<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_05_28_1235216</id>
	<title>Evidence For Liquid Water On a Frozen Early Mars</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1243514640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://spacefellowship.com/" rel="nofollow">Matt\_dk</a> writes <i>"NASA scientists modeled freezing conditions on Mars to test whether <a href="http://spacefellowship.com/News/?p=8924">liquid water could have been present</a> to form the surface features of the Martian landscape.
Evidence suggests flowing water formed the rivers and gullies on the Mars surface, even though surface temperatures were below freezing. Dissolved minerals in liquid water may be the reason."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Matt \ _dk writes " NASA scientists modeled freezing conditions on Mars to test whether liquid water could have been present to form the surface features of the Martian landscape .
Evidence suggests flowing water formed the rivers and gullies on the Mars surface , even though surface temperatures were below freezing .
Dissolved minerals in liquid water may be the reason .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Matt\_dk writes "NASA scientists modeled freezing conditions on Mars to test whether liquid water could have been present to form the surface features of the Martian landscape.
Evidence suggests flowing water formed the rivers and gullies on the Mars surface, even though surface temperatures were below freezing.
Dissolved minerals in liquid water may be the reason.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123441</id>
	<title>Re:Warmer?</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1243524360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"Weather or not its breathable"</i>
<br> <br>
Somewhat ironically, life is what made our atmosphere breathable. Without life it's highly unlikely there would be anything more than trace amounts of free oxygen in an alien atmosphere.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Weather or not its breathable " Somewhat ironically , life is what made our atmosphere breathable .
Without life it 's highly unlikely there would be anything more than trace amounts of free oxygen in an alien atmosphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Weather or not its breathable"
 
Somewhat ironically, life is what made our atmosphere breathable.
Without life it's highly unlikely there would be anything more than trace amounts of free oxygen in an alien atmosphere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28126821</id>
	<title>yes! fp!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243537800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">and committees a 4opular 'news</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>and committees a 4opular 'news [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and committees a 4opular 'news [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28126433</id>
	<title>Re:Warmer?</title>
	<author>Geoffrey.landis</author>
	<datestamp>1243536540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...we also know that there are massive periodic dust storms.
Don't you think the storms would have eroded away the water gullies, or at least filled them with dust by now ? So I would say the formations are a lot more recent than "in the ancient past when Mars had a bigger atmosphere".</p></div><p>The cross-section weighted average particle size of the dust particles is about 5 microns.  Think of the particles as being ten times finer than the particles that make up talcum powder.  It's more like cigarette smoke than it's like sand; it's not very abrasive, and doesn't do much in the way of erosion.
</p><p>Sandstorms, like we have on Earth, do much more erosion.
</p><p>However, yes, burial and deflation of features is a well-known effect on Mars.  In some places the ancient surface is exposed, but in other places it is well buried.  There are a lot of places on Mars where all you can see is the overlayer of dusty soil.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...we also know that there are massive periodic dust storms .
Do n't you think the storms would have eroded away the water gullies , or at least filled them with dust by now ?
So I would say the formations are a lot more recent than " in the ancient past when Mars had a bigger atmosphere " .The cross-section weighted average particle size of the dust particles is about 5 microns .
Think of the particles as being ten times finer than the particles that make up talcum powder .
It 's more like cigarette smoke than it 's like sand ; it 's not very abrasive , and does n't do much in the way of erosion .
Sandstorms , like we have on Earth , do much more erosion .
However , yes , burial and deflation of features is a well-known effect on Mars .
In some places the ancient surface is exposed , but in other places it is well buried .
There are a lot of places on Mars where all you can see is the overlayer of dusty soil .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...we also know that there are massive periodic dust storms.
Don't you think the storms would have eroded away the water gullies, or at least filled them with dust by now ?
So I would say the formations are a lot more recent than "in the ancient past when Mars had a bigger atmosphere".The cross-section weighted average particle size of the dust particles is about 5 microns.
Think of the particles as being ten times finer than the particles that make up talcum powder.
It's more like cigarette smoke than it's like sand; it's not very abrasive, and doesn't do much in the way of erosion.
Sandstorms, like we have on Earth, do much more erosion.
However, yes, burial and deflation of features is a well-known effect on Mars.
In some places the ancient surface is exposed, but in other places it is well buried.
