<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_28_2143219</id>
	<title>Allegedly Rigged Product Demo In SAP Suit Goes Missing</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1243504200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.itworld.com/" rel="nofollow">narramissic</a> writes <i>"Waste Management sued SAP in March 2008 over a failed ERP project. Now, well into the pre-trial discovery process, a presale product demonstration software package that Waste Management says was a key element of the 'false representations' SAP made to 'induce Waste Management into entering a software licensing and implementation agreement' <a href="http://www.itworld.com/legal/68516/rigged-product-demo-sap-suit-goes-missing">has gone missing</a>. Naturally, both sides say the other has it. And SAP, for its part, says it has 'searched extensively' for the system and wants it 'as much or more' as Waste Management, since it 'will help SAP disprove WM's fraud claim.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>narramissic writes " Waste Management sued SAP in March 2008 over a failed ERP project .
Now , well into the pre-trial discovery process , a presale product demonstration software package that Waste Management says was a key element of the 'false representations ' SAP made to 'induce Waste Management into entering a software licensing and implementation agreement ' has gone missing .
Naturally , both sides say the other has it .
And SAP , for its part , says it has 'searched extensively ' for the system and wants it 'as much or more ' as Waste Management , since it 'will help SAP disprove WM 's fraud claim .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>narramissic writes "Waste Management sued SAP in March 2008 over a failed ERP project.
Now, well into the pre-trial discovery process, a presale product demonstration software package that Waste Management says was a key element of the 'false representations' SAP made to 'induce Waste Management into entering a software licensing and implementation agreement' has gone missing.
Naturally, both sides say the other has it.
And SAP, for its part, says it has 'searched extensively' for the system and wants it 'as much or more' as Waste Management, since it 'will help SAP disprove WM's fraud claim.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131179</id>
	<title>Re:I for one...</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1243509420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Getting to choose between serious incompetence and outright malice is always fun.</i></p><p>Forget the lost demo, I have to make that choice every time I interact with SAP.</p><p>Though frankly I think it's a combination of both -- the incompetence being when SAP actually <i>does</i> work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Getting to choose between serious incompetence and outright malice is always fun.Forget the lost demo , I have to make that choice every time I interact with SAP.Though frankly I think it 's a combination of both -- the incompetence being when SAP actually does work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Getting to choose between serious incompetence and outright malice is always fun.Forget the lost demo, I have to make that choice every time I interact with SAP.Though frankly I think it's a combination of both -- the incompetence being when SAP actually does work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130909</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28132575</id>
	<title>Re:Isn't Waste Management known as sleezy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243516500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, America used to be a country where slavery was okay!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , America used to be a country where slavery was okay !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, America used to be a country where slavery was okay!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131211</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131197</id>
	<title>Re:I for one...</title>
	<author>ViennaSt</author>
	<datestamp>1243509480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give them a break, they clearly "don't recall remembering" what happened to the file. Ah, gub'ment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give them a break , they clearly " do n't recall remembering " what happened to the file .
Ah , gub'ment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give them a break, they clearly "don't recall remembering" what happened to the file.
Ah, gub'ment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130909</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28139831</id>
	<title>Pre-sale demos are always awesome!</title>
	<author>elguevote</author>
	<datestamp>1243617120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>SAP will do anything and bring any number of expert in your industry for the pre-sale demos... hell comes after you sign the papers... Not even Gil Grissom will find the missing demo</htmltext>
<tokenext>SAP will do anything and bring any number of expert in your industry for the pre-sale demos... hell comes after you sign the papers... Not even Gil Grissom will find the missing demo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SAP will do anything and bring any number of expert in your industry for the pre-sale demos... hell comes after you sign the papers... Not even Gil Grissom will find the missing demo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28136841</id>
	<title>SAP: Send Another Payment</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243600620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've had the misfortune of working with SAP for a few years now, and I can honestly say that I can't imagine a bigger waste of time, money, and resources. Here's what you get when you buy SAP: Annual licensing fees - per user, proprietary software that gathers all of your company's data (poorly) and doesn't allow you to take it out, a database backend that has tens of thousands of tables - all cryptically named, a worthless, ancient looking user interface that doesn't work very well and is confusing to even the most technical of users, a proprietary COBOL-like programming language that is cryptic, a help site that forces you to login over and over again - and then has poorly written documentation that doesn't help.</p><p>Any time you are tasked with evaluating vendor software, use Google and see what help and/or user groups are available. If you can't get to the help pre-sale, you won't be able to get to it post-sale, either.</p><p>Here's a perfect example of the suckitude that is SAP. In order to use their software, you need to attend their training - apparently, their developers never bothered to read "About Face" or any other book on UI design. You have to pay $3000 to attend a 5-day course in the US. For your $3K, you get to share a computer with another SAP customer (sucker), and a 3" binder containing printouts of the slides. They won't give you the electronic documentation - apparently "searching" is a concept that SAP has yet to master. Don't even think about getting the training data and playing with it once you get back - they won't give it to you. One good thing about the training is listening to your fellow colleagues in SAP-hell bitch about how awful the software is, and why won't it do even the most basic of tasks without several support tickets.</p><p>There are two things SAP does really well - their sales force is top-notch. There is no way they could be in business in a competitive marketplace. Secondly, they are really terrific in gathering licensing fees for every single thing that you ought to be able to do with your software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've had the misfortune of working with SAP for a few years now , and I can honestly say that I ca n't imagine a bigger waste of time , money , and resources .
