This recitation covers:
Functions are values just like any other value in OCaml. What does that mean exactly? This means that we can pass functions around as arguments to other functions, that we can store functions in data structures, that we can return functions as a result from other functions. The full implication of this will not hit you until later, but believe us, it will.
Let us look at why it is useful to have higher-order functions. The first reason is that it allows you to write more general code, hence more reusable code. As a running example, consider functions double and square on integers:
let double (x : int) : int = 2 * x let square (x : int) : int = x * x
Let us now come up with a function to quadruple a number. We could do it directly, but for utterly twisted motives decide to use the function double above:
let quad (x : int) : int = double (double x)
Straightforward enough. What about a function to raise an integer to the fourth power?
let fourth (x : int) : int = square (square x)
There is an obvious similarity between these two functions: what they do is
apply a given function twice to a value. By passing in the function to another function
as an argument, we can abstract this functionality and thus reuse code:
let twice ((f : int -> int), (x : int)) : int = f (f x)
Using this, we can write:
let quad (x : int) : int = twice (double, x) let fourth (x : int) : int = twice (square, x)
We have exploited the similarity between these two functions to save work. This can be very helpful. If someone comes up with an improved
(or corrected) version of
twice, then every function that uses it profits from the improvement.
twice is a so-called higher-order
function: it is a function from functions to other values. Notice the type of
((int -> int) * int) -> int.
To avoid polluting the top-level namespace, it can be useful to define the function locally to pass in as an argument. For example:
let fourth (x : int) : int = let square (y : int) : int = y * y in twice (square, x)
What happens when we evaluate an expression that uses a higher-order
function? We use the same rules as earlier: when a function is applied (called),
we replace the call with the body of the function, with the argument variables
(actually, variables appearing in the argument pattern) bound to the
corresponding actual values. For example,
evaluates as follows:
fourth 3 --> (fun x -> let square (y : int) : int = y * y in twice (square, x)) 3 --> let square (y : int) : int = y * y in twice (square, 3)) --> twice (fun (y : int) -> y * y, 3) --> (fun (y : int) -> y * y) ((fun (y : int) -> y * y) 3) --> (fun (y : int) -> y * y) (3 * 3) --> (fun (y : int) -> y * y) 9 --> 9 * 9 --> 81
It seems silly to define and name a function simply to pass it in as
an argument to another function. After all, all we really care about is that
twice gets a function that doubles its argument.
Fortunately, OCaml provides a better solution — anonymous functions:
let fourth (x : int) : int = twice (fun (y : int) -> y * y, x)
We introduce a new expression denoting "a function that expects an argument of a certain type and returns the value of a certain expression":e ::= ... |
(x : t
fun expression creates an anonymous
function: a function without a name. The type makes things actually clearer.
The return type of an anonymous function is not
declared (and is inferred automatically). What is the type of
fun (y : int) -> y = 3 ?
int -> bool
Notice that the declaration
let square : int -> int = fun (y : int) -> y * yhas the same effect as
let square (y : int) : int = y * yIn fact, the declaration without
funis just syntactic sugar for the more tedious long definition. (This isn't true for recursive functions, however.)
Anonymous functions are useful for creating functions to pass as arguments to
other functions, but are also useful for writing functions that return other
functions. Let us rewrite the
twice function to take a function as an argument and return a new function that applies the original function twice:
let twice (f : int -> int) = fun (x : int) -> f (f x)
This function takes a function
f (of type
int -> int) as
an argument, and returns the value
fun (x : int) -> f (f x), which is a function which when applied to an argument
f twice to that argument. Thus, we can write
let fourth = twice (fun (x : int) -> x * x) let quad = twice (fun (x : int) -> 2 * x)
and trying to evaluate
fourth 3 does indeed result in
Functions that return other functions are so common in functional programming that OCaml provides a special syntax for them. For example, we could write the twice function above as
let twice (f : int -> int) (x : int) : int = f (f x)
The "second argument"
x here is not an argument to
twice, but rather an argument to
twice f. The function
twice takes only one argument, namely a function
f, and returns another function that takes an argument
x and returns an
int. The distinction here is critical.
This device is called currying after the logician H. B. Curry. At this point you may be worried about the efficiency of returning an intermediate function when you're just going to pass all the arguments at once anyway. Run a test if you want (you should find out how to do this), but rest assured that curried functions are entirely normal in functional languages, so there is no speed penalty worth worrying about.
The type of twice is
(int -> int) -> int -> int. The
-> operator is right associative, so this is equivalent to
(int -> int) -> (int -> int). Notice that if we had left
out the parentheses on the type of
f, we would no
longer long have a function that took in another function as an argument, since
int -> int -> int -> int is equivalent to
int -> (int -> (int -> int)).
Here are more examples of useful higher-order functions that we will leave you to ponder (and try out at home):
let compose ((f, g) : (int -> int) * (int -> int)) (x : int) : int = f (g x)
let rec ntimes ((f, n) : (int -> int) * int) = if n = 0 then (fun (x : int) -> x) else compose (f, ntimes (f, n - 1))
Up until now, we have only shown you pure functional programming. But
in certain cases, imperative programming is unavoidable. One such case is
printing a value to the screen. By now you may have found it difficult to
debug your OCaml code without any way to display intermediate values on the
screen. OCaml provides the function
print_string : string -> unit to print a string to the screen.
Printing to the screen is called a side-effect because it alters the state of the computer. Until now we have been writing functions that do not change any state but merely compute some value. Later on we will show you more examples of side-effects, but printing will suffice for now.
Because of OCaml's type system,
print_string is not overloaded like Java's
bool, etc, you must first convert it to a string. Fortunately, there are built-in functions to do this conversion.
string_of_int converts an
int to a
string. So to print 3, we can
print_string (string_of_int 3). The parentheses are needed here bacause OCaml
evaluates expressions left to right.
So how can you put print statements in your code? There are two
ways. The first is with a
let expression. These can be placed inside other
allowing you to print intermediate values.
let x = 3 in let () = print_string ("Value of x is " ^ (string_of_int x)) in x + 1
There is a second way as well. For this we introduce new syntax.e ::= ... |
This expression tells OCaml to evaluate expressions e1,...,en in order and return the result of evaluating en. So we could write our example as
let x = 3 in (print_string ("Value of x is " ^ (string_of_int x)); x + 1)
To handle errors, OCaml provides built in exceptions, much like Java. To declare an exception named
Error, you write
Then to throw the exception, we use the
raise keyword. An example using the square root function is
let sqrt1 (x : float) : float = if x < 0 then raise Error else sqrt x
The type of an exception matches the code in which the exception is
thrown. So for example, in the
sqrt1 function, the type of
Error will be
float since the expression must evaluate to a real.
Exceptions can also carry values.
An example is the built-in exception
Failure, defined as
exception Failure of string
To raise this exception, we write
raise (Failure "Some error message")
We can also catch exceptions by use of the
try-with keywords. It is important not
to abuse this capability. Excessive use of exceptions can lead to
unreadable spaghetti code. For this class, it will probably never be
necessary to handle an exception. Exceptions should only be raised in
truly exceptional cases, that is, when some unrecoverable damage has been
done. If you can avoid an exception by checking bounds or using options,
this is far preferable.
Refer to the OCaml style guide for more examples and info on how to use