<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_03_195257</id>
	<title>Time On Social Networks Almost Doubles In a Year</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1244057580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>GWMAW! writes <i>"<a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20090603/time-on-social-networks-almost-doubles-inyear.htm">Spending more time on social networks</a> and blogs? You're not alone, with the latest figures showing the number of minutes spent on social networking sites in the United States has almost doubled over the past year."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>GWMAW !
writes " Spending more time on social networks and blogs ?
You 're not alone , with the latest figures showing the number of minutes spent on social networking sites in the United States has almost doubled over the past year .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GWMAW!
writes "Spending more time on social networks and blogs?
You're not alone, with the latest figures showing the number of minutes spent on social networking sites in the United States has almost doubled over the past year.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200101</id>
	<title>It's the economy, stupid</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1244062380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The number of people who don't have lives has doubled in the past year. Whether due to losing their jobs or other reasons, I'd say yes it is because those people aren't spending money elsewhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The number of people who do n't have lives has doubled in the past year .
Whether due to losing their jobs or other reasons , I 'd say yes it is because those people are n't spending money elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The number of people who don't have lives has doubled in the past year.
Whether due to losing their jobs or other reasons, I'd say yes it is because those people aren't spending money elsewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200965</id>
	<title>Re:Does /. count?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1244022540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No more antisocial then half the people on myspace.</p><p>At least we don't complain about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No more antisocial then half the people on myspace.At least we do n't complain about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No more antisocial then half the people on myspace.At least we don't complain about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28202881</id>
	<title>Re:Unemployment?</title>
	<author>Grimbleton</author>
	<datestamp>1244029380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I now have an office job where I can surf the internet at work all I want (Security) so I've increased my overall online time, while also increasing my overall work hours.</p><p>And that's alright with me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I now have an office job where I can surf the internet at work all I want ( Security ) so I 've increased my overall online time , while also increasing my overall work hours.And that 's alright with me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I now have an office job where I can surf the internet at work all I want (Security) so I've increased my overall online time, while also increasing my overall work hours.And that's alright with me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199797</id>
	<title>Damn you Hans!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244061180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ReiserFS murdered my file system!</htmltext>
<tokenext>ReiserFS murdered my file system !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ReiserFS murdered my file system!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199983</id>
	<title>And in the next news item</title>
	<author>Colin Smith</author>
	<datestamp>1244061960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People are getting bigger than ever, there has been an explosion in waist sizes say baffled doctors.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People are getting bigger than ever , there has been an explosion in waist sizes say baffled doctors .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>People are getting bigger than ever, there has been an explosion in waist sizes say baffled doctors.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206071</id>
	<title>Re:Unemployment?</title>
	<author>rtb61</author>
	<datestamp>1244055360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> The internet is really the cheapest form of entertainment and social networks are a part of that. Cheaper even than public transport to visit and interact with friends or find new friends. Social networks are the most effective means by which people can share their problems and look for solutions and, where solutions are not forth coming at least escape from their problems for a time. </p><p> What is really happening is the activity is just spreading down the line from computer geeks and nerds to the 'er' dumbest jock strap and cheer leader and, of course everyone in between. </p><p> In troubling economic times it also is the safest form of human interaction, a digital barrier between potential victims and their attackers (as long as they 'do not' make direct personal contact) or even random acts of violence travelling to that point of social interaction. For parents it provides a safer means by which their children can interact with other children and sometimes the parents of those children. </p><p> So all in all, relatively safe, cheap and of course immediately convenient, hardly surprising that it is becoming a major form of human interaction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The internet is really the cheapest form of entertainment and social networks are a part of that .
Cheaper even than public transport to visit and interact with friends or find new friends .
Social networks are the most effective means by which people can share their problems and look for solutions and , where solutions are not forth coming at least escape from their problems for a time .
What is really happening is the activity is just spreading down the line from computer geeks and nerds to the 'er ' dumbest jock strap and cheer leader and , of course everyone in between .
In troubling economic times it also is the safest form of human interaction , a digital barrier between potential victims and their attackers ( as long as they 'do not ' make direct personal contact ) or even random acts of violence travelling to that point of social interaction .
For parents it provides a safer means by which their children can interact with other children and sometimes the parents of those children .
So all in all , relatively safe , cheap and of course immediately convenient , hardly surprising that it is becoming a major form of human interaction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The internet is really the cheapest form of entertainment and social networks are a part of that.
Cheaper even than public transport to visit and interact with friends or find new friends.
Social networks are the most effective means by which people can share their problems and look for solutions and, where solutions are not forth coming at least escape from their problems for a time.
What is really happening is the activity is just spreading down the line from computer geeks and nerds to the 'er' dumbest jock strap and cheer leader and, of course everyone in between.
In troubling economic times it also is the safest form of human interaction, a digital barrier between potential victims and their attackers (as long as they 'do not' make direct personal contact) or even random acts of violence travelling to that point of social interaction.
