<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_04_162219</id>
	<title>Arrington's Web Tablet Nearly Ready For Launch?</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1244131500000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.itworld.com/" rel="nofollow">narramissic</a> writes <i>"The 'dead simple and dirt cheap' touchscreen Web tablet that Michael Arrington of TechCrunch set out to build <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/21/we-want-a-dead-simple-web-tablet-help-us-build-it/">last July</a> seems to be nearing completion, writes blogger Peter Smith. 'The CrunchPad is a <a href="http://www.itworld.com/mobile-amp-wireless/68800/arringtons-web-tablet-nearly-ready-launch">Linux-based touchscreen tablet</a> using a browser-based UI. When you turn the unit on, it boots right into the webkit-based browser. There's a pop-up virtual keyboard for entering URLs and such (you wouldn't want to do any significant typing on it) and scrolling is via swiping the screen. When Arrington first visualized the project he was shooting for a $200 price point, then discovered that a $299 price was more realistic.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>narramissic writes " The 'dead simple and dirt cheap ' touchscreen Web tablet that Michael Arrington of TechCrunch set out to build last July seems to be nearing completion , writes blogger Peter Smith .
'The CrunchPad is a Linux-based touchscreen tablet using a browser-based UI .
When you turn the unit on , it boots right into the webkit-based browser .
There 's a pop-up virtual keyboard for entering URLs and such ( you would n't want to do any significant typing on it ) and scrolling is via swiping the screen .
When Arrington first visualized the project he was shooting for a $ 200 price point , then discovered that a $ 299 price was more realistic .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>narramissic writes "The 'dead simple and dirt cheap' touchscreen Web tablet that Michael Arrington of TechCrunch set out to build last July seems to be nearing completion, writes blogger Peter Smith.
'The CrunchPad is a Linux-based touchscreen tablet using a browser-based UI.
When you turn the unit on, it boots right into the webkit-based browser.
There's a pop-up virtual keyboard for entering URLs and such (you wouldn't want to do any significant typing on it) and scrolling is via swiping the screen.
When Arrington first visualized the project he was shooting for a $200 price point, then discovered that a $299 price was more realistic.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210875</id>
	<title>Wait till Slashdot tablet</title>
	<author>Renderer of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1244135400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gartner has projected that in the next 5 years about half of all internet bloggers will paper launch their own internet tablets, because it's the next logical step.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gartner has projected that in the next 5 years about half of all internet bloggers will paper launch their own internet tablets , because it 's the next logical step .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gartner has projected that in the next 5 years about half of all internet bloggers will paper launch their own internet tablets, because it's the next logical step.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212519</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>geekmux</author>
	<datestamp>1244142540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product.  A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.</p></div><p>Exactly my thoughts too.  It would be different if this device was filling a specific niche (i.e. Kindle e-reader), and had very little market share to compete with, but at THAT price, it's damn near competing with every other portable hardware device that has a browser and a keyboard.</p><p>And the "we'll build the hardware and offer specialized customized apps and a developer kit" idea is pretty much a dead end with the popularity of the Apple store.  And once they release an iPod touch in a netbook form factor...Well, I'll just leave it at that and let the rest of the marketeers tend to that nightmare.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product .
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.Exactly my thoughts too .
It would be different if this device was filling a specific niche ( i.e .
Kindle e-reader ) , and had very little market share to compete with , but at THAT price , it 's damn near competing with every other portable hardware device that has a browser and a keyboard.And the " we 'll build the hardware and offer specialized customized apps and a developer kit " idea is pretty much a dead end with the popularity of the Apple store .
And once they release an iPod touch in a netbook form factor...Well , I 'll just leave it at that and let the rest of the marketeers tend to that nightmare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product.
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.Exactly my thoughts too.
It would be different if this device was filling a specific niche (i.e.
Kindle e-reader), and had very little market share to compete with, but at THAT price, it's damn near competing with every other portable hardware device that has a browser and a keyboard.And the "we'll build the hardware and offer specialized customized apps and a developer kit" idea is pretty much a dead end with the popularity of the Apple store.
And once they release an iPod touch in a netbook form factor...Well, I'll just leave it at that and let the rest of the marketeers tend to that nightmare.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28216323</id>
	<title>Re:Cost</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1244117160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netbooks and the iPod touch are very different products from each other, and both are very different from a large touch screen tablet pc running debian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netbooks and the iPod touch are very different products from each other , and both are very different from a large touch screen tablet pc running debian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netbooks and the iPod touch are very different products from each other, and both are very different from a large touch screen tablet pc running debian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28215989</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>nametaken</author>
	<datestamp>1244115240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a good way to put it... that list fixes everything wrong with the Kindle, and makes it cheaper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a good way to put it... that list fixes everything wrong with the Kindle , and makes it cheaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a good way to put it... that list fixes everything wrong with the Kindle, and makes it cheaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211603</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212881</id>
	<title>The +$100 from design to market</title>
	<author>dj245</author>
	<datestamp>1244143920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps you should develop such a device yourself with a target of $100, and when that becomes very difficult, settle on the price point of $200.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps you should develop such a device yourself with a target of $ 100 , and when that becomes very difficult , settle on the price point of $ 200 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps you should develop such a device yourself with a target of $100, and when that becomes very difficult, settle on the price point of $200.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211145</id>
	<title>Re:nice mockups...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Judging by prototype C, it looks like a 1280x800 display to me.<br>
<br>
Whether the final product will have that resolution I don't know, but given that it's a 12" screen, I'd say it needs it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judging by prototype C , it looks like a 1280x800 display to me .
Whether the final product will have that resolution I do n't know , but given that it 's a 12 " screen , I 'd say it needs it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judging by prototype C, it looks like a 1280x800 display to me.
Whether the final product will have that resolution I don't know, but given that it's a 12" screen, I'd say it needs it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210863</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985</id>
	<title>Expensive For what it is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't get me wrong: I love the simplicity of the idea. However, if for $300 I am only able to surf the web, I would go for a netbook instead. Sure, netbooks lack the style and aesthetic appeal of a big touchscreen, but you have a real keyboard, a real OS, and you can use it for many different tasks (as much as you can with a tiny screen and keyboard anyway).
<br> <br>
However, I may have been sold if the price had stayed at $200.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't get me wrong : I love the simplicity of the idea .
However , if for $ 300 I am only able to surf the web , I would go for a netbook instead .
Sure , netbooks lack the style and aesthetic appeal of a big touchscreen , but you have a real keyboard , a real OS , and you can use it for many different tasks ( as much as you can with a tiny screen and keyboard anyway ) .
However , I may have been sold if the price had stayed at $ 200 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't get me wrong: I love the simplicity of the idea.
However, if for $300 I am only able to surf the web, I would go for a netbook instead.
Sure, netbooks lack the style and aesthetic appeal of a big touchscreen, but you have a real keyboard, a real OS, and you can use it for many different tasks (as much as you can with a tiny screen and keyboard anyway).
However, I may have been sold if the price had stayed at $200.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211285</id>
	<title>Re:Nokia</title>
	<author>Arathrael</author>
	<datestamp>1244137200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing about the Nokia is, it only has a 800x480 resolution (I believe - correct me if I'm wrong). That's fine for some purposes, but if I'm reading a lengthy document, or trying to look at a large detailed image* I find that 800x480 is a low enough resolution to be irritating. That's what's put me off getting one.<br>
<br>
This device looks like it has a 12" screen with a 1280x800 resolution (might be a bit less, I'm just estimating), so it has the potential to be more appropriate for some kinds of usage. Depends what you're looking for really.<br>
<br>
*Like comic book pages. What were you thinking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing about the Nokia is , it only has a 800x480 resolution ( I believe - correct me if I 'm wrong ) .
That 's fine for some purposes , but if I 'm reading a lengthy document , or trying to look at a large detailed image * I find that 800x480 is a low enough resolution to be irritating .
That 's what 's put me off getting one .
This device looks like it has a 12 " screen with a 1280x800 resolution ( might be a bit less , I 'm just estimating ) , so it has the potential to be more appropriate for some kinds of usage .
Depends what you 're looking for really .
* Like comic book pages .
What were you thinking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing about the Nokia is, it only has a 800x480 resolution (I believe - correct me if I'm wrong).
That's fine for some purposes, but if I'm reading a lengthy document, or trying to look at a large detailed image* I find that 800x480 is a low enough resolution to be irritating.
That's what's put me off getting one.
This device looks like it has a 12" screen with a 1280x800 resolution (might be a bit less, I'm just estimating), so it has the potential to be more appropriate for some kinds of usage.
Depends what you're looking for really.
*Like comic book pages.
What were you thinking?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210863</id>
	<title>nice mockups...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gotta say that the mockups look fairly nice. But based on those pics, it looks like it will have a ridiculously high-res display. I'm guessing the final product will have a resolution that's about 1/3 of what they show there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Got ta say that the mockups look fairly nice .
But based on those pics , it looks like it will have a ridiculously high-res display .
I 'm guessing the final product will have a resolution that 's about 1/3 of what they show there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gotta say that the mockups look fairly nice.
But based on those pics, it looks like it will have a ridiculously high-res display.
