<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_03_1611245</id>
	<title>Hands-on With the PSP Go</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1244047920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ANkleStrong writes <i>"Sony Corp <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20090603/sony-lifts-curtain-on-new-psp.htm">unveiled on Tuesday a smaller, lighter PlayStation handheld game device</a> called the PSP Go, in a race to catch rival Nintendo in an intensely competitive mobile games arena."</i>
E3 attendees were able to <a href="http://kotaku.com/5276210/psp-go-hands+on-impressions">take the new Sony handheld for a test drive</a>, and more <a href="http://kotaku.com/5276208/psp-go-the-gallery">pictures</a> and <a href="http://en.gamers.com/news/view\_5726.html">videos</a> are now available. It's set to be <a href="http://www.ps3news.com/PlayStation-Portable/e3-2009-burning-umds-onto-the-psp-go-full-specs-available/">released on October 1st</a>, and will retail for $249. A <a href="http://e3.gamespot.com/story/6211000/resident-evil-relocates-to-psp">new <em>Resident Evil</em> game</a> is being designed specifically for the updated hardware, and <a href="http://www.gameguru.in/sony-psp/2009/03/metal-gear-solid-peace-walker-for-sony-psp-from-konami-in-2010/"> <em>Metal Gear Peace Walker</em> is coming as well</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ANkleStrong writes " Sony Corp unveiled on Tuesday a smaller , lighter PlayStation handheld game device called the PSP Go , in a race to catch rival Nintendo in an intensely competitive mobile games arena .
" E3 attendees were able to take the new Sony handheld for a test drive , and more pictures and videos are now available .
It 's set to be released on October 1st , and will retail for $ 249 .
A new Resident Evil game is being designed specifically for the updated hardware , and Metal Gear Peace Walker is coming as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ANkleStrong writes "Sony Corp unveiled on Tuesday a smaller, lighter PlayStation handheld game device called the PSP Go, in a race to catch rival Nintendo in an intensely competitive mobile games arena.
"
E3 attendees were able to take the new Sony handheld for a test drive, and more pictures and videos are now available.
It's set to be released on October 1st, and will retail for $249.
A new Resident Evil game is being designed specifically for the updated hardware, and  Metal Gear Peace Walker is coming as well.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689</id>
	<title>$250?  Owch...</title>
	<author>nweaver</author>
	<datestamp>1244051700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once again Sony is probably overpricing the market.  Sony would love to wipe the venerable DS off the face of the planet, but the DS is what, $130 or $180 for the DSi?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once again Sony is probably overpricing the market .
Sony would love to wipe the venerable DS off the face of the planet , but the DS is what , $ 130 or $ 180 for the DSi ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once again Sony is probably overpricing the market.
Sony would love to wipe the venerable DS off the face of the planet, but the DS is what, $130 or $180 for the DSi?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28210075</id>
	<title>Dead pixels more of a problem too</title>
	<author>HalAtWork</author>
	<datestamp>1244132280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having a large screen is a problem too, it's much harder to secure and absorbs more of the shock during a fall than the DS's screens, which is why 9/10 times you'll get dead pixels on a dropped PSP, and in the same situation the DS's screens will be fine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a large screen is a problem too , it 's much harder to secure and absorbs more of the shock during a fall than the DS 's screens , which is why 9/10 times you 'll get dead pixels on a dropped PSP , and in the same situation the DS 's screens will be fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a large screen is a problem too, it's much harder to secure and absorbs more of the shock during a fall than the DS's screens, which is why 9/10 times you'll get dead pixels on a dropped PSP, and in the same situation the DS's screens will be fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198997</id>
	<title>Re:Failed design is fail.</title>
	<author>Pitr</author>
	<datestamp>1244057160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I believe this is their 4th version of the PSP, not their 2nd, which only goes to show that they're even further out of touch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I believe this is their 4th version of the PSP , not their 2nd , which only goes to show that they 're even further out of touch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I believe this is their 4th version of the PSP, not their 2nd, which only goes to show that they're even further out of touch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198283</id>
	<title>UMD copy utility and PS3 slim</title>
	<author>mzs</author>
	<datestamp>1244053920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone have any info yet about what is going to be done about buying UMD games and movies in stores and getting them onto the PSP Go?</p><p>Also there was nothing on the firmed-up rumors of an upcoming PS3 slim, does anyone have anything more concrete as well?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone have any info yet about what is going to be done about buying UMD games and movies in stores and getting them onto the PSP Go ? Also there was nothing on the firmed-up rumors of an upcoming PS3 slim , does anyone have anything more concrete as well ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone have any info yet about what is going to be done about buying UMD games and movies in stores and getting them onto the PSP Go?Also there was nothing on the firmed-up rumors of an upcoming PS3 slim, does anyone have anything more concrete as well?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200641</id>
	<title>Re:$250? Owch...</title>
	<author>cadrell0</author>
	<datestamp>1244021340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The PSP Go has 16gig of internal memory.  The 16gig iPod Touch is $299.  I'm currently on the market for a new MP3 player.  With the way it can integrate with my PS3 through Remote Play and decent library, the PSP Go is a contender.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The PSP Go has 16gig of internal memory .
