia.org], a.k.a. the World's Cheapest Laptop (it hit the news here a while back). There's about a dozen different products based on it for sale.

</p><p>They look fascinating, and at some point I want to get one. I can think of lots of things to do with one, from using it as a cheap web browsing appliance to a lightweight mini server to a serial console to an automation computer. Plus, MIPS is cool. Skytone appear to be working on successor models to the 400, but they have ARM processors.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called a CnMBook.That looks like a rebadged SkyTone Alpha 400 [ wikipedia.org ] , a.k.a .
the World 's Cheapest Laptop ( it hit the news here a while back ) .
There 's about a dozen different products based on it for sale .
They look fascinating , and at some point I want to get one .
I can think of lots of things to do with one , from using it as a cheap web browsing appliance to a lightweight mini server to a serial console to an automation computer .
Plus , MIPS is cool .
Skytone appear to be working on successor models to the 400 , but they have ARM processors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called a CnMBook.That looks like a rebadged SkyTone Alpha 400 [wikipedia.org], a.k.a.
the World's Cheapest Laptop (it hit the news here a while back).
There's about a dozen different products based on it for sale.
They look fascinating, and at some point I want to get one.
I can think of lots of things to do with one, from using it as a cheap web browsing appliance to a lightweight mini server to a serial console to an automation computer.
Plus, MIPS is cool.
Skytone appear to be working on successor models to the 400, but they have ARM processors.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248617</id>
	<title>Servers on netbooks?</title>
	<author>IBBoard</author>
	<datestamp>1244456940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks like they're running their server on a netbook as well - Slashdot has brought it to its knees with only a few comments on the topic so far<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like they 're running their server on a netbook as well - Slashdot has brought it to its knees with only a few comments on the topic so far : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like they're running their server on a netbook as well - Slashdot has brought it to its knees with only a few comments on the topic so far :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249835</id>
	<title>Re:I fear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244469600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you sure it wasn't <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0196229/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">Zoolander</a> [imdb.com]?  (Which is, incidentally, one of the finest comedies of the last decade.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure it was n't Zoolander [ imdb.com ] ?
( Which is , incidentally , one of the finest comedies of the last decade .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure it wasn't Zoolander [imdb.com]?
(Which is, incidentally, one of the finest comedies of the last decade.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28253231</id>
	<title>Re:I've got one already...</title>
	<author>Thag</author>
	<datestamp>1244486520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another good site for that line of machines is <a href="http://www.littlelinuxlaptop.com/" title="littlelinuxlaptop.com">Little Linux Laptop</a> [littlelinuxlaptop.com].</p><p>I've got one, and am now running 3MX on it. 3MX makes it better, but still has some issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another good site for that line of machines is Little Linux Laptop [ littlelinuxlaptop.com ] .I 've got one , and am now running 3MX on it .
3MX makes it better , but still has some issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another good site for that line of machines is Little Linux Laptop [littlelinuxlaptop.com].I've got one, and am now running 3MX on it.
3MX makes it better, but still has some issues.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250787</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248639</id>
	<title>Site slow</title>
	<author>boiert</author>
	<datestamp>1244457060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Better link the youtube video, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZlKnubPUbk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZlKnubPUbk</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better link the youtube video , http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 2ZlKnubPUbk [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better link the youtube video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZlKnubPUbk [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250137</id>
	<title>Nobody noticed this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244471340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's running Android, but it's got a windows button in the bottom left of the keyboard...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's running Android , but it 's got a windows button in the bottom left of the keyboard.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's running Android, but it's got a windows button in the bottom left of the keyboard...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28252745</id>
	<title>Re:Ultra Small Resolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244484060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the screen is 7" and you use it to watch 720p movies, what do you want more pixels for? Higher res would only slow it down, and you'd have to get <em>really</em> close to see any difference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the screen is 7 " and you use it to watch 720p movies , what do you want more pixels for ?
Higher res would only slow it down , and you 'd have to get really close to see any difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the screen is 7" and you use it to watch 720p movies, what do you want more pixels for?
Higher res would only slow it down, and you'd have to get really close to see any difference.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248593</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244456700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check out the video on the site, they're covering all the specs in it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out the video on the site , they 're covering all the specs in it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out the video on the site, they're covering all the specs in it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835</id>
	<title>Re:Some information would be nice.</title>
	<author>angryphase</author>
	<datestamp>1244459580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul>
<li>CPU: 533MHz Freescale i.MX31 ARM-based processor</li><li>Operating System: Google Android</li><li>Display: 800 x 480 pixel touchscreen (Sascha says it's not glossy, but you can see a fair bit of glare in the video)</li><li>RAM: 256MB</li><li>Storage: Up to 8GB SSD</li><li>I/O: 3 USB ports, mic, headphone, and 4-in-1 card reader</li><li>Weight: 680 grams, or about 1.5 pounds</li></ul><p>See working video of it <a href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/06/gnbs-7-inch-google-android-netbook-video.html" title="liliputing.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [liliputing.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CPU : 533MHz Freescale i.MX31 ARM-based processorOperating System : Google AndroidDisplay : 800 x 480 pixel touchscreen ( Sascha says it 's not glossy , but you can see a fair bit of glare in the video ) RAM : 256MBStorage : Up to 8GB SSDI/O : 3 USB ports , mic , headphone , and 4-in-1 card readerWeight : 680 grams , or about 1.5 poundsSee working video of it here [ liliputing.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
CPU: 533MHz Freescale i.MX31 ARM-based processorOperating System: Google AndroidDisplay: 800 x 480 pixel touchscreen (Sascha says it's not glossy, but you can see a fair bit of glare in the video)RAM: 256MBStorage: Up to 8GB SSDI/O: 3 USB ports, mic, headphone, and 4-in-1 card readerWeight: 680 grams, or about 1.5 poundsSee working video of it here [liliputing.com] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248677</id>
	<title>http://healthwisediet.blogspot.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244457540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it sounds good info

<a href="http://deniardians.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://deniardians.blogspot.com/</a> [blogspot.com]

<a href="http://healthwisediet.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://healthwisediet.blogspot.com/</a> [blogspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>it sounds good info http : //deniardians.blogspot.com/ [ blogspot.com ] http : //healthwisediet.blogspot.com/ [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it sounds good info

http://deniardians.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]

http://healthwisediet.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531</id>
	<title>Some information would be nice.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244455860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, maybe a description of the spec, a couple of decent photos, that sort of thing...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , maybe a description of the spec , a couple of decent photos , that sort of thing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, maybe a description of the spec, a couple of decent photos, that sort of thing...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250055
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28253231
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28256285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28252745
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248613
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249727
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250751
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28292183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28252093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_08_0755256_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249683
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248737
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248639
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248637
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249565
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28252745
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248907
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28292183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249845
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250787
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28253231
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251091
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248797
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248835
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250751
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249727
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28251687
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28252093
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249679
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28248793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250603
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28256285
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_08_0755256.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28250055
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_08_0755256.28249835
</commentlist>
</conversation>
