<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_02_213201</id>
	<title>A Real-World Test of the Verizon MiFi</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1243936140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.ofb.biz/" rel="nofollow">uninet</a> writes <i>"Over the course of a few days last week, I was able to spend a good deal of time with <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/10/2015227&amp;tid=193">Verizon's amazing little MiFi 3G router</a>. It <a href="http://www.ofb.biz/safari/article/551.html">admirably performed its task of providing speedy Wi-Fi Internet</a> to other devices via an EvDO Rev. A connection. Ironically, the device even improved the experience of using the iPhone, making it usable for surfing where its native network (AT&amp;T) <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/01/03/1818206/ATT-3G-Upgrades-Degrade-2G-Signal-Strength">doesn't even connect</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>uninet writes " Over the course of a few days last week , I was able to spend a good deal of time with Verizon 's amazing little MiFi 3G router .
It admirably performed its task of providing speedy Wi-Fi Internet to other devices via an EvDO Rev .
A connection .
Ironically , the device even improved the experience of using the iPhone , making it usable for surfing where its native network ( AT&amp;T ) does n't even connect .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uninet writes "Over the course of a few days last week, I was able to spend a good deal of time with Verizon's amazing little MiFi 3G router.
It admirably performed its task of providing speedy Wi-Fi Internet to other devices via an EvDO Rev.
A connection.
Ironically, the device even improved the experience of using the iPhone, making it usable for surfing where its native network (AT&amp;T) doesn't even connect.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191083</id>
	<title>It's dishonesty, pure dishonesty.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243957140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Carriers don't buy enough equipment. They advertise speeds that they know they cannot deliver.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Carriers do n't buy enough equipment .
They advertise speeds that they know they can not deliver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Carriers don't buy enough equipment.
They advertise speeds that they know they cannot deliver.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28195741</id>
	<title>Re:Irony</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1244043840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It also tricks the iPhone into thinking you're on a faster network.  This is just because the iPhone only differentiates between "I am connected to 3G" and "I am connected to WiFi".</p><p>There's nothing surprising that the iPhone seems to perform better either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It also tricks the iPhone into thinking you 're on a faster network .
This is just because the iPhone only differentiates between " I am connected to 3G " and " I am connected to WiFi " .There 's nothing surprising that the iPhone seems to perform better either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It also tricks the iPhone into thinking you're on a faster network.
This is just because the iPhone only differentiates between "I am connected to 3G" and "I am connected to WiFi".There's nothing surprising that the iPhone seems to perform better either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607</id>
	<title>Irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243940340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ironically, the device even improved the experience of using the iPhone, making it usable for surfing where its native network (AT&amp;T) doesn't even connect.</p></div><p>How exactly is that "ironic"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ironically , the device even improved the experience of using the iPhone , making it usable for surfing where its native network ( AT&amp;T ) does n't even connect.How exactly is that " ironic " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ironically, the device even improved the experience of using the iPhone, making it usable for surfing where its native network (AT&amp;T) doesn't even connect.How exactly is that "ironic"?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188979</id>
	<title>Call me when the price drops.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243942140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's talk when this can be used for using the internet. Until the price/GB drops, this is pretty much useless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's talk when this can be used for using the internet .
Until the price/GB drops , this is pretty much useless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's talk when this can be used for using the internet.
Until the price/GB drops, this is pretty much useless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191239</id>
	<title>frIs/t stop</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243958220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">by BSDI who Sell Are allowe3 to play</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>by BSDI who Sell Are allowe3 to play [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by BSDI who Sell Are allowe3 to play [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191819</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>jhol13</author>
	<datestamp>1243963560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are similar for other phones too, for example <a href="http://www.joiku.com/index.php" title="joiku.com">http://www.joiku.com/index.php</a> [joiku.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are similar for other phones too , for example http : //www.joiku.com/index.php [ joiku.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are similar for other phones too, for example http://www.joiku.com/index.php [joiku.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28198569</id>
	<title>not so fast...</title>
	<author>illegibledotorg</author>
	<datestamp>1244055060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The following picture was taken when the unit was sitting about 5 feet from my laptop. I'm using it as my uplink as I just moved into a new development with no neighbors to steal wifi from. Literally only 2 other (WPA2) networks are in range. Consequentially, this can't be blamed on interference:</p><p><a href="http://twitpic.com/6jafg" title="twitpic.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/6jafg</a> [twitpic.com]</p><p>Also funny, I had to reconnect twice while uploading that photo to twitpic earlier since the unit dropped my connection. The problem is intermittent and hurts all three devices connected to it, not just my crappy laptop.</p><p>tl;dr<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it's okay, but not near worth the money. Instead, buy a 3G card and a router that you can slot it into.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The following picture was taken when the unit was sitting about 5 feet from my laptop .
I 'm using it as my uplink as I just moved into a new development with no neighbors to steal wifi from .
Literally only 2 other ( WPA2 ) networks are in range .
Consequentially , this ca n't be blamed on interference : http : //twitpic.com/6jafg [ twitpic.com ] Also funny , I had to reconnect twice while uploading that photo to twitpic earlier since the unit dropped my connection .
The problem is intermittent and hurts all three devices connected to it , not just my crappy laptop.tl ; dr ... it 's okay , but not near worth the money .
Instead , buy a 3G card and a router that you can slot it into .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The following picture was taken when the unit was sitting about 5 feet from my laptop.
I'm using it as my uplink as I just moved into a new development with no neighbors to steal wifi from.
Literally only 2 other (WPA2) networks are in range.
Consequentially, this can't be blamed on interference:http://twitpic.com/6jafg [twitpic.com]Also funny, I had to reconnect twice while uploading that photo to twitpic earlier since the unit dropped my connection.
The problem is intermittent and hurts all three devices connected to it, not just my crappy laptop.tl;dr ... it's okay, but not near worth the money.
Instead, buy a 3G card and a router that you can slot it into.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188745</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191909</id>
	<title>I can't believe it's cheaper in Argentina!</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1243964340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in Argentina. We have a pretty good 3G network, provided by 3 companies (Movistar, owned by Telefonica, Claro, owned by TelMEX and Personal, owned by Telecom). I have a small huawei 3G device, it's GNU/Linux and Mac OS friendly, and I only pay $31 (31 US Dollars) a month for unlimited access. It works almost everywhere. I travel a lot, and I even get signal on small towns, and even on the road (I have signal over the 400 km from Buenos Aires to Mar del Plata). Speeds vary, but it's more than usabe (On my last trip I downloaded a Linux kernel 2.6.30-rc5 at a constant 60 kb/s while going 140 km/h).</p><p>Also, the unlimited access is REALLY unlimited, I keep my torrents open 24 hours a day, on the go.<br>On the few spots I don't get 3G, it switches automatically to GPRS, which, while slower, is good enough for SSH access, and I don't pay a single extra cent for using it.</p><p>I have virtually forgot about 802.11</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Argentina .
We have a pretty good 3G network , provided by 3 companies ( Movistar , owned by Telefonica , Claro , owned by TelMEX and Personal , owned by Telecom ) .
I have a small huawei 3G device , it 's GNU/Linux and Mac OS friendly , and I only pay $ 31 ( 31 US Dollars ) a month for unlimited access .
It works almost everywhere .
I travel a lot , and I even get signal on small towns , and even on the road ( I have signal over the 400 km from Buenos Aires to Mar del Plata ) .
Speeds vary , but it 's more than usabe ( On my last trip I downloaded a Linux kernel 2.6.30-rc5 at a constant 60 kb/s while going 140 km/h ) .Also , the unlimited access is REALLY unlimited , I keep my torrents open 24 hours a day , on the go.On the few spots I do n't get 3G , it switches automatically to GPRS , which , while slower , is good enough for SSH access , and I do n't pay a single extra cent for using it.I have virtually forgot about 802.11</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Argentina.
