<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_03_002237</id>
	<title>Nintendo Announces New Mario Bros, Mario Galaxy, Metroid</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1244044080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Nintendo's E3 press conference was an eventful one, with announcements for <a href="http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/e3-new-super-mario-bros-wii-hands-on">a new <em>Super Mario Bros. Wii</em></a>, a <a href="http://www.destructoid.com/e3-09-super-mario-galaxy-2-press-conference-trailer-134598.phtml">sequel to <em>Super Mario Galaxy</em></a>, and a <a href="http://www.joystiq.com/2009/06/02/see-metroid-other-m-in-action/">new entry into the <em>Metroid</em> franchise</a> by Team Ninja. The new <em>Mario Bros.</em> game will be available for the holiday season, and the other two are scheduled for 2010. Nintendo also confirmed <a href="http://kotaku.com/5275762/wii-fit-plus-brings-more-wii-fit-this-fall">an updated version of the Wii Fit</a>, called the Wii Fit Plus (<a href="http://wii.gamespy.com/dor/objects/887115/wii-health-pack-/videos/wiifitplus\_trl\_e3\_060209.html">trailer</a>), due out this fall. A <a href="http://www.destructoid.com/e3-09-nintendo-has-a-ton-of-games-to-show-at-e3-134512.phtml">full list of Nintendo's announcements</a> is available, which includes more games and new features. Live blogs of the press conference, with commentary and pictures, are up at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/02/engadget-and-joystiq-live-from-nintendos-e3-2009-keynote/">Engadget</a> and <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3174515">1Up</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo 's E3 press conference was an eventful one , with announcements for a new Super Mario Bros. Wii , a sequel to Super Mario Galaxy , and a new entry into the Metroid franchise by Team Ninja .
The new Mario Bros. game will be available for the holiday season , and the other two are scheduled for 2010 .
Nintendo also confirmed an updated version of the Wii Fit , called the Wii Fit Plus ( trailer ) , due out this fall .
A full list of Nintendo 's announcements is available , which includes more games and new features .
Live blogs of the press conference , with commentary and pictures , are up at Engadget and 1Up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo's E3 press conference was an eventful one, with announcements for a new Super Mario Bros. Wii, a sequel to Super Mario Galaxy, and a new entry into the Metroid franchise by Team Ninja.
The new Mario Bros. game will be available for the holiday season, and the other two are scheduled for 2010.
Nintendo also confirmed an updated version of the Wii Fit, called the Wii Fit Plus (trailer), due out this fall.
A full list of Nintendo's announcements is available, which includes more games and new features.
Live blogs of the press conference, with commentary and pictures, are up at Engadget and 1Up.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191835</id>
	<title>Re:Looks good but...</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1243963740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Keep in mind, it also is the reason why the Wii has far more exclusives than its competitors.  They may not be GOOD exclusives, but there's a lot of them.  (And some ARE good.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep in mind , it also is the reason why the Wii has far more exclusives than its competitors .
They may not be GOOD exclusives , but there 's a lot of them .
( And some ARE good .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep in mind, it also is the reason why the Wii has far more exclusives than its competitors.
They may not be GOOD exclusives, but there's a lot of them.
(And some ARE good.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191861</id>
	<title>Re:Also Golden Sun DS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243963860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>italics begone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>italics begone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>italics begone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191873</id>
	<title>Re:Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>Vu1turEMaN</author>
	<datestamp>1243963980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot Kirby. The Wii would be the perfect place to take advantage of that type of gameplay....I'd love it.</p><p>I hated Galaxy, but I wouldn't mind a sequel to any other game....even RPG and Sunshine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot Kirby .
The Wii would be the perfect place to take advantage of that type of gameplay....I 'd love it.I hated Galaxy , but I would n't mind a sequel to any other game....even RPG and Sunshine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot Kirby.
The Wii would be the perfect place to take advantage of that type of gameplay....I'd love it.I hated Galaxy, but I wouldn't mind a sequel to any other game....even RPG and Sunshine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194897</id>
	<title>Re:I don't get you.</title>
	<author>dontPanik</author>
	<datestamp>1244040000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude that was an epic burn. High five!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude that was an epic burn .
High five !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude that was an epic burn.
High five!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192165</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191877</id>
	<title>The Pokeymans</title>
	<author>Haoie</author>
	<datestamp>1243964040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pokemon Gold/Silver's remakes: Now those are what many are anticipating.</p><p>With good cause too. I'm looking forward to seeing the improvements.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pokemon Gold/Silver 's remakes : Now those are what many are anticipating.With good cause too .
I 'm looking forward to seeing the improvements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pokemon Gold/Silver's remakes: Now those are what many are anticipating.With good cause too.
I'm looking forward to seeing the improvements.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192777</id>
	<title>Re:Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1244061240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Problem mainly is that people demand that stuff, if you sell 15 mio wii fit and maybe 20.000-40.000 Disaster day of Crisis (guessed number) which way do you go?<br>Nintendo just goes the way they earn most money with, thats the reality of life!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem mainly is that people demand that stuff , if you sell 15 mio wii fit and maybe 20.000-40.000 Disaster day of Crisis ( guessed number ) which way do you go ? Nintendo just goes the way they earn most money with , thats the reality of life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem mainly is that people demand that stuff, if you sell 15 mio wii fit and maybe 20.000-40.000 Disaster day of Crisis (guessed number) which way do you go?Nintendo just goes the way they earn most money with, thats the reality of life!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192123</id>
	<title>Re:Also Golden Sun DS</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1243967100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will you look at that, nintendo finally starts making video games again!</p><p>Waiting for the other shoe to drop.  Maybe you have to use the wii fit board to move mario...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will you look at that , nintendo finally starts making video games again ! Waiting for the other shoe to drop .
Maybe you have to use the wii fit board to move mario.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will you look at that, nintendo finally starts making video games again!Waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Maybe you have to use the wii fit board to move mario...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28195295</id>
	<title>Re:And new Wii Zelda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244041920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>a new Wii Zelda has been announced. Supposedly more "mature"</p></div></blockquote><p>Legend of Zelda: Midna (in her true form) Undresses?</p><p>I'd buy that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a new Wii Zelda has been announced .
Supposedly more " mature " Legend of Zelda : Midna ( in her true form ) Undresses ? I 'd buy that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a new Wii Zelda has been announced.
Supposedly more "mature"Legend of Zelda: Midna (in her true form) Undresses?I'd buy that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193089</id>
	<title>Re:Also Golden Sun DS</title>
	<author>bunkymag</author>
	<datestamp>1244021820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I enjoyed the first one too - and then it ended. Suddenly. With little warning. And an implicit instruction to go buy #2.

I was under the impression I had bought a game - a full game - for my A$60. I sold it on as soon as it became apparent I may have to end up paying several hundred for an RPG on a handheld - good though it was.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I enjoyed the first one too - and then it ended .
Suddenly. With little warning .
And an implicit instruction to go buy # 2 .
I was under the impression I had bought a game - a full game - for my A $ 60 .
I sold it on as soon as it became apparent I may have to end up paying several hundred for an RPG on a handheld - good though it was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I enjoyed the first one too - and then it ended.
Suddenly. With little warning.
