<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_04_1628231</id>
	<title>First Zero-Gravity Wedding Planned</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1244132100000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.flickr.com/trenchcoatjedi" rel="nofollow">Trenchcoatjedi</a> writes <i>"A couple from Brooklyn, NY are planning the <a href="http://www.zerogravitywedding.com/">first wedding in zero gravity</a>. The wedding will take place June 20th aboard a parabolic flight operated by <a href="http://gozerog.com/">Zero G Corp</a> and will be officiated by Richard Garriott of <em>Ultima</em> fame. The dress is designed by a Japanese haute couture designer and is specifically intended to be worn in zero gravity. Even the wedding rings will be made from meteorite."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trenchcoatjedi writes " A couple from Brooklyn , NY are planning the first wedding in zero gravity .
The wedding will take place June 20th aboard a parabolic flight operated by Zero G Corp and will be officiated by Richard Garriott of Ultima fame .
The dress is designed by a Japanese haute couture designer and is specifically intended to be worn in zero gravity .
Even the wedding rings will be made from meteorite .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trenchcoatjedi writes "A couple from Brooklyn, NY are planning the first wedding in zero gravity.
The wedding will take place June 20th aboard a parabolic flight operated by Zero G Corp and will be officiated by Richard Garriott of Ultima fame.
The dress is designed by a Japanese haute couture designer and is specifically intended to be worn in zero gravity.
Even the wedding rings will be made from meteorite.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225135</id>
	<title>Re:Not really</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1244227080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Want to free yourself entirely form the influence of gravity from distant objects that affects the shape of the spacetime you're in ? Sorry, buddy, try another universe.</p></div><p>Meh, I'll settle for a Lagrangian-point wedding.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Want to free yourself entirely form the influence of gravity from distant objects that affects the shape of the spacetime you 're in ?
Sorry , buddy , try another universe.Meh , I 'll settle for a Lagrangian-point wedding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want to free yourself entirely form the influence of gravity from distant objects that affects the shape of the spacetime you're in ?
Sorry, buddy, try another universe.Meh, I'll settle for a Lagrangian-point wedding.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218981</id>
	<title>Save money on the space wedding and meteorite ring</title>
	<author>nausea\_malvarma</author>
	<datestamp>1244142840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and just pay a viral-marketing team to personally give the middle finger to every poor person on earth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>and just pay a viral-marketing team to personally give the middle finger to every poor person on earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and just pay a viral-marketing team to personally give the middle finger to every poor person on earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219113</id>
	<title>Zero G dress?</title>
	<author>iamdrscience</author>
	<datestamp>1244144820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The dress is specifically intended to be worn in zero gravity? So what, it's like vomit colored and easily washable?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The dress is specifically intended to be worn in zero gravity ?
So what , it 's like vomit colored and easily washable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dress is specifically intended to be worn in zero gravity?
So what, it's like vomit colored and easily washable?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219567</id>
	<title>Good luck to them</title>
	<author>jabjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1244194200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you have the money to burn, and your both of the science/extreme-sport persuasion, this is a great thing to do. Added to that, they are the first. I say good luck to them, and I hope neither is sick.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have the money to burn , and your both of the science/extreme-sport persuasion , this is a great thing to do .
Added to that , they are the first .
I say good luck to them , and I hope neither is sick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have the money to burn, and your both of the science/extreme-sport persuasion, this is a great thing to do.
Added to that, they are the first.
I say good luck to them, and I hope neither is sick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28230127</id>
	<title>Zero G</title>
	<author>Zygamorph</author>
	<datestamp>1244222880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends on what you mean by Zero G. If you mean there is no ( or very little) gravity at your location then you are out of luck with all of this nonsense. If you mean free fall, I.E. you are accelerating at the same value as the local gravity field then the first part of sky diving before you reach terminal velocity would be pretty close as would a diving air plane, being in orbit and some roller coasters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on what you mean by Zero G. If you mean there is no ( or very little ) gravity at your location then you are out of luck with all of this nonsense .
If you mean free fall , I.E .
you are accelerating at the same value as the local gravity field then the first part of sky diving before you reach terminal velocity would be pretty close as would a diving air plane , being in orbit and some roller coasters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on what you mean by Zero G. If you mean there is no ( or very little) gravity at your location then you are out of luck with all of this nonsense.
If you mean free fall, I.E.
you are accelerating at the same value as the local gravity field then the first part of sky diving before you reach terminal velocity would be pretty close as would a diving air plane, being in orbit and some roller coasters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767</id>
	<title>You lack imagination.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244197800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Example: I doubt anyone's been married on waterskis before. Or while submerged and in Scuba gear. Or with a priest who has recently inhaled large quantities of helium.</p><p>For that matter, you lack imagination about other reasons one might not want to be married in a church -- one might be Jewish, or Muslim, or Wiccan, or Pagan, or Buddhist, or Taoist, or Hindu, or atheist, or anything in between. Even if one is Christian, it wouldn't <i>quite</i> be a traditional marriage if it was between homosexuals -- and that assumes your local church will do it. And even if you're Christian and straight, and have no desire to be original, you might want to save a little money and have a smaller wedding at home with friends, or outside if it's a nice day.</p><p>But even so, it'd be damned cool to be able to show your future kids and grandkids that your wedding is in the Guinness Book of World Records.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Example : I doubt anyone 's been married on waterskis before .
Or while submerged and in Scuba gear .
Or with a priest who has recently inhaled large quantities of helium.For that matter , you lack imagination about other reasons one might not want to be married in a church -- one might be Jewish , or Muslim , or Wiccan , or Pagan , or Buddhist , or Taoist , or Hindu , or atheist , or anything in between .
Even if one is Christian , it would n't quite be a traditional marriage if it was between homosexuals -- and that assumes your local church will do it .
