<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_02_0719209</id>
	<title><em>Crysis 2</em> Confirmed For Multiple Platforms</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1243970280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>EA and Crytek teamed up for an announcement at E3, confirming that <a href="http://www.giantbomb.com/news/prepare-to-weep-ea-announces-crysis-2/1354/"> <em>Crysis 2</em> was under development for the PC, PS3, and Xbox 360</a>. Details are scarce (and <a href="http://kotaku.com/5274985/crysis-2-trailer-is-light-on-the-crysis-2">the trailer is no help</a>), but the game will use <a href="http://www.crytek.com/technology/cryengine-3/specifications/">CryENGINE 3</a>, which <a href="http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/989/989159p1.html">will be able to scale performance</a> such that it will look good on consoles while still pushing the limits of PC graphics. Quoting:
<i>"When asked if that sounded like a contradiction, [Crytek's Cevat Yerli] responded that you have to think of technology as a tool that can scale. He said the game's content scales to the platform it's on. 'The PC version will look better, because of the fact that the PC can do more. It will be scaling up. But on the consoles, you're competing with console games,' he said. 'The goal is to be the best looking game on PS3 [and] the best looking game on 360 in the entire market.' On the PC front, <em>Crysis 2</em> will compete with the original <em>Crysis</em>, which still sets the bar for PC graphics."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>EA and Crytek teamed up for an announcement at E3 , confirming that Crysis 2 was under development for the PC , PS3 , and Xbox 360 .
Details are scarce ( and the trailer is no help ) , but the game will use CryENGINE 3 , which will be able to scale performance such that it will look good on consoles while still pushing the limits of PC graphics .
Quoting : " When asked if that sounded like a contradiction , [ Crytek 's Cevat Yerli ] responded that you have to think of technology as a tool that can scale .
He said the game 's content scales to the platform it 's on .
'The PC version will look better , because of the fact that the PC can do more .
It will be scaling up .
But on the consoles , you 're competing with console games, ' he said .
'The goal is to be the best looking game on PS3 [ and ] the best looking game on 360 in the entire market .
' On the PC front , Crysis 2 will compete with the original Crysis , which still sets the bar for PC graphics .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EA and Crytek teamed up for an announcement at E3, confirming that  Crysis 2 was under development for the PC, PS3, and Xbox 360.
Details are scarce (and the trailer is no help), but the game will use CryENGINE 3, which will be able to scale performance such that it will look good on consoles while still pushing the limits of PC graphics.
Quoting:
"When asked if that sounded like a contradiction, [Crytek's Cevat Yerli] responded that you have to think of technology as a tool that can scale.
He said the game's content scales to the platform it's on.
'The PC version will look better, because of the fact that the PC can do more.
It will be scaling up.
But on the consoles, you're competing with console games,' he said.
'The goal is to be the best looking game on PS3 [and] the best looking game on 360 in the entire market.
' On the PC front, Crysis 2 will compete with the original Crysis, which still sets the bar for PC graphics.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180573</id>
	<title>PC is Linux, not just Windows</title>
	<author>BloodyIron</author>
	<datestamp>1243949940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, what distros are they going to support? Because Windows isn't the only OS on the PC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what distros are they going to support ?
Because Windows is n't the only OS on the PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what distros are they going to support?
Because Windows isn't the only OS on the PC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178741</id>
	<title>Cool</title>
	<author>TheLink</author>
	<datestamp>1243975320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The popular PC graphics benchmark is going multi-platform<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</htmltext>
<tokenext>The popular PC graphics benchmark is going multi-platform : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The popular PC graphics benchmark is going multi-platform :).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755</id>
	<title>Wait</title>
	<author>shellster\_dude</author>
	<datestamp>1243975380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't we have post running several months ago, bitching about how Crytek was going under because of all the piracy?  Didn't they claim that because of the "evil pirates" there would be no sequel?  Maybe I am confused, my memory isn't as good as it used to be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't we have post running several months ago , bitching about how Crytek was going under because of all the piracy ?
Did n't they claim that because of the " evil pirates " there would be no sequel ?
Maybe I am confused , my memory is n't as good as it used to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't we have post running several months ago, bitching about how Crytek was going under because of all the piracy?
