<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_03_0147245</id>
	<title>Research Vehicle Reaches the Bottom of the Ocean</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1244040240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>timothy found BBC coverage of the voyage of the Nereus, which on May 31 dove to the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8080324.stm">bottom of the Challenger Deep in the Marianas Trench</a>. Only two vehicles have accomplished this feat before, the last 11 years ago. <i>"The unmanned vehicle is remotely operated by pilots aboard a surface ship via a lightweight tether. Its thin, fibre-optic tether to the research vessel Kilo Moana allows the submersible to make deep dives and be highly manoeuvrable. Nereus can also be switched into a free-swimming, autonomous vehicle. ... The Challenger Deep... is the deepest abyss on Earth at 11,000m-deep, more than 2km (1.2 miles) deeper than Mount Everest is high. At that depth, pressures reach 1,100 times those at the surface."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>timothy found BBC coverage of the voyage of the Nereus , which on May 31 dove to the bottom of the Challenger Deep in the Marianas Trench .
Only two vehicles have accomplished this feat before , the last 11 years ago .
" The unmanned vehicle is remotely operated by pilots aboard a surface ship via a lightweight tether .
Its thin , fibre-optic tether to the research vessel Kilo Moana allows the submersible to make deep dives and be highly manoeuvrable .
Nereus can also be switched into a free-swimming , autonomous vehicle .
... The Challenger Deep... is the deepest abyss on Earth at 11,000m-deep , more than 2km ( 1.2 miles ) deeper than Mount Everest is high .
At that depth , pressures reach 1,100 times those at the surface .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>timothy found BBC coverage of the voyage of the Nereus, which on May 31 dove to the bottom of the Challenger Deep in the Marianas Trench.
Only two vehicles have accomplished this feat before, the last 11 years ago.
"The unmanned vehicle is remotely operated by pilots aboard a surface ship via a lightweight tether.
Its thin, fibre-optic tether to the research vessel Kilo Moana allows the submersible to make deep dives and be highly manoeuvrable.
Nereus can also be switched into a free-swimming, autonomous vehicle.
... The Challenger Deep... is the deepest abyss on Earth at 11,000m-deep, more than 2km (1.2 miles) deeper than Mount Everest is high.
At that depth, pressures reach 1,100 times those at the surface.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194429</id>
	<title>I would love to set up point beacons</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1244037840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know it is interesting that we have sent a sub down there, but it would have been cool to also send down tech that could record any sealife down there on webcam...and place beacons per each say 1000ft to be able to keep sending commands down to each camera to be able to control their movement...pan right up down...etc... We were able to send 2 rovers to the moon, could we not just do something to leave behind to record, so we don't have to keep going down there every 11 years...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know it is interesting that we have sent a sub down there , but it would have been cool to also send down tech that could record any sealife down there on webcam...and place beacons per each say 1000ft to be able to keep sending commands down to each camera to be able to control their movement...pan right up down...etc... We were able to send 2 rovers to the moon , could we not just do something to leave behind to record , so we do n't have to keep going down there every 11 years.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know it is interesting that we have sent a sub down there, but it would have been cool to also send down tech that could record any sealife down there on webcam...and place beacons per each say 1000ft to be able to keep sending commands down to each camera to be able to control their movement...pan right up down...etc... We were able to send 2 rovers to the moon, could we not just do something to leave behind to record, so we don't have to keep going down there every 11 years...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191207</id>
	<title>Only Two Vehicles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243958040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plus all the boats that sank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus all the boats that sank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus all the boats that sank.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28201845</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244025540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>far less than a millimeter of penetration</p></div><p>I am sure most Slashdotters have individual workarounds for these kinds of deficiencies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>far less than a millimeter of penetrationI am sure most Slashdotters have individual workarounds for these kinds of deficiencies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>far less than a millimeter of penetrationI am sure most Slashdotters have individual workarounds for these kinds of deficiencies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125</id>
	<title>Are you ready kids?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243957620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aye aye, Captain!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aye aye , Captain !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aye aye, Captain!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191367</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1243959240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because of the electrical conductivity of salt water, submarines are shielded from most electromagnetic communications.</p><p>Very low frequency signals can penetrate about 20 meters.</p><p>Extremely low frequency signals can be received from deeper but are extremely limited in bandwidth.. and you need to use the whole earth as an antenna, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because of the electrical conductivity of salt water , submarines are shielded from most electromagnetic communications.Very low frequency signals can penetrate about 20 meters.Extremely low frequency signals can be received from deeper but are extremely limited in bandwidth.. and you need to use the whole earth as an antenna , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because of the electrical conductivity of salt water, submarines are shielded from most electromagnetic communications.Very low frequency signals can penetrate about 20 meters.Extremely low frequency signals can be received from deeper but are extremely limited in bandwidth.. and you need to use the whole earth as an antenna, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191831</id>
	<title>Say hello to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243963680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Megatron for me.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Megatron for me.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Megatron for me.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28193883</id>
	<title>Nah,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244033160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as everyone here knows, the deepest abyss on Earth is goatse.</p><p>P.S. why am I getting "useless" as captcha?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as everyone here knows , the deepest abyss on Earth is goatse.P.S .
why am I getting " useless " as captcha ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as everyone here knows, the deepest abyss on Earth is goatse.P.S.
why am I getting "useless" as captcha?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191439</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>A nonymous Coward</author>
	<datestamp>1243959780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty poor troll.  Anyone who knows the existence of words like "dielectric" already knows the answer.</p><p>Next time pay more attention to playing dumb.  You are out of your depth, troll-wise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty poor troll .