The 16gig iPod Touch is $ 299 .
I 'm currently on the market for a new MP3 player .
With the way it can integrate with my PS3 through Remote Play and decent library , the PSP Go is a contender .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The PSP Go has 16gig of internal memory.
The 16gig iPod Touch is $299.
I'm currently on the market for a new MP3 player.
With the way it can integrate with my PS3 through Remote Play and decent library, the PSP Go is a contender.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198499</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously not for kids.</title>
	<author>philpalm</author>
	<datestamp>1244054820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now if they allow You Tube to play via internet, that is an adult thing to do.
Unfortunately Pro Duo memorysticks are out and you are required to buy micro memorystick.
At least you can play videos and music like an adult.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if they allow You Tube to play via internet , that is an adult thing to do .
Unfortunately Pro Duo memorysticks are out and you are required to buy micro memorystick .
At least you can play videos and music like an adult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if they allow You Tube to play via internet, that is an adult thing to do.
Unfortunately Pro Duo memorysticks are out and you are required to buy micro memorystick.
At least you can play videos and music like an adult.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28211731</id>
	<title>Re:UMD copy utility and PS3 slim</title>
	<author>Bob of Dole</author>
	<datestamp>1244139000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>UMD games, they're going to let you rebuy them off their online store.</p><p>UMD movies, no one bought those so they can safely ignore that issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>UMD games , they 're going to let you rebuy them off their online store.UMD movies , no one bought those so they can safely ignore that issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UMD games, they're going to let you rebuy them off their online store.UMD movies, no one bought those so they can safely ignore that issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059</id>
	<title>Obviously not for kids.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244053080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sony is out of touch with the market. This thing wouldn't last a week in
my kids hands.  Toys should survive normal usage and the Go looks fragile . I think
clamshell designs are more durable, and keep the screens from being  broken or
scratched when they're dropped out of the car onto concrete.  Will it come in a pretty pink?.

I think Sony is trying for the upscale, male geek, with lots of money.  I'll pass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sony is out of touch with the market .
This thing would n't last a week in my kids hands .
Toys should survive normal usage and the Go looks fragile .
I think clamshell designs are more durable , and keep the screens from being broken or scratched when they 're dropped out of the car onto concrete .
Will it come in a pretty pink ? .
I think Sony is trying for the upscale , male geek , with lots of money .
I 'll pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sony is out of touch with the market.
This thing wouldn't last a week in
my kids hands.
Toys should survive normal usage and the Go looks fragile .
I think
clamshell designs are more durable, and keep the screens from being  broken or
scratched when they're dropped out of the car onto concrete.
Will it come in a pretty pink?.
I think Sony is trying for the upscale, male geek, with lots of money.
I'll pass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</id>
	<title>Failed design is fail.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244052720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The price tag is bad enough - but until I can flip a PSP closed to protect the screen and controls the way anybody can with any of the three models of the Nintendo DS, there's just no way in hell I'm going to waste my money on one of these.</p><p>I carry my DS in the hip pocket of my cargo shorts - it gets banged up, sat on, smooshed against the hull of the bus.  It's spanged off of desks and doors, barstools and bannisters.  And while the case is scraped and scratched (and mildly pulverized in one corner thanks to a FLYING LEAP the thing took onto pavement), the screens are still in working order and the machine continues to give me games on the go without complaint.</p><p>Sure, I could buy a screen protector or whatever for the PSP like I have for my iPod - but the only thing I've ever had to buy for my DS is <i>games</i>, and I prefer to keep it that way.  If I'm gaming outside and it's raining, I just stick the thing in a ziplock bag.</p><p>As I see it, I'd be paying a hundred bucks more for the "privilege" of the screen getting scratched all to hell the second I stick it in the pocket with my keys... and it doesn't play <i>any</i> of my games.  And I have a <i>lot</i> of DS and GBA games.</p><p>Sony may have owned the 32-bit generation of consoles, but they have yet to come up with anything compelling in the portable (or online) arena.  Heck, the <i>one</i> friend of mine with a PSP uses it to run a Skype client.  What does <i>that</i> say about the platform?</p><p>On a related note - when the first GBAs hit the market, they could play GB games.  That was dropped with the DS, which could play GBA games.  Now, finally, with the DSi, Nintendo has dropped the GBA capability (along with battery life, which is why when my DS gives out I'll be buying a DS Lite - or even another DS if I can find a new one.  The DSL is a smidge too small for my hands).  Nintendo has gone through several generations of handhelds and has maintained backwards compatibility with at least the first generation of each.  Sony's on their <i>second</i> PSP and they've already dropped UMD - which screws over anyone who's paid good money for games that come on UMD media.</p><p>Clearly, they don't understand why Nintendo continues to dominate the market - only that they <i>do</i>.  Kinda like Microsoft and Google - Sony, like Microsoft, seems to keep trying to take the lead, and every attempt is further and further proof that they just don't <i>get</i> it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The price tag is bad enough - but until I can flip a PSP closed to protect the screen and controls the way anybody can with any of the three models of the Nintendo DS , there 's just no way in hell I 'm going to waste my money on one of these.I carry my DS in the hip pocket of my cargo shorts - it gets banged up , sat on , smooshed against the hull of the bus .
