<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_05_0231200</id>
	<title>PLplot Notes Its 10,000th Commit</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244213700000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>iliketrash writes <i>"From the PLplot development team is the <a href="http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum\_id=960188">announcement</a> of their 10,000th commit: '<a href="http://plplot.sourceforge.net/">PLplot</a> is a cross-platform software package for creating scientific plots that has been in continuous development since its inception 17 years ago. On May 23, 2009 the PLplot developers quietly celebrated our ten thousandth commit since our initial software repository was populated back in May 1992. This longevity puts PLplot in some select company amongst open-source software projects. We may even be unique within this group because all PLplot development has been done by volunteers in their spare time. The enthusiasm for PLplot development continues; we have averaged more than 100 commits per month over the last year which is double our 17-year average, and we are looking forward to the celebration of our next ten thousand commits!'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>iliketrash writes " From the PLplot development team is the announcement of their 10,000th commit : 'PLplot is a cross-platform software package for creating scientific plots that has been in continuous development since its inception 17 years ago .
On May 23 , 2009 the PLplot developers quietly celebrated our ten thousandth commit since our initial software repository was populated back in May 1992 .
This longevity puts PLplot in some select company amongst open-source software projects .
We may even be unique within this group because all PLplot development has been done by volunteers in their spare time .
The enthusiasm for PLplot development continues ; we have averaged more than 100 commits per month over the last year which is double our 17-year average , and we are looking forward to the celebration of our next ten thousand commits !
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iliketrash writes "From the PLplot development team is the announcement of their 10,000th commit: 'PLplot is a cross-platform software package for creating scientific plots that has been in continuous development since its inception 17 years ago.
On May 23, 2009 the PLplot developers quietly celebrated our ten thousandth commit since our initial software repository was populated back in May 1992.
This longevity puts PLplot in some select company amongst open-source software projects.
We may even be unique within this group because all PLplot development has been done by volunteers in their spare time.
The enthusiasm for PLplot development continues; we have averaged more than 100 commits per month over the last year which is double our 17-year average, and we are looking forward to the celebration of our next ten thousand commits!
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218741</id>
	<title>Re:vs. GNUPlot</title>
	<author>gzipped\_tar</author>
	<datestamp>1244139720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm no expert, and this is how I understood about the differences between PLplot and GNUPlot.</p><p>GNUPlot is modelled like an interpreter. It works by interpreting the input as a stream of commands. If you are to embed GNUPlot in your own application, you need a separate process for GNUPlot, and you construct the GNUPlot commands from your data and send them to the plotter process. On the other hand, PLPlot is a library with multiple language bindings, making it easier to embed in applications (you just call the library functions in your app and link it to the library). </p><p>There are also PLPlot front-ends geared towards interactive usage, just like the GNUPlot interactive shell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm no expert , and this is how I understood about the differences between PLplot and GNUPlot.GNUPlot is modelled like an interpreter .
It works by interpreting the input as a stream of commands .
If you are to embed GNUPlot in your own application , you need a separate process for GNUPlot , and you construct the GNUPlot commands from your data and send them to the plotter process .
On the other hand , PLPlot is a library with multiple language bindings , making it easier to embed in applications ( you just call the library functions in your app and link it to the library ) .
There are also PLPlot front-ends geared towards interactive usage , just like the GNUPlot interactive shell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm no expert, and this is how I understood about the differences between PLplot and GNUPlot.GNUPlot is modelled like an interpreter.
It works by interpreting the input as a stream of commands.
If you are to embed GNUPlot in your own application, you need a separate process for GNUPlot, and you construct the GNUPlot commands from your data and send them to the plotter process.
On the other hand, PLPlot is a library with multiple language bindings, making it easier to embed in applications (you just call the library functions in your app and link it to the library).
There are also PLPlot front-ends geared towards interactive usage, just like the GNUPlot interactive shell.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218405</id>
	<title>Unfortunately</title>
	<author>timeOday</author>
	<datestamp>1244136120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to be a jerk, but the <a href="http://plplot.sourceforge.net/examples.php" title="sourceforge.net">example plots</a> [sourceforge.net] are not of the quality I would be proud to publish in a paper.  I wish there were more of an open-source tradition among graphic artists.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to be a jerk , but the example plots [ sourceforge.net ] are not of the quality I would be proud to publish in a paper .
