<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_05_1549258</id>
	<title>Were The "Winners" of E3 Enough To Ensure Survival?</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1244220540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Now that the industry is winding down after another E3, it's time to reflect on the relative success of the show.  Paul Govan reflects with a GeekDad view of the <a href="http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/06/who-won-e3/">"winners" of this years show</a>.  The question is, after the attempts to scale it back to a much more exclusive event, has E3 managed to escape obscurity and defeat at the hands of up-and-comers like PAX?  Highlights of the show included Microsoft's new <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/09/06/01/212249/Microsoft-Debuts-Full-Body-Controller-less-Gaming-At-E3">controller-less interface</a>, a sexier PSP, and a myriad of releases from Nintendo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that the industry is winding down after another E3 , it 's time to reflect on the relative success of the show .
Paul Govan reflects with a GeekDad view of the " winners " of this years show .
The question is , after the attempts to scale it back to a much more exclusive event , has E3 managed to escape obscurity and defeat at the hands of up-and-comers like PAX ?
Highlights of the show included Microsoft 's new controller-less interface , a sexier PSP , and a myriad of releases from Nintendo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that the industry is winding down after another E3, it's time to reflect on the relative success of the show.
Paul Govan reflects with a GeekDad view of the "winners" of this years show.
The question is, after the attempts to scale it back to a much more exclusive event, has E3 managed to escape obscurity and defeat at the hands of up-and-comers like PAX?
Highlights of the show included Microsoft's new controller-less interface, a sexier PSP, and a myriad of releases from Nintendo.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673</id>
	<title>Summary != Article</title>
	<author>Trojan35</author>
	<datestamp>1244225160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or did the article have absolutely nothing to do with the E3 question in the summary? I was expecting an article on E3's success/failure/survivability, and instead I got a Wii-Sports love-fest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or did the article have absolutely nothing to do with the E3 question in the summary ?
I was expecting an article on E3 's success/failure/survivability , and instead I got a Wii-Sports love-fest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or did the article have absolutely nothing to do with the E3 question in the summary?
I was expecting an article on E3's success/failure/survivability, and instead I got a Wii-Sports love-fest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224891</id>
	<title>Watch and decide for yourself</title>
	<author>moon3</author>
	<datestamp>1244226120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Press conference videos of the big 'three' (Microsoft,Sony,Nintendo) are here:
<br> <br>
<a href="http://e3.gamespot.com/press-conference/microsoft-e3/" title="gamespot.com" rel="nofollow">http://e3.gamespot.com/press-conference/microsoft-e3/</a> [gamespot.com]

<br> <br>
Microsoft won it for me, big time. Do not miss the project Natal introduction in Microsoft video (even with Steven Spielberg, pretty amazing stuff).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Press conference videos of the big 'three ' ( Microsoft,Sony,Nintendo ) are here : http : //e3.gamespot.com/press-conference/microsoft-e3/ [ gamespot.com ] Microsoft won it for me , big time .
Do not miss the project Natal introduction in Microsoft video ( even with Steven Spielberg , pretty amazing stuff ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Press conference videos of the big 'three' (Microsoft,Sony,Nintendo) are here:
 
http://e3.gamespot.com/press-conference/microsoft-e3/ [gamespot.com]

 
Microsoft won it for me, big time.
Do not miss the project Natal introduction in Microsoft video (even with Steven Spielberg, pretty amazing stuff).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525</id>
	<title>Multiplayer Mario</title>
	<author>dontPanik</author>
	<datestamp>1244224680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah okay, it would be entertaining to play a multiplayer game of super mario...<br>
<br>
For about five minutes.<br>
<br>
Then I would want to play a real game.<br>
I don't understand how every person reviewing E3 needs to mention that. It's not that cool. It's not original.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah okay , it would be entertaining to play a multiplayer game of super mario.. . For about five minutes .
Then I would want to play a real game .
I do n't understand how every person reviewing E3 needs to mention that .
It 's not that cool .
It 's not original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah okay, it would be entertaining to play a multiplayer game of super mario...

For about five minutes.
Then I would want to play a real game.
I don't understand how every person reviewing E3 needs to mention that.
It's not that cool.
It's not original.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226845</id>
	<title>What the hell is E3?</title>
	<author>JumpDrive</author>
	<datestamp>1244235420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, I think I can answer the question if they have obtained obscurity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , I think I can answer the question if they have obtained obscurity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, I think I can answer the question if they have obtained obscurity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224919</id>
	<title>I'd say...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1244226240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd say no one "won" E3. Nintendo's releases were "meh" at best, sure the new Metroid looks good, but Wii Sports and the rest of the "Wii" series are glorified tech demos. The multiplayer Mario game looks sort of OK, but it reminds me too much of LoZ: 4 Swords which wasn't that great. Sony shot itself in the foot with a UMD-less PSP, and their motion control like most things by Sony will be a decent implementation... But far too expensive and supporting only a few games (just look at how little the Six-Axis controller is used). The new motion control for the 360 looks interesting, but like most things done by MS, its going to have a terrible implementation. <br> <br>

I'd say everyone "lost" at E3, other then perhaps the new Golden Sun DS game I won't be buying anything demoed unless they get really, really, great reviews.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say no one " won " E3 .
Nintendo 's releases were " meh " at best , sure the new Metroid looks good , but Wii Sports and the rest of the " Wii " series are glorified tech demos .
The multiplayer Mario game looks sort of OK , but it reminds me too much of LoZ : 4 Swords which was n't that great .
Sony shot itself in the foot with a UMD-less PSP , and their motion control like most things by Sony will be a decent implementation... But far too expensive and supporting only a few games ( just look at how little the Six-Axis controller is used ) .
The new motion control for the 360 looks interesting , but like most things done by MS , its going to have a terrible implementation .
I 'd say everyone " lost " at E3 , other then perhaps the new Golden Sun DS game I wo n't be buying anything demoed unless they get really , really , great reviews .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say no one "won" E3.
Nintendo's releases were "meh" at best, sure the new Metroid looks good, but Wii Sports and the rest of the "Wii" series are glorified tech demos.
The multiplayer Mario game looks sort of OK, but it reminds me too much of LoZ: 4 Swords which wasn't that great.
