<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_03_2220210</id>
	<title>Device Reads Messages From Surface of the Brain</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1244027220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/" rel="nofollow">Al</a> writes <i>"Technology Review has a story about a start-up company that has developed <a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/biomedicine/22739/">a more-accurate and less-invasive way to read a patient's thoughts</a>. Neurolutions, based in St Louis, has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands. The device, which is less invasive than implants and more accurate than scalp electrodes, uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activity. This technology is currently used to find the origin of seizures in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy before surgery. But the company says it could also help paralyzed patients control a computer and perhaps prosthetic limbs using their thoughts. Tests involving more than 20 patients have shown that people can quickly learn to move a cursor on a computer screen using their brain activity."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Al writes " Technology Review has a story about a start-up company that has developed a more-accurate and less-invasive way to read a patient 's thoughts .
Neurolutions , based in St Louis , has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands .
The device , which is less invasive than implants and more accurate than scalp electrodes , uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activity .
This technology is currently used to find the origin of seizures in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy before surgery .
But the company says it could also help paralyzed patients control a computer and perhaps prosthetic limbs using their thoughts .
Tests involving more than 20 patients have shown that people can quickly learn to move a cursor on a computer screen using their brain activity .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Al writes "Technology Review has a story about a start-up company that has developed a more-accurate and less-invasive way to read a patient's thoughts.
Neurolutions, based in St Louis, has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands.
The device, which is less invasive than implants and more accurate than scalp electrodes, uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activity.
This technology is currently used to find the origin of seizures in patients with uncontrolled epilepsy before surgery.
But the company says it could also help paralyzed patients control a computer and perhaps prosthetic limbs using their thoughts.
Tests involving more than 20 patients have shown that people can quickly learn to move a cursor on a computer screen using their brain activity.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203997</id>
	<title>since it's an implant, it should stimulate as well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i'm getting this as soon as they add drug simulation functionality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'm getting this as soon as they add drug simulation functionality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'm getting this as soon as they add drug simulation functionality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204247</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244036520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wii remote+Knife+Glue+Eye.<br>Do it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wii remote + Knife + Glue + Eye.Do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wii remote+Knife+Glue+Eye.Do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059</id>
	<title>Ok Unrelated but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244035080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one see truncated green border around the posts? I see this on my MAC and Linux machines. It started happening about a week ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one see truncated green border around the posts ?
I see this on my MAC and Linux machines .
It started happening about a week ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one see truncated green border around the posts?
I see this on my MAC and Linux machines.
It started happening about a week ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</id>
	<title>Killer App</title>
	<author>siloko</author>
	<datestamp>1244031000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they get a cursor to follow my eyes i'll wield the scalpel myself!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they get a cursor to follow my eyes i 'll wield the scalpel myself !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they get a cursor to follow my eyes i'll wield the scalpel myself!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205769</id>
	<title>Re:Get the message</title>
	<author>miruku</author>
	<datestamp>1244050740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>getting this also. happens for some articles, not for others.</p><p>Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>getting this also .
happens for some articles , not for others.Mozilla/5.0 ( Windows ; U ; Windows NT 5.1 ; en-US ; rv : 1.9.0.10 ) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10</tokentext>
<sentencetext>getting this also.
happens for some articles, not for others.Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204363</id>
	<title>Damn self-repair mechanisms</title>
	<author>QuoteMstr</author>
	<datestamp>1244037300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I understand it, the main problem with implants that receive signals is that a layer of defensive glial cells forms around electrodes left in the brain. These cells act as electrical insulators and decrease the strength of the signal that can be picked up. How does this grid system mitigate this problem?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand it , the main problem with implants that receive signals is that a layer of defensive glial cells forms around electrodes left in the brain .
These cells act as electrical insulators and decrease the strength of the signal that can be picked up .
How does this grid system mitigate this problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand it, the main problem with implants that receive signals is that a layer of defensive glial cells forms around electrodes left in the brain.
These cells act as electrical insulators and decrease the strength of the signal that can be picked up.
How does this grid system mitigate this problem?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204707</id>
	<title>You'd think</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244040120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that with the state the American economy is in, we could afford a native English speaker to write these summaries.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Neurolutions, based in St Louis has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands. The device, which is less invasive than implants<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>that with the state the American economy is in , we could afford a native English speaker to write these summaries.Neurolutions , based in St Louis has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands .
The device , which is less invasive than implants .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that with the state the American economy is in, we could afford a native English speaker to write these summaries.Neurolutions, based in St Louis has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands.
The device, which is less invasive than implants ...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205315</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1244045460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That depends on what part of your body you connect it to...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That depends on what part of your body you connect it to.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That depends on what part of your body you connect it to...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203671</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>venicebeach</author>
	<datestamp>1244032800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain "codes" things then exploit it for our own benefit?</p></div></blockquote><p>

We have already begun to do this.  For example, understanding the binocular cues for depth perception have given us 3D movies that provide us with the illusion of depth.  Providing input to the the brain directly <i>may</i> eventually be more efficient than presenting sensory information through our sensory apparatus, but probably not for a long time.  For providing fictional experiences I think it's still going to be more practical to use the eyes and the ears compared with the auditory and visual cortices for quite a while.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain " codes " things then exploit it for our own benefit ?
We have already begun to do this .
For example , understanding the binocular cues for depth perception have given us 3D movies that provide us with the illusion of depth .
Providing input to the the brain directly may eventually be more efficient than presenting sensory information through our sensory apparatus , but probably not for a long time .
For providing fictional experiences I think it 's still going to be more practical to use the eyes and the ears compared with the auditory and visual cortices for quite a while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain "codes" things then exploit it for our own benefit?
We have already begun to do this.
For example, understanding the binocular cues for depth perception have given us 3D movies that provide us with the illusion of depth.
Providing input to the the brain directly may eventually be more efficient than presenting sensory information through our sensory apparatus, but probably not for a long time.
For providing fictional experiences I think it's still going to be more practical to use the eyes and the ears compared with the auditory and visual cortices for quite a while.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203767</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244033280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1 Looking Forward To</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 Looking Forward To</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 Looking Forward To</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205593</id>
	<title>We ain't there yet!</title>
	<author>joeyblades</author>
	<datestamp>1244048580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Seriously, folks. When are you ever going to learn. Seems like every week I read one of these stories about computers reading thoughts...
</p><p>
There's a major misconception about what these technologies do. It **IS** thought control, but that isn't the same thing as reading thoughts. No one is amazed if I move a cursor by pushing my finger against a joystick. These new brain interfaces are just a new kind of joystick with a different physical interface technology. Similar interface technologies have been demonstrated with galvanic skin response, but no one would argue that we're reading your thoughts through wires attached to your fingers...
</p><p>
This isn't to say the technologies aren't cool and advanced. They can allow hands-free control for situations where an operator needs both hands or where an individual may not have use of their hands due to various handicaps. However, these technologies can in no way read thoughts for one very simple reason. Before we can build a technology to read thoughts, we first have to understand how thoughts are represented, organized, and integrated into conscious 'streams' in the brain. We ain't there yet!
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , folks .
When are you ever going to learn .
Seems like every week I read one of these stories about computers reading thoughts.. . There 's a major misconception about what these technologies do .
It * * IS * * thought control , but that is n't the same thing as reading thoughts .
No one is amazed if I move a cursor by pushing my finger against a joystick .
These new brain interfaces are just a new kind of joystick with a different physical interface technology .
Similar interface technologies have been demonstrated with galvanic skin response , but no one would argue that we 're reading your thoughts through wires attached to your fingers.. . This is n't to say the technologies are n't cool and advanced .
They can allow hands-free control for situations where an operator needs both hands or where an individual may not have use of their hands due to various handicaps .
However , these technologies can in no way read thoughts for one very simple reason .
Before we can build a technology to read thoughts , we first have to understand how thoughts are represented , organized , and integrated into conscious 'streams ' in the brain .
We ai n't there yet !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Seriously, folks.
When are you ever going to learn.
Seems like every week I read one of these stories about computers reading thoughts...

There's a major misconception about what these technologies do.
It **IS** thought control, but that isn't the same thing as reading thoughts.
No one is amazed if I move a cursor by pushing my finger against a joystick.
These new brain interfaces are just a new kind of joystick with a different physical interface technology.
Similar interface technologies have been demonstrated with galvanic skin response, but no one would argue that we're reading your thoughts through wires attached to your fingers...

This isn't to say the technologies aren't cool and advanced.
They can allow hands-free control for situations where an operator needs both hands or where an individual may not have use of their hands due to various handicaps.
However, these technologies can in no way read thoughts for one very simple reason.
Before we can build a technology to read thoughts, we first have to understand how thoughts are represented, organized, and integrated into conscious 'streams' in the brain.
We ain't there yet!
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203251</id>
	<title>Get the message</title>
	<author>Goldberg's Pants</author>
	<datestamp>1244031000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a lot of Internet uses it'd just read a one word message.</p><p>"Vacant".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a lot of Internet uses it 'd just read a one word message .
" Vacant " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a lot of Internet uses it'd just read a one word message.
"Vacant".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205915</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1244052780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it.</i>
<br> <br>
Surely this is a human <i>output</i> device, at this point? Once it becomes a human input device, I think you will want it even less.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I do n't want it .
Surely this is a human output device , at this point ?
Once it becomes a human input device , I think you will want it even less .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it.
Surely this is a human output device, at this point?
Once it becomes a human input device, I think you will want it even less.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28214265</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244106240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it. How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.</p></div><p>Yeah, every 8 seconds!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I do n't want it .
How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.Yeah , every 8 seconds !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it.