Didn't they claim that because of the "evil pirates" there would be no sequel?
Maybe I am confused, my memory isn't as good as it used to be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179719</id>
	<title>XBox version</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243943400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Achievement unlocked: 10 FPS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Achievement unlocked : 10 FPS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Achievement unlocked: 10 FPS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178835</id>
	<title>User Friendly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243933200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"On the PC front, Crysis 2 will compete with the original Crysis, which still sets the bar for PC graphics."</p><p>Waaavy lines back to the days of UT, but substituting C2:</p><p>"Nice slide show, Stef, what is it?"<br>"Crysis 2"</p><p>--<br>BMO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" On the PC front , Crysis 2 will compete with the original Crysis , which still sets the bar for PC graphics .
" Waaavy lines back to the days of UT , but substituting C2 : " Nice slide show , Stef , what is it ?
" " Crysis 2 " --BMO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"On the PC front, Crysis 2 will compete with the original Crysis, which still sets the bar for PC graphics.
"Waaavy lines back to the days of UT, but substituting C2:"Nice slide show, Stef, what is it?
""Crysis 2"--BMO</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179171</id>
	<title>Maybe this time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243937220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll actually put out a game instead of a fucking tech demo. The first game was pretty awful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll actually put out a game instead of a fucking tech demo .
The first game was pretty awful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll actually put out a game instead of a fucking tech demo.
The first game was pretty awful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179217</id>
	<title>"Crysis 2 Confirmed For Multiple Platforms "</title>
	<author>DamienNightbane</author>
	<datestamp>1243937700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>But will it actually run on any of them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it actually run on any of them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it actually run on any of them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179185</id>
	<title>Crysis 2 Confirmed For Multiple Platforms...</title>
	<author>BraulioBezerra</author>
	<datestamp>1243937340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, to run Crisis 2 you will need 5 PCs, 3 Macs, 7 PS3s, 4 XBox'es...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , to run Crisis 2 you will need 5 PCs , 3 Macs , 7 PS3s , 4 XBox'es.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, to run Crisis 2 you will need 5 PCs, 3 Macs, 7 PS3s, 4 XBox'es...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179533</id>
	<title>Re:Crysis 2 Confirmed For Multiple Platforms...</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1243941240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A game that will actually <b>require</b> a beowulf cluster of PS3s!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A game that will actually require a beowulf cluster of PS3s !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A game that will actually require a beowulf cluster of PS3s!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182011</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243956720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the question is: Will it blend<b>^H^H^H^H^H</b>run?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the question is : Will it blend ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hrun ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the question is: Will it blend^H^H^H^H^Hrun?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178741</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181385</id>
	<title>Re:Memes</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1243954500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of an answer I overheard at a local game store a while back.
</p><p> <b>Customer:</b> "I have the latest system running the latest processor and the latest videocard. How much memory do you recommend I add for Crysis?"</p><p>
<b>Clerk:</b> "How ever much you got."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of an answer I overheard at a local game store a while back .
Customer : " I have the latest system running the latest processor and the latest videocard .
How much memory do you recommend I add for Crysis ?
" Clerk : " How ever much you got .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of an answer I overheard at a local game store a while back.
Customer: "I have the latest system running the latest processor and the latest videocard.
How much memory do you recommend I add for Crysis?