We have a pretty good 3G network, provided by 3 companies (Movistar, owned by Telefonica, Claro, owned by TelMEX and Personal, owned by Telecom).
I have a small huawei 3G device, it's GNU/Linux and Mac OS friendly, and I only pay $31 (31 US Dollars) a month for unlimited access.
It works almost everywhere.
I travel a lot, and I even get signal on small towns, and even on the road (I have signal over the 400 km from Buenos Aires to Mar del Plata).
Speeds vary, but it's more than usabe (On my last trip I downloaded a Linux kernel 2.6.30-rc5 at a constant 60 kb/s while going 140 km/h).Also, the unlimited access is REALLY unlimited, I keep my torrents open 24 hours a day, on the go.On the few spots I don't get 3G, it switches automatically to GPRS, which, while slower, is good enough for SSH access, and I don't pay a single extra cent for using it.I have virtually forgot about 802.11</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189449</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1243944660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which wired arm of T-Mobile would you want to integrate their wireless service with?  I don't think DT is coming to America any time soon.</p><p>Just sayin'...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which wired arm of T-Mobile would you want to integrate their wireless service with ?
I do n't think DT is coming to America any time soon.Just sayin'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which wired arm of T-Mobile would you want to integrate their wireless service with?
I don't think DT is coming to America any time soon.Just sayin'...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189977</id>
	<title>Isn't this what bluetooth was supposed to handle?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243947900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't Verizon cripple its bluetooth phones by disabling certain data communications?<br>You should be able to share the internet with your laptop through bluetooth.<br>I stress SHOULD...<br>This should have been available years ago using hardware that already existed. They just couldn't figure out how to bill people for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't Verizon cripple its bluetooth phones by disabling certain data communications ? You should be able to share the internet with your laptop through bluetooth.I stress SHOULD...This should have been available years ago using hardware that already existed .
They just could n't figure out how to bill people for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't Verizon cripple its bluetooth phones by disabling certain data communications?You should be able to share the internet with your laptop through bluetooth.I stress SHOULD...This should have been available years ago using hardware that already existed.
They just couldn't figure out how to bill people for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188745</id>
	<title>For those who can't get cable or DSL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243940940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll probably go out and buy one before long.  Despite the expense, the 5GB monthly cap, and the onerous contract terms, the only broadband choices where I live are EVDO and an older wireless system using <a href="http://alvarion.com/solutions/access/" title="alvarion.com">Alvarion</a> [alvarion.com] gear.  I got my Alvarion setup five years ago and have been gladly paying $44 a month for, at best, 320kbps, using a rooftop parabolic antenna pointed at the nearest tower.  I have a laptop with an EVDO setup but still have the Alvarion gear for other household members.  I would love to get rid of it.</p><p>Aside from people like me who can't get cable or DSL, devices like this work well for occasional users who are more concerned about convenience of installation than blazingly high speeds or the ability to download mountains of data.  <a href="http://clearwire.com/" title="clearwire.com">Clearwire</a> [clearwire.com] has been selling similar services for quite some time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll probably go out and buy one before long .
Despite the expense , the 5GB monthly cap , and the onerous contract terms , the only broadband choices where I live are EVDO and an older wireless system using Alvarion [ alvarion.com ] gear .
I got my Alvarion setup five years ago and have been gladly paying $ 44 a month for , at best , 320kbps , using a rooftop parabolic antenna pointed at the nearest tower .
I have a laptop with an EVDO setup but still have the Alvarion gear for other household members .
I would love to get rid of it.Aside from people like me who ca n't get cable or DSL , devices like this work well for occasional users who are more concerned about convenience of installation than blazingly high speeds or the ability to download mountains of data .
Clearwire [ clearwire.com ] has been selling similar services for quite some time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll probably go out and buy one before long.
Despite the expense, the 5GB monthly cap, and the onerous contract terms, the only broadband choices where I live are EVDO and an older wireless system using Alvarion [alvarion.com] gear.
I got my Alvarion setup five years ago and have been gladly paying $44 a month for, at best, 320kbps, using a rooftop parabolic antenna pointed at the nearest tower.
I have a laptop with an EVDO setup but still have the Alvarion gear for other household members.
I would love to get rid of it.Aside from people like me who can't get cable or DSL, devices like this work well for occasional users who are more concerned about convenience of installation than blazingly high speeds or the ability to download mountains of data.
Clearwire [clearwire.com] has been selling similar services for quite some time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191513</id>
	<title>Re:Load tests?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243960560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly why CDMA is so great. Longer device to tower distance. Great for uncrowded rural locations. GPRS may have higher theoretical speeds, but it works best in an urban area, where there are going to be more users per cell, and you have a fewer number of cells you can reach due to reduced distance. That is why I often see much much higher actual speed with CDMA. Of course, my comment has absolutely no relevance to yours depending on where you plan on using your service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly why CDMA is so great .
Longer device to tower distance .
Great for uncrowded rural locations .
GPRS may have higher theoretical speeds , but it works best in an urban area , where there are going to be more users per cell , and you have a fewer number of cells you can reach due to reduced distance .
That is why I often see much much higher actual speed with CDMA .
Of course , my comment has absolutely no relevance to yours depending on where you plan on using your service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly why CDMA is so great.
Longer device to tower distance.
Great for uncrowded rural locations.
GPRS may have higher theoretical speeds, but it works best in an urban area, where there are going to be more users per cell, and you have a fewer number of cells you can reach due to reduced distance.
That is why I often see much much higher actual speed with CDMA.
Of course, my comment has absolutely no relevance to yours depending on where you plan on using your service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194725</id>
	<title>Re:Have this as well - it is an outstanding produc</title>
	<author>cshuttle</author>
	<datestamp>1244039340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
10.  No need to use the crappy Verizon connection software on the laptop (or worse, Dell's bastard stepchild version)</p><p>Less Good / Room to Improve</p></div><p>As far as the VZ software goes, I learned from a board a long while ago that you can setup a dial up connection (dialing *777) through the WWAN modem, and it will connect over a standard DUN. Thankfully, I was able to do this and avoid installing the VZ/Smith Micro abomination they have.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>10 .
No need to use the crappy Verizon connection software on the laptop ( or worse , Dell 's bastard stepchild version ) Less Good / Room to ImproveAs far as the VZ software goes , I learned from a board a long while ago that you can setup a dial up connection ( dialing * 777 ) through the WWAN modem , and it will connect over a standard DUN .
Thankfully , I was able to do this and avoid installing the VZ/Smith Micro abomination they have .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
10.
No need to use the crappy Verizon connection software on the laptop (or worse, Dell's bastard stepchild version)Less Good / Room to ImproveAs far as the VZ software goes, I learned from a board a long while ago that you can setup a dial up connection (dialing *777) through the WWAN modem, and it will connect over a standard DUN.
Thankfully, I was able to do this and avoid installing the VZ/Smith Micro abomination they have.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190095</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189047</id>
	<title>Anyone know its international coverage?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243942680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought this would be awesome, just the device I need until I tried to get an answer out of Verizon about the international coverage.  The guy on the phone didn't even know the Mifi (okay, it was a week before it was due for public release).  I've now tried twice to get an email answer about international coverage. </p><p>I'm a travel writer.  I can't even seem to get anyone -- from any major carrier -- to intelligently talk about international coverage.  If I'm going to be locked into a plan for 2 years, I damn well want to know if I'll be able to use it in Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Europe, and most of the US.  But people just seem to turn into babbling idiots when this topic comes up.  They answer "It works in our 3G network!" and you say "And does that work in Japan?" and there's a pause and then they try to explain what the 3G network is.  I don't care what the 3G network IS.  I just want to know if I'll be able to turn the thing on in Japan and have it work.</p><p>I'm off topic.  I should just Ask Slashdot.  Perhaps I will.  But if anyone out there travels a lot and can recommend a phone \_and\_ plan that's going to work in the maximum number of countries, and \_has\_ to work in all four mentioned above, I'd love to know.  I don't even need a phone.  I primarily need email access and a touch typeable keyboard.  Hence the interest in the Mifi.  But if it's going to turn into a useless piece of junk the moment I touch down in Japan...I guess I'll still just hunt for internet cafes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this would be awesome , just the device I need until I tried to get an answer out of Verizon about the international coverage .
