<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_29_2240257</id>
	<title>Who Would Want To Be Obama's Cybersecurity Czar?</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1243596240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:lmwalsh2112@yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">dasButcher</a> writes <i>"President Obama is expected to name a new cybersecurity czar sometime soon. This person will be charged with defending the digital boards from attack by hostile nation-states and terrorist organizations. But the question Larry Walsh asks is: <a href="http://blogs.channelinsider.com/secure\_channel/content/data\_security/who\_would\_want\_to\_be\_the\_cybersecurity\_czar.html">Who really wants the job?</a> The previous three people who held the post barely made a dent in solving the security problems. Government bureaucracy and private sector resistance make it nearly impossible to find any measure of meaningful success in this job, he writes."</i>
Reader eatcajun contributes a related link to the long-awaited <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/CyberReview/">US cyberspace policy review</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>dasButcher writes " President Obama is expected to name a new cybersecurity czar sometime soon .
This person will be charged with defending the digital boards from attack by hostile nation-states and terrorist organizations .
But the question Larry Walsh asks is : Who really wants the job ?
The previous three people who held the post barely made a dent in solving the security problems .
Government bureaucracy and private sector resistance make it nearly impossible to find any measure of meaningful success in this job , he writes .
" Reader eatcajun contributes a related link to the long-awaited US cyberspace policy review .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dasButcher writes "President Obama is expected to name a new cybersecurity czar sometime soon.
This person will be charged with defending the digital boards from attack by hostile nation-states and terrorist organizations.
But the question Larry Walsh asks is: Who really wants the job?
The previous three people who held the post barely made a dent in solving the security problems.
Government bureaucracy and private sector resistance make it nearly impossible to find any measure of meaningful success in this job, he writes.
"
Reader eatcajun contributes a related link to the long-awaited US cyberspace policy review.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145489</id>
	<title>at least it pays well!</title>
	<author>nikosput</author>
	<datestamp>1243600740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on, you gotta know a job like this pays some serious bank.  And in todays economy, that means a lot more then it used to.

Sooooo...if anybody wants to hire me, you can find my resume online.  (President Obama, are you reading this?)  I posted it on my website: <a href="http://www.niksput.com/resume.html" title="niksput.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.niksput.com/resume.html</a> [niksput.com]

Also you can email me: <a href="mailto:sdn@niksput.com" title="mailto" rel="nofollow">sdn@niksput.com</a> [mailto]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , you got ta know a job like this pays some serious bank .
And in todays economy , that means a lot more then it used to .
Sooooo...if anybody wants to hire me , you can find my resume online .
( President Obama , are you reading this ?
) I posted it on my website : http : //www.niksput.com/resume.html [ niksput.com ] Also you can email me : sdn @ niksput.com [ mailto ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, you gotta know a job like this pays some serious bank.
And in todays economy, that means a lot more then it used to.
Sooooo...if anybody wants to hire me, you can find my resume online.
(President Obama, are you reading this?
)  I posted it on my website: http://www.niksput.com/resume.html [niksput.com]

Also you can email me: sdn@niksput.com [mailto]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146795</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>KarmaRundi</author>
	<datestamp>1243614540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>These positions are never officially called czars. That's just a name the media gives them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>These positions are never officially called czars .
That 's just a name the media gives them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These positions are never officially called czars.
That's just a name the media gives them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145419</id>
	<title>is that anything like a Secretary of the Internet?</title>
	<author>Xtifr</author>
	<datestamp>1243600380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.xkcd.com/494/" title="xkcd.com">Obligatory XKCD link</a> [xkcd.com] (five part story).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory XKCD link [ xkcd.com ] ( five part story ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory XKCD link [xkcd.com] (five part story).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145923</id>
	<title>Re:Czar fetish</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243604280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>etymology: czar = kaiser = caesar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>etymology : czar = kaiser = caesar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>etymology: czar = kaiser = caesar</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146509</id>
	<title>I'd like to be but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243610700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but I'm an employed white male who wouldn't base my decisions on my perceptions of social injustice brought about by my situation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but I 'm an employed white male who would n't base my decisions on my perceptions of social injustice brought about by my situation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but I'm an employed white male who wouldn't base my decisions on my perceptions of social injustice brought about by my situation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145637</id>
	<title>I nominate BOFH</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1243601880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am sure he will find away around this so called bureaucracy of yours as he has been doing quite well for himself <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastard\_Operator\_From\_Hell" title="wikipedia.org">in the private sector</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>Of course with the new job comes new nomenclature, I present to you ladies and gentlemen the BCCFH (The bastard cybersecucurity czar from hell) and don't worry about assigning him any more power than a normal UNIX sysadmin, he'll get the job done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sure he will find away around this so called bureaucracy of yours as he has been doing quite well for himself in the private sector [ wikipedia.org ] .Of course with the new job comes new nomenclature , I present to you ladies and gentlemen the BCCFH ( The bastard cybersecucurity czar from hell ) and do n't worry about assigning him any more power than a normal UNIX sysadmin , he 'll get the job done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sure he will find away around this so called bureaucracy of yours as he has been doing quite well for himself in the private sector [wikipedia.org].Of course with the new job comes new nomenclature, I present to you ladies and gentlemen the BCCFH (The bastard cybersecucurity czar from hell) and don't worry about assigning him any more power than a normal UNIX sysadmin, he'll get the job done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146785</id>
	<title>How I Would Do It</title>
	<author>Bob9113</author>
	<datestamp>1243614420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's my quick, from the hip view on how to maximize the probability of a successful outcome:</p><p>Cybersecurity is focused on maintaining control of systems and networks. Cyber-warfighting is a valuable source for understanding potential threats, but it is not the objective of the cybersecurity committee to advance the state-of-the-art of cyber-warfighting.</p><p>To advance the ability of the citizens and organizations of the United States to retain control of their information systems, an elite task-force will be formed:</p><p>
&nbsp; 1. Retain Bruce Schneier<br>
&nbsp; 2. Retain Ten Specialists, Bruce's Choice, Following Criteria:<br>
&nbsp; 2.1. One EFF Constitutional Rights specialist<br>
&nbsp; 2.2. One ACLU Constitutional Rights specialist<br>
&nbsp; 2.3. One significant code contributor from the NSA SE:Linux project<br>
&nbsp; 2.4. Two information security specialists from among:<br>
&nbsp; 2.4.1. Microsoft<br>
&nbsp; 2.4.2. Google<br>
&nbsp; 2.4.3. Apple<br>
&nbsp; 2.4.4. IBM<br>
&nbsp; 2.5. Two espionage defense specialists from among:<br>
&nbsp; 2.5.1. General Dynamics<br>
&nbsp; 2.5.2. GE<br>
&nbsp; 2.5.3. Boeing<br>
&nbsp; 2.5.4. Halliburton<br>
&nbsp; 2.6. Three platform specialists<br>
&nbsp; 2.6.1. Microsoft<br>
&nbsp; 2.6.2. Mac<br>
&nbsp; 2.6.3. *nix<br>
&nbsp; 3. Specialists Get One Vote Each<br>
&nbsp; 4. Bruce Gets Tie-Breaker Vote<br>
&nbsp; 5. Each Specialist Can Employ Two Research Specialists</p><p>Votes are expected to be unanimous or nearly unanimous - non-unanimous decisions imply that every member of the panel is failing. It is every member's job to think critically, to respect diverse needs, and to help the others understand their perspective. Failure to do so implies betrayal of duty.</p><p>All votes will be secret for at least one year. Sensitive votes will be secret for five years.</p><p>Sensitive entities (corporations, organizations, government agencies) get free advanced training, room, and board, conducted at a military academy. Security practitioners get preferred enrollment. Corporations must continue to pay the employee. Corporations can choose not to send anyone, but the name of any sensitive corporation which chooses not to send some top rank security specialists will be published. It's tough, but fair, and necessary.</p><p>Curriculum will focus on practices for keeping each system under the full control of its owner. Curriculum will not sacrifice that mission to advance the ability of any non-owner of a system to compromise full control by the owner of that system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's my quick , from the hip view on how to maximize the probability of a successful outcome : Cybersecurity is focused on maintaining control of systems and networks .
