<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_02_1752205</id>
	<title>Last.fm Strongly Denies Sharing Data With RIAA</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1243965240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>bonch writes <i>"Last.fm and CBS <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/06/lastfmriaa-drama-round-2-denials-denials-denials.ars">vehemently deny sharing any user data</a> with the RIAA, contrary to <a href="//slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/23/2149255&amp;tid=95">previous reports</a>. One anonymous party calls it 'irresponsible journalism,' and Last.fm goes so far as to suggest it is a target of slander. Carla Duckworth of the RIAA confirmed, 'We've made no such request for this information.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>bonch writes " Last.fm and CBS vehemently deny sharing any user data with the RIAA , contrary to previous reports .
One anonymous party calls it 'irresponsible journalism, ' and Last.fm goes so far as to suggest it is a target of slander .
Carla Duckworth of the RIAA confirmed , 'We 've made no such request for this information .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bonch writes "Last.fm and CBS vehemently deny sharing any user data with the RIAA, contrary to previous reports.
One anonymous party calls it 'irresponsible journalism,' and Last.fm goes so far as to suggest it is a target of slander.
Carla Duckworth of the RIAA confirmed, 'We've made no such request for this information.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28190707</id>
	<title>I did not have sexual relations...</title>
	<author>d0n0vAn</author>
	<datestamp>1243953720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>'I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski.'  You can say you didn't until you're blue in the face but if we believe you did it.... Look at it this way, remember when you said we were guilty of illegal file sharing and we said we didn't do it? Maybe you see my point, now?</htmltext>
<tokenext>'I did not have sexual relations with that woman , Miss Lewinski .
' You can say you did n't until you 're blue in the face but if we believe you did it.... Look at it this way , remember when you said we were guilty of illegal file sharing and we said we did n't do it ?
Maybe you see my point , now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski.
'  You can say you didn't until you're blue in the face but if we believe you did it.... Look at it this way, remember when you said we were guilty of illegal file sharing and we said we didn't do it?
Maybe you see my point, now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185339</id>
	<title>Why would last.fm, a UK based site</title>
	<author>Finallyjoined!!!</author>
	<datestamp>1243969740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even consider "sharing" info with the Recording Arse of America?<br> <br>
Stuff the RIArseA &amp; others, I don't buy retail music anymore, haven't for about 6 years. I have an extensive vinyl, tape &amp; CD library - some in triplicate, i.e. the same album on tape, vinyl &amp; CD (yep, I'm an idiot) but I stopped buying new when the labels started taking legal action against their own customers.<br> <br>
I do still buy 2nd hand at flea markets &amp; boot sales, but that's by the by.<br> <br>
Stuff 'em I say, tossers they are, to a man.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even consider " sharing " info with the Recording Arse of America ?
Stuff the RIArseA &amp; others , I do n't buy retail music anymore , have n't for about 6 years .
I have an extensive vinyl , tape &amp; CD library - some in triplicate , i.e .
the same album on tape , vinyl &amp; CD ( yep , I 'm an idiot ) but I stopped buying new when the labels started taking legal action against their own customers .
I do still buy 2nd hand at flea markets &amp; boot sales , but that 's by the by .
Stuff 'em I say , tossers they are , to a man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even consider "sharing" info with the Recording Arse of America?
Stuff the RIArseA &amp; others, I don't buy retail music anymore, haven't for about 6 years.
I have an extensive vinyl, tape &amp; CD library - some in triplicate, i.e.
the same album on tape, vinyl &amp; CD (yep, I'm an idiot) but I stopped buying new when the labels started taking legal action against their own customers.
I do still buy 2nd hand at flea markets &amp; boot sales, but that's by the by.
Stuff 'em I say, tossers they are, to a man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28194103</id>
	<title>Re:Sure!</title>
	<author>rbochan</author>
	<datestamp>1244035380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Suddenly, everyone uses a lame straw-man argument!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Suddenly , everyone uses a lame straw-man argument !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suddenly, everyone uses a lame straw-man argument!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186865</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445</id>
	<title>TechCrunch and Pandora</title>
	<author>meehawl</author>
	<datestamp>1243935600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pandora's main competition for mindshare is Last.FM. There's also a bit of a US/EU rivalry, with Pandora so strongly identified with the US and, with the Valley in particular, while Last.FM came out of a Euro milieu. I think I've noticed a very pro-Pandora coverage pattern at TechCrunch. Lots of the "Web 2 - Me Too" AdSense spam sites, sorry, gadget/tech blogs, take cues from TechCrunch, and among the iPhone-toting, US-centric crowd, Pandora is a darling.</p><p>Before I'd believe anything TechCrunch said about Last.FM, I'd want to know more about the personal and financial connections between the people running TechCrunch and the people running Pandora.</p><p>Personally, I've tried Pandora every years and it fails, epically, to even know about many of the <a href="http://www.last.fm/user/meehawl/library" title="www.last.fm">artists I am interested in hearing</a> [www.last.fm]. Plus, Pandora's Flash interface is just aggravating, user-hostile, and screams hipster-designer-marketroid-douchbags-in-control.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pandora 's main competition for mindshare is Last.FM .
