<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_28_2044224</id>
	<title>SourceForge To Acquire Development Portal Ohloh.net</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1243500840000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>SourceForge, Inc. (parent company of Slashdot, and the corporate overlord of SourceForge.net and ThinkGeek) <a href="http://ir.corp.sourceforge.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=82629&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1293491&amp;highlight=">announced today plans</a> to purchase Ohloh, a three-year-old Seattle company that runs <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/">Ohloh.net, a software-development portal</a> that specializes in the community aspects of distributed open source projects. The purchase will probably be final as of next month. (I hope no one requires that I show up to an office, just because one will be nearby.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>SourceForge , Inc. ( parent company of Slashdot , and the corporate overlord of SourceForge.net and ThinkGeek ) announced today plans to purchase Ohloh , a three-year-old Seattle company that runs Ohloh.net , a software-development portal that specializes in the community aspects of distributed open source projects .
The purchase will probably be final as of next month .
( I hope no one requires that I show up to an office , just because one will be nearby .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SourceForge, Inc. (parent company of Slashdot, and the corporate overlord of SourceForge.net and ThinkGeek) announced today plans to purchase Ohloh, a three-year-old Seattle company that runs Ohloh.net, a software-development portal that specializes in the community aspects of distributed open source projects.
The purchase will probably be final as of next month.
(I hope no one requires that I show up to an office, just because one will be nearby.
)</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28133711</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1243523700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never heard of nimp before.  Being brave, I had to look.  Just tell everyone it's goatse with a different skin, along with browser hijack.</p><p>Oddly - I visited from a Linux desktop, but the Windows VM alarmed about a virus attack....  hmmmmm  I'm sure glad I didn't go there FROM Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never heard of nimp before .
Being brave , I had to look .
Just tell everyone it 's goatse with a different skin , along with browser hijack.Oddly - I visited from a Linux desktop , but the Windows VM alarmed about a virus attack.... hmmmmm I 'm sure glad I did n't go there FROM Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never heard of nimp before.
Being brave, I had to look.
Just tell everyone it's goatse with a different skin, along with browser hijack.Oddly - I visited from a Linux desktop, but the Windows VM alarmed about a virus attack....  hmmmmm  I'm sure glad I didn't go there FROM Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130613</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28273343</id>
	<title>Re:I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>Walter Carver</author>
	<datestamp>1244552400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Impressive!</p><p>But where did you find this number?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Impressive ! But where did you find this number ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impressive!But where did you find this number?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130349</id>
	<title>Re:I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1243505700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'd be surprised how quickly ad money can add up on popular websites. Plus Thinkgeek sells a lot of things and has a nice markup on some items.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd be surprised how quickly ad money can add up on popular websites .
Plus Thinkgeek sells a lot of things and has a nice markup on some items .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd be surprised how quickly ad money can add up on popular websites.
Plus Thinkgeek sells a lot of things and has a nice markup on some items.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130915</id>
	<title>Ruby stats</title>
	<author>splict</author>
	<datestamp>1243508280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting. The ruby metrics gave me a laugh. A steady rise around 2008 and a steady decline afterwards. Of course it isn't scientific data, but it does seem to coincide with the surge (and subsequent apathy) over Ruby on Rails by many developers.</p><p>No offense to the rubyists out there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting .
The ruby metrics gave me a laugh .
A steady rise around 2008 and a steady decline afterwards .
Of course it is n't scientific data , but it does seem to coincide with the surge ( and subsequent apathy ) over Ruby on Rails by many developers.No offense to the rubyists out there ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting.
The ruby metrics gave me a laugh.
A steady rise around 2008 and a steady decline afterwards.
Of course it isn't scientific data, but it does seem to coincide with the surge (and subsequent apathy) over Ruby on Rails by many developers.No offense to the rubyists out there ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130861</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>bjourne</author>
	<datestamp>1243508040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Um.. ohloh.net doesn't offer project hosting. It is a tool for analyzing statistics and creating reports about projects hosted on other sites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Um.. ohloh.net does n't offer project hosting .
It is a tool for analyzing statistics and creating reports about projects hosted on other sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um.. ohloh.net doesn't offer project hosting.