There are a lot of places on Mars where all you can see is the overlayer of dusty soil.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123583</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122513</id>
	<title>Re:Whatever happened to...</title>
	<author>b0ttle</author>
	<datestamp>1243520100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Researchers did an experiment simulating the temperature and pressure conditions on Mars, and found that liquid water is possible because of the perchlorates Phoenix found on the soil. <br>
<a href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/05/26/more-researchers-say-liquid-water-present-on-mars-now/" title="universetoday.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.universetoday.com/2009/05/26/more-researchers-say-liquid-water-present-on-mars-now/</a> [universetoday.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Researchers did an experiment simulating the temperature and pressure conditions on Mars , and found that liquid water is possible because of the perchlorates Phoenix found on the soil .
http : //www.universetoday.com/2009/05/26/more-researchers-say-liquid-water-present-on-mars-now/ [ universetoday.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Researchers did an experiment simulating the temperature and pressure conditions on Mars, and found that liquid water is possible because of the perchlorates Phoenix found on the soil.
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/05/26/more-researchers-say-liquid-water-present-on-mars-now/ [universetoday.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122229</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28125347</id>
	<title>Re:Warmer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243532640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>OPINION: There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm. <i>Weather</i> or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...</p></div><p>Was the intention a pun regarding possible topical/humid weather conditions?...If not it should have been.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>OPINION : There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm .
Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...Was the intention a pun regarding possible topical/humid weather conditions ? ...If not it should have been .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OPINION: There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm.
Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...Was the intention a pun regarding possible topical/humid weather conditions?...If not it should have been.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122499</id>
	<title>? bunch of idoits.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243520040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have seen articles like these almost a year ago. Whats the repeat for?  They have teams of idiots trying to make observations from thousands of miles away. all they need to do is fly some dynamite and crack down on mar surface. Then fly a team of archeologist in space suits to dig.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have seen articles like these almost a year ago .
Whats the repeat for ?
They have teams of idiots trying to make observations from thousands of miles away .
all they need to do is fly some dynamite and crack down on mar surface .
Then fly a team of archeologist in space suits to dig .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have seen articles like these almost a year ago.
Whats the repeat for?
They have teams of idiots trying to make observations from thousands of miles away.
all they need to do is fly some dynamite and crack down on mar surface.
Then fly a team of archeologist in space suits to dig.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28127339</id>
	<title>mod 3own</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243539240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">by fundamentajl Wh3ther you</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>by fundamentajl Wh3ther you [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by fundamentajl Wh3ther you [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122489</id>
	<title>Noobs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243520040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We had rain in mid-february</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We had rain in mid-february</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We had rain in mid-february</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123463</id>
	<title>Re:Duh! No real news here, move along please...</title>
	<author>moteyalpha</author>
	<datestamp>1243524480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In college( 40 years ago) we poured the salt shakers into the ice water and then stuck the glass on a pat of butter to bond it to the trays. <br>I don't find the speculation very interesting or new, either, and I will add that since they have no complete knowledge, and a way to verify, the planet could have been covered in fudge and cellophane.<br>More scientifically, I could say that there are so many dimensions in the NULL space of <i>that</i> matrix that selecting one of infinite possible vector solutions is just silly^(n-r).<br>And you forgot:<ul> <li>4. profit.</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>In college ( 40 years ago ) we poured the salt shakers into the ice water and then stuck the glass on a pat of butter to bond it to the trays .
I do n't find the speculation very interesting or new , either , and I will add that since they have no complete knowledge , and a way to verify , the planet could have been covered in fudge and cellophane.More scientifically , I could say that there are so many dimensions in the NULL space of that matrix that selecting one of infinite possible vector solutions is just silly ^ ( n-r ) .And you forgot : 4. profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In college( 40 years ago) we poured the salt shakers into the ice water and then stuck the glass on a pat of butter to bond it to the trays.
