<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_06_01_1548251</id>
	<title>Rumors Flying About New iPhone Capabilities</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1243876740000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Jumping on the completely unconfirmed rumor bandwagon, it seems that there have been <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/06/leaked-photos-show-new-iphone-hardware-autofocus-compass/">photos leaked for the new iPhone</a>, which include things like an auto-focus camera, video capture, and a compass.  The photos were originally displayed (and then quickly removed) on a Chinese forum, and quickly spread to many other sites, including a complete <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=7697111&amp;postcount=162">human translation</a> on the MacRumors forum.  Looks like Apple security may have to break a few more pocket protectors to keep employees in line.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jumping on the completely unconfirmed rumor bandwagon , it seems that there have been photos leaked for the new iPhone , which include things like an auto-focus camera , video capture , and a compass .
The photos were originally displayed ( and then quickly removed ) on a Chinese forum , and quickly spread to many other sites , including a complete human translation on the MacRumors forum .
Looks like Apple security may have to break a few more pocket protectors to keep employees in line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jumping on the completely unconfirmed rumor bandwagon, it seems that there have been photos leaked for the new iPhone, which include things like an auto-focus camera, video capture, and a compass.
The photos were originally displayed (and then quickly removed) on a Chinese forum, and quickly spread to many other sites, including a complete human translation on the MacRumors forum.
Looks like Apple security may have to break a few more pocket protectors to keep employees in line.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171847</id>
	<title>Re:Chances are..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243887360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nowadays there are no releases, there's just leaks. Real original.</p><p>Apple are scum suckers, don't buy their shit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowadays there are no releases , there 's just leaks .
Real original.Apple are scum suckers , do n't buy their shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowadays there are no releases, there's just leaks.
Real original.Apple are scum suckers, don't buy their shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170451</id>
	<title>Re:Chances are..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243881900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that it's in Chinese, how do we know this isn't one of the Dozen iPhone clones running around? Most look pretty dang close (The Chinese Cloners really need to hire a UI guy to get all their MP5 players sorted out).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that it 's in Chinese , how do we know this is n't one of the Dozen iPhone clones running around ?
Most look pretty dang close ( The Chinese Cloners really need to hire a UI guy to get all their MP5 players sorted out ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that it's in Chinese, how do we know this isn't one of the Dozen iPhone clones running around?
Most look pretty dang close (The Chinese Cloners really need to hire a UI guy to get all their MP5 players sorted out).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172687</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243847220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>You have been able to shoot video on the iPhone once jailbroken.</i></p><p>Apple - it Just Works!</p><p>But seriously, this is even worse - it's capable, but Apple decided to disallow it?</p><p>Now to submit my Slashdot article about my five year old Motorola V980, I heard a rumour that it does video Out Of The Box. Obviously this is earth shattering news that everyone must hear about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have been able to shoot video on the iPhone once jailbroken.Apple - it Just Works ! But seriously , this is even worse - it 's capable , but Apple decided to disallow it ? Now to submit my Slashdot article about my five year old Motorola V980 , I heard a rumour that it does video Out Of The Box .
Obviously this is earth shattering news that everyone must hear about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have been able to shoot video on the iPhone once jailbroken.Apple - it Just Works!But seriously, this is even worse - it's capable, but Apple decided to disallow it?Now to submit my Slashdot article about my five year old Motorola V980, I heard a rumour that it does video Out Of The Box.
Obviously this is earth shattering news that everyone must hear about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175729</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243860540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Basically all modern phones (but it doesn't surprise me if Apple has to be different) have USB's standard micro-B connector.</p><p>You can buy a suitable cable from any decent electronics store, or borrow one from anyone else with a modern phone or other tiny device that needs a small USB connector. The micro-B socket is electrically identical to a USB B socket (like you'd find on a printer or scanner), but with shorter life (tiny conductor pads wear out faster) and obviously much smaller.</p><p>By comparison there's a good chance no-one around has an "iPod cable" unless you know a lot of turtleneck wearng bozos, which I don't so far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Basically all modern phones ( but it does n't surprise me if Apple has to be different ) have USB 's standard micro-B connector.You can buy a suitable cable from any decent electronics store , or borrow one from anyone else with a modern phone or other tiny device that needs a small USB connector .
The micro-B socket is electrically identical to a USB B socket ( like you 'd find on a printer or scanner ) , but with shorter life ( tiny conductor pads wear out faster ) and obviously much smaller.By comparison there 's a good chance no-one around has an " iPod cable " unless you know a lot of turtleneck wearng bozos , which I do n't so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Basically all modern phones (but it doesn't surprise me if Apple has to be different) have USB's standard micro-B connector.You can buy a suitable cable from any decent electronics store, or borrow one from anyone else with a modern phone or other tiny device that needs a small USB connector.
The micro-B socket is electrically identical to a USB B socket (like you'd find on a printer or scanner), but with shorter life (tiny conductor pads wear out faster) and obviously much smaller.By comparison there's a good chance no-one around has an "iPod cable" unless you know a lot of turtleneck wearng bozos, which I don't so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170625</id>
	<title>Re:Where did the phone come from?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243882680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>racist much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>racist much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>racist much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171585</id>
	<title>We miss you, Moltz!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1243886640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The rumor I heard flying is that the new iPhone can, in fact, fly. It's a full levitation device and can allow a 250 pound man to hover. The TV ads will feature Criss Angel.</p><p>I read it on Crazy Apple Rumors so I know it must be true. It transforms into a bisexual ninja sexbot that serves pudding and other snacks on demand. It will telepathically extract that hot new tune stuck in your head to use as a ring tone.</p><p>If you order one now, the man, the legend, the *god*, Phil Schiller himself will deliver it to your home personally and give you a foot massage.</p><p>Note: the above claims are true only for certain values of true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The rumor I heard flying is that the new iPhone can , in fact , fly .
It 's a full levitation device and can allow a 250 pound man to hover .
The TV ads will feature Criss Angel.I read it on Crazy Apple Rumors so I know it must be true .
It transforms into a bisexual ninja sexbot that serves pudding and other snacks on demand .
It will telepathically extract that hot new tune stuck in your head to use as a ring tone.If you order one now , the man , the legend , the * god * , Phil Schiller himself will deliver it to your home personally and give you a foot massage.Note : the above claims are true only for certain values of true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The rumor I heard flying is that the new iPhone can, in fact, fly.
It's a full levitation device and can allow a 250 pound man to hover.
The TV ads will feature Criss Angel.I read it on Crazy Apple Rumors so I know it must be true.
It transforms into a bisexual ninja sexbot that serves pudding and other snacks on demand.
It will telepathically extract that hot new tune stuck in your head to use as a ring tone.If you order one now, the man, the legend, the *god*, Phil Schiller himself will deliver it to your home personally and give you a foot massage.Note: the above claims are true only for certain values of true.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171869</id>
	<title>Awesome new features</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243887420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know what would be awesome new features?</p><p>The ability to run whatever software I want, and the ability to operate on whatever phone network I want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what would be awesome new features ? The ability to run whatever software I want , and the ability to operate on whatever phone network I want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what would be awesome new features?The ability to run whatever software I want, and the ability to operate on whatever phone network I want.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174625</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>Dan541</author>
	<datestamp>1243854420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPhone lacks standard features so your chance of getting a standard port is rare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone lacks standard features so your chance of getting a standard port is rare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone lacks standard features so your chance of getting a standard port is rare.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170179</id>
	<title>Food please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243880580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Food Please.</p><p>i'm Hungry</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Food Please.i 'm Hungry</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Food Please.i'm Hungry</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172983</id>
	<title>Re:Whatever comes out...</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1243848300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>There have always been products competing with both the iPod and iPhone that have a longer and more impressive bullet list of features.</i></p><p>Ah yes, it's the "Grumpy Featurism" hand-wave. Let's brush all the objective, reasoned, based-on-evidence arguments aside, and claim they are trumped by my personal claim of "It's better".</p><p>Well you're both wrong, I might as well claim that the Motorola V980 is the Best Phone Ever.</p><p><i>The problem being, the average person doesn't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use. Many geeks are happy to work around poorly designed interfaces for the sake of overall functionality.</i></p><p>What a load of weasel words. Citations, please?</p><p>Based on hard sales figures, the "average person" most certainly prefers Nokia phones in general to Apple phones.</p><p><i>Apple doesn't have dominance in any markets</i></p><p>I am in full agreement.</p><p><i>I still wonder if Android would exist or if it would have the level of functionality it does if Apple were not providing such strong competition.</i></p><p>The rapid and continual march of technology in the billion dollar mobile phone market has been going on for a decade or so, but Google would've only took interest in response to a Johnny come lately that, as you agree yourself, is not the dominant player in the market? Please...</p><p><i>For many people the iPhone is still the best offering. Since we're not dealing with a significantly broken market for smartphones, people should pick what works best for them, be it iPhone or an Android or <b>some other phone</b>.</i></p><p>Right. Which, again, based on hard sales figures, the overwhelming majority of people do. But it's just a shame we never hear about this technology on Slashdot. Reading Slashdot, you'd think that the mobile phone market considered of Apple as a dominant player, and only Android coming along afterwards to provide competition (and based on some of the "But hey, you can read a website on the Iphone!" comments, I'd say that many readers here <i>do</i> think that that's the case - in fact, I recently responded to a poster who actually thought that Apple were the market leader in mobile phones). It would be like Slashdot only covering OS X, giving a brief mention to Ubuntu, and never mentioning a major player like Windows at all. That would be fine if it was Apple-dot, I suppose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There have always been products competing with both the iPod and iPhone that have a longer and more impressive bullet list of features.Ah yes , it 's the " Grumpy Featurism " hand-wave .