It 's spanged off of desks and doors , barstools and bannisters .
And while the case is scraped and scratched ( and mildly pulverized in one corner thanks to a FLYING LEAP the thing took onto pavement ) , the screens are still in working order and the machine continues to give me games on the go without complaint.Sure , I could buy a screen protector or whatever for the PSP like I have for my iPod - but the only thing I 've ever had to buy for my DS is games , and I prefer to keep it that way .
If I 'm gaming outside and it 's raining , I just stick the thing in a ziplock bag.As I see it , I 'd be paying a hundred bucks more for the " privilege " of the screen getting scratched all to hell the second I stick it in the pocket with my keys... and it does n't play any of my games .
And I have a lot of DS and GBA games.Sony may have owned the 32-bit generation of consoles , but they have yet to come up with anything compelling in the portable ( or online ) arena .
Heck , the one friend of mine with a PSP uses it to run a Skype client .
What does that say about the platform ? On a related note - when the first GBAs hit the market , they could play GB games .
That was dropped with the DS , which could play GBA games .
Now , finally , with the DSi , Nintendo has dropped the GBA capability ( along with battery life , which is why when my DS gives out I 'll be buying a DS Lite - or even another DS if I can find a new one .
The DSL is a smidge too small for my hands ) .
Nintendo has gone through several generations of handhelds and has maintained backwards compatibility with at least the first generation of each .
Sony 's on their second PSP and they 've already dropped UMD - which screws over anyone who 's paid good money for games that come on UMD media.Clearly , they do n't understand why Nintendo continues to dominate the market - only that they do .
Kinda like Microsoft and Google - Sony , like Microsoft , seems to keep trying to take the lead , and every attempt is further and further proof that they just do n't get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price tag is bad enough - but until I can flip a PSP closed to protect the screen and controls the way anybody can with any of the three models of the Nintendo DS, there's just no way in hell I'm going to waste my money on one of these.I carry my DS in the hip pocket of my cargo shorts - it gets banged up, sat on, smooshed against the hull of the bus.
It's spanged off of desks and doors, barstools and bannisters.
And while the case is scraped and scratched (and mildly pulverized in one corner thanks to a FLYING LEAP the thing took onto pavement), the screens are still in working order and the machine continues to give me games on the go without complaint.Sure, I could buy a screen protector or whatever for the PSP like I have for my iPod - but the only thing I've ever had to buy for my DS is games, and I prefer to keep it that way.
If I'm gaming outside and it's raining, I just stick the thing in a ziplock bag.As I see it, I'd be paying a hundred bucks more for the "privilege" of the screen getting scratched all to hell the second I stick it in the pocket with my keys... and it doesn't play any of my games.
And I have a lot of DS and GBA games.Sony may have owned the 32-bit generation of consoles, but they have yet to come up with anything compelling in the portable (or online) arena.
Heck, the one friend of mine with a PSP uses it to run a Skype client.
What does that say about the platform?On a related note - when the first GBAs hit the market, they could play GB games.
That was dropped with the DS, which could play GBA games.
Now, finally, with the DSi, Nintendo has dropped the GBA capability (along with battery life, which is why when my DS gives out I'll be buying a DS Lite - or even another DS if I can find a new one.
The DSL is a smidge too small for my hands).
Nintendo has gone through several generations of handhelds and has maintained backwards compatibility with at least the first generation of each.
Sony's on their second PSP and they've already dropped UMD - which screws over anyone who's paid good money for games that come on UMD media.Clearly, they don't understand why Nintendo continues to dominate the market - only that they do.
Kinda like Microsoft and Google - Sony, like Microsoft, seems to keep trying to take the lead, and every attempt is further and further proof that they just don't get it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28283037</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously not for kids.</title>
	<author>PeelBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1244662500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call BS on that number.</p><p>Not once have I ever been asked who I'm purchasing a game for (my 7 year old daughter, birthday presents for cousins, friends kids, etc).</p><p>Not once have I ever been carded when buying a game or asked for my age.</p><p>Not once have I ever seen or taken a survey asking me questions along these lines.</p><p>So where are they getting their numbers from?</p><p>How many kids do you know that don't play video games?</p><p>How many pre-teens, tweens and teens do you see taking survey's?</p><p>If the survey was done online, was it a site that pre-teens, tweens and teens surf often?</p><p>If the average gamer is 30 then why has Nintendo cornered the market with "kiddie" games?</p><p>You could point out how well M rated games sell, and I could point out a lot of parents who purchase those games for their teenagers.</p><p>Why does everybody on here always complain about all the young teens on x-box live and other online services?</p><p>If the average gamer was 30 wouldn't most the people on those services be 30 and not 14?</p><p>I could go on forever.