Anyone who knows the existence of words like " dielectric " already knows the answer.Next time pay more attention to playing dumb .
You are out of your depth , troll-wise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty poor troll.
Anyone who knows the existence of words like "dielectric" already knows the answer.Next time pay more attention to playing dumb.
You are out of your depth, troll-wise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28193521</id>
	<title>Reaching the bottom of the sea is *easy*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244027940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's getting back to the surface intact that's the trick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's getting back to the surface intact that 's the trick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's getting back to the surface intact that's the trick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28201329</id>
	<title>Re:color me not impressed</title>
	<author>Starcub</author>
	<datestamp>1244023800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>350 ft/s is about 238 miles per hour.  That would mean that the underwater vessel would be traveling at about 330 miles per hour.  That's jet aircraft speed.  I find that highly unlikely as well, especially in a manned vehicle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>350 ft/s is about 238 miles per hour .
That would mean that the underwater vessel would be traveling at about 330 miles per hour .
That 's jet aircraft speed .
I find that highly unlikely as well , especially in a manned vehicle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>350 ft/s is about 238 miles per hour.
That would mean that the underwater vessel would be traveling at about 330 miles per hour.
That's jet aircraft speed.
I find that highly unlikely as well, especially in a manned vehicle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28195287</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191205</id>
	<title>All I want to know..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243958040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do they have a good pizza/wing place down there?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they have a good pizza/wing place down there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they have a good pizza/wing place down there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194923</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1244040120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Water blocks radio. If Radio worked don't you think they would have used it?<br>The only way to send radio under water is to use ELF extremely low frequency radio. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely\_low\_frequency" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely\_low\_frequency</a> [wikipedia.org]<br>As you can see the data rate is in bits per minute...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Water blocks radio .
If Radio worked do n't you think they would have used it ? The only way to send radio under water is to use ELF extremely low frequency radio .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely \ _low \ _frequency [ wikipedia.org ] As you can see the data rate is in bits per minute.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Water blocks radio.
If Radio worked don't you think they would have used it?The only way to send radio under water is to use ELF extremely low frequency radio.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely\_low\_frequency [wikipedia.org]As you can see the data rate is in bits per minute...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28193429</id>
	<title>That reminds me of...</title>
	<author>Fishchip</author>
	<datestamp>1244026260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>We call out to the beasts of the sea to come forth and join us, this night is yours<br>
Because, one day we will all be with you in the black and deep<br>
One day we will all go into the water</i> <br>
<br>
Man, I need that to help wake up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We call out to the beasts of the sea to come forth and join us , this night is yours Because , one day we will all be with you in the black and deep One day we will all go into the water Man , I need that to help wake up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We call out to the beasts of the sea to come forth and join us, this night is yours
Because, one day we will all be with you in the black and deep
One day we will all go into the water 

Man, I need that to help wake up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192039</id>
	<title>Re:undersea progress</title>
	<author>LoRdTAW</author>
	<datestamp>1243966020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, Dethklok recording their new album and a giant radioactive seahorse.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , Dethklok recording their new album and a giant radioactive seahorse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, Dethklok recording their new album and a giant radioactive seahorse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191721</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder if my great^8 grandkids</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243962600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Unlikely, seeing as the gas giant planets don't <i>have</i> surfaces.</p></div><p>The sun is a planet?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlikely , seeing as the gas giant planets do n't have surfaces.The sun is a planet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlikely, seeing as the gas giant planets don't have surfaces.The sun is a planet?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191385</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191343</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>commlinx</author>
	<datestamp>1243959060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>First, the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Yes salt water is very good at attenuating RF, the higher the frequency the worse it is. Have a look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely\_low\_frequency" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely\_low\_frequency</a> [wikipedia.org] on Wikipedia that highlights some of the difficulties, especially in relation to antenna size. Also at those frequencies you can end up with transmission rates less than one bit per second.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions .
Yes salt water is very good at attenuating RF , the higher the frequency the worse it is .
Have a look at http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely \ _low \ _frequency [ wikipedia.org ] on Wikipedia that highlights some of the difficulties , especially in relation to antenna size .
Also at those frequencies you can end up with transmission rates less than one bit per second .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.
Yes salt water is very good at attenuating RF, the higher the frequency the worse it is.
Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely\_low\_frequency [wikipedia.org] on Wikipedia that highlights some of the difficulties, especially in relation to antenna size.