Let 's brush all the objective , reasoned , based-on-evidence arguments aside , and claim they are trumped by my personal claim of " It 's better " .Well you 're both wrong , I might as well claim that the Motorola V980 is the Best Phone Ever.The problem being , the average person does n't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use .
Many geeks are happy to work around poorly designed interfaces for the sake of overall functionality.What a load of weasel words .
Citations , please ? Based on hard sales figures , the " average person " most certainly prefers Nokia phones in general to Apple phones.Apple does n't have dominance in any marketsI am in full agreement.I still wonder if Android would exist or if it would have the level of functionality it does if Apple were not providing such strong competition.The rapid and continual march of technology in the billion dollar mobile phone market has been going on for a decade or so , but Google would 've only took interest in response to a Johnny come lately that , as you agree yourself , is not the dominant player in the market ?
Please...For many people the iPhone is still the best offering .
Since we 're not dealing with a significantly broken market for smartphones , people should pick what works best for them , be it iPhone or an Android or some other phone.Right .
Which , again , based on hard sales figures , the overwhelming majority of people do .
But it 's just a shame we never hear about this technology on Slashdot .
Reading Slashdot , you 'd think that the mobile phone market considered of Apple as a dominant player , and only Android coming along afterwards to provide competition ( and based on some of the " But hey , you can read a website on the Iphone !
" comments , I 'd say that many readers here do think that that 's the case - in fact , I recently responded to a poster who actually thought that Apple were the market leader in mobile phones ) .
It would be like Slashdot only covering OS X , giving a brief mention to Ubuntu , and never mentioning a major player like Windows at all .
That would be fine if it was Apple-dot , I suppose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There have always been products competing with both the iPod and iPhone that have a longer and more impressive bullet list of features.Ah yes, it's the "Grumpy Featurism" hand-wave.
Let's brush all the objective, reasoned, based-on-evidence arguments aside, and claim they are trumped by my personal claim of "It's better".Well you're both wrong, I might as well claim that the Motorola V980 is the Best Phone Ever.The problem being, the average person doesn't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use.
Many geeks are happy to work around poorly designed interfaces for the sake of overall functionality.What a load of weasel words.
Citations, please?Based on hard sales figures, the "average person" most certainly prefers Nokia phones in general to Apple phones.Apple doesn't have dominance in any marketsI am in full agreement.I still wonder if Android would exist or if it would have the level of functionality it does if Apple were not providing such strong competition.The rapid and continual march of technology in the billion dollar mobile phone market has been going on for a decade or so, but Google would've only took interest in response to a Johnny come lately that, as you agree yourself, is not the dominant player in the market?
Please...For many people the iPhone is still the best offering.
Since we're not dealing with a significantly broken market for smartphones, people should pick what works best for them, be it iPhone or an Android or some other phone.Right.
Which, again, based on hard sales figures, the overwhelming majority of people do.
But it's just a shame we never hear about this technology on Slashdot.
Reading Slashdot, you'd think that the mobile phone market considered of Apple as a dominant player, and only Android coming along afterwards to provide competition (and based on some of the "But hey, you can read a website on the Iphone!
" comments, I'd say that many readers here do think that that's the case - in fact, I recently responded to a poster who actually thought that Apple were the market leader in mobile phones).
It would be like Slashdot only covering OS X, giving a brief mention to Ubuntu, and never mentioning a major player like Windows at all.
That would be fine if it was Apple-dot, I suppose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170811</id>
	<title>Re:Where did the phone come from?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243883700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>from your mom</htmltext>
<tokenext>from your mom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from your mom</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170201</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170947</id>
	<title>You're not up to date on your rumours...</title>
	<author>TheMightyFuzzball</author>
	<datestamp>1243884240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those pictures are just from an iPhone running OS 3.0, they were taken by a Chinese blogger demonstrating 3.0's capabilities.
According to this site: <a href="http://www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/" title="mrgadget.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/</a> [mrgadget.com.au] the blogger says (in Chinese)
that the pictures were taken of an iPhone 3G with iPhone OS 3.0.

This is why you shouldn't spread rumour...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those pictures are just from an iPhone running OS 3.0 , they were taken by a Chinese blogger demonstrating 3.0 's capabilities .
According to this site : http : //www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/ [ mrgadget.com.au ] the blogger says ( in Chinese ) that the pictures were taken of an iPhone 3G with iPhone OS 3.0 .
This is why you should n't spread rumour.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those pictures are just from an iPhone running OS 3.0, they were taken by a Chinese blogger demonstrating 3.0's capabilities.
According to this site: http://www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/ [mrgadget.com.au] the blogger says (in Chinese)
that the pictures were taken of an iPhone 3G with iPhone OS 3.0.
This is why you shouldn't spread rumour...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203</id>
	<title>I'm confused</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1243880700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought the iPhone already had an autofocus camera in it, and that it had a GPS (thus making a compas possible).

Either I'm thinking of something else, (maybe a smart phone? I can't keep up with phones nowadays), or none of this is anything more then cool app-work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the iPhone already had an autofocus camera in it , and that it had a GPS ( thus making a compas possible ) .
Either I 'm thinking of something else , ( maybe a smart phone ?
I ca n't keep up with phones nowadays ) , or none of this is anything more then cool app-work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the iPhone already had an autofocus camera in it, and that it had a GPS (thus making a compas possible).
Either I'm thinking of something else, (maybe a smart phone?
I can't keep up with phones nowadays), or none of this is anything more then cool app-work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171907</id>
	<title>Re:Wow! Autofocus!? What will Apple invent next?</title>
	<author>nsayer</author>
	<datestamp>1243887540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Do you know of any cameras that don't have autofocus?</p> </div><p>The iPhone 1G and 3G phones don't. They have a <i>fixed</i> focus camera, which is not the same thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know of any cameras that do n't have autofocus ?
The iPhone 1G and 3G phones do n't .
They have a fixed focus camera , which is not the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Do you know of any cameras that don't have autofocus?
The iPhone 1G and 3G phones don't.
They have a fixed focus camera, which is not the same thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174693</id>
	<title>Re:New casing? New UI?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1243854780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Will it look like an ancient Palm, with a black-and-white screen, a writing area, and only a dozen apps on the homescreen?</i></p><p><i>SLASHDOT, FFS, GET SOME NEW ICONS!</i></p><p><i>And WTF is up with the MacBook icon on this iPhone story? I guess I need to change my request to "new and accurate icons."</i></p><p>You seem to be under the misapprehension that the editors of this site give a fuck.</p><p>The only reason to visit Slashdot is the quality of the comments, which is good since you have to rely on the first 4-5 comments to correct all the bullshit in the story summaries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it look like an ancient Palm , with a black-and-white screen , a writing area , and only a dozen apps on the homescreen ? SLASHDOT , FFS , GET SOME NEW ICONS ! And WTF is up with the MacBook icon on this iPhone story ?
I guess I need to change my request to " new and accurate icons .
" You seem to be under the misapprehension that the editors of this site give a fuck.The only reason to visit Slashdot is the quality of the comments , which is good since you have to rely on the first 4-5 comments to correct all the bullshit in the story summaries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it look like an ancient Palm, with a black-and-white screen, a writing area, and only a dozen apps on the homescreen?SLASHDOT, FFS, GET SOME NEW ICONS!And WTF is up with the MacBook icon on this iPhone story?
I guess I need to change my request to "new and accurate icons.
"You seem to be under the misapprehension that the editors of this site give a fuck.The only reason to visit Slashdot is the quality of the comments, which is good since you have to rely on the first 4-5 comments to correct all the bullshit in the story summaries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175471</id>
	<title>Um, video?</title>
	<author>phorm</author>
	<datestamp>1243858680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you don't have an apple restriciphone, then you can install CyCorder, which takes quite nice video on my 3G without requiring any new hardware.</p><p>Which is probably a major reason why Apple WON'T ever open the phone in that manner, because then they can't sell new "hardware' with software enabled to emulate new functionality...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't have an apple restriciphone , then you can install CyCorder , which takes quite nice video on my 3G without requiring any new hardware.Which is probably a major reason why Apple WO N'T ever open the phone in that manner , because then they ca n't sell new " hardware ' with software enabled to emulate new functionality.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't have an apple restriciphone, then you can install CyCorder, which takes quite nice video on my 3G without requiring any new hardware.Which is probably a major reason why Apple WON'T ever open the phone in that manner, because then they can't sell new "hardware' with software enabled to emulate new functionality...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>Karganeth</author>
	<datestamp>1243881660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The G1 can not capture video.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The G1 can not capture video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The G1 can not capture video.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177525</id>
	<title>So it has a compass</title>
	<author>KneelBeforeZod</author>
	<datestamp>1243875240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But does it have a tweezers, toothpick, corkscrew, can opener, bottle opener,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.flat-head screwdriver, phillips-head screwdriver, nail file, scissors, saw, file, hook, magnifying glass, ballpoint pen, fish scaler, hex wrench w/bits, pliers, and key chain?  Also... it is HD ready?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it have a tweezers , toothpick , corkscrew , can opener , bottle opener , .flat-head screwdriver , phillips-head screwdriver , nail file , scissors , saw , file , hook , magnifying glass , ballpoint pen , fish scaler , hex wrench w/bits , pliers , and key chain ?
