<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_06_0259239</id>
	<title>New Display Keeps an Eye On the Viewer</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1244279460000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/" rel="nofollow">Al</a> writes <i>"Researchers at Fraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems (IPMS) <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/22754/">have developed an OLED display that doubles as a camera</a>. The idea is to use it in lightweight heads-up displays that track users' eye movements, affording some form of gaze-control. The researchers will demonstrate a prototype at the Society for Information Display conference in San Antonio this week. The current version has a simple monochromatic display: it is 1.25 centimeters on each side, with a resolution of 320 by 240 pixels. The team at Fraunhofer IPMS has also partnered with Novaled, an OLED company that manufactures high-quality white diodes, and plans to make color prototypes using the technology."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Al writes " Researchers at Fraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems ( IPMS ) have developed an OLED display that doubles as a camera .
The idea is to use it in lightweight heads-up displays that track users ' eye movements , affording some form of gaze-control .
The researchers will demonstrate a prototype at the Society for Information Display conference in San Antonio this week .
The current version has a simple monochromatic display : it is 1.25 centimeters on each side , with a resolution of 320 by 240 pixels .
The team at Fraunhofer IPMS has also partnered with Novaled , an OLED company that manufactures high-quality white diodes , and plans to make color prototypes using the technology .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Al writes "Researchers at Fraunhofer Institute for Photonic Microsystems (IPMS) have developed an OLED display that doubles as a camera.
The idea is to use it in lightweight heads-up displays that track users' eye movements, affording some form of gaze-control.
The researchers will demonstrate a prototype at the Society for Information Display conference in San Antonio this week.
The current version has a simple monochromatic display: it is 1.25 centimeters on each side, with a resolution of 320 by 240 pixels.
The team at Fraunhofer IPMS has also partnered with Novaled, an OLED company that manufactures high-quality white diodes, and plans to make color prototypes using the technology.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231277</id>
	<title>reversal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244283900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Soviet Russia, screen watches you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , screen watches you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, screen watches you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28232645</id>
	<title>Do7l</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244301240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">people's faces at I ty4E this.</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>people 's faces at I ty4E this .
[ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>people's faces at I ty4E this.
[goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234979</id>
	<title>Re:Eye tracking glasses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244317380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Even if someone would be watching along with the video stream being captured by the glasses, all there would be to see would be eye movements.</p></div><p>So, you don't see a privacy concern with Google building a database of where, how fast, and in what order your point of focus goes on every search page you view?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if someone would be watching along with the video stream being captured by the glasses , all there would be to see would be eye movements.So , you do n't see a privacy concern with Google building a database of where , how fast , and in what order your point of focus goes on every search page you view ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if someone would be watching along with the video stream being captured by the glasses, all there would be to see would be eye movements.So, you don't see a privacy concern with Google building a database of where, how fast, and in what order your point of focus goes on every search page you view?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231299</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234879</id>
	<title>Head mounted display?</title>
	<author>em05</author>
	<datestamp>1244316960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are using this display in head mounted displays, too!
<a href="http://istar-project.org/" title="istar-project.org" rel="nofollow">http://istar-project.org/</a> [istar-project.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are using this display in head mounted displays , too !
http : //istar-project.org/ [ istar-project.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are using this display in head mounted displays, too!
http://istar-project.org/ [istar-project.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231421</id>
	<title>14</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244286480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Sovjet Germany the Display is watching YOU</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Sovjet Germany the Display is watching YOU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Sovjet Germany the Display is watching YOU</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28233641</id>
	<title>Re:Incorporate this in a TV along with a cable mod</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244307360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And BLAMMO-- Big brother is watching!</p></div><p>Wooooah....you mean widespread proliferation of cameras in the homes of citizens transmitting to and controlled by centralized authorities would allow them to see what you're doing in front of the cameras?</p><p>Damn, where'd you learn all that fancy thinking?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And BLAMMO-- Big brother is watching ! Wooooah....you mean widespread proliferation of cameras in the homes of citizens transmitting to and controlled by centralized authorities would allow them to see what you 're doing in front of the cameras ? Damn , where 'd you learn all that fancy thinking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And BLAMMO-- Big brother is watching!Wooooah....you mean widespread proliferation of cameras in the homes of citizens transmitting to and controlled by centralized authorities would allow them to see what you're doing in front of the cameras?Damn, where'd you learn all that fancy thinking?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231255</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28235427</id>
	<title>Re:Paranoia!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244319660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've actually made tin foil glasses -- you make the foil dark on the inside to cut down reflections, then poke them full of pinholes, and in an emergency, these will let you see even if your glasses are a strong prescription.</p><p>There needs to be good lighting though. And you look like a gigantic nerd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've actually made tin foil glasses -- you make the foil dark on the inside to cut down reflections , then poke them full of pinholes , and in an emergency , these will let you see even if your glasses are a strong prescription.There needs to be good lighting though .
And you look like a gigantic nerd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've actually made tin foil glasses -- you make the foil dark on the inside to cut down reflections, then poke them full of pinholes, and in an emergency, these will let you see even if your glasses are a strong prescription.There needs to be good lighting though.
And you look like a gigantic nerd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231233</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231593</id>
	<title>does 1984 ring any bells?</title>
	<author>Karmada</author>
