<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_28_1912226</id>
	<title>Google's "Wave" Blurs Chat, Email, Collaboration Software</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1243538400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:superglaze@hotmail.com" rel="nofollow">superglaze</a> writes <i>"Google has unveiled a distributed, P2P-based <a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39657141,00.htm">collaboration and conversation platform called Wave</a>. Developers are being invited to join an open source project that has been formed to create a Google Wave Federation Protocol, which will underlie the system. Anyone will be able to create a 'wave,' which is a type of hosted conversation, Google has said. Waves will essentially incorporate real-time dialogue, photos, videos, maps, documents and other information forms within a single, shared communications space. Developers can also work on embedding waves into websites, or creating multimedia robots and gadgets that can be incorporated within the Google Wave client."</i> Jamie points out this <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-wave.html">more informative link</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>superglaze writes " Google has unveiled a distributed , P2P-based collaboration and conversation platform called Wave .
Developers are being invited to join an open source project that has been formed to create a Google Wave Federation Protocol , which will underlie the system .
Anyone will be able to create a 'wave, ' which is a type of hosted conversation , Google has said .
Waves will essentially incorporate real-time dialogue , photos , videos , maps , documents and other information forms within a single , shared communications space .
Developers can also work on embedding waves into websites , or creating multimedia robots and gadgets that can be incorporated within the Google Wave client .
" Jamie points out this more informative link .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>superglaze writes "Google has unveiled a distributed, P2P-based collaboration and conversation platform called Wave.
Developers are being invited to join an open source project that has been formed to create a Google Wave Federation Protocol, which will underlie the system.
Anyone will be able to create a 'wave,' which is a type of hosted conversation, Google has said.
Waves will essentially incorporate real-time dialogue, photos, videos, maps, documents and other information forms within a single, shared communications space.
Developers can also work on embedding waves into websites, or creating multimedia robots and gadgets that can be incorporated within the Google Wave client.
" Jamie points out this more informative link.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28148051</id>
	<title>Re:Public warning</title>
	<author>curunir</author>
	<datestamp>1243676940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm assuming this is a reference to Chrome, so I thought I'd share what one of the Chrome developers said in his talk about Chrome's internals at the same conference where Wave was unveiled. Someone asked the Mac/Linux question and the answer can be summed up in 5 letters...NPAPI. As explained, NPAPI is fairly windows specific and comprised a huge chunk of the engineering effort to get the Windows version of Chrome out to the public. But given that the Windows solution is almost entirely non-portable, they'll need similar efforts for Mac and/or Linux, and even Google has resource limits.</p><p>It's been felt that releasing Chrome without plugin support would be confusing to users and make Chrome look bad, so they're waiting until they've finished plugin support before releasing official Chrome builds for non-Windows platforms. But he also mentioned that the latest Chromium builds work on Linux and Mac, so people are free to grab the code and build it themselves. There just won't be support for plugins (which, in the eyes of many Slashdotters, could be an improvement over the Windows version<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>The other interesting tidbit was over the frequently scorned anonymous usage data string that Chrome sends along to Google quite frequently. While there's probably no way of verifying it, it was explained that that anonymous usage data gets analyzed to allow other Chrome users to pre-fetch DNS results of likely sites that a user will visit when viewing a page. For instance, a Chrome user's browser, when viewing this Slashdot story, may perform a DNS lookup of news.zdnet.co.uk since a significant percentage of the Slashdot readership has actually clicked through to the article (...insert bad joke about no one ever reading the articles here...)</p><p>Like I said, I'm not sure this can be verified, but it's a least a plausible explanation for why they try to collect that data. Given how fanatical Google tends to be over performance, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. But hey...I'm a bit pre-disposed to like them after the free phone surprise, so others may feel otherwise.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm assuming this is a reference to Chrome , so I thought I 'd share what one of the Chrome developers said in his talk about Chrome 's internals at the same conference where Wave was unveiled .
Someone asked the Mac/Linux question and the answer can be summed up in 5 letters...NPAPI .
As explained , NPAPI is fairly windows specific and comprised a huge chunk of the engineering effort to get the Windows version of Chrome out to the public .
But given that the Windows solution is almost entirely non-portable , they 'll need similar efforts for Mac and/or Linux , and even Google has resource limits.It 's been felt that releasing Chrome without plugin support would be confusing to users and make Chrome look bad , so they 're waiting until they 've finished plugin support before releasing official Chrome builds for non-Windows platforms .
But he also mentioned that the latest Chromium builds work on Linux and Mac , so people are free to grab the code and build it themselves .
There just wo n't be support for plugins ( which , in the eyes of many Slashdotters , could be an improvement over the Windows version ; - ) The other interesting tidbit was over the frequently scorned anonymous usage data string that Chrome sends along to Google quite frequently .
While there 's probably no way of verifying it , it was explained that that anonymous usage data gets analyzed to allow other Chrome users to pre-fetch DNS results of likely sites that a user will visit when viewing a page .
For instance , a Chrome user 's browser , when viewing this Slashdot story , may perform a DNS lookup of news.zdnet.co.uk since a significant percentage of the Slashdot readership has actually clicked through to the article ( ...insert bad joke about no one ever reading the articles here... ) Like I said , I 'm not sure this can be verified , but it 's a least a plausible explanation for why they try to collect that data .
Given how fanatical Google tends to be over performance , I 'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt .
But hey...I 'm a bit pre-disposed to like them after the free phone surprise , so others may feel otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm assuming this is a reference to Chrome, so I thought I'd share what one of the Chrome developers said in his talk about Chrome's internals at the same conference where Wave was unveiled.
Someone asked the Mac/Linux question and the answer can be summed up in 5 letters...NPAPI.
As explained, NPAPI is fairly windows specific and comprised a huge chunk of the engineering effort to get the Windows version of Chrome out to the public.
But given that the Windows solution is almost entirely non-portable, they'll need similar efforts for Mac and/or Linux, and even Google has resource limits.It's been felt that releasing Chrome without plugin support would be confusing to users and make Chrome look bad, so they're waiting until they've finished plugin support before releasing official Chrome builds for non-Windows platforms.
But he also mentioned that the latest Chromium builds work on Linux and Mac, so people are free to grab the code and build it themselves.
There just won't be support for plugins (which, in the eyes of many Slashdotters, could be an improvement over the Windows version ;-)The other interesting tidbit was over the frequently scorned anonymous usage data string that Chrome sends along to Google quite frequently.
While there's probably no way of verifying it, it was explained that that anonymous usage data gets analyzed to allow other Chrome users to pre-fetch DNS results of likely sites that a user will visit when viewing a page.
For instance, a Chrome user's browser, when viewing this Slashdot story, may perform a DNS lookup of news.zdnet.co.uk since a significant percentage of the Slashdot readership has actually clicked through to the article (...insert bad joke about no one ever reading the articles here...)Like I said, I'm not sure this can be verified, but it's a least a plausible explanation for why they try to collect that data.
Given how fanatical Google tends to be over performance, I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
But hey...I'm a bit pre-disposed to like them after the free phone surprise, so others may feel otherwise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133441</id>
	<title>Re:Photophlow</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1243521480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You use safe search?  You must be part of that Australian censorship cult........</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You use safe search ?
You must be part of that Australian censorship cult....... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You use safe search?
You must be part of that Australian censorship cult........</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129531</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131555</id>
	<title>FYI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243511340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.basecamphq.com/" title="basecamphq.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.basecamphq.com/</a> [basecamphq.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.basecamphq.com/ [ basecamphq.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.basecamphq.com/ [basecamphq.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503</id>
	<title>Public warning</title>
	<author>suffix tree monkey</author>
	<datestamp>1243542420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make the client Windows-only again and you'll feel my wrath!</p><p>(Reply by Google: What are you going to do, quit gmail? Ouch! )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make the client Windows-only again and you 'll feel my wrath !
( Reply by Google : What are you going to do , quit gmail ?
Ouch ! )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make the client Windows-only again and you'll feel my wrath!
(Reply by Google: What are you going to do, quit gmail?