Here 's what you get when you buy SAP : Annual licensing fees - per user , proprietary software that gathers all of your company 's data ( poorly ) and does n't allow you to take it out , a database backend that has tens of thousands of tables - all cryptically named , a worthless , ancient looking user interface that does n't work very well and is confusing to even the most technical of users , a proprietary COBOL-like programming language that is cryptic , a help site that forces you to login over and over again - and then has poorly written documentation that does n't help.Any time you are tasked with evaluating vendor software , use Google and see what help and/or user groups are available .
If you ca n't get to the help pre-sale , you wo n't be able to get to it post-sale , either.Here 's a perfect example of the suckitude that is SAP .
In order to use their software , you need to attend their training - apparently , their developers never bothered to read " About Face " or any other book on UI design .
You have to pay $ 3000 to attend a 5-day course in the US .
For your $ 3K , you get to share a computer with another SAP customer ( sucker ) , and a 3 " binder containing printouts of the slides .
They wo n't give you the electronic documentation - apparently " searching " is a concept that SAP has yet to master .
Do n't even think about getting the training data and playing with it once you get back - they wo n't give it to you .
One good thing about the training is listening to your fellow colleagues in SAP-hell bitch about how awful the software is , and why wo n't it do even the most basic of tasks without several support tickets.There are two things SAP does really well - their sales force is top-notch .
There is no way they could be in business in a competitive marketplace .
Secondly , they are really terrific in gathering licensing fees for every single thing that you ought to be able to do with your software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've had the misfortune of working with SAP for a few years now, and I can honestly say that I can't imagine a bigger waste of time, money, and resources.
Here's what you get when you buy SAP: Annual licensing fees - per user, proprietary software that gathers all of your company's data (poorly) and doesn't allow you to take it out, a database backend that has tens of thousands of tables - all cryptically named, a worthless, ancient looking user interface that doesn't work very well and is confusing to even the most technical of users, a proprietary COBOL-like programming language that is cryptic, a help site that forces you to login over and over again - and then has poorly written documentation that doesn't help.Any time you are tasked with evaluating vendor software, use Google and see what help and/or user groups are available.
If you can't get to the help pre-sale, you won't be able to get to it post-sale, either.Here's a perfect example of the suckitude that is SAP.
In order to use their software, you need to attend their training - apparently, their developers never bothered to read "About Face" or any other book on UI design.
You have to pay $3000 to attend a 5-day course in the US.
For your $3K, you get to share a computer with another SAP customer (sucker), and a 3" binder containing printouts of the slides.
They won't give you the electronic documentation - apparently "searching" is a concept that SAP has yet to master.
Don't even think about getting the training data and playing with it once you get back - they won't give it to you.
One good thing about the training is listening to your fellow colleagues in SAP-hell bitch about how awful the software is, and why won't it do even the most basic of tasks without several support tickets.There are two things SAP does really well - their sales force is top-notch.
There is no way they could be in business in a competitive marketplace.
Secondly, they are really terrific in gathering licensing fees for every single thing that you ought to be able to do with your software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131023</id>
	<title>Waste Management? uh, oh.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Waste Management is headquartered about an hour from SAP America's headquarters in PA.</p><p>They also are also the subject of various mob-related rumors (as are all trash disposal companies), and have had a dubious string of CEO's come and leave under weird accusations of accounting fraud.</p><p>I wouldn't want to walk to my car late at night at SAP. That's all I'm sayin'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Waste Management is headquartered about an hour from SAP America 's headquarters in PA.They also are also the subject of various mob-related rumors ( as are all trash disposal companies ) , and have had a dubious string of CEO 's come and leave under weird accusations of accounting fraud.I would n't want to walk to my car late at night at SAP .