And even if you 're Christian and straight , and have no desire to be original , you might want to save a little money and have a smaller wedding at home with friends , or outside if it 's a nice day.But even so , it 'd be damned cool to be able to show your future kids and grandkids that your wedding is in the Guinness Book of World Records .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Example: I doubt anyone's been married on waterskis before.
Or while submerged and in Scuba gear.
Or with a priest who has recently inhaled large quantities of helium.For that matter, you lack imagination about other reasons one might not want to be married in a church -- one might be Jewish, or Muslim, or Wiccan, or Pagan, or Buddhist, or Taoist, or Hindu, or atheist, or anything in between.
Even if one is Christian, it wouldn't quite be a traditional marriage if it was between homosexuals -- and that assumes your local church will do it.
And even if you're Christian and straight, and have no desire to be original, you might want to save a little money and have a smaller wedding at home with friends, or outside if it's a nice day.But even so, it'd be damned cool to be able to show your future kids and grandkids that your wedding is in the Guinness Book of World Records.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218481</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218399</id>
	<title>Like the old saying goes</title>
	<author>seifried</author>
	<datestamp>1244136060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Money can't buy good taste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Money ca n't buy good taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Money can't buy good taste.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221817</id>
	<title>I now pronounce you...blllleeeecccchhhhhh!!!!!</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1244214060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope they understand that the first instinct in zero Gs is to hurl!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they understand that the first instinct in zero Gs is to hurl !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they understand that the first instinct in zero Gs is to hurl!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28226767</id>
	<title>Re:News Duck</title>
	<author>Nyeerrmm</author>
	<datestamp>1244235060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh? I'm pretty sure thats the definition of Zero-G.  If you're going to try and be pedantic, complain about it not being called microgravity... all the objects in free fall have a mutual gravitational attraction to each other, so you do end up with micro-g (~g*1e-6) levels of gravity, thus making Zero-G a misnomer.</p><p>You'd be absolutely right if they were calling this the first space wedding.  But they're not.  The only difference between free-fall and microgravity is your reference frame.  That understanding was one of the main things that allowed Einstein to derive general relativity from its special relative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh ?
I 'm pretty sure thats the definition of Zero-G. If you 're going to try and be pedantic , complain about it not being called microgravity... all the objects in free fall have a mutual gravitational attraction to each other , so you do end up with micro-g ( ~ g * 1e-6 ) levels of gravity , thus making Zero-G a misnomer.You 'd be absolutely right if they were calling this the first space wedding .
But they 're not .
The only difference between free-fall and microgravity is your reference frame .
That understanding was one of the main things that allowed Einstein to derive general relativity from its special relative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh?
I'm pretty sure thats the definition of Zero-G.  If you're going to try and be pedantic, complain about it not being called microgravity... all the objects in free fall have a mutual gravitational attraction to each other, so you do end up with micro-g (~g*1e-6) levels of gravity, thus making Zero-G a misnomer.You'd be absolutely right if they were calling this the first space wedding.
But they're not.
The only difference between free-fall and microgravity is your reference frame.
That understanding was one of the main things that allowed Einstein to derive general relativity from its special relative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28223349</id>
	<title>underwater scuba-suit wedding - essentially zero-G</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244220240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I will bet that there have been several underwater scuba-suit weddings before. It is essentially a zero-G environment once you have neutral buoyancy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I will bet that there have been several underwater scuba-suit weddings before .
It is essentially a zero-G environment once you have neutral buoyancy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will bet that there have been several underwater scuba-suit weddings before.
It is essentially a zero-G environment once you have neutral buoyancy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465</id>
	<title>Not really</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Parabolic flights are simulated zero G. If I jump out of a plane in a cardboard box, then I, too have the illusion of zero G. In relation to my confining cardboard walls, I think I am floating. These flights are exactly the same principle. When they marry onboard a Virgin Galactic flight, then we can argue. Even then, they will be in micro gravity, not true "Zero G."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Parabolic flights are simulated zero G. If I jump out of a plane in a cardboard box , then I , too have the illusion of zero G. In relation to my confining cardboard walls , I think I am floating .
These flights are exactly the same principle .
When they marry onboard a Virgin Galactic flight , then we can argue .
Even then , they will be in micro gravity , not true " Zero G. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Parabolic flights are simulated zero G. If I jump out of a plane in a cardboard box, then I, too have the illusion of zero G. In relation to my confining cardboard walls, I think I am floating.
These flights are exactly the same principle.
When they marry onboard a Virgin Galactic flight, then we can argue.
Even then, they will be in micro gravity, not true "Zero G."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218895</id>
	<title>The fact that Lord British is officiating...</title>
	<author>majorgoodvibes</author>
	<datestamp>1244141940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...is what's funny to me.

Their marriage will only be legally recognized in Sosaria.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...is what 's funny to me .
Their marriage will only be legally recognized in Sosaria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is what's funny to me.
Their marriage will only be legally recognized in Sosaria.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218817</id>
	<title>What about honeymoon?</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1244140800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And sex!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And sex !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And sex!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219795</id>
	<title>Lets face it it won't be the 1st time</title>
	<author>Big Hairy Ian</author>
	<datestamp>1244198100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>someone vomits at a wedding</htmltext>
<tokenext>someone vomits at a wedding</tokentext>
<sentencetext>someone vomits at a wedding</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218471</id>
	<title>Obligatory vocabulary:</title>
	<author>orngjce223</author>
	<datestamp>1244136600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called microgravity, not zero gravity.  Someone needs to take their head out of the outdated books sections.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called microgravity , not zero gravity .
Someone needs to take their head out of the outdated books sections .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called microgravity, not zero gravity.