Sony shot itself in the foot with a UMD-less PSP, and their motion control like most things by Sony will be a decent implementation... But far too expensive and supporting only a few games (just look at how little the Six-Axis controller is used).
The new motion control for the 360 looks interesting, but like most things done by MS, its going to have a terrible implementation.
I'd say everyone "lost" at E3, other then perhaps the new Golden Sun DS game I won't be buying anything demoed unless they get really, really, great reviews.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224437</id>
	<title>More of the same</title>
	<author>Drakkenmensch</author>
	<datestamp>1244224380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>From my personal view as someone who was not able to attend and was left with television and website coverage, 2009's edition was little more than 2008 with booth babes and more people in the background. Press conferences were lifeless as ever, with a few scant release announcement to cut the hum-drum of what looked like a stockholders quarterly fiscal meeting laced with flat corporate-approved jokes.<p>

In short, can we have PAX yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From my personal view as someone who was not able to attend and was left with television and website coverage , 2009 's edition was little more than 2008 with booth babes and more people in the background .
Press conferences were lifeless as ever , with a few scant release announcement to cut the hum-drum of what looked like a stockholders quarterly fiscal meeting laced with flat corporate-approved jokes .
In short , can we have PAX yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From my personal view as someone who was not able to attend and was left with television and website coverage, 2009's edition was little more than 2008 with booth babes and more people in the background.
Press conferences were lifeless as ever, with a few scant release announcement to cut the hum-drum of what looked like a stockholders quarterly fiscal meeting laced with flat corporate-approved jokes.
In short, can we have PAX yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28230225</id>
	<title>SCRIBBELNAUTS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244224440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>why dont yous talk about the scribbelnauts game on th NINETENDO DS it looks fantastic!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why dont yous talk about the scribbelnauts game on th NINETENDO DS it looks fantastic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why dont yous talk about the scribbelnauts game on th NINETENDO DS it looks fantastic!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225463</id>
	<title>Re:Why did they make it exclusive, anyway?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244228580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How bout anyone with a game in beta has to let people at e3 play it, so they can see how unprepared for release it actually is *cough Demigod cough*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How bout anyone with a game in beta has to let people at e3 play it , so they can see how unprepared for release it actually is * cough Demigod cough *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How bout anyone with a game in beta has to let people at e3 play it, so they can see how unprepared for release it actually is *cough Demigod cough*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28256109</id>
	<title>Nintendo won, seriously?</title>
	<author>n00854180t</author>
	<datestamp>1244453940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see how anyone could come to this conclusion, and it seems like no one but GeekDad actually has.  Almost every other outlet covering E3 pointed out how much better both Sony and MS' offerings were than Nintendo's, on pretty much every front.  Most have declared Nintendo the clear "loser" of the E3 showing, for giving us nothing better than more of the same tired first party games, and completely bullshit peripherals (Wii Vitality Sensor, anyone?).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see how anyone could come to this conclusion , and it seems like no one but GeekDad actually has .
Almost every other outlet covering E3 pointed out how much better both Sony and MS ' offerings were than Nintendo 's , on pretty much every front .
Most have declared Nintendo the clear " loser " of the E3 showing , for giving us nothing better than more of the same tired first party games , and completely bullshit peripherals ( Wii Vitality Sensor , anyone ?
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see how anyone could come to this conclusion, and it seems like no one but GeekDad actually has.
Almost every other outlet covering E3 pointed out how much better both Sony and MS' offerings were than Nintendo's, on pretty much every front.
Most have declared Nintendo the clear "loser" of the E3 showing, for giving us nothing better than more of the same tired first party games, and completely bullshit peripherals (Wii Vitality Sensor, anyone?
).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226471</id>
	<title>Impressions...</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1244233380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel fairly strongly that Nintendo has dropped the ball with their motion technology. They certainly had a great idea and it has helped reshape gaming, Microsoft's and Sony's motion control systems are evidence of that. However, they failed to capitalize on the technology. Too many of their games, while fun, were limited in scope and felt a bit too much like tech demos. Too many third party games were crap. And I think in too many cases the controls felt forced, like there was an obligation to feature motion control. And I think it's becoming apparent that the limited processing power of the Wii is a hindrance. Certainly, the low cost of the console was a huge asset initially.</p><p>The problem is that Sony and Microsoft are catching up, and because their systems are more powerful they can offer a more satisfying gaming experience. At this point I think more dedicated gamers are shaping the market. It's amazing how the Wii appeal to casual gamers and even non-gamers. Friends of mine who had virtually no interest in games ended up getting a Wii. But like so many other people the only game they own in addition to Wii Sports is Wii Fit. This market is quite fickle.</p><p>In that light, Nintendo's performance at this E3 was almost as weak as last year's. Fortunately they still have a few decent games to fall back on, which will more likely appeal to more dedicated gamers. Super Mario Bros certainly looks fun, but it looks too much like more of the same. I'm actually somewhat disappointed by the graphics. I expected them to feel more exaggerated and juicy, instead they almost come off as a fan remake. The new Metroid was another high spot, but at this point it's little more than announcement and there isn't much to see.</p><p>Project Natal is very impressive, but at this point it feels too much like a concept. There are too many questions that need to be addressed. Sony's system, on the other hand, was nearly as impressive but actually seemed like a practical application of the technology. It definitely looked like it was ready to go to market. As for the PSP Go, although I don't like the slider format on any device, I think it's decent. It's a logical next step for the PSP.</p><p>As is the case every year E3 ultimately ends up being irrelevant from the consumer's point of view. Many, if not most, games featured aren't released before the following E3. And despite all the fanfare regarding the announcement or demonstration of any game at the event ultimately what matters is what the game is like upon release. At that point reviewers refer to E3 only as a comparison on whether or not the game lived up to initial hype. So from that standpoint I pay attention to see what's coming, but for little more than that. I see no point in getting excited, year after year, over games that are still years off from being completed or too often end up as a disappointment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel fairly strongly that Nintendo has dropped the ball with their motion technology .
They certainly had a great idea and it has helped reshape gaming , Microsoft 's and Sony 's motion control systems are evidence of that .
However , they failed to capitalize on the technology .
Too many of their games , while fun , were limited in scope and felt a bit too much like tech demos .
Too many third party games were crap .
And I think in too many cases the controls felt forced , like there was an obligation to feature motion control .
And I think it 's becoming apparent that the limited processing power of the Wii is a hindrance .