And an implicit instruction to go buy #2.
I was under the impression I had bought a game - a full game - for my A$60.
I sold it on as soon as it became apparent I may have to end up paying several hundred for an RPG on a handheld - good though it was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193415</id>
	<title>Re:Ridley... isn't dead?</title>
	<author>BenoitRen</author>
	<datestamp>1244026200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course Ridley will have survived. The Metroid Prime games take place between Metroid and Metroid II. Ridley has to be there for Super Metroid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course Ridley will have survived .
The Metroid Prime games take place between Metroid and Metroid II .
Ridley has to be there for Super Metroid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course Ridley will have survived.
The Metroid Prime games take place between Metroid and Metroid II.
Ridley has to be there for Super Metroid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191689</id>
	<title>Re:Broken...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243962360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried to tag it ifuckedyourdeadgreatgrandmother to no avail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried to tag it ifuckedyourdeadgreatgrandmother to no avail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried to tag it ifuckedyourdeadgreatgrandmother to no avail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191997</id>
	<title>Re:wtf slashdot is all italic!!</title>
	<author>Artemis3</author>
	<datestamp>1243965540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least i can now read comments, last week i was getting "Connection Interrupted" errors in all articles using Firefox, with Midori it would work after a few retries, but it seemed to not read the css at all (Midori passes Acid3 with 100/100)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least i can now read comments , last week i was getting " Connection Interrupted " errors in all articles using Firefox , with Midori it would work after a few retries , but it seemed to not read the css at all ( Midori passes Acid3 with 100/100 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least i can now read comments, last week i was getting "Connection Interrupted" errors in all articles using Firefox, with Midori it would work after a few retries, but it seemed to not read the css at all (Midori passes Acid3 with 100/100)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191885</id>
	<title>Italics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243964160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Done</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Done</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Done</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192131</id>
	<title>Re:wtf slashdot is all italic!!</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1243967160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since we are off topic anyway, let me add my voice to the plea to stop screwing around with the site already. I used to be able to read slashdot on iphone, but now when I touch links such as Read More on a story on the front page half the time it selects the entire box instead of just the link and reloads the front page. On firefox I can't see the comment subjects on the pages with green title bg, the site feels slower than it used to be. What purpose is served by any of the recent changes apart from letting somebody show off his "web 2.0" skills? Can we have an option to "downgrade" to an old version that works?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since we are off topic anyway , let me add my voice to the plea to stop screwing around with the site already .
I used to be able to read slashdot on iphone , but now when I touch links such as Read More on a story on the front page half the time it selects the entire box instead of just the link and reloads the front page .
On firefox I ca n't see the comment subjects on the pages with green title bg , the site feels slower than it used to be .
What purpose is served by any of the recent changes apart from letting somebody show off his " web 2.0 " skills ?
Can we have an option to " downgrade " to an old version that works ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since we are off topic anyway, let me add my voice to the plea to stop screwing around with the site already.
I used to be able to read slashdot on iphone, but now when I touch links such as Read More on a story on the front page half the time it selects the entire box instead of just the link and reloads the front page.
On firefox I can't see the comment subjects on the pages with green title bg, the site feels slower than it used to be.
What purpose is served by any of the recent changes apart from letting somebody show off his "web 2.0" skills?
Can we have an option to "downgrade" to an old version that works?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191809</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191917</id>
	<title>And new Wii Zelda</title>
	<author>RyoShin</author>
	<datestamp>1243964400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While there's extremely little information outside of "It exists", <a href="http://www.nintendoworldreport.com/newsArt.cfm?artid=18699" title="nintendoworldreport.com">a new Wii Zelda</a> [nintendoworldreport.com] has been announced.  Supposedly more "mature", though that can mean many things to many people.</p><p>All in all, this is a MUCH better showing from Nintendo than last year's "Yay let's flail around faking music!" show.  I almost wish they had split what we've see this year between this and 2008 E3s, so that we might see more of each thing.</p><p>Personally, I'm more excited for Golden Sun DS than anything else, though I'm sure to pick of SMG2 and Metroid.  Too bad that rumored Metroid: Dread for DS never came about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While there 's extremely little information outside of " It exists " , a new Wii Zelda [ nintendoworldreport.com ] has been announced .
Supposedly more " mature " , though that can mean many things to many people.All in all , this is a MUCH better showing from Nintendo than last year 's " Yay let 's flail around faking music !
" show .
I almost wish they had split what we 've see this year between this and 2008 E3s , so that we might see more of each thing.Personally , I 'm more excited for Golden Sun DS than anything else , though I 'm sure to pick of SMG2 and Metroid .
Too bad that rumored Metroid : Dread for DS never came about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While there's extremely little information outside of "It exists", a new Wii Zelda [nintendoworldreport.com] has been announced.
Supposedly more "mature", though that can mean many things to many people.All in all, this is a MUCH better showing from Nintendo than last year's "Yay let's flail around faking music!
" show.
I almost wish they had split what we've see this year between this and 2008 E3s, so that we might see more of each thing.Personally, I'm more excited for Golden Sun DS than anything else, though I'm sure to pick of SMG2 and Metroid.
Too bad that rumored Metroid: Dread for DS never came about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194011</id>
	<title>Re:Also Golden Sun DS</title>
	<author>bluefoxlucid</author>
	<datestamp>1244034540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a long game dude.  Part 2 is longer, and you can transfer your save game from Part 1.  Also I paid $30USD</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a long game dude .
Part 2 is longer , and you can transfer your save game from Part 1 .
Also I paid $ 30USD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a long game dude.
Part 2 is longer, and you can transfer your save game from Part 1.
Also I paid $30USD</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193089</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194169</id>
	<title>Re:Ridley... isn't dead?</title>
	<author>Spatial</author>
	<datestamp>1244035920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As much as I love the Metroid series, I know that it must some day end.</p></div><p>WHAT!?  Get him!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I love the Metroid series , I know that it must some day end.WHAT ! ?
Get him !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I love the Metroid series, I know that it must some day end.WHAT!?
Get him!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192107</id>
	<title>Re:Nintendo....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243966860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Nintendo needs to make more "hardcore" games so whenever they aren't in first place anymore they won't go belly up.</p></div></blockquote><p>They first need to release Wii 2 with better specs before 'hardcore' gamers are tempted to buy one. Don't get me wrong, Wii is a superb platform for really innovative games, but Mario Galaxy is already pushing its limits and that's not even \_that\_ special. The best thing they could do was improve on their succes and release newer versions of their best-selling games.</p><p>I don't know anything about DS so i won't comment on it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nintendo needs to make more " hardcore " games so whenever they are n't in first place anymore they wo n't go belly up.They first need to release Wii 2 with better specs before 'hardcore ' gamers are tempted to buy one .
Do n't get me wrong , Wii is a superb platform for really innovative games , but Mario Galaxy is already pushing its limits and that 's not even \ _that \ _ special .
The best thing they could do was improve on their succes and release newer versions of their best-selling games.I do n't know anything about DS so i wo n't comment on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nintendo needs to make more "hardcore" games so whenever they aren't in first place anymore they won't go belly up.They first need to release Wii 2 with better specs before 'hardcore' gamers are tempted to buy one.
