<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_06_2030208</id>
	<title>Vicariously Tour the National Ignition Facility</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244277840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://eecue.com/" rel="nofollow">Dave Bullock</a> writes <i>"The National Ignition Facility (NIF) has been <a href="//science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/28/2210229&amp;tid=14">discussed</a> <a href="//science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/23/2215208&amp;tid=126">several</a> <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/23/2232253&amp;tid=232">times</a> over the years on Slashdot and just recently <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/11/029239&amp;tid=232">fired all of its 192 lasers</a>.  LLNL scientists predict NIF will attain ignition (controlled nuclear explosion) in 2010. For now, <a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2009/05/gallery\_nif">take a look at the photos I shot of NIF for Wired.com</a> when I toured it earlier this year."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dave Bullock writes " The National Ignition Facility ( NIF ) has been discussed several times over the years on Slashdot and just recently fired all of its 192 lasers .
LLNL scientists predict NIF will attain ignition ( controlled nuclear explosion ) in 2010 .
For now , take a look at the photos I shot of NIF for Wired.com when I toured it earlier this year .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dave Bullock writes "The National Ignition Facility (NIF) has been discussed several times over the years on Slashdot and just recently fired all of its 192 lasers.
LLNL scientists predict NIF will attain ignition (controlled nuclear explosion) in 2010.
For now, take a look at the photos I shot of NIF for Wired.com when I toured it earlier this year.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236695</id>
	<title>Re:Sit right there, make yourself comfortable</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1244284980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I also hope they have a webcam, especially in that room with the giant tubes (lasers).</p></div><p>Obviously, you would want to have a workstation positioned directly in the path of the lasers, but does it really need a webcam?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also hope they have a webcam , especially in that room with the giant tubes ( lasers ) .Obviously , you would want to have a workstation positioned directly in the path of the lasers , but does it really need a webcam ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also hope they have a webcam, especially in that room with the giant tubes (lasers).Obviously, you would want to have a workstation positioned directly in the path of the lasers, but does it really need a webcam?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28243121</id>
	<title>Re:National Ignition Facility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244404440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I doubt they would survive under other name like '1000000 Jigawat laser experiment' or something similar, more crazy or more specific</p></div><p>Well, I don't know. In France we have the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser\_M\%C3\%A9gajoule" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Megajoule Laser</a> [wikipedia.org] which sound both similar and more crazy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt they would survive under other name like '1000000 Jigawat laser experiment ' or something similar , more crazy or more specificWell , I do n't know .
In France we have the Megajoule Laser [ wikipedia.org ] which sound both similar and more crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt they would survive under other name like '1000000 Jigawat laser experiment' or something similar, more crazy or more specificWell, I don't know.
In France we have the Megajoule Laser [wikipedia.org] which sound both similar and more crazy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717</id>
	<title>Re:192 lasers?</title>
	<author>deglr6328</author>
	<datestamp>1244294640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those Wired pictures are nice and all but if you want wallpaper, why don't you just go to the source, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/llnl/" title="flickr.com">LLNL's Flickr</a> [flickr.com] page? As an aside, as someone who works at the US's other major laser fusion facility (there aren't many, I'll leave it to you to figure out), I can tell you that all the scaled implosions we've been doing for the past 10 years here validate the expectation that NIF will achieve fusion ignition, burn, and high gain when they go to 2MJ cryogenic DT ice implosions next year. We are extremely excited. This will be the first time nuclear fusion breakeven and ignition will have been achieved in a laboratory. I want you to think for a little while about what the long term implications of fusion energy on technologically advanced human civilization will be. I still don't think very many people realize that this experiment is a MAJOR step in that ultimate goal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those Wired pictures are nice and all but if you want wallpaper , why do n't you just go to the source , LLNL 's Flickr [ flickr.com ] page ?
As an aside , as someone who works at the US 's other major laser fusion facility ( there are n't many , I 'll leave it to you to figure out ) , I can tell you that all the scaled implosions we 've been doing for the past 10 years here validate the expectation that NIF will achieve fusion ignition , burn , and high gain when they go to 2MJ cryogenic DT ice implosions next year .
We are extremely excited .
This will be the first time nuclear fusion breakeven and ignition will have been achieved in a laboratory .
I want you to think for a little while about what the long term implications of fusion energy on technologically advanced human civilization will be .
I still do n't think very many people realize that this experiment is a MAJOR step in that ultimate goal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those Wired pictures are nice and all but if you want wallpaper, why don't you just go to the source, LLNL's Flickr [flickr.com] page?
As an aside, as someone who works at the US's other major laser fusion facility (there aren't many, I'll leave it to you to figure out), I can tell you that all the scaled implosions we've been doing for the past 10 years here validate the expectation that NIF will achieve fusion ignition, burn, and high gain when they go to 2MJ cryogenic DT ice implosions next year.
We are extremely excited.
This will be the first time nuclear fusion breakeven and ignition will have been achieved in a laboratory.
I want you to think for a little while about what the long term implications of fusion energy on technologically advanced human civilization will be.
I still don't think very many people realize that this experiment is a MAJOR step in that ultimate goal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629</id>
	<title>National Ignition Facility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244284440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Smart naming, you can go a long way under such a guise and receive steady government funding.<br> <br>
That might explain why they carry on for decades without a sign of anything working. <br> <br>I doubt they would survive under other name like '1000000 Jigawat laser experiment' or something similar, more crazy or more specific.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Smart naming , you can go a long way under such a guise and receive steady government funding .