The guy on the phone did n't even know the Mifi ( okay , it was a week before it was due for public release ) .
I 've now tried twice to get an email answer about international coverage .
I 'm a travel writer .
I ca n't even seem to get anyone -- from any major carrier -- to intelligently talk about international coverage .
If I 'm going to be locked into a plan for 2 years , I damn well want to know if I 'll be able to use it in Japan , South Korea , Mexico , Europe , and most of the US .
But people just seem to turn into babbling idiots when this topic comes up .
They answer " It works in our 3G network !
" and you say " And does that work in Japan ?
" and there 's a pause and then they try to explain what the 3G network is .
I do n't care what the 3G network IS .
I just want to know if I 'll be able to turn the thing on in Japan and have it work.I 'm off topic .
I should just Ask Slashdot .
Perhaps I will .
But if anyone out there travels a lot and can recommend a phone \ _and \ _ plan that 's going to work in the maximum number of countries , and \ _has \ _ to work in all four mentioned above , I 'd love to know .
I do n't even need a phone .
I primarily need email access and a touch typeable keyboard .
Hence the interest in the Mifi .
But if it 's going to turn into a useless piece of junk the moment I touch down in Japan...I guess I 'll still just hunt for internet cafes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this would be awesome, just the device I need until I tried to get an answer out of Verizon about the international coverage.
The guy on the phone didn't even know the Mifi (okay, it was a week before it was due for public release).
I've now tried twice to get an email answer about international coverage.
I'm a travel writer.
I can't even seem to get anyone -- from any major carrier -- to intelligently talk about international coverage.
If I'm going to be locked into a plan for 2 years, I damn well want to know if I'll be able to use it in Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Europe, and most of the US.
But people just seem to turn into babbling idiots when this topic comes up.
They answer "It works in our 3G network!
" and you say "And does that work in Japan?
" and there's a pause and then they try to explain what the 3G network is.
I don't care what the 3G network IS.
I just want to know if I'll be able to turn the thing on in Japan and have it work.I'm off topic.
I should just Ask Slashdot.
Perhaps I will.
But if anyone out there travels a lot and can recommend a phone \_and\_ plan that's going to work in the maximum number of countries, and \_has\_ to work in all four mentioned above, I'd love to know.
I don't even need a phone.
I primarily need email access and a touch typeable keyboard.
Hence the interest in the Mifi.
But if it's going to turn into a useless piece of junk the moment I touch down in Japan...I guess I'll still just hunt for internet cafes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192507</id>
	<title>Re:Load tests?</title>
	<author>atamido</author>
	<datestamp>1243971420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, this is all true.  There is only so much spectrum to be used in a wireless cell.  Go to someplace like Disneyland and the data portion of your cell phone will be entirely useless.  Newer wireless technologies are working on more efficient ways of transferring large amounts of data, but I don't see any way they can keep up with the rate that data usage is increasing at.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this is all true .
There is only so much spectrum to be used in a wireless cell .
Go to someplace like Disneyland and the data portion of your cell phone will be entirely useless .
Newer wireless technologies are working on more efficient ways of transferring large amounts of data , but I do n't see any way they can keep up with the rate that data usage is increasing at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this is all true.
There is only so much spectrum to be used in a wireless cell.
Go to someplace like Disneyland and the data portion of your cell phone will be entirely useless.
Newer wireless technologies are working on more efficient ways of transferring large amounts of data, but I don't see any way they can keep up with the rate that data usage is increasing at.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188783</id>
	<title>Mmm milfs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243941180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Verizon's amazing MILF what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Verizon 's amazing MILF what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Verizon's amazing MILF what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28197783</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>Patch86</author>
	<datestamp>1244052060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BT currently have an offer for wired-broadband customers. If you're on their "Unlimited" package, you pay a GBP10 one time fee and get a free mobile internet "dongle". You then get 1GB of free usage a month for the duration of your DSL contract, only paying for any extra usage above that.</p><p>GBP10 for 18 months of free occasional usage seems reasonable enough for the casual user. And if you're going to be a heavy user of mobile broadband, there are plenty of other contracts that can do you higher download limits for appropriate amounts more money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BT currently have an offer for wired-broadband customers .
If you 're on their " Unlimited " package , you pay a GBP10 one time fee and get a free mobile internet " dongle " .
You then get 1GB of free usage a month for the duration of your DSL contract , only paying for any extra usage above that.GBP10 for 18 months of free occasional usage seems reasonable enough for the casual user .
And if you 're going to be a heavy user of mobile broadband , there are plenty of other contracts that can do you higher download limits for appropriate amounts more money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BT currently have an offer for wired-broadband customers.
If you're on their "Unlimited" package, you pay a GBP10 one time fee and get a free mobile internet "dongle".
You then get 1GB of free usage a month for the duration of your DSL contract, only paying for any extra usage above that.GBP10 for 18 months of free occasional usage seems reasonable enough for the casual user.
And if you're going to be a heavy user of mobile broadband, there are plenty of other contracts that can do you higher download limits for appropriate amounts more money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189157</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190281</id>
	<title>Re:Irony</title>
	<author>Ignatius D'Lusional</author>
	<datestamp>1243950060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously, you're losing touch with popular culture. "Irony" applies to anything that is NOT ironic. See: Alanis Morisette.
<br>
<br>
Just like the word "literally" has come to mean "figuratively".
<br> <br>
It's a world gone mad, I tell you!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , you 're losing touch with popular culture .
" Irony " applies to anything that is NOT ironic .
See : Alanis Morisette .
Just like the word " literally " has come to mean " figuratively " .
It 's a world gone mad , I tell you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, you're losing touch with popular culture.
"Irony" applies to anything that is NOT ironic.
See: Alanis Morisette.
Just like the word "literally" has come to mean "figuratively".
It's a world gone mad, I tell you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188939</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>bzzfzz</author>
	<datestamp>1243941960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The delay in integration is because spectrum and construction costs for wireless broadband are still high enough to allow it to compete economically with wired alternatives.  Wireless broadband has been and still is a product for people more concerned with ubiquity and convenience than cost or bandwidth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The delay in integration is because spectrum and construction costs for wireless broadband are still high enough to allow it to compete economically with wired alternatives .
Wireless broadband has been and still is a product for people more concerned with ubiquity and convenience than cost or bandwidth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The delay in integration is because spectrum and construction costs for wireless broadband are still high enough to allow it to compete economically with wired alternatives.
Wireless broadband has been and still is a product for people more concerned with ubiquity and convenience than cost or bandwidth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191839</id>
	<title>For a family on the go w/ a bunch of ipod touches,</title>
	<author>jeremie</author>
	<datestamp>1243963740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This thing is amazing, as long as the kids don't start watching youtube<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing is amazing , as long as the kids do n't start watching youtube : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing is amazing, as long as the kids don't start watching youtube :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</id>
	<title>Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243939800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know, it's all wow-ee-wow-oo-oo, but I'm still not impressed.  If you're on the road a lot and can justify the extra cost of cellular access, yes, it's very cool.  For everyone else, not so much.  I just can't pay for a home plan and a wireless plan or multiple wireless plans for myself and my family.  It's a luxury I can't justify.<br> <br>

We've got phones that are palmtop computing devices, internet access devices, phones, cameras, video cameras, and music/video players all in one.  Device makers are embracing the mantra of integration.  Is it that the wired arms of the telcos can't vertically integrate home and wireless access into affordable bundles due to anti-trust concerns or is it that they currently see that keeping them separate maximizes profit because the market just isn't demanding "internet anywhere" convenience at a workable price point?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , it 's all wow-ee-wow-oo-oo , but I 'm still not impressed .