For parents it provides a safer means by which their children can interact with other children and sometimes the parents of those children.
So all in all, relatively safe, cheap and of course immediately convenient, hardly surprising that it is becoming a major form of human interaction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200147</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1244062500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Now almost everyone, from my boss, coworkers and even my grandparents have a Facebook.</p> </div><p>So they are ALL joining the meat market because they are sadly disillusioned with their lives?</p><p>Question:  Could it be YOUR fault?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now almost everyone , from my boss , coworkers and even my grandparents have a Facebook .
So they are ALL joining the meat market because they are sadly disillusioned with their lives ? Question : Could it be YOUR fault ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Now almost everyone, from my boss, coworkers and even my grandparents have a Facebook.
So they are ALL joining the meat market because they are sadly disillusioned with their lives?Question:  Could it be YOUR fault?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200613</id>
	<title>Cancelling cable forever</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1244021280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have not watch broadcast television or used my Tivo since February and I seem to be keeping up fine with pop cultural references and the like in conversations.  I'm going to cancel my cable forever this summer.  I use Hulu but instead of watching 4-5 shows I watch 3 now and I get all my news in textual form.  One thing I have begun noticing is that when discussing a current event lately that my liberal (MSNBC) and conservative (foxnews) friends quickly gel into imitative stances on any issue that seem to have been picked up from watching the same talking head deliver the news to them every night for years.  They even began arguing over O'Reilly and Olberman and how each was lying just like they do on television.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have not watch broadcast television or used my Tivo since February and I seem to be keeping up fine with pop cultural references and the like in conversations .
I 'm going to cancel my cable forever this summer .
I use Hulu but instead of watching 4-5 shows I watch 3 now and I get all my news in textual form .
One thing I have begun noticing is that when discussing a current event lately that my liberal ( MSNBC ) and conservative ( foxnews ) friends quickly gel into imitative stances on any issue that seem to have been picked up from watching the same talking head deliver the news to them every night for years .
They even began arguing over O'Reilly and Olberman and how each was lying just like they do on television .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have not watch broadcast television or used my Tivo since February and I seem to be keeping up fine with pop cultural references and the like in conversations.
I'm going to cancel my cable forever this summer.
I use Hulu but instead of watching 4-5 shows I watch 3 now and I get all my news in textual form.
One thing I have begun noticing is that when discussing a current event lately that my liberal (MSNBC) and conservative (foxnews) friends quickly gel into imitative stances on any issue that seem to have been picked up from watching the same talking head deliver the news to them every night for years.
They even began arguing over O'Reilly and Olberman and how each was lying just like they do on television.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200009</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203699</id>
	<title>Re:Depressing that so many people are on Slashdot</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1244032920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, you don't have to give any information that you don't want people to see.</p><p>Is it depressing that you're posting on Slashdot? Obviously, you only publish or put on your profile what you want people to see.</p><p>I'd also point out that Facebook (as well as places like LiveJournal) are much better than Slashdot when it comes to privacy, as you can have several levels, e.g., restricting information to only be visible to some people. On Slashdot, it's visible to all. So why are you here?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , you do n't have to give any information that you do n't want people to see.Is it depressing that you 're posting on Slashdot ?
Obviously , you only publish or put on your profile what you want people to see.I 'd also point out that Facebook ( as well as places like LiveJournal ) are much better than Slashdot when it comes to privacy , as you can have several levels , e.g. , restricting information to only be visible to some people .
On Slashdot , it 's visible to all .
So why are you here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, you don't have to give any information that you don't want people to see.Is it depressing that you're posting on Slashdot?
Obviously, you only publish or put on your profile what you want people to see.I'd also point out that Facebook (as well as places like LiveJournal) are much better than Slashdot when it comes to privacy, as you can have several levels, e.g., restricting information to only be visible to some people.
On Slashdot, it's visible to all.
So why are you here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28204175</id>
	<title>economic meltdown?</title>
	<author>v3xt0r</author>
	<datestamp>1244036040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hmmm... cause or effect?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hmmm... cause or effect ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hmmm... cause or effect?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893</id>
	<title>Well....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244061540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well within the last year its become acceptable for <b>everyone</b> to have a Facebook, from Jr. High kids up to grandparents. Even last year Facebook was seen as only really used by high school and college kids. Now almost everyone, from my boss, coworkers and even my grandparents have a Facebook. Also, the popularity of code and host it yourself websites have been largely replaced with blogs so that would increase that popularity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well within the last year its become acceptable for everyone to have a Facebook , from Jr. High kids up to grandparents .
Even last year Facebook was seen as only really used by high school and college kids .
Now almost everyone , from my boss , coworkers and even my grandparents have a Facebook .
Also , the popularity of code and host it yourself websites have been largely replaced with blogs so that would increase that popularity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well within the last year its become acceptable for everyone to have a Facebook, from Jr. High kids up to grandparents.
Even last year Facebook was seen as only really used by high school and college kids.