"
Clerk: "How ever much you got.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180193</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182089</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>sponga</author>
	<datestamp>1243956960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are confused, as far as I can tell as a long time heavy PC game user with experience.</p><p>That is why they are bringing it to the PS3 and Xbox along with the original PC; expand the market to the heavy hitter DRM systems like consoles where it is a lot harder for your average person to pirate it unless you have your system modded. I know "yeaaa for the dead PC gaming at Slashdot", prepare for the ultra DRM machines consoles now. Say, how is that cracking of the Blu-Ray games going?</p><p>Obviously the pirate market forced or made their decision easier to expand it to the console market, which will later be reflected by maybe dropping PC support.<br>I know the sentiment around here is to turn a blind eye to pirating and the likes; but pirating is hurting the PC gaming market and absolutely devastating the little developers.<br>Open your eyes a little and see that there are Warez groups behind these things you download from Piratebay and as much as you don't want to ackowledge that pirating hurts.<br>Open one of the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.txt files that come with the game you download with your game/movie you downloaded, you will start noticing a trend in their acknowledgement that pirating it hurting. Let me burst your little virgin pirate bubble by posting a little text from the people who crack your games and movies.</p><p>" 1. Unpack release<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#194;&#177; &#195; 2. Mount image or burn it<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; 3. Install game<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; 4. Play the game<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; Indie developers like the ones who are behind this cool title<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; needs support. Think before you choose not to pay for the<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; software you enjoy. Worst case senario is a dead PC game iso<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; scene, just like that happened with our beloved Amiga game<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; scene.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; People called it evolution, perhaps, but don't let it be<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; exclusion of our perfered game scene. Microsoft, Nintendo and<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; Sony wont let the same mistakes happen again, so think twice<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; before you choose not to support an PC developer.              &#195; &#195;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195;<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &#195; &#195; Don't let the consoles win! Rise of the PC machines!   "</p><p>I downloaded this game and liked it shortly, but I didn't buy it. Why the hell would I buy it when I can download it for free as long as it doesn't require online play. Pretty simple economics setting aside morals and such, much like this deal to expand the market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are confused , as far as I can tell as a long time heavy PC game user with experience.That is why they are bringing it to the PS3 and Xbox along with the original PC ; expand the market to the heavy hitter DRM systems like consoles where it is a lot harder for your average person to pirate it unless you have your system modded .
I know " yeaaa for the dead PC gaming at Slashdot " , prepare for the ultra DRM machines consoles now .
Say , how is that cracking of the Blu-Ray games going ? Obviously the pirate market forced or made their decision easier to expand it to the console market , which will later be reflected by maybe dropping PC support.I know the sentiment around here is to turn a blind eye to pirating and the likes ; but pirating is hurting the PC gaming market and absolutely devastating the little developers.Open your eyes a little and see that there are Warez groups behind these things you download from Piratebay and as much as you do n't want to ackowledge that pirating hurts.Open one of the .txt files that come with the game you download with your game/movie you downloaded , you will start noticing a trend in their acknowledgement that pirating it hurting .
Let me burst your little virgin pirate bubble by posting a little text from the people who crack your games and movies .
" 1 .
Unpack release                   2 .
Mount image or burn it                 3 .
Install game                 4 .
Play the game                                 Indie developers like the ones who are behind this cool title                 needs support .
Think before you choose not to pay for the                 software you enjoy .
Worst case senario is a dead PC game iso                 scene , just like that happened with our beloved Amiga game                 scene .
                                People called it evolution , perhaps , but do n't let it be                 exclusion of our perfered game scene .
Microsoft , Nintendo and                 Sony wont let the same mistakes happen again , so think twice                 before you choose not to support an PC developer .
                                    Do n't let the consoles win !
Rise of the PC machines !
" I downloaded this game and liked it shortly , but I did n't buy it .
Why the hell would I buy it when I can download it for free as long as it does n't require online play .
Pretty simple economics setting aside morals and such , much like this deal to expand the market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are confused, as far as I can tell as a long time heavy PC game user with experience.That is why they are bringing it to the PS3 and Xbox along with the original PC; expand the market to the heavy hitter DRM systems like consoles where it is a lot harder for your average person to pirate it unless you have your system modded.
I know "yeaaa for the dead PC gaming at Slashdot", prepare for the ultra DRM machines consoles now.
Say, how is that cracking of the Blu-Ray games going?Obviously the pirate market forced or made their decision easier to expand it to the console market, which will later be reflected by maybe dropping PC support.I know the sentiment around here is to turn a blind eye to pirating and the likes; but pirating is hurting the PC gaming market and absolutely devastating the little developers.Open your eyes a little and see that there are Warez groups behind these things you download from Piratebay and as much as you don't want to ackowledge that pirating hurts.Open one of the .txt files that come with the game you download with your game/movie you downloaded, you will start noticing a trend in their acknowledgement that pirating it hurting.
Let me burst your little virgin pirate bubble by posting a little text from the people who crack your games and movies.
" 1.
Unpack release
            Â± Ã 2.