If you 're on the road a lot and can justify the extra cost of cellular access , yes , it 's very cool .
For everyone else , not so much .
I just ca n't pay for a home plan and a wireless plan or multiple wireless plans for myself and my family .
It 's a luxury I ca n't justify .
We 've got phones that are palmtop computing devices , internet access devices , phones , cameras , video cameras , and music/video players all in one .
Device makers are embracing the mantra of integration .
Is it that the wired arms of the telcos ca n't vertically integrate home and wireless access into affordable bundles due to anti-trust concerns or is it that they currently see that keeping them separate maximizes profit because the market just is n't demanding " internet anywhere " convenience at a workable price point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, it's all wow-ee-wow-oo-oo, but I'm still not impressed.
If you're on the road a lot and can justify the extra cost of cellular access, yes, it's very cool.
For everyone else, not so much.
I just can't pay for a home plan and a wireless plan or multiple wireless plans for myself and my family.
It's a luxury I can't justify.
We've got phones that are palmtop computing devices, internet access devices, phones, cameras, video cameras, and music/video players all in one.
Device makers are embracing the mantra of integration.
Is it that the wired arms of the telcos can't vertically integrate home and wireless access into affordable bundles due to anti-trust concerns or is it that they currently see that keeping them separate maximizes profit because the market just isn't demanding "internet anywhere" convenience at a workable price point?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28193545</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>pacinpm</author>
	<datestamp>1244028480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't simplier and cheaper to just use your cellphone as a modem through Bluetooth?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't simplier and cheaper to just use your cellphone as a modem through Bluetooth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't simplier and cheaper to just use your cellphone as a modem through Bluetooth?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192879</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone know its international coverage?</title>
	<author>bemymonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1244062560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought a quad-band phone would work in pretty much any country (with a functioning GSM and/or 3G network, of course), and that it was more of a question of unbelievably high roaming charges. I dunno about Japan, but Europe is no problem. Most Southeast-Asian countries have perfectly normal GSM networks too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought a quad-band phone would work in pretty much any country ( with a functioning GSM and/or 3G network , of course ) , and that it was more of a question of unbelievably high roaming charges .
I dunno about Japan , but Europe is no problem .
Most Southeast-Asian countries have perfectly normal GSM networks too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought a quad-band phone would work in pretty much any country (with a functioning GSM and/or 3G network, of course), and that it was more of a question of unbelievably high roaming charges.
I dunno about Japan, but Europe is no problem.
Most Southeast-Asian countries have perfectly normal GSM networks too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189047</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189135</id>
	<title>Nevermind..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243943040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was just about to pull the trigger on ordering one to replace my company supplied Verizon usb dongle, until I found out it cost $399 without contract (since the dongle and contract is company owned, I can't go messing with it).</p><p>Stupid carriers mark up the prices and then subsidize them at the price they should be at un-subsidized. The hell this thing cost $400 to make/market/support.</p><p>ARGH!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was just about to pull the trigger on ordering one to replace my company supplied Verizon usb dongle , until I found out it cost $ 399 without contract ( since the dongle and contract is company owned , I ca n't go messing with it ) .Stupid carriers mark up the prices and then subsidize them at the price they should be at un-subsidized .
The hell this thing cost $ 400 to make/market/support.ARGH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was just about to pull the trigger on ordering one to replace my company supplied Verizon usb dongle, until I found out it cost $399 without contract (since the dongle and contract is company owned, I can't go messing with it).Stupid carriers mark up the prices and then subsidize them at the price they should be at un-subsidized.
The hell this thing cost $400 to make/market/support.ARGH!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192021</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1243965840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very cool.  One teeny tiny problem:  using a cell phone this way without a special (very expensive)  plan is probably against your terms of service. Don't know  what the odds are of getting caught, but if you are caught,  you'll get a bill itemizing every packet you sent this way.  We're talking thousands of dollars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very cool .
One teeny tiny problem : using a cell phone this way without a special ( very expensive ) plan is probably against your terms of service .
Do n't know what the odds are of getting caught , but if you are caught , you 'll get a bill itemizing every packet you sent this way .
We 're talking thousands of dollars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very cool.
One teeny tiny problem:  using a cell phone this way without a special (very expensive)  plan is probably against your terms of service.
Don't know  what the odds are of getting caught, but if you are caught,  you'll get a bill itemizing every packet you sent this way.
We're talking thousands of dollars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28195131</id>
	<title>Can we get rid of the term Wi-Fi, please?</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1244041140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The term wi-fi is a hijack of Hi-Fi.  The Fi in Hi-Fi is meaningful, in Wi-Fi it's meaningless.  It's just an attempt to steal recognition and to be cutesy.  Calling it wireless is plenty informative.  Have you seen the commercial for HD sunglasses?  They go on and on about being "high definition" to borrow the name recognition of HDTV.</p><p>Off my lawn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The term wi-fi is a hijack of Hi-Fi .
The Fi in Hi-Fi is meaningful , in Wi-Fi it 's meaningless .
It 's just an attempt to steal recognition and to be cutesy .
Calling it wireless is plenty informative .
Have you seen the commercial for HD sunglasses ?
They go on and on about being " high definition " to borrow the name recognition of HDTV.Off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The term wi-fi is a hijack of Hi-Fi.
The Fi in Hi-Fi is meaningful, in Wi-Fi it's meaningless.
It's just an attempt to steal recognition and to be cutesy.
Calling it wireless is plenty informative.
Have you seen the commercial for HD sunglasses?
They go on and on about being "high definition" to borrow the name recognition of HDTV.Off my lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191315</id>
	<title>Ebony and irony</title>
	<author>1u3hr</author>
	<datestamp>1243958940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously it's not irony. Since the device is black, it's "ebony".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously it 's not irony .
Since the device is black , it 's " ebony " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously it's not irony.
Since the device is black, it's "ebony".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189157</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1243943220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you're on the road a lot and can justify the extra cost of cellular access, yes, it's very cool. For everyone else, not so much.</p></div><p>Uh, yeah. That's true for this kind of internet connection in general. That's not exactly news.</p><p>This is one important difference: you can go on a plan where you only pay for access on the days you actually use it. That means you have to pay full price for the router, but it still would work for a lot of people who travel sporadically. Or an office where one person is often on the road, but not always the same person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're on the road a lot and can justify the extra cost of cellular access , yes , it 's very cool .
For everyone else , not so much.Uh , yeah .
That 's true for this kind of internet connection in general .
That 's not exactly news.This is one important difference : you can go on a plan where you only pay for access on the days you actually use it .
That means you have to pay full price for the router , but it still would work for a lot of people who travel sporadically .
Or an office where one person is often on the road , but not always the same person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're on the road a lot and can justify the extra cost of cellular access, yes, it's very cool.
For everyone else, not so much.Uh, yeah.
That's true for this kind of internet connection in general.
That's not exactly news.This is one important difference: you can go on a plan where you only pay for access on the days you actually use it.
That means you have to pay full price for the router, but it still would work for a lot of people who travel sporadically.
Or an office where one person is often on the road, but not always the same person.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>areusche</author>
	<datestamp>1243941180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>On a side note, WMWifirouter has been able to do this on Windows Mobile smartphones for a while now. It's constantly being worked on and the speeds are definitely acceptable. The link for it <a href="http://www.wmwifirouter.com/" title="wmwifirouter.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wmwifirouter.com/</a> [wmwifirouter.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>On a side note , WMWifirouter has been able to do this on Windows Mobile smartphones for a while now .