I don't find the speculation very interesting or new, either, and I will add that since they have no complete knowledge, and a way to verify, the planet could have been covered in fudge and cellophane.More scientifically, I could say that there are so many dimensions in the NULL space of that matrix that selecting one of infinite possible vector solutions is just silly^(n-r).And you forgot: 4. profit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122269</id>
	<title>no where left to hide</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243518840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>never a better time to pause, &amp; think about being kinder to, &amp; taking better care of, each other. that might cool things down a bit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>never a better time to pause , &amp; think about being kinder to , &amp; taking better care of , each other .
that might cool things down a bit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>never a better time to pause, &amp; think about being kinder to, &amp; taking better care of, each other.
that might cool things down a bit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999</id>
	<title>Re:Warmer?</title>
	<author>scorp1us</author>
	<datestamp>1243522440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The atmospheric composition of Mars is predominantly CO2 (95\%). If you take some eco-nut stance, the warming is linear, if you take a better-modeled stance you'll find it is less than that. (Diminishes logarithmically)</p><p>The real question is one of geology. Was Mars' inner core capable of producing a protective magnetic should like the Earth's? Remember Mars is smaller and will therefore cool faster. Our core, as the theory goes is made by counter-rotating spheres of liquid iron. With this, comes a thick, rich and creamy atmosphere shielded from the solar wind by the magnetic field.</p><p>The other question is what was the older composition of the thick atmosphere. Mars has too much methane, allegedly. Both methane and water vapor are far better greenhouse gasses than CO2. (Terrestrially we worry about CO2, because it is our biggest byproduct of human activity, and is stable molecule that either needs a plant to make it into sugar, or the ocean to sink it to the bottom).</p><p>The surface of Mars can reach 25C from being heated by the Sun. So there is a decent amount of energy.</p><p>OPINION: There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm. Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The atmospheric composition of Mars is predominantly CO2 ( 95 \ % ) .
If you take some eco-nut stance , the warming is linear , if you take a better-modeled stance you 'll find it is less than that .
( Diminishes logarithmically ) The real question is one of geology .
Was Mars ' inner core capable of producing a protective magnetic should like the Earth 's ?
Remember Mars is smaller and will therefore cool faster .
Our core , as the theory goes is made by counter-rotating spheres of liquid iron .
With this , comes a thick , rich and creamy atmosphere shielded from the solar wind by the magnetic field.The other question is what was the older composition of the thick atmosphere .
Mars has too much methane , allegedly .
Both methane and water vapor are far better greenhouse gasses than CO2 .
( Terrestrially we worry about CO2 , because it is our biggest byproduct of human activity , and is stable molecule that either needs a plant to make it into sugar , or the ocean to sink it to the bottom ) .The surface of Mars can reach 25C from being heated by the Sun .
So there is a decent amount of energy.OPINION : There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm .
Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The atmospheric composition of Mars is predominantly CO2 (95\%).
If you take some eco-nut stance, the warming is linear, if you take a better-modeled stance you'll find it is less than that.
(Diminishes logarithmically)The real question is one of geology.
Was Mars' inner core capable of producing a protective magnetic should like the Earth's?
Remember Mars is smaller and will therefore cool faster.
Our core, as the theory goes is made by counter-rotating spheres of liquid iron.
With this, comes a thick, rich and creamy atmosphere shielded from the solar wind by the magnetic field.The other question is what was the older composition of the thick atmosphere.
Mars has too much methane, allegedly.
Both methane and water vapor are far better greenhouse gasses than CO2.
(Terrestrially we worry about CO2, because it is our biggest byproduct of human activity, and is stable molecule that either needs a plant to make it into sugar, or the ocean to sink it to the bottom).The surface of Mars can reach 25C from being heated by the Sun.
So there is a decent amount of energy.OPINION: There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm.
Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122303</id>
	<title>Quaaaaaid...</title>
	<author>tygerstripes</author>
	<datestamp>1243519020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quaaaaaaid... free Maaaaars...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quaaaaaaid... free Maaaaars.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quaaaaaaid... free Maaaaars...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122221</id>
	<title>Briny rivers</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1243518540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here on earth we have so much water. Where did this water come from? The magical water comet?</p><p>No! Water is a naturally occurring compound, like basalt and methane. So water can exist anywhere the conditions are right for it. And Mars is right for it.</p><p>We don't need to see the crystallized mineral deposits on the riverbeds to understand there was water running. There were riverbeds!</p><p>But if there was salt in the water, there was probably also life in that water. Life living in the salty water making it saltier by pissing in it every single day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here on earth we have so much water .
Where did this water come from ?
The magical water comet ? No !
Water is a naturally occurring compound , like basalt and methane .
So water can exist anywhere the conditions are right for it .
And Mars is right for it.We do n't need to see the crystallized mineral deposits on the riverbeds to understand there was water running .