Also... it is HD ready ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it have a tweezers, toothpick, corkscrew, can opener, bottle opener, .flat-head screwdriver, phillips-head screwdriver, nail file, scissors, saw, file, hook, magnifying glass, ballpoint pen, fish scaler, hex wrench w/bits, pliers, and key chain?
Also... it is HD ready?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28192257</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>metaforest</author>
	<datestamp>1243968780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm iPhone is a circa 1998 desktop-class computer, stuffed into a 11cm X 6cm X 0.5cm form factor with a qvga comparable display.</p><p>One of it's many embedded peripherals happens to be a 3G phone.</p><p>I think you misunderstand.   It's not a Phone with an embedded computer module.   It's a computer with an embedded Phone module.</p><p>Comparing an iPhone to a dedicated "dumb phone" is simply unfair.   Even the Blackberries don't compare in terms of performance and capability....</p><p>Let's get real here.... the iPhone is really a PDA that has an embedded phone.   Expecting it to perform like a dedicated phone, in terms of battery life is, IMO unreasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm iPhone is a circa 1998 desktop-class computer , stuffed into a 11cm X 6cm X 0.5cm form factor with a qvga comparable display.One of it 's many embedded peripherals happens to be a 3G phone.I think you misunderstand .
It 's not a Phone with an embedded computer module .
It 's a computer with an embedded Phone module.Comparing an iPhone to a dedicated " dumb phone " is simply unfair .
Even the Blackberries do n't compare in terms of performance and capability....Let 's get real here.... the iPhone is really a PDA that has an embedded phone .
Expecting it to perform like a dedicated phone , in terms of battery life is , IMO unreasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm iPhone is a circa 1998 desktop-class computer, stuffed into a 11cm X 6cm X 0.5cm form factor with a qvga comparable display.One of it's many embedded peripherals happens to be a 3G phone.I think you misunderstand.
It's not a Phone with an embedded computer module.
It's a computer with an embedded Phone module.Comparing an iPhone to a dedicated "dumb phone" is simply unfair.
Even the Blackberries don't compare in terms of performance and capability....Let's get real here.... the iPhone is really a PDA that has an embedded phone.
Expecting it to perform like a dedicated phone, in terms of battery life is, IMO unreasonable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170341</id>
	<title>Re:I'm confused</title>
	<author>EkriirkE</author>
	<datestamp>1243881360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>A GPS "compass" is just a heading indicator; the direction of travel between 2 samplings.  This new compass supposedly is magnet (earth's core) sensing - presumably if you hold a magnet nearby you could see which pole is facing the device and on what edge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A GPS " compass " is just a heading indicator ; the direction of travel between 2 samplings .
This new compass supposedly is magnet ( earth 's core ) sensing - presumably if you hold a magnet nearby you could see which pole is facing the device and on what edge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A GPS "compass" is just a heading indicator; the direction of travel between 2 samplings.
This new compass supposedly is magnet (earth's core) sensing - presumably if you hold a magnet nearby you could see which pole is facing the device and on what edge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170701</id>
	<title>Uh-oh</title>
	<author>inertia@yahoo.com</author>
	<datestamp>1243883160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like Apple security may have to break a few more pocket protectors to keep employees in line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like Apple security may have to break a few more pocket protectors to keep employees in line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like Apple security may have to break a few more pocket protectors to keep employees in line.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>EastCoastSurfer</author>
	<datestamp>1243847520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>And since it's not a standard USB plug, I couldn't just plug it in to the plethora of USB ports around.</p></div></blockquote><p>Do many phones have USB on the phone side?  From my experience, the iPhone cable plugs into any USB port and will charge from it.  You're right on the phone side it is a special connector (ipod connector), but every phone I've owned has been like that.</p><p>BTW, the iphone cable is just a standard ipod cable.  Even people who don't own ipods seem to have some of those around at this point lol.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And since it 's not a standard USB plug , I could n't just plug it in to the plethora of USB ports around.Do many phones have USB on the phone side ?
From my experience , the iPhone cable plugs into any USB port and will charge from it .
You 're right on the phone side it is a special connector ( ipod connector ) , but every phone I 've owned has been like that.BTW , the iphone cable is just a standard ipod cable .
Even people who do n't own ipods seem to have some of those around at this point lol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And since it's not a standard USB plug, I couldn't just plug it in to the plethora of USB ports around.Do many phones have USB on the phone side?
From my experience, the iPhone cable plugs into any USB port and will charge from it.
You're right on the phone side it is a special connector (ipod connector), but every phone I've owned has been like that.BTW, the iphone cable is just a standard ipod cable.
Even people who don't own ipods seem to have some of those around at this point lol.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175661</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1243860060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll join the crowd.  My LG enV2 has a micro-USB port for charging and data.  Most recent LG phones are similar.</p><p>The only nice part about the iPhone's proprietary connector is that it works with old iPod accessories, and supports a few other functions such as Video Out (which, frankly, is a rather neat thing to have)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll join the crowd .
My LG enV2 has a micro-USB port for charging and data .
Most recent LG phones are similar.The only nice part about the iPhone 's proprietary connector is that it works with old iPod accessories , and supports a few other functions such as Video Out ( which , frankly , is a rather neat thing to have )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll join the crowd.
My LG enV2 has a micro-USB port for charging and data.
Most recent LG phones are similar.The only nice part about the iPhone's proprietary connector is that it works with old iPod accessories, and supports a few other functions such as Video Out (which, frankly, is a rather neat thing to have)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170249</id>
	<title>Whatever comes out...</title>
	<author>Kensai7</author>
	<datestamp>1243880940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... it will be less than capable of the respective Nokia N-device but as always the Apple marketing and fanboyz will put so much light that everyone will be blinded by yet again another incomplete smartphone that locks you to the dark side. Is Apple becoming the Microsoft of the mobile world?!</p><p>I don't know... but I'm telling you something guys: this is 2009 and we have Symbian &amp; Android which together reach some <b>60\% of the mobile smartphone market</b> and are <b>OPEN SOURCE</b>. Imagine if Linux had a 60\% market share on the desktop OS what boost would we have for open source applications.</p><p>So let's not pull are eyes out with our own hands and choose iPhone NOT.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... it will be less than capable of the respective Nokia N-device but as always the Apple marketing and fanboyz will put so much light that everyone will be blinded by yet again another incomplete smartphone that locks you to the dark side .
Is Apple becoming the Microsoft of the mobile world ?
! I do n't know... but I 'm telling you something guys : this is 2009 and we have Symbian &amp; Android which together reach some 60 \ % of the mobile smartphone market and are OPEN SOURCE .
Imagine if Linux had a 60 \ % market share on the desktop OS what boost would we have for open source applications.So let 's not pull are eyes out with our own hands and choose iPhone NOT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... it will be less than capable of the respective Nokia N-device but as always the Apple marketing and fanboyz will put so much light that everyone will be blinded by yet again another incomplete smartphone that locks you to the dark side.
Is Apple becoming the Microsoft of the mobile world?
!I don't know... but I'm telling you something guys: this is 2009 and we have Symbian &amp; Android which together reach some 60\% of the mobile smartphone market and are OPEN SOURCE.
Imagine if Linux had a 60\% market share on the desktop OS what boost would we have for open source applications.So let's not pull are eyes out with our own hands and choose iPhone NOT.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173161</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1243848960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone seems to be priced just about the same as most other smart phones and have the same contract requirements.<br>There are cheaper smart phones but none that offer as good of a browser.   I am waiting for the Pre myself but the price will be about the same. Sprints contract is cheaper and I have had no problems with Sprint as a carrier. I don't like AT&amp;T because of the cost, I am not fond of Verizon because of cost and they tend to cripple phones, and TMobile doesn't offer 3 g in my area yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone seems to be priced just about the same as most other smart phones and have the same contract requirements.There are cheaper smart phones but none that offer as good of a browser .
I am waiting for the Pre myself but the price will be about the same .
Sprints contract is cheaper and I have had no problems with Sprint as a carrier .
I do n't like AT&amp;T because of the cost , I am not fond of Verizon because of cost and they tend to cripple phones , and TMobile does n't offer 3 g in my area yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone seems to be priced just about the same as most other smart phones and have the same contract requirements.There are cheaper smart phones but none that offer as good of a browser.
I am waiting for the Pre myself but the price will be about the same.
Sprints contract is cheaper and I have had no problems with Sprint as a carrier.
I don't like AT&amp;T because of the cost, I am not fond of Verizon because of cost and they tend to cripple phones, and TMobile doesn't offer 3 g in my area yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170631</id>
	<title>Re:Chances are..</title>
	<author>CambodiaSam</author>
	<datestamp>1243882740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to say this, but the front page of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. has not been a good indicator of business success. If it was, then Linux would be King of the Desktop OS, and the EU would be preparing antitrust litigation against RedHat.<br> <br>
However, I do agree with your main point. I wouldn't be surprised if this was their way of marketing the new product. How much is it costing them? About $0?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to say this , but the front page of / .
has not been a good indicator of business success .
If it was , then Linux would be King of the Desktop OS , and the EU would be preparing antitrust litigation against RedHat .
However , I do agree with your main point .
I would n't be surprised if this was their way of marketing the new product .
How much is it costing them ?
About $ 0 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to say this, but the front page of /.
has not been a good indicator of business success.
If it was, then Linux would be King of the Desktop OS, and the EU would be preparing antitrust litigation against RedHat.
However, I do agree with your main point.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was their way of marketing the new product.
How much is it costing them?
