<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_29_1725240</id>
	<title>OLPC Spinoff Pixel Qi Merges E-ink With LCD</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1243626180000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:sandyfoot@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">MaryBethP</a> writes with some tasty prototype photos and info about the new OLPC spin off "Pixel Qi" that is <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/05/29/pixel-qi-demonstrates-three-mode-3qi-display-merges-e-ink-with/">combining the best of e-ink and traditional LCD displays</a>.  <i>"The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors, can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors (shown after the break), and, as its pi&#232;ce de r&#233;sistance, can be toggled into an energy-efficient 'epaper' mode. How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery, but we're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year. Color us intrigued."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MaryBethP writes with some tasty prototype photos and info about the new OLPC spin off " Pixel Qi " that is combining the best of e-ink and traditional LCD displays .
" The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors , can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors ( shown after the break ) , and , as its pi   ce de r   sistance , can be toggled into an energy-efficient 'epaper ' mode .
How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery , but we 're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year .
Color us intrigued .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MaryBethP writes with some tasty prototype photos and info about the new OLPC spin off "Pixel Qi" that is combining the best of e-ink and traditional LCD displays.
"The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors, can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors (shown after the break), and, as its pièce de résistance, can be toggled into an energy-efficient 'epaper' mode.
How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery, but we're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year.
Color us intrigued.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144669</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1243595640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if it's the holy grail, but it's up there. I think mediatronic wallpaper is the current goalpost, but you could argue that it's apparently-solid holographics. At the moment, I would be satisfied with a cheap eyetap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if it 's the holy grail , but it 's up there .
I think mediatronic wallpaper is the current goalpost , but you could argue that it 's apparently-solid holographics .
At the moment , I would be satisfied with a cheap eyetap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if it's the holy grail, but it's up there.
I think mediatronic wallpaper is the current goalpost, but you could argue that it's apparently-solid holographics.
At the moment, I would be satisfied with a cheap eyetap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142959</id>
	<title>Two LCD matrices layered on top of each other?</title>
	<author>Bruiser80</author>
	<datestamp>1243587600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The B/W e-paper and the high-contrast Color LCD - sounds like the color is used in both the backlit and non-lit versions, while the e-paper is used to get the high efficiency mode.
<br> <br>
I wonder what the refresh rates on each of these displays is?
<br>
I'm guessing the refresh rate on the e-paper is way low if it uses so little power. Black to White in 250ms maybe?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The B/W e-paper and the high-contrast Color LCD - sounds like the color is used in both the backlit and non-lit versions , while the e-paper is used to get the high efficiency mode .
I wonder what the refresh rates on each of these displays is ?
I 'm guessing the refresh rate on the e-paper is way low if it uses so little power .
Black to White in 250ms maybe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The B/W e-paper and the high-contrast Color LCD - sounds like the color is used in both the backlit and non-lit versions, while the e-paper is used to get the high efficiency mode.
I wonder what the refresh rates on each of these displays is?
I'm guessing the refresh rate on the e-paper is way low if it uses so little power.
Black to White in 250ms maybe?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142869</id>
	<title>e-Ink?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243630380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As far as I know, e-Ink is a marketing name for a specific piece of technology using colored particles and static electricity. Somehow I'm not so sure that this is the technology used here, it looks more like different ways of handling an LCD than a layer of e-Ink. I would not know how you could make a sheet of e-Ink invisible for the eye, and it seems this is required. The screen in the photo does not look like digital paper either.</p><p>My money is on B/W LCD without (significant) back-lighting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I know , e-Ink is a marketing name for a specific piece of technology using colored particles and static electricity .
Somehow I 'm not so sure that this is the technology used here , it looks more like different ways of handling an LCD than a layer of e-Ink .
I would not know how you could make a sheet of e-Ink invisible for the eye , and it seems this is required .
The screen in the photo does not look like digital paper either.My money is on B/W LCD without ( significant ) back-lighting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I know, e-Ink is a marketing name for a specific piece of technology using colored particles and static electricity.
Somehow I'm not so sure that this is the technology used here, it looks more like different ways of handling an LCD than a layer of e-Ink.