How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.Yeah, every 8 seconds!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204129</id>
	<title>how is this less invasive?</title>
	<author>glitch23</author>
	<datestamp>1244035740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The device, which is less invasive than implants and more accurate that scalp electrodes, uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activity.</p> </div><p>How is having to put an entire grid of electrodes on the surface of the brain less invasive than an implant?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The device , which is less invasive than implants and more accurate that scalp electrodes , uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activity .
How is having to put an entire grid of electrodes on the surface of the brain less invasive than an implant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The device, which is less invasive than implants and more accurate that scalp electrodes, uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activity.
How is having to put an entire grid of electrodes on the surface of the brain less invasive than an implant?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205037</id>
	<title>Re:Ok Unrelated but</title>
	<author>adavies42</author>
	<datestamp>1244042880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I see this on my MAC</p></div><p>you read slashdot on your <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MAC\_Cosmetics" title="wikipedia.org">lipstick</a> [wikipedia.org]? what's it run, netbsd?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see this on my MACyou read slashdot on your lipstick [ wikipedia.org ] ?
what 's it run , netbsd ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see this on my MACyou read slashdot on your lipstick [wikipedia.org]?
what's it run, netbsd?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204827</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1244041080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Offtopic: You know ~ is already in use to elongate words. Or make them sound more musical.<br>ex. Hi~<br>Hm~~~~~<br> <br>The origin is Japanese where a double vowel word like konpyuutaa is written as konpyu~ta~ (written in japanese character of course). Written to drag it out you would write one really long tilde but since the advent of computers generally people use a chain of them together. Also of note that you might be interested in from japanese culture. Japanese people often end sentences with a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;; or even shorter ; to represent a type of sadness or confusion(<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;\_; is a sad emoticon in japan and ^^;; is confusion (sweat drops)), this is possible since the semicolon doesn't exist in Japanese. As well some people use ^ at the end of a line for happiness (from ^\_^). And<nobr> <wbr></nobr>// for.... ughh or you are an idiot (from -\_-//). There are other various sentence endings that take part of the emoticon and attach it to the end to refer to different things. And japan has hundreds of different kaomoji(emoticons) unlike the 10 we might use. And so you don't need to ask, there isn't to my knowledge a line ending for sarcasm. I think it'd defeat the purpose of being sarcastic anyways<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Offtopic : You know ~ is already in use to elongate words .
Or make them sound more musical.ex .
Hi ~ Hm ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ The origin is Japanese where a double vowel word like konpyuutaa is written as konpyu ~ ta ~ ( written in japanese character of course ) .
Written to drag it out you would write one really long tilde but since the advent of computers generally people use a chain of them together .
Also of note that you might be interested in from japanese culture .
Japanese people often end sentences with a ; ; or even shorter ; to represent a type of sadness or confusion ( ; \ _ ; is a sad emoticon in japan and ^ ^ ; ; is confusion ( sweat drops ) ) , this is possible since the semicolon does n't exist in Japanese .
As well some people use ^ at the end of a line for happiness ( from ^ \ _ ^ ) .
And // for.... ughh or you are an idiot ( from - \ _-// ) .
There are other various sentence endings that take part of the emoticon and attach it to the end to refer to different things .
And japan has hundreds of different kaomoji ( emoticons ) unlike the 10 we might use .
And so you do n't need to ask , there is n't to my knowledge a line ending for sarcasm .
I think it 'd defeat the purpose of being sarcastic anyways : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Offtopic: You know ~ is already in use to elongate words.
Or make them sound more musical.ex.
Hi~Hm~~~~~ The origin is Japanese where a double vowel word like konpyuutaa is written as konpyu~ta~ (written in japanese character of course).
Written to drag it out you would write one really long tilde but since the advent of computers generally people use a chain of them together.
Also of note that you might be interested in from japanese culture.
Japanese people often end sentences with a ;; or even shorter ; to represent a type of sadness or confusion( ;\_; is a sad emoticon in japan and ^^;; is confusion (sweat drops)), this is possible since the semicolon doesn't exist in Japanese.
As well some people use ^ at the end of a line for happiness (from ^\_^).
And // for.... ughh or you are an idiot (from -\_-//).
There are other various sentence endings that take part of the emoticon and attach it to the end to refer to different things.
And japan has hundreds of different kaomoji(emoticons) unlike the 10 we might use.
And so you don't need to ask, there isn't to my knowledge a line ending for sarcasm.
I think it'd defeat the purpose of being sarcastic anyways :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203621</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244032620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If they get a cursor to follow my eyes i'll wield the scalpel myself!</p></div></blockquote><p>I hope you don't twitch under extreme pain.  Could end up in some kind of endlessly recursive feedback loop.  Which would hurt.  Muchly.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they get a cursor to follow my eyes i 'll wield the scalpel myself ! I hope you do n't twitch under extreme pain .
Could end up in some kind of endlessly recursive feedback loop .
Which would hurt .
Muchly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they get a cursor to follow my eyes i'll wield the scalpel myself!I hope you don't twitch under extreme pain.
Could end up in some kind of endlessly recursive feedback loop.
Which would hurt.
Muchly.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204771</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>FrostDust</author>
	<datestamp>1244040660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just think about it, custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying, fighting a dragon, more epic than any video game imaginable, all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects.</p></div><p>There are a lot of drugs out there that don't get a user physically addicted, but the user instead develops a psychological addiction. The high they get is so good that, compared to normal life, they think they can't be happy without it.</p><p>We already have clinics up and running for curing internet addiction, and we just have LCDs &amp; CRTs. When we develop total-immersion technology, why would people bother ever returning to their cold, lonely, boring real lives, except when they run out of money to fuel their digital lives?</p><p>For an example (yeah, I know it's fictional, but still), look at Cypher from The Matrix. The fake digital world was so much better than the real world, he sold out his crewmates in order to forget the real world even existed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just think about it , custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying , fighting a dragon , more epic than any video game imaginable , all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects.There are a lot of drugs out there that do n't get a user physically addicted , but the user instead develops a psychological addiction .
The high they get is so good that , compared to normal life , they think they ca n't be happy without it.We already have clinics up and running for curing internet addiction , and we just have LCDs &amp; CRTs .
When we develop total-immersion technology , why would people bother ever returning to their cold , lonely , boring real lives , except when they run out of money to fuel their digital lives ? For an example ( yeah , I know it 's fictional , but still ) , look at Cypher from The Matrix .
The fake digital world was so much better than the real world , he sold out his crewmates in order to forget the real world even existed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just think about it, custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying, fighting a dragon, more epic than any video game imaginable, all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects.There are a lot of drugs out there that don't get a user physically addicted, but the user instead develops a psychological addiction.
The high they get is so good that, compared to normal life, they think they can't be happy without it.We already have clinics up and running for curing internet addiction, and we just have LCDs &amp; CRTs.
When we develop total-immersion technology, why would people bother ever returning to their cold, lonely, boring real lives, except when they run out of money to fuel their digital lives?For an example (yeah, I know it's fictional, but still), look at Cypher from The Matrix.
The fake digital world was so much better than the real world, he sold out his crewmates in order to forget the real world even existed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203283</id>
	<title>I gotta get this question off my mind. Please help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244031120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always wanted to ejaculate on a woman's period in a petri dish, wait 3 days, then install the fertilized egg into a chicken egg to keep it under a lamp for 4 months. Will it grow? Inquiring minds would like to know. Also of note, when I get realy randy I would dig a hole in the ground out beyond a line of trees and drop a couple cumwads and burry it: anyone ever see any of those walking tree men, or dendrites as they call them? I can almost swear that these new saplings have ears, maybe from me, and they can't be trusted to keep secrets (as I swore I wouldn't write any of this on slashdot, yet I did!)!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always wanted to ejaculate on a woman 's period in a petri dish , wait 3 days , then install the fertilized egg into a chicken egg to keep it under a lamp for 4 months .
Will it grow ?
Inquiring minds would like to know .
Also of note , when I get realy randy I would dig a hole in the ground out beyond a line of trees and drop a couple cumwads and burry it : anyone ever see any of those walking tree men , or dendrites as they call them ?
I can almost swear that these new saplings have ears , maybe from me , and they ca n't be trusted to keep secrets ( as I swore I would n't write any of this on slashdot , yet I did !
) !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always wanted to ejaculate on a woman's period in a petri dish, wait 3 days, then install the fertilized egg into a chicken egg to keep it under a lamp for 4 months.
Will it grow?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
Also of note, when I get realy randy I would dig a hole in the ground out beyond a line of trees and drop a couple cumwads and burry it: anyone ever see any of those walking tree men, or dendrites as they call them?
I can almost swear that these new saplings have ears, maybe from me, and they can't be trusted to keep secrets (as I swore I wouldn't write any of this on slashdot, yet I did!
)!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206305</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244059080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You won't have to explain that, as it will happen to ~90\% of males, so it'll be an accepted fact that once or twice during a live online presentation, you'll get some porn. Yay!</p><p>I wonder what we'll get to see when women are using the device. Subconcious online shopping?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You wo n't have to explain that , as it will happen to ~ 90 \ % of males , so it 'll be an accepted fact that once or twice during a live online presentation , you 'll get some porn .
Yay ! I wonder what we 'll get to see when women are using the device .
Subconcious online shopping ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You won't have to explain that, as it will happen to ~90\% of males, so it'll be an accepted fact that once or twice during a live online presentation, you'll get some porn.
Yay!I wonder what we'll get to see when women are using the device.
Subconcious online shopping?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203693</id>
	<title>Old News</title>
	<author>schrodingers\_rabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1244032920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Technology the already exists, and has for a relatively long time, can be used to let some paralyzed patients communicate through computers. The subject of one study by Brown University and Massachussets General Hospital in 2006, Matthew Nagle, preformed all the functions listed in the article. <i>I'm</i> waiting for the mind-control implants<br>...
for the world is hollow and...brZAP...I...ZAP....give up....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Technology the already exists , and has for a relatively long time , can be used to let some paralyzed patients communicate through computers .