I'm guessing the final product will have a resolution that's about 1/3 of what they show there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213697</id>
	<title>Re:Cost</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1244147220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A 30\% markup is reasonable for the first generation.</p><p>And I don't see how a dinky little iPod touch even begins to compare to a full-fledged touchscreen like this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A 30 \ % markup is reasonable for the first generation.And I do n't see how a dinky little iPod touch even begins to compare to a full-fledged touchscreen like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 30\% markup is reasonable for the first generation.And I don't see how a dinky little iPod touch even begins to compare to a full-fledged touchscreen like this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28216243</id>
	<title>Neat!</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1244116680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait to spit <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/28/some-things-need-to-change/" title="techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/28/some-things-need-to-change/</a> [techcrunch.com] on it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait to spit http : //www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/28/some-things-need-to-change/ [ techcrunch.com ] on it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait to spit http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/28/some-things-need-to-change/ [techcrunch.com] on it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28217951</id>
	<title>Re:A platform for output-only applications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We could probably use this at work.</p><p>I have to manage charts and files, sprewn across the office. This way I have a portable device that can tell me when a patient is supposed to be back, or when they were last here, to better track the chart. And not just that, but it could be useful for somebody looking stuff up at a library.</p><p>Or a factory floor. Or a student in a math class.</p><p>300$? Not a bad price. Would be better if it was 200$, but hell, this is great. I would have loved to see an ARM version to, but that might be difficult for a startup.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We could probably use this at work.I have to manage charts and files , sprewn across the office .
This way I have a portable device that can tell me when a patient is supposed to be back , or when they were last here , to better track the chart .
And not just that , but it could be useful for somebody looking stuff up at a library.Or a factory floor .
Or a student in a math class.300 $ ?
Not a bad price .
Would be better if it was 200 $ , but hell , this is great .
I would have loved to see an ARM version to , but that might be difficult for a startup .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could probably use this at work.I have to manage charts and files, sprewn across the office.
This way I have a portable device that can tell me when a patient is supposed to be back, or when they were last here, to better track the chart.
And not just that, but it could be useful for somebody looking stuff up at a library.Or a factory floor.
Or a student in a math class.300$?
Not a bad price.
Would be better if it was 200$, but hell, this is great.
I would have loved to see an ARM version to, but that might be difficult for a startup.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28219281</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive For what it is</title>
	<author>Crayon Kid</author>
	<datestamp>1244233500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad to see I'm not alone in this. I have a very clear perception of the prices these small devices would be worth to me and I think they're all still about a $100 overpriced at the moment.</p><ul><li>I would pay <b>up to $100</b> (preferrably less) for a device that's strictly an <b>ebook reader</b>: up to 500g weight (a bit over 1 pound), 6+ hours of running battery life (AA or ability to plug directly into mains), 6-10in screen (grayscale LCD is fine too, I'm not fussy), SD card slot, ability to choose from several fonts and sizes and tweak the color of text and background, and a simple system that will simply pick the ebooks from the SD card, which I would manage with a card reader. If the device can be plugged in USB and seen as a storage device, bonus. The eBookwise is the only one that comes close (which proves it's perfectly possible), but they have a completely brain-dead scheme for getting ebooks on the device, not to mention extra features which I DON'T want (a <i>modem</i>? WTF).</li><li>I would pay <b>up to $200</b> for a device with certain additional features (<b>a "web tablet"</b>): color LCD touchscreen, SD card slot, on-screen keyboard, music player and audio jack, WiFi and ethernet, web browser, note taker and agenda, plus USB which makes the device double as card reader for the SD card. These are the bare minimum. But since such a device already tends to feature a full-fledged OS, it can probably also take generic applications, which can expand its capabilities. Bonus for such applications, such as book reader, GPS map navigation, simple document processor, image browser. Also bonus for Bluetooth connectivity. Acceptable weight: up to 1.75 lbs or 800 grams.</li><li>I would pay <b>up to $300</b> for <b>a netbook</b>, which is to say a mini-laptop with 8-10in screen, keyboard and perhaps touchpad, SD and CF slots, USB plugs and ability to server as host for card readers, mice, flash sticks, printers, audio out, DVI/VGA out, webcam, Bluetooth, WiFi and ethernet, 4-6 hours of average battery life. Since it's a full OS, I expect to be able to do anything on it, provided the hardware can offer the juice. I think 1 GHz CPU and 2 GB of RAM should be quite adequate for 90\% of the usual tasks. HD decoding should be relegated to a dedicated chip or the GPU (yes, I want HD decoding and movie playback). Weight: up to 1.5 kg (3.3 lbs).</li></ul><p>I realize producers need to come off the high horse and competition is needed before prices drop, but at the same time I'm NOT going to pay $200+ for a book reader in a million years. $150 is the absolute maximum I would begrudgingly pay, but it would have to be an outstanding device for that $50 premium.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad to see I 'm not alone in this .
I have a very clear perception of the prices these small devices would be worth to me and I think they 're all still about a $ 100 overpriced at the moment.I would pay up to $ 100 ( preferrably less ) for a device that 's strictly an ebook reader : up to 500g weight ( a bit over 1 pound ) , 6 + hours of running battery life ( AA or ability to plug directly into mains ) , 6-10in screen ( grayscale LCD is fine too , I 'm not fussy ) , SD card slot , ability to choose from several fonts and sizes and tweak the color of text and background , and a simple system that will simply pick the ebooks from the SD card , which I would manage with a card reader .
If the device can be plugged in USB and seen as a storage device , bonus .
The eBookwise is the only one that comes close ( which proves it 's perfectly possible ) , but they have a completely brain-dead scheme for getting ebooks on the device , not to mention extra features which I DO N'T want ( a modem ?
WTF ) .I would pay up to $ 200 for a device with certain additional features ( a " web tablet " ) : color LCD touchscreen , SD card slot , on-screen keyboard , music player and audio jack , WiFi and ethernet , web browser , note taker and agenda , plus USB which makes the device double as card reader for the SD card .
These are the bare minimum .
But since such a device already tends to feature a full-fledged OS , it can probably also take generic applications , which can expand its capabilities .
Bonus for such applications , such as book reader , GPS map navigation , simple document processor , image browser .
Also bonus for Bluetooth connectivity .
Acceptable weight : up to 1.75 lbs or 800 grams.I would pay up to $ 300 for a netbook , which is to say a mini-laptop with 8-10in screen , keyboard and perhaps touchpad , SD and CF slots , USB plugs and ability to server as host for card readers , mice , flash sticks , printers , audio out , DVI/VGA out , webcam , Bluetooth , WiFi and ethernet , 4-6 hours of average battery life .
Since it 's a full OS , I expect to be able to do anything on it , provided the hardware can offer the juice .
I think 1 GHz CPU and 2 GB of RAM should be quite adequate for 90 \ % of the usual tasks .
HD decoding should be relegated to a dedicated chip or the GPU ( yes , I want HD decoding and movie playback ) .
Weight : up to 1.5 kg ( 3.3 lbs ) .I realize producers need to come off the high horse and competition is needed before prices drop , but at the same time I 'm NOT going to pay $ 200 + for a book reader in a million years .
$ 150 is the absolute maximum I would begrudgingly pay , but it would have to be an outstanding device for that $ 50 premium .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad to see I'm not alone in this.
I have a very clear perception of the prices these small devices would be worth to me and I think they're all still about a $100 overpriced at the moment.I would pay up to $100 (preferrably less) for a device that's strictly an ebook reader: up to 500g weight (a bit over 1 pound), 6+ hours of running battery life (AA or ability to plug directly into mains), 6-10in screen (grayscale LCD is fine too, I'm not fussy), SD card slot, ability to choose from several fonts and sizes and tweak the color of text and background, and a simple system that will simply pick the ebooks from the SD card, which I would manage with a card reader.
If the device can be plugged in USB and seen as a storage device, bonus.
The eBookwise is the only one that comes close (which proves it's perfectly possible), but they have a completely brain-dead scheme for getting ebooks on the device, not to mention extra features which I DON'T want (a modem?
WTF).I would pay up to $200 for a device with certain additional features (a "web tablet"): color LCD touchscreen, SD card slot, on-screen keyboard, music player and audio jack, WiFi and ethernet, web browser, note taker and agenda, plus USB which makes the device double as card reader for the SD card.
These are the bare minimum.
But since such a device already tends to feature a full-fledged OS, it can probably also take generic applications, which can expand its capabilities.
Bonus for such applications, such as book reader, GPS map navigation, simple document processor, image browser.
Also bonus for Bluetooth connectivity.
Acceptable weight: up to 1.75 lbs or 800 grams.I would pay up to $300 for a netbook, which is to say a mini-laptop with 8-10in screen, keyboard and perhaps touchpad, SD and CF slots, USB plugs and ability to server as host for card readers, mice, flash sticks, printers, audio out, DVI/VGA out, webcam, Bluetooth, WiFi and ethernet, 4-6 hours of average battery life.
Since it's a full OS, I expect to be able to do anything on it, provided the hardware can offer the juice.
I think 1 GHz CPU and 2 GB of RAM should be quite adequate for 90\% of the usual tasks.
HD decoding should be relegated to a dedicated chip or the GPU (yes, I want HD decoding and movie playback).
Weight: up to 1.5 kg (3.3 lbs).I realize producers need to come off the high horse and competition is needed before prices drop, but at the same time I'm NOT going to pay $200+ for a book reader in a million years.