There 's also a bit of a US/EU rivalry , with Pandora so strongly identified with the US and , with the Valley in particular , while Last.FM came out of a Euro milieu .
I think I 've noticed a very pro-Pandora coverage pattern at TechCrunch .
Lots of the " Web 2 - Me Too " AdSense spam sites , sorry , gadget/tech blogs , take cues from TechCrunch , and among the iPhone-toting , US-centric crowd , Pandora is a darling.Before I 'd believe anything TechCrunch said about Last.FM , I 'd want to know more about the personal and financial connections between the people running TechCrunch and the people running Pandora.Personally , I 've tried Pandora every years and it fails , epically , to even know about many of the artists I am interested in hearing [ www.last.fm ] .
Plus , Pandora 's Flash interface is just aggravating , user-hostile , and screams hipster-designer-marketroid-douchbags-in-control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pandora's main competition for mindshare is Last.FM.
There's also a bit of a US/EU rivalry, with Pandora so strongly identified with the US and, with the Valley in particular, while Last.FM came out of a Euro milieu.
I think I've noticed a very pro-Pandora coverage pattern at TechCrunch.
Lots of the "Web 2 - Me Too" AdSense spam sites, sorry, gadget/tech blogs, take cues from TechCrunch, and among the iPhone-toting, US-centric crowd, Pandora is a darling.Before I'd believe anything TechCrunch said about Last.FM, I'd want to know more about the personal and financial connections between the people running TechCrunch and the people running Pandora.Personally, I've tried Pandora every years and it fails, epically, to even know about many of the artists I am interested in hearing [www.last.fm].
Plus, Pandora's Flash interface is just aggravating, user-hostile, and screams hipster-designer-marketroid-douchbags-in-control.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185771</id>
	<title>By their statements, there's nothing official but</title>
	<author>TheGreatOrangePeel</author>
	<datestamp>1243971600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... I can't help but to wonder if the RIAA is scraping the data and Last.fm is letting it slide.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... I ca n't help but to wonder if the RIAA is scraping the data and Last.fm is letting it slide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... I can't help but to wonder if the RIAA is scraping the data and Last.fm is letting it slide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885</id>
	<title>Hmmm, Credibility....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243972080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, who do I trust more:</p><p>1. The RIAA PR person, the CBS PR person, and the Last.fm PR person.<br>-- or --<br>2. A completely unverifiable source who may have an axe to grind or other nefarious motive for completely fabricating the story.</p><p>Frankly, it's a tough call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , who do I trust more : 1 .
The RIAA PR person , the CBS PR person , and the Last.fm PR person.-- or --2 .
A completely unverifiable source who may have an axe to grind or other nefarious motive for completely fabricating the story.Frankly , it 's a tough call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, who do I trust more:1.
The RIAA PR person, the CBS PR person, and the Last.fm PR person.-- or --2.
A completely unverifiable source who may have an axe to grind or other nefarious motive for completely fabricating the story.Frankly, it's a tough call.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185187</id>
	<title>RIAA also says</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243968960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Thanks for the good idea!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Thanks for the good idea !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Thanks for the good idea!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186865</id>
	<title>Re:Sure!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243933200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Suddenly, everyone accused of rape fits the bill too!</p><p>Is it logical that Tom would rape the supermodel Tina?  Yup.  Would her friend Sheri cooperate with the police?  Yup.</p><p>I have no problem believing Tom really did it.  And have no problem believing he would LIE about it.  It's really in his best interest.</p><p>With your logic there's no way for Last.fm to win.  Simply because they were accused of it, and because the accusation was plausible, they are guilty.  I know these are liberal times and all, but let's not jump the gun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Suddenly , everyone accused of rape fits the bill too ! Is it logical that Tom would rape the supermodel Tina ?
Yup. Would her friend Sheri cooperate with the police ?
Yup.I have no problem believing Tom really did it .
And have no problem believing he would LIE about it .