There were riverbeds ! But if there was salt in the water , there was probably also life in that water .
Life living in the salty water making it saltier by pissing in it every single day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here on earth we have so much water.
Where did this water come from?
The magical water comet?No!
Water is a naturally occurring compound, like basalt and methane.
So water can exist anywhere the conditions are right for it.
And Mars is right for it.We don't need to see the crystallized mineral deposits on the riverbeds to understand there was water running.
There were riverbeds!But if there was salt in the water, there was probably also life in that water.
Life living in the salty water making it saltier by pissing in it every single day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122399</id>
	<title>the next frontier</title>
	<author>IlluminatedOne</author>
	<datestamp>1243519500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've so many things to learn from our red neighbor. I hate to put my tin foil hat on this early in the day, but I oft wonder how much data has been retrieved/analyzed/hypothesized upon that we (mouth breathers at-large) have not been made aware of. There are some tantalizing possibilities with Mars, both to learn of our past and to help forge our future. Like Buzz Aldrin, I think whomever the first Mars pioneers wind up being, they should not plan on returning...<br> <br>Without giving the scientific method a nod, it easy to say 'of course there's water on Mars...duh!', but I still await the slam dunk chemical analysis. Too many things fool the eye from a distance, like so many men/women from across the room...</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've so many things to learn from our red neighbor .
I hate to put my tin foil hat on this early in the day , but I oft wonder how much data has been retrieved/analyzed/hypothesized upon that we ( mouth breathers at-large ) have not been made aware of .
There are some tantalizing possibilities with Mars , both to learn of our past and to help forge our future .
Like Buzz Aldrin , I think whomever the first Mars pioneers wind up being , they should not plan on returning... Without giving the scientific method a nod , it easy to say 'of course there 's water on Mars...duh !
' , but I still await the slam dunk chemical analysis .
Too many things fool the eye from a distance , like so many men/women from across the room.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've so many things to learn from our red neighbor.
I hate to put my tin foil hat on this early in the day, but I oft wonder how much data has been retrieved/analyzed/hypothesized upon that we (mouth breathers at-large) have not been made aware of.
There are some tantalizing possibilities with Mars, both to learn of our past and to help forge our future.
Like Buzz Aldrin, I think whomever the first Mars pioneers wind up being, they should not plan on returning... Without giving the scientific method a nod, it easy to say 'of course there's water on Mars...duh!
', but I still await the slam dunk chemical analysis.
Too many things fool the eye from a distance, like so many men/women from across the room...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122415</id>
	<title>Coulda, woulda, shoulda</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1243519560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, another speculative article from someone one what COULD have been. I wish one of these days NASA would give me more than models, simulations, possibilities, and probes that are SUPPOSED to reveal actual conclusive evidence but which never do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , another speculative article from someone one what COULD have been .
I wish one of these days NASA would give me more than models , simulations , possibilities , and probes that are SUPPOSED to reveal actual conclusive evidence but which never do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, another speculative article from someone one what COULD have been.
I wish one of these days NASA would give me more than models, simulations, possibilities, and probes that are SUPPOSED to reveal actual conclusive evidence but which never do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375</id>
	<title>Warmer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243519380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it possible that mars was warmer at a time? Either with a high level of CO2 or some other greenhouse gas that would have warmed the surface enough for running water? Maybe a little more dramatic but maybe even a slightly closer orbit?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it possible that mars was warmer at a time ?
Either with a high level of CO2 or some other greenhouse gas that would have warmed the surface enough for running water ?
Maybe a little more dramatic but maybe even a slightly closer orbit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it possible that mars was warmer at a time?
Either with a high level of CO2 or some other greenhouse gas that would have warmed the surface enough for running water?
Maybe a little more dramatic but maybe even a slightly closer orbit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124119</id>
	<title>The magical comet? Umm , yes actually</title>
	<author>Viol8</author>
	<datestamp>1243527600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The current theory is that a lot if not most of the water on earth came from water comets bombarding it after it had solidifed and cooled enough so that the water didn't just boil away out of the atmosphere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The current theory is that a lot if not most of the water on earth came from water comets bombarding it after it had solidifed and cooled enough so that the water did n't just boil away out of the atmosphere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The current theory is that a lot if not most of the water on earth came from water comets bombarding it after it had solidifed and cooled enough so that the water didn't just boil away out of the atmosphere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122221</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122581</id>
	<title>So what</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243520400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dhhuuu, move one. Found any beer yet? I'm not going unless there are proof there is beer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dhhuuu , move one .