Also at those frequencies you can end up with transmission rates less than one bit per second.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191389</id>
	<title>Re:undersea progress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243959360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, first they have to finish something more important: This thread is useless without pics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , first they have to finish something more important : This thread is useless without pics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, first they have to finish something more important: This thread is useless without pics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191605</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>ssimmons</author>
	<datestamp>1243961760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.</p></div><p>
The ocean isn't just good at blocking transmissions.  It's <i>ridiculously</i> good at blocking radio waves.  If you work the math on <a href="http://www.qsl.net/vk5br/UwaterComms.htm" title="qsl.net" rel="nofollow">this</a> [qsl.net] page, you can see that your basic WiFi transmission (at 2.4 GHz) will experience an attenuation of almost 1700 dB/meter!  At that rate you'd get far less than a millimeter of penetration.</p><p>
Even the lowest frequency short wave bands (1.8 MHz) get 46 dB/meter attenuation.  It starts to get possible to receive RF when you get down in the kHz range but of course, your data rate goes to hell.</p><p>
For underwater communications under a couple hundred meters or so you can use an acoustic modem.  Even then, your best data rate is going to be on the order 2400 baud or less.</p><p>

If you want high speed underwater communications, you gotta use a cable.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions .
The ocean is n't just good at blocking transmissions .
It 's ridiculously good at blocking radio waves .
If you work the math on this [ qsl.net ] page , you can see that your basic WiFi transmission ( at 2.4 GHz ) will experience an attenuation of almost 1700 dB/meter !
At that rate you 'd get far less than a millimeter of penetration .
Even the lowest frequency short wave bands ( 1.8 MHz ) get 46 dB/meter attenuation .
It starts to get possible to receive RF when you get down in the kHz range but of course , your data rate goes to hell .
For underwater communications under a couple hundred meters or so you can use an acoustic modem .
Even then , your best data rate is going to be on the order 2400 baud or less .
If you want high speed underwater communications , you got ta use a cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.
The ocean isn't just good at blocking transmissions.
It's ridiculously good at blocking radio waves.
If you work the math on this [qsl.net] page, you can see that your basic WiFi transmission (at 2.4 GHz) will experience an attenuation of almost 1700 dB/meter!
At that rate you'd get far less than a millimeter of penetration.
Even the lowest frequency short wave bands (1.8 MHz) get 46 dB/meter attenuation.
It starts to get possible to receive RF when you get down in the kHz range but of course, your data rate goes to hell.
For underwater communications under a couple hundred meters or so you can use an acoustic modem.
Even then, your best data rate is going to be on the order 2400 baud or less.
If you want high speed underwater communications, you gotta use a cable.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191189</id>
	<title>I wonder if my great^8 grandkids</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243957920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will see a craft reach the surface of one of the gaseous giants.  Now that would be a helluva science and engineering project.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will see a craft reach the surface of one of the gaseous giants .
Now that would be a helluva science and engineering project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will see a craft reach the surface of one of the gaseous giants.
Now that would be a helluva science and engineering project.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28195167</id>
	<title>Already been done?</title>
	<author>Lost Penguin</author>
	<datestamp>1244041320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't the Titanic already make this journey?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/Oh, you meant "and returned".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>//My bad...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't the Titanic already make this journey ?
/Oh , you meant " and returned " .
//My bad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't the Titanic already make this journey?
/Oh, you meant "and returned".
//My bad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196343</id>
	<title>Units, anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244046300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"11,000m-deep, more than 2km (1.2 miles) deeper than Mount Everest is high."  WTF? Someone is confused. It *is* deeper than Everest is tall though...</p><p>You have: 29000 feet<br>You want: miles<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * 5.4924242<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; / 0.18206897<br>You have: 11000 meters<br>You want: miles<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * 6.8350831<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; / 0.146304</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 11,000m-deep , more than 2km ( 1.2 miles ) deeper than Mount Everest is high .
" WTF ?
Someone is confused .
It * is * deeper than Everest is tall though...You have : 29000 feetYou want : miles                 * 5.4924242                 / 0.18206897You have : 11000 metersYou want : miles                 * 6.8350831                 / 0.146304</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"11,000m-deep, more than 2km (1.2 miles) deeper than Mount Everest is high.
"  WTF?
Someone is confused.
It *is* deeper than Everest is tall though...You have: 29000 feetYou want: miles
                * 5.4924242
                / 0.18206897You have: 11000 metersYou want: miles
                * 6.8350831
                / 0.146304</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191559</id>
	<title>Re:Are you ready kids?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243961220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have an iPhone stuck up my ass.  What do I do?!?!?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iPhone stuck up my ass .
What do I do ? ! ? ! ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iPhone stuck up my ass.
What do I do?!?!?!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28204455</id>
	<title>Whoosh.</title>
	<author>OgGreeb</author>
	<datestamp>1244038140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, did they see the plug?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , did they see the plug ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, did they see the plug?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28195979</id>
	<title>Big deal, I've been to the bottom of the ocean</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1244044800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Granted, it wasn't he really deep parts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Granted , it was n't he really deep parts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Granted, it wasn't he really deep parts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192631</id>
	<title>Re:how hard can it be?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244059620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Something that won't crumple in 1,100 atmospheres, sweety.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Something that wo n't crumple in 1,100 atmospheres , sweety .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something that won't crumple in 1,100 atmospheres, sweety.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191359</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191571</id>
	<title>And what did they find?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243961400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MEGATRON!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MEGATRON ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MEGATRON!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196113</id>
	<title>Light Comms</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244045340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might be able to use light, though I don't know how far that would get.  Certainly it's dark on the ocean floor, even in full daylight.  In fact I think it's pretty dark after a couple hundred feet.</p><p>However, a high power laser of optimum wavelength might blast a ways through it, at least enough for a glimmer to show up on the receiving end.</p><p>How you would power such a thing on the bottom of the ocean for an extended period beats me.</p><p>Perhaps a relay team of dolphins could pass the message along...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might be able to use light , though I do n't know how far that would get .