It 's really in his best interest.With your logic there 's no way for Last.fm to win .
Simply because they were accused of it , and because the accusation was plausible , they are guilty .
I know these are liberal times and all , but let 's not jump the gun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suddenly, everyone accused of rape fits the bill too!Is it logical that Tom would rape the supermodel Tina?
Yup.  Would her friend Sheri cooperate with the police?
Yup.I have no problem believing Tom really did it.
And have no problem believing he would LIE about it.
It's really in his best interest.With your logic there's no way for Last.fm to win.
Simply because they were accused of it, and because the accusation was plausible, they are guilty.
I know these are liberal times and all, but let's not jump the gun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28194009</id>
	<title>Re:TechCrunch and Pandora</title>
	<author>Mordaximus</author>
	<datestamp>1244034540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Pandora's main competition for mindshare is Last.FM. There's also a bit of a US/EU rivalry, with Pandora so strongly identified with the US and...</i> </p><p>There isn't much of a rivalry at all. Firstly, anyone can use Last.fm, Pandora is restricted to the US. But tthat aside, they aren't really even similar services at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pandora 's main competition for mindshare is Last.FM .
There 's also a bit of a US/EU rivalry , with Pandora so strongly identified with the US and... There is n't much of a rivalry at all .
Firstly , anyone can use Last.fm , Pandora is restricted to the US .
But tthat aside , they are n't really even similar services at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Pandora's main competition for mindshare is Last.FM.
There's also a bit of a US/EU rivalry, with Pandora so strongly identified with the US and... There isn't much of a rivalry at all.
Firstly, anyone can use Last.fm, Pandora is restricted to the US.
But tthat aside, they aren't really even similar services at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28189705</id>
	<title>Re:Why would last.fm, a UK based site</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1243946220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the "Recording Industry Ass. of America". Learn your abbreviations, you M$ shill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the " Recording Industry Ass .
of America " .
Learn your abbreviations , you M $ shill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the "Recording Industry Ass.
of America".
Learn your abbreviations, you M$ shill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185339</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187475</id>
	<title>I'm doubt last.fm would knowingly break the law...</title>
	<author>ChowRiit</author>
	<datestamp>1243935720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>last.fm is an English company, with its servers located in London. Complying to such a request for user data would be illegal under UK data protection laws, as best as I can tell.</p><p>Not saying that proves much either way, but for what it's worth I've always found last.fm fairly open and engaged with its users. I rather doubt they would knowingly give away user's data, especially given its illegality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>last.fm is an English company , with its servers located in London .
Complying to such a request for user data would be illegal under UK data protection laws , as best as I can tell.Not saying that proves much either way , but for what it 's worth I 've always found last.fm fairly open and engaged with its users .
I rather doubt they would knowingly give away user 's data , especially given its illegality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>last.fm is an English company, with its servers located in London.
Complying to such a request for user data would be illegal under UK data protection laws, as best as I can tell.Not saying that proves much either way, but for what it's worth I've always found last.fm fairly open and engaged with its users.
I rather doubt they would knowingly give away user's data, especially given its illegality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187997</id>
	<title>You&amp; Fai7 It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243937640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they want you to superior to sl0w, surveys show that their parting EVERYDAY...REDEFINE Progress. In 1992, '*BSD Sux0rs'. This disgust, or been own lube, beverage, is the ultimate Triumphs would soon to decline for told reporters, NetBSD user backwards.  To the a previously during this file butts are exposed and sling or table track of where '*BSD Sux0rs'. This [SAMAG.COM] IN THE world. GNAA members house... pathetic. Host what the house OF AMERICA irc So on, FreeBSD went 800 w/512 Megs of Me if you'd like, long term survival current core were is wiped off and and easy - only</htmltext>
<tokenext>they want you to superior to sl0w , surveys show that their parting EVERYDAY...REDEFINE Progress .
In 1992 , ' * BSD Sux0rs' .
This disgust , or been own lube , beverage , is the ultimate Triumphs would soon to decline for told reporters , NetBSD user backwards .
To the a previously during this file butts are exposed and sling or table track of where ' * BSD Sux0rs' .
This [ SAMAG.COM ] IN THE world .
GNAA members house... pathetic. Host what the house OF AMERICA irc So on , FreeBSD went 800 w/512 Megs of Me if you 'd like , long term survival current core were is wiped off and and easy - only</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they want you to superior to sl0w, surveys show that their parting EVERYDAY...REDEFINE Progress.
In 1992, '*BSD Sux0rs'.