Mount image or burn it
            Ã Ã 3.
Install game
            Ã Ã 4.
Play the game
            Ã Ã
            Ã Ã Indie developers like the ones who are behind this cool title
            Ã Ã needs support.
Think before you choose not to pay for the
            Ã Ã software you enjoy.
Worst case senario is a dead PC game iso
            Ã Ã scene, just like that happened with our beloved Amiga game
            Ã Ã scene.
            Ã Ã
            Ã Ã People called it evolution, perhaps, but don't let it be
            Ã Ã exclusion of our perfered game scene.
Microsoft, Nintendo and
            Ã Ã Sony wont let the same mistakes happen again, so think twice
            Ã Ã before you choose not to support an PC developer.
Ã Ã
            Ã Ã
            Ã Ã Don't let the consoles win!
Rise of the PC machines!
"I downloaded this game and liked it shortly, but I didn't buy it.
Why the hell would I buy it when I can download it for free as long as it doesn't require online play.
Pretty simple economics setting aside morals and such, much like this deal to expand the market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178937</id>
	<title>Two platforms?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243934220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I was all excited thinking they were releasing a linux version</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I was all excited thinking they were releasing a linux version</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I was all excited thinking they were releasing a linux version</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179019</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1243935300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Didn't we have post running several months ago, bitching about how Crytek was going under because of all the piracy? Didn't they claim that because of the "evil pirates" there would be no sequel? Maybe I am confused, my memory isn't as good as it used to be.</p></div><p>Turns out they don't actually <i>lose</i> money every time someone copies their game, and they still get money every time someone buys it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't we have post running several months ago , bitching about how Crytek was going under because of all the piracy ?
Did n't they claim that because of the " evil pirates " there would be no sequel ?
Maybe I am confused , my memory is n't as good as it used to be.Turns out they do n't actually lose money every time someone copies their game , and they still get money every time someone buys it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't we have post running several months ago, bitching about how Crytek was going under because of all the piracy?
Didn't they claim that because of the "evil pirates" there would be no sequel?
Maybe I am confused, my memory isn't as good as it used to be.Turns out they don't actually lose money every time someone copies their game, and they still get money every time someone buys it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28183281</id>
	<title>Re:Memes</title>
	<author>Late Adopter</author>
	<datestamp>1243960980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> And it was on Vista. And I still have to see a BSOD.</p></div><p>Well, if you absolutely <i>have</i> to see a BSOD, then I suppose Windows isn't a bad operating system to use.
<br> <br>
(I kid, I kid...)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And it was on Vista .
And I still have to see a BSOD.Well , if you absolutely have to see a BSOD , then I suppose Windows is n't a bad operating system to use .
( I kid , I kid... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext> And it was on Vista.
And I still have to see a BSOD.Well, if you absolutely have to see a BSOD, then I suppose Windows isn't a bad operating system to use.
(I kid, I kid...)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178913</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243933860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But will it run on my netbook?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it run on my netbook ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it run on my netbook?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178741</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179107</id>
	<title>Re:bespoked for each platformm, good luck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243936440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The only game I know where you have to disable the sound to be able to play it!</p></div><p>Damn kids.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only game I know where you have to disable the sound to be able to play it ! Damn kids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only game I know where you have to disable the sound to be able to play it!Damn kids.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178761</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180583</id>
	<title>Re:Crysis 2 Confirmed For Multiple Platforms...</title>
	<author>underqualified</author>
	<datestamp>1243949940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>just a little bit more then you'll be able to run java</htmltext>
<tokenext>just a little bit more then you 'll be able to run java</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just a little bit more then you'll be able to run java</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178655</id>
	<title>My big fat penis runs crysis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243974240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>up your ass.</p><p>FP</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>up your ass.FP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>up your ass.FP</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181757</id>
	<title>Re:Memes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243956000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it should run acceptiablly on an Athlon X2 4050e with 2GB of RAM and HD 3870 at 1440x900 with decent graphics?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it should run acceptiablly on an Athlon X2 4050e with 2GB of RAM and HD 3870 at 1440x900 with decent graphics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it should run acceptiablly on an Athlon X2 4050e with 2GB of RAM and HD 3870 at 1440x900 with decent graphics?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182455</id>
	<title>Re:Memes</title>
	<author>ir</author>
	<datestamp>1243958220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Re: vista, I think it is more about people who are afraid of change or just trying to run it on obsolete PCs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Re : vista , I think it is more about people who are afraid of change or just trying to run it on obsolete PCs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Re: vista, I think it is more about people who are afraid of change or just trying to run it on obsolete PCs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182087</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243956960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, they didn't say that.  They said that they would no longer be making PC exclusives because of piracy, and would focus more effort on console games.  That is exactly what they have done here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they did n't say that .
