<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_03_2239203</id>
	<title>$10M For Unmanned Aircraft That Can Perch Like a Bird</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1244046300000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://networkworld.com/" rel="nofollow">coondoggie</a> writes <i>"Unmanned aircraft maker AeroVironment got an additional $5.4 million to further develop a diminutive aircraft that can fly into tight spaces undetected, <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/42390">perch and send live surveillance</a> information to its handlers.  Last Fall, AeroVironment, got $4.6 million initial funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to develop the Stealthy, Persistent, Perch and Stare Air Vehicle System (SP2S), which is being built on the company's one-pound, 29-inch wingspan battery-powered Wasp unmanned system."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>coondoggie writes " Unmanned aircraft maker AeroVironment got an additional $ 5.4 million to further develop a diminutive aircraft that can fly into tight spaces undetected , perch and send live surveillance information to its handlers .
Last Fall , AeroVironment , got $ 4.6 million initial funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ) to develop the Stealthy , Persistent , Perch and Stare Air Vehicle System ( SP2S ) , which is being built on the company 's one-pound , 29-inch wingspan battery-powered Wasp unmanned system .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>coondoggie writes "Unmanned aircraft maker AeroVironment got an additional $5.4 million to further develop a diminutive aircraft that can fly into tight spaces undetected, perch and send live surveillance information to its handlers.
Last Fall, AeroVironment, got $4.6 million initial funding from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to develop the Stealthy, Persistent, Perch and Stare Air Vehicle System (SP2S), which is being built on the company's one-pound, 29-inch wingspan battery-powered Wasp unmanned system.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205809</id>
	<title>Much more impressive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244051340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a "one-pound, 29-inch wingspan battery-powered Wasp MANNED system"</p><p>Now that would be amazing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a " one-pound , 29-inch wingspan battery-powered Wasp MANNED system " Now that would be amazing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a "one-pound, 29-inch wingspan battery-powered Wasp MANNED system"Now that would be amazing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206191</id>
	<title>Re:How lifelike</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1244057700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Will it <b>drop bird poop</b> on your surveillance target? I mean how suspicious would a bird be if it didn't do that?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, it'll leak battery acid, just like my @#*!&amp; Dell laptop.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it drop bird poop on your surveillance target ?
I mean how suspicious would a bird be if it did n't do that ? Yes , it 'll leak battery acid , just like my @ # * ! &amp; Dell laptop .
       </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it drop bird poop on your surveillance target?
I mean how suspicious would a bird be if it didn't do that?Yes, it'll leak battery acid, just like my @#*!&amp; Dell laptop.
       
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207175</id>
	<title>Re:How lifelike</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1244114400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope it shits napalm, just for the coolness factor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope it shits napalm , just for the coolness factor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope it shits napalm, just for the coolness factor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211247</id>
	<title>Re:I can see it now..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244137020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Deploy:  Lazorbeak.  Mission:  Poop on Terrorists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Deploy : Lazorbeak .
Mission : Poop on Terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deploy:  Lazorbeak.
Mission:  Poop on Terrorists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205707</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207549</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>Beezlebub33</author>
	<datestamp>1244119620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Take a look at the statistics in terms of the number of unmanned airplanes and ground vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan right now.  There are, literally, thousands of them.  Right now, they are remotely piloted, but you can't tell that when one is driving around or flying over your house.  And pretty soon, they won't be remotely piloted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look at the statistics in terms of the number of unmanned airplanes and ground vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan right now .
There are , literally , thousands of them .
Right now , they are remotely piloted , but you ca n't tell that when one is driving around or flying over your house .
And pretty soon , they wo n't be remotely piloted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look at the statistics in terms of the number of unmanned airplanes and ground vehicles in Iraq and Afghanistan right now.
There are, literally, thousands of them.
Right now, they are remotely piloted, but you can't tell that when one is driving around or flying over your house.
And pretty soon, they won't be remotely piloted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206079</id>
	<title>Re:10 million? Cheap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244055540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Twenty times 10 million is 200 million.  A new <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22\_Raptor" title="wikipedia.org">F22</a> [wikipedia.org] is 137 million.  I don't think there are any $200 million missiles, unless they are nuclear.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Twenty times 10 million is 200 million .
A new F22 [ wikipedia.org ] is 137 million .
I do n't think there are any $ 200 million missiles , unless they are nuclear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twenty times 10 million is 200 million.
A new F22 [wikipedia.org] is 137 million.
I don't think there are any $200 million missiles, unless they are nuclear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207561</id>
	<title>Re:Why not a real bird?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244119740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cameras would have to be disguised as coconuts so they could be gripped by the husk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cameras would have to be disguised as coconuts so they could be gripped by the husk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cameras would have to be disguised as coconuts so they could be gripped by the husk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207455</id>
	<title>Re:[verb] like a [animal]</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244118480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In the future I expect robots that can</p><ul><li>slither like a snake</li><li>prowl like a lion</li><li>fly like an eagle</li></ul></div><p>and dance like a hampster ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the future I expect robots that canslither like a snakeprowl like a lionfly like an eagleand dance like a hampster ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the future I expect robots that canslither like a snakeprowl like a lionfly like an eagleand dance like a hampster ?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206037</id>
	<title>Stainless</title>
	<author>JustOK</author>
	<datestamp>1244054760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't the Stainless Steel Rat already use one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't the Stainless Steel Rat already use one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't the Stainless Steel Rat already use one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207305</id>
	<title>YOU FAIL iT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244116620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">FreeBSD is 4lready fly...don't fear escape them by dying' crowd - boug4t the farm.... (Click Here lube. This can lead Talk to one of the continues in a house... pathetic. bunch of retarded You loved that Of FreeBSD Usenet have left in non nigger patrons Out how to make the The project is in</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>FreeBSD is 4lready fly...do n't fear escape them by dying ' crowd - boug4t the farm.... ( Click Here lube .
This can lead Talk to one of the continues in a house... pathetic. bunch of retarded You loved that Of FreeBSD Usenet have left in non nigger patrons Out how to make the The project is in [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FreeBSD is 4lready fly...don't fear escape them by dying' crowd - boug4t the farm.... (Click Here lube.
