<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_04_138213</id>
	<title>Google Labs Offers Table-Based Search Results</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1244121960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.oreilly.com/" rel="nofollow">blackbearnh</a> writes <i>"Google just released <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/">Google Squared</a> into the Google Labs playground. Google Squared lets you get results back in row and column format, and then add more columns to the result set.  There's <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2009/06/google-squared-is-an-exponenti.html">a brief tour of the features</a> over on O'Reilly Radar, where the judgement is that there's lots of rough edges, but a huge amount of potential, especially for quick and dirty table generation for reports."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>blackbearnh writes " Google just released Google Squared into the Google Labs playground .
Google Squared lets you get results back in row and column format , and then add more columns to the result set .
There 's a brief tour of the features over on O'Reilly Radar , where the judgement is that there 's lots of rough edges , but a huge amount of potential , especially for quick and dirty table generation for reports .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blackbearnh writes "Google just released Google Squared into the Google Labs playground.
Google Squared lets you get results back in row and column format, and then add more columns to the result set.
There's a brief tour of the features over on O'Reilly Radar, where the judgement is that there's lots of rough edges, but a huge amount of potential, especially for quick and dirty table generation for reports.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</id>
	<title>Bible Books</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244126040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=bible+books" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=bible+books</a> [google.com]

Who knew Esther was a babe?</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = bible + books [ google.com ] Who knew Esther was a babe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=bible+books [google.com]

Who knew Esther was a babe?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261</id>
	<title>Wow. Pretty cool.</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1244128920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But when I asked for <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=supermodels" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=supermodels</a> [google.com] I couldn't help but notice it was missing a few key columns.</p><p>HOLY CRAP! This post started out as a joke but then I then typed 'measurements' into the 'Add columns' box <i>and it effing worked!</i> Then click in the 'Add items' in the lower left, add the 5 suggestions, do that a few more times, and BAM, you've got a good amount of data. Holy crap, this is neat. There goes the rest of my day. I could see using this for <i>actual work</i>, like bridge lengths and building heights and such.</p><p>And it's FUN! Data appears instantly, as if by magic, complete with pictures. I've never said this in my 10+ years on Slashdot, but everyone, GO RTFA! Actually, skip TFA, just go visit the site!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But when I asked for http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = supermodels [ google.com ] I could n't help but notice it was missing a few key columns.HOLY CRAP !
This post started out as a joke but then I then typed 'measurements ' into the 'Add columns ' box and it effing worked !
Then click in the 'Add items ' in the lower left , add the 5 suggestions , do that a few more times , and BAM , you 've got a good amount of data .
Holy crap , this is neat .
There goes the rest of my day .
I could see using this for actual work , like bridge lengths and building heights and such.And it 's FUN !
Data appears instantly , as if by magic , complete with pictures .
I 've never said this in my 10 + years on Slashdot , but everyone , GO RTFA !
Actually , skip TFA , just go visit the site !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But when I asked for http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=supermodels [google.com] I couldn't help but notice it was missing a few key columns.HOLY CRAP!
This post started out as a joke but then I then typed 'measurements' into the 'Add columns' box and it effing worked!
Then click in the 'Add items' in the lower left, add the 5 suggestions, do that a few more times, and BAM, you've got a good amount of data.
Holy crap, this is neat.
There goes the rest of my day.
I could see using this for actual work, like bridge lengths and building heights and such.And it's FUN!
Data appears instantly, as if by magic, complete with pictures.
I've never said this in my 10+ years on Slashdot, but everyone, GO RTFA!
Actually, skip TFA, just go visit the site!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210817</id>
	<title>YMMV seems to fit here</title>
	<author>JayDaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1244135220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Based on playing with the site for a few minutes and reading through posts so far it seems like perception of this feature depends on what you are searching for and how you enter the search terms.  Perception of this feature also seems to be dependent upon the user's pre-judgment of Google vs. Wolfram Alpha, but that's probably best left for another discussion.