I wish there were more of an open-source tradition among graphic artists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to be a jerk, but the example plots [sourceforge.net] are not of the quality I would be proud to publish in a paper.
I wish there were more of an open-source tradition among graphic artists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217949</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ITS OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*</p><p>Or in this case, TEN.</p><p>P.S. Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING. Gotta love<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ITS OVER NINE THOUSAND ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
* Or in this case , TEN.P.S .
Filter error : Do n't use so many caps .
It 's like YELLING .
Got ta love / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ITS OVER NINE THOUSAND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*Or in this case, TEN.P.S.
Filter error: Don't use so many caps.
It's like YELLING.
Gotta love /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28222037</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244215200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As opposed to the editors of USAToday, scientists prefer their plots as graphically simple as possible since they are trying to convey complex information in the most legible manner, instead of trying to do an artistic statement. Except for the green foreground over black background, the examples on your link look perfectly adequate for a scientific paper. Readability triumphs aesthetics in scientific information visualization and that is why there are no graphic artists deciding how to decorate plots.</p><p>On top of that, plots usually are in black and white because most scientists print them in laser-jet printers anyway and journals and conferences charge the authors extra money if they include color in their papers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As opposed to the editors of USAToday , scientists prefer their plots as graphically simple as possible since they are trying to convey complex information in the most legible manner , instead of trying to do an artistic statement .
Except for the green foreground over black background , the examples on your link look perfectly adequate for a scientific paper .
Readability triumphs aesthetics in scientific information visualization and that is why there are no graphic artists deciding how to decorate plots.On top of that , plots usually are in black and white because most scientists print them in laser-jet printers anyway and journals and conferences charge the authors extra money if they include color in their papers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As opposed to the editors of USAToday, scientists prefer their plots as graphically simple as possible since they are trying to convey complex information in the most legible manner, instead of trying to do an artistic statement.
Except for the green foreground over black background, the examples on your link look perfectly adequate for a scientific paper.
Readability triumphs aesthetics in scientific information visualization and that is why there are no graphic artists deciding how to decorate plots.On top of that, plots usually are in black and white because most scientists print them in laser-jet printers anyway and journals and conferences charge the authors extra money if they include color in their papers</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28227537</id>
	<title>OT: your sig</title>
	<author>kelnos</author>
	<datestamp>1244196240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Atheism is not a religion, it is the absence of religion.<br>
Agnosticism is the absence of decisiveness.</p></div><p>Heh, atheism sure sounds like a religion sometimes, given how fervently some atheists push their belief that there is no god.  Some seem almost as bad as evangelical Christians.<br>
<br>
Agnosticism is merely logic at play.  Anyone who isn't an agnostic is deluded.  Claiming to know with certainty that there isn't a god is just as unscientific as claiming that there is a god (Richard Dawkins' beliefs notwithstanding).<br>
<br>
Of course, the mass media has confused the definition of agnosticism to the point of uselessness, so it's unsurprising to have this misconception.

(Full disclosure: I'm an agnostic atheist.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Atheism is not a religion , it is the absence of religion .
Agnosticism is the absence of decisiveness.Heh , atheism sure sounds like a religion sometimes , given how fervently some atheists push their belief that there is no god .
Some seem almost as bad as evangelical Christians .
Agnosticism is merely logic at play .
Anyone who is n't an agnostic is deluded .
Claiming to know with certainty that there is n't a god is just as unscientific as claiming that there is a god ( Richard Dawkins ' beliefs notwithstanding ) .
Of course , the mass media has confused the definition of agnosticism to the point of uselessness , so it 's unsurprising to have this misconception .
( Full disclosure : I 'm an agnostic atheist .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Atheism is not a religion, it is the absence of religion.
Agnosticism is the absence of decisiveness.Heh, atheism sure sounds like a religion sometimes, given how fervently some atheists push their belief that there is no god.
Some seem almost as bad as evangelical Christians.
Agnosticism is merely logic at play.
Anyone who isn't an agnostic is deluded.
Claiming to know with certainty that there isn't a god is just as unscientific as claiming that there is a god (Richard Dawkins' beliefs notwithstanding).
Of course, the mass media has confused the definition of agnosticism to the point of uselessness, so it's unsurprising to have this misconception.
