BRUSSELS	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
June	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Nearly	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*)	O
donor	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
opened	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
checkbooks	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bail	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
struggling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Slobodan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Milosevic	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lightning	NN	*	O
transfer	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*	O
crimes	NNS	*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Hague	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Nobody	NN	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Hague	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP(VP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
sooner	RBR	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
better	JJR	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Yugoslav	NNP	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Miroljub	NNP	*	O
Labus	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*))	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
donors	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
conference	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
co-sponsored	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
hoping	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
raise	VB	(VP*	O
1.25	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1.47	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
urgent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
repairs	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
infrastructure	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
salaries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
teachers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
servants	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
midday	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
garnered	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
pledges	NNS	*)	O
totalling	VBG	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
1.37	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
grants	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
low	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
-	:	*	O
or	CC	*	O
no-interest	JJ	*)	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
three	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
target	NN	*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
3.9	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Belgrade	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
need	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-year	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
anounced	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
pledged	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
grants	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
loans	NNS	*)))	O
totalling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
530	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
450	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
pledge	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pledges	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
separately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Gunnar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Wiegand	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
spokesman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
External	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*	O
Chris	NNP	*	O
Patten	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Labus	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
until	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
last	JJ	*	DSE
minute	NN	*))	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
uncertain	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
attending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
contingent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Milosevic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
extradition	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	O
181.6	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*	O
session	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
German	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Germany	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
pledged	VBN	(VP*	O
153	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
marks	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
66.32	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ambassador	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
Takayuki	NNP	*	O
Kimura	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
pledged	VBN	(VP*	O
50	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
technical	JJ	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
10	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whole	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
southeast	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Europe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Johannes	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Linn	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
World	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
vice-president	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Asia	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
pledged	VBN	(VP*	O
150	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
calendar	NN	*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
over	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
three	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
Yugoslavia	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tune	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
540	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
US	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
concessional	JJ	(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Linn	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Belgrade	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Milosevic	JJ	*	O
extradition	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
talking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
integral	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
successful	JJ	*	ESE
formula	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
trust	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Aside	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
assistance	NN	*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
said	VBD	(SINV(VP*)	DSE
Labus	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
symbolic	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
fully	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
back	RB	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
politically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
diplomatically	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
financially	RB	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
bold	JJ	*	ESE
decisions	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fast	JJ	*	O
track	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
directly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
rules	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Labus	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Milosevic	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
extradition	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
equation	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
but	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
broad	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
introduced	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
''	''	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
played	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Milosevic	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
brought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
signal	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
respect	VB	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
obligations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Labus	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
recovering	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
decade	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
dramatic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
decline	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP(NP*	O
isolation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
...	:	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
middle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
complicated	VBN	*)	ESE
process	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
changing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
completely	RB	*)	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
political	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
system	NN	*))))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
This	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
long	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
painful	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Infrastructure	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
water	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
rail	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
roads	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
decay	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
mismanagement	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NATO	NNP	*	O
1999	CD	*	O
bombing	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
ended	VBN	(VP*	O
Belgrade	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
repression	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kosovo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
Albanian	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
A	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNP	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
firm	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
decisive	JJ	*)	ESE
program	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	O
integrated	JJ	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wider	JJR	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
dream	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reality	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
quick	JJ	*	ESE
fix	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Yugoslav	NNP	*	O
problem	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Johannes	NNP	*	O
Linn	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
failing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
support	VB	(VP*	ESE
Yugoslavia	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
struggles	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
break	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
past	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
surely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
higher	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
stable	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
prosperous	JJ	*)	ESE
Yugoslavia	NN	*)	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
integration	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
dared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
hope	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP(NP*	O
eight	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Berlin	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bodo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hombach	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
coordinator	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Balkans	NNP	*	O
Stability	NNP	*	O
Pact	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
delegations	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brussels	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
easier	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
motivating	JJ	*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
supply	NN	(NP*	O
Belgrade	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
desperately	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
needs	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Stability	NNP	*	O
Pact	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rebuild	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
years	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
communism	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cow	NN	*	O
grazing	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
village	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Meresti	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Harghita	NNP	*	O
County	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
bitten	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fox	NN	*)	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
rabies	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
consequence	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cow	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
infected	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
such	JJ	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
symptoms	NNS	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
owner	NN	*)	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
animal	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
intoxication	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
veterinarian	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
examine	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cow	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Very	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
soon	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
symptoms	NNS	*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
rabies	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
banging	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crib	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
restless	JJ	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
owner	NN	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
animal	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vet	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
forbidden	VBN	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
latter	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cow	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
head	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
lab	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
rabies	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
owner	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
neighbor	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
helped	VBN	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
animal	NN	*)))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
urgently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hospital	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Infectious	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Diseases	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Miercurea	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ciuc	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
preventive	JJ	(NP*	O
anti-rabies	JJ	*	O
treatment	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
carcass	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cow	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
burned	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
buried	VBN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
stable	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
disinfected	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Harghita	NNP	*	O
County	NNP	*	O
Sanitary	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Veterinary	NNP	*	O
Directorate	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
anti-rabies	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vaccinate	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
70,000	CD	*)	O
cattle	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
horses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
sheep	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pigs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
22	CD	(NP*	O
localities	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

GATUNA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Rwanda	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
July	NNP	*	O
6	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
Kagame	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rwanda	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Ugandan	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*)	O
Yoweri	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Museveni	NNP	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mend	VB	(VP*	O
soured	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
relations	NNS	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
neighbouring	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
canvas	NN	*	O
awning	NN	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RB	(NP(NP(QP(ADVP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occasion	NN	*)))	O
a	DT	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
hundred	CD	*)	O
metres	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
yards	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gatuna	NNP	*	O
border	NN	*	O
post	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
AFP	NNP	*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(ADJP(NP*	O
formerly	RB	*)	O
close	JJ	*)	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
each	DT	(S(NP*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
back	VB	(VP*	O
rebel	JJ	(NP*	O
movements	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
neighbouring	VBG	*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
mounting	VBG	(S(NP*	DSE
rivalry	NN	*)	DSE
lead	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
clashes	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
armies	NNS	*))))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Museveni	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kagame	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(SBAR(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fighting	NN	*)	O
broke	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kisangani	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
town	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
northeast	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
patching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Uganda	NNP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Rwanda	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hostile	JJ	*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
arising	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kigali	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
alleged	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rival	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Museveni	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
each	DT	(NP*)	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
backing	NN	(NP*	DSE
dissidents	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

KINSHASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
July	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
14	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
60	CD	*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
society	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
parties	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
rebel	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
DRC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preparatory	JJ	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
reviving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vast	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
facilitator	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Hacen	NNP	(NP*	O
Ould	NNP	*	O
Lebatt	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
38	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
representing	VBG	(VP*	O
seven	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
11	CD	*	O
provinces	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
designated	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
round	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
consultations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
formal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
various	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*))))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
dubbed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
inter-Congolese	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*	O
''	''	*))	O
--	:	*))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
20	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Botswana	NNP	*	O
capital	NN	*	O
Gaborone	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
facilitator	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Botswana	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*	O
Ketumile	NNP	*	O
Masire	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Masire	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
team	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
criss-crossed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Zaire	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prepare	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pursuing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provinces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bandundu	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Bas-Congo	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Equateur	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
Kinshasa	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Lebatt	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Masire	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
corners	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
''	''	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
superficial	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
exercise	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
feature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*	O
accords	NNS	*)	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
warring	VBG	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Zaire	NN	*))))))))	O
--	:	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
rebel	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
backers	NNS	*	O
Rwanda	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Uganda	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kinshasa	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Angola	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Masire	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
facilitator	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inter-Congolese	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Joseph	NNP	*	O
Kabila	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
young	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
father	NN	*	O
Laurent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
assassinated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
sidelined	VBN	(VP*	O
Masire	NNP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
biased	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
favour	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
rebels	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lebatt	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
deep	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
divergences	NNS	*)	ESE
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
concerning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
designation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
delegates	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
DRC	NNP	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
signed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Lusaka	NNP	*	O
agreement	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
players	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
overcome	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
divisions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
finding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formula	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
consensus	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Lebatt	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mauritania	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Lusaka	NNP	*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
speaks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
about	RB	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
One	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
ask	VB	(VP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
whom	WP	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
what	WP	(VP(FRAG(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
?	.	*))))	O
'	''	*	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Lebatt	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
facilitation	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
participants	NNS	(NP*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
6	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Zaire	NN	*)))	O
broke	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
rebels	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
backed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Laurent	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kabila	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
erstwhile	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
Rwanda	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Uganda	NNP	*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
insurgency	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
1998	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
favours	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
creation	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
instruments	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
regulate	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
16	CD	(NP(NP*	O
July	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
account	NN	(NP*))	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
specific	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regulation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signatories	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
framework	NN	*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bonn	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
reads	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
account	NN	(NP*))	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
vital	JJ	(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
viewpoint	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prospects	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*)))))))))))	O
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	DSE
interested	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
instruments	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
regulating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stable	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
signatories	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
sphere	NN	*))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
exceptions	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
reads	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
introducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
regulate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
negatively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
affects	VBZ	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
efficient	JJ	*)	O
character	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
reads	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
July	NNP	*	O
17	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
DaimlerChrysler	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
AG	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
recall	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mercedes-Benz	NNP	(NP*	O
luxury	NN	*	O
cars	NNS	*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
affect	VB	(VP*	O
vehicle	NN	(NP*	O
owners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
written	VBN	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
China	NNP	*	O
branch	NN	*))))	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
glitches	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
recall	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
China	NNP	*	O
Daily	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Germany-based	JJ	*	O
auto	NN	*	O
giant	NN	*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	O
150,000	CD	(NP*	O
Mercedes-Benz	NNP	*	O
luxury	NN	*	O
cars	NNS	*)	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fix	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defect	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
cause	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
driver	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
side	NN	*	O
air	NN	*	O
bag	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deploy	VB	(VP*	O
prematurely	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
recall	NN	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
purely	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	O
precautionary	JJ	*	ESE
measure	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Daily	NNP	*)	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
exclusion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recall	NN	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
claims	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
firm	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
biased	VBN	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
customers	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Consumers	NNPS	*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
complaints	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
problems	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
related	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Benz	NNP	(NP*	O
cars	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
Daily	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
discovered	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
1996	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
November	NNP	*	O
1999	CD	*	O
recall	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cars	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Asia	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
hot	JJ	(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
humid	JJ	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
thought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
trigger	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
bags	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
seize	VBP	(VP*	O
87	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kg	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heroin	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tajik-Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
border	NN	*))))))))	O

Dushanbe	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
21	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
July	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
patrol	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
border	NN	*	O
guards	NNS	*))))	O
discovered	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
sacks	NNS	*)	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
narcotics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Moskva	NNP	*	O
border	NN	*	O
detachment	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
section	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Tajik-Afghan	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*	O
July	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
expert	NN	*	O
examination	NN	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
sacks	NNS	*)	O
contained	VBD	(VP*	O
86.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pure	JJ	(NP*	O
heroin	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Border	NNP	*	O
Troops	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP*	O
Colonel	NNP	*	O
Aleksandr	NNP	*	O
Kondratyev	NNP	*)))))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
ITAR-TASS	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Drug	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
dealers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(QP*	O
3,600	CD	*)	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
narcotics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
tonne	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heroin	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Tajik-Afghan	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
colonel	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
2000	CD	(NP*	O
border	NN	*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
confiscated	VBD	(VP*	O
2,950	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
drugs	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
670	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heroin	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Kondratyev	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

TEHRAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Representative	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mashhad	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Khorasan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Turkmen	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
new	JJ	(S(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
issuing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
visas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Iranians	NNPS	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
intend	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Turkmenistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
issuing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
visas	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Iranian	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
temporary	JJ	(NP*	O
arrangements	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
second	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
ever	RB	(ADJP*	O
mad	JJ	*)	O
cow	NN	*	O
disease	NN	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
northeast	NN	(NP*	O
department	NN	*)))	O
discovered	VBD	(VP*))))	O

Nancy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
August	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	(ADJP*	O
ever	RB	*)	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bovine	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Spongiform	NNP	*	O
Encephalopathy	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
BSE	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
mad	JJ	(NP*	O
cow	NN	*	O
disease	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Meurthe-et-Moselle	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
northeast	NN	(NP*))))	O
France	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
diagnosed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
13	CD	*	O
August	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Longuyon	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
north	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
department	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cow	NN	*)	O
born	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1994	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
FDSEA	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Departmental	NNP	*	O
Federation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Farmers	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Unions	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Charolais	NNP	*	O
breed	NN	*	O
cow	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
GAEC	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Agricultural	NNP	(NP*	O
Cooperative	NNP	*	O
Grouping	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Bruyeres	NNP	*	O
herd	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Longuyon	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
signs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
illness	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
slaughtered	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
test	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
conformity	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	O
suspicions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
BSE	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
later	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
confirmed	VBN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
herd	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
220	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cattle	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
slaughtered	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
BSE	NNP	*	O
case	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Meurthe-et-Moselle	JJ	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
17	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
July	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Charolais	NNP	*	O
bull	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
south	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
department	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Aug.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
17	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
push	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Chinese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
language	NN	*	O
education	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vast	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Southeast	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Overseas	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OCAC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
head	VBP	(VP*	O
Chang	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Fu-mei	NNP	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
concluding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
symposium	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
work	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
communities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Southeast	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
education	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
cultural	JJ	(NP*	O
work	NN	*))	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
further	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	O
strengthened	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
communities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Southeast	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
limited	JJ	*	O
funding	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
her	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
entitled	VBN	(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
OCAC	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
focus	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
educational	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cultural	JJ	*)	O
work	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fewest	JJ	*	O
resources	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Myanmar	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Burma	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
mainland	NNP	(S(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
squeezing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
development	NN	*	O
space	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
huge	JJ	*	O
resources	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomacy	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ROC	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
break	VB	(VP*	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
difficulties	NNS	*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
implements	VBZ	(VP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
obtains	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
overseas	JJ	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
communities	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
38	CD	(NP(NP*	O
overseas	JJ	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
nine	CD	(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pacific	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symposium	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
exchanged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
views	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
cross-Taiwan	JJ	(NP*	O
Strait	NNP	*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MDC	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
again	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))	O

OPPOSITION	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
youths	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
agitating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
guns	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
shoot	VB	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
President	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
out	RB	(ADJP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
office	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
MDC	VBP	(VP*)	O
leader	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
address	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cape	NNP	*	O
Town	NNP	*	O
Press	NNP	*	O
club	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Reuters	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
having	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
rein	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
militants	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
keen	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
fight	VB	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rule	NN	*))))))))	O
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
choice	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
commit	VB	(VP*	O
ourselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
path	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
obstacles	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
resort	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
violent	JJ	*	O
overthrow	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
violent	JJ	*	O
means	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
...	:	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
You	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VB	(PP(PP(NP(S(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
and	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP(VP*	O
guns	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
and	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
shoot	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
man	NN	*))	ESE
out	IN	(PP*)))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
office	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
Please	UH	(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
thing	NN	*)	O
you	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
do	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
endorsed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
targeted	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
full	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ruinous	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
mistake	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Democracy	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Recovery	NNP	*	O
Bill	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seeks	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
opposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
plunge	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
deeper	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recession	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pushed	VBN	(VP*	O
unemployment	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
inflation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
interest	NN	*	O
rates	NNS	*)	O
above	IN	(PP*	O
60	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
sanctions	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
survive	VB	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
reluctant	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
stage	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
endorse	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*	O
option	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Until	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
subverts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
extreme	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
option	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
However	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
limitations	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
villains	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
face	VB	(VP*	O
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contravening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Law	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Order	NNP	(NP*	O
Maintenance	NNP	*	O
Act	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
threatening	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
violently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
remove	VB	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
referred	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
challenged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legality	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
LOMA	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
superior	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
since	IN	(ADVP*)	O
heard	VBN	(VP*	O
State	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
defence	NN	*)	O
arguments	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legality	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
laid	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
reserved	VBN	(NP*	O
judgment	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
rules	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
favour	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
convicted	VBN	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)))))	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
face	VB	(VP*	O
life	NN	(NP*	O
imprisonment	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Attorney	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
charge	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
appeal	NN	*)	O
fails	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
referred	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Charges	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)))	O
arose	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
allegedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crowd	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
''	''	*)))))	O
...	:	*	O
Zvatichada	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
tell	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))	O
...	:	*	O
please	VB	(S(INTJ*)	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
remove	VB	(VP*	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
violently	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*))))	O
constituted	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
breach	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
LOMA	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
alleged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
provoke	VB	(VP*	DSE
protests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
excuse	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
flirting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
mercenaries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	O
anyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
speak	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
language	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
violence	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
fire	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
performance	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mozambique	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Somalia	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*))))	O
speaks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
quickest	JJS	*	O
defeat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
MDC	NNP	*	ESE
lot	NN	*))))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
chose	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
path	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
analyst	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
condition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
anonymity	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

SA	NNP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SANDF	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
chief	JJ	(S(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Siphiwe	NNP	*	O
Nyanda	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
SABC	NNP	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*	O
news	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

SANDF	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Chris	NNP	*	O
Pepane	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Nyanda	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
goodwill	NN	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
strengthening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nyanda	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
then	RB	*	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Congo	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indonesian	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
alerted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)	O
bound	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Coastwatch	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Australia	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
75	CD	(NP*	O
nautical	JJ	*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Christmas	NNP	(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Indian	NNP	*	O
Ocean	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesian	JJ	(NP*	O
waters	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indonesia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
notified	VBN	(VP*	O
merchant	NN	(NP*	O
shipping	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
check	VB	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unconfirmed	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Norwegian	JJ	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
immigration	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Philip	NNP	(NP*	O
Ruddock	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
80	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Coastwatch	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Australia	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
maintained	VBN	(VP*	O
surveillance	NN	(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
flights	NNS	(NP*)	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
minister	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
resort	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
force	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
changing	VBG	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
renegade	NN	*	ESE
province	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Yi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
made	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
three-day	JJ	*	O
working	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allay	VB	(VP*	O
fears	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
amongst	IN	(PP*	O
allies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
cross-straits	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
assurance	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
escalate	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))	ESE
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
latter	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
acquisition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
offensive	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Weapons	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
reuniting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thai	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Singapore	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
pressure	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
mounts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
dialogue	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
poised	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
suit	NN	(NP*)	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
pursuit	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
unification	NN	*)))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resumption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dialogue	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
bogged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
president	NN	(NP*	O
Lee	NNP	*	O
Teng-hui	NNP	*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
political	JJ	(NP*	O
parity	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
unilaterally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
redefining	VBG	(VP*	DSE
bilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	ESE
state-to-state	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
relations	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
mellowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
bow	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
one-China	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
precondition	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
dialogue	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
latest	JJS	*	DSE
speech	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
long-standing	JJ	*	O
dispute	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
resolved	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
dialogue	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
respect	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
principles	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
freedom	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
heightened	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*))	O
Wang	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(UCP*	ESE
parliamentarian	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
private	JJ	(NP*	ESE
diplomacy	NN	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
recognition	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
worried	VBN	*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tactic	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chinese	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Premier	NNP	*	O
Zhu	NNP	*	O
Rongji	NNP	*)	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Thai	NNP	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Thai	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
visiting	VBG	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Parliament	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
increasing	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
unusual	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
rate	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
disapproved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*))	O
because	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
what	WP	(WHNP*	ESE
capacity	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
travel	VBP	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
treats	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	ESE
visits	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
us	PRP	(NP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
parliamentarians	NNS	(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hold	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quasi-official	JJ	*	ESE
status	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Taiwanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bangkok	NNP	(NP*)))	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
trips	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
voluntary	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
initiated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
visitors	NNS	*)	ESE
themselves	PRP	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Wang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
objections	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
stop-over	JJ	*	ESE
tactic	NN	*)	ESE
used	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
generate	VB	(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
host	NN	*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
still-tense	JJ	*	ESE
relationship	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Wang	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
optimistic	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
reunification	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
eventually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Macau	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
popularity	NN	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
attributed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
favouring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
less	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
10	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
now	JJ	*	O
favour	NN	*	DSE
independence	NN	*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
broad	JJ	(NP*	O
statistics	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan-born	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
voters	NNS	*)	O
favouring	VBG	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
account	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
65	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
23	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
population	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
unification	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
benefit	VB	(VP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Straits	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
2.85	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
visitors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Seoul	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Aug.	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yonhap	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
LG	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Electronics	NNP	*	O
Co.	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
code	NN	*	O
division	NN	*	O
multiple	JJ	*	O
access	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CDMA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
mobile	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
phone	NN	*	O
service	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tashkent	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
service	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
1	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Independence	NNP	*	O
Day	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
opening	VBG	*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDMA	NNP	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
LG	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Electronics	NNP	*	O
Co.	NNP	*	O
.	.	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Park	NNP	*	O
Chung-gun	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbek	NNP	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Anatoliy	NNP	*	O
Isaev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Perfect	NNP	(NP*	O
Mobile	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Alexey	NNP	*	O
Martinson	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dignitaries	NNS	*)	O
attending	VBG	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
LG	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

LG	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
contract	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shipment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDMA	NNP	*	O
equipment	NN	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Perfect	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mobile	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exclusive	JJ	*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
CDMA	NNP	(NP*	O
business	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

LG	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
30,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
circuits	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
800	CD	(NP*	O
Megahertz	NNP	*	O
CDMA	NNP	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tashkent	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Uzbek	NNP	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
planning	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
200,000	CD	*)	O
circuits	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2004	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

LG	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
upgrade	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
beginning	VBG	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Park	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
opening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
LG	NNP	*	O
CDMA	NNP	*	O
mobile	JJ	*	O
phone	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
neighboring	JJ	(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
occasion	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
LG	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
inroads	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Asian	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
central	JJ	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
23	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
rich	JJ	(VP(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
natural	JJ	(NP*	O
resources	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
state-run	JJ	*	O
Uzbektelecom	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
offering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
services	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Global	NNP	*	O
System	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mobile	NNP	(NP*	O
Communications	NNPS	*))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GMS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
100,000	CD	*)	O
subscribers	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bangkok	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Aug.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
28	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taipei-based	NNP	*	O
Chinese	NNPS	*	O
Federation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Labor	NNP	(NP*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CFL	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Labor	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ILO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bangkok	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
mainly	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
because	IN	*	O
of	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
laborers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

CFL	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Lin	NNP	*	O
Hui-kuan	NNP	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
observer	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Confederation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Free	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ICFTU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
labor	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
invited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ILO	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
affiliate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
CFL	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
objection	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
observer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
non-U.N.	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
opposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
sovereignty	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prerequisite	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
CFL	NNP	*)	O
gained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
high	JJ	(NP*	DSE
appraisal	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Thai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Filipino	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesian	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Vietnamese	JJ	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allows	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(S(NP*	O
laborers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
salary	NN	*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
counterparts	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
elevates	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Lin	NNP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
U.N.	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
two	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	O
related	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
labor	NN	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
abides	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
regulations	NNS	*))))	O
stipulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ILO	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Lin	NNP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
eliminate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
minimum	JJ	*	O
wage	NN	*	O
requirement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)	O
mainly	RB	(ADJP*	O
due	JJ	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pressure	VB	(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
labor	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
laborers	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
working	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
extra	JJ	(NP*	O
attention	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
labor	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ICFTU	JJ	*	O
founders	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ILO	NNP	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
model	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
quadrennial	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Burundi	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Abducted	NNP	(S(NP*	O
fishermen	NNS	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
rebels	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southwest	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
agency	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
28	CD	*	O
fishermen	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
28	CD	*	O
August	NNP	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Lake	NNP	(NP*	O
Tanganyika	NNP	*)))))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ransom	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
family	NN	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Rumonge	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
southwestern	NNP	*	O
Burundi	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fishermen	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
freed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
kidnappers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
FDD-FNL	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Defence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Democracy-National	NNP	(NP*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
rebels	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
confused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fishermen	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
boat	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Burundi	NNP	*	O
army	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
answer	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
antiglobalists	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
arguments	NNS	*)))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
personal	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Guy	NNP	*	O
Verhofstadt	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
taking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
care	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
partners	NN	*	O
opinions	NNS	*	DSE
'	''	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
heard	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
general	JJ	(S(NP*	O
considerations	NNS	*)	O
alternate	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	O
initiatives	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
concessions	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
sufficiently	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
concrete	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
10	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
attract	VB	(VP*	O
worldwide	JJ	(NP*	ESE
attention	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
timing	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
right	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

First	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Annemie	NNP	(NP*	O
Neyts	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
climate	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
read	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
globalization	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Parliament	NNP	*)))))))	O
;	:	*	O
later	RBR	(S(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
preside	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
informal	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bruges	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
antiglobalists	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
but	CC	(S*	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
little	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
violence	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
rather	RB	*)	ESE
targeted	JJ	(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Annemie	NNP	(NP*	O
Neyts	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
antiglobalist	JJ	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
set	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Gothenburg	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Genoa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
ablaze	VBP	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
However	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
protesters	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
listen	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
current	JJ	*	O
generation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
entitled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
receive	VB	(VP*	ESE
answers	NNS	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
colored	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
leftist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
ideology	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
game	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(S(ADVP*	ESE
at	IN	*)	ESE
once	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ideological	JJ	*	ESE
fight	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
capitalism	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP(VP*	O
listening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
arguing	VBG	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
cautious	JJ	*	DSE
approach	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1968	CD	(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
Paris	NNP	*	O
student	NN	*	O
revolt	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
annoyed	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
politicians	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sided	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
gain	VB	(VP*	ESE
popularity	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Neyts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
presiding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Liberal	JJ	*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
free	JJ	*	O
market-oriented	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
spontaneously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
talks	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1968	CD	*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
protest	NN	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
phase	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
contestation	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1968	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
protesters	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gulf	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
north	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
south	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Neyts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
noticed	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
while	NN	*)	O
reading	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kenya	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
holiday	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Morocco	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
All	PDT	(NP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
often	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
attributed	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
globalization	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	O
country-specific	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
corruption	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Neyts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
convinced	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
gaining	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
complex	JJ	*)	ESE
phenomenon	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
generally	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
reassuring	VBG	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
believe	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Tobin	NNP	*	O
tax	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
speculative	JJ	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
movements	NNS	*)))	O
-RSB-	RB	(ADVP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
stimulate	VB	(VP*	O
development	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
development	NN	*	O
debate	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
focus	VB	(VP*	ESE
enough	RB	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
stability	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	DSE
do	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	DSE
do	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
efficient	JJ	*	O
judicial	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Neyts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
resolute	JJ	*	ESE
defender	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Trade	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
save	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
Neyts	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
but	CC	*	O
in	RB	(S(ADVP(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*	O
far	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
refers	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
products	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
movement	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
persons	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
constitutes	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
factor	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1930	NN	*	O
's	POS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
depression	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
close	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
borders	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
situation	NN	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
got	VBD	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
opt	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*	O
model	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
alternative	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
conflict	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
isolation	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
nationalism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
ultimately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

International	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
cooperation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
slow	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
function	VB	(VP*	ESE
optimally	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
alternatives	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
fostering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
trade	NN	(NP*	ESE
anarchy	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
implies	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
totally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
liberalize	VB	(VP*	ESE
trade	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
WTO	NNP	*)	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
exactly	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
contrary	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
issues	NNS	*	O
regulations	NNS	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
penalties	NNS	(NX*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
case	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
regulations	NNS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
observed	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
young	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
small	JJ	*)	O
organization	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
cold	JJ	*	ESE
monster	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
depicting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Neyts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
understands	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
developing	VBG	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	DSE
feel	VB	(VP*	DSE
uneasy	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*	O
level	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
And	CC	*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
feeling	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Out	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
140	CD	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(NP*	ESE
50	CD	*	ESE
percent	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Geneva	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
countries	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
possess	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	*	ESE
expertise	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
highly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
technical	JJ	*)	ESE
negotiations	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
loaded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
sins	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
developing	VBG	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
link	VB	(VP*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
regulations	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*	O
regulations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
protectionism	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
abolishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tariff	NN	(NP(NP*	O
barriers	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
agriculture	NN	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
all	RB	*	ESE
about	IN	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Neyts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
rejects	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
understands	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Certain	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
excesses	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
above	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	ESE
summits	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
'	''	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
high	NN	*	ESE
masses	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
'	''	*)	ESE
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
call	VBP	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reaction	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
immense	JJ	*	ESE
gulf	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hype	NN	*)	ESE
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
often	RB	(ADJP*	O
worded	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
illegible	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conclusions	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
worse	JJR	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
G-8	NN	(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Closing	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
off	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
zone	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
means	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
containers	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Genoa	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
objectionable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
brutality	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
positive	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
summits	NNS	*	O
'	''	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
2003	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Neyts	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hype	NN	*)	ESE
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
answer	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
silence	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
protests	NNS	*))))))	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
exist	VB	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
living	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
politically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
highly	RB	*	ESE
sophisticated	JJ	*)	ESE
society	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
closure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Renault	NNP	*	O
plant	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vilvoorde	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Renault	NNP	*	O
law	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
brutality	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
closure	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
implemented	VBN	(VP*)))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
unheard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	O
instruments	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Unfortunately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Renault	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Vilvoorde	NNP	*	O
plant	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
close	RB	(ADVP*	O
down	RB	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
but	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
overcapacity	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
automobile	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
According	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Neyts	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
initiatives	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
alleviate	VB	(VP*	O
discontent	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
nongovernmental	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
texts	NNS	*)	DSE
include	VBP	(VP*	DSE
passages	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
heed	VB	(VP*	ESE
civilian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
society	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
pay	VB	(VP*	ESE
attention	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
durable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
development	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
else	RB	(S(NP*	O
we	PRP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
antiglobalists	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
realize	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
obstruct	VBP	(VP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
south	NN	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
justified	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
negotiate	VBP	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
do	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
regulations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
structure	NN	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
needed	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Otherwise	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
existing	VBG	(S(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
blocks	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
grow	VB	(VP*	O
stronger	JJR	(ADJP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
least	JJS	(ADJP*	O
developed	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	ESE
behind	RP	(PRT*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

VIENNA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
6	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Security	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*)	O
6	CD	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Macedonia	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
joining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
26	CD	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Balkans	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
republic	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

OSCE	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ambassadors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
55	CD	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
lifted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
objections	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
beefed	NN	*))	O
up	IN	(PP*	O
presence	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
slowed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
raising	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
mandate	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
contrast	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NATO	NNP	*	O
mission	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collect	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP*	O
Albanian	NNP	*	O
rebels	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Macedonia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
hoping	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
plunging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
civil	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP*	O
Albanian	NNP	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Slav	NNP	*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NATO	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
entered	VBN	(VP*	O
Macedonia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
collect	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
30-day	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
26	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Macedonia	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stability	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
depend	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OSCE	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
mandate	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
surveying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
situation	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
refugees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
OSCE	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
council	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
mandate	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OSCE	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
training	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Macedonian	NNP	*	O
police	NN	*	O
force	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
helping	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
organise	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
census	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meantime	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
doubling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
monitors	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
put	VBD	(VP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
minds	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
ease	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
OSCE	NNP	*)	O
comprises	VBZ	(VP*	O
55	CD	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
central	JJ	*	O
Asia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Monitors	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Macedonia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tokyo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
7	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Defense	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
Director	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Gen	NNP	*	O
Nakatani	NNP	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
Timor	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Nakatani	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
ceremonies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
commemorating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50th	JJ	*	O
anniversaries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signings	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Treaty	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Peace	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japan-U.S.	NN	*))))))))))))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Treaty	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
San	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Francisco	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Makiko	NNP	*	O
Tanaka	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
flying	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
via	IN	*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Timor	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
inspection	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
United	NNP	(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))	O
officials	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Self-Defense	JJ	*	O
Forces	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.N.	NNP	*	O
peacekeeping	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
15	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dushanbe	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
meeting	NN	(S(NP*	O
discusses	NNS	*)	O
helping	VBG	(VP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
Alliance	NNS	*))))))	O

Dushanbe	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
September	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
India	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghan	NNP	*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
closed-door	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Dushanbe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*	O
13	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*))))))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Gen	NNP	(NP*	O
Muhammad	NNP	*	O
Fahim	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
introduced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
replaced	VBN	(VP*	O
Ahmad	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Shah	NNP	*	O
Masud	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fell	VBD	(S(VP*	O
victim	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
assassination	NN	*	O
attempt	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
extension	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
aid	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
internationally	RB	(ADJP*	O
recognized	VBN	*)	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
tragic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
shocking	JJ	*)	ESE
events	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
shook	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
destroying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
urban	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
military	NN	*	O
landmarks	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
aroused	VBN	(VP*	O
grief	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
sorrow	NN	*)	DSE
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
struck	VBN	(VP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
women	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
children	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
defenseless	JJ	(NP*	ESE
civilians	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
scenes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
destruction	NN	(NP*)))	O
reminded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	ESE
devastation	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
falling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
victim	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
acts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bombardment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
targeted	JJ	(NP*	O
assassinations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
incursions	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
towns	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
villages	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Bayt	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jala	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Khan	NNP	(NP*	O
Yunus	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Rafah	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Janin	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tulkarm	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Ramlallah	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jericho	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Nabulus	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nobody	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
live	JJ	*	ESE
conscience	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
feelings	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(UCP(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
otherwise	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
could	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
moved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
events	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
sympathy	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
victims	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stances	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
totally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
biased	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
advanced	JJ	*)	O
US	NNP	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
intifadah	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
hoping	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
realize	VB	(VP*	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
realized	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
justice	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cause	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enormous	JJ	*	ESE
injustice	NN	*)	ESE
suffered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
expelled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
homeland	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	ESE
land	NNS	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
deprived	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
minimum	JJ	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
any	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
going	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
moved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scenes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
destruction	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
involved	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Manhattan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
sites	NNS	*)	O
destroyed	VBN	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
residential	JJ	*	O
neighborhoods	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
apartment	NN	*	O
buildings	NNS	*	O
parallel	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
combat	VB	*	O
lines	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
targeted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Apaches	NNP	*	O
helicopters	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
large-caliber	NN	*	O
artillery	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
machine	NN	*	O
guns	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
tragedy	NN	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
claim	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
standing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
ditch	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
twisted	JJ	*	ESE
logic	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
persecuting	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
denying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exercise	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	PDT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
comparison	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
theoretically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
valid	JJ	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
withdrew	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
continued	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
busy	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
following	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
targets	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
feeling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
sorry	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
incursion	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Janin	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
neighboring	JJ	*	O
villages	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
bombarded	VBD	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
sites	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
demolished	VBD	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	O
homes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
killed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
activists	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
non-activists	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
11-year-old	JJ	*	ESE
girl	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
realize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
difference	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israeli	NNP	*	O
cases	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cause	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
beside	IN	(PP*	ESE
right	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
justice	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
required	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
fronts	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
push	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
ally	NN	*	O
Israel	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
sensitivities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
hatred	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
injustice	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
spread	NN	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MADRID	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
14	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
Interpol	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
previously	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
confidential	JJ	*)	O
search	NN	*	O
warrants	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
vital	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
details	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
life	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
activities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Usamah	NNP	(NP*	O
bin-Ladin	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
suspect	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deadly	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
warrants	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
--	:	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
here	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	*	O
Interpol	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jesus	NNP	*	O
Espigares	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Ronald	NNP	*	O
K.	NNP	*	O
Noble	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
1998	CD	*	O
warrant	NN	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bin-Ladin	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Saudi	JJ	*	O
billionaire	NN	*)	O
housed	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
guest	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1994	CD	*	O
murder	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Germans	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Syrte	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Libya	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
file	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Libya	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
extradition	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
warrant	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
4	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
drafted	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
request	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detailed	JJ	*	O
description	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tops	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Investigation	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
FBI	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
most	RBS	(ADVP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	O
list	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
everything	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
biographical	JJ	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Bin-Ladin	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
born	VBN	(VP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1957	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jiddah	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
--	:	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
physical	JJ	*	O
description	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
black	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
hair	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
brown	JJ	(NP*	O
eyes	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
1.96	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
meters	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
6	CD	(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
4	CD	(NP*	O
inches	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
tall	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
67	CD	*)	O
kilograms	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
148	CD	(NP*	O
pounds	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
various	JJ	*	O
aliases	NNS	*)))))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
walk	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cane	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
noting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
speaks	VBZ	(VP*	O
Arabic	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
Southwest	NNP	(S(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
Asian	NNP	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
around	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
notes	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
offered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
five	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
5.4	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
anyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bin-Ladin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arrest	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Espigares	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Noble	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Interpol	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
named	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
date	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*	O
two	CD	*	O
hijacked	NNS	*))	O
airplanes	NNS	(S(S(NP*)	O
crashed	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
City	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(S(NP*)	O
hit	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
leaving	VBG	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
force	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Lyon	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
non-stop	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
filter	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Interpol	NNP	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Noble	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Interpol	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Budapest	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
24-29	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
member	NN	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
discuss	VB	(VP*	DSE
methods	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
justice	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Espigares	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Noble	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Interpol	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
organize	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
team	NN	*	O
specialized	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
identifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
victims	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
refusing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Interpol	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
collaboration	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
FBI	NNP	(NP*	O
investigations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
moments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
history	NN	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
marked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
forever	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
me	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
death	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
John	NNP	(NP*	O
F.	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Kennedy	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
Spain	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
forces	VBZ	(VP*	O
attacking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
mark	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
entire	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Noble	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Pope	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
promises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
crowd-puller	NN	*)))))))	ESE

Pilgrims	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pope	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
preparing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Pope	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
pilgrims	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Siberia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
450	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
340	CD	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
flying	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Tashkent	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
charter	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
220	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
arriving	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kyrgyzstan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
pilgrims	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Poland	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Austria	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
the	JJ	*	O
Philippines	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Switzerland	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Latvia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Ukraine	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Turkmenistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Lithuania	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Belarus	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Pope	NNP	(S(NP*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
22-25	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

GABORONE	VBP	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP*	O
17	CD	*))	O
Sapa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
USAID	NNP	(NP*	O
SIGN	NNP	*	O
DEVELOPMENT	NNP	*	O
AGREEMENTS	NNP	*))))	O