Of course Google will produce some strange and/or invalid results for the search terms since it is searching then entire internet whereas Alpha is only searching a small subset of sites that it has deemed worthy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Based on playing with the site for a few minutes and reading through posts so far it seems like perception of this feature depends on what you are searching for and how you enter the search terms .
Perception of this feature also seems to be dependent upon the user 's pre-judgment of Google vs. Wolfram Alpha , but that 's probably best left for another discussion .
Of course Google will produce some strange and/or invalid results for the search terms since it is searching then entire internet whereas Alpha is only searching a small subset of sites that it has deemed worthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based on playing with the site for a few minutes and reading through posts so far it seems like perception of this feature depends on what you are searching for and how you enter the search terms.
Perception of this feature also seems to be dependent upon the user's pre-judgment of Google vs. Wolfram Alpha, but that's probably best left for another discussion.
Of course Google will produce some strange and/or invalid results for the search terms since it is searching then entire internet whereas Alpha is only searching a small subset of sites that it has deemed worthy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210093</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244132340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's hilarious, I looked up 'chicks' and it brought up Errors in the King James Bible</p><p>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=chicks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's hilarious , I looked up 'chicks ' and it brought up Errors in the King James Biblehttp : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = chicks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's hilarious, I looked up 'chicks' and it brought up Errors in the King James Biblehttp://www.google.com/squared/search?q=chicks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28216265</id>
	<title>Re:Not usable at all...</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1244116800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All your searches are for reference information and Wolfram is pretty good at this, for obvious stuff at least.
<br> <br>
Instead of "countries in eu", try "baltic countries": Wolfram will give you detailed (and correct) information for "baltic states", but nothing for "baltic countries", Google Squared will give you pretty decent results for both (it misses one of the capitals for the "countries" search, it comes up as the second "guess" though).
<br> <br>
That's the thing about W|A, you have to formulate your queries so specifically (and idiosyncratically) that you could've just as easily looked up the information in your reference source of choice, it doesn't really "search" anything.
<br> <br>
I've yet to get back anything but a blank stare from Wolfram for anything that (a) I'm actually interested in and (b) I wouldn't immediately know how to look up.  Their examples work great, though.
<br> <br>
The Google thing, on the other hand, actually looks good for doing research: culling search results for structured information. You're not supposed to take the first thing that comes back as gospel.
<br> <br>
Exercise for the reader: see which one will come up with a list of the Knight Sabers first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All your searches are for reference information and Wolfram is pretty good at this , for obvious stuff at least .
Instead of " countries in eu " , try " baltic countries " : Wolfram will give you detailed ( and correct ) information for " baltic states " , but nothing for " baltic countries " , Google Squared will give you pretty decent results for both ( it misses one of the capitals for the " countries " search , it comes up as the second " guess " though ) .
That 's the thing about W | A , you have to formulate your queries so specifically ( and idiosyncratically ) that you could 've just as easily looked up the information in your reference source of choice , it does n't really " search " anything .
I 've yet to get back anything but a blank stare from Wolfram for anything that ( a ) I 'm actually interested in and ( b ) I would n't immediately know how to look up .
Their examples work great , though .
The Google thing , on the other hand , actually looks good for doing research : culling search results for structured information .
You 're not supposed to take the first thing that comes back as gospel .
Exercise for the reader : see which one will come up with a list of the Knight Sabers first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All your searches are for reference information and Wolfram is pretty good at this, for obvious stuff at least.
Instead of "countries in eu", try "baltic countries": Wolfram will give you detailed (and correct) information for "baltic states", but nothing for "baltic countries", Google Squared will give you pretty decent results for both (it misses one of the capitals for the "countries" search, it comes up as the second "guess" though).
That's the thing about W|A, you have to formulate your queries so specifically (and idiosyncratically) that you could've just as easily looked up the information in your reference source of choice, it doesn't really "search" anything.
I've yet to get back anything but a blank stare from Wolfram for anything that (a) I'm actually interested in and (b) I wouldn't immediately know how to look up.
Their examples work great, though.
The Google thing, on the other hand, actually looks good for doing research: culling search results for structured information.
You're not supposed to take the first thing that comes back as gospel.
Exercise for the reader: see which one will come up with a list of the Knight Sabers first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211315</id>
	<title>Re:E=MC^2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They have a long way to go then as it seems to provide some awfully terrible results.  Like check this one out for <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=roller\%20coasters&amp;suggest=0" title="google.com">Roller coasters</a> [google.com].</p><p>Apparently there's a roller coaster named GhostRider, it has a length of 4,533 ft, height of 118 ft, and it travels past the speed of sound at 1038 mph!!</p><p>I think I'll just stick to the basic Google search using quotes, +'s, -'s, AND's and OR's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have a long way to go then as it seems to provide some awfully terrible results .
Like check this one out for Roller coasters [ google.com ] .Apparently there 's a roller coaster named GhostRider , it has a length of 4,533 ft , height of 118 ft , and it travels past the speed of sound at 1038 mph !
! I think I 'll just stick to the basic Google search using quotes , + 's , - 's , AND 's and OR 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have a long way to go then as it seems to provide some awfully terrible results.
Like check this one out for Roller coasters [google.com].Apparently there's a roller coaster named GhostRider, it has a length of 4,533 ft, height of 118 ft, and it travels past the speed of sound at 1038 mph!
!I think I'll just stick to the basic Google search using quotes, +'s, -'s, AND's and OR's.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211453</id>
	<title>Re:Wow. Pretty cool.</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1244137860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is super cool and I'm really looking forward to what will come of it, partly because I can see this has miles of potential and partly because the results at the moment can be unintentionally comical. Searching for 'planets' yields 7: Earth, Jupiter, Pluto, Saturn, Mercury, Ceres, and Venus. And in the "description" column for Venus it says "Only at Venus, find the sexiest women's swimwear and clothing. Shop online or request a catalog for sizzling hot clothing."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-) And Pluto, evidently, has a giant sign on it--the pic comes from a random blog. When I created my own list, they all came in better but still not perfect. The "Mercury" and "Saturn" descriptions are for the car companies and Pluto's picture, this time, was the cartoon dog. Still, very cool, and TONS of potential.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is super cool and I 'm really looking forward to what will come of it , partly because I can see this has miles of potential and partly because the results at the moment can be unintentionally comical .
Searching for 'planets ' yields 7 : Earth , Jupiter , Pluto , Saturn , Mercury , Ceres , and Venus .
And in the " description " column for Venus it says " Only at Venus , find the sexiest women 's swimwear and clothing .
Shop online or request a catalog for sizzling hot clothing .
" : - ) And Pluto , evidently , has a giant sign on it--the pic comes from a random blog .
When I created my own list , they all came in better but still not perfect .
The " Mercury " and " Saturn " descriptions are for the car companies and Pluto 's picture , this time , was the cartoon dog .
Still , very cool , and TONS of potential .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is super cool and I'm really looking forward to what will come of it, partly because I can see this has miles of potential and partly because the results at the moment can be unintentionally comical.
Searching for 'planets' yields 7: Earth, Jupiter, Pluto, Saturn, Mercury, Ceres, and Venus.
And in the "description" column for Venus it says "Only at Venus, find the sexiest women's swimwear and clothing.
Shop online or request a catalog for sizzling hot clothing.
" :-) And Pluto, evidently, has a giant sign on it--the pic comes from a random blog.
When I created my own list, they all came in better but still not perfect.
The "Mercury" and "Saturn" descriptions are for the car companies and Pluto's picture, this time, was the cartoon dog.
Still, very cool, and TONS of potential.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210995</id>
	<title>no-go w/ w3m</title>
	<author>10am-bedtime</author>
	<datestamp>1244135940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Unfortunately, this facility does not interoperate with w3m.
All you can see is a "preparing" progress-bar thingy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately , this facility does not interoperate with w3m .
All you can see is a " preparing " progress-bar thingy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Unfortunately, this facility does not interoperate with w3m.
All you can see is a "preparing" progress-bar thingy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209391</id>
	<title>Re:Already better that Alpha</title>
	<author>Gulthek</author>
	<datestamp>1244129400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No data analysis! GS and WA are completely different beasts.</p><p>In Google Squared:</p><p>Try getting a square with the five largest countries by area. (In Wolfram|Alpha search for <a href="http://www16.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=five+largest+countries+by+area" title="wolframalpha.com">five largest countries by area</a> [wolframalpha.com])</p><p>Try to mathematically manipulate results like, say, dividing power usage of the united states by its population. (In Wolfram|Alpha search for <a href="http://www16.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=united+states+electric+production+\%2F+population" title="wolframalpha.com">united states electric production / population</a> [wolframalpha.com]</p><p>Try to get GS to do anything like growth charts, ISS location calculations, morse code translation, puzzle solving, food calorie counting, differential equations.</p><p>Also the data is much less complete. Check out Google Squared's results for the <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/table/agl3dQKWyfSqnaPfyIu9qw5w" title="google.com">escape velocities of the moons of Mars</a> [google.com]. Now check <a href="http://www44.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=escape+velocities+of+the+moons+of+mars" title="wolframalpha.com">Wolfram|Alpha's</a> [wolframalpha.com]. Yeah, there's a reason that WA is citable as a primary source.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No data analysis !
GS and WA are completely different beasts.In Google Squared : Try getting a square with the five largest countries by area .
( In Wolfram | Alpha search for five largest countries by area [ wolframalpha.com ] ) Try to mathematically manipulate results like , say , dividing power usage of the united states by its population .
( In Wolfram | Alpha search for united states electric production / population [ wolframalpha.com ] Try to get GS to do anything like growth charts , ISS location calculations , morse code translation , puzzle solving , food calorie counting , differential equations.Also the data is much less complete .
Check out Google Squared 's results for the escape velocities of the moons of Mars [ google.com ] .
Now check Wolfram | Alpha 's [ wolframalpha.com ] .
Yeah , there 's a reason that WA is citable as a primary source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No data analysis!
GS and WA are completely different beasts.In Google Squared:Try getting a square with the five largest countries by area.
(In Wolfram|Alpha search for five largest countries by area [wolframalpha.com])Try to mathematically manipulate results like, say, dividing power usage of the united states by its population.
(In Wolfram|Alpha search for united states electric production / population [wolframalpha.com]Try to get GS to do anything like growth charts, ISS location calculations, morse code translation, puzzle solving, food calorie counting, differential equations.Also the data is much less complete.
Check out Google Squared's results for the escape velocities of the moons of Mars [google.com].
Now check Wolfram|Alpha's [wolframalpha.com].
Yeah, there's a reason that WA is citable as a primary source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214137</id>
	<title>Some obvious missing functionality</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1244148840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where is the ability to sort the records by columns?  I mean duh?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the ability to sort the records by columns ?
I mean duh ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the ability to sort the records by columns?
I mean duh?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209785</id>
	<title>This Google thing will never catch on...</title>
	<author>viper34j</author>
	<datestamp>1244130900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This Google thing will never catch on...</htmltext>
<tokenext>This Google thing will never catch on.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This Google thing will never catch on...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211871</id>
	<title>Literature searches</title>
	<author>stei7766</author>
	<datestamp>1244139720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, a bit clunky now, but I would imagine it could be WTFBBQ for scientific literature searches. Scifinder makes babies cry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , a bit clunky now , but I would imagine it could be WTFBBQ for scientific literature searches .
Scifinder makes babies cry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, a bit clunky now, but I would imagine it could be WTFBBQ for scientific literature searches.
Scifinder makes babies cry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211961</id>
	<title>It actually works!</title>
	<author>agslashdot</author>
	<datestamp>1244140080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=finite+abelian+group#" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=finite+abelian+group#</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=differentiation+rules" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=differentiation+rules</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=power+series" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=power+series</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=differential+geometry" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=differential+geometry</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=slashdot" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=slashdot</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=pornstars" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=pornstars</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=c+compiler" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=c+compiler</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=probability+distribution" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=probability+distribution</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=cancer" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=cancer</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=spielberg+films" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=spielberg+films</a> [google.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=Gross+domestic+product+countries" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=Gross+domestic+product+countries</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = finite + abelian + group # [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = differentiation + rules [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = power + series [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = differential + geometry [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = slashdot [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = pornstars [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = c + compiler [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = probability + distribution [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = cancer [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = spielberg + films [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = Gross + domestic + product + countries [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=finite+abelian+group# [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=differentiation+rules [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=power+series [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=differential+geometry [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=slashdot [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=pornstars [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=c+compiler [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=probability+distribution [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=cancer [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=spielberg+films [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=Gross+domestic+product+countries [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209111</id>
	<title>Re:Already better that Alpha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244128440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it is a competitor to Alpha.  I don't know that I'd say it's better, though.

</p><p>Alpha operates only on "curated" data, which means that there's a lot more that can be done with the data, since Alpha understands its structure much better.  Also, Alpha can do math on it, create graphs, etc..  But with Alpha, you can only use the data that's been made available.

</p><p>Google squared can't do as much with the data, but it can use the whole web, so it's data source is much richer.