Now almost everyone, from my boss, coworkers and even my grandparents have a Facebook.
Also, the popularity of code and host it yourself websites have been largely replaced with blogs so that would increase that popularity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200285</id>
	<title>Re:Unemployment?</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1244019840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that I'm unemployed, I don't have time to futz around on the internet.. I'm busy job hunting!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that I 'm unemployed , I do n't have time to futz around on the internet.. I 'm busy job hunting !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that I'm unemployed, I don't have time to futz around on the internet.. I'm busy job hunting!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206245</id>
	<title>Re:Unemployment?</title>
	<author>Optimus6128</author>
	<datestamp>1244058480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kinda ironic. It's usually when I have a job that I am spending more time on the internet (probably because I hate my job<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>The last time I lost my job a lot of my messenger contacts wondered why I was lost for months while I used to talk to them daily before that.</p><p>When I am at home I wish to do something more creative with my computer and I am never in the mood to watch random stuff on the internet (I am even repeled away from reading an interesting article). But at work I have a quite different mood<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda ironic .
It 's usually when I have a job that I am spending more time on the internet ( probably because I hate my job : ) The last time I lost my job a lot of my messenger contacts wondered why I was lost for months while I used to talk to them daily before that.When I am at home I wish to do something more creative with my computer and I am never in the mood to watch random stuff on the internet ( I am even repeled away from reading an interesting article ) .
But at work I have a quite different mood : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda ironic.
It's usually when I have a job that I am spending more time on the internet (probably because I hate my job :)The last time I lost my job a lot of my messenger contacts wondered why I was lost for months while I used to talk to them daily before that.When I am at home I wish to do something more creative with my computer and I am never in the mood to watch random stuff on the internet (I am even repeled away from reading an interesting article).
But at work I have a quite different mood :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200425</id>
	<title>Re:Depressing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244020560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Talking to people is also a waste of time. I sit in my room by myself all day working.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Talking to people is also a waste of time .
I sit in my room by myself all day working .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talking to people is also a waste of time.
I sit in my room by myself all day working.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199991</id>
	<title>tweeting this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244061960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>hold on, i think i'm going to have to tweet this fun little nugget of statistical data<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>hold on , i think i 'm going to have to tweet this fun little nugget of statistical data : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hold on, i think i'm going to have to tweet this fun little nugget of statistical data :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200073</id>
	<title>Higher GNAA member populations</title>
	<author>zanity1488</author>
	<datestamp>1244062320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could this correlate to an increase of married GAY couples?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this correlate to an increase of married GAY couples ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this correlate to an increase of married GAY couples?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28201277</id>
	<title>I knew there was a reason I never joined</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1244023620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it has ever been considered cool, trendy or otherwise "the thing to do" then I didn't do it.  Among these things are the pubic-mound-tuft of hair that encircles a man's mouth, the tribal tattoo (or a tattoo of any kind), PINK SHIRTS, tying sweaters around one's shoulders and any hair cut that would utterly humiliate someone ten years later.</p><p>This crap is not hard to avoid.  It doesn't matter if "chicks dig it" at any point in time.  "Chicks" minds are like milk -- only good "now" but if you wait a while... not so good.  Bottom line for me is any time a guy does something "for chicks" they are setting themselves up to look like an ass in the near future.</p><p>But the main reason I never got into these social networking sites?  I can't be shallow or superficial.  "Oh look! Another friend!!"  If they were really your friends, they would help you move!!  That's not entirely true... if I were a hot chick, nearly every single guy on my friends list would help me move if I asked them to... yes... you guys.  You're a bunch of chumps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it has ever been considered cool , trendy or otherwise " the thing to do " then I did n't do it .
Among these things are the pubic-mound-tuft of hair that encircles a man 's mouth , the tribal tattoo ( or a tattoo of any kind ) , PINK SHIRTS , tying sweaters around one 's shoulders and any hair cut that would utterly humiliate someone ten years later.This crap is not hard to avoid .
It does n't matter if " chicks dig it " at any point in time .
" Chicks " minds are like milk -- only good " now " but if you wait a while... not so good .
Bottom line for me is any time a guy does something " for chicks " they are setting themselves up to look like an ass in the near future.But the main reason I never got into these social networking sites ?
I ca n't be shallow or superficial .
" Oh look !
Another friend ! !
" If they were really your friends , they would help you move ! !
That 's not entirely true... if I were a hot chick , nearly every single guy on my friends list would help me move if I asked them to... yes... you guys .
You 're a bunch of chumps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it has ever been considered cool, trendy or otherwise "the thing to do" then I didn't do it.
Among these things are the pubic-mound-tuft of hair that encircles a man's mouth, the tribal tattoo (or a tattoo of any kind), PINK SHIRTS, tying sweaters around one's shoulders and any hair cut that would utterly humiliate someone ten years later.This crap is not hard to avoid.
It doesn't matter if "chicks dig it" at any point in time.