That might explain why they carry on for decades without a sign of anything working .
I doubt they would survive under other name like '1000000 Jigawat laser experiment ' or something similar , more crazy or more specific .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smart naming, you can go a long way under such a guise and receive steady government funding.
That might explain why they carry on for decades without a sign of anything working.
I doubt they would survive under other name like '1000000 Jigawat laser experiment' or something similar, more crazy or more specific.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236241</id>
	<title>I hope I'm not the only one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244281440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope I'm not the only one who immediately thought of this: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqkbPkeahOQ" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">PIZZA NIF</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope I 'm not the only one who immediately thought of this : PIZZA NIF [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope I'm not the only one who immediately thought of this: PIZZA NIF [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239721</id>
	<title>Re:192 lasers?</title>
	<author>vyvepe</author>
	<datestamp>1244406540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why you think this is going to be cheaper than fission? I'm unimpressed by the project from the point of view of power genration. Otherwise it looks cool though<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why you think this is going to be cheaper than fission ?
I 'm unimpressed by the project from the point of view of power genration .
Otherwise it looks cool though : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why you think this is going to be cheaper than fission?
I'm unimpressed by the project from the point of view of power genration.
Otherwise it looks cool though :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239767</id>
	<title>Re:192 lasers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244407380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"why don't you just go to the source, LLNL's Flickr [flickr.com] page?"</p><p>Gee, Goose shit, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" why do n't you just go to the source , LLNL 's Flickr [ flickr.com ] page ?
" Gee , Goose shit , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"why don't you just go to the source, LLNL's Flickr [flickr.com] page?
"Gee, Goose shit, thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263</id>
	<title>192 lasers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244281620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geez, how much does it take to keep all those sharks fed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geez , how much does it take to keep all those sharks fed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geez, how much does it take to keep all those sharks fed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237111</id>
	<title>Re:Warning light?</title>
	<author>bakedpatato</author>
	<datestamp>1244288760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>nice Half-Life reference. looks like read TFA all the way through, the last slide has a Half-Life mention. all it needs is a turncoat administrator...</htmltext>
<tokenext>nice Half-Life reference .
looks like read TFA all the way through , the last slide has a Half-Life mention .
all it needs is a turncoat administrator.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nice Half-Life reference.
looks like read TFA all the way through, the last slide has a Half-Life mention.
all it needs is a turncoat administrator...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236335</id>
	<title>Even cooler photos from an earlier version of NIF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244282040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you check out the <a href="http://www.zippo.com/ZippoCaseMuseum/index.aspx" title="zippo.com" rel="nofollow">photo on the lower left</a> [zippo.com] you will see one of the largest of the old-style combustion reactors and many overweight boy scouts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you check out the photo on the lower left [ zippo.com ] you will see one of the largest of the old-style combustion reactors and many overweight boy scouts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you check out the photo on the lower left [zippo.com] you will see one of the largest of the old-style combustion reactors and many overweight boy scouts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236301</id>
	<title>2010?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244281860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a long time to be chargin thah lazers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a long time to be chargin thah lazers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a long time to be chargin thah lazers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237247</id>
	<title>Better than: Controlled Nuclear Explosion Facility</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1244290140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Smart naming, you can go a long way under such a guise and receive steady government funding.</p></div><p>Would any Congressman vote for spending for a "Controlled Nuclear Explosion Facility?"
</p><p>With "National Ignition Facility," they probably think that it has something to do with NASCAR, spark plugs or better fuel efficiency.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Smart naming , you can go a long way under such a guise and receive steady government funding.Would any Congressman vote for spending for a " Controlled Nuclear Explosion Facility ?
" With " National Ignition Facility , " they probably think that it has something to do with NASCAR , spark plugs or better fuel efficiency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Smart naming, you can go a long way under such a guise and receive steady government funding.Would any Congressman vote for spending for a "Controlled Nuclear Explosion Facility?
"
With "National Ignition Facility," they probably think that it has something to do with NASCAR, spark plugs or better fuel efficiency.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236539</id>
	<title>Re:Warning light?</title>
	<author>Lambticc</author>
	<datestamp>1244283540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I much prefer to watch from behind locked doors or unbreakable glass windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I much prefer to watch from behind locked doors or unbreakable glass windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I much prefer to watch from behind locked doors or unbreakable glass windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236501</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Jamamala</author>
	<datestamp>1244283240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial\_confinement\_fusion#ICF\_mechanism\_of\_action" title="wikipedia.org">Here's a link</a> [wikipedia.org] to a wikipedia section explaining what the summary means by "controlled nuclear explosion".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a link [ wikipedia.org ] to a wikipedia section explaining what the summary means by " controlled nuclear explosion " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a link [wikipedia.org] to a wikipedia section explaining what the summary means by "controlled nuclear explosion".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239365</id>
	<title>Re:Running windows!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244314380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly it looks like this particular experiment does it's control on Windows. It may run it to some supercomputers some place but nevertheless, if that's the control room, then it looks like things are controlled by Windows machines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly it looks like this particular experiment does it 's control on Windows .
It may run it to some supercomputers some place but nevertheless , if that 's the control room , then it looks like things are controlled by Windows machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly it looks like this particular experiment does it's control on Windows.