Found any beer yet ?
I 'm not going unless there are proof there is beer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dhhuuu, move one.
Found any beer yet?
I'm not going unless there are proof there is beer</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124285</id>
	<title>Re:Duh! No real news here, move along please...</title>
	<author>Uber Banker</author>
	<datestamp>1243528200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess if in a salaried environment and 'not nitpicking and actually having something useful to say' were built into a package you'd say something more useful than the above.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess if in a salaried environment and 'not nitpicking and actually having something useful to say ' were built into a package you 'd say something more useful than the above .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess if in a salaried environment and 'not nitpicking and actually having something useful to say' were built into a package you'd say something more useful than the above.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122683</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123205</id>
	<title>Water water water</title>
	<author>coopaq</author>
	<datestamp>1243523340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody needs to get those guys at NASA a glass of water already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody needs to get those guys at NASA a glass of water already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody needs to get those guys at NASA a glass of water already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123569</id>
	<title>can we start terraforming yet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243524960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not going to see any Mars terraforming efforts in my lifetime, am I?</p><p>That sucks. Why are we so slow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not going to see any Mars terraforming efforts in my lifetime , am I ? That sucks .
Why are we so slow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not going to see any Mars terraforming efforts in my lifetime, am I?That sucks.
Why are we so slow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28134983</id>
	<title>Re:can we start terraforming yet?</title>
	<author>Spugglefink</author>
	<datestamp>1243534260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'Cuz those MPAA bastards at Paramount won't release the schematic to the fucking Genesis device.  Sons of bitches!  I could be drinking margaritas at the foot of Mons Olympus by now.</p><p>At least briefly anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'Cuz those MPAA bastards at Paramount wo n't release the schematic to the fucking Genesis device .
Sons of bitches !
I could be drinking margaritas at the foot of Mons Olympus by now.At least briefly anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'Cuz those MPAA bastards at Paramount won't release the schematic to the fucking Genesis device.
Sons of bitches!
I could be drinking margaritas at the foot of Mons Olympus by now.At least briefly anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123569</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123237</id>
	<title>Re:Warmer?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1243523400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>OPINION: There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm. Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...</p></div><p>The pressure and temperature matter more than whether you can breathe the atmosphere without a mask. But maybe I'm just biased towards a rapid terraforming model<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>OPINION : There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm .
Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...The pressure and temperature matter more than whether you can breathe the atmosphere without a mask .
But maybe I 'm just biased towards a rapid terraforming model : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OPINION: There is enough evidence to suggest that Mars could have been roughly equivalent to tropical - humid and warm.
Weather or not its breathable is a whole other story with all that supposed methane...The pressure and temperature matter more than whether you can breathe the atmosphere without a mask.
But maybe I'm just biased towards a rapid terraforming model :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122683</id>
	<title>Duh!  No real news here, move along please...</title>
	<author>strangedays</author>
	<datestamp>1243520940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"We found that the salts in water solutions can reduce the melting point of water, which may help explain how liquid water existed in a frozen Martian environment"  -- Alberto Fairen, a space scientist at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. and the lead author of the study.
<p>
<i>Scientists concluded that salty liquid water on Mars may explain the stability of fluids against freezing on the Martian surface at temperatures below 0C</i>

</p><p>
No! Really?  That's completely well...  unsurprising...  </p><p>
I always wondered why we spread salt on the road in wintertime, turns out it helps melt ice.
Thanks for spending valuable research money to clear that up NASA!
<br>
There are however, three real mysteries here:
</p><ul>
<li>1.  How to get a job at Ames re-discovering totally obvious stuff.</li>
<li>2.  Why such a lame waste of taxpayers money makes it as an Article in Nature.</li>
<li>3.  Why lame articles in Nature make it into Slashdot as "news"</li>
</ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We found that the salts in water solutions can reduce the melting point of water , which may help explain how liquid water existed in a frozen Martian environment " -- Alberto Fairen , a space scientist at NASA Ames Research Center , Moffett Field , Calif. and the lead author of the study .
Scientists concluded that salty liquid water on Mars may explain the stability of fluids against freezing on the Martian surface at temperatures below 0C No !