About $0?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173729</id>
	<title>Re:Verizon?</title>
	<author>Achromatic1978</author>
	<datestamp>1243851000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I was paying one data phone one standard phone for $185 and can get an iPhone service for two phones for $120/month.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Data plan for iPhone: $30, x 2.</p><p>
Smallest Family Plan: $50 for 550 shared minutes.</p><p>
Messaging Family pack: $30.</p><p>
AT&amp;T Fees: $1.25 + 11.3\% of bill = no change from $150. Kinda hard to imagine someone forking out for two iPhones, with the minimum possible minutes (4 hours each per month, outside of weekends/evenings), and no messaging... But even then you're still over $120...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was paying one data phone one standard phone for $ 185 and can get an iPhone service for two phones for $ 120/month .
Data plan for iPhone : $ 30 , x 2 .
Smallest Family Plan : $ 50 for 550 shared minutes .
Messaging Family pack : $ 30 .
AT&amp;T Fees : $ 1.25 + 11.3 \ % of bill = no change from $ 150 .
Kinda hard to imagine someone forking out for two iPhones , with the minimum possible minutes ( 4 hours each per month , outside of weekends/evenings ) , and no messaging... But even then you 're still over $ 120.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was paying one data phone one standard phone for $185 and can get an iPhone service for two phones for $120/month.
Data plan for iPhone: $30, x 2.
Smallest Family Plan: $50 for 550 shared minutes.
Messaging Family pack: $30.
AT&amp;T Fees: $1.25 + 11.3\% of bill = no change from $150.
Kinda hard to imagine someone forking out for two iPhones, with the minimum possible minutes (4 hours each per month, outside of weekends/evenings), and no messaging... But even then you're still over $120...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171825</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170201</id>
	<title>Where did the phone come from?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243880700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where did those chinese people get the phone from? When manufactured, the phone's firmware is just a dummy bootloader to prevent those ridiculous chinese people from stealing the firmware. So how could these guys get their hands on a new iPhone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where did those chinese people get the phone from ?
When manufactured , the phone 's firmware is just a dummy bootloader to prevent those ridiculous chinese people from stealing the firmware .
So how could these guys get their hands on a new iPhone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where did those chinese people get the phone from?
When manufactured, the phone's firmware is just a dummy bootloader to prevent those ridiculous chinese people from stealing the firmware.
So how could these guys get their hands on a new iPhone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28176903</id>
	<title>Re:New casing? New UI?</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1243869720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As someone who has an interest in graphic design, I have the icons turned off. It is Slashdot, after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As someone who has an interest in graphic design , I have the icons turned off .
It is Slashdot , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As someone who has an interest in graphic design, I have the icons turned off.
It is Slashdot, after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170751</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170397</id>
	<title>Re:Whatever comes out...</title>
	<author>99BottlesOfBeerInMyF</author>
	<datestamp>1243881660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... it will be less than capable of the respective Nokia N-device but as always the Apple marketing and fanboyz</p></div><p>There have always been products competing with both the iPod and iPhone that have a longer and more impressive bullet list of features. The problem being, the average person doesn't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use. Many geeks are happy to work around poorly designed interfaces for the sake of overall functionality.  </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Is Apple becoming the Microsoft of the mobile world?!</p></div><p>The problem with Microsoft is that they use a very large market share in one market to destroy competition and innovation in other markets, thus slowing progress. Apple doesn't have dominance in any markets, so their locked down products drive innovation by providing real competition. When Apple has a monopoly o near monopoly and ties to other markets, then "ll lump them in with Microsoft.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't know... but I'm telling you something guys: this is 2009 and we have Symbian &amp; Android which together reach some 60\% of the mobile smartphone market...</p></div><p>Yup, that's very cool and I have high hopes for Android, which have not really panned out yet. I still wonder if Android would exist or if it would have the level of functionality it does if Apple were not providing such strong competition.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>So let's not pull are eyes out with our own hands and choose iPhone NOT.</p></div><p>For many people the iPhone is still the best offering. Since we're not dealing with a significantly broken market for smartphones, people should pick what works best for them, be it iPhone or an Android or some other phone. This drives developers to work hard and try to make better products. I don't see the point of picking a product that is not as well suited to my tasks based upon the underlying OS. All that does is provide incentive for developers of that OS to not work harder to meet my needs and not compete as strongly. (Note: I don't own any kind of smartphone, iPhone or other.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... it will be less than capable of the respective Nokia N-device but as always the Apple marketing and fanboyzThere have always been products competing with both the iPod and iPhone that have a longer and more impressive bullet list of features .
The problem being , the average person does n't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use .
Many geeks are happy to work around poorly designed interfaces for the sake of overall functionality .
Is Apple becoming the Microsoft of the mobile world ?
! The problem with Microsoft is that they use a very large market share in one market to destroy competition and innovation in other markets , thus slowing progress .
Apple does n't have dominance in any markets , so their locked down products drive innovation by providing real competition .
When Apple has a monopoly o near monopoly and ties to other markets , then " ll lump them in with Microsoft.I do n't know... but I 'm telling you something guys : this is 2009 and we have Symbian &amp; Android which together reach some 60 \ % of the mobile smartphone market...Yup , that 's very cool and I have high hopes for Android , which have not really panned out yet .
I still wonder if Android would exist or if it would have the level of functionality it does if Apple were not providing such strong competition.So let 's not pull are eyes out with our own hands and choose iPhone NOT.For many people the iPhone is still the best offering .
Since we 're not dealing with a significantly broken market for smartphones , people should pick what works best for them , be it iPhone or an Android or some other phone .
This drives developers to work hard and try to make better products .
I do n't see the point of picking a product that is not as well suited to my tasks based upon the underlying OS .
All that does is provide incentive for developers of that OS to not work harder to meet my needs and not compete as strongly .
( Note : I do n't own any kind of smartphone , iPhone or other .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... it will be less than capable of the respective Nokia N-device but as always the Apple marketing and fanboyzThere have always been products competing with both the iPod and iPhone that have a longer and more impressive bullet list of features.
The problem being, the average person doesn't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use.
Many geeks are happy to work around poorly designed interfaces for the sake of overall functionality.
Is Apple becoming the Microsoft of the mobile world?
!The problem with Microsoft is that they use a very large market share in one market to destroy competition and innovation in other markets, thus slowing progress.
Apple doesn't have dominance in any markets, so their locked down products drive innovation by providing real competition.
When Apple has a monopoly o near monopoly and ties to other markets, then "ll lump them in with Microsoft.I don't know... but I'm telling you something guys: this is 2009 and we have Symbian &amp; Android which together reach some 60\% of the mobile smartphone market...Yup, that's very cool and I have high hopes for Android, which have not really panned out yet.
I still wonder if Android would exist or if it would have the level of functionality it does if Apple were not providing such strong competition.So let's not pull are eyes out with our own hands and choose iPhone NOT.For many people the iPhone is still the best offering.
Since we're not dealing with a significantly broken market for smartphones, people should pick what works best for them, be it iPhone or an Android or some other phone.
This drives developers to work hard and try to make better products.
I don't see the point of picking a product that is not as well suited to my tasks based upon the underlying OS.
All that does is provide incentive for developers of that OS to not work harder to meet my needs and not compete as strongly.
(Note: I don't own any kind of smartphone, iPhone or other.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170503</id>
	<title>iPhone OS 3.0 != iPhone 3G 2009</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243882080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr Gadget points out that Gizmodo's report on these new screenshots are actually screenshots from months ago of iPhone 3.0 OS running on an ordinary iPhone 3G.

<a href="http://www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/" title="mrgadget.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/</a> [mrgadget.com.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr Gadget points out that Gizmodo 's report on these new screenshots are actually screenshots from months ago of iPhone 3.0 OS running on an ordinary iPhone 3G .
http : //www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/ [ mrgadget.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr Gadget points out that Gizmodo's report on these new screenshots are actually screenshots from months ago of iPhone 3.0 OS running on an ordinary iPhone 3G.
http://www.mrgadget.com.au/gadget/2009/gizmodo-gets-it-wrong-just-iphone-30-os-screen-grabs/ [mrgadget.com.au]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>alta</author>
	<datestamp>1243887300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would be happy with a better ibattery.</p><p>I was just given an iphone that was sent to us as warranty exchange.  Battery life on this thing is terrible, and from what I've read, this is standard.  Now, I'm comparing to the curve I was using before... With the curve, I could count on the battery lasting 3-5 days of lite use. I REA</p><p>On this thing, I can BARELY go the weekend.  I unplugged before I left the office Friday afternoon, Monday morning on the way in, I got the "Your battery is low" message.<br>And since it's not a standard USB plug, I couldn't just plug it in to the plethora of USB ports around.  You'd think we'd be beyond the days of custom ports by now.  I can count of finding USB power anywhere I can find a computer, in my car, friends houses, etc.  So THANK YOU Motorola L2, and Blackberry Curve.</p><p>Screw you LG Shine and Apple iPhone.</p><p>(These are all phones I've had recent experience with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would be happy with a better ibattery.I was just given an iphone that was sent to us as warranty exchange .
Battery life on this thing is terrible , and from what I 've read , this is standard .
Now , I 'm comparing to the curve I was using before... With the curve , I could count on the battery lasting 3-5 days of lite use .
I REAOn this thing , I can BARELY go the weekend .
I unplugged before I left the office Friday afternoon , Monday morning on the way in , I got the " Your battery is low " message.And since it 's not a standard USB plug , I could n't just plug it in to the plethora of USB ports around .
You 'd think we 'd be beyond the days of custom ports by now .
I can count of finding USB power anywhere I can find a computer , in my car , friends houses , etc .
So THANK YOU Motorola L2 , and Blackberry Curve.Screw you LG Shine and Apple iPhone .