Ouch! )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128699</id>
	<title>Gmail</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Barely <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/28/1236240" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">out of beta</a> [slashdot.org], and now it's obsolete.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Barely out of beta [ slashdot.org ] , and now it 's obsolete .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barely out of beta [slashdot.org], and now it's obsolete.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28170027</id>
	<title>Re:Google is also...</title>
	<author>dzfoo</author>
	<datestamp>1243879740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; <i>which will be the same service with different properties.</i></p><p>Except for the new LightWave(tm) protocol, which will have features of both the Wave and Particle protocols.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; -dZ.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; which will be the same service with different properties.Except for the new LightWave ( tm ) protocol , which will have features of both the Wave and Particle protocols .
        -dZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; which will be the same service with different properties.Except for the new LightWave(tm) protocol, which will have features of both the Wave and Particle protocols.
        -dZ.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129449</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133425</id>
	<title>Re:First one to Make a Lame Wave Joke Loses</title>
	<author>professorflipwig</author>
	<datestamp>1243521360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We will end up with a history teacher making one of these things and using it to emulate Nazi Germany in the classroom without the students' knowlage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We will end up with a history teacher making one of these things and using it to emulate Nazi Germany in the classroom without the students ' knowlage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We will end up with a history teacher making one of these things and using it to emulate Nazi Germany in the classroom without the students' knowlage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129005</id>
	<title>Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oi Google, Google, give us a Wave
Give us a Waaaaave

Google, Google give us a Wave
Give us a Waaaaave

Rraaaaaaaaaayyyyyy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oi Google , Google , give us a Wave Give us a Waaaaave Google , Google give us a Wave Give us a Waaaaave Rraaaaaaaaaayyyyyy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oi Google, Google, give us a Wave
Give us a Waaaaave

Google, Google give us a Wave
Give us a Waaaaave

Rraaaaaaaaaayyyyyy!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129945</id>
	<title>Re:quite needed...</title>
	<author>KevinColyer</author>
	<datestamp>1243504320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely, I needed this just the other week.</p><p>Personally I wsould take the Alpha right now!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely , I needed this just the other week.Personally I wsould take the Alpha right now !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely, I needed this just the other week.Personally I wsould take the Alpha right now!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013</id>
	<title>quite needed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>i cant wait for this app... its so hard for people on tight budgets to collaborate on projects due to the high software costs... sure one can argue that there are many free alternatives out there but there really isn't anyone that has it quite right yet. One on one collaborations are okay but it is still quite impossible to have a decent meeting on line if you have three people or more, for free...</htmltext>
<tokenext>i cant wait for this app... its so hard for people on tight budgets to collaborate on projects due to the high software costs... sure one can argue that there are many free alternatives out there but there really is n't anyone that has it quite right yet .
One on one collaborations are okay but it is still quite impossible to have a decent meeting on line if you have three people or more , for free.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i cant wait for this app... its so hard for people on tight budgets to collaborate on projects due to the high software costs... sure one can argue that there are many free alternatives out there but there really isn't anyone that has it quite right yet.
One on one collaborations are okay but it is still quite impossible to have a decent meeting on line if you have three people or more, for free...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129449</id>
	<title>Google is also...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243502280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google is also introducing the new service "Particle" which will be the same service with different properties.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is also introducing the new service " Particle " which will be the same service with different properties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is also introducing the new service "Particle" which will be the same service with different properties.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129793</id>
	<title>man, I love Google.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will be another great step into freedom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be another great step into freedom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be another great step into freedom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28139713</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect...</title>
	<author>magister159</author>
	<datestamp>1243616400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm going to write a dice throwing app.</p></div><p>Roll the dice to see if I'm getting drunk!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm going to write a dice throwing app.Roll the dice to see if I 'm getting drunk !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm going to write a dice throwing app.Roll the dice to see if I'm getting drunk!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491</id>
	<title>Perfect...</title>
	<author>GypC</author>
	<datestamp>1243542360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>for PNP RPGs!!!

I'm going to write a dice throwing app.

God, I'm a nerd.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-\</htmltext>
<tokenext>for PNP RPGs ! ! !
I 'm going to write a dice throwing app .
God , I 'm a nerd .
: - \</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for PNP RPGs!!!
I'm going to write a dice throwing app.
God, I'm a nerd.
:-\</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28183793</id>
	<title>Re:Firefly</title>
	<author>Elwood P Dowd</author>
	<datestamp>1243963140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And did everyone see the "curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal" error message that popped up in the lower right when the demo crashed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And did everyone see the " curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal " error message that popped up in the lower right when the demo crashed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And did everyone see the "curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal" error message that popped up in the lower right when the demo crashed?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129115</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133373</id>
	<title>Re:Public warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243520940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Make me write 10k+ line programs in jscript and you'll feel mine!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Make me write 10k + line programs in jscript and you 'll feel mine ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make me write 10k+ line programs in jscript and you'll feel mine!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129523</id>
	<title>Re:Public warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243502520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Make the client Windows-only again and you'll feel my wrath!</p><p>(Reply by Google: <b>We know where you live.</b> )</p></div><p>Fixed that for you.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Make the client Windows-only again and you 'll feel my wrath !
( Reply by Google : We know where you live .
) Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make the client Windows-only again and you'll feel my wrath!
(Reply by Google: We know where you live.
)Fixed that for you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128899</id>
	<title>wave.google.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243543620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://wave.google.com</p><p>HURR I AM SLASHDOT EDTOR me mash keys 4 u lol micro\%ft suks lol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //wave.google.comHURR I AM SLASHDOT EDTOR me mash keys 4 u lol micro \ % ft suks lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://wave.google.comHURR I AM SLASHDOT EDTOR me mash keys 4 u lol micro\%ft suks lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131305</id>
	<title>Synapse!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243510140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm gad to see that Garry Winston at NURV has finally launched Synapse!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm gad to see that Garry Winston at NURV has finally launched Synapse !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm gad to see that Garry Winston at NURV has finally launched Synapse!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133535</id>
	<title>Saw this movie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243522320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't this the software they were developing in the film Anti-Trust? I think it was called Synapts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't this the software they were developing in the film Anti-Trust ?
I think it was called Synapts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't this the software they were developing in the film Anti-Trust?
I think it was called Synapts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130023</id>
	<title>Easier!</title>
	<author>Pahroza</author>
	<datestamp>1243504560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Great, nothing like a good wave to help get some height.&nbsp; Should make it considerably easier to jump the shark with.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , nothing like a good wave to help get some height.   Should make it considerably easier to jump the shark with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, nothing like a good wave to help get some height.  Should make it considerably easier to jump the shark with.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28157787</id>
	<title>Re:Windows Only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243780920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The demo'd it on a Mac</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The demo 'd it on a Mac</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The demo'd it on a Mac</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128437</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28138981</id>
	<title>Re:Windows Only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243612620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I do now some online services that are IE only, and therefore windows only</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I do now some online services that are IE only , and therefore windows only</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I do now some online services that are IE only, and therefore windows only</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131283</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129433</id>
	<title>Messyboard anyone?</title>
	<author>Eharley</author>
	<datestamp>1243502220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This reminds me of a PhD thesis I read about a few years back. Adam Fass' <a href="http://www.messyboard.org/" title="messyboard.org">Messyboard</a> [messyboard.org]</p><p><i>MessyBoard is a networked bulletin board that allows people to share notes, pictures, files and other content. Everyone who looks at a MessyBoard sees exactly the same thing, and all users see changes in real time. It runs as a Java applet inside your web browser, so no software installation is necessary. Text and images from other applications can easily be posted on MessyBoard using drag-and-drop and cut-and-paste. Each board has a URL that is easy to remember, so you can access it from any computer on the Internet.</i></p><p><i>MessyBoard stores a complete history of all activity, allowing users to go back in time and recover old content simply by clicking on a slider bar.<br></i></p><p>Coincidentally, Fass now works for Google in WA state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of a PhD thesis I read about a few years back .
Adam Fass ' Messyboard [ messyboard.org ] MessyBoard is a networked bulletin board that allows people to share notes , pictures , files and other content .
Everyone who looks at a MessyBoard sees exactly the same thing , and all users see changes in real time .