The subject of one study by Brown University and Massachussets General Hospital in 2006 , Matthew Nagle , preformed all the functions listed in the article .
I 'm waiting for the mind-control implants.. . for the world is hollow and...brZAP...I...ZAP....give up... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technology the already exists, and has for a relatively long time, can be used to let some paralyzed patients communicate through computers.
The subject of one study by Brown University and Massachussets General Hospital in 2006, Matthew Nagle, preformed all the functions listed in the article.
I'm waiting for the mind-control implants...
for the world is hollow and...brZAP...I...ZAP....give up....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204361</id>
	<title>I tried this once</title>
	<author>sokoban</author>
	<datestamp>1244037300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried this device one time.  The only message it could read from the surface of my brain was "Squiggle"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried this device one time .
The only message it could read from the surface of my brain was " Squiggle "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried this device one time.
The only message it could read from the surface of my brain was "Squiggle"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203601</id>
	<title>To Implant or not to implant...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244032560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quote:</p><p>developed a small <b>implanted device</b> that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands. The device, which is <b>less invasive than implants</b></p><p>How's that again?</p><p>I suppose I could break down read TFA.....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quote : developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands .
The device , which is less invasive than implantsHow 's that again ? I suppose I could break down read TFA.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quote:developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands.
The device, which is less invasive than implantsHow's that again?I suppose I could break down read TFA.....
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207321</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244116800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather get a scalpel to follow my eyes. It'll be awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather get a scalpel to follow my eyes .
It 'll be awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather get a scalpel to follow my eyes.
It'll be awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206639</id>
	<title>Re:Get the message</title>
	<author>Kugrian</author>
	<datestamp>1244106900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If using the Classic Discussion System, coming to the article via the RSS feed produces the above effect.  A work-around is to click on the links from the homepage instead (this lets you view the pages as Classic).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If using the Classic Discussion System , coming to the article via the RSS feed produces the above effect .
A work-around is to click on the links from the homepage instead ( this lets you view the pages as Classic ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If using the Classic Discussion System, coming to the article via the RSS feed produces the above effect.
A work-around is to click on the links from the homepage instead (this lets you view the pages as Classic).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273</id>
	<title>Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244031120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More stories like this please.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More stories like this please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More stories like this please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203577</id>
	<title>old...again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244032440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Old. Google up "Brain gate". Hell, even wired.com has had articles on this.</p><p>And it is a bit misleading to say that moving a cursor accross a computer screen is the equivanlent to reading someones thoughts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old .
Google up " Brain gate " .
Hell , even wired.com has had articles on this.And it is a bit misleading to say that moving a cursor accross a computer screen is the equivanlent to reading someones thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old.
Google up "Brain gate".
Hell, even wired.com has had articles on this.And it is a bit misleading to say that moving a cursor accross a computer screen is the equivanlent to reading someones thoughts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207017</id>
	<title>Re:ohh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244111880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Amoral technocrats will be the ruin of us all. This group includes many Slashdot readers.</p><p><i>"Once the rockets go up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department," says Werner von Braun.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Amoral technocrats will be the ruin of us all .
This group includes many Slashdot readers .
" Once the rockets go up , who cares where they come down ?
That 's not my department , " says Werner von Braun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amoral technocrats will be the ruin of us all.
This group includes many Slashdot readers.
"Once the rockets go up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department," says Werner von Braun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203525</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205723</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244050200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You won't have to explain, your missus will be able to read your thoughts!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You wo n't have to explain , your missus will be able to read your thoughts !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You won't have to explain, your missus will be able to read your thoughts!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28221175</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>Tinctorius</author>
	<datestamp>1244211060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not as bad as using operating systems that are defective by design.</p><p>"My OS is getting slow, I think I should reinstall it some time. Wait, did I think that out loud?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not as bad as using operating systems that are defective by design .
" My OS is getting slow , I think I should reinstall it some time .
Wait , did I think that out loud ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not as bad as using operating systems that are defective by design.
"My OS is getting slow, I think I should reinstall it some time.
Wait, did I think that out loud?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206083</id>
	<title>Finally...</title>
	<author>defireman</author>
	<datestamp>1244055600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> i'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet

A means to accomplish a device to stab people over the internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet A means to accomplish a device to stab people over the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> i'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet

A means to accomplish a device to stab people over the internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204217</id>
	<title>"Less Invasive"?</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1244036340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Laying an electrocorticogram array (that's what they're using -- it's not new) on the surface of the brain requires removing a section of the scalp, skull and dura mater. There's nothing about it that's not invasive as well as dangerous. Single cortical or deep electrodes can be put in through very small drilled holes. The former requires a full neurosurgical suite/team. The latter can be done in a clinic visit if localization isn't critical, or else in a CT or MR scanner with no more invasive electrode technology than the clinic version. The draw back to implanted electrodes is that inserting them into proximity of the neurons of interest can cause them to die off immediately, and will cause them to die off eventually.</p><p>Both are unnecessary for the application. In 1994 a researcher working at Radford University with Karl Pribram developed an EEG analysis program that could recognize various shapes, sizes and colors (various combinations thereof) of objects both seen and only internally visualized, with a 95\% accuracy. Such accuracy among the many permutations of possible signals could very easily translate into control signals sent to another device. Fully designed but not built around this technology was such a control device intended to run an 8 stepper motor robotic arm using a standard parallel printer port. Since it rests on the scalp, an EEG electrode such as we used here is not invasive in the least. Well, the sticky glue electrode paste necessary to keep the electrode on and conducting for several hours tend to pull out hair, but that's annoying and slightly painful, but not invasive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Laying an electrocorticogram array ( that 's what they 're using -- it 's not new ) on the surface of the brain requires removing a section of the scalp , skull and dura mater .
There 's nothing about it that 's not invasive as well as dangerous .
Single cortical or deep electrodes can be put in through very small drilled holes .
The former requires a full neurosurgical suite/team .
The latter can be done in a clinic visit if localization is n't critical , or else in a CT or MR scanner with no more invasive electrode technology than the clinic version .
The draw back to implanted electrodes is that inserting them into proximity of the neurons of interest can cause them to die off immediately , and will cause them to die off eventually.Both are unnecessary for the application .
In 1994 a researcher working at Radford University with Karl Pribram developed an EEG analysis program that could recognize various shapes , sizes and colors ( various combinations thereof ) of objects both seen and only internally visualized , with a 95 \ % accuracy .
Such accuracy among the many permutations of possible signals could very easily translate into control signals sent to another device .
Fully designed but not built around this technology was such a control device intended to run an 8 stepper motor robotic arm using a standard parallel printer port .
Since it rests on the scalp , an EEG electrode such as we used here is not invasive in the least .
Well , the sticky glue electrode paste necessary to keep the electrode on and conducting for several hours tend to pull out hair , but that 's annoying and slightly painful , but not invasive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laying an electrocorticogram array (that's what they're using -- it's not new) on the surface of the brain requires removing a section of the scalp, skull and dura mater.
There's nothing about it that's not invasive as well as dangerous.
Single cortical or deep electrodes can be put in through very small drilled holes.
The former requires a full neurosurgical suite/team.
The latter can be done in a clinic visit if localization isn't critical, or else in a CT or MR scanner with no more invasive electrode technology than the clinic version.
The draw back to implanted electrodes is that inserting them into proximity of the neurons of interest can cause them to die off immediately, and will cause them to die off eventually.Both are unnecessary for the application.
In 1994 a researcher working at Radford University with Karl Pribram developed an EEG analysis program that could recognize various shapes, sizes and colors (various combinations thereof) of objects both seen and only internally visualized, with a 95\% accuracy.
Such accuracy among the many permutations of possible signals could very easily translate into control signals sent to another device.
Fully designed but not built around this technology was such a control device intended to run an 8 stepper motor robotic arm using a standard parallel printer port.
Since it rests on the scalp, an EEG electrode such as we used here is not invasive in the least.
Well, the sticky glue electrode paste necessary to keep the electrode on and conducting for several hours tend to pull out hair, but that's annoying and slightly painful, but not invasive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204299</id>
	<title>The surface of the brain is pretty damned invasive</title>
	<author>SteeldrivingJon</author>
	<datestamp>1244036880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, really.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205361</id>
	<title>legacy code</title>
	<author>benjamin.haley</author>
	<datestamp>1244046000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>biology is ripe with code/hardware that has been running for billions of years, (eg ribosomes).  I imagine that maintaining backwards compatibility will be something of an issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>biology is ripe with code/hardware that has been running for billions of years , ( eg ribosomes ) .
I imagine that maintaining backwards compatibility will be something of an issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>biology is ripe with code/hardware that has been running for billions of years, (eg ribosomes).
I imagine that maintaining backwards compatibility will be something of an issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205775</id>
	<title>Conspiracy theory...</title>
	<author>h4rdc0d3</author>
	<datestamp>1244050740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We Slashdot readers better be careful.  If they ever decide to embed this technology into tin foil, we're all in trouble.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We Slashdot readers better be careful .
If they ever decide to embed this technology into tin foil , we 're all in trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We Slashdot readers better be careful.
If they ever decide to embed this technology into tin foil, we're all in trouble.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207999</id>
	<title>Psionics</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1244122980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i propose calling mind-machine interface "Psionics".  It's consistent with avionics and easier to say than protoculture.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i propose calling mind-machine interface " Psionics " .
It 's consistent with avionics and easier to say than protoculture .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i propose calling mind-machine interface "Psionics".