This can lead Talk to one of the continues in a house... pathetic. bunch of retarded You loved that Of FreeBSD Usenet have left in non nigger patrons Out how to make the The project is in [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28216801</id>
	<title>Extended range version</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1244119920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Self-refueling. Finds earthworms and seeds, converts to ethanol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Self-refueling .
Finds earthworms and seeds , converts to ethanol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Self-refueling.
Finds earthworms and seeds, converts to ethanol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207221</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>peragrin</author>
	<datestamp>1244115060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you missed the steam punk transformers series then.  congratulations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you missed the steam punk transformers series then .
congratulations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you missed the steam punk transformers series then.
congratulations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206819</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>Thanshin</author>
	<datestamp>1244109120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And their robot bird could turn into a cassette tape too. For easy playback, no less.</p></div><p>That project would go much beyond the planned $10M.</p><p>An entire tape? at $650.000 per song in IP rights?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And their robot bird could turn into a cassette tape too .
For easy playback , no less.That project would go much beyond the planned $ 10M.An entire tape ?
at $ 650.000 per song in IP rights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And their robot bird could turn into a cassette tape too.
For easy playback, no less.That project would go much beyond the planned $10M.An entire tape?
at $650.000 per song in IP rights?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210827</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1244135220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The best glib answer is when they changed the "Department of War" to the "Department of Defense".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The best glib answer is when they changed the " Department of War " to the " Department of Defense " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The best glib answer is when they changed the "Department of War" to the "Department of Defense".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209759</id>
	<title>Re:10 million? Cheap</title>
	<author>Nyvhek</author>
	<datestamp>1244130780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>While grandparent is probably exaggerating about missiles being worth $200 million, he does have a point. Keep in mind that $10 million is the entire development cost of the program to date. From the F-22 wikipedia article, $28 billion has been spent on its development so far.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While grandparent is probably exaggerating about missiles being worth $ 200 million , he does have a point .
Keep in mind that $ 10 million is the entire development cost of the program to date .
From the F-22 wikipedia article , $ 28 billion has been spent on its development so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While grandparent is probably exaggerating about missiles being worth $200 million, he does have a point.
Keep in mind that $10 million is the entire development cost of the program to date.
From the F-22 wikipedia article, $28 billion has been spent on its development so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919</id>
	<title>[verb] like a [animal]</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244052780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Upon reading the title, my first reaction was that there was a meeting that went something like
</p><ul>
<li>... just send our spy planes to perch somewhere nearby and watch the terrorists.</li><li>Uh, sir, spy planes don't "perch".</li><li>Oh? Well, why not? I expect my spy planes to be able to perch. Like a bird. Somebody get on that.</li><li>Err... yes, sir!</li></ul><p>In the future I expect robots that can
</p><ul>
<li>slither like a snake</li><li>prowl like a lion</li><li>fly like an eagle</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Upon reading the title , my first reaction was that there was a meeting that went something like ... just send our spy planes to perch somewhere nearby and watch the terrorists.Uh , sir , spy planes do n't " perch " .Oh ?
Well , why not ?
I expect my spy planes to be able to perch .
Like a bird .
Somebody get on that.Err... yes , sir ! In the future I expect robots that can slither like a snakeprowl like a lionfly like an eagle</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Upon reading the title, my first reaction was that there was a meeting that went something like

... just send our spy planes to perch somewhere nearby and watch the terrorists.Uh, sir, spy planes don't "perch".Oh?
Well, why not?
I expect my spy planes to be able to perch.
Like a bird.
Somebody get on that.Err... yes, sir!In the future I expect robots that can

slither like a snakeprowl like a lionfly like an eagle</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765</id>
	<title>10 million? Cheap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ten million is not expensive for an aerospace contractor, there are some missiles parked under planes costing over 20 times 10 million that in the air force that are worth more than that each - and they are *disposable*.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ten million is not expensive for an aerospace contractor , there are some missiles parked under planes costing over 20 times 10 million that in the air force that are worth more than that each - and they are * disposable * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ten million is not expensive for an aerospace contractor, there are some missiles parked under planes costing over 20 times 10 million that in the air force that are worth more than that each - and they are *disposable*.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206045</id>
	<title>Power lines?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244055000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could perch on a power line and recharge its batteries for round the clock operations. Scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could perch on a power line and recharge its batteries for round the clock operations .
Scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could perch on a power line and recharge its batteries for round the clock operations.
Scary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205877</id>
	<title>Slippery slope...</title>
	<author>AnotherAnonymousUser</author>
	<datestamp>1244052240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to perching sharks &gt;= )?!</htmltext>
<tokenext>to perching sharks &gt; = ) ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to perching sharks &gt;= )?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206647</id>
	<title>key words = "perch and grip technology"?</title>
	<author>idigitallDotCom</author>
	<datestamp>1244107020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are the keywords here "Perch and grip" ? Don't we already have unmanned airborne spy hover vehicles? heck I'm sure I could build a mini-hot-air-balloon-with-steering-fans-type drone that transmits surveillance for under $1M. From what I saw on National Geographic channel, it'd be very easy to build a hot-air-balloon with "perch and grip" technology if we just emulate birds...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are the keywords here " Perch and grip " ?
Do n't we already have unmanned airborne spy hover vehicles ?
heck I 'm sure I could build a mini-hot-air-balloon-with-steering-fans-type drone that transmits surveillance for under $ 1M .
From what I saw on National Geographic channel , it 'd be very easy to build a hot-air-balloon with " perch and grip " technology if we just emulate birds.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are the keywords here "Perch and grip" ?
Don't we already have unmanned airborne spy hover vehicles?
heck I'm sure I could build a mini-hot-air-balloon-with-steering-fans-type drone that transmits surveillance for under $1M.
From what I saw on National Geographic channel, it'd be very easy to build a hot-air-balloon with "perch and grip" technology if we just emulate birds...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206001</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244054100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, Lazerbeak was the first thing that popped into my head before I even finished reading the summary!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , Lazerbeak was the first thing that popped into my head before I even finished reading the summary !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, Lazerbeak was the first thing that popped into my head before I even finished reading the summary!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205801</id>
	<title>i just got off the toilet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244051220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i shit out an obama.<br> <br>plop!</htmltext>
<tokenext>i shit out an obama .
plop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i shit out an obama.
plop!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28213531</id>
	<title>Nobody likes a robotic bird</title>
	<author>liquiddark</author>
	<datestamp>1244146500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So the leet-speak phonetic translation of that codename is "spazzes", yes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the leet-speak phonetic translation of that codename is " spazzes " , yes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the leet-speak phonetic translation of that codename is "spazzes", yes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206899</id>
	<title>War robots 2</title>
	<author>Max\_W</author>
	<datestamp>1244110260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would suggest to ban by an international law all military robots. While there are not so many of them yet. It would be more difficult and expensive when there are armies of millions military robots.