Don't get me wrong, Wii is a superb platform for really innovative games, but Mario Galaxy is already pushing its limits and that's not even \_that\_ special.
The best thing they could do was improve on their succes and release newer versions of their best-selling games.I don't know anything about DS so i won't comment on it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191679</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191841</id>
	<title>Italics be gone!</title>
	<author>Jophiel04</author>
	<datestamp>1243963740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well that took a while to get fixed, but it all looks normal now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well that took a while to get fixed , but it all looks normal now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well that took a while to get fixed, but it all looks normal now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192129</id>
	<title>Re:Looks good but...</title>
	<author>Swampash</author>
	<datestamp>1243967160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly. The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system</i>

Worldwide sales to date.

WII: 255,066
XB360: 118,622
PS3: 103,378

Ooh yeah. Nintendo's hurting all right. They really must be kicking themselves about the utter incompetence they've shown in TOTALLY DOMINATING WORLDWIDE CONSOLE SALES.</htmltext>
<tokenext>nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly .
The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system Worldwide sales to date .
WII : 255,066 XB360 : 118,622 PS3 : 103,378 Ooh yeah .
Nintendo 's hurting all right .
They really must be kicking themselves about the utter incompetence they 've shown in TOTALLY DOMINATING WORLDWIDE CONSOLE SALES .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly.
The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system

Worldwide sales to date.
WII: 255,066
XB360: 118,622
PS3: 103,378

Ooh yeah.
Nintendo's hurting all right.
They really must be kicking themselves about the utter incompetence they've shown in TOTALLY DOMINATING WORLDWIDE CONSOLE SALES.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191809</id>
	<title>wtf slashdot is all italic!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243963440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must be new here but again, please stop touching the pages guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be new here but again , please stop touching the pages guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be new here but again, please stop touching the pages guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193351</id>
	<title>Re:Nintendo....</title>
	<author>BenoitRen</author>
	<datestamp>1244025480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hardcore gamers already have a Wii next to their XBox 360 or PS3.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hardcore gamers already have a Wii next to their XBox 360 or PS3 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hardcore gamers already have a Wii next to their XBox 360 or PS3.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191915</id>
	<title>Bad HTML</title>
	<author>nolesrule</author>
	<datestamp>1243964400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The title of the submission is missing a closing em tag after the word "Metroid", causing any non-styled text below it to appear italicized. This affects any page containing the title.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The title of the submission is missing a closing em tag after the word " Metroid " , causing any non-styled text below it to appear italicized .
This affects any page containing the title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The title of the submission is missing a closing em tag after the word "Metroid", causing any non-styled text below it to appear italicized.
This affects any page containing the title.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</id>
	<title>Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1243963200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, everyone loves Mario but at this point it's obvious Nintendo is very stagnant.  Most of the stuff on the Wii is pure shovelware garbage, and I've yet to be truly impressed with the uses of the Wiimote (although the device itself is fantastic and I even use it with my computer via bluetooth).  The Wii is a stagnant system all-around for the more active gamer, and its "environment" is so sterile (less mature games, using the friend code system, etc) and the system is far enough behind the others in terms of graphical and processing ability to not allow for faithful ports of games on the XBox 360 or PS3.</p><p>You'd think Nintendo would at least ramp up 1st party games but nope.  Most of what is coming out is unremarkable shovelware.  The DS is definitely starting to lose some of its luster as only a few good games on it seem over the horizon--though I do think the DS was overall a success with many quality games.</p><p>Mario, Mario, and Metriod.  And another gimmick, Wii fit.  How depressing for us Wii owners.</p><p>As an aside, when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to Star Fox 64?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , everyone loves Mario but at this point it 's obvious Nintendo is very stagnant .
Most of the stuff on the Wii is pure shovelware garbage , and I 've yet to be truly impressed with the uses of the Wiimote ( although the device itself is fantastic and I even use it with my computer via bluetooth ) .
The Wii is a stagnant system all-around for the more active gamer , and its " environment " is so sterile ( less mature games , using the friend code system , etc ) and the system is far enough behind the others in terms of graphical and processing ability to not allow for faithful ports of games on the XBox 360 or PS3.You 'd think Nintendo would at least ramp up 1st party games but nope .
Most of what is coming out is unremarkable shovelware .
The DS is definitely starting to lose some of its luster as only a few good games on it seem over the horizon--though I do think the DS was overall a success with many quality games.Mario , Mario , and Metriod .
And another gimmick , Wii fit .
How depressing for us Wii owners.As an aside , when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to Star Fox 64 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, everyone loves Mario but at this point it's obvious Nintendo is very stagnant.
Most of the stuff on the Wii is pure shovelware garbage, and I've yet to be truly impressed with the uses of the Wiimote (although the device itself is fantastic and I even use it with my computer via bluetooth).
The Wii is a stagnant system all-around for the more active gamer, and its "environment" is so sterile (less mature games, using the friend code system, etc) and the system is far enough behind the others in terms of graphical and processing ability to not allow for faithful ports of games on the XBox 360 or PS3.You'd think Nintendo would at least ramp up 1st party games but nope.
Most of what is coming out is unremarkable shovelware.
The DS is definitely starting to lose some of its luster as only a few good games on it seem over the horizon--though I do think the DS was overall a success with many quality games.Mario, Mario, and Metriod.
And another gimmick, Wii fit.
How depressing for us Wii owners.As an aside, when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to Star Fox 64?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192273</id>
	<title>I'll be delicate...</title>
	<author>Schnoogs</author>
	<datestamp>1243969020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so as to not offend Wii owners but man does that Mario game look like something for the DS.  I know graphics doesn't equal fun but it's hard for me to get excited over a game that looks like the SNES could have run it fine 15 years ago.  It just looks like they went the easy route on this one.  Slap together some 2D levels...charge $50.</p><p>The sad thing is that it probably is pushing the Wii to the breaking point processor wise.  Needless to say I don't get the popularity of that system.  The Wiimote too me works poorly and the games are  gimmicky.  This game will not make me drop $150 or so to buy a Wii.</p><p>Sorry if offended any Wii owners but I just don't get the hype.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so as to not offend Wii owners but man does that Mario game look like something for the DS .
I know graphics does n't equal fun but it 's hard for me to get excited over a game that looks like the SNES could have run it fine 15 years ago .
It just looks like they went the easy route on this one .
Slap together some 2D levels...charge $ 50.The sad thing is that it probably is pushing the Wii to the breaking point processor wise .
Needless to say I do n't get the popularity of that system .
The Wiimote too me works poorly and the games are gimmicky .
This game will not make me drop $ 150 or so to buy a Wii.Sorry if offended any Wii owners but I just do n't get the hype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so as to not offend Wii owners but man does that Mario game look like something for the DS.
I know graphics doesn't equal fun but it's hard for me to get excited over a game that looks like the SNES could have run it fine 15 years ago.
It just looks like they went the easy route on this one.
Slap together some 2D levels...charge $50.The sad thing is that it probably is pushing the Wii to the breaking point processor wise.
Needless to say I don't get the popularity of that system.
The Wiimote too me works poorly and the games are  gimmicky.