It may run it to some supercomputers some place but nevertheless, if that's the control room, then it looks like things are controlled by Windows machines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239143</id>
	<title>HAHAHAHA</title>
	<author>Weaselmancer</author>
	<datestamp>1244310480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Firstly, because it's basically a way around the bans on testing fusion weapons.</i>

</p><p>Yeah, we'll sure be ready for the day when we get an enemy to sit still all day long while we fine tune 192 x ray lasers to fire all in sync at him.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Firstly , because it 's basically a way around the bans on testing fusion weapons .
Yeah , we 'll sure be ready for the day when we get an enemy to sit still all day long while we fine tune 192 x ray lasers to fire all in sync at him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Firstly, because it's basically a way around the bans on testing fusion weapons.
Yeah, we'll sure be ready for the day when we get an enemy to sit still all day long while we fine tune 192 x ray lasers to fire all in sync at him.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28240459</id>
	<title>Let me hi-jack this to ask a serious question..</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1244378280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How dangerous do the physics-nerds amongst you think this little gadget is: <a href="http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.6830" title="dealextreme.com">http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.6830</a> [dealextreme.com] ? From what I know, as long as it does not crack and I don't breathe the stuff, it's perfectly save to carry on on your keyring, but I like to triple-check in a case like this, mainly cause I don't fancy the thought of frying my crotch (or worse, destroying data on my thumb drive!). Sadly, I don't have a Geiger counter nor a way to test x-ray exposure (Bremsstrahlung..) so there is no way for me to actually check on this.</p><p>PS: It's awesome! Paired with a small Q5-based AAA flashlight on your keyring, you will never know how you were able to survive, before!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How dangerous do the physics-nerds amongst you think this little gadget is : http : //www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.6830 [ dealextreme.com ] ?
From what I know , as long as it does not crack and I do n't breathe the stuff , it 's perfectly save to carry on on your keyring , but I like to triple-check in a case like this , mainly cause I do n't fancy the thought of frying my crotch ( or worse , destroying data on my thumb drive ! ) .
Sadly , I do n't have a Geiger counter nor a way to test x-ray exposure ( Bremsstrahlung.. ) so there is no way for me to actually check on this.PS : It 's awesome !
Paired with a small Q5-based AAA flashlight on your keyring , you will never know how you were able to survive , before !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How dangerous do the physics-nerds amongst you think this little gadget is: http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.6830 [dealextreme.com] ?
From what I know, as long as it does not crack and I don't breathe the stuff, it's perfectly save to carry on on your keyring, but I like to triple-check in a case like this, mainly cause I don't fancy the thought of frying my crotch (or worse, destroying data on my thumb drive!).
Sadly, I don't have a Geiger counter nor a way to test x-ray exposure (Bremsstrahlung..) so there is no way for me to actually check on this.PS: It's awesome!
Paired with a small Q5-based AAA flashlight on your keyring, you will never know how you were able to survive, before!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237479</id>
	<title>I knew it!</title>
	<author>clyde\_cadiddlehopper</author>
	<datestamp>1244292540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The beryllium sphere featured <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margo\_Lane" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">here</a> [wikipedia.org] and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy\_Quest" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">here</a> [wikipedia.org] is real!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The beryllium sphere featured here [ wikipedia.org ] and here [ wikipedia.org ] is real !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The beryllium sphere featured here [wikipedia.org] and here [wikipedia.org] is real!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236757</id>
	<title>The actual tour is better</title>
	<author>theltemes</author>
	<datestamp>1244285460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least I hope it is when I go on mine in September.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least I hope it is when I go on mine in September .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least I hope it is when I go on mine in September.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236659</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244284680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If things go wrong, they can say 'Hey, we told you, it's an explosion!'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If things go wrong , they can say 'Hey , we told you , it 's an explosion !
' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If things go wrong, they can say 'Hey, we told you, it's an explosion!
'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239425</id>
	<title>Is it running allready ?</title>
	<author>deep-deep-blue</author>
	<datestamp>1244315220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because the first picture has something that resembles the experiment from half life 1.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the first picture has something that resembles the experiment from half life 1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the first picture has something that resembles the experiment from half life 1.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238397</id>
	<title>Re:Running windows!!</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1244301360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Did anyone else notice that they are running windows in the control room?

That frightens me.</p></div><p>Windows does just fine as a display system: if that's all they're using it for I have no problem. Where I wouldn't want to see it is performing any kind of control function.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else notice that they are running windows in the control room ?
That frightens me.Windows does just fine as a display system : if that 's all they 're using it for I have no problem .
Where I would n't want to see it is performing any kind of control function .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else notice that they are running windows in the control room?
That frightens me.Windows does just fine as a display system: if that's all they're using it for I have no problem.
Where I wouldn't want to see it is performing any kind of control function.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238103</id>
	<title>The photos are too small...</title>
	<author>Man On Pink Corner</author>
	<datestamp>1244298000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... poorly compressed, and gratuitously spread out across 10 pages for no reason other than ad revenue.</p><p>Attention Wired: Look at how <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2008/08/the\_large\_hadron\_collider.html" title="boston.com">boston.com</a> [boston.com] does it.  They're doing it right.  You're doing it wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... poorly compressed , and gratuitously spread out across 10 pages for no reason other than ad revenue.Attention Wired : Look at how boston.com [ boston.com ] does it .
They 're doing it right .
You 're doing it wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... poorly compressed, and gratuitously spread out across 10 pages for no reason other than ad revenue.Attention Wired: Look at how boston.com [boston.com] does it.
They're doing it right.