Certainly it 's dark on the ocean floor , even in full daylight .
In fact I think it 's pretty dark after a couple hundred feet.However , a high power laser of optimum wavelength might blast a ways through it , at least enough for a glimmer to show up on the receiving end.How you would power such a thing on the bottom of the ocean for an extended period beats me.Perhaps a relay team of dolphins could pass the message along.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might be able to use light, though I don't know how far that would get.
Certainly it's dark on the ocean floor, even in full daylight.
In fact I think it's pretty dark after a couple hundred feet.However, a high power laser of optimum wavelength might blast a ways through it, at least enough for a glimmer to show up on the receiving end.How you would power such a thing on the bottom of the ocean for an extended period beats me.Perhaps a relay team of dolphins could pass the message along...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191605</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28205331</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?  I'm too lazy to look it up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244045700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Oh, gee, I'm too bloody lazy to even fire up google or wikipedia.   And I've been asleep at school since grade 6.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Idiot.  Lazy idiot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , gee , I 'm too bloody lazy to even fire up google or wikipedia .
And I 've been asleep at school since grade 6 .
Idiot. Lazy idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, gee, I'm too bloody lazy to even fire up google or wikipedia.
And I've been asleep at school since grade 6.
Idiot.  Lazy idiot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191217</id>
	<title>Pray for some luck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243958100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope that while down there, those folks can find some life forms with proteins that can fight off the AIDS or cancer menace.</p><p>It's sad that when afflicted by these diseases, the prognosis on the whole, is a death sentence. That is to say, it's a matter of time before the diseases exhaust your will to live.</p><p>Sad indeed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that while down there , those folks can find some life forms with proteins that can fight off the AIDS or cancer menace.It 's sad that when afflicted by these diseases , the prognosis on the whole , is a death sentence .
That is to say , it 's a matter of time before the diseases exhaust your will to live.Sad indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope that while down there, those folks can find some life forms with proteins that can fight off the AIDS or cancer menace.It's sad that when afflicted by these diseases, the prognosis on the whole, is a death sentence.
That is to say, it's a matter of time before the diseases exhaust your will to live.Sad indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196435</id>
	<title>Pineapple</title>
	<author>blueforce</author>
	<datestamp>1244046780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In related news, researchers have also discovered who actually lives in a pineapple under the sea.</p><p>News at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In related news , researchers have also discovered who actually lives in a pineapple under the sea.News at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In related news, researchers have also discovered who actually lives in a pineapple under the sea.News at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28202047</id>
	<title>Re:Nice, but what does it do?</title>
	<author>Mal-2</author>
	<datestamp>1244026200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is best to explore and deliberately push the boundaries of these craft. You never know when they might be required urgently for something like the Air France Flight 447 black box search, and it is best to break them when there is time to fix them, rather than when they just have to work.</p><p>Mal-2</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is best to explore and deliberately push the boundaries of these craft .
You never know when they might be required urgently for something like the Air France Flight 447 black box search , and it is best to break them when there is time to fix them , rather than when they just have to work.Mal-2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is best to explore and deliberately push the boundaries of these craft.
You never know when they might be required urgently for something like the Air France Flight 447 black box search, and it is best to break them when there is time to fix them, rather than when they just have to work.Mal-2</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192237</id>
	<title>Re:undersea progress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243968600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've been there before, with a manned craft, back in the 60s.  They used something called a bathyscaphe.  They just found some flounder down there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've been there before , with a manned craft , back in the 60s .
They used something called a bathyscaphe .
They just found some flounder down there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've been there before, with a manned craft, back in the 60s.
They used something called a bathyscaphe.
They just found some flounder down there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192731</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244060820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations - you managed to be so wrong that you were modded Funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations - you managed to be so wrong that you were modded Funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations - you managed to be so wrong that you were modded Funny.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191275</id>
	<title>When will</title>
	<author>schrodingers\_rabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1243958520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>submersibles actually manage to stay at the bottom of the trench for extended lengths of time? Short visits can only tell scientists so much about ordinary conditions. A permanent unmaned observation station could record a much larger data sample. Now all that's left to do is develop technologies that can withstand the pressure and power themselves of sulphur-feeding clamlike tube creatures.</htmltext>
<tokenext>submersibles actually manage to stay at the bottom of the trench for extended lengths of time ?
Short visits can only tell scientists so much about ordinary conditions .
A permanent unmaned observation station could record a much larger data sample .
Now all that 's left to do is develop technologies that can withstand the pressure and power themselves of sulphur-feeding clamlike tube creatures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>submersibles actually manage to stay at the bottom of the trench for extended lengths of time?
Short visits can only tell scientists so much about ordinary conditions.