I would not know how you could make a sheet of e-Ink invisible for the eye, and it seems this is required.
The screen in the photo does not look like digital paper either.My money is on B/W LCD without (significant) back-lighting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143083</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1243588080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who said anything about cathode ray tubes?  Get off my lawn and let me go back to my Teletype!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said anything about cathode ray tubes ?
Get off my lawn and let me go back to my Teletype !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said anything about cathode ray tubes?
Get off my lawn and let me go back to my Teletype!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142747</id>
	<title>Huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243629900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Attack of the ACRONYMS!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Attack of the ACRONYMS ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Attack of the ACRONYMS!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143473</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1243590000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I still like nixie tube displays.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still like nixie tube displays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still like nixie tube displays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943</id>
	<title>Summary is a complete ripoff!</title>
	<author>Facegarden</author>
	<datestamp>1243630680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary is completely taken from Engadget. Are we just copying and pasting now? WTF?</p><p>I think the "shown after the break" should have been a tipoff, there's no "break" in a regular summary!</p><p>Lame.</p><p>From Engadget:</p><p>"We knew Pixel Qi was up to something when it pledged to give us a cheap laptop that could last 40 hours on a charge. Now we can finally see what, with the OLPC spin-off releasing some images of a prototype screen called 3qi that looks like it can combine the best of e-ink and traditional LCD displays -- prototypes that will be shown in the flesh at Computex next week. The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors, can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors (shown after the break), and, as its pi&#195;ce de r&#195;&#169;sistance, can be toggled into an energy-efficient "epaper" mode. How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery, but we're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year. Color us intrigued. "</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary is completely taken from Engadget .
Are we just copying and pasting now ?
WTF ? I think the " shown after the break " should have been a tipoff , there 's no " break " in a regular summary ! Lame.From Engadget : " We knew Pixel Qi was up to something when it pledged to give us a cheap laptop that could last 40 hours on a charge .
Now we can finally see what , with the OLPC spin-off releasing some images of a prototype screen called 3qi that looks like it can combine the best of e-ink and traditional LCD displays -- prototypes that will be shown in the flesh at Computex next week .
The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors , can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors ( shown after the break ) , and , as its pi   ce de r     sistance , can be toggled into an energy-efficient " epaper " mode .
How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery , but we 're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year .
Color us intrigued .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary is completely taken from Engadget.
Are we just copying and pasting now?
WTF?I think the "shown after the break" should have been a tipoff, there's no "break" in a regular summary!Lame.From Engadget:"We knew Pixel Qi was up to something when it pledged to give us a cheap laptop that could last 40 hours on a charge.
Now we can finally see what, with the OLPC spin-off releasing some images of a prototype screen called 3qi that looks like it can combine the best of e-ink and traditional LCD displays -- prototypes that will be shown in the flesh at Computex next week.
The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors, can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors (shown after the break), and, as its piÃce de rÃ©sistance, can be toggled into an energy-efficient "epaper" mode.
How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery, but we're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year.
Color us intrigued.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143001</id>
	<title>Re:Summary is a complete ripoff!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243587780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Alright, maybe I was a bit hasty, I see that they did link to Engadget - I didn't see "Engadget" in the summary so I figured someone was just passing it off as their own writing. But should it have at least been mentioned that it was via Engadget, rather than leaving the reader to actually follow the link to see where the text came from? How does that work?<br>-Taylor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Alright , maybe I was a bit hasty , I see that they did link to Engadget - I did n't see " Engadget " in the summary so I figured someone was just passing it off as their own writing .
But should it have at least been mentioned that it was via Engadget , rather than leaving the reader to actually follow the link to see where the text came from ?
How does that work ? -Taylor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Alright, maybe I was a bit hasty, I see that they did link to Engadget - I didn't see "Engadget" in the summary so I figured someone was just passing it off as their own writing.
But should it have at least been mentioned that it was via Engadget, rather than leaving the reader to actually follow the link to see where the text came from?