It runs as a Java applet inside your web browser , so no software installation is necessary .
Text and images from other applications can easily be posted on MessyBoard using drag-and-drop and cut-and-paste .
Each board has a URL that is easy to remember , so you can access it from any computer on the Internet.MessyBoard stores a complete history of all activity , allowing users to go back in time and recover old content simply by clicking on a slider bar.Coincidentally , Fass now works for Google in WA state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of a PhD thesis I read about a few years back.
Adam Fass' Messyboard [messyboard.org]MessyBoard is a networked bulletin board that allows people to share notes, pictures, files and other content.
Everyone who looks at a MessyBoard sees exactly the same thing, and all users see changes in real time.
It runs as a Java applet inside your web browser, so no software installation is necessary.
Text and images from other applications can easily be posted on MessyBoard using drag-and-drop and cut-and-paste.
Each board has a URL that is easy to remember, so you can access it from any computer on the Internet.MessyBoard stores a complete history of all activity, allowing users to go back in time and recover old content simply by clicking on a slider bar.Coincidentally, Fass now works for Google in WA state.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130933</id>
	<title>Re:Messyboard anyone?</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1243508400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was one at Brigham Young a few years back discussing collaborative software, nothing quite as polished like this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was one at Brigham Young a few years back discussing collaborative software , nothing quite as polished like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was one at Brigham Young a few years back discussing collaborative software, nothing quite as polished like this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129433</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131283</id>
	<title>Re:Windows Only?</title>
	<author>Zarel</author>
	<datestamp>1243509960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They always release their software for Windows first. Will this be the same? I wonder...</p></div><p>Considering Wave is an online service, it would be pretty difficult for them to make it Windows-only. None of Google's other Web pages are Windows-only.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They always release their software for Windows first .
Will this be the same ?
I wonder...Considering Wave is an online service , it would be pretty difficult for them to make it Windows-only .
None of Google 's other Web pages are Windows-only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They always release their software for Windows first.
Will this be the same?
I wonder...Considering Wave is an online service, it would be pretty difficult for them to make it Windows-only.
None of Google's other Web pages are Windows-only.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128437</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129115</id>
	<title>Firefly</title>
	<author>endianx</author>
	<datestamp>1243544340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can not believe this was tagged Firefly so quickly.  I am truly among my peers here on Slashdot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can not believe this was tagged Firefly so quickly .
I am truly among my peers here on Slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can not believe this was tagged Firefly so quickly.
I am truly among my peers here on Slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129345</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1243501920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get this "real life" you speak of to run on a TCP/IP transport layer and I'm sold!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get this " real life " you speak of to run on a TCP/IP transport layer and I 'm sold !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get this "real life" you speak of to run on a TCP/IP transport layer and I'm sold!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128905</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134285</id>
	<title>vistime.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243527660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>might be angry</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>might be angry</tokentext>
<sentencetext>might be angry</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133921</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are already <a href="http://www.rptools.net/" title="rptools.net" rel="nofollow">programs</a> [rptools.net] for playing PNP RPGs online, and they would probably be better suited for such games than a general purpose communication program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are already programs [ rptools.net ] for playing PNP RPGs online , and they would probably be better suited for such games than a general purpose communication program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are already programs [rptools.net] for playing PNP RPGs online, and they would probably be better suited for such games than a general purpose communication program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134339</id>
	<title>Re:Groove ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243528020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree. It seems they spent a LOT of work making sure everything is real-time collaboration, which looks neat, sounds neat, but in practice, might not be so practical. I make a lot of spelling mistakes, I pause in typing to find the right word. I have to rephrase a lot to get my point across, in fact I counted the times I re-factored this post: 10. I don't want you to see all my revisions, and neither do you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
It seems they spent a LOT of work making sure everything is real-time collaboration , which looks neat , sounds neat , but in practice , might not be so practical .
I make a lot of spelling mistakes , I pause in typing to find the right word .
I have to rephrase a lot to get my point across , in fact I counted the times I re-factored this post : 10 .
I do n't want you to see all my revisions , and neither do you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
It seems they spent a LOT of work making sure everything is real-time collaboration, which looks neat, sounds neat, but in practice, might not be so practical.
I make a lot of spelling mistakes, I pause in typing to find the right word.
I have to rephrase a lot to get my point across, in fact I counted the times I re-factored this post: 10.
I don't want you to see all my revisions, and neither do you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28137875</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>outcast36</author>
	<datestamp>1243607640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://laconi.ca/" title="laconi.ca">Laconica</a> [laconi.ca] is a FOSS twitter clone. You can install private, publish to web, and it works with so many of the popular third party tools.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Laconica [ laconi.ca ] is a FOSS twitter clone .
You can install private , publish to web , and it works with so many of the popular third party tools .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laconica [laconi.ca] is a FOSS twitter clone.
You can install private, publish to web, and it works with so many of the popular third party tools.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28132597</id>
	<title>Re:Uhhh. SIP Anyone? Anyone?</title>
	<author>Prof.Phreak</author>
	<datestamp>1243516620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>...if the Telcos will litigate Google</i></p><p>Sadly, you won't be able to find said Telcos on the Internet...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...if the Telcos will litigate GoogleSadly , you wo n't be able to find said Telcos on the Internet... : -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if the Telcos will litigate GoogleSadly, you won't be able to find said Telcos on the Internet... :-/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785</id>
	<title>Ugh</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1243543200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like email and twitter and instant messaging and facebook all in one.</p><p>Disgusting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like email and twitter and instant messaging and facebook all in one.Disgusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like email and twitter and instant messaging and facebook all in one.Disgusting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131205</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1243509540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But I can't set up my own private facebook or twitter server,</p></div><p>Twitter -- I see no reason why this couldn't be just Jabber to some sort of broadcast channel.</p><p>Facebook -- XFN, OpenID, and friends.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>even if I do, there's not support for my server to let people befriend and network with people on the real Facebook and Twitter.</p></div><p>That's the real problem.</p><p>There's a whole set of open standards that pretty much covers all of what social networks do for the user. But for some reason, most users are still in the gated community of  Facebook, so even though the open communities could theoretically be bigger, better, and freer, right now they're smaller, because they're not Facebook.</p><p>But what makes you think this will be different, other than the Google branding?</p><p>Here's hoping they actually take a clue from existing systems designed for this, and at least support them. That way, at least they might start to do for other systems what they've done for Jabber... Of course, I have maybe three or four contacts who use Gtalk (and they use it only from Gmail), whereas I have more like 50 who use Yahoo, MSN, or AIM. So the same problem applies.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I ca n't set up my own private facebook or twitter server,Twitter -- I see no reason why this could n't be just Jabber to some sort of broadcast channel.Facebook -- XFN , OpenID , and friends.even if I do , there 's not support for my server to let people befriend and network with people on the real Facebook and Twitter.That 's the real problem.There 's a whole set of open standards that pretty much covers all of what social networks do for the user .
But for some reason , most users are still in the gated community of Facebook , so even though the open communities could theoretically be bigger , better , and freer , right now they 're smaller , because they 're not Facebook.But what makes you think this will be different , other than the Google branding ? Here 's hoping they actually take a clue from existing systems designed for this , and at least support them .
That way , at least they might start to do for other systems what they 've done for Jabber... Of course , I have maybe three or four contacts who use Gtalk ( and they use it only from Gmail ) , whereas I have more like 50 who use Yahoo , MSN , or AIM .
So the same problem applies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I can't set up my own private facebook or twitter server,Twitter -- I see no reason why this couldn't be just Jabber to some sort of broadcast channel.Facebook -- XFN, OpenID, and friends.even if I do, there's not support for my server to let people befriend and network with people on the real Facebook and Twitter.That's the real problem.There's a whole set of open standards that pretty much covers all of what social networks do for the user.
But for some reason, most users are still in the gated community of  Facebook, so even though the open communities could theoretically be bigger, better, and freer, right now they're smaller, because they're not Facebook.But what makes you think this will be different, other than the Google branding?Here's hoping they actually take a clue from existing systems designed for this, and at least support them.
That way, at least they might start to do for other systems what they've done for Jabber... Of course, I have maybe three or four contacts who use Gtalk (and they use it only from Gmail), whereas I have more like 50 who use Yahoo, MSN, or AIM.