Cyber-warfighting is a valuable source for understanding potential threats , but it is not the objective of the cybersecurity committee to advance the state-of-the-art of cyber-warfighting.To advance the ability of the citizens and organizations of the United States to retain control of their information systems , an elite task-force will be formed :   1 .
Retain Bruce Schneier   2 .
Retain Ten Specialists , Bruce 's Choice , Following Criteria :   2.1 .
One EFF Constitutional Rights specialist   2.2 .
One ACLU Constitutional Rights specialist   2.3 .
One significant code contributor from the NSA SE : Linux project   2.4 .
Two information security specialists from among :   2.4.1 .
Microsoft   2.4.2 .
Google   2.4.3 .
Apple   2.4.4 .
IBM   2.5 .
Two espionage defense specialists from among :   2.5.1 .
General Dynamics   2.5.2 .
GE   2.5.3 .
Boeing   2.5.4 .
Halliburton   2.6 .
Three platform specialists   2.6.1 .
Microsoft   2.6.2 .
Mac   2.6.3 .
* nix   3 .
Specialists Get One Vote Each   4 .
Bruce Gets Tie-Breaker Vote   5 .
Each Specialist Can Employ Two Research SpecialistsVotes are expected to be unanimous or nearly unanimous - non-unanimous decisions imply that every member of the panel is failing .
It is every member 's job to think critically , to respect diverse needs , and to help the others understand their perspective .
Failure to do so implies betrayal of duty.All votes will be secret for at least one year .
Sensitive votes will be secret for five years.Sensitive entities ( corporations , organizations , government agencies ) get free advanced training , room , and board , conducted at a military academy .
Security practitioners get preferred enrollment .
Corporations must continue to pay the employee .
Corporations can choose not to send anyone , but the name of any sensitive corporation which chooses not to send some top rank security specialists will be published .
It 's tough , but fair , and necessary.Curriculum will focus on practices for keeping each system under the full control of its owner .
Curriculum will not sacrifice that mission to advance the ability of any non-owner of a system to compromise full control by the owner of that system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's my quick, from the hip view on how to maximize the probability of a successful outcome:Cybersecurity is focused on maintaining control of systems and networks.
Cyber-warfighting is a valuable source for understanding potential threats, but it is not the objective of the cybersecurity committee to advance the state-of-the-art of cyber-warfighting.To advance the ability of the citizens and organizations of the United States to retain control of their information systems, an elite task-force will be formed:
  1.
Retain Bruce Schneier
  2.
Retain Ten Specialists, Bruce's Choice, Following Criteria:
  2.1.
One EFF Constitutional Rights specialist
  2.2.
One ACLU Constitutional Rights specialist
  2.3.
One significant code contributor from the NSA SE:Linux project
  2.4.
Two information security specialists from among:
  2.4.1.
Microsoft
  2.4.2.
Google
  2.4.3.
Apple
  2.4.4.
IBM
  2.5.
Two espionage defense specialists from among:
  2.5.1.
General Dynamics
  2.5.2.
GE
  2.5.3.
Boeing
  2.5.4.
Halliburton
  2.6.
Three platform specialists
  2.6.1.
Microsoft
  2.6.2.
Mac
  2.6.3.
*nix
  3.
Specialists Get One Vote Each
  4.
Bruce Gets Tie-Breaker Vote
  5.
Each Specialist Can Employ Two Research SpecialistsVotes are expected to be unanimous or nearly unanimous - non-unanimous decisions imply that every member of the panel is failing.
It is every member's job to think critically, to respect diverse needs, and to help the others understand their perspective.
Failure to do so implies betrayal of duty.All votes will be secret for at least one year.
Sensitive votes will be secret for five years.Sensitive entities (corporations, organizations, government agencies) get free advanced training, room, and board, conducted at a military academy.
Security practitioners get preferred enrollment.
Corporations must continue to pay the employee.
Corporations can choose not to send anyone, but the name of any sensitive corporation which chooses not to send some top rank security specialists will be published.
It's tough, but fair, and necessary.Curriculum will focus on practices for keeping each system under the full control of its owner.
Curriculum will not sacrifice that mission to advance the ability of any non-owner of a system to compromise full control by the owner of that system.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145409</id>
	<title>hostile nation-states and terrorist organizations</title>
	<author>Jurily</author>
	<datestamp>1243600260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about hostile countries that are not nation-states?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about hostile countries that are not nation-states ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about hostile countries that are not nation-states?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145553</id>
	<title>ME!</title>
	<author>iamhigh</author>
	<datestamp>1243601220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But only because I am sure it would look pretty bad ass on my resume.  I am sure with that on there I would be able to get a job somewhere, pretty much forever.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But only because I am sure it would look pretty bad ass on my resume .
I am sure with that on there I would be able to get a job somewhere , pretty much forever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But only because I am sure it would look pretty bad ass on my resume.
I am sure with that on there I would be able to get a job somewhere, pretty much forever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145403</id>
	<title>Not Bolden</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems like everytime somebody is about to be OR IS appointed for a NASA job, Obama moves them elsewhere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems like everytime somebody is about to be OR IS appointed for a NASA job , Obama moves them elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems like everytime somebody is about to be OR IS appointed for a NASA job, Obama moves them elsewhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149167</id>
	<title>Were the job not limited to just security?</title>
	<author>TigerPlish</author>
	<datestamp>1243696560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the job wasn't limited to security, I'd say Wozniak.</p><p>If the job is limited to security, all they'll need is an ineffectual mid-grade bulletstopper.  This will make it a true government operation.  Same as it ever was and all that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the job was n't limited to security , I 'd say Wozniak.If the job is limited to security , all they 'll need is an ineffectual mid-grade bulletstopper .
This will make it a true government operation .
Same as it ever was and all that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the job wasn't limited to security, I'd say Wozniak.If the job is limited to security, all they'll need is an ineffectual mid-grade bulletstopper.
This will make it a true government operation.
Same as it ever was and all that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145627</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243601760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In my view, the position of czar is a joke. Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government.</p></div><p>I see this as a subtle move to start referencing absolute power. Napoleon called himself "First Consul", and then "Emperor of the French Republic" after seizing total control, for a long time, because the public was not ready to go back to monarchy.</p><p>Of course I'm just being paranoid again, and the voters have total control over the government.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In my view , the position of czar is a joke .
Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government.I see this as a subtle move to start referencing absolute power .
Napoleon called himself " First Consul " , and then " Emperor of the French Republic " after seizing total control , for a long time , because the public was not ready to go back to monarchy.Of course I 'm just being paranoid again , and the voters have total control over the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my view, the position of czar is a joke.
Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government.I see this as a subtle move to start referencing absolute power.
Napoleon called himself "First Consul", and then "Emperor of the French Republic" after seizing total control, for a long time, because the public was not ready to go back to monarchy.Of course I'm just being paranoid again, and the voters have total control over the government.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145771</id>
	<title>Morrison!</title>
	<author>Ektanoor</author>
	<datestamp>1243603080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mitnick is a great guy. But he is too specific on creating a mess. Besides, too private and he seems even shy...</p><p>Go for Morrison... He knows how to make a real worldwide mess out of Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mitnick is a great guy .
But he is too specific on creating a mess .
Besides , too private and he seems even shy...Go for Morrison... He knows how to make a real worldwide mess out of Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mitnick is a great guy.
But he is too specific on creating a mess.