This disgust, or been own lube, beverage, is the ultimate Triumphs would soon to decline for told reporters, NetBSD user backwards.
To the a previously during this file butts are exposed and sling or table track of where '*BSD Sux0rs'.
This [SAMAG.COM] IN THE world.
GNAA members house... pathetic. Host what the house OF AMERICA irc So on, FreeBSD went 800 w/512 Megs of Me if you'd like, long term survival current core were is wiped off and and easy - only</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188341</id>
	<title>Even if it's not true</title>
	<author>scarboni888</author>
	<datestamp>1243939260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a bad taste in my mouth after finding out that lastfm (corporate whore) was owned or someways affiliated with cbs.

I'll stick with soma.fm spank you very much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a bad taste in my mouth after finding out that lastfm ( corporate whore ) was owned or someways affiliated with cbs .
I 'll stick with soma.fm spank you very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a bad taste in my mouth after finding out that lastfm (corporate whore) was owned or someways affiliated with cbs.
I'll stick with soma.fm spank you very much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186915</id>
	<title>Hang on...</title>
	<author>godIsaDJ</author>
	<datestamp>1243933380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... They claim that they can't distinguish between streamed music and music from your collection. That would make sense unless they planned to rat out users with illegal collections.

It seems a lot of trouble to go through and makes little sense to me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>... They claim that they ca n't distinguish between streamed music and music from your collection .
That would make sense unless they planned to rat out users with illegal collections .
It seems a lot of trouble to go through and makes little sense to me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... They claim that they can't distinguish between streamed music and music from your collection.
That would make sense unless they planned to rat out users with illegal collections.
It seems a lot of trouble to go through and makes little sense to me...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185533</id>
	<title>Re:Smells fishy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243970520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Methinks [they] doth protest too much.</i></p><p>The RIAA never requested the information.  CBS volunteered it willingly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Methinks [ they ] doth protest too much.The RIAA never requested the information .
CBS volunteered it willingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Methinks [they] doth protest too much.The RIAA never requested the information.
CBS volunteered it willingly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185239</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185259</id>
	<title>Irresponsible Journalism??</title>
	<author>Renderer of Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1243969380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TechCrunch? I refuse to believe that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TechCrunch ?
I refuse to believe that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TechCrunch?
I refuse to believe that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185821</id>
	<title>How Dare You</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1243971840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Share"! As if Last.fm would give such valuable data away for free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Share " !
As if Last.fm would give such valuable data away for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Share"!
As if Last.fm would give such valuable data away for free.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28190187</id>
	<title>Re:So, did they get the data?</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1243949400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nor did RIAA receive the data from Last.fm.  They received it from the intermediary that received it from Last.fm.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nor did RIAA receive the data from Last.fm .
They received it from the intermediary that received it from Last.fm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nor did RIAA receive the data from Last.fm.
They received it from the intermediary that received it from Last.fm.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185239</id>
	<title>Smells fishy</title>
	<author>Tanktalus</author>
	<datestamp>1243969260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wasn't so sure before, but when the RIAA denies even making the request, well, now I'm paranoid.  Methinks [they] doth protest too much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't so sure before , but when the RIAA denies even making the request , well , now I 'm paranoid .
Methinks [ they ] doth protest too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't so sure before, but when the RIAA denies even making the request, well, now I'm paranoid.
Methinks [they] doth protest too much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186861</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a form of...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243976340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>weird, I entered 10 artists I listen to regularly and none of them showed up on GrooveShark, none. So much for "... any song in the world. For free". I'll take last.fm with access to all ten of those artists, thanks</htmltext>
<tokenext>weird , I entered 10 artists I listen to regularly and none of them showed up on GrooveShark , none .
So much for " ... any song in the world .
For free " .
I 'll take last.fm with access to all ten of those artists , thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>weird, I entered 10 artists I listen to regularly and none of them showed up on GrooveShark, none.
So much for "... any song in the world.
For free".
I'll take last.fm with access to all ten of those artists, thanks</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185709</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185661</id>
	<title>f\_irst</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243971120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BackwArds.  To the Baby take my</htmltext>
<tokenext>BackwArds .
To the Baby take my</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BackwArds.
To the Baby take my</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188015</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm, Credibility....</title>
	<author>pbhj</author>
	<datestamp>1243937760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So, who do I trust more:</p><p>1. The RIAA PR person, the CBS PR person, and the Last.fm PR person.<br>-- or --<br>2. A completely unverifiable source who may have an axe to grind or other nefarious motive for completely fabricating the story.</p><p>Frankly, it's a tough call.</p></div><p>Well at least now CBS have started libel proceedings against TC the truth will come out in court. Oh wait.</p><p>Now what possible reason might the CBS have for believing they could fail in court, after all TC is all just scurrilous lies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , who do I trust more : 1 .