( These are all phones I 've had recent experience with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would be happy with a better ibattery.I was just given an iphone that was sent to us as warranty exchange.
Battery life on this thing is terrible, and from what I've read, this is standard.
Now, I'm comparing to the curve I was using before... With the curve, I could count on the battery lasting 3-5 days of lite use.
I REAOn this thing, I can BARELY go the weekend.
I unplugged before I left the office Friday afternoon, Monday morning on the way in, I got the "Your battery is low" message.And since it's not a standard USB plug, I couldn't just plug it in to the plethora of USB ports around.
You'd think we'd be beyond the days of custom ports by now.
I can count of finding USB power anywhere I can find a computer, in my car, friends houses, etc.
So THANK YOU Motorola L2, and Blackberry Curve.Screw you LG Shine and Apple iPhone.
(These are all phones I've had recent experience with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28189957</id>
	<title>Re:dashboard looks like it is in a western car</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243947780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't know about Chinese, but Japanese cars do. There's no actual character for km in Japanese, and spelling out kilometer in katakana (one of their phonetic alphabets, commonly used for foreign-origin words) would take up too much space. Likewise the auto selector was labelled R N D L 2 in latin characters. Don't know about trip, it wasn't labelled at all on my car.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't know about Chinese , but Japanese cars do .
There 's no actual character for km in Japanese , and spelling out kilometer in katakana ( one of their phonetic alphabets , commonly used for foreign-origin words ) would take up too much space .
Likewise the auto selector was labelled R N D L 2 in latin characters .
Do n't know about trip , it was n't labelled at all on my car .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't know about Chinese, but Japanese cars do.
There's no actual character for km in Japanese, and spelling out kilometer in katakana (one of their phonetic alphabets, commonly used for foreign-origin words) would take up too much space.
Likewise the auto selector was labelled R N D L 2 in latin characters.
Don't know about trip, it wasn't labelled at all on my car.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171027</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170387</id>
	<title>My goal is obvious!</title>
	<author>brian0918</author>
	<datestamp>1243881660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now my goal is obvious - to be more excited about the new iPhone than the Chinese! Thank you Apple for the fake leak to help <i>me</i> gauge my interest!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now my goal is obvious - to be more excited about the new iPhone than the Chinese !
Thank you Apple for the fake leak to help me gauge my interest !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now my goal is obvious - to be more excited about the new iPhone than the Chinese!
Thank you Apple for the fake leak to help me gauge my interest!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171595</id>
	<title>New Shiny !</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1243886640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone version 3 is finally getting all the stuff that other cellphones have had for 10 years ? And people will still blindly pay through the nose for these "exclusive features" ?</p><p>Not sure about the compass though, I'd have preferred a pair of nail clippers, a corkscrew / bottle opener, and a pair of scissors<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... wait, we're talking about a Swiss Army Knife right ?</p><p>We can only hope that the iPhone version 4 will at least upgrade the camera to 1.3 megapix.</p><p>*ducks*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone version 3 is finally getting all the stuff that other cellphones have had for 10 years ?
And people will still blindly pay through the nose for these " exclusive features " ? Not sure about the compass though , I 'd have preferred a pair of nail clippers , a corkscrew / bottle opener , and a pair of scissors ... wait , we 're talking about a Swiss Army Knife right ? We can only hope that the iPhone version 4 will at least upgrade the camera to 1.3 megapix .
* ducks *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone version 3 is finally getting all the stuff that other cellphones have had for 10 years ?
And people will still blindly pay through the nose for these "exclusive features" ?Not sure about the compass though, I'd have preferred a pair of nail clippers, a corkscrew / bottle opener, and a pair of scissors ... wait, we're talking about a Swiss Army Knife right ?We can only hope that the iPhone version 4 will at least upgrade the camera to 1.3 megapix.
*ducks*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172705</id>
	<title>New Features (remeber the iPod?)</title>
	<author>DorkRawk</author>
	<datestamp>1243847280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're right, Apple should have probably learned their lesson about taking their time and getting features correct rather than trying to have the most features on the block after the whole iPod thing blew up in their faces.

"No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame." (2001)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , Apple should have probably learned their lesson about taking their time and getting features correct rather than trying to have the most features on the block after the whole iPod thing blew up in their faces .
" No wireless .
Less space than a Nomad .
Lame. " ( 2001 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, Apple should have probably learned their lesson about taking their time and getting features correct rather than trying to have the most features on the block after the whole iPod thing blew up in their faces.
"No wireless.
Less space than a Nomad.
Lame." (2001)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170569</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1243882440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.t3.com/news/android-cupcake-1-5-update-to-enable-video-capture-for-g1?=38641" title="t3.com">http://www.t3.com/news/android-cupcake-1-5-update-to-enable-video-capture-for-g1?=38641</a> [t3.com]</p><p>The hardware is capable, but the software is not yet willing.  That will be changed, - see above.</p><p>Note that this is the EXACT same situation as the iPhone.  You have been able to shoot video on the iPhone once jailbroken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.t3.com/news/android-cupcake-1-5-update-to-enable-video-capture-for-g1 ? = 38641 [ t3.com ] The hardware is capable , but the software is not yet willing .
That will be changed , - see above.Note that this is the EXACT same situation as the iPhone .
You have been able to shoot video on the iPhone once jailbroken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.t3.com/news/android-cupcake-1-5-update-to-enable-video-capture-for-g1?=38641 [t3.com]The hardware is capable, but the software is not yet willing.
That will be changed, - see above.Note that this is the EXACT same situation as the iPhone.
You have been able to shoot video on the iPhone once jailbroken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173553</id>
	<title>Hey, new iPhone...</title>
	<author>jomcty</author>
	<datestamp>1243850220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, new iPhone, meet my <a href="http://na.blackberry.com/eng/devices/blackberrycurve8900/" title="blackberry.com" rel="nofollow">BlackBerry Curve 8900</a> [blackberry.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , new iPhone , meet my BlackBerry Curve 8900 [ blackberry.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, new iPhone, meet my BlackBerry Curve 8900 [blackberry.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174143</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>The Qube</author>
	<datestamp>1243852380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As a developer, I'm a lot more excited by the 3.0 software than the hardware itself. Yes, the new hardware will (hopefully) increase the market size, but the 3.0 software has some really exciting things from a business perspective. The key to these things is in-app purchase capability.
<br>Apple has had enough feedback from serious developers that the bottom end of the market ($1-$2 apps) is too low to sustain any serious development/business effort. The ability to make additional money from the customers to whom you've already sold your $1 app (ie. practically given it away at that price), will satisfy the existing serious developers and hopefully attract other ones.
<br>The current model is simply not sustainable. For me for example, I sell my app, <a href="http://virtualcricket.mobi/" title="virtualcricket.mobi">Virtual Cricket</a> [virtualcricket.mobi], at $1. With the cost of the professional data sources which provide live scores and commentary to all cricket matches around the world, this would require a very high sustained level of new customers just to break even, let alone make money. In-game purchases will allow some conversion of the existing customer base for subscription to higher-end content etc.
<br>This is where the market must go to go away from your iBeer and iFart type of efforts which do nothing to promote the platform as a serious marketplace.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a developer , I 'm a lot more excited by the 3.0 software than the hardware itself .
Yes , the new hardware will ( hopefully ) increase the market size , but the 3.0 software has some really exciting things from a business perspective .
The key to these things is in-app purchase capability .
Apple has had enough feedback from serious developers that the bottom end of the market ( $ 1- $ 2 apps ) is too low to sustain any serious development/business effort .
The ability to make additional money from the customers to whom you 've already sold your $ 1 app ( ie .
practically given it away at that price ) , will satisfy the existing serious developers and hopefully attract other ones .
The current model is simply not sustainable .
For me for example , I sell my app , Virtual Cricket [ virtualcricket.mobi ] , at $ 1 .
With the cost of the professional data sources which provide live scores and commentary to all cricket matches around the world , this would require a very high sustained level of new customers just to break even , let alone make money .
In-game purchases will allow some conversion of the existing customer base for subscription to higher-end content etc .
This is where the market must go to go away from your iBeer and iFart type of efforts which do nothing to promote the platform as a serious marketplace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a developer, I'm a lot more excited by the 3.0 software than the hardware itself.
Yes, the new hardware will (hopefully) increase the market size, but the 3.0 software has some really exciting things from a business perspective.
The key to these things is in-app purchase capability.
Apple has had enough feedback from serious developers that the bottom end of the market ($1-$2 apps) is too low to sustain any serious development/business effort.
The ability to make additional money from the customers to whom you've already sold your $1 app (ie.
practically given it away at that price), will satisfy the existing serious developers and hopefully attract other ones.
The current model is simply not sustainable.
For me for example, I sell my app, Virtual Cricket [virtualcricket.mobi], at $1.
With the cost of the professional data sources which provide live scores and commentary to all cricket matches around the world, this would require a very high sustained level of new customers just to break even, let alone make money.
In-game purchases will allow some conversion of the existing customer base for subscription to higher-end content etc.
This is where the market must go to go away from your iBeer and iFart type of efforts which do nothing to promote the platform as a serious marketplace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170545</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>IamTheRealMike</author>
	<datestamp>1243882260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 1.5 cupcake update added that exact ability. It's rolling out now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 1.5 cupcake update added that exact ability .
It 's rolling out now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 1.5 cupcake update added that exact ability.