It's consistent with avionics and easier to say than protoculture.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203915</id>
	<title>Groundbreaking news!</title>
	<author>feepness</author>
	<datestamp>1244034180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Neurolutions, based in St Louis has developed a small <b>implanted device</b> that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands. The device, which is <b>less invasive than implants</b> and more accurate that scalp electrodes, uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activity</p></div><p>Awesome!  They developed an implant which is less invasive than implants!
<br> <br>
Next up, a duck that quacks louder than a duck!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Neurolutions , based in St Louis has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands .
The device , which is less invasive than implants and more accurate that scalp electrodes , uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activityAwesome !
They developed an implant which is less invasive than implants !
Next up , a duck that quacks louder than a duck !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neurolutions, based in St Louis has developed a small implanted device that translates signals recorded from the surface of the brain into computer commands.
The device, which is less invasive than implants and more accurate that scalp electrodes, uses a grid of electrodes placed directly on the surface of the brain to monitor electrical activityAwesome!
They developed an implant which is less invasive than implants!
Next up, a duck that quacks louder than a duck!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28213123</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244145000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Agreed. Except I can't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say "less invasive" and "applied directly to the surface of your brain". Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain?</p></div><p>

Electrocorticography ! Apply directly to the brain! Electrocorticography ! Apply directly to the brain!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
Except I ca n't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say " less invasive " and " applied directly to the surface of your brain " .
Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain ?
Electrocorticography !
Apply directly to the brain !
Electrocorticography !
Apply directly to the brain !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
Except I can't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say "less invasive" and "applied directly to the surface of your brain".
Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain?
Electrocorticography !
Apply directly to the brain!
Electrocorticography !
Apply directly to the brain!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204903</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206991</id>
	<title>what am I thinking?</title>
	<author>Puppet Master</author>
	<datestamp>1244111280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>rm -rf *
<p>
Let's see how long their computer will last.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>rm -rf * Let 's see how long their computer will last .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rm -rf *

Let's see how long their computer will last.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206355</id>
	<title>One Must Fall?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244146200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me know when I can buy a Jaguar HAR!</p><p>-zaggynl</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when I can buy a Jaguar HAR ! -zaggynl</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when I can buy a Jaguar HAR!-zaggynl</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203323</id>
	<title>Nothing new, but is it efficient?</title>
	<author>Co0Ps</author>
	<datestamp>1244031300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Non invasive brain interfaces is nothing new. Here's a video of a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNr3yGcI\_V8" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">HL2 mod where you're using your mind to pick up objects and throw them at other players</a> [youtube.com]. The question is if the mind reading is accurate enough to actually control a mouse pointer efficiently or reliably start macros (voice recognition style).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Non invasive brain interfaces is nothing new .
Here 's a video of a HL2 mod where you 're using your mind to pick up objects and throw them at other players [ youtube.com ] .
The question is if the mind reading is accurate enough to actually control a mouse pointer efficiently or reliably start macros ( voice recognition style ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Non invasive brain interfaces is nothing new.
Here's a video of a HL2 mod where you're using your mind to pick up objects and throw them at other players [youtube.com].
The question is if the mind reading is accurate enough to actually control a mouse pointer efficiently or reliably start macros (voice recognition style).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</id>
	<title>Input device</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244031120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it. How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I do n't want it .
How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it.
How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204635</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>smchris</author>
	<datestamp>1244039580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Strange Days, dude.  I suppose it will be up to the CIA to get the squid to send.  Then the technology will leak same as LSD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strange Days , dude .
I suppose it will be up to the CIA to get the squid to send .
Then the technology will leak same as LSD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strange Days, dude.
I suppose it will be up to the CIA to get the squid to send.
Then the technology will leak same as LSD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</id>
	<title>How much...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1244031600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain "codes" things then exploit it for our own benefit? Just think about it, custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying, fighting a dragon, more epic than any video game imaginable, all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects. Or take a pill and have the entire library of congress memorized. I wonder how much longer this will take.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain " codes " things then exploit it for our own benefit ?
Just think about it , custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying , fighting a dragon , more epic than any video game imaginable , all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects .
Or take a pill and have the entire library of congress memorized .
I wonder how much longer this will take .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain "codes" things then exploit it for our own benefit?
Just think about it, custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying, fighting a dragon, more epic than any video game imaginable, all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects.
Or take a pill and have the entire library of congress memorized.
I wonder how much longer this will take.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28209045</id>
	<title>Re:Groundbreaking news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244128140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's less invasive because it doesn't alter your thoughts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's less invasive because it does n't alter your thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's less invasive because it doesn't alter your thoughts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203915</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204373</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244037360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If computers can be controlled by thoughts, why is a cursor needed at all?</p><p>Surely it's possible to interact with the controls directly through thought.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If computers can be controlled by thoughts , why is a cursor needed at all ? Surely it 's possible to interact with the controls directly through thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If computers can be controlled by thoughts, why is a cursor needed at all?Surely it's possible to interact with the controls directly through thought.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205393</id>
	<title>Re:Ok Unrelated but</title>
	<author>thatkid\_2002</author>
	<datestamp>1244046300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every looks fine to me... Looks like they stylishly rounded just one corner of the box.</p><p>Title headers are perfect.</p><p>I'm running Debian Lenny with Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.9) Gecko/2009050519 Iceweasel/3.0.9 (Debian-3.0.9-1) and it looks exactly the same in Konqueror in KDE 4.2</p><p>Perhaps you are the victim of yet more dodgy Ubuntu packaging?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every looks fine to me... Looks like they stylishly rounded just one corner of the box.Title headers are perfect.I 'm running Debian Lenny with Mozilla/5.0 ( X11 ; U ; Linux i686 ; en-US ; rv : 1.9.0.9 ) Gecko/2009050519 Iceweasel/3.0.9 ( Debian-3.0.9-1 ) and it looks exactly the same in Konqueror in KDE 4.2Perhaps you are the victim of yet more dodgy Ubuntu packaging ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every looks fine to me... Looks like they stylishly rounded just one corner of the box.Title headers are perfect.I'm running Debian Lenny with Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.9) Gecko/2009050519 Iceweasel/3.0.9 (Debian-3.0.9-1) and it looks exactly the same in Konqueror in KDE 4.2Perhaps you are the victim of yet more dodgy Ubuntu packaging?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204313</id>
	<title>Re:Ok Unrelated but</title>
	<author>mcrbids</author>
	<datestamp>1244036940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, but using FF 3 on Linux, there is no background for the titles.</p><p>Makes it damned hard to see what the post is about without highlighting the header with a click-drag with the mouse.</p><p>(sigh)</p><p>Wouldn't it be nice if Slashdot editors used the O/S that they promote?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but using FF 3 on Linux , there is no background for the titles.Makes it damned hard to see what the post is about without highlighting the header with a click-drag with the mouse .
( sigh ) Would n't it be nice if Slashdot editors used the O/S that they promote ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but using FF 3 on Linux, there is no background for the titles.Makes it damned hard to see what the post is about without highlighting the header with a click-drag with the mouse.
(sigh)Wouldn't it be nice if Slashdot editors used the O/S that they promote?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204625</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>FiloEleven</author>
	<datestamp>1244039400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The way the brain works makes such experiences nearly impossible to encode and certainly impossible with drugs, as another poster pointed out.  If we take "drugs" to include "nanomachines targeting the brain and disguised as a pill" then we enter the realm of the merely highly improbable.  The machines would have to collectively be smart enough to override signals from and to the body while simultaneously generating the desired experience.</p><p>Another possibility would be a single device at the top of the spinal column and networked with lots of processing power, like a wireless Matrix or the <a href="http://www.marshallbrain.com/manna7.htm" title="marshallbrain.com">Vertebrane system</a> [marshallbrain.com] from Manna.  This too requires advanced nanotech to implant, as it must splice every nerve in the spinal column plus the optic and aural nerves, and so is also highly improbable to occur at all, and certainly not for nearly a hundred years unless the Singularity frea--er, folks are right.</p><p>Given all that, the experiences you speak of (flying, fighting a dragon) could happen, but doing the "I know kung-fu!" thing is impossible due to the nature of consciousness.  If you want to learn something, you're going to have to spend the time to learn it.  Reshaping synapse connections and brainwave patterns to implant memories requires godlike knowledge of the individual's brain state and history.  Let's not forget that we are messy meat machines (if machines we are) whose sense of self and memory is only infinitesimally less mysterious now as it has always been.  Faking an external world and letting the brain experience it, hard as it is, is orders of magnitude simpler than fabricating a past experience, especially an intellectual one such as memorizing the LOC, out of whole cloth.</p><p>Sorry I'm such a party pooper =(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The way the brain works makes such experiences nearly impossible to encode and certainly impossible with drugs , as another poster pointed out .
If we take " drugs " to include " nanomachines targeting the brain and disguised as a pill " then we enter the realm of the merely highly improbable .
The machines would have to collectively be smart enough to override signals from and to the body while simultaneously generating the desired experience.Another possibility would be a single device at the top of the spinal column and networked with lots of processing power , like a wireless Matrix or the Vertebrane system [ marshallbrain.com ] from Manna .
This too requires advanced nanotech to implant , as it must splice every nerve in the spinal column plus the optic and aural nerves , and so is also highly improbable to occur at all , and certainly not for nearly a hundred years unless the Singularity frea--er , folks are right.Given all that , the experiences you speak of ( flying , fighting a dragon ) could happen , but doing the " I know kung-fu !
" thing is impossible due to the nature of consciousness .
If you want to learn something , you 're going to have to spend the time to learn it .
Reshaping synapse connections and brainwave patterns to implant memories requires godlike knowledge of the individual 's brain state and history .