Executive	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Prega	NNP	(NP*	O
Ramsamy	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
USAID	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
dollar-based	JJ	(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
rand-terms	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
R7,77-million	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
drought	NN	(NP*	O
relief	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
R44-million	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
;	:	*	O
R6,48-million	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
objective	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
achieving	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
integrated	VBN	*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
R189-million	NN	(NP*	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
R898560	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
strengthening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
economies	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
non	JJ	(NP*	O
governmental	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
programme	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
R88,99-million	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
programmes	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
virtually	RB	(ADJP*	O
open	JJ	*	O
ended	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
topped	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
projects	NNS	(NP*	O
finish	NN	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
initiated	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
signing	NN	*)	O
sends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
importance	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
views	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
integration	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Botswana	NNP	(NP*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Lange	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Ramsamy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
secretariat	NN	*)	O
condemns	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
unreservedly	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
strongest	JJS	*	DSE
terms	NNS	*)))	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Replying	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Lange	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
days	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	(UCP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
global	JJ	*	ESE
village	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foundations	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
grateful	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Ramsamy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
read	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
close	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
finance	NN	*)	O
ministers	NNS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Blantyre	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Malawi	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
labelling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
ghastly	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
barbaric	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
learnt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	DSE
shock	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
sorrow	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
condemn	VB	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ghastly	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
barbaric	JJ	*)	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
wanton	NN	*	ESE
destruction	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
property	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loss	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
lives	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	ESE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*))	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)	ESE
see	VB	(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
culprits	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
book	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
14	CD	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
Angola	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Botswana	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Congo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Lesotho	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Malawi	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Mauritius	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Mozambique	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Seychelles	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Swaziland	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tanzania	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Zambia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

SOFIA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
26	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bulgarian	JJ	*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
claimed	VBN	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
aides	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)))	O
approached	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
purchase	VB	(VP*	O
spent	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
fuel	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Bulgarian	JJ	*	O
plant	NN	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Saudi	JJ	*	O
dissident	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
identified	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Ivan	NNP	(NP*	O
Ivanov	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
worked	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sri	NNP	(NP*	O
Lanka	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
Emirates	NNPS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)))	O
introduced	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
bin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
suspect	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
terrorist	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
10	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Peshawar	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
young	JJ	*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
chemical	NN	*	O
engineer	NN	*)	O
contacted	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intermediary	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
fuel	NN	*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kozlodui	NNP	*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
plant	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
offer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
200,000	CD	*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
commission	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sale	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Bulgaria	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
energy	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)))))	O
separately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
imagine	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bomb	NN	*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
products	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reactors	NNS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kozlodui	NNP	*	O
power	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
legally	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
selling	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
waste	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
stockpiled	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
secure	JJ	*	O
depot	NN	*)	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
processed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Anton	NNP	(NP*	O
Ivanov	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
26	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Vatican	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
any	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
soon	RB	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
judging	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Ministry	NNP	(S(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MOFA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)))	O
Chang	NNP	*	O
Siao-yue	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remark	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
wire	NN	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
mainland	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Vatican	NNP	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
preparing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
bridge	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
differences	NNS	*))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
slated	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
setting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
formal	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Vatican	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
report	NN	*))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Beijing	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
chances	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
boost	VB	(VP*	O
exchanges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Holy	NNP	(NP*	O
See	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
Oct.	NNP	(NP*	O
14-18	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Oct.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
24-25	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Rome	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Catholic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
scholars	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
former	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Italian	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Giulio	NNP	*	O
Andreotti	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
symposium	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
celebrate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
400th	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Italian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Jesuit	NNP	*	O
Matteo	NNP	*	O
Ricci	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mission	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1601	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MOFA	NNP	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
affirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
from	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
angle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Eastern	NNP	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Western	NNP	*)	O
cultural	JJ	*	O
exchanges	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sponsoring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
similar	JJ	(NP*	O
conferences	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
instrumental	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
better	JJR	*	ESE
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Catholicism	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
contributions	NNS	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Vatican	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
differences	NNS	(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Beijing	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Holy	NNP	*	O
See	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))))	O
dates	VBZ	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*	O
ago	RB	*))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Vatican	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
broach	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
being	VBG	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reaffirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
solid	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cordial	JJ	*)	ESE
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
links	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Vatican	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TAIPEI	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
27	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
officially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
become	VB	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Vice	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Steve	NNP	*	O
Chen	NNP	*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
March	NNP	(NP*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*)	ESE
estimate	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
earlier	JJR	(S(NP*	O
admission	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
entirely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
ruled	VBN	*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Chen	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chief	JJ	*	O
WTO	NN	*	O
negotiator	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
secured	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approval	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
working	VBG	*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Geneva	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
entry	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ministerial	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Qatar	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
undergo	VB	(VP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	(NP*	O
deliberation	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
tariff	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
1,021	CD	(NP*	O
farm	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
12.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
accession	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
20.0	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
phase	VB	(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
internal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
products	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
export	NN	(NP*	O
subsidies	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
tariff	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
3,470	CD	(NP*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
items	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
slashed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
4.2	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
eventually	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
6.0	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tariffs	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
imported	VBN	(NP*	O
cars	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reduced	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
30.0	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
entry	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
17.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
external	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
less	JJR	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
need	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
readjust	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
post-WTO	JJ	*	O
era	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	O
functioned	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
market-oriented	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
largely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
conforms	VBZ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
conventions	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan-made	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
stood	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
becoming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
even	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
competitive	JJ	*)	ESE
thanks	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
wider	JJR	(NP(NP(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
overseas	JJ	(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
lower	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
material	NN	(NP*	O
imports	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
expected	JJ	*	DSE
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
farm	NN	(NP*	O
imports	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
agricultural	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
vice	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
service	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sustain	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
excessive	JJ	*	ESE
impact	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
largely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
opened	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	*)	O
participation	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
service	NN	(NP(NP*	O
ventures	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
transport	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
telecom	NN	*	O
sectors	NNS	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
benefit	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
introduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
advanced	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
skills	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
expertise	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
abroad	RB	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	VBG	(ROOT(FRAG(S(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
27	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
China	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
suspected	VBN	(NP(NP*	DSE
separatists	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*	O
bordering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
clampdown	NN	*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
possible	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*	O
strikes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Large	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
People	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim-majority	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
far	JJ	*	O
west	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
suspected	VBN	(NP*	DSE
separatists	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
criminals	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minority	NN	*)))	O
religious	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
bureau	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kashgar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
furthest	JJ	*	O
west	NN	*	O
city	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Public	NNP	(S(NP*	O
sentencing	NN	*	O
rallies	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
counties	NNS	*))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Kashgar	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
identified	VBD	(S(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Yakefu	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
increasing	VBG	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
troop	NN	*	O
movements	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
night	NN	(NP*))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Kashgar	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unsure	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
where	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
orders	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
dispatched	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	DSE
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
attitudes	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devastating	JJ	*	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Afganistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
ultra-Islamic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
Taliban	JJ	*)	O
regime	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Diplomat	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
Arthur	NNP	*	O
Marquardt	NNP	*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kashgar	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Urumqi	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Dong	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jianhua	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kashgar	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
bureau	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Marquardt	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
separate	JJ	(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
police	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minority	NN	*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
departments	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
talking	VBG	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))	O
`	``	(NP*	O
development	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
program	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
minority	NN	(NP*	O
nationalities	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
opinions	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	O
close	JJ	*)	O
eye	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	VBG	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
expectation	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
mounts	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
home	NN	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspected	VBN	*	DSE
mastermind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terror	NN	*	ESE
attacks	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Usama	NNP	*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Zhu	NNP	*	O
Bangzao	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Tuesday	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	*	ESE
measures	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stability	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
border	NN	*	O
regions	NNS	*))	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
retaliatory	NN	*	O
strikes	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Authorities	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
aware	JJ	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Kashgar	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
4,000	CD	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
kilometres	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
2,500	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
only	RB	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tenth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
distance	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
desperate	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
instability	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
militancy	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
leak	VB	(VP*	ESE
over	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
frontiers	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bomb	NN	(NP*	O
blasts	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Urumqi	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*)	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP*	O
Turkistan	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
Dong	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kashgar	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
bureau	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
clampdown	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
usual	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
linked	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
national	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*	O
holiday	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
crackdown	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
normal	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
holidays	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kashgar	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ancient	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
historic	JJ	*	O
Silk	NNP	*	O
Road	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
tourism	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
border	NN	*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
affected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
situation	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Many	JJ	(S(S(NP*	O
tour	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
cancelled	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tourism	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
affected	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
neighboring	VBG	(NP*	O
Hetian	NNP	*	O
city	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hotbed	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impoverished	JJ	*	ESE
southern	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
borders	VBZ	(VP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
office	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Nippon	NNP	*	O
Foundation	NNP	*)	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pirates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Southeast	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*)	O
attacking	VBG	(VP*	O
ships	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
rise	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
several	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
pirate	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
shifted	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
syndicated	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
crime	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
attacking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
ships	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
minor	JJ	*	O
crime	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
theft	NN	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
robbery	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foundation	NN	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pirate	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sea	NN	(NP*)))	O
jacking	VBG	(VP*	O
ships	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
increasing	VBG	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Maritime	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
civic	JJ	*	O
organ	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
acts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
suspicious	JJ	(NP*	O
shipping	NN	*	O
movements	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
piracy	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
armed	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
robbery	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
sea	NN	(NP(NP*	O
anywhere	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pirate	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
half	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))	O
stood	VBD	(VP*	O
165	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
exceeding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
record	JJ	*	O
high	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
161	CD	(NP(NP*	O
pirate	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ninety	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
approximately	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
half	PDT	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Southeast	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
Asian	JJ	*)	O
waters	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
prominent	JJ	*)	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
sea	NN	(NP(NP*	O
jack	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
waters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
Sumatra	NNP	(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
ambushed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cruise	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Involved	VBN	(ROOT(SINV(ADJP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*)	O
two	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
employees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
merged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
established	JJ	*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
oil-related	JJ	*	O
company	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Indonesian	JJ	*	O
state-run	JJ	*	O
company	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pirate	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
day	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
waters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Borneo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
trawl-boats	NNS	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
lumber	NN	*	O
carriers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
ambushed	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
Indonesian-registered	JJ	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
attacked	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
crews	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
ships	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
captain	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
kidnapped	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
held	VBN	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eight	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
noted	VBN	(VP*	O
above	IN	(PP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
ransom	NN	*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
disclosed	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yoshihiko	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Yamada	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
division	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nippon	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Foundation	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
few	JJ	*)	O
piracy	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
vessels	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prevailing	JJ	*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
piracy	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
anti-government	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
amidst	VBN	(VP*	O
mounting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
unrest	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
afternoon	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
29	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
delays	NNS	*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
causes	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
successfully	RB	(ADVP*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
H2A	CD	*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
No.	NN	*	O
1	CD	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Tanegashima	NNP	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
milestone	NN	*)	ESE
puts	VBZ	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
aerospace	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
track	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
carrier	NN	*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foundation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
exploration	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
utilization	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
hurdle	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overcome	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
realize	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
astronautical	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
previously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
developed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
L	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
M	NNP	*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
launch	NN	(NP*	O
vehicles	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
rockets	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
primarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
low	JJ	(NP*	O
orbit	NN	*	O
satellites	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*	O
stationary	JJ	*	O
satellites	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
developed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
H	NNP	*	O
series	NN	*	O
rocket	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
performance	NN	*	O
characteristics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
H	NNP	*	O
series	NN	*	O
rocket	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
comparable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
aerospace	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
great	JJ	*	DSE
deal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
pride	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
achievement	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
compete	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
drastically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
reduce	VB	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
aspect	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
rocket	NN	(NP*	O
design	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
manufacture	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
adopted	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
simplest	JJS	*	O
design	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
implemented	VBD	(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
cost-cutting	JJ	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lower	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manufacturing	VBG	*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
satellite	NN	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yen	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yen	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
generation	NN	*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
both	DT	(ADJP*	O
inexpensive	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	O
reliable	JJ	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
things	NNS	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
plan	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
low	JJ	*	O
cost	NN	*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
brought	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
satellite	NN	(NP*	O
launch	NN	*	O
failures	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
multi-purpose	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
H2	NNP	(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
No.	NNP	*	O
8	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
predetermined	VBN	*	O
orbit	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
destroyed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
failure	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
row	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
incident	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
redesign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
engine	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
H2	NNP	*	O
rocket	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eventually	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
H2A	NNP	*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
carrier	NN	(NP*	O
rockets	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
invested	VBD	(VP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
utilization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*	O
technologies	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wishes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
21	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
year	NN	(NP(NP*	O
aerospace	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
centered	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*	O
development	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
field	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
satellite	NN	(NP*	O
communications	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
National	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NASDA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
spent	VBD	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
310	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ETS-8	NN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Engineering	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Test	NNP	*	O
Satellite	NNP	*)	O
8	CD	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
satellite	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
doubled	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
test	NN	*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
previously	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
launched	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
not	RB	(VP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
puts	VBZ	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lead	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
mobile	JJ	*	O
communication	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
allows	VBZ	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
test	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
satellite	NN	*	O
communication	NN	*	O
techniques	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
introduced	VBN	(VP*	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Japanese	NNPS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
H2A	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
surveillance	NN	*	O
satellites	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
included	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
development	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
program	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
allocated	VBN	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1.3	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
surveillance	NN	*	O
satellite	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
consisting	VBG	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
optical	JJ	*	O
satellites	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
radar	NN	*	O
satellites	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
huge	JJ	*	ESE
space	NN	*	O
power	NN	*	O
plant	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
proposes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
construct	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gigantic	JJ	*	O
solar	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
plant	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*)	O
generated	VBN	(VP*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
converted	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
microwaves	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
microwave	NN	(NP(NP*	O
receiver	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
earth	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
converted	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
electricity	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
12	CD	(NP(NP*	O
satellites	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
generation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unmanned	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
lab	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
supply	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
5	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
decade	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
stagnating	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
put	VBN	(VP*	DSE
space	NN	(NP*	DSE
exploration	NN	*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
top	JJ	*	DSE
priority	NN	*	DSE
item	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
program	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
aerospace	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ambitious	JJ	*	ESE
plan	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explore	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
planets	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
target	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moon	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Presently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
implementing	VBG	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP*	O
stages	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Lunar	NNP	(NP*	O
A	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
projects	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
delivering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
penetrators	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moon	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collect	VB	(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
data	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
landing	NN	*	O
site	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Apollo	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ring-shaped	JJ	*	O
mountain	NN	*	O
range	NN	*)))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dark	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moon	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Selene	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
project	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
200	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
price	NN	*	O
tag	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2003	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
comprised	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
lunar	NN	*	O
orbiters	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
soft	JJ	*	O
landing	NN	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
soft-landing	JJ	*	O
vehicle	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
data	NN	(NP*	O
collection	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
transmission	NN	*))	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
earth	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
processing	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
power	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
aerospace	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
path	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
becoming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Between	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1970	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
66	CD	(NP*	O
satellites	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
quantity	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
takes	VBZ	*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
project	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
astronauts	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
relatively	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*)	ESE
aerospace	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
revenue	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
1.1	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
trillion	CD	*)	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
represents	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
10.5	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
market	NN	*	O
share	NN	*)	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
stalemate	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reorganized	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
aerospace	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	DSE
priorities	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
five	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
spy	NN	*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
data	NN	*	O
relay	NN	*	O
satellite	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
transfer	VB	(VP*	O
data	NNS	(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
satellites	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unmanned	JJ	*	O
universe	NN	*	O
lab	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
test	NN	*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
communications	NNS	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
broadcasting	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
observation	NN	*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Kibo	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(PP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
experimental	JJ	*	O
module	NN	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
supply	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
H2A	NNP	*	O
carrier	NN	*	O
rocket	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*	O
share	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
aerospace	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
17.4	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)	DSE
set	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tokyo	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Oct.	NNP	*	O
8	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
shorten	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
one-day	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(ADJP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
due	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
British	JJ	*)	O
retaliatory	JJ	*	O
strikes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
government	NN	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Koizumi	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
hour	NN	*)))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
originally	RB	(ADJP*	O
scheduled	VBN	*)	O
time	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*))	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
earlier	RBR	(ADJP(ADVP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
scheduled	VBN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Marco	NNP	*	O
Polo	NNP	*	O
Bridge	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
site	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1937	CD	*	O
clash	NN	*)))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBN	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eight-year	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nearby	JJ	*	O
museum	NN	*)	O
commemorating	VBG	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
anti-Japanese	JJ	*	O
movement	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
constitutes	VBZ	(VP*	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
very	RB	(NP*	ESE
exceptional	JJ	*	ESE
circumstances	NNS	*))	ESE
--	:	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
necessary	JJ	*	ESE
evil	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
imperfect	VBN	*)	ESE
world	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bitter	JJ	*	ESE
pill	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
swallow	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
thoroughly	RB	(ADJP*	O
non-militaristic	JJ	*)	O
society	NN	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
ours	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
clash	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)))	O
provokes	VBZ	(VP*	O
healthy	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
reactions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
repulsion	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
unfortunately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
little	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
one	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Without	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
armed	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Nazi	JJ	*	ESE
regime	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
similar	JJ	(NP*	ESE
forces	NNS	*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
wind	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
sails	NNS	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1930s	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
battle	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reached	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tragic	JJ	*	ESE
culmination	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
11	NNP	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
limited	JJ	*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
ruled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
many	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
often	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
confusing	JJ	*))	ESE
reports	NNS	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
allows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
pattern	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
detected	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
network	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Usama	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*))	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
foundations	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
West	NNP	*))))))))))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
ramifications	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
worldwide	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
vast	JJ	*	O
amounts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
thanks	NNS	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Taliban	NNP	*	ESE
regime	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
excellent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
training	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
attack	NN	*)))	O
bases	VBZ	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
transnational	JJ	*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
exceptionally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
broad	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
committed	JJ	*)	ESE
strategy	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
targeted	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
infrastructure	NN	*)	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP*	O
Ladin	NNP	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
principal	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
acted	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
exceptional	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
caution	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unbelievable	JJ	*	ESE
provocation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
pains	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
build	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
broad	JJ	*	ESE
coalition	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
make	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
Islam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
defined	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
perverse	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
interpretation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
religion	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
placed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
stress	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
battle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
endurance	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
targets	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
began	VBD	(S(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
-LSB-	VBD	(VP*	O
7	CD	(NP*)	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
remain	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
risky	JJ	*	ESE
enterprise	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
coming	VBG	*)	O
days	NNS	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
reveal	VB	(VP*	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
effective	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
sufficiently	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
precisely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
targeted	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
limited	VBN	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
scope	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
condition	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
unavoidable	JJ	*	ESE
phase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
battle	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
humanly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
talk	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
success	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
broad	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
begins	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
bear	VB	(VP*	ESE
fruit	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
worldwide	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
include	VB	(VP*	O
both	PDT	(UCP(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
repression	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
importantly	RB	*)	ESE
constructive	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
positive	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
measures	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Whatever	WDT	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(FRAG(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
entering	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
period	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
danger	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
wounded	VBN	*)	O
but	CC	(VP*	O
not	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
yet	RB	*)	O
eliminated	VBD	*	O
network	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
trump	NN	*	ESE
card	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
commit	VBP	(VP*	ESE
further	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
acts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
disastrous	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
clear	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
effects	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
economy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
hitting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poorest	JJS	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
far	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*)	ESE
most	JJS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
positive	JJ	(NP(NP(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*)	ESE
unintentionally	RB	*))	ESE
negative	JJ	*	ESE
effects	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
choice	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
sat	VBN	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
arms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
folded	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
hostages	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Oct.	NNP	*	O
8	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
military	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
spur	VB	(VP*	ESE
global	JJ	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*	O
sentiment	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
brushing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
aside	RP	(PRT*)	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
uncertain	JJ	*	O
factors	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Council	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP*	O
Planning	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Development	NNP	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CEPD	VBN	(VP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
Chairman	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Po-chih	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(ADJP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
investors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
mired	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
uncertainties	NNS	(NP*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Chen	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
not	RB	*)	O
spread	VB	(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
limited	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
CEPD	NNP	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
early	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WDT	(WHNP*	O
extent	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
affect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
regain	VB	(VP*	O
momentum	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wu	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Hui-lin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
researcher	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Change	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hua	NNP	*	O
Institution	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Research	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
predicted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
business	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
rebound	VB	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
robustly	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
short	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
hi-tech	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
last	VB	(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
high-risks	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*	O
returns	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Wu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
optimistically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unnecessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wait	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
vast	JJ	(S(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
produce	VB	(VP*	O
opportunities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
construction	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(ADJP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
monitoring	VBG	*	O
subsequent	JJ	(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cope	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
situations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Wu	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
noting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
short-term	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
pains	NNS	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
eventually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
pass	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
everyday	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
normal	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
soon	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Czech	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Suspicious	NNP	(S(NP*	O
consignment	NNP	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Karlovy	NNP	(NP*	O
Vary	NNP	*))))))	O

Karlovy	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
Vary	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
western	JJ	(NP*	O
Bohemia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
15	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
October	NNP	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
police	NNS	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
firemen	NNS	(NX*)))	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
surroundings	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sokolovska	NNP	(NP*	O
street	NN	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Karlovy	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Vary	NNP	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
11:00	CD	(NP*	O
a.m.	RB	*)))	O
-LSB-	VBG	(VP*	O
0900	CD	(NP*	O
gmt	NN	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
due	JJ	(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspicious	JJ	*	O
envelope	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
shop	NN	*	O
employees	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mail	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
abroad	RB	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
address	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
envelope	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
written	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
Roman	NNP	*	O
characters	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
fire	NN	*	O
squad	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*	O
Roman	NNP	*	O
Krumhanzl	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
CTK	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Assisted	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP*	O
inspectors	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
firemen	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
wearing	VBG	(VP*	O
antichemical	JJ	(NP*	O
suits	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
respirators	NNS	*))	O
-	:	*))	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
envelope	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
plastic	JJ	*	O
bag	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
chemical	NN	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

SHANGHAI	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Oct	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
16	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Malaysian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Syed	NNP	*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Albar	NNP	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
prolonged	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
destabilise	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
calls	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
quickly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ended	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Syed	NNP	(NP*	O
Hamid	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(PP(ADVP*	O
ahead	RB	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ministerial	JJ	*	O
gathering	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
APEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
forum	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
worried	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Islamic	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
combatting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
prolonged	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
trouble	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
instability	NN	*)	ESE
all	DT	(PP*	O
around	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Islamic	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
ourselves	PRP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
support	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
ultimately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
rise	VB	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
seeing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
these	DT	*	ESE
innocent	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
killed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
...	:	*))	O

we	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
perceived	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Islam	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Syed	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hamid	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
deal	VB	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
rationally	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
security	NN	*	O
architecture	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
dimension	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
crime	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
humanity	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
For	IN	(PP*	O
continued	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
growth	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
architecture	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conventional	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)	O
but	CC	(SBAR(S(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
internal	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
At	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
focus	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
happens	VBZ	(S(VP*)))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Over	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
look	VB	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
terrorism	NN	(S(NP*)	O
manifests	VBZ	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
terrorism	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
properly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
defined	VBN	(VP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crime	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
humanity	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
so	IN	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Syed	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hamid	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
critics	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
affect	VB	(VP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
liberties	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
One	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
philosophical	JJ	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
idealistic	JJ	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
liberties	NNS	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
jeopardise	VB	(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
security	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
law	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
order	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Opposition	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mahathir	NNP	*	O
Mohamad	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
crack	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
dissent	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mahathir	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
APEC	NNP	(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
convening	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*))	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	DSE
declaration	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conclusion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
gathering	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
terrorism	NN	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
most	JJS	*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
law-abiding	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
affront	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Syed	NNP	(NP*	O
Hamid	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Predominantly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
Muslim	NNP	(NP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*)	O
supports	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
hunt	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
opposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mahathir	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
convene	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
16	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Northern	JJ	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
units	NNS	*)	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Gen	NNP	(NP*	O
Abdorrashid	NNP	*	O
Dostum	NNP	*	O
lack	NN	*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
ammunition	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
properly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
fight	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
Dostum	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
noting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
supplies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dostum	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
units	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-e-Sharif	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
aiming	VBG	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
seize	VB	(VP*	O
control	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
populated	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Samangan	NNP	(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
block	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taleban	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
units	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-e-Sharif	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dostum	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*	O
edition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Moskovskiye	NNP	(NP*	O
Novosti	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
commands	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
18,000	CD	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
about	IN	(VP(PP*	O
4,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Taleban	JJ	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
hardware	NN	*))	O
''	''	*))	O
have	VBP	*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
side	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
air	NN	*	O
strikes	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
destroyed	VBN	(VP*	O
Taleban	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
emplacements	NNS	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-e-Sharif	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dostum	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reports	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
concentrated	VBN	(VP*	O
large	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
such	JJ	*	ESE
forces	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
border	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Hayraton	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Uzbek	NNP	*	O
town	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Termez	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
slightly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
estimations	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Dostum	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
representing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP*	O
Uzbeks	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Taleban	VBG	(S(VP*	O
fighters	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
stained	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
blood	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Dostum	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
favoured	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
former	JJ	*	O
King	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Zaher	NNP	*	O
Shah	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

18	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Jiji	NNP	(NP*	O
Press	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Pakistani	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
Shaukat	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Aziz	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
late	RB	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*)))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
envoy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pervez	NNP	*	O
Musharraf	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
air	NN	(NP*	O
strikes	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Aziz	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Finance	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Masajuro	NNP	*	O
Shiokawa	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
meetings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Aziz	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
impacts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
flooding	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Musharraf	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
letter	NN	*	O
implicitly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
debt	NN	*	O
relief	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Oct	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Visiting	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
underscored	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
coordinated	JJ	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)))	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
fair	JJ	*	ESE
'	''	*	O
level	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
looming	JJ	*	ESE
recession	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terrorist	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
must	MD	*)))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
non-OPEC	JJ	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
producers	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
organization	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
alleviate	VB	(VP*	ESE
existing	VBG	(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
falling	VBG	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
prices	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
part	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
highlighted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
collective	JJ	*	O
quest	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stabilize	VB	(VP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reasonable	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
concern	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
producers	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
consumers	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
organization	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP(VP*	O
producers	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
price	NN	(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
markets	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Elsewhere	RB	(ROOT(S(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Khatami	NNP	(NP*)	O
lashed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
displeasure	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
developments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war-ravaged	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
comprising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reinforce	VB	(VP*	O
stability	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Khatami	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
`	``	(S(NP*	O
Dialogue	NNP	*)	O
Among	IN	(PP*	O
Civilizations	NNP	(NP*	O
'	POS	*))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
mitigate	VB	(VP*	ESE
clashes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
civilizations	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
durable	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuelan	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
holds	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rotating	VBG	*	O
chairmanship	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP*	O
Sunday	NNP	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Riyadh	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
related	VBN	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sunday	NNP	*	O
evening	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
deliberations	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
subject	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
important	JJ	*)	O
non-OPEC	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*)))	O
producing	VBG	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
embarked	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Austria	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Libya	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Algeria	NNP	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
garner	VB	(VP*	O
support	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prop	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Guangzhou	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
October	NNP	*	O
22	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
90th	JJ	*	O
Session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
Export	NNP	*	O
Commodities	NNPS	*	O
Fair	NNP	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
15	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
26	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
south	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Guangdong	NNP	*	O
Province	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
attracted	VBD	(VP*	O
wide	JJ	(NP*	DSE
attention	NN	*)	DSE
both	DT	(PP*	O
at	IN	*	O
home	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
abroad	RB	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
admitted	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forthcoming	JJ	*	O
new	JJ	*	O
round	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*	O
multilateral	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Doha	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Qatar	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
200	CD	(NP*	O
economists	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
entrepreneurs	NNS	*)	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Experts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
tremendous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
opportunities	NNS	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
entry	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
challenges	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
require	VB	(VP*	O
accelerated	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
profound	JJ	*	ESE
reform	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
enterprises	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Jinglian	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
economist	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
sets	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transition	NN	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
five	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
adaption	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
rules	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
practices	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
major	JJ	*	O
risks	NNS	*)	ESE
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
confront	VB	(VP*)))))	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
medium-sized	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
small	JJ	*)	O
enterprises	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
setting	NN	*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sound	JJ	*	ESE
social	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
society	NN	*))))	ESE
ruled	VBD	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

MOSCOW	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
October	NNP	*	O
22	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Itar-Tass	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
actively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
consultations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
exporting	VBG	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kremlin	NNP	*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OPEC	NNP	*	O
chairperson	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
interesting	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Relations	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
twice	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
important	JJ	*))	ESE
considering	VBG	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
present	JJ	(NP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chairperson	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
especially	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
satisfied	VBN	*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Russian-Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
stable	JJ	(S(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
dynamic	JJ	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
positive	JJ	*	ESE
factor	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(PP*	ESE
from	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
ensuring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
stable	JJ	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
supply	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
connection	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
keeping	VBG	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
within	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
range	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
turn	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
gratitude	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Putin	NNP	(NP*))	O
``	``	(PP*	O
for	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
generosity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
soul	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
thought	VBD	(VP*	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
friendship	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
enormous	JJ	*	DSE
interest	NN	*))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
thanked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Dushanbe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hugo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
visiting	VBG	(VP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Algeria	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
ever	RB	(S(NP(ADJP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
OPEC	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
begin	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
oil	NN	(S(NP*	O
production	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reduced	VBN	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
continuing	VBG	*	ESE
decline	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hydrocarbons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
market	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Late	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)))	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
stock	NN	(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
19.07	CD	(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(ADJP*	O
barrel	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lowest	JJS	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
effectively	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
protecting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
prices	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
exporters	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
May	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Amman	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Jordan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
bound	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
clauses	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Free	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Agreement	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
FTA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
mulling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	DSE
signing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
though	IN	*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
six	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Having	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
clauses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
labour	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
body	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
FTA	NNP	*))))))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
signing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	O
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Minister	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Municipal	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rural	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Razzaq	NNP	*	O
Tbeishat	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
conclusively	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
development	NN	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Certain	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
objective	NN	*))	DSE
--	:	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
signing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
deal	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
intentions	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
workshop	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
organised	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))	O
Development	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Programme	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UNDP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Climate	NNP	*	O
Change	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
compels	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
nations	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
blamed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
gases	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
factories	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cars	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
burn	VBP	(S(VP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
limit	VB	(VP(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
signing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
affect	VB	(VP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
upgrade	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
framework	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tbeishat	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
signing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
positive	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	CC	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP*	ESE
issues	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	(S*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(UCP(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
care	VBP	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
clean	JJ	(NP*	O
industry	NN	*)))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
-RSB-	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
sustainable	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	O
development	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
upon	IN	(PP*	DSE
by	IN	*	O
160	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UNFCCC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
industrialised	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
5.2	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*	O
to	TO	*	O
2012	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
1998	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
overturned	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
faltering	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
rising	VBG	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
prices	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sudan	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
due	JJ	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
Khartoum	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prepare	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
envoy	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
assistant	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Charles	NNP	*	O
Schneider	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Khartoum	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*	O
25	CD	*	O
October	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
three-day	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Sudan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Director	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*	O
Mirghani	NNP	*	O
Muhammad	NNP	*	O
Salih	NNP	*)))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Suna	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Sudanese	NNP	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preparation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coming	VBG	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
envoy	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sudan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ambassador	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Salih	NNP	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sudanese	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
personalities	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sudanese	NNP	*	O
charge	NN	*)	O
d'affaires	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NAC*	O
,	,	*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*)	O
Al-Khidr	NNP	*	O
Harun	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
Suna	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Sudanese	JJ	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
identify	VB	(VP*	DSE
viewpoints	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Sudan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
aims	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prepare	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coming	VBG	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
envoy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Sudan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kenya	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Remand	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
escape	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
custody	NN	*)))))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
offence	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
escaped	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
robbery	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))))	O
escaped	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Molo	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Rift	NNP	*	O
Valley	NNP	*	O
Province	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Police	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Deputy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Police	NNP	*	O
Spokesman	NNP	*	O
Dola	NNP	*	O
Indidis	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
escapees	NNS	*)	O
gained	VBD	(VP*	O
freedom	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
digging	NN	(NP*))	O
out	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hole	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wall	NN	*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
chisel	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saying	VBG	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
escaped	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
5.30	CD	(NP*	O
p.m.	RB	*)))))))	O

-LSB-	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
yesterday	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Indidis	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
police	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
investigating	VBG	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
obtained	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chisel	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
police	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
combing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
escapees	NNS	*))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
none	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
re-arrested	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indidis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
appealed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assist	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
re-arrest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ISLAMABAD	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Oct	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
29	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
unspecified	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arrests	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Salam	NNP	*	O
Zaeef	NNP	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

PESHAWAR	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
1	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
About	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
armed	VBN	*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*	O
tribesmen	NNS	*)	O
crossed	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
witnesses	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
crossed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Bajaur	NNP	(NP*	O
agency	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Frontier	NNP	*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
50	CD	(NP*	O
vehicles	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
witnesses	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Taliban	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
vehicles	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
border	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Kunar	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Maulana	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Ismail	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
leader	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
radical	JJ	*	O
Tehreek	NNP	*	O
Nifaz-e-Sharia	NNP	*	O
Mohammadi	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
adopting	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
relatively	RB	(ADJP*	O
new	JJ	*)	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
towns	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
re-occupied	VBN	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
three	CD	*)	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
implementing	VBG	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
total	JJ	*	ESE
withdrawal	NN	*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
demanded	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whole	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
--	:	*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
phased	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
partial	JJ	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
town	NN	*)	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cease-fire	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
particular	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
town	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
eventually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
integrated	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
total	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
map	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
cantons	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
envisions	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
lands	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bayt	NNP	*	O
Jala	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	ESE
so	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
claims	VBZ	(VP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
yesterday	NN	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Qalqiliyah	NNP	(NP*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
centers	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
re-occupied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
invading	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
outlets	NNS	*))	O
point	VBP	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
future	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
phased	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
partial	JJ	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
circumvent	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
intifadah	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
surrounding	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tension	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
dealing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
separately	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
facts	NNS	*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
execution	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Talking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
use	NN	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(ADJP(NP*	ESE
months	NNS	*)	ESE
old	JJ	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
more	RBR	(S(ADVP*	ESE
exactly	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
headed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Ari'el	NNP	(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*))))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
nine	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
tactic	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
improved	VBN	*	ESE
carbon	NN	*	ESE
copy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
style	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
divide	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rule	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
deal	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
united	VBN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
indivisible	JJ	(NP*	O
whole	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
inevitable	JJ	*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
tactic	NN	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
succeeds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
temporarily	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
calming	VBG	*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))))))	O
--	:	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
conditions	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
former	JJ	*	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
tension	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
core	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
method	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
crush	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
moves	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
confiscate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
liberation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independence	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
core	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)))	ESE
lies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
just	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
framework	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
approve	VB	(VP(VP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
participate	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
end	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*))	O
construction	NN	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
framework	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
lay	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
firm	NN	*	ESE
foundations	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*)	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
justice	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
recognition	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
such	PDT	*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	ESE
security	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
parties	NNS	*))	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
exception	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
Israel	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
parallel	JJ	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
withdrawal	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
such	JJ	*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
parallel	JJ	*	ESE
withdrawal	NN	*))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
expedite	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*))))	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reference	NN	*	O
point	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ending	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
ending	VBG	(VP*	O
settlement	NN	(NP*	O
construction	NN	*	O
activities	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
restoring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
full	JJ	*	ESE
inalienable	NN	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BANGUI	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
6	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Gunfire	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
broke	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
out	IN	(ADVP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Libyan	JJ	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
reinforcements	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
government	NN	(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
standoff	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
soldiers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
loyal	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ousted	VBN	*	O
army	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shooting	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
heard	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP*	O
Bangui	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
airport	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
neighborhood	NN	*)	O
inhabited	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ange	NNP	*	O
Felix	NNP	*	O
Patasse	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
AFP	NNP	*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
calm	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
schools	NNS	*	O
reopening	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
authorities	NNS	(NP*))	O
anxiously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mediation	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OAU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)))	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
soldiers	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
loyal	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
sacked	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
army	NN	(NP*	O
staff	NN	*	O
Francois	NNP	*	O
Bozize	NNP	*))))))	O
exchanged	VBD	(VP*	O
gunfire	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*	O
units	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	*	O
troops	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
shooting	NN	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
soldiers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrest	VB	(VP*	O
Bozize	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
close	NN	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Patasse	NNP	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
army	NN	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1996	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
amounts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
suspicions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preparation	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
edge	NN	(NP*))	DSE
since	IN	(ADVP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
May	NNP	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
mutinous	JJ	(S(NP*	DSE
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
attempted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
Patasse	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
unleashing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBD	(S(VP*	O
dozens	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
displaced	VBN	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bozize	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
fired	VBN	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
moves	NNS	(NP*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bangui	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
close	VB	(VP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*	O
loopholes	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
became	VBD	(S(VP*	O
evident	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
abortive	JJ	*	O
putsch	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Defense	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
dismissed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Libyan	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
helped	VBD	(VP*	O
prop	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
Patasse	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
100	CD	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
since	IN	(ADVP*)	O
remained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
guard	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
80	CD	(S(NP*	O
Libyan	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
disembarked	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Antonov	NNP	*	O
transport	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*))	O
carrying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
diplomat	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bozize	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
holed	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Bangui	NNP	*	O
residence	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prague	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Czech	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
successful	JJ	*	ESE
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
aim	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Environment	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Milos	NNP	*	O
Kuzvart	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climatic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Moroccan	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakech	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Czech	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Visegrad	NNP	*	O
group	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
four	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
5.2	CD	*	O
%	NN	*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polluting	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2008-2012	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*	O
level	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
8	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
United	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
Mary	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Robinson	NNP	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
warning	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
hosts	NNS	*))))))))	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
excuse	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
repression	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Robinson	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
raise	VB	(VP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
widespread	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
torture	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Robinson	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP(VP*	O
discussions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
education	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
signing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
dialogue	NN	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Afterwards	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
answering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
questions	NNS	(NP*)	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
co-signatory	JJ	(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Wang	NNP	*	O
Guangya	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
measures	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
crack	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
used	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP*	O
abuses	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Irish	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
worrying	JJ	*	ESE
trend	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
excuse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
combating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
clamp	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
expression	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
dissent	NN	*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
violent	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))))	O
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
highlighted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
Uighhur	NNP	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
furthest	JJ	*	O
west	NN	*	O
region	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
rights	NNS	(S(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
claimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crackdown	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
separatists	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
stepped	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
anti-terror	JJ	(NP*	O
campaigns	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
very	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)	ESE
boundaries	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Uighur	NNP	*	O
population	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
worried	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
raise	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Any	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
rights	NNS	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
blunt	VB	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
adopt	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
pronged	NN	*	O
approach	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
encourage	VB	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
situations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
shortcomings	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
do	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
abuses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tibet	NNP	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
separatists	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Uighurs	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Turkestan	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tibetans	NNP	*)	O
associated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Dalai	NNP	*	O
Lama	NNP	*))))))))))	O
--	:	*))	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tibet	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(SINV(VP*)	DSE
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Zhu	NNP	*	O
Bangzao	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
problems	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
out	IN	(ADVP*	O
there	RB	*))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
separatists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
East	NNP	*	O
Turkestan	NNP	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Dalai	NNP	*	O
Lama	NNP	*	O
separatist	JJ	*	O
clique	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
briefing	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	VBG	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
battle	NN	*))))))))))	O
``	``	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
double	JJ	*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
pursued	VBN	(VP*	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
victim	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
borders	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Uighur	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
activists	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
rounded	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Robinson	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
among	IN	(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
widespread	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
torture	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
raise	VB	(VP(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
individual	JJ	*	O
cases	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	(NP*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
visit	VBP	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(S(PP(ADVP*)	O
despite	IN	*	O
previous	JJ	(NP*	O
discussions	NNS	*))	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(NP*	O
much	JJ	*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
wished	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Analysts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
however	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
tough	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
Robinson	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
talk	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
attention	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
firmly	RB	*	ESE
focused	JJ	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
place	VB	(VP*	O
much	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taleban	JJ	(NP*	O
assertions	NNS	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
serving	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Formations	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-Taleban	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
officers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Interfax	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP*	ESE
military-technical	JJ	*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
dispatched	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
either	CC	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
unit	NN	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
instructors	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