Really ? That 's completely well... unsurprising.. . I always wondered why we spread salt on the road in wintertime , turns out it helps melt ice .
Thanks for spending valuable research money to clear that up NASA !
There are however , three real mysteries here : 1 .
How to get a job at Ames re-discovering totally obvious stuff .
2. Why such a lame waste of taxpayers money makes it as an Article in Nature .
3. Why lame articles in Nature make it into Slashdot as " news "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We found that the salts in water solutions can reduce the melting point of water, which may help explain how liquid water existed in a frozen Martian environment"  -- Alberto Fairen, a space scientist at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. and the lead author of the study.
Scientists concluded that salty liquid water on Mars may explain the stability of fluids against freezing on the Martian surface at temperatures below 0C


No!
Really?  That's completely well...  unsurprising...  
I always wondered why we spread salt on the road in wintertime, turns out it helps melt ice.
Thanks for spending valuable research money to clear that up NASA!
There are however, three real mysteries here:

1.
How to get a job at Ames re-discovering totally obvious stuff.
2.  Why such a lame waste of taxpayers money makes it as an Article in Nature.
3.  Why lame articles in Nature make it into Slashdot as "news"
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122229</id>
	<title>Whatever happened to...</title>
	<author>pHus10n</author>
	<datestamp>1243518600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whatever happened to the "looks-like-a-liquid" that was evaporating from the soil where one of the rovers was scraping?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever happened to the " looks-like-a-liquid " that was evaporating from the soil where one of the rovers was scraping ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever happened to the "looks-like-a-liquid" that was evaporating from the soil where one of the rovers was scraping?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123713</id>
	<title>i hear ringing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243525680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the pivotal factor is the great flood.  The truth is we (human beings) were created by God within a 7 day period etc etc... BUT the original home for us was MARS.  Hence the drastically different life spans, physiological discrepancies (giants and other deviations)and the environment.</p><p>Having completed this beta phase and learned some valuable lessons, God took the opportunity to launch His RC on Earth and implement the necessary changes to continue development (see changelog commonly known as bible).  Noah and family are the first true astronauts, having been relocated during the "40 days".</p><p>The methods of relocation employed by God resulted in the de-mobbing &amp; moth-balling of Mars - traces are there but not the ones we are expecting...</p><p>err, you get the idea...   So, can we make a movie or what?</p><p>(fire alarm testing all day today... the bells are making me craaaaaaaaaazy)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the pivotal factor is the great flood .
The truth is we ( human beings ) were created by God within a 7 day period etc etc... BUT the original home for us was MARS .
Hence the drastically different life spans , physiological discrepancies ( giants and other deviations ) and the environment.Having completed this beta phase and learned some valuable lessons , God took the opportunity to launch His RC on Earth and implement the necessary changes to continue development ( see changelog commonly known as bible ) .
Noah and family are the first true astronauts , having been relocated during the " 40 days " .The methods of relocation employed by God resulted in the de-mobbing &amp; moth-balling of Mars - traces are there but not the ones we are expecting...err , you get the idea... So , can we make a movie or what ?
( fire alarm testing all day today... the bells are making me craaaaaaaaaazy )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the pivotal factor is the great flood.
The truth is we (human beings) were created by God within a 7 day period etc etc... BUT the original home for us was MARS.
Hence the drastically different life spans, physiological discrepancies (giants and other deviations)and the environment.Having completed this beta phase and learned some valuable lessons, God took the opportunity to launch His RC on Earth and implement the necessary changes to continue development (see changelog commonly known as bible).
Noah and family are the first true astronauts, having been relocated during the "40 days".The methods of relocation employed by God resulted in the de-mobbing &amp; moth-balling of Mars - traces are there but not the ones we are expecting...err, you get the idea...   So, can we make a movie or what?
(fire alarm testing all day today... the bells are making me craaaaaaaaaazy)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122401</id>
	<title>Rocket Science Here!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243519500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Evidence suggests flowing water formed the rivers</i> </p><p>Who'da Thunk It!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Evidence suggests flowing water formed the rivers Who'da Thunk It !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Evidence suggests flowing water formed the rivers Who'da Thunk It!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28127391</id>
	<title>Re:DAN QUALYE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243539420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>No he's not. He's at home slycing potatoes.
Just kidding. I liked Dan Quayle. But what's he got to do with this story?</htmltext>
<tokenext>No he 's not .