Someone needs to take their head out of the outdated books sections.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28222617</id>
	<title>Damn it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244217540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>With relatively few states accepting gay marriage (and none in NY, though they'll recognize them if the wedding was performed somewhere else where it is allowed), this just <i>has</i> to be the christians flipping us off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With relatively few states accepting gay marriage ( and none in NY , though they 'll recognize them if the wedding was performed somewhere else where it is allowed ) , this just has to be the christians flipping us off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With relatively few states accepting gay marriage (and none in NY, though they'll recognize them if the wedding was performed somewhere else where it is allowed), this just has to be the christians flipping us off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28228285</id>
	<title>Re:You lack imagination.</title>
	<author>genner</author>
	<datestamp>1244201220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Example: I doubt anyone's been married on waterskis before. Or while submerged and in Scuba gear. </p></div><p>Waterski wedding <br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwkJymK71g4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwkJymK71g4</a> [youtube.com] <br>
<br> <br>
Suba Wedding <br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-\_GFQ0JST0" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-\_GFQ0JST0</a> [youtube.com] <br>
<br> <br>

Everything else has probly been done too. Google for yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Example : I doubt anyone 's been married on waterskis before .
Or while submerged and in Scuba gear .
Waterski wedding http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = vwkJymK71g4 [ youtube.com ] Suba Wedding http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = W- \ _GFQ0JST0 [ youtube.com ] Everything else has probly been done too .
Google for yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Example: I doubt anyone's been married on waterskis before.
Or while submerged and in Scuba gear.
Waterski wedding 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwkJymK71g4 [youtube.com] 
 
Suba Wedding 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-\_GFQ0JST0 [youtube.com] 
 

Everything else has probly been done too.
Google for yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28223765</id>
	<title>Re:You lack imagination.</title>
	<author>edgr</author>
	<datestamp>1244221860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Example: I doubt anyone's been married on waterskis before. Or while submerged and in Scuba gear.</p></div><p>You could at least have come up with some better examples:
<a href="http://www.powder2glass.com/WendyandJon.htm" title="powder2glass.com" rel="nofollow">Wedding on waterskis</a> [powder2glass.com],
<a href="http://www.blisstree.com/ouroneheart/wedding-theme-idea-scuba-wedding/" title="blisstree.com" rel="nofollow">Underwater wedding</a> [blisstree.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Example : I doubt anyone 's been married on waterskis before .
Or while submerged and in Scuba gear.You could at least have come up with some better examples : Wedding on waterskis [ powder2glass.com ] , Underwater wedding [ blisstree.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Example: I doubt anyone's been married on waterskis before.
Or while submerged and in Scuba gear.You could at least have come up with some better examples:
Wedding on waterskis [powder2glass.com],
Underwater wedding [blisstree.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218485</id>
	<title>That can't end badly...</title>
	<author>XDirtypunkX</author>
	<datestamp>1244136660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alcohol and a whole bunch of people in a vomit comet. That can't end badly at all...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alcohol and a whole bunch of people in a vomit comet .
That ca n't end badly at all.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alcohol and a whole bunch of people in a vomit comet.
That can't end badly at all...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218583</id>
	<title>Re:Not really</title>
	<author>FooAtWFU</author>
	<datestamp>1244137620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Really what's the difference between orbit and a Vomit Comet - besides the fact that the latter is aimed so that it'll hit the ground sooner or or later, and the former isn't? From the relativistic point of view, there isn't really much - just different tracks through a curved region of spacetime. I mean, I suppose objects may be slightly more energetic in orbit and time will elapse at a slightly faster rate, but it's not that much. </p><p>
Really, we only experience the feeling of gravity when we try to stop it. (Like when the ground's in the way.) Want to free yourself entirely form the influence of gravity from distant objects that affects the shape of the spacetime you're in ? Sorry, buddy, try another universe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really what 's the difference between orbit and a Vomit Comet - besides the fact that the latter is aimed so that it 'll hit the ground sooner or or later , and the former is n't ?
From the relativistic point of view , there is n't really much - just different tracks through a curved region of spacetime .
I mean , I suppose objects may be slightly more energetic in orbit and time will elapse at a slightly faster rate , but it 's not that much .
Really , we only experience the feeling of gravity when we try to stop it .
( Like when the ground 's in the way .
) Want to free yourself entirely form the influence of gravity from distant objects that affects the shape of the spacetime you 're in ?
Sorry , buddy , try another universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Really what's the difference between orbit and a Vomit Comet - besides the fact that the latter is aimed so that it'll hit the ground sooner or or later, and the former isn't?
From the relativistic point of view, there isn't really much - just different tracks through a curved region of spacetime.
I mean, I suppose objects may be slightly more energetic in orbit and time will elapse at a slightly faster rate, but it's not that much.
Really, we only experience the feeling of gravity when we try to stop it.
(Like when the ground's in the way.
) Want to free yourself entirely form the influence of gravity from distant objects that affects the shape of the spacetime you're in ?
Sorry, buddy, try another universe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218539</id>
	<title>Re:Not really</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>heh, guy disses use of "zero-g" and counters with "micro-gravity"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. it's amazing how hard the words "in free fall" are to some people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>heh , guy disses use of " zero-g " and counters with " micro-gravity " .. it 's amazing how hard the words " in free fall " are to some people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>heh, guy disses use of "zero-g" and counters with "micro-gravity" .. it's amazing how hard the words "in free fall" are to some people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218529</id>
	<title>Goatse</title>
	<author>bigblacknigger</author>
	<datestamp>1244137200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want to hear or better yet see the first zero gravity <a href="http://goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">anal stretching.</a> [goatse.fr]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to hear or better yet see the first zero gravity anal stretching .
[ goatse.fr ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to hear or better yet see the first zero gravity anal stretching.
[goatse.fr]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218871</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory vocabulary:</title>
	<author>artor3</author>
	<datestamp>1244141700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those are synonyms.  They're just cool ways of saying "gravity is still there, but you're falling, so you don't notice."</p><p>And before you bring it up - orbit is the same thing, only you miss the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those are synonyms .
They 're just cool ways of saying " gravity is still there , but you 're falling , so you do n't notice .
" And before you bring it up - orbit is the same thing , only you miss the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those are synonyms.
They're just cool ways of saying "gravity is still there, but you're falling, so you don't notice.