You're doing it wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236241</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236511</id>
	<title>Streams</title>
	<author>WilyCoder</author>
	<datestamp>1244283300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't cross the streams!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't cross the streams !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't cross the streams!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237797</id>
	<title>National Indignation Facility</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244295420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I initially read the title as "Vicariously Tour the National I<b>ndigna</b>tion Facility" and thought, "They have one of those?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I initially read the title as " Vicariously Tour the National Indignation Facility " and thought , " They have one of those ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I initially read the title as "Vicariously Tour the National Indignation Facility" and thought, "They have one of those?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28241661</id>
	<title>Re:192 lasers?</title>
	<author>jmorris42</author>
	<datestamp>1244393700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I want you to think for a little while about what the long term implications of fusion energy on technologically advanced human civilization will be.</p><p>Exactly the same as fission, diddly squat.  Greens hate the N word for one reason, it means energy independence.  So they will hate fusion for exactly the same reason.  If we had the will to ignore the greens we could be reaping the benefits of fission now and eventually have fusion as an incremental improvement and hedge against running out of fissionable material.  Barring that improbable event neither will do us any good.</p><p>Greens seem to be divided into three groups.  The group making most of the decisions are the 'watermelons'.  Red Communists hiding behind a Green cover.  The two groups had enough goals in common to make cooperation inevitable.  And even if knowing cooperation hadn't happened subversion was a given, the Soviets subverted any organization they thought might be useful and the Greens are very useful to their purposes.  Both Greens and Communists want to slow/stop western industrial civilization.  Note that until the fall of the Soviet Union no major 'Green' organiation made much of a fuss about Soviet environmental disasters and outright crimes against nature and for that matter still tend to cover up for them.   While the Watermelons make up most of the Green leadership, the bulk of the shock troops are even more dangerous; the Gaians.  These self hating pieces of mental disfunction worship the Earth.  And every time they pray to Her they seem to hear the same message, "Humans are a disease.  Industry and the Civilization it makes possible are an abomination against Me.  Smash it all, and I shall unleash the Four Horsemen to complete the task of erasing the scourge of Humanity from My face.  For thy service to Me, you shall be granted the honor of dying last."  Third and making up a percentage too small to make a difference are the responsible enviromentalists and conservationists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I want you to think for a little while about what the long term implications of fusion energy on technologically advanced human civilization will be.Exactly the same as fission , diddly squat .
Greens hate the N word for one reason , it means energy independence .
So they will hate fusion for exactly the same reason .
If we had the will to ignore the greens we could be reaping the benefits of fission now and eventually have fusion as an incremental improvement and hedge against running out of fissionable material .
Barring that improbable event neither will do us any good.Greens seem to be divided into three groups .
The group making most of the decisions are the 'watermelons' .
Red Communists hiding behind a Green cover .
The two groups had enough goals in common to make cooperation inevitable .
And even if knowing cooperation had n't happened subversion was a given , the Soviets subverted any organization they thought might be useful and the Greens are very useful to their purposes .
Both Greens and Communists want to slow/stop western industrial civilization .
Note that until the fall of the Soviet Union no major 'Green ' organiation made much of a fuss about Soviet environmental disasters and outright crimes against nature and for that matter still tend to cover up for them .
While the Watermelons make up most of the Green leadership , the bulk of the shock troops are even more dangerous ; the Gaians .
These self hating pieces of mental disfunction worship the Earth .
And every time they pray to Her they seem to hear the same message , " Humans are a disease .
Industry and the Civilization it makes possible are an abomination against Me .
Smash it all , and I shall unleash the Four Horsemen to complete the task of erasing the scourge of Humanity from My face .
For thy service to Me , you shall be granted the honor of dying last .
" Third and making up a percentage too small to make a difference are the responsible enviromentalists and conservationists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I want you to think for a little while about what the long term implications of fusion energy on technologically advanced human civilization will be.Exactly the same as fission, diddly squat.
Greens hate the N word for one reason, it means energy independence.
So they will hate fusion for exactly the same reason.
If we had the will to ignore the greens we could be reaping the benefits of fission now and eventually have fusion as an incremental improvement and hedge against running out of fissionable material.
Barring that improbable event neither will do us any good.Greens seem to be divided into three groups.
The group making most of the decisions are the 'watermelons'.
Red Communists hiding behind a Green cover.
The two groups had enough goals in common to make cooperation inevitable.
And even if knowing cooperation hadn't happened subversion was a given, the Soviets subverted any organization they thought might be useful and the Greens are very useful to their purposes.
Both Greens and Communists want to slow/stop western industrial civilization.
Note that until the fall of the Soviet Union no major 'Green' organiation made much of a fuss about Soviet environmental disasters and outright crimes against nature and for that matter still tend to cover up for them.
While the Watermelons make up most of the Green leadership, the bulk of the shock troops are even more dangerous; the Gaians.
These self hating pieces of mental disfunction worship the Earth.
And every time they pray to Her they seem to hear the same message, "Humans are a disease.
Industry and the Civilization it makes possible are an abomination against Me.
Smash it all, and I shall unleash the Four Horsemen to complete the task of erasing the scourge of Humanity from My face.
For thy service to Me, you shall be granted the honor of dying last.