It's rolling out now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170311</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>aaandre</author>
	<datestamp>1243881300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iWish you good iHealth and a long iLife.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iWish you good iHealth and a long iLife .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iWish you good iHealth and a long iLife.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28179541</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243941360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Excel (Temples fingers) lent</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excel ( Temples fingers ) lent</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excel (Temples fingers) lent</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177349</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243873740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>not exactly. i don't know of any other modern smartphone that limits me to ~8gb of total storage, after charging me $500 for a phone. And you can't give me a single good technical reason to not include a microsd slot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>not exactly .
i do n't know of any other modern smartphone that limits me to ~ 8gb of total storage , after charging me $ 500 for a phone .
And you ca n't give me a single good technical reason to not include a microsd slot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not exactly.
i don't know of any other modern smartphone that limits me to ~8gb of total storage, after charging me $500 for a phone.
And you can't give me a single good technical reason to not include a microsd slot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170521</id>
	<title>I hear rumours...</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1243882200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That this will do everything Apple claims it will.  <br> <br>
Seems unlikely though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That this will do everything Apple claims it will .
Seems unlikely though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That this will do everything Apple claims it will.
Seems unlikely though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171325</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1243885560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't even know that there still are phones without video capture. Pretty much all phones here have one cam. Some have two (for video chat).</p><p>How much would you pay, If I'd send you one of these, from over here: <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;hl=en&amp;js=n&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.xonio.com\%2Fbestenlisten\%2FBestenliste-Handys--index\%2Findex\%2Fid\%2F598\%2F&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;history\_state0=" title="google.com">http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;hl=en&amp;js=n&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.xonio.com\%2Fbestenlisten\%2FBestenliste-Handys--index\%2Findex\%2Fid\%2F598\%2F&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;history\_state0=</a> [google.com] (autotranslated)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't even know that there still are phones without video capture .
Pretty much all phones here have one cam .
Some have two ( for video chat ) .How much would you pay , If I 'd send you one of these , from over here : http : //translate.google.com/translate ? prev = hp&amp;hl = en&amp;js = n&amp;u = http \ % 3A \ % 2F \ % 2Fwww.xonio.com \ % 2Fbestenlisten \ % 2FBestenliste-Handys--index \ % 2Findex \ % 2Fid \ % 2F598 \ % 2F&amp;sl = de&amp;tl = en&amp;history \ _state0 = [ google.com ] ( autotranslated )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't even know that there still are phones without video capture.
Pretty much all phones here have one cam.
Some have two (for video chat).How much would you pay, If I'd send you one of these, from over here: http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;hl=en&amp;js=n&amp;u=http\%3A\%2F\%2Fwww.xonio.com\%2Fbestenlisten\%2FBestenliste-Handys--index\%2Findex\%2Fid\%2F598\%2F&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;history\_state0= [google.com] (autotranslated)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170467</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243881960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>um...yes it can, since the 1.5 update</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>um...yes it can , since the 1.5 update</tokentext>
<sentencetext>um...yes it can, since the 1.5 update</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28178899</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>SlashWombat</author>
	<datestamp>1243933800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next thing you know, you'll be able to use it to make a phone call!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next thing you know , you 'll be able to use it to make a phone call !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next thing you know, you'll be able to use it to make a phone call!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170751</id>
	<title>New casing? New UI?</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1243883460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it look like an ancient Palm, with a black-and-white screen, a writing area, and only a dozen apps on the homescreen?</p><p>SLASHDOT, FFS, GET SOME NEW ICONS!</p><p>And WTF is up with the MacBook icon <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/01/1512213" title="slashdot.org">on this iPhone story?</a> [slashdot.org] I guess I need to change my request to "new <em>and accurate</em> icons."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it look like an ancient Palm , with a black-and-white screen , a writing area , and only a dozen apps on the homescreen ? SLASHDOT , FFS , GET SOME NEW ICONS ! And WTF is up with the MacBook icon on this iPhone story ?
[ slashdot.org ] I guess I need to change my request to " new and accurate icons .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it look like an ancient Palm, with a black-and-white screen, a writing area, and only a dozen apps on the homescreen?SLASHDOT, FFS, GET SOME NEW ICONS!And WTF is up with the MacBook icon on this iPhone story?
[slashdot.org] I guess I need to change my request to "new and accurate icons.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175539</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1243859160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Even people who don't own ipods seem to have some of those around at this point lol.</i></p><p>I don't.  And yes, most smart phones do have mini USB ports on them.</p><p>That said, I'm still hoping a new iPhone will be released this month at the World Wide What Would Jesus aka Steve Jobs Do Conference so I can replace my dying Windows Mobile phone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even people who do n't own ipods seem to have some of those around at this point lol.I do n't .
And yes , most smart phones do have mini USB ports on them.That said , I 'm still hoping a new iPhone will be released this month at the World Wide What Would Jesus aka Steve Jobs Do Conference so I can replace my dying Windows Mobile phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even people who don't own ipods seem to have some of those around at this point lol.I don't.
And yes, most smart phones do have mini USB ports on them.That said, I'm still hoping a new iPhone will be released this month at the World Wide What Would Jesus aka Steve Jobs Do Conference so I can replace my dying Windows Mobile phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172669</id>
	<title>Apple Rumor</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1243847100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Excuse me while I hack out a filter to skip over all Slashdot stories that have "apple" and "rumor" as keywords. Because the editors don't seem to realize that most Apple rumors are bullshit. That company attracts more lame rumor-mongers that a convention of conspiracy buffs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me while I hack out a filter to skip over all Slashdot stories that have " apple " and " rumor " as keywords .
Because the editors do n't seem to realize that most Apple rumors are bullshit .
That company attracts more lame rumor-mongers that a convention of conspiracy buffs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me while I hack out a filter to skip over all Slashdot stories that have "apple" and "rumor" as keywords.
Because the editors don't seem to realize that most Apple rumors are bullshit.
That company attracts more lame rumor-mongers that a convention of conspiracy buffs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170273</id>
	<title>Creating unsubstatiated rumors</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1243881060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also heard somewhere that the new iPhone will come with a free puppy. It will also water my lawn, clean my house, and walk the puppy for me.</p><p>Can I join a PR agency now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also heard somewhere that the new iPhone will come with a free puppy .
It will also water my lawn , clean my house , and walk the puppy for me.Can I join a PR agency now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also heard somewhere that the new iPhone will come with a free puppy.
It will also water my lawn, clean my house, and walk the puppy for me.Can I join a PR agency now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005</id>
	<title>Wow! Autofocus!?  What will Apple invent next?</title>
	<author>This name in use</author>
	<datestamp>1243884480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stating "Autofocus Camera" is pretty redundant at this point. <br> Do you know of any cameras that don't have autofocus? <br> If this has already been stated, then I am as redundant as the parent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stating " Autofocus Camera " is pretty redundant at this point .
Do you know of any cameras that do n't have autofocus ?
If this has already been stated , then I am as redundant as the parent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stating "Autofocus Camera" is pretty redundant at this point.
Do you know of any cameras that don't have autofocus?
If this has already been stated, then I am as redundant as the parent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177545</id>
	<title>Re:Creating unsubstatiated rumors</title>
	<author>fuzzlost</author>
	<datestamp>1243875480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But will it make toast?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But will it make toast ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But will it make toast?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170273</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171103</id>
	<title>Jalbreak?</title>
	<author>Stenchwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1243884780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No matter what features they will or won't include, it is not going to be as feature-rich as it be will when I jailbreak it. It's sad that I have to void the warranty to make this device (that is running a kernel invented and intended for the Open-Source world, BTW) what it should be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No matter what features they will or wo n't include , it is not going to be as feature-rich as it be will when I jailbreak it .
It 's sad that I have to void the warranty to make this device ( that is running a kernel invented and intended for the Open-Source world , BTW ) what it should be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No matter what features they will or won't include, it is not going to be as feature-rich as it be will when I jailbreak it.
It's sad that I have to void the warranty to make this device (that is running a kernel invented and intended for the Open-Source world, BTW) what it should be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170409</id>
	<title>Nope</title>
	<author>CritterNYC</author>
	<datestamp>1243881720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iPhone camera is fixed focus and can't shoot video (at least not out of the box).  And there is no compass.  A compass is handy for turn-by-turn navigation and other neat-o things like street view on the G1 making use of the built-in compass: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PRfVKzuUJ4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PRfVKzuUJ4</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPhone camera is fixed focus and ca n't shoot video ( at least not out of the box ) .
And there is no compass .
A compass is handy for turn-by-turn navigation and other neat-o things like street view on the G1 making use of the built-in compass : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 4PRfVKzuUJ4 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPhone camera is fixed focus and can't shoot video (at least not out of the box).
And there is no compass.
A compass is handy for turn-by-turn navigation and other neat-o things like street view on the G1 making use of the built-in compass: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PRfVKzuUJ4 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170745</id>
	<title>Will the new iPhone give me a blow job?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243883400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there an app for that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there an app for that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there an app for that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170431</id>
	<title>Meh.</title>
	<author>Naatach</author>
	<datestamp>1243881840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give me the ability to run non-apple background services and customizable alerts.  Until then, it's just "Pretty but Dumb".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give me the ability to run non-apple background services and customizable alerts .
Until then , it 's just " Pretty but Dumb " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give me the ability to run non-apple background services and customizable alerts.