So the same problem applies.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130775</id>
	<title>Re:quite needed...</title>
	<author>linzeal</author>
	<datestamp>1243507740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will kill commercial academic software they currently use for online classes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will kill commercial academic software they currently use for online classes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will kill commercial academic software they currently use for online classes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28154731</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243695840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you see this guys? http://www.corvalius.com/blog/?p=40 Do you believe them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you see this guys ?
http : //www.corvalius.com/blog/ ? p = 40 Do you believe them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you see this guys?
http://www.corvalius.com/blog/?p=40 Do you believe them?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129941</id>
	<title>Hotline all over again</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243504260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>countdown to this being used for warez and porn<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 3<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 2<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>countdown to this being used for warez and porn ... 3 ... 2 ... 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>countdown to this being used for warez and porn ... 3 ... 2 ... 1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134621</id>
	<title>Re:Groove ?</title>
	<author>Swanktastic</author>
	<datestamp>1243530840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>People are not at their best when they have to be creative, inventive, or thoughtful in real-time with an audience.</p></div><p>I'd be interested for you to elaborate on why you believe this.  There's plenty of counter-evidence to this point in that the following practices are time-tested ways of creative thinking:<br>- comedy writers bouncing ideas off each other to start penning a script or sketch<br>- group brainstorming for new names of products and advertising ideas<br>- new product ideation amongst engineers</p><p>I'm sure everyone is different, and some prefer quiet solitude to be creative, but it seems the exception rather than the rule in most organizations.  I personally find that people tend to be much more cautious and defensive when they have time to craft a well thought out idea, as opposed to blurting out a potentially stupid/creative idea.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People are not at their best when they have to be creative , inventive , or thoughtful in real-time with an audience.I 'd be interested for you to elaborate on why you believe this .
There 's plenty of counter-evidence to this point in that the following practices are time-tested ways of creative thinking : - comedy writers bouncing ideas off each other to start penning a script or sketch- group brainstorming for new names of products and advertising ideas- new product ideation amongst engineersI 'm sure everyone is different , and some prefer quiet solitude to be creative , but it seems the exception rather than the rule in most organizations .
I personally find that people tend to be much more cautious and defensive when they have time to craft a well thought out idea , as opposed to blurting out a potentially stupid/creative idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People are not at their best when they have to be creative, inventive, or thoughtful in real-time with an audience.I'd be interested for you to elaborate on why you believe this.
There's plenty of counter-evidence to this point in that the following practices are time-tested ways of creative thinking:- comedy writers bouncing ideas off each other to start penning a script or sketch- group brainstorming for new names of products and advertising ideas- new product ideation amongst engineersI'm sure everyone is different, and some prefer quiet solitude to be creative, but it seems the exception rather than the rule in most organizations.
I personally find that people tend to be much more cautious and defensive when they have time to craft a well thought out idea, as opposed to blurting out a potentially stupid/creative idea.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128573</id>
	<title>Federation Protocol != Non-interference directive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Speaking personally, I think "they" (Google) will always own the word in their minds, in the sense that "they" will continue to use it with a negative connotation attached. No amount of cultural shift will affect the meaning that "they" will personally ascribe to it. What will change, I believe, is mass-culture's perception of the word. The negativity will be sucked out of it by the tides of the young and the tolerant. People like yourself will voice yourselves less cautiously, and will be listened to more openly. But it isn't going to be easy, and it will often come at a mental/emotional/physical cost. People's notions of self and identity are wrapped up in words like 'atheist' and 'believer,' and many of those people will continue to be threatened by a destabilization in what they consider to be 'family values.' Or, on the other side, will continue to feel frustrated and fenced in by an intolerant larger culture - all as we make slow but visible strides toward a more socially accepting, yet individually hyper-critical, society. In other words: Business as usual.</p><p>(Just my two cents)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking personally , I think " they " ( Google ) will always own the word in their minds , in the sense that " they " will continue to use it with a negative connotation attached .
No amount of cultural shift will affect the meaning that " they " will personally ascribe to it .
What will change , I believe , is mass-culture 's perception of the word .
The negativity will be sucked out of it by the tides of the young and the tolerant .
People like yourself will voice yourselves less cautiously , and will be listened to more openly .
But it is n't going to be easy , and it will often come at a mental/emotional/physical cost .
People 's notions of self and identity are wrapped up in words like 'atheist ' and 'believer, ' and many of those people will continue to be threatened by a destabilization in what they consider to be 'family values .
' Or , on the other side , will continue to feel frustrated and fenced in by an intolerant larger culture - all as we make slow but visible strides toward a more socially accepting , yet individually hyper-critical , society .
In other words : Business as usual .
( Just my two cents )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking personally, I think "they" (Google) will always own the word in their minds, in the sense that "they" will continue to use it with a negative connotation attached.
No amount of cultural shift will affect the meaning that "they" will personally ascribe to it.
What will change, I believe, is mass-culture's perception of the word.
The negativity will be sucked out of it by the tides of the young and the tolerant.
People like yourself will voice yourselves less cautiously, and will be listened to more openly.
But it isn't going to be easy, and it will often come at a mental/emotional/physical cost.
People's notions of self and identity are wrapped up in words like 'atheist' and 'believer,' and many of those people will continue to be threatened by a destabilization in what they consider to be 'family values.
' Or, on the other side, will continue to feel frustrated and fenced in by an intolerant larger culture - all as we make slow but visible strides toward a more socially accepting, yet individually hyper-critical, society.
In other words: Business as usual.
(Just my two cents)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28148821</id>
	<title>This changes everything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243692300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I posted this <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-wave.html#c8713850345177910982" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">elsewhere</a> [blogspot.com]:<blockquote><div><p>I just finished watching the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v\_UyVmITiYQ" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">video</a> [youtube.com], and I was blown away. I was amazed at how content-centric this is. Any type of content can theoretically be added to a wave: chats, e-mail, documents, images, spreadsheets, code, video, twits, etc.--anything you wish. Even extensions are exposed as content within waves. This completely breaks down the barrier between different forms of content (and applications) and unifies it all as waves. This means that, theoretically, all of Google's services can be unified within Google Wave. They wouldn't necessary have to go away, but their interfaces would be used less, as all their content would be exposed through Google Wave's interface. Not just that, but <em>any</em> service could be added and exposed as waves, from Google Reader and Gmail to competing services like Flickr and Facebook. Just like RSS feeds pull in the web to us, Wave could eventually pull in <em>all</em> our online activity into one organized place. And we'd rarely need to leave it!<br>
<br>
The best part of all this is how open this is. Anyone can offer a competing services, and anyone can theoretically take all his waves with him to a competing service. One could even run a Wave server at home, solving the privacy issues of using a third-party service.<br>
<br>
In short, this has the potential to change not just the web, but how we compute in general. I can't wait to see where it goes.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I posted this elsewhere [ blogspot.com ] : I just finished watching the video [ youtube.com ] , and I was blown away .
I was amazed at how content-centric this is .
Any type of content can theoretically be added to a wave : chats , e-mail , documents , images , spreadsheets , code , video , twits , etc.--anything you wish .
Even extensions are exposed as content within waves .
This completely breaks down the barrier between different forms of content ( and applications ) and unifies it all as waves .
This means that , theoretically , all of Google 's services can be unified within Google Wave .
They would n't necessary have to go away , but their interfaces would be used less , as all their content would be exposed through Google Wave 's interface .
Not just that , but any service could be added and exposed as waves , from Google Reader and Gmail to competing services like Flickr and Facebook .
Just like RSS feeds pull in the web to us , Wave could eventually pull in all our online activity into one organized place .
And we 'd rarely need to leave it !
The best part of all this is how open this is .
Anyone can offer a competing services , and anyone can theoretically take all his waves with him to a competing service .
One could even run a Wave server at home , solving the privacy issues of using a third-party service .
In short , this has the potential to change not just the web , but how we compute in general .
I ca n't wait to see where it goes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I posted this elsewhere [blogspot.com]:I just finished watching the video [youtube.com], and I was blown away.