</p><p>I bet there are as many kids from age 3 to 17 that play games as there are 18 to 32 year olds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call BS on that number.Not once have I ever been asked who I 'm purchasing a game for ( my 7 year old daughter , birthday presents for cousins , friends kids , etc ) .Not once have I ever been carded when buying a game or asked for my age.Not once have I ever seen or taken a survey asking me questions along these lines.So where are they getting their numbers from ? How many kids do you know that do n't play video games ? How many pre-teens , tweens and teens do you see taking survey 's ? If the survey was done online , was it a site that pre-teens , tweens and teens surf often ? If the average gamer is 30 then why has Nintendo cornered the market with " kiddie " games ? You could point out how well M rated games sell , and I could point out a lot of parents who purchase those games for their teenagers.Why does everybody on here always complain about all the young teens on x-box live and other online services ? If the average gamer was 30 would n't most the people on those services be 30 and not 14 ? I could go on forever.I bet there are as many kids from age 3 to 17 that play games as there are 18 to 32 year olds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call BS on that number.Not once have I ever been asked who I'm purchasing a game for (my 7 year old daughter, birthday presents for cousins, friends kids, etc).Not once have I ever been carded when buying a game or asked for my age.Not once have I ever seen or taken a survey asking me questions along these lines.So where are they getting their numbers from?How many kids do you know that don't play video games?How many pre-teens, tweens and teens do you see taking survey's?If the survey was done online, was it a site that pre-teens, tweens and teens surf often?If the average gamer is 30 then why has Nintendo cornered the market with "kiddie" games?You could point out how well M rated games sell, and I could point out a lot of parents who purchase those games for their teenagers.Why does everybody on here always complain about all the young teens on x-box live and other online services?If the average gamer was 30 wouldn't most the people on those services be 30 and not 14?I could go on forever.I bet there are as many kids from age 3 to 17 that play games as there are 18 to 32 year olds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198601</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28206415</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously not for kids.</title>
	<author>CronoCloud</author>
	<datestamp>1244147040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The PSP isn't designed for kids, people don't buy them for kids they buy them for themselves.  It's a game playing, photo viewing, music playing, video playing, remote playing, RSS reading, web browsing, skype capable, internet radio playing machine.  It can also take photos itself, and serve as a GPS device as well, but those addons have not been released in the NTSC U/C territory....bastards.</p><p>The PSP may look fragile, I remember people saying how the PSP-1000 looked so fragile that they were afraid of breaking/scratching it, but it's not.</p><p>As for pink, there was a pink model, but you can't find it in stores.  But you can always buy a pink skin for it.  I want a Hello Kitty skin for mine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The PSP is n't designed for kids , people do n't buy them for kids they buy them for themselves .
It 's a game playing , photo viewing , music playing , video playing , remote playing , RSS reading , web browsing , skype capable , internet radio playing machine .
It can also take photos itself , and serve as a GPS device as well , but those addons have not been released in the NTSC U/C territory....bastards.The PSP may look fragile , I remember people saying how the PSP-1000 looked so fragile that they were afraid of breaking/scratching it , but it 's not.As for pink , there was a pink model , but you ca n't find it in stores .
But you can always buy a pink skin for it .
I want a Hello Kitty skin for mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The PSP isn't designed for kids, people don't buy them for kids they buy them for themselves.
It's a game playing, photo viewing, music playing, video playing, remote playing, RSS reading, web browsing, skype capable, internet radio playing machine.
It can also take photos itself, and serve as a GPS device as well, but those addons have not been released in the NTSC U/C territory....bastards.The PSP may look fragile, I remember people saying how the PSP-1000 looked so fragile that they were afraid of breaking/scratching it, but it's not.As for pink, there was a pink model, but you can't find it in stores.
But you can always buy a pink skin for it.
I want a Hello Kitty skin for mine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199621</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously not for kids.</title>
	<author>flamingdog</author>
	<datestamp>1244060220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>THANK YOU SONY!!!!!</p><p>I fix video games for a living, and Sony has made great plans to keep me in business. This thing looks like it could quite possibly be the most fragile system ever. Adults can't use sliders without breaking them, and Sony wants to give them to teenagers and children that will throw them in backpacks with textbooks.</p><p>Taking clamshell durability versus slider durability, then comparing to the rate of user destruction of clamshell systems would imply that without a carrying case or protective hard cover used constantly for storage, these things are just simply doomed. I don't see how a single one can survive on its own. I imagine the fish that are presents for the little girl in Finding Nemo.</p><p>I hope they've already started working on the logistics of handling millions of warranty returns and repairs at once. Microsoft may be able to provide some advice on that front.</p><p>RE: AC below commenting on flex ribbons wearing out: I don't think I've seen more than one or two (out of several thousand) ribbons in a clamshell system that have just "worn out." They do break easily, but only once the actual case or hinges are broken, or if someone was tampering with the internals. Even the few that were "worn out" appeared to have worn out because there was a ton of dirt and debris inside the areas where the moved around, adding to the wear. They are simply not the fault point <i>on their own or through normal use</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THANK YOU SONY ! ! ! !
! I fix video games for a living , and Sony has made great plans to keep me in business .
This thing looks like it could quite possibly be the most fragile system ever .
Adults ca n't use sliders without breaking them , and Sony wants to give them to teenagers and children that will throw them in backpacks with textbooks.Taking clamshell durability versus slider durability , then comparing to the rate of user destruction of clamshell systems would imply that without a carrying case or protective hard cover used constantly for storage , these things are just simply doomed .
I do n't see how a single one can survive on its own .