This game will not make me drop $150 or so to buy a Wii.Sorry if offended any Wii owners but I just don't get the hype.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585</id>
	<title>Broken...</title>
	<author>jack2000</author>
	<datestamp>1243961520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>WTF? Why can't add tags?</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
Why ca n't add tags ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
Why can't add tags?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575</id>
	<title>Also Golden Sun DS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243961400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Golden Sun DS (not mentioned in TFS) is really what I'm most excited about. Golden Sun and its sequel for GBA were possibly my favorite RPG series for a long time. What a brilliant mixture of RPG gameplay with puzzle solving it was, with great graphics (for GBA) to boot! I've been waiting for a third for ages, as the second had a somewhat open ending.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Golden Sun DS ( not mentioned in TFS ) is really what I 'm most excited about .
Golden Sun and its sequel for GBA were possibly my favorite RPG series for a long time .
What a brilliant mixture of RPG gameplay with puzzle solving it was , with great graphics ( for GBA ) to boot !
I 've been waiting for a third for ages , as the second had a somewhat open ending .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Golden Sun DS (not mentioned in TFS) is really what I'm most excited about.
Golden Sun and its sequel for GBA were possibly my favorite RPG series for a long time.
What a brilliant mixture of RPG gameplay with puzzle solving it was, with great graphics (for GBA) to boot!
I've been waiting for a third for ages, as the second had a somewhat open ending.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194363</id>
	<title>Re:Looks good but...</title>
	<author>donaldm</author>
	<datestamp>1244037420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No Final Fantasy XIII, but it does get Dragon Quest X, the latest entry of the #1 selling RPG franchise in Japan. Not to mention that Dragon Quest games tend to be better than Final Fantasy anyway.</p><p>However, porting ability? If the Wii's power was a problem, they wouldn't even dream of porting their titles to the PlayStation 2. But many developers do.</p></div><p>How about no FF V11, V111, 1X, X, X-2 and X11 (X1 is a PC game. X111 and X1V are not out yet) and if you like no Dragon Quest V111 which IMHO is great game especially when played on my BC PS3 to my HDTV. I am not aware of Wii games being ported to the PS2 although the other way is definitely the case. I think this is normally called shovelware and even then if the game requires more buttons than what the Wii has it is difficult to port.<br>
<br>
The reality is the Wii is slightly more powerful than the Gamecube which in turn had a bit more powerful than the PS2. If you look at games that run on both the Wii, PS3 and the Xbox360 you will see that the game on the Wii looks less polished graphically on a HDTV than the other consoles. In addition the Wii just can't do what the PS3 and Xbox360 can do (motion controller aside). Take a look at the "Force Unleashed" and you will see what I mean.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Final Fantasy XIII , but it does get Dragon Quest X , the latest entry of the # 1 selling RPG franchise in Japan .
Not to mention that Dragon Quest games tend to be better than Final Fantasy anyway.However , porting ability ?
If the Wii 's power was a problem , they would n't even dream of porting their titles to the PlayStation 2 .
But many developers do.How about no FF V11 , V111 , 1X , X , X-2 and X11 ( X1 is a PC game .
X111 and X1V are not out yet ) and if you like no Dragon Quest V111 which IMHO is great game especially when played on my BC PS3 to my HDTV .
I am not aware of Wii games being ported to the PS2 although the other way is definitely the case .
I think this is normally called shovelware and even then if the game requires more buttons than what the Wii has it is difficult to port .
The reality is the Wii is slightly more powerful than the Gamecube which in turn had a bit more powerful than the PS2 .
If you look at games that run on both the Wii , PS3 and the Xbox360 you will see that the game on the Wii looks less polished graphically on a HDTV than the other consoles .
In addition the Wii just ca n't do what the PS3 and Xbox360 can do ( motion controller aside ) .
Take a look at the " Force Unleashed " and you will see what I mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Final Fantasy XIII, but it does get Dragon Quest X, the latest entry of the #1 selling RPG franchise in Japan.
Not to mention that Dragon Quest games tend to be better than Final Fantasy anyway.However, porting ability?
If the Wii's power was a problem, they wouldn't even dream of porting their titles to the PlayStation 2.
But many developers do.How about no FF V11, V111, 1X, X, X-2 and X11 (X1 is a PC game.
X111 and X1V are not out yet) and if you like no Dragon Quest V111 which IMHO is great game especially when played on my BC PS3 to my HDTV.
I am not aware of Wii games being ported to the PS2 although the other way is definitely the case.
I think this is normally called shovelware and even then if the game requires more buttons than what the Wii has it is difficult to port.
The reality is the Wii is slightly more powerful than the Gamecube which in turn had a bit more powerful than the PS2.
If you look at games that run on both the Wii, PS3 and the Xbox360 you will see that the game on the Wii looks less polished graphically on a HDTV than the other consoles.
In addition the Wii just can't do what the PS3 and Xbox360 can do (motion controller aside).
Take a look at the "Force Unleashed" and you will see what I mean.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192151</id>
	<title>Re:Looks good but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243967460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Gamecube had very competitive hardware, and what most 3rd parties did was crap out inferior ports compared to the Xbox and PS2 versions.  The Wii is underpowered for many reasons, one of which is to make it cheap for developers to experiment with its control system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Gamecube had very competitive hardware , and what most 3rd parties did was crap out inferior ports compared to the Xbox and PS2 versions .
The Wii is underpowered for many reasons , one of which is to make it cheap for developers to experiment with its control system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Gamecube had very competitive hardware, and what most 3rd parties did was crap out inferior ports compared to the Xbox and PS2 versions.
The Wii is underpowered for many reasons, one of which is to make it cheap for developers to experiment with its control system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191859</id>
	<title>Re:Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1243963860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Mario, Mario, and Metriod. And another gimmick, Wii fit. How depressing for us Wii owners.</i> <br> <br>

If it's that depressing for Wii owners, why do those games SELL SO WELL?  Why is Sony and Microsoft intent on copying them?<br> <br>

I get what you're saying.  I want some hardcore action, FPS, RPG, and strategy games.  The Wiimote would make a sweet interface for a RTS like Starcraft.  But just remember, Wii Fit makes more people more happy than a port of 'Bioshock' would.  Just not necessarily you or I.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mario , Mario , and Metriod .
And another gimmick , Wii fit .
How depressing for us Wii owners .
If it 's that depressing for Wii owners , why do those games SELL SO WELL ?
Why is Sony and Microsoft intent on copying them ?
I get what you 're saying .
I want some hardcore action , FPS , RPG , and strategy games .
The Wiimote would make a sweet interface for a RTS like Starcraft .
But just remember , Wii Fit makes more people more happy than a port of 'Bioshock ' would .
Just not necessarily you or I .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mario, Mario, and Metriod.
And another gimmick, Wii fit.
How depressing for us Wii owners.
If it's that depressing for Wii owners, why do those games SELL SO WELL?
Why is Sony and Microsoft intent on copying them?
I get what you're saying.
I want some hardcore action, FPS, RPG, and strategy games.
The Wiimote would make a sweet interface for a RTS like Starcraft.
But just remember, Wii Fit makes more people more happy than a port of 'Bioshock' would.