United	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
IRNA	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*))	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))	O
here	RB	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
cooperation	NN	(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
key	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
forestalling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
further	JJ	(NP*	ESE
oil	NN	*	ESE
price	NN	*	ESE
declines	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hailed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
travelling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
non-OPEC	JJ	(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
garner	VB	(VP*	O
support	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
propping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sagging	VBG	*	O
crude	NN	*	O
prices	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Khatami	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sidelines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*	O
session	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	ESE
Afghan	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
strikes	NNS	*)))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stance	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
call	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
coalition	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
based	VBN	(PP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stem	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
roots	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Forming	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world-wide	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
justice	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
eradicate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ominous	JJ	*	ESE
phenomenon	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
must	MD	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Khatami	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
currently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
heads	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
whirlwind	JJ	*	O
trips	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
non-OPEC	JJ	(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
line	NN	(NP*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
producing	VBG	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
cooperation	NN	(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
non-OPEC	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
boost	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
national	JJ	*	DSE
interests	NNS	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Caracas	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
stance	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fight	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
violence	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intrigues	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

OPEC	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vienna	NNP	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
widely	RB	(ADJP*	O
expected	VBN	*)	DSE
production	NN	*	O
cut	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
further	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
expansion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Caracas	NNP	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
fields	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
77	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
G77	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Khatami	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
Dialogue	NNP	(NP*))	O
Among	IN	(PP*	O
Civilizations	NNP	(NP*	O
'	POS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
theme	NN	*)	O
approved	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
designated	VBN	(VP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	(NP(NP*	O
Dialogue	NNP	(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
Civilizations	NNP	(NP*))	O
'	''	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
initiative	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

WE	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
remain	VB	(VP*	ESE
silent	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
count	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Remi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Parmentier	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Greenpeace	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
responding	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Gulf	NNP	(NP*	O
Times	NNP	*))))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
ministerial	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
opened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Doha	NNP	(NP*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Parmentier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
categorically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
street	NN	(NP*	DSE
demonstrations	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Qatari	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
neither	RB	*	DSE
sought	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
nor	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Greenpeace	NNP	(NP*))	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
undertake	VB	(VP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
boat	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
moor	VB	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
fulfilled	VBN	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
those	DT	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environmentalist	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Doha	NNP	*	O
harbour	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
setting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
sail	NN	(NP*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
Doha	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sheraton	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*	O
venue	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
act	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
responsibly	RB	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP*	DSE
guarantees	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Sheikh	NNP	(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Hamad	NNP	(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Faisal	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
al-Thani	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
organising	VBG	*	O
committee	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
act	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
constructive	JJ	*)	ESE
manner	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Greenpeace	NNP	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
voice	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
concerns	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
voice	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
dont	VBP	(VP*	ESE
want	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hear	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
thats	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
meaning	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Rainbow	NNP	*	O
Warrior	NNP	*)))	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
going	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
voice	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
voice	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
demands	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Parmentier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
means	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
disposal	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
voice	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
heard	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Qatar	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
presenting	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Dohas	NNP	*)	O
candidature	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
host	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
official	JJ	*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Rainbow	NNP	*	O
Warrior	NNP	*)	O
sailed	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Doha	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
morning	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
challenge	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
4th	JJ	*	O
ministerial	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
force	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
commit	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Talking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Greenpeace	NNP	(NP*	O
executive	NN	*	O
director	NN	*	O
Gerd	NNP	*	O
Leipold	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
currently	RB	(SBAR(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
climate	NN	(NP*	ESE
change	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
burn	VB	(VP*	O
fossil	JJ	(NP*	O
fuel	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
look	VBP	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bleak	JJ	*	ESE
future	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Islands	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
nations	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
vanish	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
face	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
earth	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
millions	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
leave	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
homes	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
rendered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
worthless	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
extracted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
produces	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
green	JJ	*	O
house	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
4	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
reaps	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
benefits	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mock	JJ	(NP*	ESE
globalisation	NN	*))))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
global	JJ	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
facing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
today	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
fundamentally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unfair	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unjust	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Leipold	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Parmentier	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
claims	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
sustainable	JJ	(S(ADJP*)	ESE
development	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
environmental	JJ	(NP*	ESE
protection	NN	*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
virtually	RB	(NP*	ESE
nothing	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
rejection	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
effect	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
hidden	JJ	*	ESE
subsidy	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
breach	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
constitution	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
claims	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
environment	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	ESE
today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Doha	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
condemn	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hidden	JJ	*	O
subsidy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
governments	NNS	*)))	O
own	JJ	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
equivalent	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
76.7	CD	*	O
bn	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	*	O
300bn	CD	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
test	NN	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Parmentier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
discuss	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
round	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))))	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Doha	NNP	(NP*)))	O
ratifies	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Greenpeace	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
looked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
forward	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
partnership	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	ESE
assessment	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
round	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
1993	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*))))	O
everybody	NN	(NP*)	ESE
jumped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
checking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
proper	JJ	*	ESE
safety	NN	*	ESE
net	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
bottom	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(VP*))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
lets	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
jump	VB	(VP*	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
too	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
quickly	RB	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
lets	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
check	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
safety	NN	*	ESE
net	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
lets	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
consolidate	VB	(VP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*	O
safety	NN	*))))	O
nets	VBZ	(VP*	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
jump	VBP	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
round	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
responsible	JJ	*)	ESE
course	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
action	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
historic	JJ	*	ESE
success	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Doha	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
success	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
time	NN	(NP*)	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
round	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
success	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
force	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
WTO	NNP	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

WTO	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overrule	VB	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	DSE
environmental	JJ	*	DSE
agreements	NNS	*))))))))	DSE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
precautionary	JJ	*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
incorporated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
decision-making	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
patents	NNS	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
life	NN	(NP*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
banned	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Parmentier	NNP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*))))	DSE

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Rainbow	NNP	*	O
Warrior	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
nationalities	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
witnesses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
testify	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adverse	JJ	*	ESE
effects	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
broadcasting	VBG	(VP*	O
No	DT	(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Round	NNP	*	O
Radio	NNP	*)	O
daily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Internet	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Parmentier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Qatari	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
honour	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
free	JJ	(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ship	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
vice	NN	*	O
versa	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Answering	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
question	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Qatar	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hide	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
protestors	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
run	VB	(VP*	ESE
but	CC	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
hide	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

JAMMU	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
India	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Indian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
Sunday	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
killed	VBD	(VP*	O
11	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indian-administered	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kashmir	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
separate	JJ	*	O
encounters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mandi	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
Poonch	NNP	*	O
district	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
225	CD	(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
kilometres	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
140	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
northwest	RB	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kashmir	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
winter	NN	*	O
capital	NN	*)))	O
Jammu	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
cordoned	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
rebel	JJ	*	O
hideouts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
villages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jalian	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Bandi	NNP	(NP*	O
Kama	NNP	*	O
Khan	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
exchanged	VBD	(VP*	O
heavy	JJ	(NP*	O
gunfire	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
killing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
rebels	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bandi	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jalian	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Jammu	NNP	(NP*	O
police	NNP	*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
superintendent	NN	*	O
Kamal	NNP	*	O
Saini	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Saini	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
rebels	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
mercenaries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
entered	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
district	NN	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Line	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Control	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
de	FW	(ADJP*	O
facto	FW	*)	O
border	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
divides	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Kashmir	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
50	CD	(NP(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Poonch	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
15	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Economy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Domingo	NNP	*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Fernando	NNP	(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
changed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
changed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latter	JJ	*	O
case	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blame	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
fruitless	JJ	*	ESE
effort	NN	*)))	ESE
belongs	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stinginess	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
rather	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mix	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
shortsightedness	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
irresponsibility	NN	*)))))	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reschedule	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
default	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
disguise	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
moreover	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
success	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
recent	JJ	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
stake	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
spite	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
this	DT	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
either	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
requirements	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
detail	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
there	EX	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provinces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
revenue	NN	(NP*	O
sharing	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Peronism	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
send	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
clear-cut	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
2002	CD	*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
governors	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
public	JJ	(S(NP*	O
spending	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
control	NN	(NP*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
most	JJS	(ADJP*	O
out	IN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
control	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
message	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(CONJP*	O
just	RB	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
zero	CD	*	O
deficit	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
enjoys	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
consensus	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
not	RB	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
enough	JJ	*	ESE
messages	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
regard	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
conveyed	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
thousand	CD	*	O
different	JJ	*	O
channels	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
powerful	JJ	*	ESE
head	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Condoleeza	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rice	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chief	JJ	*	O
adviser	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
bluntly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
public	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
remarks	NNS	*)	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
close	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
representing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
interference	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rice	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*	ESE
as	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
mention	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentine	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
leanings	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
demonstrate	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
commitment	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
austerity	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
confirm	VB	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
honor	VB	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
institutional	JJ	*	O
timetable	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
turn	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
give	VB	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
manage	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

De	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
waited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
anxiously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
until	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
cabinet	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chrystian	NNP	(NP*	O
Colombo	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(VP(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
announce	VB	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Peronist	NNP	*	O
governors	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
influence	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
governors	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
over	IN	(VP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
lawmakers	NNS	*))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Colombo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(PRN*	O
only	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
tell	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
all	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
vain	JJ	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sort	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crisis	NN	(NP*))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(NP(QP*	ESE
one	CD	*)	ESE
guilty	JJ	*	ESE
party	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
paying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
price	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
delays	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
together	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
defeat	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
interest	NN	(NP(NP*	O
payments	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
maturing	VBG	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*	O
as	RB	*	O
well	RB	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
naive	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Peronism	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
readily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reach	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
defeated	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
necessarily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
those	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
won	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
funding	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Domingo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
seeing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
empty	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ignore	VB	(VP*	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
issues	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
realized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
nothing	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
meeting	NN	*)	ESE
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
demands	NNS	(NX*))	DSE
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
clearly	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
stated	VBN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
met	VBN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
put	VBD	(SQ(VP*)	O
emphasis	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
failure	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
foregone	JJ	*	ESE
conclusion	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
newspapers	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
way	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fulfill	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
requirements	NNS	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
needed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
active	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
just	RB	*	DSE
verbal	JJ	*	DSE
,	,	*)	DSE
support	NN	*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

First	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
off	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
brought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
discipline	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
institutions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
inclined	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
followed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
albeit	IN	(ADVP*)))	ESE
less	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
enthusiastically	RB	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Treasury	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
spite	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
offices	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*	O
two	CD	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
John	NNP	(NP*	O
Taylor	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
taking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
cool	JJ	*	DSE
approach	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Paul	NNP	(NP*	O
O'Neill	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
fresh	JJ	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reschedule	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
funds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Treasury	NNP	*)))	O
itself	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
less	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
utopian	JJ	*)	ESE
wish	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
multilateral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
offers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
more	JJR	*)	DSE
urgent	JJ	*	DSE
need	NN	*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
regardless	RB	(S(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
disburse	VB	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
1.2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Internal	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
Discipline	NNP	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
either	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
convinced	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
deserved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
bailing	VBG	(SBAR(S(S(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
accordingly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
could	MD	(SQ*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
modicum	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
internal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
discipline	NN	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
advance	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
accords	NNS	*)	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
noteworthy	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
present	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
future	NN	*	O
needs	NNS	*)))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
needs	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
previously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
stopped	VBN	(VP*	DSE
importuning	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Brasilia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Argentine	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
De	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
jointly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sao	NNP	(NP*	O
Paulo	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
sort	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	NN	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
lent	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
noteworthy	JJ	*	ESE
twist	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
case	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

United	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
,	,	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
14	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unrealistic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
envisage	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
suffering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
lack	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
poverty	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
hunger	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
health	NN	*))))))))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
delegations	NNS	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Third	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Social	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Humanitarian	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cultural	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
56th	JJ	*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
formal	JJ	*	DSE
debate	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
questions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
alternative	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
approaches	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	O
enjoyment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	O
freedoms	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Representatives	NNPS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
two	CD	(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
preconditions	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
universal	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
promotion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
release	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
crucial	JJ	*	ESE
element	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
maintaining	VBG	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
emphasized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
debate	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
questions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
alternative	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
approaches	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	O
enjoyment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	O
freedoms	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Briefing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Human	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
sides	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
coin	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
addressed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
tandem	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
People	NNS	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
development	NN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
scourges	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
social	JJ	(NP*	ESE
ills	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
disease	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
narcotic	JJ	(NP*	O
drugs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
armed	JJ	(NP*	O
conflicts	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
types	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transnational	JJ	(NP*	O
organized	JJ	*	O
crime	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Eritrea	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
globalization	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
threatening	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
further	RBR	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
marginalize	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
world	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
alienate	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
masses	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hampering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exercise	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
duties	NNS	*)	O
enshrined	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
instruments	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Narrowing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*	O
gap	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
crucial	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
realization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
universal	JJ	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
Shen	NNP	*	O
Guofang	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Underdevelopment	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
hindered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
promote	VB	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
With	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rapid	JJ	*	O
spread	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
globalization	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
expansion	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
deteriorating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
each	DT	(NP*	ESE
passing	VBG	*	ESE
day	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Shen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
despite	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
horrors	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
truly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
human	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
expediency	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
compromise	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lapse	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
vigilance	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
Promoting	VBG	*	O
and	CC	*	O
strengthening	VBG	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
democracy	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
integral	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
multilateral	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
''	''	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
speaking	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Egypt	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Morocco	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Mali	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Greece	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
again	RB	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
debate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
questions	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tashkent	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
November	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
1.3	CD	(NP(QP*	O
bn	CD	*)	O
US	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbek	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Islam	NNP	*	O
Karimov	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
lawmakers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tashkent	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
14	CD	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
industries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
health	NN	(NP(NP*	O
care	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
education	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
improvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Karimov	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
trade	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
133m	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADJP*	O
double	JJ	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
71m	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
international	JJ	(S(NP*	O
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
having	VBG	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	DSE
red	JJ	*	DSE
light	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
issued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
carbon-dependent	JJ	*)	O
industries	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
165	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakech	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Morocco	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
40	CD	*)	O
industrialized	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
cut	VB	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
limit	VB	*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
heat-trapping	JJ	*	O
gases	NNS	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
5.2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Scientists	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
greenhouse	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
gases	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GHG	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
mainly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
result	VB	(VP(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
burning	VBG	(NP*	O
fossil	JJ	*	O
fuels	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
raise	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
temperature	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
floods	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
droughts	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
abnormal	JJ	*	O
weather	NN	*	O
phenomena	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
South	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
included	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Annex	NNP	*	O
I	NNP	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
composed	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
affect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
while	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Development	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OECD	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
regarded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
obliged	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
GHG	NNP	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
considering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
South	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	ESE
growth	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fend	VB	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
much	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
experts	NNS	(NP*)	O
note	VBP	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
statistics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
IEA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Paris-based	JJ	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
affiliated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OECD	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
recorded	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
growth	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
showing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
75.5	JJ	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
discharged	VBN	(VP*	O
410	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
ranking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
tenth	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
industrialized	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
start	VBP	(VP*	O
cutting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
GHG	NNP	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
target	NN	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
begins	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
seventh	JJ	*	O
most	JJS	*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
dioxide-producing	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
IEA	NNP	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	ESE
steps	NNS	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cutback	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
wait-and-see	JJ	*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	O
instead	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
As	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
South	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
`	``	*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
country	NN	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
status	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
voluntarily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
express	VB	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Yoon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jong-soo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
environment	NN	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
estimate	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Korea	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
join	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
cutting	VBG	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
no	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
later	RB	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
2018	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
plan	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
step	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
efforts	NNS	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gradually	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
change	VB	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
structure	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
promoting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
research	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
renewable	JJ	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
energy-efficient	NN	*	O
technologies	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Jun	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mu	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
industry	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
environment	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Industry	NNP	*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
KCCI	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
So	IN	(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
industries	NNS	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
rather	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
passive	JJ	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
emission	NN	(NP*	O
reductions	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lie	VB	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
off	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
gathering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opinions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
business	NN	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
continuing	VBG	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy-efficient	JJ	(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
formed	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
KCCI	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
January	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
treaty	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tackle	VB	(VP*	ESE
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
envisioned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)	O
four	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
due	RB	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
conflicting	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
developed	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
developing	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
contentious	JJ	*	ESE
issues	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
emission	NN	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
targets	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
faced	VBD	(VP*	O
danger	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
shelved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
altogether	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
one-fourth	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CO2	CD	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
abruptly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
treaty	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
fears	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
negative	JJ	*	ESE
effect	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
maintains	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
developing	VBG	(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
India	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
mandatory	JJ	(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
targets	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
due	JJ	(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	ESE
initiative	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
set	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rules	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
treaty	NN	*	O
_	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
without	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
order	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
55	CD	*)	O
parties	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
enough	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
industrialized	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
55	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
43	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(SBAR*	O
Korea	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
15	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
rule	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
peacekeeping	NN	*	O
force	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
stability	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
give	VB	(VP*	DSE
sincere	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
earnest	NN	*)	DSE
consideration	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
contribute	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
stability	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
peace	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Zhang	NNP	*	O
Qiyue	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Her	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
remark	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
multinational	JJ	*	O
peacekeeping	VBG	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peacekeepers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
attained	VBN	(VP*	ESE
renewed	JJ	(NP*	ESE
urgency	NN	*)	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
rapid	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
advances	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
militia	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
yet	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
contact	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Together	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reconciliation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
briefing	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
played	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
tiny	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
handful	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))	O
peacekeeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
actions	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Cambodia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Minister	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Science	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Technology	NNP	(NP*	O
Ronaldo	NNP	*	O
Mota	NNP	*	O
Sardenberg	NNP	*))))	O
headed	VBD	(VP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Seventh	JJ	*	O
Conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Parties	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arduous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
negotiations	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	ESE
successfully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
0600	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
objective	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
complete	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
regulations	NNS	*)	O
governing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
thereby	RB	(ADVP*)	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
technical	JJ	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latter	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ratification	NN	*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
industrialized	VBN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
consequently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
benefit	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
well-being	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
future	JJ	(NP*	ESE
generations	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
all	DT	(PP*	ESE
over	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
planet	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
neither	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
simple	JJ	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
minor	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
many	JJ	*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
helping	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
improve	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
knowledge	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
latest	JJS	(ADJP*	O
available	JJ	*)	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*	O
flatly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
already	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
observed	JJ	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
0.5	CD	*)	O
degree	NN	*	O
Celsius	NN	*)	O
--	:	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
results	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
nothing	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
degrees	NNS	*))	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
century	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
unmistakable	JJ	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
potentially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
disastrous	JJ	*))	ESE
effects	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Particularly	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADJP*	ESE
affected	VBN	*))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
poorer	JJR	*	O
regions	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
achieved	VBN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
prevailed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
climate	NN	(S(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
presents	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
challenge	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leaders	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
goals	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
initially	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
industrialized	VBN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	ESE
distribution	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
resulting	VBG	*	O
burden	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
fair	JJ	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
face	VB	(VP*	ESE
reality	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minimum	NN	*))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
emissions	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
limited	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
high	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
generated	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
means	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transportation	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
agricultural	JJ	*	O
practices	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
frequently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
interacted	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overcome	VB	(VP(VP*	O
obstacles	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
paths	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
negotiation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
formidable	JJ	*	ESE
deadlock	NN	*)	ESE
occurred	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Hague	NNP	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
threatened	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
future	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bonn	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
thanks	NNS	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
delegations	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
played	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
role	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
isolate	VB	(VP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
negotiation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
three	CD	*)	O
important	JJ	*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
object	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
accord	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bonn	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
express	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
satisfactory	JJ	(NP*	ESE
terms	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
involved	VBN	(VP*)))	O
won	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
assurance	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
actual	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
legally	RB	(ADJP*	O
binding	JJ	*)	O
manner	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
big	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
regulate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
detail	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
compensation	NN	*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP*	O
one	NN	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Clean	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Mechanism	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CDM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
applies	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	O
regulation	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
finally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*))))	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
free	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*))))))	O
so	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
reductions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
real	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
--	:	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
physical	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(UCP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*))	O
bookkeeping	NN	*)	O
exercises	VBZ	(VP*))))))	O
--	:	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(VP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
flexibility	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
controls	NNS	*	O
so	RB	*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
burden	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(ADJP(NP*	O
compensation	NN	*	O
transactions	NNS	*)	O
excessively	RB	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
environmental	JJ	*	ESE
integrity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
control	NN	(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mechanism	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
big	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*	ESE
concerns	NNS	*	O
land	NN	*)	O
use	VBP	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*	O
land	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
forests	NNS	(NP*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inclusion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
activities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
example	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
simple	JJ	*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
aging	VBG	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
forests	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
controversy	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
subject	NN	*)))	O
contributed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
deadlock	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Hague	NNP	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
pressure	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
strong	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
zero	CD	*	O
cost	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
contributed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
greatly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
success	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
colleagues	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
multilateral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
diplomacy	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
involving	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
shared	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
but	CC	*	O
differentiated	JJ	*)	O
responsibility	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
contributing	VBG	(VP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ministers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ranging	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
India	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)))))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
industrialized	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
contributing	VBG	(VP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
excellent	JJ	*	ESE
technical	JJ	*	ESE
preparation	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
mature	JJ	*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
consisted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
experienced	JJ	(NP*	O
negotiators	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
contributing	VBG	(VP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interested	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
well-organized	JJ	*)	ESE
participation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
nongovernmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
demonstration	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seen	VBN	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
government	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
CDM	NNP	*	O
Executive	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
operating	NN	(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDM	NNP	*)))	O
originated	VBP	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
part	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concept	NN	*)	O
successfully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
advocated	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ever	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
since	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ministerial	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
advocated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
begin	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
quickly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
step	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
consensus	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDM	NNP	*	O
Executive	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
expresses	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	*	DSE
will	NN	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dominant	JJ	*	O
norm	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
field	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
standpoint	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
declared	VBD	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
reasons	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
intend	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ratify	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
giving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
indications	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
adopt	VB	(VP*	DSE
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
concepts	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
capable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
harmonized	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
forth	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
convergence	NN	*)	ESE
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
submit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
predicted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
sufficient	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sustainable	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
proof	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
10th	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
success	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Rio	NNP	*	ESE
Conference	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
whole	JJ	*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
effort	NN	*)	ESE
began	VBD	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Seoul	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Nov.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
16	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yonhap	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
employees	NNS	(NP*))))	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
or	CC	*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
drastically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
companies	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
slash	VB	(VP*	O
labor	NN	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Statistical	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NSO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

NSO	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statistics	NNS	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
workers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
employed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))))	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
888,000	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
6,962,000	CD	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
4,182,000	CD	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
4,641,000	CD	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
hired	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))))	O
surged	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
2,321,000	CD	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1,892,000	CD	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cited	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
full-time	JJ	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)))	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	O
626,000	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
6,525,000	CD	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*	O
span	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Demand	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
working	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
or	CC	*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
risiing	VBG	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
companies	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*	O
labor	NN	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
continued	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
slowdown	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
NSO	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
90	CD	(NP*))	O
percent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
full-time	JJ	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)))	O
receive	VBP	(VP*	O
retirement	NN	(NP*	O
allowances	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
bonuses	NNS	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
comparable	JJ	*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
temporary	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
1	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
employed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
80	CD	*	O
to	TO	*	O
90	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
full-time	JJ	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
registered	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
pension	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
employment	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
health	NN	*	O
insurance	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
comparable	JJ	*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
shrank	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
2	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
3	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
temporary	JJ	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
hired	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
KwaZulu-Natal	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pietermaritzburg	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
orphaned	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Aids	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
rocket	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Neil	NNP	*	O
McKerrow	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
chief	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
paediatrician	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Pietermaritzburg	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Metropolitan	NNP	*	O
Hospitals	NNPS	*	O
Complex	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
50	CD	(S(NP(QP*	O
000	CD	*)	O
Aids	NNP	*	O
orphans	NNS	*)	O
live	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
rises	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP(QP*	O
000	CD	*)))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
surrounding	VBG	(S(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Midlands	NNPS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
included	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

McKerrow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
estimates	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
orphans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Midlands	NNPS	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
top	VB	(VP*	O
250	CD	(NP(QP*	O
000	CD	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
refer	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
children	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
16	CD	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
mothers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Organisation	NNP	*	O
definition	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Statistics	NNP	(NP*	O
SA	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
193	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
000	CD	*)	O
children	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
age	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
573	CD	(NP(QP*	O
000	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
care	NN	(NP(NP*	O
centres	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
orphanages	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pietermaritzburg	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
McKerrow	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
study	NN	*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
extended	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
community	NN	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
McKerrow	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
colleague	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Edendale	NNP	*	O
Hospital	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Annelise	NNP	(NP*	O
Verbeek	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
pioneered	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	O
Models	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Care	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Children	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Distress	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
coined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
abandoned	VBN	(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
displaced	VBN	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
orphaned	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
6	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
children	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pietermaritzburg	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
Aids	NNP	(NP*	O
orphans	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
risen	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
informal	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
council	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(S(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
estimates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
teachers	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
many	JJ	*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
100	CD	*	O
000	CD	*)	O
Aids	NNP	*	O
orphans	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
city	NN	(S(NP*	O
health	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
appear	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
high	JJ	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

McKerrow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
estimates	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
household	NN	(NP(NP*	O
counts	NNS	*)	O
coupled	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
mathematical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
models	NNS	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WHO	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

KwaZulu-Natal	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
HIV	NN	(NP*	O
infection	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
SA	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
36	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
infected	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

McKerrow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
estimates	VBZ	(VP*	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
4.6	CD	(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
orphans	NNS	*)	O
countrywide	JJ	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yvonne	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Spain	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
co-ordinator	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Children	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
In	NNP	*	O
Distress	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
network	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
50	CD	*)	O
organisations	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
communities	NNS	(SBAR(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
absorbing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
multiple	JJ	(S(NP*	O
deaths	NNS	*)	O
occur	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
safety	NN	*	ESE
net	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
fall	VB	(VP*	ESE
apart	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
Aids	NNP	*	O
Action	NNP	*	O
Unit	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Sandile	NNP	*	O
Buthelezi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
faced	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
quite	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
higher	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
McKerrow	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
orphans	NNS	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
static	JJ	*	O
thing	NN	*)))	O
...	:	*))	O

Every	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
orphan	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
enormous	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
province	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Buthelezi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
health	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
welfare	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
funding	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
bodies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Aids	NNP	(NP*	O
orphans	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

HONG	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
KONG	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
south	JJ	(NP*	O
Asians	NNPS	*))))	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
political	JJ	(NP*	O
asylum	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rise	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
200	CD	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Asians	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
claiming	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
businessmen	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
sought	VBN	(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
asylum	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Refugees	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
October	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
double	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)))))	O
applying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
seven	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mass-circulating	JJ	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
paper	NN	*	O
Oriental	NNP	*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
News	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
claimants	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Sri	NNP	(NP*	O
Lanka	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Bangladesh	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
entered	VBD	(VP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
through	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chek	NNP	*	O
Lap	NNP	*	O
Kok	NNP	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
airport	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Lo	NNP	(NP*	O
Wu	NNP	*	O
checkpoints	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
bureau	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Hong	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
anyone	NN	(NP*)	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
asylum	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
present	JJ	(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
management	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hong	NNP	*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
shocked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
surge	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
means	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*))	O
indefinitely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
immigration	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
instructed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
step	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
checks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
suspicious	JJ	(NP*	O
travellers	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refugee	NN	*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
thrust	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
spotlight	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*))))	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accept	VB	(VP*	O
438	CD	(NP(NP*	O
mainly	RB	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
rescued	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leaking	JJ	*	O
ship	NN	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
stranded	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
sea	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
days	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hong	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Vietnamese	JJ	(NP*	O
migrants	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
1,400	CD	*	O
remaining	VBG	*	O
boat	NN	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
surge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(QP*	O
230,000	CD	*)	O
refugees	NNS	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Saigon	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1975	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
spent	VBD	(VP*	O
8.7	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

AYDIN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
BODRUM	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
AMASYA	NNP	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
23	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Security	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
129	CD	*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Didim	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
township	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
province	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Aydin	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bodrum	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
township	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
province	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugla	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
proceed	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Greece	NNP	(NP*))	O
illegally	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
56	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Iraqis	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
34	CD	(NP*	O
Moroccans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
11	CD	(NP*	O
Pakistanis	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
8	CD	(NP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
7	CD	(NP*	O
Turks	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
8	CD	(NP*	O
Iranians	NNPS	*))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*)))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
violating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Turkish	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
borders	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
passport	NN	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
confiscated	VBD	(VP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
lorries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
automobiles	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
deported	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
proceedings	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
intercepted	VBZ	(VP*	O
40	CD	(NP*)	O
Iranians	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraqis	NNPS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
entered	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
ways	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Teams	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Security	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
made	VBD	(S(VP*	O
road	NN	(NP*	O
control	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lorry	NN	*)	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Nizamettin	NNP	(NP*	O
Tas	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
40	CD	(NP(QP*)	O
Iraqis	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iranians	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
entered	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
ways	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trunk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lorry	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
interrogated	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Amasya	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Directorate	NNP	*	O
Foreigners	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
deported	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

ISLAMABAD	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
24	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Makiko	NNP	*	O
Tanaka	NNP	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
warm	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hazards	NNS	*	O
facing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
wanting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
focused	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
need	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rehabilitate	VB	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
pave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
safe	JJ	*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
estimated	VBN	*	O
four	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
neighbouring	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Daisuke	NNP	*	O
Matsunaga	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Filippo	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Grandi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
coordinator	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Refugees	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UNHCR	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
thanked	NNP	(NP(NP*	DSE
Japan	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
contribution	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
aid	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
warm	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Matsunaga	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Grandi	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
outlined	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tanka	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
four-pronged	JJ	*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
improving	VBG	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
camps	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
expanding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UNHCR	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
further	JJ	*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
assisting	VBG	(VP*	O
non-governmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
encouraging	VBG	(VP*	O
refugees	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
homes	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Returning	VBG	(ROOT(SINV(S(VP*	O
refugees	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
faced	VBD	(VP*)	O
minefields	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
educational	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ruined	JJ	(NP*	O
irrigation	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
dealt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rebuild	VB	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
estimated	VBN	(ADJP*	O
may	MD	(SBAR(S(VP(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
10	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Grandi	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Tanka	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
four	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meantime	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UNHCR	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Office	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Coordination	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Humanitarian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Assistance	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OCHA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
tents	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
clothing	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
heaters	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
returning	VBG	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
displaced	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
wanting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
return	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
towns	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
villages	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tanka	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reconstruction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reward	VB	(VP*	DSE
Islamabad	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
counterpart	NN	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Sattar	NNP	*)	O
later	RB	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pervez	NNP	*	O
Musharraf	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leading	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
drive	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rebuild	VB	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
host	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
finance	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	*)	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
22	CD	*)	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
platform	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
commitments	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rebuild	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
shattered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
two	CD	*)	O
decades	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
offered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rescheduling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
550	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
debt	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provision	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
40	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP(NP*	O
budgetary	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
refugee	NN	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
strikes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
135,000	CD	*)	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
crossed	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
true	JJ	*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	O
higher	JJR	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
before	IN	*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
playing	VBG	(VP*	O
host	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
estimated	VBN	*	O
2.5	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
fled	VBN	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
22	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
bloodshed	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MANILA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
24	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gloria	NNP	*	O
Arroyo	NNP	*)	O
praised	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
swift	JJ	*	O
arrest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*))))))))	O
Nur	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Misuari	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
embarked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fresh	JJ	*	O
rebellion	NN	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Arroyo	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
satisfied	JJ	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
efficient	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrest	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Rigoberto	NNP	*	O
Tiglao	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
DZBB	NNP	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
department	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Victoriano	NNP	*	O
Lecaros	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
warning	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
inhospitable	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
ground	NN	*)	ESE
within	IN	(PP*	O
ASEAN	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10-member	JJ	*	O
Association	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Southeast	NNP	(NP*	O
Asian	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tiglao	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
separately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Manila	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Kuala	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Lumpur	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deportation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
politician	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
neighbors	NNS	*)	O
lack	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
extradition	NN	*	O
treaty	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Kuala	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Lumpur	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
initiative	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
violated	VBN	(VP*	O
Malaysian	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
entering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
passport	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Manila	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rebellion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
revolt	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
113	CD	*)	O
lives	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Philippine	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
cancelled	VBD	(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
regular	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
passports	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Jolo	NNP	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
founder	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Moro	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MNLF	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
group	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
self-rule	JJ	*	O
Autonomous	NNS	*)	O
Region	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Muslim	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mindanao	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ARMM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Misuari	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
revolt	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Arroyo	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
back	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
MNLF	NNP	*	O
rival	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
choose	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
ARMM	NNP	*	O
governor	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Jolo	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deter	VB	(VP*	O
attempts	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disrupt	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
balloting	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malaysia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
official	NN	*	O
Bernama	NN	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sabah	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Borneo	NNP	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
illegally	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Manila	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Royal	NNP	*	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
Police	NNS	*)	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speedboat	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
occupants	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
checked	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malaysia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
sanctuary	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
1970s	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Misuari	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bloody	JJ	*	O
six-day-old	JJ	*	O
rebellion	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
Philippine	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jolo	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lecaros	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
ASEAN	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
particularly	RB	(NP*	ESE
Malaysia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
succeeding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
counter	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brunei	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
trading	NN	*	O
partners	NNS	*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ASEAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
Brunei	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Cambodia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Laos	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Myanmar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Singapore	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lecaros	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
ties	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*	O
rebel	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spree	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
kidnappings	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Philippine	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
links	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
militant	NNP	*	O
Osama	NNP	*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
blamed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
killed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
4,000	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
lawbreaking	JJ	*	ESE
person	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Lecaros	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Philippine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Misuari	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(ADVP*	O
late	RB	*)	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
links	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
more	RBR	(S(NP*)	ESE
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Bernama	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
Malaysian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*	O
Norian	NNP	*	O
Mai	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
police	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hand	VB	(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*))))	O
over	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
soon	RB	*	O
as	RB	(S(ADJP*	O
possible	JJ	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tiglao	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sabah	NNP	*	O
state	NN	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kota	NNP	(NP*	O
Kinabalu	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
jail	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Definitely	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
enforce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Regular	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Robin	NNP	(NP*	O
Cook	NNP	*)	O
signalled	VBD	(VP*	O
tonight	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
militia	NN	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
surrendering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
spiritual	JJ	*	O
home	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*)))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Northern	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
entered	VBD	(VP*	O
Kunduz	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

SAS	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Special	NNP	*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Service	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
counterparts	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
swept	VBN	(VP*	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
swathes	NNS	*)	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Commons	NNP	(NP*	O
Leader	NNP	*	O
Mr	NNP	*	O
Cook	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
look	VBP	(VP*	O
back	RB	(SBAR(S(S(ADVP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
month	NN	*)))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*)))))))	ESE
myself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
imagine	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

British	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
48	CD	(NP*	O
hour	NN	*	O
stand-by	NNS	*))	O
but	CC	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
better	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
anybody	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
hoped	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*)))))))	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Cook	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
review	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
frankly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
welcome	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reverse	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
advance	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