(Full disclosure: I'm an agnostic atheist.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219067</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219069</id>
	<title>ass</title>
	<author>sigmet</author>
	<datestamp>1244144100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet it still looks like ass? it doesn't look like something that has been in development for 17 years but more like something that was developed 17 years ago unfortunately.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet it still looks like ass ?
it does n't look like something that has been in development for 17 years but more like something that was developed 17 years ago unfortunately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet it still looks like ass?
it doesn't look like something that has been in development for 17 years but more like something that was developed 17 years ago unfortunately.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28221925</id>
	<title>SigmaPlot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244214600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As mentioned in a comment above, the paid for competition here is SigmaPlot.  I remember first using Sigmaplot over ten years ago and the output of that version was head and shoulders above this.  In fact there isn't any open source competition for Sigmaplot.  Grace used to style itself as a SigmaPlot alternative, but hasn't been updated in a very long time and as never a match anyway.</p><p>As a scientist who primarily uses a Linux desktop I am fed up with rebooting to Windows just to run Sigmaplot (or SPSS for that matter - whilst there are plenty of stats software for unix, there are no easy to use but powerful GUI based packages for those of us that have to use stats every day but aren't statisticians).  I'd happily pay for a Linux version of SigmaPlot, but I'd much rather use open source software.  It's not about the money (my employer pays) it's about being able to access my own files and results in five years time.  Unfortunately there are some areas where open-source doesn't come close to proprietory software and this is one of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As mentioned in a comment above , the paid for competition here is SigmaPlot .
I remember first using Sigmaplot over ten years ago and the output of that version was head and shoulders above this .
In fact there is n't any open source competition for Sigmaplot .
Grace used to style itself as a SigmaPlot alternative , but has n't been updated in a very long time and as never a match anyway.As a scientist who primarily uses a Linux desktop I am fed up with rebooting to Windows just to run Sigmaplot ( or SPSS for that matter - whilst there are plenty of stats software for unix , there are no easy to use but powerful GUI based packages for those of us that have to use stats every day but are n't statisticians ) .
I 'd happily pay for a Linux version of SigmaPlot , but I 'd much rather use open source software .
It 's not about the money ( my employer pays ) it 's about being able to access my own files and results in five years time .
Unfortunately there are some areas where open-source does n't come close to proprietory software and this is one of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As mentioned in a comment above, the paid for competition here is SigmaPlot.
I remember first using Sigmaplot over ten years ago and the output of that version was head and shoulders above this.
In fact there isn't any open source competition for Sigmaplot.
Grace used to style itself as a SigmaPlot alternative, but hasn't been updated in a very long time and as never a match anyway.As a scientist who primarily uses a Linux desktop I am fed up with rebooting to Windows just to run Sigmaplot (or SPSS for that matter - whilst there are plenty of stats software for unix, there are no easy to use but powerful GUI based packages for those of us that have to use stats every day but aren't statisticians).
I'd happily pay for a Linux version of SigmaPlot, but I'd much rather use open source software.
It's not about the money (my employer pays) it's about being able to access my own files and results in five years time.
Unfortunately there are some areas where open-source doesn't come close to proprietory software and this is one of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28220465</id>
	<title>Re:More commits needed to sort the aethetics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244206020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The example graphs don't look so pleasant though. The (default?) colour scheme is excellent for a semi-lit astronomical dome (doesn't ruin your night vision) but I put those in front a business board without a fair bit of work on the aesthetics</p></div><p>
Agreed. When it comes to your papers, you really want the best looking plots, and the examples on the PLPlot site don't even use anti aliasing! Check out the commercial <a href="http://www.sigmaplot.com/products/sigmaplot/sigmaplot-details.php" title="sigmaplot.com">competition</a> [sigmaplot.com]. Mathematica generates pretty plots too, and some amazing <a href="http://gallery.wolfram.com/" title="wolfram.com">mathematical graphics</a> [wolfram.com]. Hell, even a recent Gnuplot seem to do a <a href="http://gnuplot.sourceforge.net/demo\_4.3/" title="sourceforge.net">better job</a> [sourceforge.net] at plotting.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The example graphs do n't look so pleasant though .
The ( default ?
) colour scheme is excellent for a semi-lit astronomical dome ( does n't ruin your night vision ) but I put those in front a business board without a fair bit of work on the aesthetics Agreed .