Just not necessarily you or I.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192165</id>
	<title>I don't get you.</title>
	<author>nobodyman</author>
	<datestamp>1243967640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that the 3rd party situation is abysmal,  but I'm scratching my head when you say that they are stagnating.  If anything, I'd say they are the only console manufacturer that has truly managed to innovate and break out of traditional "gamer" demographic.</p><p>And then there's this:</p><blockquote><div><p>Mario, Mario, and Metriod. And another gimmick, Wii fit. How depressing for us Wii owners.</p><p>As an aside, when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to Star Fox 64?</p></div></blockquote><p>Translation:</p><blockquote><div><p>&lt;sequel/&gt;, &lt;sequel/&gt;, and &lt;sequel/&gt;. And another gimmick, Wii fit. How depressing for us Wii owners.</p><p>As an aside, when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to &lt;sequel/&gt;?</p></div></blockquote><p>So you want innovation... except when you don't?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that the 3rd party situation is abysmal , but I 'm scratching my head when you say that they are stagnating .
If anything , I 'd say they are the only console manufacturer that has truly managed to innovate and break out of traditional " gamer " demographic.And then there 's this : Mario , Mario , and Metriod .
And another gimmick , Wii fit .
How depressing for us Wii owners.As an aside , when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to Star Fox 64 ? Translation : , , and .
And another gimmick , Wii fit .
How depressing for us Wii owners.As an aside , when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to ? So you want innovation... except when you do n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that the 3rd party situation is abysmal,  but I'm scratching my head when you say that they are stagnating.
If anything, I'd say they are the only console manufacturer that has truly managed to innovate and break out of traditional "gamer" demographic.And then there's this:Mario, Mario, and Metriod.
And another gimmick, Wii fit.
How depressing for us Wii owners.As an aside, when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to Star Fox 64?Translation:, , and .
And another gimmick, Wii fit.
How depressing for us Wii owners.As an aside, when is Nintendo going to come out with a faithful quality sequel to ?So you want innovation... except when you don't?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192005</id>
	<title>Metroid: Other M Trailer</title>
	<author>yoyhed</author>
	<datestamp>1243965660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Instead of slashdotting a smaller site hosting a shaky-cam video of the trailer, how about a high quality direct-feed video on a larger site?

<a href="http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-09-metroid-other/50237" title="gametrailers.com">Metroid: Other M trailer</a> [gametrailers.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of slashdotting a smaller site hosting a shaky-cam video of the trailer , how about a high quality direct-feed video on a larger site ?
Metroid : Other M trailer [ gametrailers.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of slashdotting a smaller site hosting a shaky-cam video of the trailer, how about a high quality direct-feed video on a larger site?
Metroid: Other M trailer [gametrailers.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193817</id>
	<title>Re:Also Golden Sun DS</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1244032380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Waiting for the other shoe to drop. Maybe you have to use the wii fit board to move mario...</p><p>I sense negativity, but after experiencing a Wii for the first time over Memorial Day Weekend, I have to agree with that pessimism.  I always enjoyed Nintendo games and still play my N64 and Gamecube, but the Wii games I played were less than inspiring.  One game I played was a scuba-diving simulator where you rub fish to see what species it is.  YAWN.  Then I played a dull shooter and a game called Wario World which I suspect will eventually cause ADD in the player.  I didn't like that game at all.</p><p>The only games I enjoyed were Mario Kart and Smash Brothers, but of course I already own those games on my old consoles so why upgrade?  And I find the motion controllers to be inventive but annoying.  I feel the traditional controller provides better control over the action on the screen, whereas the motion controllers often don't register your move.  Grrr.</p><p>Anyway I've always bought the #1 console, so naturally I'll buy a Wii eventually just as I purchased the previous-#1 PS2, but that won't happen until the price drops below $200.  I feel little desire to get one now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; Waiting for the other shoe to drop .
Maybe you have to use the wii fit board to move mario...I sense negativity , but after experiencing a Wii for the first time over Memorial Day Weekend , I have to agree with that pessimism .
I always enjoyed Nintendo games and still play my N64 and Gamecube , but the Wii games I played were less than inspiring .
One game I played was a scuba-diving simulator where you rub fish to see what species it is .
YAWN. Then I played a dull shooter and a game called Wario World which I suspect will eventually cause ADD in the player .
I did n't like that game at all.The only games I enjoyed were Mario Kart and Smash Brothers , but of course I already own those games on my old consoles so why upgrade ?
And I find the motion controllers to be inventive but annoying .
I feel the traditional controller provides better control over the action on the screen , whereas the motion controllers often do n't register your move .
Grrr.Anyway I 've always bought the # 1 console , so naturally I 'll buy a Wii eventually just as I purchased the previous- # 1 PS2 , but that wo n't happen until the price drops below $ 200 .
I feel little desire to get one now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;Waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Maybe you have to use the wii fit board to move mario...I sense negativity, but after experiencing a Wii for the first time over Memorial Day Weekend, I have to agree with that pessimism.
I always enjoyed Nintendo games and still play my N64 and Gamecube, but the Wii games I played were less than inspiring.
One game I played was a scuba-diving simulator where you rub fish to see what species it is.
YAWN.  Then I played a dull shooter and a game called Wario World which I suspect will eventually cause ADD in the player.
I didn't like that game at all.The only games I enjoyed were Mario Kart and Smash Brothers, but of course I already own those games on my old consoles so why upgrade?
And I find the motion controllers to be inventive but annoying.
I feel the traditional controller provides better control over the action on the screen, whereas the motion controllers often don't register your move.
Grrr.Anyway I've always bought the #1 console, so naturally I'll buy a Wii eventually just as I purchased the previous-#1 PS2, but that won't happen until the price drops below $200.
I feel little desire to get one now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723</id>
	<title>Looks good but...</title>
	<author>blahplusplus</author>
	<datestamp>1243962600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly.  The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system.  Which means:  No final fantasy 13, no Street fighter 4, No soul calibur 4, etc, etc....</p><p>Everytime nintendo learns from it's mistakes, it makes another one.  It's also a shame that they fucked up starfox series so badly with Starfox Assault and Starfox adventures (was: Dinosaur planet)</p><p>I heard the starfox developer got in a tiff with Miyamoto on the direction of the starfox franchise and they went their seperate ways... shame, it appears that Miyamoto thinks he's gods gift, and he outrights ignores the fan's of the games themselves.  Pretty awful in my opinion.</p><p>It's cool that Nintendo seems to be getting on the ball with Metroid, I hope Team Ninja's metroid is awesome, looks good from the trailers... I wish that they would farm out Zelda to team that does 3D combat well, I wonder what the god of war team could come up with working with Nintendo's own team.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly .
The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system .
Which means : No final fantasy 13 , no Street fighter 4 , No soul calibur 4 , etc , etc....Everytime nintendo learns from it 's mistakes , it makes another one .
It 's also a shame that they fucked up starfox series so badly with Starfox Assault and Starfox adventures ( was : Dinosaur planet ) I heard the starfox developer got in a tiff with Miyamoto on the direction of the starfox franchise and they went their seperate ways... shame , it appears that Miyamoto thinks he 's gods gift , and he outrights ignores the fan 's of the games themselves .