A permanent unmaned observation station could record a much larger data sample.
Now all that's left to do is develop technologies that can withstand the pressure and power themselves of sulphur-feeding clamlike tube creatures.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191617</id>
	<title>What They Aren't Telling Us...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243961820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that they found an undersea kingdom full of nubile, singing mermaids wearing clamshell bras.</p><p>Disney and Universal are in a bidding war for the rights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that they found an undersea kingdom full of nubile , singing mermaids wearing clamshell bras.Disney and Universal are in a bidding war for the rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that they found an undersea kingdom full of nubile, singing mermaids wearing clamshell bras.Disney and Universal are in a bidding war for the rights.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194569</id>
	<title>Re:undersea progress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244038560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who know's <a href="http://www.macguff.fr/goomi/unspeakable/vault301.html" title="macguff.fr" rel="nofollow">what they'll find...</a> [macguff.fr]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who know 's what they 'll find... [ macguff.fr ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who know's what they'll find... [macguff.fr]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192237</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192923</id>
	<title>Twists in the fiber optic cable</title>
	<author>FranTaylor</author>
	<datestamp>1244019900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I worked on an ROV simulation back in the 90's and we needed to keep track of how many times the ROV turned around because twists accumulate in the cable.  At some point you may have to sit in place and spin for a bit to undo the twists.  Terrible things happen when the tether gets too twisted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I worked on an ROV simulation back in the 90 's and we needed to keep track of how many times the ROV turned around because twists accumulate in the cable .
At some point you may have to sit in place and spin for a bit to undo the twists .
Terrible things happen when the tether gets too twisted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I worked on an ROV simulation back in the 90's and we needed to keep track of how many times the ROV turned around because twists accumulate in the cable.
At some point you may have to sit in place and spin for a bit to undo the twists.
Terrible things happen when the tether gets too twisted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196527</id>
	<title>Re:undersea progress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To hell with Seaquest, let's build Rapture, in exactly the same way as it was in Bioshock, no silly laws to hold back the great, etc.</p><p>Actually, i feel like playing it now, but i'm trying to get this damned PHP to bend to my will at the moment...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To hell with Seaquest , let 's build Rapture , in exactly the same way as it was in Bioshock , no silly laws to hold back the great , etc.Actually , i feel like playing it now , but i 'm trying to get this damned PHP to bend to my will at the moment.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To hell with Seaquest, let's build Rapture, in exactly the same way as it was in Bioshock, no silly laws to hold back the great, etc.Actually, i feel like playing it now, but i'm trying to get this damned PHP to bend to my will at the moment...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</id>
	<title>Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>Lord Byron II</author>
	<datestamp>1243958760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody smarter than myself, please comment on why we need a cable over a distance of 11km? There's a ton of off-the-shelf radio equipment that can easily handle that distance with very high bitrates.</p><p>I can imagine two possible problems:</p><p>First, the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.</p><p>Second, the varying pressures and temperatures might distort a signal to the point where it is unusable. I'm referring to dielectric effects and the fact that the dielectric constant would not be constant in this sort of operation. But would it be "constant-enough"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody smarter than myself , please comment on why we need a cable over a distance of 11km ?
There 's a ton of off-the-shelf radio equipment that can easily handle that distance with very high bitrates.I can imagine two possible problems : First , the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.Second , the varying pressures and temperatures might distort a signal to the point where it is unusable .
I 'm referring to dielectric effects and the fact that the dielectric constant would not be constant in this sort of operation .
But would it be " constant-enough " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody smarter than myself, please comment on why we need a cable over a distance of 11km?
There's a ton of off-the-shelf radio equipment that can easily handle that distance with very high bitrates.I can imagine two possible problems:First, the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.Second, the varying pressures and temperatures might distort a signal to the point where it is unusable.
I'm referring to dielectric effects and the fact that the dielectric constant would not be constant in this sort of operation.
But would it be "constant-enough"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192269</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder if my great^8 grandkids</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243968900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sun is a mass of incandescent gas<br>A gigantic nuclear furnace<br>Where hydrogen is built into helium<br>At a temperature of millions of degrees.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sun is a mass of incandescent gasA gigantic nuclear furnaceWhere hydrogen is built into heliumAt a temperature of millions of degrees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sun is a mass of incandescent gasA gigantic nuclear furnaceWhere hydrogen is built into heliumAt a temperature of millions of degrees.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191721</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191385</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder if my great^8 grandkids</title>
	<author>Geoffrey.landis</author>
	<datestamp>1243959360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Will see a craft reach the surface of one of the gaseous giants.</p>  </div><p>Unlikely, seeing as the gas giant planets don't <i>have</i> surfaces.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will see a craft reach the surface of one of the gaseous giants .
Unlikely , seeing as the gas giant planets do n't have surfaces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will see a craft reach the surface of one of the gaseous giants.