Besides, too private and he seems even shy...Go for Morrison... He knows how to make a real worldwide mess out of Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145529</id>
	<title>Please inform them so they'll stop saying "cyber"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243601040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>n/t</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>n/t</tokentext>
<sentencetext>n/t</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145379</id>
	<title>Stephen Conroy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We'll give you Stephen Conroy if you like.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'll give you Stephen Conroy if you like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'll give you Stephen Conroy if you like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145437</id>
	<title>Spammers are the Cyberterrorists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whoever he picks, I hope they are technologically savvy enough to realize that all of the terrorists in the world won't be able to do one millionth of the damage that's already being done by spammers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever he picks , I hope they are technologically savvy enough to realize that all of the terrorists in the world wo n't be able to do one millionth of the damage that 's already being done by spammers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever he picks, I hope they are technologically savvy enough to realize that all of the terrorists in the world won't be able to do one millionth of the damage that's already being done by spammers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147669</id>
	<title>Eh.</title>
	<author>SphericalCrusher</author>
	<datestamp>1243713660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For something like this, I honestly don't like the idea of having one person behind it. What happens if he's murdered? I mean, if a group of professions honestly want to hack the U.S.... the poor son of a bitch who is the "Cyber Czar" is going to take a hit. Rather physical, such as being sniped or just having his shit hacked... he will be knocked out of the way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For something like this , I honestly do n't like the idea of having one person behind it .
What happens if he 's murdered ?
I mean , if a group of professions honestly want to hack the U.S.... the poor son of a bitch who is the " Cyber Czar " is going to take a hit .
Rather physical , such as being sniped or just having his shit hacked... he will be knocked out of the way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For something like this, I honestly don't like the idea of having one person behind it.
What happens if he's murdered?
I mean, if a group of professions honestly want to hack the U.S.... the poor son of a bitch who is the "Cyber Czar" is going to take a hit.
Rather physical, such as being sniped or just having his shit hacked... he will be knocked out of the way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145413</id>
	<title>No!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not me! I don't want Congress telling me to "remove all references to them from the Internets" or "turn off the Internets".</p><p>First post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not me !
I do n't want Congress telling me to " remove all references to them from the Internets " or " turn off the Internets " .First post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not me!
I don't want Congress telling me to "remove all references to them from the Internets" or "turn off the Internets".First post.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145487</id>
	<title>lol cyberczar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is the cyberczar going to declare a "WAR ON BLOGS"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is the cyberczar going to declare a " WAR ON BLOGS " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is the cyberczar going to declare a "WAR ON BLOGS"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149491</id>
	<title>ME</title>
	<author>stanjam</author>
	<datestamp>1243699680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll do it, no problems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll do it , no problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll do it, no problems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148615</id>
	<title>Bruce Schneier would be a great fit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243688640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technical knowledge, ability to look at problems objectively, stay apprised of a variety of threats, and organize information for the ready consumption of others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technical knowledge , ability to look at problems objectively , stay apprised of a variety of threats , and organize information for the ready consumption of others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technical knowledge, ability to look at problems objectively, stay apprised of a variety of threats, and organize information for the ready consumption of others.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145585</id>
	<title>Whats a Cybersecurity Czar?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243601460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh no matter, pick me....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh no matter , pick me... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh no matter, pick me....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145463</id>
	<title>I paid my taxes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so I guess I am ineligible even if I wanted the job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so I guess I am ineligible even if I wanted the job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so I guess I am ineligible even if I wanted the job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148713</id>
	<title>Re:Kevin Mitnick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243690740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145399</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147875</id>
	<title>It's a political, leadership role</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243716720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For this job you need someone who has political savvy and can indeed show leadership coupled with diplomacy - and on top of that he needs to have at least a degree of technical competence to ensure someone isn't telling him lots of guff.</p><p>If I wasn't non US I'd be interested as I've done this a few times before.  I built the fundamentals on a large government work when nobody was interested in collaboration, and I did international interoperability where the group I worked with was talked with making it happen but was placed at totally the wrong level to have any clout whatsoever.  And we managed regardless by working at the human level.</p><p>The technical stuff is the easy part.  Dealing with the human side of things is the hard work, but it's fun too.  If you get the right team you can steer them in the rightdirection, form them and let them get ready for when you have the breakthrough (it sort of happens in parallel, but you need more focus on a strategic aim than a tactical effort to drive it in the right direction).</p><p>But I'm rambling now.  What I wanted to say is that it is NOT an impossible job.  But it certainly isn't going to be an easy one for the first few years.</p><p>As a matter of fact, if your understanding of a job at that level is simply staying out of trouble you are the wrong person for the job.  You will really have to commit yourself.</p><p>Whoever gets the job, he/she has my respect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For this job you need someone who has political savvy and can indeed show leadership coupled with diplomacy - and on top of that he needs to have at least a degree of technical competence to ensure someone is n't telling him lots of guff.If I was n't non US I 'd be interested as I 've done this a few times before .
I built the fundamentals on a large government work when nobody was interested in collaboration , and I did international interoperability where the group I worked with was talked with making it happen but was placed at totally the wrong level to have any clout whatsoever .
And we managed regardless by working at the human level.The technical stuff is the easy part .
Dealing with the human side of things is the hard work , but it 's fun too .
If you get the right team you can steer them in the rightdirection , form them and let them get ready for when you have the breakthrough ( it sort of happens in parallel , but you need more focus on a strategic aim than a tactical effort to drive it in the right direction ) .But I 'm rambling now .
What I wanted to say is that it is NOT an impossible job .
But it certainly is n't going to be an easy one for the first few years.As a matter of fact , if your understanding of a job at that level is simply staying out of trouble you are the wrong person for the job .
You will really have to commit yourself.Whoever gets the job , he/she has my respect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For this job you need someone who has political savvy and can indeed show leadership coupled with diplomacy - and on top of that he needs to have at least a degree of technical competence to ensure someone isn't telling him lots of guff.If I wasn't non US I'd be interested as I've done this a few times before.
I built the fundamentals on a large government work when nobody was interested in collaboration, and I did international interoperability where the group I worked with was talked with making it happen but was placed at totally the wrong level to have any clout whatsoever.
And we managed regardless by working at the human level.The technical stuff is the easy part.
Dealing with the human side of things is the hard work, but it's fun too.
If you get the right team you can steer them in the rightdirection, form them and let them get ready for when you have the breakthrough (it sort of happens in parallel, but you need more focus on a strategic aim than a tactical effort to drive it in the right direction).But I'm rambling now.
What I wanted to say is that it is NOT an impossible job.
But it certainly isn't going to be an easy one for the first few years.As a matter of fact, if your understanding of a job at that level is simply staying out of trouble you are the wrong person for the job.
You will really have to commit yourself.Whoever gets the job, he/she has my respect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148147</id>
	<title>Re:Czar fetish</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1243678980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fetish? Nonsense. You're just imagining things, comrade.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fetish ?
Nonsense. You 're just imagining things , comrade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fetish?
Nonsense. You're just imagining things, comrade.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146731</id>
	<title>Adriel Desautels, CTO of Netragard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243613700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This guy's a hard-core hacker and pen-tester who's helping to lock down banks.  He does not do politics.  He's just hard-core about locking down networks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy 's a hard-core hacker and pen-tester who 's helping to lock down banks .
He does not do politics .
He 's just hard-core about locking down networks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy's a hard-core hacker and pen-tester who's helping to lock down banks.
He does not do politics.
He's just hard-core about locking down networks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145793</id>
	<title>Theo de Raadt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243603260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146305</id>
	<title>Obviously it is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243608180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chuck Norris.<br>The internet was developed from observing his CNS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chuck Norris.The internet was developed from observing his CNS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chuck Norris.The internet was developed from observing his CNS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146269</id>
	<title>Who wants the job?</title>
	<author>wowbagger</author>
	<datestamp>1243607820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who wants the job? Perhaps somebody who wants to have power, without all that pesky "running for office and actually being elected by the people" stuff. Somebody who wants to make rules about how everybody is to run their computers, without all that pesky "being responsible for what goes wrong" stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who wants the job ?
Perhaps somebody who wants to have power , without all that pesky " running for office and actually being elected by the people " stuff .
Somebody who wants to make rules about how everybody is to run their computers , without all that pesky " being responsible for what goes wrong " stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who wants the job?
Perhaps somebody who wants to have power, without all that pesky "running for office and actually being elected by the people" stuff.