News	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
control	NN	*)	O
crumbled	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
stronghold	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kunduz	NNP	(NP*))))	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
surrender	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
troops	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
gave	VBD	(S(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(SBAR(ADVP*	O
up	RB	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
days	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)))	O
interspersed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
increasing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
danger	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
militants	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hours	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vanguard	NN	*)))	O
entered	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
west	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tank	NN	*	O
column	NN	*)	O
halted	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
advance	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
east	JJ	*))	O
,	,	*	O
fearing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
hostile	JJ	(NP*	O
fire	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
surrender	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
days	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hammer	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
,	,	*	O
primarily	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
because	IN	*	O
hard	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
core	NN	*	O
Taliban	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Usama	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al-Qa	NN	*)	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	(NP*	O
terror	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)))))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
give	VB	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kunduz	NNP	(NP*)))	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
last	JJ	*	O
major	JJ	*	O
stronghold	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rapid	JJ	*	O
collapse	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hundreds	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
siege	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
riot	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fortress	NNS	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-e-Sharif	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(S(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
discussing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
surrender	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
calls	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
70	CD	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
tribal	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))))	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
avert	VB	(VP*	O
bloodshed	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
there	RB	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
surrender	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Gen	NNP	(NP*	O
Mohammed	NNP	*	O
Zaer	NNP	*	O
Azimi	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Herat	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ruud	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Lubbers	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Refugees	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Afghanistan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
secure	JJ	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
operate	VB	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
enough	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
food	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
secure	JJ	*	O
environment	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
programme	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
So	CC	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
places	NNS	*)))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
one	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
safe	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
secure	JJ	(ADJP*	O
enough	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
So	CC	*	DSE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
quite	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
job	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
secure	JJ	*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
echoed	VBD	(VP*	O
those	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
leading	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
charity	NN	*	O
Oxfam	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
instability	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
hampering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
aid	NN	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
official	JJ	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
today	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Tony	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pleased	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
fronts	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
fluid	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
hour	NN	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
hour	NN	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
direction	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
Alliance	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
success	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
getting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
food	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
multi-faceted	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)))))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
equally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
evidence	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*	DSE
campaign	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
over	RP	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
middle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
25	CD	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
Army	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
relieving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
stationed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kosovo	NNP	(NP*))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
NATO-led	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
KFOR	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Kosovo	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
replacement	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Luxembourg	NNP	*	O
contingent	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
--	:	*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Romanian	JJ	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
84	CD	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
23	CD	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
relief	NN	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
involve	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
900	CD	*	O
troops	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
last	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
12	CD	(S(NP*	O
December	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brussels	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
New	NNP	(S(NP(ADJP*	O
confidential	JJ	*)	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
current	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
former	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
directly	RB	(ADJP*	O
responsible	JJ	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
massacres	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sabra	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Shatila	NNP	*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1982	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lawyers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
survivors	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
filed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
complaint	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
survivors	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
lawyers	NNS	(S(NP(NP*	O
Luc	NNP	*	O
Walleyn	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Michael	NNP	*	O
Verhaeghe	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*))	O
June	NNP	(NP*))	O
filed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
complaint	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brussels	NNP	*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Prosecution	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lebanese	JJ	*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
deemed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massacres	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beirut	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(PP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
filing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
complaint	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
documents	NNS	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Hebrew	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
English	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1982	CD	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
invasion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sabra	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Shatila	NNP	*	O
events	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
meeting	NN	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
intelligence	NN	(NP(NP*	O
service	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
interrogation	NN	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reveal	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Judging	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
texts	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
De	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Standaard	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
related	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	NNP	*	O
Kahan	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
investigated	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sabra	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Shatila	NNP	*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1982-1983	CD	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
published	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
not	RB	(S(NP*	O
all	PDT	*	O
the	DT	*	O
documents	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
interrogation	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
deemed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
damaging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
state	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
interests	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Walleyn	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Verhaeghe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
convinced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
authenticity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
stack	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Investigating	NNP	(NP*	O
Magistrate	NNP	*	O
Patrick	NNP	*	O
Collignon	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Prosecution	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
request	VB	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
confirm	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
authenticity	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Lebanese	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
Phalangist	NNP	*	O
militias	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
perpetrated	VBN	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
massacres	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
cooperated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Phalange	NN	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
advance	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
exercised	VBD	(VP*	O
complete	JJ	(NP*	O
control	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
militias	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
massacres	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
instructed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Phalange	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
assume	VB	(VP*	ESE
responsibility	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
practice	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Phalangist	NNP	*	O
militias	NNS	*)	O
operated	VBD	(VP*	O
directly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
command	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Senior	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*))	O
bore	VBD	(VP*	O
command	NN	(NP*	O
responsibility	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNS	*)	O
preceding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
English	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
militias	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
actions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Belgian	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
held	VBN	(VP*	ESE
responsible	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Verhaeghe	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Tomorrow	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Indictments	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Investigating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Judge	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Collignon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
questions	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimacy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
early	RB	*))))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meantime	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
initiated	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
suit	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Elie	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hobeika	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
militia	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
perpetrators	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
massacres	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
complaint	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Hobeika	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
name	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
deemed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wise	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Collignon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
questions	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
juridical	JJ	*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Lebanese	JJ	*	O
amnesty	NN	*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
27	NNP	*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
modernize	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
extend	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
service	NN	*	O
life	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
units	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provisions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
programme	NN	*	O
Energy-Efficient	NNP	*	O
Economy	NNP	*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
covers	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*	O
to	TO	*	O
2005	CD	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
sets	VBZ	(VP*	O
guidelines	NNS	(NP*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
27	CD	*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
programme	NN	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overhaul	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
view	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
extending	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
safe	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
efficient	JJ	*)	O
operation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
extending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
service	NN	*	O
life	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*	O
units	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
resumption	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
construction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
units	NNS	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
compiling	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
promising	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sites	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
provisions	NNS	*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overhaul	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
construction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP(NP*	O
elements	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overhaul	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
wet	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
waste	NNP	*	O
storage	NN	*	O
facilities	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
2006-2010	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
existing	JJ	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
stepped	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
increasing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
utilization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
current	JJ	(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
extending	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
service	NN	*	O
life	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
increasing	VBG	(VP*	O
capacity	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
new-generation	NN	(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
units	NNS	*)	O
In	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
total	VB	(VP*	O
25.24	CD	(NP*	O
GW	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
3	CD	(NP(NP*	O
GW	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002-05	CD	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
4.81	CD	(NP(NP*	O
GW	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2006-10	CD	(NP*	O
to	TO	*	O
30.05	CD	*))))	O
GW	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
nuclear	JJ	(S(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
account	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
20	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*))))	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(NP*	O
52bn	JJ	*	O
cubic	JJ	*	O
metres	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gas	NN	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
saved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
65.5	CD	*	O
bn	NN	*	O
cubic	JJ	*	O
metres	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
construction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
India	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Ukraine	NNP	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
42bn	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002-2005	CD	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
24bn	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2006-2010	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
severely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
restricted	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*))))	O
residing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(WHPP*	O
that	WDT	(WHNP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
passing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
issuing	VBG	(VP*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
directives	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sending	VBG	(VP*	O
secret	JJ	(NP*	O
memoranda	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
judiciary	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
such	JJ	*	O
measure	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
directive	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
23	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
immigrants	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)	O
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
involvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chorus	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
condemnation	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democrats	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
activists	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
directive	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
lawyers	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
contravention	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
constitution	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
judicial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
investigations	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defendants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bail	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nor	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	O
will	MD	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
appeal	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
courts	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Currently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
around	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
1,100	CD	*)	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
chiefly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Islamic	JJ	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
Eastern	NNP	*	O
states	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
detention	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
divested	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
basis	NN	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
voices	NNS	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
heard	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
prompted	VBN	(VP*	O
European	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
refuse	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hand	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
10	CD	*)	O
individuals	NNS	*)	O
suspected	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
belonging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
fear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
receive	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
fair	JJ	*	ESE
trial	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
always	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
today	NN	(ADVP*)	O
placing	VBG	(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
solitary	JJ	(NP*	O
confinement	NN	*)))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
means	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
communication	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
depriving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
basic	JJ	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
contravention	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
constitution	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
violates	VBZ	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
rights	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
23	CD	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
directive	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
effect	NN	(NP*))	ESE
drawn	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
line	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
blatant	JJ	*	ESE
case	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
discrimination	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
-	:	*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
practised	VBN	(VP*	O
anywhere	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
else	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
worth	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
mentioning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*))	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
severely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
put	VBN	*	DSE
pressure	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))	O
condemned	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Peru	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
secret	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
regulations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
open	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*)	O
trials	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
observance	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defendants	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
basic	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)))	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
demonstrates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
observe	VB	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
places	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
forerunner	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sphere	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
rank	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
restrict	VBP	(S(VP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
security	NN	(NP*	ESE
considerations	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
directive	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))))	O
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	O
law	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-entry	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
expelled	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

STRASBOURG	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
leading	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
jointly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*)))	O
29	CD	(NP(NP*	O
November	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Security	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OSCE	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
responding	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
worrying	JJ	*	ESE
developments	NNS	*	O
''	''	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
While	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
recognize	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
specific	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
refrain	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
excessive	JJ	*	ESE
steps	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
violate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	ESE
freedoms	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
dissent	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Strasbourg	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Warsaw	NNP	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

UN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Mary	NNP	*	O
Robinson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Walter	NNP	(NP*	O
Schwimmer	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Ambassador	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gerard	NNP	*	O
Stoudmann	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
OSCE	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Institutions	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)))))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
essential	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
``	``	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
strictly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
adhere	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
obligations	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
uphold	VB	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
freedoms	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Robinson	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
critical	JJ	*)	ESE
voice	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
guarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
abuses	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
heavy	JJ	*	ESE
toll	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
liberties	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
two	CD	(SBAR(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
British	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commons	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
legislation	NN	*)	O
allowing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
killing	VBG	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
inmates	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
uprising	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-i-Sharif	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*))))	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
killings	NNS	*)	O
prompted	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
call	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
London-based	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
group	NN	*	O
Amnesty	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
inquiry	NN	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
affair	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
essential	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
governments	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
strike	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
balance	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
fundamental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
freedoms	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
consistent	JJ	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*	O
commitments	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
listed	VBN	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
essential	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
hollowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
life	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
expression	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
religion	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
torture	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
retroactive	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
imposition	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
severe	JJ	*	ESE
penalties	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
avoided	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
hinted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
expand	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(VP*	O
swift	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
both	DT	(NP*	O
Germany	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
France	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
called	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
restraint	NN	(NP*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov.	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Thirty	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
political	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
slated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
symposium	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
consolidation	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
Sunday	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
scholars	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
divided	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
discussion	NN	(NP(NP*	O
panels	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
significance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
consolidation	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comparative	JJ	*	O
analysis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
democracy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
roundtable	JJ	*	O
discussion	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GIO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
co-sponsoring	JJ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
symposium	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chengchi	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
symposium	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
greater	JJR	*	DSE
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
stability	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
GIO	NNP	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
accomplishment	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
democratization	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	(NP*	ESE
role	NN	*	ESE
model	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
progress	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mainland	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
Chairwoman	NNP	*	O
Tsai	NNP	*	O
Ing-wen	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
keynote	JJ	*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
symposium	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
visiting	VBG	*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arriving	VBG	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
key	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	(NX(NX*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
local	JJ	(NX*	O
political	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
legislators	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
county	NN	*	O
chiefs	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
city	NN	*	O
mayors	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
scholars	NNS	*))))))	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tsai	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
response	NN	(NP*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
question	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
over-reliance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainland	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*)))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
achieve	VB	(VP*	ESE
balanced	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
growth	NN	*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
strikes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
balance	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
globally	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
normalizing	VBG	(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
10	CD	*)	O
Nov	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Xinhua	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Expert	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
View	NNP	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Global	JJ	(NP*	O
Climate	NN	*	O
Change	NNP	*	O
Protocols	NNP	*))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
seventh	JJ	*	O
Conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Parties	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
COP	NNP	(NP*	O
7	CD	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UNFCCC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Morocco	NNP	*	O
,	,	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
29	CD	(NP*))	O
October	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ren	NNP	*	O
Guoyu	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expert	NN	*	O
meteorologist	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Climate	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Xinhua	NNP	(NP*	O
News	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
deal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
effort	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
successfully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
arrested	VBN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Ren	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
humans	NNS	(NP*)	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
excessive	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
amounts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
primarily	RB	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
50	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Carbon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
dioxide	NN	*	O
concentration	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
higher	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
past	JJ	*	ESE
several	JJ	(QP*	ESE
hundred	CD	*	ESE
thousand	CD	*)	ESE
years	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
excessive	JJ	*	ESE
emission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mean	JJ	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rise	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
0.4	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
0.8	CD	(NP(NP*	O
degree	NN	*	O
C	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
140	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
emission	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
rigorously	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	ESE
limited	VBN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
climb	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
average	JJ	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
surge	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
1.5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
5.8	CD	*)))	O
C	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
The	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
sea	NN	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
rise	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
nine	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
88	CD	(NP*	O
millimeters	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
disastrous	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
frequent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
extreme	JJ	*	O
weather	NN	*	O
phenomena	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
cold	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
spells	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
heat	NN	(NP*	O
waves	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
torrential	JJ	(NP*	O
rain	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tornadoes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
society	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
abrupt	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
critical	JJ	*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
temperature	NN	(NP*	O
rise	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
exceeded	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*	O
suddenly	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
sharply	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
fall	VB	(VP*	O
precipitously	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deleterious	JJ	*	ESE
effect	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
mankind	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
disaster	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
averted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
all	RB	*	ESE
join	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(S(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas-emitting	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rise	VB	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
rescind	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
promise	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
excuses	NNS	*)	ESE
include	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
harm	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
insufficient	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
participation	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Ren	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
irresponsible	JJ	*	ESE
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
carbon	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
accumulated	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
100-200	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
emitted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
developing	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
several	JJ	*	O
decades	NNS	*))))))	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
fraction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
emission	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
industrialized	JJ	(NP*	ESE
nations	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
per	IN	(ADJP*	O
capita	NN	*)	O
basis	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
far	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
less	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	VBN	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
per	IN	(ADJP*	O
capita	NN	*)	O
emission	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
one-sixth	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
requires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	VBN	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
excuse	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
evade	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
Although	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*	O
target	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change-related	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
significantly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reduced	VBN	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
efficiency	NN	(NP(NP*	O
improvement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
conservation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
development	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
advanced	JJ	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
technology	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
recognized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
globe	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Ren	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
usually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
incur	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
loss	NN	*)	O
equivalent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
GDP	NN	*)))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
tries	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
lower	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
1	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
weak	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
developing	JJ	*	ESE
nation	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
absorb	VB	(VP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
burden	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
monetary	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
technical	JJ	*)	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	VBN	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
protect	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
interests	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
industrialized	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
made	VBD	(VP*	ESE
outrageous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
past	JJ	(NP*	O
UNFCCC	NN	*	O
conferences	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
made	VBD	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
compromise	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
significant	JJ	*	ESE
concession	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
significantly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
weakened	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	*)	O
played	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
tactic	NN	*)	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
delay	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
refuse	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
fulfill	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
obligations	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Negotiation	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
stymied	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
compromise	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
smooth	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
either	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reminder	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Ren	NNP	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
gesture	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
mankind	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fundamentally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
less	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
actually	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
curb	VB	*	ESE
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Earth	NNP	(NP*	O
Summit	NNP	*	O
2002	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mankind	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
next	JJ	*	O
step	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
long	JJ	*	ESE
road	NN	*)	ESE
ahead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Dr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Ren	NNP	*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
developing	VBG	(S(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
join	VB	(VP*	ESE
forces	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kazakhstan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
external	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
counting	VBG	*	O
unregulated	JJ	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
11,305,400,000	CD	(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
14	CD	(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
year	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kazakh	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Statistics	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
favourable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1.84	CD	(NP(NP*	O
bn	NN	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
favourable	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
2.89	CD	(NP*	O
bn	NN	*	O
dollars	NNS	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
accounted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
30.9	FW	(NP(NP*	O
per	FW	*	O
cent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*))))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
period	NN	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
27	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
ISS	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
brand	NN	*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
TMA-1	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
formally	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
committed	VBD	*	DSE
itself	PRP	(NP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
vis-a-vis	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
European	JJ	*)	O
partners	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
ESA	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
Frank	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
Winne	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ticket	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
highway	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
stars	NNS	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
radiant	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
Frank	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
Winne	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
flight	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Charles	NNP	(NP*	O
Picque	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Science	NNP	(NP*	O
Policy	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
commissioner	NN	*)	O
Yvan	NNP	(NP*	O
Ylieff	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
ESA	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
European	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Frank	NNP	(S(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
Winne	NNP	*)	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reports	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Rosaviacosmos	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
guaranteed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expenses	NNS	*)	O
tied	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
trip	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP*)	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
little	JJ	*	O
less	JJR	(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
one	CD	*)))	O
year	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
Belgian	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Baikonor	NNP	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*))))))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
brand	NN	*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
TMA-1	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
modern	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
bigger	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Soyuzes	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
Frank	NNP	(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
Winne	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
on-board	JJ	*	O
engineer	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
qualified	JJ	*)	O
crew	NN	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
on-board	JJ	*	O
comander	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
still	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
appointed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
prove	VB	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
De	NNP	(NP*	O
Winne	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
personally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
pilot	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
TMA	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
attests	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
partners	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(NP*	O
example	NN	*	O
?	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
28	CD	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
Claudie	NNP	*	O
Haignere	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))	O
together	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
identical	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
De	NNP	(NP*	O
Winne	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
find	VB	(VP*	DSE
enough	JJ	(NP*	DSE
praise	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
fellow	JJ	*	O
citizen	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
whom	WP	(WHNP*))	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
trained	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Frank	NNP	(NP*)	O
worked	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Star	NNP	(NP*	O
City	NNP	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
much	JJ	(NP*	ESE
intensity	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
learned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
indispensable	JJ	*	O
bases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
language	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
appreciable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
training	NN	(NP*))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
share	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
experiences	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
dynamism	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
asset	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
really	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
unanimous	JJ	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
assessment	NN	*)	O
confirms	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
choices	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
delighted	NNP	*	DSE
Ylieff	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
Particularly	NNP	(NP*	O
Financial	NNP	*	O
Choices	NNPS	*)))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Frank	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
Winne	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
taxi	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
lasting	VBG	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
10	CD	*)	O
days	NNS	*)))	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*	O
tax	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
600	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
francs	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
15.5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Belgian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
yesterday	NN	*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
segment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2.5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Frank	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
training	NN	*)	O
costs	VBZ	(VP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
avenues	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
explored	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
overall	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
undoubtedly	RB	(NP(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
logical	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
internal	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
SSTC	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
Scientific	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Technical	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cultural	NNP	(NP*	O
Services	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
manage	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
budgets	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
sum	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
question	NN	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SSTC	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
budgets	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
deducted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
two	CD	(NP(QP*	O
or	CC	*	O
three	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
SSTC	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
overall	JJ	*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
suffer	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nor	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	O
will	MD	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*)	O
sector	VB	(VP*	O
's	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
particular	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Cancellation	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
Insurance	NNP	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Budgets	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
constant	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
explained	VBD	(VP*)	O
Eric	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Beka	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SSTC	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
secretary	NN	*	O
general	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
sums	NNS	*)	O
obtained	VBN	(VP*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
result	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assignment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
portion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
budget	NN	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
many	JJ	*)	O
related	VBN	(VP*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP*	O
fall-outs	NNS	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
optional	JJ	*	O
programs	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
word	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
De	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Winne	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ticket	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
financed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
parachute	VBD	(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Since	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ESA	NNP	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
capable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
replacing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Frank	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
Winne	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)))))))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
suddenly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
proved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
expecting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
`	``	(NP(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
insurance	NN	*	O
'	''	*)	O
for	IN	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
''	''	*	O
Yvan	NNP	(NP*	O
Ylieff	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
insure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
recover	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
sums	NNS	*)	O
involved	VBN	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(FRAG(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prospect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
trip	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
One	CD	(NP*	O
million	CD	*	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
devoted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
cancellation	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
insurance	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
10	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dirk	NNP	(NP*	O
Frimout	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
earth	NN	(NP*	O
orbit	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Atlantis	NNP	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
Belgian	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
don	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
suit	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
rich	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
promises	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

De	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Winne	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
qualify	VB	(VP*	O
technically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
piloting	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*	ESE
elements	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corps	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
projects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Belgian	JJ	(NP*	O
scientists	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
industrialists	NNS	*)))	O
active	JJ	(S(ADJP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*))	O
far	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Picque	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
franc	NN	*)	O
invested	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
brought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
three	CD	(NP*	ESE
francs	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Who	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
said	VBD	(SQ(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
space	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
investments	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
interesting	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Youths	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nidal	NNP	*	O
Sanduqah	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Ra	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
`	``	*	O
fat	JJ	(NP*	O
al-Bajjali	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
injured	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
result	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
explosion	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
rocked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
causes	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
explosion	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
house	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Saf	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Street	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
unknown	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
person	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
moderately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wounded	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
explosion	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
concerned	VBN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
investigation	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
incident	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
short	JJ	*	O
while	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Ra	JJ	(S(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
fat	JJ	*	O
al-Bajjali	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
martyred	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
wounds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
sustained	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
explosion	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
3	NNP	*	O
December	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transport	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*	O
Progress	NN	*	O
M1-7	NN	*)	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
26	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*))	O
finally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
docked	VBN	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zvezda	NNP	*	O
module	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
3	NNP	*	O
December	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
solved	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
90-minute	JJ	*	O
spacewalk	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
water	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
technical	JJ	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
food	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
parcels	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
videos	NNS	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*	O
crew	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*	O
Centre	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
ITAR-TASS	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
delivered	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
microsatellite	NN	*)	O
Kolibri	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
research	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
orbit	NN	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
spacewalk	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Progress	NNP	*	O
M1-7	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
2,468	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilograms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cargo	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
tonne	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Progress	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
programme	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Banja	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Luka	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dec	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
4	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ONASA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Republika	NNP	(NP*	O
Srpska	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Serb	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*))	O
RS	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mladen	NNP	*	O
Ivanic	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
4	CD	*	O
December	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
departed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
last	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
9	CD	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
read	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
RS	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
public	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
bureau	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ivanic	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Qian	NNP	*	O
Qichen	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
possibilities	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ivanic	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Milenko	NNP	*	O
Vracar	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
province	NN	(NP*))))	O
Hebei	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Niu	NNP	*	O
Maosheng	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
invited	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
province	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BAGRAM	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dec	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
7	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foretaste	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
resistance	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
peacekeepers	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
uneasy	JJ	*	ESE
atmosphere	NN	*)	ESE
reigns	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bagram	NNP	*	O
airbase	NN	*	O
north	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
airbase	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
1979-89	CD	(NP(NP*	O
invasion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bagram	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
become	VBN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hub	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
flights	NNS	(NP*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Kabul	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
own	JJ	*	O
airport	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
unexploded	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
bombs	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Northern	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
control	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
entrance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
60	CD	*	O
kilometres	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
35	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
north	RB	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
perimeter	NN	*))))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
checkpoint	NN	*)	O
manned	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
heavily-armed	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
metres	NNS	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*	O
down	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
road	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
commandos	NNS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
guard	NN	(NP*	O
duty	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
contingent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
10th	JJ	*	O
mountain	NN	*	O
division	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
base	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Bagram	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
joining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(QP*	O
150	CD	*)	O
British	JJ	*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
air	NN	*	O
corridor	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*))))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
security	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crucial	JJ	*	O
airbase	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
By	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
means	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
we	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
help	VB	(VP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Sergeant-Major	NNP	*	O
Ray	NNP	*	O
Cordell	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ill-disciplined	JJ	*	ESE
alliance	NN	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
little-disguised	JJ	(NP*	ESE
irritation	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
dominant	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Bagram	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
refusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
through	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
General	NNP	(NP*	O
Babajan	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
driving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
positions	NNS	(NP*)	O
along	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
British	NNP	*	O
officers	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
naturedly	NN	*)	ESE
shrugged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	DSE
problem	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	VB	(VP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))	O
?	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(SBAR(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
smiling	VBG	(S(VP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
then	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
asked	VBN	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
permission	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Babajan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
replied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
charge	NN	(NP*))	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	DSE
balance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
authority	NN	(NP*)))	O
became	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
invited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accompany	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
convoy	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
swiftly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
countermanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
officers	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
checkpoint	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*	O
armed	JJ	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
M-4	NN	(NP*	O
carbines	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
manning	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
post	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
assisted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sniffer	NN	*	O
dog	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHNP(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*)	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
provoked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
incident	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
toured	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Bagram	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
halted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
tracks	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
burst	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gunfire	NN	(NP*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
alliance	NN	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
vehicle	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
When	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
gets	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Northern	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
start	VBP	(VP*	O
firing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
air	NN	*)))	O
just	RB	(PP(ADVP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
something	NN	(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Cordell	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Northern	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
irritated	JJ	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
images	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
armed	VBN	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
soil	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
so	IN	*	O
media	NNS	(S(NP(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
temporarily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
suspended	VBN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
pictures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
reminded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
invasion	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
caps	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
brings	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
back	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
bad	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
memories	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Cordell	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Ironically	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
200	CD	*	O
armed	NNP	*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*))	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
dressed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
uniforms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
emergencies	NNS	*	O
ministry	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
camp	NN	(NP*)	O
10	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
re-establish	VB	(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
armed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
five-year	JJ	*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
offered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
unequivocal	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
political	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loose	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP*	O
minorities	NNS	*))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
swept	VBD	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
13	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
power-sharing	JJ	*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bonn	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
22	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADJP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*)	O
UN-mandated	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
Northern	NNP	(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
defence	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Qasim	NNP	*	O
Fahim	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
rebuffed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
offer	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coming	VBG	*	O
days	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
strictly	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	ESE
limited	VBN	*)	ESE
UN	NNP	*	O
force	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Osaka	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Dec.	NNP	*	O
7	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
nongovernmental	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NGO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kobe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
shipped	VBN	(VP*	O
relief	NN	(NP(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
blankets	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sweaters	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
refugee	NN	(NP(NP*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
endure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
severe	JJ	*	O
winter	NN	*	O
weather	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Packages	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
relief	NN	*	O
goods	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
collected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ACEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
customs	NNS	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Osaka	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
shipped	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Islamabad	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Narita	NNP	(NP*	O
airport	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
east	JJ	(ADVP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
ACEC	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
request	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Crescent	NNP	*	O
Society	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
ACEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
donations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
relief	NN	(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Web	NNP	*	O
site	NN	*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
November	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
ACEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
shipped	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(QP*	O
200	CD	*)	O
kilograms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50	CD	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
relief	NN	(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*))))	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
collected	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
shipped	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
sea	NN	(NP*))	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

ACEC	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
monetary	JJ	(NP*	O
donations	NNS	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
money	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
shipping	NN	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cold	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
sole	JJ	*	ESE
superpower	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
trend	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
pragmatism	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
clearer	JJR	(S(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
clearer	JJR	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Pragmatism	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(NP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
place	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
traditional	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
coming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
unilateralism	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
pragmatism	NN	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
main	JJ	*	ESE
foreign	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*	ESE
line	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Alternate	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
complementary	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
nature	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
pragmatism	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unilateralism	NN	*))))	ESE
constitute	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
characteristics	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
diplomacy	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
coming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
deploying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Missile	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
System	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
NMD	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	(NP(ADVP*)	O
US	NNP	*	O
western	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
neighbor	NNP	*	O
Canada	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
consistently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
opposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
alone	RB	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	DSE
US	NNP	*	DSE
diplomatic	JJ	*	DSE
goals	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
NMD	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
revise	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Anti-Ballistic	NNP	*	O
Missile	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
AMD	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
flashing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
carrot	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
stick	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
missile	NN	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
pose	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
trigger	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
arms	NNS	*	ESE
race	NN	*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
occasion	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(S(NP*	O
Anti-Ballistic	NNP	*	O
Missile	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1972	CD	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
product	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Cold	NNP	*	ESE
War	NNP	*	ESE
era	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	*	ESE
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
binding	JJ	*	ESE
force	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NMD	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
prepared	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
scrap	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ABM	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
funds	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
research	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
testing	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
N	NNP	*	O
!	.	*	O
MD	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
accelerated	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
test	NN	*	O
frequency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-missile	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)))))))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
after	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
resolution	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
abiding	VBG	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Anti-Ballistic	NNP	*	O
Missile	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*))))	O
''	''	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
29	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
November	NNP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
56th	NNP	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
persisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
carrying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
missile	NN	*	O
interception	NN	*	O
test	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
word	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NMD	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
purpose	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	ESE
attacking	VBG	*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
countries	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
preventing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
attacking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
thereby	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
genuinely	VBN	*	ESE
securing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
sole	JJ	*	ESE
super	CD	*	ESE
power	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
Sino-US	NNP	*	O
plane	NN	*	O
collision	NN	*	O
event	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
occurred	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
April	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
best	RBS	(ADVP*)	ESE
illustrate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
alternate	JJ	*	O
application	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
two-isms	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
diplomacy	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plane	NN	*	O
collision	NN	*	O
event	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
logic	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
only	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
spy	NN	*	ESE
plane	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
permitted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
spy	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
doorsteps	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
host	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
doors	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
protect	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
yard	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
responsibility	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
event	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
a	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
crashed	VBD	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
pilot	NN	*)	O
perished	VBD	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
side	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
not	RB	(VP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
apologize	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
claimed	VBD	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
crew	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)))))	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
being	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
deterred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
firm	NN	*	DSE
position	NN	*))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
due	JJ	(VP(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
crew	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
compelled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
offer	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
apology	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
crew	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
major	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
changed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
immediately	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
trade	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Olympics	NNPS	(NP*))	O
hosting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
retaliate	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
coming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
proceeding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	JJ	*	ESE
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
interests	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pragmatism	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unilateralism	NN	*	ESE
position	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
treaties	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
catering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
interests	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
oil	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
coal	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
barons	NNS	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
donations	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Republican	NNP	*	ESE
Party	NNP	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
prior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
consultations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enforce	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
unanimous	JJ	(NP*	DSE
condemnation	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
let	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Comprehensive	NNP	*	O
Test	JJ	*	O
Ban	NN	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
``	``	*	O
freeze	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hard	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heels	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
negotiation	NN	*	O
representative	NN	*	O
Marie	NNP	*	O
Chevrier	NNP	*))))))	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Geneva	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Biological	JJ	*	O
Weapons	JJ	*	O
Convention	NN	*	O
''	''	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
objected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
enforcement	NN	*	DSE
plan	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
convention	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
either	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
refuses	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
ratify	VB	*	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
implement	VB	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
treaties	NNS	*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
asks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
revision	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
treaties	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
benefit	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
security	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
economy	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
globalization	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
treaties	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mechanisms	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
organizations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
restrict	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
prevent	VBP	*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
freedom	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
countries	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
organizations	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
orders	NNS	*)))))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
always	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
cause	VBP	(VP*	ESE
troubles	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
strongly	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
condemned	VBD	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
acts	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
sympathy	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Supported	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
century	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
US	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
war	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
views	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
major	JJ	*	ESE
force	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
anti-terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
only	RB	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNP	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
capability	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Either	CC	(S(S*	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
continues	VBZ	(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
harbor	NN	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
support	NN	*	DSE
terrorism	NN	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hostile	JJ	*	ESE
regime	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
stand	VB	(VP*	DSE
behind	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
decides	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
friend	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
basis	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
attitude	NN	*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
using	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
multilateral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
diplomacy	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
enhance	VB	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
unilateralism	NNP	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
practices	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
pragmatism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
frontline	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
event	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
kept	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
distance	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
imposed	VBD	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
declaring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
war	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
not	RB	(VP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
drew	VBD	(VP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
side	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
provided	VBD	*	O
aid	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whether	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
responsible	JJ	*	O
manner	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
anybody	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
guess	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
reasons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
linked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
interests	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
naturally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
chose	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
intensive	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
PA	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
difficult	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*)	O
security	NN	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
remove	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
PA	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*)	O
Yasir	NNP	(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
support	NN	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
biased	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
strengthened	VBD	(VP*	O
Israeli	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ari'el	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attempts	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
suppress	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
national	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
ambitions	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
declared	JJ	*	DSE
objective	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
establishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rubble	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
logical	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
demanded	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mutual	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
concurrent	JJ	*)	O
cessation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
exploit	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
calm	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
files	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*	ESE
revenge	NN	*)))	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
assassinations	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
arrests	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
logical	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
withdrawal	NN	(NP*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
activity	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
demands	NNS	*)	ESE
constitute	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	ESE
base	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
bringing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
calm	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
putting	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
turning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
leaf	NN	*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
fruitful	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
negotiations	NNS	*)	ESE
leading	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
acceptable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
tragic	JJ	*	ESE
repercussions	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
viewed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
perspective	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
killing	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
martyrs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	ESE
children	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
ignored	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
homes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
installations	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
PA	NNP	(NP*	O
infrastructure	NN	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
overlooked	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
interest	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
long	JJ	*	ESE
run	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
heightens	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
frustration	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
damages	NNS	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
credibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sponsor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
indeed	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	O
partner	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
eighties	NNS	*))))))	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
faltered	VBD	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
intransigence	NN	*))))	ESE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
realizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
achieve	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
avenue	NN	*)	ESE
unexplored	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
quest	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
enables	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
regain	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
stability	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
unfair	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
blame	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PA	NNP	*	O
for	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tension	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*))	O
violence	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
oppressive	CD	*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
activities	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Every	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
oppressive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
vindictive	JJ	*)	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
stopped	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1994	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
control	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	ESE
yet	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
forces	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
weapons	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
measures	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
achieve	VB	(VP*	ESE
full	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
comprehensive	JJ	*)	ESE
quiet	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP*)))	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
27	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
context	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
note	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
curbing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
residential	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
explaining	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
picture	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Certainly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intensive	JJ	*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
big	JJ	*	ESE
sister	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Egypt	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
bridle	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
oppressive	JJ	*)	ESE
activity	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
warn	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
targeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PA	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
highly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
appreciated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
general	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Dec	NNP	*	O
9	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Tehran-based	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
IHRC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
force	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
weapon	NN	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
last	JJ	*	ESE
say	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
IHRC	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mark	VB	(VP*	O
December	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
10	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
''	''	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
formulated	VBN	(VP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
honor	VB	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
50	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bitter	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
experience	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
heavy	JJ	*	ESE
losses	NNS	*)))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
humanity	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
several	JJ	(S(S(NP(QP*	O
hundred	CD	*)	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
signed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
different	JJ	(S(NP*	O
cultures	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
put	VBN	(VP*	DSE
forward	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
outlooks	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
envisaged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
measures	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
violation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
IHRC	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
prohibition	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
discrimination	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
torture	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
arbitrary	JJ	(ADJP*	O
detention	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
honoring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
associations	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
women	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
envisaged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
recommended	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
divine	JJ	*	O
religions	NNS	*))	O
several	JJ	(ADVP(NP*	O
centuries	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
regretted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
provisions	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
materialized	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
communities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
heavy	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
losses	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
devastating	JJ	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	O
wars	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
understood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
dependent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
honoring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
IHRC	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
racism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Durban	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
August	NNP	*)	O
31-September	NNP	(NP*	O
7	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
turning	NN	*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
honor	VB	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
deplored	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
injustice	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
violation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
activists	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
minorities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
women	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
IHRC	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
religions	NNS	*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
solidarity	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dry	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
roots	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
security	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
certain	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
resort	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
military	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
embark	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
trampling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilians	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
statesmen	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
heed	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
teachings	NNS	*)	O
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
established	VBN	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
honoring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
human	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
development	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva-based	JJ	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Mary	NNP	*	O
Robinson	NNP	*)))	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
bombing	NN	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
denounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
activists	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
urging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
halt	VB	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
targeted	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
killing	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

SPENDING	VBG	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
5	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
2005	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
Mohamed	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Al-Amri	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
managing	VBG	(NP(NP(NP*	O
partner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Dr	NNP	*	O
Mohamed	NNP	*	O
Al-Amri	NNP	*	O
&	CC	*	O
amp	NNP	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
Company	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
provider	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
auditing	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
accounting	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
tax	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
IT	NNS	*	O
consulting	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
spending	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
software	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
services	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saudi	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
businesses	NNS	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
software	NN	(NP(NP*	O
applications	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
retain	VB	(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
clients	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
market	NN	*	O
reach	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
operating	VBG	*	O
costs	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Al-Amri	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gazette	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
growth	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
s	NNP	*	O
IT	NNP	*	O
spending	NN	*))	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rise	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
34	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
four	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
Saudi-based	JJ	(S(NP*	O
businesses	NNS	*	O
capabilities	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
compete	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
markets	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Al-Amri	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	DSE
priority	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Saudi	JJ	(NP*	O
businesses	NNS	*)))	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
application	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
customer	NN	(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*	O
management	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CRM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
capabilities	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increasing	VBG	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
spending	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
CRM	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
projected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
10	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
mark	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
2005	CD	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Al-Amri	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Internet	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
coupled	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
thrust	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*))))	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exposure	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
competitiveness	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
pushing	VBG	(VP*	O
Saudi-based	JJ	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
web-based	JJ	(NP*	O
strategies	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wider	JJR	*	O
market	NN	*	O
reach	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
manageable	JJ	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Software	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
e-business	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
e-CRM	JJ	*	O
capabilities	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Saudi	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Mohamed	NNP	*	O
Al-Amri	NNP	*	O
&	CC	*	O
amp	NNP	*)	O
;	:	*	O
Company	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
local	JJ	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Kingdom-wide	JJ	(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
certified	JJ	*	O
e-CRM	JJ	*	O
ACCPAC	NN	*	O
partner	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Worldwide	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
revenues	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CRM	NNP	*	O
services	NNS	*	O
markets	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
over	IN	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
126.2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2004	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
e-CRM	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
technology	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
customer	NN	(NP*	O
interactions	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
little	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
intermediation	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
side	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
consists	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
direct-to-customer	JJ	(NP*	O
channels	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
mainly	RB	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
e-mail	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Wide	NNP	*	O
Web	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WWWW	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
emerging	VBG	*	O
technologies	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
WAP	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
December	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*))	O
Leszek	NNP	(NP*	O
Miller	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*	O
management	NN	*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
coordinate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)))	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Krzysztof	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Janik	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
minister	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
internal	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
internal	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
administration	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
personally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
head	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
staff	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chiefs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Internal	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
coordinate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ministries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
crisis	NN	(NP*	O
situations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eventuality	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Minister	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Janik	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heightened	VBN	(NP*	O
alert	NN	*)))	O
introduced	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Poland	NNP	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
upheld	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
ends	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Minister	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Janik	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
counterpart	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Polish	JJ	*	O
Operation	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Maneuver	NNP	*	O
Reaction	NNP	*	O
Group	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
GROM	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ultimately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
employ	VB	*	O
350	CD	(NP(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
missions	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Krzysztof	NNP	(NP*	O
Janik	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tighten	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
eastern	JJ	*	O
borders	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
JT	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Higher	JJR	*	O
Court	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Justice	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
filed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*))	O
contesting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
recently	RB	(ADJP*	O
endorsed	JJ	*)	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
Elections	NN	*	O
Law	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
lawyer	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Rateb	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Juneidi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
court	NN	*	O
presided	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Judge	NNP	(NP*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*	O
Hadad	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
examined	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charge	NN	*	O
sheets	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
arguments	NNS	*)	DSE
presented	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
adjourned	VBN	*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
31	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Opposition	NNP	*	O
Parties	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Higher	NNP	*	O
Coordination	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
contested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
16	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grounds	NNS	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
unconstitutional	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
warranting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enactment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)	O
allows	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
executive	JJ	*	O
branch	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	O
temporary	JJ	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
absence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Parliament	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
provided	VBD	(PP*	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
clarified	VBN	(S(VP(VP*	O
voting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
procedures	NNS	(NP*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
maintained	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
one-person	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
one-vote	JJ	*	O
formula	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
endorsed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	*	O
over	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dissolution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Lower	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Political	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
professional	JJ	(NP*	O
associations	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
moved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
contest	VB	(VP*	DSE
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
gatherings	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
amendments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Penal	NNP	*	O
Code	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O