</p><p>Of course, alpha can add data, and Google can add knowledge of relationships and the ability to do calculations and generate graphs.  Their capabilities may converge over time.  In which case Google will win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is a competitor to Alpha .
I do n't know that I 'd say it 's better , though .
Alpha operates only on " curated " data , which means that there 's a lot more that can be done with the data , since Alpha understands its structure much better .
Also , Alpha can do math on it , create graphs , etc.. But with Alpha , you can only use the data that 's been made available .
Google squared ca n't do as much with the data , but it can use the whole web , so it 's data source is much richer .
Of course , alpha can add data , and Google can add knowledge of relationships and the ability to do calculations and generate graphs .
Their capabilities may converge over time .
In which case Google will win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is a competitor to Alpha.
I don't know that I'd say it's better, though.
Alpha operates only on "curated" data, which means that there's a lot more that can be done with the data, since Alpha understands its structure much better.
Also, Alpha can do math on it, create graphs, etc..  But with Alpha, you can only use the data that's been made available.
Google squared can't do as much with the data, but it can use the whole web, so it's data source is much richer.
Of course, alpha can add data, and Google can add knowledge of relationships and the ability to do calculations and generate graphs.
Their capabilities may converge over time.
In which case Google will win.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210471</id>
	<title>Re:Not usable at all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244133900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ergo: do not use it. Not yet in any case.</p></div><p>Your conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from your poorly stated propositions.</p><p>(I have tried several searches and google squares returned very appropriate results.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ergo : do not use it .
Not yet in any case.Your conclusion does n't necessarily follow from your poorly stated propositions .
( I have tried several searches and google squares returned very appropriate results .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ergo: do not use it.
Not yet in any case.Your conclusion doesn't necessarily follow from your poorly stated propositions.
(I have tried several searches and google squares returned very appropriate results.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28219015</id>
	<title>Re:Already better that Alpha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244143260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dnno. I wanted to see how fast light travls inside glass. It instead tried to convert the speed of light into the amount of stuff small glasses hold: http://www44.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=speed+of+light+in+glass . At least it failed to do the conversion...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dnno .
I wanted to see how fast light travls inside glass .
It instead tried to convert the speed of light into the amount of stuff small glasses hold : http : //www44.wolframalpha.com/input/ ? i = speed + of + light + in + glass .
At least it failed to do the conversion.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dnno.
I wanted to see how fast light travls inside glass.
It instead tried to convert the speed of light into the amount of stuff small glasses hold: http://www44.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=speed+of+light+in+glass .
At least it failed to do the conversion...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208749</id>
	<title>Google Grid</title>
	<author>JensenDied</author>
	<datestamp>1244126880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AT9ho2G0N\_Y" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Epic 2014</a> [youtube.com] <br>Stay tuned for the news wars next year!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Epic 2014 [ youtube.com ] Stay tuned for the news wars next year !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Epic 2014 [youtube.com] Stay tuned for the news wars next year!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211617</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>apok04</author>
	<datestamp>1244138460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The smartphones query doesn't include the G1.  Oops.  <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=smartphones" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=smartphones</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The smartphones query does n't include the G1 .
Oops. http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = smartphones [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The smartphones query doesn't include the G1.
Oops.  http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=smartphones [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017</id>
	<title>Mixed results</title>
	<author>gaspyy</author>
	<datestamp>1244128020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The default result sets are more than useless - are laughable.<br>I searched for <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=europe+demographics" title="google.com">europe demographics</a> [google.com] and it automatically created a set of rows that was made of Gibraltar, Isle of Man and Faroe Islands; for columns it created Image, Description, Language, Capital and Currency. The <a href="http://www58.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=europe+demographics" title="wolframalpha.com">same search on Wolfram Alpha</a> [wolframalpha.com] produced clear, concise results.</p><p>Eventually, I could get good results on Squared too by starting with an empty square and adding rows and columns myself. Took about 10 minutes; I could have made a simple search to get the same results.</p><p>I realize Google-bashing is dangerous around here, but they definitely have to improve Squared if they want it to be useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The default result sets are more than useless - are laughable.I searched for europe demographics [ google.com ] and it automatically created a set of rows that was made of Gibraltar , Isle of Man and Faroe Islands ; for columns it created Image , Description , Language , Capital and Currency .
The same search on Wolfram Alpha [ wolframalpha.com ] produced clear , concise results.Eventually , I could get good results on Squared too by starting with an empty square and adding rows and columns myself .
Took about 10 minutes ; I could have made a simple search to get the same results.I realize Google-bashing is dangerous around here , but they definitely have to improve Squared if they want it to be useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The default result sets are more than useless - are laughable.I searched for europe demographics [google.com] and it automatically created a set of rows that was made of Gibraltar, Isle of Man and Faroe Islands; for columns it created Image, Description, Language, Capital and Currency.
The same search on Wolfram Alpha [wolframalpha.com] produced clear, concise results.Eventually, I could get good results on Squared too by starting with an empty square and adding rows and columns myself.
Took about 10 minutes; I could have made a simple search to get the same results.I realize Google-bashing is dangerous around here, but they definitely have to improve Squared if they want it to be useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208887</id>
	<title>wikipedia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244127420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it sure provides a ton of information from wikipedia. i wonder what \% of wikipedia articles form google's results these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it sure provides a ton of information from wikipedia .
i wonder what \ % of wikipedia articles form google 's results these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it sure provides a ton of information from wikipedia.
i wonder what \% of wikipedia articles form google's results these days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213301</id>
	<title>Re:How it works</title>
	<author>Prof.Phreak</author>
	<datestamp>1244145660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed. Sounds like an application of NMF: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-negative\_matrix\_factorization" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-negative\_matrix\_factorization</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
Sounds like an application of NMF : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-negative \ _matrix \ _factorization [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
Sounds like an application of NMF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-negative\_matrix\_factorization [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211049</id>
	<title>Put in your first name and reply mit results...</title>
	<author>tyroneking</author>
	<datestamp>1244136240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it said "Heartless"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for me ... it said " Heartless "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for me ... it said "Heartless"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210261</id>
	<title>Re:Mixed results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244132940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Search for <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=&quot;mountains+in+germany&quot;" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Mountains in Germany</a> [google.com]. You will find the Zugspitze, height 2,962m (fair enough), the black forest (ok, there are some mountains in that area), height 19.5km (huh?) and the baltic sea (WTF?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Search for Mountains in Germany [ google.com ] .
You will find the Zugspitze , height 2,962m ( fair enough ) , the black forest ( ok , there are some mountains in that area ) , height 19.5km ( huh ?
) and the baltic sea ( WTF ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Search for Mountains in Germany [google.com].
You will find the Zugspitze, height 2,962m (fair enough), the black forest (ok, there are some mountains in that area), height 19.5km (huh?
) and the baltic sea (WTF?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209053</id>
	<title>Re:E=MC^2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244128200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It doesn't take an Einstein to find out that this is good for researching things.  It certainly beats going through all of the connecting websites to get to the juicy details.</p></div><p>Except that it doesn't work. Take a simple search, like "cloud types" (no, I'm not just picking something I know doesn't work). The initial display isn't terrible (although, for something that straight forward, the number of gaps is surprising). Now, look at the suggestions for more columns: "homeworld", "affiliation", and "hair color"....What?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't take an Einstein to find out that this is good for researching things .
It certainly beats going through all of the connecting websites to get to the juicy details.Except that it does n't work .
Take a simple search , like " cloud types " ( no , I 'm not just picking something I know does n't work ) .
The initial display is n't terrible ( although , for something that straight forward , the number of gaps is surprising ) .
Now , look at the suggestions for more columns : " homeworld " , " affiliation " , and " hair color " ....What ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't take an Einstein to find out that this is good for researching things.
It certainly beats going through all of the connecting websites to get to the juicy details.Except that it doesn't work.
Take a simple search, like "cloud types" (no, I'm not just picking something I know doesn't work).
The initial display isn't terrible (although, for something that straight forward, the number of gaps is surprising).
Now, look at the suggestions for more columns: "homeworld", "affiliation", and "hair color"....What?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208593</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210417</id>
	<title>Re:First thoughts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244133660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like there are some bugs: <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/table/ag0LZjw0-WIatilQAcN8sU9w" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/table/ag0LZjw0-WIatilQAcN8sU9w</a> [google.com]

We all knew that Ann Coulter was packing quite the sausage between those legs, for sure, but Ronald Reagan with a python dick?  No way in hell..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like there are some bugs : http : //www.google.com/squared/table/ag0LZjw0-WIatilQAcN8sU9w [ google.com ] We all knew that Ann Coulter was packing quite the sausage between those legs , for sure , but Ronald Reagan with a python dick ?
No way in hell. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like there are some bugs: http://www.google.com/squared/table/ag0LZjw0-WIatilQAcN8sU9w [google.com]

We all knew that Ann Coulter was packing quite the sausage between those legs, for sure, but Ronald Reagan with a python dick?
No way in hell..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208623</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212697</id>
	<title>It doesn't rank itself very highly</title>
	<author>mr\_lizard13</author>
	<datestamp>1244143260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=google+squared" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=google+squared</a> [google.com]
<br>
Oh well!</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = google + squared [ google.com ] Oh well !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=google+squared [google.com]

Oh well!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208993</id>
	<title>Pretty neat but...</title>
	<author>keeegan</author>
	<datestamp>1244127900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where's the option to save it to my hard drive as a spreadsheet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the option to save it to my hard drive as a spreadsheet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the option to save it to my hard drive as a spreadsheet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212111</id>
	<title>hmph</title>
	<author>GregNorc</author>
	<datestamp>1244140740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like they're trying to take on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clusty" title="wikipedia.org">Clusty</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like they 're trying to take on Clusty [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like they're trying to take on Clusty [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209183</id>
	<title>Re:Already better that Alpha</title>
	<author>Reality Master 101</author>
	<datestamp>1244128680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apples and Oranges. Google squared doesn't try to do ANY analysis of the data, it's just a way to do many searches at once in a grid format (see my other post). Alpha takes data and tries to do computations on it (with a terrible input parser, I might add).