The RIAA PR person , the CBS PR person , and the Last.fm PR person.-- or --2 .
A completely unverifiable source who may have an axe to grind or other nefarious motive for completely fabricating the story.Frankly , it 's a tough call.Well at least now CBS have started libel proceedings against TC the truth will come out in court .
Oh wait.Now what possible reason might the CBS have for believing they could fail in court , after all TC is all just scurrilous lies ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, who do I trust more:1.
The RIAA PR person, the CBS PR person, and the Last.fm PR person.-- or --2.
A completely unverifiable source who may have an axe to grind or other nefarious motive for completely fabricating the story.Frankly, it's a tough call.Well at least now CBS have started libel proceedings against TC the truth will come out in court.
Oh wait.Now what possible reason might the CBS have for believing they could fail in court, after all TC is all just scurrilous lies ....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185375</id>
	<title>Re:From the Article:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243969860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, who would have thought that Michael Arrington who talks out of his ass 99\% of the time was making shit up just to increase traffic to his worthless blog? He's the Perez Hilton of the tech world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , who would have thought that Michael Arrington who talks out of his ass 99 \ % of the time was making shit up just to increase traffic to his worthless blog ?
He 's the Perez Hilton of the tech world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, who would have thought that Michael Arrington who talks out of his ass 99\% of the time was making shit up just to increase traffic to his worthless blog?
He's the Perez Hilton of the tech world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186989</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm, Credibility....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243933740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not at all. I am fully confident that <a href="http://blog.last.fm/2009/02/23/techcrunch-are-full-of-shit" title="blog.last.fm" rel="nofollow">Techcrunch are full of shit.</a> [blog.last.fm]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not at all .
I am fully confident that Techcrunch are full of shit .
[ blog.last.fm ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not at all.
I am fully confident that Techcrunch are full of shit.
[blog.last.fm]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185407</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243970040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just one bill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just one bill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just one bill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205</id>
	<title>From the Article:</title>
	<author>InMSWeAntitrust</author>
	<datestamp>1243969080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This all leaves us in the same place we were in February&#226;"with a slew of accusations, a handful of denials, and zero evidence.</p> </div><p>That's what happens when you believe rumors.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This all leaves us in the same place we were in February   " with a slew of accusations , a handful of denials , and zero evidence .
That 's what happens when you believe rumors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This all leaves us in the same place we were in Februaryâ"with a slew of accusations, a handful of denials, and zero evidence.
That's what happens when you believe rumors.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28192687</id>
	<title>Re:TechCrunch and Pandora</title>
	<author>bickerdyke</author>
	<datestamp>1244060400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IIRC.. wasn't Pandora blocked for non US-IPs? Would explain the rivalry. Or rather the ignorance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IIRC.. was n't Pandora blocked for non US-IPs ?
Would explain the rivalry .
Or rather the ignorance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IIRC.. wasn't Pandora blocked for non US-IPs?
Would explain the rivalry.
Or rather the ignorance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188707</id>
	<title>Re:TechCrunch and Pandora</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1243940820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>FWIW, the Valley is a small place.  One of Arrington's first interviews was Tim Westergren, founder of Pandora.<br> <br>There doesn't need to be any fiduciary interest on Arrington's part, familiarity with Pandora might be all it takes to make him favor Pandora.<br> <br>And also, not sure where you're getting the concept of a big rivalry between Pandora and Last.fm.  I've observed no such thing... just that people use what they are comfortable with.  Maybe there're fanboys sprouting up, but I think you're overanalyzing.<br> <br>IMO, Arrington's just a twit.  Twits exist independently of financial arrangements.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FWIW , the Valley is a small place .
One of Arrington 's first interviews was Tim Westergren , founder of Pandora .
There does n't need to be any fiduciary interest on Arrington 's part , familiarity with Pandora might be all it takes to make him favor Pandora .
And also , not sure where you 're getting the concept of a big rivalry between Pandora and Last.fm .
I 've observed no such thing... just that people use what they are comfortable with .
Maybe there 're fanboys sprouting up , but I think you 're overanalyzing .
IMO , Arrington 's just a twit .
Twits exist independently of financial arrangements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FWIW, the Valley is a small place.
One of Arrington's first interviews was Tim Westergren, founder of Pandora.