Let 's not forget that we are messy meat machines ( if machines we are ) whose sense of self and memory is only infinitesimally less mysterious now as it has always been .
Faking an external world and letting the brain experience it , hard as it is , is orders of magnitude simpler than fabricating a past experience , especially an intellectual one such as memorizing the LOC , out of whole cloth.Sorry I 'm such a party pooper = (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The way the brain works makes such experiences nearly impossible to encode and certainly impossible with drugs, as another poster pointed out.
If we take "drugs" to include "nanomachines targeting the brain and disguised as a pill" then we enter the realm of the merely highly improbable.
The machines would have to collectively be smart enough to override signals from and to the body while simultaneously generating the desired experience.Another possibility would be a single device at the top of the spinal column and networked with lots of processing power, like a wireless Matrix or the Vertebrane system [marshallbrain.com] from Manna.
This too requires advanced nanotech to implant, as it must splice every nerve in the spinal column plus the optic and aural nerves, and so is also highly improbable to occur at all, and certainly not for nearly a hundred years unless the Singularity frea--er, folks are right.Given all that, the experiences you speak of (flying, fighting a dragon) could happen, but doing the "I know kung-fu!
" thing is impossible due to the nature of consciousness.
If you want to learn something, you're going to have to spend the time to learn it.
Reshaping synapse connections and brainwave patterns to implant memories requires godlike knowledge of the individual's brain state and history.
Let's not forget that we are messy meat machines (if machines we are) whose sense of self and memory is only infinitesimally less mysterious now as it has always been.
Faking an external world and letting the brain experience it, hard as it is, is orders of magnitude simpler than fabricating a past experience, especially an intellectual one such as memorizing the LOC, out of whole cloth.Sorry I'm such a party pooper =(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204185</id>
	<title>Re:"More-accurate and less-invasive"? Not so much.</title>
	<author>jrumney</author>
	<datestamp>1244036100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I also had trouble parsing this:
</p><blockquote><div><p> a small <b>implanted device</b> that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... is less invasive than implants</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I also had trouble parsing this : a small implanted device that ... is less invasive than implants</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I also had trouble parsing this:
 a small implanted device that ... is less invasive than implants
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205481</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>realnrh</author>
	<datestamp>1244047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is <a href="http://drmcninja.com/page.php?pageNum=40&amp;issue=10" title="drmcninja.com" rel="nofollow">THIS</a> [drmcninja.com] what you want to do with your eyes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is THIS [ drmcninja.com ] what you want to do with your eyes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is THIS [drmcninja.com] what you want to do with your eyes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204017</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>control\_freq</author>
	<datestamp>1244034840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0100802/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">nothing could go wrong with that</a> [imdb.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because nothing could go wrong with that [ imdb.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because nothing could go wrong with that [imdb.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28212763</id>
	<title>Re:Get the message</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244143560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this is likely just you and a few other people with the same virus / whatever that can make XP act "weird" at times. You should probably reinstall XP from scratch. That fixes most problems in XP.<br> <br>
Linux 2.6.28-11-generic Ubuntu 9.04 Mozilla Firefox 3.5 beta 4</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is likely just you and a few other people with the same virus / whatever that can make XP act " weird " at times .
You should probably reinstall XP from scratch .
That fixes most problems in XP .
Linux 2.6.28-11-generic Ubuntu 9.04 Mozilla Firefox 3.5 beta 4</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is likely just you and a few other people with the same virus / whatever that can make XP act "weird" at times.
You should probably reinstall XP from scratch.
That fixes most problems in XP.
Linux 2.6.28-11-generic Ubuntu 9.04 Mozilla Firefox 3.5 beta 4</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599</id>
	<title>Re:Get the message</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1244048640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fucking Slashdot, all the green-background headers are invisible, due to being white-background for all parts except the initial "curve at top left".  Any orange (yro.slashdot.org) or purple (games.slashdot.org) pages show up just fine.  This has been happening for over a week, now, on Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP.  The "workaround" is to highlight the header, so I can see what the text says...  Or, Ctrl+A to mark the whole page, and read in inverse.  Yay!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fucking Slashdot , all the green-background headers are invisible , due to being white-background for all parts except the initial " curve at top left " .
Any orange ( yro.slashdot.org ) or purple ( games.slashdot.org ) pages show up just fine .
This has been happening for over a week , now , on Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP .
The " workaround " is to highlight the header , so I can see what the text says... Or , Ctrl + A to mark the whole page , and read in inverse .
Yay ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fucking Slashdot, all the green-background headers are invisible, due to being white-background for all parts except the initial "curve at top left".
Any orange (yro.slashdot.org) or purple (games.slashdot.org) pages show up just fine.
This has been happening for over a week, now, on Firefox 3.0.10 on Windows XP.
The "workaround" is to highlight the header, so I can see what the text says...  Or, Ctrl+A to mark the whole page, and read in inverse.
Yay!!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203251</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204007</id>
	<title>Is this really a good idea?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1244034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What in all your reading of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Terminal\_Man" title="wikipedia.org">The Terminal Man</a> [wikipedia.org], has ever given you the slightest impression that this device is a good idea?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What in all your reading of The Terminal Man [ wikipedia.org ] , has ever given you the slightest impression that this device is a good idea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What in all your reading of The Terminal Man [wikipedia.org], has ever given you the slightest impression that this device is a good idea?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206077</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244055540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it. How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.</p></div><p>Especially if it happens every 6 seconds...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I do n't want it .
How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.Especially if it happens every 6 seconds.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When this becomes a standard human input device...I don't want it.
How will you explain when your browser suddenly navigates to your favourite porn site.Especially if it happens every 6 seconds...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206437</id>
	<title>Re:"More-accurate and less-invasive"? Not so much.</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1244147580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"More-accurate and less-invasive" is misleading, since the thing that it is "more accurate" than is not the same thing it is "less invasive" than. It is more accurate than the minimally-invasive electrodes-on-the-scalp method, and less-invasive than the more accurate electrodes-implanted-into-the-brain method.</i></p><p>The question I have at this point is, seeing as the only useful claim made for it (that patients can learn to control a cursor with it) has also been made for the electrodes-on-the-scalp approach, is what use is this additional accuracy?  More precise cursor control?  Give us some numbers, e.g. a comparitive study with the previous best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" More-accurate and less-invasive " is misleading , since the thing that it is " more accurate " than is not the same thing it is " less invasive " than .
It is more accurate than the minimally-invasive electrodes-on-the-scalp method , and less-invasive than the more accurate electrodes-implanted-into-the-brain method.The question I have at this point is , seeing as the only useful claim made for it ( that patients can learn to control a cursor with it ) has also been made for the electrodes-on-the-scalp approach , is what use is this additional accuracy ?
More precise cursor control ?
Give us some numbers , e.g .
a comparitive study with the previous best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"More-accurate and less-invasive" is misleading, since the thing that it is "more accurate" than is not the same thing it is "less invasive" than.
It is more accurate than the minimally-invasive electrodes-on-the-scalp method, and less-invasive than the more accurate electrodes-implanted-into-the-brain method.The question I have at this point is, seeing as the only useful claim made for it (that patients can learn to control a cursor with it) has also been made for the electrodes-on-the-scalp approach, is what use is this additional accuracy?
More precise cursor control?
Give us some numbers, e.g.
a comparitive study with the previous best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204975</id>
	<title>Real question is....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244042460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it work with my Atari 2600?  I have a lot of mindlink games I want to play!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it work with my Atari 2600 ?
I have a lot of mindlink games I want to play !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it work with my Atari 2600?
I have a lot of mindlink games I want to play!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203635</id>
	<title>who writes, verifies, and tests the code for this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244032680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The potential abuses of this sort of device are many.</p><p>* Policeman A to Policeman B: "Check this out!  Just as fun as a Tazer, but no physical contact required!"  (Points government-issued remote control at random passerby and presses button)</p><p>* Prosecutor in courtroom to policeman on the witness stand: "And what was it about Mr. Jones which caused you to arrest him?"  Policeman: "My government-issued Thought Interceptor Display showed me that he was *thinking* about robbing a bank.  And, he also thought about the Pope, the damn, stinking Catholic -- everybody knows what *they* are like!"</p><p>* Supervisor at work, viewing a screen while speaking to his/her subordinate: "So, Bill, what do you *really* think of my new policies?"</p><p>* NSA/DIA/FBI/TLA agent to terrified detainee: "Mr. Jones, you were the only one who had access to those classified documents whose movements are unaccounted for.  The contents of those documents are now in the hands of the .  Who have you been talking to?"</p><p>Detainee: "Nobody... no-one.... I didn't do anything, I didn't... oh, my God!  My neural interface unit must have been scanned!"</p><p>Agent: "A likely story.  Take him away!"</p><p>* Smiling man with a laptop stands near the polls.  A voter comes out and is given a media exit interview, and says (twitching), "Yes... Candidate-Johnson-is-the-best-candidate.  I-love-candidate-Johnson.  Johnson-has-the-welfare-of-the-people-in-mind-at-all-times."</p><p>* Doctor to patient who is physically restrained, but continues to writhe madly: "Mr. Smith, I can't find any biological reason for these spasm.  Have you installed the latest code patch flash into your Model 43 Neural Interface Unit?"</p><p>Yeah, it's mostly tin-foil-hat tallk, but still possible.</p><p>Actually, I think the last scenario is the most likely.  Who would you trust to write and verify correct code for a device which interfaced directly to your brain?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The potential abuses of this sort of device are many .
* Policeman A to Policeman B : " Check this out !
Just as fun as a Tazer , but no physical contact required !
" ( Points government-issued remote control at random passerby and presses button ) * Prosecutor in courtroom to policeman on the witness stand : " And what was it about Mr. Jones which caused you to arrest him ?