"And before you bring it up - orbit is the same thing, only you miss the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218471</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363</id>
	<title>BORING!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to hear or better yet see the first zero gravity honeymoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to hear or better yet see the first zero gravity honeymoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to hear or better yet see the first zero gravity honeymoon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218609</id>
	<title>Screw Zero-G wedding. Am looking for...</title>
	<author>freedom\_india</author>
	<datestamp>1244138040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... a leaked homemade video of something <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/" title="imdb.com">like this</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... a leaked homemade video of something like this [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a leaked homemade video of something like this [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220581</id>
	<title>Re:You lack imagination.</title>
	<author>will\_die</author>
	<datestamp>1244206980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>SCUBA is common, here is a company that does them and will provide SCUBA training <a href="http://www.pensacoladivecompany.com/weddiing.html" title="pensacoladivecompany.com">http://www.pensacoladivecompany.com/weddiing.html</a> [pensacoladivecompany.com] <br>
<a href="http://www.canadianrockies.net/weddings/weddings-in-canmore-and-banff-alberta-mixing-marriage-and-pleasure-in-the-canadian-rockies.html" title="canadianrockies.net">http://www.canadianrockies.net/weddings/weddings-in-canmore-and-banff-alberta-mixing-marriage-and-pleasure-in-the-canadian-rockies.html</a> [canadianrockies.net] does skis, also white water rafting boat, along with other.<br>
I give up and will give you the helium sucking priest.  You are the second search result for this on Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>SCUBA is common , here is a company that does them and will provide SCUBA training http : //www.pensacoladivecompany.com/weddiing.html [ pensacoladivecompany.com ] http : //www.canadianrockies.net/weddings/weddings-in-canmore-and-banff-alberta-mixing-marriage-and-pleasure-in-the-canadian-rockies.html [ canadianrockies.net ] does skis , also white water rafting boat , along with other .
I give up and will give you the helium sucking priest .
You are the second search result for this on Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SCUBA is common, here is a company that does them and will provide SCUBA training http://www.pensacoladivecompany.com/weddiing.html [pensacoladivecompany.com] 
http://www.canadianrockies.net/weddings/weddings-in-canmore-and-banff-alberta-mixing-marriage-and-pleasure-in-the-canadian-rockies.html [canadianrockies.net] does skis, also white water rafting boat, along with other.
I give up and will give you the helium sucking priest.
You are the second search result for this on Google.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218911</id>
	<title>Re:Meteorite rings?</title>
	<author>Shooter6947</author>
	<datestamp>1244142180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dunno anything about these folks' rings, but I got my wife <a href="http://barnesos.net/wedding/ring.shtml" title="barnesos.net">an engagement ring with Martian basalt</a> [barnesos.net] in it.  Thankfully she is also a nerd, and in fact studies the Moon and Mars for her research.  Otherwise I don't recommend this tactic, as it's likely to get you slapped rather than engaged . . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dunno anything about these folks ' rings , but I got my wife an engagement ring with Martian basalt [ barnesos.net ] in it .
Thankfully she is also a nerd , and in fact studies the Moon and Mars for her research .
Otherwise I do n't recommend this tactic , as it 's likely to get you slapped rather than engaged .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dunno anything about these folks' rings, but I got my wife an engagement ring with Martian basalt [barnesos.net] in it.
Thankfully she is also a nerd, and in fact studies the Moon and Mars for her research.
Otherwise I don't recommend this tactic, as it's likely to get you slapped rather than engaged .
. .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218493</id>
	<title>Don't skydiving weddings count?</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1244136780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There have been skydiving weddings for a long while now.  Aren't they Zero-G?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There have been skydiving weddings for a long while now .
Are n't they Zero-G ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There have been skydiving weddings for a long while now.
Aren't they Zero-G?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225077</id>
	<title>What about the honeymoon?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244226780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wedding?  That is boring.  Now the honeymoon would be interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wedding ?
That is boring .
Now the honeymoon would be interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wedding?
That is boring.
Now the honeymoon would be interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221407</id>
	<title>Cool, two stories on /. Married by Garriot</title>
	<author>Gr0kThis</author>
	<datestamp>1244212260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I was reading this because I would love to go up in the "Vomit Comet" and found that Richard Garriot actually owns a lunar lander and rover the Russians sold to him.  The story about preserving moon landings references the Russian lunar missions.</p><p>So based on international treaty no government can lay claim to anything on the moon nor the moon itself as property.  But Garriot is the first private person, that I know of, to have property on the moon and actually has the first step in claiming his own lunar plot.</p><p>Thats synergy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I was reading this because I would love to go up in the " Vomit Comet " and found that Richard Garriot actually owns a lunar lander and rover the Russians sold to him .
The story about preserving moon landings references the Russian lunar missions.So based on international treaty no government can lay claim to anything on the moon nor the moon itself as property .
But Garriot is the first private person , that I know of , to have property on the moon and actually has the first step in claiming his own lunar plot.Thats synergy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I was reading this because I would love to go up in the "Vomit Comet" and found that Richard Garriot actually owns a lunar lander and rover the Russians sold to him.
The story about preserving moon landings references the Russian lunar missions.So based on international treaty no government can lay claim to anything on the moon nor the moon itself as property.
But Garriot is the first private person, that I know of, to have property on the moon and actually has the first step in claiming his own lunar plot.Thats synergy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28231625</id>
	<title>Re:BORING!</title>
	<author>mrmeval</author>
	<datestamp>1244290260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They'll have to use the three Dolphins technique.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll have to use the three Dolphins technique .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll have to use the three Dolphins technique.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225199</id>
	<title>Re:BORING!</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1244227380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately they may discover that their mutual attraction is purely gravitational.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately they may discover that their mutual attraction is purely gravitational .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately they may discover that their mutual attraction is purely gravitational.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218721</id>
	<title>don't forget, they're from New York City</title>
	<author>SethJohnson</author>
	<datestamp>1244139420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's still probably <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/06/20/wedding.budget/index.html" title="cnn.com">cheaper</a> [cnn.com] than having their ceremony in New York.<br> <br>Seth</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's still probably cheaper [ cnn.com ] than having their ceremony in New York .