When it comes to your papers , you really want the best looking plots , and the examples on the PLPlot site do n't even use anti aliasing !
Check out the commercial competition [ sigmaplot.com ] .
Mathematica generates pretty plots too , and some amazing mathematical graphics [ wolfram.com ] .
Hell , even a recent Gnuplot seem to do a better job [ sourceforge.net ] at plotting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The example graphs don't look so pleasant though.
The (default?
) colour scheme is excellent for a semi-lit astronomical dome (doesn't ruin your night vision) but I put those in front a business board without a fair bit of work on the aesthetics
Agreed.
When it comes to your papers, you really want the best looking plots, and the examples on the PLPlot site don't even use anti aliasing!
Check out the commercial competition [sigmaplot.com].
Mathematica generates pretty plots too, and some amazing mathematical graphics [wolfram.com].
Hell, even a recent Gnuplot seem to do a better job [sourceforge.net] at plotting.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28226303</id>
	<title>Re:SigmaPlot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244232540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>3D plots are definitely a big one.  You may not find them useful, but many many people in the scientific community do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>3D plots are definitely a big one .
You may not find them useful , but many many people in the scientific community do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>3D plots are definitely a big one.
You may not find them useful, but many many people in the scientific community do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28223389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217937</id>
	<title>R!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>R, lattice, ggplot!  Oh mY!</p><p>www.r-project.org !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>R , lattice , ggplot !
Oh mY ! www.r-project.org !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>R, lattice, ggplot!
Oh mY!www.r-project.org !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983</id>
	<title>Commit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What on earth is a commit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What on earth is a commit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What on earth is a commit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28223389</id>
	<title>Re:SigmaPlot</title>
	<author>xiox</author>
	<datestamp>1244220420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What sort of plotting do you do? Can you give me some idea of what the most useful plots missing from <a href="http://home.gna.org/veusz/" title="gna.org">Veusz</a> [gna.org] are? I know it doesn't do 3D plots, but I don't find them generally useful (except for volume renderings, etc.).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What sort of plotting do you do ?
Can you give me some idea of what the most useful plots missing from Veusz [ gna.org ] are ?
I know it does n't do 3D plots , but I do n't find them generally useful ( except for volume renderings , etc .
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What sort of plotting do you do?
Can you give me some idea of what the most useful plots missing from Veusz [gna.org] are?
I know it doesn't do 3D plots, but I don't find them generally useful (except for volume renderings, etc.
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28221925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219279</id>
	<title>Re:vs. GNUPlot</title>
	<author>EsbenMoseHansen</author>
	<datestamp>1244233500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In what way is this better than GNUPlot?</p></div><p>Well, it has a decent license, for one thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In what way is this better than GNUPlot ? Well , it has a decent license , for one thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what way is this better than GNUPlot?Well, it has a decent license, for one thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219067</id>
	<title>Re:BRL-CAD, Emacs, and GCC for some perspective</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244144100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The KDE project is approaching commit 1 million<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) I wonder if they will get there before converting to git, though,.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The KDE project is approaching commit 1 million : ) I wonder if they will get there before converting to git , though, .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The KDE project is approaching commit 1 million :) I wonder if they will get there before converting to git, though,.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218031</id>
	<title>Re:Commit?</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1244131980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a <a href="http://plplot.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/plplot/trunk/" title="sourceforge.net">list</a> [sourceforge.net] of examples..<br> <br>
Quite a good record too. I went looking for howlers to link to but they seem to be doing a good professional job of tracking changes to their code.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a list [ sourceforge.net ] of examples. . Quite a good record too .
I went looking for howlers to link to but they seem to be doing a good professional job of tracking changes to their code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a list [sourceforge.net] of examples.. 
Quite a good record too.
I went looking for howlers to link to but they seem to be doing a good professional job of tracking changes to their code.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557</id>
	<title>vs. GNUPlot</title>
	<author>chriso11</author>
	<datestamp>1244137380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In what way is this better than GNUPlot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In what way is this better than GNUPlot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what way is this better than GNUPlot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217979</id>
	<title>Mazel Tov!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm <b>plotzing</b>!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm plotzing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm plotzing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218157</id>
	<title>Re:Commit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244133600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What on earth is a commit?</p></div><p>Turn in your geek card.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What on earth is a commit ? Turn in your geek card .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What on earth is a commit?Turn in your geek card.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219741</id>
	<title>xmgrace</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244197080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/" title="weizmann.ac.il" rel="nofollow">Grace</a> [weizmann.ac.il] is the robust industry-quality tool for making publication ready graphs with quite extensive data analysis capabilities. The best of all mentioned here, if you don't need 3-D.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Grace [ weizmann.ac.il ] is the robust industry-quality tool for making publication ready graphs with quite extensive data analysis capabilities .