I was amazed at how content-centric this is.
Any type of content can theoretically be added to a wave: chats, e-mail, documents, images, spreadsheets, code, video, twits, etc.--anything you wish.
Even extensions are exposed as content within waves.
This completely breaks down the barrier between different forms of content (and applications) and unifies it all as waves.
This means that, theoretically, all of Google's services can be unified within Google Wave.
They wouldn't necessary have to go away, but their interfaces would be used less, as all their content would be exposed through Google Wave's interface.
Not just that, but any service could be added and exposed as waves, from Google Reader and Gmail to competing services like Flickr and Facebook.
Just like RSS feeds pull in the web to us, Wave could eventually pull in all our online activity into one organized place.
And we'd rarely need to leave it!
The best part of all this is how open this is.
Anyone can offer a competing services, and anyone can theoretically take all his waves with him to a competing service.
One could even run a Wave server at home, solving the privacy issues of using a third-party service.
In short, this has the potential to change not just the web, but how we compute in general.
I can't wait to see where it goes.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130249</id>
	<title>Re:First one to Make a Lame Wave Joke Loses</title>
	<author>megamerican</author>
	<datestamp>1243505340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it kind of odd that they call it the wave. Maybe its inspiration is from the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083316/" title="imdb.com">TV movie</a> [imdb.com] of the same name?</p><p>Hopefully their motto won't be "strength through community."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it kind of odd that they call it the wave .
Maybe its inspiration is from the TV movie [ imdb.com ] of the same name ? Hopefully their motto wo n't be " strength through community .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it kind of odd that they call it the wave.
Maybe its inspiration is from the TV movie [imdb.com] of the same name?Hopefully their motto won't be "strength through community.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128421</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129711</id>
	<title>A lot of potentially good uses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On a personal level, we just planned a large camping trip for 19 people on Memorial Day Weekend through email, and it would have been a lot easier had we been able to conveniently embed maps and such into the conversation, and had it flow a little more real time.</p><p>On a business level, we have employees on two coasts and this might be a useful tool.   Though how much of this is really P2P and how much of the data resides in the cloud?  The encryption issue stated by a poster above is also a big one, and I would want all business related traffic encrypted.</p><p>Good stuff though, can't wait to play with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On a personal level , we just planned a large camping trip for 19 people on Memorial Day Weekend through email , and it would have been a lot easier had we been able to conveniently embed maps and such into the conversation , and had it flow a little more real time.On a business level , we have employees on two coasts and this might be a useful tool .
Though how much of this is really P2P and how much of the data resides in the cloud ?
The encryption issue stated by a poster above is also a big one , and I would want all business related traffic encrypted.Good stuff though , ca n't wait to play with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On a personal level, we just planned a large camping trip for 19 people on Memorial Day Weekend through email, and it would have been a lot easier had we been able to conveniently embed maps and such into the conversation, and had it flow a little more real time.On a business level, we have employees on two coasts and this might be a useful tool.
Though how much of this is really P2P and how much of the data resides in the cloud?
The encryption issue stated by a poster above is also a big one, and I would want all business related traffic encrypted.Good stuff though, can't wait to play with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28171275</id>
	<title>Re:Groove ?</title>
	<author>Triv</author>
	<datestamp>1243885320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ha.</p><p>Groove + Google = Grovel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ha.Groove + Google = Grovel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ha.Groove + Google = Grovel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28150859</id>
	<title>Re:First one to Make a Lame Wave Joke Loses</title>
	<author>XNormal</author>
	<datestamp>1243710960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Based, BTW, on a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Third\_Wave" title="wikipedia.org">real world incident.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Based , BTW , on a real world incident .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Based, BTW, on a real world incident.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130249</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130225</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>monkeyboythom</author>
	<datestamp>1243505280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is the parent marked as a Troll? It is an opinion.
</p><p>From the picture given, it looks extremely busy. Are we trying to raise a seizure-proof human by overloading one's senses until one completely shorts out by having no attention span at all?
</p><p>Yes, I see where people feel the need to group apps into one container; it is our nature to try to tidy things up. But really, do we need that much data anyway?
</p><p>Seeing people walking or driving or whatever they're doing while looking at a tiny screen reminds me of the Monty Python skit of the man who never looked up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is the parent marked as a Troll ?
It is an opinion .
From the picture given , it looks extremely busy .
Are we trying to raise a seizure-proof human by overloading one 's senses until one completely shorts out by having no attention span at all ?
Yes , I see where people feel the need to group apps into one container ; it is our nature to try to tidy things up .
But really , do we need that much data anyway ?
Seeing people walking or driving or whatever they 're doing while looking at a tiny screen reminds me of the Monty Python skit of the man who never looked up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is the parent marked as a Troll?
It is an opinion.
From the picture given, it looks extremely busy.
Are we trying to raise a seizure-proof human by overloading one's senses until one completely shorts out by having no attention span at all?
Yes, I see where people feel the need to group apps into one container; it is our nature to try to tidy things up.
But really, do we need that much data anyway?
Seeing people walking or driving or whatever they're doing while looking at a tiny screen reminds me of the Monty Python skit of the man who never looked up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131839</id>
	<title>There goes my plan for world domination</title>
	<author>ynotds</author>
	<datestamp>1243512780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is a good thing, because my priorities have moved on anyway.</p><p>All I ever wanted the never really started TransForum 2.0 for was a tool for communication and collaboration about other, potentially media-rich, projects.</p><p>Now a decade on from when <a href="http://www.transforum.net/" title="transforum.net">TransForum</a> [transforum.net] 0.99 was momentarily state-of-the-art, I have a dozen projects ready to try surfing this next Southern Ocean Wave<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... as always too much choice.</p><p>Now if only Google will finally complete what has long been their obvious mission and provide a guaranteed permanent URI for everything ever worth citing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is a good thing , because my priorities have moved on anyway.All I ever wanted the never really started TransForum 2.0 for was a tool for communication and collaboration about other , potentially media-rich , projects.Now a decade on from when TransForum [ transforum.net ] 0.99 was momentarily state-of-the-art , I have a dozen projects ready to try surfing this next Southern Ocean Wave ... as always too much choice.Now if only Google will finally complete what has long been their obvious mission and provide a guaranteed permanent URI for everything ever worth citing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is a good thing, because my priorities have moved on anyway.All I ever wanted the never really started TransForum 2.0 for was a tool for communication and collaboration about other, potentially media-rich, projects.Now a decade on from when TransForum [transforum.net] 0.99 was momentarily state-of-the-art, I have a dozen projects ready to try surfing this next Southern Ocean Wave ... as always too much choice.Now if only Google will finally complete what has long been their obvious mission and provide a guaranteed permanent URI for everything ever worth citing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693</id>
	<title>Groove ?</title>
	<author>lbalbalba</author>
	<datestamp>1243542960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somehow I can't shake the feeling that this is a similar product as 'Groove' from a few years back...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow I ca n't shake the feeling that this is a similar product as 'Groove ' from a few years back.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow I can't shake the feeling that this is a similar product as 'Groove' from a few years back...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28139065</id>
	<title>Re:Please kill "One Note"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243613040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My thoughts exactly.<br>Not the 'it would be so nice' part, mind you, but the fact that it could definitely blow onenote outta the water.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My thoughts exactly.Not the 'it would be so nice ' part , mind you , but the fact that it could definitely blow onenote outta the water .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My thoughts exactly.Not the 'it would be so nice' part, mind you, but the fact that it could definitely blow onenote outta the water.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131293</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130327</id>
	<title>Serious threat to Facebook, Twitter, et al</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243505640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The decentralised nature of this system will directly threaten Facebook, Twitter et al.</p><p>The DNS system works, and scales, because everyone publishing information to the DNS is responsible for the upkeep of the nodes that publish their own records.</p><p>Facebook and Twitter, however, have scaling and financial problems.  Facebook, so far as I am aware, continues to make a substantial annual loss despite its enormous success, and I have yet to hear that Twitter has managed to turn a profit.</p><p>More importantly, the privacy of everyone publishing much of their personal, private correspondence using a small number of centralized agencies is directly threatened -- and it could get particularly messy if, in a few years time, $SOCIALNETWORK fails to become profitable, goes into receivership, and the vast databases of private information are identified by the administrators as the organisation's most valuable asset.</p><p>In contrast, a Wave infrastructure, like DNS, will distribute the upkeep and storage of private information to many (hopefully) locally trustworthy systems. Because of social engineering / hacking attacks, leakage of private information can and will still occur, but the impact should hopefully be minimized if the Wave protocol and its implementations have been suitably well engineered.</p><p>This is going to be interesting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The decentralised nature of this system will directly threaten Facebook , Twitter et al.The DNS system works , and scales , because everyone publishing information to the DNS is responsible for the upkeep of the nodes that publish their own records.Facebook and Twitter , however , have scaling and financial problems .