Seth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's still probably cheaper [cnn.com] than having their ceremony in New York.
Seth</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218589</id>
	<title>Re:Don't skydiving weddings count?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"There have been skydiving weddings for a long while now. Aren't they Zero-G?"</i></p><p>Not really. In fact, most would say that gravity is a fairly fundamental part of the whole skydiving experience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There have been skydiving weddings for a long while now .
Are n't they Zero-G ?
" Not really .
In fact , most would say that gravity is a fairly fundamental part of the whole skydiving experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There have been skydiving weddings for a long while now.
Aren't they Zero-G?
"Not really.
In fact, most would say that gravity is a fairly fundamental part of the whole skydiving experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218493</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220701</id>
	<title>Re:No time to change your mind</title>
	<author>jeffmeden</author>
	<datestamp>1244208000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No time to change your mind<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...since it will all be over in 30 seconds.</p></div><p>Thats...  What she said?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No time to change your mind ...since it will all be over in 30 seconds.Thats... What she said ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No time to change your mind ...since it will all be over in 30 seconds.Thats...  What she said?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218365</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28223359</id>
	<title>Zero-G dress?</title>
	<author>theoriginalturtle</author>
	<datestamp>1244220300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the hell fun is THAT?  I mean, this is the best thing since Girls On Trampolines, and they design a dress to defeat the most intriguing part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the hell fun is THAT ?
I mean , this is the best thing since Girls On Trampolines , and they design a dress to defeat the most intriguing part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the hell fun is THAT?
I mean, this is the best thing since Girls On Trampolines, and they design a dress to defeat the most intriguing part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218481</id>
	<title>everythings been done now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will be a while before we get the first wedding in orbit. <br>
For now every idea has been done. <br>
You can all stop being original and go get married in a church.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be a while before we get the first wedding in orbit .
For now every idea has been done .
You can all stop being original and go get married in a church .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be a while before we get the first wedding in orbit.
For now every idea has been done.
You can all stop being original and go get married in a church.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219871</id>
	<title>Re:Like the old saying goes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244199300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was "If you have money, you don't need taste."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was " If you have money , you do n't need taste .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was "If you have money, you don't need taste.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220257</id>
	<title>Re:Meteorite rings?</title>
	<author>Mad\_Rain</author>
	<datestamp>1244203800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Meteorite rings are fine for some nerdy couples.  For those people who like to be more hands-on and build stuff ourselves (like my wife and I), we made our own rings (with a little help from an instructor).  <br> <br>

<a href="http://www.newyorkweddingring.com/" title="newyorkweddingring.com">http://www.newyorkweddingring.com/</a> [newyorkweddingring.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meteorite rings are fine for some nerdy couples .
For those people who like to be more hands-on and build stuff ourselves ( like my wife and I ) , we made our own rings ( with a little help from an instructor ) .
http : //www.newyorkweddingring.com/ [ newyorkweddingring.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meteorite rings are fine for some nerdy couples.
For those people who like to be more hands-on and build stuff ourselves (like my wife and I), we made our own rings (with a little help from an instructor).
http://www.newyorkweddingring.com/ [newyorkweddingring.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218427</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218623</id>
	<title>Go OCTOMOM 2!!!</title>
	<author>zazenation</author>
	<datestamp>1244138280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now they only need 8 kids through IVF and they can have their own TV show!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now they only need 8 kids through IVF and they can have their own TV show !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now they only need 8 kids through IVF and they can have their own TV show!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220391</id>
	<title>the sh.. we burn our fossils for...</title>
	<author>bostei2008</author>
	<datestamp>1244205420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sometimes I am afraid we burn away our ability to bootstrap our civilization to space.</p><p>But then, maybe space tourism fuels public interest in space exploration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes I am afraid we burn away our ability to bootstrap our civilization to space.But then , maybe space tourism fuels public interest in space exploration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes I am afraid we burn away our ability to bootstrap our civilization to space.But then, maybe space tourism fuels public interest in space exploration.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218613</id>
	<title>Re:Not really</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244138040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn, I love it when computer engineers think they're engineers.</p><p>rj</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , I love it when computer engineers think they 're engineers.rj</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, I love it when computer engineers think they're engineers.rj</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218759</id>
	<title>Awwwww...</title>
	<author>Draconi</author>
	<datestamp>1244139960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just don't try to eat the complementary M&amp;Ms at +1.8gees, guys. A lesson learned the hard way!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just do n't try to eat the complementary M&amp;Ms at + 1.8gees , guys .
A lesson learned the hard way !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just don't try to eat the complementary M&amp;Ms at +1.8gees, guys.
A lesson learned the hard way!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218427</id>
	<title>Meteorite rings?</title>
	<author>penguin\_punk</author>
	<datestamp>1244136180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm more interested in the rings.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm more interested in the rings .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm more interested in the rings.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218395</id>
	<title>Seriously</title>
	<author>DrugCheese</author>
	<datestamp>1244136000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope some one out there is in the industry and can hook up with Zero G Corp and bring us all Zero G tits.</p><p>I think it would seriously sell.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope some one out there is in the industry and can hook up with Zero G Corp and bring us all Zero G tits.I think it would seriously sell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope some one out there is in the industry and can hook up with Zero G Corp and bring us all Zero G tits.I think it would seriously sell.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218577</id>
	<title>Re:No time to change your mind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like the sex</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like the sex</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like the sex</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218365</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28227631</id>
	<title>And what about the proposal?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244196840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did he propose to her by writing "Will You Marry Me?" on the moon with a giant ray gun? Or maybe it was something from this <a href="http://willyoumarrymekc.com/geeky-proposals/" title="willyoumarrymekc.com" rel="nofollow">list of geeky proposals</a> [willyoumarrymekc.com]?</p><p>Of all the geeky marriage ideas, it seems the more money you put towards them the better your chances of attracting attention</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did he propose to her by writing " Will You Marry Me ?