	<datestamp>1244289960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>(sarcasm) I don't know but I am keep thinking about "1984" when I am reading this post. (/sarcasm)</htmltext>
<tokenext>( sarcasm ) I do n't know but I am keep thinking about " 1984 " when I am reading this post .
( /sarcasm )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(sarcasm) I don't know but I am keep thinking about "1984" when I am reading this post.
(/sarcasm)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28232961</id>
	<title>Research, medical</title>
	<author>FiveDozenWhales</author>
	<datestamp>1244303580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know eye-tracking is already used extensively in <a href="http://www.physorg.com/news95616854.html" title="physorg.com" rel="nofollow">research</a> [physorg.com], and don't quote me on this but I think there has been some R&amp;D going into making an eye-control system for those without the use of their arms or hands.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know eye-tracking is already used extensively in research [ physorg.com ] , and do n't quote me on this but I think there has been some R&amp;D going into making an eye-control system for those without the use of their arms or hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know eye-tracking is already used extensively in research [physorg.com], and don't quote me on this but I think there has been some R&amp;D going into making an eye-control system for those without the use of their arms or hands.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231841</id>
	<title>Re:Prototype, eh?</title>
	<author>moon3</author>
	<datestamp>1244293560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fraunhofer guys invented MP3 compression, this German think tank do have results..<br> <br>Also this is proof of concept. It doesn't really matter whether the resolution is 12 or 1024.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fraunhofer guys invented MP3 compression , this German think tank do have results.. Also this is proof of concept .
It does n't really matter whether the resolution is 12 or 1024 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fraunhofer guys invented MP3 compression, this German think tank do have results.. Also this is proof of concept.
It doesn't really matter whether the resolution is 12 or 1024.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231333</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231629</id>
	<title>Has been being researched for a while</title>
	<author>tomalpha</author>
	<datestamp>1244290320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember doing work experience at Philips Research Labs back in the mid nineties and they were working on a similar concept back then - a monitor that doubled as a flatbed scanner. It was based on an lcd monitor, with small gaps between pixels to allow light to pass through to the scanner at the back. The big challenges were getting the focal depth right, and avoiding refraction(?) patterns after the light had passed through the screen portion.</p><p>They seemed to have gotten roung that problem by placing the photoreceptors and lcd pixels at the same level. Can't wait to see a monitor sized one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember doing work experience at Philips Research Labs back in the mid nineties and they were working on a similar concept back then - a monitor that doubled as a flatbed scanner .
It was based on an lcd monitor , with small gaps between pixels to allow light to pass through to the scanner at the back .
The big challenges were getting the focal depth right , and avoiding refraction ( ?
) patterns after the light had passed through the screen portion.They seemed to have gotten roung that problem by placing the photoreceptors and lcd pixels at the same level .
Ca n't wait to see a monitor sized one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember doing work experience at Philips Research Labs back in the mid nineties and they were working on a similar concept back then - a monitor that doubled as a flatbed scanner.
It was based on an lcd monitor, with small gaps between pixels to allow light to pass through to the scanner at the back.
The big challenges were getting the focal depth right, and avoiding refraction(?
) patterns after the light had passed through the screen portion.They seemed to have gotten roung that problem by placing the photoreceptors and lcd pixels at the same level.
Can't wait to see a monitor sized one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231323</id>
	<title>Typo in summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244284740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>usersl</p></div><p>The "l" is on the wrong side.</p><p>-- BOFH</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>userslThe " l " is on the wrong side.-- BOFH</tokentext>
<sentencetext>userslThe "l" is on the wrong side.-- BOFH
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231523</id>
	<title>Oh goody...</title>
	<author>Calmaveth</author>
	<datestamp>1244288460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems they've invented the Telescreen...
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescreen" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescreen</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems they 've invented the Telescreen.. . http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescreen [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems they've invented the Telescreen...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescreen [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234993</id>
	<title>Paper thin Microsoft Surface</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1244317440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always figured this would be the ideal way to make a paper thin Microsoft Surface like interface. No need for rear-projection and a rear-view camera. Not sure whether this can be made cheaper than the capacitative touch surface on, say, an iPhone, but I imagine with time it will be as cheap as active-matrix LCD displays are. Afterall, you already have transistors to drive the pixels, might as well add some photodiodes in there as well for sensing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always figured this would be the ideal way to make a paper thin Microsoft Surface like interface .
No need for rear-projection and a rear-view camera .
Not sure whether this can be made cheaper than the capacitative touch surface on , say , an iPhone , but I imagine with time it will be as cheap as active-matrix LCD displays are .
Afterall , you already have transistors to drive the pixels , might as well add some photodiodes in there as well for sensing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always figured this would be the ideal way to make a paper thin Microsoft Surface like interface.
No need for rear-projection and a rear-view camera.
Not sure whether this can be made cheaper than the capacitative touch surface on, say, an iPhone, but I imagine with time it will be as cheap as active-matrix LCD displays are.
Afterall, you already have transistors to drive the pixels, might as well add some photodiodes in there as well for sensing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231613</id>
	<title>It had to be said</title>
	<author>Sausage Nibblets</author>
	<datestamp>1244290140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Soviet Russia...</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231513</id>
	<title>Future seasons of BigBrother will be watching you!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244288280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I propose we call it the telescreen. And only a quarter-century late.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I propose we call it the telescreen .
And only a quarter-century late .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I propose we call it the telescreen.
And only a quarter-century late.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231299</id>
	<title>Eye tracking glasses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244284380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>1.25 centimeters- that's half an inch. Perhaps a bit too small yet for use in a monitor- but probably reasonably easy to scale up to the size of a pair of glasses.