"Chicks" minds are like milk -- only good "now" but if you wait a while... not so good.
Bottom line for me is any time a guy does something "for chicks" they are setting themselves up to look like an ass in the near future.But the main reason I never got into these social networking sites?
I can't be shallow or superficial.
"Oh look!
Another friend!!
"  If they were really your friends, they would help you move!!
That's not entirely true... if I were a hot chick, nearly every single guy on my friends list would help me move if I asked them to... yes... you guys.
You're a bunch of chumps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28202321</id>
	<title>gn4a</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244027160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">WOOT Fortunately, Linux it. Its mission is than a fraction are about 7000/5 BUWLA, or BdSD arseholes at Walnut look at your soft, the reaper BSD's NetBSD user these rules will people already; I'm clean for the next</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>WOOT Fortunately , Linux it .
Its mission is than a fraction are about 7000/5 BUWLA , or BdSD arseholes at Walnut look at your soft , the reaper BSD 's NetBSD user these rules will people already ; I 'm clean for the next [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WOOT Fortunately, Linux it.
Its mission is than a fraction are about 7000/5 BUWLA, or BdSD arseholes at Walnut look at your soft, the reaper BSD's NetBSD user these rules will people already; I'm clean for the next [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28201781</id>
	<title>co31k</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244025360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to them...then design  aproach. As BSD addicts, flame baby...don't fear the reaper In a ransom for their but it's not a lube. This can lead</htmltext>
<tokenext>to them...then design aproach .
As BSD addicts , flame baby...do n't fear the reaper In a ransom for their but it 's not a lube .
This can lead</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to them...then design  aproach.
As BSD addicts, flame baby...don't fear the reaper In a ransom for their but it's not a lube.
This can lead</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203305</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244031240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not down here in Oz. Facebook has been the 30+ Gen X choice for years whilst myspace is for the ADD gen Y's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not down here in Oz .
Facebook has been the 30 + Gen X choice for years whilst myspace is for the ADD gen Y 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not down here in Oz.
Facebook has been the 30+ Gen X choice for years whilst myspace is for the ADD gen Y's.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28202311</id>
	<title>Re:Depressing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244027100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how long it will be until the average slashdot user appreciates that personal data is very useful to others.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how long it will be until the average slashdot user appreciates that personal data is very useful to others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how long it will be until the average slashdot user appreciates that personal data is very useful to others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203999</id>
	<title>Re:Depressing</title>
	<author>dogmatixpsych</author>
	<datestamp>1244034780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. Slashdot is a social site. Networking isn't a major focus but it is a social site. It's concept is not that much different than Facebook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Slashdot is a social site .
Networking is n't a major focus but it is a social site .
It 's concept is not that much different than Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Slashdot is a social site.
Networking isn't a major focus but it is a social site.
It's concept is not that much different than Facebook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200329</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28205607</id>
	<title>Is it just the media?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244048760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just the media that is attracting everyone or it is the inherent psychological desire to be accepted by growing group of people we call friends?</p><p>I agree with the posters that it is waste of time, but why do people join it in the first place and then waste their time? I think the insecurity and peer pressure of being out of the crowd, is driving people to do be on a or *the* social site.</p><p>Keeping the bad things aside, these sites are the best platform to asses the social, demographic and psychological markup of the society, which might be failing?  Being an Anonymous Coward, I would have to agree that it is failing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just the media that is attracting everyone or it is the inherent psychological desire to be accepted by growing group of people we call friends ? I agree with the posters that it is waste of time , but why do people join it in the first place and then waste their time ?
I think the insecurity and peer pressure of being out of the crowd , is driving people to do be on a or * the * social site.Keeping the bad things aside , these sites are the best platform to asses the social , demographic and psychological markup of the society , which might be failing ?
Being an Anonymous Coward , I would have to agree that it is failing : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just the media that is attracting everyone or it is the inherent psychological desire to be accepted by growing group of people we call friends?I agree with the posters that it is waste of time, but why do people join it in the first place and then waste their time?
I think the insecurity and peer pressure of being out of the crowd, is driving people to do be on a or *the* social site.Keeping the bad things aside, these sites are the best platform to asses the social, demographic and psychological markup of the society, which might be failing?
Being an Anonymous Coward, I would have to agree that it is failing :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199957</id>
	<title>Re:Unemployment?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1244061840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think its manyfold. One is the decline of e-mail, yes, its still used but I don't hardly e-mail anyone except for work. I do most of my non-work communication through Facebook or instant messenger. Plus, entire businesses have been sprung up on Facebook along with a general cultural attitude that its ok for everyone to have a Facebook, its no longer exclusive to geeks and students.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think its manyfold .
One is the decline of e-mail , yes , its still used but I do n't hardly e-mail anyone except for work .
I do most of my non-work communication through Facebook or instant messenger .