Somebody who wants to make rules about how everybody is to run their computers, without all that pesky "being responsible for what goes wrong" stuff.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145435</id>
	<title>Theo de Raadt!!</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1243600500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't wait for the edict that every single government owned computer must be running a recently patched install of OpenBSD.  Yeah he's not really American but apparently he's enough of an ass that everyone will assume he is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait for the edict that every single government owned computer must be running a recently patched install of OpenBSD .
Yeah he 's not really American but apparently he 's enough of an ass that everyone will assume he is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait for the edict that every single government owned computer must be running a recently patched install of OpenBSD.
Yeah he's not really American but apparently he's enough of an ass that everyone will assume he is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145681</id>
	<title>I vote for Kevin Mitnick</title>
	<author>Ouchie</author>
	<datestamp>1243602360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In this type of political postion reputation and personality are as important as your knowledge.  Kevin has shown in his legal employment history an aptitude to address cyber security in a way that draws the necessary attention to the issue.  His crimial history gives him the legitimacy with both sides of the issue.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this type of political postion reputation and personality are as important as your knowledge .
Kevin has shown in his legal employment history an aptitude to address cyber security in a way that draws the necessary attention to the issue .
His crimial history gives him the legitimacy with both sides of the issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this type of political postion reputation and personality are as important as your knowledge.
Kevin has shown in his legal employment history an aptitude to address cyber security in a way that draws the necessary attention to the issue.
His crimial history gives him the legitimacy with both sides of the issue.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149317</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't sound so bad actually...</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1243697940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely! You have a lot of press conferences where you announce all the solutions that you know will never be accepted, then it's never your fault. You crow about all your 'victories' (anything you can reasonably take any credit for) and make some sneaky deals to get yourself a CIOship when you leave. S.O.P.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely !
You have a lot of press conferences where you announce all the solutions that you know will never be accepted , then it 's never your fault .
You crow about all your 'victories ' ( anything you can reasonably take any credit for ) and make some sneaky deals to get yourself a CIOship when you leave .
S.O.P .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely!
You have a lot of press conferences where you announce all the solutions that you know will never be accepted, then it's never your fault.
You crow about all your 'victories' (anything you can reasonably take any credit for) and make some sneaky deals to get yourself a CIOship when you leave.
S.O.P.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145813</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145425</id>
	<title>The rights holders want it...</title>
	<author>icebike</author>
	<datestamp>1243600440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The copyright holders and their corrupt organizations may want it.</p><p>They use the position to make sure one looks too hard at the invasive digging into people's hard drives and network traffic.</p><p>Meanwhile they totally ignore any REAL threats and protection measures.  (As can be seen by stories on Slashdot about data thefts left and right).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The copyright holders and their corrupt organizations may want it.They use the position to make sure one looks too hard at the invasive digging into people 's hard drives and network traffic.Meanwhile they totally ignore any REAL threats and protection measures .
( As can be seen by stories on Slashdot about data thefts left and right ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The copyright holders and their corrupt organizations may want it.They use the position to make sure one looks too hard at the invasive digging into people's hard drives and network traffic.Meanwhile they totally ignore any REAL threats and protection measures.
(As can be seen by stories on Slashdot about data thefts left and right).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145583</id>
	<title>The difference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243601400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The difference this time is that Obama is a Democrat, so the media will ignore the czar's complete ineffectiveness and never criticize anything he or she does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference this time is that Obama is a Democrat , so the media will ignore the czar 's complete ineffectiveness and never criticize anything he or she does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference this time is that Obama is a Democrat, so the media will ignore the czar's complete ineffectiveness and never criticize anything he or she does.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147733</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243714800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about a militia?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about a militia ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about a militia?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146337</id>
	<title>Re:RIAA Lawyers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243608480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's already given the CNN and MSNBC reporter's jobs in the Transportation department.  I figure if this Senate seat doesn't work out for Stuart Smalley, they could appoint him to run the interwebbie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's already given the CNN and MSNBC reporter 's jobs in the Transportation department .
I figure if this Senate seat does n't work out for Stuart Smalley , they could appoint him to run the interwebbie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's already given the CNN and MSNBC reporter's jobs in the Transportation department.
I figure if this Senate seat doesn't work out for Stuart Smalley, they could appoint him to run the interwebbie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145439</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145843</id>
	<title>I'll do it!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243603680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mixture of OSs.  Some Win, some BSD, some Linux, some OS-X, different flavors of each.  Mixture of N, N-1, and N-2 security patches (in case a patch introduces a new 'sploit).</p><p>Range of machine architectures.  X86, PPC, ARM, Itanium, Sparc, whatever else is around.</p><p>Public facing machines behind firewalls and only open the needed ports.</p><p>On corporate or government systems that are only used for tasks like word processing or spreadsheets, the ability for normal user accounts to run executables other than the system ones is disabled.</p><p>Machines needing top security are airgapped to the public internet.</p><p>I could go on.  But the above stuff would go a long ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mixture of OSs .
Some Win , some BSD , some Linux , some OS-X , different flavors of each .
Mixture of N , N-1 , and N-2 security patches ( in case a patch introduces a new 'sploit ) .Range of machine architectures .
X86 , PPC , ARM , Itanium , Sparc , whatever else is around.Public facing machines behind firewalls and only open the needed ports.On corporate or government systems that are only used for tasks like word processing or spreadsheets , the ability for normal user accounts to run executables other than the system ones is disabled.Machines needing top security are airgapped to the public internet.I could go on .
But the above stuff would go a long ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mixture of OSs.
Some Win, some BSD, some Linux, some OS-X, different flavors of each.
Mixture of N, N-1, and N-2 security patches (in case a patch introduces a new 'sploit).Range of machine architectures.
X86, PPC, ARM, Itanium, Sparc, whatever else is around.Public facing machines behind firewalls and only open the needed ports.On corporate or government systems that are only used for tasks like word processing or spreadsheets, the ability for normal user accounts to run executables other than the system ones is disabled.Machines needing top security are airgapped to the public internet.I could go on.
But the above stuff would go a long ways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148175</id>
	<title>Re:I&#226;(TM)m from the government and I&#226;(TM</title>
	<author>alfs boner</author>
	<datestamp>1243679820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It wasn't until this that I seriously considered supporting the Pirate Party.</i> <p>
You're tired of sitting back and doing nothing, so now you're going to stand up and do nothing! Oh, wait - you haven't even gotten there yet, you're only <i>seriously considering</i> lending "support" to an online petition masquerading as a political party. Well, baby steps I guess. I still commend you for wanting to make a change though; instead of just sitting there and complaining like most people, you're going to sit there and complain on the internet! But only after "seriously considering" it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't until this that I seriously considered supporting the Pirate Party .
You 're tired of sitting back and doing nothing , so now you 're going to stand up and do nothing !
Oh , wait - you have n't even gotten there yet , you 're only seriously considering lending " support " to an online petition masquerading as a political party .
Well , baby steps I guess .
I still commend you for wanting to make a change though ; instead of just sitting there and complaining like most people , you 're going to sit there and complain on the internet !
But only after " seriously considering " it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't until this that I seriously considered supporting the Pirate Party.
You're tired of sitting back and doing nothing, so now you're going to stand up and do nothing!
Oh, wait - you haven't even gotten there yet, you're only seriously considering lending "support" to an online petition masquerading as a political party.
Well, baby steps I guess.
I still commend you for wanting to make a change though; instead of just sitting there and complaining like most people, you're going to sit there and complain on the internet!
But only after "seriously considering" it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146313</id>
	<title>Re:Czar fetish</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1243608180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are setting the ground to make people accept the next change, a very big one. Be ready to see lots of posts titled "In Soviet America..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are setting the ground to make people accept the next change , a very big one .
Be ready to see lots of posts titled " In Soviet America... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are setting the ground to make people accept the next change, a very big one.