I imagine the fish that are presents for the little girl in Finding Nemo.I hope they 've already started working on the logistics of handling millions of warranty returns and repairs at once .
Microsoft may be able to provide some advice on that front.RE : AC below commenting on flex ribbons wearing out : I do n't think I 've seen more than one or two ( out of several thousand ) ribbons in a clamshell system that have just " worn out .
" They do break easily , but only once the actual case or hinges are broken , or if someone was tampering with the internals .
Even the few that were " worn out " appeared to have worn out because there was a ton of dirt and debris inside the areas where the moved around , adding to the wear .
They are simply not the fault point on their own or through normal use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THANK YOU SONY!!!!
!I fix video games for a living, and Sony has made great plans to keep me in business.
This thing looks like it could quite possibly be the most fragile system ever.
Adults can't use sliders without breaking them, and Sony wants to give them to teenagers and children that will throw them in backpacks with textbooks.Taking clamshell durability versus slider durability, then comparing to the rate of user destruction of clamshell systems would imply that without a carrying case or protective hard cover used constantly for storage, these things are just simply doomed.
I don't see how a single one can survive on its own.
I imagine the fish that are presents for the little girl in Finding Nemo.I hope they've already started working on the logistics of handling millions of warranty returns and repairs at once.
Microsoft may be able to provide some advice on that front.RE: AC below commenting on flex ribbons wearing out: I don't think I've seen more than one or two (out of several thousand) ribbons in a clamshell system that have just "worn out.
" They do break easily, but only once the actual case or hinges are broken, or if someone was tampering with the internals.
Even the few that were "worn out" appeared to have worn out because there was a ton of dirt and debris inside the areas where the moved around, adding to the wear.
They are simply not the fault point on their own or through normal use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197789</id>
	<title>Re:$250? Owch...</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1244052060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The price would be OK if it played Blu-ray Discs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The price would be OK if it played Blu-ray Discs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price would be OK if it played Blu-ray Discs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28211339</id>
	<title>Re:Failed design is fail.</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1244137380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You have an over-priced mp3 player that could get scratched up.  Yet you complain about a device that is a more sophisticated piece of hardware at a cheaper price being too expensive and unwilling to protect it like you would your iPod.  Isn't that a bit hypocritical?<br> <br>Maybe they do understand why Nintendo continues to dominate that market.  So they target a different market with a different type of gaming portable.  Yeah, their target audience is smaller given the price tag, but as long as they are making a profit, who the hell cares?  Only fan boys care if something outsells the other.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You have an over-priced mp3 player that could get scratched up .
Yet you complain about a device that is a more sophisticated piece of hardware at a cheaper price being too expensive and unwilling to protect it like you would your iPod .
Is n't that a bit hypocritical ?
Maybe they do understand why Nintendo continues to dominate that market .
So they target a different market with a different type of gaming portable .
Yeah , their target audience is smaller given the price tag , but as long as they are making a profit , who the hell cares ?
Only fan boys care if something outsells the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have an over-priced mp3 player that could get scratched up.
Yet you complain about a device that is a more sophisticated piece of hardware at a cheaper price being too expensive and unwilling to protect it like you would your iPod.
Isn't that a bit hypocritical?
Maybe they do understand why Nintendo continues to dominate that market.
So they target a different market with a different type of gaming portable.
Yeah, their target audience is smaller given the price tag, but as long as they are making a profit, who the hell cares?
Only fan boys care if something outsells the other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28205389</id>
	<title>The PSP isn't a DS competitor...</title>
	<author>Monstr</author>
	<datestamp>1244046300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And there's the flaw with this comparison. Sony is not comparing the PSP Go to a DS. It's probably more in line with a ipod touch, if anything.<br>The DS is what you buy your kids. The PSP Go is what you buy yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And there 's the flaw with this comparison .
Sony is not comparing the PSP Go to a DS .
It 's probably more in line with a ipod touch , if anything.The DS is what you buy your kids .
The PSP Go is what you buy yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there's the flaw with this comparison.
Sony is not comparing the PSP Go to a DS.
It's probably more in line with a ipod touch, if anything.The DS is what you buy your kids.
The PSP Go is what you buy yourself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200359</id>
	<title>50+ Million PSPs vs Some Guy On Slashdot</title>
	<author>MediaStreams</author>
	<datestamp>1244020200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Over 50 million PSPs have been sold worldwide by Sony. But some guy on Slashdot says they don't know what they are doing...</p><p>Which one to believe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Over 50 million PSPs have been sold worldwide by Sony .
But some guy on Slashdot says they do n't know what they are doing...Which one to believe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Over 50 million PSPs have been sold worldwide by Sony.
But some guy on Slashdot says they don't know what they are doing...Which one to believe?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199149</id>
	<title>Spread too thin?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244057880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Currently Sony has such a complex line of products, virtually none of them leaders of their segment, that you can't help but wonder if they have completely lost their bearings.  Perhaps a re-invention of the company, a la Steve Jobs when returning to Apple, would allow them to cut the dead wood and refocus on a few areas where they can be again undisputed kings.  As it is right now, however, every new launch seems like another (overpriced) dead horse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Currently Sony has such a complex line of products , virtually none of them leaders of their segment , that you ca n't help but wonder if they have completely lost their bearings .