Facebook , so far as I am aware , continues to make a substantial annual loss despite its enormous success , and I have yet to hear that Twitter has managed to turn a profit.More importantly , the privacy of everyone publishing much of their personal , private correspondence using a small number of centralized agencies is directly threatened -- and it could get particularly messy if , in a few years time , $ SOCIALNETWORK fails to become profitable , goes into receivership , and the vast databases of private information are identified by the administrators as the organisation 's most valuable asset.In contrast , a Wave infrastructure , like DNS , will distribute the upkeep and storage of private information to many ( hopefully ) locally trustworthy systems .
Because of social engineering / hacking attacks , leakage of private information can and will still occur , but the impact should hopefully be minimized if the Wave protocol and its implementations have been suitably well engineered.This is going to be interesting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The decentralised nature of this system will directly threaten Facebook, Twitter et al.The DNS system works, and scales, because everyone publishing information to the DNS is responsible for the upkeep of the nodes that publish their own records.Facebook and Twitter, however, have scaling and financial problems.
Facebook, so far as I am aware, continues to make a substantial annual loss despite its enormous success, and I have yet to hear that Twitter has managed to turn a profit.More importantly, the privacy of everyone publishing much of their personal, private correspondence using a small number of centralized agencies is directly threatened -- and it could get particularly messy if, in a few years time, $SOCIALNETWORK fails to become profitable, goes into receivership, and the vast databases of private information are identified by the administrators as the organisation's most valuable asset.In contrast, a Wave infrastructure, like DNS, will distribute the upkeep and storage of private information to many (hopefully) locally trustworthy systems.
Because of social engineering / hacking attacks, leakage of private information can and will still occur, but the impact should hopefully be minimized if the Wave protocol and its implementations have been suitably well engineered.This is going to be interesting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133093</id>
	<title>Re:Patent License?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243519140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAL so could someone explain this a little better?</p><p>I guess it has something to do with how Google is going to get around the patents with this technology or what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL so could someone explain this a little better ? I guess it has something to do with how Google is going to get around the patents with this technology or what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL so could someone explain this a little better?I guess it has something to do with how Google is going to get around the patents with this technology or what?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128437</id>
	<title>Windows Only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They always release their software for Windows first. Will this be the same? I wonder...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They always release their software for Windows first .
Will this be the same ?
I wonder.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They always release their software for Windows first.
Will this be the same?
I wonder...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136143</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect...</title>
	<author>QuantumFTL</author>
	<datestamp>1243591260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read this as "Perfect for PNP <b>RNGs</b>."  I thought that using user input from multiple users just to generate random dice throws was a bit much, but...  interesting at least.
<br> <br>
Start a google code project for this, I'm sure you'll be surprised how much help you get.  email me if there's anything I can do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read this as " Perfect for PNP RNGs .
" I thought that using user input from multiple users just to generate random dice throws was a bit much , but... interesting at least .
Start a google code project for this , I 'm sure you 'll be surprised how much help you get .
email me if there 's anything I can do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read this as "Perfect for PNP RNGs.
"  I thought that using user input from multiple users just to generate random dice throws was a bit much, but...  interesting at least.
Start a google code project for this, I'm sure you'll be surprised how much help you get.
email me if there's anything I can do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28167967</id>
	<title>Whiteboard</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1243870680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only person who thought about Netscape 4's whiteboard and wondered why this technology is still 10 years behind?<br>At this rate my D&amp;D campaign will never end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only person who thought about Netscape 4 's whiteboard and wondered why this technology is still 10 years behind ? At this rate my D&amp;D campaign will never end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only person who thought about Netscape 4's whiteboard and wondered why this technology is still 10 years behind?At this rate my D&amp;D campaign will never end.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131293</id>
	<title>Please kill "One Note"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243510080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this could kill Microsoft One Note that would be so nice.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this could kill Microsoft One Note that would be so nice .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this could kill Microsoft One Note that would be so nice.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129379</id>
	<title>Patent License?</title>
	<author>xlotlu</author>
	<datestamp>1243502040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's <a href="http://www.waveprotocol.org/patent-license" title="waveprotocol.org">this</a> [waveprotocol.org] I find most interesting:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Google and its affiliates hereby grant to you a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this License) patent license for patents necessarily infringed by implementation of this specification. If you institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the implementation of the specification constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses for the specification granted to you under this License shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's this [ waveprotocol.org ] I find most interesting : Subject to the terms and conditions of this License , Google and its affiliates hereby grant to you a perpetual , worldwide , non-exclusive , no-charge , royalty-free , irrevocable ( except as stated in this License ) patent license for patents necessarily infringed by implementation of this specification .
If you institute patent litigation against any entity ( including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit ) alleging that the implementation of the specification constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement , then any patent licenses for the specification granted to you under this License shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's this [waveprotocol.org] I find most interesting:Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Google and its affiliates hereby grant to you a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this License) patent license for patents necessarily infringed by implementation of this specification.
If you institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the implementation of the specification constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses for the specification granted to you under this License shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130657</id>
	<title>Google Wave? Federation??</title>
	<author>decavolt</author>
	<datestamp>1243507080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My inescapable train of thought while reading the summary:<br>
<br>
Google Wave Federation.<br>
Goole Wave?<br>
Federation?<br>
Genesis Wave.<br>
<br>
<strong>KAAAAAHHHHHHN!!!!!</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>My inescapable train of thought while reading the summary : Google Wave Federation .
Goole Wave ?
Federation ? Genesis Wave .
KAAAAAHHHHHHN ! ! ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My inescapable train of thought while reading the summary:

Google Wave Federation.
Goole Wave?
Federation?
Genesis Wave.
KAAAAAHHHHHHN!!!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134917</id>
	<title>Innara, Innara</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243533600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Innara, Innara, wherefore art thou?</p><p>Now, if only I can get the Calahan, full bore, with custom sites named "Vera" to go with wave...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Innara , Innara , wherefore art thou ? Now , if only I can get the Calahan , full bore , with custom sites named " Vera " to go with wave.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Innara, Innara, wherefore art thou?Now, if only I can get the Calahan, full bore, with custom sites named "Vera" to go with wave...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134803</id>
	<title>Wave uses XMPP (Jabber)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243532580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.waveprotocol.org/draft-protocol-spec#intro-overview" title="waveprotocol.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.waveprotocol.org/draft-protocol-spec#intro-overview</a> [waveprotocol.org]</p><p>Google Wave is based off of XMPP (a.k.a. Jabber). The protocol is fairly useful as a distributed message bus, but this is the first high profile use of it I've heard of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.waveprotocol.org/draft-protocol-spec # intro-overview [ waveprotocol.org ] Google Wave is based off of XMPP ( a.k.a .
Jabber ) . The protocol is fairly useful as a distributed message bus , but this is the first high profile use of it I 've heard of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.waveprotocol.org/draft-protocol-spec#intro-overview [waveprotocol.org]Google Wave is based off of XMPP (a.k.a.
Jabber). The protocol is fairly useful as a distributed message bus, but this is the first high profile use of it I've heard of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129531</id>
	<title>Photophlow</title>
	<author>NightRain</author>
	<datestamp>1243502520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This thing is a complete rip off of <a href="http://images.google.com.au/images?q=photophlow" title="google.com.au">photophlow</a> [google.com.au]</htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing is a complete rip off of photophlow [ google.com.au ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing is a complete rip off of photophlow [google.com.au]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28135937</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>bazorg</author>
	<datestamp>1243588560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Facebook already has instant "status notifications" (tweets) and online chat. I'm quite happy with it, especially after finding the ZX Spectrum emulator. let's see Google beat that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Facebook already has instant " status notifications " ( tweets ) and online chat .