Be ready to see lots of posts titled "In Soviet America..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146187</id>
	<title>How Much Does it Pay?</title>
	<author>florescent\_beige</author>
	<datestamp>1243607040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>EOM</htmltext>
<tokenext>EOM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EOM</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146689</id>
	<title>I'll take...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243613040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>King of the Internet.  I already provide half the commentary on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>King of the Internet .
I already provide half the commentary on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>King of the Internet.
I already provide half the commentary on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145399</id>
	<title>Kevin Mitnick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...nuff said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...nuff said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...nuff said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149349</id>
	<title>Re:How I Would Do It</title>
	<author>MRe\_nl</author>
	<datestamp>1243698240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jonathan James, Adrian Lam, Kevin Mitnick, Kevin Poulsen, Robert Tappan Morris.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jonathan James , Adrian Lam , Kevin Mitnick , Kevin Poulsen , Robert Tappan Morris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jonathan James, Adrian Lam, Kevin Mitnick, Kevin Poulsen, Robert Tappan Morris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146047</id>
	<title>Re:Czar fetish</title>
	<author>Ektanoor</author>
	<datestamp>1243605360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Simple buddy... Czar is synonim to Samoderzhec, something like "the power in himself by himself". Much like the  "L'Etat c'est moi..."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Simple buddy... Czar is synonim to Samoderzhec , something like " the power in himself by himself " .
Much like the " L'Etat c'est moi... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simple buddy... Czar is synonim to Samoderzhec, something like "the power in himself by himself".
Much like the  "L'Etat c'est moi..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145885</id>
	<title>I'd take the Job!</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1243603920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, I'm not qualified but we're talking about the U.S. government here so since when would <i>that</i> matter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , I 'm not qualified but we 're talking about the U.S. government here so since when would that matter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, I'm not qualified but we're talking about the U.S. government here so since when would that matter?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146579</id>
	<title>There's only one man for the job</title>
	<author>Alzheimers</author>
	<datestamp>1243611780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The man who's name is synonymous with Security: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter\_Norton" title="wikipedia.org">Peter Norton</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The man who 's name is synonymous with Security : Peter Norton [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The man who's name is synonymous with Security: Peter Norton [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145983</id>
	<title>Me me me</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1243604820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There will be lolcats all over the place, I promise!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There will be lolcats all over the place , I promise !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will be lolcats all over the place, I promise!
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148117</id>
	<title>It depends</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243678200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Must this new cyber-czar claim expenses that (mostly) correlate to the price of hookers and blow consumed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Must this new cyber-czar claim expenses that ( mostly ) correlate to the price of hookers and blow consumed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Must this new cyber-czar claim expenses that (mostly) correlate to the price of hookers and blow consumed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145491</id>
	<title>ALFRED E. NEUMAN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He couldn't do worse that an RIAA lawyer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He could n't do worse that an RIAA lawyer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He couldn't do worse that an RIAA lawyer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545</id>
	<title>Czar fetish</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1243601160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>What is up with this American love affair with old Russian titles?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What is up with this American love affair with old Russian titles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is up with this American love affair with old Russian titles?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145709</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>tehdaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1243602540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government."</p><p>
It is worse than that. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czar" title="wikipedia.org">Czar</a> [wikipedia.org] is nothing more than the slavic/russian version of the word Caesar.</p><p>
T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government .
" It is worse than that .
Czar [ wikipedia.org ] is nothing more than the slavic/russian version of the word Caesar .
T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government.
"
It is worse than that.
Czar [wikipedia.org] is nothing more than the slavic/russian version of the word Caesar.
T</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148143</id>
	<title>I nominate...</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1243678800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Leo Laporte!</p><p>He'll show them crackers what for!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Leo Laporte ! He 'll show them crackers what for !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Leo Laporte!He'll show them crackers what for!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146335</id>
	<title>Stallman</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1243608420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would love to see him in a fake photo with Czar clothes. Maybe he goes forward to the czar role, pushes us to the open source communism and Ballmer starts calling him Stalinman.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would love to see him in a fake photo with Czar clothes .
Maybe he goes forward to the czar role , pushes us to the open source communism and Ballmer starts calling him Stalinman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would love to see him in a fake photo with Czar clothes.
Maybe he goes forward to the czar role, pushes us to the open source communism and Ballmer starts calling him Stalinman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146929</id>
	<title>RE: Our Nazi Racist 'n Chief</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243616220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like our Nazi Racist 'n Chief President Barak Obama is painting himself in a corner quicker than Alolf Hitler<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and will end the same.  At least, perhaps, the US will not invade Poland, in its search of cyber weapons of mass destruction, in order to justify the invasion of Poland and the killing of civilians.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like our Nazi Racist 'n Chief President Barak Obama is painting himself in a corner quicker than Alolf Hitler ... and will end the same .
At least , perhaps , the US will not invade Poland , in its search of cyber weapons of mass destruction , in order to justify the invasion of Poland and the killing of civilians .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like our Nazi Racist 'n Chief President Barak Obama is painting himself in a corner quicker than Alolf Hitler ... and will end the same.
At least, perhaps, the US will not invade Poland, in its search of cyber weapons of mass destruction, in order to justify the invasion of Poland and the killing of civilians.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146069</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243605600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this sounds like a job for Public Security Section 9.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this sounds like a job for Public Security Section 9 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this sounds like a job for Public Security Section 9.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145757</id>
	<title>Enough with the Czars</title>
	<author>assertation</author>
	<datestamp>1243602900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think Regan was the one who started giving government officials the the nickname of the "The \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Czar".   In every case the problem assigned to the Czar never went away and often got worse.   You would think that term would fall out of use.  You want to guarantee a problem will not go away?  Appoint a Czar to oversee it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Regan was the one who started giving government officials the the nickname of the " The \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ Czar " .
In every case the problem assigned to the Czar never went away and often got worse .
You would think that term would fall out of use .
You want to guarantee a problem will not go away ?
Appoint a Czar to oversee it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Regan was the one who started giving government officials the the nickname of the "The \_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Czar".
In every case the problem assigned to the Czar never went away and often got worse.
You would think that term would fall out of use.
You want to guarantee a problem will not go away?
Appoint a Czar to oversee it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147313</id>
	<title>Greed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243621440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only people who would <i>want</i> to be the Cyber Czar would be those who'd be in it for personal benefits.<br>Hopefully, this means that more moral and qualified people would want to keep the job just to keep it out of shitty hands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only people who would want to be the Cyber Czar would be those who 'd be in it for personal benefits.Hopefully , this means that more moral and qualified people would want to keep the job just to keep it out of shitty hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only people who would want to be the Cyber Czar would be those who'd be in it for personal benefits.Hopefully, this means that more moral and qualified people would want to keep the job just to keep it out of shitty hands.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146479</id>
	<title>czar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243610340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some non-tech yes man.<br>Preferably visible minority.<br>Why interrupt the pattern.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some non-tech yes man.Preferably visible minority.Why interrupt the pattern .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some non-tech yes man.Preferably visible minority.Why interrupt the pattern.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146709</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed, not so much</title>
	<author>aoeu</author>
	<datestamp>1243613400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NSA?</htmltext>
<tokenext>NSA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NSA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145829</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1243603560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...19th century Russia and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...United States government.</p></div><p>
I'm sorry, but with the way things are going, what exactly do you perceive the difference to be? (Politically that is, we all know there is such a thing as nuclear\_\_\_ now).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...19th century Russia and ...United States government .
I 'm sorry , but with the way things are going , what exactly do you perceive the difference to be ?
( Politically that is , we all know there is such a thing as nuclear \ _ \ _ \ _ now ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...19th century Russia and ...United States government.
I'm sorry, but with the way things are going, what exactly do you perceive the difference to be?
(Politically that is, we all know there is such a thing as nuclear\_\_\_ now).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145927</id>
	<title>Private Sector</title>
	<author>chrispycreeme</author>
	<datestamp>1243604340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm a huge fan of this administration but in this particular case I think the private sector could do a much better job protecting against threats than any Czar.  Besides, I hate anyone who's title has a C followed by a Z in it, that's just not right. Drop the "c" or just say: "KaZaar!".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm a huge fan of this administration but in this particular case I think the private sector could do a much better job protecting against threats than any Czar .