<p>They aren't solving the same problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apples and Oranges .
Google squared does n't try to do ANY analysis of the data , it 's just a way to do many searches at once in a grid format ( see my other post ) .
Alpha takes data and tries to do computations on it ( with a terrible input parser , I might add ) .
They are n't solving the same problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apples and Oranges.
Google squared doesn't try to do ANY analysis of the data, it's just a way to do many searches at once in a grid format (see my other post).
Alpha takes data and tries to do computations on it (with a terrible input parser, I might add).
They aren't solving the same problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208593</id>
	<title>E=MC^2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244126160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't take an Einstein to find out that this is good for researching things.  It certainly beats going through all of the connecting websites to get to the juicy details.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't take an Einstein to find out that this is good for researching things .
It certainly beats going through all of the connecting websites to get to the juicy details .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't take an Einstein to find out that this is good for researching things.
It certainly beats going through all of the connecting websites to get to the juicy details.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211967</id>
	<title>Square?</title>
	<author>Saija</author>
	<datestamp>1244140140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No semantic searches. Less accuracy than Wolfram. Lame.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>No semantic searches .
Less accuracy than Wolfram .
Lame. ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No semantic searches.
Less accuracy than Wolfram.
Lame. ;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28216153</id>
	<title>7 wonders</title>
	<author>pablodiazgutierrez</author>
	<datestamp>1244116200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If done (and used) right, this could be a quantum leap (yes, I work for Intel) in Internet search for semi-structured information search. However, my first search: <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=7+wonders" title="google.com">7 wonders</a> [google.com], gave only partially satisfactory results. Stonehenge 120 yards tall? The Empire State building and Panama channel? Well, it's rightly beta, so I shouldn't complain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If done ( and used ) right , this could be a quantum leap ( yes , I work for Intel ) in Internet search for semi-structured information search .
However , my first search : 7 wonders [ google.com ] , gave only partially satisfactory results .
Stonehenge 120 yards tall ?
The Empire State building and Panama channel ?
Well , it 's rightly beta , so I should n't complain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If done (and used) right, this could be a quantum leap (yes, I work for Intel) in Internet search for semi-structured information search.
However, my first search: 7 wonders [google.com], gave only partially satisfactory results.
Stonehenge 120 yards tall?
The Empire State building and Panama channel?
Well, it's rightly beta, so I shouldn't complain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213093</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>mobida2</author>
	<datestamp>1244144880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well Yes, Google Square is somethng amazing product for webmasters to streamline their SEO Activities. This is going to add a value to their efforts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well Yes , Google Square is somethng amazing product for webmasters to streamline their SEO Activities .
This is going to add a value to their efforts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well Yes, Google Square is somethng amazing product for webmasters to streamline their SEO Activities.
This is going to add a value to their efforts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210053</id>
	<title>Accurate informations...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244132160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Learn more about <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=operating+systems" title="google.com" rel="nofollow"> Operating Systems</a> [google.com]</p><p>Ah! Who new Windows was free?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Learn more about Operating Systems [ google.com ] Ah !
Who new Windows was free ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Learn more about  Operating Systems [google.com]Ah!
Who new Windows was free?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212507</id>
	<title>Re:Wow. Pretty cool.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244142480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, then add Dress Size. Who knew Halle Berry was a 75.88 KB?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , then add Dress Size .
Who knew Halle Berry was a 75.88 KB ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, then add Dress Size.
Who knew Halle Berry was a 75.88 KB?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209051</id>
	<title>Not so impressed</title>
	<author>foniksonik</author>
	<datestamp>1244128140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I get better information from a normal search. This query set is very limited (for now at least). You can only give it a broad set topic and it will only give you back more specific subsets. Nothing related, similar or tangential. Do a search for "javascript" and you get 2 results - the international standard and a link to Mozilla. Nothing about any of the popular libraries, help sites, documentation, blogs, books or history...</p><p>Do a search on Dog breeds however and you get a nice list of those as they are a discrete subset of the query term.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I get better information from a normal search .
This query set is very limited ( for now at least ) .
You can only give it a broad set topic and it will only give you back more specific subsets .
Nothing related , similar or tangential .
Do a search for " javascript " and you get 2 results - the international standard and a link to Mozilla .
Nothing about any of the popular libraries , help sites , documentation , blogs , books or history...Do a search on Dog breeds however and you get a nice list of those as they are a discrete subset of the query term .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I get better information from a normal search.
This query set is very limited (for now at least).
You can only give it a broad set topic and it will only give you back more specific subsets.
Nothing related, similar or tangential.
Do a search for "javascript" and you get 2 results - the international standard and a link to Mozilla.
Nothing about any of the popular libraries, help sites, documentation, blogs, books or history...Do a search on Dog breeds however and you get a nice list of those as they are a discrete subset of the query term.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210881</id>
	<title>Re:Not usable at all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244135460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I googled "greek prime ministers" and I got:</p><p>Google Squared couldn't automatically build a Square about greek prime ministers.<br>But don't give up yet!</p><p>Start a Square by entering up to 5 example items below.<br>example: Planets<br>Venus<br>Mercury<br>Earth<br>Jupiter</p><p>After entering karamanlis, simitis, papandreou, mitsotakis, and kapodistrias in the boxes, I got a table with all five of them plus Khrushchev and Gorbachev!! Well, it needs some work...<br>Wikipedia, using "greek prime ministers" returned "No article title matches" but the first hit in the list was "List of Prime Ministers of Greece", which was correct.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I googled " greek prime ministers " and I got : Google Squared could n't automatically build a Square about greek prime ministers.But do n't give up yet ! Start a Square by entering up to 5 example items below.example : PlanetsVenusMercuryEarthJupiterAfter entering karamanlis , simitis , papandreou , mitsotakis , and kapodistrias in the boxes , I got a table with all five of them plus Khrushchev and Gorbachev ! !
Well , it needs some work...Wikipedia , using " greek prime ministers " returned " No article title matches " but the first hit in the list was " List of Prime Ministers of Greece " , which was correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I googled "greek prime ministers" and I got:Google Squared couldn't automatically build a Square about greek prime ministers.But don't give up yet!Start a Square by entering up to 5 example items below.example: PlanetsVenusMercuryEarthJupiterAfter entering karamanlis, simitis, papandreou, mitsotakis, and kapodistrias in the boxes, I got a table with all five of them plus Khrushchev and Gorbachev!!
Well, it needs some work...Wikipedia, using "greek prime ministers" returned "No article title matches" but the first hit in the list was "List of Prime Ministers of Greece", which was correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208629</id>
	<title>Useful for brainstorming</title>
	<author>Jarlsberg</author>
	<datestamp>1244126280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And just when you thought table-based design was gone!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

I find the idea interesting, but not very practical. It seems to work well for brain storming. With just a few keywords, you get a lot of results that can shed a fresh light on what you were thinking about. Well worth a try.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And just when you thought table-based design was gone !
: ) I find the idea interesting , but not very practical .
It seems to work well for brain storming .
With just a few keywords , you get a lot of results that can shed a fresh light on what you were thinking about .
Well worth a try .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And just when you thought table-based design was gone!
:)

I find the idea interesting, but not very practical.
It seems to work well for brain storming.
With just a few keywords, you get a lot of results that can shed a fresh light on what you were thinking about.
Well worth a try.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28216531</id>
	<title>Awesome</title>
	<author>nog\_lorp</author>
	<datestamp>1244118420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kinda of like Wolfram Alpha except:<br>1) less accurate.<br>2) actually usable.</p><p>Makes me think I'll be using this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda of like Wolfram Alpha except : 1 ) less accurate.2 ) actually usable.Makes me think I 'll be using this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda of like Wolfram Alpha except:1) less accurate.2) actually usable.Makes me think I'll be using this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211825</id>
	<title>Try this: search engine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244139540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enter search engine as a term for Google Squared, then add a column titled URL. You will see funny results<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enter search engine as a term for Google Squared , then add a column titled URL .
You will see funny results : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enter search engine as a term for Google Squared, then add a column titled URL.
You will see funny results :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515</id>
	<title>Not usable at all...</title>
	<author>Arrawa</author>
	<datestamp>1244129820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've tried several searches and found that all searches are completely false, misleading or screwed up.
<br> <br>
Example 1: Dutch provinces. Wolfram accurately lists 12 and has the right names. Google lists dozens results, including Belgium rivers, shows the picture of a soccer player (with the same name as a
<br> <br>
Example 2: Dutch prime ministers. Wolfram shows the current one correctly and some older ones. All the info Wolfram shows is correct. Google lists many. Mostly the names are correct, but there is a picture and description of a car salesman with the same name, among others.
<br> <br>
Example 3: Countries in the EU. Wolfram shows 27 correct names. Google shows lots and lots of names. On the first pages it is ok, but on page threee, Sports is listed as an country (with the capital listed as $9500 ??) as well as Switzerland (not a EU-member) and English.
<br> <br>
So the tables are completely useless, it also sources Wikipedia almost all the time.
<br> <br>
Ergo: do not use it. Not yet in any case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've tried several searches and found that all searches are completely false , misleading or screwed up .
Example 1 : Dutch provinces .
Wolfram accurately lists 12 and has the right names .
Google lists dozens results , including Belgium rivers , shows the picture of a soccer player ( with the same name as a Example 2 : Dutch prime ministers .
Wolfram shows the current one correctly and some older ones .
All the info Wolfram shows is correct .
Google lists many .
Mostly the names are correct , but there is a picture and description of a car salesman with the same name , among others .
Example 3 : Countries in the EU .
Wolfram shows 27 correct names .
Google shows lots and lots of names .
On the first pages it is ok , but on page threee , Sports is listed as an country ( with the capital listed as $ 9500 ? ?
) as well as Switzerland ( not a EU-member ) and English .
So the tables are completely useless , it also sources Wikipedia almost all the time .
Ergo : do not use it .
Not yet in any case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've tried several searches and found that all searches are completely false, misleading or screwed up.
Example 1: Dutch provinces.
Wolfram accurately lists 12 and has the right names.
Google lists dozens results, including Belgium rivers, shows the picture of a soccer player (with the same name as a
 