$150 is the absolute maximum I would begrudgingly pay, but it would have to be an outstanding device for that $50 premium.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214079</id>
	<title>Re:Nokia</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1244148660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Just buy a Nokia N8x0. I am willing to bet you can pick up an n800 for well under $200. "</i>
<br> <br>
You're comparing apples with oranges?  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-N810-Portable-Internet-Tablet/dp/B000Y4AH3C" title="amazon.com">The Nokia N8x0 has a 4.1" screen</a> [amazon.com].  It's in a different class than a web tablet with a 12" LCD.  The Nokia's competition is the similarly priced Apple Touch.
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.mobiletechreview.com/notebooks/fujitsu-lifebook-t4010.htm" title="mobiletechreview.com">The Fujitsu T4010 is a better competitor.</a> [mobiletechreview.com]  12" LCD, 1.6ghz, ram upgradeable to 2gb, 60+ gb hard drive, touchscreen, 4 lbs, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRtmxLp47Ik" title="youtube.com">boots XP in 30 seconds</a> [youtube.com].  It's a few years old so you should be able to find one for $300.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Just buy a Nokia N8x0 .
I am willing to bet you can pick up an n800 for well under $ 200 .
" You 're comparing apples with oranges ?
The Nokia N8x0 has a 4.1 " screen [ amazon.com ] .
It 's in a different class than a web tablet with a 12 " LCD .
The Nokia 's competition is the similarly priced Apple Touch .
The Fujitsu T4010 is a better competitor .
[ mobiletechreview.com ] 12 " LCD , 1.6ghz , ram upgradeable to 2gb , 60 + gb hard drive , touchscreen , 4 lbs , boots XP in 30 seconds [ youtube.com ] .
It 's a few years old so you should be able to find one for $ 300 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Just buy a Nokia N8x0.
I am willing to bet you can pick up an n800 for well under $200.
"
 
You're comparing apples with oranges?
The Nokia N8x0 has a 4.1" screen [amazon.com].
It's in a different class than a web tablet with a 12" LCD.
The Nokia's competition is the similarly priced Apple Touch.
The Fujitsu T4010 is a better competitor.
[mobiletechreview.com]  12" LCD, 1.6ghz, ram upgradeable to 2gb, 60+ gb hard drive, touchscreen, 4 lbs, boots XP in 30 seconds [youtube.com].
It's a few years old so you should be able to find one for $300.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211707</id>
	<title>A platform for output-only applications</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244138880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Think of it as a mobile platform for mostly-output applications.
eBook reader.  Web browser. PowerPoint.  TV and movies.  Maps.  Things where input is minimal.
</p><p>
That's the proper positioning for this - as a content delivery platform with a screen big enough to be useful.  There's a market for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of it as a mobile platform for mostly-output applications .
eBook reader .
Web browser .
PowerPoint. TV and movies .
Maps. Things where input is minimal .
That 's the proper positioning for this - as a content delivery platform with a screen big enough to be useful .
There 's a market for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Think of it as a mobile platform for mostly-output applications.
eBook reader.
Web browser.
PowerPoint.  TV and movies.
Maps.  Things where input is minimal.
That's the proper positioning for this - as a content delivery platform with a screen big enough to be useful.
There's a market for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28222989</id>
	<title>Re:What am I going to do??</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1244218920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let's see, I have a $300 Kindle for e-books, a $300 CrunchPad for Web pages...</p></div><p>This may come as a suprise to you but you can read books via the www.</p><p>You can also do photoshop, do banking, listen to music, make phone calls, read your email, watch videos, watch TV<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... in fact just about anything you'd need a screen for. Crunchpad has a USB input too so you can use it to power your mobile rocket launcher. Not enough on board power? Just use it as a slim client using VNC over 'net.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see , I have a $ 300 Kindle for e-books , a $ 300 CrunchPad for Web pages...This may come as a suprise to you but you can read books via the www.You can also do photoshop , do banking , listen to music , make phone calls , read your email , watch videos , watch TV ... in fact just about anything you 'd need a screen for .
Crunchpad has a USB input too so you can use it to power your mobile rocket launcher .
Not enough on board power ?
Just use it as a slim client using VNC over 'net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see, I have a $300 Kindle for e-books, a $300 CrunchPad for Web pages...This may come as a suprise to you but you can read books via the www.You can also do photoshop, do banking, listen to music, make phone calls, read your email, watch videos, watch TV ... in fact just about anything you'd need a screen for.
Crunchpad has a USB input too so you can use it to power your mobile rocket launcher.
Not enough on board power?
Just use it as a slim client using VNC over 'net.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213309</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211225</id>
	<title>Finally a replacement for my SmartDisplay</title>
	<author>phorest</author>
	<datestamp>1244136900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, I am hoping to see this sometime soon as my 10" <a href="http://www.viewsonic.com/products/mobile-wireless/home-automation/v212003.htm" title="viewsonic.com">ViewSonic AirPanel</a> [viewsonic.com] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart\_Display" title="wikipedia.org">SmartDisplay</a> [wikipedia.org] is getting a little long in the tooth. Still running 902.11<b>B</b> standard! It's slow with today's web but it is the most convenient item in my stable to browse the web away from my office-chair. I can watch TV, read/mod posts on slashdot -or- news on the web -or- read books &amp; tweak my network from the comfort of my couch.</p><p>
Yeah, it runs Windows CE but everything isn't perfect. Still it's very light, doesn't need a stylus to click on a link or button (though has one). The only way it could be the browser tool even better would be an external Home, Forward and Back buttons in a convenient place on the frame somewhere.</p><p>
I recently got a Dell Mini10 as a present and a netbook will never replace a small tablet for the way I use the airpanel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , I am hoping to see this sometime soon as my 10 " ViewSonic AirPanel [ viewsonic.com ] SmartDisplay [ wikipedia.org ] is getting a little long in the tooth .
Still running 902.11B standard !
It 's slow with today 's web but it is the most convenient item in my stable to browse the web away from my office-chair .
I can watch TV , read/mod posts on slashdot -or- news on the web -or- read books &amp; tweak my network from the comfort of my couch .
Yeah , it runs Windows CE but everything is n't perfect .
Still it 's very light , does n't need a stylus to click on a link or button ( though has one ) .
The only way it could be the browser tool even better would be an external Home , Forward and Back buttons in a convenient place on the frame somewhere .
I recently got a Dell Mini10 as a present and a netbook will never replace a small tablet for the way I use the airpanel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, I am hoping to see this sometime soon as my 10" ViewSonic AirPanel [viewsonic.com] SmartDisplay [wikipedia.org] is getting a little long in the tooth.
Still running 902.11B standard!
It's slow with today's web but it is the most convenient item in my stable to browse the web away from my office-chair.
I can watch TV, read/mod posts on slashdot -or- news on the web -or- read books &amp; tweak my network from the comfort of my couch.
Yeah, it runs Windows CE but everything isn't perfect.
Still it's very light, doesn't need a stylus to click on a link or button (though has one).
The only way it could be the browser tool even better would be an external Home, Forward and Back buttons in a convenient place on the frame somewhere.
I recently got a Dell Mini10 as a present and a netbook will never replace a small tablet for the way I use the airpanel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28217483</id>
	<title>Too pricey</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1244125620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a full screen browser, with that performance, with those limitations on what can be done with it, I wouldn't pay $299.  I might pay $199.</p><p>The first thing that someone will do is tear it down and install ubuntu on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a full screen browser , with that performance , with those limitations on what can be done with it , I would n't pay $ 299 .
I might pay $ 199.The first thing that someone will do is tear it down and install ubuntu on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a full screen browser, with that performance, with those limitations on what can be done with it, I wouldn't pay $299.
I might pay $199.The first thing that someone will do is tear it down and install ubuntu on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211373</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>phorest</author>
	<datestamp>1244137500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A netbook may be more capable, but I have a 10" ViewSonic Airpanel and believe me a netbook is very uncomfortable to use laying down on your back. Also too I find the web almost unusable on a widescreen format screen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A netbook may be more capable , but I have a 10 " ViewSonic Airpanel and believe me a netbook is very uncomfortable to use laying down on your back .
Also too I find the web almost unusable on a widescreen format screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A netbook may be more capable, but I have a 10" ViewSonic Airpanel and believe me a netbook is very uncomfortable to use laying down on your back.
Also too I find the web almost unusable on a widescreen format screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211097</id>
	<title>Re:Nokia</title>
	<author>LodCrappo</author>
	<datestamp>1244136360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the nokia n8xx are pretty cheap now.  they make a very nice ultra portable, good for web browsing, email, IM, watching movies, music, etc.  with the 810 model or a bluetooth keyboard they are usable for terminal sessions and a litle bit of work.</p><p>I don't use mine much when at home, but its great for travelling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the nokia n8xx are pretty cheap now .
they make a very nice ultra portable , good for web browsing , email , IM , watching movies , music , etc .
with the 810 model or a bluetooth keyboard they are usable for terminal sessions and a litle bit of work.I do n't use mine much when at home , but its great for travelling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the nokia n8xx are pretty cheap now.
they make a very nice ultra portable, good for web browsing, email, IM, watching movies, music, etc.
with the 810 model or a bluetooth keyboard they are usable for terminal sessions and a litle bit of work.I don't use mine much when at home, but its great for travelling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211459</id>
	<title>Instead of a tablet...</title>
	<author>Nutria</author>
	<datestamp>1244137860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what I could <b>really</b> use is a clamshell computer (think <a href="http://www.slashphone.com/media/data/796/samsung-alias-2.jpg" title="slashphone.com">Samsung Alias 2</a> [slashphone.com]) strapped to my forearm.  (Like Turanga Leela, but real.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what I could really use is a clamshell computer ( think Samsung Alias 2 [ slashphone.com ] ) strapped to my forearm .