That 's all I 'm sayin' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waste Management is headquartered about an hour from SAP America's headquarters in PA.They also are also the subject of various mob-related rumors (as are all trash disposal companies), and have had a dubious string of CEO's come and leave under weird accusations of accounting fraud.I wouldn't want to walk to my car late at night at SAP.
That's all I'm sayin'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130881</id>
	<title>i had it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but i traded it for a slice of hot, thick and hairy gay cock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but i traded it for a slice of hot , thick and hairy gay cock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but i traded it for a slice of hot, thick and hairy gay cock.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871</id>
	<title>like every other sales demo</title>
	<author>SoupGuru</author>
	<datestamp>1243508100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So this is pretty much like any other sales demo?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this is pretty much like any other sales demo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this is pretty much like any other sales demo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131065</id>
	<title>Isn't Waste Management known as sleezy</title>
	<author>docbrody</author>
	<datestamp>1243508880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't Waste Management know to be a sleazy company?  Old Mafia ties, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't Waste Management know to be a sleazy company ?
Old Mafia ties , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't Waste Management know to be a sleazy company?
Old Mafia ties, etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28135477</id>
	<title>SAP actually works pretty well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243540140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I work in a company that runs SAP, it actually works pretty well for us and I've not had this bad experience that some people describe above.</p><p>Perhaps it's because I work with the logistics part of it, a fairly old and well defined part of the system, but generally the software works and lets the company run fine.</p><p>It's certainly better than some of the other systems I've worked with in the past and I sort of like the mainframey 70ties kind of feeling that I get from the software.</p><p>But then again i probably count as biased since i'm part of this evil SAP consultant priesthood described earlier - but really, isn't it like this for any kind of complex software?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I work in a company that runs SAP , it actually works pretty well for us and I 've not had this bad experience that some people describe above.Perhaps it 's because I work with the logistics part of it , a fairly old and well defined part of the system , but generally the software works and lets the company run fine.It 's certainly better than some of the other systems I 've worked with in the past and I sort of like the mainframey 70ties kind of feeling that I get from the software.But then again i probably count as biased since i 'm part of this evil SAP consultant priesthood described earlier - but really , is n't it like this for any kind of complex software ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work in a company that runs SAP, it actually works pretty well for us and I've not had this bad experience that some people describe above.Perhaps it's because I work with the logistics part of it, a fairly old and well defined part of the system, but generally the software works and lets the company run fine.It's certainly better than some of the other systems I've worked with in the past and I sort of like the mainframey 70ties kind of feeling that I get from the software.But then again i probably count as biased since i'm part of this evil SAP consultant priesthood described earlier - but really, isn't it like this for any kind of complex software?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28157501</id>
	<title>Has anyone finished their SAP implementation?</title>
	<author>sglines</author>
	<datestamp>1243777440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me but could someone point to any successful SAP implementations. I've never seen one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me but could someone point to any successful SAP implementations .
I 've never seen one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me but could someone point to any successful SAP implementations.
I've never seen one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131017</id>
	<title>SAP has no copy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any sofware company that cannot find a copy of something they produced for a customer is INCOMPETENT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any sofware company that can not find a copy of something they produced for a customer is INCOMPETENT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any sofware company that cannot find a copy of something they produced for a customer is INCOMPETENT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28137995</id>
	<title>Re:Failure to understand technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243608120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the garbage men throwing the demo away makes perfect sense.</p><p>You know, gotta keep those trucks filled!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the garbage men throwing the demo away makes perfect sense.You know , got ta keep those trucks filled !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the garbage men throwing the demo away makes perfect sense.You know, gotta keep those trucks filled!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131193</id>
	<title>No, it really matters more to Waste Management</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243509480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not a lawyer, but..</p><p>Most software licensing agreements contain limitations of liability and monetary damages, usually limited to the amount paid by the customer. However, if the customer can demonstrate fraud, the customer has a chance to 'break' those limitation and go after additional damages (lost profits, cost of replacement, etc.). So <i>if</i> the demo exists and <i>if</i> it shows capabilities not found in the actual SAP implementation, WM <i>might</i> be able to use it to prove fraud -- assuming that the judge doesn't simply rule the demo as being "sales puffery" (i.e., salespersons are allowed a certain legal leeway in extolling the virtues of the product they're trying to sell).</p><p>Should be interesting.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..bruce..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not a lawyer , but..Most software licensing agreements contain limitations of liability and monetary damages , usually limited to the amount paid by the customer .
However , if the customer can demonstrate fraud , the customer has a chance to 'break ' those limitation and go after additional damages ( lost profits , cost of replacement , etc. ) .