How does that work?-Taylor</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146161</id>
	<title>nothing mysterious about it</title>
	<author>jipn4</author>
	<datestamp>1243606800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not "e-ink", which is an electrophoretic display, it's an LCD that can be run in two different modes: reflective and with backlight.  When it's used with a backlight, the LCD elements are colored, and when used without, they are not colored.  It's kind of a hack, but it's a useful hack.  In terms of resolution, it doesn't actually help much, since you can do color antialiasing on a color LCD anyway.  It's good for battery life, though.</p><p>The OLPC screens already work that way.  I'm not sure what they are announcing.  Maybe they just needed a press release.</p><p>The question I have is: when is there going to be an EEE PC with one of these screens?  That would be really useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not " e-ink " , which is an electrophoretic display , it 's an LCD that can be run in two different modes : reflective and with backlight .
When it 's used with a backlight , the LCD elements are colored , and when used without , they are not colored .
It 's kind of a hack , but it 's a useful hack .
In terms of resolution , it does n't actually help much , since you can do color antialiasing on a color LCD anyway .
It 's good for battery life , though.The OLPC screens already work that way .
I 'm not sure what they are announcing .
Maybe they just needed a press release.The question I have is : when is there going to be an EEE PC with one of these screens ?
That would be really useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not "e-ink", which is an electrophoretic display, it's an LCD that can be run in two different modes: reflective and with backlight.
When it's used with a backlight, the LCD elements are colored, and when used without, they are not colored.
It's kind of a hack, but it's a useful hack.
In terms of resolution, it doesn't actually help much, since you can do color antialiasing on a color LCD anyway.
It's good for battery life, though.The OLPC screens already work that way.
I'm not sure what they are announcing.
Maybe they just needed a press release.The question I have is: when is there going to be an EEE PC with one of these screens?
That would be really useful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143187</id>
	<title>XO?</title>
	<author>AvitarX</author>
	<datestamp>1243588560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This looks to me exactly like the XO, but with a better color display.</p><p>I was intrigued 2 years ago when i got my XO.</p><p>Now it is simply what I hoped would happen, same tech, but with focus on image quality and resolution over inexpensiveness.</p><p>On the XO, the wavy lines can become quite the hassle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This looks to me exactly like the XO , but with a better color display.I was intrigued 2 years ago when i got my XO.Now it is simply what I hoped would happen , same tech , but with focus on image quality and resolution over inexpensiveness.On the XO , the wavy lines can become quite the hassle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This looks to me exactly like the XO, but with a better color display.I was intrigued 2 years ago when i got my XO.Now it is simply what I hoped would happen, same tech, but with focus on image quality and resolution over inexpensiveness.On the XO, the wavy lines can become quite the hassle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28147161</id>
	<title>Re:nothing mysterious about it</title>
	<author>anothy</author>
	<datestamp>1243618440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>it's also worth noting that (again, at least on the XO) the screen very often looks better in b&amp;w mode; i run it that way even in daylight often. it's just a software setting that sets it to b&amp;w when backlight goes to zero; you can toggle each manually.</htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's also worth noting that ( again , at least on the XO ) the screen very often looks better in b&amp;w mode ; i run it that way even in daylight often .
it 's just a software setting that sets it to b&amp;w when backlight goes to zero ; you can toggle each manually .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's also worth noting that (again, at least on the XO) the screen very often looks better in b&amp;w mode; i run it that way even in daylight often.
it's just a software setting that sets it to b&amp;w when backlight goes to zero; you can toggle each manually.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146161</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28145743</id>
	<title>Most power is not used in LCDs....</title>
	<author>stardude82</author>
	<datestamp>1243602780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking at power consumption of LCD's by laptops as percentage of total power consumption it isn't much for most modern laptops (5-0.5 watts versus 50-20 whats for a system under moderate load) and its going down on average with LED backlights becoming more common.  It  Using this sort of black and white only mode only really makes sense for ultra low power system.</p><p>That being said, it would be killer on a laptop with an embedded SplashTop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at power consumption of LCD 's by laptops as percentage of total power consumption it is n't much for most modern laptops ( 5-0.5 watts versus 50-20 whats for a system under moderate load ) and its going down on average with LED backlights becoming more common .