It 's constantly being worked on and the speeds are definitely acceptable .
The link for it http : //www.wmwifirouter.com/ [ wmwifirouter.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a side note, WMWifirouter has been able to do this on Windows Mobile smartphones for a while now.
It's constantly being worked on and the speeds are definitely acceptable.
The link for it http://www.wmwifirouter.com/ [wmwifirouter.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188913</id>
	<title>Re:Irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243941840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Duh, the device is made out of case iron. Making any experience with it Iron-ic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Duh , the device is made out of case iron .
Making any experience with it Iron-ic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duh, the device is made out of case iron.
Making any experience with it Iron-ic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191417</id>
	<title>Immobile phone in HK</title>
	<author>1u3hr</author>
	<datestamp>1243959540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>A similar service in Hong Kong: <a href="http://www.smartone-vodafone.com/jsp/mobile/home\_broadband/english/benefits.jsp" title="smartone-vodafone.com">Vodafone's home broadband</a> [smartone-vodafone.com], which uses a router that connects to the HSPA 3G network, combining a 4 port ethernet router, Wifi, an IP phone line. It's specifically NOT mobile, locked to a particular cell, but on paper seems good deal. HK$148/month for unlimited usage (about US$19), supposedly  7 MB/s. Just been introduced so no idea how it actually performs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A similar service in Hong Kong : Vodafone 's home broadband [ smartone-vodafone.com ] , which uses a router that connects to the HSPA 3G network , combining a 4 port ethernet router , Wifi , an IP phone line .
It 's specifically NOT mobile , locked to a particular cell , but on paper seems good deal .
HK $ 148/month for unlimited usage ( about US $ 19 ) , supposedly 7 MB/s .
Just been introduced so no idea how it actually performs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A similar service in Hong Kong: Vodafone's home broadband [smartone-vodafone.com], which uses a router that connects to the HSPA 3G network, combining a 4 port ethernet router, Wifi, an IP phone line.
It's specifically NOT mobile, locked to a particular cell, but on paper seems good deal.
HK$148/month for unlimited usage (about US$19), supposedly  7 MB/s.
Just been introduced so no idea how it actually performs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194155</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1244035800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or if you have a Nokia, you can get Joiku (its freeware lite version is limited to http traffic only, and it takes at least 2 minutes to first start really working -- thought I have no idea why. And on the unlimited data plan of T-Mobile it will still be slow when you're browsing with it, but it's still a nice piece of freeware to have just in case you ever in need of a hot-spot).
<a href="http://joiku.com/" title="joiku.com">http://joiku.com/</a> [joiku.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or if you have a Nokia , you can get Joiku ( its freeware lite version is limited to http traffic only , and it takes at least 2 minutes to first start really working -- thought I have no idea why .
And on the unlimited data plan of T-Mobile it will still be slow when you 're browsing with it , but it 's still a nice piece of freeware to have just in case you ever in need of a hot-spot ) .
http : //joiku.com/ [ joiku.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or if you have a Nokia, you can get Joiku (its freeware lite version is limited to http traffic only, and it takes at least 2 minutes to first start really working -- thought I have no idea why.
And on the unlimited data plan of T-Mobile it will still be slow when you're browsing with it, but it's still a nice piece of freeware to have just in case you ever in need of a hot-spot).
http://joiku.com/ [joiku.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194105</id>
	<title>Cost? Mobile broadband cheaper than ADSL here!</title>
	<author>thijsh</author>
	<datestamp>1244035380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WMWifirouter works great, I got over 2mbps constant throughput with multiple laptops connecting over 1 cellphone (that's faster than the cheapest ADSL here). And an unlimited mobile data plan is less than 10 euro in the Netherlands!
Only one problem though: the battery drains fast. Even when charging with USB the battery still slowly leaks to 0 and the temperature of the phone goes up.
Good thing the program comes with some thermal-overload-shutdown before your phone explodes while you're browsing the internet on a hot summer day...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)
<br> <br>
For Symbian phones there is also JoikuSpot b.t.w.</htmltext>
<tokenext>WMWifirouter works great , I got over 2mbps constant throughput with multiple laptops connecting over 1 cellphone ( that 's faster than the cheapest ADSL here ) .
And an unlimited mobile data plan is less than 10 euro in the Netherlands !
Only one problem though : the battery drains fast .
Even when charging with USB the battery still slowly leaks to 0 and the temperature of the phone goes up .
Good thing the program comes with some thermal-overload-shutdown before your phone explodes while you 're browsing the internet on a hot summer day... ; - ) For Symbian phones there is also JoikuSpot b.t.w .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WMWifirouter works great, I got over 2mbps constant throughput with multiple laptops connecting over 1 cellphone (that's faster than the cheapest ADSL here).
And an unlimited mobile data plan is less than 10 euro in the Netherlands!
Only one problem though: the battery drains fast.
Even when charging with USB the battery still slowly leaks to 0 and the temperature of the phone goes up.
Good thing the program comes with some thermal-overload-shutdown before your phone explodes while you're browsing the internet on a hot summer day... ;-)
 
For Symbian phones there is also JoikuSpot b.t.w.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188815</id>
	<title>Got one. Love it.</title>
	<author>ScentCone</author>
	<datestamp>1243941300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It does exactly what it's supposed to, it's tiny, fast, and very simple to administer. It's a shame that 5GB/month costs what it costs, but if you can put out one serious server fire or interact with a customer in a way that saves a deal, it's worth every bit of what it costs.
<br> <br>
I bought one on a Friday night, and it paid for itself and earned its monthly keep before lunchtime on Saturday.
<br> <br>
Interestingly, it seems to be far more sensitive to Verizon's local RF signals than my phone is. Which is nice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does exactly what it 's supposed to , it 's tiny , fast , and very simple to administer .
It 's a shame that 5GB/month costs what it costs , but if you can put out one serious server fire or interact with a customer in a way that saves a deal , it 's worth every bit of what it costs .
I bought one on a Friday night , and it paid for itself and earned its monthly keep before lunchtime on Saturday .
Interestingly , it seems to be far more sensitive to Verizon 's local RF signals than my phone is .
Which is nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does exactly what it's supposed to, it's tiny, fast, and very simple to administer.
It's a shame that 5GB/month costs what it costs, but if you can put out one serious server fire or interact with a customer in a way that saves a deal, it's worth every bit of what it costs.
I bought one on a Friday night, and it paid for itself and earned its monthly keep before lunchtime on Saturday.
Interestingly, it seems to be far more sensitive to Verizon's local RF signals than my phone is.
Which is nice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189777</id>
	<title>Re:Call me when the price drops.</title>
	<author>ScentCone</author>
	<datestamp>1243946700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, with averaging only 160MB a day, seven days a week, there's just no way you could run some RDP sessions, check your mail, do some business, upload some JPGs to Grandma, read the news, and call it an hour's work until you get back to a WiFi hotspot of your home/office broadband. Yes, just plain useless. None of that is "using the internet," huh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , with averaging only 160MB a day , seven days a week , there 's just no way you could run some RDP sessions , check your mail , do some business , upload some JPGs to Grandma , read the news , and call it an hour 's work until you get back to a WiFi hotspot of your home/office broadband .
Yes , just plain useless .
None of that is " using the internet , " huh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, with averaging only 160MB a day, seven days a week, there's just no way you could run some RDP sessions, check your mail, do some business, upload some JPGs to Grandma, read the news, and call it an hour's work until you get back to a WiFi hotspot of your home/office broadband.
Yes, just plain useless.