So if the demo exists and if it shows capabilities not found in the actual SAP implementation , WM might be able to use it to prove fraud -- assuming that the judge does n't simply rule the demo as being " sales puffery " ( i.e. , salespersons are allowed a certain legal leeway in extolling the virtues of the product they 're trying to sell ) .Should be interesting .
..bruce. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not a lawyer, but..Most software licensing agreements contain limitations of liability and monetary damages, usually limited to the amount paid by the customer.
However, if the customer can demonstrate fraud, the customer has a chance to 'break' those limitation and go after additional damages (lost profits, cost of replacement, etc.).
So if the demo exists and if it shows capabilities not found in the actual SAP implementation, WM might be able to use it to prove fraud -- assuming that the judge doesn't simply rule the demo as being "sales puffery" (i.e., salespersons are allowed a certain legal leeway in extolling the virtues of the product they're trying to sell).Should be interesting.
..bruce..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28139667</id>
	<title>Beware the SAP Kool-Aid</title>
	<author>motherpusbucket</author>
	<datestamp>1243616040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The company I used to work for implemented SAP.  As a part of the indoctrination, it was taboo to call it 'sap', as in tree sap.  S.A.P. was the only acceptable terminology.  Calling it 'sap' was more fitting, as it 'saps the life out of you'.

In this case 'Waste Management' is a bit of an oxymoron.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The company I used to work for implemented SAP .
As a part of the indoctrination , it was taboo to call it 'sap ' , as in tree sap .
S.A.P. was the only acceptable terminology .
Calling it 'sap ' was more fitting , as it 'saps the life out of you' .
In this case 'Waste Management ' is a bit of an oxymoron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The company I used to work for implemented SAP.
As a part of the indoctrination, it was taboo to call it 'sap', as in tree sap.
S.A.P. was the only acceptable terminology.
Calling it 'sap' was more fitting, as it 'saps the life out of you'.
In this case 'Waste Management' is a bit of an oxymoron.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130909</id>
	<title>I for one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would definitely trust SAP on this. Who wouldn't trust an ERP vendor that either managed to lose a vital file or managed to "lose" a vital file?<br> <br>

Getting to choose between serious incompetence and outright malice is always fun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would definitely trust SAP on this .
Who would n't trust an ERP vendor that either managed to lose a vital file or managed to " lose " a vital file ?
Getting to choose between serious incompetence and outright malice is always fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would definitely trust SAP on this.
Who wouldn't trust an ERP vendor that either managed to lose a vital file or managed to "lose" a vital file?
Getting to choose between serious incompetence and outright malice is always fun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28133207</id>
	<title>"As much or more"</title>
	<author>Adrian Lopez</author>
	<datestamp>1243519800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<i>And SAP, for its part, says it has 'searched extensively' for the system and wants it 'as much or more' as Waste Management, since it 'will help SAP disprove WM's fraud claim.'</i>"</p><p>Hmm... "I want police to find my wife as much or more as the District Attorney, since she will help disprove the DA's claim that I killed her and neatly disposed of her body."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" And SAP , for its part , says it has 'searched extensively ' for the system and wants it 'as much or more ' as Waste Management , since it 'will help SAP disprove WM 's fraud claim. ' " Hmm.. .
" I want police to find my wife as much or more as the District Attorney , since she will help disprove the DA 's claim that I killed her and neatly disposed of her body .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"And SAP, for its part, says it has 'searched extensively' for the system and wants it 'as much or more' as Waste Management, since it 'will help SAP disprove WM's fraud claim.'"Hmm...
"I want police to find my wife as much or more as the District Attorney, since she will help disprove the DA's claim that I killed her and neatly disposed of her body.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131029</id>
	<title>two rules</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>#1 - if the evidence supports your side of the case, make sure you're the one who holds on to the evidence</p><p>#2 - if the evidence doesn't support your side of the case, make sure you're the one who holds on to the evidence</p></htmltext>
<tokenext># 1 - if the evidence supports your side of the case , make sure you 're the one who holds on to the evidence # 2 - if the evidence does n't support your side of the case , make sure you 're the one who holds on to the evidence</tokentext>
<sentencetext>#1 - if the evidence supports your side of the case, make sure you're the one who holds on to the evidence#2 - if the evidence doesn't support your side of the case, make sure you're the one who holds on to the evidence</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28141799</id>
	<title>Rummy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243626060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmmm, another case of a missing WMD-emo?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmmm , another case of a missing WMD-emo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmmm, another case of a missing WMD-emo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191</id>
	<title>Failure to understand technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243509480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>In fact, Waste Management should have the demo in its possession, as it was transferred to the trash hauler's system in late 2005 and early 2006, according to SAP, which demanded in a May 14 filing that Waste Management turn it over.</i> So, copying the software to a customer's computer automatically erases it from developer's computer? And now they want it back, 'cause that will automatically erase it from the customers computer? This dispute makes both sides look like morons, but looking like an idiot is going to have more more impact on SAP's business than on Waste Management's bottom line. No one expects a garbage man to be an IT expert. But if a software developer can't keep a copy of everything they give to a customer, how the hell can they be expected to maintain the software they distribute?</htmltext>
<tokenext>In fact , Waste Management should have the demo in its possession , as it was transferred to the trash hauler 's system in late 2005 and early 2006 , according to SAP , which demanded in a May 14 filing that Waste Management turn it over .