" on the moon with a giant ray gun ?
Or maybe it was something from this list of geeky proposals [ willyoumarrymekc.com ] ? Of all the geeky marriage ideas , it seems the more money you put towards them the better your chances of attracting attention</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did he propose to her by writing "Will You Marry Me?
" on the moon with a giant ray gun?
Or maybe it was something from this list of geeky proposals [willyoumarrymekc.com]?Of all the geeky marriage ideas, it seems the more money you put towards them the better your chances of attracting attention</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218929</id>
	<title>News Duck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244142300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Free fall without air resistance != Zero Gravity, stop abusing scientific terms to get media attention. It's exactly like having "the first wedding on mars", that's really just a wedding in the nasa mars simulation robot test lot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Free fall without air resistance ! = Zero Gravity , stop abusing scientific terms to get media attention .
It 's exactly like having " the first wedding on mars " , that 's really just a wedding in the nasa mars simulation robot test lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free fall without air resistance != Zero Gravity, stop abusing scientific terms to get media attention.
It's exactly like having "the first wedding on mars", that's really just a wedding in the nasa mars simulation robot test lot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225581</id>
	<title>Re:Don't skydiving weddings count?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244229120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The things that differentiate this wedding from one done while skydiving are that they're doing it inside a vehicle, so they don't have the rush of air past them drowning out voices, and that they don't have to get it all done in one take -- the plane will be going back up and making several parabolic arcs. In both cases, they're falling freely in a ballistic trajectory; it is only that the aircraft they are in is following the same trajectory that makes it <b>look</b> as if they're floating in the cabin. You could get the same 'floating' effect by disengaging all of the safety mechanisms on an elevator and cutting the cables (except for the deceleration trauma at the end).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The things that differentiate this wedding from one done while skydiving are that they 're doing it inside a vehicle , so they do n't have the rush of air past them drowning out voices , and that they do n't have to get it all done in one take -- the plane will be going back up and making several parabolic arcs .
In both cases , they 're falling freely in a ballistic trajectory ; it is only that the aircraft they are in is following the same trajectory that makes it look as if they 're floating in the cabin .
You could get the same 'floating ' effect by disengaging all of the safety mechanisms on an elevator and cutting the cables ( except for the deceleration trauma at the end ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The things that differentiate this wedding from one done while skydiving are that they're doing it inside a vehicle, so they don't have the rush of air past them drowning out voices, and that they don't have to get it all done in one take -- the plane will be going back up and making several parabolic arcs.
In both cases, they're falling freely in a ballistic trajectory; it is only that the aircraft they are in is following the same trajectory that makes it look as if they're floating in the cabin.
You could get the same 'floating' effect by disengaging all of the safety mechanisms on an elevator and cutting the cables (except for the deceleration trauma at the end).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218589</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28230625</id>
	<title>Re:BORING!</title>
	<author>Mr. Freeman</author>
	<datestamp>1244230620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, any reasonable sex position is damn near impossible in space.  The missionary is the hardest, though not the most exciting anyway.  I think someone actually developed a suit specifically designed for screwing in Null-G.<br><br>Long story short, the honeymoon wouldn't be that exciting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , any reasonable sex position is damn near impossible in space .
The missionary is the hardest , though not the most exciting anyway .
I think someone actually developed a suit specifically designed for screwing in Null-G.Long story short , the honeymoon would n't be that exciting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, any reasonable sex position is damn near impossible in space.
The missionary is the hardest, though not the most exciting anyway.
I think someone actually developed a suit specifically designed for screwing in Null-G.Long story short, the honeymoon wouldn't be that exciting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220719</id>
	<title>Hope they dont get sick!</title>
	<author>cyman777</author>
	<datestamp>1244208180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So if 45\% of people get sick, either bride or groom or the minister will not make it through the ceremony...


Qute from our beloved Wikipedia:

The most common problem experienced by humans in the initial hours of weightlessness is known as space adaptation syndrome or SAS, commonly referred to as space sickness. Symptoms of SAS include nausea and vomiting, vertigo, headaches, lethargy, and overall malaise. The first case of SAS was reported by cosmonaut Gherman Titov in 1961. Since then, roughly 45\% of all people who have flown in space have suffered from this condition. The duration of space sickness varies, but in no case has it lasted for more than 72 hours, after which the body adjusts to the new environment. NASA jokingly measures SAS using the "Garn scale", named for United States Senator Jake Garn, whose SAS during STS-51-D was the worst on record. Accordingly, one "Garn" is equivalent to the most severe possible case of SAS.[13]

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if 45 \ % of people get sick , either bride or groom or the minister will not make it through the ceremony.. . Qute from our beloved Wikipedia : The most common problem experienced by humans in the initial hours of weightlessness is known as space adaptation syndrome or SAS , commonly referred to as space sickness .
Symptoms of SAS include nausea and vomiting , vertigo , headaches , lethargy , and overall malaise .
The first case of SAS was reported by cosmonaut Gherman Titov in 1961 .
Since then , roughly 45 \ % of all people who have flown in space have suffered from this condition .
The duration of space sickness varies , but in no case has it lasted for more than 72 hours , after which the body adjusts to the new environment .
NASA jokingly measures SAS using the " Garn scale " , named for United States Senator Jake Garn , whose SAS during STS-51-D was the worst on record .
Accordingly , one " Garn " is equivalent to the most severe possible case of SAS .
[ 13 ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if 45\% of people get sick, either bride or groom or the minister will not make it through the ceremony...


Qute from our beloved Wikipedia:

The most common problem experienced by humans in the initial hours of weightlessness is known as space adaptation syndrome or SAS, commonly referred to as space sickness.