<br> <br>
The definition is simple: no military equipment without a responsible human physically attached to it.
<br> <br>
In the 50s it would have been much easier to ban nuclear weapons while there were only few of them around, not hundreds of thousand as it is now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would suggest to ban by an international law all military robots .
While there are not so many of them yet .
It would be more difficult and expensive when there are armies of millions military robots .
The definition is simple : no military equipment without a responsible human physically attached to it .
In the 50s it would have been much easier to ban nuclear weapons while there were only few of them around , not hundreds of thousand as it is now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would suggest to ban by an international law all military robots.
While there are not so many of them yet.
It would be more difficult and expensive when there are armies of millions military robots.
The definition is simple: no military equipment without a responsible human physically attached to it.
In the 50s it would have been much easier to ban nuclear weapons while there were only few of them around, not hundreds of thousand as it is now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207569</id>
	<title>Bad idea</title>
	<author>georgenh16</author>
	<datestamp>1244119860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perch, and get shot.
<br> <br>
Keep flying, not as much of an easy target.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perch , and get shot .
Keep flying , not as much of an easy target .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perch, and get shot.
Keep flying, not as much of an easy target.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207117</id>
	<title>Keep perching!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244113560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's it...*eyeball*... Hold still.. *squeeze*... Hold still... *squeeze*... Keep perching... *breathe out*... *squeeze* *POP*... Gotcha!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's it... * eyeball * ... Hold still.. * squeeze * ... Hold still... * squeeze * ... Keep perching... * breathe out * ... * squeeze * * POP * ... Gotcha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's it...*eyeball*... Hold still.. *squeeze*... Hold still... *squeeze*... Keep perching... *breathe out*... *squeeze* *POP*... Gotcha!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206337</id>
	<title>African Swallow</title>
	<author>rhinokitty</author>
	<datestamp>1244146020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And it can post its surveillance reports to the Internet in under 140 characters.  This bird will tweet!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And it can post its surveillance reports to the Internet in under 140 characters .
This bird will tweet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it can post its surveillance reports to the Internet in under 140 characters.
This bird will tweet!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208043</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>jareth780</author>
	<datestamp>1244123340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about:</p><p>"Do you like our owl?"<br>"It's artificial?"<br>"Of course it is."<br>"...Must be expensive."<br>"Very."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about : " Do you like our owl ?
" " It 's artificial ?
" " Of course it is .
" " ...Must be expensive. " " Very .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about:"Do you like our owl?
""It's artificial?
""Of course it is.
""...Must be expensive.""Very.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206067</id>
	<title>js107</title>
	<author>js107</author>
	<datestamp>1244055360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really liked your article..

I'm so glad you enjoyed it.

Sujja
------

<a href="http://www.ftpshell.com/client" title="ftpshell.com" rel="nofollow">FTP Client</a> [ftpshell.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really liked your article. . I 'm so glad you enjoyed it .
Sujja ------ FTP Client [ ftpshell.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really liked your article..

I'm so glad you enjoyed it.
Sujja
------

FTP Client [ftpshell.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1244108280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nowadays you'd need a separate transformer to be able to turn into a cassette player to play it back, good luck finding one elsewhere!</p><p>Something does amuse me about the fact an ultra-high tech. robot of the future would turn into a cassette of all things though.</p><p>Might as well have optimus prime turn into a horse and cart.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowadays you 'd need a separate transformer to be able to turn into a cassette player to play it back , good luck finding one elsewhere ! Something does amuse me about the fact an ultra-high tech .
robot of the future would turn into a cassette of all things though.Might as well have optimus prime turn into a horse and cart .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowadays you'd need a separate transformer to be able to turn into a cassette player to play it back, good luck finding one elsewhere!Something does amuse me about the fact an ultra-high tech.
robot of the future would turn into a cassette of all things though.Might as well have optimus prime turn into a horse and cart.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205885</id>
	<title>2100</title>
	<author>aereinha</author>
	<datestamp>1244052300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>One day unmanned aircraft will deliver pizza's to our door.  Replacing delivery drivers that keep getting lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One day unmanned aircraft will deliver pizza 's to our door .
Replacing delivery drivers that keep getting lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One day unmanned aircraft will deliver pizza's to our door.
Replacing delivery drivers that keep getting lost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207451</id>
	<title>Well now that they know...</title>
	<author>that IT girl</author>
	<datestamp>1244118480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't information/technology like this be much more helpful if it was kept quiet? If enemies know what to look for, it makes it harder to go undetected... Before news like this broke, nobody would pay any attention to a bird fluttering around, but now people are going to be armed with bird hunting rifles all around sensitive areas. Ha.
<br> <br>
As a sidenote, this is a general beef I have with things like this, not just the perching (but unmanned, who'da thought?) surveillance aircraft. I'm torn between my geeky desire to know about these things, and the thought that it'd probably be much more effective if it was kept under wraps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't information/technology like this be much more helpful if it was kept quiet ?
If enemies know what to look for , it makes it harder to go undetected... Before news like this broke , nobody would pay any attention to a bird fluttering around , but now people are going to be armed with bird hunting rifles all around sensitive areas .
Ha . As a sidenote , this is a general beef I have with things like this , not just the perching ( but unmanned , who'da thought ?
) surveillance aircraft .
I 'm torn between my geeky desire to know about these things , and the thought that it 'd probably be much more effective if it was kept under wraps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't information/technology like this be much more helpful if it was kept quiet?
If enemies know what to look for, it makes it harder to go undetected... Before news like this broke, nobody would pay any attention to a bird fluttering around, but now people are going to be armed with bird hunting rifles all around sensitive areas.
Ha.
 
As a sidenote, this is a general beef I have with things like this, not just the perching (but unmanned, who'da thought?
) surveillance aircraft.