Besides , I hate anyone who 's title has a C followed by a Z in it , that 's just not right .
Drop the " c " or just say : " KaZaar !
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm a huge fan of this administration but in this particular case I think the private sector could do a much better job protecting against threats than any Czar.
Besides, I hate anyone who's title has a C followed by a Z in it, that's just not right.
Drop the "c" or just say: "KaZaar!
".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145805</id>
	<title>The answer is obvious</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1243603380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cowboy Neal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cowboy Neal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cowboy Neal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145421</id>
	<title>I&#226;(TM)m from the government and I&#226;(TM)m</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Drug" czar, Terrorism Czar, and now Cybersecurity czar.  These czars seem to have a power out-of-all-proportion to any self-respecting republic and always want to infringe on personal liberties.</p><p>With Obama's record, this probably will only a RIAA/MPAA shill pushing those groups' agendas.  I shiver when I think what the internet possibibly could be turned into within 10 years.  (Perhaps everytime we start up a browser, that FBI copyright warning will be displayed for 30 seconds.  Among other things....)</p><p>It wasn't until this that I seriously considered supporting the Pirate Party.  I don't buy their message wholesale, but welcome it a whole hell lot of more than anything the government can and will do to "improve" things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Drug " czar , Terrorism Czar , and now Cybersecurity czar .
These czars seem to have a power out-of-all-proportion to any self-respecting republic and always want to infringe on personal liberties.With Obama 's record , this probably will only a RIAA/MPAA shill pushing those groups ' agendas .
I shiver when I think what the internet possibibly could be turned into within 10 years .
( Perhaps everytime we start up a browser , that FBI copyright warning will be displayed for 30 seconds .
Among other things.... ) It was n't until this that I seriously considered supporting the Pirate Party .
I do n't buy their message wholesale , but welcome it a whole hell lot of more than anything the government can and will do to " improve " things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Drug" czar, Terrorism Czar, and now Cybersecurity czar.
These czars seem to have a power out-of-all-proportion to any self-respecting republic and always want to infringe on personal liberties.With Obama's record, this probably will only a RIAA/MPAA shill pushing those groups' agendas.
I shiver when I think what the internet possibibly could be turned into within 10 years.
(Perhaps everytime we start up a browser, that FBI copyright warning will be displayed for 30 seconds.
Among other things....)It wasn't until this that I seriously considered supporting the Pirate Party.
I don't buy their message wholesale, but welcome it a whole hell lot of more than anything the government can and will do to "improve" things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145707</id>
	<title>Mission Impossible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243602480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They want everyone else to be insecure and theirs super secure. Leaving run of the mill networks insecure as to leave a bait, to see who is doing what and let them think they are getting something. But in actuality the top brass practices such compartmentalized security right down to the electronic emissions computers make. Even Apple has compromised their security to play nice with Uncle Spook. Java exploit still not patched and it's been 7 months now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They want everyone else to be insecure and theirs super secure .
Leaving run of the mill networks insecure as to leave a bait , to see who is doing what and let them think they are getting something .
But in actuality the top brass practices such compartmentalized security right down to the electronic emissions computers make .
Even Apple has compromised their security to play nice with Uncle Spook .
Java exploit still not patched and it 's been 7 months now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They want everyone else to be insecure and theirs super secure.
Leaving run of the mill networks insecure as to leave a bait, to see who is doing what and let them think they are getting something.
But in actuality the top brass practices such compartmentalized security right down to the electronic emissions computers make.
Even Apple has compromised their security to play nice with Uncle Spook.
Java exploit still not patched and it's been 7 months now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145531</id>
	<title>alt.cyberczar.recovery</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1243601100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Results <b>1 - 10</b> of about <b>17,800</b> for <b>sysadmin horror stories</b>...</p><p>1. How do you convince the prez that he shouldn't download shonky software just because his Macbook isn't running Windows?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Results 1 - 10 of about 17,800 for sysadmin horror stories...1 .
How do you convince the prez that he should n't download shonky software just because his Macbook is n't running Windows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Results 1 - 10 of about 17,800 for sysadmin horror stories...1.
How do you convince the prez that he shouldn't download shonky software just because his Macbook isn't running Windows?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145755</id>
	<title>Bill Gates, of course</title>
	<author>xednieht</author>
	<datestamp>1243602840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Arguably, few have had more experience dealing with gaping software security vulnerabilities than the big kahuna himself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Arguably , few have had more experience dealing with gaping software security vulnerabilities than the big kahuna himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arguably, few have had more experience dealing with gaping software security vulnerabilities than the big kahuna himself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147311</id>
	<title>Afro-American Racism Against Whites &amp; Asians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243621440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.  See the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] by CNN.
<p>
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.  These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against non-Blacks.  Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is a non-Black minority.  So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate.  Only about 65\% of them supported Obama.
</p><p>
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.  At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
</p><p>
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.  That claim is an outright lie.  Look at the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/epolls/#NCDEM" title="cnn.com" rel="nofollow">exit-polling data</a> [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.  Consider the case of North Carolina.  Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.  Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.  Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.  Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
</p><p>
Here is the bottom line.  Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.  He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
</p><p>
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.  Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.  Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.  Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.  You need not defend your actions in any way.  Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today's moral values.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>During the election , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
See the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] by CNN .
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics , Asian-Americans , etc .
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against non-Blacks .
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is a non-Black minority .
So , Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate .
Only about 65 \ % of them supported Obama .
If African-Americans were not racist , then at most 65 \ % of them would have supported Obama .
At that level of support , McCain would have won the presidential race .
At this point , African-American supremacists ( and apologists ) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he ( 1 ) is a member of the Democratic party and ( 2 ) supports its ideals .
That claim is an outright lie .
Look at the exit-polling data [ cnn.com ] for the Democratic primaries .
Consider the case of North Carolina .
Again , about 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton .
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats , and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical .
Yet , 95 \ % of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton .
Why ? African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin .
Here is the bottom line .
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America .
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans .
African-Americans have established that expressing " racial pride " by voting on the basis of skin color is 100 \ % acceptable .
Neither the " Wall Street Journal " nor the " New York Times " complained about this racist behavior .
Therefore , in future elections , please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color .
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American .
You need not defend your actions in any way .
Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today 's moral values .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During the election, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for Barack Hussein Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
See the exit-polling data [cnn.com] by CNN.
Note the voting pattern of Hispanics, Asian-Americans, etc.
These non-Black minorities serve as a measurement of African-American racism against non-Blacks.
Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain is a non-Black minority.
So, Hispanics and Asian-Americans used only non-racial criteria in selecting a candidate.
Only about 65\% of them supported Obama.
If African-Americans were not racist, then at most 65\% of them would have supported Obama.
At that level of support, McCain would have won the presidential race.
At this point, African-American supremacists (and apologists) claim that African-Americans voted for Obama because he (1) is a member of the Democratic party and (2) supports its ideals.
That claim is an outright lie.
Look at the exit-polling data [cnn.com] for the Democratic primaries.
Consider the case of North Carolina.
Again, about 95\% of African-Americans voted for him and against Hillary Clinton.
Both Clinton and Obama are Democrats, and their official political positions on the campaign trail were nearly identical.
Yet, 95\% of African-Americans voted for Obama and against Hillary Clinton.
Why?  African-Americans supported Obama due solely to the color of his skin.
Here is the bottom line.
Barack Hussein Obama does not represent mainstream America.
He won the election due to the racist voting pattern exhibited by African-Americans.
African-Americans have established that expressing "racial pride" by voting on the basis of skin color is 100\% acceptable.
Neither the "Wall Street Journal" nor the "New York Times" complained about this racist behavior.
Therefore, in future elections, please feel free to express your racial pride by voting on the basis of skin color.
Feel free to vote for the non-Black candidates and against the Black candidates if you are not African-American.
You need not defend your actions in any way.