Perhaps a re-invention of the company , a la Steve Jobs when returning to Apple , would allow them to cut the dead wood and refocus on a few areas where they can be again undisputed kings .
As it is right now , however , every new launch seems like another ( overpriced ) dead horse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Currently Sony has such a complex line of products, virtually none of them leaders of their segment, that you can't help but wonder if they have completely lost their bearings.
Perhaps a re-invention of the company, a la Steve Jobs when returning to Apple, would allow them to cut the dead wood and refocus on a few areas where they can be again undisputed kings.
As it is right now, however, every new launch seems like another (overpriced) dead horse.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197771</id>
	<title>You mean the PSP Cartman?</title>
	<author>AuraSeer</author>
	<datestamp>1244052000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, once you notice the resemblance it's impossible to see it as anything else.</p><p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5273445/psp-go-a-dead-ringer-for-south-parks-eric-cartman" title="gizmodo.com">http://gizmodo.com/5273445/psp-go-a-dead-ringer-for-south-parks-eric-cartman</a> [gizmodo.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , once you notice the resemblance it 's impossible to see it as anything else.http : //gizmodo.com/5273445/psp-go-a-dead-ringer-for-south-parks-eric-cartman [ gizmodo.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, once you notice the resemblance it's impossible to see it as anything else.http://gizmodo.com/5273445/psp-go-a-dead-ringer-for-south-parks-eric-cartman [gizmodo.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198665</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously not for kids.</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1244055480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait, you think a $250 piece of electronics is a kids toy... and you call Sony out of touch?  I have a PSP3000, and the screen, and everything else for that matter, is fine.  I also keep it in a case when not in use (as my wife keeps her DS in a case too... which is handy when you want to play more than the one game current in the device).</p><p>As far as the "upscale male geek," maybe more hardcore gamers, because I think there are exactly zero games on the DS which interest me, but lots of money?  The PSP I have cost 169.  Why one with no moving parts and is smaller would cost more I can't imagine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , you think a $ 250 piece of electronics is a kids toy... and you call Sony out of touch ?
I have a PSP3000 , and the screen , and everything else for that matter , is fine .
I also keep it in a case when not in use ( as my wife keeps her DS in a case too... which is handy when you want to play more than the one game current in the device ) .As far as the " upscale male geek , " maybe more hardcore gamers , because I think there are exactly zero games on the DS which interest me , but lots of money ?
The PSP I have cost 169 .
Why one with no moving parts and is smaller would cost more I ca n't imagine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, you think a $250 piece of electronics is a kids toy... and you call Sony out of touch?
I have a PSP3000, and the screen, and everything else for that matter, is fine.
I also keep it in a case when not in use (as my wife keeps her DS in a case too... which is handy when you want to play more than the one game current in the device).As far as the "upscale male geek," maybe more hardcore gamers, because I think there are exactly zero games on the DS which interest me, but lots of money?
The PSP I have cost 169.
Why one with no moving parts and is smaller would cost more I can't imagine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199651</id>
	<title>New hardware?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244060340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A new Resident Evil game is being designed specifically for the updated hardware,</p></div><p>Let me guess: one cross, 8 buttons (triangle, square, circle, x, L1, R1, Select &amp; Start),  and one damm f****ing placed analog stick and one screen. I guess that's the same hardware as PSP Classic &amp; Slim.</p><p>Another thing would be if the game is designed to run "only" in PSP Go... that's another question.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A new Resident Evil game is being designed specifically for the updated hardware,Let me guess : one cross , 8 buttons ( triangle , square , circle , x , L1 , R1 , Select &amp; Start ) , and one damm f * * * * ing placed analog stick and one screen .
I guess that 's the same hardware as PSP Classic &amp; Slim.Another thing would be if the game is designed to run " only " in PSP Go... that 's another question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A new Resident Evil game is being designed specifically for the updated hardware,Let me guess: one cross, 8 buttons (triangle, square, circle, x, L1, R1, Select &amp; Start),  and one damm f****ing placed analog stick and one screen.
I guess that's the same hardware as PSP Classic &amp; Slim.Another thing would be if the game is designed to run "only" in PSP Go... that's another question.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200347</id>
	<title>Re:Failed design is fail.</title>
	<author>MikeBabcock</author>
	<datestamp>1244020140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No offence, but Sony's got a much better backward-compatibility track record than Nintendo.</p><p>Arguably backward compatibility has a lot more to do with your installed consumer base than anything else.  If you count the number of Gameboy games that were on the market by the time the color or advance units were released, it would have been simply foolish to lose all those titles.</p><p>Sony on the other hand is obviously selling this product to people who don't yet have a PSP and several of the originally UMD-only games are available already on the PSN store to purchase as downloads already (and I'd expect a majority to make the transition in time).</p><p>Yes, if you have a classic PSP you'll want to replace it with another UMD-supporting PSP to play those games, or you can sell them and re-purchase the downloadable versions when you miss them.  Yes, that's a pain.  What did you do when you upgraded your SNES to your N64?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No offence , but Sony 's got a much better backward-compatibility track record than Nintendo.Arguably backward compatibility has a lot more to do with your installed consumer base than anything else .