I'm torn between my geeky desire to know about these things, and the thought that it'd probably be much more effective if it was kept under wraps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28212001</id>
	<title>Oh please</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1244140260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the sort of thing that Wyat Cenack (sp?), senior military analyst on The Daily Show, described as RFC projects.  "Really F***ing Cool."</p><p>Yes, this is all cool and impressive and all, but hang on a second.  Why does the US still put so much faith in technology to fix all the world's problems?</p><p>I remember reading an article in The Economist years ago about an American-developed mine clearing system.  It was a huge, expensively developed, bulldozer.  Er, yes, a bulldozer.  It had a few bells and whistles and looked like something dropped out of an Imperial Star Destroyer, but trust me, it was just a bulldozer.  Well they found that it was less effective than the tried and tested British method of a trained guy with a metal detector and a big stick poking into the ground.  I'll let you guess which was cheaper and more effective.</p><p>If the British had adopted in Northern Ireland the same tactics that the USA is adopting now in different parts of the world, the troubles in Northern Ireland would still be going strong, we'd have gone as far as full on civil war, and the Brits would be looking to the UN for support because they'd have pissed off so many Irish Republicans that bomb alerts in London would be a daily occurrence.</p><p>Air strikes in residential areas? Sending in troops to act as policemen when they can't even speak the local language?  What the hell are they thinking?  Do they seriously think that the battle for the hearts and minds of muslims is going to be won by UAVs, robotic birds, satellites, tanks, and legions of soldiers occupying other peoples' countries as if their sovereignty counts for nothing? Do they think the reaction will be any different than their own reaction would be if Iranian troops were occupying San Diego, bursting into peoples' homes in search of militants, and calling in air strikes to wedding receptions?</p><p>They need to learn a few lessons from the British.  An insurgency and a poisonous militant mindset is not defeated by a standing army. It's defeated behind the scenes by the intelligence services, by infiltration, away from the prying eyes of the media and it's done for the purpose of getting the job done, not in public for the purpose of winning votes. The only thing done in public is consistent repudiation of violence as a means of achieving political aims, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIX\_YGtgpbQ" title="youtube.com">education about the futility of violence and how it achieves nothing but heartbreak for all involved</a> [youtube.com] (viewer discretion advised), and providing a peaceful political alternative to the physical force method. It's less glamorous and the boys don't get to play with their toys, but it's a lot more effective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the sort of thing that Wyat Cenack ( sp ?
) , senior military analyst on The Daily Show , described as RFC projects .
" Really F * * * ing Cool .
" Yes , this is all cool and impressive and all , but hang on a second .
Why does the US still put so much faith in technology to fix all the world 's problems ? I remember reading an article in The Economist years ago about an American-developed mine clearing system .
It was a huge , expensively developed , bulldozer .
Er , yes , a bulldozer .
It had a few bells and whistles and looked like something dropped out of an Imperial Star Destroyer , but trust me , it was just a bulldozer .
Well they found that it was less effective than the tried and tested British method of a trained guy with a metal detector and a big stick poking into the ground .
I 'll let you guess which was cheaper and more effective.If the British had adopted in Northern Ireland the same tactics that the USA is adopting now in different parts of the world , the troubles in Northern Ireland would still be going strong , we 'd have gone as far as full on civil war , and the Brits would be looking to the UN for support because they 'd have pissed off so many Irish Republicans that bomb alerts in London would be a daily occurrence.Air strikes in residential areas ?
Sending in troops to act as policemen when they ca n't even speak the local language ?
What the hell are they thinking ?
Do they seriously think that the battle for the hearts and minds of muslims is going to be won by UAVs , robotic birds , satellites , tanks , and legions of soldiers occupying other peoples ' countries as if their sovereignty counts for nothing ?
Do they think the reaction will be any different than their own reaction would be if Iranian troops were occupying San Diego , bursting into peoples ' homes in search of militants , and calling in air strikes to wedding receptions ? They need to learn a few lessons from the British .
An insurgency and a poisonous militant mindset is not defeated by a standing army .
It 's defeated behind the scenes by the intelligence services , by infiltration , away from the prying eyes of the media and it 's done for the purpose of getting the job done , not in public for the purpose of winning votes .
The only thing done in public is consistent repudiation of violence as a means of achieving political aims , education about the futility of violence and how it achieves nothing but heartbreak for all involved [ youtube.com ] ( viewer discretion advised ) , and providing a peaceful political alternative to the physical force method .
It 's less glamorous and the boys do n't get to play with their toys , but it 's a lot more effective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the sort of thing that Wyat Cenack (sp?
), senior military analyst on The Daily Show, described as RFC projects.
"Really F***ing Cool.
"Yes, this is all cool and impressive and all, but hang on a second.
Why does the US still put so much faith in technology to fix all the world's problems?I remember reading an article in The Economist years ago about an American-developed mine clearing system.
It was a huge, expensively developed, bulldozer.
Er, yes, a bulldozer.
It had a few bells and whistles and looked like something dropped out of an Imperial Star Destroyer, but trust me, it was just a bulldozer.
Well they found that it was less effective than the tried and tested British method of a trained guy with a metal detector and a big stick poking into the ground.
I'll let you guess which was cheaper and more effective.If the British had adopted in Northern Ireland the same tactics that the USA is adopting now in different parts of the world, the troubles in Northern Ireland would still be going strong, we'd have gone as far as full on civil war, and the Brits would be looking to the UN for support because they'd have pissed off so many Irish Republicans that bomb alerts in London would be a daily occurrence.Air strikes in residential areas?
Sending in troops to act as policemen when they can't even speak the local language?
What the hell are they thinking?
Do they seriously think that the battle for the hearts and minds of muslims is going to be won by UAVs, robotic birds, satellites, tanks, and legions of soldiers occupying other peoples' countries as if their sovereignty counts for nothing?
Do they think the reaction will be any different than their own reaction would be if Iranian troops were occupying San Diego, bursting into peoples' homes in search of militants, and calling in air strikes to wedding receptions?They need to learn a few lessons from the British.
An insurgency and a poisonous militant mindset is not defeated by a standing army.
It's defeated behind the scenes by the intelligence services, by infiltration, away from the prying eyes of the media and it's done for the purpose of getting the job done, not in public for the purpose of winning votes.