( Like Turanga Leela , but real .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what I could really use is a clamshell computer (think Samsung Alias 2 [slashphone.com]) strapped to my forearm.
(Like Turanga Leela, but real.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28216765</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>blackest\_k</author>
	<datestamp>1244119680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A touch screen tablet is interesting , a clam shell design able to be used either in touch screen mode or regular clamshell would be even better. I don't like the idea of  touch screen only due to the damage it would get just being carried round.</p><p>I'm just looking for a better netbook really, a bigger screen isnt an improvement but increased versatility is.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A touch screen tablet is interesting , a clam shell design able to be used either in touch screen mode or regular clamshell would be even better .
I do n't like the idea of touch screen only due to the damage it would get just being carried round.I 'm just looking for a better netbook really , a bigger screen isnt an improvement but increased versatility is .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>A touch screen tablet is interesting , a clam shell design able to be used either in touch screen mode or regular clamshell would be even better.
I don't like the idea of  touch screen only due to the damage it would get just being carried round.I'm just looking for a better netbook really, a bigger screen isnt an improvement but increased versatility is.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213309</id>
	<title>What am I going to do??</title>
	<author>Jane Q. Public</author>
	<datestamp>1244145660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What am I going to do with this closetful of $300 single-purpose devices?
<br> <br>
Let's see, I have a $300 Kindle for e-books, a $300 CrunchPad for Web pages...
<br> <br>
Maybe I'll sell them all and get a $300 Netbook that does all of those things. Maybe not quite as well, but all of those things and a helluva lot more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What am I going to do with this closetful of $ 300 single-purpose devices ?
Let 's see , I have a $ 300 Kindle for e-books , a $ 300 CrunchPad for Web pages.. . Maybe I 'll sell them all and get a $ 300 Netbook that does all of those things .
Maybe not quite as well , but all of those things and a helluva lot more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What am I going to do with this closetful of $300 single-purpose devices?
Let's see, I have a $300 Kindle for e-books, a $300 CrunchPad for Web pages...
 
Maybe I'll sell them all and get a $300 Netbook that does all of those things.
Maybe not quite as well, but all of those things and a helluva lot more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211495</id>
	<title>Re:Looks great but...</title>
	<author>RalphBNumbers</author>
	<datestamp>1244137980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Earlier prototypes used an Atom CPU, I doubt that's changed.  And the connectivity is some sort of wifi, presumably g, maybe n.</p><p>It looks like a neat device, and I'm definitely interested in the cheap lightweight tablet form factor and market niche.  But when I think about purchasing it I can't help comparing it in my head to the super-sized iPod tablet Apple is rumored to be working on.<br>The crunchpad's 12" screen is nice compared to the 8-10" expected from apple, but the atom and big screen are going to make for really crappy battery life compared to an ARM based 8-10" solution, and the Apple version will be able to do more than just web surf (a version of the iPhone SDK and app store seems inevitable).  However, while the crunchpad may have missed it's $200 price target in favor of $300, the rumors of Apple's $600+ price point were never in that league to begin with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Earlier prototypes used an Atom CPU , I doubt that 's changed .
And the connectivity is some sort of wifi , presumably g , maybe n.It looks like a neat device , and I 'm definitely interested in the cheap lightweight tablet form factor and market niche .
But when I think about purchasing it I ca n't help comparing it in my head to the super-sized iPod tablet Apple is rumored to be working on.The crunchpad 's 12 " screen is nice compared to the 8-10 " expected from apple , but the atom and big screen are going to make for really crappy battery life compared to an ARM based 8-10 " solution , and the Apple version will be able to do more than just web surf ( a version of the iPhone SDK and app store seems inevitable ) .
However , while the crunchpad may have missed it 's $ 200 price target in favor of $ 300 , the rumors of Apple 's $ 600 + price point were never in that league to begin with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Earlier prototypes used an Atom CPU, I doubt that's changed.
And the connectivity is some sort of wifi, presumably g, maybe n.It looks like a neat device, and I'm definitely interested in the cheap lightweight tablet form factor and market niche.
But when I think about purchasing it I can't help comparing it in my head to the super-sized iPod tablet Apple is rumored to be working on.The crunchpad's 12" screen is nice compared to the 8-10" expected from apple, but the atom and big screen are going to make for really crappy battery life compared to an ARM based 8-10" solution, and the Apple version will be able to do more than just web surf (a version of the iPhone SDK and app store seems inevitable).
However, while the crunchpad may have missed it's $200 price target in favor of $300, the rumors of Apple's $600+ price point were never in that league to begin with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211671</id>
	<title>Cost can be reduced with services</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244138700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the CrunchPad can build services and have the hardware cost subsidized (like cell phones) then the price could be reduced or even possible free.</p><p>- Mobile phone companies can offer it with built in 3G<br>- Partner with E-Schoolbook, E-Magazine, E-Newspaper companies - Google may be interested now that they have thrown their hat into the E-Book arena<br>- Look at Hospitals, Schools, Government agencies to use this for data entry - imagine going to a doctors appointment and being handed the CrunchPad to update medical records, views records, check on prescriptions all while waiting for the appointment. With the push to modernize records to reduce costs this device could take advantage of web apps to streamline processes.<br>- Newspapers are in a crunch to find new ways to profit. This device can be linked into a subscription with advertising being dynamically assigned by content.</p><p>Just a few possible ways to reduce the hardware cost while still building a profit model.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the CrunchPad can build services and have the hardware cost subsidized ( like cell phones ) then the price could be reduced or even possible free.- Mobile phone companies can offer it with built in 3G- Partner with E-Schoolbook , E-Magazine , E-Newspaper companies - Google may be interested now that they have thrown their hat into the E-Book arena- Look at Hospitals , Schools , Government agencies to use this for data entry - imagine going to a doctors appointment and being handed the CrunchPad to update medical records , views records , check on prescriptions all while waiting for the appointment .
With the push to modernize records to reduce costs this device could take advantage of web apps to streamline processes.- Newspapers are in a crunch to find new ways to profit .
This device can be linked into a subscription with advertising being dynamically assigned by content.Just a few possible ways to reduce the hardware cost while still building a profit model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the CrunchPad can build services and have the hardware cost subsidized (like cell phones) then the price could be reduced or even possible free.- Mobile phone companies can offer it with built in 3G- Partner with E-Schoolbook, E-Magazine, E-Newspaper companies - Google may be interested now that they have thrown their hat into the E-Book arena- Look at Hospitals, Schools, Government agencies to use this for data entry - imagine going to a doctors appointment and being handed the CrunchPad to update medical records, views records, check on prescriptions all while waiting for the appointment.
With the push to modernize records to reduce costs this device could take advantage of web apps to streamline processes.- Newspapers are in a crunch to find new ways to profit.
This device can be linked into a subscription with advertising being dynamically assigned by content.Just a few possible ways to reduce the hardware cost while still building a profit model.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210895</id>
	<title>Tech Support?</title>
	<author>siloko</author>
	<datestamp>1244135520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>a webbased OS sitting on a homebrew touchscreen - sounds rock solid to me!</htmltext>
<tokenext>a webbased OS sitting on a homebrew touchscreen - sounds rock solid to me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a webbased OS sitting on a homebrew touchscreen - sounds rock solid to me!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211583</id>
	<title>A dream come true for me.</title>
	<author>n1hilist</author>
	<datestamp>1244138340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm legally blind, so this is something I've been waiting for, for ages.</p><p>If I can stick Ubuntu, or anything with a customizable UI on, with a browser / pdf reader that lets me put large, white text on a black background.. surf and read ebooks.. I'm sold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm legally blind , so this is something I 've been waiting for , for ages.If I can stick Ubuntu , or anything with a customizable UI on , with a browser / pdf reader that lets me put large , white text on a black background.. surf and read ebooks.. I 'm sold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm legally blind, so this is something I've been waiting for, for ages.If I can stick Ubuntu, or anything with a customizable UI on, with a browser / pdf reader that lets me put large, white text on a black background.. surf and read ebooks.. I'm sold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211537</id>
	<title>Taken with a grain of salt</title>
	<author>ikirudennis</author>
	<datestamp>1244138160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Frankly, after the whole techcrunch/last.fm thing, I need some more concrete evidence from Mr. Arrington before I start taking anything he says seriously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , after the whole techcrunch/last.fm thing , I need some more concrete evidence from Mr. Arrington before I start taking anything he says seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, after the whole techcrunch/last.fm thing, I need some more concrete evidence from Mr. Arrington before I start taking anything he says seriously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211151</id>
	<title>Compare how far it has come</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I first saw the project, I thought that it was entirely too klunky</p><p><a href="http://cache0.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/tabletprototypea.jpg" title="techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">Eary Image</a> [techcrunch.com]</p><p>Where it's at now, however...</p><p><a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/crunchtablet-4.jpg" title="crunchgear.com" rel="nofollow">Current Prototype</a> [crunchgear.com]</p><p>Is looking much more impressive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I first saw the project , I thought that it was entirely too klunkyEary Image [ techcrunch.com ] Where it 's at now , however...Current Prototype [ crunchgear.com ] Is looking much more impressive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I first saw the project, I thought that it was entirely too klunkyEary Image [techcrunch.com]Where it's at now, however...Current Prototype [crunchgear.com]Is looking much more impressive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211513</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder...</title>
	<author>linhares</author>
	<datestamp>1244138100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In fact, there should be a "web client".  The idea is to remain in a browser at all times (except for skype).  But what techcrunch screwed up royally here is that they did not use android.  That would have given them the latest codebase from a megacorp to have what?  A nice screen keyboard (I know it's an oxymoron, jokers), 3g, and other important stuff... such as the browser.  Job would have been much easier with Android.  It might also have much more perceived safety in the long run.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , there should be a " web client " .