Certainly , the low cost of the console was a huge asset initially.The problem is that Sony and Microsoft are catching up , and because their systems are more powerful they can offer a more satisfying gaming experience .
At this point I think more dedicated gamers are shaping the market .
It 's amazing how the Wii appeal to casual gamers and even non-gamers .
Friends of mine who had virtually no interest in games ended up getting a Wii .
But like so many other people the only game they own in addition to Wii Sports is Wii Fit .
This market is quite fickle.In that light , Nintendo 's performance at this E3 was almost as weak as last year 's .
Fortunately they still have a few decent games to fall back on , which will more likely appeal to more dedicated gamers .
Super Mario Bros certainly looks fun , but it looks too much like more of the same .
I 'm actually somewhat disappointed by the graphics .
I expected them to feel more exaggerated and juicy , instead they almost come off as a fan remake .
The new Metroid was another high spot , but at this point it 's little more than announcement and there is n't much to see.Project Natal is very impressive , but at this point it feels too much like a concept .
There are too many questions that need to be addressed .
Sony 's system , on the other hand , was nearly as impressive but actually seemed like a practical application of the technology .
It definitely looked like it was ready to go to market .
As for the PSP Go , although I do n't like the slider format on any device , I think it 's decent .
It 's a logical next step for the PSP.As is the case every year E3 ultimately ends up being irrelevant from the consumer 's point of view .
Many , if not most , games featured are n't released before the following E3 .
And despite all the fanfare regarding the announcement or demonstration of any game at the event ultimately what matters is what the game is like upon release .
At that point reviewers refer to E3 only as a comparison on whether or not the game lived up to initial hype .
So from that standpoint I pay attention to see what 's coming , but for little more than that .
I see no point in getting excited , year after year , over games that are still years off from being completed or too often end up as a disappointment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel fairly strongly that Nintendo has dropped the ball with their motion technology.
They certainly had a great idea and it has helped reshape gaming, Microsoft's and Sony's motion control systems are evidence of that.
However, they failed to capitalize on the technology.
Too many of their games, while fun, were limited in scope and felt a bit too much like tech demos.
Too many third party games were crap.
And I think in too many cases the controls felt forced, like there was an obligation to feature motion control.
And I think it's becoming apparent that the limited processing power of the Wii is a hindrance.
Certainly, the low cost of the console was a huge asset initially.The problem is that Sony and Microsoft are catching up, and because their systems are more powerful they can offer a more satisfying gaming experience.
At this point I think more dedicated gamers are shaping the market.
It's amazing how the Wii appeal to casual gamers and even non-gamers.
Friends of mine who had virtually no interest in games ended up getting a Wii.
But like so many other people the only game they own in addition to Wii Sports is Wii Fit.
This market is quite fickle.In that light, Nintendo's performance at this E3 was almost as weak as last year's.
Fortunately they still have a few decent games to fall back on, which will more likely appeal to more dedicated gamers.
Super Mario Bros certainly looks fun, but it looks too much like more of the same.
I'm actually somewhat disappointed by the graphics.
I expected them to feel more exaggerated and juicy, instead they almost come off as a fan remake.
The new Metroid was another high spot, but at this point it's little more than announcement and there isn't much to see.Project Natal is very impressive, but at this point it feels too much like a concept.
There are too many questions that need to be addressed.
Sony's system, on the other hand, was nearly as impressive but actually seemed like a practical application of the technology.
It definitely looked like it was ready to go to market.
As for the PSP Go, although I don't like the slider format on any device, I think it's decent.
It's a logical next step for the PSP.As is the case every year E3 ultimately ends up being irrelevant from the consumer's point of view.
Many, if not most, games featured aren't released before the following E3.
And despite all the fanfare regarding the announcement or demonstration of any game at the event ultimately what matters is what the game is like upon release.
At that point reviewers refer to E3 only as a comparison on whether or not the game lived up to initial hype.
So from that standpoint I pay attention to see what's coming, but for little more than that.
I see no point in getting excited, year after year, over games that are still years off from being completed or too often end up as a disappointment.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225137</id>
	<title>Amy Riadof?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244227080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else look at the tags and google for 'Amy Riadof'?  Was really hoping slashdot had found me a new good looking gamer geek girl.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else look at the tags and google for 'Amy Riadof ' ?
Was really hoping slashdot had found me a new good looking gamer geek girl .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else look at the tags and google for 'Amy Riadof'?
Was really hoping slashdot had found me a new good looking gamer geek girl.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227403</id>
	<title>Re:Summary != Article</title>
	<author>sietecuadrado</author>
	<datestamp>1244195220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember, the media throws things like, "Who won E3?" into their headlines in order to grab readers.  No one actually wins or loses the event.  The media is here to report the news and, at times, give their opinion of an event.  Some things you'll agree with; some things you'll disagree with.  Some do a good job of summarizing; some do not. However, the point of the article is to give you information while giving you another perspective to take into consideration while forming your own.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember , the media throws things like , " Who won E3 ?
" into their headlines in order to grab readers .
No one actually wins or loses the event .
The media is here to report the news and , at times , give their opinion of an event .
Some things you 'll agree with ; some things you 'll disagree with .
Some do a good job of summarizing ; some do not .
However , the point of the article is to give you information while giving you another perspective to take into consideration while forming your own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember, the media throws things like, "Who won E3?
" into their headlines in order to grab readers.
No one actually wins or loses the event.
The media is here to report the news and, at times, give their opinion of an event.
Some things you'll agree with; some things you'll disagree with.
Some do a good job of summarizing; some do not.
However, the point of the article is to give you information while giving you another perspective to take into consideration while forming your own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224445</id>
	<title>Myriad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244224380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"and a myriad of releases from Nintendo"</p><p>Note that "myriad" is a synonym for "many".  This should be "and myriad releases from Nintendo" unless you mean to say "and a many of releases from Nintendo".</p><p>Brought to you by your local Grammar Nazi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" and a myriad of releases from Nintendo " Note that " myriad " is a synonym for " many " .
This should be " and myriad releases from Nintendo " unless you mean to say " and a many of releases from Nintendo " .Brought to you by your local Grammar Nazi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"and a myriad of releases from Nintendo"Note that "myriad" is a synonym for "many".