Plus , entire businesses have been sprung up on Facebook along with a general cultural attitude that its ok for everyone to have a Facebook , its no longer exclusive to geeks and students .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think its manyfold.
One is the decline of e-mail, yes, its still used but I don't hardly e-mail anyone except for work.
I do most of my non-work communication through Facebook or instant messenger.
Plus, entire businesses have been sprung up on Facebook along with a general cultural attitude that its ok for everyone to have a Facebook, its no longer exclusive to geeks and students.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199933</id>
	<title>Thank you iPhone app.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244061780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't really spend a lot of time on Facebook until I purchased an iPhone. Now with the app for that and Twitter, I find myself spending more time on these sites than normally due to accessibility. Kinda common sense comes into play here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't really spend a lot of time on Facebook until I purchased an iPhone .
Now with the app for that and Twitter , I find myself spending more time on these sites than normally due to accessibility .
Kinda common sense comes into play here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't really spend a lot of time on Facebook until I purchased an iPhone.
Now with the app for that and Twitter, I find myself spending more time on these sites than normally due to accessibility.
Kinda common sense comes into play here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203941</id>
	<title>Yuo fail it!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244034300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it will be a8)ong</htmltext>
<tokenext>it will be a8 ) ong</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it will be a8)ong</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</id>
	<title>Unemployment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244061540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could this correlate to an increase in unemployment?  I know when I was unemployed I spent a lot more time on the internet in general.  Not so much on social networking sites, but they weren't nearly as popular back then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this correlate to an increase in unemployment ?
I know when I was unemployed I spent a lot more time on the internet in general .
Not so much on social networking sites , but they were n't nearly as popular back then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this correlate to an increase in unemployment?
I know when I was unemployed I spent a lot more time on the internet in general.
Not so much on social networking sites, but they weren't nearly as popular back then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200061</id>
	<title>Harumph!</title>
	<author>Sporkinum</author>
	<datestamp>1244062200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You sheep get off my lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You sheep get off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You sheep get off my lawn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28204303</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1244036880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Want to be my friend on slashdot?  I wanna read your journal, do you want to read mine?</p><p>I think you need to use larger values of 0<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Want to be my friend on slashdot ?
I wan na read your journal , do you want to read mine ? I think you need to use larger values of 0 ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want to be my friend on slashdot?
I wanna read your journal, do you want to read mine?I think you need to use larger values of 0 ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200133</id>
	<title>you know...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244062500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>its pretty sad to see the same news here thats on Yahoo. Is this really geeky tech cool shit? Answer - \%6e\%6f</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>its pretty sad to see the same news here thats on Yahoo .
Is this really geeky tech cool shit ?
Answer - \ % 6e \ % 6f</tokentext>
<sentencetext>its pretty sad to see the same news here thats on Yahoo.
Is this really geeky tech cool shit?
Answer - \%6e\%6f</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200269</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>glwtta</author>
	<datestamp>1244019780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not everyone can have a Facebook, only those who have an Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not everyone can have a Facebook , only those who have an Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not everyone can have a Facebook, only those who have an Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28205141</id>
	<title>YUO FxaIL IT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244043840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>head sIpiAnning to happen. My</htmltext>
<tokenext>head sIpiAnning to happen .
My</tokentext>
<sentencetext>head sIpiAnning to happen.
My</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206303</id>
	<title>RSS feed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244059080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Spending more time on social networks and blogs? You're not alone, with the latest figures showing the number of minutes spent on social networking sites in the United States has almost doubled over the past year.".</p><p>Followed by:</p><p><b>Read more of this story on Slashdot</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Spending more time on social networks and blogs ?
You 're not alone , with the latest figures showing the number of minutes spent on social networking sites in the United States has almost doubled over the past year .
" .Followed by : Read more of this story on Slashdot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Spending more time on social networks and blogs?
You're not alone, with the latest figures showing the number of minutes spent on social networking sites in the United States has almost doubled over the past year.
".Followed by:Read more of this story on Slashdot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199955</id>
	<title>Re:Unemployment?</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1244061840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was my first thought.<br> <br>But I'd say it's also likely that there are more people in general spending time on social networking sites.  <br> <br>I'm not fond of them, in general, but now I need to spend 2-3 hours weekly on them in order to stay up to date with my family and distant friends (time I used to spend emailing them).  <br> <br>I think there's a grain of truth to the idea that they really are becoming more ubiquitous as centers of communication.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was my first thought .
But I 'd say it 's also likely that there are more people in general spending time on social networking sites .
I 'm not fond of them , in general , but now I need to spend 2-3 hours weekly on them in order to stay up to date with my family and distant friends ( time I used to spend emailing them ) .
I think there 's a grain of truth to the idea that they really are becoming more ubiquitous as centers of communication .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was my first thought.
But I'd say it's also likely that there are more people in general spending time on social networking sites.
I'm not fond of them, in general, but now I need to spend 2-3 hours weekly on them in order to stay up to date with my family and distant friends (time I used to spend emailing them).