I 'm quite happy with it , especially after finding the ZX Spectrum emulator .
let 's see Google beat that : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Facebook already has instant "status notifications" (tweets) and online chat.
I'm quite happy with it, especially after finding the ZX Spectrum emulator.
let's see Google beat that :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136903</id>
	<title>Re:Groove ?</title>
	<author>devonbowen</author>
	<datestamp>1243601340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you're right that most creativity comes asynchronously. But I find synchronous collaboration useful because it helps to define the problem and find additional issues that I might not otherwise realize were there. The solutions often then come asynchronously. But distributing the problem is probably better done synchronously to avoid people having wildly different views of what the problem actually is. Something that I have found is often the case in these situations.</p><p>Devon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're right that most creativity comes asynchronously .
But I find synchronous collaboration useful because it helps to define the problem and find additional issues that I might not otherwise realize were there .
The solutions often then come asynchronously .
But distributing the problem is probably better done synchronously to avoid people having wildly different views of what the problem actually is .
Something that I have found is often the case in these situations.Devon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're right that most creativity comes asynchronously.
But I find synchronous collaboration useful because it helps to define the problem and find additional issues that I might not otherwise realize were there.
The solutions often then come asynchronously.
But distributing the problem is probably better done synchronously to avoid people having wildly different views of what the problem actually is.
Something that I have found is often the case in these situations.Devon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129287</id>
	<title>Sounds good</title>
	<author>georgenh16</author>
	<datestamp>1243501740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as it's not Dot-Communism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as it 's not Dot-Communism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as it's not Dot-Communism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134831</id>
	<title>Croquet is the old "Wave".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243532880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how does "wave" compare to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croquet\_project" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Croquet</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how does " wave " compare to Croquet [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how does "wave" compare to Croquet [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128967</id>
	<title>Uhhh.  SIP Anyone? Anyone?</title>
	<author>mpapet</author>
	<datestamp>1243543800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, they use SIP to chat and handle voice.  There's a protocol for presentation that's rolled into some SIP servers.  You guys have no idea how powerful the SIP standard is.  There isn't a client that handles it all yet.</p><p>Besides the very un-special nature of the application, I'd be interested to see if the Telcos will litigate Google on their gigantic pool of obvious patents.  Either that or Google's paying them a 'vig' already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , they use SIP to chat and handle voice .
There 's a protocol for presentation that 's rolled into some SIP servers .
You guys have no idea how powerful the SIP standard is .
There is n't a client that handles it all yet.Besides the very un-special nature of the application , I 'd be interested to see if the Telcos will litigate Google on their gigantic pool of obvious patents .
Either that or Google 's paying them a 'vig ' already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, they use SIP to chat and handle voice.
There's a protocol for presentation that's rolled into some SIP servers.
You guys have no idea how powerful the SIP standard is.
There isn't a client that handles it all yet.Besides the very un-special nature of the application, I'd be interested to see if the Telcos will litigate Google on their gigantic pool of obvious patents.
Either that or Google's paying them a 'vig' already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1243503540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except maybe it will be what something like Twitter, Facebook, and IM should have been from the beginning.  For one thing, it sounds like it will be open and decentralized, meaning that I can set up my own Wave server, and you can set up your own Wave server, and our users can talk without any problems.
</p><p>You can already do that with IM so long as we're all using Jabber, but otherwise it can get a little problematic.  But I can't set up my own private facebook or twitter server, and even if I do, there's not support for my server to let people befriend and network with people on the real Facebook and Twitter.
</p><p>To me, that's always been the #1 problem with social networking sites on the Internet.  You can't set up your own, but instead your left to make a new account on whatever site is cool this week.  Like what if instead of being able to set up my own webpage, I had to set up a webpage on whatever hosting company was trendy, and then rewrite it based on that host's protocols?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except maybe it will be what something like Twitter , Facebook , and IM should have been from the beginning .
For one thing , it sounds like it will be open and decentralized , meaning that I can set up my own Wave server , and you can set up your own Wave server , and our users can talk without any problems .
You can already do that with IM so long as we 're all using Jabber , but otherwise it can get a little problematic .
But I ca n't set up my own private facebook or twitter server , and even if I do , there 's not support for my server to let people befriend and network with people on the real Facebook and Twitter .
To me , that 's always been the # 1 problem with social networking sites on the Internet .
You ca n't set up your own , but instead your left to make a new account on whatever site is cool this week .
Like what if instead of being able to set up my own webpage , I had to set up a webpage on whatever hosting company was trendy , and then rewrite it based on that host 's protocols ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except maybe it will be what something like Twitter, Facebook, and IM should have been from the beginning.
For one thing, it sounds like it will be open and decentralized, meaning that I can set up my own Wave server, and you can set up your own Wave server, and our users can talk without any problems.
You can already do that with IM so long as we're all using Jabber, but otherwise it can get a little problematic.
But I can't set up my own private facebook or twitter server, and even if I do, there's not support for my server to let people befriend and network with people on the real Facebook and Twitter.
To me, that's always been the #1 problem with social networking sites on the Internet.
You can't set up your own, but instead your left to make a new account on whatever site is cool this week.
Like what if instead of being able to set up my own webpage, I had to set up a webpage on whatever hosting company was trendy, and then rewrite it based on that host's protocols?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28138185</id>
	<title>Re:Uhhh. SIP Anyone? Anyone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243608960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you know what a "vig" is?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know what a " vig " is ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know what a "vig" is?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128967</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129165</id>
	<title>Re:Public warning</title>
	<author>Blice</author>
	<datestamp>1243501320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first "client" is actually a web app. A pretty one, at that.<br> <br>

<a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/\_7ZYqYi4xigk/Sh40hRLylhI/AAAAAAAAD10/sLJ28\_3Fe9E/s1600-h/Google\_Wave\_snapshots\_inbox.png" title="blogspot.com">Screenshot here~</a> [blogspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first " client " is actually a web app .
A pretty one , at that .
Screenshot here ~ [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first "client" is actually a web app.
A pretty one, at that.
Screenshot here~ [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129923</id>
	<title>Re:Public warning</title>
	<author>cl0s</author>
	<datestamp>1243504200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also if you're referring to the Google video/voice chat which isn't available on Linux browsers. Its available, and works even better in Empathy (Gnome's voip/chat client).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also if you 're referring to the Google video/voice chat which is n't available on Linux browsers .
Its available , and works even better in Empathy ( Gnome 's voip/chat client ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also if you're referring to the Google video/voice chat which isn't available on Linux browsers.
Its available, and works even better in Empathy (Gnome's voip/chat client).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133539</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds good for playing RPGs online</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1243522320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Use the chat or Skype for talking, and the Wave functions for posting maps and stuff</p></div><p> <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse\_thread/thread/802c56b72d2d73a7" title="google.com">because Google has created a spec for voice over XMPP (used by google talk), it is definitely possible that wave clients and apps could make use of voice. </a> [google.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Use the chat or Skype for talking , and the Wave functions for posting maps and stuff because Google has created a spec for voice over XMPP ( used by google talk ) , it is definitely possible that wave clients and apps could make use of voice .
[ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use the chat or Skype for talking, and the Wave functions for posting maps and stuff because Google has created a spec for voice over XMPP (used by google talk), it is definitely possible that wave clients and apps could make use of voice.
[google.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129553</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277</id>
	<title>Re:Groove ?</title>
	<author>Lemmy Caution</author>
	<datestamp>1243509900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that real-time collaboration is a flawed concept in most contexts. People are not at their best when they have to be creative, inventive, or thoughtful in real-time with an audience. Nor do people do their best analysis when they're sitting around a (virtual) whiteboard.</p><p>Asynchronous collaboration tools are always going to be more important than synchronous ones; synchronous is better for broadcast and one-to-many communication.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that real-time collaboration is a flawed concept in most contexts .