They said that they would no longer be making PC exclusives because of piracy , and would focus more effort on console games .
That is exactly what they have done here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they didn't say that.
They said that they would no longer be making PC exclusives because of piracy, and would focus more effort on console games.
That is exactly what they have done here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179543</id>
	<title>Multiple?</title>
	<author>Tinctorius</author>
	<datestamp>1243941360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does that mean there exists more than one PC in the world that is capable of running it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that mean there exists more than one PC in the world that is capable of running it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that mean there exists more than one PC in the world that is capable of running it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181279</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1243953900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only if you brought it back from the distant future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if you brought it back from the distant future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if you brought it back from the distant future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28189919</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe this time</title>
	<author>justinlee37</author>
	<datestamp>1243947540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What? No it wasn't. It was thoroughly entertaining. The stealth system was well implemented; the cloak was unique and the ability to use the game's foliage as cover from enemies was something that hasn't been seen in many games. The AI was pretty good too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
No it was n't .
It was thoroughly entertaining .
The stealth system was well implemented ; the cloak was unique and the ability to use the game 's foliage as cover from enemies was something that has n't been seen in many games .
The AI was pretty good too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
No it wasn't.
It was thoroughly entertaining.
The stealth system was well implemented; the cloak was unique and the ability to use the game's foliage as cover from enemies was something that hasn't been seen in many games.
The AI was pretty good too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367</id>
	<title>Memes</title>
	<author>papabob</author>
	<datestamp>1243939440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how many of the "but this time it will run on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...?" guys actually tried Crysis. The same with the "Vista is awful and slow and terrible" meme. How did they start? Maybe one guru posted it in his blog and everybody repeat it as a mantra? I feel curious...</p><p>BTW yes, I played Crysis with a nvidia 9600GT (I think it's now under $100) at native resolution with 'Ultra-Quality' settings, and it didn't loss any frames. And it was on Vista. And I still have to see a BSOD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many of the " but this time it will run on ... ?
" guys actually tried Crysis .
The same with the " Vista is awful and slow and terrible " meme .
How did they start ?
Maybe one guru posted it in his blog and everybody repeat it as a mantra ?
I feel curious...BTW yes , I played Crysis with a nvidia 9600GT ( I think it 's now under $ 100 ) at native resolution with 'Ultra-Quality ' settings , and it did n't loss any frames .
And it was on Vista .
And I still have to see a BSOD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many of the "but this time it will run on ...?
" guys actually tried Crysis.
The same with the "Vista is awful and slow and terrible" meme.
How did they start?
Maybe one guru posted it in his blog and everybody repeat it as a mantra?
I feel curious...BTW yes, I played Crysis with a nvidia 9600GT (I think it's now under $100) at native resolution with 'Ultra-Quality' settings, and it didn't loss any frames.
And it was on Vista.
And I still have to see a BSOD.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180193</id>
	<title>Re:Memes</title>
	<author>FreonTrip</author>
	<datestamp>1243947420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But Vista was awful and slow and terrible for me.  Following the application of the first service pack the OS stopped loading the display drivers and cited a Code 43 error, and no power on heaven or Earth could get them working again.  Performance was consistently slower than XP even on a Core 2 that was comfortably better-specced than Microsoft's recommendations, and in the end I found too few reasons to stick with it.

As for Crysis, I thought it was pretty but otherwise played out like a Sci-Fi movie of the week with great production values.  Combined with Vista it was a system-devouring sight to behold...</htmltext>
<tokenext>But Vista was awful and slow and terrible for me .
Following the application of the first service pack the OS stopped loading the display drivers and cited a Code 43 error , and no power on heaven or Earth could get them working again .