The best of all mentioned here , if you do n't need 3-D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grace [weizmann.ac.il] is the robust industry-quality tool for making publication ready graphs with quite extensive data analysis capabilities.
The best of all mentioned here, if you don't need 3-D.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28234615</id>
	<title>Re:More commits needed to sort the aethetics</title>
	<author>NaturalJow</author>
	<datestamp>1244314620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you look carefully at the plots on the website, e.g.:

<a href="http://plplot.sourceforge.net/examples-data/demo08/x08.03.png" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://plplot.sourceforge.net/examples-data/demo08/x08.03.png</a> [sourceforge.net]

you'll see that the plots are indeed antialiased. For the website plots a driver based on the cairo library is used.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you look carefully at the plots on the website , e.g .
: http : //plplot.sourceforge.net/examples-data/demo08/x08.03.png [ sourceforge.net ] you 'll see that the plots are indeed antialiased .
For the website plots a driver based on the cairo library is used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you look carefully at the plots on the website, e.g.
:

http://plplot.sourceforge.net/examples-data/demo08/x08.03.png [sourceforge.net]

you'll see that the plots are indeed antialiased.
For the website plots a driver based on the cairo library is used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28220465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28230537</id>
	<title>Re:SigmaPlot</title>
	<author>Nubicles</author>
	<datestamp>1244229300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm personally fond of gnuplot.  The output is quite nice if you use a vector drawing backend like eps or svg (much better than the PNG demos on the homepage would suggest), and integration with latex via the epslatex terminal is perfect for my needs.  Matplotlib output is almost as good (and getting better all the time) and is arguably easier to use, especially for those familiar with Matlab.  The most popular open source plotting packages among my colleagues seem to be gnuplot and xmgrace.<br><br>I downloaded and tried the SigmaPlot demo a few years ago.  The output was indeed quite nice, but I did not enjoy using a GUI for plotting.  My workflow often involves generating some data, plotting it, tweaking something, repeat.  It's much more convenient for me to write a plotting script once than have to repeatedly import data and set up a plot.  I admit that the CLI of gnuplot isn't as accessible as the SigmaPlot GUI, but once you're past the initial learning curve the CLI is probably faster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm personally fond of gnuplot .
The output is quite nice if you use a vector drawing backend like eps or svg ( much better than the PNG demos on the homepage would suggest ) , and integration with latex via the epslatex terminal is perfect for my needs .
Matplotlib output is almost as good ( and getting better all the time ) and is arguably easier to use , especially for those familiar with Matlab .
The most popular open source plotting packages among my colleagues seem to be gnuplot and xmgrace.I downloaded and tried the SigmaPlot demo a few years ago .
The output was indeed quite nice , but I did not enjoy using a GUI for plotting .
My workflow often involves generating some data , plotting it , tweaking something , repeat .
It 's much more convenient for me to write a plotting script once than have to repeatedly import data and set up a plot .
I admit that the CLI of gnuplot is n't as accessible as the SigmaPlot GUI , but once you 're past the initial learning curve the CLI is probably faster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm personally fond of gnuplot.
The output is quite nice if you use a vector drawing backend like eps or svg (much better than the PNG demos on the homepage would suggest), and integration with latex via the epslatex terminal is perfect for my needs.
Matplotlib output is almost as good (and getting better all the time) and is arguably easier to use, especially for those familiar with Matlab.
The most popular open source plotting packages among my colleagues seem to be gnuplot and xmgrace.I downloaded and tried the SigmaPlot demo a few years ago.
The output was indeed quite nice, but I did not enjoy using a GUI for plotting.
My workflow often involves generating some data, plotting it, tweaking something, repeat.
It's much more convenient for me to write a plotting script once than have to repeatedly import data and set up a plot.