It Using this sort of black and white only mode only really makes sense for ultra low power system.That being said , it would be killer on a laptop with an embedded SplashTop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at power consumption of LCD's by laptops as percentage of total power consumption it isn't much for most modern laptops (5-0.5 watts versus 50-20 whats for a system under moderate load) and its going down on average with LED backlights becoming more common.
It  Using this sort of black and white only mode only really makes sense for ultra low power system.That being said, it would be killer on a laptop with an embedded SplashTop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143071</id>
	<title>LCD Dilemma</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243588080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with this is...oh God my cock is so fucking hard. I jerked off over lunch lying next to a beautiful woman who was fucking herself with a vibe. She wouldn't let me fuck her because she is married, but I did see her in all her nude glory. I also massaged her small, perky tits and her pencil eraser sized nipples were tweaked and pinched. She came first; I came second. I held out because I wanted her to watch me splurge all over, and what a huge load it was. She even said wow, you came a lot! Yes. Yes I did, my dear. Thinking about this now is why my dick is suffering from such a raging hard on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with this is...oh God my cock is so fucking hard .
I jerked off over lunch lying next to a beautiful woman who was fucking herself with a vibe .
She would n't let me fuck her because she is married , but I did see her in all her nude glory .
I also massaged her small , perky tits and her pencil eraser sized nipples were tweaked and pinched .
She came first ; I came second .
I held out because I wanted her to watch me splurge all over , and what a huge load it was .
She even said wow , you came a lot !
Yes. Yes I did , my dear .
Thinking about this now is why my dick is suffering from such a raging hard on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with this is...oh God my cock is so fucking hard.
I jerked off over lunch lying next to a beautiful woman who was fucking herself with a vibe.
She wouldn't let me fuck her because she is married, but I did see her in all her nude glory.
I also massaged her small, perky tits and her pencil eraser sized nipples were tweaked and pinched.
She came first; I came second.
I held out because I wanted her to watch me splurge all over, and what a huge load it was.
She even said wow, you came a lot!
Yes. Yes I did, my dear.
Thinking about this now is why my dick is suffering from such a raging hard on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143243</id>
	<title>Hoping</title>
	<author>gubers33</author>
	<datestamp>1243588920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if you can convert this one into a economically helpful Mean Green Hacking Machine like the OLPC</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if you can convert this one into a economically helpful Mean Green Hacking Machine like the OLPC</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if you can convert this one into a economically helpful Mean Green Hacking Machine like the OLPC</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28145913</id>
	<title>Pixel Qi - no E-Ink</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243604100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the Pixel Qi displays are (we believe) remarkable and can and will really serve as exceptional e-paper displays, there is no relationship to E-Ink. Not the company and not the electrophoretic technology that E-Ink uses.</p><p>John Ryan<br>Pixel Qi Corp.<br>Taiwan</p><p>(Filed as anonymous coward, because I *do* have a separate<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. personal account.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the Pixel Qi displays are ( we believe ) remarkable and can and will really serve as exceptional e-paper displays , there is no relationship to E-Ink .
Not the company and not the electrophoretic technology that E-Ink uses.John RyanPixel Qi Corp.Taiwan ( Filed as anonymous coward , because I * do * have a separate / .
personal account .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the Pixel Qi displays are (we believe) remarkable and can and will really serve as exceptional e-paper displays, there is no relationship to E-Ink.
Not the company and not the electrophoretic technology that E-Ink uses.John RyanPixel Qi Corp.Taiwan(Filed as anonymous coward, because I *do* have a separate /.
personal account.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143023</id>
	<title>Re:Summary is a complete ripoff!</title>
	<author>Gravedigger3</author>
	<datestamp>1243587900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are we just copying and pasting now? WTF?</p></div><p>
You must be new here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we just copying and pasting now ?
WTF ? You must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we just copying and pasting now?
WTF?
You must be new here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144421</id>
	<title>Re:Two LCD matrices layered on top of each other?</title>
	<author>ErkDemon</author>
	<datestamp>1243594200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was going to blog about this idea. Was going to say that with ebook authors being encouraged to use "advanced" media enhancements in their ported ebooks (like, y'know, color), that it was getting difficult to justify standard epaper with its rotten page refresh times and glorious monochrome. Once people are used to seeing colour video on their iPhones and MP3 players, monochrome and page-scrambling every time you flip a page is a bit sucky.