This should be "and myriad releases from Nintendo" unless you mean to say "and a many of releases from Nintendo".Brought to you by your local Grammar Nazi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225801</id>
	<title>Re:Multiplayer Mario</title>
	<author>MAD R</author>
	<datestamp>1244230080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You haven't played <a href="http://smw.72dpiarmy.com/" title="72dpiarmy.com" rel="nofollow">Super Mario War</a> [72dpiarmy.com], have you?  the game its based on is basically a simple death match mode of Super Mario where you try to jump on the other player, and this updated version adds power ups from the various games into the mix.  It's probably what this new super mario bros game will devolve into after a few minutes of "friendly co op gameplay", though hopefully Nintendo will include a death match mode too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have n't played Super Mario War [ 72dpiarmy.com ] , have you ?
the game its based on is basically a simple death match mode of Super Mario where you try to jump on the other player , and this updated version adds power ups from the various games into the mix .
It 's probably what this new super mario bros game will devolve into after a few minutes of " friendly co op gameplay " , though hopefully Nintendo will include a death match mode too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You haven't played Super Mario War [72dpiarmy.com], have you?
the game its based on is basically a simple death match mode of Super Mario where you try to jump on the other player, and this updated version adds power ups from the various games into the mix.
It's probably what this new super mario bros game will devolve into after a few minutes of "friendly co op gameplay", though hopefully Nintendo will include a death match mode too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226645</id>
	<title>Probably not Valve</title>
	<author>DaveGod</author>
	<datestamp>1244234400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=885287" title="steampowered.com" rel="nofollow">If this reaction is anything to go by...</a> [steampowered.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this reaction is anything to go by... [ steampowered.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If this reaction is anything to go by... [steampowered.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28228297</id>
	<title>Re:Why did they make it exclusive, anyway?</title>
	<author>UnknownSoldier</author>
	<datestamp>1244201280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I don't really understand why E3 can't be more like Comic-Con. Make it a fun event for gamers. It's not like the press will find it any harder to get info. Create some panels, signings, big rooms for LAN games, etc.</p><p>As someone who was there all 3 days, you're missing the point of its purpose: its targeted for publishers and the media, not gamers.<br>That said, I got a chance to play Silent Hill: Shattered Memories, Torchlight, and Jade Dynasty amongst many, many others.</p><p>The show is already big enough, that it doesn't need yet even more people of a different demographic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I do n't really understand why E3 ca n't be more like Comic-Con .
Make it a fun event for gamers .
It 's not like the press will find it any harder to get info .
Create some panels , signings , big rooms for LAN games , etc.As someone who was there all 3 days , you 're missing the point of its purpose : its targeted for publishers and the media , not gamers.That said , I got a chance to play Silent Hill : Shattered Memories , Torchlight , and Jade Dynasty amongst many , many others.The show is already big enough , that it does n't need yet even more people of a different demographic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I don't really understand why E3 can't be more like Comic-Con.
Make it a fun event for gamers.
It's not like the press will find it any harder to get info.
Create some panels, signings, big rooms for LAN games, etc.As someone who was there all 3 days, you're missing the point of its purpose: its targeted for publishers and the media, not gamers.That said, I got a chance to play Silent Hill: Shattered Memories, Torchlight, and Jade Dynasty amongst many, many others.The show is already big enough, that it doesn't need yet even more people of a different demographic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226439</id>
	<title>Re:Myriad</title>
	<author>arb phd slp</author>
	<datestamp>1244233200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Surely some of the comments offer better fodder for your zealotry...</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Zealotry was originally a political movement in first century Judaism which sought to incite the people of Iudaea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the holy land by force of arms, most notably during the Great Jewish Revolt (AD 66-70). Zealotry was described by Josephus as one of the "four sects" at this time.</p></div><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealotry" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealotry</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>I don't see how that applies to the GP.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely some of the comments offer better fodder for your zealotry...Zealotry was originally a political movement in first century Judaism which sought to incite the people of Iudaea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the holy land by force of arms , most notably during the Great Jewish Revolt ( AD 66-70 ) .
Zealotry was described by Josephus as one of the " four sects " at this time.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealotry [ wikipedia.org ] I do n't see how that applies to the GP .
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely some of the comments offer better fodder for your zealotry...Zealotry was originally a political movement in first century Judaism which sought to incite the people of Iudaea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the holy land by force of arms, most notably during the Great Jewish Revolt (AD 66-70).
Zealotry was described by Josephus as one of the "four sects" at this time.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealotry [wikipedia.org]I don't see how that applies to the GP.
:p
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224663</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227013</id>
	<title>This year was horrible</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1244193000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft unveils their Wii market grab Sega Activator clone which can, at best, only achieve Eye-toy like success.They unveil "awesome" facebook and twitter integration while not mentioning they have to do this because they're the only console without a browser and therefore lack the freedom and choice of the others.
<br> <br>
Sony unveils a new PSP, something people have been talking about for nearly a year so it's not be surprise and they unveil a load of predictable games. Anyone really surprised that there are Gran Turismo games on the way? We're still waiting on Rockstar's first PS3 exclusive, so don't hold your breath for Agent.
<br> <br>
Nintendo does enough just to get by. They don't have to try because they earn so much money they don't have to try. But they annouce new Mario games and we hear that a Zelda game is in the works. Again any real surprise?
<br> <br>
Imo, Nintendo did win it closely followed by Sony. They all had predictable boring, uninspired announcements. But you know the new Mario Galaxy game will kick ass. So at least they get bonus points for quality predictability.
<br> <br>
MS is the loser, imo, no decent games announcements and the worst motion control of the lot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft unveils their Wii market grab Sega Activator clone which can , at best , only achieve Eye-toy like success.They unveil " awesome " facebook and twitter integration while not mentioning they have to do this because they 're the only console without a browser and therefore lack the freedom and choice of the others .
Sony unveils a new PSP , something people have been talking about for nearly a year so it 's not be surprise and they unveil a load of predictable games .
Anyone really surprised that there are Gran Turismo games on the way ?
We 're still waiting on Rockstar 's first PS3 exclusive , so do n't hold your breath for Agent .
Nintendo does enough just to get by .
They do n't have to try because they earn so much money they do n't have to try .
But they annouce new Mario games and we hear that a Zelda game is in the works .
Again any real surprise ?