" Policeman : " My government-issued Thought Interceptor Display showed me that he was * thinking * about robbing a bank .
And , he also thought about the Pope , the damn , stinking Catholic -- everybody knows what * they * are like !
" * Supervisor at work , viewing a screen while speaking to his/her subordinate : " So , Bill , what do you * really * think of my new policies ?
" * NSA/DIA/FBI/TLA agent to terrified detainee : " Mr. Jones , you were the only one who had access to those classified documents whose movements are unaccounted for .
The contents of those documents are now in the hands of the .
Who have you been talking to ?
" Detainee : " Nobody... no-one.... I did n't do anything , I did n't... oh , my God !
My neural interface unit must have been scanned !
" Agent : " A likely story .
Take him away !
" * Smiling man with a laptop stands near the polls .
A voter comes out and is given a media exit interview , and says ( twitching ) , " Yes... Candidate-Johnson-is-the-best-candidate. I-love-candidate-Johnson .
Johnson-has-the-welfare-of-the-people-in-mind-at-all-times. " * Doctor to patient who is physically restrained , but continues to writhe madly : " Mr. Smith , I ca n't find any biological reason for these spasm .
Have you installed the latest code patch flash into your Model 43 Neural Interface Unit ?
" Yeah , it 's mostly tin-foil-hat tallk , but still possible.Actually , I think the last scenario is the most likely .
Who would you trust to write and verify correct code for a device which interfaced directly to your brain ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The potential abuses of this sort of device are many.
* Policeman A to Policeman B: "Check this out!
Just as fun as a Tazer, but no physical contact required!
"  (Points government-issued remote control at random passerby and presses button)* Prosecutor in courtroom to policeman on the witness stand: "And what was it about Mr. Jones which caused you to arrest him?
"  Policeman: "My government-issued Thought Interceptor Display showed me that he was *thinking* about robbing a bank.
And, he also thought about the Pope, the damn, stinking Catholic -- everybody knows what *they* are like!
"* Supervisor at work, viewing a screen while speaking to his/her subordinate: "So, Bill, what do you *really* think of my new policies?
"* NSA/DIA/FBI/TLA agent to terrified detainee: "Mr. Jones, you were the only one who had access to those classified documents whose movements are unaccounted for.
The contents of those documents are now in the hands of the .
Who have you been talking to?
"Detainee: "Nobody... no-one.... I didn't do anything, I didn't... oh, my God!
My neural interface unit must have been scanned!
"Agent: "A likely story.
Take him away!
"* Smiling man with a laptop stands near the polls.
A voter comes out and is given a media exit interview, and says (twitching), "Yes... Candidate-Johnson-is-the-best-candidate.  I-love-candidate-Johnson.
Johnson-has-the-welfare-of-the-people-in-mind-at-all-times."* Doctor to patient who is physically restrained, but continues to writhe madly: "Mr. Smith, I can't find any biological reason for these spasm.
Have you installed the latest code patch flash into your Model 43 Neural Interface Unit?
"Yeah, it's mostly tin-foil-hat tallk, but still possible.Actually, I think the last scenario is the most likely.
Who would you trust to write and verify correct code for a device which interfaced directly to your brain?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203883</id>
	<title>does this have any interrogation use?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244034000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does this have any interrogation use?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does this have any interrogation use ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does this have any interrogation use?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203933</id>
	<title>Caps</title>
	<author>Arcturax</author>
	<datestamp>1244034300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This makes me think of the capped people in the Tripods trilogy.</p><p>In the books, aliens had taken over earth and used these caps that melded a mesh into the head that would render people docile and subservient so they could be used as slaves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes me think of the capped people in the Tripods trilogy.In the books , aliens had taken over earth and used these caps that melded a mesh into the head that would render people docile and subservient so they could be used as slaves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes me think of the capped people in the Tripods trilogy.In the books, aliens had taken over earth and used these caps that melded a mesh into the head that would render people docile and subservient so they could be used as slaves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28214815</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1244109180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, you're suggesting that we create a perfectly safe answer to LSD and then ask congress to legalize it? I'm putting that on the "not in my lifetime" list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , you 're suggesting that we create a perfectly safe answer to LSD and then ask congress to legalize it ?
I 'm putting that on the " not in my lifetime " list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, you're suggesting that we create a perfectly safe answer to LSD and then ask congress to legalize it?
I'm putting that on the "not in my lifetime" list.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28212893</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>GWBasic</author>
	<datestamp>1244143980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain "codes" things then exploit it for our own benefit? Just think about it, custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying, fighting a dragon, more epic than any video game imaginable, all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects. Or take a pill and have the entire library of congress memorized. I wonder how much longer this will take.</p></div><p>Uhm, LSD?  The controversy started when Timothy Leary tried to prove his hypothesis that LSD can invoke a religions experience.</p><p>On a more serious note; there is a LOT of active research into psychoactive chemicals.  There are over 200 known psychoactive chemicals, and the rate of discovery is increasing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain " codes " things then exploit it for our own benefit ?
Just think about it , custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying , fighting a dragon , more epic than any video game imaginable , all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects .
Or take a pill and have the entire library of congress memorized .
I wonder how much longer this will take.Uhm , LSD ?
The controversy started when Timothy Leary tried to prove his hypothesis that LSD can invoke a religions experience.On a more serious note ; there is a LOT of active research into psychoactive chemicals .
There are over 200 known psychoactive chemicals , and the rate of discovery is increasing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much longer till we can figure out how our brain "codes" things then exploit it for our own benefit?
Just think about it, custom-made drugs to make it seem like you are flying, fighting a dragon, more epic than any video game imaginable, all while being perfectly controlled with little to no side effects.
Or take a pill and have the entire library of congress memorized.
I wonder how much longer this will take.Uhm, LSD?
The controversy started when Timothy Leary tried to prove his hypothesis that LSD can invoke a religions experience.On a more serious note; there is a LOT of active research into psychoactive chemicals.
There are over 200 known psychoactive chemicals, and the rate of discovery is increasing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204071</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244035200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or slip a pill on that hot blond girl's drink and activate her brain implants to think I am a mix of James Bond+Sean Connery+Denzel Washington+Brad Pitt, and that she MUST do anything to copulate with me RIGHT AWAY... Or better than a pill: get some malicious (no pun intended) code through an open bluetooth or WiFi connection port on her brain implant's communication interface and make her get obsessed with me... endless possibilities...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or slip a pill on that hot blond girl 's drink and activate her brain implants to think I am a mix of James Bond + Sean Connery + Denzel Washington + Brad Pitt , and that she MUST do anything to copulate with me RIGHT AWAY... Or better than a pill : get some malicious ( no pun intended ) code through an open bluetooth or WiFi connection port on her brain implant 's communication interface and make her get obsessed with me... endless possibilities.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or slip a pill on that hot blond girl's drink and activate her brain implants to think I am a mix of James Bond+Sean Connery+Denzel Washington+Brad Pitt, and that she MUST do anything to copulate with me RIGHT AWAY... Or better than a pill: get some malicious (no pun intended) code through an open bluetooth or WiFi connection port on her brain implant's communication interface and make her get obsessed with me... endless possibilities...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203959</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244034480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm impressed that you came up with a list of applications and NONE of them included any combination of "sex" or "supermodels".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm impressed that you came up with a list of applications and NONE of them included any combination of " sex " or " supermodels " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm impressed that you came up with a list of applications and NONE of them included any combination of "sex" or "supermodels".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203837</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new, but is it efficient?</title>
	<author>toppavak</author>
	<datestamp>1244033640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"non-invasive" is a very relative term here considering you still have to crack open a patient's skull to get the electrode array in. It is, however, less invasive than the electrodes used for deep brain stimulation that are implanted in the grey matter itself. I wonder how long these arrays last before they succumb to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofouling" title="wikipedia.org">biofouling</a> [wikipedia.org] and scar tissue formation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" non-invasive " is a very relative term here considering you still have to crack open a patient 's skull to get the electrode array in .
It is , however , less invasive than the electrodes used for deep brain stimulation that are implanted in the grey matter itself .
I wonder how long these arrays last before they succumb to biofouling [ wikipedia.org ] and scar tissue formation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"non-invasive" is a very relative term here considering you still have to crack open a patient's skull to get the electrode array in.
It is, however, less invasive than the electrodes used for deep brain stimulation that are implanted in the grey matter itself.
I wonder how long these arrays last before they succumb to biofouling [wikipedia.org] and scar tissue formation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204227</id>
	<title>Re:Ok Unrelated but</title>
	<author>feepness</author>
	<datestamp>1244036400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Getting it here on XP + Firefox.  Yeah, about a week.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting it here on XP + Firefox .
Yeah , about a week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting it here on XP + Firefox.
Yeah, about a week.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28209969</id>
	<title>Re:Ok Unrelated but</title>
	<author>vertinox</author>
	<datestamp>1244131800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Am I the only one see truncated green border around the posts? I see this on my MAC and Linux machines. It started happening about a week ago.</i></p><p>Yeah. I went into the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. user preferences and switched to "classic view" and it resolved that issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one see truncated green border around the posts ?
I see this on my MAC and Linux machines .
It started happening about a week ago.Yeah .
I went into the / .
user preferences and switched to " classic view " and it resolved that issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one see truncated green border around the posts?
I see this on my MAC and Linux machines.
It started happening about a week ago.Yeah.