Incorporating a camera display on the inside of a pair of glasses would make eye tracking much simpler, and reduce any privacy concerns- Even if someone would be watching along with the video stream being captured by the glasses, all there would be to see would be eye movements.</htmltext>
<tokenext>1.25 centimeters- that 's half an inch .
Perhaps a bit too small yet for use in a monitor- but probably reasonably easy to scale up to the size of a pair of glasses .
Incorporating a camera display on the inside of a pair of glasses would make eye tracking much simpler , and reduce any privacy concerns- Even if someone would be watching along with the video stream being captured by the glasses , all there would be to see would be eye movements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.25 centimeters- that's half an inch.
Perhaps a bit too small yet for use in a monitor- but probably reasonably easy to scale up to the size of a pair of glasses.
Incorporating a camera display on the inside of a pair of glasses would make eye tracking much simpler, and reduce any privacy concerns- Even if someone would be watching along with the video stream being captured by the glasses, all there would be to see would be eye movements.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231395</id>
	<title>1984 anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244285940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231993</id>
	<title>Re:Apple might have a patent for this...</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244295780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Personally I would prefer to use a discreet webcam.</p></div><p>It doesn't get much more discreet than not having a lens. Maybe you meant discrete?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally I would prefer to use a discreet webcam.It does n't get much more discreet than not having a lens .
Maybe you meant discrete ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally I would prefer to use a discreet webcam.It doesn't get much more discreet than not having a lens.
Maybe you meant discrete?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231483</id>
	<title>Re:Apple might have a patent for this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244287680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This, cameras are:<br>1) Already more advanced, with less circuitry required.<br>2) Cheaper to add in<br>3) Easily upgradeable, creating a small source of income for snap-in cameras?</p><p>3 would be a nice thing to see, it would make things so much simpler to have cameras IN the monitors. (plus, it fits with the actual name too, they will be monitoring you as well)<br>Have it work wirelessly (bluetooth or similar) and you could make it removable for any of those times you want to move it around for whatever reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This , cameras are : 1 ) Already more advanced , with less circuitry required.2 ) Cheaper to add in3 ) Easily upgradeable , creating a small source of income for snap-in cameras ? 3 would be a nice thing to see , it would make things so much simpler to have cameras IN the monitors .
( plus , it fits with the actual name too , they will be monitoring you as well ) Have it work wirelessly ( bluetooth or similar ) and you could make it removable for any of those times you want to move it around for whatever reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This, cameras are:1) Already more advanced, with less circuitry required.2) Cheaper to add in3) Easily upgradeable, creating a small source of income for snap-in cameras?3 would be a nice thing to see, it would make things so much simpler to have cameras IN the monitors.
(plus, it fits with the actual name too, they will be monitoring you as well)Have it work wirelessly (bluetooth or similar) and you could make it removable for any of those times you want to move it around for whatever reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231449</id>
	<title>Oblig...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244287020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia, TV watches YOU!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , TV watches YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, TV watches YOU!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231941</id>
	<title>Re:reversal</title>
	<author>inviolet</author>
	<datestamp>1244295000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>In Soviet Russia, screen watches you!</p></div></blockquote><p>You laugh, but this invention is important.  Video-phones cannot catch on without it, because humans require eye contact in order to trust each other.  You can't have eye contact over a video-phone unless your camera is also your monitor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , screen watches you ! You laugh , but this invention is important .
Video-phones can not catch on without it , because humans require eye contact in order to trust each other .
You ca n't have eye contact over a video-phone unless your camera is also your monitor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, screen watches you!You laugh, but this invention is important.
Video-phones cannot catch on without it, because humans require eye contact in order to trust each other.
You can't have eye contact over a video-phone unless your camera is also your monitor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28233059</id>
	<title>So Pajamas Media better not really be ...</title>
	<author>cavehobbit</author>