The idea is to remain in a browser at all times ( except for skype ) .
But what techcrunch screwed up royally here is that they did not use android .
That would have given them the latest codebase from a megacorp to have what ?
A nice screen keyboard ( I know it 's an oxymoron , jokers ) , 3g , and other important stuff... such as the browser .
Job would have been much easier with Android .
It might also have much more perceived safety in the long run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, there should be a "web client".
The idea is to remain in a browser at all times (except for skype).
But what techcrunch screwed up royally here is that they did not use android.
That would have given them the latest codebase from a megacorp to have what?
A nice screen keyboard (I know it's an oxymoron, jokers), 3g, and other important stuff... such as the browser.
Job would have been much easier with Android.
It might also have much more perceived safety in the long run.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210853</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211855</id>
	<title>Re:hrmmm</title>
	<author>GMFTatsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1244139660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Check out the <a href="http://www.irextechnologies.com/products/iliad" title="irextechnologies.com">iLead ebook reader</a> [irextechnologies.com].  Expensive, but exactly fits what you're asking for.  I'm saving up for one myself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Check out the iLead ebook reader [ irextechnologies.com ] .
Expensive , but exactly fits what you 're asking for .
I 'm saving up for one myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Check out the iLead ebook reader [irextechnologies.com].
Expensive, but exactly fits what you're asking for.
I'm saving up for one myself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214053</id>
	<title>Re:Tech Support?</title>
	<author>KharmaWidow</author>
	<datestamp>1244148540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I only wish he had aimed for $100.00....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I only wish he had aimed for $ 100.00... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only wish he had aimed for $100.00....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210895</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213635</id>
	<title>Re:hrmmm</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1244146920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It runs Ubuntu, so just get developing. PDF in several flavors is included with Ubuntu, so that's a given.</p><p>As for the stylus... I know Ubuntu's working on that sort of thing, and it has a touchscreen, so I imagine at least being able to write on it is already done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It runs Ubuntu , so just get developing .
PDF in several flavors is included with Ubuntu , so that 's a given.As for the stylus... I know Ubuntu 's working on that sort of thing , and it has a touchscreen , so I imagine at least being able to write on it is already done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It runs Ubuntu, so just get developing.
PDF in several flavors is included with Ubuntu, so that's a given.As for the stylus... I know Ubuntu's working on that sort of thing, and it has a touchscreen, so I imagine at least being able to write on it is already done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211091</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212567</id>
	<title>Re:Wait till Slashdot tablet</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1244142840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but will the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. tablet run linux<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but will the / .
tablet run linux : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but will the /.
tablet run linux :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210837</id>
	<title>I was going to get a first post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would have got a first post, but I was typing on a web tablet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have got a first post , but I was typing on a web tablet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have got a first post, but I was typing on a web tablet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214501</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder...</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1244107560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not going with Android was a genuine idiot move. The Android user base is growing so aggressively it's turning Windows Mobile phones <em>into</em> Android phones. That's right, it's not just growing market share, it's <em>stealing</em> it. (I just hope this comes to my HTC Fuze one day; it is already on a related phone.)</p><p>Until someone actually comes up with something better than Android, supporting it is probably the best way to go by far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not going with Android was a genuine idiot move .
The Android user base is growing so aggressively it 's turning Windows Mobile phones into Android phones .
That 's right , it 's not just growing market share , it 's stealing it .
( I just hope this comes to my HTC Fuze one day ; it is already on a related phone .
) Until someone actually comes up with something better than Android , supporting it is probably the best way to go by far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not going with Android was a genuine idiot move.
The Android user base is growing so aggressively it's turning Windows Mobile phones into Android phones.
That's right, it's not just growing market share, it's stealing it.
(I just hope this comes to my HTC Fuze one day; it is already on a related phone.
)Until someone actually comes up with something better than Android, supporting it is probably the best way to go by far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211513</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211769</id>
	<title>Costs can be reduced through services</title>
	<author>raydias</author>
	<datestamp>1244139180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>

If the CrunchPad can build services and have the hardware cost subsidized (like cell phones) then the price could be reduced or even possible free.

- Mobile phone companies can offer it with built in 3G
- Partner with E-Schoolbook, E-Magazine, E-Newspaper companies - Google may be interested now that they have thrown their hat into the E-Book arena
- Look at Hospitals, Schools, Government agencies to use this for data entry - imagine going to a doctors appointment and being handed the CrunchPad to update medical records, views records, check on prescriptions all while waiting for the appointment. With the push to modernize records to reduce costs this device could take advantage of web apps to streamline processes.
- Newspapers are in a crunch to find new ways to profit. This device can be linked into a subscription with advertising being dynamically assigned by content.

Just a few possible ways to reduce the hardware cost while still building a profit model.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the CrunchPad can build services and have the hardware cost subsidized ( like cell phones ) then the price could be reduced or even possible free .
- Mobile phone companies can offer it with built in 3G - Partner with E-Schoolbook , E-Magazine , E-Newspaper companies - Google may be interested now that they have thrown their hat into the E-Book arena - Look at Hospitals , Schools , Government agencies to use this for data entry - imagine going to a doctors appointment and being handed the CrunchPad to update medical records , views records , check on prescriptions all while waiting for the appointment .
With the push to modernize records to reduce costs this device could take advantage of web apps to streamline processes .
- Newspapers are in a crunch to find new ways to profit .
This device can be linked into a subscription with advertising being dynamically assigned by content .
Just a few possible ways to reduce the hardware cost while still building a profit model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

If the CrunchPad can build services and have the hardware cost subsidized (like cell phones) then the price could be reduced or even possible free.
- Mobile phone companies can offer it with built in 3G
- Partner with E-Schoolbook, E-Magazine, E-Newspaper companies - Google may be interested now that they have thrown their hat into the E-Book arena
- Look at Hospitals, Schools, Government agencies to use this for data entry - imagine going to a doctors appointment and being handed the CrunchPad to update medical records, views records, check on prescriptions all while waiting for the appointment.
With the push to modernize records to reduce costs this device could take advantage of web apps to streamline processes.
- Newspapers are in a crunch to find new ways to profit.
This device can be linked into a subscription with advertising being dynamically assigned by content.
Just a few possible ways to reduce the hardware cost while still building a profit model.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211183</id>
	<title>So it's like the XO then</title>
	<author>Benanov</author>
	<datestamp>1244136720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reality bumped the price by $100.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reality bumped the price by $ 100 .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reality bumped the price by $100.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915</id>
	<title>Nokia</title>
	<author>mschoolbus</author>
	<datestamp>1244135580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just buy a Nokia N8x0.  I am willing to bet you can pick up an n800 for well under $200.  The N810 is a bit more but has a slideout qwerty keypad.  Its a nice web browser, or portable video screen with great battery life.<br> <br>
Lets stop reinventing the wheel and use what hardware and software is already out there!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just buy a Nokia N8x0 .
I am willing to bet you can pick up an n800 for well under $ 200 .
The N810 is a bit more but has a slideout qwerty keypad .
Its a nice web browser , or portable video screen with great battery life .
Lets stop reinventing the wheel and use what hardware and software is already out there !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just buy a Nokia N8x0.
I am willing to bet you can pick up an n800 for well under $200.
The N810 is a bit more but has a slideout qwerty keypad.
Its a nice web browser, or portable video screen with great battery life.
Lets stop reinventing the wheel and use what hardware and software is already out there!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212819</id>
	<title>Re:A platform for output-only applications</title>
	<author>Fallingcow</author>
	<datestamp>1244143740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bingo.  Exactly why I want one.  Traditional tablets are too expensive, and trying too hard to be laptops, IMO.  This thing's like a giant iPhone to carry around your house/office to provide a decent-sized display and <i>light</i> interface any place you damn well please.</p><p>What's not to like?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bingo .
Exactly why I want one .
Traditional tablets are too expensive , and trying too hard to be laptops , IMO .
This thing 's like a giant iPhone to carry around your house/office to provide a decent-sized display and light interface any place you damn well please.What 's not to like ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bingo.
Exactly why I want one.
Traditional tablets are too expensive, and trying too hard to be laptops, IMO.
This thing's like a giant iPhone to carry around your house/office to provide a decent-sized display and light interface any place you damn well please.What's not to like?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210893</id>
	<title>Looks great but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A cursory glance through TFA and the main post it links to do not reveal the specs of the device.</p><p>What's the platform? What sort of connectivity does it have?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A cursory glance through TFA and the main post it links to do not reveal the specs of the device.What 's the platform ?
What sort of connectivity does it have ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A cursory glance through TFA and the main post it links to do not reveal the specs of the device.What's the platform?