He 's at home slycing potatoes .
Just kidding .
I liked Dan Quayle .
But what 's he got to do with this story ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No he's not.
He's at home slycing potatoes.
Just kidding.
I liked Dan Quayle.
But what's he got to do with this story?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122199</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122457</id>
	<title>Now that we have water...</title>
	<author>Nailor</author>
	<datestamp>1243519860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give this people eyre!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give this people eyre !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give this people eyre!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124997</id>
	<title>c0km</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243531140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">do, and with any you can. No, Don't be a sling Play parties the in posting a GNAA (Click Here your own beer</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>do , and with any you can .
No , Do n't be a sling Play parties the in posting a GNAA ( Click Here your own beer [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do, and with any you can.
No, Don't be a sling Play parties the in posting a GNAA (Click Here your own beer [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122989</id>
	<title>What's with all the trolls?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243522320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why so much hate for the red Planet today?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why so much hate for the red Planet today ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why so much hate for the red Planet today?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28140283</id>
	<title>Re:Briny rivers</title>
	<author>wastedlife</author>
	<datestamp>1243619400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where is the salt that life is pissing into the water coming from? Pretty sure it would come from the salty water as well. This would mean the water would not get saltier as more life pisses into the water. Not saying the rest of your statement is wrong, but the life making water saltier seems to be circular logic.</p><p>However, someone else made the point that the current theory is that Earth received much of its water from "magical" water comets. I seem to recall that many of them are made of ice, now what does ice melt into again?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where is the salt that life is pissing into the water coming from ?
Pretty sure it would come from the salty water as well .
This would mean the water would not get saltier as more life pisses into the water .
Not saying the rest of your statement is wrong , but the life making water saltier seems to be circular logic.However , someone else made the point that the current theory is that Earth received much of its water from " magical " water comets .
I seem to recall that many of them are made of ice , now what does ice melt into again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where is the salt that life is pissing into the water coming from?
Pretty sure it would come from the salty water as well.
This would mean the water would not get saltier as more life pisses into the water.
Not saying the rest of your statement is wrong, but the life making water saltier seems to be circular logic.However, someone else made the point that the current theory is that Earth received much of its water from "magical" water comets.
I seem to recall that many of them are made of ice, now what does ice melt into again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122221</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123583</id>
	<title>Re:Warmer?</title>
	<author>smoker2</author>
	<datestamp>1243525020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only problem I can see with all your comments is that you are assuming this took place a long time ago. We know that Mars can reach the mid 20s C and we also know that there are massive periodic dust storms. <br>Don't you think the storms would have eroded away the water gullies, or at least filled them with dust by now ? So I would say the formations are a lot more recent than "in the ancient past when Mars had a bigger atmosphere".</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only problem I can see with all your comments is that you are assuming this took place a long time ago .
We know that Mars can reach the mid 20s C and we also know that there are massive periodic dust storms .
Do n't you think the storms would have eroded away the water gullies , or at least filled them with dust by now ?
So I would say the formations are a lot more recent than " in the ancient past when Mars had a bigger atmosphere " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only problem I can see with all your comments is that you are assuming this took place a long time ago.
We know that Mars can reach the mid 20s C and we also know that there are massive periodic dust storms.
Don't you think the storms would have eroded away the water gullies, or at least filled them with dust by now ?
So I would say the formations are a lot more recent than "in the ancient past when Mars had a bigger atmosphere".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122199</id>
	<title>DAN QUALYE</title>
	<author>goombah99</author>
	<datestamp>1243518480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dan Qualye is having the last laugh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dan Qualye is having the last laugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dan Qualye is having the last laugh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124375</id>
	<title>Re:Warmer?</title>
	<author>pckl300</author>
	<datestamp>1243528500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't Mars already have absurd levels of C02?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't Mars already have absurd levels of C02 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't Mars already have absurd levels of C02?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122959</id>
	<title>Early Mars was warmer [Re:Warmer?]</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1243522200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it possible that mars was warmer at a time? Either with a high level of CO2 or some other greenhouse gas that would have warmed the surface enough for running water?</p> </div><p>Yes, that's a good summary of the current scientific thinking.  The Viking orbital images show a lot of the surface is sculpted by water-carved features, and the belief is that Mars originally has a much thicker carbon dioxide atmosphere, which provided a significant amount of greenhouse warming (*).  With the loss of Mars' magnetic field, this thick atmosphere was slowly eroded away by the solar wind to the very thin atmosphere we see today.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe a little more dramatic but maybe even a slightly closer orbit?</p></div><p>No, that's quite unlikely.  Planets are hard to move.