None of that is "using the internet," huh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188979</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647</id>
	<title>Load tests?</title>
	<author>TinBromide</author>
	<datestamp>1243940520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a treo  which does 3g on AT&amp;T's (first cingular's) network. I would use the mobile test from dslreports.com on my treo to check my speed from various locations, just to play with my new toy. I got a pretty good feel for how fast it would go at my workplace, at my favorite lunch spots, etc and in different kinds of weather. The iphone came out and i saw a 25\% drop in speed, the iphone 3g came out and i saw another 25\% drop in speed. It seems like on most networks, if you want to get your advertised speeds, get away from where everybody is using it and attach to a cell tower without too many people attached. While these mifi tests may test the theoretical-realistic speeds (data transfer speeds in real world situations), if this catches on, users will experience realistic-realistic speeds (data transfer speeds in real world with real world congestion). <br> <br>Standard disclaimer may apply, a single user's empirical tests do not cover even a fraction of a percent of the real world. Please feel free to post your anecdotes which prove or disprove my anecdote.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a treo which does 3g on AT&amp;T 's ( first cingular 's ) network .
I would use the mobile test from dslreports.com on my treo to check my speed from various locations , just to play with my new toy .
I got a pretty good feel for how fast it would go at my workplace , at my favorite lunch spots , etc and in different kinds of weather .
The iphone came out and i saw a 25 \ % drop in speed , the iphone 3g came out and i saw another 25 \ % drop in speed .
It seems like on most networks , if you want to get your advertised speeds , get away from where everybody is using it and attach to a cell tower without too many people attached .
While these mifi tests may test the theoretical-realistic speeds ( data transfer speeds in real world situations ) , if this catches on , users will experience realistic-realistic speeds ( data transfer speeds in real world with real world congestion ) .
Standard disclaimer may apply , a single user 's empirical tests do not cover even a fraction of a percent of the real world .
Please feel free to post your anecdotes which prove or disprove my anecdote .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a treo  which does 3g on AT&amp;T's (first cingular's) network.
I would use the mobile test from dslreports.com on my treo to check my speed from various locations, just to play with my new toy.
I got a pretty good feel for how fast it would go at my workplace, at my favorite lunch spots, etc and in different kinds of weather.
The iphone came out and i saw a 25\% drop in speed, the iphone 3g came out and i saw another 25\% drop in speed.
It seems like on most networks, if you want to get your advertised speeds, get away from where everybody is using it and attach to a cell tower without too many people attached.
While these mifi tests may test the theoretical-realistic speeds (data transfer speeds in real world situations), if this catches on, users will experience realistic-realistic speeds (data transfer speeds in real world with real world congestion).
Standard disclaimer may apply, a single user's empirical tests do not cover even a fraction of a percent of the real world.
Please feel free to post your anecdotes which prove or disprove my anecdote.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192305</id>
	<title>iPhone = Non Verizon GSM device?</title>
	<author>PixetaledPikachu</author>
	<datestamp>1243969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is amusing that most people find it's acceptable to replace "Non Verizon GSM device with Wi-Fi capability" with "iPhone" ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is amusing that most people find it 's acceptable to replace " Non Verizon GSM device with Wi-Fi capability " with " iPhone " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is amusing that most people find it's acceptable to replace "Non Verizon GSM device with Wi-Fi capability" with "iPhone" ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188591</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243940280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And judging from our experience with the internet, i.e. file stealing, that "workable price point" means everyone gets internet for "free".</p><p>Fucking file sharing faggots. Oooh, I wasn't sure if collecting 6TiB of dvdrip movies was "fair use" or not. Or my neighbour did it, hacking into my wireless because WEP isn't secure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And judging from our experience with the internet , i.e .
file stealing , that " workable price point " means everyone gets internet for " free " .Fucking file sharing faggots .
Oooh , I was n't sure if collecting 6TiB of dvdrip movies was " fair use " or not .
Or my neighbour did it , hacking into my wireless because WEP is n't secure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And judging from our experience with the internet, i.e.
file stealing, that "workable price point" means everyone gets internet for "free".Fucking file sharing faggots.
Oooh, I wasn't sure if collecting 6TiB of dvdrip movies was "fair use" or not.
Or my neighbour did it, hacking into my wireless because WEP isn't secure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28193295</id>
	<title>Re:Irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1244024820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The definition of irony is now so broad that it is difficult to use it incorrectly.  It's ironic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The definition of irony is now so broad that it is difficult to use it incorrectly .
It 's ironic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The definition of irony is now so broad that it is difficult to use it incorrectly.
It's ironic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188499</id>
	<title>Milfi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243939920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds good</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds good</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds good</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190913</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>evil\_aar0n</author>
	<datestamp>1243955100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use my Sprint wireless service as an "alternate" ISP while at work.  I completely avoid the company routers, etc.  Sure, I'm probably violating a policy or two, but whatever.  I don't surf NSFW - generally - but I also don't care to give the company a say in where I go, or let them know where I've been.</p><p>These things are great - could almost say life savers - for field service reps sent out into the wild.  Try downloading a NIC driver for a NIC that's not working, yet.  With my laptop and wireless modem, no problem.</p><p>I've also used e-mail while driving across the state.  Yeah, I at least slow down a little while typing...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use my Sprint wireless service as an " alternate " ISP while at work .
I completely avoid the company routers , etc .
Sure , I 'm probably violating a policy or two , but whatever .
I do n't surf NSFW - generally - but I also do n't care to give the company a say in where I go , or let them know where I 've been.These things are great - could almost say life savers - for field service reps sent out into the wild .
Try downloading a NIC driver for a NIC that 's not working , yet .
With my laptop and wireless modem , no problem.I 've also used e-mail while driving across the state .
Yeah , I at least slow down a little while typing... ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use my Sprint wireless service as an "alternate" ISP while at work.
I completely avoid the company routers, etc.
Sure, I'm probably violating a policy or two, but whatever.
I don't surf NSFW - generally - but I also don't care to give the company a say in where I go, or let them know where I've been.These things are great - could almost say life savers - for field service reps sent out into the wild.
Try downloading a NIC driver for a NIC that's not working, yet.
With my laptop and wireless modem, no problem.I've also used e-mail while driving across the state.
Yeah, I at least slow down a little while typing... ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188889</id>
	<title>Another Option: Kyocera KR-2</title>
	<author>Bodero</author>
	<datestamp>1243941660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your other option instead of waiting for a Mi-Fi, or if you want the portability of a USB cellular modem, is the <a href="http://www.kyocera-wireless.com/kr2-router/" title="kyocera-wireless.com">Kyocera KR-2</a> [kyocera-wireless.com] Mobile Router. I use this with Verizon and it has the added benefit of being network-neutral, and also allowing for using another (faster) network and reverting to the cellular connection as a backup. The downside? Not as portable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your other option instead of waiting for a Mi-Fi , or if you want the portability of a USB cellular modem , is the Kyocera KR-2 [ kyocera-wireless.com ] Mobile Router .
I use this with Verizon and it has the added benefit of being network-neutral , and also allowing for using another ( faster ) network and reverting to the cellular connection as a backup .
The downside ?
Not as portable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your other option instead of waiting for a Mi-Fi, or if you want the portability of a USB cellular modem, is the Kyocera KR-2 [kyocera-wireless.com] Mobile Router.
I use this with Verizon and it has the added benefit of being network-neutral, and also allowing for using another (faster) network and reverting to the cellular connection as a backup.
The downside?
Not as portable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190571</id>
	<title>Re:Got one. Love it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243952580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the same monthly cost and $100 more up front, you can get a netbook that, unless I'm mistaken, can do everything this little thing can and more...it should be possible to setup an ad-hoc wireless network and share the internet connection with other devices.</p><p>Beyond the $100 difference in initial price, what advantages does this thing have over the netbook? It would seem to me that the netbook is more convenient to bring with you wherever you go than both this device and a laptop to hook it up to and for those times that you do have your normal notebook too, it can work just like this thing does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the same monthly cost and $ 100 more up front , you can get a netbook that , unless I 'm mistaken , can do everything this little thing can and more...it should be possible to setup an ad-hoc wireless network and share the internet connection with other devices.Beyond the $ 100 difference in initial price , what advantages does this thing have over the netbook ?