It is a tool for analyzing statistics and creating reports about projects hosted on other sites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28134931</id>
	<title>Re:I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>religious freak</author>
	<datestamp>1243533780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh, I'd say that displays their high cost structure.  You think they generate a ton of advertising revenue off of that?  Maybe they do, but I'm pretty skeptical - how many people really click through on the florescent shower head ad?<br> <br>
Sure, they make a few bucks, I'm just saying they probably don't make much.  But hell, either: 1) I'm wrong or 2) they're overextending themselves by making unneeded acquisitions, like plenty of other companies have done in the past.  But like I said, I hope I'm wrong and they're making buckets of money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , I 'd say that displays their high cost structure .
You think they generate a ton of advertising revenue off of that ?
Maybe they do , but I 'm pretty skeptical - how many people really click through on the florescent shower head ad ?
Sure , they make a few bucks , I 'm just saying they probably do n't make much .
But hell , either : 1 ) I 'm wrong or 2 ) they 're overextending themselves by making unneeded acquisitions , like plenty of other companies have done in the past .
But like I said , I hope I 'm wrong and they 're making buckets of money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, I'd say that displays their high cost structure.
You think they generate a ton of advertising revenue off of that?
Maybe they do, but I'm pretty skeptical - how many people really click through on the florescent shower head ad?
Sure, they make a few bucks, I'm just saying they probably don't make much.
But hell, either: 1) I'm wrong or 2) they're overextending themselves by making unneeded acquisitions, like plenty of other companies have done in the past.
But like I said, I hope I'm wrong and they're making buckets of money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132699</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131255</id>
	<title>Re:I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>Zapotek</author>
	<datestamp>1243509780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And they've also added an option to disable ads on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and I'm not a subscriber either. I already blocked them anyways...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And they 've also added an option to disable ads on / .
and I 'm not a subscriber either .
I already blocked them anyways.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And they've also added an option to disable ads on /.
and I'm not a subscriber either.
I already blocked them anyways...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28138583</id>
	<title>Re:Newsflash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243610700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>WHOOOOSH</htmltext>
<tokenext>WHOOOOSH</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHOOOOSH</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</id>
	<title>Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>Bacon Bits</author>
	<datestamp>1243505040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't really see this as a good thing.  In my experience many of the projects on Ohloh.net are there because the maintainers were unhappy or frustrated with problems they were having at SourceForge.  FileZilla, for example, kept complaining to SourceForge that the ads that showed up would always include download links to sites charging for download of FileZilla.</p><p>I suppose such projects will move to Google Code, but it's important to remember that choice is a good thing, and not everybody is happy with SourceForge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really see this as a good thing .
In my experience many of the projects on Ohloh.net are there because the maintainers were unhappy or frustrated with problems they were having at SourceForge .
FileZilla , for example , kept complaining to SourceForge that the ads that showed up would always include download links to sites charging for download of FileZilla.I suppose such projects will move to Google Code , but it 's important to remember that choice is a good thing , and not everybody is happy with SourceForge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really see this as a good thing.
In my experience many of the projects on Ohloh.net are there because the maintainers were unhappy or frustrated with problems they were having at SourceForge.
FileZilla, for example, kept complaining to SourceForge that the ads that showed up would always include download links to sites charging for download of FileZilla.I suppose such projects will move to Google Code, but it's important to remember that choice is a good thing, and not everybody is happy with SourceForge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131815</id>
	<title>Re:Ohloh's programming language chart is nice...</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1243512720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be nice, except that the output is complete nonsense.  It think, for example, that I am responsible for around 50K lines of Autoconf and 1K lines of D, when I have never committed anything in either language.  My statistics for C and C++ are correct now, but for a while it was counting all of my Objective-C headers as 'C/C++' not as Objective-C, giving a widely skewed result.  Because most of my Objective-C headers are documentation, it thought I had a comment ratio of almost 90\% for C/C++.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice , except that the output is complete nonsense .
It think , for example , that I am responsible for around 50K lines of Autoconf and 1K lines of D , when I have never committed anything in either language .
My statistics for C and C + + are correct now , but for a while it was counting all of my Objective-C headers as 'C/C + + ' not as Objective-C , giving a widely skewed result .