Until then, it's just "Pretty but Dumb".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173867</id>
	<title>Re:Wow! Autofocus!? What will Apple invent next?</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1243851480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The HTC Apache (Sprint PPC6700\Verizon XV6700) has a manually adjustable focus on it's camera.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The HTC Apache ( Sprint PPC6700 \ Verizon XV6700 ) has a manually adjustable focus on it 's camera .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The HTC Apache (Sprint PPC6700\Verizon XV6700) has a manually adjustable focus on it's camera.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28179983</id>
	<title>Re:dashboard looks like it is in a western car</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243945680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Do cars shipped to China have trip, km and other english words on the dash instead of the equivalent Chinese?  The reasons for the fuzzy photos don't wash as the photographer brandished the phone in public in a car.  Seems to me better photos could have been taken easily.</p></div><p>Couldnt agree more, especially as the handbrake was applied and at least one occupant was not wearing a seatbelt.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do cars shipped to China have trip , km and other english words on the dash instead of the equivalent Chinese ?
The reasons for the fuzzy photos do n't wash as the photographer brandished the phone in public in a car .
Seems to me better photos could have been taken easily.Couldnt agree more , especially as the handbrake was applied and at least one occupant was not wearing a seatbelt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do cars shipped to China have trip, km and other english words on the dash instead of the equivalent Chinese?
The reasons for the fuzzy photos don't wash as the photographer brandished the phone in public in a car.
Seems to me better photos could have been taken easily.Couldnt agree more, especially as the handbrake was applied and at least one occupant was not wearing a seatbelt.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171027</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170197</id>
	<title>What would Steve Jobs say?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243880700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am Steve Jobs and I am here to ask you a question:<br>Is a man not entitled to an iPhone?</p><p>No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.<br>No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.<br>No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.</p><p>I rejected those answers.  Instead, I chose something different.<br>I chose the impossible.<br>I chose<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am Steve Jobs and I am here to ask you a question : Is a man not entitled to an iPhone ? No , says the man in Washington ; it belongs to the poor.No , says the man in the Vatican ; it belongs to God.No , says the man in Moscow ; it belongs to everyone.I rejected those answers .
Instead , I chose something different.I chose the impossible.I chose ... Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am Steve Jobs and I am here to ask you a question:Is a man not entitled to an iPhone?No, says the man in Washington; it belongs to the poor.No, says the man in the Vatican; it belongs to God.No, says the man in Moscow; it belongs to everyone.I rejected those answers.
Instead, I chose something different.I chose the impossible.I chose ... Apple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177253</id>
	<title>Re:Whatever comes out...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243872900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot to mention those of us that can manage complex interfaces but have better things to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot to mention those of us that can manage complex interfaces but have better things to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot to mention those of us that can manage complex interfaces but have better things to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170617</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28180033</id>
	<title>Hard to believe where is the killer feature?</title>
	<author>basiel</author>
	<datestamp>1243946160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find this rumour hard to accept. Because there is nothing mentioning any new great feature that would want people to buy the latest generation iPhone. Who is gonna buy a new phone to have a better camera and a compass???
Anyone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find this rumour hard to accept .
Because there is nothing mentioning any new great feature that would want people to buy the latest generation iPhone .
Who is gon na buy a new phone to have a better camera and a compass ? ? ?
Anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find this rumour hard to accept.
Because there is nothing mentioning any new great feature that would want people to buy the latest generation iPhone.
Who is gonna buy a new phone to have a better camera and a compass???
Anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171859</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>moniker127</author>
	<datestamp>1243887420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The ipod touch?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The ipod touch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The ipod touch?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170523</id>
	<title>Sure it can</title>
	<author>CritterNYC</author>
	<datestamp>1243882200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure it can.  I mean it's not gonna be the quality of a camcorder, but it's decent: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0A2tMTEI7M" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0A2tMTEI7M</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>And you can upload it directly to YouTube from your G1, which is handy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure it can .
I mean it 's not gon na be the quality of a camcorder , but it 's decent : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = r0A2tMTEI7M [ youtube.com ] And you can upload it directly to YouTube from your G1 , which is handy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure it can.
I mean it's not gonna be the quality of a camcorder, but it's decent: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0A2tMTEI7M [youtube.com]And you can upload it directly to YouTube from your G1, which is handy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171149</id>
	<title>Let me be the first to ask:</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1243884960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it finally have <strong>buttons</strong>? ^^</p><p>(On the back, side, top or bottom does not count. Non-tactile does not count too.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it finally have buttons ?
^ ^ ( On the back , side , top or bottom does not count .
Non-tactile does not count too .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it finally have buttons?
^^(On the back, side, top or bottom does not count.
Non-tactile does not count too.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174699</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>Late Adopter</author>
	<datestamp>1243854780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nokia's most recent phones use Micro USB, which is the sanest thing I can think of to standardize on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nokia 's most recent phones use Micro USB , which is the sanest thing I can think of to standardize on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nokia's most recent phones use Micro USB, which is the sanest thing I can think of to standardize on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171027</id>
	<title>dashboard looks like it is in a western car</title>
	<author>SocietyoftheFist</author>
	<datestamp>1243884540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do cars shipped to China have trip, km and other english words on the dash instead of the equivalent Chinese?  The reasons for the fuzzy photos don't wash as the photographer brandished the phone in public in a car.  Seems to me better photos could have been taken easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do cars shipped to China have trip , km and other english words on the dash instead of the equivalent Chinese ?
The reasons for the fuzzy photos do n't wash as the photographer brandished the phone in public in a car .
Seems to me better photos could have been taken easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do cars shipped to China have trip, km and other english words on the dash instead of the equivalent Chinese?
The reasons for the fuzzy photos don't wash as the photographer brandished the phone in public in a car.
Seems to me better photos could have been taken easily.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172053</id>
	<title>Re:Wow! Autofocus!? What will Apple invent next?</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1243888020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Do you know of any cameras that don't have autofocus?</p></div></blockquote><p>Actually, yes, I do.<br>Neither Leica M8 nor Leica M8.2 have got AF.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know of any cameras that do n't have autofocus ? Actually , yes , I do.Neither Leica M8 nor Leica M8.2 have got AF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know of any cameras that don't have autofocus?Actually, yes, I do.Neither Leica M8 nor Leica M8.2 have got AF.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170753</id>
	<title>Re:iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1243883460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're iNsane.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're iNsane .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're iNsane.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173257</id>
	<title>Would you kindly...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1243849320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...troll someplace else?</p><p>Or do I need to go and get a golf club?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...troll someplace else ? Or do I need to go and get a golf club ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...troll someplace else?Or do I need to go and get a golf club?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170333</id>
	<title>What I heard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243881360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The new iPhone will actually be able to fly and steam milk for lattes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The new iPhone will actually be able to fly and steam milk for lattes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new iPhone will actually be able to fly and steam milk for lattes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171161</id>
	<title>So the next iPhone will be...</title>
	<author>GooberToo</author>
	<datestamp>1243884960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>which include things like an auto-focus camera, video capture, and a compass</i></p><p>an android phone? Sounds like the G1 spec sheet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>which include things like an auto-focus camera , video capture , and a compassan android phone ?
Sounds like the G1 spec sheet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which include things like an auto-focus camera, video capture, and a compassan android phone?
Sounds like the G1 spec sheet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170875</id>
	<title>Verizon?</title>
	<author>the-matt-mobile</author>
	<datestamp>1243884000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being available for Verizon is the only iPhone feature I'm looking for.  No chance I'm going with AT&amp;T - period.  Maybe I'm the only one that feels this way, or maybe the lure of the iPhone is enough for other people to make the switch.  Meh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being available for Verizon is the only iPhone feature I 'm looking for .
No chance I 'm going with AT&amp;T - period .
Maybe I 'm the only one that feels this way , or maybe the lure of the iPhone is enough for other people to make the switch .
Meh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being available for Verizon is the only iPhone feature I'm looking for.
No chance I'm going with AT&amp;T - period.
Maybe I'm the only one that feels this way, or maybe the lure of the iPhone is enough for other people to make the switch.
Meh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170407</id>
	<title>Wow!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243881720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iT flies!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iT flies ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iT flies!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159</id>
	<title>iNexpensive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243880520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iM waiting for the rumored iNexpensive iPhone with the new lower iPrice and no long-term iContract.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iM waiting for the rumored iNexpensive iPhone with the new lower iPrice and no long-term iContract .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iM waiting for the rumored iNexpensive iPhone with the new lower iPrice and no long-term iContract.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172791</id>
	<title>Flying iPhone Capabilities?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243847580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not dyslexic, I just don't always sentences read properly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not dyslexic , I just do n't always sentences read properly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not dyslexic, I just don't always sentences read properly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195</id>
	<title>Chances are..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243880640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple themselves leaked the pictures, after all they are the masters of "media" manipulation.<br> <br>
After all's said &amp; done; it's just made the front page of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple themselves leaked the pictures , after all they are the masters of " media " manipulation .
After all 's said &amp; done ; it 's just made the front page of / .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple themselves leaked the pictures, after all they are the masters of "media" manipulation.
After all's said &amp; done; it's just made the front page of /.
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172049</id>
	<title>Re:Chances are..</title>
	<author>The End Of Days</author>
	<datestamp>1243888020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno that Slashdot users are that much of a concern for Apple.  People around here like their computers cheap with interfaces from the 70s.  That's not exactly Apple's target market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno that Slashdot users are that much of a concern for Apple .
People around here like their computers cheap with interfaces from the 70s .
That 's not exactly Apple 's target market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno that Slashdot users are that much of a concern for Apple.
People around here like their computers cheap with interfaces from the 70s.
That's not exactly Apple's target market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185</id>
	<title>You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243880580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"things like an auto-focus camera, video capture, and a compass"</p><p>You mean they're gonna release a G1?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" things like an auto-focus camera , video capture , and a compass " You mean they 're gon na release a G1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"things like an auto-focus camera, video capture, and a compass"You mean they're gonna release a G1?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170695</id>
	<title>Re:What would Steve Jobs say?</title>
	<author>James Skarzinskas</author>
	<datestamp>1243883160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are we not men? We are Apple.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we not men ?