	<datestamp>1244304180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Commando Media behind the screen?</p><p>The last thing I need is a flash of Glenn Reynolds little blogger as he stands up after his last post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Commando Media behind the screen ? The last thing I need is a flash of Glenn Reynolds little blogger as he stands up after his last post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Commando Media behind the screen?The last thing I need is a flash of Glenn Reynolds little blogger as he stands up after his last post.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231333</id>
	<title>Prototype, eh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244284920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The camera in the researchers' current prototype is still fairly rudimentary. It has a resolution of only <b>12 pixels</b>, which means that <b>it can't yet track a user's eye movements.</b></p></div> </blockquote><p>In other news, I have made a prototype flying car in my garage. It doesn't fly yet, but I <i>have</i> put some stylish looking fins on it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The camera in the researchers ' current prototype is still fairly rudimentary .
It has a resolution of only 12 pixels , which means that it ca n't yet track a user 's eye movements .
In other news , I have made a prototype flying car in my garage .
It does n't fly yet , but I have put some stylish looking fins on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The camera in the researchers' current prototype is still fairly rudimentary.
It has a resolution of only 12 pixels, which means that it can't yet track a user's eye movements.
In other news, I have made a prototype flying car in my garage.
It doesn't fly yet, but I have put some stylish looking fins on it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28238875</id>
	<title>One important ommission...</title>
	<author>Waccoon</author>
	<datestamp>1244306640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does it focus without some kind of lens?</p><p>Photodetectors are a piece of cake.  It's the optics that adds bulk and complexity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it focus without some kind of lens ? Photodetectors are a piece of cake .
It 's the optics that adds bulk and complexity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it focus without some kind of lens?Photodetectors are a piece of cake.
It's the optics that adds bulk and complexity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234977</id>
	<title>Re:Eye tracking glasses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244317380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't what you were watching be reflected on your eyes?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't what you were watching be reflected on your eyes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't what you were watching be reflected on your eyes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231299</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231455</id>
	<title>Re:Apple might have a patent for this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244287080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are some advantages, for instance depth perception, the sides of the monitor are going to be able to see you from both the left and right.</p><p>It can also double as a touch screen since the tip of your finger up close will be detectable only by the sensors directly under it.</p><p>It could also scan documents in by pushing them onto the screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are some advantages , for instance depth perception , the sides of the monitor are going to be able to see you from both the left and right.It can also double as a touch screen since the tip of your finger up close will be detectable only by the sensors directly under it.It could also scan documents in by pushing them onto the screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are some advantages, for instance depth perception, the sides of the monitor are going to be able to see you from both the left and right.It can also double as a touch screen since the tip of your finger up close will be detectable only by the sensors directly under it.It could also scan documents in by pushing them onto the screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234411</id>
	<title>How does it focus?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244312820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn't it need some kind of lens? Or does it work like a facet eye?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't it need some kind of lens ?
Or does it work like a facet eye ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't it need some kind of lens?
Or does it work like a facet eye?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28235915</id>
	<title>A boon to spammers</title>
	<author>geopsychic</author>
	<datestamp>1244279340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can put my add where you MUST see it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can put my add where you MUST see it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can put my add where you MUST see it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331</id>
	<title>Apple might have a patent for this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244284920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...They submitted a patent application for something like this in January 2006