What sort of connectivity does it have?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28219041</id>
	<title>Re:With a little tweeking it could be a nice niche</title>
	<author>atamido</author>
	<datestamp>1244143680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first thing I thought when I read about this is that it would make an excellent home remote.  There are some far less interesting remotes that cost more out there than this.  Of course, it'd need an IR port, or you would need a server with an IR blaster.  But if there were a way to use it, it would be pretty cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first thing I thought when I read about this is that it would make an excellent home remote .
There are some far less interesting remotes that cost more out there than this .
Of course , it 'd need an IR port , or you would need a server with an IR blaster .
But if there were a way to use it , it would be pretty cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first thing I thought when I read about this is that it would make an excellent home remote.
There are some far less interesting remotes that cost more out there than this.
Of course, it'd need an IR port, or you would need a server with an IR blaster.
But if there were a way to use it, it would be pretty cool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211509</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210883</id>
	<title>Re:I was going to get a first post</title>
	<author>MaerD</author>
	<datestamp>1244135460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's got to be better then typing on my cellphone.
T9 or other predictive texts only help if you and the cell phone know how to spell the word you want.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's got to be better then typing on my cellphone .
T9 or other predictive texts only help if you and the cell phone know how to spell the word you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's got to be better then typing on my cellphone.
T9 or other predictive texts only help if you and the cell phone know how to spell the word you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212499</id>
	<title>Nice for a mobile device</title>
	<author>Presto Vivace</author>
	<datestamp>1244142420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>but pricey at $300 for such limited capability.</htmltext>
<tokenext>but pricey at $ 300 for such limited capability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but pricey at $300 for such limited capability.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211259</id>
	<title>Except it doesnt have a screen made for Liliputian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People have 52 inch screens in the living room, 19 to 24 inch computer screens and you want them to read on a small screen the size of a gum pack?</p><p>Take your touch and shove it where it dont shine.... thats one place where the small screen size will actually be of benefit.</p><p>You need a 10-12 inch screen to be able to comfortably read something.</p><p>As for getting a netbook, no you dont. I bought an Acer One for 269$ and it wasnt the 50-60$ over the magical 200 bucks that was going to change my mind.</p><p>You on the other hand will have no problem paying 5 times the price as long as the logo is fruity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People have 52 inch screens in the living room , 19 to 24 inch computer screens and you want them to read on a small screen the size of a gum pack ? Take your touch and shove it where it dont shine.... thats one place where the small screen size will actually be of benefit.You need a 10-12 inch screen to be able to comfortably read something.As for getting a netbook , no you dont .
I bought an Acer One for 269 $ and it wasnt the 50-60 $ over the magical 200 bucks that was going to change my mind.You on the other hand will have no problem paying 5 times the price as long as the logo is fruity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People have 52 inch screens in the living room, 19 to 24 inch computer screens and you want them to read on a small screen the size of a gum pack?Take your touch and shove it where it dont shine.... thats one place where the small screen size will actually be of benefit.You need a 10-12 inch screen to be able to comfortably read something.As for getting a netbook, no you dont.
I bought an Acer One for 269$ and it wasnt the 50-60$ over the magical 200 bucks that was going to change my mind.You on the other hand will have no problem paying 5 times the price as long as the logo is fruity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211077</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211211</id>
	<title>Re:Why not get an iPhone?</title>
	<author>OolimPhon</author>
	<datestamp>1244136840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have an iPhone with a 12" screen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have an iPhone with a 12 " screen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have an iPhone with a 12" screen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211041</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211679</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>0xdeadbeef</author>
	<datestamp>1244138760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product. A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.</i></p><p>WiFi? Larger screen than an iPhone? Lame.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product .
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.WiFi ?
Larger screen than an iPhone ?
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product.
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.WiFi?
Larger screen than an iPhone?
Lame.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211323</id>
	<title>better article; not cheap</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1244137320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The second link from the slashdot summary, describing the current product, is extremely short, and is essentially the same text as the slashdot summary. A longer and better article is <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/03/crunchpad-the-launch-prototype/" title="techcrunch.com">here</a> [techcrunch.com]. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/19/techcrunch-tablet-update-prototype-b/" title="techcrunch.com">This</a> [techcrunch.com] page has technical specs: 12-inch touchscreen (1024x768 4:3), via nano, 1 GB ram, 4 GB flash, wifi, accelerometer, camera, 3 lb, currently running ubuntu.
</p><p>
Sorry, but $300 is not "dirt cheap," IMO. Zareason.com or system76.com will routinely sell you a full-featured desktop system for $300. WalMart and Sears have sold desktop machines like the Everex gPC as cheap as $200. Target has had the eeePC for $280. This is not even something you'd want to use as a full-function computer, so I'd say $300 is actually pretty expensive. Of course some people may be willing to pay for style or convenience. But as far as convenience, I'm not convinced I'd want something portable like this that didn't have a lid to protect the screen.
</p><p>
"Dirt cheap" is going to be ARM-based computers retailing for $50-100, which we'll probably have within a few years.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The second link from the slashdot summary , describing the current product , is extremely short , and is essentially the same text as the slashdot summary .
A longer and better article is here [ techcrunch.com ] .
This [ techcrunch.com ] page has technical specs : 12-inch touchscreen ( 1024x768 4 : 3 ) , via nano , 1 GB ram , 4 GB flash , wifi , accelerometer , camera , 3 lb , currently running ubuntu .
Sorry , but $ 300 is not " dirt cheap , " IMO .
Zareason.com or system76.com will routinely sell you a full-featured desktop system for $ 300 .
WalMart and Sears have sold desktop machines like the Everex gPC as cheap as $ 200 .
Target has had the eeePC for $ 280 .
This is not even something you 'd want to use as a full-function computer , so I 'd say $ 300 is actually pretty expensive .
Of course some people may be willing to pay for style or convenience .
But as far as convenience , I 'm not convinced I 'd want something portable like this that did n't have a lid to protect the screen .
" Dirt cheap " is going to be ARM-based computers retailing for $ 50-100 , which we 'll probably have within a few years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The second link from the slashdot summary, describing the current product, is extremely short, and is essentially the same text as the slashdot summary.
A longer and better article is here [techcrunch.com].
This [techcrunch.com] page has technical specs: 12-inch touchscreen (1024x768 4:3), via nano, 1 GB ram, 4 GB flash, wifi, accelerometer, camera, 3 lb, currently running ubuntu.
Sorry, but $300 is not "dirt cheap," IMO.
Zareason.com or system76.com will routinely sell you a full-featured desktop system for $300.
WalMart and Sears have sold desktop machines like the Everex gPC as cheap as $200.
Target has had the eeePC for $280.
This is not even something you'd want to use as a full-function computer, so I'd say $300 is actually pretty expensive.
Of course some people may be willing to pay for style or convenience.
But as far as convenience, I'm not convinced I'd want something portable like this that didn't have a lid to protect the screen.
"Dirt cheap" is going to be ARM-based computers retailing for $50-100, which we'll probably have within a few years.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212709</id>
	<title>Re:Nokia</title>
	<author>Fallingcow</author>
	<datestamp>1244143320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The N8x0 is tiny.</p><p>I want this tablet thing as a portable (around the house) media player.  It's big enough for two people (myself and my wife) to watch comfortably, has pretty high resolution, and wireless connectivity.</p><p>Select your movie from the file server via VLC's web interface, fire up VLC, connect to the stream, set it up on its stand, and enjoy a movie in any room that doesn't already have a screen.  We use our laptops for this kind of thing now, but a tablet would be much, much better.</p><p>Want music in any room?  Turn it on, plug it in to a couple speakers, open up the music player.  Want 'Net access in your study for doing quick lookups while reading, but don't want a dedicated machine in there and don't want to cart your laptop all over the damn house (especially since its fucking battery only lasts like 45 minutes <i>while idle</i> after a year of moderate, mostly-plugged-in use, so you have to carry its cord around to use it for anything).  This tablet's perfect for this stuff.</p><p>Previous tablets were, IMO, too weak to replace a laptop but too big/expensive/small-screened to fill a sub-laptop niche.  This thing's awesome, and hits the sweet spot between internet/video phones and laptops.  I love it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The N8x0 is tiny.I want this tablet thing as a portable ( around the house ) media player .
It 's big enough for two people ( myself and my wife ) to watch comfortably , has pretty high resolution , and wireless connectivity.Select your movie from the file server via VLC 's web interface , fire up VLC , connect to the stream , set it up on its stand , and enjoy a movie in any room that does n't already have a screen .
We use our laptops for this kind of thing now , but a tablet would be much , much better.Want music in any room ?
Turn it on , plug it in to a couple speakers , open up the music player .
Want 'Net access in your study for doing quick lookups while reading , but do n't want a dedicated machine in there and do n't want to cart your laptop all over the damn house ( especially since its fucking battery only lasts like 45 minutes while idle after a year of moderate , mostly-plugged-in use , so you have to carry its cord around to use it for anything ) .
This tablet 's perfect for this stuff.Previous tablets were , IMO , too weak to replace a laptop but too big/expensive/small-screened to fill a sub-laptop niche .
This thing 's awesome , and hits the sweet spot between internet/video phones and laptops .
I love it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The N8x0 is tiny.I want this tablet thing as a portable (around the house) media player.