People are not at their best when they have to be creative , inventive , or thoughtful in real-time with an audience .
Nor do people do their best analysis when they 're sitting around a ( virtual ) whiteboard.Asynchronous collaboration tools are always going to be more important than synchronous ones ; synchronous is better for broadcast and one-to-many communication .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that real-time collaboration is a flawed concept in most contexts.
People are not at their best when they have to be creative, inventive, or thoughtful in real-time with an audience.
Nor do people do their best analysis when they're sitting around a (virtual) whiteboard.Asynchronous collaboration tools are always going to be more important than synchronous ones; synchronous is better for broadcast and one-to-many communication.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128905</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh</title>
	<author>SchizoStatic</author>
	<datestamp>1243543620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I already have this...... Real life</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already have this...... Real life</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already have this...... Real life</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129553</id>
	<title>Sounds good for playing RPGs online</title>
	<author>HertzaHaeon</author>
	<datestamp>1243502580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This could be a cool tool for playing RPGs (of the pen and paper variant) online.</p><p>Use the chat or Skype for talking, and the Wave functions for posting maps and stuff, and clients for rolling dice and such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This could be a cool tool for playing RPGs ( of the pen and paper variant ) online.Use the chat or Skype for talking , and the Wave functions for posting maps and stuff , and clients for rolling dice and such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This could be a cool tool for playing RPGs (of the pen and paper variant) online.Use the chat or Skype for talking, and the Wave functions for posting maps and stuff, and clients for rolling dice and such.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133597</id>
	<title>Realtime CMS mixed with UC?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243522740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems like Google is pushing towards what would be a wiki-esqe realtime concurrent collaboration content management system rolled into a unified communications framework, right? It's versioning your communications when dealing with semi-static content, so there's the whole wiki/CMS/Google Docs play there, along with the usual train of voice/chat/email communications (googletalk does the chat and voice, gmail does the email and can show chat histories, now only need autotranscription of voice chats for searching communications).</p><p>As some people have been moaning over google needing to get into realtime search ala twitter, a deep realtime CMS/UFC hybrid would give a lot of insight regarding information relationships and the user themselves, provided someone (Google) controls the platform end-to-end. This would be taking things like Cerego/smart.fm's user memory modeling to its logical end, trying to have a rough software analog of a user's mind/semantic space.</p><p>Asteroza</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems like Google is pushing towards what would be a wiki-esqe realtime concurrent collaboration content management system rolled into a unified communications framework , right ?
It 's versioning your communications when dealing with semi-static content , so there 's the whole wiki/CMS/Google Docs play there , along with the usual train of voice/chat/email communications ( googletalk does the chat and voice , gmail does the email and can show chat histories , now only need autotranscription of voice chats for searching communications ) .As some people have been moaning over google needing to get into realtime search ala twitter , a deep realtime CMS/UFC hybrid would give a lot of insight regarding information relationships and the user themselves , provided someone ( Google ) controls the platform end-to-end .
This would be taking things like Cerego/smart.fm 's user memory modeling to its logical end , trying to have a rough software analog of a user 's mind/semantic space.Asteroza</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems like Google is pushing towards what would be a wiki-esqe realtime concurrent collaboration content management system rolled into a unified communications framework, right?
It's versioning your communications when dealing with semi-static content, so there's the whole wiki/CMS/Google Docs play there, along with the usual train of voice/chat/email communications (googletalk does the chat and voice, gmail does the email and can show chat histories, now only need autotranscription of voice chats for searching communications).As some people have been moaning over google needing to get into realtime search ala twitter, a deep realtime CMS/UFC hybrid would give a lot of insight regarding information relationships and the user themselves, provided someone (Google) controls the platform end-to-end.
This would be taking things like Cerego/smart.fm's user memory modeling to its logical end, trying to have a rough software analog of a user's mind/semantic space.Asteroza</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129693</id>
	<title>Re:Groove ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243503060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really? I thought this was called WASTE when Shawn Fanning made it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I thought this was called WASTE when Shawn Fanning made it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I thought this was called WASTE when Shawn Fanning made it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28184087</id>
	<title>Zzzzz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243964520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but if your technology takes almost 1.5 hours to describe you'll have lost most of the world.</p><p>For instance:<br>Phone: punch in number, talk to friend, etc.<br>Car: big fat rectangle stop, long skinny one, go, D = drive, R = Reverse, P = Park, turn the wheel in the direction you want to go.<br>Computers: Click or double click on browser icon, go to google.com, in the search field type "Free Porn", click I'm feeling lucky.<br>Camera: point the camera at what you want a picture of, click the button, see how shitty the picture is and try again.</p><p>etc.</p><p>+10 for nerd content though</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but if your technology takes almost 1.5 hours to describe you 'll have lost most of the world.For instance : Phone : punch in number , talk to friend , etc.Car : big fat rectangle stop , long skinny one , go , D = drive , R = Reverse , P = Park , turn the wheel in the direction you want to go.Computers : Click or double click on browser icon , go to google.com , in the search field type " Free Porn " , click I 'm feeling lucky.Camera : point the camera at what you want a picture of , click the button , see how shitty the picture is and try again.etc. + 10 for nerd content though</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but if your technology takes almost 1.5 hours to describe you'll have lost most of the world.For instance:Phone: punch in number, talk to friend, etc.Car: big fat rectangle stop, long skinny one, go, D = drive, R = Reverse, P = Park, turn the wheel in the direction you want to go.Computers: Click or double click on browser icon, go to google.com, in the search field type "Free Porn", click I'm feeling lucky.Camera: point the camera at what you want a picture of, click the button, see how shitty the picture is and try again.etc.+10 for nerd content though</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128421</id>
	<title>First one to Make a Lame Wave Joke Loses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, you can do better then 90\% of the Tech Journalists</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , you can do better then 90 \ % of the Tech Journalists</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, you can do better then 90\% of the Tech Journalists</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136639</id>
	<title>Re:Patent License?</title>
	<author>Meneth</author>
	<datestamp>1243597920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>*Sigh*. Good for the moment, I suppose, but if software patents were abolished, we wouldn't need it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* Sigh * .
Good for the moment , I suppose , but if software patents were abolished , we would n't need it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*Sigh*.
Good for the moment, I suppose, but if software patents were abolished, we wouldn't need it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129379</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128411</id>
	<title>first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243542180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The first "wave" created?  "Hello world!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first " wave " created ?
" Hello world !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first "wave" created?
"Hello world!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128611</id>
	<title>If you read it for the comments</title>
	<author>BurzumNazgul</author>
	<datestamp>1243542720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This makes a lot of sense for those of us that read the news for the comments. I'm looking at you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers

(ps i love reading comments too!)</htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes a lot of sense for those of us that read the news for the comments .
I 'm looking at you /.ers ( ps i love reading comments too !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes a lot of sense for those of us that read the news for the comments.
I'm looking at you /.ers

(ps i love reading comments too!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130775
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129345
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128905
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133539
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129553
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133425
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134621
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28157787
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129923
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134803
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28183793
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129115
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131205
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136639
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133373
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28135937
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28138185
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131555
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130225
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28150859
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130249
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128421
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136143
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28154731
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28170027
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129449
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28132597
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128967
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129165
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28137875
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129945
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129523
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28139065
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131293
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136903
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129531
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28138981
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128437
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28139713
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130933
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129433
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28171275
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129693
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133093
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129379
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134339
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133921
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1912226_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28148051
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129449
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28170027
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131305
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131293
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28139065
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129711
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130327
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131277
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134339
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134621
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136903
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129693
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28171275
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129379
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136639
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133093
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129553
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133539
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28167967
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129941
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128491
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28139713
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133921
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28136143
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129531
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133441
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130933
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128967
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28132597
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28138185
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128411
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128573
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129013
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130775
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131555
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129945
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128421
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130249
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28150859
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133425
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128785
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28135937
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128905
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129345
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28130225
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28154731
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129797
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28137875
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131205
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28134803
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128437
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28157787
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28131283
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28138981
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129115
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28183793
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1912226.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28128503
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28133373
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129923
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129165
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28129523
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1912226.28148051
</commentlist>
</conversation>