see <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/26/apple-patent-embeds-thousands-of-cameras-among-lcd-pixels/" title="engadget.com">here</a> [engadget.com]. Personally I would prefer to use a discreet webcam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...They submitted a patent application for something like this in January 2006 see here [ engadget.com ] .
Personally I would prefer to use a discreet webcam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...They submitted a patent application for something like this in January 2006

see here [engadget.com].
Personally I would prefer to use a discreet webcam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28237117</id>
	<title>Active camouflage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244288820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or would this technology be perfect for active camouflage?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or would this technology be perfect for active camouflage ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or would this technology be perfect for active camouflage?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231233</id>
	<title>Paranoia!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244283120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any idea the current price on tinfoil glasses?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any idea the current price on tinfoil glasses ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any idea the current price on tinfoil glasses?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28233023</id>
	<title>Telescreens?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244303940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telescreen" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Telescreens</a> [wikipedia.org], anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Telescreens [ wikipedia.org ] , anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Telescreens [wikipedia.org], anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231419</id>
	<title>A display that watches you?</title>
	<author>TheCreeep</author>
	<datestamp>1244286480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cool! <br> I bet most of the researchers came from Soviet Russia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool !
I bet most of the researchers came from Soviet Russia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool!
I bet most of the researchers came from Soviet Russia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231771</id>
	<title>Video Conferencing</title>
	<author>Orphaze</author>
	<datestamp>1244292540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something like this may eventually make video conferencing useful. Anyone who has actually video conferenced with someone can attest to the lack of eye contact associated with both parties looking at their screen to see each other, rather than looking at the camera sitting atop their monitor. This lack of eye contact is very annoying, and I'd go so far as to say that it defeats the entire purpose of video conferencing in the first place. A camera positioned directly behind the video conference window fixes this issue entirely.</p><p>Once that is resolved, all we have to contend with is the severe bandwidth and latency issues that make most video conferences today an exercise in low quality, laggy futility.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something like this may eventually make video conferencing useful .
Anyone who has actually video conferenced with someone can attest to the lack of eye contact associated with both parties looking at their screen to see each other , rather than looking at the camera sitting atop their monitor .
This lack of eye contact is very annoying , and I 'd go so far as to say that it defeats the entire purpose of video conferencing in the first place .
A camera positioned directly behind the video conference window fixes this issue entirely.Once that is resolved , all we have to contend with is the severe bandwidth and latency issues that make most video conferences today an exercise in low quality , laggy futility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something like this may eventually make video conferencing useful.
Anyone who has actually video conferenced with someone can attest to the lack of eye contact associated with both parties looking at their screen to see each other, rather than looking at the camera sitting atop their monitor.
This lack of eye contact is very annoying, and I'd go so far as to say that it defeats the entire purpose of video conferencing in the first place.
A camera positioned directly behind the video conference window fixes this issue entirely.Once that is resolved, all we have to contend with is the severe bandwidth and latency issues that make most video conferences today an exercise in low quality, laggy futility.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28233873</id>
	<title>Imagine pro sites hacked to capture the viewer...</title>
	<author>ECCN</author>
	<datestamp>1244308800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just invision this technology in place...