If you count the number of Gameboy games that were on the market by the time the color or advance units were released , it would have been simply foolish to lose all those titles.Sony on the other hand is obviously selling this product to people who do n't yet have a PSP and several of the originally UMD-only games are available already on the PSN store to purchase as downloads already ( and I 'd expect a majority to make the transition in time ) .Yes , if you have a classic PSP you 'll want to replace it with another UMD-supporting PSP to play those games , or you can sell them and re-purchase the downloadable versions when you miss them .
Yes , that 's a pain .
What did you do when you upgraded your SNES to your N64 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No offence, but Sony's got a much better backward-compatibility track record than Nintendo.Arguably backward compatibility has a lot more to do with your installed consumer base than anything else.
If you count the number of Gameboy games that were on the market by the time the color or advance units were released, it would have been simply foolish to lose all those titles.Sony on the other hand is obviously selling this product to people who don't yet have a PSP and several of the originally UMD-only games are available already on the PSN store to purchase as downloads already (and I'd expect a majority to make the transition in time).Yes, if you have a classic PSP you'll want to replace it with another UMD-supporting PSP to play those games, or you can sell them and re-purchase the downloadable versions when you miss them.
Yes, that's a pain.
What did you do when you upgraded your SNES to your N64?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197791</id>
	<title>Re:$250? Owch...</title>
	<author>xenolion</author>
	<datestamp>1244052060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yep its a Sony product over priced again...
Its a shame I was hoping that it would be around $150-180 and then I would think about buying it. $250 nope over priced again...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep its a Sony product over priced again.. . Its a shame I was hoping that it would be around $ 150-180 and then I would think about buying it .
$ 250 nope over priced again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep its a Sony product over priced again...
Its a shame I was hoping that it would be around $150-180 and then I would think about buying it.
$250 nope over priced again...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28206387</id>
	<title>Re:Failed design is fail.</title>
	<author>CronoCloud</author>
	<datestamp>1244146680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The PSP screen isn't fragile, it's tough.  Some kind of weird hard plastic, rather reflective and it shows smudges easy, but it doesn't scratch easy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The PSP screen is n't fragile , it 's tough .
Some kind of weird hard plastic , rather reflective and it shows smudges easy , but it does n't scratch easy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The PSP screen isn't fragile, it's tough.
Some kind of weird hard plastic, rather reflective and it shows smudges easy, but it doesn't scratch easy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199343</id>
	<title>Re:Failed design is fail.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244058900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing as there are over 50 million PSPs in the wild, you may be surprised that a number of other gamers don't share your opinion. Hey, don't worry, get back to your girly "game" machine, with it's 1980s level of "gaming". Be quick though, your "pet" dog or horse might need feeding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as there are over 50 million PSPs in the wild , you may be surprised that a number of other gamers do n't share your opinion .
Hey , do n't worry , get back to your girly " game " machine , with it 's 1980s level of " gaming " .
Be quick though , your " pet " dog or horse might need feeding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as there are over 50 million PSPs in the wild, you may be surprised that a number of other gamers don't share your opinion.
Hey, don't worry, get back to your girly "game" machine, with it's 1980s level of "gaming".
Be quick though, your "pet" dog or horse might need feeding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197799</id>
	<title>Intensely competitive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244052120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah... sure... if by, "intensely competitive," you mean that the DS / DSi are throttling all other handhelds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... sure... if by , " intensely competitive , " you mean that the DS / DSi are throttling all other handhelds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah... sure... if by, "intensely competitive," you mean that the DS / DSi are throttling all other handhelds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198455</id>
	<title>Re:Failed design is fail.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244054640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> If I'm gaming outside and it's raining, I just stick the thing in a ziplock bag.</p> </div><p>Playing outside in the rain?  Never again will I think of the DS as a system for casual players.  That's hardcore!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm gaming outside and it 's raining , I just stick the thing in a ziplock bag .
Playing outside in the rain ?
Never again will I think of the DS as a system for casual players .
That 's hardcore !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If I'm gaming outside and it's raining, I just stick the thing in a ziplock bag.
Playing outside in the rain?
Never again will I think of the DS as a system for casual players.
That's hardcore!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197779</id>
	<title>Hands-on With the Goatse Man</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244052000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ANkleStrong writes "Goat Corp unveiled on Tuesday a smaller, tighter Goatse anus called the Danica Patrick, in a race to catch rival Malda Corp in an intensely competitive mobile anus arena." E3 attendees were able to take the new Goatse handheld for a test drive, and more pictures and videos are now available. It's set to be released on October 1st, and will retail for $249. A new Slashdot Moderator anus is being designed specifically for the updated hardware, and kdawson version is coming as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ANkleStrong writes " Goat Corp unveiled on Tuesday a smaller , tighter Goatse anus called the Danica Patrick , in a race to catch rival Malda Corp in an intensely competitive mobile anus arena .
" E3 attendees were able to take the new Goatse handheld for a test drive , and more pictures and videos are now available .
It 's set to be released on October 1st , and will retail for $ 249 .