The only thing done in public is consistent repudiation of violence as a means of achieving political aims, education about the futility of violence and how it achieves nothing but heartbreak for all involved [youtube.com] (viewer discretion advised), and providing a peaceful political alternative to the physical force method.
It's less glamorous and the boys don't get to play with their toys, but it's a lot more effective.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28215645</id>
	<title>Re:[verb] like a [animal]</title>
	<author>jafac</author>
	<datestamp>1244113320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With friggin lasers on their heads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With friggin lasers on their heads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With friggin lasers on their heads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715</id>
	<title>Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And their robot bird could turn into a cassette tape too. For easy playback, no less.</p><p>How awesome was that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And their robot bird could turn into a cassette tape too .
For easy playback , no less.How awesome was that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And their robot bird could turn into a cassette tape too.
For easy playback, no less.How awesome was that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206425</id>
	<title>Re:Took twitter a bit too seriously</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244147460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He didn't say he wanted a spyplane that "perches", he said he wanted to "purchase" a spyplane!<br>Once the junior gets the order though, the big-pocketed war machinery lumbers into motion...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He did n't say he wanted a spyplane that " perches " , he said he wanted to " purchase " a spyplane ! Once the junior gets the order though , the big-pocketed war machinery lumbers into motion.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He didn't say he wanted a spyplane that "perches", he said he wanted to "purchase" a spyplane!Once the junior gets the order though, the big-pocketed war machinery lumbers into motion...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206015</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206579</id>
	<title>Helicopter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244106060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ten million is not expensive for an aerospace contractor</p></div><p>...and just WTF is wrong with a helicopter?</p><p>You're not going to get near the speed/agility of a bird for $10M.<br>Far better to put grasping feet on a helo and be done with it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ten million is not expensive for an aerospace contractor...and just WTF is wrong with a helicopter ? You 're not going to get near the speed/agility of a bird for $ 10M.Far better to put grasping feet on a helo and be done with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ten million is not expensive for an aerospace contractor...and just WTF is wrong with a helicopter?You're not going to get near the speed/agility of a bird for $10M.Far better to put grasping feet on a helo and be done with it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28214285</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>GWBasic</author>
	<datestamp>1244106360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaders from a robot planet?</p></div><p>Robot wars mean less human casualties.  It's an important part of the path away from our animal instincts to fight each other.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaders from a robot planet ? Robot wars mean less human casualties .
It 's an important part of the path away from our animal instincts to fight each other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaders from a robot planet?Robot wars mean less human casualties.
It's an important part of the path away from our animal instincts to fight each other.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28218005</id>
	<title>Retrofit a damn bird</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244131740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just train a squadron of real birds with cameras on 'em.</p><p>Heck, connect probes to their brains so you can guide them.</p><p>Fuel?  No problem, let 'em eat stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just train a squadron of real birds with cameras on 'em.Heck , connect probes to their brains so you can guide them.Fuel ?
No problem , let 'em eat stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just train a squadron of real birds with cameras on 'em.Heck, connect probes to their brains so you can guide them.Fuel?
No problem, let 'em eat stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206369</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244146440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at that point, over there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at that point , over there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at that point, over there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207993</id>
	<title>Re:[verb] like a [animal]</title>
	<author>snerdy</author>
	<datestamp>1244122920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In the future I expect robots that can<br></i></p><ul><li><i>fly like an eagle</i></li></ul><p>They would fly like an eagle, to the sea, fly like an eagle and let their spirits carry them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the future I expect robots that canfly like an eagleThey would fly like an eagle , to the sea , fly like an eagle and let their spirits carry them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the future I expect robots that canfly like an eagleThey would fly like an eagle, to the sea, fly like an eagle and let their spirits carry them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211141</id>
	<title>Re:[verb] like a [animal]</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1244136540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>- Hump like a bonobo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>- Hump like a bonobo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>- Hump like a bonobo!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206815</id>
	<title>Military robots</title>
	<author>Max\_W</author>
	<datestamp>1244109060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The robot war machines will be the next generation of weapons of mass destruction.
<br> <br>
Soon we will see swarms of poisonous digital mosquitoes, mechanical snakes with nuclear warheads, which can enter the land unnoticed, robot-fish, which enters a lake via a small river and poisons the whole lake, and so on and so forth.
<br> <br>
Let us note now how it all started.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The robot war machines will be the next generation of weapons of mass destruction .
Soon we will see swarms of poisonous digital mosquitoes , mechanical snakes with nuclear warheads , which can enter the land unnoticed , robot-fish , which enters a lake via a small river and poisons the whole lake , and so on and so forth .
Let us note now how it all started .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The robot war machines will be the next generation of weapons of mass destruction.
Soon we will see swarms of poisonous digital mosquitoes, mechanical snakes with nuclear warheads, which can enter the land unnoticed, robot-fish, which enters a lake via a small river and poisons the whole lake, and so on and so forth.
Let us note now how it all started.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205711</id>
	<title>what else?</title>
	<author>Ryyuajnin</author>
	<datestamp>1244050080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>does its tail pipe pucker like a birds?</htmltext>
<tokenext>does its tail pipe pucker like a birds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does its tail pipe pucker like a birds?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785</id>
	<title>How lifelike</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it drop bird poop on your surveillance target? I mean how suspicious would a bird be if it didn't do that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it drop bird poop on your surveillance target ?
I mean how suspicious would a bird be if it did n't do that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it drop bird poop on your surveillance target?
I mean how suspicious would a bird be if it didn't do that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206541</id>
	<title>Unmanned SP2S</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244148840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A 450 gram, 29-inch wing span, battery powered vehicle ISN'T MANNED???? WTF?</p><p>Sweet babby Jebus!</p></div><p>In order to maintain airspeed velocity, a manned SP2S would need to beat its wings 43 times every second, am I right? </p><p>In related news AeroVironment has announced that they will be dividing their SP2S project into two branches, one to follow more stationary targets and the other to track people traveling over large distances. The more stationary version will be known as the African Stealthy, Persistent, Perch and Stare Air Vehicle System (ASP2S) and its migratory cousin with be known as the European SP2S or ESP2S.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A 450 gram , 29-inch wing span , battery powered vehicle IS N'T MANNED ? ? ? ?
WTF ? Sweet babby Jebus ! In order to maintain airspeed velocity , a manned SP2S would need to beat its wings 43 times every second , am I right ?