Because most of my Objective-C headers are documentation , it thought I had a comment ratio of almost 90 \ % for C/C + + .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice, except that the output is complete nonsense.
It think, for example, that I am responsible for around 50K lines of Autoconf and 1K lines of D, when I have never committed anything in either language.
My statistics for C and C++ are correct now, but for a while it was counting all of my Objective-C headers as 'C/C++' not as Objective-C, giving a widely skewed result.
Because most of my Objective-C headers are documentation, it thought I had a comment ratio of almost 90\% for C/C++.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130171</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28133291</id>
	<title>new features</title>
	<author>El\_Muerte\_TDS</author>
	<datestamp>1243520280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they finally start adding the popular feature requests. Like ignoring certain paths in a repository.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they finally start adding the popular feature requests .
Like ignoring certain paths in a repository .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they finally start adding the popular feature requests.
Like ignoring certain paths in a repository.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130727</id>
	<title>timothy, timothy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243507500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; announced today plans

Congratulations my sincere!</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; announced today plans Congratulations my sincere !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; announced today plans

Congratulations my sincere!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28133147</id>
	<title>Need I say it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243519440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh noh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh noh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh noh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130805</id>
	<title>Re:I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243507800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you checked out the prices on thinkgeek? There's your answer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you checked out the prices on thinkgeek ?
There 's your answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you checked out the prices on thinkgeek?
There's your answer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011</id>
	<title>I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243504500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How the hell do these guys make any money?  I mean, really...  The ads don't pay that much.  Good for them though, I'm hopeful they'll be able to keep it up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How the hell do these guys make any money ?
I mean , really... The ads do n't pay that much .
Good for them though , I 'm hopeful they 'll be able to keep it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How the hell do these guys make any money?
I mean, really...  The ads don't pay that much.
Good for them though, I'm hopeful they'll be able to keep it up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28142237</id>
	<title>Instead of ads, offer valuable content and...</title>
	<author>helpacoder</author>
	<datestamp>1243627920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ask for donations.</p><p>I've come to the conlusion that people HATE advertising hence all the blocking and hatred of content containing ads like 'adware'.</p><p>For 'small fry' not having large ad budgets to have ANY chance of earning money and not alienating your potential customers in this setting, 'tipware' seems to be the only way to go.</p><p>People are not interrupted by 3rd party advertisers and if the content offered has value and merit, people will support the creator financially.</p><p>If the audience pool is large enough, enough people will pay to make it all worthwhile.  Otherwise make your offerings available free as advertising for YOURSELF -- someone could contact you with paid work later if what you make available to them for free is worth it to them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ask for donations.I 've come to the conlusion that people HATE advertising hence all the blocking and hatred of content containing ads like 'adware'.For 'small fry ' not having large ad budgets to have ANY chance of earning money and not alienating your potential customers in this setting , 'tipware ' seems to be the only way to go.People are not interrupted by 3rd party advertisers and if the content offered has value and merit , people will support the creator financially.If the audience pool is large enough , enough people will pay to make it all worthwhile .
Otherwise make your offerings available free as advertising for YOURSELF -- someone could contact you with paid work later if what you make available to them for free is worth it to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ask for donations.I've come to the conlusion that people HATE advertising hence all the blocking and hatred of content containing ads like 'adware'.For 'small fry' not having large ad budgets to have ANY chance of earning money and not alienating your potential customers in this setting, 'tipware' seems to be the only way to go.People are not interrupted by 3rd party advertisers and if the content offered has value and merit, people will support the creator financially.If the audience pool is large enough, enough people will pay to make it all worthwhile.
Otherwise make your offerings available free as advertising for YOURSELF -- someone could contact you with paid work later if what you make available to them for free is worth it to them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130349</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130199</id>
	<title>Congratulations!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243505220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations to SourceForge for their triumphant acquisition of Ohloh.net.  Have some delicious and moist cake to celebrate with those of us still alive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations to SourceForge for their triumphant acquisition of Ohloh.net .
Have some delicious and moist cake to celebrate with those of us still alive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations to SourceForge for their triumphant acquisition of Ohloh.net.