Imo , Nintendo did win it closely followed by Sony .
They all had predictable boring , uninspired announcements .
But you know the new Mario Galaxy game will kick ass .
So at least they get bonus points for quality predictability .
MS is the loser , imo , no decent games announcements and the worst motion control of the lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft unveils their Wii market grab Sega Activator clone which can, at best, only achieve Eye-toy like success.They unveil "awesome" facebook and twitter integration while not mentioning they have to do this because they're the only console without a browser and therefore lack the freedom and choice of the others.
Sony unveils a new PSP, something people have been talking about for nearly a year so it's not be surprise and they unveil a load of predictable games.
Anyone really surprised that there are Gran Turismo games on the way?
We're still waiting on Rockstar's first PS3 exclusive, so don't hold your breath for Agent.
Nintendo does enough just to get by.
They don't have to try because they earn so much money they don't have to try.
But they annouce new Mario games and we hear that a Zelda game is in the works.
Again any real surprise?
Imo, Nintendo did win it closely followed by Sony.
They all had predictable boring, uninspired announcements.
But you know the new Mario Galaxy game will kick ass.
So at least they get bonus points for quality predictability.
MS is the loser, imo, no decent games announcements and the worst motion control of the lot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225681</id>
	<title>Re:Why did they make it exclusive, anyway?</title>
	<author>Cheeko</author>
	<datestamp>1244229480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Basically make it PAX with press conferences?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically make it PAX with press conferences ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically make it PAX with press conferences?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225023</id>
	<title>Microsoft for the... win?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244226540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a Playstation 2, the Eyetoy camera, and most to all of the Eyetoy titles. I was assuming that Nintendo's next generation would pick up the no-controller torch, but it looks like it's going to be Microsoft. I, for one, will probably give them my money and do the nerd walk of shame back to the car with the box. So far my newest console is a Wii...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a Playstation 2 , the Eyetoy camera , and most to all of the Eyetoy titles .
I was assuming that Nintendo 's next generation would pick up the no-controller torch , but it looks like it 's going to be Microsoft .
I , for one , will probably give them my money and do the nerd walk of shame back to the car with the box .
So far my newest console is a Wii.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a Playstation 2, the Eyetoy camera, and most to all of the Eyetoy titles.
I was assuming that Nintendo's next generation would pick up the no-controller torch, but it looks like it's going to be Microsoft.
I, for one, will probably give them my money and do the nerd walk of shame back to the car with the box.
So far my newest console is a Wii...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225615</id>
	<title>Re:Summary != Article</title>
	<author>PrescriptionWarning</author>
	<datestamp>1244229180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>yes, they had a wii-mote in their pants. no they're not happy to see you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yes , they had a wii-mote in their pants .
no they 're not happy to see you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yes, they had a wii-mote in their pants.
no they're not happy to see you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224929</id>
	<title>There are more than a few "winners" at E3</title>
	<author>BaShildy</author>
	<datestamp>1244226240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of us on the floor who were making deals, and making important contacts all won this year as opposed to last year where it was very difficult to meet everyone due to how spread out it was.</p><p>E3 in its current form is far more likely to succeed than its previous form.  Booth babes and glam weren't the only things brought back this year.  E3 was slowly becoming Gamestop-fest where more than 50\% of the attendees were game players as opposed to game makers.  The ratio was far better this year, with all of the infrastructure that was lacking in the E3 Santa Monica model.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of us on the floor who were making deals , and making important contacts all won this year as opposed to last year where it was very difficult to meet everyone due to how spread out it was.E3 in its current form is far more likely to succeed than its previous form .
Booth babes and glam were n't the only things brought back this year .
E3 was slowly becoming Gamestop-fest where more than 50 \ % of the attendees were game players as opposed to game makers .
The ratio was far better this year , with all of the infrastructure that was lacking in the E3 Santa Monica model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of us on the floor who were making deals, and making important contacts all won this year as opposed to last year where it was very difficult to meet everyone due to how spread out it was.E3 in its current form is far more likely to succeed than its previous form.
Booth babes and glam weren't the only things brought back this year.
E3 was slowly becoming Gamestop-fest where more than 50\% of the attendees were game players as opposed to game makers.
The ratio was far better this year, with all of the infrastructure that was lacking in the E3 Santa Monica model.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224663</id>
	<title>Re:Myriad</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1244225160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This makes for a good example of why the word 'Nazi' gets used...</p><p><a href="http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/myriad.html" title="wsu.edu">http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/myriad.html</a> [wsu.edu] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Some traditionalists object to the word &#226;oeof&#226; after &#226;oemyriad&#226; or an &#226;oea&#226; before, though both are fairly common in formal writing.</p></div><p>Surely some of the comments offer better fodder for your zealotry...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes for a good example of why the word 'Nazi ' gets used...http : //www.wsu.edu/ ~ brians/errors/myriad.html [ wsu.edu ] Some traditionalists object to the word   oeof   after   oemyriad   or an   oea   before , though both are fairly common in formal writing.Surely some of the comments offer better fodder for your zealotry.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes for a good example of why the word 'Nazi' gets used...http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/myriad.html [wsu.edu] Some traditionalists object to the word âoeofâ after âoemyriadâ or an âoeaâ before, though both are fairly common in formal writing.Surely some of the comments offer better fodder for your zealotry...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229347</id>
	<title>E3  is a godsend and will stay</title>
	<author>johncandale</author>
	<datestamp>1244212080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be blunt, you guys are delusional.   E3 is at least twice as important as all other events combined.   It basically works all year long as a marketing device and the industry loves it.  Every game magazine and web site runs months of pre E3 speculation and sneak peeks and rumors.  The coverage takes up at least twice the amount of space in pages then any other event.  Then for months afterwords the announcements are talked about.   There is no better place to announce  a new title or accessory if you want the most people to see it or talk about it.   Of course it's for the press and industry.  Having a few thousand press there is much better for your product when they go write about it then a few thousand fans.  Any one who follows game news, lurks game forums, knows E3 is THE event of the year to wait for.    Whether by merit or just recognition, E3 is here to stay.  Millions of people are not watching the PAX videos.  Millions watch the E3 videos.  To restate, it is a industry event.  Not a fan event with some industry people coming along, like comiccon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be blunt , you guys are delusional .
E3 is at least twice as important as all other events combined .