So , copying the software to a customer 's computer automatically erases it from developer 's computer ?
And now they want it back , 'cause that will automatically erase it from the customers computer ?
This dispute makes both sides look like morons , but looking like an idiot is going to have more more impact on SAP 's business than on Waste Management 's bottom line .
No one expects a garbage man to be an IT expert .
But if a software developer ca n't keep a copy of everything they give to a customer , how the hell can they be expected to maintain the software they distribute ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In fact, Waste Management should have the demo in its possession, as it was transferred to the trash hauler's system in late 2005 and early 2006, according to SAP, which demanded in a May 14 filing that Waste Management turn it over.
So, copying the software to a customer's computer automatically erases it from developer's computer?
And now they want it back, 'cause that will automatically erase it from the customers computer?
This dispute makes both sides look like morons, but looking like an idiot is going to have more more impact on SAP's business than on Waste Management's bottom line.
No one expects a garbage man to be an IT expert.
But if a software developer can't keep a copy of everything they give to a customer, how the hell can they be expected to maintain the software they distribute?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131799</id>
	<title>Re:How?</title>
	<author>Quothz</author>
	<datestamp>1243512600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How can you "go" missing?  Missing is something you are or are not, not a place or activity.  How, unless you are a bad marksman, or are on the prowl for young ladies, can you "go" missing?</p></div><p>Go crazy, then take a left at the second stop sign. Missing's right on the left. You can't miss it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you " go " missing ?
Missing is something you are or are not , not a place or activity .
How , unless you are a bad marksman , or are on the prowl for young ladies , can you " go " missing ? Go crazy , then take a left at the second stop sign .
Missing 's right on the left .
You ca n't miss it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you "go" missing?
Missing is something you are or are not, not a place or activity.
How, unless you are a bad marksman, or are on the prowl for young ladies, can you "go" missing?Go crazy, then take a left at the second stop sign.
Missing's right on the left.
You can't miss it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131135</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131159</id>
	<title>Courtney</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1243509360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SAP.  SAP get my presale product demonstration software package.</p><p>I am SAP.</p><p>Get me my presale product demonstration software package.</p><p>No.  Wha ha ha!</p><p>Grr.  I'll just get my own presale product demonstration software package through the pre-trial discovery process.</p><p>But the presale product demonstration software package was MISSING.</p><p>*BLAM!*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SAP .
SAP get my presale product demonstration software package.I am SAP.Get me my presale product demonstration software package.No .
Wha ha ha ! Grr .
I 'll just get my own presale product demonstration software package through the pre-trial discovery process.But the presale product demonstration software package was MISSING. * BLAM !
*</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SAP.
SAP get my presale product demonstration software package.I am SAP.Get me my presale product demonstration software package.No.
Wha ha ha!Grr.
I'll just get my own presale product demonstration software package through the pre-trial discovery process.But the presale product demonstration software package was MISSING.*BLAM!
*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131211</id>
	<title>Re:Isn't Waste Management known as sleezy</title>
	<author>LaRoach</author>
	<datestamp>1243509540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Waste Management was caught cooking the books ala Enron, Worldcom, etc:

<a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/headlines/wastemgmt6.htm" title="sec.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.sec.gov/news/headlines/wastemgmt6.htm</a> [sec.gov]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Waste Management was caught cooking the books ala Enron , Worldcom , etc : http : //www.sec.gov/news/headlines/wastemgmt6.htm [ sec.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waste Management was caught cooking the books ala Enron, Worldcom, etc:

http://www.sec.gov/news/headlines/wastemgmt6.htm [sec.gov]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28133483</id>
	<title>Re:Failure to understand technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243521960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No... Waste Management has it. When SAP trashed/lost it (maybe because of the lawsuit), it was "transferred" to a landfill.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No... Waste Management has it .