Unlikely, seeing as the gas giant planets don't have surfaces.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28197053</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder if my great^8 grandkids</title>
	<author>mrdoogee</author>
	<datestamp>1244049240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo-ho Its hot<br>The Sun is not<br>A place where we could live</p><p>But here on Earth<br>There'd be no life<br>Without the light it gives</p><p>We need its light<br>We need its heat<br>We need its energy<br>Without the sun, without a doubt<br>There'd be no you and me</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo-ho Its hotThe Sun is notA place where we could liveBut here on EarthThere 'd be no lifeWithout the light it givesWe need its lightWe need its heatWe need its energyWithout the sun , without a doubtThere 'd be no you and me</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo-ho Its hotThe Sun is notA place where we could liveBut here on EarthThere'd be no lifeWithout the light it givesWe need its lightWe need its heatWe need its energyWithout the sun, without a doubtThere'd be no you and me</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192269</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194839</id>
	<title>Re:All I want to know..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244039760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, but you can get a good Krabby Patty at the Krusty Krab down there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but you can get a good Krabby Patty at the Krusty Krab down there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but you can get a good Krabby Patty at the Krusty Krab down there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191359</id>
	<title>how hard can it be?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243959180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to belittle the achievement, but how hard can it be to make something that won't crumple? Does every bit of equipment need to be at 1 atmosphere for it to function? Are there no solid-state components?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to belittle the achievement , but how hard can it be to make something that wo n't crumple ?
Does every bit of equipment need to be at 1 atmosphere for it to function ?
Are there no solid-state components ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to belittle the achievement, but how hard can it be to make something that won't crumple?
Does every bit of equipment need to be at 1 atmosphere for it to function?
Are there no solid-state components?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192103</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>InfoJunkie777</author>
	<datestamp>1243966860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I saw on the Science Channel show "Brink" about experimental LASER communication for close-range ship or sub-to-sub communications or sub to aircraft communications.  Here is a link to the people trying to perfect it:  <a href="http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jav/jav\_0184.html" title="janes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jav/jav\_0184.html</a> [janes.com].  It seems to hold some promise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw on the Science Channel show " Brink " about experimental LASER communication for close-range ship or sub-to-sub communications or sub to aircraft communications .
Here is a link to the people trying to perfect it : http : //www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jav/jav \ _0184.html [ janes.com ] .
It seems to hold some promise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw on the Science Channel show "Brink" about experimental LASER communication for close-range ship or sub-to-sub communications or sub to aircraft communications.
Here is a link to the people trying to perfect it:  http://www.janes.com/extracts/extract/jav/jav\_0184.html [janes.com].
It seems to hold some promise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191381</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191581</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243961520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why the fuck do you think people are using SONAR underwater, and not radio?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why the fuck do you think people are using SONAR underwater , and not radio ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why the fuck do you think people are using SONAR underwater, and not radio?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191311</id>
	<title>Nice, but what does it do?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243958880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It may give us access to 100\% of the sea floor, but given the expense of sea exploration, how much will we actually explore?  Setting records is nice and all, but it takes time, effort, and money to map the deep sea floor in any kind of detail.</p><p>It should be able to take samples and such, but what about repeat dives?  The artile was a bit lacking, but hopefully google will turn up the juicy details on this particular little bot....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It may give us access to 100 \ % of the sea floor , but given the expense of sea exploration , how much will we actually explore ?
Setting records is nice and all , but it takes time , effort , and money to map the deep sea floor in any kind of detail.It should be able to take samples and such , but what about repeat dives ?
The artile was a bit lacking , but hopefully google will turn up the juicy details on this particular little bot... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may give us access to 100\% of the sea floor, but given the expense of sea exploration, how much will we actually explore?
Setting records is nice and all, but it takes time, effort, and money to map the deep sea floor in any kind of detail.It should be able to take samples and such, but what about repeat dives?
The artile was a bit lacking, but hopefully google will turn up the juicy details on this particular little bot....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191295</id>
	<title>Re:Are you ready kids?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243958760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod parent up!  First post <i>and</i> on-topic!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up !
First post and on-topic !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up!
First post and on-topic!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191429</id>
	<title>So then they were the first customers</title>
	<author>moniker127</author>
	<datestamp>1243959720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to the walmart setup down there by one of the previous vehicles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>to the walmart setup down there by one of the previous vehicles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to the walmart setup down there by one of the previous vehicles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194345</id>
	<title>Obligatory Talking Heads</title>
	<author>Dripdry</author>
	<datestamp>1244037300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remove the water, carry the water!<br>Remove the water, from the bottom of the ocean!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remove the water , carry the water ! Remove the water , from the bottom of the ocean !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remove the water, carry the water!Remove the water, from the bottom of the ocean!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192247</id>
	<title>But check out what it brought back!</title>
	<author>SomeGuyFromCA</author>
	<datestamp>1243968720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"They said it was hauled from the Challenger Deep, but I'm positive that beast never swam in terrestrial waters until a week ago."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" They said it was hauled from the Challenger Deep , but I 'm positive that beast never swam in terrestrial waters until a week ago .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"They said it was hauled from the Challenger Deep, but I'm positive that beast never swam in terrestrial waters until a week ago.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191271</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder if my great^8 grandkids</title>
	<author>The\_mad\_linguist</author>
	<datestamp>1243958460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah?  Well, I'm going to be the first man to set foot on the surface of the sun!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah ?
Well , I 'm going to be the first man to set foot on the surface of the sun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah?