Bob is surfing the web for some 'entertaining' pron...  He comes across something that strikes his fancy...

But Bob doesn't know that the site has been set up by / taken over by someone with nefarious intintions...

Bob starts enjoying the site...  (Meanwhile, back in the batcave, someone starts recording the NEW "Bob's Amateur Pron Theater"  that just started streaming on the WWW......)


Brings a whole new concept to the term 'Spycam'.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just invision this technology in place.. . Bob is surfing the web for some 'entertaining ' pron... He comes across something that strikes his fancy.. . But Bob does n't know that the site has been set up by / taken over by someone with nefarious intintions.. . Bob starts enjoying the site... ( Meanwhile , back in the batcave , someone starts recording the NEW " Bob 's Amateur Pron Theater " that just started streaming on the WWW...... ) Brings a whole new concept to the term 'Spycam'.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just invision this technology in place...

Bob is surfing the web for some 'entertaining' pron...  He comes across something that strikes his fancy...

But Bob doesn't know that the site has been set up by / taken over by someone with nefarious intintions...

Bob starts enjoying the site...  (Meanwhile, back in the batcave, someone starts recording the NEW "Bob's Amateur Pron Theater"  that just started streaming on the WWW......)


Brings a whole new concept to the term 'Spycam'.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234783</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>az1324</author>
	<datestamp>1244316180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A chance to reintroduce the Monitor Camera Monkey Picture Joke!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A chance to reintroduce the Monitor Camera Monkey Picture Joke !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A chance to reintroduce the Monitor Camera Monkey Picture Joke!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231489</id>
	<title>Re:Apple might have a patent for this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244287920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No problem. The institute will simply license the technology to Apple, who will probably screw up doing anything meaningful with it. Then after the patent is expired (as things are developing, probably in 170 years from now) everyone can use this technology. Everything is fine, no?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No problem .
The institute will simply license the technology to Apple , who will probably screw up doing anything meaningful with it .
Then after the patent is expired ( as things are developing , probably in 170 years from now ) everyone can use this technology .
Everything is fine , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No problem.
The institute will simply license the technology to Apple, who will probably screw up doing anything meaningful with it.
Then after the patent is expired (as things are developing, probably in 170 years from now) everyone can use this technology.
Everything is fine, no?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234941</id>
	<title>How is this news?</title>
	<author>koreaman</author>
	<datestamp>1244317200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has already existed for a <a href="http://www.hb4u.com/photo/" title="hb4u.com">long time</a> [hb4u.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has already existed for a long time [ hb4u.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has already existed for a long time [hb4u.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231255</id>
	<title>Incorporate this in a TV along with a cable modem-</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244283540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And BLAMMO-- Big brother is watching!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And BLAMMO-- Big brother is watching !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And BLAMMO-- Big brother is watching!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28235427
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231233
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28233641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231255
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231941
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231277
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234977
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234979
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231299
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231841
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231333
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_06_0259239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234411
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28233641
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231299
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28234977
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231323
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231841
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231277
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231629
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231233
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28235427
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28231449
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_06_0259239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_06_0259239.28237117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