Voting on the basis of skin is quite acceptable by the standards of today's moral values.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145813</id>
	<title>Doesn't sound so bad actually...</title>
	<author>iamdrscience</author>
	<datestamp>1243603500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd take this job in a second. The position has a track record of failure and thus, expectations are low. This is exactly the kind of job I'm looking for. If you succeed, you're a miracle worker, if you fail, nobody blames you, either way it's not bad. It looks even better when you add in the fact that the pay is good and you have an awesome title. I mean c'mon, you'd be a freaking czar, how many people can legitimately put "Czar" on their resume?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd take this job in a second .
The position has a track record of failure and thus , expectations are low .
This is exactly the kind of job I 'm looking for .
If you succeed , you 're a miracle worker , if you fail , nobody blames you , either way it 's not bad .
It looks even better when you add in the fact that the pay is good and you have an awesome title .
I mean c'mon , you 'd be a freaking czar , how many people can legitimately put " Czar " on their resume ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd take this job in a second.
The position has a track record of failure and thus, expectations are low.
This is exactly the kind of job I'm looking for.
If you succeed, you're a miracle worker, if you fail, nobody blames you, either way it's not bad.
It looks even better when you add in the fact that the pay is good and you have an awesome title.
I mean c'mon, you'd be a freaking czar, how many people can legitimately put "Czar" on their resume?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145589</id>
	<title>I'd Take the job</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1243601460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is why you would want it:

You have the ear of the president of the USA. You get to put down on your resume that you were the cyber-security czar.
<br> <br>
Yeah, the very idea that a cyber-security czar has any control over US cyber-security is truly silly, but who knows. Your suggestions might get a few positive changes to be made, and in the event of a catastrophic cyber-security catastrophic event (like, terrorists flying virtual 747s into the virtual world trade center in Microsoft's flight simulator...) you can just resign and write a tell all book about how you were prevented from doing the right thing by idiots and red tape.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is why you would want it : You have the ear of the president of the USA .
You get to put down on your resume that you were the cyber-security czar .
Yeah , the very idea that a cyber-security czar has any control over US cyber-security is truly silly , but who knows .
Your suggestions might get a few positive changes to be made , and in the event of a catastrophic cyber-security catastrophic event ( like , terrorists flying virtual 747s into the virtual world trade center in Microsoft 's flight simulator... ) you can just resign and write a tell all book about how you were prevented from doing the right thing by idiots and red tape .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is why you would want it:

You have the ear of the president of the USA.
You get to put down on your resume that you were the cyber-security czar.
Yeah, the very idea that a cyber-security czar has any control over US cyber-security is truly silly, but who knows.
Your suggestions might get a few positive changes to be made, and in the event of a catastrophic cyber-security catastrophic event (like, terrorists flying virtual 747s into the virtual world trade center in Microsoft's flight simulator...) you can just resign and write a tell all book about how you were prevented from doing the right thing by idiots and red tape.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147251</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>Monsuco</author>
	<datestamp>1243620360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If we're serious... and I mean really serious... we need a branch of the military to do the heavy lifting.  We don't need to start this in a big way, but we need the security infrastructure to build on should tensions begin rising with nation states.  These guys would be the grunts doing the front line lifting and poking around while the NSA focuses it's talent on developing high level techniques.  This is what we'd do if we got really serious.</p> </div><p>The NSA could likely be extended to cover both ends of security (both defence against hacking and offence in the sense of monitoring enemies.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we 're serious... and I mean really serious... we need a branch of the military to do the heavy lifting .
We do n't need to start this in a big way , but we need the security infrastructure to build on should tensions begin rising with nation states .
These guys would be the grunts doing the front line lifting and poking around while the NSA focuses it 's talent on developing high level techniques .
This is what we 'd do if we got really serious .
The NSA could likely be extended to cover both ends of security ( both defence against hacking and offence in the sense of monitoring enemies .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we're serious... and I mean really serious... we need a branch of the military to do the heavy lifting.
We don't need to start this in a big way, but we need the security infrastructure to build on should tensions begin rising with nation states.
These guys would be the grunts doing the front line lifting and poking around while the NSA focuses it's talent on developing high level techniques.
This is what we'd do if we got really serious.
The NSA could likely be extended to cover both ends of security (both defence against hacking and offence in the sense of monitoring enemies.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</id>
	<title>New military branch needed</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1243601160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>We don't need a "czar", we need a new military branch.  I am not aware of ANY real and lasting contribution any "czar" has ever made in the United States.  The first drug czars came close... if you call that a contribution, but from everything I've seen, they're basically PR and cheerleaders, and don't have much authority or get much done.  <br> <br>
If we're serious... and I mean really serious... we need a branch of the military to do the heavy lifting.  We don't need to start this in a big way, but we need the security infrastructure to build on should tensions begin rising with nation states.  These guys would be the grunts doing the front line lifting and poking around while the NSA focuses it's talent on developing high level techniques.  This is what we'd do if we got really serious.  <br> <br>
In my view, the position of czar is a joke.  Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't need a " czar " , we need a new military branch .
I am not aware of ANY real and lasting contribution any " czar " has ever made in the United States .
The first drug czars came close... if you call that a contribution , but from everything I 've seen , they 're basically PR and cheerleaders , and do n't have much authority or get much done .
If we 're serious... and I mean really serious... we need a branch of the military to do the heavy lifting .
We do n't need to start this in a big way , but we need the security infrastructure to build on should tensions begin rising with nation states .
These guys would be the grunts doing the front line lifting and poking around while the NSA focuses it 's talent on developing high level techniques .
This is what we 'd do if we got really serious .
In my view , the position of czar is a joke .
Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't need a "czar", we need a new military branch.
I am not aware of ANY real and lasting contribution any "czar" has ever made in the United States.
The first drug czars came close... if you call that a contribution, but from everything I've seen, they're basically PR and cheerleaders, and don't have much authority or get much done.
If we're serious... and I mean really serious... we need a branch of the military to do the heavy lifting.
We don't need to start this in a big way, but we need the security infrastructure to build on should tensions begin rising with nation states.
These guys would be the grunts doing the front line lifting and poking around while the NSA focuses it's talent on developing high level techniques.
This is what we'd do if we got really serious.
In my view, the position of czar is a joke.
Czars are for 19th century Russia and have no place in a modern United States government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145951</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>Ektanoor</author>
	<datestamp>1243604520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A military branch to fight crime? While I agree th US doesn't need a "czar" and even agree with your arguments, your alternative is not brighter.</p><p>Crime shall no be fought by the military in any possible way. First they will shoot and then... They will not give themselves the question "whom are we shooting at"! They will keep shooting until the field is flat.</p><p>Second, a military environment is always preemable to crime. BTW, I have already had to deal with such a case on Internet: military+cybergangs. If you want a pure "catch 22" burning under your... You know where... Just give the military a free hand on this field.</p><p>Third, military will never give themselves the trouble of building an infrastructure of databases and longterm tracking procedures. Their methods are simple - there is a foe, track him and shoot on the spot.</p><p>Oh, I nearly forgot to mention.  Military intelligence is usually... Not so intelligent. Even foes are so badly defined, that things go wrong from the very start. They call it "colateral", I call it "dumbasses".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A military branch to fight crime ?
While I agree th US does n't need a " czar " and even agree with your arguments , your alternative is not brighter.Crime shall no be fought by the military in any possible way .
First they will shoot and then... They will not give themselves the question " whom are we shooting at " !
They will keep shooting until the field is flat.Second , a military environment is always preemable to crime .
BTW , I have already had to deal with such a case on Internet : military + cybergangs .
If you want a pure " catch 22 " burning under your... You know where... Just give the military a free hand on this field.Third , military will never give themselves the trouble of building an infrastructure of databases and longterm tracking procedures .
Their methods are simple - there is a foe , track him and shoot on the spot.Oh , I nearly forgot to mention .
Military intelligence is usually... Not so intelligent .
Even foes are so badly defined , that things go wrong from the very start .
They call it " colateral " , I call it " dumbasses " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A military branch to fight crime?