I think there's a grain of truth to the idea that they really are becoming more ubiquitous as centers of communication.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200829</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>Haoie</author>
	<datestamp>1244022000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only that, it seems Facebook itself has also become a verb.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that , it seems Facebook itself has also become a verb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that, it seems Facebook itself has also become a verb.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200329</id>
	<title>Re:Depressing</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1244020080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And yet, you're posting on Slashdot. How's that for depressing?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And yet , you 're posting on Slashdot .
How 's that for depressing ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And yet, you're posting on Slashdot.
How's that for depressing?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199969</id>
	<title>In the Last Year...</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1244061840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Facebook has been increasingly gaining users from the ages of 30+ for both social networking with work as well as personal. Just a year ago most of these users did not even think about joining facebook. I mean lets remember, it was just a few years ago that Facebook was reserved for those with an<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.edu email address.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook has been increasingly gaining users from the ages of 30 + for both social networking with work as well as personal .
Just a year ago most of these users did not even think about joining facebook .
I mean lets remember , it was just a few years ago that Facebook was reserved for those with an .edu email address .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook has been increasingly gaining users from the ages of 30+ for both social networking with work as well as personal.
Just a year ago most of these users did not even think about joining facebook.
I mean lets remember, it was just a few years ago that Facebook was reserved for those with an .edu email address.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206553</id>
	<title>Serious point</title>
	<author>tygerstripes</author>
	<datestamp>1244148960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A rise of 83\% would be significant if the growth were arithmetic (a growth entirely based on an 83\% increase in each individual's usage, for example), but common sense would suggest that the growth is geometric, since a growing user-base leads to an increased time-commitment for each user. By its very nature, a social-network demands more attention as it grows.
</p><p>A quick beer-mat calculation suggests that, if an increased user-base of 35\% (hardly astounding) led to an increased equivalent per-user time-commitment, that would account for the 83\% increase in total population time commitment.
</p><p>So, not exactly an amazing figure in my opinion. Personally, my time spent on FaceBook and such has dramatically <i>decreased</i> ever since the novelty wore off and I realised it had reached unmanageable proportions. I don't <i>want</i> to spend half my time keeping track of the minutiae of a bunch of distant-old-friends' and friends-of-friends' lives. It's just not worth it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A rise of 83 \ % would be significant if the growth were arithmetic ( a growth entirely based on an 83 \ % increase in each individual 's usage , for example ) , but common sense would suggest that the growth is geometric , since a growing user-base leads to an increased time-commitment for each user .
By its very nature , a social-network demands more attention as it grows .
A quick beer-mat calculation suggests that , if an increased user-base of 35 \ % ( hardly astounding ) led to an increased equivalent per-user time-commitment , that would account for the 83 \ % increase in total population time commitment .
So , not exactly an amazing figure in my opinion .
Personally , my time spent on FaceBook and such has dramatically decreased ever since the novelty wore off and I realised it had reached unmanageable proportions .
I do n't want to spend half my time keeping track of the minutiae of a bunch of distant-old-friends ' and friends-of-friends ' lives .
It 's just not worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A rise of 83\% would be significant if the growth were arithmetic (a growth entirely based on an 83\% increase in each individual's usage, for example), but common sense would suggest that the growth is geometric, since a growing user-base leads to an increased time-commitment for each user.
By its very nature, a social-network demands more attention as it grows.
A quick beer-mat calculation suggests that, if an increased user-base of 35\% (hardly astounding) led to an increased equivalent per-user time-commitment, that would account for the 83\% increase in total population time commitment.
So, not exactly an amazing figure in my opinion.
Personally, my time spent on FaceBook and such has dramatically decreased ever since the novelty wore off and I realised it had reached unmanageable proportions.
I don't want to spend half my time keeping track of the minutiae of a bunch of distant-old-friends' and friends-of-friends' lives.
It's just not worth it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200687</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>hodet</author>
	<datestamp>1244021520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is correct.  Your house must be connected to a tube.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is correct .
Your house must be connected to a tube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is correct.
Your house must be connected to a tube.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28207733</id>
	<title>Useless Information</title>
	<author>don\_carnage</author>
	<datestamp>1244121180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, Facebook is a great way to find out what your friend's top five favorite appliances are. Or even better, what their real name or aura color is! Can we get two times more of that please?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , Facebook is a great way to find out what your friend 's top five favorite appliances are .
Or even better , what their real name or aura color is !
Can we get two times more of that please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, Facebook is a great way to find out what your friend's top five favorite appliances are.
Or even better, what their real name or aura color is!