It basically works all year long as a marketing device and the industry loves it .
Every game magazine and web site runs months of pre E3 speculation and sneak peeks and rumors .
The coverage takes up at least twice the amount of space in pages then any other event .
Then for months afterwords the announcements are talked about .
There is no better place to announce a new title or accessory if you want the most people to see it or talk about it .
Of course it 's for the press and industry .
Having a few thousand press there is much better for your product when they go write about it then a few thousand fans .
Any one who follows game news , lurks game forums , knows E3 is THE event of the year to wait for .
Whether by merit or just recognition , E3 is here to stay .
Millions of people are not watching the PAX videos .
Millions watch the E3 videos .
To restate , it is a industry event .
Not a fan event with some industry people coming along , like comiccon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be blunt, you guys are delusional.
E3 is at least twice as important as all other events combined.
It basically works all year long as a marketing device and the industry loves it.
Every game magazine and web site runs months of pre E3 speculation and sneak peeks and rumors.
The coverage takes up at least twice the amount of space in pages then any other event.
Then for months afterwords the announcements are talked about.
There is no better place to announce  a new title or accessory if you want the most people to see it or talk about it.
Of course it's for the press and industry.
Having a few thousand press there is much better for your product when they go write about it then a few thousand fans.
Any one who follows game news, lurks game forums, knows E3 is THE event of the year to wait for.
Whether by merit or just recognition, E3 is here to stay.
Millions of people are not watching the PAX videos.
Millions watch the E3 videos.
To restate, it is a industry event.
Not a fan event with some industry people coming along, like comiccon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227511</id>
	<title>Deals Don't Get Made at PAX</title>
	<author>Kagato</author>
	<datestamp>1244196060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing about PAX is it's a consumer marketing show.  It's a great show to generate buzz for not a lot of money.  But it's not a show where deals are going to be made.  EA isn't going to ink a deal with a major retailer a swank suite at PAX.  E3, sure.</p><p>On the other hand, since I'm not in the industry I'd much rather go to PAX vs E3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing about PAX is it 's a consumer marketing show .
It 's a great show to generate buzz for not a lot of money .
But it 's not a show where deals are going to be made .
EA is n't going to ink a deal with a major retailer a swank suite at PAX .
E3 , sure.On the other hand , since I 'm not in the industry I 'd much rather go to PAX vs E3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing about PAX is it's a consumer marketing show.
It's a great show to generate buzz for not a lot of money.
But it's not a show where deals are going to be made.
EA isn't going to ink a deal with a major retailer a swank suite at PAX.
E3, sure.On the other hand, since I'm not in the industry I'd much rather go to PAX vs E3.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493</id>
	<title>Why did they make it exclusive, anyway?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244224560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really understand why E3 can't be more like Comic-Con.  Make it a fun event for gamers.  It's not like the press will find it any harder to get info.  Create some panels, signings, big rooms for LAN games, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really understand why E3 ca n't be more like Comic-Con .
Make it a fun event for gamers .
It 's not like the press will find it any harder to get info .
Create some panels , signings , big rooms for LAN games , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really understand why E3 can't be more like Comic-Con.
Make it a fun event for gamers.
It's not like the press will find it any harder to get info.
Create some panels, signings, big rooms for LAN games, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224429</id>
	<title>FIST SPORT</title>
	<author>ringbarer</author>
	<datestamp>1244224380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, sequels and product placement.</p><p>Everyone's a fucking winner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , sequels and product placement.Everyone 's a fucking winner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, sequels and product placement.Everyone's a fucking winner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225643</id>
	<title>Re:Why did they make it exclusive, anyway?</title>
	<author>whiledo</author>
	<datestamp>1244229360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You basically just described PAX.  Seriously, everything you just said is in there.  They modeled it after comic conventions.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You basically just described PAX .
Seriously , everything you just said is in there .
They modeled it after comic conventions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You basically just described PAX.
Seriously, everything you just said is in there.
They modeled it after comic conventions.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226349</id>
	<title>Re:Summary != Article</title>
	<author>Painted</author>
	<datestamp>1244232780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed, the author clearly "knew" there was one winner, Nintendo. Personally, both the MS and Sony info was far more compelling. Having the article be 80\% "boo-yah! Nintendo" and 20\% "oh yeah, there were some other companies there too" makes a complete lie out of both the headline and the summary...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed , the author clearly " knew " there was one winner , Nintendo .
Personally , both the MS and Sony info was far more compelling .
Having the article be 80 \ % " boo-yah !
Nintendo " and 20 \ % " oh yeah , there were some other companies there too " makes a complete lie out of both the headline and the summary.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed, the author clearly "knew" there was one winner, Nintendo.
Personally, both the MS and Sony info was far more compelling.
Having the article be 80\% "boo-yah!
Nintendo" and 20\% "oh yeah, there were some other companies there too" makes a complete lie out of both the headline and the summary...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225375</id>
	<title>PAX != E3</title>
	<author>pcgabe</author>
	<datestamp>1244228220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The question is, after the attempts to scale it back to a much more exclusive event has E3 managed to escape obscurity and defeat at the hands of up-and-comers like PAX?</p></div></blockquote><p>E3 is about games.<br>PAX is about gamers.</p><p>They're fundamentally different, and not really in competition with each other.  I'm not sure where the submitter even got this question; E3 battling obscurity isn't mentioned in the article, nor is PAX, nor other expos at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The question is , after the attempts to scale it back to a much more exclusive event has E3 managed to escape obscurity and defeat at the hands of up-and-comers like PAX ? E3 is about games.PAX is about gamers.They 're fundamentally different , and not really in competition with each other .
I 'm not sure where the submitter even got this question ; E3 battling obscurity is n't mentioned in the article , nor is PAX , nor other expos at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The question is, after the attempts to scale it back to a much more exclusive event has E3 managed to escape obscurity and defeat at the hands of up-and-comers like PAX?E3 is about games.PAX is about gamers.They're fundamentally different, and not really in competition with each other.