There doesn't need to be any fiduciary interest on Arrington's part, familiarity with Pandora might be all it takes to make him favor Pandora.
And also, not sure where you're getting the concept of a big rivalry between Pandora and Last.fm.
I've observed no such thing... just that people use what they are comfortable with.
Maybe there're fanboys sprouting up, but I think you're overanalyzing.
IMO, Arrington's just a twit.
Twits exist independently of financial arrangements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186157</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243973280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What type of user data were they supposedly passing onto the RIAA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What type of user data were they supposedly passing onto the RIAA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What type of user data were they supposedly passing onto the RIAA?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185257</id>
	<title>Sure!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243969380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the company is going to come right out and tell people....  "we fuckin sold you out to make a quick buck! hahahahaha!"</p><p>Is it logical that the RIAA would want that data?  Yup.  Would CBS really cooperate with them?  Yup.</p><p>I have no problem believing they really did it.   And have no problem believing that they would LIE about it.     Both are really in their best intrests.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the company is going to come right out and tell people.... " we fuckin sold you out to make a quick buck !
hahahahaha ! " Is it logical that the RIAA would want that data ?
Yup. Would CBS really cooperate with them ?
Yup.I have no problem believing they really did it .
And have no problem believing that they would LIE about it .
Both are really in their best intrests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the company is going to come right out and tell people....  "we fuckin sold you out to make a quick buck!
hahahahaha!"Is it logical that the RIAA would want that data?
Yup.  Would CBS really cooperate with them?
Yup.I have no problem believing they really did it.
And have no problem believing that they would LIE about it.
Both are really in their best intrests.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185709</id>
	<title>Re:Perhaps a form of...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243971300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw Last.fm. <a href="http://listen.grooveshark.com/" title="grooveshark.com">Grooveshark</a> [grooveshark.com] has a much better offer, is less anal-retentive and is much more accessible than Last.fm. If only they would provide a plugin for <a href="http://getsongbird.com/" title="getsongbird.com">Songbird</a> [getsongbird.com] (or a decent API so someone could make it), they would have a killer internet radio.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw Last.fm .
Grooveshark [ grooveshark.com ] has a much better offer , is less anal-retentive and is much more accessible than Last.fm .
If only they would provide a plugin for Songbird [ getsongbird.com ] ( or a decent API so someone could make it ) , they would have a killer internet radio .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw Last.fm.
Grooveshark [grooveshark.com] has a much better offer, is less anal-retentive and is much more accessible than Last.fm.
If only they would provide a plugin for Songbird [getsongbird.com] (or a decent API so someone could make it), they would have a killer internet radio.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185345</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186801</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot hands over information to Microsoft</title>
	<author>MikeURL</author>
	<datestamp>1243976100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before we get too worked up about "poor CBS" or "poor RIAA" we might want to remember why people are so willing to believe this anonymous Techcrunch story in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Before we get too worked up about " poor CBS " or " poor RIAA " we might want to remember why people are so willing to believe this anonymous Techcrunch story in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before we get too worked up about "poor CBS" or "poor RIAA" we might want to remember why people are so willing to believe this anonymous Techcrunch story in the first place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28191969</id>
	<title>Re:So, did they get the data?</title>
	<author>bonch</author>
	<datestamp>1243965120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Other than Last.fm strongly denying that they shared anything, of course.  But let's ignore that part and continue spreading the rumor through anonymous coward posts on Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Other than Last.fm strongly denying that they shared anything , of course .
But let 's ignore that part and continue spreading the rumor through anonymous coward posts on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Other than Last.fm strongly denying that they shared anything, of course.
But let's ignore that part and continue spreading the rumor through anonymous coward posts on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185447</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm...</title>
	<author>MaerD</author>
	<datestamp>1243970160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somewhere around $4.35 for a mallard, unless you <a href="http://www.metzerfarms.com/prices.htm" title="metzerfarms.com" rel="nofollow"> buy in bulk.</a> [metzerfarms.com]
<br>
Google, helping me be a smart ass since 1998.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere around $ 4.35 for a mallard , unless you buy in bulk .
[ metzerfarms.com ] Google , helping me be a smart ass since 1998 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhere around $4.35 for a mallard, unless you  buy in bulk.
[metzerfarms.com]

Google, helping me be a smart ass since 1998.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186329</id>
	<title>Don't know about the duck..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243974120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The windshield he tried to fly through cost me $300 to replace, though......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The windshield he tried to fly through cost me $ 300 to replace , though..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The windshield he tried to fly through cost me $300 to replace, though......</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28189503</id>
	<title>As Johnny Rotten has said...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243944960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck EMI!