"  Third and making up a percentage too small to make a difference are the responsible enviromentalists and conservationists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238587</id>
	<title>What's it sound like?</title>
	<author>Bitmanhome</author>
	<datestamp>1244303520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always wondered what a place like that sounds like at the moment it goes off.  Is everything so insulated you don't hear a thing?  Or does everything shudder like when someone's blasting at a quarry a few miles away?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wondered what a place like that sounds like at the moment it goes off .
Is everything so insulated you do n't hear a thing ?
Or does everything shudder like when someone 's blasting at a quarry a few miles away ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wondered what a place like that sounds like at the moment it goes off.
Is everything so insulated you don't hear a thing?
Or does everything shudder like when someone's blasting at a quarry a few miles away?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236647</id>
	<title>Re:192 lasers?</title>
	<author>peragrin</author>
	<datestamp>1244284560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>American's are fat and tasty.  Why else is computer science in america shrinking In at least one way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>American 's are fat and tasty .
Why else is computer science in america shrinking In at least one way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>American's are fat and tasty.
Why else is computer science in america shrinking In at least one way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236939</id>
	<title>Running windows!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244287020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anyone else notice that they are running windows in the control room?<p>
That frightens me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else notice that they are running windows in the control room ?
That frightens me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else notice that they are running windows in the control room?
That frightens me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236269</id>
	<title>I for one...</title>
	<author>bobdotorg</author>
	<datestamp>1244281680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... am looking forward to our nuclear shark overlords.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... am looking forward to our nuclear shark overlords .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... am looking forward to our nuclear shark overlords.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238203</id>
	<title>Boondoggle</title>
	<author>LazLong</author>
	<datestamp>1244298960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is the US gov't's most recent acronym for boondoggle? NIF</p><p>Yet another "Aid for Dependent Physicists of the Cold War" program. Nuclear weapons are no longer anything more than engineering. Why do we have all these theoretical physicists on the payroll to make sure our bombs work? Just periodically refurbish the warheads by completely rebuilding them from pits to primaries, all we know they will work.</p><p>Think of all the better uses this money could have been put to....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is the US gov't 's most recent acronym for boondoggle ?
NIFYet another " Aid for Dependent Physicists of the Cold War " program .
Nuclear weapons are no longer anything more than engineering .
Why do we have all these theoretical physicists on the payroll to make sure our bombs work ?
Just periodically refurbish the warheads by completely rebuilding them from pits to primaries , all we know they will work.Think of all the better uses this money could have been put to... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is the US gov't's most recent acronym for boondoggle?
NIFYet another "Aid for Dependent Physicists of the Cold War" program.
Nuclear weapons are no longer anything more than engineering.
Why do we have all these theoretical physicists on the payroll to make sure our bombs work?
Just periodically refurbish the warheads by completely rebuilding them from pits to primaries, all we know they will work.Think of all the better uses this money could have been put to....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353</id>
	<title>Warning light?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244282160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Throughout the entire NIF facility, emergency shutdown panels listing the status of the laser (using both text and light) provide a level of safety for the hapless scientist or technician who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time before a firing of the lasers.</p></div><p>Well, I think I speak for everyone here when I say that it was thoughtful of them to provide a warning light before they turn it on...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>I also hope they have a webcam, especially in that room with the giant tubes (lasers). When the portal storm finally starts I'd like to see those cool lasers ripping through walls, headcrabs, and hapless scientists before I'm turned into a zombie myself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Throughout the entire NIF facility , emergency shutdown panels listing the status of the laser ( using both text and light ) provide a level of safety for the hapless scientist or technician who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time before a firing of the lasers.Well , I think I speak for everyone here when I say that it was thoughtful of them to provide a warning light before they turn it on... ; - ) I also hope they have a webcam , especially in that room with the giant tubes ( lasers ) .
When the portal storm finally starts I 'd like to see those cool lasers ripping through walls , headcrabs , and hapless scientists before I 'm turned into a zombie myself ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throughout the entire NIF facility, emergency shutdown panels listing the status of the laser (using both text and light) provide a level of safety for the hapless scientist or technician who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time before a firing of the lasers.Well, I think I speak for everyone here when I say that it was thoughtful of them to provide a warning light before they turn it on... ;-)I also hope they have a webcam, especially in that room with the giant tubes (lasers).