Symptoms of SAS include nausea and vomiting, vertigo, headaches, lethargy, and overall malaise.
The first case of SAS was reported by cosmonaut Gherman Titov in 1961.
Since then, roughly 45\% of all people who have flown in space have suffered from this condition.
The duration of space sickness varies, but in no case has it lasted for more than 72 hours, after which the body adjusts to the new environment.
NASA jokingly measures SAS using the "Garn scale", named for United States Senator Jake Garn, whose SAS during STS-51-D was the worst on record.
Accordingly, one "Garn" is equivalent to the most severe possible case of SAS.
[13]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weightlessness [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28224309</id>
	<title>Re:BORING!</title>
	<author>Nyeerrmm</author>
	<datestamp>1244223840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I doubt its exactly what the AC is looking for, the first "Space Honeymoon" is already planned, as soon as SpaceShipTwo gets flying: <a href="http://spacelove.org/" title="spacelove.org">http://spacelove.org/</a> [spacelove.org].  Information is on the menu bar on the bottom...  Loretta and George Whitesides have already bought their tickets, although I think lately they've been too busy to update that particular page.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I doubt its exactly what the AC is looking for , the first " Space Honeymoon " is already planned , as soon as SpaceShipTwo gets flying : http : //spacelove.org/ [ spacelove.org ] .
Information is on the menu bar on the bottom... Loretta and George Whitesides have already bought their tickets , although I think lately they 've been too busy to update that particular page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I doubt its exactly what the AC is looking for, the first "Space Honeymoon" is already planned, as soon as SpaceShipTwo gets flying: http://spacelove.org/ [spacelove.org].
Information is on the menu bar on the bottom...  Loretta and George Whitesides have already bought their tickets, although I think lately they've been too busy to update that particular page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219791</id>
	<title>Re:News Duck</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1244198100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free fall without air resistance is exactly the same phenomenon as "Zero Gravity" or "Microgravity".</p><p>In fact, orbit is exactly like this -- it is free fall. The only difference is that the trajectory takes you around the earth instead of into it.</p><p>Yes, that is a difference worth noting, but that's more like the difference between a water bottle and a water fountain. It's still water, it's just that the bottle will run out -- the plane will have to level off (or smack into the ground).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free fall without air resistance is exactly the same phenomenon as " Zero Gravity " or " Microgravity " .In fact , orbit is exactly like this -- it is free fall .
The only difference is that the trajectory takes you around the earth instead of into it.Yes , that is a difference worth noting , but that 's more like the difference between a water bottle and a water fountain .
It 's still water , it 's just that the bottle will run out -- the plane will have to level off ( or smack into the ground ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free fall without air resistance is exactly the same phenomenon as "Zero Gravity" or "Microgravity".In fact, orbit is exactly like this -- it is free fall.
The only difference is that the trajectory takes you around the earth instead of into it.Yes, that is a difference worth noting, but that's more like the difference between a water bottle and a water fountain.
It's still water, it's just that the bottle will run out -- the plane will have to level off (or smack into the ground).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218929</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218931</id>
	<title>Re:Not really</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1244142300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Parabolic flights are simulated zero G.</i></p><p>How do you simulate zero G?</p><p>Here's another hint: 'zero G' doesn't mean 'zero gravity' (which <i>is</i> actually an incorrect term even for space). It means that the body is experiencing the equivalent of zero G. Just like a fighter pilot in a tight turn might be at eight Gs doesn't mean that he went to Neptune or some place where the gravitational force is eight times as strong. (Disclaimer: Neptune is actually 17x the Mass of Earth.)</p><p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G\_force" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org]: "The g-force of an object is 0 g in any weightless environment <b>such as free-fall</b> or an orbiting satellite" (emphasis mine).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Parabolic flights are simulated zero G.How do you simulate zero G ? Here 's another hint : 'zero G ' does n't mean 'zero gravity ' ( which is actually an incorrect term even for space ) .
It means that the body is experiencing the equivalent of zero G. Just like a fighter pilot in a tight turn might be at eight Gs does n't mean that he went to Neptune or some place where the gravitational force is eight times as strong .
( Disclaimer : Neptune is actually 17x the Mass of Earth .
) From Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] : " The g-force of an object is 0 g in any weightless environment such as free-fall or an orbiting satellite " ( emphasis mine ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Parabolic flights are simulated zero G.How do you simulate zero G?Here's another hint: 'zero G' doesn't mean 'zero gravity' (which is actually an incorrect term even for space).
It means that the body is experiencing the equivalent of zero G. Just like a fighter pilot in a tight turn might be at eight Gs doesn't mean that he went to Neptune or some place where the gravitational force is eight times as strong.
(Disclaimer: Neptune is actually 17x the Mass of Earth.
)From Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]: "The g-force of an object is 0 g in any weightless environment such as free-fall or an orbiting satellite" (emphasis mine).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219439</id>
	<title>there's a misunderstanding here</title>
	<author>tbj61898</author>
	<datestamp>1244192760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He probably meant to say "gravity is bad" referring to a pair of something completely different....</htmltext>
<tokenext>He probably meant to say " gravity is bad " referring to a pair of something completely different... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He probably meant to say "gravity is bad" referring to a pair of something completely different....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218365</id>
	<title>No time to change your mind</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1244135820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...since it will all be over in 30 seconds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...since it will all be over in 30 seconds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...since it will all be over in 30 seconds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221641</id>
	<title>Re:Not really</title>
	<author>Creepy</author>
	<datestamp>1244213280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>speaking of Vomit Comet, it has that name for a reason - and I imagine they may want to restrain from "you may now kiss the bride" until they hit gravity again.</p><p>Couple marries in zero g, then both die choking on vomit.  We don't know who's vomit it was, you can't exactly dust for vomit (with thanks to Spinal Tap for that one).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>speaking of Vomit Comet , it has that name for a reason - and I imagine they may want to restrain from " you may now kiss the bride " until they hit gravity again.Couple marries in zero g , then both die choking on vomit .