In related news AeroVironment has announced that they will be dividing their SP2S project into two branches , one to follow more stationary targets and the other to track people traveling over large distances .
The more stationary version will be known as the African Stealthy , Persistent , Perch and Stare Air Vehicle System ( ASP2S ) and its migratory cousin with be known as the European SP2S or ESP2S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 450 gram, 29-inch wing span, battery powered vehicle ISN'T MANNED????
WTF?Sweet babby Jebus!In order to maintain airspeed velocity, a manned SP2S would need to beat its wings 43 times every second, am I right?
In related news AeroVironment has announced that they will be dividing their SP2S project into two branches, one to follow more stationary targets and the other to track people traveling over large distances.
The more stationary version will be known as the African Stealthy, Persistent, Perch and Stare Air Vehicle System (ASP2S) and its migratory cousin with be known as the European SP2S or ESP2S.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206401</id>
	<title>Is it a bird?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244146860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it a plane?</p><p>No, it is a pork-mobile oink, oink, oink all the way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it a plane ? No , it is a pork-mobile oink , oink , oink all the way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it a plane?No, it is a pork-mobile oink, oink, oink all the way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206237</id>
	<title>Just wait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244058420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>until they combine this technology with camouflage technology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>until they combine this technology with camouflage technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>until they combine this technology with camouflage technology.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205705</id>
	<title>How many dupes today?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow there have been a lot of many month old dupes today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow there have been a lot of many month old dupes today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow there have been a lot of many month old dupes today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210631</id>
	<title>Re:10 million? Cheap</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1244134560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AeroVironment makes some pretty neat stuff.  They also make extremely high power electric vehicle chargers -- as much as 250kW.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AeroVironment makes some pretty neat stuff .
They also make extremely high power electric vehicle chargers -- as much as 250kW .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AeroVironment makes some pretty neat stuff.
They also make extremely high power electric vehicle chargers -- as much as 250kW.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209333</id>
	<title>Re:How lifelike</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244129220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well it sounds like this company just made the world a shittier place so having it crap would be appropriate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it sounds like this company just made the world a shittier place so having it crap would be appropriate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it sounds like this company just made the world a shittier place so having it crap would be appropriate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205713</id>
	<title>More than meets the eye.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>""Unmanned aircraft maker AeroVironment got an additional $5.4 million to further develop a diminutive aircraft that can fly into tight spaces undetected, perch and send live surveillance information to its handlers."</p><p>I'm reminded of the Transformer's "Lazerbeak".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" " Unmanned aircraft maker AeroVironment got an additional $ 5.4 million to further develop a diminutive aircraft that can fly into tight spaces undetected , perch and send live surveillance information to its handlers .
" I 'm reminded of the Transformer 's " Lazerbeak " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>""Unmanned aircraft maker AeroVironment got an additional $5.4 million to further develop a diminutive aircraft that can fly into tight spaces undetected, perch and send live surveillance information to its handlers.
"I'm reminded of the Transformer's "Lazerbeak".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206181</id>
	<title>$10M up in smoke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244057520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Dad! You won't believe what I just caught with my BB-gun!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Dad !
You wo n't believe what I just caught with my BB-gun !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Dad!
You won't believe what I just caught with my BB-gun!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210109</id>
	<title>Re:Ummm...</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1244132400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaderst?</p></div><p>Around the 1840s</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest\_Destiny" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest\_Destiny</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaderst ? Around the 1840shttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest \ _Destiny [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaderst?Around the 1840shttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest\_Destiny [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206409</id>
	<title>Shades of Vulcan's Hammer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244146980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>
I just got done reading Philip Dick's <i>Vulcan's Hammer</i>, where a rogue AI starts manufacturing little flying spy robots. That perch.<br>
<br>
Can I not read ONE sci-fi novel without someone trying to make it a hideous reality?<br>
<br>
Maybe that's why Hollywood is pumping out the PKD films like there's no tomorrow... to prepare us for the pink mind-control lasers.  And the flapples.  I still don't know what an effing flapple is, and I have gobs of PKD novels and short stories sitting around my conapt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just got done reading Philip Dick 's Vulcan 's Hammer , where a rogue AI starts manufacturing little flying spy robots .
That perch .
Can I not read ONE sci-fi novel without someone trying to make it a hideous reality ?
Maybe that 's why Hollywood is pumping out the PKD films like there 's no tomorrow... to prepare us for the pink mind-control lasers .
And the flapples .
I still do n't know what an effing flapple is , and I have gobs of PKD novels and short stories sitting around my conapt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I just got done reading Philip Dick's Vulcan's Hammer, where a rogue AI starts manufacturing little flying spy robots.
That perch.
Can I not read ONE sci-fi novel without someone trying to make it a hideous reality?
Maybe that's why Hollywood is pumping out the PKD films like there's no tomorrow... to prepare us for the pink mind-control lasers.
And the flapples.
I still don't know what an effing flapple is, and I have gobs of PKD novels and short stories sitting around my conapt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205707</id>
	<title>I can see it now..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Deploy:  Lazorbeak.  Mission:  Scout Terrorists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Deploy : Lazorbeak .
Mission : Scout Terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Deploy:  Lazorbeak.
Mission:  Scout Terrorists.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211345</id>
	<title>Love letters</title>
	<author>g00ey</author>
	<datestamp>1244137380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think I'm gonna get one!!! I'll paint it pink and use it for sending love letters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I 'm gon na get one ! ! !
I 'll paint it pink and use it for sending love letters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I'm gonna get one!!!
I'll paint it pink and use it for sending love letters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206637</id>
	<title>Cloaking technology</title>
	<author>bagsta</author>
	<datestamp>1244106900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe it's not far away the day that such aircrafts would be undetected not only by radars but also by sight(like the cloaking technology of Romulans in Star Trek).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe it 's not far away the day that such aircrafts would be undetected not only by radars but also by sight ( like the cloaking technology of Romulans in Star Trek ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe it's not far away the day that such aircrafts would be undetected not only by radars but also by sight(like the cloaking technology of Romulans in Star Trek).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206085</id>
	<title>Re:10 million? Cheap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244055660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup B2s cost just under 1 Billion a pop, and a Nimitz class costs 4.5 Billion</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup B2s cost just under 1 Billion a pop , and a Nimitz class costs 4.5 Billion</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup B2s cost just under 1 Billion a pop, and a Nimitz class costs 4.5 Billion</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205703</id>
	<title>Frost Piss?!</title>
	<author>FunkyRider</author>
	<datestamp>1244050020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Frost Piss?! I want unmanned flying dinosaurs!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Frost Piss ? !