While I agree th US doesn't need a "czar" and even agree with your arguments, your alternative is not brighter.Crime shall no be fought by the military in any possible way.
First they will shoot and then... They will not give themselves the question "whom are we shooting at"!
They will keep shooting until the field is flat.Second, a military environment is always preemable to crime.
BTW, I have already had to deal with such a case on Internet: military+cybergangs.
If you want a pure "catch 22" burning under your... You know where... Just give the military a free hand on this field.Third, military will never give themselves the trouble of building an infrastructure of databases and longterm tracking procedures.
Their methods are simple - there is a foe, track him and shoot on the spot.Oh, I nearly forgot to mention.
Military intelligence is usually... Not so intelligent.
Even foes are so badly defined, that things go wrong from the very start.
They call it "colateral", I call it "dumbasses".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146865</id>
	<title>Re:The difference</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1243615440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The difference this time is that Obama is a Democrat, so the media will ignore the czar's complete ineffectiveness and never criticize anything he or she does.</i></p><p>You're not just trolling, are you?  You actually believe that.  Dear God.</p><p>Have you actually read a newspaper, or watched a TV news program, or listened to a radio news show, at any point during Obama's administration?  Or during the Clinton administration?  Or during the Carter administration, assuming you're old enough to remember that?  Ever?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference this time is that Obama is a Democrat , so the media will ignore the czar 's complete ineffectiveness and never criticize anything he or she does.You 're not just trolling , are you ?
You actually believe that .
Dear God.Have you actually read a newspaper , or watched a TV news program , or listened to a radio news show , at any point during Obama 's administration ?
Or during the Clinton administration ?
Or during the Carter administration , assuming you 're old enough to remember that ?
Ever ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference this time is that Obama is a Democrat, so the media will ignore the czar's complete ineffectiveness and never criticize anything he or she does.You're not just trolling, are you?
You actually believe that.
Dear God.Have you actually read a newspaper, or watched a TV news program, or listened to a radio news show, at any point during Obama's administration?
Or during the Clinton administration?
Or during the Carter administration, assuming you're old enough to remember that?
Ever?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145507</id>
	<title>A no win situation</title>
	<author>AnalPerfume</author>
	<datestamp>1243600920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While corporate lobbyists dictate the infrastructure, it's gonna be a Windows backbone. Nobody can make that secure. While this situation remains, the position is a no win one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While corporate lobbyists dictate the infrastructure , it 's gon na be a Windows backbone .
Nobody can make that secure .
While this situation remains , the position is a no win one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While corporate lobbyists dictate the infrastructure, it's gonna be a Windows backbone.
Nobody can make that secure.
While this situation remains, the position is a no win one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145835</id>
	<title>Sounds like a challenge</title>
	<author>PacketScan</author>
	<datestamp>1243603620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll do it</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll do it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll do it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145439</id>
	<title>RIAA Lawyers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are there any RIAA lawyers left who don't yet have high level Obama positions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there any RIAA lawyers left who do n't yet have high level Obama positions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there any RIAA lawyers left who don't yet have high level Obama positions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148355</id>
	<title>Have a real one!</title>
	<author>FilatovEV</author>
	<datestamp>1243683900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why to have a cybersecurity Czar? Better have a real one. The American Czar will establish an Empire, and it's a kewl thing. People think that a Czar is Undemocratic, but when you have a Czar it's he who would decide what is Democratic.

In America, every Citizen would have a right to be the Czar, but the only Czar would be Obama, because it's Democratic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why to have a cybersecurity Czar ?
Better have a real one .
The American Czar will establish an Empire , and it 's a kewl thing .
People think that a Czar is Undemocratic , but when you have a Czar it 's he who would decide what is Democratic .
In America , every Citizen would have a right to be the Czar , but the only Czar would be Obama , because it 's Democratic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why to have a cybersecurity Czar?
Better have a real one.
The American Czar will establish an Empire, and it's a kewl thing.
People think that a Czar is Undemocratic, but when you have a Czar it's he who would decide what is Democratic.
In America, every Citizen would have a right to be the Czar, but the only Czar would be Obama, because it's Democratic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147133</id>
	<title>Re:New military branch needed</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1243618140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This problem needs to be addressed from the bottom-up, not from the top-down. We don't need a "Czar", we don't need a branch of the military, we need someone more like the "Surgeon General" (and even that title sounds too military). </p><p>We need someone who explains and educates us, not someone who barks orders at us. We need to look at computer security as a public health issue. People need to be taught about basic computer hygiene (just like we were taught about normal body and sanitary hygiene after finding out about germ theory).</p><p>In the end, you can appoint a Czar and give him billions of dollars to raise an army, but we all know that's going to do squat if the idiots, the misinformed, and the technophobes among us -- still don't know why it's a bad idea to give just one piece of information to an unauthenticated person over the phone, or why it's a bad idea to plug in some random usb thumb drive they just found in the parking lot.

</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This problem needs to be addressed from the bottom-up , not from the top-down .
We do n't need a " Czar " , we do n't need a branch of the military , we need someone more like the " Surgeon General " ( and even that title sounds too military ) .
We need someone who explains and educates us , not someone who barks orders at us .
We need to look at computer security as a public health issue .
People need to be taught about basic computer hygiene ( just like we were taught about normal body and sanitary hygiene after finding out about germ theory ) .In the end , you can appoint a Czar and give him billions of dollars to raise an army , but we all know that 's going to do squat if the idiots , the misinformed , and the technophobes among us -- still do n't know why it 's a bad idea to give just one piece of information to an unauthenticated person over the phone , or why it 's a bad idea to plug in some random usb thumb drive they just found in the parking lot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This problem needs to be addressed from the bottom-up, not from the top-down.
We don't need a "Czar", we don't need a branch of the military, we need someone more like the "Surgeon General" (and even that title sounds too military).
We need someone who explains and educates us, not someone who barks orders at us.
We need to look at computer security as a public health issue.
People need to be taught about basic computer hygiene (just like we were taught about normal body and sanitary hygiene after finding out about germ theory).In the end, you can appoint a Czar and give him billions of dollars to raise an army, but we all know that's going to do squat if the idiots, the misinformed, and the technophobes among us -- still don't know why it's a bad idea to give just one piece of information to an unauthenticated person over the phone, or why it's a bad idea to plug in some random usb thumb drive they just found in the parking lot.

</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145475</id>
	<title>Bruce . . .</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1243600680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>. . . Schneier and Campbell . . .
</p><p> . . . Schneier can lecture us on, "What is Cybersecurity?" . . . Campbell can cut 'em up with chainsaws, and blow their brains out with his shotgun.
</p><p>How could we lose?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
Schneier and Campbell .
. .
. .
. Schneier can lecture us on , " What is Cybersecurity ?
" .
. .
Campbell can cut 'em up with chainsaws , and blow their brains out with his shotgun .
How could we lose ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
Schneier and Campbell .
. .
. .
. Schneier can lecture us on, "What is Cybersecurity?
" .
. .
Campbell can cut 'em up with chainsaws, and blow their brains out with his shotgun.
How could we lose?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145671</id>
	<title>I pay my taxes every year,</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1243602240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...so clearly I'm not qualified to be on Obama's cabinet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...so clearly I 'm not qualified to be on Obama 's cabinet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...so clearly I'm not qualified to be on Obama's cabinet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148147
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146047
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146865
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145583
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146795
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146337
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145439
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145709
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146313
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145829
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145951
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147733
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147133
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145399
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147311
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145627
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149317
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145813
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147251
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_2240257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148175
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145583
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146865
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145843
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145681
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145545
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146047
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148147
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146313
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149349
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145413
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148175
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145813
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28149317
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145529
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147311
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145489
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145439
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146337
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145437
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145541
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147133
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146795
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147733
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145829
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28146709
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145951
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147251
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145627
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145709
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28147875
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145435
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145475
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145399
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28148713
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145487
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_2240257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_2240257.28145507
</commentlist>
</conversation>