It's big enough for two people (myself and my wife) to watch comfortably, has pretty high resolution, and wireless connectivity.Select your movie from the file server via VLC's web interface, fire up VLC, connect to the stream, set it up on its stand, and enjoy a movie in any room that doesn't already have a screen.
We use our laptops for this kind of thing now, but a tablet would be much, much better.Want music in any room?
Turn it on, plug it in to a couple speakers, open up the music player.
Want 'Net access in your study for doing quick lookups while reading, but don't want a dedicated machine in there and don't want to cart your laptop all over the damn house (especially since its fucking battery only lasts like 45 minutes while idle after a year of moderate, mostly-plugged-in use, so you have to carry its cord around to use it for anything).
This tablet's perfect for this stuff.Previous tablets were, IMO, too weak to replace a laptop but too big/expensive/small-screened to fill a sub-laptop niche.
This thing's awesome, and hits the sweet spot between internet/video phones and laptops.
I love it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214677</id>
	<title>Re:better article; not cheap</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1244108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>$300 <i>is</i> dirt cheap for an x86 PC with a touchscreen that huge.</p><p>See: <a href="http://www.logicsupply.com/categories/panel\_pc" title="logicsupply.com">http://www.logicsupply.com/categories/panel\_pc</a> [logicsupply.com]</p><p>I'm sorry that you're not the target market. (Actually, I'm not either; I own 3 desktops<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P ) Just be aware that although you don't find it useful or affordable, that doesn't discount the market entirely.</p><p>I mean, people pay $200 for a Chumby, and $240 for a PSP with $60 worth of hardware in it. This thing probably has $250 worth of hardware. It really <i>is</i> very affordable, if you require a touchscreen panel PC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 300 is dirt cheap for an x86 PC with a touchscreen that huge.See : http : //www.logicsupply.com/categories/panel \ _pc [ logicsupply.com ] I 'm sorry that you 're not the target market .
( Actually , I 'm not either ; I own 3 desktops : P ) Just be aware that although you do n't find it useful or affordable , that does n't discount the market entirely.I mean , people pay $ 200 for a Chumby , and $ 240 for a PSP with $ 60 worth of hardware in it .
This thing probably has $ 250 worth of hardware .
It really is very affordable , if you require a touchscreen panel PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$300 is dirt cheap for an x86 PC with a touchscreen that huge.See: http://www.logicsupply.com/categories/panel\_pc [logicsupply.com]I'm sorry that you're not the target market.
(Actually, I'm not either; I own 3 desktops :P ) Just be aware that although you don't find it useful or affordable, that doesn't discount the market entirely.I mean, people pay $200 for a Chumby, and $240 for a PSP with $60 worth of hardware in it.
This thing probably has $250 worth of hardware.
It really is very affordable, if you require a touchscreen panel PC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213525</id>
	<title>tubgi8yl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244146440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Slashdot's Distro is done Here aal servers. Coming Way. It used to bFe</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot 's Distro is done Here aal servers .
Coming Way .
It used to bFe [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot's Distro is done Here aal servers.
Coming Way.
It used to bFe [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211103</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product.  A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.</p></div><p>Larger screen.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product .
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.Larger screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product.
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.Larger screen.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210853</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>acb</author>
	<datestamp>1244135340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>whether there'll be a last.fm client for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>whether there 'll be a last.fm client for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whether there'll be a last.fm client for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28218889</id>
	<title>Re:Cost</title>
	<author>the donner party</author>
	<datestamp>1244141880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A would-be enterpreneur with a realistic view of his prospects is far less likely to take the leap and start a company than someone who thinks he is smarter and more business-savvy than anyone else around.  And god knows there is no shortage of the latter sort of people, especially in the blogging circles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A would-be enterpreneur with a realistic view of his prospects is far less likely to take the leap and start a company than someone who thinks he is smarter and more business-savvy than anyone else around .
And god knows there is no shortage of the latter sort of people , especially in the blogging circles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A would-be enterpreneur with a realistic view of his prospects is far less likely to take the leap and start a company than someone who thinks he is smarter and more business-savvy than anyone else around.
And god knows there is no shortage of the latter sort of people, especially in the blogging circles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211487</id>
	<title>Re:better article; not cheap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Accelerometer?  Camera?  Why, why must we tack all these things on to every even semi portable gadget?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Accelerometer ?
Camera ? Why , why must we tack all these things on to every even semi portable gadget ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accelerometer?
Camera?  Why, why must we tack all these things on to every even semi portable gadget?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211041</id>
	<title>Why not get an iPhone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At that price point why not just get an iPhone which has webkit based web browsing and also has cellular data connectivity so you can use it anywhere?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At that price point why not just get an iPhone which has webkit based web browsing and also has cellular data connectivity so you can use it anywhere ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At that price point why not just get an iPhone which has webkit based web browsing and also has cellular data connectivity so you can use it anywhere?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212487</id>
	<title>Re:Expensive For what it is</title>
	<author>grepya</author>
	<datestamp>1244142420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't underestimate the power of a great big touchscreen to wipe out many other deficiencies (including a great big price tag). You do remember the iPhone... don't you ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't underestimate the power of a great big touchscreen to wipe out many other deficiencies ( including a great big price tag ) .
You do remember the iPhone... do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't underestimate the power of a great big touchscreen to wipe out many other deficiencies (including a great big price tag).
You do remember the iPhone... don't you ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211091</id>
	<title>hrmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It needs a stylus for writing notes, if possible, directly onto a webpage.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>I hope a PDF viewer is included.  Being able to write on the PDF file would be A++++ awesome.</p><p>Just like some simple program that stores what I'm writing into a JPG file, and it gets associated to the file or page I'm viewing.  So it gets overlaid on the document.</p><p>If it replaces a notepad, while allowing me to surf the net, I'm sold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It needs a stylus for writing notes , if possible , directly onto a webpage .
: - ) I hope a PDF viewer is included .
Being able to write on the PDF file would be A + + + + awesome.Just like some simple program that stores what I 'm writing into a JPG file , and it gets associated to the file or page I 'm viewing .
So it gets overlaid on the document.If it replaces a notepad , while allowing me to surf the net , I 'm sold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It needs a stylus for writing notes, if possible, directly onto a webpage.
:-)I hope a PDF viewer is included.
Being able to write on the PDF file would be A++++ awesome.Just like some simple program that stores what I'm writing into a JPG file, and it gets associated to the file or page I'm viewing.
So it gets overlaid on the document.If it replaces a notepad, while allowing me to surf the net, I'm sold.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</id>
	<title>less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product.  A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product .
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see what is compelling or really even interesting about this product.
A netbook for the same money is a far more capable device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28222925</id>
	<title>Re:Cost</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1244218680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> And in the end, the promised price point of 200 dollars was necessary; for 300 dollars, I can get a fully-featured netbook or iPod touch.</p></div><p>Can you get a 12" / 30cm touch screen for that price? I've tried and been unsuccessful, &#194;&pound;300 is the price in the UK, that's not a portable device that's just the screen.</p><p>Granted this probably means $300 for a touchscreen in the US, but getting a wifi / 3g enabled portable net device with a touchscreen  for that price seems pretty awesome to me. If they were available in the UK for $300 I'd have one now and use it as a POS terminal and / or demoing websites to clients.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And in the end , the promised price point of 200 dollars was necessary ; for 300 dollars , I can get a fully-featured netbook or iPod touch.Can you get a 12 " / 30cm touch screen for that price ?
I 've tried and been unsuccessful ,     300 is the price in the UK , that 's not a portable device that 's just the screen.Granted this probably means $ 300 for a touchscreen in the US , but getting a wifi / 3g enabled portable net device with a touchscreen for that price seems pretty awesome to me .
If they were available in the UK for $ 300 I 'd have one now and use it as a POS terminal and / or demoing websites to clients .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> And in the end, the promised price point of 200 dollars was necessary; for 300 dollars, I can get a fully-featured netbook or iPod touch.Can you get a 12" / 30cm touch screen for that price?
I've tried and been unsuccessful, Â£300 is the price in the UK, that's not a portable device that's just the screen.Granted this probably means $300 for a touchscreen in the US, but getting a wifi / 3g enabled portable net device with a touchscreen  for that price seems pretty awesome to me.
If they were available in the UK for $300 I'd have one now and use it as a POS terminal and / or demoing websites to clients.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213523</id>
	<title>Re:Cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244146440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with the Tata Nano is that YOU are the crumple zone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with the Tata Nano is that YOU are the crumple zone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with the Tata Nano is that YOU are the crumple zone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211823</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>GMFTatsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1244139480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And no Kindle books.<br>Or e-Ink display.<br>Or Whispernet connectivity.<br>Or in fact any features of the Kindle except for being thin and having a screen that can show text.</p><p>Why not think of it as an ultra-thin web appliance instead?  The two are not even close to each other in function or design.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And no Kindle books.Or e-Ink display.Or Whispernet connectivity.Or in fact any features of the Kindle except for being thin and having a screen that can show text.Why not think of it as an ultra-thin web appliance instead ?
The two are not even close to each other in function or design .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And no Kindle books.Or e-Ink display.Or Whispernet connectivity.Or in fact any features of the Kindle except for being thin and having a screen that can show text.Why not think of it as an ultra-thin web appliance instead?