I'm not sure where the submitter even got this question; E3 battling obscurity isn't mentioned in the article, nor is PAX, nor other expos at all.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224791</id>
	<title>PAX is unlike E3</title>
	<author>trevorrowe</author>
	<datestamp>1244225640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live in the Seattle area and have attended the last 4 PAX events.  PAX won't replace E3.  Don't missunderstand, PAX is probably much more fun of an event than E3 ever will be.  PAX is for the community of gamers, not for the publishers and developers.  Sure, there is some spill-over, but PAX is overwhelmingly a gamer convention.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in the Seattle area and have attended the last 4 PAX events .
PAX wo n't replace E3 .
Do n't missunderstand , PAX is probably much more fun of an event than E3 ever will be .
PAX is for the community of gamers , not for the publishers and developers .
Sure , there is some spill-over , but PAX is overwhelmingly a gamer convention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in the Seattle area and have attended the last 4 PAX events.
PAX won't replace E3.
Don't missunderstand, PAX is probably much more fun of an event than E3 ever will be.
PAX is for the community of gamers, not for the publishers and developers.
Sure, there is some spill-over, but PAX is overwhelmingly a gamer convention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225883</id>
	<title>Nintendo wins?</title>
	<author>Reapman</author>
	<datestamp>1244230440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Was a bit suprised that it seems like in the article he goes with Nintendo.. for me I think Sony and Microsoft showed technology that surpas anything Nintendo has.  Most of the news and excitement seems to be for one of those two, not Nintendo.</p><p>Nintendo's new hardware was last E3's Motion Plus and a Vitality Sensor (wtf?).  I'm not saying it was all bad, the new Mario and the new Metroid games sound VERY impressive, almost enough for me to buy a Wii again.  But I think the winner would have been Microsoft or Sony.. honestly I'd give more of an edge to Sony simply because their game announcements to go along with their motion tech was more exciting to me then Microsoft's.    I'm very excited to see what MS and Sony do now with their motion tech, I have high hopes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was a bit suprised that it seems like in the article he goes with Nintendo.. for me I think Sony and Microsoft showed technology that surpas anything Nintendo has .
Most of the news and excitement seems to be for one of those two , not Nintendo.Nintendo 's new hardware was last E3 's Motion Plus and a Vitality Sensor ( wtf ? ) .
I 'm not saying it was all bad , the new Mario and the new Metroid games sound VERY impressive , almost enough for me to buy a Wii again .
But I think the winner would have been Microsoft or Sony.. honestly I 'd give more of an edge to Sony simply because their game announcements to go along with their motion tech was more exciting to me then Microsoft 's .
I 'm very excited to see what MS and Sony do now with their motion tech , I have high hopes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was a bit suprised that it seems like in the article he goes with Nintendo.. for me I think Sony and Microsoft showed technology that surpas anything Nintendo has.
Most of the news and excitement seems to be for one of those two, not Nintendo.Nintendo's new hardware was last E3's Motion Plus and a Vitality Sensor (wtf?).
I'm not saying it was all bad, the new Mario and the new Metroid games sound VERY impressive, almost enough for me to buy a Wii again.
But I think the winner would have been Microsoft or Sony.. honestly I'd give more of an edge to Sony simply because their game announcements to go along with their motion tech was more exciting to me then Microsoft's.
I'm very excited to see what MS and Sony do now with their motion tech, I have high hopes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224441</id>
	<title>Heard of E3. Never heard of PAX</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244224380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I guess that E3 has managed to escape obscurity and defeat for now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I guess that E3 has managed to escape obscurity and defeat for now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I guess that E3 has managed to escape obscurity and defeat for now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229939</id>
	<title>Re:More of the same</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244220240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was there, it was vastly different.  Last year was absolutely tiny.  I guess the illusion created by TV was that it was a big deal, it wasn't.  This year was back to a big exciting show once again.  Night and day I tell you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was there , it was vastly different .
Last year was absolutely tiny .
I guess the illusion created by TV was that it was a big deal , it was n't .
This year was back to a big exciting show once again .
Night and day I tell you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was there, it was vastly different.
Last year was absolutely tiny.
I guess the illusion created by TV was that it was a big deal, it wasn't.
This year was back to a big exciting show once again.
Night and day I tell you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224437</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225931</id>
	<title>Re:Why did they make it exclusive, anyway?</title>
	<author>bickle</author>
	<datestamp>1244230680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because it is not intended for entertaining the fans. It is an industry event to drum up interest in their titles and get retailers to order copies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it is not intended for entertaining the fans .
It is an industry event to drum up interest in their titles and get retailers to order copies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it is not intended for entertaining the fans.
It is an industry event to drum up interest in their titles and get retailers to order copies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226935</id>
	<title>Worst E3 ever</title>
	<author>Latinhypercube</author>
	<datestamp>1244192520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about reducing the console prices so normal people can actually play these games ?
Nintendo = more of the same. PS3 &amp; Xbox = check out our useless gimicy controllers (cue lots of waving of hands, it's really brilliant, honest)
Yawn. No money for you guys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about reducing the console prices so normal people can actually play these games ?
Nintendo = more of the same .
PS3 &amp; Xbox = check out our useless gimicy controllers ( cue lots of waving of hands , it 's really brilliant , honest ) Yawn .
No money for you guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about reducing the console prices so normal people can actually play these games ?
Nintendo = more of the same.
PS3 &amp; Xbox = check out our useless gimicy controllers (cue lots of waving of hands, it's really brilliant, honest)
Yawn.
No money for you guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224607</id>
	<title>you f4il it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244224980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">isn't a lemonade the 'community' my bedpost up my in our group though, I have to a relatively towels On the floor One common goal -</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>is n't a lemonade the 'community ' my bedpost up my in our group though , I have to a relatively towels On the floor One common goal - [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isn't a lemonade the 'community' my bedpost up my in our group though, I have to a relatively towels On the floor One common goal - [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224953</id>
	<title>Re:Multiplayer Mario</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244226360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah okay, it would be entertaining to play a multiplayer game of super mario...</p><p>For about five minutes.</p></div><p>You've obviously never played a multiplayer game of Zelda on the Gamecube.</p><p>Okay, granted, it's phenomenally unlikely you would have, given the requirements (four people, each with GBAs, plus four GBA-to-GC cables), but still, the one time I could pull that off with my friends, it was an insane amount of fun for a few hours.  A deceptively vicious combination of cooperation and screaming obscenities at each other in less-than-cooperative points.  And it would've been fun the next time, too, if we could ever get that stupid setup together again.</p><p>This makes me wonder if they'll try making a DS-and-Wii based Four Swords game.  At the very least, it would remove the cable element.  But still, I'm not discounting the idea of a multiplayer Mario game.  I mean, Nintendo has a decent idea of what they're doing.  Sounds like it could be a lot of fun.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah okay , it would be entertaining to play a multiplayer game of super mario...For about five minutes.You 've obviously never played a multiplayer game of Zelda on the Gamecube.Okay , granted , it 's phenomenally unlikely you would have , given the requirements ( four people , each with GBAs , plus four GBA-to-GC cables ) , but still , the one time I could pull that off with my friends , it was an insane amount of fun for a few hours .