Have some delicious and moist cake to celebrate with those of us still alive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132699</id>
	<title>Re:I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243517100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>400000 visitors, an hour.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>400000 visitors , an hour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>400000 visitors, an hour.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131295</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243510080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I hate most about SourceForge is when you search for an open source project and get handed the link to its SourceForge page rather than its actual web page.</p><p>Gods damn it, if it wanted to browse the CVS or any of that crap, I would have found my way there eventually. Most of the time, I just want to find out what the application is all about and *then* go poking around the source or download the software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I hate most about SourceForge is when you search for an open source project and get handed the link to its SourceForge page rather than its actual web page.Gods damn it , if it wanted to browse the CVS or any of that crap , I would have found my way there eventually .
Most of the time , I just want to find out what the application is all about and * then * go poking around the source or download the software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I hate most about SourceForge is when you search for an open source project and get handed the link to its SourceForge page rather than its actual web page.Gods damn it, if it wanted to browse the CVS or any of that crap, I would have found my way there eventually.
Most of the time, I just want to find out what the application is all about and *then* go poking around the source or download the software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130771</id>
	<title>Just curious ..</title>
	<author>THEbwana</author>
	<datestamp>1243507680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where are their servers located ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. would be interesting to know, due to various regional annoyances such as the DMCA, opposition to open versions of DeCSS etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where are their servers located ?
.. would be interesting to know , due to various regional annoyances such as the DMCA , opposition to open versions of DeCSS etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where are their servers located ?
.. would be interesting to know, due to various regional annoyances such as the DMCA, opposition to open versions of DeCSS etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130817</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1243507860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I suppose such projects will move to Google Code, but it's important to remember that choice is a good thing, and not everybody is happy with SourceForge."</p><p>I was thinking the same thing. You see more and more projects (a lot of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET stuff though) at code.google.com. I'm glad to hear that they have no intention of giving up the ghost.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I suppose such projects will move to Google Code , but it 's important to remember that choice is a good thing , and not everybody is happy with SourceForge .
" I was thinking the same thing .
You see more and more projects ( a lot of .NET stuff though ) at code.google.com .
I 'm glad to hear that they have no intention of giving up the ghost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I suppose such projects will move to Google Code, but it's important to remember that choice is a good thing, and not everybody is happy with SourceForge.
"I was thinking the same thing.
You see more and more projects (a lot of .NET stuff though) at code.google.com.
I'm glad to hear that they have no intention of giving up the ghost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132093</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243514100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>FileZilla, for example, kept complaining to SourceForge that the ads that showed up would always include download links to sites charging for download of FileZilla.</p></div><p>FileZilla is GPL'ed. As long as those selling the program respect the GPL, I fail to see the problem.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FileZilla , for example , kept complaining to SourceForge that the ads that showed up would always include download links to sites charging for download of FileZilla.FileZilla is GPL'ed .
As long as those selling the program respect the GPL , I fail to see the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FileZilla, for example, kept complaining to SourceForge that the ads that showed up would always include download links to sites charging for download of FileZilla.FileZilla is GPL'ed.
As long as those selling the program respect the GPL, I fail to see the problem.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130735</id>
	<title>ahwell..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243507500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time to delete my info off of ohloh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to delete my info off of ohloh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to delete my info off of ohloh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130613</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243506780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had no idea that ohloh hosted open source projects. My only exposure to them has been in the form of those annoying animated GIFs that display ohloh statistics on some open source project pages (typically hosted elsewhere).<br>I hated those so much that one of the two explicit blocks in my Privoxy user.action file was "www.ohloh.net/projects/\d+/badge\_js". To put that in perspective, the other block was for ".on.nimp.org".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had no idea that ohloh hosted open source projects .
My only exposure to them has been in the form of those annoying animated GIFs that display ohloh statistics on some open source project pages ( typically hosted elsewhere ) .I hated those so much that one of the two explicit blocks in my Privoxy user.action file was " www.ohloh.net/projects/ \ d + /badge \ _js " .
To put that in perspective , the other block was for " .on.nimp.org " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had no idea that ohloh hosted open source projects.
My only exposure to them has been in the form of those annoying animated GIFs that display ohloh statistics on some open source project pages (typically hosted elsewhere).I hated those so much that one of the two explicit blocks in my Privoxy user.action file was "www.ohloh.net/projects/\d+/badge\_js".