The two are not even close to each other in function or design.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211603</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211147</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>ChunderDownunder</author>
	<datestamp>1244136600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed, a general purpose netbook tablet can't be too far away anyway.</p><p>The lack of a keyboard does marginalise it as a $US300 single purpose gadget, as in Nokia's Maemo offerings. For that price an iPhone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed , a general purpose netbook tablet ca n't be too far away anyway.The lack of a keyboard does marginalise it as a $ US300 single purpose gadget , as in Nokia 's Maemo offerings .
For that price an iPhone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed, a general purpose netbook tablet can't be too far away anyway.The lack of a keyboard does marginalise it as a $US300 single purpose gadget, as in Nokia's Maemo offerings.
For that price an iPhone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211509</id>
	<title>With a little tweeking it could be a nice niche pr</title>
	<author>Seth Kriticos</author>
	<datestamp>1244138100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just checked out the newest presentation video of this thing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP-0Nce5oTQ , and it is quite an interesting product.<br><br>Of course the application as a browser only thing is a bit too little.<br><br>For the folks who asked what the underlying OS is: Linux + webkit<br>Specs: no idea, not much.<br><br>Now what would be really great: a sane interface API for this thing and the possibility to write apps for it + wlan + bluetooth. Then it would be quite a viable niche product (for cool people only) who for instance could program applications that would allow them to dim the light in their rooms on this thing or monitor a remote server.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just checked out the newest presentation video of this thing : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = jP-0Nce5oTQ , and it is quite an interesting product.Of course the application as a browser only thing is a bit too little.For the folks who asked what the underlying OS is : Linux + webkitSpecs : no idea , not much.Now what would be really great : a sane interface API for this thing and the possibility to write apps for it + wlan + bluetooth .
Then it would be quite a viable niche product ( for cool people only ) who for instance could program applications that would allow them to dim the light in their rooms on this thing or monitor a remote server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just checked out the newest presentation video of this thing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP-0Nce5oTQ , and it is quite an interesting product.Of course the application as a browser only thing is a bit too little.For the folks who asked what the underlying OS is: Linux + webkitSpecs: no idea, not much.Now what would be really great: a sane interface API for this thing and the possibility to write apps for it + wlan + bluetooth.
Then it would be quite a viable niche product (for cool people only) who for instance could program applications that would allow them to dim the light in their rooms on this thing or monitor a remote server.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211603</id>
	<title>Re:less functional than netbook at same price</title>
	<author>tbuskey</author>
	<datestamp>1244138400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of it as a Kindle with:<br>Color<br>Openness<br>WiFi instead of Cell</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of it as a Kindle with : ColorOpennessWiFi instead of Cell</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of it as a Kindle with:ColorOpennessWiFi instead of Cell</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211377</id>
	<title>Bulk up to cheap down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why did they go with such a small profile?  I bet that's most of the cost problem, if not the hugeness of the display.  I'd totally deal with it being a little clunky if it was cheap and effective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did they go with such a small profile ?
I bet that 's most of the cost problem , if not the hugeness of the display .
I 'd totally deal with it being a little clunky if it was cheap and effective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did they go with such a small profile?
I bet that's most of the cost problem, if not the hugeness of the display.
I'd totally deal with it being a little clunky if it was cheap and effective.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211521</id>
	<title>Re:Looks great but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244138100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>ARM9 @ 600mHZ, 512MB Ram, Linux 2.6. Wifi connectivity (B, G, and N).  X is used for the display, so it should be about 5 minutes before you can use this as a remote X client.  10 minutes and it will be replacing $2000 wacom tablets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ARM9 @ 600mHZ , 512MB Ram , Linux 2.6 .
Wifi connectivity ( B , G , and N ) .
X is used for the display , so it should be about 5 minutes before you can use this as a remote X client .
10 minutes and it will be replacing $ 2000 wacom tablets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ARM9 @ 600mHZ, 512MB Ram, Linux 2.6.
Wifi connectivity (B, G, and N).
X is used for the display, so it should be about 5 minutes before you can use this as a remote X client.
10 minutes and it will be replacing $2000 wacom tablets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211077</id>
	<title>Sounds like a large Ipod Touch</title>
	<author>ITJC68</author>
	<datestamp>1244136300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>After reading some of this story this device sounds like a large Ipod Touch without all the fancy Apple applications. I agree with the previous poster that a netbook would make a far better choice for this price. When they make a netbook around 190 bucks that is versatile enough I may get one. With most projects he wanted to keep the cost down but that is easier said then done.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading some of this story this device sounds like a large Ipod Touch without all the fancy Apple applications .
I agree with the previous poster that a netbook would make a far better choice for this price .
When they make a netbook around 190 bucks that is versatile enough I may get one .
With most projects he wanted to keep the cost down but that is easier said then done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading some of this story this device sounds like a large Ipod Touch without all the fancy Apple applications.
I agree with the previous poster that a netbook would make a far better choice for this price.
When they make a netbook around 190 bucks that is versatile enough I may get one.
With most projects he wanted to keep the cost down but that is easier said then done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211451</id>
	<title>Kiosk - many uses</title>
	<author>Drinian</author>
	<datestamp>1244137800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>One use I'd deploy right now is a scheduling kiosk for our fleet.  We have a fleet of vehicles and we use pen and paper to schedule their use.  I'd love to install one of these next to the key box and have a networked scheduling web app running on it.  That way if you're at the key box you can schedule or you could do it from your workstation.  Or I could put one next to a common space phone and set it to browse our intranet.    Or use it as a wall mounted closed circuit tv monitor.  All kinds of uses...</htmltext>
<tokenext>One use I 'd deploy right now is a scheduling kiosk for our fleet .
We have a fleet of vehicles and we use pen and paper to schedule their use .
I 'd love to install one of these next to the key box and have a networked scheduling web app running on it .
That way if you 're at the key box you can schedule or you could do it from your workstation .
Or I could put one next to a common space phone and set it to browse our intranet .
Or use it as a wall mounted closed circuit tv monitor .
All kinds of uses.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One use I'd deploy right now is a scheduling kiosk for our fleet.
We have a fleet of vehicles and we use pen and paper to schedule their use.
I'd love to install one of these next to the key box and have a networked scheduling web app running on it.
That way if you're at the key box you can schedule or you could do it from your workstation.
Or I could put one next to a common space phone and set it to browse our intranet.
Or use it as a wall mounted closed circuit tv monitor.
All kinds of uses...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869</id>
	<title>Cost</title>
	<author>rm999</author>
	<datestamp>1244139720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"When Arrington first visualized the project he was shooting for a $200 price point, then discovered that a $299 price was more realistic"</p><p>Why do so many people make this same mistake? I think it is hubris - the idea that "I'm smarter than everyone else in the industry, and I have ideas that none of them do". One of the worst PR moves is to drastically raise your estimated price, in this case by 50\%. And in the end, the promised price point of 200 dollars was necessary; for 300 dollars, I can get a fully-featured netbook or iPod touch.</p><p>And I'd like to add that there are several examples of companies promising a great price, and then actually delivering on it (e.g. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata\_Nano" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata\_Nano</a> [wikipedia.org])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" When Arrington first visualized the project he was shooting for a $ 200 price point , then discovered that a $ 299 price was more realistic " Why do so many people make this same mistake ?
I think it is hubris - the idea that " I 'm smarter than everyone else in the industry , and I have ideas that none of them do " .
One of the worst PR moves is to drastically raise your estimated price , in this case by 50 \ % .
And in the end , the promised price point of 200 dollars was necessary ; for 300 dollars , I can get a fully-featured netbook or iPod touch.And I 'd like to add that there are several examples of companies promising a great price , and then actually delivering on it ( e.g .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata \ _Nano [ wikipedia.org ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"When Arrington first visualized the project he was shooting for a $200 price point, then discovered that a $299 price was more realistic"Why do so many people make this same mistake?
I think it is hubris - the idea that "I'm smarter than everyone else in the industry, and I have ideas that none of them do".
One of the worst PR moves is to drastically raise your estimated price, in this case by 50\%.
And in the end, the promised price point of 200 dollars was necessary; for 300 dollars, I can get a fully-featured netbook or iPod touch.And I'd like to add that there are several examples of companies promising a great price, and then actually delivering on it (e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata\_Nano [wikipedia.org])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28217355</id>
	<title>Re:Cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244124240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think your motivation for the above post was solely so you could find a good place to use the word "Hubris".  I am still trying to find I good change to employ that word.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think your motivation for the above post was solely so you could find a good place to use the word " Hubris " .
I am still trying to find I good change to employ that word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think your motivation for the above post was solely so you could find a good place to use the word "Hubris".
I am still trying to find I good change to employ that word.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28217951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214501
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210853
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28222989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213309
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210895
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28216765
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28218889
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211097
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213697
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28219281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211041
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211091
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28216323
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210883
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210837
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211487
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212519
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28217355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214677
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211495
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211521
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211679
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211145
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210863
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28219041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211509
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28222925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211259
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211077
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_162219_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28215989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211603
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28219281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211091
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211855
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211183
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211211
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214079
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211097
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211285
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210863
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211145
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211513
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214501
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212567
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210883
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211509
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28219041
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211377
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213309
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28222989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28214677
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211521
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211495
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28217951
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28210935
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211451
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28216765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211603
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28215989
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28212519
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211373
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28218889
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28216323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28217355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28222925
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213697
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28213523
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_162219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_162219.28211583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