<p>
Fuck CBS
</p><p>
Fuck Last.fm
</p><p>... and (quoting Frank Zappa): FUCK WARNER BROS!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck EMI !
Fuck CBS Fuck Last.fm ... and ( quoting Frank Zappa ) : FUCK WARNER BROS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck EMI!
Fuck CBS

Fuck Last.fm
... and (quoting Frank Zappa): FUCK WARNER BROS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185707</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot hands over information to Microsoft</title>
	<author>geekboy642</author>
	<datestamp>1243971300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only am I quitting Slashdot, I'm forming a massive and poorly-written network of interlinking blogs all supporting this exact story!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only am I quitting Slashdot , I 'm forming a massive and poorly-written network of interlinking blogs all supporting this exact story !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only am I quitting Slashdot, I'm forming a massive and poorly-written network of interlinking blogs all supporting this exact story!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186959</id>
	<title>"Confirmed" or "claimed?"</title>
	<author>serutan</author>
	<datestamp>1243933560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can the RIAA ever be said to have "confirmed" anything when we pretty much assume that everything they say is a lie?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can the RIAA ever be said to have " confirmed " anything when we pretty much assume that everything they say is a lie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can the RIAA ever be said to have "confirmed" anything when we pretty much assume that everything they say is a lie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185257</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391</id>
	<title>So, did they get the data?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243969920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The RIAA says that they didn't request the data, but note that there is no denial that they received it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The RIAA says that they did n't request the data , but note that there is no denial that they received it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The RIAA says that they didn't request the data, but note that there is no denial that they received it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185567</id>
	<title>Re:Uhm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243970760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why a duck?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why a duck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why a duck?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283</id>
	<title>Uhm...</title>
	<author>agnosticanarch</author>
	<datestamp>1243969560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's a Duckworth?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's a Duckworth ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's a Duckworth?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185813</id>
	<title>OK... Now i believe them</title>
	<author>Ezrymyrh</author>
	<datestamp>1243971780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the RIAA backing them up? No way they would lie, I know because they promised me a pony.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the RIAA backing them up ?
No way they would lie , I know because they promised me a pony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the RIAA backing them up?
No way they would lie, I know because they promised me a pony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541</id>
	<title>Slashdot hands over information to Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243970580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm an ex-Slashdot employee, ex-astronaut, and ex-president of the Hair Club for Men, and two weeks ago CmdrTaco gave Microsoft the posting history along with IPs, email addresses, favorite colors, your FICO score, and if you like pouring hot grits down your pants for the Bing search engine.</p><p>I'm anonymous, on the Internet, and have no actually proof, so it has to be 100\% true! Now is the time to over-react and proclaim you are quitting Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm an ex-Slashdot employee , ex-astronaut , and ex-president of the Hair Club for Men , and two weeks ago CmdrTaco gave Microsoft the posting history along with IPs , email addresses , favorite colors , your FICO score , and if you like pouring hot grits down your pants for the Bing search engine.I 'm anonymous , on the Internet , and have no actually proof , so it has to be 100 \ % true !
Now is the time to over-react and proclaim you are quitting Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm an ex-Slashdot employee, ex-astronaut, and ex-president of the Hair Club for Men, and two weeks ago CmdrTaco gave Microsoft the posting history along with IPs, email addresses, favorite colors, your FICO score, and if you like pouring hot grits down your pants for the Bing search engine.I'm anonymous, on the Internet, and have no actually proof, so it has to be 100\% true!
Now is the time to over-react and proclaim you are quitting Slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185619</id>
	<title>Who cares what they say?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243971000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reason this story is so hurtful to them is because the ONLY thing keeping your privacy safe is them deciding whether or not to violate it.</p><p>They do not deny having all of this information, or being owned by someone you dont want to have this information. Whether or not they've yet to breach that tiny little divide is irrelevant as long as the potential is there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason this story is so hurtful to them is because the ONLY thing keeping your privacy safe is them deciding whether or not to violate it.They do not deny having all of this information , or being owned by someone you dont want to have this information .
Whether or not they 've yet to breach that tiny little divide is irrelevant as long as the potential is there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason this story is so hurtful to them is because the ONLY thing keeping your privacy safe is them deciding whether or not to violate it.They do not deny having all of this information, or being owned by someone you dont want to have this information.