Pretty awful in my opinion.It 's cool that Nintendo seems to be getting on the ball with Metroid , I hope Team Ninja 's metroid is awesome , looks good from the trailers... I wish that they would farm out Zelda to team that does 3D combat well , I wonder what the god of war team could come up with working with Nintendo 's own team .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly.
The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system.
Which means:  No final fantasy 13, no Street fighter 4, No soul calibur 4, etc, etc....Everytime nintendo learns from it's mistakes, it makes another one.
It's also a shame that they fucked up starfox series so badly with Starfox Assault and Starfox adventures (was: Dinosaur planet)I heard the starfox developer got in a tiff with Miyamoto on the direction of the starfox franchise and they went their seperate ways... shame, it appears that Miyamoto thinks he's gods gift, and he outrights ignores the fan's of the games themselves.
Pretty awful in my opinion.It's cool that Nintendo seems to be getting on the ball with Metroid, I hope Team Ninja's metroid is awesome, looks good from the trailers... I wish that they would farm out Zelda to team that does 3D combat well, I wonder what the god of war team could come up with working with Nintendo's own team.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192223</id>
	<title>Re:Muscle March</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243968420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only they'd release <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hcElGydzb8" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Muscle March</a> [youtube.com] and similar Japanese games in Europe/US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only they 'd release Muscle March [ youtube.com ] and similar Japanese games in Europe/US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only they'd release Muscle March [youtube.com] and similar Japanese games in Europe/US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28204423</id>
	<title>Re:And new Wii Zelda</title>
	<author>AKAImBatman</author>
	<datestamp>1244037720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Supposedly more "mature", though that can mean many things to many people.</p></div></blockquote><p>You read it wrong. (Or someone reported it wrong.) The game will feature "a more mature Link". i.e. He's grown up more than in previous games.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Supposedly more " mature " , though that can mean many things to many people.You read it wrong .
( Or someone reported it wrong .
) The game will feature " a more mature Link " .
i.e. He 's grown up more than in previous games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Supposedly more "mature", though that can mean many things to many people.You read it wrong.
(Or someone reported it wrong.
) The game will feature "a more mature Link".
i.e. He's grown up more than in previous games.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191917</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191849</id>
	<title>Re:Broken...</title>
	<author>Vu1turEMaN</author>
	<datestamp>1243963800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blame babby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blame babby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blame babby.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191989</id>
	<title>Re:Broken...</title>
	<author>ailnlv</author>
	<datestamp>1243965420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think someone forgot to add a &lt;/i&gt; somewhere</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think someone forgot to add a somewhere</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think someone forgot to add a  somewhere</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192095</id>
	<title>In other words...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243966800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other words, Nintendo is continuing to beat a dead horse, and continue to reuse it's ancient copyright's</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other words , Nintendo is continuing to beat a dead horse , and continue to reuse it 's ancient copyright 's</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other words, Nintendo is continuing to beat a dead horse, and continue to reuse it's ancient copyright's</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311</id>
	<title>Ridley... isn't dead?</title>
	<author>Tinctorius</author>
	<datestamp>1243969560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm really wondering how Nintendo is going to resurrect Ridley this time. He's "died" in every game he's been in, and they're not going to tell me that killing him in <em>Metroid Prime 3: Corruption</em> didn't do anything. Again.</p><p>As much as I love the Metroid series, I know that it must some day end. For me, it'll never get better than Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion. The way I see it, the whole adventure of finding new areas or trying to skip areas (at which I horribly suck, but the trying part is fun enough) is pretty much gone in the 3D versions. Time for Nintendo to leave the saga as it is, and create some new great idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really wondering how Nintendo is going to resurrect Ridley this time .
He 's " died " in every game he 's been in , and they 're not going to tell me that killing him in Metroid Prime 3 : Corruption did n't do anything .
Again.As much as I love the Metroid series , I know that it must some day end .
For me , it 'll never get better than Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion .
The way I see it , the whole adventure of finding new areas or trying to skip areas ( at which I horribly suck , but the trying part is fun enough ) is pretty much gone in the 3D versions .
Time for Nintendo to leave the saga as it is , and create some new great idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm really wondering how Nintendo is going to resurrect Ridley this time.
He's "died" in every game he's been in, and they're not going to tell me that killing him in Metroid Prime 3: Corruption didn't do anything.
Again.As much as I love the Metroid series, I know that it must some day end.
For me, it'll never get better than Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion.
The way I see it, the whole adventure of finding new areas or trying to skip areas (at which I horribly suck, but the trying part is fun enough) is pretty much gone in the 3D versions.
Time for Nintendo to leave the saga as it is, and create some new great idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192225</id>
	<title>Re:Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1243968420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure, everyone loves Mario but at this point it's obvious Nintendo is very stagnant. Most of the stuff on the Wii is pure shovelware garbage...You'd think Nintendo would at least ramp up 1st party games but nope. Most of what is coming out is unremarkable shovelware.</p> </div><p>Shovelware doesn't mean "games I don't like."  Wii fit is not shovelware, nintendo put effort in there and it paid off.  I don't like a lot of what nintendo puts out as of late, but it's not crap they're shoveling out for cheap.  Nintendo puts far more effort into it's games than the other two console makers.</p><p>Calling mario a gimmick is just flamebait.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , everyone loves Mario but at this point it 's obvious Nintendo is very stagnant .
Most of the stuff on the Wii is pure shovelware garbage...You 'd think Nintendo would at least ramp up 1st party games but nope .
Most of what is coming out is unremarkable shovelware .
Shovelware does n't mean " games I do n't like .
" Wii fit is not shovelware , nintendo put effort in there and it paid off .
I do n't like a lot of what nintendo puts out as of late , but it 's not crap they 're shoveling out for cheap .
Nintendo puts far more effort into it 's games than the other two console makers.Calling mario a gimmick is just flamebait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, everyone loves Mario but at this point it's obvious Nintendo is very stagnant.
Most of the stuff on the Wii is pure shovelware garbage...You'd think Nintendo would at least ramp up 1st party games but nope.
Most of what is coming out is unremarkable shovelware.
Shovelware doesn't mean "games I don't like.
"  Wii fit is not shovelware, nintendo put effort in there and it paid off.
I don't like a lot of what nintendo puts out as of late, but it's not crap they're shoveling out for cheap.
Nintendo puts far more effort into it's games than the other two console makers.Calling mario a gimmick is just flamebait.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192961</id>
	<title>Re:Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1244020320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never said wii fit was shovelware or Mario was a gimmick.  Please read closely, it will help you a lot in the future.</p><p>I am talking about those gimmick games which rely on the wiimote very poorly and don't focus on actual good game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never said wii fit was shovelware or Mario was a gimmick .
Please read closely , it will help you a lot in the future.I am talking about those gimmick games which rely on the wiimote very poorly and do n't focus on actual good game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never said wii fit was shovelware or Mario was a gimmick.
Please read closely, it will help you a lot in the future.I am talking about those gimmick games which rely on the wiimote very poorly and don't focus on actual good game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192225</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193191</id>
	<title>Re:Looks good but...</title>
	<author>BenoitRen</author>
	<datestamp>1244023620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No Final Fantasy XIII, but it does get Dragon Quest X, the latest entry of the #1 selling RPG franchise in Japan. Not to mention that Dragon Quest games tend to be better than Final Fantasy anyway.</p><p>However, porting ability? If the Wii's power was a problem, they wouldn't even dream of porting their titles to the PlayStation 2. But many developers do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No Final Fantasy XIII , but it does get Dragon Quest X , the latest entry of the # 1 selling RPG franchise in Japan .