</p><p>-----
<br>*Footnote: The media likes to pretend that there is some controversy about the fact that carbon dioxide produces greenhouse effect warming (because controversy sells newspapers), but in the science community studying planetary atmosphere, there is no controversy whatsoever.  It is just physics.
</p><p>If you search hard enough, you can find somebody who disagrees, and quote them, and say, "look, not all scientists agree!"  And since this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. I'm sure somebody's about to do that: the miracle of the internet is that these fringe thinkers have just as loud a voice as people who have actually stufied the subject.  But nevertheless, the greenhouse effect is just physics.  And relatively simple physics.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it possible that mars was warmer at a time ?
Either with a high level of CO2 or some other greenhouse gas that would have warmed the surface enough for running water ?
Yes , that 's a good summary of the current scientific thinking .
The Viking orbital images show a lot of the surface is sculpted by water-carved features , and the belief is that Mars originally has a much thicker carbon dioxide atmosphere , which provided a significant amount of greenhouse warming ( * ) .
With the loss of Mars ' magnetic field , this thick atmosphere was slowly eroded away by the solar wind to the very thin atmosphere we see today.Maybe a little more dramatic but maybe even a slightly closer orbit ? No , that 's quite unlikely .
Planets are hard to move .
----- * Footnote : The media likes to pretend that there is some controversy about the fact that carbon dioxide produces greenhouse effect warming ( because controversy sells newspapers ) , but in the science community studying planetary atmosphere , there is no controversy whatsoever .
It is just physics .
If you search hard enough , you can find somebody who disagrees , and quote them , and say , " look , not all scientists agree !
" And since this is / .
I 'm sure somebody 's about to do that : the miracle of the internet is that these fringe thinkers have just as loud a voice as people who have actually stufied the subject .
But nevertheless , the greenhouse effect is just physics .
And relatively simple physics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it possible that mars was warmer at a time?
Either with a high level of CO2 or some other greenhouse gas that would have warmed the surface enough for running water?
Yes, that's a good summary of the current scientific thinking.
The Viking orbital images show a lot of the surface is sculpted by water-carved features, and the belief is that Mars originally has a much thicker carbon dioxide atmosphere, which provided a significant amount of greenhouse warming (*).
With the loss of Mars' magnetic field, this thick atmosphere was slowly eroded away by the solar wind to the very thin atmosphere we see today.Maybe a little more dramatic but maybe even a slightly closer orbit?No, that's quite unlikely.
Planets are hard to move.
-----
*Footnote: The media likes to pretend that there is some controversy about the fact that carbon dioxide produces greenhouse effect warming (because controversy sells newspapers), but in the science community studying planetary atmosphere, there is no controversy whatsoever.
It is just physics.
If you search hard enough, you can find somebody who disagrees, and quote them, and say, "look, not all scientists agree!
"  And since this is /.
I'm sure somebody's about to do that: the miracle of the internet is that these fringe thinkers have just as loud a voice as people who have actually stufied the subject.
But nevertheless, the greenhouse effect is just physics.
And relatively simple physics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122469</id>
	<title>Jeeij, another story about water on mars.</title>
	<author>Exception Duck</author>
	<datestamp>1243519860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's just send some water over there and call it quits and go to Io, Europa or Ganymede</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's just send some water over there and call it quits and go to Io , Europa or Ganymede</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's just send some water over there and call it quits and go to Io, Europa or Ganymede</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123463
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122959
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28134983
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123569
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123237
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122513
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122229
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124119
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28125347
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124375
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123441
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28140283
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122221
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28127391
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122199
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28126433
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123583
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_05_28_1235216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124285
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122683
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1235216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123569
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28134983
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1235216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122199
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28127391
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1235216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122683
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124285
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123463
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1235216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122229
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122513
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1235216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122221
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124119
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28140283
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1235216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122401
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_05_28_1235216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122375
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122999
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28125347
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123237
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123441
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28123583
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28126433
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28122959
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_05_28_1235216.28124375
</commentlist>
</conversation>