I went into the /.
user preferences and switched to "classic view" and it resolved that issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204307</id>
	<title>Confusion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244036880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't let your mind wander during setup, or you'll end up having to think of your grandmother riding a unicycle in order to shut down your computer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't let your mind wander during setup , or you 'll end up having to think of your grandmother riding a unicycle in order to shut down your computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't let your mind wander during setup, or you'll end up having to think of your grandmother riding a unicycle in order to shut down your computer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203441</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new, but is it efficient?</title>
	<author>venicebeach</author>
	<datestamp>1244031780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The signals in that video are recorded from the scalp.   Basically when you filter the electrical signals from the brain through the skull you lose a lot of spatial resolution.  Given that spatial maps are one important way the brain encodes information having the electrodes actually on the surface of the brain makes a huge difference in the amount of information you have access to.  <br> <br>
That said, this is not really a new technology, merely a new application of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECoG" title="wikipedia.org">electrocorticography</a> [wikipedia.org].  Non-invasive it is not, since it involves opening up the skull.  It's only "less invasive" compared with poking an electrode deep into the brain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The signals in that video are recorded from the scalp .
Basically when you filter the electrical signals from the brain through the skull you lose a lot of spatial resolution .
Given that spatial maps are one important way the brain encodes information having the electrodes actually on the surface of the brain makes a huge difference in the amount of information you have access to .
That said , this is not really a new technology , merely a new application of electrocorticography [ wikipedia.org ] .
Non-invasive it is not , since it involves opening up the skull .
It 's only " less invasive " compared with poking an electrode deep into the brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The signals in that video are recorded from the scalp.
Basically when you filter the electrical signals from the brain through the skull you lose a lot of spatial resolution.
Given that spatial maps are one important way the brain encodes information having the electrodes actually on the surface of the brain makes a huge difference in the amount of information you have access to.
That said, this is not really a new technology, merely a new application of electrocorticography [wikipedia.org].
Non-invasive it is not, since it involves opening up the skull.
It's only "less invasive" compared with poking an electrode deep into the brain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203323</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206731</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1244107920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope you don't twitch under extreme pain. Could end up in some kind of endlessly recursive feedback loop. Which would hurt. Muchly.</p></div><p>You're lucky this wasn't my laptop keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope you do n't twitch under extreme pain .
Could end up in some kind of endlessly recursive feedback loop .
Which would hurt .
Muchly.You 're lucky this was n't my laptop keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope you don't twitch under extreme pain.
Could end up in some kind of endlessly recursive feedback loop.
Which would hurt.
Muchly.You're lucky this wasn't my laptop keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203621</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207185</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>Etylowy</author>
	<datestamp>1244114580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We'd end up clicking on anything with tits all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'd end up clicking on anything with tits all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'd end up clicking on anything with tits all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204357</id>
	<title>Re:does this have any interrogation use?</title>
	<author>infonography</author>
	<datestamp>1244037300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn You,</p><p>Now my Cheney Corp Stock is worthless. The CEO was all over the national news promoting it before the IPO. I was banking on the big future demand for waterboarding and electroshock I haven't had such bad news since they asked for my AIG bonuses back.  Well I still got my futures in Mustard Gas and shares in Blackwater.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn You,Now my Cheney Corp Stock is worthless .
The CEO was all over the national news promoting it before the IPO .
I was banking on the big future demand for waterboarding and electroshock I have n't had such bad news since they asked for my AIG bonuses back .
Well I still got my futures in Mustard Gas and shares in Blackwater .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn You,Now my Cheney Corp Stock is worthless.
The CEO was all over the national news promoting it before the IPO.
I was banking on the big future demand for waterboarding and electroshock I haven't had such bad news since they asked for my AIG bonuses back.
Well I still got my futures in Mustard Gas and shares in Blackwater.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203883</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203955</id>
	<title>Re:To Implant or not to implant...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1244034420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are they saying that electrodes implanted in your brain are less invasive then silicone implanted in your chest? What about a game controller integrated into breast implants -- man, you'd never be able to get me off of Mario Kart if I had some of those to play with!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they saying that electrodes implanted in your brain are less invasive then silicone implanted in your chest ?
What about a game controller integrated into breast implants -- man , you 'd never be able to get me off of Mario Kart if I had some of those to play with !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they saying that electrodes implanted in your brain are less invasive then silicone implanted in your chest?
What about a game controller integrated into breast implants -- man, you'd never be able to get me off of Mario Kart if I had some of those to play with!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205407</id>
	<title>Well, you know what I think about that</title>
	<author>NicknamesAreStupid</author>
	<datestamp>1244046420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><br>    .</htmltext>
<tokenext>.</tokentext>
<sentencetext>    .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571</id>
	<title>"More-accurate and less-invasive"? Not so much...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244032380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Technology Review has a story about a start-up company that has developed a more-accurate and less-invasive way to read a patients thoughts.</p></div> </blockquote><p>"More-accurate and less-invasive" is misleading, since the thing that it is "more accurate" than is not the same thing it is "less invasive" than. It is more accurate than the minimally-invasive electrodes-on-the-scalp method, and less-invasive than the more accurate electrodes-implanted-into-the-brain method.</p><p>It is, likewise, <i>less accurate</i> than the electrodes-in-the-brain method, and <i>more invasive</i> than the electrodes-on-the-scalp method, so it would be as accurate (and as hyperbolic, in the opposite direction) as TFS to call it a "less-accurate and more-invasive" method as it was to call it a "more-accurate and less-invasive" method (simply switching which existing method it was compared to for accuracy and which it was compared to for invasiveness.)</p><p>It would be most accurate (and not at all hyperbolic) to call it a method which is intermediate between two existing methods in terms of both accuracy and invasiveness.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Technology Review has a story about a start-up company that has developed a more-accurate and less-invasive way to read a patients thoughts .
" More-accurate and less-invasive " is misleading , since the thing that it is " more accurate " than is not the same thing it is " less invasive " than .
It is more accurate than the minimally-invasive electrodes-on-the-scalp method , and less-invasive than the more accurate electrodes-implanted-into-the-brain method.It is , likewise , less accurate than the electrodes-in-the-brain method , and more invasive than the electrodes-on-the-scalp method , so it would be as accurate ( and as hyperbolic , in the opposite direction ) as TFS to call it a " less-accurate and more-invasive " method as it was to call it a " more-accurate and less-invasive " method ( simply switching which existing method it was compared to for accuracy and which it was compared to for invasiveness .
) It would be most accurate ( and not at all hyperbolic ) to call it a method which is intermediate between two existing methods in terms of both accuracy and invasiveness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technology Review has a story about a start-up company that has developed a more-accurate and less-invasive way to read a patients thoughts.
"More-accurate and less-invasive" is misleading, since the thing that it is "more accurate" than is not the same thing it is "less invasive" than.
It is more accurate than the minimally-invasive electrodes-on-the-scalp method, and less-invasive than the more accurate electrodes-implanted-into-the-brain method.It is, likewise, less accurate than the electrodes-in-the-brain method, and more invasive than the electrodes-on-the-scalp method, so it would be as accurate (and as hyperbolic, in the opposite direction) as TFS to call it a "less-accurate and more-invasive" method as it was to call it a "more-accurate and less-invasive" method (simply switching which existing method it was compared to for accuracy and which it was compared to for invasiveness.
)It would be most accurate (and not at all hyperbolic) to call it a method which is intermediate between two existing methods in terms of both accuracy and invasiveness.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204121</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244035680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like these?</p><p>http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/07/21/1926251/NIA-Brain-Computer-Interface-Mind-Control-Gaming</p><p>http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/06/27/2343259/OCZs-Brain-Wave-Interface-Headband-Reviewed</p><p>BTW, I own one:<br>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826100006&amp;Tpk=ocz\%20nia</p><p>It works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like these ? http : //hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/07/21/1926251/NIA-Brain-Computer-Interface-Mind-Control-Gaminghttp : //hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/06/27/2343259/OCZs-Brain-Wave-Interface-Headband-ReviewedBTW , I own one : http : //www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx ? Item = N82E16826100006&amp;Tpk = ocz \ % 20niaIt works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like these?http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/07/21/1926251/NIA-Brain-Computer-Interface-Mind-Control-Gaminghttp://hardware.slashdot.org/story/08/06/27/2343259/OCZs-Brain-Wave-Interface-Headband-ReviewedBTW, I own one:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826100006&amp;Tpk=ocz\%20niaIt works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203315</id>
	<title>Other uses can't be far</title>
	<author>piojo</author>
	<datestamp>1244031240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We can already let blind people see by connecting cameras to their tongues. If this sort of technique becomes easier/safer, it could be used for any sort of human/machine interface. Prosthetic limbs are only the beginning...</p><p>I hope this does not have nasty side effects like increased chances of tumors...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We can already let blind people see by connecting cameras to their tongues .
If this sort of technique becomes easier/safer , it could be used for any sort of human/machine interface .
Prosthetic limbs are only the beginning...I hope this does not have nasty side effects like increased chances of tumors.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can already let blind people see by connecting cameras to their tongues.
If this sort of technique becomes easier/safer, it could be used for any sort of human/machine interface.
Prosthetic limbs are only the beginning...I hope this does not have nasty side effects like increased chances of tumors...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204411</id>
	<title>Hyperbole isn't always a bad thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244037600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the use of positive hyperbole in TFS is justified in cases like these, where we're discussing an almost-universally good thing.</p><p>Nobody's going to use this device in instances where a conventional EEG would be sufficiently accurate (well, I hope), but they <b> <i>might</i> </b> use it if EEG is too inaccurate and but conventional implants would be overkill. What they've done is given neurologists a choice, which is something that's generally accepted as being a good thing (in the absence of other factors).</p><p>The equivalent car metaphor for your comment would be calling hybrids more pollutive that solar cars and less powerful than gasoline.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the use of positive hyperbole in TFS is justified in cases like these , where we 're discussing an almost-universally good thing.Nobody 's going to use this device in instances where a conventional EEG would be sufficiently accurate ( well , I hope ) , but they might use it if EEG is too inaccurate and but conventional implants would be overkill .