We do n't know who 's vomit it was , you ca n't exactly dust for vomit ( with thanks to Spinal Tap for that one ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>speaking of Vomit Comet, it has that name for a reason - and I imagine they may want to restrain from "you may now kiss the bride" until they hit gravity again.Couple marries in zero g, then both die choking on vomit.
We don't know who's vomit it was, you can't exactly dust for vomit (with thanks to Spinal Tap for that one).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28226337</id>
	<title>Re:You lack imagination.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244232720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But even so, it'd be damned cool to be able to show your future kids and grandkids that your wedding is in the Guinness Book of World Records.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Seems rather narcissistic to me.  Why not simply show your future kids and grandkids that you defied odds &amp; most expectations and actually stayed married to, faithful to, and happy with their mother/grandmother for 50 years?<br> <br>

Seems to me that living well would be a much bigger deal than a sentence in some book that is largely comprised of a latter-day freakshow.  Do you really want to find the listing for your wedding between the entry for the man with the world's longest pubic hair and the entry about the woman who holds the world record for eating the most hot dogs in 60 seconds?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But even so , it 'd be damned cool to be able to show your future kids and grandkids that your wedding is in the Guinness Book of World Records .
Seems rather narcissistic to me .
Why not simply show your future kids and grandkids that you defied odds &amp; most expectations and actually stayed married to , faithful to , and happy with their mother/grandmother for 50 years ?
Seems to me that living well would be a much bigger deal than a sentence in some book that is largely comprised of a latter-day freakshow .
Do you really want to find the listing for your wedding between the entry for the man with the world 's longest pubic hair and the entry about the woman who holds the world record for eating the most hot dogs in 60 seconds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But even so, it'd be damned cool to be able to show your future kids and grandkids that your wedding is in the Guinness Book of World Records.
Seems rather narcissistic to me.
Why not simply show your future kids and grandkids that you defied odds &amp; most expectations and actually stayed married to, faithful to, and happy with their mother/grandmother for 50 years?
Seems to me that living well would be a much bigger deal than a sentence in some book that is largely comprised of a latter-day freakshow.
Do you really want to find the listing for your wedding between the entry for the man with the world's longest pubic hair and the entry about the woman who holds the world record for eating the most hot dogs in 60 seconds?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218707</id>
	<title>I thought it said...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244139120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it said Zero-G Welding..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it said Zero-G Welding. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it said Zero-G Welding..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28399811</id>
	<title>Re:Like the old saying goes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1245441480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Money can't buy good taste.</p></div><p>right on! I am up with Good Taste...  fluttering in an uninsulated bomber is tres fait</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Money ca n't buy good taste.right on !
I am up with Good Taste... fluttering in an uninsulated bomber is tres fait</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Money can't buy good taste.right on!
I am up with Good Taste...  fluttering in an uninsulated bomber is tres fait
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218443</id>
	<title>Poor planning</title>
	<author>Snarf You</author>
	<datestamp>1244136360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A zero-G wedding sounds nice at first, but the divorce will cost 100 G's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A zero-G wedding sounds nice at first , but the divorce will cost 100 G 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A zero-G wedding sounds nice at first, but the divorce will cost 100 G's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220847</id>
	<title>The full story from Erin &amp; Noah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244209140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These two are anime / sci-fi podcasters, whose show is called the <a href="http://ninjaconsultant.livejournal.com/" title="livejournal.com">Ninja Consultants</a> [livejournal.com].  They discuss their wedding plans and how they're pulling it together in <a href="http://ninjaconsultant.livejournal.com/31786.html" title="livejournal.com">an April episode</a> [livejournal.com].  They're pretty cool people (I met them at Anime Weekend Atlanta a few times): Erin worked on a couple of animated series and writes for Otaku USA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These two are anime / sci-fi podcasters , whose show is called the Ninja Consultants [ livejournal.com ] .
They discuss their wedding plans and how they 're pulling it together in an April episode [ livejournal.com ] .
They 're pretty cool people ( I met them at Anime Weekend Atlanta a few times ) : Erin worked on a couple of animated series and writes for Otaku USA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These two are anime / sci-fi podcasters, whose show is called the Ninja Consultants [livejournal.com].
They discuss their wedding plans and how they're pulling it together in an April episode [livejournal.com].
They're pretty cool people (I met them at Anime Weekend Atlanta a few times): Erin worked on a couple of animated series and writes for Otaku USA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221161</id>
	<title>Re:That can't end badly...</title>
	<author>arkham6</author>
	<datestamp>1244211000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I actually know these two, used to play Call of Cthulhu with them.<br><br>Anyways, I was joking with another one of their friends about this sort of thing, and he was worried that someone may puke on Richard Garriot. I replied back if that if someone did, they should say that was for Ultima IX.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually know these two , used to play Call of Cthulhu with them.Anyways , I was joking with another one of their friends about this sort of thing , and he was worried that someone may puke on Richard Garriot .
I replied back if that if someone did , they should say that was for Ultima IX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually know these two, used to play Call of Cthulhu with them.Anyways, I was joking with another one of their friends about this sort of thing, and he was worried that someone may puke on Richard Garriot.
I replied back if that if someone did, they should say that was for Ultima IX.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218485</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218471
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28231625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218577
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218911
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28230625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218529
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28226767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225199
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28230127
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218589
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218493
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225135
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218485
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28399811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28224309
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219871
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28228285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28223765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218365
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218929
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218427
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28226337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_1628231_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218481
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218871
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219767
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28226337
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28228285
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220581
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28223765
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28230625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28224309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28231625
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218577
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218493
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218589
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28230127
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225581
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218707
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218465
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218931
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218583
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28225135
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221641
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218613
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218929
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28226767
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218395
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28399811
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218427
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218911
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218443
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28218485
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28221161
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28220391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_1628231.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_1628231.28219567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