Example 2: Dutch prime ministers.
Wolfram shows the current one correctly and some older ones.
All the info Wolfram shows is correct.
Google lists many.
Mostly the names are correct, but there is a picture and description of a car salesman with the same name, among others.
Example 3: Countries in the EU.
Wolfram shows 27 correct names.
Google shows lots and lots of names.
On the first pages it is ok, but on page threee, Sports is listed as an country (with the capital listed as $9500 ??
) as well as Switzerland (not a EU-member) and English.
So the tables are completely useless, it also sources Wikipedia almost all the time.
Ergo: do not use it.
Not yet in any case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212483</id>
	<title>A little better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244142420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Better results from a typo (european)<br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=europian+demographics" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=europian+demographics</a> [google.com] <br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=european+demographics" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=european+demographics</a> [google.com]  (Nice photo Monaco)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Better results from a typo ( european ) http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = europian + demographics [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = european + demographics [ google.com ] ( Nice photo Monaco )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better results from a typo (european)
http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=europian+demographics [google.com] 

http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=european+demographics [google.com]  (Nice photo Monaco)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211115</id>
	<title>Curated tables.</title>
	<author>orngjce223</author>
	<datestamp>1244136480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see the promise but would rather that my user-entered values be accessible like the GoogleSearchWiki.  This could be described as a "curated table".  (Much more useful than the utterly random data given - when I search for Fruit, I want to see a picture of an apple, not an Apple.)  Obviously I'm taking half the pages from Wikipedia's book and throwing them at Google, but the idea's there I think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see the promise but would rather that my user-entered values be accessible like the GoogleSearchWiki .
This could be described as a " curated table " .
( Much more useful than the utterly random data given - when I search for Fruit , I want to see a picture of an apple , not an Apple .
) Obviously I 'm taking half the pages from Wikipedia 's book and throwing them at Google , but the idea 's there I think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see the promise but would rather that my user-entered values be accessible like the GoogleSearchWiki.
This could be described as a "curated table".
(Much more useful than the utterly random data given - when I search for Fruit, I want to see a picture of an apple, not an Apple.
)  Obviously I'm taking half the pages from Wikipedia's book and throwing them at Google, but the idea's there I think.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214563</id>
	<title>Re:Wow. Pretty cool.</title>
	<author>Carnildo</author>
	<datestamp>1244107920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Searching for supermodels?  Why not search for women who actually look good instead?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Searching for supermodels ?
Why not search for women who actually look good instead ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Searching for supermodels?
Why not search for women who actually look good instead?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211909</id>
	<title>Re:Mixed results</title>
	<author>orgelspieler</author>
	<datestamp>1244139840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you try "programming languages", "supreme court justices", or "linux distros" you get no results from Alpha, but a reasonable effort from Squared. Then again, these are all topics that are well covered by Wikipedia. It seems that when you do get results from Alpha, they're almost always exactly what you're looking for (unless there's a periodical with the exact phrase you're searching for, e.g. "construction equipment"). On the other hand, Squared takes more of a bad-data-is-better-than-no-data approach. They both serve their purposes, but I wouldn't exactly call them competitors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you try " programming languages " , " supreme court justices " , or " linux distros " you get no results from Alpha , but a reasonable effort from Squared .
Then again , these are all topics that are well covered by Wikipedia .
It seems that when you do get results from Alpha , they 're almost always exactly what you 're looking for ( unless there 's a periodical with the exact phrase you 're searching for , e.g .
" construction equipment " ) .
On the other hand , Squared takes more of a bad-data-is-better-than-no-data approach .
They both serve their purposes , but I would n't exactly call them competitors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you try "programming languages", "supreme court justices", or "linux distros" you get no results from Alpha, but a reasonable effort from Squared.
Then again, these are all topics that are well covered by Wikipedia.
It seems that when you do get results from Alpha, they're almost always exactly what you're looking for (unless there's a periodical with the exact phrase you're searching for, e.g.
"construction equipment").
On the other hand, Squared takes more of a bad-data-is-better-than-no-data approach.
They both serve their purposes, but I wouldn't exactly call them competitors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209617</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244130240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=slashdot+users</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = slashdot + users</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=slashdot+users</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209387</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>[HooL]</author>
	<datestamp>1244129340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>:-)<br><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nerd" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nerd</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>: - ) http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = nerd [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>:-)http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nerd [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28218513</id>
	<title>So I decided to try this</title>
	<author>visible.frylock</author>
	<datestamp>1244136900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I've been looking around for LAME (the not-the-mp3-encoder) stuff for the past 30 minutes. I've never heard of Google Squared before, so I thought I'd test it out with lame:</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lame" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lame</a> [google.com]</p><p>Apparently google doesn't like bond movies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Or it knows where I can dl mp3s of the soundtracks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I'm not actually sure.</p><p>Then I decided to RTFM, and use a different string, and it was actually pretty cool:</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lame+front+ends" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lame+front+ends</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I 've been looking around for LAME ( the not-the-mp3-encoder ) stuff for the past 30 minutes .
I 've never heard of Google Squared before , so I thought I 'd test it out with lame : http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = lame [ google.com ] Apparently google does n't like bond movies ... Or it knows where I can dl mp3s of the soundtracks ... I 'm not actually sure.Then I decided to RTFM , and use a different string , and it was actually pretty cool : http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = lame + front + ends [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I've been looking around for LAME (the not-the-mp3-encoder) stuff for the past 30 minutes.
I've never heard of Google Squared before, so I thought I'd test it out with lame:http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lame [google.com]Apparently google doesn't like bond movies ... Or it knows where I can dl mp3s of the soundtracks ... I'm not actually sure.Then I decided to RTFM, and use a different string, and it was actually pretty cool:http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lame+front+ends [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211879</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>apok04</author>
	<datestamp>1244139780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Axis of Evil: <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=axis+of+evil" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=axis+of+evil</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Axis of Evil : http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = axis + of + evil [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Axis of Evil: http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=axis+of+evil [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209167</id>
	<title>Spider Man = Monkey</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244128620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=monkeys" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=monkeys</a> [google.com]</p><p>I never knew!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = monkeys [ google.com ] I never knew !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=monkeys [google.com]I never knew!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209419</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244129520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=memes" title="google.com">Memes</a> [google.com] is surprisingly accurate - and, hilariously, it also counts Ron Paul as one.  Which, when you come to think about it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Memes [ google.com ] is surprisingly accurate - and , hilariously , it also counts Ron Paul as one .
Which , when you come to think about it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Memes [google.com] is surprisingly accurate - and, hilariously, it also counts Ron Paul as one.
Which, when you come to think about it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210657</id>
	<title>Ordering algorithm for rows?</title>
	<author>Odonian</author>
	<datestamp>1244134620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how they are ordering their table results.  If I put in "star trek characters" for instance, I do indeed get a first set of ten that are all from ST.
<br>
#1 is Spock (the Zachary Quinto version, but OK good)
<br>
Kirk however is #6 after Riker, Troi, Picard, and Neelix.
<br>
Neelix?  c'mon google, that's a fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how they are ordering their table results .
If I put in " star trek characters " for instance , I do indeed get a first set of ten that are all from ST . # 1 is Spock ( the Zachary Quinto version , but OK good ) Kirk however is # 6 after Riker , Troi , Picard , and Neelix .
Neelix ? c'mon google , that 's a fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how they are ordering their table results.
If I put in "star trek characters" for instance, I do indeed get a first set of ten that are all from ST.