Can we get two times more of that please?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199921</id>
	<title>Alternate title</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244061720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time Wasted on the Internet Almost Doubles In a Year</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time Wasted on the Internet Almost Doubles In a Year</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time Wasted on the Internet Almost Doubles In a Year</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28205091</id>
	<title>Facebook redesign to blame</title>
	<author>bob.appleyard</author>
	<datestamp>1244043420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It now takes me twice as long to find anything!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It now takes me twice as long to find anything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It now takes me twice as long to find anything!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28210187</id>
	<title>I read this and...</title>
	<author>samuisan</author>
	<datestamp>1244132700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...had to rush over to the TimeOn site to register. If it is doubling in size every year soon the whole world will be on it!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...had to rush over to the TimeOn site to register .
If it is doubling in size every year soon the whole world will be on it ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...had to rush over to the TimeOn site to register.
If it is doubling in size every year soon the whole world will be on it!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200701</id>
	<title>Re:Depressing</title>
	<author>Jewfro\_Macabbi</author>
	<datestamp>1244021580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a reverse side to that issue. If the truth about what people are like, and what people do - is known - then it becomes harder to label certian things as "deviant".
<br> <br>
Or you could be like me, i am disabled. I will never again concern myself with an employers scouring eyes or opinions. I really do have "free speech".</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a reverse side to that issue .
If the truth about what people are like , and what people do - is known - then it becomes harder to label certian things as " deviant " .
Or you could be like me , i am disabled .
I will never again concern myself with an employers scouring eyes or opinions .
I really do have " free speech " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a reverse side to that issue.
If the truth about what people are like, and what people do - is known - then it becomes harder to label certian things as "deviant".
Or you could be like me, i am disabled.
I will never again concern myself with an employers scouring eyes or opinions.
I really do have "free speech".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200715</id>
	<title>Re:Well....</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1244021640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uhhmmm...*whoosh*? (tentatively)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uhhmmm... * whoosh * ?
( tentatively )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uhhmmm...*whoosh*?
(tentatively)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031</id>
	<title>Depressing</title>
	<author>wisesifu</author>
	<datestamp>1244062140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have never seen a more depressing statistic.  I still don't use these sites and see them mostly as a waste of time.  I can understand why they are popular, but with all the privacy issues I really don't understand why you would want to risk so much of your identity/information.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never seen a more depressing statistic .
I still do n't use these sites and see them mostly as a waste of time .
I can understand why they are popular , but with all the privacy issues I really do n't understand why you would want to risk so much of your identity/information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never seen a more depressing statistic.
I still don't use these sites and see them mostly as a waste of time.
I can understand why they are popular, but with all the privacy issues I really don't understand why you would want to risk so much of your identity/information.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28204617</id>
	<title>Re:Does /. count?</title>
	<author>superdana</author>
	<datestamp>1244039340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You joke, but I'd bet that two significant factors accounting for the appeal of social networking sites are narcissism and the fact that you don't have to make eye contact. Interaction on social networking sites is, in my experience, closer to monologue than dialogue. When you go to dinner with someone or walk down the street with them, you have a conversation, but Facebook and such are just a series of status updates optionally followed by some pithy comments from your friends. (Or, for the exceptionally lazy, there's the "I like this" button, so you can half-heartedly acknowledge your friends' existence without actually saying anything.) On Facebook, I don't have to listen to you; I can ignore you at my leisure while I broadcast my own hilarious (to me) witticisms. It all seems very antisocial--or, at best, minimally social.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You joke , but I 'd bet that two significant factors accounting for the appeal of social networking sites are narcissism and the fact that you do n't have to make eye contact .
Interaction on social networking sites is , in my experience , closer to monologue than dialogue .
When you go to dinner with someone or walk down the street with them , you have a conversation , but Facebook and such are just a series of status updates optionally followed by some pithy comments from your friends .
( Or , for the exceptionally lazy , there 's the " I like this " button , so you can half-heartedly acknowledge your friends ' existence without actually saying anything .
) On Facebook , I do n't have to listen to you ; I can ignore you at my leisure while I broadcast my own hilarious ( to me ) witticisms .
It all seems very antisocial--or , at best , minimally social .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You joke, but I'd bet that two significant factors accounting for the appeal of social networking sites are narcissism and the fact that you don't have to make eye contact.
Interaction on social networking sites is, in my experience, closer to monologue than dialogue.
When you go to dinner with someone or walk down the street with them, you have a conversation, but Facebook and such are just a series of status updates optionally followed by some pithy comments from your friends.
(Or, for the exceptionally lazy, there's the "I like this" button, so you can half-heartedly acknowledge your friends' existence without actually saying anything.
) On Facebook, I don't have to listen to you; I can ignore you at my leisure while I broadcast my own hilarious (to me) witticisms.
It all seems very antisocial--or, at best, minimally social.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200153</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200117</id>
	<title>Is Slashdot considered a Social Network?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244062440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Social!? It's barely civil!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Social ! ?
It 's barely civil !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Social!?