When the portal storm finally starts I'd like to see those cool lasers ripping through walls, headcrabs, and hapless scientists before I'm turned into a zombie myself ;-)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237557</id>
	<title>Re:Warning light?</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1244293200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>Throughout the entire NIF facility, emergency shutdown panels listing the status of the laser (using both text and light) provide a level of safety for the hapless scientist or technician who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time before a firing of the lasers.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, I think I speak for everyone here when I say that it was thoughtful of them to provide a warning light before they turn it on...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, given that they call them emergency <i>shutdown</i> panels, I assume they not only notify possible targets-to-be of their impending demise, but also provide them a way to avoid it by shutting everything down.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Throughout the entire NIF facility , emergency shutdown panels listing the status of the laser ( using both text and light ) provide a level of safety for the hapless scientist or technician who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time before a firing of the lasers.Well , I think I speak for everyone here when I say that it was thoughtful of them to provide a warning light before they turn it on... ; - ) Well , given that they call them emergency shutdown panels , I assume they not only notify possible targets-to-be of their impending demise , but also provide them a way to avoid it by shutting everything down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throughout the entire NIF facility, emergency shutdown panels listing the status of the laser (using both text and light) provide a level of safety for the hapless scientist or technician who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time before a firing of the lasers.Well, I think I speak for everyone here when I say that it was thoughtful of them to provide a warning light before they turn it on... ;-)Well, given that they call them emergency shutdown panels, I assume they not only notify possible targets-to-be of their impending demise, but also provide them a way to avoid it by shutting everything down.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236753</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244285460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is more likely to produce a black hole in a bank account.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is more likely to produce a black hole in a bank account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is more likely to produce a black hole in a bank account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28244273</id>
	<title>Re:192 lasers?</title>
	<author>edxwelch</author>
	<datestamp>1244370780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Those Wired pictures are nice and all but if you want wallpaper, why don't you just go to the source, LLNL's Flickr [flickr.com] page?</p><p>Hmm, what are those owls doing in the NIF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Those Wired pictures are nice and all but if you want wallpaper , why do n't you just go to the source , LLNL 's Flickr [ flickr.com ] page ? Hmm , what are those owls doing in the NIF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Those Wired pictures are nice and all but if you want wallpaper, why don't you just go to the source, LLNL's Flickr [flickr.com] page?Hmm, what are those owls doing in the NIF?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</id>
	<title>"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1244281680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um... wow. 'controlled nuclear explosion'?</p><p>I'm an utter layman - anyone care to explain why that shouldn't be shocking?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um... wow. 'controlled nuclear explosion ' ? I 'm an utter layman - anyone care to explain why that should n't be shocking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um... wow. 'controlled nuclear explosion'?I'm an utter layman - anyone care to explain why that shouldn't be shocking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236983</id>
	<title>National Ignition Key?</title>
	<author>florescent\_beige</author>
	<datestamp>1244287560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let me get this straight...they have this giant ignition facility but they don't have the giant ignition key to start it.

Boy are they going to be embarrassed. I bet the president will be there and everything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me get this straight...they have this giant ignition facility but they do n't have the giant ignition key to start it .
Boy are they going to be embarrassed .
I bet the president will be there and everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me get this straight...they have this giant ignition facility but they don't have the giant ignition key to start it.
Boy are they going to be embarrassed.
I bet the president will be there and everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237255</id>
	<title>Watchmen quote</title>
	<author>SoVeryTired</author>
	<datestamp>1244290200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Light...<br>The light is taking me to pieces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Light...The light is taking me to pieces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Light...The light is taking me to pieces.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236595</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Penguinshit</author>
	<datestamp>1244284020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shocking is the whole point...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shocking is the whole point.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shocking is the whole point...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28246131</id>
	<title>Re:Let me hi-jack this to ask a serious question..</title>
	<author>deglr6328</author>
	<datestamp>1244385900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's literally entirely harmless. Tritium is a pure beta emitter (electrons). The maximum energy of a beta particle from a decaying T atom is 18.6 KeV. A beta particle of 18 KeV can penetrate no more than about 5mm in air or 6-7 MICROmeters in water (or your skin). Exactly zero beta particles are escaping the phosphor coated glass ampoule (let alone the plastic outer case). ok so now what about bremsstrahlung. Well the percent of incident 18 KeV betas on the glass ampoule that actually produce bremsstrahlung is VERY low, 0.1\% at absolute most and remember, the number of betas emitted that are &gt;than even 15 KeV <a href="http://www-ik.fzk.de/tritium/overview/index.html" title="www-ik.fzk.de">is VERY low</a> [www-ik.fzk.de] (few percent). This ampoule likely contains about 10 millicuries of T or ~370 million betas emitted per second. We can assume (extremely) roughly that 10K X-rays of &gt;15KeV are produced every second from this source then. The half value layer of 20 KeV x-rays is 1mm for aluminum, so 3mm of aluminum will block ~90\% of a 20 KeV x-ray source, I assume the thickness (mass) of the glass of the ampoule and the lucite plastic is at least roughly equal to 3mm of Al so now we're down to 1,000 x-rays per second emitted isotropically (500 per second toward you, ~half of which would be absorbed merely while penetrating your skin alone). Even this, though it's very tiny, has got to be a ridiculous over estimate. How do I know? Because fortunately someone has taken the time to measure the emanation from a HUGE tube of this sort taken from an emergency exit sign. What did he find? It was giving off <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/cwillis/rad/tlight.html" title="angelfire.com"> 60 counts per MINUTE </a> [angelfire.com] of x-rays. An utterly, totally trivial amount of radiation. You will get thousands of times this sort of dose from cosmic rays on a half hour plane ride.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's literally entirely harmless .
Tritium is a pure beta emitter ( electrons ) .
The maximum energy of a beta particle from a decaying T atom is 18.6 KeV .
A beta particle of 18 KeV can penetrate no more than about 5mm in air or 6-7 MICROmeters in water ( or your skin ) .
Exactly zero beta particles are escaping the phosphor coated glass ampoule ( let alone the plastic outer case ) .
ok so now what about bremsstrahlung .
Well the percent of incident 18 KeV betas on the glass ampoule that actually produce bremsstrahlung is VERY low , 0.1 \ % at absolute most and remember , the number of betas emitted that are &gt; than even 15 KeV is VERY low [ www-ik.fzk.de ] ( few percent ) .
This ampoule likely contains about 10 millicuries of T or ~ 370 million betas emitted per second .
We can assume ( extremely ) roughly that 10K X-rays of &gt; 15KeV are produced every second from this source then .