I want unmanned flying dinosaurs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frost Piss?!
I want unmanned flying dinosaurs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205749</id>
	<title>Quoth the SP2S</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stealthy spy plane of the sci-fi days of yore.
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door -
Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door -
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.
<p>
Quoth the SP2S, "nevermore" and nothing more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Open here I flung the shutter , when , with many a flirt and flutter , In there stepped a stealthy spy plane of the sci-fi days of yore .
Not the least obeisance made he ; not a minute stopped or stayed he ; But , with mien of lord or lady , perched above my chamber door - Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door - Perched , and sat , and nothing more .
Quoth the SP2S , " nevermore " and nothing more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open here I flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stealthy spy plane of the sci-fi days of yore.
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But, with mien of lord or lady, perched above my chamber door -
Perched upon a bust of Pallas just above my chamber door -
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.
Quoth the SP2S, "nevermore" and nothing more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206167</id>
	<title>Re:10 million? Cheap</title>
	<author>tychver</author>
	<datestamp>1244057340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The AGM-129, the most advanced nuclear equipped cruise missile the USA operates, has a unit cost of 4 million.

Were you talking about development costs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The AGM-129 , the most advanced nuclear equipped cruise missile the USA operates , has a unit cost of 4 million .
Were you talking about development costs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The AGM-129, the most advanced nuclear equipped cruise missile the USA operates, has a unit cost of 4 million.
Were you talking about development costs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28214019</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>darkwing\_bmf</author>
	<datestamp>1244148420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Something does amuse me about the fact an ultra-high tech. robot of the future would turn into a cassette of all things though.</i></p><p>Noob. All the transformers have their 20th century vehicle (or other) shapes because they were trying to blend in. I believe their respective ships sent out probes to analyze the environment and configure the bots appropriately. At any rate, their Cybertron forms <i>were</i> more ultra-high tech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something does amuse me about the fact an ultra-high tech .
robot of the future would turn into a cassette of all things though.Noob .
All the transformers have their 20th century vehicle ( or other ) shapes because they were trying to blend in .
I believe their respective ships sent out probes to analyze the environment and configure the bots appropriately .
At any rate , their Cybertron forms were more ultra-high tech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something does amuse me about the fact an ultra-high tech.
robot of the future would turn into a cassette of all things though.Noob.
All the transformers have their 20th century vehicle (or other) shapes because they were trying to blend in.
I believe their respective ships sent out probes to analyze the environment and configure the bots appropriately.
At any rate, their Cybertron forms were more ultra-high tech.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206705</id>
	<title>Re:Frost Piss?!</title>
	<author>fractoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244107620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Manned flying dinosaurs are SO much cooler. Vote for sky riders today!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Manned flying dinosaurs are SO much cooler .
Vote for sky riders today !
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Manned flying dinosaurs are SO much cooler.
Vote for sky riders today!
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205703</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209243</id>
	<title>Re:Power lines?</title>
	<author>stuntpope</author>
	<datestamp>1244128860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Old news.</p><p>Small UAVs May Recharge on Power Lines<br><a href="http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,158240,00.html" title="military.com">http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,158240,00.html</a> [military.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old news.Small UAVs May Recharge on Power Lineshttp : //www.military.com/features/0,15240,158240,00.html [ military.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old news.Small UAVs May Recharge on Power Lineshttp://www.military.com/features/0,15240,158240,00.html [military.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206045</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28215703</id>
	<title>Re:2100</title>
	<author>slodan</author>
	<datestamp>1244113560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These damn robots are taking away my job!  My name is Hiro Protagonist, and I'm against robot labor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These damn robots are taking away my job !
My name is Hiro Protagonist , and I 'm against robot labor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These damn robots are taking away my job!
My name is Hiro Protagonist, and I'm against robot labor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205955</id>
	<title>Not man-rated?</title>
	<author>M0b1u5</author>
	<datestamp>1244053200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A 450 gram, 29-inch wing span, battery powered vehicle ISN'T MANNED???? WTF?</p><p>Sweet babby Jebus!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A 450 gram , 29-inch wing span , battery powered vehicle IS N'T MANNED ? ? ? ?
WTF ? Sweet babby Jebus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A 450 gram, 29-inch wing span, battery powered vehicle ISN'T MANNED????
WTF?Sweet babby Jebus!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206365</id>
	<title>Re:Not man-rated?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244146320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is babby Jesus formed?</p><p>How virgin get pragnent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is babby Jesus formed ? How virgin get pragnent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is babby Jesus formed?How virgin get pragnent?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205955</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207045</id>
	<title>Suspect we have a Robert Sheckley fan...</title>
	<author>cowbutt</author>
	<datestamp>1244112420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.mastersofscifi.com/site/masters\_of\_science\_fiction/episodes/watchbird.html" title="mastersofscifi.com">Watchbird</a> [mastersofscifi.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Watchbird [ mastersofscifi.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watchbird [mastersofscifi.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208049</id>
	<title>Re:10 million? Cheap</title>
	<author>MobyTurbo</author>
	<datestamp>1244123400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was refering to planes, and then to the missles under them, my message was written very unclearly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was refering to planes , and then to the missles under them , my message was written very unclearly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was refering to planes, and then to the missles under them, my message was written very unclearly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206079</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28214271</id>
	<title>Why Re-invent the Wheel?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1244106300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have an abundant supply of birds pre-configured with BOTH perching AND the ability to fit into small places!</p><p>Just rig some mind control device to them and presto! An added side effect is camouflage as a freakin' bird!</p><p>Downside would be peta freaks.</p><p>Alternatively Birds with Freakin' Lasers attached to their heads! Muahahaha!</p><p>Would that count as biological warfare?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have an abundant supply of birds pre-configured with BOTH perching AND the ability to fit into small places ! Just rig some mind control device to them and presto !
An added side effect is camouflage as a freakin ' bird ! Downside would be peta freaks.Alternatively Birds with Freakin ' Lasers attached to their heads !