Paris	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
French	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
abroad	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
entailed	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overspend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
3.290	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
Francs	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Fr	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
expenditure	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(ADVP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
Fr3	VBG	(S(VP*	O
.255	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
operations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mobilize	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
5,000	CD	*	O
men	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Outside	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
outside	IN	(PRN(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
agreements	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
2001	VBG	(S(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10,750	CD	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gendarmerie	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
stationed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kosovo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
5,890	CD	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Bosnia-Herzegovina	NNP	(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
2,820	NNP	(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Dec.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Mainland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MAC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Chairwoman	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Tsai	NNP	*	O
Ing-wen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
foresees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*	O
resume	NN	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)))))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	(ADJP*	O
York-based	JJ	*)	O
non-partisan	JJ	*	O
association	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
celebrities	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*))	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
goodwill	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Tsai	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
carefully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
mull	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
significance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
particularly	RB	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
opportunities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
all	DT	(ADVP*)	ESE
depends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
mainland	NNP	(S(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
interprets	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
latest	JJS	*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
cultivate	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
favorable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
resumption	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
long-stalled	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Tsai	NNP	(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Committee	NNP	(NX*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP*)))	O
''	''	*	O
delegation	NN	*))	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
precondition	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)))	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
such	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
reached	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mutually	RB	(ADJP*	O
acceptable	JJ	*)	O
meaning	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
term	NN	*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
wisdom	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
creativity	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
visiting	VBG	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
overseas	JJ	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*)	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
originally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
not	RB	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
cherished	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Republic	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*	ESE
vanish	NNP	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
Therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guardian	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
sovereignty	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
dignity	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
principle	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
overnight	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
forge	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
mutual	JJ	(NP*	ESE
trust	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
talks	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
solid	JJ	*	ESE
basis	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Tsai	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
view	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
Tsai	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
endeavoring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*	O
elections	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
affecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsai	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)))	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
give	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	DSE
positive	JJ	*	DSE
response	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
goodwill	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
post-Taiwan	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
fully	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
aware	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
stability	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
mainland	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
planner	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
assured	VBD	(VP*	DSE
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
guests	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
unchanged	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Progressive	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
emerged	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
legislative	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Legislative	JJ	*	O
Yuan	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*))	O
evening	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
brief	VB	(VP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
scholars	NNS	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
politicians	NNS	(NX*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
direction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Dec.	NNP	*	O
1	CD	*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Pervez	NNP	*	O
Musharraf	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
20th	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
24th	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
invitation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
mark	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climax	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50th	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Premier	NNP	(NP*	O
Zhu	NNP	*	O
Rongji	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Li	NNP	*	O
Peng	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
People	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Congress	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
review	VB	(VP*	O
Pakistan-China	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
focus	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kashmir	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bilateral	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Saindak	NNP	*	O
copper	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
gold	JJ	(NP*	O
projects	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Thar	NN	(NP*	O
coal	NN	*	O
mines	NNS	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
technical	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
revolving	JJ	*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP*	O
research	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
hydroelectric	JJ	*	O
projects	NNS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
hovers	VBZ	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
partner	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
external	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ANKARA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Dec	NNP	*	O
15	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Interior	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Rustu	NNP	*	O
Kazim	NNP	*	O
Yucelen	NNP	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decree	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
migration	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
sea	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
decree	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
smuggling	NN	*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
coasts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP*	O
islands	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
France	NNP	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADJP*	O
due	JJ	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
reasons	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Coast	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*	O
units	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
6	CD	(NP(QP*	O
thousand	CD	*))	O
743	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	*)))	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1996	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

2,816	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
11	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Coast	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
detailed	JJ	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
about	RB	(NP(NP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
smuggling	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
number	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreigners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
1	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
26	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Turkish	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greek	JJ	*	O
flagged	NN	*	O
ships	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
fishing	NN	(NP*	O
boats	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
speed	NN	(NP*	O
boats	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
smugglers	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
migration	NN	*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
sea	NN	(NP*)))))	O
happened	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
provinces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Izmir	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Aydin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mugla	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

28	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
63	CD	(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bodrum	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
township	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugla	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
generally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
increase	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
spring	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fall	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Turkish	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
southeastern	JJ	*	O
provinces	NNS	*)))	O
accounted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
31	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iraqi	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)	O
followed	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Having	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP*	O
95.1	JJ	*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Middle	NNP	*)	O
Eastern	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
migration	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
under	IN	*	O
developed	VBN	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
correct	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
issue	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
important	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
frustrate	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
territorial	JJ	*	DSE
ambition	NN	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Apart	RB	(ROOT(S(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
talk	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
issue	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
suryong	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
Comrade	NNP	*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Il-song	NNP	*)	O
taught	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Imperialism	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
source	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
disturber	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
urgent	JJ	*	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
appear	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
withdrawing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
17	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
pulled	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tulkarm	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
River	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
optimistic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Toward	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	CD	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
relatively	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
calm	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
pretended	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
abiding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
decision	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
withdrawing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
halfway	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
through	IN	*	O
under	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
unstable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
knowing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
halt	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
again	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
pretext	NN	*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
before	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*	O
Israel	NNP	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
withdrawing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Tulkarm	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
deliberately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
gunned	VBN	*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	CD	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
quarries	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
bulldozed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
dwelling	NN	(NP*	O
houses	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
area	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
committed	JJ	*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
atrocious	JJ	*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
wounding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
hesitation	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
tense	JJ	(NP*)	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
due	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
pressure	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
withdrawing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
area	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
Israeli	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
then	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
visited	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
holy	JJ	*	O
place	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kuds	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
throwing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fierce	JJ	*	O
fight	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
behavior	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
insulting	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))))	ESE
infuriated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Palestine	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
desperate	JJ	*	ESE
fight	NN	*)	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
took	VBD	(VP*	ESE
tolls	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
women	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
children	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
clash	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)))	O
briefly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
abating	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large-scale	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*	O
incident	NN	*	O
-LSB-	CD	*	O
taesupkyok	NN	*	O
sakon	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
fierce	JJ	(S(ADJP*))	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tourism	NN	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
assassinated	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	CD	*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
paying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
attention	NN	(NP*)	DSE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
becoming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
complicated	JJ	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

International	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
again	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Caving	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
pressure	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
pretended	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
waging	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
shore	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Islamic	JJ	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
crafty	JJ	*	ESE
ruse	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Seeing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
scheme	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
troop	NN	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
area	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
abandoned	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
aggressive	JJ	*	ESE
ambitions	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Convinced	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
abandon	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
completely	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
dragging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
feet	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
citing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
variety	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
excuses	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
adamantly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
completely	RB	(ADJP*	O
independent	JJ	*)	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
scheme	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
Palestine	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
vassal	JJ	*	ESE
state	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
control	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
granting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Palestine	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
claim	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
small	JJ	*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
territory	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
waive	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
right	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
raise	VB	(VP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
organize	VB	(VP*	O
-RSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
territorial	JJ	*	ESE
ambition	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
persistent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
clever	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kuds	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Commenting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*))	O
emphatically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
stratagem	NN	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
support	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sphere	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
domination	NN	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
van	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
invading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
put	VB	(VP*	DSE
pressure	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
because	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	DSE
sympathetic	JJ	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
finds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Palestine	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
tolerable	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
before	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
because	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
interests	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
obvious	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
employ	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
crafty	JJ	*	ESE
trick	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
realize	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
burning	VBG	*	ESE
territorial	NN	*	ESE
ambition	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
obvious	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
aggressive	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
remain	VB	(VP*	ESE
unchanged	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prospect	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
issue	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
bleak	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
due	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
stand	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*	ESE
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
yongdoja	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Comrade	NNP	*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Chong-il	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pointed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Although	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
imperialists	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
reactionaries	NNS	*)	ESE
speak	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
ill	JJ	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
socialism	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
pretend	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
advocates	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ones	NNS	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
really	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
abuse	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
picked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
quarrel	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
speaking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
problem	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
acted	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	RBR	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
often	RB	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
not	RB	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
acting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
adjudicator	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
published	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
Annual	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Report	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
Annual	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Report	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Religious	NNPS	*	O
Freedom	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
attempting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
teach	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
or	CC	(NP(QP*	ESE
two	CD	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
--	:	*)))))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
deems	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
disagreeable	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
qualified	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
easily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
talk	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
manner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
racial	JJ	*	O
discrimination	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
passage	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
ruthlessly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
trampled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
upon	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
colored	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
jointly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
daily	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Harvard	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
wondering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
American	JJ	*	ESE
society	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
reverting	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
1960s	NNS	*)))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
racial	JJ	(S(NP*	O
discrimination	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1,709	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
blacks	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Latinos	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Asians	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
participated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
responded	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
three	CD	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
ten	CD	(NP*	O
blacks	NNS	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
find	VB	(VP(VP*	O
job	NN	(NP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
denied	VBN	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
workplace	NN	*)))	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
blacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
eight	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
ten	CD	(NP*	O
blacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
thirds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Latinos	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Asians	NNPS	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
persecution	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
subjected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
abusive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
language	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ali	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Barr	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*)	O
name	VBP	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
published	VBN	(S(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
black	JJ	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
TV	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Atlanta	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
experienced	VBN	(VP*	O
racial	JJ	(NP*	O
discrimination	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
restaurant	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Ali	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Barr	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
company	NN	*))	O
entered	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
restaurant	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
ten	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
restaurant	NN	*)))	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
surprised	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
waitress	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
premise	NN	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Recalling	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
scene	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Ali	NNP	(NP*	O
Barr	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Myself	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
company	NN	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
racially	RB	(ADJP*	O
discriminated	JJ	*	O
against	IN	(PP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
forget	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
live	VBP	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
racial	JJ	(NP*	O
discrimination	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
minorities	NNS	*)))	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
vital	JJ	*	O
statistics	NNS	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
so	RB	*	O
long	RB	*	O
ago	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
residents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
suburban	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
minority	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
5	CD	(ADJP(ADJP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
higher	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
likely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
remember	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
withdrew	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
racism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Durban	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
send	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
eventually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
dispatched	VBD	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
low-level	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
voices	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
violation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
raised	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*	ESE
as	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
claiming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
represent	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
behaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
settings	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
wonder	NN	*)	ESE
people	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))	O
follow	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
example	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
talking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
things	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
house	NN	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
abuse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
rampant	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
effort	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rectify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
practices	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
everything	NN	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
collapsing	VBG	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
both	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
finally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
having	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sovereign	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
integrating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
--	:	(FRAG*	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reminded	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
?	.	*)))))))	ESE
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
overwhelming	JJ	*	ESE
majority	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
duty	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
voice	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
basic	JJ	*	ESE
truths	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
patriot	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(FRAG*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nationalist	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
homeland	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
France	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
lead	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
deny	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
heritage	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
ancient	JJ	(NP*	O
Israel	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
contains	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
heritages	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*)))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
indifferent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
destiny	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
millions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jews	NNPS	(NP*))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
common	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
historians	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	ESE
century	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
passed	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quarrel	NN	*)	DSE
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
Zionism	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
involved	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
shortage	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
arguments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jewish	JJ	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
simply	RB	(NP*	ESE
clear-headed	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Zionism	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
established	VBD	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sensitive	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
nothing	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
normal	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
settle	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
someone	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
territory	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
all	RB	*	O
created	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conclusion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
today	NN	*)	O
challenges	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
despite	IN	(UCP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
crises	NNS	*)	ESE
arising	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
cited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Aboriginal	NNP	*	O
athlete	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Olympic	NNP	*	O
Games	NNPS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sydney	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Likewise	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
recent	JJ	*)	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
indifferent	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
gaze	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forced	VBN	*	ESE
exodus	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
thousands	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
descendants	NNS	*))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
into	IN	(PP*	DSE
question	NN	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
injustice	NN	*)	ESE
suffered	VBD	(VP*	ESE
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
recognized	VBN	(VP*))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
negotiated	VBN	(VP*	O
fairly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Let	VB	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
content	VB	(VP*	ESE
ourselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
reiterating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Since	IN	(S(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
1967	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
dominated	VBN	(VP*	O
territories	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
crushed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
politically	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
socially	VBG	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
economically	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
resistance	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
formally	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
recognized	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
begun	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Oslo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
recognized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PLO	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Yasser	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
achieved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
goal	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
feeding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
growing	VBG	*	ESE
frustration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
wing	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
broken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
conducting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
death	NN	*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
horrifies	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
us	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
settlement	NN	(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
increased	VBN	(VP*	ESE
considerably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
eating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
supposedly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
autonomous	JJ	*)	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
crisscrossed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
bypass	NN	(NP*	O
roads	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
forms	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
fuel	VB	(VP*	ESE
each	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Palestinian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
existed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
small	JJ	*)	O
scale	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Yitzhak	NNP	(NP*	O
Rabin	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
dramatic	JJ	*	ESE
dimension	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
extra-judicial	NN	*	ESE
liquidations	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
dramatic	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*	ESE
sense	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
resembles	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
structured	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
organized	VBN	(ADJP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Like	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
form	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
state	NN	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
above	IN	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
contradictory	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Yasser	NNP	(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
police	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
while	IN	*	ESE
destroying	VBG	(S(VP*)))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
instruments	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
isolated	JJ	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
drive	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
away	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scarcely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
disguised	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ariel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
exploitation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
massacres	NNS	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unmistakable	JJ	*	ESE
sign	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
compared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Arafat	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Ladin	NNP	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Mullah	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Omar	NNP	*)	ESE
put	VBD	(VP*	ESE
together	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Whom	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
think	VB	(VP*	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
resembles	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
not	RB	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
perpetrator	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Sabra	NNP	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Shatila	NNP	*)))	ESE
massacres	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
escape	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
perspective	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
solutions	NNS	*)	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(S*	ESE
logical	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expulsion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
known	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
Eretz	NNP	(NP*	O
Israel	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mandatory	NNP	(NP*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
recently	RB	(ADJP*	O
assassinated	JJ	*)	O
minister	NN	*)	O
favored	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Can	MD	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crimes	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Can	MD	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP*)	ESE
believe	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
approve	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(SQ(VP*	ESE
then	RB	*	ESE
remain	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
universal	JJ	*	ESE
character	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
prophets	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
--	:	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
Isaiah	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
--	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
hope	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
living	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
opposite	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
hospitable	JJ	*	ESE
climes	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Europe	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
absolutely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
being	VBG	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(FRAG*	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(FRAG(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(SQ(VP*	ESE
remain	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ideals	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
saw	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
liberators	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
builders	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Asking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*))))	ESE
serves	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reminder	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
many	DT	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
left	VBN	*	O
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
reinventing	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Diaspora	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
intend	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
French	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Algeria	NNP	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
third	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*)	ESE
consists	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
coexistence	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
separate	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
federation	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
confederation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
civic	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
social	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*))	ESE
equality	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
applies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
primarily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attitudes	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
prevail	VB	(VP*	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
future	JJ	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
applies	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
53	CD	(PP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
equal	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
furthermore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
holds	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
decide	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
encysted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
second	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reciprocity	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Any	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
renunciation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
sovereignty	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
either	DT	(NP*	O
party	NN	*)))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
compensated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
applies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
discussion	NN	(NP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
acknowledged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ariel	NNP	(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposite	JJ	*	O
tack	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
grudgingly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
recognized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*))	O
such	JJ	(PP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
reduced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
series	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Bantustans	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
living	VBG	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
developing	VBG	*)))	ESE
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Extremists	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(VP(VP(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
understood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
derived	VBN	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
encouragement	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
France	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Elie	NNP	(NP*	O
Barnavi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
contradictory	JJ	*	ESE
statements	NNS	*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
That	DT	(S(NP*)	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
those	DT	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Nurit	NNP	(NP*	O
Peled	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
government	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
death	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
could	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
easily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
fit	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
telephone	NN	*	ESE
booth	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
...	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
existence	NN	*))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
constitute	VBP	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
very	JJ	*	ESE
honor	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hope	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prophets	NNS	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
mustard	NN	*	ESE
seed	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
another	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prophet	NN	*)	O
referred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
hope	NN	(NP*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
hope	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

December	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
5	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
24	CD	*	O
executive	JJ	*	O
directors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(FRAG(X(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mondays	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Wednesdays	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Fridays	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
under	IN	(VP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chairmanship	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
institution	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
director	NN	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Horst	NNP	*	O
Kohler	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
usually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
punctuate	VBD	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
weekly	JJ	*	O
schedule	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
review	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
subjects	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(VP(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
achievements	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
under	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
program	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
particular	JJ	*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
turn	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
victim	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
explosive	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
levels	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
disposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
two	CD	(NP*	ESE
hours	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
promised	VBN	(VP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
zero	CD	*	O
budget	NN	*	O
deficit	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
board	NN	*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
``	``	(VP*	DSE
recommend	VB	*	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
releasing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
1.264	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))	O
tranche	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
22	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
program	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shortly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
thereafter	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
institution	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Thomas	NNP	(NP*	O
Dawson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reach	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*	O
goals	NNS	*)	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
money	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
movement	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
limit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
capital	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
regrettable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
flexible	JJ	*)	ESE
later	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	RB	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eyewitness	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
cut	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
dry	JJ	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
accounting-like	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
servants	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	(NP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
death	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
subject	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
debate	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(PP(NP(NP*	O
presentation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	*	O
Chile	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Thomas	NNP	*	O
Reichmann	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mission	NN	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	ESE
spoke	VBD	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
most	RBS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	ESE
differences	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
sensitivity	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
emerged	VBD	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
or	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
closed	VBD	(SBAR(SBAR(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
discussions	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
latter	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
concession	NN	*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
struggling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
restructure	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
simply	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
default	VB	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unconditional	JJ	(ROOT(NP*	DSE
Support	NN	*))	DSE

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
essence	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	DSE
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
thing	NN	*))	O
:	:	*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
inviolable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
surprising	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
same	JJ	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
history	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
IMF	NNP	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
lined	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
derogations	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
stopped	VBN	(VP*	ESE
counting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
times	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
financial	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
bailout	NN	*	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
difficulty	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
stopped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
counting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
unconditional	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
institution	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
neither	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
especially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
virtuous	JJ	*)	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
especially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
interest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(NP(UCP(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*))	O
Pakistan	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
soviet	JJ	*	O
giant	NN	*)	O
consolidate	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
emerging	VBG	*	O
democracy	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
intervened	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
1998	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
rounds	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
Fernando	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reelection	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
macroeconomic	JJ	*	O
options	NNS	*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
requirements	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
contrary	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
leftist	JJ	*	O
adversary	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Luis	NNP	(NP*	O
Inacio	NNP	*	O
``	``	*	O
Lula	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
da	NNP	*	O
Silva	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
geostrategic	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
serves	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
avalanche	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
loans	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
trade	NN	*	ESE
facilities	NNS	*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Islamabad	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
none	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
worthy	JJ	*	ESE
arguments	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
,	,	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
pupils	NNS	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
adopted	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
fixed	JJ	*	O
parity	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
unrestricted	JJ	(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Buenos	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
Aires	VBZ	(VP*	O
privatized	VBN	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recommendation	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP(PP*	O
assets	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
falling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
condemned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
asking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
payments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
equilibrium	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
130	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
urgent	NN	*))	ESE
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inflow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
capital	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
repay	VB	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
debt	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*)))	O
December	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
non-payment	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
outcast	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
administrators	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
bookkeeping-based	JJ	*	ESE
decision	NN	*)	O
marks	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
toughening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
America	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
republicans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
especially	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
past	JJ	*	O
largesse	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
illustration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leading	JJ	*	O
shareholder	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
squander	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
American	JJ	*	ESE
taxpayer	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
money	NN	*))))))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ann	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Krueger	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ultraliberal	JJ	*	O
American	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
number	NN	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
case	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
falls	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
parliamentary	JJ	(S(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP(NP*	O
negotiation	NN	*	O
matters	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
green	JJ	*	O
light	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
stimulation	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
dragging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
along	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
risk	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
ruffling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
republicans	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(SINV(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
priority	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
confides	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
bankruptcy	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
cause	VB	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
chain	NN	*	ESE
reaction	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grave	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
emerging	VBG	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(S(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
economists	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
very	RB	(S(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
likely	JJ	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
at	IN	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
most	JJS	*)	ESE
limited	VBN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
time	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lessen	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
dependence	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP(NP*	O
links	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
emerging	VBG	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
calling	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))	O
less	CC	*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
sharp	JJ	*	O
ebb	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
investments	NNS	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dramatic	JJ	*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997-1998	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Will	MD	(ROOT(SQ*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
bankrupt	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*))	O
December	NNP	(NP*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Argentines	NNS	*)))	O
depends	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Regardless	RB	(ROOT(S(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
happens	VBZ	(S(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	ESE
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
perilous	JJ	*)	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
setback	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
IMF	NNP	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
following	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
accounting	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
magnifying	VBG	*	ESE
glass	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
incapable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
guaranteeing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
financial	JJ	*	O
equilibrium	NN	*)	O
just	RB	(PP*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
submit	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
demands	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
December	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
overcome	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
current	JJ	*	ESE
difficulties	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
revive	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
economy	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
maintain	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
social	JJ	*	ESE
stability	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
Spokeswoman	NNP	*	O
Zhang	NNP	*	O
Qiyue	NNP	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	ESE
disturbances	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
shop	NN	(NP(NP*	O
robberies	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
traffic	NN	*	O
breakdowns	NNS	*)	O
occurred	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
groceries	NNS	*)	O
owned	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
overseas	RB	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
origin	NN	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
looted	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
30-day	JJ	*	O
emergency	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
Embassy	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
life	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
property	NN	*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
overseas	JJ	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
origin	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Zhang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

GROSS	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
DOMESTIC	NNP	*	O
PRODUCT	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
estimated	VBN	*	O
nominal	JJ	*	O
gross	JJ	*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
product	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
2001	CD	*	O
totalled	JJ	*	O
Hr170	NNS	*)	O
,427	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*)))	O
--	:	*	O
Hr18	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,421	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	O
gross	JJ	*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
product	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*)))	O
measured	VBD	(VP*	O
109.1	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
108	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
real	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
GDP	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
9.1	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
compared	VBN	(S(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
relevant	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
gross	JJ	(NP*	O
value	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

INDUSTRY	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
129.1	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
hryvnyas	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
worth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
services	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
rendered	VBD	(VP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Compared	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
output	NN	(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
16.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Increases	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
production	NN	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
principal	JJ	*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
extractive	JJ	*	O
industry	NN	*))	O
production	NN	(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
4.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
as	IN	*))))	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manufacturing	VBG	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
accounts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(NP*	O
three-quarters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
production	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
output	NN	(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
19.6	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*	O
as	RB	*))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Output	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
food	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
processing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
products	NNS	*))))))	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
19.8	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Light	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
achieved	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
15.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
output	NN	(NP*)))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reporting	NN	*	O
period	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Production	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
textile	JJ	*	O
industry	NN	*)))	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
12	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
enterprises	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
process	VBP	(S(VP*	O
wood	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
manufacture	NN	*	O
wood	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
output	NN	(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
25.9	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*	O
as	IN	*))))	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pulp	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
paper	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
production	NN	(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
20.5	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
enterprises	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
producing	VBG	(VP*	O
nonmetal	JJ	(NP*	O
mineral	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
output	NN	(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Output	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
metallurgical	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
metal-processing	JJ	*	O
enterprises	NNS	*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
8.3	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Output	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
machinebuilding	VBG	(NP*	O
enterprises	NNS	*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
21.7	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*	O
as	RB	*))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Output	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
enterprises	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
produce	VBP	(S(VP*	O
coke	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
refining	NN	*))))))))))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
57.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chemical	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
petrochemical	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
production	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
11.9	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Compared	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
output	NN	(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
enterprises	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
generate	VB	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
distribute	VB	*	O
electric	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*)))))))	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2.4	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reporting	NN	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
138	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
kWh	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
electric	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
kWh	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
0.7	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
more	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP(NP(QP*)	O
power	NN	*)	O
than	IN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3.7-percent	JJ	*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
output	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
electric	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Production	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
thermal	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
hydroelectric	JJ	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
3.6	CD	(NP(QP*	O
%	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
11	CD	*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Ukrainian	JJ	(NP*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
enterprises	NNS	*)	O
shipped	VBD	(VP*	O
products	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
rendered	VBN	(VP*	O
services	NNS	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Hr112	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
.9	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*	O
sum	NN	*))	O
barter	NN	(S(NP*	O
deals	NNS	*)	O
accounted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Hr9	NNS	(NP*))	O
.1	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
8.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
monetary	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
payments	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
Hr87	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
.7	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
77.7	CD	(NP(QP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
barter	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cash	NN	*	O
payments	NNS	*)	O
accounted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
18.3	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
66.4	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

AGRICULTURE	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
output	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
9.1	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
compared	VBN	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
output	NN	(NP*)))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
enterprises	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ownership	NN	(NP*))))	O
--	:	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
19.7	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
farms	NNS	*)	O
--	:	*	O
3.2	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Corn	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
harvested	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1.1	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
hectares	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
90	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
designated	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
crop	NN	*)))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
yield	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
3.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
--	:	*	O
32.1	CD	(NP(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
hectare	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sugar	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
beets	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
factory	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
gathered	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
842,000	CD	(NP*	O
hectares	NNS	*)))))))	O
;	:	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
15.5	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
beets	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
harvested	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
yield	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
184	CD	(NP(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
hectare	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
2.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
7	CD	(NP(NP*	O
centners	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
hectare	NN	(NP*))))	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sunflower	NN	(NP(NP*	O
seeds	NNS	*)	O
threshed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
categories	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
farms	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
2.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
one-third	NN	(NP(QP*	O
less	JJR	*))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
average	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
yield	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
hectare	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
amounting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
10.1	CD	(NP(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
17	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
potatoes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
14	CD	(ADJP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
less	JJR	*	O
than	IN	(PP(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
106	CD	(NP(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
hectare	NN	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
5.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vegetables	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
2.2	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
more	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
date	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
116	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
hectare	NN	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Potato	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
yield	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
16	CD	(ADJP(ADJP(ADJP(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)	O
lower	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vegetables	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
higher	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
quintals	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Private	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
farms	NNS	*)	O
accounted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
98	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
potato	NN	*	O
yield	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
16.8	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
metric	JJ	(NP*	O
tons	NNS	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
90	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
vegetables	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
4.9	CD	(NP*	O
million	CD	*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
property	NN	*	O
shares	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
parcels	NNS	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
shareholders	NNS	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
1.3	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
grain	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
19,100	CD	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sunflower	NN	(NP*	O
seeds	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
4,800	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cattle	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
poultry	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
liveweight	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
4,800	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
milk	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
dairy	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
3.5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
eggs	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
2,400	CD	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vegetable	NN	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
5,100	CD	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sugar	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Average	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
farm	NN	(NP(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
channels	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
8	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*))	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
animal	NN	(NP*	O
husbandry	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*)))))	O
--	:	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
42	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crops	NNS	(NP*)))	O
dropped	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
7	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

CONSTRUCTION	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

Construction	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
enterprises	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ownership	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
contracts	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
performed	VBD	(VP*	O
jobs	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Hr8	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
.3	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
amounts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
83.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
sum	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contracts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
concluded	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Construction	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ten-month	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
6.7	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
nine	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
7.2	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
eight	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
8.2	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

TRANSPORTATION	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
transportation	NN	(NP*	O
enterprises	NNS	*)	O
hauled	VBD	(VP*	O
632.5	CD	(NP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freight	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
1.1	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
more	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	*	O
during	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ten	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Freight	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
0.8	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
325.7	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
ton-kilometers	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
railroads	NNS	(NP*)	O
transported	VBD	(VP*	O
260.9	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freight	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
7.1	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
more	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	*	O
in	IN	*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
unloading	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freight	NN	(NP*	O
cars	NNS	*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
overall	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
4.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
15,100	CD	(NP*	O
cars	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
unloaded	VBN	(VP*	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
day	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
railroad	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freight	NN	(NP*)))	O
transported	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
sea	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
river	NN	*	O
fleet	NN	*)	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
3.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
6.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
hauls	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
12.7	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freight	NN	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
customers	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freight	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
processed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP(PP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fishing	NN	*	O
ports	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
docks	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
sea	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
river	NN	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
87.1	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
constituting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
6.2	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
interoblast	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
hauls	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
motor	NN	(NP*	O
transport	NN	*)))))	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grow	VB	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Freight	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
motor	NN	(NP*	O
transport	NN	*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
12.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
6.8	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
ton-kilometers	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freight	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
pipelines	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
184.2	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
2.1	CD	(ADJP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
less	JJR	*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decrease	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
5.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
natural	JJ	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
pipage	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
6.4	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
decrease	NN	*)))))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
through	IN	*	O
shipments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ammonia	NN	(NP*)))	O
transported	VBD	(VP*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
overall	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
11.6	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
shipment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ammonia	NN	(NP*))))	O
--	:	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
7.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
2.7	CD	(S(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
passengers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
conveyed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transport	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
work	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
passengers	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
72.1	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
passenger-kilometers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
3	CD	(ADJP(ADJP(ADJP(NP*	O
%	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
3.3	CD	*	O
%	NN	*)	O
more	JJR	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

FINANCES	NNS	(ROOT(NP*))	O

Consolidated	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Budget	NNP	*	O
revenues	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
nine	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
data	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Treasury	NNP	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
Hr39	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
.2	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
25.8	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
amounts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
74	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approved	VBN	*	O
sum	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Consolidated	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Budget	NNP	*	O
expenditures	NNS	*)	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
Hr37	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
.8	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
24.9	CD	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
amounts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
71.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approved	VBN	*	O
sum	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
servicing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hr3	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
7.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
expenditures	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
servicing	VBG	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
amounted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Hr1	VB	(VP*	O
.7	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1.2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
4.6	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
expenditures	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Consolidated	NNP	*	O
Budget	NNP	*	O
surplus	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
nine	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Hr1	VB	(VP*	O
.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
0.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
revenues	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Budget	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
executed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hr28	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
.3	CD	(ADJP(ADJP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
67.3	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approved	JJ	*	O
sum	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
18.6	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
percentage	NN	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
account	NN	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
budgets	NNS	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
taxes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
accounting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
57.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
revenues	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Budget	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
balanced	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
surplus	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hr0	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
.8	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
0.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
October	NNP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
debt	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
credit	NN	*	O
obligations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
entities	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exception	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
enterprises	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
budget-financed	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hr217	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Hr279	CD	*	O
.3	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Compared	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
debt	NN	(NP*	O
obligations	NNS	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
17.1	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
credit	NN	(NP(NP*	O
obligations	NNS	*)	O
8.1	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

EXTERNAL	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
ECONOMIC	NNP	*	O
ACTIVITY	NNP	*))	O

Ukraine	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
26.8	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
12.2	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Export	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
services	NNS	*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
11.8	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
import	NN	(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*))	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
12.6	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
totalling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
14.6	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	*	O
12.2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
positive	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
2.4	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
2.2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ukraine	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
23.4	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
13.9	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Export	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
volumes	NNS	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
14.6	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
imports	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
13.1	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
amounting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
12	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	*	O
11.4	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
positive	JJ	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
632.5	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
against	IN	*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
421.8	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Barter	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
deals	NNS	*)	O
accounted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
0.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
exports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
0.3	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
import	NN	*	O
volumes	NNS	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
1.7	CD	(NP(QP*	O
%	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
1.8	CD	*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Exports	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukrainian	JJ	(NP*	O
customer-supplied	JJ	*	O
raw	JJ	*	O
materials	NNS	*)))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
137.5	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Imports	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
finished	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*)	O
manufactured	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Ukrainian	JJ	(NP*	O
customer-supplied	JJ	*	O
raw	JJ	*	O
materials	NNS	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
741.8	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Exports	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
finished	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
imported	JJ	(NP*	O
customer-supplied	JJ	*	O
raw	JJ	*	O
materials	NNS	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1,270.2	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
services	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
nine	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
3,487.3	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
1.8	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
against	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
nine	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
exports	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
amounting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
2,604.8	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
0.6	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
imports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
amounting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
882.5	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
5.5	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
positive	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
amounted	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1,722.3	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
1.8	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*)))	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
invested	VBN	(VP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
4.2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
investments	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ukrainian	JJ	(NP*	O
enteprises	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Investments	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
112	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

WHOLESALE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
AND	CC	*	O
RETAIL	NNP	*	O
TRADE	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
THE	DT	(NP*	O
RESTAURANT	NNP	*	O
INDUSTRY	NNP	*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
retail	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
retail	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
enterprises	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
restaurant	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*))))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Hr27	VB	(VP*	O
.7	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
comparable	JJ	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
11.8	CD	(ADJP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
more	JJR	*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
volume	NN	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

PRICES	NNS	(ROOT(NP*	O
AND	CC	*	O
RATES	NNS	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consumer	NN	*	O
price	NN	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
inflation	NN	(NP*	O
index	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
measured	VBD	(VP*	O
103.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
123.3	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*)))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
100.7	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
117.1	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

PERSONAL	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
INCOMES	NNPS	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
nominal	JJ	(NP*	O
personal	JJ	*	O
incomes	NNS	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
24.5	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
against	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
totalled	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Hr76	NNS	*)	O
,279	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
real	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
incomes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
determined	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
excluding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
compulsory	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
payments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
voluntary	JJ	(NP*	O
contributions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inflation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
6.1	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Average	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
monthly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
per	IN	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
capita	NN	*)	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
income	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hr172	CD	(NP(QP*	O
.3	CD	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Hr137	NNP	(NP*	O
.4	CD	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Monetary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
expenditures	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
personal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
savings	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
Hr72	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
,852	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
23.1	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
higher	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	*	O
during	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
monthly	JJ	*	O
nominal	JJ	*	O
wage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
staff	NN	*	O
employee	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hr299	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
37.2	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
more	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	*	O
during	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Real	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
wages	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
18.4	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*))	O
real	JJ	(NP*	O
wages	NNS	*)	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
1.2	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
against	IN	*	O
August	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
owed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
back	JJ	(NP*	O
wages	NNS	*))))	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
twelve	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Hr2	VBG	(S(VP*	O
.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
42.5	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP*	O
October	NNP	*	O
2001	CD	*	O
totalled	NN	*	O
Hr3	NNS	*)	O
.3	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
wage	NN	(NP*	O
arrears	NNS	*)))	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Hr1	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
.6	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
one-third	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
complete	JJ	*	O
liquidation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arrears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*))))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Finance	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pension	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
arrears	NNS	*)	O
accumulated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
subsequent	JJ	(NP*	O
periods	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Arrears	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
by	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Law	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*	O
On	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Assistance	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Families	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Children	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
46.6	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Hr4	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
.4	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(NP(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*	O
November	NNP	(ADJP(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)	O
totalled	JJ	*)	O
Hr13	NNS	*))	O
.8	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
lower	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
4.5	CD	(NP*)))))	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
owed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
lower	JJR	(VP(ADJP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
5.8	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
owed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
data	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
submitted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ministries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
executive-branch	JJ	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
arrears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
stipends	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
financial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
students	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
studenty	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
kursanty	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
uchni	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
educational	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
jurisdiction	NN	*)))))))))))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
13.3	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)	O
totalled	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Hr2	NNS	*)	O
.2	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
less	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
4.2	CD	(NP*)))))	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
owed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
less	JJR	(VP(ADJP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
4.2	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
owed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
subsidies	NNS	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
disbursed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
2,730,800	CD	(NP*	O
families	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
compensate	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
housing	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
municipal	JJ	*)	O
services	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
electric	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
disbursed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
subsidies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Hr122	VBG	(VP*	O
.3	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
475,800	CD	(NP(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
94.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
subsidies	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
compensate	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
purchasing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
condensed	JJ	*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
solid	JJ	(NP*	O
fuel	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Hr112	VBG	(VP*	O
.7	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
population	NN	*)	O
paid	VBD	(VP*	O
Hr4	NNS	(NP*)	O
,209.2	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
municipal	JJ	(NP*	O
services	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
payment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
outstanding	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
debts	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
earlier	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
periods	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
amounted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
83.8	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amounts	NNS	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
period	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

THE	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
JOB	NNP	*	O
MARKET	NNP	*	O
AND	CC	*	O
THE	NNP	*	O
DEMOGRAPHIC	NNP	*)	O
SITUATION	NNP	(NP*)))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
151,800	CD	(NP(NP*	O
jobless	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
employment	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
search	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
work	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
13,500	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
9.8	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
than	IN	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
unemployed	JJ	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)))))	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
14.4	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
12	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
1.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
month	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
971,200	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unemployed	JJ	(NP*)))))	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
registered	JJ	*	O
unemployment	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
4.2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
3.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
able-bodied	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
age	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
date	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
available	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*)	O
jobs	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
vacancies	NNS	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unemployed	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*))))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
12	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reduced	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strain	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
labor	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
load	NN	*	O
coefficient	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
job	NN	(NP*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
vacancy	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
indicated	VBN	*	O
period	NN	*)))	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
nine	CD	*)	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
1	CD	(NP*))))	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
employment	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
helped	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
jobs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
83,000	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
placement	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
exceeded	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
job	NN	(NP*	O
placements	NNS	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
month	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
one-third	RB	(NP(NP(QP*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
32.5	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
the	DT	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
employment	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
removed	VBD	(VP*	O
83,400	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
register	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reasons	NNS	(NP*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
jobs	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
exceeded	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
0.5	CD	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
the	DT	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
job	NN	(NP*	O
placements	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
retirement	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
2,700	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Hr48	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
.9	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
spent	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
universally	NN	*)))))))	O
compulsory	VBP	(VP*	O
State	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Unemployment	NN	*	O
Insurance	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
assistance	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
unemployed	JJ	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
recorded	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unemployed	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
received	VBD	(S(VP*	O
unemployment	NN	(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))))))	O
totalled	VBD	(VP*	O
589,800	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
estimated	VBN	*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
49	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
January-September	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inhabitants	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(QP*	O
324,000	CD	*)	O
persons	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
occuring	VBG	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
both	DT	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
natural	JJ	*	O
decrease	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
287,000	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
emigration	NN	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
37,000	CD	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
natural	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
decrease	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
population	NN	(NP*)))))	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
7.2	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
birthrate	NN	*)	O
measures	VBZ	(VP*	O
7.7	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
inhabitants	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(PP*	O
against	IN	*	O
7.8	CD	(NP*))))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
dropped	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
15.3	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
14.7	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ISTANBUL	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dec	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Rauf	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Denktas	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Northern	NNP	(NP*	O
Cyprus	NNP	*)))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
TRNC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Cyprus	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
wanted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
given	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
gift	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
stole	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Cyprus	NNP	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
means	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
membership	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
resist	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
much	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Turkey	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
consciously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
justice	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Communities	NNP	(NP*	O
Friendship	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Brotherhood	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*))	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Addressing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Denktas	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
Martryrs	NNP	(NP*	O
Week	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
38th	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
started	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
annihilate	VB	(VP*	ESE
Turks	NNPS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Cyprus	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
...	:	*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
fought	VBD	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
half	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
lives	NNS	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cyprus	NNP	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Greece	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
to	TO	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Greek	JJ	*	ESE
dagger	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
thrust	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Anatolia	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
message	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
friends	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1960	CD	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
Cyprus	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
nonexistent	JJ	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Denktas	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*)	O
treated	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(UCP(NP*	ESE
Greek	JJ	*	ESE
Cypriot	NNP	*	ESE
Republic	NNP	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
partner	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
minority	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Denktas	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
live	VB	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Cypriots	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
don	VB	(VP*	DSE
`	``	(S*	DSE
t	NN	(NP*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
will	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP*	O
Cypriots	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
wish	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
throw	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
island	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
condemn	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
lies	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
by	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
deceiving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Denktas	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cypriot	NNP	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
t	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
minority	NN	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
stressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
Cyprus	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
friendship	NN	*	ESE
bridge	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greece	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Calling	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
attended	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
congress	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Denktas	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Turkish	JJ	(S(S(NP*	O
Cypriots	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
minority	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
representatives	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
explain	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
visit	VBP	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
help	NN	(NP*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Denktas	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ask	VBP	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
help	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
compromise	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
Cyprus	NNP	(NP*	O
question	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
forgot	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1960	CD	*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
Cypriots	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
minority	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Greek	JJ	*	O
Cypriot	NNP	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
unilaterally	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
as	RB	(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cyprus	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