When SAP trashed/lost it ( maybe because of the lawsuit ) , it was " transferred " to a landfill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No... Waste Management has it.
When SAP trashed/lost it (maybe because of the lawsuit), it was "transferred" to a landfill.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131135</id>
	<title>How?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243509240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can you "go" missing?  Missing is something you are or are not, not a place or activity.  How, unless you are a bad marksman, or are on the prowl for young ladies, can you "go" missing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you " go " missing ?
Missing is something you are or are not , not a place or activity .
How , unless you are a bad marksman , or are on the prowl for young ladies , can you " go " missing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you "go" missing?
Missing is something you are or are not, not a place or activity.
How, unless you are a bad marksman, or are on the prowl for young ladies, can you "go" missing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28134895</id>
	<title>Re:like every other sales demo</title>
	<author>jsebrech</author>
	<datestamp>1243533420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The company I work for also sells waste management solutions. The first time we sold it, we took a planning tool meant for building maintenance (repairing light bulbs and the like) and repurposed it. Even today the garbage trucks still have to be entered into the system as employees.</p><p>So, yeah, this is pretty common.</p><p>Then again, the users are very positive about our solution, which is apparently one of the easiest to use in the market. That says a lot about just how bad the niche enterprise software business is in general. People think those special-purpose apps are well-crafted, but because they're special purpose they usually are held to a much lower standard than consumer apps.</p><p>The most embarassing "enterprise" niche software product I've seen was a solution for patient transport in hospitals. It was written by a hobbyist, and I could have done a better job at 15 than that guy did. Still, they sold it for thousands of dollars a seat, and were apparently one of the key players in the patient transport business. Scary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The company I work for also sells waste management solutions .
The first time we sold it , we took a planning tool meant for building maintenance ( repairing light bulbs and the like ) and repurposed it .
Even today the garbage trucks still have to be entered into the system as employees.So , yeah , this is pretty common.Then again , the users are very positive about our solution , which is apparently one of the easiest to use in the market .
That says a lot about just how bad the niche enterprise software business is in general .
People think those special-purpose apps are well-crafted , but because they 're special purpose they usually are held to a much lower standard than consumer apps.The most embarassing " enterprise " niche software product I 've seen was a solution for patient transport in hospitals .
It was written by a hobbyist , and I could have done a better job at 15 than that guy did .
Still , they sold it for thousands of dollars a seat , and were apparently one of the key players in the patient transport business .
Scary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The company I work for also sells waste management solutions.
The first time we sold it, we took a planning tool meant for building maintenance (repairing light bulbs and the like) and repurposed it.
Even today the garbage trucks still have to be entered into the system as employees.So, yeah, this is pretty common.Then again, the users are very positive about our solution, which is apparently one of the easiest to use in the market.
That says a lot about just how bad the niche enterprise software business is in general.
People think those special-purpose apps are well-crafted, but because they're special purpose they usually are held to a much lower standard than consumer apps.The most embarassing "enterprise" niche software product I've seen was a solution for patient transport in hospitals.
It was written by a hobbyist, and I could have done a better job at 15 than that guy did.
Still, they sold it for thousands of dollars a seat, and were apparently one of the key players in the patient transport business.
Scary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28135043</id>
	<title>Re:Failure to understand technology</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1243534860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is like when I was downloading the ne acdc album of off someone, and noticed that he was downloading it from me as well. I messaged him and asked him what he was doing, he said "I'm getting back my ablum, asshole".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is like when I was downloading the ne acdc album of off someone , and noticed that he was downloading it from me as well .
I messaged him and asked him what he was doing , he said " I 'm getting back my ablum , asshole " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is like when I was downloading the ne acdc album of off someone, and noticed that he was downloading it from me as well.
I messaged him and asked him what he was doing, he said "I'm getting back my ablum, asshole".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131163</id>
	<title>Re:Isn't Waste Management known as sleezy</title>
	<author>tsalmark</author>
	<datestamp>1243509360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are both known to be Sleazy and Dirty. Dirty in different ways.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are both known to be Sleazy and Dirty .
Dirty in different ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are both known to be Sleazy and Dirty.