To put that in perspective, the other block was for ".on.nimp.org".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130593</id>
	<title>by acquire we mean...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243506720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i've heard of a few companies acquiring other companies of late.  the kind of acquiring where one company says to the other, we'll give you jobs because it saves you from going broke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 've heard of a few companies acquiring other companies of late .
the kind of acquiring where one company says to the other , we 'll give you jobs because it saves you from going broke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i've heard of a few companies acquiring other companies of late.
the kind of acquiring where one company says to the other, we'll give you jobs because it saves you from going broke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130725</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>TinBromide</author>
	<datestamp>1243507500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>For some reason, (and i could be wrong) but it feels like the people who run thinkgeek, slashdot, and other sites under the umbrella may have a bit of autonomy as to how they run things. While yes, there will always be corporate mandates handed down from on high (DO THIS!), perhaps the ohloh.net managers will realize that how sourceforge does their ads was costing them big projects and would resist change as good nerds should. <br> <br>Then again, I am an eternal optimist that likes to hope for the best, you don't gain anything by ignoring the best or the worst, but if you plan for rainy days but hope you never have to use the plan, you can sleep at night without nightmares.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For some reason , ( and i could be wrong ) but it feels like the people who run thinkgeek , slashdot , and other sites under the umbrella may have a bit of autonomy as to how they run things .
While yes , there will always be corporate mandates handed down from on high ( DO THIS !
) , perhaps the ohloh.net managers will realize that how sourceforge does their ads was costing them big projects and would resist change as good nerds should .
Then again , I am an eternal optimist that likes to hope for the best , you do n't gain anything by ignoring the best or the worst , but if you plan for rainy days but hope you never have to use the plan , you can sleep at night without nightmares .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some reason, (and i could be wrong) but it feels like the people who run thinkgeek, slashdot, and other sites under the umbrella may have a bit of autonomy as to how they run things.
While yes, there will always be corporate mandates handed down from on high (DO THIS!
), perhaps the ohloh.net managers will realize that how sourceforge does their ads was costing them big projects and would resist change as good nerds should.
Then again, I am an eternal optimist that likes to hope for the best, you don't gain anything by ignoring the best or the worst, but if you plan for rainy days but hope you never have to use the plan, you can sleep at night without nightmares.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132375</id>
	<title>Re:I love slashdot, but...</title>
	<author>Samah</author>
	<datestamp>1243515480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Good for them though, I'm hopeful they'll be able to keep it up.</p></div><p>They just need to get someone to start a project called OpenViagra.<br>
Either that or start reading spam emails.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good for them though , I 'm hopeful they 'll be able to keep it up.They just need to get someone to start a project called OpenViagra .
Either that or start reading spam emails .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good for them though, I'm hopeful they'll be able to keep it up.They just need to get someone to start a project called OpenViagra.
Either that or start reading spam emails.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130293</id>
	<title>I was worried</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243505460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was worried this was going to be yet another one of those useful openey sourcey things that was held back by a bad name. I guess bing was taken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was worried this was going to be yet another one of those useful openey sourcey things that was held back by a bad name .
I guess bing was taken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was worried this was going to be yet another one of those useful openey sourcey things that was held back by a bad name.
I guess bing was taken.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28137277</id>
	<title>Lines Of Code</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243604160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Using Lines Of Code as an estimate of a project value is just complete bullshit, and Ohloh even provides a widget for spreading such bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Using Lines Of Code as an estimate of a project value is just complete bullshit , and Ohloh even provides a widget for spreading such bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Using Lines Of Code as an estimate of a project value is just complete bullshit, and Ohloh even provides a widget for spreading such bullshit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131235</id>
	<title>Newsflash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243509660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(I hope no one requires that I show up to an office, just because one will be nearby.)</p></div><p>Newsflash: We don't care. That's your personal fear and issue that really is best left off the front page.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( I hope no one requires that I show up to an office , just because one will be nearby .
) Newsflash : We do n't care .
That 's your personal fear and issue that really is best left off the front page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(I hope no one requires that I show up to an office, just because one will be nearby.
)Newsflash: We don't care.