Performance was consistently slower than XP even on a Core 2 that was comfortably better-specced than Microsoft 's recommendations , and in the end I found too few reasons to stick with it .
As for Crysis , I thought it was pretty but otherwise played out like a Sci-Fi movie of the week with great production values .
Combined with Vista it was a system-devouring sight to behold.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But Vista was awful and slow and terrible for me.
Following the application of the first service pack the OS stopped loading the display drivers and cited a Code 43 error, and no power on heaven or Earth could get them working again.
Performance was consistently slower than XP even on a Core 2 that was comfortably better-specced than Microsoft's recommendations, and in the end I found too few reasons to stick with it.
As for Crysis, I thought it was pretty but otherwise played out like a Sci-Fi movie of the week with great production values.
Combined with Vista it was a system-devouring sight to behold...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178989</id>
	<title>Re:Wait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243934820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did get a pirate version of Crysis.<br><br>But I didn't bother with Crysis Warhead. Is it worth it? I mean other than as a computer system benchmark...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did get a pirate version of Crysis.But I did n't bother with Crysis Warhead .
Is it worth it ?
I mean other than as a computer system benchmark.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did get a pirate version of Crysis.But I didn't bother with Crysis Warhead.
Is it worth it?
I mean other than as a computer system benchmark...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178745</id>
	<title>First</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243975320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, its going to wicked nuff said</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , its going to wicked nuff said</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, its going to wicked nuff said</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28184701</id>
	<title>Simple, really...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243967040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anecdotes become as good as empirical data when they align with groupthink. Thanks to the Internet, many people cannot even tell the difference between the two or, worse, why they should have to.</p><p>(Don't get pissy at me kids, you know its true.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anecdotes become as good as empirical data when they align with groupthink .
Thanks to the Internet , many people can not even tell the difference between the two or , worse , why they should have to .
( Do n't get pissy at me kids , you know its true .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anecdotes become as good as empirical data when they align with groupthink.
Thanks to the Internet, many people cannot even tell the difference between the two or, worse, why they should have to.
(Don't get pissy at me kids, you know its true.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28183549</id>
	<title>Multiple platforms</title>
	<author>V50</author>
	<datestamp>1243962000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Little mentioned is that by "multiple platforms" they mean you will NEED multiple platforms to run a single copy of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Little mentioned is that by " multiple platforms " they mean you will NEED multiple platforms to run a single copy of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Little mentioned is that by "multiple platforms" they mean you will NEED multiple platforms to run a single copy of it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180177</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>The Grim Reefer2</author>
	<datestamp>1243947360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But will it run on my netbook?</p></div><p>Does your netbook run Crysis (1)?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it run on my netbook ? Does your netbook run Crysis ( 1 ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it run on my netbook?Does your netbook run Crysis (1)?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178913</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178761</id>
	<title>bespoked for each platformm, good luck</title>
	<author>Necroloth</author>
	<datestamp>1243975500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This I gotta see to believe.

I hate playing games ported because you always feel that it wasn't a bespoke game and at worst, is completely fubar'd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Juiced 2, I'm looking at you! The only game I know where you have to disable the sound to be able to play it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This I got ta see to believe .
I hate playing games ported because you always feel that it was n't a bespoke game and at worst , is completely fubar 'd ... Juiced 2 , I 'm looking at you !
The only game I know where you have to disable the sound to be able to play it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This I gotta see to believe.
I hate playing games ported because you always feel that it wasn't a bespoke game and at worst, is completely fubar'd ... Juiced 2, I'm looking at you!
The only game I know where you have to disable the sound to be able to play it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181385
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180193
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28183281
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179019
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180177
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178989
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28189919
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181279
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178913
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182455
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28184701
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182011
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178741
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182089
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181757
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179107
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178761
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_02_0719209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182087
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180573
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28189919
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179367
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182455
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28184701
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180193
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181385
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181757
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28183281
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178755
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179019
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178989
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182087
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182089
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178741
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178913
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180177
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28181279
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28182011
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28180583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179533
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178761
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179107
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28178835
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_02_0719209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_02_0719209.28179217
</commentlist>
</conversation>