Dirty in different ways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131065</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131003</id>
	<title>Oh, oh, SAP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SAP... liquid cement... the firm that sold ERP to CEOs and turned thriving firms into basket cases by forcing wholesale moves to slow, cumbersome, slow-motion systems controlled by an elite of take-it-up-the-ass-and-weep consultants and partners? The firm that pioneered the creation of Euro 1,250 "consultants" who were newbies with sociology majors that had done three months of BAP and knew less about software than a E-scoring CompSci major.  The firm that pushed for software patents in Europe because they swallowed the cool aid and were too pussy to compete against FOSS?  And finally someone sued them?  Where do I donate to the attack fund?  God, I *hate* SAP.  Bastards, long overdue against the wall.  Utter, utter bastards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SAP... liquid cement... the firm that sold ERP to CEOs and turned thriving firms into basket cases by forcing wholesale moves to slow , cumbersome , slow-motion systems controlled by an elite of take-it-up-the-ass-and-weep consultants and partners ?
The firm that pioneered the creation of Euro 1,250 " consultants " who were newbies with sociology majors that had done three months of BAP and knew less about software than a E-scoring CompSci major .
The firm that pushed for software patents in Europe because they swallowed the cool aid and were too pussy to compete against FOSS ?
And finally someone sued them ?
Where do I donate to the attack fund ?
God , I * hate * SAP .
Bastards , long overdue against the wall .
Utter , utter bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SAP... liquid cement... the firm that sold ERP to CEOs and turned thriving firms into basket cases by forcing wholesale moves to slow, cumbersome, slow-motion systems controlled by an elite of take-it-up-the-ass-and-weep consultants and partners?
The firm that pioneered the creation of Euro 1,250 "consultants" who were newbies with sociology majors that had done three months of BAP and knew less about software than a E-scoring CompSci major.
The firm that pushed for software patents in Europe because they swallowed the cool aid and were too pussy to compete against FOSS?
And finally someone sued them?
Where do I donate to the attack fund?
God, I *hate* SAP.
Bastards, long overdue against the wall.
Utter, utter bastards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130899</id>
	<title>SAP reply was to waste management...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in reference to cleaning up this mess...</p><p>"Can't someone else do it?"</p><p>Waste management was not amused.</p><p>3 points for the reference.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in reference to cleaning up this mess... " Ca n't someone else do it ?
" Waste management was not amused.3 points for the reference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in reference to cleaning up this mess..."Can't someone else do it?
"Waste management was not amused.3 points for the reference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131499</id>
	<title>Re:like every other sales demo</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1243511100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure that I see "incompetence" stamped all over this.  On BOTH sides.  WM is so impompetent, that they need software to manage their company.  Software is no replacement for managerial skills.  SAP would have us believe that they are so incompetent that they only ever produced ONE COPY of a presentation software, with no backups.  And, they've lost it.</p><p>The judge needs to have all parties flogged and thrown in the frigging DUNGEON.  Feed them watery gruel for a year, let them out, and see if they are ready to proceed with a trial.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that I see " incompetence " stamped all over this .
On BOTH sides .
WM is so impompetent , that they need software to manage their company .
Software is no replacement for managerial skills .
SAP would have us believe that they are so incompetent that they only ever produced ONE COPY of a presentation software , with no backups .
And , they 've lost it.The judge needs to have all parties flogged and thrown in the frigging DUNGEON .
Feed them watery gruel for a year , let them out , and see if they are ready to proceed with a trial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure that I see "incompetence" stamped all over this.
On BOTH sides.
WM is so impompetent, that they need software to manage their company.
Software is no replacement for managerial skills.
SAP would have us believe that they are so incompetent that they only ever produced ONE COPY of a presentation software, with no backups.
And, they've lost it.The judge needs to have all parties flogged and thrown in the frigging DUNGEON.
Feed them watery gruel for a year, let them out, and see if they are ready to proceed with a trial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131059</id>
	<title>My legal opinion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243508820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Waste Management are a good old American business.  Whereas SAP are a German (nazi+evil) corporation (super evil), who are European (communist).</p><p>We find in favor of the plaintiff!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Waste Management are a good old American business .
Whereas SAP are a German ( nazi + evil ) corporation ( super evil ) , who are European ( communist ) .We find in favor of the plaintiff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Waste Management are a good old American business.
Whereas SAP are a German (nazi+evil) corporation (super evil), who are European (communist).We find in favor of the plaintiff!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28138203</id>
	<title>babies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243609080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could write them a full blown system for 20\% of what that piece of crap company SAP is charging and it would perform 10x better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could write them a full blown system for 20 \ % of what that piece of crap company SAP is charging and it would perform 10x better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could write them a full blown system for 20\% of what that piece of crap company SAP is charging and it would perform 10x better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28134905</id>
	<title>WHO/WHAT?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243533480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is SAP? Who made it?<br>Who is Waste Management?<br>Both the summary and the article ASSUME people know what each of those is,<br>and trying to google for such generic terms is useless</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is SAP ?