Well, I'm going to be the first man to set foot on the surface of the sun!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191189</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192533</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>fractoid</author>
	<datestamp>1243971780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, try explaining to a government official that you need more funding because you're using elves to talk to your submarine.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , try explaining to a government official that you need more funding because you 're using elves to talk to your submarine .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, try explaining to a government official that you need more funding because you're using elves to talk to your submarine.
:P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191343</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191893</id>
	<title>No biggie...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243964160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The last time this happened was seven hours ago.  And the slashdot post announcing it appears to be identical...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last time this happened was seven hours ago .
And the slashdot post announcing it appears to be identical.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last time this happened was seven hours ago.
And the slashdot post announcing it appears to be identical...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137</id>
	<title>undersea progress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243957620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, that is great. Hope they find some interesting stuff down there. Maybe some animals we didn't even know existed.

Next up: Building the Seaquest</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that is great .
Hope they find some interesting stuff down there .
Maybe some animals we did n't even know existed .
Next up : Building the Seaquest</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that is great.
Hope they find some interesting stuff down there.
Maybe some animals we didn't even know existed.
Next up: Building the Seaquest</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191357</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1243959180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>First, the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.</i></p><p>I don't have direct knowledge of the behavior of radio waves in water, but I would strongly guess this.</p><p>Even sunlight peters out at depths measured in dozens of feet, and that you need pretty strong lights to illuminate even 10 feet in front of you if you're at the bottom. Going through two miles of water would likely be quite a feat.</p><p>Further, I'm pretty sure that the reason water is "blue" is that blue light tends to penetrate better (think looking up from the perspective of a SCUBA diver 20 or 30 feet down), which suggests that longer wavelengths get blocked more, which is exactly the <i>opposite</i> of what you would want for radio penetration.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.I do n't have direct knowledge of the behavior of radio waves in water , but I would strongly guess this.Even sunlight peters out at depths measured in dozens of feet , and that you need pretty strong lights to illuminate even 10 feet in front of you if you 're at the bottom .
Going through two miles of water would likely be quite a feat.Further , I 'm pretty sure that the reason water is " blue " is that blue light tends to penetrate better ( think looking up from the perspective of a SCUBA diver 20 or 30 feet down ) , which suggests that longer wavelengths get blocked more , which is exactly the opposite of what you would want for radio penetration .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, the ocean might simply be good at blocking transmissions.I don't have direct knowledge of the behavior of radio waves in water, but I would strongly guess this.Even sunlight peters out at depths measured in dozens of feet, and that you need pretty strong lights to illuminate even 10 feet in front of you if you're at the bottom.
Going through two miles of water would likely be quite a feat.Further, I'm pretty sure that the reason water is "blue" is that blue light tends to penetrate better (think looking up from the perspective of a SCUBA diver 20 or 30 feet down), which suggests that longer wavelengths get blocked more, which is exactly the opposite of what you would want for radio penetration.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191391</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243959360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Somebody smarter than myself, please comment on why we need a cable over a distance of 11km? There's a ton of off-the-shelf radio equipment that can easily handle that distance with very high bitrates.</p></div><p>really? a ton of radio equipment capable of transmitting through 11km of water? oh, you meant through air? wtf does that have to do with this? 802.11 signal strength fluctuates with the humidity in the air, you dont think 11km of water might have some affect on signal propagation?<br>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm referring to dielectric effects and the fact that the dielectric constant would not be constant in this sort of operation. But would it be "constant-enough"?</p></div><p>could you have any more of a wank fest? did you just learn the word dielectric and feel the need to try it out and impress some geeks? the "IM A FUCKING MORON" sign on your forehead is a dead giveaway</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody smarter than myself , please comment on why we need a cable over a distance of 11km ?
There 's a ton of off-the-shelf radio equipment that can easily handle that distance with very high bitrates.really ?
a ton of radio equipment capable of transmitting through 11km of water ?
oh , you meant through air ?
wtf does that have to do with this ?
802.11 signal strength fluctuates with the humidity in the air , you dont think 11km of water might have some affect on signal propagation ?
  I 'm referring to dielectric effects and the fact that the dielectric constant would not be constant in this sort of operation .
But would it be " constant-enough " ? could you have any more of a wank fest ?
did you just learn the word dielectric and feel the need to try it out and impress some geeks ?
the " IM A FUCKING MORON " sign on your forehead is a dead giveaway</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody smarter than myself, please comment on why we need a cable over a distance of 11km?
There's a ton of off-the-shelf radio equipment that can easily handle that distance with very high bitrates.really?
a ton of radio equipment capable of transmitting through 11km of water?
oh, you meant through air?
wtf does that have to do with this?
802.11 signal strength fluctuates with the humidity in the air, you dont think 11km of water might have some affect on signal propagation?
  I'm referring to dielectric effects and the fact that the dielectric constant would not be constant in this sort of operation.
But would it be "constant-enough"?could you have any more of a wank fest?
did you just learn the word dielectric and feel the need to try it out and impress some geeks?
the "IM A FUCKING MORON" sign on your forehead is a dead giveaway
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192009</id>
	<title>Re:Are you ready kids?</title>
	<author>spyder-implee</author>
	<datestamp>1243965660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And...