We are Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we not men?
We are Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170197</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170477</id>
	<title>Re:You mean the G1?</title>
	<author>za7ch</author>
	<datestamp>1243882020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cupcake 1.5 fixed that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cupcake 1.5 fixed that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cupcake 1.5 fixed that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177241</id>
	<title>Peripheral Vision Amusing As Always</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243872780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone else read the head line as<br>"Rumors About New iPhone Flying Capabilities"?</p><p>My first thought was that they were attempting to<br>take over some of Microsoft's flying chair market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else read the head line as " Rumors About New iPhone Flying Capabilities " ? My first thought was that they were attempting totake over some of Microsoft 's flying chair market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else read the head line as"Rumors About New iPhone Flying Capabilities"?My first thought was that they were attempting totake over some of Microsoft's flying chair market.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171797</id>
	<title>Re:I'm confused</title>
	<author>nsayer</author>
	<datestamp>1243887240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought the iPhone already had an autofocus camera in it,</p></div><p>No, it has a <i>fixed</i> focus camera.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>and that it had a GPS (thus making a compas possible).</p></div><p>GPS can only act as a compass while you're moving. a magnetic compass can do that job while you're standing still.</p><p>The two together can potentially be teh aw3som3, since knowing your GPS location can allow you to compute the magnetic correction automatically for your location, giving you a <i>true</i> compass heading, not just a magnetic one.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the iPhone already had an autofocus camera in it,No , it has a fixed focus camera.and that it had a GPS ( thus making a compas possible ) .GPS can only act as a compass while you 're moving .
a magnetic compass can do that job while you 're standing still.The two together can potentially be teh aw3som3 , since knowing your GPS location can allow you to compute the magnetic correction automatically for your location , giving you a true compass heading , not just a magnetic one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the iPhone already had an autofocus camera in it,No, it has a fixed focus camera.and that it had a GPS (thus making a compas possible).GPS can only act as a compass while you're moving.
a magnetic compass can do that job while you're standing still.The two together can potentially be teh aw3som3, since knowing your GPS location can allow you to compute the magnetic correction automatically for your location, giving you a true compass heading, not just a magnetic one.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170671</id>
	<title>Compass?</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1243882980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure there is already an app that serves as a compass. What did Apple do steal it and make standard on the phone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure there is already an app that serves as a compass .
What did Apple do steal it and make standard on the phone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure there is already an app that serves as a compass.
What did Apple do steal it and make standard on the phone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170617</id>
	<title>Re:Whatever comes out...</title>
	<author>david\_thornley</author>
	<datestamp>1243882620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
You are, as is usual here, missing the point about Apple products.
</p><p>
They frequently don't have the raw capabilities of their competition, but they are reasonably stylish and very easy to use.  You and I may be able to efficiently handle complicated interfaces, but most people have a great deal of difficulty with them.  They will learn what they have to, and no more.  The average smart phone is used only for a very few things.
</p><p>
The iPhone is easy to use.  It's easy to figure out how to do things.  There are darn few glitches or gotchas.  There's a fairly thick manual, which nobody has to read.  This is important, since nobody but us actually reads the manuals.  It's easy to extend the functionality, now that the App Store is there.  It has never been easier to make a telephone generate its own fart sounds, or do a variety of other things, some of which are actually useful.  I find this attractive, since I've long since tired of learning complicated things that aren't actually important to what I want to do.  (For example, why would I want to learn Microsoft Word's more arcane features when vim and LaTeX already do what I want?)
</p><p>
If this makes no sense to you, or if you think Apple's popularity is due to nothing but marketing and fanbois, please do not do any interface design for end users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are , as is usual here , missing the point about Apple products .
They frequently do n't have the raw capabilities of their competition , but they are reasonably stylish and very easy to use .
You and I may be able to efficiently handle complicated interfaces , but most people have a great deal of difficulty with them .
They will learn what they have to , and no more .
The average smart phone is used only for a very few things .
The iPhone is easy to use .
It 's easy to figure out how to do things .
There are darn few glitches or gotchas .
There 's a fairly thick manual , which nobody has to read .
This is important , since nobody but us actually reads the manuals .
It 's easy to extend the functionality , now that the App Store is there .
It has never been easier to make a telephone generate its own fart sounds , or do a variety of other things , some of which are actually useful .
I find this attractive , since I 've long since tired of learning complicated things that are n't actually important to what I want to do .
( For example , why would I want to learn Microsoft Word 's more arcane features when vim and LaTeX already do what I want ?
) If this makes no sense to you , or if you think Apple 's popularity is due to nothing but marketing and fanbois , please do not do any interface design for end users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
You are, as is usual here, missing the point about Apple products.
They frequently don't have the raw capabilities of their competition, but they are reasonably stylish and very easy to use.
You and I may be able to efficiently handle complicated interfaces, but most people have a great deal of difficulty with them.
They will learn what they have to, and no more.
The average smart phone is used only for a very few things.
The iPhone is easy to use.
It's easy to figure out how to do things.
There are darn few glitches or gotchas.
There's a fairly thick manual, which nobody has to read.
This is important, since nobody but us actually reads the manuals.
It's easy to extend the functionality, now that the App Store is there.
It has never been easier to make a telephone generate its own fart sounds, or do a variety of other things, some of which are actually useful.
I find this attractive, since I've long since tired of learning complicated things that aren't actually important to what I want to do.
(For example, why would I want to learn Microsoft Word's more arcane features when vim and LaTeX already do what I want?
)

If this makes no sense to you, or if you think Apple's popularity is due to nothing but marketing and fanbois, please do not do any interface design for end users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170761</id>
	<title>Really, Slashdot?</title>
	<author>Bradicus</author>
	<datestamp>1243883460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please, there has to be somewhere in the world that doesn't start fondling itself whenever Apple leaks garbage to the press to remind everybody how much people go crazy over any news related to their products.

An entire post over the RUMOR of a POSSIBILITY that the new iPhone will have an autofocusing camera, video capability, and a compass? Is that really exciting? Actually, doesn't the G1 do all those things already?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , there has to be somewhere in the world that does n't start fondling itself whenever Apple leaks garbage to the press to remind everybody how much people go crazy over any news related to their products .
An entire post over the RUMOR of a POSSIBILITY that the new iPhone will have an autofocusing camera , video capability , and a compass ?
Is that really exciting ?
Actually , does n't the G1 do all those things already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, there has to be somewhere in the world that doesn't start fondling itself whenever Apple leaks garbage to the press to remind everybody how much people go crazy over any news related to their products.
An entire post over the RUMOR of a POSSIBILITY that the new iPhone will have an autofocusing camera, video capability, and a compass?
Is that really exciting?
Actually, doesn't the G1 do all those things already?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171825</id>
	<title>Re:Verizon?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243887300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why Verizon? So you can pay $60-70 more per month? Seriously, I was paying one data phone one standard phone for $185 and can get an iPhone service for two phones for $120/month. But more power to you if that is how you like it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why Verizon ?
So you can pay $ 60-70 more per month ?
Seriously , I was paying one data phone one standard phone for $ 185 and can get an iPhone service for two phones for $ 120/month .
But more power to you if that is how you like it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why Verizon?
So you can pay $60-70 more per month?
Seriously, I was paying one data phone one standard phone for $185 and can get an iPhone service for two phones for $120/month.
But more power to you if that is how you like it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170875</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172173</id>
	<title>Re:Whatever comes out...</title>
	<author>Maury Markowitz</author>
	<datestamp>1243888380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; The problem being, the average person doesn't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use.</p><p>My Motorola phone had a browser. I tried to use it once.</p><p>Once.</p><p>Maury</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; The problem being , the average person does n't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use.My Motorola phone had a browser .
I tried to use it once.Once.Maury</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; The problem being, the average person doesn't enjoy using them and half those features are so poorly implemented they are just painful to use.My Motorola phone had a browser.
I tried to use it once.Once.Maury</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170397</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170823</id>
	<title>Re:Chances are..</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1243883760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler\_&amp;\_Koch\_MP5" title="wikipedia.org">German MP5 player</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the German MP5 player [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the German MP5 player [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170451</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171825
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170875
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171325
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175729
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172049
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170823
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170451
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170695
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173867
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28189957
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28178899
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171907
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28176903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170751
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170273
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177253
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170617
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170409
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172173
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172687
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170569
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171847
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170197
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170467
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175661
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170397
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170249
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170811
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170201
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170753
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170631
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170341
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28179983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171027
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170477
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28179541
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28192257
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170625
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170201
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_06_01_1548251_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170545
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170503
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171027
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28179983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28189957
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170751
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28176903
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170249
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170397
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172173
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172983
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170617
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177253
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170159
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173161
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177349
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170311
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170753
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28179541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174143
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171839
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28192257
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172773
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175661
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174699
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175539
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28175729
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28178899
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28174625
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171869
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171103
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170201
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170811
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170625
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170195
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170451
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170823
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170631
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172049
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171847
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170333
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170875
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171825
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173729
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170185
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171325
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170389
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170523
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170477
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170569
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172687
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170545
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170467
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170761
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170273
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28177545
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170203
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171797
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170341
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170409
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170197
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173257
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28170695
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171149
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173553
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_06_01_1548251.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171005
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28171907
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28173867
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_06_01_1548251.28172053
</commentlist>
</conversation>