<p>
So I was a going to suggest a dual-layer screen, perhaps with a simple electro-photosensitive layer over the backlit LCD that could capture and retain a shadow of the LCD image when you toggle a charge across it. That way the overlay can be a simple "dumb" sheet with no addressing, and the LCD and backlight "flashes" the image onto the overlay when you're in epaper mode.
</p><p>
Looks like someone beat me to it (well, it was an obvious idea).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was going to blog about this idea .
Was going to say that with ebook authors being encouraged to use " advanced " media enhancements in their ported ebooks ( like , y'know , color ) , that it was getting difficult to justify standard epaper with its rotten page refresh times and glorious monochrome .
Once people are used to seeing colour video on their iPhones and MP3 players , monochrome and page-scrambling every time you flip a page is a bit sucky .
So I was a going to suggest a dual-layer screen , perhaps with a simple electro-photosensitive layer over the backlit LCD that could capture and retain a shadow of the LCD image when you toggle a charge across it .
That way the overlay can be a simple " dumb " sheet with no addressing , and the LCD and backlight " flashes " the image onto the overlay when you 're in epaper mode .
Looks like someone beat me to it ( well , it was an obvious idea ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was going to blog about this idea.
Was going to say that with ebook authors being encouraged to use "advanced" media enhancements in their ported ebooks (like, y'know, color), that it was getting difficult to justify standard epaper with its rotten page refresh times and glorious monochrome.
Once people are used to seeing colour video on their iPhones and MP3 players, monochrome and page-scrambling every time you flip a page is a bit sucky.
So I was a going to suggest a dual-layer screen, perhaps with a simple electro-photosensitive layer over the backlit LCD that could capture and retain a shadow of the LCD image when you toggle a charge across it.
That way the overlay can be a simple "dumb" sheet with no addressing, and the LCD and backlight "flashes" the image onto the overlay when you're in epaper mode.
Looks like someone beat me to it (well, it was an obvious idea).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142959</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143185</id>
	<title>Re:Summary is a complete ripoff!</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1243588560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are we just copying and pasting now? WTF?</p></div><p>Don't be ridiculous. If we'd just been copying and pasting, it would have looked like this (emphasis added):</p><blockquote><div><p>"The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors, can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors (shown after the break), and, as its <strong>pi&#195;ce de r&#195;&#169;sistance</strong>, can be toggled into an energy-efficient "epaper" mode. How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery, but we're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year. Color us intrigued."</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we just copying and pasting now ?
WTF ? Do n't be ridiculous .
If we 'd just been copying and pasting , it would have looked like this ( emphasis added ) : " The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors , can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors ( shown after the break ) , and , as its pi   ce de r     sistance , can be toggled into an energy-efficient " epaper " mode .
How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery , but we 're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year .
Color us intrigued .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we just copying and pasting now?
WTF?Don't be ridiculous.
If we'd just been copying and pasting, it would have looked like this (emphasis added):"The screen can work as a traditional backlit LCD when indoors, can have that backlight disabled to be perfectly visible outdoors (shown after the break), and, as its piÃce de rÃ©sistance, can be toggled into an energy-efficient "epaper" mode.
How exactly the company is fitting these seemingly disparate slices of technology into a single 10.1-inch screen is something of a mystery, but we're guessing much will be answered next week ahead of a planned product launch by the end of the year.
Color us intrigued.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143289</id>
	<title>Solar laptop.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243589100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now all we need is someone to to make a netbook with an arm processor, one of these as the screen, and solar panels on the back and we'd be all set.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now all we need is someone to to make a netbook with an arm processor , one of these as the screen , and solar panels on the back and we 'd be all set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now all we need is someone to to make a netbook with an arm processor, one of these as the screen, and solar panels on the back and we'd be all set.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146285</id>
	<title>The screen trifecta</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243608060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I predict that the 3qi technology is going to be a real game-changer.  The daylight-readable screen means you will be taking your netbook into many more places and situations than you ever had before.  The e-paper mode means that you can truly use your netbook as a Kindle-like device -- only better, because then it will be a true PC, and not a purpose-built appliance.  The low power, full-motion color mode means you'll be able to use your netbook to watch video or play games without sucking down twice the cost of your netbook in extra batteries.</p><p>Combine this with very low cost (fabless) construction techniques, and you've got a real winner.</p><p>Go, Mary Jo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I predict that the 3qi technology is going to be a real game-changer .