Not to mention that Dragon Quest games tend to be better than Final Fantasy anyway.However , porting ability ?
If the Wii 's power was a problem , they would n't even dream of porting their titles to the PlayStation 2 .
But many developers do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Final Fantasy XIII, but it does get Dragon Quest X, the latest entry of the #1 selling RPG franchise in Japan.
Not to mention that Dragon Quest games tend to be better than Final Fantasy anyway.However, porting ability?
If the Wii's power was a problem, they wouldn't even dream of porting their titles to the PlayStation 2.
But many developers do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193307</id>
	<title>Re:Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>master\_p</author>
	<datestamp>1244024940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't you buy one of the other consoles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't you buy one of the other consoles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't you buy one of the other consoles?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193503</id>
	<title>Re:Still dissapointing.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244027580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope Nintendo doesn't listen to you, for their own good. They did the homework already, about what kind of demographic gets them the more profits, and they nailed the equation. Just because there is one console manufacturer that doesn't cater to <b>your</b> needs, doesn't make their strategy a bad one. You have Sony, Microsoft and a host of PC game developers catering to the likes of you. Surely that's enough?</p><p>I for one find the "hardcore gamer's games" boring and unplayable. I could complain why doesn't Sony bring more fun games to the PS3? Its amazing hardware could make for a great experience for those games, but you don't see me or anyone else complaining to Sony. So you guys play with your crap and we play with ours. We shut the fuck up, so can you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope Nintendo does n't listen to you , for their own good .
They did the homework already , about what kind of demographic gets them the more profits , and they nailed the equation .
Just because there is one console manufacturer that does n't cater to your needs , does n't make their strategy a bad one .
You have Sony , Microsoft and a host of PC game developers catering to the likes of you .
Surely that 's enough ? I for one find the " hardcore gamer 's games " boring and unplayable .
I could complain why does n't Sony bring more fun games to the PS3 ?
Its amazing hardware could make for a great experience for those games , but you do n't see me or anyone else complaining to Sony .
So you guys play with your crap and we play with ours .
We shut the fuck up , so can you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope Nintendo doesn't listen to you, for their own good.
They did the homework already, about what kind of demographic gets them the more profits, and they nailed the equation.
Just because there is one console manufacturer that doesn't cater to your needs, doesn't make their strategy a bad one.
You have Sony, Microsoft and a host of PC game developers catering to the likes of you.
Surely that's enough?I for one find the "hardcore gamer's games" boring and unplayable.
I could complain why doesn't Sony bring more fun games to the PS3?
Its amazing hardware could make for a great experience for those games, but you don't see me or anyone else complaining to Sony.
So you guys play with your crap and we play with ours.
We shut the fuck up, so can you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194151</id>
	<title>Re:In other words...</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1244035740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In other words, Nintendo is continuing to beat a dead horse, and continue to reuse it's ancient copyright's</p></div><p>... in a manner that has proven popular and profitable for decades.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other words , Nintendo is continuing to beat a dead horse , and continue to reuse it 's ancient copyright 's... in a manner that has proven popular and profitable for decades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other words, Nintendo is continuing to beat a dead horse, and continue to reuse it's ancient copyright's... in a manner that has proven popular and profitable for decades.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191679</id>
	<title>Nintendo....</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1243962240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its nice to see Nintendo actually making an effort to appeal to gamers who want a game more involved than a tech demo, but can we please have something... fresh? Sure, Mario, Metroid, and Golden Sun are good, but it seems like Nintendo has really stagnated in good games that aren't gimmicks. Plus theres a bunch of old IP that isn't being capitalized on such as the old Japanese Fire Emblem games, Earthbound hasn't even seen a US release on the Virtual Console and Kid Icarus hasn't seen a new game in ages. <br> <br>

Nintendo needs to make more "hardcore" games so whenever they aren't in first place anymore they won't go belly up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its nice to see Nintendo actually making an effort to appeal to gamers who want a game more involved than a tech demo , but can we please have something... fresh ? Sure , Mario , Metroid , and Golden Sun are good , but it seems like Nintendo has really stagnated in good games that are n't gimmicks .
Plus theres a bunch of old IP that is n't being capitalized on such as the old Japanese Fire Emblem games , Earthbound has n't even seen a US release on the Virtual Console and Kid Icarus has n't seen a new game in ages .
Nintendo needs to make more " hardcore " games so whenever they are n't in first place anymore they wo n't go belly up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its nice to see Nintendo actually making an effort to appeal to gamers who want a game more involved than a tech demo, but can we please have something... fresh? Sure, Mario, Metroid, and Golden Sun are good, but it seems like Nintendo has really stagnated in good games that aren't gimmicks.
Plus theres a bunch of old IP that isn't being capitalized on such as the old Japanese Fire Emblem games, Earthbound hasn't even seen a US release on the Virtual Console and Kid Icarus hasn't seen a new game in ages.
Nintendo needs to make more "hardcore" games so whenever they aren't in first place anymore they won't go belly up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191637</id>
	<title>dangle tags at your own peril</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243962000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Submitter is right. This story needs emphasis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Submitter is right .
This story needs emphasis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Submitter is right.
This story needs emphasis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194447</id>
	<title>Re:Nintendo....</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1244038020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would not be so sure about it. Ok the Wii is a system which fits into the style of games Nintendo makes, but that does not mean it is just Nintendo who release decent games.<br>Here is a small list:<br>Mad World, No more Heroes, Sam and Max Season 1, Tenchu Shadow Assasins, Disaster day of Crisis. All of those are relatively newly released and definitely gather to the hardcore crowd!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would not be so sure about it .
Ok the Wii is a system which fits into the style of games Nintendo makes , but that does not mean it is just Nintendo who release decent games.Here is a small list : Mad World , No more Heroes , Sam and Max Season 1 , Tenchu Shadow Assasins , Disaster day of Crisis .
All of those are relatively newly released and definitely gather to the hardcore crowd !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would not be so sure about it.
Ok the Wii is a system which fits into the style of games Nintendo makes, but that does not mean it is just Nintendo who release decent games.Here is a small list:Mad World, No more Heroes, Sam and Max Season 1, Tenchu Shadow Assasins, Disaster day of Crisis.
All of those are relatively newly released and definitely gather to the hardcore crowd!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192107</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194729</id>
	<title>Re:Ridley... isn't dead?</title>
	<author>Yosho</author>
	<datestamp>1244039400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only game in which Ridley "died" and later came back was the original Metroid, simply because Nintendo hadn't planned a sequel at the time.  He wasn't in Metroid II, and while he was in the Metroid Prime games, he survived all of those encounters.  He died for real in Super Metroid.  The Ridley in Metroid Fusion is a copy of him that the X Parasite made.</p><p>So... I have no idea what they're going to do to bring him back in this game.  (unless it's set before Super Metroid)</p><p><div class="quote"><p>the whole adventure of finding new areas or trying to skip areas is pretty much gone in the 3D versions</p></div><p>Not at all.  It's more difficult than it used to be, but there's still plenty of sequence breaking to be done.  Take a look over at <a href="http://www.metroid2002.com/" title="metroid2002.com">http://www.metroid2002.com/</a> [metroid2002.com] .</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only game in which Ridley " died " and later came back was the original Metroid , simply because Nintendo had n't planned a sequel at the time .