#1 is Spock (the Zachary Quinto version, but OK good)

Kirk however is #6 after Riker, Troi, Picard, and Neelix.
Neelix?  c'mon google, that's a fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210173</id>
	<title>Re:Wow. Pretty cool.</title>
	<author>subtr4ct</author>
	<datestamp>1244132640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Adding a column "marital status" reveals some of the ladies to be single.  Not perfect, though.  "No value found" for several rows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adding a column " marital status " reveals some of the ladies to be single .
Not perfect , though .
" No value found " for several rows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adding a column "marital status" reveals some of the ladies to be single.
Not perfect, though.
"No value found" for several rows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214449</id>
	<title>interesting and strange and possibly useful</title>
	<author>krakround</author>
	<datestamp>1244107260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"planets" gives you the results you might expect, but not nine or even eight rows.

"english queens" leads off with Edward VII.  Poor Edward, I did not truly know ye.

On a related note, the above query failed to include Queen Victoria, although I see at the time of posting she now appears in the drop down box.  Related queries got Victoria confused with the current Crown Princess of Sweden and  Victoria's Secret.

A surprisingly complete result is "stargate atlantis characters".

I think the way to use this is to not consider the initial result definitive, but as a starting point that can be refined.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" planets " gives you the results you might expect , but not nine or even eight rows .
" english queens " leads off with Edward VII .
Poor Edward , I did not truly know ye .
On a related note , the above query failed to include Queen Victoria , although I see at the time of posting she now appears in the drop down box .
Related queries got Victoria confused with the current Crown Princess of Sweden and Victoria 's Secret .
A surprisingly complete result is " stargate atlantis characters " .
I think the way to use this is to not consider the initial result definitive , but as a starting point that can be refined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"planets" gives you the results you might expect, but not nine or even eight rows.
"english queens" leads off with Edward VII.
Poor Edward, I did not truly know ye.
On a related note, the above query failed to include Queen Victoria, although I see at the time of posting she now appears in the drop down box.
Related queries got Victoria confused with the current Crown Princess of Sweden and  Victoria's Secret.
A surprisingly complete result is "stargate atlantis characters".
I think the way to use this is to not consider the initial result definitive, but as a starting point that can be refined.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209723</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244130540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=fruit</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = fruit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=fruit</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213535</id>
	<title>How about a hybrid approach?</title>
	<author>noodlesquares</author>
	<datestamp>1244146500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Noodle Squares uses a combination of human intelligence and automation to generate better results. Compare:
<br>
<br>
<b>Search engines</b> <br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=search+engines" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=search+engines</a> [google.com]
<br>
<a href="http://noodlesquares.com/SearchEngines.html" title="noodlesquares.com" rel="nofollow">http://noodlesquares.com/SearchEngines.html</a> [noodlesquares.com]
<br> <br>
<b>Cameras</b> <br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=cameras" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=cameras</a> [google.com] <br>
<a href="http://noodlesquares.com/Cameras.html" title="noodlesquares.com" rel="nofollow">http://noodlesquares.com/Cameras.html</a> [noodlesquares.com] <br>
<br>
[disclaimer: associated with noodlesquares]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Noodle Squares uses a combination of human intelligence and automation to generate better results .
Compare : Search engines http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = search + engines [ google.com ] http : //noodlesquares.com/SearchEngines.html [ noodlesquares.com ] Cameras http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = cameras [ google.com ] http : //noodlesquares.com/Cameras.html [ noodlesquares.com ] [ disclaimer : associated with noodlesquares ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Noodle Squares uses a combination of human intelligence and automation to generate better results.
Compare:


Search engines 
http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=search+engines [google.com]

http://noodlesquares.com/SearchEngines.html [noodlesquares.com]
 
Cameras 
http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=cameras [google.com] 
http://noodlesquares.com/Cameras.html [noodlesquares.com] 

[disclaimer: associated with noodlesquares]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211611</id>
	<title>Re:Wolfram Alpha...Slashdotted?</title>
	<author>LoverOfJoy</author>
	<datestamp>1244138460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is Wolfram Alpha always this slow or has it been slashdotted?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Wolfram Alpha always this slow or has it been slashdotted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Wolfram Alpha always this slow or has it been slashdotted?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209581</id>
	<title>Re:Useful for brainstorming</title>
	<author>Yetihehe</author>
	<datestamp>1244130060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next thing you know, (Apple|Microsoft) will make Bing^3, which will return results in div's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next thing you know , ( Apple | Microsoft ) will make Bing ^ 3 , which will return results in div 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next thing you know, (Apple|Microsoft) will make Bing^3, which will return results in div's.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208629</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</id>
	<title>Just goofing around</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1244127240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yahoo URL: "No value found"<br><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=search+engines" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=search+engines</a> [google.com]</p><p>Random fun:<br><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=large+noses" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=large+noses</a> [google.com]<br><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lolcat+pictures" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lolcat+pictures</a> [google.com]</p><p>Reply if you find other amusing queries!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo URL : " No value found " http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = search + engines [ google.com ] Random fun : http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = large + noses [ google.com ] http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = lolcat + pictures [ google.com ] Reply if you find other amusing queries !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo URL: "No value found"http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=search+engines [google.com]Random fun:http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=large+noses [google.com]http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=lolcat+pictures [google.com]Reply if you find other amusing queries!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212915</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1244144040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone who read the book. That's who.<p>
Esther 2:7</p><p>
Mordecai had a cousin named Hadassah, whom he had brought up because she had neither father nor mother. This girl, who was also known as Esther, <i>was lovely in form and features</i>, and Mordecai had taken her as his own daughter when her father and mother died.</p><p>
Esther 2:17</p><p>
Now <i>the king was attracted to Esther more than to any of the other women</i>, and she won his favor and approval more than any of the other virgins. So he set a royal crown on her head and made her queen instead of Vashti.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone who read the book .
That 's who .
Esther 2 : 7 Mordecai had a cousin named Hadassah , whom he had brought up because she had neither father nor mother .
This girl , who was also known as Esther , was lovely in form and features , and Mordecai had taken her as his own daughter when her father and mother died .
Esther 2 : 17 Now the king was attracted to Esther more than to any of the other women , and she won his favor and approval more than any of the other virgins .
So he set a royal crown on her head and made her queen instead of Vashti .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone who read the book.
That's who.
Esther 2:7
Mordecai had a cousin named Hadassah, whom he had brought up because she had neither father nor mother.
This girl, who was also known as Esther, was lovely in form and features, and Mordecai had taken her as his own daughter when her father and mother died.
Esther 2:17
Now the king was attracted to Esther more than to any of the other women, and she won his favor and approval more than any of the other virgins.
So he set a royal crown on her head and made her queen instead of Vashti.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213511</id>
	<title>Re:Wow. Pretty cool.</title>
	<author>JaneTheIgnorantSlut</author>
	<datestamp>1244146380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Heidi Klum wears size 10 shoes. Who knew? How cared?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heidi Klum wears size 10 shoes .
Who knew ?
How cared ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heidi Klum wears size 10 shoes.
Who knew?
How cared?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209549</id>
	<title>George Washington Carver = first president</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244129940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I clicked the link on the front of the page for "US Presidents."  http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=US presidents&amp;suggest=1 for the lazy.  Under full name for George Washington, it lists Mr. George Carver.  You'd think for something 1) so common and 2) that they promote on the front of their main site should have 100\% accurate and vetted information and not tell us that George Washington Carver, despite his wonderful accomplishments, was the first president of these United States.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I clicked the link on the front of the page for " US Presidents .
" http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = US presidents&amp;suggest = 1 for the lazy .
Under full name for George Washington , it lists Mr. George Carver .
You 'd think for something 1 ) so common and 2 ) that they promote on the front of their main site should have 100 \ % accurate and vetted information and not tell us that George Washington Carver , despite his wonderful accomplishments , was the first president of these United States .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I clicked the link on the front of the page for "US Presidents.
"  http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=US presidents&amp;suggest=1 for the lazy.
Under full name for George Washington, it lists Mr. George Carver.
You'd think for something 1) so common and 2) that they promote on the front of their main site should have 100\% accurate and vetted information and not tell us that George Washington Carver, despite his wonderful accomplishments, was the first president of these United States.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214005</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244148360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=geico</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = geico</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=geico</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211601</id>
	<title>I'm Not Seeing It...</title>
	<author>tunapez</author>
	<datestamp>1244138400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like all the other "progress" bars frozen on mid-load.<br>Have tried multiple unique and linked searches and the "Building a Square for..."<br>bar fills 90\% and stops every time... didn't think Big G was susceptible to the Slashdot Effect.</p><p>Meh, back to the <a href="http://newstimeline.googlelabs.com/" title="googlelabs.com" rel="nofollow">timeline</a> [googlelabs.com] for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like all the other " progress " bars frozen on mid-load.Have tried multiple unique and linked searches and the " Building a Square for... " bar fills 90 \ % and stops every time... did n't think Big G was susceptible to the Slashdot Effect.Meh , back to the timeline [ googlelabs.com ] for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like all the other "progress" bars frozen on mid-load.Have tried multiple unique and linked searches and the "Building a Square for..."bar fills 90\% and stops every time... didn't think Big G was susceptible to the Slashdot Effect.Meh, back to the timeline [googlelabs.com] for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209615</id>
	<title>sarcomere</title>
	<author>nassar</author>
	<datestamp>1244130240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've been playing with returning tables for structured data in the datalab project, e.g.:
<a href="http://www.renci.org/~nassar/datalab/rplot.html" title="renci.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.renci.org/~nassar/datalab/rplot.html</a> [renci.org]