The half value layer of 20 KeV x-rays is 1mm for aluminum , so 3mm of aluminum will block ~ 90 \ % of a 20 KeV x-ray source , I assume the thickness ( mass ) of the glass of the ampoule and the lucite plastic is at least roughly equal to 3mm of Al so now we 're down to 1,000 x-rays per second emitted isotropically ( 500 per second toward you , ~ half of which would be absorbed merely while penetrating your skin alone ) .
Even this , though it 's very tiny , has got to be a ridiculous over estimate .
How do I know ?
Because fortunately someone has taken the time to measure the emanation from a HUGE tube of this sort taken from an emergency exit sign .
What did he find ?
It was giving off 60 counts per MINUTE [ angelfire.com ] of x-rays .
An utterly , totally trivial amount of radiation .
You will get thousands of times this sort of dose from cosmic rays on a half hour plane ride .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's literally entirely harmless.
Tritium is a pure beta emitter (electrons).
The maximum energy of a beta particle from a decaying T atom is 18.6 KeV.
A beta particle of 18 KeV can penetrate no more than about 5mm in air or 6-7 MICROmeters in water (or your skin).
Exactly zero beta particles are escaping the phosphor coated glass ampoule (let alone the plastic outer case).
ok so now what about bremsstrahlung.
Well the percent of incident 18 KeV betas on the glass ampoule that actually produce bremsstrahlung is VERY low, 0.1\% at absolute most and remember, the number of betas emitted that are &gt;than even 15 KeV is VERY low [www-ik.fzk.de] (few percent).
This ampoule likely contains about 10 millicuries of T or ~370 million betas emitted per second.
We can assume (extremely) roughly that 10K X-rays of &gt;15KeV are produced every second from this source then.
The half value layer of 20 KeV x-rays is 1mm for aluminum, so 3mm of aluminum will block ~90\% of a 20 KeV x-ray source, I assume the thickness (mass) of the glass of the ampoule and the lucite plastic is at least roughly equal to 3mm of Al so now we're down to 1,000 x-rays per second emitted isotropically (500 per second toward you, ~half of which would be absorbed merely while penetrating your skin alone).
Even this, though it's very tiny, has got to be a ridiculous over estimate.
How do I know?
Because fortunately someone has taken the time to measure the emanation from a HUGE tube of this sort taken from an emergency exit sign.
What did he find?
It was giving off  60 counts per MINUTE  [angelfire.com] of x-rays.
An utterly, totally trivial amount of radiation.
You will get thousands of times this sort of dose from cosmic rays on a half hour plane ride.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28240459</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236375</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244282460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Nuclear Explosion" is a rather stupid way of phrasing what is going to happen, theoretically, inside the reactor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Nuclear Explosion " is a rather stupid way of phrasing what is going to happen , theoretically , inside the reactor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Nuclear Explosion" is a rather stupid way of phrasing what is going to happen, theoretically, inside the reactor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236771</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244285580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is shocking.</p><p>Firstly, because it's basically a way around the bans on testing fusion weapons.</p><p>Secondly, because it's a <i>really expensive</i> way around the bans on testing fusion weapons. Multi-billion-dollar expensive.</p><p>Thirdly, because they like to pretend it has some relevance to civilian energy generation to help justify it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is shocking.Firstly , because it 's basically a way around the bans on testing fusion weapons.Secondly , because it 's a really expensive way around the bans on testing fusion weapons .
Multi-billion-dollar expensive.Thirdly , because they like to pretend it has some relevance to civilian energy generation to help justify it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is shocking.Firstly, because it's basically a way around the bans on testing fusion weapons.Secondly, because it's a really expensive way around the bans on testing fusion weapons.
Multi-billion-dollar expensive.Thirdly, because they like to pretend it has some relevance to civilian energy generation to help justify it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28251629</id>
	<title>Re:Running windows!!</title>
	<author>EvilBudMan</author>
	<datestamp>1244479020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was probably to run QuickBooks to pay everyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was probably to run QuickBooks to pay everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was probably to run QuickBooks to pay everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236939</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237473</id>
	<title>Re:192 lasers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244292480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh I can just hear the moaning from those who will say "just think how many poor could be fed with all the
money bla bla bla"....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh I can just hear the moaning from those who will say " just think how many poor could be fed with all the money bla bla bla " ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh I can just hear the moaning from those who will say "just think how many poor could be fed with all the
money bla bla bla"....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236677</id>
	<title>This is horrible news.</title>
	<author>chrispycreeme</author>
	<datestamp>1244284800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The National Ignition Facility (NIF) has been discussed several times over the years on Slashdot and just recently fired all of its 192 lasers.</p></div></blockquote><p>You know the economy is bad when even lasers are losing their jobs..</p><p>*Ba-dum-cha*</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The National Ignition Facility ( NIF ) has been discussed several times over the years on Slashdot and just recently fired all of its 192 lasers.You know the economy is bad when even lasers are losing their jobs.. * Ba-dum-cha *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The National Ignition Facility (NIF) has been discussed several times over the years on Slashdot and just recently fired all of its 192 lasers.You know the economy is bad when even lasers are losing their jobs..*Ba-dum-cha*
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236463</id>
	<title>My one simple request...</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1244283000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... was to have missiles with frickin lasers attached to their warheads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... was to have missiles with frickin lasers attached to their warheads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... was to have missiles with frickin lasers attached to their warheads.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236841</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244286060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used to work at LLNL on another project, but I'll give it my best shot from what I understood of NIF.  I toured it once myself, if that means anything...