He was n't in Metroid II , and while he was in the Metroid Prime games , he survived all of those encounters .
He died for real in Super Metroid .
The Ridley in Metroid Fusion is a copy of him that the X Parasite made.So... I have no idea what they 're going to do to bring him back in this game .
( unless it 's set before Super Metroid ) the whole adventure of finding new areas or trying to skip areas is pretty much gone in the 3D versionsNot at all .
It 's more difficult than it used to be , but there 's still plenty of sequence breaking to be done .
Take a look over at http : //www.metroid2002.com/ [ metroid2002.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only game in which Ridley "died" and later came back was the original Metroid, simply because Nintendo hadn't planned a sequel at the time.
He wasn't in Metroid II, and while he was in the Metroid Prime games, he survived all of those encounters.
He died for real in Super Metroid.
The Ridley in Metroid Fusion is a copy of him that the X Parasite made.So... I have no idea what they're going to do to bring him back in this game.
(unless it's set before Super Metroid)the whole adventure of finding new areas or trying to skip areas is pretty much gone in the 3D versionsNot at all.
It's more difficult than it used to be, but there's still plenty of sequence breaking to be done.
Take a look over at http://www.metroid2002.com/ [metroid2002.com] .
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192195</id>
	<title>Re:Also Golden Sun DS</title>
	<author>Overfiend1976</author>
	<datestamp>1243968060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait...if that's the case, will we get to watch Mario progressively get less fat as you beat the game?? What's next? Yoshi's Diet, Low-Fat, Trans-Fat Free, Unsalted Rice Cakes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait...if that 's the case , will we get to watch Mario progressively get less fat as you beat the game ? ?
What 's next ?
Yoshi 's Diet , Low-Fat , Trans-Fat Free , Unsalted Rice Cakes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait...if that's the case, will we get to watch Mario progressively get less fat as you beat the game??
What's next?
Yoshi's Diet, Low-Fat, Trans-Fat Free, Unsalted Rice Cakes?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192123</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191595</id>
	<title>Spam this site...</title>
	<author>blogger11</author>
	<datestamp>1243961640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://sitelist.ca/" title="sitelist.ca" rel="nofollow">SiteList</a> [sitelist.ca].  Add random links.  It's instantaneous and free. hehe...</htmltext>
<tokenext>SiteList [ sitelist.ca ] .
Add random links .
It 's instantaneous and free .
hehe.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SiteList [sitelist.ca].
Add random links.
It's instantaneous and free.
hehe...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192259</id>
	<title>I thank you 7or your time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243968780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>archItecture. My LLok at the of open-source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>archItecture .
My LLok at the of open-source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>archItecture.
My LLok at the of open-source.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28196535</id>
	<title>Re:Ridley... isn't dead?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244047260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never gets better than Metroid Fusion? Seriously? Am I misremembering, or is this the game where, once you complete your current task, they show you on the map exactly where you need to head next, and then promptly lock off all the doors except those that lead to where you need to go, thus leaving you virtually no ability to explore at will? I didn't care for that much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never gets better than Metroid Fusion ?
Seriously ? Am I misremembering , or is this the game where , once you complete your current task , they show you on the map exactly where you need to head next , and then promptly lock off all the doors except those that lead to where you need to go , thus leaving you virtually no ability to explore at will ?
I did n't care for that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never gets better than Metroid Fusion?
Seriously? Am I misremembering, or is this the game where, once you complete your current task, they show you on the map exactly where you need to head next, and then promptly lock off all the doors except those that lead to where you need to go, thus leaving you virtually no ability to explore at will?
I didn't care for that much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192185</id>
	<title>Re:Looks good but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243967820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly. The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system. Which means: No final fantasy 13, no Street fighter 4, No soul calibur 4, etc, etc....</p></div><p>With the wii leading the pack, you've really got to wonder why 3rd parties aren't doing it the other way around: making games primarily for the wii and porting it to the more powerful systems.</p><p>They'll spew something about different types of gamers, but most gamers I know bought a wii early on and have nothing to use it for.  Even if you're sure somehow only half of wii owners are interested in your game, that's a half that is starved for ANYTHING decent, and half the wii base is still pretty sizeable.</p><p>(Yes, I realize that "most gamers I know" is not very scientific.  I doubt 3rd party devs are very scientific about it either though.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly .
The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system .
Which means : No final fantasy 13 , no Street fighter 4 , No soul calibur 4 , etc , etc....With the wii leading the pack , you 've really got to wonder why 3rd parties are n't doing it the other way around : making games primarily for the wii and porting it to the more powerful systems.They 'll spew something about different types of gamers , but most gamers I know bought a wii early on and have nothing to use it for .
Even if you 're sure somehow only half of wii owners are interested in your game , that 's a half that is starved for ANYTHING decent , and half the wii base is still pretty sizeable .
( Yes , I realize that " most gamers I know " is not very scientific .
I doubt 3rd party devs are very scientific about it either though .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... nintendo really needs 3rd party games badly.
The fact they went with underpowered hardware really killed 3rd party companies ability to port their games to the system.
Which means: No final fantasy 13, no Street fighter 4, No soul calibur 4, etc, etc....With the wii leading the pack, you've really got to wonder why 3rd parties aren't doing it the other way around: making games primarily for the wii and porting it to the more powerful systems.They'll spew something about different types of gamers, but most gamers I know bought a wii early on and have nothing to use it for.
Even if you're sure somehow only half of wii owners are interested in your game, that's a half that is starved for ANYTHING decent, and half the wii base is still pretty sizeable.
(Yes, I realize that "most gamers I know" is not very scientific.
I doubt 3rd party devs are very scientific about it either though.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192713</id>
	<title>Re:Ridley... isn't dead?</title>
	<author>El Gigante de Justic</author>
	<datestamp>1244060640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe he just has a bunch of siblings with the same name, like George Foreman's kids?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe he just has a bunch of siblings with the same name , like George Foreman 's kids ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe he just has a bunch of siblings with the same name, like George Foreman's kids?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193351
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192223
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191849
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192961
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28204423
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194151
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192131
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193415
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193503
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191679
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28196535
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193307
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191873
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194897
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192129
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194363
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193191
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194169
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191835
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191997
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191809
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191689
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192195
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192123
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_03_002237_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28195295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191917
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192273
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191637
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191723
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192129
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193191
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194363
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191835
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192151
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193089
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192123
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193817
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192195
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191585
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191689
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191849
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191917
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28204423
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28195295
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191773
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192165
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194897
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193307
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192777
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191873
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192225
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192961
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192223
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191679
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192107
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194447
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193351
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28193415
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194729
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28196535
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192713
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28194169
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_03_002237.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191809
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28192131
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_03_002237.28191997
</commentlist>
</conversation>