I admit that the CLI of gnuplot isn't as accessible as the SigmaPlot GUI, but once you're past the initial learning curve the CLI is probably faster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28221925</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219927</id>
	<title>Re:Unfortunately</title>
	<author>16384</author>
	<datestamp>1244199900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at this library's example plots:
<a href="http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/gallery.html" title="sourceforge.net">http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/gallery.html</a> [sourceforge.net]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at this library 's example plots : http : //matplotlib.sourceforge.net/gallery.html [ sourceforge.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at this library's example plots:
http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/gallery.html [sourceforge.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218405</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218129</id>
	<title>Still not done?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244133120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What?!</p><p>17 years and it's still not done?</p><p>Slackers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
! 17 years and it 's still not done ? Slackers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
!17 years and it's still not done?Slackers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28227435</id>
	<title>Re:BRL-CAD, Emacs, and GCC for some perspective</title>
	<author>kelnos</author>
	<datestamp>1244195400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Er, I don't quite understand why 10,000 is such a big deal.  <a href="http://svn.xfce.org/svn/xfce/" title="xfce.org">Xfce is at 29,994</a> [xfce.org], and that's just for version 4, which was started around... 2001 or 2002 or so?  Version 3 adds <a href="http://svn.xfce.org/svn/xfce3/" title="xfce.org">another 1181 commits</a> [xfce.org] to that, and I'm sure v2 and v1 would add a bit more if their history was still around.<br>
<br>
I'm not saying this to brag (hell, KDE has over 125k, and I'm sure GNOME is comparable to that); I doubt it'll be a big deal when Xfce hits 30k commits, even.  I'm just wondering why PLplot (arguably something of an obscure project) gets a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article for what seems to be not much of a milestone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Er , I do n't quite understand why 10,000 is such a big deal .
Xfce is at 29,994 [ xfce.org ] , and that 's just for version 4 , which was started around... 2001 or 2002 or so ?
Version 3 adds another 1181 commits [ xfce.org ] to that , and I 'm sure v2 and v1 would add a bit more if their history was still around .
I 'm not saying this to brag ( hell , KDE has over 125k , and I 'm sure GNOME is comparable to that ) ; I doubt it 'll be a big deal when Xfce hits 30k commits , even .
I 'm just wondering why PLplot ( arguably something of an obscure project ) gets a / .
article for what seems to be not much of a milestone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Er, I don't quite understand why 10,000 is such a big deal.
Xfce is at 29,994 [xfce.org], and that's just for version 4, which was started around... 2001 or 2002 or so?
Version 3 adds another 1181 commits [xfce.org] to that, and I'm sure v2 and v1 would add a bit more if their history was still around.
I'm not saying this to brag (hell, KDE has over 125k, and I'm sure GNOME is comparable to that); I doubt it'll be a big deal when Xfce hits 30k commits, even.
I'm just wondering why PLplot (arguably something of an obscure project) gets a /.
article for what seems to be not much of a milestone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28220495</id>
	<title>Re:vs. GNUPlot</title>
	<author>ciderVisor</author>
	<datestamp>1244206260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In what way is this better than GNUPlot?</p></div><p>It has what graphs crave. It has electrolytes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In what way is this better than GNUPlot ? It has what graphs crave .
It has electrolytes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what way is this better than GNUPlot?It has what graphs crave.
It has electrolytes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218281</id>
	<title>BRL-CAD, Emacs, and GCC for some perspective</title>
	<author>morrison</author>
	<datestamp>1244134740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://brlcad.org/" title="brlcad.org">BRL-CAD</a> [brlcad.org] is about to cross <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/brlcad/commits" title="ohloh.net">35,000 commits</a> [ohloh.net].  Emacs has more than <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/emacs/commits" title="ohloh.net">85,000</a> [ohloh.net].  GCC has about 12,000 unique over <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/gcc/commits" title="ohloh.net">150,000 commits</a> [ohloh.net].</p><p>That rounds out the <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/blog/worlds\_oldest\_source\_code\_repositories" title="ohloh.net">three oldest continuously developed repositories</a> [ohloh.net] with preserved revision history.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BRL-CAD [ brlcad.org ] is about to cross 35,000 commits [ ohloh.net ] .
Emacs has more than 85,000 [ ohloh.net ] .