A new Slashdot Moderator anus is being designed specifically for the updated hardware , and kdawson version is coming as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ANkleStrong writes "Goat Corp unveiled on Tuesday a smaller, tighter Goatse anus called the Danica Patrick, in a race to catch rival Malda Corp in an intensely competitive mobile anus arena.
" E3 attendees were able to take the new Goatse handheld for a test drive, and more pictures and videos are now available.
It's set to be released on October 1st, and will retail for $249.
A new Slashdot Moderator anus is being designed specifically for the updated hardware, and kdawson version is coming as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197741</id>
	<title>PSP Go?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244051940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But, can it still play my rips of FF7-FF9/ANY ps1 game like my current PSP?  (1001 w/ 5.02 m33 firmware).  If not, Sony can PSPGO @#\%&amp; themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But , can it still play my rips of FF7-FF9/ANY ps1 game like my current PSP ?
( 1001 w/ 5.02 m33 firmware ) .
If not , Sony can PSPGO @ # \ % &amp; themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, can it still play my rips of FF7-FF9/ANY ps1 game like my current PSP?
(1001 w/ 5.02 m33 firmware).
If not, Sony can PSPGO @#\%&amp; themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28201945</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the PSP Cartman?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244025840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shut up, Jew.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shut up , Jew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shut up, Jew.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197771</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197731</id>
	<title>What's in this device that's new?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244051880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So removal of UMD drive, adding 16GB of flash, use of smaller display, smaller packaging, cost-reduced internal hardware (CPU,GPU), cheaper RAM (just because prices drop over time) results in a device that is significantly more expensive.</p><p>Does this device have a faster CPU and GPU than the current PSP?</p><p>What does it add over the current PSP besides $10 worth of flash memory?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So removal of UMD drive , adding 16GB of flash , use of smaller display , smaller packaging , cost-reduced internal hardware ( CPU,GPU ) , cheaper RAM ( just because prices drop over time ) results in a device that is significantly more expensive.Does this device have a faster CPU and GPU than the current PSP ? What does it add over the current PSP besides $ 10 worth of flash memory ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So removal of UMD drive, adding 16GB of flash, use of smaller display, smaller packaging, cost-reduced internal hardware (CPU,GPU), cheaper RAM (just because prices drop over time) results in a device that is significantly more expensive.Does this device have a faster CPU and GPU than the current PSP?What does it add over the current PSP besides $10 worth of flash memory?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197821</id>
	<title>Re:$250? Owch...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244052180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed. The only thing the Go has over the Vanilla PSP is bluetooth - huzzah, I guess? There was mention of being able to tether the Go to your phone, I'd be interested in seeing how that works out. But aside from that, the lack of added benefit will still run you an additional $80.<br> <br>

Sorry, Sony, but the price tag just shot this horse right out of the gate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
The only thing the Go has over the Vanilla PSP is bluetooth - huzzah , I guess ?
There was mention of being able to tether the Go to your phone , I 'd be interested in seeing how that works out .
But aside from that , the lack of added benefit will still run you an additional $ 80 .
Sorry , Sony , but the price tag just shot this horse right out of the gate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
The only thing the Go has over the Vanilla PSP is bluetooth - huzzah, I guess?
There was mention of being able to tether the Go to your phone, I'd be interested in seeing how that works out.
But aside from that, the lack of added benefit will still run you an additional $80.
Sorry, Sony, but the price tag just shot this horse right out of the gate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198601</id>
	<title>Re:Obviously not for kids.</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1244055240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>News flash:  the average age of a gamer these days is 30.</htmltext>
<tokenext>News flash : the average age of a gamer these days is 30 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>News flash:  the average age of a gamer these days is 30.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197777</id>
	<title>Re:$250? Owch...</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1244052000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly, I want me a PSP 2000 or 3000. Only one reason Tekken 5 &amp; 6.<br>
But at least those are not 250$, jebus cripes, I really dislike Sony and there constant overpricing of things.<br>
With the title selection and price tag a DS Lite looks a lot more tempting to Americans, Especially in this economy.<br>
There is a reason why I became and XBro, and so late to the part to PS2 also.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly , I want me a PSP 2000 or 3000 .
Only one reason Tekken 5 &amp; 6 .
But at least those are not 250 $ , jebus cripes , I really dislike Sony and there constant overpricing of things .
With the title selection and price tag a DS Lite looks a lot more tempting to Americans , Especially in this economy .
There is a reason why I became and XBro , and so late to the part to PS2 also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly, I want me a PSP 2000 or 3000.
Only one reason Tekken 5 &amp; 6.
But at least those are not 250$, jebus cripes, I really dislike Sony and there constant overpricing of things.
With the title selection and price tag a DS Lite looks a lot more tempting to Americans, Especially in this economy.
There is a reason why I became and XBro, and so late to the part to PS2 also.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28211731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28206415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197821
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28206387
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28210075
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200359
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28283037
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198601
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28211339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197791
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198665
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28201945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197771
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200641
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_1611245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197771
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28201945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28211731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198059
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199621
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198665
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28206415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198499
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198601
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28283037
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197741
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197949
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28199343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28198997
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28210075
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200347
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28206387
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28211339
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197789
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197821
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197791
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28200641
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_1611245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_1611245.28197731
</commentlist>
</conversation>