<br> <br>
In a nuclear bomb, say, they would have several kilograms of nuclear fuel, and the catalyst for the reaction is usually another bomb of some kind.  Very uncontrolled, just trying to make a big "boom".  In this experiment, they are using very very tiny amounts of deuterium and tritium, and the catalyst is 192 lasers firing simultaneously.  The energy output will have a very real ceiling that is theoretically well below what is needed to blow up the whole lab.  (Still, it's probably bad to be in the room when it goes off...)
<br> <br>
Their goal is actually to get as much energy out of this explosion as is possible, so if the lab did blow up, it would probably ironically be something of a success...  Their real goal is to simply get more energy out than they inject via lasers in a controlled fashion.  That would be a proof of concept for workable fusion powered reactors.

<br> <br> Note, this is NOT a power plant, and my comments should not be misconstrued to say "Hey, them there's a fusion power plant".  We're still a long long way from that.  Kay, thanks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to work at LLNL on another project , but I 'll give it my best shot from what I understood of NIF .
I toured it once myself , if that means anything.. . In a nuclear bomb , say , they would have several kilograms of nuclear fuel , and the catalyst for the reaction is usually another bomb of some kind .
Very uncontrolled , just trying to make a big " boom " .
In this experiment , they are using very very tiny amounts of deuterium and tritium , and the catalyst is 192 lasers firing simultaneously .
The energy output will have a very real ceiling that is theoretically well below what is needed to blow up the whole lab .
( Still , it 's probably bad to be in the room when it goes off... ) Their goal is actually to get as much energy out of this explosion as is possible , so if the lab did blow up , it would probably ironically be something of a success... Their real goal is to simply get more energy out than they inject via lasers in a controlled fashion .
That would be a proof of concept for workable fusion powered reactors .
Note , this is NOT a power plant , and my comments should not be misconstrued to say " Hey , them there 's a fusion power plant " .
We 're still a long long way from that .
Kay , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to work at LLNL on another project, but I'll give it my best shot from what I understood of NIF.
I toured it once myself, if that means anything...

 
In a nuclear bomb, say, they would have several kilograms of nuclear fuel, and the catalyst for the reaction is usually another bomb of some kind.
Very uncontrolled, just trying to make a big "boom".
In this experiment, they are using very very tiny amounts of deuterium and tritium, and the catalyst is 192 lasers firing simultaneously.
The energy output will have a very real ceiling that is theoretically well below what is needed to blow up the whole lab.
(Still, it's probably bad to be in the room when it goes off...)
 
Their goal is actually to get as much energy out of this explosion as is possible, so if the lab did blow up, it would probably ironically be something of a success...  Their real goal is to simply get more energy out than they inject via lasers in a controlled fashion.
That would be a proof of concept for workable fusion powered reactors.
Note, this is NOT a power plant, and my comments should not be misconstrued to say "Hey, them there's a fusion power plant".
We're still a long long way from that.
Kay, thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236887</id>
	<title>One laser actually</title>
	<author>stox</author>
	<datestamp>1244286420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The process starts with a single laser diode. The output of that is split and amplified to make the 192 beams. Pretty amazing when you think about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The process starts with a single laser diode .
The output of that is split and amplified to make the 192 beams .
Pretty amazing when you think about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The process starts with a single laser diode.
The output of that is split and amplified to make the 192 beams.
Pretty amazing when you think about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237793</id>
	<title>Re:National Ignition Facility</title>
	<author>deglr6328</author>
	<datestamp>1244295360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"That might explain why they carry on for decades without a sign of anything working."</p><p>Right, right, yeah exactly because they definitely didn't just report on their website being able to deliver &gt;1 MJ of UV light to the target chamber like last month or anything like that. clueless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" That might explain why they carry on for decades without a sign of anything working .
" Right , right , yeah exactly because they definitely did n't just report on their website being able to deliver &gt; 1 MJ of UV light to the target chamber like last month or anything like that .
clueless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That might explain why they carry on for decades without a sign of anything working.
"Right, right, yeah exactly because they definitely didn't just report on their website being able to deliver &gt;1 MJ of UV light to the target chamber like last month or anything like that.
clueless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236921</id>
	<title>Re:"controlled nuclear explosion"</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1244286900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you think it is, that is going on inside nuclear power plants?</p><p>Exactly.</p><p>Also a controlled nuclear reaction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you think it is , that is going on inside nuclear power plants ? Exactly.Also a controlled nuclear reaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you think it is, that is going on inside nuclear power plants?Exactly.Also a controlled nuclear reaction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236793</id>
	<title>192 Lasers, Nuclear Weapons and Fusion -101</title>
	<author>auric\_dude</author>
	<datestamp>1244285640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A short video brought to you from those caring folks at Wired <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/10/video-podcast-6/" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/10/video-podcast-6/</a> [wired.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>A short video brought to you from those caring folks at Wired http : //www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/10/video-podcast-6/ [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A short video brought to you from those caring folks at Wired http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/10/video-podcast-6/ [wired.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236595
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236659
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28246131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28240459
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236241
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28244273
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236647
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28251629
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236939
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28241661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28243121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_2030208_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236263
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237717
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239767
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239721
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28241661
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28244273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237473
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236887
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236335
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28243121
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237793
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237247
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236353
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236539
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236695
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28237557
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238587
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236757
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236241
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236511
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236375
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236659
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236501
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236595
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236771
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28236939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28251629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28238397
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28239365
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_2030208.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28240459
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_2030208.28246131
</commentlist>
</conversation>