GCC has about 12,000 unique over 150,000 commits [ ohloh.net ] .That rounds out the three oldest continuously developed repositories [ ohloh.net ] with preserved revision history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> BRL-CAD [brlcad.org] is about to cross 35,000 commits [ohloh.net].
Emacs has more than 85,000 [ohloh.net].
GCC has about 12,000 unique over 150,000 commits [ohloh.net].That rounds out the three oldest continuously developed repositories [ohloh.net] with preserved revision history.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219055</id>
	<title>GraphViz!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244143980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GraphViz WTF!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GraphViz WTF !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GraphViz WTF!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219205</id>
	<title>This is news?  Call it idle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244232420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10k commits - who cares?  1992 is a bit more impressive, but still, who cares?  How about a comparison with other projects?  What is this US Today?  "What we're committing today"   Feh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10k commits - who cares ?
1992 is a bit more impressive , but still , who cares ?
How about a comparison with other projects ?
What is this US Today ?
" What we 're committing today " Feh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10k commits - who cares?
1992 is a bit more impressive, but still, who cares?
How about a comparison with other projects?
What is this US Today?
"What we're committing today"   Feh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218847</id>
	<title>Re:How does it compare to R?</title>
	<author>digitalchinky</author>
	<datestamp>1244141400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did I miss a memo or something? What is it with websites and the need to show a whole bunch of links in different font sizes? Are they trying to be like wordpress?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did I miss a memo or something ?
What is it with websites and the need to show a whole bunch of links in different font sizes ?
Are they trying to be like wordpress ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did I miss a memo or something?
What is it with websites and the need to show a whole bunch of links in different font sizes?
Are they trying to be like wordpress?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218435</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28229591</id>
	<title>Re:SigmaPlot</title>
	<author>solanum</author>
	<datestamp>1244215140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll check out Veusz (I hadn't come across it before), from the screenshots it looks like it does most of the plot types I use. The main things for me are to be able to put multiple plots on the same axis, not always the same type (ie line over bar etc), multiple y axes, and the ability to manipulate individual elements easily (e.g. change the colour/style of a single bar/line in a multiple bar/line graph, alter font/font size).  That sort of thing.  I use stats software to do stats, so I don't care about that, but curve fitting (to the data) is essential.  I also need to be able to add elements (e.g. text box), to a figure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll check out Veusz ( I had n't come across it before ) , from the screenshots it looks like it does most of the plot types I use .
The main things for me are to be able to put multiple plots on the same axis , not always the same type ( ie line over bar etc ) , multiple y axes , and the ability to manipulate individual elements easily ( e.g .
change the colour/style of a single bar/line in a multiple bar/line graph , alter font/font size ) .
That sort of thing .
I use stats software to do stats , so I do n't care about that , but curve fitting ( to the data ) is essential .
I also need to be able to add elements ( e.g .
text box ) , to a figure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll check out Veusz (I hadn't come across it before), from the screenshots it looks like it does most of the plot types I use.
The main things for me are to be able to put multiple plots on the same axis, not always the same type (ie line over bar etc), multiple y axes, and the ability to manipulate individual elements easily (e.g.
change the colour/style of a single bar/line in a multiple bar/line graph, alter font/font size).
That sort of thing.
I use stats software to do stats, so I don't care about that, but curve fitting (to the data) is essential.
I also need to be able to add elements (e.g.
text box), to a figure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28223389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217965</id>
	<title>10000th!@#</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>congrads to everyone who develops PLplot</htmltext>
<tokenext>congrads to everyone who develops PLplot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>congrads to everyone who develops PLplot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219537</id>
	<title>Huh? Veusz</title>
	<author>xiox</author>
	<datestamp>1244193900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://home.gna.org/veusz/" title="gna.org">Veusz</a> [gna.org], my scientific plotting package, is up to revision 1009, and I'm virtually the single author and a volunteer. It has been in development since 2003. The output, IMHO, looks quite a bit nicer than PLPlot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Veusz [ gna.org ] , my scientific plotting package , is up to revision 1009 , and I 'm virtually the single author and a volunteer .
It has been in development since 2003 .
The output , IMHO , looks quite a bit nicer than PLPlot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Veusz [gna.org], my scientific plotting package, is up to revision 1009, and I'm virtually the single author and a volunteer.
It has been in development since 2003.