The daylight-readable screen means you will be taking your netbook into many more places and situations than you ever had before .
The e-paper mode means that you can truly use your netbook as a Kindle-like device -- only better , because then it will be a true PC , and not a purpose-built appliance .
The low power , full-motion color mode means you 'll be able to use your netbook to watch video or play games without sucking down twice the cost of your netbook in extra batteries.Combine this with very low cost ( fabless ) construction techniques , and you 've got a real winner.Go , Mary Jo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I predict that the 3qi technology is going to be a real game-changer.
The daylight-readable screen means you will be taking your netbook into many more places and situations than you ever had before.
The e-paper mode means that you can truly use your netbook as a Kindle-like device -- only better, because then it will be a true PC, and not a purpose-built appliance.
The low power, full-motion color mode means you'll be able to use your netbook to watch video or play games without sucking down twice the cost of your netbook in extra batteries.Combine this with very low cost (fabless) construction techniques, and you've got a real winner.Go, Mary Jo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144533</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243594860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not dead yet!</p><p>My <a href="http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/h2000.html" title="columbia.edu" rel="nofollow">Hazeltine 2000</a> [columbia.edu] isn't dead yet!</p><p>Also, I'm a boomer. Gen X look like a bunch of green kids from here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not dead yet ! My Hazeltine 2000 [ columbia.edu ] is n't dead yet ! Also , I 'm a boomer .
Gen X look like a bunch of green kids from here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not dead yet!My Hazeltine 2000 [columbia.edu] isn't dead yet!Also, I'm a boomer.
Gen X look like a bunch of green kids from here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815</id>
	<title>Wait. What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243630140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LCD is traditional?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LCD is traditional ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LCD is traditional?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142891</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1243630500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, they are when compared to things like OLED or electronic ink.  And whatever the hell these people are doing.
</p><p>It seems to me the holy grail of displays would be something like full-color electronic ink with fast response times, paired with some kind of lighting scheme for when ambient lighting isn't sufficient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , they are when compared to things like OLED or electronic ink .
And whatever the hell these people are doing .
It seems to me the holy grail of displays would be something like full-color electronic ink with fast response times , paired with some kind of lighting scheme for when ambient lighting is n't sufficient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, they are when compared to things like OLED or electronic ink.
And whatever the hell these people are doing.
It seems to me the holy grail of displays would be something like full-color electronic ink with fast response times, paired with some kind of lighting scheme for when ambient lighting isn't sufficient.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146001</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1243604880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It seems to me the holy grail of displays would be something like full-color electronic ink with fast response times, paired with some kind of lighting scheme for when ambient lighting isn't sufficient.</p></div><p>So what benefits would e-ink provide in this case? Its benefits are precisely that it doesn't need to be redrawn much (but if you need fast response time, it means you're redrawing often anyway, and a single redrawing of e-ink is actually more expensive than, say, TFT); and that it doesn't shine a powerful lamp directly into your face, straining the eyes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me the holy grail of displays would be something like full-color electronic ink with fast response times , paired with some kind of lighting scheme for when ambient lighting is n't sufficient.So what benefits would e-ink provide in this case ?
Its benefits are precisely that it does n't need to be redrawn much ( but if you need fast response time , it means you 're redrawing often anyway , and a single redrawing of e-ink is actually more expensive than , say , TFT ) ; and that it does n't shine a powerful lamp directly into your face , straining the eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me the holy grail of displays would be something like full-color electronic ink with fast response times, paired with some kind of lighting scheme for when ambient lighting isn't sufficient.So what benefits would e-ink provide in this case?