What they 've done is given neurologists a choice , which is something that 's generally accepted as being a good thing ( in the absence of other factors ) .The equivalent car metaphor for your comment would be calling hybrids more pollutive that solar cars and less powerful than gasoline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the use of positive hyperbole in TFS is justified in cases like these, where we're discussing an almost-universally good thing.Nobody's going to use this device in instances where a conventional EEG would be sufficiently accurate (well, I hope), but they  might  use it if EEG is too inaccurate and but conventional implants would be overkill.
What they've done is given neurologists a choice, which is something that's generally accepted as being a good thing (in the absence of other factors).The equivalent car metaphor for your comment would be calling hybrids more pollutive that solar cars and less powerful than gasoline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28217995</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>FiloEleven</author>
	<datestamp>1244131680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another possibility to fight dragons and stuff that I surprisingly missed (considering I have, ahem, privately experimented with it) could be a combination of drugs and primitive VR--that is, not much more advanced than what we can do today.  With the right psychoactive substance, the user could be wearing sensors and standing in front of a big screen, though glasses would be nicer, and essentially playing a video game while the drug made him feel like he <em>was actually there, man.</em>  I don't know if an ideal drug exists, one that opens the mind up to suggestion enough that it fills in and enhances the details but isn't so powerful as to make you trip hard and freak out when you realize you're <em>actually there, man</em>.</p><p>For some people, hypnosis and a Playstation is enough to do the trick.  But again the important factor is actually spending time doing something that is an analogue of the concrete experience, even if it's fairly abstract: our minds are powerful enough to take past experiences of being near or singed by a fire or what it feels like to chop at something (even if it's as mundane as wood) and, in the right state, <em>attach</em> those experiences to this new one so that we remember plunging the sword into the dragon's belly and feeling a spray of blood.</p><p>While intriguing, I doubt this would pass muster with the original poster, though, because my intuition tells me that it would feel very dreamlike when remembered because of the patchwork memories filling in for gaps in the true experience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another possibility to fight dragons and stuff that I surprisingly missed ( considering I have , ahem , privately experimented with it ) could be a combination of drugs and primitive VR--that is , not much more advanced than what we can do today .
With the right psychoactive substance , the user could be wearing sensors and standing in front of a big screen , though glasses would be nicer , and essentially playing a video game while the drug made him feel like he was actually there , man .
I do n't know if an ideal drug exists , one that opens the mind up to suggestion enough that it fills in and enhances the details but is n't so powerful as to make you trip hard and freak out when you realize you 're actually there , man.For some people , hypnosis and a Playstation is enough to do the trick .
But again the important factor is actually spending time doing something that is an analogue of the concrete experience , even if it 's fairly abstract : our minds are powerful enough to take past experiences of being near or singed by a fire or what it feels like to chop at something ( even if it 's as mundane as wood ) and , in the right state , attach those experiences to this new one so that we remember plunging the sword into the dragon 's belly and feeling a spray of blood.While intriguing , I doubt this would pass muster with the original poster , though , because my intuition tells me that it would feel very dreamlike when remembered because of the patchwork memories filling in for gaps in the true experience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another possibility to fight dragons and stuff that I surprisingly missed (considering I have, ahem, privately experimented with it) could be a combination of drugs and primitive VR--that is, not much more advanced than what we can do today.
With the right psychoactive substance, the user could be wearing sensors and standing in front of a big screen, though glasses would be nicer, and essentially playing a video game while the drug made him feel like he was actually there, man.
I don't know if an ideal drug exists, one that opens the mind up to suggestion enough that it fills in and enhances the details but isn't so powerful as to make you trip hard and freak out when you realize you're actually there, man.For some people, hypnosis and a Playstation is enough to do the trick.
But again the important factor is actually spending time doing something that is an analogue of the concrete experience, even if it's fairly abstract: our minds are powerful enough to take past experiences of being near or singed by a fire or what it feels like to chop at something (even if it's as mundane as wood) and, in the right state, attach those experiences to this new one so that we remember plunging the sword into the dragon's belly and feeling a spray of blood.While intriguing, I doubt this would pass muster with the original poster, though, because my intuition tells me that it would feel very dreamlike when remembered because of the patchwork memories filling in for gaps in the true experience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204625</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28208305</id>
	<title>Sounds like "Becalmed in Hell"</title>
	<author>awright69</author>
	<datestamp>1244124600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.... by Larry Niven. His first SF short story, I believe. Space miner has catastrophic accident, his CNS is salvaged and connected to a ship which has a breakdown while visiting Venus. A good read; I remember it as one of my early favorites to entice people to get interested in SF.</htmltext>
<tokenext>.... by Larry Niven .
His first SF short story , I believe .
Space miner has catastrophic accident , his CNS is salvaged and connected to a ship which has a breakdown while visiting Venus .
A good read ; I remember it as one of my early favorites to entice people to get interested in SF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... by Larry Niven.
His first SF short story, I believe.
Space miner has catastrophic accident, his CNS is salvaged and connected to a ship which has a breakdown while visiting Venus.
A good read; I remember it as one of my early favorites to entice people to get interested in SF.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205245</id>
	<title>Re:How much...</title>
	<author>randyleepublic</author>
	<datestamp>1244044800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, don't you know?  We are all playing that game right now.  Hello?  More epic indeed...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , do n't you know ?
We are all playing that game right now .
Hello ? More epic indeed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, don't you know?
We are all playing that game right now.
Hello?  More epic indeed...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207925</id>
	<title>Re:Input device</title>
	<author>kungfugleek</author>
	<datestamp>1244122560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least you'd have both hands free for once.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you 'd have both hands free for once .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you'd have both hands free for once.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204505</id>
	<title>Re:Ok Unrelated but</title>
	<author>jlf278</author>
	<datestamp>1244038620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, I have the same issue at work with XP and explorer. I have to highlight the green banner area to see what the text is.  Fine on my windows xp at home with every major web app.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I have the same issue at work with XP and explorer .
I have to highlight the green banner area to see what the text is .
Fine on my windows xp at home with every major web app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I have the same issue at work with XP and explorer.
I have to highlight the green banner area to see what the text is.
Fine on my windows xp at home with every major web app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204903</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>DeadMonkey321</author>
	<datestamp>1244041800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed.

Except I can't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say "less invasive" and "applied directly to the surface of your brain". Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
Except I ca n't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say " less invasive " and " applied directly to the surface of your brain " .
Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
Except I can't help but feel they conflict themselves when they say "less invasive" and "applied directly to the surface of your brain".
Is there any non-invasive way to touch your brain?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207665</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244120820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well that was rather enlightening but Why on earth did you post it here??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well that was rather enlightening but Why on earth did you post it here ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well that was rather enlightening but Why on earth did you post it here?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204827</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204355</id>
	<title>Re:"More-accurate and less-invasive"? Not so much.</title>
	<author>d'baba</author>
	<datestamp>1244037300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dead on! Buy this dragon a beer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dead on !
Buy this dragon a beer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dead on!
Buy this dragon a beer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204667</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1244039760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure people are working on cursors that follow your eyes, but the crazy bastards I heard about were just using cameras pointed at the eyes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure people are working on cursors that follow your eyes , but the crazy bastards I heard about were just using cameras pointed at the eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure people are working on cursors that follow your eyes, but the crazy bastards I heard about were just using cameras pointed at the eyes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203525</id>
	<title>ohh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244032140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I WOULD HAVE to say that ALL METHODS OF thought READING are INVASIVE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I WOULD HAVE to say that ALL METHODS OF thought READING are INVASIVE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I WOULD HAVE to say that ALL METHODS OF thought READING are INVASIVE.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205779</id>
	<title>Re:Killer App</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1244050800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except your eyes don't sit staring at one spot even when you think
your staring at one spot, your eyes continuously flicker around and scan the
general direction your looking at in order to build up a image of the
world. I think there has already been several machines that read where
your looking from the reflection off your eyes, with middling results. In general
people just can't hold the stare, even if the machine can average out the
microscans of the eyes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except your eyes do n't sit staring at one spot even when you think your staring at one spot , your eyes continuously flicker around and scan the general direction your looking at in order to build up a image of the world .
I think there has already been several machines that read where your looking from the reflection off your eyes , with middling results .
In general people just ca n't hold the stare , even if the machine can average out the microscans of the eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except your eyes don't sit staring at one spot even when you think
your staring at one spot, your eyes continuously flicker around and scan the
general direction your looking at in order to build up a image of the
world.
I think there has already been several machines that read where
your looking from the reflection off your eyes, with middling results.
In general
people just can't hold the stare, even if the machine can average out the
microscans of the eyes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205481
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205361
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28217995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207925
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203837
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28213123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205769
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204227
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203601
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204247
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206077
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204667
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204121
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28209969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28214265
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204411
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205723
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28214815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28212893
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206437
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28209045
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203915
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205393
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28212763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203251
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203883
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203323
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204355
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204635
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207017
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203525
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204505
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204827
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205779
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203767
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203671
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28221175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207321
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_2220210_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204827
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204903
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28213123
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204121
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205599
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28212763
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206639
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205769
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203883
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204357
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203315
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204007
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205393
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204227
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28209969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204505
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205037
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204313
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203525
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207017
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28209045
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203571
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204355
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204411
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204017
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203671
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204635
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28212893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28214815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204625
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28217995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205361
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203767
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204299
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205315
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206077
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28214265
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28221175
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203601
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203955
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203323
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205481
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203621
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28206731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204247
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28205779
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28204667
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207321
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28207185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203635
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_2220210.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_2220210.28203997
</commentlist>
</conversation>