There will be no accusations, just friendly crustaceans.
Under the sea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And.. . There will be no accusations , just friendly crustaceans .
Under the sea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And...
There will be no accusations, just friendly crustaceans.
Under the sea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28195287</id>
	<title>color me not impressed</title>
	<author>kel-tor</author>
	<datestamp>1244041860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Currently, the deepest-rated vehicles are able to descend to 6,500m, allowing scientists access to 95\% of the seafloor.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>Deep Flight Challenger</p><p>Deep Flight Challenger was built to enable adventurer, Steve Fossett, to set the ultimate solo dive record for all time (37,000 feet). Unfortunately Fossett perished in a plane crash before he could dive the submersible to record depth. Hawkes Ocean Technologies is now the only organization in the world that has full ocean depth technology.</p><p>Flight endurance: full ocean depth and back in 5 hours<br>Speed: Cruise  2.2 knots; Max  3 knots<br>Ascent/Descent Rate:350 feet/second at +/- 45 degrees<br>Operating Depth: 37,000 fsw<br>Crew: 1</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.deepflight.com/subs/df\_challenger.htm" title="deepflight.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.deepflight.com/subs/df\_challenger.htm</a> [deepflight.com]</p><p>37,000 feet &gt; 6,500m normally.  News reporters seldom seem to actually fully understand reality or what they are reporting, is it any wonder that the rest of the news sounds so distorted and that headlines are usually one way hashes?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Currently , the deepest-rated vehicles are able to descend to 6,500m , allowing scientists access to 95 \ % of the seafloor.Deep Flight ChallengerDeep Flight Challenger was built to enable adventurer , Steve Fossett , to set the ultimate solo dive record for all time ( 37,000 feet ) .
Unfortunately Fossett perished in a plane crash before he could dive the submersible to record depth .
Hawkes Ocean Technologies is now the only organization in the world that has full ocean depth technology.Flight endurance : full ocean depth and back in 5 hoursSpeed : Cruise 2.2 knots ; Max 3 knotsAscent/Descent Rate : 350 feet/second at + /- 45 degreesOperating Depth : 37,000 fswCrew : 1 http : //www.deepflight.com/subs/df \ _challenger.htm [ deepflight.com ] 37,000 feet &gt; 6,500m normally .
News reporters seldom seem to actually fully understand reality or what they are reporting , is it any wonder that the rest of the news sounds so distorted and that headlines are usually one way hashes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Currently, the deepest-rated vehicles are able to descend to 6,500m, allowing scientists access to 95\% of the seafloor.Deep Flight ChallengerDeep Flight Challenger was built to enable adventurer, Steve Fossett, to set the ultimate solo dive record for all time (37,000 feet).
Unfortunately Fossett perished in a plane crash before he could dive the submersible to record depth.
Hawkes Ocean Technologies is now the only organization in the world that has full ocean depth technology.Flight endurance: full ocean depth and back in 5 hoursSpeed: Cruise  2.2 knots; Max  3 knotsAscent/Descent Rate:350 feet/second at +/- 45 degreesOperating Depth: 37,000 fswCrew: 1 http://www.deepflight.com/subs/df\_challenger.htm [deepflight.com]37,000 feet &gt; 6,500m normally.
News reporters seldom seem to actually fully understand reality or what they are reporting, is it any wonder that the rest of the news sounds so distorted and that headlines are usually one way hashes?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191855</id>
	<title>Re:Are you ready kids?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243963860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't hear you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't hear you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't hear you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191381</id>
	<title>Re:Cable? Why?</title>
	<author>ColdWetDog</author>
	<datestamp>1243959360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You got it the first time.  Radio transmission is very difficult in the water.  You're pretty much limited to ultra low frequency transmission, like the military uses to talk to subs. It's slow, about <a href="http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&amp;metadataPrefix=html&amp;identifier=AD0910973" title="dtic.mil">1 bit<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sec</a> [dtic.mil] and might have problems at extreme depths or in complex topography.   <br> <br>
Hence, the tether.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You got it the first time .
Radio transmission is very difficult in the water .
You 're pretty much limited to ultra low frequency transmission , like the military uses to talk to subs .
It 's slow , about 1 bit /sec [ dtic.mil ] and might have problems at extreme depths or in complex topography .
Hence , the tether .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You got it the first time.
Radio transmission is very difficult in the water.
You're pretty much limited to ultra low frequency transmission, like the military uses to talk to subs.
It's slow, about 1 bit /sec [dtic.mil] and might have problems at extreme depths or in complex topography.
Hence, the tether.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28201329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28195287
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28202047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28201845
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28197053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192269
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191721
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191581
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192039
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191439
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196527
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191367
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191357
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191271
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191189
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191359
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191381
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191855
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196113
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191605
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191559
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28205331
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_0147245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191343
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192533
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191357
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191581
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191605
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28201845
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196113
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28205331
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191381
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191189
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191385
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191721
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192269
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28197053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191271
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191359
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192631
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196343
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191617
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28202047
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191125
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191559
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191855
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194839
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192923
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191137
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192039
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28191389
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28196527
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28192237
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28194569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_0147245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28195287
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_0147245.28201329
</commentlist>
</conversation>