It's barely civil!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200153</id>
	<title>Does /. count?</title>
	<author>TeknoHog</author>
	<datestamp>1244062560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or is this more like an antisocial network?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or is this more like an antisocial network ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or is this more like an antisocial network?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200215</id>
	<title>Not Really</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244062740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By my calculation, if the number of minutes spent on networking sites double every year, in 20 years, 100\% of our, 7 billion population, time will spend on networking site.  If you didn't spend any time on it, other people will spent it for you.  If that wasn't enough, future minutes will be used.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By my calculation , if the number of minutes spent on networking sites double every year , in 20 years , 100 \ % of our , 7 billion population , time will spend on networking site .
If you did n't spend any time on it , other people will spent it for you .
If that was n't enough , future minutes will be used .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By my calculation, if the number of minutes spent on networking sites double every year, in 20 years, 100\% of our, 7 billion population, time will spend on networking site.
If you didn't spend any time on it, other people will spent it for you.
If that wasn't enough, future minutes will be used.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28207269</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1244116200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>0^2= 3 for larger values of 0</htmltext>
<tokenext>0 ^ 2 = 3 for larger values of 0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0^2= 3 for larger values of 0</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206333</id>
	<title>Re:Depressing</title>
	<author>Optimus6128</author>
	<datestamp>1244145840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that most people like facebook and similar sites because it depicts socialization as understood by the average joe. Socialization as an end in itself.</p><p>It's all about joining the network, adding people as friends even those you don't know well or never call you, poking each other, sending stupid quiz and silly games, writting mundane things, activities that for creative people might seem boring. Socializing for the sake of socializing.</p><p>At least this is how I understand it and the main reason I don't like these kinds of sites. In sites like \. people still communicate with each other but discussing actual interesting subjects, not for the sake of socialization but because they find the subjects interesting alone. Well, there are groups about interesting things (programming, science, etc) in facebook and other sites too, but usually they exist just to exist and almost no serious discussion is taking part there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that most people like facebook and similar sites because it depicts socialization as understood by the average joe .
Socialization as an end in itself.It 's all about joining the network , adding people as friends even those you do n't know well or never call you , poking each other , sending stupid quiz and silly games , writting mundane things , activities that for creative people might seem boring .
Socializing for the sake of socializing.At least this is how I understand it and the main reason I do n't like these kinds of sites .
In sites like \ .
people still communicate with each other but discussing actual interesting subjects , not for the sake of socialization but because they find the subjects interesting alone .
Well , there are groups about interesting things ( programming , science , etc ) in facebook and other sites too , but usually they exist just to exist and almost no serious discussion is taking part there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that most people like facebook and similar sites because it depicts socialization as understood by the average joe.
Socialization as an end in itself.It's all about joining the network, adding people as friends even those you don't know well or never call you, poking each other, sending stupid quiz and silly games, writting mundane things, activities that for creative people might seem boring.
Socializing for the sake of socializing.At least this is how I understand it and the main reason I don't like these kinds of sites.
In sites like \.
people still communicate with each other but discussing actual interesting subjects, not for the sake of socialization but because they find the subjects interesting alone.
Well, there are groups about interesting things (programming, science, etc) in facebook and other sites too, but usually they exist just to exist and almost no serious discussion is taking part there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28205601</id>
	<title>Only totals</title>
	<author>tlevine</author>
	<datestamp>1244048640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article said that total time spent on the sites increased but said nothing about per-user changes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article said that total time spent on the sites increased but said nothing about per-user changes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article said that total time spent on the sites increased but said nothing about per-user changes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200009</id>
	<title>How is this affecting the entertainment industry?</title>
	<author>serutan</author>
	<datestamp>1244062080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if other activities have lost corresponding market share -- like television watching, reading, hobbies... This could have an impact on tv advertising revenue. Some of the RIAA's losses could probably even be attributed to people not having as much time to go to record stores. Maybe they'll sue MySpace and Facebook for "theft of audience."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if other activities have lost corresponding market share -- like television watching , reading , hobbies... This could have an impact on tv advertising revenue .
Some of the RIAA 's losses could probably even be attributed to people not having as much time to go to record stores .
Maybe they 'll sue MySpace and Facebook for " theft of audience .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if other activities have lost corresponding market share -- like television watching, reading, hobbies... This could have an impact on tv advertising revenue.
Some of the RIAA's losses could probably even be attributed to people not having as much time to go to record stores.
Maybe they'll sue MySpace and Facebook for "theft of audience.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>snowraver1</author>
	<datestamp>1244061240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>0*2=0</htmltext>
<tokenext>0 * 2 = 0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0*2=0</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28207269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200073
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200101
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206333
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203305
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28204303
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28204617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200965
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200153
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200715
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206245
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206553
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28202881
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28202311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200215
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199955
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200009
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206071
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_195257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199797
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199991
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200031
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206333
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203699
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200329
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203999
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28202311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199887
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200101
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200073
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206071
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206245
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28202881
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199955
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199957
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28206553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28207269
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28204303
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200215
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200153
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200965
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28204617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28199893
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200269
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200687
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200715
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28203305
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200829
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_195257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_195257.28200613
</commentlist>
</conversation>