Its benefits are precisely that it doesn't need to be redrawn much (but if you need fast response time, it means you're redrawing often anyway, and a single redrawing of e-ink is actually more expensive than, say, TFT); and that it doesn't shine a powerful lamp directly into your face, straining the eyes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142891</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146901</id>
	<title>cheap low-power displays almost here?</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1243615920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This looks interesting. For some reason, low-power displays just fascinate the heck out of me. I can think of so many neat projects to create out of them. (eInk displays would be great, except that they are horribly expensive right now.)</p><p>One display that I'd love to get more information on is the one in Google's new <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyHaImmmkGs" title="youtube.com">electronic conference room signs</a> [youtube.com]. It looks and acts just like a standard low-resolution LCD display, except the image is retained even when power is completely removed. I did some research and I found the company that apparently makes them, but I never was able to figure out exactly how to buy a development kit or sample.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This looks interesting .
For some reason , low-power displays just fascinate the heck out of me .
I can think of so many neat projects to create out of them .
( eInk displays would be great , except that they are horribly expensive right now .
) One display that I 'd love to get more information on is the one in Google 's new electronic conference room signs [ youtube.com ] .
It looks and acts just like a standard low-resolution LCD display , except the image is retained even when power is completely removed .
I did some research and I found the company that apparently makes them , but I never was able to figure out exactly how to buy a development kit or sample .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This looks interesting.
For some reason, low-power displays just fascinate the heck out of me.
I can think of so many neat projects to create out of them.
(eInk displays would be great, except that they are horribly expensive right now.
)One display that I'd love to get more information on is the one in Google's new electronic conference room signs [youtube.com].
It looks and acts just like a standard low-resolution LCD display, except the image is retained even when power is completely removed.
I did some research and I found the company that apparently makes them, but I never was able to figure out exactly how to buy a development kit or sample.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1243630380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Generation X is dead and their cathode ray tubes are dead, long live the twittering tweens and their lcd screens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Generation X is dead and their cathode ray tubes are dead , long live the twittering tweens and their lcd screens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Generation X is dead and their cathode ray tubes are dead, long live the twittering tweens and their lcd screens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143299</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>cthulu\_mt</author>
	<datestamp>1243589160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Death to Videodrome!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Death to Videodrome !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Death to Videodrome!
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144475</id>
	<title>Re:Two LCD matrices layered on top of each other?</title>
	<author>Kz</author>
	<datestamp>1243594560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is not e-ink.  it's reflective LCD.</p><p>the trick is to put the color filter needed for color LCD \_behind\_ the LCD itself, and turn the backlit off.</p><p>I remember using my Palm III on bright sunlight by turning the backlit off.  it was really good.  now, a modern LCD, with thinner walls, and higher contrast would be even better.  and having color capabilities when you want them, is just great</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is not e-ink .
it 's reflective LCD.the trick is to put the color filter needed for color LCD \ _behind \ _ the LCD itself , and turn the backlit off.I remember using my Palm III on bright sunlight by turning the backlit off .
it was really good .
now , a modern LCD , with thinner walls , and higher contrast would be even better .
and having color capabilities when you want them , is just great</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is not e-ink.
it's reflective LCD.the trick is to put the color filter needed for color LCD \_behind\_ the LCD itself, and turn the backlit off.I remember using my Palm III on bright sunlight by turning the backlit off.
it was really good.
now, a modern LCD, with thinner walls, and higher contrast would be even better.
and having color capabilities when you want them, is just great</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142959</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28147825</id>
	<title>!bigdeal</title>
	<author>achurch</author>
	<datestamp>1243715940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are already laptops with translucent screens that let ambient light substitute for the backlight, so you can e.g. turn off the backlight entirely when you're outside.  As the owner of a Japanese <a href="http://dynabook.com/pc/catalog/ss\_c/080909rx/index\_j.htm" title="dynabook.com">Toshiba Dynabook SS RX2</a> [dynabook.com], I can confirm that it works as described -- I'm beginning to wonder if they actually enforce "truth in advertising" over here or something -- and is actually easier on my eyes than using the backlight indoors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are already laptops with translucent screens that let ambient light substitute for the backlight , so you can e.g .
turn off the backlight entirely when you 're outside .