Of course, data in tables is a well proven concept<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've been playing with returning tables for structured data in the datalab project , e.g .
: http : //www.renci.org/ ~ nassar/datalab/rplot.html [ renci.org ] Of course , data in tables is a well proven concept : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've been playing with returning tables for structured data in the datalab project, e.g.
:
http://www.renci.org/~nassar/datalab/rplot.html [renci.org]

Of course, data in tables is a well proven concept :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209115</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1244128440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, she was a concubine of Xerxes (of 300 fame) and later his wife chosen because of her extraordinary beauty (and intelligence, but whatever).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , she was a concubine of Xerxes ( of 300 fame ) and later his wife chosen because of her extraordinary beauty ( and intelligence , but whatever ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, she was a concubine of Xerxes (of 300 fame) and later his wife chosen because of her extraordinary beauty (and intelligence, but whatever).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213609</id>
	<title>Units?</title>
	<author>chord.wav</author>
	<datestamp>1244146800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go to: <a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nissan" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nissan</a> [google.com]</p><p>Can we have the width in the unit system please? I have inches and millimeters all mixed up. It would be awesome if I can choose the unit. Measuring a car width in millimeters is not very practical from a user perspective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go to : http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = nissan [ google.com ] Can we have the width in the unit system please ?
I have inches and millimeters all mixed up .
It would be awesome if I can choose the unit .
Measuring a car width in millimeters is not very practical from a user perspective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go to: http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nissan [google.com]Can we have the width in the unit system please?
I have inches and millimeters all mixed up.
It would be awesome if I can choose the unit.
Measuring a car width in millimeters is not very practical from a user perspective.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208839</id>
	<title>Wolfram Alpha</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1244127120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wolfram Alpha may not be a direct competitor for Google, yet, this is their response. <br>
Yes, I know, Wolfram takes info from reduced and trusted sources while Google does not. But the semantic database that they are building have the same structure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wolfram Alpha may not be a direct competitor for Google , yet , this is their response .
Yes , I know , Wolfram takes info from reduced and trusted sources while Google does not .
But the semantic database that they are building have the same structure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wolfram Alpha may not be a direct competitor for Google, yet, this is their response.
Yes, I know, Wolfram takes info from reduced and trusted sources while Google does not.
But the semantic database that they are building have the same structure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212445</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>dark\_panda</author>
	<datestamp>1244142180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=internet+memes" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=internet+memes</a> [google.com]</p><p>Pay attention to the column headings, especially "Captain".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = internet + memes [ google.com ] Pay attention to the column headings , especially " Captain " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=internet+memes [google.com]Pay attention to the column headings, especially "Captain".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208575</id>
	<title>How it works</title>
	<author>Reality Master 101</author>
	<datestamp>1244126040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This actually seems to be a pretty simple concept. It takes the keywords on the y axis (which is the initial search), and then generates popular keywords for the x axis, and then does searches for the combinations to fill in the boxes. What goes in the box is the least amount of the target page that more-or-less fulfills the keyword search.

So as near as I can tell, there's no "semantic" analysis here, it's basically a bunch of mini web searches in a grid format.

It's an interesting concept, but I don't see it as any sort of world changing function, like the hype seemed to imply.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This actually seems to be a pretty simple concept .
It takes the keywords on the y axis ( which is the initial search ) , and then generates popular keywords for the x axis , and then does searches for the combinations to fill in the boxes .
What goes in the box is the least amount of the target page that more-or-less fulfills the keyword search .
So as near as I can tell , there 's no " semantic " analysis here , it 's basically a bunch of mini web searches in a grid format .
It 's an interesting concept , but I do n't see it as any sort of world changing function , like the hype seemed to imply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This actually seems to be a pretty simple concept.
It takes the keywords on the y axis (which is the initial search), and then generates popular keywords for the x axis, and then does searches for the combinations to fill in the boxes.
What goes in the box is the least amount of the target page that more-or-less fulfills the keyword search.
So as near as I can tell, there's no "semantic" analysis here, it's basically a bunch of mini web searches in a grid format.
It's an interesting concept, but I don't see it as any sort of world changing function, like the hype seemed to imply.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208529</id>
	<title>First Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244125800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Suck it, minorities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Suck it , minorities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suck it, minorities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210687</id>
	<title>Best part of that Yahoo entry</title>
	<author>xant</author>
	<datestamp>1244134740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Revenue: Question mark</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Revenue : Question mark</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Revenue: Question mark</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209417</id>
	<title>Useless searches without context ...</title>
	<author>oneiros27</author>
	<datestamp>1244129460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I search on "space physics virtual observatory"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and it prompts me to give 5 examples so I do (VSO, VMO, VHO, ViTMO, ViRBO)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and well, it populated a grid with the top result for "VSO" which is "VSO Software" not "The Virtual Solar Observatory"  (in all fairness, the Virtual Solar Observatory doesn't show up under the search, "Space Physics Virtual Observatory VSO", but it does show up under "Virtual Observatory VSO"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... so I start with the search "Virtual Observatory" (which brings up astronomy VOs, not space physics VOs) and add "VSO"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  and it still gives me "VSO Software".</p><p>So<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it might be useful for some fields, but not all.</p><p>(it \_was\_ able to tell me the countries of the nighttime VOs, though, which is handy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... although all of the items in the list weren't VOs.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I search on " space physics virtual observatory " ... and it prompts me to give 5 examples so I do ( VSO , VMO , VHO , ViTMO , ViRBO ) ... and well , it populated a grid with the top result for " VSO " which is " VSO Software " not " The Virtual Solar Observatory " ( in all fairness , the Virtual Solar Observatory does n't show up under the search , " Space Physics Virtual Observatory VSO " , but it does show up under " Virtual Observatory VSO " ... so I start with the search " Virtual Observatory " ( which brings up astronomy VOs , not space physics VOs ) and add " VSO " ... and it still gives me " VSO Software " .So ... it might be useful for some fields , but not all .
( it \ _was \ _ able to tell me the countries of the nighttime VOs , though , which is handy ... although all of the items in the list were n't VOs .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I search on "space physics virtual observatory" ... and it prompts me to give 5 examples so I do (VSO, VMO, VHO, ViTMO, ViRBO) ... and well, it populated a grid with the top result for "VSO" which is "VSO Software" not "The Virtual Solar Observatory"  (in all fairness, the Virtual Solar Observatory doesn't show up under the search, "Space Physics Virtual Observatory VSO", but it does show up under "Virtual Observatory VSO" ... so I start with the search "Virtual Observatory" (which brings up astronomy VOs, not space physics VOs) and add "VSO" ...  and it still gives me "VSO Software".So ... it might be useful for some fields, but not all.
(it \_was\_ able to tell me the countries of the nighttime VOs, though, which is handy ... although all of the items in the list weren't VOs.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210171</id>
	<title>Re:Not usable at all...</title>
	<author>dargaud</author>
	<datestamp>1244132580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Strange, I find it very good. I typed "Antarctic Explorers" and then added a columned for "explored" and it tells me what those guys did explore, even adding multiple extra items. Granted, there are a few that went nowhere near Antarctica.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Strange , I find it very good .
I typed " Antarctic Explorers " and then added a columned for " explored " and it tells me what those guys did explore , even adding multiple extra items .
Granted , there are a few that went nowhere near Antarctica .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strange, I find it very good.
I typed "Antarctic Explorers" and then added a columned for "explored" and it tells me what those guys did explore, even adding multiple extra items.
Granted, there are a few that went nowhere near Antarctica.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211985</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books (Titus)</title>
	<author>Bryan Gividen</author>
	<datestamp>1244140200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also startling is that Titus appears to be a body-builder in addition to being a proselytizer with St. Paul.

-Bryan Gividen</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also startling is that Titus appears to be a body-builder in addition to being a proselytizer with St. Paul . -Bryan Gividen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also startling is that Titus appears to be a body-builder in addition to being a proselytizer with St. Paul.