It would seem to me that the netbook is more convenient to bring with you wherever you go than both this device and a laptop to hook it up to and for those times that you do have your normal notebook too , it can work just like this thing does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the same monthly cost and $100 more up front, you can get a netbook that, unless I'm mistaken, can do everything this little thing can and more...it should be possible to setup an ad-hoc wireless network and share the internet connection with other devices.Beyond the $100 difference in initial price, what advantages does this thing have over the netbook?
It would seem to me that the netbook is more convenient to bring with you wherever you go than both this device and a laptop to hook it up to and for those times that you do have your normal notebook too, it can work just like this thing does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188837</id>
	<title>Nothing new</title>
	<author>SlashdotOgre</author>
	<datestamp>1243941420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's pretty cool given the size of the device, but bridging cellular and WiFi networks is nothing new.  I'm sure it's been done long before; personally I recall doing this in 2006 while working at Cal-IT2 (a research institution at UCSD). I was with a group of engineers stuck in barracks at Moffett Field with no WiFi or TV.  We did have a Soekris board running Debian, a Verizon PCMCIA broadband card, and PCMCIA WiFi card which worked with hostap; and we ended up with a WiFi access point serving cellular broadband.</p><p>These days I can do the same thing using my Samsung Saga and ICScontrol to share connection over WiFi.  Or I can tether to my phone to my laptop running Gentoo, place my laptop's WiFi card in ad-hoc mode.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's pretty cool given the size of the device , but bridging cellular and WiFi networks is nothing new .
I 'm sure it 's been done long before ; personally I recall doing this in 2006 while working at Cal-IT2 ( a research institution at UCSD ) .
I was with a group of engineers stuck in barracks at Moffett Field with no WiFi or TV .
We did have a Soekris board running Debian , a Verizon PCMCIA broadband card , and PCMCIA WiFi card which worked with hostap ; and we ended up with a WiFi access point serving cellular broadband.These days I can do the same thing using my Samsung Saga and ICScontrol to share connection over WiFi .
Or I can tether to my phone to my laptop running Gentoo , place my laptop 's WiFi card in ad-hoc mode .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's pretty cool given the size of the device, but bridging cellular and WiFi networks is nothing new.
I'm sure it's been done long before; personally I recall doing this in 2006 while working at Cal-IT2 (a research institution at UCSD).
I was with a group of engineers stuck in barracks at Moffett Field with no WiFi or TV.
We did have a Soekris board running Debian, a Verizon PCMCIA broadband card, and PCMCIA WiFi card which worked with hostap; and we ended up with a WiFi access point serving cellular broadband.These days I can do the same thing using my Samsung Saga and ICScontrol to share connection over WiFi.
Or I can tether to my phone to my laptop running Gentoo, place my laptop's WiFi card in ad-hoc mode.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189041</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>Sporkinum</author>
	<datestamp>1243942560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heck with that.. I can't justify a cell phone. I have one that work supplied. The only personal use is for the occasional pick up a gallon of milk call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck with that.. I ca n't justify a cell phone .
I have one that work supplied .
The only personal use is for the occasional pick up a gallon of milk call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck with that.. I can't justify a cell phone.
I have one that work supplied.
The only personal use is for the occasional pick up a gallon of milk call.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188749</id>
	<title>OH MAN!</title>
	<author>areusche</author>
	<datestamp>1243941000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of all the funny man-in-the-middle pranks you can play on desperate business travelers in airports with "free public wifi"!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of all the funny man-in-the-middle pranks you can play on desperate business travelers in airports with " free public wifi " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of all the funny man-in-the-middle pranks you can play on desperate business travelers in airports with "free public wifi"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189565</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great... if you can justify the cost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243945260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cradlepoint is the BEST option for most people, especially the PHS300 (I love mine). I don't travel that often but use my LG Vu for the data connection. The external antenna helps too, especially for those of us with AT&amp;T<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:( but hey, connecting my netbook, Nokia N810 and the host of other junk that I use on wifi, talk about the best value per dollar...</p><p>Not having an iPhone really saves me too, the extra $30 for an iPhone (for data) is available on my LG Vu, but I get to use tethering... nice little add-on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cradlepoint is the BEST option for most people , especially the PHS300 ( I love mine ) .
I do n't travel that often but use my LG Vu for the data connection .
The external antenna helps too , especially for those of us with AT&amp;T : ( but hey , connecting my netbook , Nokia N810 and the host of other junk that I use on wifi , talk about the best value per dollar...Not having an iPhone really saves me too , the extra $ 30 for an iPhone ( for data ) is available on my LG Vu , but I get to use tethering... nice little add-on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cradlepoint is the BEST option for most people, especially the PHS300 (I love mine).
I don't travel that often but use my LG Vu for the data connection.
The external antenna helps too, especially for those of us with AT&amp;T :( but hey, connecting my netbook, Nokia N810 and the host of other junk that I use on wifi, talk about the best value per dollar...Not having an iPhone really saves me too, the extra $30 for an iPhone (for data) is available on my LG Vu, but I get to use tethering... nice little add-on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190095</id>
	<title>Have this as well - it is an outstanding product</title>
	<author>CFD339</author>
	<datestamp>1243948680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As others point out, it isn't a revolution in communication.  It is, however, a very elegant implementation of a useful service at a price that is (for my needs) reasonable.</p><p>I've been using it a week or two now, here's what my take:</p><p>Summary: It does what it says it does, in the way it promises, without the slightest hassle.  For electronics, that's a hell of an endorsement.</p><p>The GOOD:</p><p>1. Size - it's damn easy to carry  It really is as small as the ads make it look.<br>2. Replaceable Battery - I have a spare right with it (spare was just under $40)<br>3. Runs on USB charger, laptop USB, or Battery<br>4. Good - maybe not amazing - battery life (2-3 hours in reality)<br>5. Micro-usb connector is compatible with my phone charger so I carry fewer blocks<br>6. Performance -&gt; It out performs the EVDO Rev A. Mini-PCI card that I had in my laptop.<br>7. Reception -&gt; Better than my best cell phone  ---- Also, in poor reception areas like some hotel rooms, I can put it over by the window where the signal is good, and use the network anywhere in the room!<br>8. Ubiquity -&gt; I don't have to pick what device I bring with me based on my connectivity needs.<br>9. Multi-Device support -&gt; Laptop, Hand-held game, netbook, kid's laptop in the car, etc.<br>10.  No need to use the crappy Verizon connection software on the laptop (or worse, Dell's bastard stepchild version)</p><p>Less Good / Room to Improve</p><p>1. It needs a signal level indicator on the outside surface.  To check signal, you have to hit the router's config page with a browser.<br>2. The data sheet on this says it has a connector for an external antenna.  I have yet to see such a thing.  Maybe it is hiding.<br>3. It seems to be powered up any time you plug it in to charge.  No way to charge with the wifi part off (you can tell it not to connect to the cell network)</p><p>Overall, I'm really impressed with this thing.</p><p>Sure, I could run a linux vm on my laptop and share the internal card over the wireless; I could get a router that's compatible with another evdo card, or some other solution -- but this just works and works well.</p><p>As far as the cost:   If you travel on business and end up paying for hotel wifi, this quickly pays for itself.   Better yet, is the ability to pop open the laptop or handheld pretty much ANYWHERE and pretty much ANYTIME and get connected.  Airport baggage claim, taxi cab, doctor's waiting room, and most important at the park waiting for one of my kids to finish soccer practice.  You could just find an open wifi, but I like knowing what I'm connected to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As others point out , it is n't a revolution in communication .