Muahahaha ! Would that count as biological warfare ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have an abundant supply of birds pre-configured with BOTH perching AND the ability to fit into small places!Just rig some mind control device to them and presto!
An added side effect is camouflage as a freakin' bird!Downside would be peta freaks.Alternatively Birds with Freakin' Lasers attached to their heads!
Muahahaha!Would that count as biological warfare?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207153</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1244114160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Nowadays you'd need a separate transformer to be able to turn into a cassette player to play it back</p></div></blockquote><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundwave\_(Transformers)" title="wikipedia.org">Soundwave.</a> [wikipedia.org]  Yeah, they had that covered.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowadays you 'd need a separate transformer to be able to turn into a cassette player to play it backSoundwave .
[ wikipedia.org ] Yeah , they had that covered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowadays you'd need a separate transformer to be able to turn into a cassette player to play it backSoundwave.
[wikipedia.org]  Yeah, they had that covered.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208285</id>
	<title>Re:[verb] like a [animal]</title>
	<author>Nichole\_knc</author>
	<datestamp>1244124540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And sting like a bee....</htmltext>
<tokenext>And sting like a bee... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And sting like a bee....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207443</id>
	<title>I can see it now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244118360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Iraqi 1- Hey man, have you noticed that bird just sitting there staring at us for the past hour?? I don't think it's even made a sound!</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p>Iraqi 2- Yeah.. I've also been googleing to see when the last time a California Condor was even remotely close to here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iraqi 1- Hey man , have you noticed that bird just sitting there staring at us for the past hour ? ?
I do n't think it 's even made a sound !
  Iraqi 2- Yeah.. I 've also been googleing to see when the last time a California Condor was even remotely close to here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iraqi 1- Hey man, have you noticed that bird just sitting there staring at us for the past hour??
I don't think it's even made a sound!
  Iraqi 2- Yeah.. I've also been googleing to see when the last time a California Condor was even remotely close to here...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210761</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>drkoemans</author>
	<datestamp>1244135040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i thought GI Joe had a jet powered wing but I couldn't find it. Doesn't matter, this nut has nearly been cracked by Jet Man. Give that guy the 10m.

<a href="http://media.techeblog.com/images/swissman\_6.jpg" title="techeblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://media.techeblog.com/images/swissman\_6.jpg</a> [techeblog.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>i thought GI Joe had a jet powered wing but I could n't find it .
Does n't matter , this nut has nearly been cracked by Jet Man .
Give that guy the 10m .
http : //media.techeblog.com/images/swissman \ _6.jpg [ techeblog.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i thought GI Joe had a jet powered wing but I couldn't find it.
Doesn't matter, this nut has nearly been cracked by Jet Man.
Give that guy the 10m.
http://media.techeblog.com/images/swissman\_6.jpg [techeblog.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757</id>
	<title>Ummm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaders from a robot planet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaders from a robot planet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at what point does the US military stop looking like a human defense force and start looking looking like alien invaders from a robot planet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206015</id>
	<title>Took twitter a bit too seriously</title>
	<author>Myrcutio</author>
	<datestamp>1244054460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know twitter has been getting popular lately, but i think a $10m spyplane that perches is taking things a bit too literally.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know twitter has been getting popular lately , but i think a $ 10m spyplane that perches is taking things a bit too literally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know twitter has been getting popular lately, but i think a $10m spyplane that perches is taking things a bit too literally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211557</id>
	<title>Re:Transformers did it first</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1244138220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Might as well have optimus prime turn into a horse and cart.</p></div><p>No, he'd just turn into a horse. When going back to robot mode, the cart would disappear into the background until he needed to go back into beast-- er... vehicle mode.</p><p>The holographic human he uses to whip himself into running is just disturbing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might as well have optimus prime turn into a horse and cart.No , he 'd just turn into a horse .
When going back to robot mode , the cart would disappear into the background until he needed to go back into beast-- er... vehicle mode.The holographic human he uses to whip himself into running is just disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might as well have optimus prime turn into a horse and cart.No, he'd just turn into a horse.
When going back to robot mode, the cart would disappear into the background until he needed to go back into beast-- er... vehicle mode.The holographic human he uses to whip himself into running is just disturbing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211087</id>
	<title>Re:Bad idea</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1244136300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well the 'bird' is for surveillance, and that means being inconspicuous.  If they know where the robot is to shoot at it, then for the purposes of many missions it's already failed.  A motionless bird, even one with a 29" wingspan, is much harder to spot when sitting still on a branch than when flying around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the 'bird ' is for surveillance , and that means being inconspicuous .
If they know where the robot is to shoot at it , then for the purposes of many missions it 's already failed .
A motionless bird , even one with a 29 " wingspan , is much harder to spot when sitting still on a branch than when flying around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the 'bird' is for surveillance, and that means being inconspicuous.
If they know where the robot is to shoot at it, then for the purposes of many missions it's already failed.
A motionless bird, even one with a 29" wingspan, is much harder to spot when sitting still on a branch than when flying around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206703</id>
	<title>Why not a real bird?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244107620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why can't they just train real birds to perch and randomly attach cameras or whatever to things. Swallows come to mind, I'd have to check. I don't remember if African or European would be best.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't they just train real birds to perch and randomly attach cameras or whatever to things .
Swallows come to mind , I 'd have to check .
I do n't remember if African or European would be best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't they just train real birds to perch and randomly attach cameras or whatever to things.
Swallows come to mind, I'd have to check.
I don't remember if African or European would be best.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207549
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207993
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206365
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28214285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206085
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207221
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207153
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206167
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209243
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206045
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205707
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210109
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211141
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206579
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207561
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206369
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28215645
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210761
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205703
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206015
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211557
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205955
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28215703
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28214019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2239203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206079
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28215703
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28212001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206705
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205919
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211141
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207993
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28215645
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210827
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207549
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210109
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28214285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206369
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206899
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211087
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207451
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206703
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207561
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206181
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206045
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209243
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205801
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206365
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206541
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206753
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207221
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28214019
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211557
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210761
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28207175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206191
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206409
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28211247
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205765
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206085
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206579
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206079
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28209759
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28208049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28210631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28206637
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2239203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2239203.28205877
</commentlist>
</conversation>