A deceptively vicious combination of cooperation and screaming obscenities at each other in less-than-cooperative points .
And it would 've been fun the next time , too , if we could ever get that stupid setup together again.This makes me wonder if they 'll try making a DS-and-Wii based Four Swords game .
At the very least , it would remove the cable element .
But still , I 'm not discounting the idea of a multiplayer Mario game .
I mean , Nintendo has a decent idea of what they 're doing .
Sounds like it could be a lot of fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah okay, it would be entertaining to play a multiplayer game of super mario...For about five minutes.You've obviously never played a multiplayer game of Zelda on the Gamecube.Okay, granted, it's phenomenally unlikely you would have, given the requirements (four people, each with GBAs, plus four GBA-to-GC cables), but still, the one time I could pull that off with my friends, it was an insane amount of fun for a few hours.
A deceptively vicious combination of cooperation and screaming obscenities at each other in less-than-cooperative points.
And it would've been fun the next time, too, if we could ever get that stupid setup together again.This makes me wonder if they'll try making a DS-and-Wii based Four Swords game.
At the very least, it would remove the cable element.
But still, I'm not discounting the idea of a multiplayer Mario game.
I mean, Nintendo has a decent idea of what they're doing.
Sounds like it could be a lot of fun.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224999</id>
	<title>Re:Multiplayer Mario</title>
	<author>KDR\_11k</author>
	<datestamp>1244226480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NSMB (DS) had that multiplayer mode for two people, those who played it loved it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NSMB ( DS ) had that multiplayer mode for two people , those who played it loved it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NSMB (DS) had that multiplayer mode for two people, those who played it loved it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224425</id>
	<title>Haven't cared much</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244224320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I doubt I'll ever have an opportunity to go.  PAX on the other hand - I haven't made it yet but I will eventually.  So e3?  meh.  PAX? yes- absolutely I am stoked it is doing well as I look forward to being a part of it in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I doubt I 'll ever have an opportunity to go .
PAX on the other hand - I have n't made it yet but I will eventually .
So e3 ?
meh. PAX ?
yes- absolutely I am stoked it is doing well as I look forward to being a part of it in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I doubt I'll ever have an opportunity to go.
PAX on the other hand - I haven't made it yet but I will eventually.
So e3?
meh.  PAX?
yes- absolutely I am stoked it is doing well as I look forward to being a part of it in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224967</id>
	<title>What industry?</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1244226420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pretty bad summary.  It was like a past-tense German sentence (apologies to native German speakers), where I didn't know the verb until the end of the sentence.  Until PSP and Nintendo were mentioned, I didn't know they were talking about a computer gaming conference.  The second to last sentence made my mind race (Controller-less interface for Windows/Office?  Neat!).  Then I came down to earth;  oh, just console gaming.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty bad summary .
It was like a past-tense German sentence ( apologies to native German speakers ) , where I did n't know the verb until the end of the sentence .
Until PSP and Nintendo were mentioned , I did n't know they were talking about a computer gaming conference .
The second to last sentence made my mind race ( Controller-less interface for Windows/Office ?
Neat ! ) . Then I came down to earth ; oh , just console gaming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty bad summary.
It was like a past-tense German sentence (apologies to native German speakers), where I didn't know the verb until the end of the sentence.
Until PSP and Nintendo were mentioned, I didn't know they were talking about a computer gaming conference.
The second to last sentence made my mind race (Controller-less interface for Windows/Office?
Neat!).  Then I came down to earth;  oh, just console gaming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229921</id>
	<title>Re:I'd say...</title>
	<author>Burpmaster</author>
	<datestamp>1244219760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The multiplayer Mario game looks sort of OK, but it reminds me too much of LoZ: 4 Swords which wasn't that great.</p></div><p>I'm guessing you haven't played Four Swords Adventures for GameCube. That one was a full-blown adventure game compared to what came with the GBA Link to the Past, which was essentially a mini-game. It even includes a really fun battle mode.</p><p>New Super Mario Bros Wii will probably be closer to the second Four Swords, so I expect it to be a lot of fun...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The multiplayer Mario game looks sort of OK , but it reminds me too much of LoZ : 4 Swords which was n't that great.I 'm guessing you have n't played Four Swords Adventures for GameCube .
That one was a full-blown adventure game compared to what came with the GBA Link to the Past , which was essentially a mini-game .
It even includes a really fun battle mode.New Super Mario Bros Wii will probably be closer to the second Four Swords , so I expect it to be a lot of fun.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The multiplayer Mario game looks sort of OK, but it reminds me too much of LoZ: 4 Swords which wasn't that great.I'm guessing you haven't played Four Swords Adventures for GameCube.
That one was a full-blown adventure game compared to what came with the GBA Link to the Past, which was essentially a mini-game.
It even includes a really fun battle mode.New Super Mario Bros Wii will probably be closer to the second Four Swords, so I expect it to be a lot of fun...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227161</id>
	<title>Re:Multiplayer Mario</title>
	<author>Millennium</author>
	<datestamp>1244193780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you've gotten so desperate to hate the Wii that you're now saying Mario isn't a real game? Sounds like someone needs a nap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 've gotten so desperate to hate the Wii that you 're now saying Mario is n't a real game ?
Sounds like someone needs a nap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you've gotten so desperate to hate the Wii that you're now saying Mario isn't a real game?
Sounds like someone needs a nap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225615
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28228297
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225643
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224953
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224663
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_1549258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229939
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224891
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224663
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226439
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224673
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28226349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225615
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224953
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224929
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28227013
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28228297
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225463
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225643
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224791
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224607
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28225137
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28224919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229921
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_1549258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_1549258.28229347
</commentlist>
</conversation>