It is , however , a very elegant implementation of a useful service at a price that is ( for my needs ) reasonable.I 've been using it a week or two now , here 's what my take : Summary : It does what it says it does , in the way it promises , without the slightest hassle .
For electronics , that 's a hell of an endorsement.The GOOD : 1 .
Size - it 's damn easy to carry It really is as small as the ads make it look.2 .
Replaceable Battery - I have a spare right with it ( spare was just under $ 40 ) 3 .
Runs on USB charger , laptop USB , or Battery4 .
Good - maybe not amazing - battery life ( 2-3 hours in reality ) 5 .
Micro-usb connector is compatible with my phone charger so I carry fewer blocks6 .
Performance - &gt; It out performs the EVDO Rev A. Mini-PCI card that I had in my laptop.7 .
Reception - &gt; Better than my best cell phone ---- Also , in poor reception areas like some hotel rooms , I can put it over by the window where the signal is good , and use the network anywhere in the room ! 8 .
Ubiquity - &gt; I do n't have to pick what device I bring with me based on my connectivity needs.9 .
Multi-Device support - &gt; Laptop , Hand-held game , netbook , kid 's laptop in the car , etc.10 .
No need to use the crappy Verizon connection software on the laptop ( or worse , Dell 's bastard stepchild version ) Less Good / Room to Improve1 .
It needs a signal level indicator on the outside surface .
To check signal , you have to hit the router 's config page with a browser.2 .
The data sheet on this says it has a connector for an external antenna .
I have yet to see such a thing .
Maybe it is hiding.3 .
It seems to be powered up any time you plug it in to charge .
No way to charge with the wifi part off ( you can tell it not to connect to the cell network ) Overall , I 'm really impressed with this thing.Sure , I could run a linux vm on my laptop and share the internal card over the wireless ; I could get a router that 's compatible with another evdo card , or some other solution -- but this just works and works well.As far as the cost : If you travel on business and end up paying for hotel wifi , this quickly pays for itself .
Better yet , is the ability to pop open the laptop or handheld pretty much ANYWHERE and pretty much ANYTIME and get connected .
Airport baggage claim , taxi cab , doctor 's waiting room , and most important at the park waiting for one of my kids to finish soccer practice .
You could just find an open wifi , but I like knowing what I 'm connected to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As others point out, it isn't a revolution in communication.
It is, however, a very elegant implementation of a useful service at a price that is (for my needs) reasonable.I've been using it a week or two now, here's what my take:Summary: It does what it says it does, in the way it promises, without the slightest hassle.
For electronics, that's a hell of an endorsement.The GOOD:1.
Size - it's damn easy to carry  It really is as small as the ads make it look.2.
Replaceable Battery - I have a spare right with it (spare was just under $40)3.
Runs on USB charger, laptop USB, or Battery4.
Good - maybe not amazing - battery life (2-3 hours in reality)5.
Micro-usb connector is compatible with my phone charger so I carry fewer blocks6.
Performance -&gt; It out performs the EVDO Rev A. Mini-PCI card that I had in my laptop.7.
Reception -&gt; Better than my best cell phone  ---- Also, in poor reception areas like some hotel rooms, I can put it over by the window where the signal is good, and use the network anywhere in the room!8.
Ubiquity -&gt; I don't have to pick what device I bring with me based on my connectivity needs.9.
Multi-Device support -&gt; Laptop, Hand-held game, netbook, kid's laptop in the car, etc.10.
No need to use the crappy Verizon connection software on the laptop (or worse, Dell's bastard stepchild version)Less Good / Room to Improve1.
It needs a signal level indicator on the outside surface.
To check signal, you have to hit the router's config page with a browser.2.
The data sheet on this says it has a connector for an external antenna.
I have yet to see such a thing.
Maybe it is hiding.3.
It seems to be powered up any time you plug it in to charge.
No way to charge with the wifi part off (you can tell it not to connect to the cell network)Overall, I'm really impressed with this thing.Sure, I could run a linux vm on my laptop and share the internal card over the wireless; I could get a router that's compatible with another evdo card, or some other solution -- but this just works and works well.As far as the cost:   If you travel on business and end up paying for hotel wifi, this quickly pays for itself.
Better yet, is the ability to pop open the laptop or handheld pretty much ANYWHERE and pretty much ANYTIME and get connected.
Airport baggage claim, taxi cab, doctor's waiting room, and most important at the park waiting for one of my kids to finish soccer practice.
You could just find an open wifi, but I like knowing what I'm connected to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188497</id>
	<title>$$ Cost $$</title>
	<author>mcfatboy93</author>
	<datestamp>1243939920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>now whats worth more, having internet outside and where the At&amp;T network is or carrying around a small wireless router that get signals from another company? just asking...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>now whats worth more , having internet outside and where the At&amp;T network is or carrying around a small wireless router that get signals from another company ?
just asking.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now whats worth more, having internet outside and where the At&amp;T network is or carrying around a small wireless router that get signals from another company?
just asking...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190167</id>
	<title>This is great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243949280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now it can do what my Nokia N95 (or nearly any S60 device) has been doing for ages through <a href="http://www.walkinghotspot.com/" title="walkinghotspot.com">Walkinghotspot</a> [walkinghotspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now it can do what my Nokia N95 ( or nearly any S60 device ) has been doing for ages through Walkinghotspot [ walkinghotspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now it can do what my Nokia N95 (or nearly any S60 device) has been doing for ages through Walkinghotspot [walkinghotspot.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28201793</id>
	<title>Re:Nothing new</title>
	<author>ACMENEWSLLC</author>
	<datestamp>1244025420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DIGI has been selling these devices for years.   Others did before them;</p><p><a href="http://www.digi.com/products/cellulargateways/" title="digi.com">http://www.digi.com/products/cellulargateways/</a> [digi.com]</p><p>When you have a remote office out in the middle of no where and you need Internet, sometimes this is the only option.  This or VSAT/DirecWay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DIGI has been selling these devices for years .
Others did before them ; http : //www.digi.com/products/cellulargateways/ [ digi.com ] When you have a remote office out in the middle of no where and you need Internet , sometimes this is the only option .
This or VSAT/DirecWay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DIGI has been selling these devices for years.
Others did before them;http://www.digi.com/products/cellulargateways/ [digi.com]When you have a remote office out in the middle of no where and you need Internet, sometimes this is the only option.
This or VSAT/DirecWay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188837</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188763</id>
	<title>Re:Irony</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1243941120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention; Now that is "irony!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention ; Now that is " irony !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The use of words expressing something other than their literal intention; Now that is "irony!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192771</id>
	<title>Re:This is great...</title>
	<author>Santzes</author>
	<datestamp>1244061180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can also do it with <a href="http://www.joiku.com/?action=products&amp;mode=productDetails&amp;product\_id=310" title="joiku.com" rel="nofollow">JoikuSpot</a> [joiku.com]. Free version only supports HTTP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can also do it with JoikuSpot [ joiku.com ] .
Free version only supports HTTP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can also do it with JoikuSpot [joiku.com].
Free version only supports HTTP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190167</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188591
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192507
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28197783
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189157
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188763
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189047
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194105
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189777
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188979
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188939
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189041
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192771
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190167
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28201793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188837
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194155
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191819
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190095
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189449
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189565
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28193295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28193545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28198569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188745
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190571
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28195741
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191315
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_213201_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192021
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190571
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190167
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192771
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188647
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192507
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28195131
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188607
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188763
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28193295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28195741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190281
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191315
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188837
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28201793
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189977
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188979
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189777
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188745
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28198569
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188789
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194155
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194105
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192021
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28193545
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28191819
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189041
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188591
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190913
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189157
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28197783
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188939
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189565
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28188749
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28189047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28192879
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_213201.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28190095
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_213201.28194725
</commentlist>
</conversation>