-Bryan Gividen</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211071</id>
	<title>Re:Not usable at all...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244136300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google is automated<br>Wolfram is human-edited</p><p>which one is inevitably going to be superior?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is automatedWolfram is human-editedwhich one is inevitably going to be superior ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is automatedWolfram is human-editedwhich one is inevitably going to be superior?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28215973</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244115120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=4976024.39+miles+in+kilometers&amp;btnG=Search&amp;cts=1244154613818&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=</p><p>http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&amp;q=50432.0129+kilometers+in+miles&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/search ? hl = en&amp;q = 4976024.39 + miles + in + kilometers&amp;btnG = Search&amp;cts = 1244154613818&amp;aq = f&amp;oq = &amp;aqi = http : //www.google.ie/search ? hl = en&amp;q = 50432.0129 + kilometers + in + miles&amp;btnG = Search&amp;meta =</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=4976024.39+miles+in+kilometers&amp;btnG=Search&amp;cts=1244154613818&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=http://www.google.ie/search?hl=en&amp;q=50432.0129+kilometers+in+miles&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209225</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244128860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>click us presidents, then add "race", "sexual orientation", "color"


complete garbage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>click us presidents , then add " race " , " sexual orientation " , " color " complete garbage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>click us presidents, then add "race", "sexual orientation", "color"


complete garbage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209007</id>
	<title>Re:How it works</title>
	<author>pete-wilko</author>
	<datestamp>1244127960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Have you tried different queries? I think the selection of the column names is actually a very difficult task and it seems to do a decent job of extracting from different pages relevant pieces of information for each column.<br> <br>If the column 'types' were known a priori then this wouldn't be that neat, however if its classifying on the fly what columns are to be used then that's pretty cool.  Looks like a really nice large scale application of 'wrapper induction'.<br> <br>
How the columns are determined is the impressive and novel bit tbh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried different queries ?
I think the selection of the column names is actually a very difficult task and it seems to do a decent job of extracting from different pages relevant pieces of information for each column .
If the column 'types ' were known a priori then this would n't be that neat , however if its classifying on the fly what columns are to be used then that 's pretty cool .
Looks like a really nice large scale application of 'wrapper induction' .
How the columns are determined is the impressive and novel bit tbh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tried different queries?
I think the selection of the column names is actually a very difficult task and it seems to do a decent job of extracting from different pages relevant pieces of information for each column.
If the column 'types' were known a priori then this wouldn't be that neat, however if its classifying on the fly what columns are to be used then that's pretty cool.
Looks like a really nice large scale application of 'wrapper induction'.
How the columns are determined is the impressive and novel bit tbh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209847</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>Alascom</author>
	<datestamp>1244131200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/table/agyxom8lIUS0Ibf2RurpmKnA" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/squared/table/agyxom8lIUS0Ibf2RurpmKnA</a> [google.com]</p><p>Comparison of hot vehicles in squared!</p><p>You gotta love the MPG value on the Saleen...  and the Prelude stats are so dead-on!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/table/agyxom8lIUS0Ibf2RurpmKnA [ google.com ] Comparison of hot vehicles in squared ! You got ta love the MPG value on the Saleen... and the Prelude stats are so dead-on !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/table/agyxom8lIUS0Ibf2RurpmKnA [google.com]Comparison of hot vehicles in squared!You gotta love the MPG value on the Saleen...  and the Prelude stats are so dead-on!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213505</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>st0rmshadow</author>
	<datestamp>1244146320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love the 4 items that come up when you query 'Nerds':</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nerds" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nerds</a> [google.com]</p><p>Provider</p><p>Support</p><p>Are you a Jackass?</p><p>Maybe</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love the 4 items that come up when you query 'Nerds ' : http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = nerds [ google.com ] ProviderSupportAre you a Jackass ? Maybe</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love the 4 items that come up when you query 'Nerds':http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=nerds [google.com]ProviderSupportAre you a Jackass?Maybe</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209823</id>
	<title>Re:Mixed results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.</p><p>Google Squared returns a table of information about a group of things. You are asking it for information about something that is not a group of things. Unsurprisingly, it is not giving you good results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ask a stupid question , get a stupid answer.Google Squared returns a table of information about a group of things .
You are asking it for information about something that is not a group of things .
Unsurprisingly , it is not giving you good results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ask a stupid question, get a stupid answer.Google Squared returns a table of information about a group of things.
You are asking it for information about something that is not a group of things.
Unsurprisingly, it is not giving you good results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209065</id>
	<title>I squared Microsoft</title>
	<author>sveard</author>
	<datestamp>1244128260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I squared Microsoft and lol'd<br><a href="http://www.svenarduwie.be/Microsoft\%20Google\%20Squared.png" title="svenarduwie.be">http://www.svenarduwie.be/Microsoft\%20Google\%20Squared.png</a> [svenarduwie.be]<br>License: GPL, Free<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I squared Microsoft and lol'dhttp : //www.svenarduwie.be/Microsoft \ % 20Google \ % 20Squared.png [ svenarduwie.be ] License : GPL , Free ... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I squared Microsoft and lol'dhttp://www.svenarduwie.be/Microsoft\%20Google\%20Squared.png [svenarduwie.be]License: GPL, Free ... :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209215</id>
	<title>Re:Just goofing around</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1244128800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yahoo URL: "No value found"<br><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=search+engines" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared</a> [google.com]</p></div><p>What? no Bing?</p><p>btw, In Mexico "bing" is a registered trademark:<br><a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=helados+bing" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.com/images?q=helados+bing</a> [google.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo URL : " No value found " http : //www.google.com/squared [ google.com ] What ?
no Bing ? btw , In Mexico " bing " is a registered trademark : http : //images.google.com/images ? q = helados + bing [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo URL: "No value found"http://www.google.com/squared [google.com]What?
no Bing?btw, In Mexico "bing" is a registered trademark:http://images.google.com/images?q=helados+bing [google.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210255</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244132940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you add the next ten items to the square, the book of Micah has the porn star "Micah Moore" as the associated image.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you add the next ten items to the square , the book of Micah has the porn star " Micah Moore " as the associated image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you add the next ten items to the square, the book of Micah has the porn star "Micah Moore" as the associated image.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783</id>
	<title>Already better that Alpha</title>
	<author>Lord Byron II</author>
	<datestamp>1244126940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In fifteen seconds of playing around with it, I already feel like I'm able to get better data and have better control than I do with Wolfram Alpha.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In fifteen seconds of playing around with it , I already feel like I 'm able to get better data and have better control than I do with Wolfram Alpha .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fifteen seconds of playing around with it, I already feel like I'm able to get better data and have better control than I do with Wolfram Alpha.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28218213</id>
	<title>Dead People</title>
	<author>AlastairLynn</author>
	<datestamp>1244134020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I asked Google Squared for a list of dead people. One of the first to appear was 'God,' whose date of death was apparently September 2006.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I asked Google Squared for a list of dead people .
One of the first to appear was 'God, ' whose date of death was apparently September 2006 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I asked Google Squared for a list of dead people.
One of the first to appear was 'God,' whose date of death was apparently September 2006.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213249</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244145480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Esther was definitely a babe...but she's barely in the top 10 Babes of the Bible according to...</p><p>http://www.examiner.com/x-8276-Charlotte-Methodist-Examiner~y2009m5d1-Top-10-babes-of-the-Bible</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Esther was definitely a babe...but she 's barely in the top 10 Babes of the Bible according to...http : //www.examiner.com/x-8276-Charlotte-Methodist-Examiner ~ y2009m5d1-Top-10-babes-of-the-Bible</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Esther was definitely a babe...but she's barely in the top 10 Babes of the Bible according to...http://www.examiner.com/x-8276-Charlotte-Methodist-Examiner~y2009m5d1-Top-10-babes-of-the-Bible</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209163</id>
	<title>Re:Bible Books</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1244128620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=Linux+distros" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=Linux+distros</a> [google.com]</p><p>The descriptions are not really useful...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.google.com/squared/search ? q = Linux + distros [ google.com ] The descriptions are not really useful.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.google.com/squared/search?q=Linux+distros [google.com]The descriptions are not really useful...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208623</id>
	<title>First thoughts</title>
	<author>unfasten</author>
	<datestamp>1244126280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>My first thoughts after trying a few of the example searches on the main page are that it seems to be aimed a bit at Wolfram Alpha. It isn't as broad as Wolfram Alpha but it is focused on giving back data sets instead of a list of search results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My first thoughts after trying a few of the example searches on the main page are that it seems to be aimed a bit at Wolfram Alpha .
It is n't as broad as Wolfram Alpha but it is focused on giving back data sets instead of a list of search results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My first thoughts after trying a few of the example searches on the main page are that it seems to be aimed a bit at Wolfram Alpha.
It isn't as broad as Wolfram Alpha but it is focused on giving back data sets instead of a list of search results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214563
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211453
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211909
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208629
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209007
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28216265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210171
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210261
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209115
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212445
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209183
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208593
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210417
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208623
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214005
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209111
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28215973
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213511
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211985
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211611
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208839
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28219015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210471
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213301
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208593
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_04_138213_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212483
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211909
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209515
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210471
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28216265
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210995
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209261
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211453
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210173
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213511
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214563
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208839
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211611
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209051
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208629
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209581
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209167
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211961
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208593
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209785
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209183
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209111
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209391
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28219015
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209007
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213301
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208855
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209847
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28214005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209617
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210687
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209215
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212445
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208573
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28212915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28211985
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28213093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28215973
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209163
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210093
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28209549
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_04_138213.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28208623
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_04_138213.28210417
</commentlist>
</conversation>