Azerbaijan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Kyrgyzstan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Turkmenistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
TRNC	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
autonomous	JJ	*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*	O
namely	NNP	*	O
Altay	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Bashkortostan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Chuvashia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Khakassia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Gagauz	NNP	*	O
Place	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Chechnia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Crimea	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Saha	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tatarstan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tuva	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Turks	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Bulgaria	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Macedonia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Kosovo	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Western	NNP	*	O
Thrace	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Middle	NNP	(NP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
auspices	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Suleyman	NNP	*	O
Demirel	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Dec	NNP	*	O
23	CD	*	O
IRNA	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Muhammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
submitted	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proposed	JJ	*	O
rls	JJ	*	O
663,757	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
budget	NN	*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
calendar	NN	*	O
year	NN	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
starting	VBG	(VP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
21	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2002	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Consultative	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Majlis	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Majlis	NNP	(NP*	O
deputies	NNS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
bagan	VBN	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
minutes	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
outlining	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
characteristics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*	O
bill	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Management	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Planning	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
45.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
calendar	NN	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
1381	CD	(NP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
estimated	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
rls	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
243,898	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
indicates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
48	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1380	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
budget	NN	*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
calendar	NN	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
state-owned	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
profit-making	JJ	*	O
institutes	NNS	*)	O
affiliated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
estimated	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
rls	NN	(NP*	O
435,842	CD	(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
showing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rise	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
45	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Sulaymaniyah-based	JJ	*	O
telecommunications	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
KurdTel	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
digital	JJ	*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sulaymaniyah	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
directly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
connected	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
KurdSat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
TV	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
24	CD	(NP*)))	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	*	O
Kurdish	NNP	*	O
city	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
receive	VB	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
calls	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
home	NN	*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
lines	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
KurdSat	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
line	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
opened	VBN	(VP*	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
telecommunications	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	*	O
Kurdish	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
tatters	NNS	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kurds	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
control	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
managed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
restore	VB	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
network	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
as	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mobile	JJ	(NP*	O
telephones	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
internet	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Channel	NNP	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
tip-off	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
materials	NNS	*))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
today	NN	(ADVP*)	O
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	DSE
all	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
clear	JJ	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
police	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
450ft	JJ	*	O
long	JJ	*	O
vessel	NN	*	O
Nisha	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
26,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
-LSB-	VBG	(VP*	O
metric	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tons	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
raw	JJ	(NP*	O
sugar	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*	O
December	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
fears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
transporting	VBG	(VP*	O
noxious	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
hazardous	JJ	*	O
or	CC	*	O
dangerous	JJ	*)	O
substances	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
detailed	JJ	*	O
examination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
moored	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Isle	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Wight	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
nothing	NN	(ADJP*	O
suspicious	JJ	*)))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Assistant	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*	O
David	NNP	*	O
Veness	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Scotland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Yard	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
specialist	NN	*	O
operations	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
New	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
combined	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
relentless	JJ	*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
detailed	JJ	*	O
knowledge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
movements	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
very	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
careful	JJ	*)	ESE
examination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
three	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)))))))))	O
leads	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
completely	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
satisfied	JJ	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Nisha	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
suspicious	JJ	*	O
vessel	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
pose	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
danger	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Nisha	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
halted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Royal	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Customs	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Excise	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tip-off	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
contained	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
material	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Royal	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
frigate	NN	*	O
HMS	NNP	*	O
Sutherland	NNP	*)	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
her	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
waters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
30	CD	*)	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
south	RB	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Beachy	NNP	(NP*	O
Head	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MV	NNP	*	O
Nisha	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
operated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Great	NNP	*	O
Eastern	NNP	*	O
Shipping	NNP	*	O
Company	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bombay	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
India	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
east	JJ	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
country	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Djibouti	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
neighbour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Somalia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Usama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qa'ida	NNP	*	O
terror	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
sailed	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Mauritius	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sugar	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tate	NNP	*	O
&	CC	*	O
amp	NNPS	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
Lyle	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
refinery	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Thames	NNPS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Silvertown	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
east	JJ	(NP*	O
London	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
indicated	VBN	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
search	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weeks	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
size	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
design	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
experts	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
completed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Anti-terrorist	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
satisfied	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
crew	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
owners	NNS	(NP*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
offence	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Veness	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
journey	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
completion	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
voyage	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
consultation	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
interested	VBN	*)	O
parties	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
detected	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
interference	NN	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
seals	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
holds	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
interfered	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
anticipated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
detailed	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
examination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)))	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
rather	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
risk	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*)	O
ship	NN	(VP*	O
Nisha	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
boarded	VBN	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
intelligence-led	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
proper	JJ	*)	ESE
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thankfully	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
proved	VBN	(VP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
pose	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
danger	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Veness	NNP	*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crew	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
's	POS	*	O
owners	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
co-operation	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
remain	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
vigilant	NN	(NP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
totally	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
committed	JJ	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
ensuring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
similar	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
potential	JJ	*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Nisha	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cargo	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
raw	JJ	(NP*	O
sugar	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
owned	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mauritius	NNP	*	O
Sugar	NNP	*	O
Syndicate	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
chartered	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
dock	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
east	JJ	(NP*	O
London	NNP	*)))))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Great	NNP	*	O
Eastern	NNP	*	O
Shipping	NNP	*	O
Company	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Sudhir	NNP	(NP*	O
Mulji	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Djibouti	NNP	(NP*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
journey	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
drop	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
grain	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
food	NN	*	O
aid	NN	*	O
shipment	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mauritius	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pick	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sugar	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
20	CD	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
transport	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Great	NNP	*	O
Eastern	NNP	*	O
Shipping	NNP	*	O
Company	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
offices	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
London	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Singapore	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
Emirates	NNPS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	JJ	*	O
Indian	JJ	*	O
shipping	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
offshore	JJ	*	O
service	NN	*	O
provider	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fleet	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
38	CD	(NP*	O
cargo-carrying	JJ	*	O
vessels	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

JAKARTA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Agency	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
follow	VB	(VP(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
halt	VB	(VP*	O
payment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
top	JJ	(NP*	O
economics	NNS	*))))))))))	O
minister	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
Dorodjatun	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Kuntjoro-Jakti	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
quoted	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
24	NNP	*	O
December	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
plans	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
halt	VB	(VP*	O
repayment	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
US$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
70	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
national	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dorodjatun	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
No	VBG	(S(VP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
further	RBR	*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
continue	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
honor	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
coordinating	VBG	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
5	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
overcome	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
reforms	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indonesia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stands	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
140	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
$	$	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP(QP*	O
70	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
halting	VBG	(VP*	O
payments	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
132	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
national	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
default	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
history	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tokyo	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Dec.	NNP	*	O
26	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yonhap	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
initially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
suspected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	JJ	(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
spy	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
communicated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sunk	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
patrol	NN	*	O
boats	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
East	NNP	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Sankei	NNP	*	O
Shimbun	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*	O
edition	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
confirm	VB	(VP*	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)))))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
trawler	NN	*)	O
exchanged	VBD	(VP*	O
messages	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*))	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
patrol	NN	(NP*	O
boats	NNS	*))	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Amami	NNP	(NP*	O
Oshima	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
stationed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
provided	VBD	(VP*	O
video	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
detecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
reconnaissance	NN	*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
18	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
following	VBG	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
trawler	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korean	NNP	*	O
Workers	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Party	NNP	*	O
radio	NN	*	O
frequency	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
antisubmarine	JJ	*	O
patrol	NN	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
dispatched	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
scene	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(SBAR(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
details	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
messages	NNS	*)	O
exchanged	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	JJ	(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
side	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
smuggling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
drugs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
drug	NN	(NP*	O
addicts	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
first	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	JJ	(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
spy	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
shape	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
equipment	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
gained	VBN	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
suspicions	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
certain	JJ	(S(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
forceful	JJ	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
either	CC	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
life	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
that	WDT	(WHNP*	O
purpose	NN	*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	O
someone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
assume	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Since	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
realized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
train	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
stopping	VBG	(VP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
run	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
off	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
track	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
ideas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
destabilization	NN	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	O
again	RB	*)	O
surfaced	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
ideas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
killed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
four	CD	(S(NP*	ESE
shots	NNS	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
solve	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
futile	JJ	*	ESE
illusion	NN	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lie	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
such	PDT	(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
solve	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
year-end	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Vargas	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
garrisons	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
speaking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
Poliedro	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Pinochet	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
analyzing	VBG	(VP*	O
man	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
man	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pinochet	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
pit	VB	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Pinochet	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
FAN	NNP	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
venture	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
assure	VB	(VP*	DSE
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
attacks	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
targeting	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
person	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
over	IN	(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
buying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
communist	JJ	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
find	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(ADJP(ADVP*	DSE
all	DT	*)	DSE
strange	JJ	*)	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
managed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
connect	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
Usama	NNP	*	ESE
Bin	NNP	*	ESE
Ladin	NNP	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
strategy	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
try	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
discredit	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
politically	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
economically	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
socially	VBZ	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
draws	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
close	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
indicators	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
positive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
regained	VBN	(VP*	ESE
such	JJ	(PP*	O
internationally	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
recognized	VBN	*)	O
posts	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
77	CD	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
complained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mass	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reporting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
suits	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
annoyance	NN	*)	DSE
does	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
extend	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
owners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
newspapers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
radio	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
television	NN	*	O
broadcasting	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
measure	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
breathing	NN	*	ESE
room	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wished	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
luck	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
confident	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
only	RB	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
depicted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
model	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reversed	VBN	(VP*	O
negatively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
neoliberal	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
opposed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
path	NN	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
happened	VBN	(VP*	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
viewed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Colombian	JJ	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
enemies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
operations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Colombian	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rebel	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	ESE
error	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resulted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
victims	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
loss	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
meddling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
directly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Colombia	NNP	(NP*	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*))))	O
quotation	NN	(NP(NP*	O
marks	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
published	VBN	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
meddling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
violation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
turn	NN	(NP*))	ESE
gave	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
guerrillas	NNS	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
units	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Poll	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
Ukrainians	NNPS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

Kyiv	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
29	CD	(NP*	O
December	NNP	*))	O
:	:	*	O
Forty-three	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukrainians	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
disapprove	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
antiterrorist	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*))))))	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Ukrainian	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
GfK-USM	NNP	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
request	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Politics	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
November	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
5	CD	(NP*	O
December	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
over	RB	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
third	JJ	*)	O
-	:	*	O
34	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))	O
-	:	*)	O
support	VBP	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
historic	JJ	*	ESE
memory	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
whole	JJ	*	ESE
generation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
compatriots	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
fear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
authorities	NNS	*)))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
concerns	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Director	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Politics	NNP	(NP*	O
Mykola	NNP	*	O
Tomenko	NNP	*)))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kyiv	NNP	(NP*))	O
today	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(SBAR(X*	O
lower	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
living	VBG	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*)))	O
polled	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(X*	O
less	JJR	*)	O
frequently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
campaign	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tomenko	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
29	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
consider	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
poor	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
support	VBP	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
46	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*))))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
among	IN	(S(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(ADJP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
average	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
income	NN	*	O
levels	NNS	*))))	O
39	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))	O
approve	VBP	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
45	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*	O
disapprove	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
enthusiastically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
euro	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
currency	NN	*))	ESE
''	''	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	*	ESE
so	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
long	JJ	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
much-wielded	JJ	*	ESE
slogan	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
really	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
moment	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
look	NN	*))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
?	.	*))	O

More	RBR	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
shaking	VBG	(VP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNP	*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
useful	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reduced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
simple	JJ	*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
implications	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
unfortunately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
invisible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
proclaim	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Constitution	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
worth	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
discovered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
philosopher	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
stone	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
linking	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
guarantee	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
stability	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
meant	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rid	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hyperinflation	NN	*)	O
running	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
experienced	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1970s	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
80s	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
tale	NN	*)	ESE
today	NN	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
bitter	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
began	VBD	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
euphoria	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
contract	NN	*)	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Carlos	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Menem	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
10-year	JJ	*	O
presidency	NN	*)))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1989-99	CD	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
simple	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
principle	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
pillars	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Monetary	NNP	(NP*	O
discipline	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
liberalism	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Introducing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
board	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
obliged	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
circulation	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
reserves	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
issuing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
bodies	NNS	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
only	JJ	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*	O
notes	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
equivalent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
gold	JJ	*	O
reserves	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
parity	VBD	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
introduce	VB	(VP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP*	O
controls	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
devastating	JJ	*	ESE
effect	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
liberalism	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
strand	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Menem	NNP	*	O
program	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
lived	VBD	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
promises	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Privatization	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
earned	VBD	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
40	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
success	NN	*)	O
established	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reputation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
gauge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
grew	VBD	(S(VP(VP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
grew	VBD	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
more	RBR	(VP(ADVP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
doubled	VBD	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990s	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
60	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*	O
to	TO	*	O
$	$	*	O
132	CD	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
even	RB	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
150	CD	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*	O
one	CD	*	O
market	NN	*	O
borrower	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
emerging	VBG	*	O
economies	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Looking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
one	CD	(NP*)))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
general	JJ	*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
vigilance	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*))	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
principal	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
watchdog	VBN	(VP*	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	O
bailing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
come	VBP	(S(VP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
unstuck	VBP	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Michael	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Mussa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chief	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
economist	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
recognizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
paid	VBN	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	O
budgetary	JJ	*	O
deficit	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
national	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
1996	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
1998	CD	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
better	JJR	*)	ESE
position	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
absorb	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
real	JJ	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
vulnerable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
abandoned	VBD	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
fixed	JJ	*	O
parity	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Economists	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
market	NN	*	O
players	NNS	*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noticed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
over-financed	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Credibility	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
evaporated	VBD	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(NP*)	DSE
quote	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
expression	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
stresses	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
paradoxes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
bases	NNS	*)	O
seemed	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
sound	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

First	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
paradox	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
open	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
even	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
neighbors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
just	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
8	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
GDP	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*)))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
imports	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
marked	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
contrast	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
balance	NN	(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
payments	NNS	(NP*)))	O
deficit	NN	*)	O
burdened	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
servicing	NN	(NP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
live	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
board	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
most	RBS	(ADVP*	O
notably	RB	*)	O
Hong	NNP	(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
open	JJ	*)	ESE
economy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(UCP(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*))	ESE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
exceed	VBP	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
GDP	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
facilitating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
influx	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Second	JJ	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
paradox	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
self-proclaimed	JJ	*	O
parity	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))	O
never	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
enabled	VBD	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
less	JJR	*)	ESE
private	JJ	*	O
borrowers	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
obtain	VB	(VP*	O
credit	NN	(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
match	VB	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
enjoyed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
risk	NN	*	O
premium	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
considerable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
rates	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
never	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
falling	VBG	*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
places	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unbearable	JJ	*	ESE
burden	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
servicing	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
revenue	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
match	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentine	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
pension	NN	*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
enjoyed	VBN	(VP*	O
interest	NN	(S(NP*	O
rates	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
35	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
No	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
less	JJR	(ADJP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
45	CD	*))	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
estimated	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
130	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	*	O
150	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
themselves	PRP	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
street	NN	(NP(NP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	*)	O
culminating	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
13	CD	(NP*))))	O
December	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
visible	JJ	*)	O
aspect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
creditors	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
debtors	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Appeals	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
rescheduling	VBG	(VP*	O
involving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
55	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(SINV(S(S*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
come	VB	(VP*	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
pressure	NN	(NP*))	DSE
again	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
approve	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
1.3	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
loan	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Finance	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Domingo	NNP	*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
put	VB	(VP*	DSE
pressure	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(VP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latter	NN	*))	O
have	VBP	*	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
understood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
not	RB	(FRAG*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
private	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
debtors	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
became	VBD	(S(VP*	O
indebted	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ruined	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
devaluation	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
dollarization	NN	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
politicians	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
From	IN	(S(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Carlos	NNP	*	O
Menem	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
influential	JJ	*)	ESE
Peronist	NN	*	O
faction	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Miguel	NNP	*	O
Kiguel	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
banker	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	O
along	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Domingo	NNP	(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
restoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
order	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
finances	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
switch	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
stabilize	VB	(VP*	ESE
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
creditors	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
debtors	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
painful	JJ	*)	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
restoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
credibility	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
loses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
virginity	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
enter	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
convent	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
neither	CC	(NP*	ESE
dollarization	NN	(NP*)	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
board	NN	*))	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guarantee	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
low	JJ	(NP*	O
interest	NN	*	O
rates	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Argentine	JJ	*	ESE
risk	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Plus	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
external	JJ	(NP*	O
competitiveness	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
remains	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
unsolved	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unless	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
devalued	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
disappears	VBZ	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
technically	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
delicate	JJ	*))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
credibility	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
economically	RB	*	ESE
realistic	JJ	*)	ESE
solution	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
backed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
technical	JJ	*	O
experts	NNS	*))	O
:	:	*	O
Floating	VBG	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
risky	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Are	VBP	(ROOT(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
now	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
position	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
forge	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
social	JJ	*	ESE
contract	NN	*)))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
TV	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
Todo	NNP	*	O
Noticias	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
``	``	*	O
All	NNP	*	O
News	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
-RSB-	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
telephoned	VBD	(VP*	O
Cordoba	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*	O
Governor	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Manuel	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Sota	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Justicialist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
PJ	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
once	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
served	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
ambassador	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
--	:	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
voice	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
incidents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Cardoso	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
De	NNP	(NP*	O
la	FW	*	O
Sota	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
images	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Plaza	NNP	*	O
de	NNP	*	O
Mayo	NNP	*)))))	O
show	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
verge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
civil	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
channel	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
journalists	NNS	*)))	O
commented	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
advised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
De	NNP	(NP*	O
la	FW	*	O
Sota	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
forward	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
initially	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
slated	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
neither	CC	(NP*	O
Itamaraty	NNP	(NP*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Planalto	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*))	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
phone	NN	*	O
call	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cordoba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Legislators	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
Request	NNP	(NP(NP*	DSE
Action	NNP	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)))))	O

Concern	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
spread	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	(NP*	O
legislators	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Violent	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
legislature	NN	*)))	O
sounded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
alarm	NN	(NP*	DSE
bells	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
arena	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
senators	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
parties	NNS	*)))	O
defended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	DSE
concrete	NN	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Deputy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Genoino	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Workers	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Sao	NNP	(NP*	O
Paulo	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
wave	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
looting	NN	(NP*)))	O
threatens	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Argentine	JJ	(NP*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
promote	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
meetings	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
continent	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
intermediary	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
unpredictable	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
anarchical	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
crisis	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Colombia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
risky	JJ	*)	ESE
scenario	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Any	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
step	NN	*	ESE
backward	RB	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
continent	NN	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
disaster	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
with	IN	*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
folded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
watching	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Genoino	NNP	(NP*)	O
affirmed	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

PSDB	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Brazilian	NNP	*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Democracy	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Anibal	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Sao	NNP	(NP*	O
Paulo	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Cardoso	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
placed	VBN	(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
disposal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
adopt	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
open	JJ	*	ESE
posture	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
experiencing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
tragedy	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
Jose	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Agripino	NNP	*	O
Maia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
PFL	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Liberal	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
detached	VBN	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
disregard	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
crises	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
devastating	VBG	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
neighboring	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
political	JJ	*	ESE
warning	NN	*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
heeded	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Either	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
pays	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
attention	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
happened	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
Maia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
commented	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Senator	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Heloisa	NNP	*	O
Helena	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Workers	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Alagoas	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Latin	NNP	(S(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
join	VB	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
autonomy	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
economies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
see	VBP	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
happens	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
abdicates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
financial	JJ	*	ESE
autonomy	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
alert	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
revise	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Analysts	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Lack	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Alternative	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Power	NNP	(NP*)))))))	ESE

Political	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
scientists	NNS	*)	O
agree	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
lacks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Peronism	NNP	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Radicalism	NNP	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
viewed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	ESE
impediment	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

USP	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sao	NNP	(NP*	O
Paulo	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
professor	NN	*	O
Emir	NNP	*	O
Sader	NNP	*)))	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Peronists	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
slowly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
growing	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
weaker	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
allowing	VBG	(VP*	O
room	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
pauperization	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
brutal	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Everything	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
depends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(NP(SBAR(WHADVP*	O
long	RB	*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Peronism	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
burn	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
emerge	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Sader	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
scientist	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
wait	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
assistance	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Latin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RBR	*)	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
focus	NN	*)	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
no	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
longer	RB	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sader	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
affirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
permit	VB	(VP*	ESE
decay	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
security	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
eyes	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Uzbekistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
raises	VBZ	(VP*	O
annual	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
cotton	NN	*	O
target	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
3.75	CD	(NP*	O
m	NN	*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Iranian	JJ	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*)))))	O

Uzbekistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
cotton	NN	*	O
target	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cotton	NN	(NP(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IRNA	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Iranian	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Uzbek	NNP	*	O
Agriculture	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
department	NN	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
department	NN	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
cotton	NN	*	O
target	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
3,750,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
t	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
envoy	RB	(ADVP*)	O
retired	VBD	(VP*	O
General	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Anthony	NNP	*	O
Zinni	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
circumstances	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
surrounded	VBN	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
works	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
abort	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
mission	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
advance	NN	(NP*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
storming	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
territories	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
assassinating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
alleges	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
links	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
security	NN	(NP*	ESE
activities	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
arresting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
change	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
link	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
martyrs	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
hand	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
armed	JJ	*	ESE
organizations	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
mere	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
unarmed	JJ	*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
accidentally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
present	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
near	IN	(PP*	O
regular	JJ	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
targets	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Palestinians	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Zinni	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presence	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
abided	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
calm	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cease-fire	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
provokes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	DSE
vindictive	JJ	(NP*	DSE
reactions	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
sympathy	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
using	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
branding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
conduct	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
rid	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
occupation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
settlements	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
purpose	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
likens	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
such	JJ	(NP*	DSE
reactions	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
occured	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
11	NNP	(NP*	ESE
September	NNP	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
liberation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independence	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)	O
seek	VBP	(VP*	DSE
negotiations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*	ESE
option	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
rejection	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
colonialism	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
force	NN	(NP*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
34	CD	*)	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
provocation	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
harsh	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tolerated	VBN	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
storm	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
areas	NNS	*)	ESE
;	:	*	ESE
assassinate	VB	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
arrest	VB	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
;	:	*	ESE
demolish	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
homes	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
headquarters	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
establishments	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
;	:	*	ESE
uproot	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
thousands	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
trees	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
;	:	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
besiege	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
cities	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
villages	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
likes	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
committing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)	O
bear	VBP	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
patiently	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
suppress	JJ	*)	ESE
fury	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
hoping	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US-dominated	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
acknowledge	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
seek	VBP	(VP*	DSE
calm	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
end	VB	(VP*	ESE
occupation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
territories	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
dignity	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independence	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
nations	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Past	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Incidents	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cease-fire	NN	*	DSE
declaration	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-violence	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
Israel	NNP	*	O
brands	NNS	*	DSE
terrorism	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
unjustified	JJ	*	ESE
escalation	NN	*))	ESE
show	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
totally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
committed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
agreements	NNS	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
understandings	NNS	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
mind	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
Government	NN	*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
utmost	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hamper	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*	ESE
process	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
entrench	VB	(VP*	ESE
occupation	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
step	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
settlement	NN	(NP*	O
building	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
envoy	NNP	*	O
Zinni	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
realized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
clear-cut	JJ	*	ESE
facts	NNS	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
reading	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Argentina	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(NP*	ESE
choices	NNS	*))))))))	ESE

Paris	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
2	CD	(X(NP*	O
January	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
During	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*	O
2	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
IMF	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Horst	NNP	(NP*	O
Koehler	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Jacques	NNP	*	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
choices	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
through	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reporting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conversation	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Elysee	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
presidency	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Catherine	NNP	*	O
Colonna	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
choices	NNS	*)	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
future	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
France	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
partners	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
contact	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(PRN(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
and	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
attaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Jacques	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Mrs	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Colonna	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
raised	VBD	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
director	NN	*	O
general	NN	*))	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
Lebanon	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consolidation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
France	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*))))))	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan.	NNP	*	O
3	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Premier	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chang	NNP	*	O
Chun-hsiung	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
alarm	JJ	(NP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
legislator	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
kidnapped	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
held	VBN	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Taipei	NNP	*	O
hotel	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
utmost	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
gangsters	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
preying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
lawmakers	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Presiding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inter-agency	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
catch	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gangsters	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
detained	VBD	(VP*	O
Legislator	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Huang	NNP	*	O
Hsien-chou	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Grand	NNP	*	O
Hyatt	NNP	*	O
Hotel	NNP	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Later	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
that	DT	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Fu-shun	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
27	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(SBAR(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
younger	JJR	*	O
brother	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hui-hua	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
invited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Huang	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
her	PRP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hotel	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Huang	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hotel	NN	*	O
room	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Huang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taichung	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
trapped	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gangsters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
pretended	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
supporters	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Huang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
gangsters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
included	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
two	CD	*)	O
men	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
woman	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
appointment	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hotel	NN	*))	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
26	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
offered	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
drink	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
lost	VBD	(VP*	O
consciousness	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
drinking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
awoke	VBD	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
bound	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
gangsters	NNS	*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
NT$	RB	(NP(ADVP*)	O
2	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
but	CC	(PRN*	O
finally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
settled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
NT$	NNP	(NP*	O
800,000	CD	*)))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
withdrew	VBD	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Huang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
credit	NN	*	O
card	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Huang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
31	CD	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
police	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Huang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
story	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
press	NN	(S(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
caught	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
prostitutes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hotel	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
blackmailed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hotel	NN	*	O
room	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
by	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
checked	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
under	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Lin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
An	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alias	NNS	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*	O
Hui-hua	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
container	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swedish	JJ	*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
technology	NN	*	O
firm	NN	*	O
Studsvik	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
leaked	VBN	(VP*	O
radioactive	JJ	(NP*	O
materials	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Swedish	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
exposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	O
radiation	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
indication	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
container	NN	*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leak	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sweden	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Sweden	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
serious	JJ	*)	O
incident	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
involving	VBG	*	O
radiation	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
indications	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
radioactive	JJ	*	O
container	NN	*)	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
technology	NN	*	O
firm	NN	*	O
Studsvik	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
leak	VB	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
transport	NN	(NP*))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
Sweden	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
container	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
transshipped	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Paris	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
measurements	NNS	(NP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
abnormal	JJ	*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Transport	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
container	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
radioactive	JJ	*	O
substance	NN	*	O
iridium	NN	*	O
192	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
transshipped	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Charles	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
de	IN	*	O
Gaulle	NNP	*	O
Airport	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Paris	NNP	(NP*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shipping	VBG	*	O
company	NN	*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Express	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
pilot	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
container	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
equipped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dosimeter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
measures	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
radiation	NN	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Transport	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
Studsvik	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
measurements	NNS	*)	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Federal	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Express	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Paris	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
abnormality	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
leak	NN	*)	O
occurred	VBD	(VP*	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
container	NN	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
Paris	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
correct	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
fewer	JJR	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
exposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
radiation	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Hans-Bertil	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hakansson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Studsvik	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
managing	VBG	(VP*	O
director	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
concern	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
DN	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Dagens	NNP	*	O
Nyheter	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
not	RB	*	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
iridium	NN	*	O
container	NN	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leak	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
However	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unlikely	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
leak	NN	*)	O
occurred	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Paris	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Memphis	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Hakansson	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Studsvik	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
confirmation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	(S*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reliable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Hakansson	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
iridium	NN	*	O
container	NN	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Studsvik	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Nykoping	NNP	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
27	CD	(NP*))	O
December	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
shipped	VBN	(VP*	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
Norrkoping	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Arlanda	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Paris	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Memphis	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
arrival	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
measurements	NNS	(NP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
emitting	VBG	(VP*	O
far	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
too	RB	*	O
much	JJ	*)	O
radiation	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Measurements	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Studsvik	NNP	(NP*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
dispatch	NNP	(NP*))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
radiation	NN	*	O
values	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
07	NNP	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Radiation	NNP	(NP*	O
Protection	NNP	*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SSI	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
exclude	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
contact	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
container	NN	*)	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	O
acute	JJ	(NP*	O
health	NN	*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
radiation	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
classified	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
level-three	JJ	*	O
incident	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Nuclear	NNP	*	O
Event	NNP	*	O
Scale	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
INES	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	O
serious	JJ	*)	O
ever	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
Sweden	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
SSI	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
attempting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
trace	VB	(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
exposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
radiation	NN	*	O
leak	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
SSI	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
involves	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
ten	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sweden	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
iridium	NN	*	O
container	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
examined	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Orleans	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Studsvik	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
own	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
When	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
open	VBP	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
picture	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
cleared	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Hakansson	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
shipments	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Studsvik	NNP	(NP*	O
Isotope	NNP	*	O
Service	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
halted	VBN	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
notice	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

STAVROPOL	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
Jan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
8	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax-AVN	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Two	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
attempted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cross	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
illegally	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	*	O
Azerbaijan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Caucasus	NNPS	*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Military	NNP	(NP*	O
News	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
aged	VBN	(VP*	O
26	CD	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
picket	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Derbent	NNP	*	O
border	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*	O
detachment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
probe	NN	*))))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
incident	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Servicemen	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sochi	NNP	*	O
border	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
protecting	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
section	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian-Georgian	JJ	*	O
frontier	NN	*)))))))	O
apprehended	VBD	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
violator	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
33-year-old	JJ	*	O
citizen	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP*)))	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
illegally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Georgia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
breakaway	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Abkhazia	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
heavy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
snowfalls	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
avalanches	NNS	(NP*))))	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
limit	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
traffic	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Caucasus	NNP	*	O
highway	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Military	JJ	(NP*	O
Georgian	JJ	*	O
highway	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nizhny	NNP	*	O
Zaramag	NNP	*	O
checkpoint	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian-Georgian	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
closed	VBN	(VP*	O
temporarily	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Verkhny	NNP	*	O
Lars	NNP	*	O
checkpoint	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
operating	VBG	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
small	JJ	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	RB	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
117	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
58	CD	(NP*	O
vehicles	NNS	*))	O
crossed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
checkpoint	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Brussels	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Second	NNP	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
initiate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
euthanasia	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bills	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
euthanasia	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
palliative	NN	*	O
care	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)	O
approved	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
autumn	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ever	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
since	IN	*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
work	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
increasing	VBG	(NP*	DSE
criticisms	NNS	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
groups	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
support	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
euthanasia	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
criticisms	NNS	*)	DSE
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
focus	VBP	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
applicability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bill	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
palliative	JJ	*	O
filter	NN	*)))))))	O
prior	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
committing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
euthanasia	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
supervisory	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
assessment	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
understaffed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nonexistence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
fixed	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
penalties	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
unjustifiable	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
euthanasia	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
differently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
worked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
justice	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
health	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chamber	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
health	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
environment	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
emancipation	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
advisory	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
-LSB-	VBD	(VP*	O
8	CD	(NP*)	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
initiated	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hearing	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
palliative	JJ	(NP*	O
care	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
VLD	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Flemish	NNP	*	O
Liberal	NNP	*	O
Democrats	NNPS	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
deputies	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senators	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
work	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
CD	NNP	(NP*	O
&	CC	*	O
amp	NNP	*)	O
;	:	*	O
V	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Flemish	JJ	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
advisory	JJ	*	O
function	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chamber	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
justice	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
go	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
alone	RB	(ADJP*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
euthanasia	NN	*	O
debate	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
euthanasia	NN	*	O
bill	NN	*))	O
today	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
SP.A	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Dutch-speaking	NNP	*	O
Socialist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
Different	JJ	(S(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Fred	NNP	*	O
Erdman	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
drafted	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
terminating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
life	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terminally	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
ill	JJ	*)	O
patients	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)	O
VLD	NNP	(NP*	O
Floor	NNP	*	O
Leader	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Coveliers	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
party	NN	*	O
member	NN	*	O
Maggie	NNP	*	O
De	NNP	*	O
Block	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
euthanasia	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
proposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
Yolande	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Avondroodt	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
VLD	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
requesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
palliative	JJ	*	O
care	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
patient	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
needs	NNS	*))))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
bill	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
push	VB	(VP*	DSE
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
euthanasia	NN	(NP*))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
available	JJ	(S(NP*	O
speaking	NN	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
limited	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
federal	JJ	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
local	JJ	*)	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
protocol	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
limiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Within	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
7.5	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2008-2012	CD	*	O
period	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
parliaments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
concerned	VBN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
equivalent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
implies	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
--	:	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
agrees	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
--	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
binding	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
inhabitants	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
readily	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
accept	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
intentions	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
various	JJ	*	O
sectors	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comply	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
standards	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
broad	JJ	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
debate	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crucial	JJ	*	ESE
question	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADJP*	ESE
much	JJ	*)	ESE
should	MD	(SQ*	ESE
each	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
target	NN	(NP*	O
group	NN	*))	O
contribute	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
achieving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
standard	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*))))))))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
failed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
place	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
understandable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ranging	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
processing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
manufacturing	VBG	*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electricity	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tertiary	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transport	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
residential	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
utmost	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
future	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
small	JJ	*)	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
acceptable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
possible	JJ	(FRAG*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
strikingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
illustrated	JJ	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Belgian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
large-scale	JJ	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
energy	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
intensity	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
energy	NN	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
unit	NN	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
final	JJ	(NP*	O
product	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
improved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
considerably	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
considerable	JJ	*)	ESE
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
production	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(S(PRN*	O
even	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
with	IN	*	ESE
very	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
efficient	JJ	*)	ESE
processes	NNS	*))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
overall	JJ	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Large-scale	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
wishes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
counter	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
expected	JJ	*	DSE
rise	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
so-called	JJ	(NP*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nutshell	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
benchmarking	NN	(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
companies	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
compare	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
efficiency	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
similar	JJ	(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*))))	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
covenants	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
pledge	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rank	VB	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
exempted	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
additional	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Flemish	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
emission	NN	*)	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
taxes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
negotiable	JJ	(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Belgian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
advocating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
benchmark	JJ	(NP*	O
covenants	NNS	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
limit	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
weaken	VB	(VP*	ESE
considerably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
competitive	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
respect	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
similar	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
regions	NNS	(NP*))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
industry	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
relocation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
resulting	VBG	*	O
job	NN	*	O
losses	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
disregards	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
arguments	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
other	JJ	(PP*	O
than	IN	*	O
purely	RB	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
ones	NNS	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
location	NN	*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
companies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
favorable	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
location	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
seaports	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
availability	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
know-how	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
well-educated	JJ	(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
stable	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
political	JJ	*)	O
climate	NN	*)	O
...	:	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
covenants	NNS	*)	O
contain	VBP	(VP*	O
insufficient	JJ	(NP*	ESE
guarantees	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Belgian/Flemish	Flemish	*	O
reduction	NN	*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
efficient	JJ	*)	ESE
manner	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
begin	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
benchmarking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
raises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
questions	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
emerge	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comparison	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
certain	JJ	(S(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
rank	VB	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
present	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
efficiency	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
benchmarking	NN	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
sufficient	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
viewpoint	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
efficiency	NN	*))	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
realizing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lowest	JJS	*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whole	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
society	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cost-efficient	JJ	*	ESE
division	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
efforts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
implies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
each	DT	(S(NP*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
limit	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
extra	JJ	*	O
ton	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reduction	NN	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
additional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
industry	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
compared	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(UCP(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transport	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
households	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
service	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
forth	RB	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Benchmarking	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
guarantees	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	O
companies	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
belong	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
class	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
class	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
performance	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
universe	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Second	LS	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
benchmark	JJ	(NP*	O
covenants	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
external	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
use	NN	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increased	JJ	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*)	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
burning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fossil	JJ	(NP*	O
fuels	NNS	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
correctly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
account	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*))	O
account	VBP	(VP*	O
these	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
external	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
essential	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
users	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy-intensive	JJ	(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
confronted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
product	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
less	RBR	(NP(ADJP*	O
energy-intensive	JJ	*)	O
products	NNS	*)	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
relative	JJ	*	O
advantage	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Third	LS	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
questions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
covenants	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Companies	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
proposed	VBN	*	O
covenants	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adopt	VB	(VP(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
cost	NN	*	O
recovery	NN	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
less	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
five	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP*)))	O
greater	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
straight-lined	JJ	*	O
obligation	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unclear	JJ	*)	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
extra	JJ	*	O
reductions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
comparison	NN	(NP*))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
business	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
usual	JJ	(NP*	O
scenario	NN	*))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
additional	JJ	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fourth	JJ	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
contrast	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
relative	JJ	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
standards	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*))))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
industry	NN	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
wish	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
let	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
pinned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
emissions	NNS	*	O
ceiling	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
feels	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
ceiling	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
industry	NN	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
foisting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
necessary	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
society	NN	(NP*))))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
industrial	JJ	(S(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
considerably	RB	(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
offset	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commensurate	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transport	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
services	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
households	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
forth	RB	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
significant	JJ	*)	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
target	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
society	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
whereas	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
latter	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deliberations	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
covenants	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
broad	JJ	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
debate	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	O
contribute	VB	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
much	JJ	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
realizing	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
standards	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
urgently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
shortcomings	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reserved	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
instrument	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
benchmark	JJ	(NP*	O
covenants	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reconciled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
proposals	NNS	*))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unified	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
assumes	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
companies	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
obtain	VBP	(VP*	O
rights	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
emit	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hence	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
irreconcilable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
first	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
sight	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Flemish	JJ	*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
opportune	VBN	(VP*	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
settling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
allocation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emission	NN	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Companies	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
allocated	VBN	(VP*	O
rights	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
efficiency	NN	*	O
standard	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
emissions	NNS	*	O
ceiling	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
emit	VB	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
output	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
increasing	VBG	(VP*	O
considerably	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	O
provided	VBN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
purchase	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
necessary	JJ	*	O
emission	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
companies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
surplus	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rights	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
advantage	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
negotiable	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
that	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cost-efficient	JJ	*	O
division	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
effort	NN	(NP*))))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
target	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
benchmark	JJ	*	O
covenants	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allocate	VB	(VP*	O
emission	NN	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
initially	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
points	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
covenants	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
retained	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
drawbacks	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
eliminated	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
high	JJ	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
debate	NN	*)	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
division	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
effort	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
aims	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	O
division	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
account	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sector	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
possibilities	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
borne	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
various	JJ	*	O
target	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))	O
guarantees	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Belgium	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
aims	NNS	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
draconian	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	O
having	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
eleventh	JJ	*	ESE
hour	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