Who made it ? Who is Waste Management ? Both the summary and the article ASSUME people know what each of those is,and trying to google for such generic terms is useless</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is SAP?
Who made it?Who is Waste Management?Both the summary and the article ASSUME people know what each of those is,and trying to google for such generic terms is useless</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131489</id>
	<title>Re:like every other sales demo</title>
	<author>dave562</author>
	<datestamp>1243511040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty much.  I worked for a consulting company, and one of our clients needed a system to manage their manufacturing and distribution processes.  Developing a system like that was far beyond the scope of our ability, but we developed the needs analysis (documented all of their internal processes, etc) and helped them shop for vendors.  We eventually narrowed it down to Epicor and the Epicor sales staff of course promised everything under the heavens... then signed a contract committing to their promises.  A year and a half later, when the product STILL wasn't working, the client sued Epicor for breach of contract.  We were in the clear because we just did the needs analysis, and we didn't know that Epicor was full of crap.</p><p>It seems like there are two worlds, the ideal world, and the real world.  In the ideal world, you can purchase an off the shelf software package that supports all of your business processes.  In the real world, you find something that comes as close as possible, and then modify the way you do business... or, you hire programmers/farm out the programming work to customize the hell out of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much .
I worked for a consulting company , and one of our clients needed a system to manage their manufacturing and distribution processes .
Developing a system like that was far beyond the scope of our ability , but we developed the needs analysis ( documented all of their internal processes , etc ) and helped them shop for vendors .
We eventually narrowed it down to Epicor and the Epicor sales staff of course promised everything under the heavens... then signed a contract committing to their promises .
A year and a half later , when the product STILL was n't working , the client sued Epicor for breach of contract .
We were in the clear because we just did the needs analysis , and we did n't know that Epicor was full of crap.It seems like there are two worlds , the ideal world , and the real world .
In the ideal world , you can purchase an off the shelf software package that supports all of your business processes .
In the real world , you find something that comes as close as possible , and then modify the way you do business... or , you hire programmers/farm out the programming work to customize the hell out of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much.
I worked for a consulting company, and one of our clients needed a system to manage their manufacturing and distribution processes.
Developing a system like that was far beyond the scope of our ability, but we developed the needs analysis (documented all of their internal processes, etc) and helped them shop for vendors.
We eventually narrowed it down to Epicor and the Epicor sales staff of course promised everything under the heavens... then signed a contract committing to their promises.
A year and a half later, when the product STILL wasn't working, the client sued Epicor for breach of contract.
We were in the clear because we just did the needs analysis, and we didn't know that Epicor was full of crap.It seems like there are two worlds, the ideal world, and the real world.
In the ideal world, you can purchase an off the shelf software package that supports all of your business processes.
In the real world, you find something that comes as close as possible, and then modify the way you do business... or, you hire programmers/farm out the programming work to customize the hell out of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131049</id>
	<title>HMMMM . . .</title>
	<author>arizwebfoot</author>
	<datestamp>1243508820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you suppose Waste Management is going to try and "trash" SAP?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you suppose Waste Management is going to try and " trash " SAP ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you suppose Waste Management is going to try and "trash" SAP?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130925</id>
	<title>Hahahaha</title>
	<author>goldaryn</author>
	<datestamp>1243508400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hahahaha<br>
<br>
<i>In response to Waste Management's complaint, SAP has said in part that the company failed to "timely and accurately define its business requirements" and did not supply "sufficient, knowledgeable, decision-empowered users and managers"</i> <br>
<br>
Not "decision-empowered".. good way of saying brainless lusers. I like it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hahahaha In response to Waste Management 's complaint , SAP has said in part that the company failed to " timely and accurately define its business requirements " and did not supply " sufficient , knowledgeable , decision-empowered users and managers " Not " decision-empowered " .. good way of saying brainless lusers .
I like it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hahahaha

In response to Waste Management's complaint, SAP has said in part that the company failed to "timely and accurately define its business requirements" and did not supply "sufficient, knowledgeable, decision-empowered users and managers" 

Not "decision-empowered".. good way of saying brainless lusers.
I like it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28132575
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131211
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131489
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28135043
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28137995
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131179
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28133483
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28134895
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131163
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131065
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131799
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131135
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131197
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130909
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2143219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131499
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28135477
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131049
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130909
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131179
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131197
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131003
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131191
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28135043
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28137995
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28133483
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131135
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131799
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131059
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130871
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28134895
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131489
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131499
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28133207
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131193
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130925
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131023
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131029
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131017
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131065
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131211
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28132575
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28131163
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2143219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2143219.28130881
</commentlist>
</conversation>