As the owner of a Japanese Toshiba Dynabook SS RX2 [ dynabook.com ] , I can confirm that it works as described -- I 'm beginning to wonder if they actually enforce " truth in advertising " over here or something -- and is actually easier on my eyes than using the backlight indoors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are already laptops with translucent screens that let ambient light substitute for the backlight, so you can e.g.
turn off the backlight entirely when you're outside.
As the owner of a Japanese Toshiba Dynabook SS RX2 [dynabook.com], I can confirm that it works as described -- I'm beginning to wonder if they actually enforce "truth in advertising" over here or something -- and is actually easier on my eyes than using the backlight indoors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144759</id>
	<title>Re:e-Ink?</title>
	<author>agurk</author>
	<datestamp>1243596120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could have e-Ink technology behind the lcd tech. When you turn off the lcd layer you would reveal the e-ink screen.</p><p>e-Ink particles layer -&gt; LIGHT -&gt; lcd layer</p><p>or if you had semitransparent particles:</p><p>BACKLIGHT -&gt; e-Ink particles layer -&gt; lcd layer</p><p>I really cannot see what technology is used from those blurry pictures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could have e-Ink technology behind the lcd tech .
When you turn off the lcd layer you would reveal the e-ink screen.e-Ink particles layer - &gt; LIGHT - &gt; lcd layeror if you had semitransparent particles : BACKLIGHT - &gt; e-Ink particles layer - &gt; lcd layerI really can not see what technology is used from those blurry pictures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could have e-Ink technology behind the lcd tech.
When you turn off the lcd layer you would reveal the e-ink screen.e-Ink particles layer -&gt; LIGHT -&gt; lcd layeror if you had semitransparent particles:BACKLIGHT -&gt; e-Ink particles layer -&gt; lcd layerI really cannot see what technology is used from those blurry pictures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143117</id>
	<title>Re:e-Ink?</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1243588260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As far as I know, e-Ink is a marketing name for a specific piece of technology</p></div><p>Meh.  People use e-paper, e-ink, digital paper, digital ink, electronic paper, electronic ink, and maybe some other terms I haven't heard.  They use them all interchangeably to mean "flat panel electronic screens that don't need a backlight."  And maybe they also include the part about not needing a charge to maintain the displayed image, but only needing the charge to change the image.
</p><p>I think people just haven't quite settled on a terminology here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As far as I know , e-Ink is a marketing name for a specific piece of technologyMeh .
People use e-paper , e-ink , digital paper , digital ink , electronic paper , electronic ink , and maybe some other terms I have n't heard .
They use them all interchangeably to mean " flat panel electronic screens that do n't need a backlight .
" And maybe they also include the part about not needing a charge to maintain the displayed image , but only needing the charge to change the image .
I think people just have n't quite settled on a terminology here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As far as I know, e-Ink is a marketing name for a specific piece of technologyMeh.
People use e-paper, e-ink, digital paper, digital ink, electronic paper, electronic ink, and maybe some other terms I haven't heard.
They use them all interchangeably to mean "flat panel electronic screens that don't need a backlight.
"  And maybe they also include the part about not needing a charge to maintain the displayed image, but only needing the charge to change the image.
I think people just haven't quite settled on a terminology here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142869</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142879</id>
	<title>Re:Wait. What?</title>
	<author>snl2587</author>
	<datestamp>1243630380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>For laptops? Yeah...though I guess that should technically say "active-matrix liquid crystal display".</htmltext>
<tokenext>For laptops ?
Yeah...though I guess that should technically say " active-matrix liquid crystal display " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For laptops?
Yeah...though I guess that should technically say "active-matrix liquid crystal display".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143299
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143117
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144759
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142869
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143473
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143023
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144475
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143083
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28147161
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146161
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146001
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144533
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144669
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142891
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142879
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_29_1725240_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144421
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142959
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28145913
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142879
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142877
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144533
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143299
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143083
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143473
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142891
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144669
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146001
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142943
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143023
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143001
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142747
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146285
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144475
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144421
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143289
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28146161
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28147161
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28142869
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28144759
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143117
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_29_1725240.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_29_1725240.28143187
</commentlist>
</conversation>