COTABATO	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
CITY	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
An	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nur	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Misuari	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
elite	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rescue	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
jailed	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MacArthur	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Rasul	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokesperson	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Mutallah	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
orders	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mount	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rescue	NN	*	O
operation	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rasul	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Radio	NNP	(NP*	O
Mindanao	NNP	*	O
Network	NNP	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
1,000	CD	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Misuari	NNP	*	O
force	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
standby	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
spring	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
detention	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sta	NNP	(NP*	O
.	.	*	O
Rosa	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Laguna	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
anytime	RB	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Misuari	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
rebellion	NN	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Nov.	NNP	*	O
19	CD	*	O
mutiny	NN	*)	O
staged	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jolo	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
locked	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fort	NNP	*	O
Sto	NNP	*	O
.	.	*	O
Domingo	NNP	*	O
police	NNP	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sta	NNP	(NP*	O
.	.	*	O
Rosa	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
pocket	NN	*	O
rebellion	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
subsequent	JJ	*	O
hostage-taking	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*))	O
resulted	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
over	IN	(NP*	O
100	CD	*	O
deaths	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
field	NN	*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
orders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
higher	JJR	*	O
hierarchy	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rasul	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Rasul	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
even	RB	(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
strong	JJ	*	DSE
desire	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	DSE
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
followers	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
free	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
fail	VB	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
jailed	JJ	*	O
rebel	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Chairman	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Misuari	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
go	VB	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rescue	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
otherwise	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	ESE
but	CC	(FRAG*	ESE
follow	VB	(S(VP*)))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
commander	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
chief	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
admitting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
plot	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Rasul	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
followers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
appealing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Macapagal	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
free	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
For	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sake	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Rasul	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hard	JJ	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
Misuari	NNP	(NP*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
lenient	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
revolted	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
extend	VB	(VP*	DSE
amnesty	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
Christian	JJ	*	ESE
brothers	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
renegade	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
officer	NN	*	O
Gregorio	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
Gringo	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
Honasan	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
why	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
ca	MD	(SQ*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
accord	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
privilege	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Chairman	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Misuari	NNP	*	ESE
?	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rasul	NNP	*))	O
asked	VBN	(S(VP*))))))	DSE

Local	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
Assistant	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Abraham	NNP	*	O
Iribani	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Saturday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
sobriety	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	DSE
Muslim	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Moro	NNP	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*))))	O
commanders	NNS	*))))	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
alleged	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
attempts	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
detention	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
remain	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
calm	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
let	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*)	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
course	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Iribani	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
designated	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
spokesperson	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
case	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
MNLF	JJ	(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zamboanga	NNP	(NP*	O
City	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Irabini	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rebellion	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
because	IN	*	ESE
``	``	(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bangsamoro	NNP	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
MNLF	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Moro	NNP	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
claimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Misuari	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
detention	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
affront	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Muslim	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
cause	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Muslim	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
act	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rebellion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
public	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
charges	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
fabricated	VBN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Iribani	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
phone	NN	*	O
interview	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dialogue	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
officially	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
report	VB	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
status	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
questions	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
detention	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iribani	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reports	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
renegade	NNP	(S(NP*	O
MNLF	NNP	*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
plotting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stage	VB	(VP*	O
bomb	NN	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mindanao	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Metro	NNP	*	O
Manila	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protest	VB	(VP*	ESE
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arrest	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
That	DT	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Iribani	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
personal	JJ	*	DSE
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
access	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
detainee	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
developed	VBD	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
lawyers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
28	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
former	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
Davao	NNP	*	O
City	NNP	*	O
Mayor	NNP	*	O
Benjamin	NNP	*	O
de	IN	*	O
Guzman	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
others	NNS	*))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
counsel	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

De	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Guzman	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
lawyer	NN	(NP(NP*	O
Macapanton	NNP	*	O
Abbas	NNP	*	O
Jr.	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
vice	NN	*	O
mayor	NN	*	O
Dominador	NNP	*	O
Zuno	NNP	*	O
Jr.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
city	NN	(NP*	O
councilor	NN	*	O
Victorio	NNP	*	O
Advincula	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
lawyers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
court	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Misuari	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
other	JJ	*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
judicial	JJ	*	ESE
system	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(NP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
client	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
trial	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
nuances	NNS	*))))	ESE
surrounding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
deportation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
drew	VBD	(VP*	DSE
flak	NN	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*	O
legislators	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
warned	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
trigger	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reaction	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Maguindanao	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rep.	NNP	*	O
Didagen	NNP	*	O
Dilangalen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
prosecution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rebellion	NN	(NP*)))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
force	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
revive	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
rebel	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Moro	NNP	*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sen.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Aquilino	NNP	*	O
Pimentel	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
same	JJ	*	DSE
apprehension	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Aside	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
sensitive	JJ	*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	O
questions	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Pimentel	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
growing	VBG	*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Misuari	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
pose	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
security	NN	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Misuari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
defense	NN	*	O
team	NN	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Integrated	NNP	*	O
Bar	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*))))	O
Arthur	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Lim	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Appeals	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
justice	NN	*	O
Omar	NNP	*	O
Amin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
labor	NN	*	O
relations	NNS	*	O
commissioner	NN	*	O
Musib	NNP	*	O
Buat	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Salvador	NNP	(NP*	O
Panelo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
US-based	NNP	(NP*	O
Elly	NNP	*	O
Pamatong	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
ARRM	NNP	*	O
solicitor	NN	*	O
general	NN	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Lorena	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MOSCOW	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
Jan	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
stands	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
quickest	JJS	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
investigation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incident	NN	*)	O
late	JJ	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
December	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*)	O
loaded	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
smuggled	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
self-ruled	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)))))))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
truth	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
smuggled	VBN	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
punish	VB	(VP*	ESE
those	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
guilty	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Alexander	NNP	*	O
Saltanov	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Interfax	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ambiguity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
obstacle	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resumption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
efforts	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tenet-Mitchell	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
key	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
conducting	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ship	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	NNP	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)	O
claim	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
smuggle	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
Yasser	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Arafat	NNP	*)	ESE
stranded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
fulfilled	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
fails	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
fulfill	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
there	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
-LSB-	VBN	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Ramallah	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
-RSB-	NNP	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
as	RB	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
long	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
remain	VBP	(VP*))))	ESE
prime	JJ	*	ESE
minister	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

ANKARA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
15	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Uzbek	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
general	NN	*	O
Rashid	NNP	*	O
Dostum	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Afghanistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
`	``	*	O
s	NNP	(NP*	O
Embassy	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ankara	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Dostum	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
temporary	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Ankara	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
family	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dostum	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inauguration	NN	*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbek	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Consulate	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-e-Sharif	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dostum	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
Ankara	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coming	VBG	*	O
days	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
definite	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
or	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
Uzbek	NNP	(S(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ankara	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lugano	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
8	CD	(NP*	O
Jan	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Spanish-Israeli	NNP	(S(NP*	O
businessman	NN	*	O
Felipe	NNP	*	O
Turover	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
denounced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Court	NNP	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Strasbourg	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
danger	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian-Belarus	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Pavel	NNP	*	O
Borodin	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Kremlin	NNP	*)	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*))))	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
money	NN	(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
lawyer	NN	*))	O
Niccolo	NNP	(NP*	O
Salvioni	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*	O
ATS	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
37-year-old	JJ	*	O
M.	NNP	*	O
Turover	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
key	JJ	*	ESE
witness	NN	*)))))	ESE
--	:	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	NNP	*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
protection	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
believing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
himself	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Mafia	NNP	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
leaks	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Swiss	JJ	(NP*	O
court	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pavel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Borodin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
property	NN	*	O
manager	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kremlin	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
laundered	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
25	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
secret	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
commissions	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
headquartered	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tessin	JJ	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
southeast	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
region	NN	*)))))))))))	O
--	:	*	O
Mercata	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mabetex	NNP	(NP*))	O
--	:	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
awarded	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
renovation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kremlin	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1995	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
1996	CD	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
complaint	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Turover	NNP	(NP*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Carla	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Del	NNP	*	O
Ponte	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lawyer	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Criminal	NNP	*	O
Tribunal	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Yugoslavia	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ICTY	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Turover	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
her	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
danger	NN	(NP*))	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rejection	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
upheld	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Tribunal	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Switzerland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
highest	JJS	*	O
court	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Turover	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
accused	NNP	*	DSE
Mme.	NNP	*))	O

Del	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Ponte	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
furnished	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
headed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))))	O
--	:	*))	O
confidential	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*	O
Corriere	NNP	*	O
della	NNP	*	O
Sera	NNP	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
made	VBD	(S(VP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	O
revelations	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mabetex-Borodin	JJ	*	O
affair	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
credit	NN	(NP(NP*	O
cards	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Yeltsin	NNP	*	O
family	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
Turover	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
informer	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
affair	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish-Israeli	JJ	*	O
businessman	NN	*))))))	O
affirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
leaks	NNS	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
danger	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Turover	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accusing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
several	JJ	(NP*	ESE
occasions	NNS	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
lawyer	NN	*)))	O
affirms	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Tribunal	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	NNP	*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))	O
``	``	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
given	VBN	(VP*	ESE
proof	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
illegality	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
persecution	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mabetex	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
construction	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
landed	VBN	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
renovating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kremlin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*	O
buildings	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
offering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
bribes	NNS	(NP*	O
worth	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dozen	NN	*	O
million	CD	(QP*	O
dollars	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1995	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
1996	CD	*))))))))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
close	VB	(VP*	O
associates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*	O
Boris	NNP	*	O
Yeltsin	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Borodin	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
request	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
court	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Borodin	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
17	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
extradited	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Switzerland	NNP	(NP*))	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
7th	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preventive	JJ	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bail	NN	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
3	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dushanbe	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
16	CD	(NP(NP*	O
January	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
Tijorat	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
branch	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Khujand	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
-LSB-	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
northern	JJ	*	O
Soghd	NNP	*	O
Region	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Alii	NNP	(NP*	O
Tusi	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
name	NN	*	O
transliterated	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Asia-Plus	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Soghd	NNP	(NP*	O
Region	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Khujand	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
bank	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
ambassador	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mohammad-Reza	NNP	(NP*	O
Forqani	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Soghd	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
visited	VBD	(VP*	O
higher	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
educational	JJ	*	O
establishments	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Zafarobod	NNP	(NP*	O
District	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
aim	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
agreements	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
expanding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Iranian	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
businessmen	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Soghd	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tokyo	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan.	NNP	*	O
17	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
just	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
completed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whirlwind	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
Southeast	NNP	*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
longed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
leisurely	JJ	*	ESE
trips	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
but	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wait	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
post	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	*	ESE
leisurely	JJ	*	ESE
pace	NN	*)))	ESE
--	:	*	O
meet	VB	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
not	RB	(PP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
sightseeing	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
premier	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
gathering	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
duties	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prime	JJ	(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
visit	VB	(VP(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
stay	VB	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
only	RB	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
day	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
limited	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
two	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
best	JJS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Of	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
step	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prime	JJ	(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
visit	VB	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
each	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
premier	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
short	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
meaningful	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
saying	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
seeing	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
believing	VBG	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
two	CD	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
significant	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
views	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
person	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Koizumi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weeklong	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Philippines	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Thailand	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Singapore	NNP	*)	O
earlier	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stayed	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
less	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)))	O
day	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
17	CD	(NP(NP*	O
January	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
export	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dual-purpose	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
supervision	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
control	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
information	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
documents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
exports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
controlled	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2001	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
obsolete	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
executive	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Supervision	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Control	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Inspection	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Atomic	NNP	*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
functioning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
constant	JJ	(NP*	O
supervision	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
control	NN	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

SARAJEVO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
18	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ONASA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
extradition	NN	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Algerians	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
accordance	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
responsibility	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
authorities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
BiH	NNP	*	O
Federation	NNP	*	O
bodies	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
obligations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coordination	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
anti-terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
18	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
One	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
neglect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
BiH	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
member	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
obliged	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
strictly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
respect	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
dated	JJ	(ADJP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
28	CD	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
obliges	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
UN	NNP	(S(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cooperation	NN	*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
prevention	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
read	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
team	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bosnian	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
handed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
custody	NN	*))	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Algerians	NNS	*)	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
suspicion	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
involvement	NN	(NP*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
ordered	VBN	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Reuters	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
planned	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
quickly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
move	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
al-Qa	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
specifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
when	WRB	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sarajevo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
Algerian	NNP	*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
BiH	JJ	(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Bosnia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Herzegovina	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
authorities	NNS	*))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
mid-October	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
custody	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
custody	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
individuals	NNS	*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
BiH	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
both	DT	(S*	O
posed	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
credible	JJ	*	ESE
security	NN	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
facilities	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
demonstrated	VBD	(VP*	O
involvement	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
acted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
credible	JJ	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
transfer	NN	*)	O
exposed	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
campaigners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
disregarding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
declared	JJ	*	DSE
``	``	*	ESE
war	NN	*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
six	CD	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
links	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fugitive	JJ	(NP*	O
Usama	NNP	*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Bosnian	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
legal	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
respected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
human	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bosnia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
trampled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
over	RP	(PRT*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
had	VBD	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
court	NN	*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
release	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
body	NN	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
instructed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
authorities	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
disappointing	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Madeleine	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rees	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bosnia	NNP	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
violates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
fire	NN	(NP*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1949	CD	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bosnia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Muslim-Croat	JJ	*	O
federation	NN	*)))	O
ruled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
reason	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
detain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
Algerians	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Yemeni	NNP	*	O
passport	NN	*)	O
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
obtained	VBN	(VP*	O
fraudulently	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Local	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
acting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
tip	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
threats	NNS	(NP*))))))	DSE
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
British	NNP	*	O
embassies	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

International	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
Bosnia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
justice	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
information	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
prompted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Five	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*)))	O
also	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
held	VBD	*	O
Bosnian	JJ	(NP*	O
citizenship	NN	*))	O
but	CC	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
stripped	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
appealed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rees	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
deported	VBG	(VP*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
complete	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Bosnian	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	DSE
appeal	NN	*)	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*)))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
legal	JJ	(S(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
followed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
aware	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bosnia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
measures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
procedure	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
respected	JJ	*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Jusif	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Halilagic	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
represents	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chamber	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
protesters	NNS	*)	O
gathered	VBD	(VP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
Sarajevo	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
central	JJ	*	O
prison	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
night	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
block	VB	(VP*	O
vehicles	NNS	(NP*)	O
presumably	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
hand	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
form	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
substantial	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bosnia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
NATO-led	JJ	*	O
peacekeeping	NN	*	O
force	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

GENEVA	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
18	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
delegates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Red	NNP	(NX*	O
Cross	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ICRC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
visiting	VBG	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
confidential	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ICRC	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
18	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Darcy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Christen	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
navy	NN	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
possibly	RB	(NP*	ESE
some	DT	*	O
French	JJ	*	O
speakers	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva-based	JJ	*	O
ICRC	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nationality	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comment	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
French	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ICRC	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
envoys	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
discussing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
release	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
nationalities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Christen	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
findings	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
got	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
way	NN	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
last	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
one	CD	*))	O
week	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
directly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Christen	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Confidentiality	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
respected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
long	RB	(S(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
confidentiality	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
results	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
sphere	NN	*)))))))))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
visits	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
four-member	JJ	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
doctor	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
increasing	VBG	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
arriving	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*	O
later	RB	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
arrivals	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
coming	VBG	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
important	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
repeat	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
isolated	VBN	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
outpost	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
southwestern	JJ	*	O
coast	NN	*)))))))))	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
110	CD	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
30	CD	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
controversy	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
stating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
unlawful	JJ	*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Third	NNP	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Christen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
battle	NN	*	O
field	NN	*)))	O
''	''	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
exist	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
category	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*	O
anyone	NN	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
battlefield	NN	*))))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
presumed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)	ESE
exists	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
person	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
doubt	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
decided	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
acting	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
judicial	JJ	(NP*	O
guarantees	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Christen	NNP	(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(S(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
operating	VBG	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
unknown	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
For	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
special	JJ	(NP*	ESE
courts	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
avoid	VB	(VP*	DSE
expeditious	JJ	(NP*	O
justice	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
18	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
British	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP(VP*	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
assessing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
110	CD	*	O
suspected	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
confirm	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
overnight	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
task	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
identifying	VBG	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claim	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
reporting	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
welfare	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claim	VBP	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
assisting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	O
inquiries	NNS	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
atrocities	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
British	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Britons	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
cramped	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
spartan	NN	*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
much	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

London	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
insists	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
reassurances	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
criticism	NN	(NP*)	DSE
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
diplomats	NNS	(NP*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
outdoor	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
each	DT	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
separate	JJ	*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
floor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
wooden	JJ	(NP*	O
roof	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
chain-link	JJ	(NP*	O
walls	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mat	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sleep	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
and	CC	(NP(QP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
towels	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*	O
rug	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
four-member	JJ	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
flew	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
navy	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP*	O
soil	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
interviewing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)))	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*)	O
British	JJ	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
travelled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
19	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
British	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
parliament	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
Saturday	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
19	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
ambassador	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
growing	VBG	(NP(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
suspects	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Britons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cross-party	JJ	*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
lobbying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
ambassador	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
William	NNP	*	O
Farish	NNP	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
fears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
110	CD	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
kept	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
inhumane	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
makeshift	JJ	*	O
outdoor	JJ	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
houses	VBZ	(VP*	O
single	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
floor	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
wooden	JJ	(NP*	O
roof	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
chain-link	JJ	(NP*	O
walls	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
do	VBP	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

London	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
meanwhile	RB	(ADVP*)	O
insists	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
reassurances	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ann	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Clwyd	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chairperson	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Labour	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
words	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
suggest	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Clwyd	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Farish	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
voice	NN	(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)))	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
just	RB	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ones	NNS	*)	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
acceptance	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	DSE
substantial	JJ	(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
Labour	NNP	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	ESE
statement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
fought	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
shoulder	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
shoulder	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
aftermath	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
became	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
firmer	JJR	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
all	RB	*	ESE
signed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assess	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Newspaper	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
intelligence	NN	(NP*	O
agents	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
interrogate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
As	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
filing	NN	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UK	NNP	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
monitored	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
FBIS	NNP	(NP*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
observed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
UK	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
cited	VBN	(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP*)	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
release	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
photographs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
showing	VBG	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
kneeling	VBG	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
manacled	VBD	(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
blindfolded	VBD	(ADVP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
wearing	VBG	(VP*	O
ear	NN	(NP*	O
muffs	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
technical	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
customary	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
clear	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
share	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Britain	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
photographs	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
front	JJ	*	O
pages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
newspapers	NNS	*))))	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
110	CD	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
being	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
Britons	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pictures	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
officer	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))))	O
show	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
suspected	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Usama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
network	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
kneeling	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
orange	JJ	(NP*	O
jump	NN	*)))	O
suits	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
mancled	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
waist	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
wearing	VBG	(VP*	O
dark	JJ	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
blot	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
light	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ear	NN	(NP*	O
muffs	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
sound	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
mittens	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
right-wing	JJ	*	O
Mail	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
normally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
ran	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
photographs	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
headline	NN	*	DSE
``	``	*	O
Tortured	NNP	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
hear	VB	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
smell	NN	(NP*	O
nothing	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
feel	VB	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
middle-market	JJ	*	O
tabloid	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Manacled	NNP	(NP*	O
hand	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
foot	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
kneel	VBP	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
submission	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Is	VBZ	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(S(PRN*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP*	O
British	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Blair	NNP	(NP*)	O
defend	VBP	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
civilisation	NN	*))))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
shackled	VBN	(S(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
wild	JJ	(NP*	ESE
animals	NNS	*))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
shocking	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
certain	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
intensify	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
outrage	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
kept	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(PP(NP*	O
Mail	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Straw	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
visits	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
await	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
report	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
photographs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
published	JJ	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
photographs	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
do	VBP	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

London	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
previously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
insisted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
reassurances	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
humanely	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

TOKYO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3,000	CD	*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
reconstruction	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)))	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
minor	JJ	(NP*	O
explosions	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
deploying	VBG	(VP*	O
3,000	CD	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	*	O
metropolitan	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
boosted	VBD	(VP*	O
security	NN	(NP*)	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
incident	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Participants	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)))	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
chairman	NN	*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Karzai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Treasury	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
O'Neill	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
World	NNP	(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
James	NNP	*	O
Wolfensohn	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
53-year-old	JJ	*	O
homeless	NN	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
injured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
explosion	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
park	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
business	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
entertainment	NN	*	O
district	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Shinjuku	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
explosion	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
apparently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
caused	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
device	NN	*)	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rubbish	JJ	*	O
bin	NNP	*))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
occurred	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
seven	CD	(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
kilometres	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
4.3	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
away	RB	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*	O
venue	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
blew	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
victim	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lower	JJR	(ADJP*	O
left	NN	*)	O
arm	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
injured	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
leg	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coma	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
explosion	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
January	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

News	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
explosions	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
group	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Spanish	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
daily	NN	*)	O
warns	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
USA	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
suspects	NNS	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
alienate	VB	(VP*	ESE
allies	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
USA	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
credibility	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tarnished	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
allows	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
holds	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guarantee	NN	*	O
whatsoever	RB	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fair	JJ	*	O
trial	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
stubborn	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
persist	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
attitude	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
cause	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
rift	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
showed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
only	JJ	(NP*	ESE
solidarity	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
generosity	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
11	NNP	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
alienate	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
militarily	IN	(PP*	O
speaking	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
conducting	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
virtual	JJ	(NP*	O
isolation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
legislation	NN	*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*))))	O
September	NNP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
see	VB	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
1997	JJ	*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
``	``	(S(NP(NP*	O
unlawful	JJ	*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
arrested	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
battlefield	NN	*)))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
outside	IN	(PP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
territory	NN	*))	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
secret	JJ	(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
courts	NNS	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
condemned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
death	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assurance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
guilty	JJ	(NP*)	O
``	``	*	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*	ESE
doubt	NN	*))	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
court-martial	NN	*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
usual	JJ	*	O
procedure	NN	*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
sturdier	JJ	*)	ESE
legal	JJ	*	O
defence	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Legal	NNP	(NP*	O
Professionals	NNPS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
pass	VB	(VP*	O
sentence	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
crimes	NNS	*))))))))	O
other	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
derived	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
violations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	ESE
contradiction	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
declared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
war	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
rules	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
freed	VBN	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
repatriated	VBN	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hostilities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
ended	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
happens	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
among	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
various	JJ	*	O
Saudis	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
amongst	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Australia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
prefer	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
worked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
especially	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
since	IN	*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
contrast	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
John	NNP	(NP*	O
Walker	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
20-year-old	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
convert	VBP	(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*))	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
moment	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
stands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
accused	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
penalty	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
jail	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
life	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Everyone	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	ESE
opportunities	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
protection	NN	*)	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*)	ESE
so	RB	*))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
token	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
suspected	VBN	(NP(NP*	DSE
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Qa	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
`	``	*	O
idah	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
numbers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
risen	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
interviewing	VBG	(VP*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
100	CD	*))	O
Taleban	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
idah	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
receiving	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Defence	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*)))))	DSE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
interest	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Humanitarian	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
baptized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	ESE
X-Ray	NNP	*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
allusion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
building	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
covered	VBN	*	O
sheds	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
barbed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
wire	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
walls	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
-LSB-	VBG	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
house	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
moment	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
television	NN	*	O
channels	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
CNN	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Qatar	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Al-Jazeera	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
full	JJ	*	ESE
access	NN	*)	ESE
-LSB-	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Guaranteeing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
justice	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))))	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
perceive	VBP	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(PP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
promoters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
principles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
impedes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
comparisons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
regime	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fence	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
Fidel	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
spoken	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Spanish	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
daily	NN	*)	O
urges	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
USA	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
end	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
inhumane	JJ	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Qa	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
idah	NN	*	O
suspects	NNS	*)))))))))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
Amnesty	NNP	(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pointedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
remarked	VBD	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
photographs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
unashamedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
fit	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
release	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
reminiscent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
torture	JJ	*	ESE
centres	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
eastern	JJ	(NP*	O
Europe	NNP	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cold	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Holding	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
handcuffs	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
shackles	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
democracy	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
depriving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
their	PRP$	*	ESE
senses	NNS	*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
blindfolds	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
eyes	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
surgical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
masks	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
mouths	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
noses	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
gloves	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disorientate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
subject	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
sensory	JJ	(NP*	O
deprivation	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
explanations	NNS	*)	DSE
-	:	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
got	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
masks	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
fear	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
spreading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
tuberculosis	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
-	:	*))	O
hardly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ring	VBP	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
discredit	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
USA	NNP	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
seem	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
confirm	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prevalent	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
assumption	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
allied	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
superpower	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
decided	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
wage	NN	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
administer	VB	(VP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)	ESE
all	DT	(PP*	ESE
on	IN	*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Proof	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
110	CD	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hundreds	NNS	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
Amnesty	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
self-respecting	JJ	*	ESE
democrat	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
according	VBG	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Geneva	NNP	*	ESE
Convention	NNP	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
disagreement	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
insisting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	ESE
concerns	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
belong	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
left	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	*	ESE
tribunal	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
impartial	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independent	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Article	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
5	CD	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*	O
states	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
before	IN	*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
-RSB-	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Watch	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
1.8	CD	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
metre	JJ	*	O
cages	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
scandalous	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
photographs	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
distributed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*))	O
voluntarily	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*))))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
suggest	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
aware	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
doing	VBG	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
,	,	(VP*	O
worse	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
still	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
care	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
They	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
murderers	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
treat	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
pleases	VBZ	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Defence	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reply	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
critics	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fortunately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(NP(NP*	O
everyone	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
same	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Thanks	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
pressure	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
allied	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
notably	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commandant	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
interview	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
please	VBP	(VP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
direction	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
start	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(X(X*	O
sooner	RB	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
detainees	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
better	JJR	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	ESE

Urumqi	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*	O
Uygur	NNP	*	O
Autonomous	NNP	*	O
Region	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
northwest	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
invest	VB	(VP*	O
420	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
51	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*))	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fixed	JJ	(NP*	O
assets	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
10th	JJ	*	O
Five-Year	JJ	*	O
Plan	NN	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
2001-2005	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
254	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1996-2000	CD	*	O
period	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nearly	RB	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
60	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
state-owned	JJ	(NP*	O
enterprises	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
investment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fixed	JJ	(NP*	O
assets	NNS	*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
year	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
70.6	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
technical	JJ	(NP*	O
renovation	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
real	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
estate	NN	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
up	IN	(RRC(NP(QP*	O
23.9	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
65.5	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fixed	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
asset	NN	*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
80.7	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
15.2	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
construction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
27	CD	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
projects	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fields	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP(NP*	O
conservancy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
energy	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
transportation	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Lequan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
secretary	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Communist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
listed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
comprehensive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Tarim	NNP	*	O
River	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
project	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ship	VB	(VP*	O
natural	JJ	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
eastern	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
projects	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1996-2000	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*)	O
completed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
big	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
major	JJ	(NP*	O
transportation	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
water	NN	*	O
conservancy	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
telecommunications	NN	*	O
projects	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
254	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fixed	VBN	(NP*	O
asset	NN	*	O
investment	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Upon	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
operation	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
double-track	JJ	*	O
railway	NN	*	O
line	NN	*)))	O
linking	VBG	(VP*	O
Lanzhou	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Gansu	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Urumqi	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
capital	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*	O
railway	NN	*	O
line	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
links	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Kashi	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Turpan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mileage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
railways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
3,008	CD	(NP*	O
km	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Xinjiang	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
33,500	CD	(NP(NP*	O
km	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
highways	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
60	CD	*)	O
air	NN	*	O
routes	NNS	*)	O
linking	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
21	CD	(NP*	O
January	NNP	*))	O
:	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
workshops	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
detail	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
manned	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
unmanned	JJ	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
centre	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Aleksandr	NNP	(NP*	O
Medvedev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
segment	NN	*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
ISS	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rosaviakosmos	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Director	NNP	*	O
Yuriy	NNP	*	O
Koptev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
turn	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
actively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
interacting	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
interchangeability	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
American	JJ	*	O
segment	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Koptev	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*	O
development	NN	*	O
programme	NN	*)	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
deficit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
4.7	CD	(NP*	O
bn	NN	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Koptev	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
interaction	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
spacemen	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
three	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rescue	NN	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
director-general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
centre	NN	*)))	O
briefed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
heavy	JJ	*	O
Proton	NNP	*	O
rocket-booster	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
upgraded	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
director	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
booster	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
launches	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
all	DT	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
civilian	JJ	*)	O
satellites	NNS	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Medvedev	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
upgrading	NN	*	O
work	NN	*)	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
replacement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
control	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
improvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
design	NN	(NP*	O
data	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
determination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ecological	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
improvement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rocket-booster	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
boosting	JJ	*	O
unit	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
expense	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
upgrading	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
especially	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
last	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*))	ESE
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
boosting	JJ	*	O
unit	NN	*)	O
-	:	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
surge	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*))))	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
commercial	JJ	*)	O
effect	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
upgraded	VBN	*	O
Proton	NNP	*	O
rocket-booster	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Medvedev	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Proton	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1965	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Medvedev	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
284	CD	(NP(NP*	O
launches	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(PP*	O
from	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Accompanying	VBG	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
centre	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ilya	NNP	*	O
Klebanov	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Presidential	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sergey	NNP	(NP*	O
Prikhodko	NNP	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
chief	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
staff	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Anatoliy	NNP	(NP*	O
Kvashnin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
assistant	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Yevgeniy	NNP	(NP*	O
Shaposhnikov	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Aleksey	NNP	*	O
Moskovskiy	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Space	NNP	(NP*	O
Forces	NNP	*	O
Commander	NNP	*	O
Anatoliy	NNP	*	O
Perminov	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
antiterrorist	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
initially	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
launched	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
Operation	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Infinite	NNP	*	ESE
Justice	NNP	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
infinitely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reconcile	VB	(VP*	ESE
oneself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
chained	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
humiliated	JJ	*	ESE
Taliban	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaida	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*)	O
resemble	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
attempt	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
satisfy	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
primitive	JJ	*	ESE
thirst	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
revenge	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
convince	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Americans	NNPS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*	ESE
administration	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
removing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
regime	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
religious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
madmen	NN	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
out-of-the-way	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(S(NP*)	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
acts	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))	O
day	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
most	RBS	(ADVP*	O
recently	RB	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
reject	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
suggestion	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
harmed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
alter	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hooded	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
chains	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
paint	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
picture	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(NP(NP(UCP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
name	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
self-righteousness	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
-	:	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
equally	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
worryingly	NN	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
amount	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
debate	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
-	:	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
infringe	VB	(VP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rules	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
reinforced	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ignored	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
refused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
-	:	(PRN*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)))))	ESE
-	:	*)	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
competent	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
differently	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
superpower	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
entered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
fog	NN	*)	ESE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
stamped	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nonsense	JJ	*	ESE
term	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
battlefield	NN	(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
face	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prospect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
due	JJ	*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
analysis	NN	*)	O
perhaps	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
sentenced	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
death	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
closed	VBN	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
courts	NNS	*))))	O
instead	RB	(CONJP*	O
of	IN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
open	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mobilize	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
great	JJ	*	DSE
degree	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
understanding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bloody	JJ	*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
day	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
what	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
issue	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
moment	NN	*))	O
principles	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
stake	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
far-reaching	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
repercussions	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
behavior	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
compromising	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
as	IN	(PP(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
expression	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
higher	JJR	*	ESE
form	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
unshakeable	JJ	*	ESE
defender	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
justice	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
undoubtedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
rub	VB	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
superpower	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Denmark	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
duty	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
speak	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Swedish	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Anna	NNP	*	O
Lindh	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Otherwise	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
face	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
risk	NN	*)	ESE
not	RB	(PP*	O
only	RB	*	O
of	IN	*	O
undermining	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
antiterrorism	NN	*	O
war	NN	*)))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
but	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sending	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
signal	NN	*)))))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
despots	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
know	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
exploit	VB	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
demonstrated	VBN	*	ESE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
skill	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
behavior	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
exploiting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fear	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prime	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Anders	NNP	*	O
Fogh	NNP	*	O
Rasmussen	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Liberal	NNP	(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
voiced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
approval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
144	CD	*	O
al-Qaida	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
respect	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
commitments	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Fogh	NNP	(NP*	O
Rasmussen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
weekly	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
22	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Criticism	NN	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	DSE
From	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
fails	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
mention	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
subsequently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

EU	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Javier	NNP	*	O
Solana	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	DSE
recognizing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
al-Qaida	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
understood	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Swedish	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fogh	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
Must	MD	(VP*	ESE
Be	VB	(VP*	O
Given	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Fair	NNP	*	ESE
Trial	NNP	*)))))))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
integrity	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
religion	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fair	JJ	*	ESE
trial	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Fogh	NNP	(NP*	O
Rasmussen	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
Liberal	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
spokesman	NN	*))	O
Troels	NNP	(NP*	O
Lund	NNP	*	O
Poulsen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
debate	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
intellectual	JJ	*	ESE
discussion	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Per	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Stig	NNP	*	O
Moller	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Give	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Them	NNP	*	ESE
Rights	NNPS	*)))	ESE

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Per	IN	*	O
Stig	NNP	*	O
Moller	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Conservative	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Party	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
urging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(UCP(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
consequence	NN	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*))))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
satisfy	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
requirements	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
conventions	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Per	NNP	(NP*	O
Stig	NNP	*	O
Moller	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Berlin	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Raise	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Denmark	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
Voice	NNP	*)))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Danish	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
raise	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
voice	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
information	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
questionable	JJ	*	ESE
aspects	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
approach	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Mogens	NNP	*	O
Lykketoft	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Social	NNP	(NP*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Ritzau	NNP	(NP*	O
Bureau	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
who	WP	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
focus	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Socialist	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
sending	VBG	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
urgent	JJ	*	DSE
call	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
deliver	VB	(VP*	DSE
official	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
duty	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Danish	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
applaud	VB	(VP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
support	VBP	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
criticize	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
treatment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Socialist	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
People	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Party	NNP	*	O
Chairman	NNP	*	O
Holger	NNP	*	O
K.	NNP	*	O
Nielsen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
ask	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
written	VBN	*	O
reply	NN	*)	O
outlining	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Danish	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Are	VBP	(SQ*	ESE
They	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
Danes	NNPS	(NP*))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Danish	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
criticize	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
To	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
begin	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
great	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
what	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
imagine	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reasons	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
transporting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Peter	NNP	*	O
Skaarup	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Danish	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Party	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