That's your personal fear and issue that really is best left off the front page.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130171</id>
	<title>Ohloh's programming language chart is nice...</title>
	<author>tcopeland</author>
	<datestamp>1243505160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...it shows a <a href="http://www.ohloh.net/languages/compare?measure=commits&amp;percent=&amp;l0=c&amp;l1=java&amp;l2=objective\_c&amp;l3=python&amp;l4=ruby&amp;l5=-1&amp;commit=Update" title="ohloh.net">breakdown of commits by language</a> [ohloh.net]; interesting stuff.  Of course, the sample is limited to the projects they're tracking, and the metric - number of commits - is affected by the source code mgmt tool's idioms.  Still, nice AJAXy-ness.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...it shows a breakdown of commits by language [ ohloh.net ] ; interesting stuff .
Of course , the sample is limited to the projects they 're tracking , and the metric - number of commits - is affected by the source code mgmt tool 's idioms .
Still , nice AJAXy-ness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...it shows a breakdown of commits by language [ohloh.net]; interesting stuff.
Of course, the sample is limited to the projects they're tracking, and the metric - number of commits - is affected by the source code mgmt tool's idioms.
Still, nice AJAXy-ness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28139053</id>
	<title>Re:Newsflash</title>
	<author>sgt scrub</author>
	<datestamp>1243612980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>We don't care.</i><br>Not true.  If timothy starts wearing ties, <a href="http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&amp;q=mens+suits&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ei=BPkfSsjMHJjuMoKfrZ8J&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=product\_result\_group&amp;resnum=1&amp;ct=title" title="google.com">or worse</a> [google.com], where does that leave the rest of us?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't care.Not true .
If timothy starts wearing ties , or worse [ google.com ] , where does that leave the rest of us ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't care.Not true.
If timothy starts wearing ties, or worse [google.com], where does that leave the rest of us?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131235</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28146681</id>
	<title>Re:Not a Good Thing</title>
	<author>Spugglefink</author>
	<datestamp>1243612860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ohloh.net provides metrics, and the projects that are listed there are there because someone found them interesting enough to be worth tracking.  They don't host projects.  You imply that projects have left SourceForge for Ohloh to wind up "there" but that's nonsense.  Ohloh tracks projects that are hosted all over the place.  They don't host anything themselves.  This is complete nonsense, and the people who modded you +5 "Insightful" clearly have no clue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ohloh.net provides metrics , and the projects that are listed there are there because someone found them interesting enough to be worth tracking .
They do n't host projects .
You imply that projects have left SourceForge for Ohloh to wind up " there " but that 's nonsense .
Ohloh tracks projects that are hosted all over the place .
They do n't host anything themselves .
This is complete nonsense , and the people who modded you + 5 " Insightful " clearly have no clue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ohloh.net provides metrics, and the projects that are listed there are there because someone found them interesting enough to be worth tracking.
They don't host projects.
You imply that projects have left SourceForge for Ohloh to wind up "there" but that's nonsense.
Ohloh tracks projects that are hosted all over the place.
They don't host anything themselves.
This is complete nonsense, and the people who modded you +5 "Insightful" clearly have no clue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28138999</id>
	<title>freshmeat.net'ish site</title>
	<author>sgt scrub</author>
	<datestamp>1243612800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never heard of them. It looks like they are basically the same thing as freshmeat.net but with statistics tools for projects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never heard of them .
It looks like they are basically the same thing as freshmeat.net but with statistics tools for projects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never heard of them.
It looks like they are basically the same thing as freshmeat.net but with statistics tools for projects.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131295
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28273343
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130725
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131815
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28142237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130349
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130817
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28133711
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130613
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28139053
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130805
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130861
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28134931
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132699
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131255
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130915
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130171
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28138583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131235
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_2044224_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28146681
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2044224.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130199
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2044224.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130011
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130805
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131255
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132699
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28134931
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28273343
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130349
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28142237
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2044224.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130171
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131815
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130915
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2044224.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130149
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28132093
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130725
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28146681
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131295
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130861
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130817
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130613
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28133711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2044224.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28131235
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28139053
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28138583
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_2044224.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_2044224.28130771
</commentlist>
</conversation>