Whether or not they've yet to breach that tiny little divide is irrelevant as long as the potential is there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187567</id>
	<title>Re:So, did they get the data?</title>
	<author>dotgain</author>
	<datestamp>1243936080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They actually did say more that wasn't quoted in the blurb.  <a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/02/riaa-denies-rumors-that-lastfm-turned-over-data.ars" title="arstechnica.com" rel="nofollow">See here</a> [arstechnica.com]<blockquote><div><p>"[We're] not sure where that rumor came from," RIAA spokesperson Cara Duckworth told Ars on Saturday. "It's not true."</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They actually did say more that was n't quoted in the blurb .
See here [ arstechnica.com ] " [ We 're ] not sure where that rumor came from , " RIAA spokesperson Cara Duckworth told Ars on Saturday .
" It 's not true .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They actually did say more that wasn't quoted in the blurb.
See here [arstechnica.com]"[We're] not sure where that rumor came from," RIAA spokesperson Cara Duckworth told Ars on Saturday.
"It's not true.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28190853</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot hands over information to Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243954620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am quitting Slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am quitting Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am quitting Slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185389</id>
	<title>Re:From the Article:</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1243969920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>This all leaves us in the same place we were in February&mdash;"with a slew of accusations, a handful of denials, and zero evidence.
</i> <br>
<br>
Wait a second. Are we talking about the TechCrunch accusations or the RIAA's lawsuits here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This all leaves us in the same place we were in February    " with a slew of accusations , a handful of denials , and zero evidence .
Wait a second .
Are we talking about the TechCrunch accusations or the RIAA 's lawsuits here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This all leaves us in the same place we were in February—"with a slew of accusations, a handful of denials, and zero evidence.
Wait a second.
Are we talking about the TechCrunch accusations or the RIAA's lawsuits here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188419</id>
	<title>Re:Hmmm, Credibility....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243939620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no Last.fm PR person.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no Last.fm PR person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no Last.fm PR person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28193009</id>
	<title>Re:From the Article:</title>
	<author>luk3Z</author>
	<datestamp>1244020860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this last.fm reply after so "long" time is too overall and suspicious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this last.fm reply after so " long " time is too overall and suspicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this last.fm reply after so "long" time is too overall and suspicious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185291</id>
	<title>Yeah and...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243969560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of the Guards at Auschwitz said they treated prisoners with respect and care...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the Guards at Auschwitz said they treated prisoners with respect and care.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the Guards at Auschwitz said they treated prisoners with respect and care...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185345</id>
	<title>Perhaps a form of...</title>
	<author>Aristophrenia</author>
	<datestamp>1243969740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Industrial Espionage?<br>
<br>
Many users may not trust Last.fm after this, regardless of its validity.  And we know that many more people have no trust for the RIAA.  All things considered, this may have driven much traffic to other similar sites (even with the Streisand Effect) thus providing other sites a chance to increase revenue.<br>
<br>
While this may not be the most likely cause, it is something to consider and contemplate, while making sure one doesn't go too far down the tinfoil hat road.<br>
<br>
For further reading <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial\_espionage" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial\_espionage</a> [wikipedia.org] .</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Industrial Espionage ?
Many users may not trust Last.fm after this , regardless of its validity .
And we know that many more people have no trust for the RIAA .
All things considered , this may have driven much traffic to other similar sites ( even with the Streisand Effect ) thus providing other sites a chance to increase revenue .
While this may not be the most likely cause , it is something to consider and contemplate , while making sure one does n't go too far down the tinfoil hat road .
For further reading http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial \ _espionage [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Industrial Espionage?
Many users may not trust Last.fm after this, regardless of its validity.
And we know that many more people have no trust for the RIAA.
All things considered, this may have driven much traffic to other similar sites (even with the Streisand Effect) thus providing other sites a chance to increase revenue.
While this may not be the most likely cause, it is something to consider and contemplate, while making sure one doesn't go too far down the tinfoil hat road.
For further reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial\_espionage [wikipedia.org] .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28194009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28194103
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185447
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188015
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28189705
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185339
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28191969
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28190853
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186801
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28190187
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188419
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185257
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185567
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28192687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185707
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185345
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186329
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185239
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28193009
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_1752205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185407
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187445
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28194009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188707
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28192687
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185885
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188419
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28188015
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186915
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186989
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186801
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28190853
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185707
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185283
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185407
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185447
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186329
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185205
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28193009
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185389
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185259
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185187
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185339
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28189705
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185391
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187567
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28191969
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28190187
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186865
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28194103
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186959
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28187997
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185821
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185709
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28186861
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185291
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_1752205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185239
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_1752205.28185533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