The output, IMHO, looks quite a bit nicer than PLPlot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219559</id>
	<title>Linux average ~3500/month.</title>
	<author>Karellen</author>
	<datestamp>1244194080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And given that releases are roughly every 3 months, it exceeds 10,000 commits per minor release.</p><p><a href="http://mirror.celinuxforum.org/gitstat/index.php" title="celinuxforum.org">Source</a> [celinuxforum.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And given that releases are roughly every 3 months , it exceeds 10,000 commits per minor release.Source [ celinuxforum.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And given that releases are roughly every 3 months, it exceeds 10,000 commits per minor release.Source [celinuxforum.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218403</id>
	<title>Re:Commit?</title>
	<author>R.Mo\_Robert</author>
	<datestamp>1244136060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A better question is: what on earth is PLplot?!</p><p>...or maybe I'm the only person on Slashdot who had no idea what this software was before finding this article on the home page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A better question is : what on earth is PLplot ?
! ...or maybe I 'm the only person on Slashdot who had no idea what this software was before finding this article on the home page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better question is: what on earth is PLplot?
!...or maybe I'm the only person on Slashdot who had no idea what this software was before finding this article on the home page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218125</id>
	<title>More commits needed to sort the aethetics</title>
	<author>SplashMyBandit</author>
	<datestamp>1244133120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well done to the PLplot team.<p>
The example graphs don't look so pleasant though. The (default?) colour scheme is excellent for a semi-lit astronomical dome (doesn't ruin your night vision) but I put those in front a business board without a fair bit of work on the aesthetics - wouldn't want the company directors to start throwing chairs, would ya?.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well done to the PLplot team .
The example graphs do n't look so pleasant though .
The ( default ?
) colour scheme is excellent for a semi-lit astronomical dome ( does n't ruin your night vision ) but I put those in front a business board without a fair bit of work on the aesthetics - would n't want the company directors to start throwing chairs , would ya ? .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well done to the PLplot team.
The example graphs don't look so pleasant though.
The (default?
) colour scheme is excellent for a semi-lit astronomical dome (doesn't ruin your night vision) but I put those in front a business board without a fair bit of work on the aesthetics - wouldn't want the company directors to start throwing chairs, would ya?.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218435</id>
	<title>How does it compare to R?</title>
	<author>gringer</author>
	<datestamp>1244136240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, reminds me a bit of <a href="http://www.r-project.org/" title="r-project.org">R</a> [r-project.org], the plotting part of it, at least. There are a few examples of the kind of plotting you can achieve in R <a href="http://addictedtor.free.fr/graphiques/" title="addictedtor.free.fr">here</a> [addictedtor.free.fr].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , reminds me a bit of R [ r-project.org ] , the plotting part of it , at least .
There are a few examples of the kind of plotting you can achieve in R here [ addictedtor.free.fr ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, reminds me a bit of R [r-project.org], the plotting part of it, at least.
There are a few examples of the kind of plotting you can achieve in R here [addictedtor.free.fr].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28222015</id>
	<title>Re:BRL-CAD, Emacs, and GCC for some perspective</title>
	<author>morrison</author>
	<datestamp>1244215080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The numbers referred to for the other projects are 'unique' trunk/mainline commits only.  Per that same measure, KDE sits at a little over <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/p/kde/commits" title="ohloh.net">125,000</a> [ohloh.net] commits.  Raw commits to all branches is vastly different for everyone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The numbers referred to for the other projects are 'unique ' trunk/mainline commits only .
Per that same measure , KDE sits at a little over 125,000 [ ohloh.net ] commits .
Raw commits to all branches is vastly different for everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The numbers referred to for the other projects are 'unique' trunk/mainline commits only.
Per that same measure, KDE sits at a little over 125,000 [ohloh.net] commits.
Raw commits to all branches is vastly different for everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219067</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218435
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28230537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28221925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28234615
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28220465
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28220495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218157
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28226303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28223389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28221925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28222015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28222037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218031
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218403
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28227435
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28229591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28223389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28221925
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219927
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218405
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_05_0231200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28227537
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219067
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28227435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219067
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28222015
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28227537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28221925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28223389
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28229591
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28226303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28230537
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217965
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219055
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28217983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218403
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218157
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218405
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28222037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219927
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218557
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28219279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28220495
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28220465
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28234615
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_05_0231200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218435
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_05_0231200.28218847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