As	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
Danes	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Danish	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Denmark	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
interfere	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Dane	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Otherwise	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
directly	RB	(ADJP*	O
affected	JJ	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Peter	NNP	(NP*	O
Skaarup	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
alluding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Sweden	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Spanish	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
daily	NN	*)	O
urges	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
caution	NN	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
judging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
USA	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
suspects	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
dissemination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
photos	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
aroused	VBN	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
controversy	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Critics	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
condemn	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
nature	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
receiving	VBG	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
handcuffed	VBN	(S(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
immobilized	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
shackles	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
sensory	JJ	(NP*	ESE
deprivation	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
confined	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
minute	JJ	(NP*	ESE
cells	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
accusations	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
definition	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
torture	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
violation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
witnessing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
distortion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
reality	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
cases	NNS	*)	ESE
pure	JJ	(NP*	ESE
falsehoods	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
photos	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	DSE
voluntarily	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
clarified	VBN	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
depicted	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
dangerous	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
undergone	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
identification	NN	(NP*)))	O
prior	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
confinement	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
normal	JJ	*	O
living	NN	*	O
conditions	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
decisive	JJ	*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
days	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
usual	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
make	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	DSE
statements	NNS	*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Herein	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
difference	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
torture	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
systematically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*	O
Cuba	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
inspection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
permitted	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
account	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
before	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
political	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
judgments	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
guilty	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
guilty	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
being	VBG	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
interviewed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
nationality	NN	*)))))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
complaints	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
receiving	VBG	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indications	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
exist	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
excessively	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
harsh	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
dispel	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
suspicions	NNS	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nor	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	ESE
does	VBZ	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
seem	VB	(VP*	ESE
proper	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cite	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
soil	NN	*)))))))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rented	VBN	*	O
base	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Backing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
either	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
justification	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
excesses	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
being	VBG	*))	O
,	,	*	O
what	WDT	(NP*)	O
exist	VBP	(VP*	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
indications	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
shadows	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
suspicion	NN	(NP*))	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
materialize	VB	(VP(VP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
dispelled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
knowledge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
facts	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
relevant	JJ	*	O
reports	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
launch	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
scandal	NN	(NP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
anti-Americanism	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attitude	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
one	NN	*))	O
previously	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
displayed	VBD	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
dictatorships	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
totalitarian	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
communist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
permit	VBP	(S(VP*	O
neither	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inspection	NN	*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dissemination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
photographs	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
enormous	JJ	*	ESE
difference	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
known	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
or	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
terror	NN	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*	O
Towers	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
freedoms	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
values	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))	O
stand	VBP	(VP*))))))))	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*	O
afterward	RB	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
repeated	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
deal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
truth	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
light	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
happened	VBN	(VP*	ESE
afterwards	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
arises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNP	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NX*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
themselves	PRP	(ADVP*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
sometimes	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
inclined	VBN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
sacrifice	VB	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
values	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
cause	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
intensified	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
measures	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
imperative	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrible	JJ	*	ESE
tragedy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*)))))	O
September	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
suffering	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
generally	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
known	VBN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ends	NNS	*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
dealing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
means	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
place	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Apart	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reasons	NNS	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
justification	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
action	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
combatants	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
war	NN	*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
constantly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
tested	VBN	*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
curb	VB	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Back	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
all	DT	*)	O
the	DT	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
sufferings	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
henceforth	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
bearable	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
especially	RB	(PP*	ESE
for	IN	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
directly	RB	(ADJP*	O
involved	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
laid	VBN	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
four	CD	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
provide	VBP	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sick	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
wounded	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
servicemen	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
attempts	NNS	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
unnecessary	JJ	*	O
suffering	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
civilians	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greatest	JJS	*	DSE
attention	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
paid	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
principle	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latter	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
object	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
distinction	NN	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	O
involved	VBN	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
supplementary	JJ	*	O
protocols	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1977	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
parties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
ratified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
protocols	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
offer	VBP	(VP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enforce	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
doubtful	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
news	NN	*)	O
reaches	VBZ	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	O
many	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
suggest	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
regularly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
solemn	NN	(NP*	DSE
pledges	NNS	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
minimizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
civilian	JJ	(NP*	O
casualties	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
civilian	JJ	(NP*	O
property	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
hardly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
speak	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
targeting	VBG	*	ESE
error	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*	O
warehouse	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
clearly	RB	(S(ADJP*	ESE
recognizable	JJ	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
red	JJ	*	O
cross	NN	*)	O
painted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
roof	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
shelled	VBN	(VP*	O
twice	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
building	NN	*)	O
enjoys	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
can	MD	(VP(VP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
object	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
purposes	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
doubtful	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
crucial	JJ	*	O
distinction	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
targets	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
systematically	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Newspaper	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
headlines	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
United	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Confirms	NNP	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Bombing	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Village	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mosque	NNP	*)))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
100	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Killed	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bombing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Eastern	NNP	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
speak	VBP	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
witnesses	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
neither	CC	(S(NP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
observed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
target	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civilian	JJ	(NP*	O
casualties	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
justifiable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
whoever	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
precautions	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
tragedy	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
only	RB	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)))))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
go	VBP	(VP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
inclined	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*	O
surrenders	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
relatively	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
small	JJ	*)	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
forces	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accept	VB	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
hope	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
either	RB	(ADVP*)	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
taken	VBN	*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
''	''	*))))))))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
suggested	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
death	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
out	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
conflict	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
amount	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
flagrant	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
violation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
whoever	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
ceases	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
reason	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
entitled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
protection	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
deplored	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
come	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
somebody	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
commander	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
serves	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
example	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
observance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rules	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
nearly	RB	(ADVP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
concern	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captive	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
increased	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moving	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
rightly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
whipping	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
storm	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Humanitarian	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
those	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fall	VBP	(S(VP*	O
captive	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
opponent	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hands	NNS	*)))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
times	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
decent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
qualify	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Transporting	VBG	(ROOT(X(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
shackled	JJ	(NP*	O
hand	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
foot	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
hoods	NNS	(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
shaving	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
beards	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
form	VBP	(S(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
identity	NN	*))))))	O
--	:	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
accommodation	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
half-open	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cages	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	O
too	RB	*	O
small	JJ	*	O
can	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
never	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
pass	VB	*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
test	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
...	:	*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
consequences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
11	NNP	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
felt	VBD	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
battlefield	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Shortly	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
after	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
only	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
sparse	JJ	*	ESE
information	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
press	NN	(NP*))	O
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
jewel	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
Constitution	NNP	*)))	ESE
--	:	*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
restricted	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
reasons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
actions	NNS	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
crippled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
present	NN	*))	DSE
without	IN	(PP*	DSE
much	JJ	(NP*	DSE
complaint	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protest	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sections	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
antiterrorism	NN	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	O
haste	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreigners	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(PRN*	O
loose	RB	(ADJP*)	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
indefinitely	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
uncertainty	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
precise	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
certain	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
over	IN	(S(NP(NP*	O
1,000	CD	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
questioning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
presumed	VBN	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
very	RB	(NP*	O
roughly	RB	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
aloud	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
timely	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
accurate	JJ	*)	O
information	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
naturally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
particularly	RB	*	O
great	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
whether	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
global	JJ	*	ESE
ban	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
torture	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
abused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
account	NN	*)))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
raises	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
questions	NNS	*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Through	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
detain	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
try	VB	*	O
anybody	NN	(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
citizen	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qa	NN	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
commissions	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
stated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
black	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
white	JJ	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
hardly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
feasible	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
commissions	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
normal	JJ	*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
rules	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Consequently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
normal	JJ	*	O
person	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
deems	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
guilt	NN	(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
reasonable	JJ	(NP*	O
doubt	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presumption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
innocence	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Appeal	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
penalty	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recently	RB	(ADJP*	O
captured	VBN	*)	O
John	NNP	*	O
Walker	NNP	*	O
Lindh	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ordinary	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
courts	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
difference	NN	*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
likelihood	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
captured	JJ	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
questioning	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Presumed	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
criminals	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Milosevic	NNP	(NP*)))	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
guarantees	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
fair	JJ	*	ESE
trial	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
falls	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
short	RB	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))	ESE
alone	RB	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
screws	NNS	*)	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
tightened	VBD	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
sharpened	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
11	NNP	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
increased	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
possibilities	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
stricter	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
legislation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
asylum	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
immigration	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UK	NNP	*)	O
proclaimed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Antiterrorism	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Crime	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	(NP*	O
Act	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whenever	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
suspicion	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
foreigner	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
imprisoned	VBN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
emerges	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
removed	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
danger	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*)	O
indefinitely	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
tragedy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
polish	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
image	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Out	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
well-understood	JJ	(NP*	ESE
self-interest	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	*)))	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
enabled	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
compare	VB	(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
moral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
waging	VBG	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
years	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israeli	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Palestinian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
Usama	NNP	*	ESE
Bin	NNP	*	ESE
Ladin	NNP	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	DSE
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
undoubtedly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
justified	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
holds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
respected	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Observance	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
insure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
prove	VB	(VP*	ESE
respect	NN	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
dignity	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
rightly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
champion	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Kazakhstan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
main	JJ	*	O
seaport	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
brisk	JJ	(NP*	O
business	NN	*))))	O

Aktau	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
22	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
The	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Aktau	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
Trading	NNP	*	O
Port	NNP	*	O
republican	NN	*	O
state	NN	*	O
enterprise	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
RSE	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caspian	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
situated	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mangistau	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Region	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
handled	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
116,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cargo	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
14	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
21	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
2002	CD	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Interfax-Kazakhstan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
learnt	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
RSE	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
79,000	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
37,044	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dry	JJ	(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transshipped	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
port	NN	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
quoted	VBN	*	O
period	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
RSE	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
343,735	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cargo	NN	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
handled	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
Aktau	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
seaport	NNP	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
21	CD	*))))	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
261,841	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
81,894	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dry	JJ	(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
transshipped	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
port	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Aktau	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
seaport	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
only	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
seaport	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
annual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
transshipment	NN	*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1.5	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
m	NN	*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dry	JJ	(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
8m	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tokyo	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan.	NNP	*	O
23	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
225-issue	JJ	*	O
Nikkei	NNP	*	O
Stock	NNP	*	O
Average	NNP	*)	O
managed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
above	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
10,000	CD	*	O
line	NN	*)))))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
morning	NN	(NP*)	O
thanks	NNS	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
gains	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
semiconductor-related	JJ	*	O
shares	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
automakers	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Nikkei	NNP	*)	O
climbed	VBD	(VP*	O
50.18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
0.50	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
10,101.16	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
broader	NNP	*	O
Tokyo	NNP	*	O
Stock	NNP	*	O
Price	NNP	*	O
Index	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
TOPIX	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
First	NNP	*	O
Section	NNP	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RB	(ADVP*	O
2.73	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
0.28	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
982.40	CD	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
TOPIX	NN	*)	O
hit	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
session	NN	*	O
low	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
977.42	CD	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
deals	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
falling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
post-bubble	JJ	*	O
closing	NN	*	O
low	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
980.11	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
logged	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Oct.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1998	CD	*	O
,	,	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
trading	NN	*	O
days	NNS	*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
intraday	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Volume	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
section	NN	*)))	O
decreased	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
303.91	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
shares	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
morning	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
328.82	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
losers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
surpassing	VBG	(VP*	O
gainers	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
863	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
466	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
153	CD	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
finishing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
unchanged	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nikkei	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
downside	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
supported	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
buybacks	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
bargain-hunting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
reaction	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
2	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
fall	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
index	NN	*)	O
only	RB	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
step	NN	*)	O
away	RB	*)	O
from	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
10,000	CD	*	O
line	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Nikkei	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
fluctuating	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
induces	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
buybacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
technical	JJ	(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Kazunori	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jinnai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
general	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
manager	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
equity	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Daiwa	NNP	(NP*	O
Securities	NNPS	*	O
SMBC	NNP	*	O
Co.	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
chip-related	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*	O
Electron	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Advantest	NNP	*)))	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
higher	JJR	*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overnight	JJ	*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
stocks	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Nasdaq	NNP	*	O
composite	JJ	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
plunged	VBD	(VP*	O
47.81	CD	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
2.48	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
close	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1,882.53	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
30-issue	JJ	*	O
Dow	NNP	*	O
Jones	NNP	*	O
Industrial	NNP	*	O
Average	NNP	*)	O
lost	VBD	(VP*	O
58.05	CD	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
0.59	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
9,713.80	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brokers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
chip-related	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
got	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
boost	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
association	NN	*)	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	O
North	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
America-based	JJ	*	O
manufacturers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
semiconductor	NN	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)))))))	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
orders	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
shipments	NNS	*)	O
rise	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Export-dependent	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
automakers	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
contributed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Nikkei	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rise	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Toyota	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Motor	NNP	*)	O
gaining	VBG	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
3,470	CD	(NP(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Honda	NNP	(NP*	O
Motor	NNP	*)))	O
70	CD	(NP(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	*	O
5,230	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rubber	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
makers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
nonferrous	JJ	(NP*	O
metal	NN	*	O
firms	NNS	*))	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rise	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
telecoms	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	O
estate	NN	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
banks	NNS	(NP*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
soft	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NTT	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hit	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
record	JJ	*	O
low	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
377,000	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
ending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
383,000	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
volume	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
machinery	NN	(NP(NP*	O
maker	NN	*	O
Yuken	NNP	*	O
Kogyo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
shot	VBD	(S(VP*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
28	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
152	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Snow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Brand	NNP	*	O
Milk	NNP	*	O
Products	NNPS	*)	O
dived	VBD	(VP*	O
37	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
187	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
media	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
earlier	RB	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
subsidiary	NN	*)	O
Snow	NNP	(NP*	O
Brand	NNP	*	O
Food	NNP	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
disguising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
beef	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
subsidy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
mad	JJ	(NP*	O
cow	NN	*	O
disease	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Snow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Brand	NNP	*	O
Food	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
listed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Second	JJ	*	O
Section	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
shed	VBD	(VP*	O
7	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
85	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mitsui	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Construction	NNP	*)	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
1	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
46	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Sumitomo	NNP	(NP*	O
Construction	NNP	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
integrating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
operations	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sumitomo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Construction	NNP	*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	O
unchanged	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nomura	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Holdings	NNP	*)	O
lost	VBD	(VP*	O
19	CD	(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1,533	CD	(NP(NP*	O
yen	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
79	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
dive	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*	O
net	JJ	*	O
profit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
April-December	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))))))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
earlier	RBR	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Second	JJ	*	O
Section	NN	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
shed	VBD	(VP*	O
17.02	CD	(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1,675.10	CD	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
7.06	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
shares	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Osaka	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near-term	JJ	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
Nikkei	NNP	*	O
225	NNP	*	O
index	NN	*	O
futures	NNS	*	O
contract	NN	*)	O
advanced	VBD	(VP*	O
40	CD	(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
10,090	CD	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Commentary	RB	(ROOT(PP(ADVP*)	DSE
by	IN	*	O
Nawab	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Khan	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Perspective	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
column	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Hypocrisy	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
Exposed	VBD	(VP*))	O
''	''	*)))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
US-led	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
inspiring	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
opportunistic	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
attacks	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
civil	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
liberties	NNS	*)	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
`	``	(NP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Watch	NNP	*)	O
'	''	*	O
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
annual	JJ	*	DSE
global	JJ	*	DSE
survey	NN	*)	DSE
released	VBN	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
gained	VBD	(VP*	O
worldwide	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sympathy	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
evaporated	VBD	(VP*	ESE
quickly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
due	JJ	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
gross	JJ	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
norms	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
behaviour	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
arresting	VBG	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
locking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
cages	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
this	DT	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
bombings	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*	O
now	RB	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
setting	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrific	JJ	*	ESE
example	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
violate	VB	(VP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Watch	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
Imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
condemning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tin-pot	JJ	*	ESE
tyrant	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
rid	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
enemies	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
criticism	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
can	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	ESE
sting	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
ring	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
hypocrisy	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
western	NNP	*	O
Europe	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
measures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
threatening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
long-held	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
principles	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Terrorists	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
believe	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
anything	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cause	NN	*	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Kenneth	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Roth	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Executive	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Director	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Watch	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
buy	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
logic	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Human	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
rights	NNS	*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
compromised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
cause	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
drive	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
succeed	VB	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
ruthless	JJ	*)	ESE
set	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
criminals	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Roth	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
defeat	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
amorality	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
firm	NN	*	ESE
grounding	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
willingness	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
most	JJS	(NP*	ESE
western	JJ	*	ESE
governments	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
tolerate	VB	(VP*	ESE
abuses	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
friendly	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
tended	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
growth	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
culture	NN	*)))	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	ESE
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
failure	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rein	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
abuses	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
apparent	JJ	*	ESE
disregard	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
grave	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
civilian	JJ	*	ESE
suffering	NN	*)	ESE
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
complete	JJ	*	DSE
unwillingness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
raise	VB	(VP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
friendly	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
24	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
British	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
Jack	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*)))))	O
24	CD	(NP(NP*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
far	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
preferable	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
British	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
face	VB	(VP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Britons	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
158	CD	(NP*))	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
now-crumbled	JJ	*	O
hardline	NN	*	ESE
Taliban	NN	*	O
regime	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
preferable	JJ	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
British	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
face	VB	(VP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Straw	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
BBC	JJ	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
speaking	VBG	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
American	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Walker	NNP	*	O
Lindh	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
handcuffed	VBN	(S(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
shackled	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Dulles	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Airport	NNP	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
capital	NN	*))))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nearby	JJ	*	O
jail	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
faces	VBZ	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
conspiring	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
supporting	VBG	(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
hold	NN	(NP(NP*	O
transfers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuba	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

International	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
makeshift	JJ	*	O
camp	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
grown	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
month	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
outdoor	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
each	DT	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
separate	JJ	*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
floor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
wooden	JJ	(NP*	O
roof	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
chain-link	JJ	(NP*	O
walls	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Stop	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
circus	NN	*))))	ESE

A	DT	(ROOT(S(PP(NP*	ESE
YEAR	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	*	O
gently	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
attempting	VBG	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
nudge	VB	(VP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
embracing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
minimum	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allow	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
presidential	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
back	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
square	JJ	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
move	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
inch	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
missions	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
organisations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
powerhouse	NN	*	O
Nigeria	NN	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
come	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
gone	VBN	*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*	O
empty-handed	CD	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(S*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
attempts	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
civic	JJ	*	O
bodies	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Crisis	NNP	*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Constitutional	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
well-meaning	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
churches	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Roman	NNP	*	O
Catholics	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
so-called	JJ	*)	ESE
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Consultative	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
ways	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
sought	VBN	(VP*	DSE
dialogue	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
confrontation	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prod	VB	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
reason	NN	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
first	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
embark	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
suicidal	JJ	*	ESE
path	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
chosen	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Predictably	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
advice	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
fallen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
stones	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
suggestions	NNS	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
care	VB	(VP*	ESE
less	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
interested	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
only	RB	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
retaining	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
cost	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))	O
only	RB	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
month	NN	*)	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
appear	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
grown	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
too	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
tired	JJ	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
insisting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
demands	NNS	*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
of	IN	(VP(PP*	O
actually	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
scaling	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
back	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
frustrated	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
listening	VBG	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
commission	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP(VP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preparations	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reluctantly	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	DSE
willing	JJ	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accommodate	VB	(VP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
partisan	JJ	*	ESE
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Supervisory	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
bodies	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deployment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
independent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
yet	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
none	NN	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
even	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
-	:	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
obvious	JJ	*	ESE
all	RB	(PP(ADVP*	ESE
along	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
organisations	NNS	*))))))))	O
-	:	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
nothing	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
whatsoever	RB	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
deter	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
anything	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
everything	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
claim	VB	(VP*	O
victory	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
fraudulent	JJ	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
tragic	JJ	*	ESE
circus	NN	*)))))	ESE
-	:	(PRN*	O
many	DT	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
madness	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
-	:	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
either	CC	(ADVP*	ESE
now	RB	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
never	RB	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
realise	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
running	VBG	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
meaningful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
options	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
influence	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
events	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
EU	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
submissions	NNS	*)	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
two	CD	*	ESE
weeks	NNS	*)	ESE
ago	RB	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(NP(NP*	O
pliant	JJ	*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
handpicked	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
validate	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
sham	NN	*))))))	ESE
-	:	*))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
now	RB	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
15-nation	JJ	*	O
bloc	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
talking	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
!	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
engaging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dialogue	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
interested	JJ	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
buying	NN	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)))	ESE
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
fervently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
escalates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
bludgeoning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hope	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
frightening	JJ	(NP*	ESE
voters	NNS	*))))	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
South	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
African	NNP	*	ESE
President	NNP	*	ESE
Thabo	NNP	*	ESE
Mbeki	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
SADC	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
nothing	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
practical	JJ	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
body	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
complies	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Either	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SADC	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
indeed	RB	(NP*	ESE
all	DT	*	O
others	NNS	*))	O
-	:	*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
meaningful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
forever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
hold	VBP	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
example	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SADC	NN	*))	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
others	NNS	*))	O
-	:	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
refuse	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
early	RB	*))))))))))))))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	RB	*	ESE
latest	JJS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
follows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
therefore	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
reject	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
advance	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fraud	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
staged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
guise	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
election	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
urgently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
meets	VBZ	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
minimum	JJ	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allow	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
semblance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
ballot	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
all	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
know	VB	(VP*))))	ESE
-	:	(PRN*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
included	VBD	(VP*))	ESE
-	:	*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
winning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP(PP*	O
intimidation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
violence	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
notwithstanding	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
desperate	JJ	*	ESE
last-minute	JJ	*	ESE
act	NN	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
votes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hurried	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

KUALA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
LUMPUR	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
25	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
sent	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
official	JJ	*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*))	O
here	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
inhumane	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*))))))))	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Syed	NNP	*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Albar	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bernama	NNP	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
protesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
At	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
treatment	NN	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
rough	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
guidelines	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
satisfactory	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
memorandum	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
came	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mahathir	NNP	*	O
Mohamad	NNP	*)	O
criticised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

European	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
conditions	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
photograph	NN	*)))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
shackled	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
blindfolded	VBD	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
kneeling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
wearing	VBG	*	O
ear	NN	(NP*	O
muffs	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
ill-treatment	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
satisfied	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
upholding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
traditions	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
humane	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
protecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
guarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
158	NNP	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
isolated	VBN	*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
southeastern	JJ	*	O
coast	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
270	CD	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
or	CC	*	O
near	IN	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

KUALA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
LUMPUR	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
24	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Bernama	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Umno	NNP	*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
send	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
memorandum	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
protest	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
US	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(S(ADJP*	O
inhumane	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Prime	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Datuk	NNP	*	O
Seri	NNP	*	O
Dr	NNP	*	O
Mahathir	NNP	*	O
Mohamad	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Umno	NNP	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
note	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Camp	NNP	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
criticised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
handling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captured	NNP	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
finds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
memo	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
chairing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Umno	NNP	*	O
headquarters	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
158	CD	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*	O
Naval	NNP	*	O
Base	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
inmates	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
typically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
shackles	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
handcuffs	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
wearing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
blacked-out	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
earmuffs	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
surgical	JJ	(NP*	O
masks	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
biting	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Mahathir	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
dangers	NNS	*)	O
posed	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kumpulan	NNP	*	O
Militan	NNP	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
KMM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
activities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
aimed	VBN	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
topple	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
enough	JJ	(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
violence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
connection	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
stressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
KMM	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
group	NN	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
action	NN	(S(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
detain	VB	(VP*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
involved	VBN	(ADJP*))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
investigations	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
KMM	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
ongoing	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mahathir	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
laws	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
prevented	VBD	(S(VP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
crimes	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
happening	VBG	(S(VP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
allowed	VBD	(VP*	O
detention	NN	(NP*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
court	NN	(S(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
proofs	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
criminal	JJ	(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

KABUL	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
25	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP*	O
21-member	JJ	*	O
commission	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
organise	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
tribal	JJ	*	O
council	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
path	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
named	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
historic	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Kofi	NNP	*	O
Annan	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Annan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
interim	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Karzai	NNP	*)	O
read	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
task	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Annan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
paying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
40	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
factional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
naming	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
group	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
easy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Annan	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
explaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
21	CD	*	O
names	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
whittled	VBN	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shortlist	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
300	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
not	RB	(S(NP*	O
everybody	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
entirely	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
happy	JJ	*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
list	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
list	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
let	VBD	(VP*	ESE
's	POS	(S(NP*)	ESE
support	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
one	CD	*)	O
woman	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
vice	NN	(NP*	O
chair	NN	*))	O
,	,	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
female	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
representation	NN	*)	O
outlined	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
set	VBD	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
Karzai	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interim	JJ	*	O
authority	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
independent	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
men	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
women	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
integrity	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
highly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
respected	VBN	*	ESE
within	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
society	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
request	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
organise	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Annan	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
21-member	JJ	*	O
council	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
procedures	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
traditional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
council	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tribal	JJ	(NP*	O
elders	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
paved	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six-month	JJ	*	O
power-sharing	JJ	*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
22	CD	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
appoint	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transitional	JJ	*	O
authority	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
rule	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war-ravaged	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lead-up	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
obliged	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draft	VB	(VP*	O
rules	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
relating	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
allocation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
seats	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))	O
living	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
settled	VBN	(VP*	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
society	NN	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Islamic	JJ	(NP*	O
scholars	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
intellectuals	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
traders	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
rules	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
convening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	RB	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	O
and	CC	*	O
where	WRB	*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
how	WRB	(FRAG(WHADJP*	O
long	JJ	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
indirect	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
selection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
both	DT	(ADJP*	O
transparent	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Karzai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reaffirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
determination	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
interfere	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
Loya	NNP	(NP*	O
Jirga	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Annan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
commission	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
together	RB	(ADJP*	O
with	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
successful	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
work	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fair	JJ	*	ESE
Loya	NNP	*	O
Jirga	NNP	*)))))))	O
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

KOTA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
BAHARU	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
26	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Bernama	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
PAS	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
bad	JJ	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qaeda	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
fighters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*	O
Camp	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

PAS	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Datuk	NNP	*	O
Fadzil	NNP	*	O
Noor	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
PAS	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
prisoners-of-war	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
accorded	VBN	(VP*	O
treatment	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
provided	VBD	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Basic	NNP	(NP*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
...	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
To	TO	(S(VP*	O
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
vengeance	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
ignored	VBN	(VP*	ESE
principles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
justice	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
principles	NNS	*)))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
opening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seminar	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
PAS	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peninsula	NN	*)))	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Datuk	NNP	*	O
Seri	NNP	*	O
Syed	NNP	*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Albar	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Wisma	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Putra	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
handed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
official	JJ	*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
bad	JJ	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malaysia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
soliders	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
provisions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
26	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reverse	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
declare	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
four-page	JJ	*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
memorandum	NN	*)	O
obtained	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*))))	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Powell	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
request	NN	*))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
s	VBZ	(VP*	O
National	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
plans	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*))	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
18	CD	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
hundreds	NNS	(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Usama	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al-Qa	NN	*)	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
detainees	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
prisoners	VBG	(S(VP*	O
of	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	*	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	O
subject	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
rights	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
requested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
reconsider	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
White	NNP	(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
Counsel	NNP	*	O
Alberto	NNP	*	O
Gonzales	NNP	*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
memo	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
conclude	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
GPW	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Geneva	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Treatment	NNP	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Prisoners	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
War	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
Human	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
protested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
living	VBG	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
158	CD	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Naval	NNP	*	O
Base	NNP	*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
After	IN	(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
low-profile	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
14	CD	*	O
professional	JJ	*	O
associations	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
anti-normalisation	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
renewed	VBD	(VP*)))))))))	DSE
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
severing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
ties	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Zionist	NNP	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
50	CD	*)	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unions	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Anti-Normalisation	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one-day	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
backdrop	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
uncertainty	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
10-year-old	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
speakers	NNS	*)	O
outlined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plight	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
occupation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suffering	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Iraqi	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
facing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
crippling	JJ	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
sanctions	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
eleventh	NN	*))	O
consecutive	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
lambasted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
US-British	JJ	(NP*	ESE
aggression	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
meddling	NNP	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
internal	JJ	*	ESE
affairs	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Normalisation	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Zionist	NNP	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
crime	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
nation	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
humanity	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
read	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banners	NNS	*)	O
hoisted	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Professional	NNP	*	O
Associations	NNP	*	O
Complex	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Council	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Unions	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Oran	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-	JJ	*	O
normalisation	NN	*	O
drive	NN	*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
goal	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
binding	VBG	*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
professional	JJ	*	O
associations	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
general	JJ	*	O
assembly	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Jordan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
sealed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
1994	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Former	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Hamas	NNP	*	O
spokesperson	NN	*	O
Ibrahim	NNP	*	O
Ghosheh	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
spokesperson	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
Brotherhood	NNP	*	O
Jamil	NNP	*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Baker	NNP	*))))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sunday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
gathering	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
such	JJ	*	O
public	JJ	*	O
event	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
authorities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
cracked	VBN	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anti-normalisation	JJ	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
public	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
a	DT	*	DSE
blacklist	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jordanians	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*))))))	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
ties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
conference	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
nine	CD	(NP*	O
papers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Political	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
affiliation	NNP	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
association	NN	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))	O
lean	VBP	(VP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
Islamist	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
pan-Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
leftist	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Conference	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
expansionist	JJ	*	ESE
plans	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
argued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*	ESE
treaty	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
favour	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Zionist	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	(S(VP*	O
ostracising	VBG	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
deal	VBP	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
partners	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
maintaining	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
boycott	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
grassroots	NNS	*	O
level	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
strained	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outbreak	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Intifada	NNP	*)))	O
16	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jordan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
delayed	VBN	(VP*	O
sending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ambassador	NN	*	O
designate	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Abdul	NNP	(NP*	O
Ilah	NNP	*	O
Kurdi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tel	NNP	(NP*	O
Aviv	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
honoured	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jordanian	JJ	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
jails	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
12	CD	*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISAF	NNP	*	O
deployment	NN	*	O
area	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
C-130	NNP	*	O
Hercules	NNP	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
transports	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
48	CD	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
police	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
escorting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
patrolling	VBG	(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
protecting	VBG	(VP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
convoys	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
controlling	VBG	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*	O
points	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Romania	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
C-130	NNP	*	O
Hercules	NNP	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ISAF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
disposal	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
transport	NN	(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aforementioned	JJ	*	O
zone	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Through	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
correspondent	NN	*	O
Doru	NNP	*	O
Dragomir	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
accompany	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
contingent	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Ziua	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
readers	NNS	*)	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
detachment	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
missions	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISAF	NNP	*	O
framework	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
sure	JJ	*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
communicating	VBG	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
drawn	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hue	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cry	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
provoked	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
release	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
now	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
famous	JJ	*)	ESE
photographs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
blinded	JJ	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
gagged	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
chained	FW	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
kneeling	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
enclosure	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
camp	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
brilliantly	RB	(ADJP(ADJP(ADVP*)	ESE
waged	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
carefully	RB	*	ESE
framed	JJ	*))	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
punctuated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
briefings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
Donald	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
veritable	JJ	*	ESE
media	NNS	*	ESE
triumph	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	CD	*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
many	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commentaries	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
newspapers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
disposed	JJ	*	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))))	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
Telegraph	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
The	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
coalition	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
reactions	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
particularly	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Great	NNP	(NP*	O
Britain	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
ranged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
incomprehension	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
indignation	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
slight	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
confusion	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
high	JJ	(NP*	ESE
distress	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
quite	RB	(ADJP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
pulling	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*))	ESE
:	:	*	O
losing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sympathy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
astonished	JJ	*	DSE
The	NNP	*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
Mirror	NNP	*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
confuse	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
vengeance	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
lest	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
lose	VBP	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
advantage	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
commissioner	NN	*	O
Chris	NNP	*	O
Patten	NNP	*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
newspapers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
hinted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
doubts	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attitude	NN	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	ESE
Illegal	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
Combatants	VBZ	(VP*)	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

All	PDT	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
this	DT	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
single	JJ	*	ESE
photograph	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
neat	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
tidy	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
men	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
dressed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
gleaming	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
suits	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
modern	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
instruments	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
coercion	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
blinding	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
eyeglasses	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
masks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
incapacitating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
mouth	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
nose	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
ear-splitting	JJ	*	ESE
ear	NN	*	ESE
phones	NNS	*))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
photograph	NN	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldier	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
officially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
disseminated	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
Navy	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
Internet	NNP	*	O
site	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
edifying	JJ	*	ESE
photograph	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	(NP(NP(QP*	O
viewed	CD	*)	DSE
as	RB	*	O
such	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
explanation	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
deceiving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
photographed	VBN	(VP*	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR(S(SBAR*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
understands	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
correctly	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
shackled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
blinded	VBN	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
27-hour	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
supervision	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
shaved	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
enjoying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
hygienic	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
food	NN	*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
superior	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
known	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Rumsfield	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
ordinarily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
sure	JJ	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
jokes	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
gone	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
off	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
rocker	NN	*))	ESE
once	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
hour	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
ranted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
raved	VBN	*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
hyperbole	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
exaggeration	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
marked	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
reactions	NNS	*)	DSE
generated	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
photograph	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
reminded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
humane	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
legal	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
proper	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	DSE
``	``	*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
aspect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
quite	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
known	VBN	*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(UCP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
or	CC	*	ESE
think	VBP	(VP*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
identities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	JJS	*)	ESE
``	``	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
army	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
general	JJ	(NP*	O
staff	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
theory	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
seem	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
prisoner	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*	ESE
par	NN	*	ESE
excellence	NN	*)))))))	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
confusing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
destroyed	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
without	IN	(VP(PP*	ESE
declaring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
network	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
solidity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
argument	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
though	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
increasingly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
demolished	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
until	IN	(PP*	ESE
proof	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	ESE
legally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
established	JJ	*)	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
refuse	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
school	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
thought	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
refrain	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
interrogating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
indeed	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
release	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
hostilities	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
aware	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
here	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
very	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
solid	JJ	*)	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
ground	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
Rumsfield	NNP	(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
reasonably	RB	*	ESE
consistent	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
saying	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
particular	JJ	*	ESE
case	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
judge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Just	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
the	DT	(X*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))	ESE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Al-Qa	NNP	*)	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
ida	NN	(NP*	ESE
fighter	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
John	NNP	(NP*	O
Walker	NNP	*	O
Lindh	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
shut	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
four	CD	*	ESE
square	JJ	*	ESE
meter	NN	*	ESE
cages	NNS	*))))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
sent	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
prison	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
normal	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
End	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Means	NNPS	*)))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
11	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
behaved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
natural	JJ	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victims	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
deeply	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Americans	NNPS	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
even	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
explained	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*))))))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

Until	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
now	RB	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
right-this	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
right	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
right	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
prefers-has	NNS	*)	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
less	JJR	*))	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
partners	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
distress	NN	*)	ESE
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
photograph	NN	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
inadvertently	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
excess	JJ	(NP*	ESE
self-confidence	NN	*))))))))	ESE
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
process	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
eroding	VBG	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(FRAG*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
longer	RB	*)	DSE
quite	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
ready	JJ	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
follow	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
thinking	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
something	NN	(NP*)	ESE
else	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
deeper	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
diffuse	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Throughout	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	ESE
slightly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
troubling	JJ	*)	ESE
images	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
concrete	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
like	VBP	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
fighters	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
rags	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
haggard	VBD	(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
survivors	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
weeks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
bombing	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
special	NN	*)))))	O
forces	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
equipped	JJ	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
their	PRP$	*	ESE
panopoly	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
soldiers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
arresting	JJ	*	ESE
contrast	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
auxiliaries	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Northern	NNP	*	ESE
Alliance	NNP	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
barefoot	VBD	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
wearing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
sandals	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
snow	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entrance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
caves	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
cleaning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
virtual	JJ	*)	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
communication	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
better	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
monitored	VBN	*))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Marines	NNPS	(NP*))	ESE
protected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
surgical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
masks	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
gloves	NNS	*))	O
transporting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
chained	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
stretchers	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
planes	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
journalists	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
print	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
binoculars	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(PP(ADVP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
intuition	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
than	IN	*	O
on	IN	*	O
images	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
doubts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
match-up	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
means	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
admiration	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
mixed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
fear	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
implacable	JJ	*	ESE
force	NN	*)	ESE
generates	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
airplanes	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
provisional	JJ	(NP*	ESE
epilogue	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
quasi-Orwellian	JJ	*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
totally	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
dominated	JJ	*)	ESE
men	NNS	*)	ESE
deprived	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
senses	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Big	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
Brother	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(UCP(ADJP*	ESE
democratically	RB	*	ESE
elected	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
perforce	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	ESE
bit	RB	*)	ESE
scary	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
27	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Naval	NNP	*	O
Base	NNP	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
firsthand	JJ	*	O
look	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rumsfeld	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
itinerary	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-ray	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	O
watch	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rumsfeld	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
asserted	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
grant	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*	O
status	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
POWs	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
unlawful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Naval	NNP	*	O
Base	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
POWs	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Human	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
France	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
upset	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
classify	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protections	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Space	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
priority	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
21	CD	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Scientific	NNP	*	ESE
Production	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Putin	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
lay	VB	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
claim	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worthy	JJ	*	ESE
place	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
capability	NN	*))))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
abandons	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
programs	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
misinterpretation	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
let	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
understood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kremlin	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
full	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
resolve	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russia	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
place	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civilized	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
capability	NN	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
general	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Aleksandr	NNP	(NP*	O
Medvedev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
devoting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
significantly	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
time	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
cosmonautics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
previous	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))))))	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
examples	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space-rocket	JJ	*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
enterprise	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Vladimir	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Putin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
center	NN	*)))	O
proved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
instructive	JJ	*)	ESE
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
pleasant	VBN	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unlike	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vast	JJ	*	ESE
majority	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
giants	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
industry	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
entirely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
successful	JJ	*)	ESE
enterprise	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*	O
too	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
successful	JJ	*)	ESE
space-rocket	JJ	*	O
firms	NNS	*)	O
not	RB	(PP(CONJP*	O
only	JJ	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
criteria	NNS	*))	O
but	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*))))))	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hard-currency	JJ	*	O
earnings	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
foundation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1993	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
nearing	VBG	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
space-device	JJ	*	O
launches	NNS	*)))	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
annual	JJ	*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
exceeds	VBZ	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
rubles	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Proton	JJ	*	O
family	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rockets	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
produces	VBZ	(VP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
popular	JJ	*)	ESE
commodities	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heavy	JJ	(NP*	O
carriers	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
implementing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
programs	NNS	*)	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
project	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
promising	JJ	*)	ESE
space	NN	*	O
programs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
envisage	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
completely	RB	(ADJP*	O
new	JJ	*)	O
family	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Angara	NNP	(NP*	O
carrier	NN	*	O
rockets	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Plesetsk	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
center	NN	*))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Incidentally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
earned	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
center	NN	*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
main	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
allowed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Plesetsk	NNP	*	O
launch	NN	*	O
pad	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Soviet	JJ	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ukrainian	JJ	*	O
Zenit	NNP	*	O
carrier	NN	*	O
rockets	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
re-equipped	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
upcoming	JJ	*	O
Angara	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
as	RB	*)))))))))))))))))	O
well	RB	(CONJP*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
ground	NN	*	O
infrastructure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
light	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Rokot	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
carriers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
remodeled	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
SS-19	NNP	(NP*	O
ballistic	JJ	*	O
combat	NN	*	O
missiles	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
Vladimir	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
center	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Khrunichev	NNP	*	O
firm	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
godfather	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
January	NNP	*))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
current	JJ	*	O
general	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Medvedev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
position	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
previous	JJ	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Anatoliy	NNP	(NP*	O
Kiselev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
resigned	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
health	NN	(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
enterprise	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
headed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Rosvooruzheniye	NNP	*	O
Head	NNP	*	O
Aleksey	NNP	*	O
Ogarev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
bound	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Boris	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Yeltsin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
family	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
Putin	NNP	(NP*)	O
vetoed	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
minute	NN	*))))	O
--	:	*	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
general	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
appointed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))	O
personally	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Vladimir	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
insistently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tackle	VB	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
problems	NNS	*)))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Rosaviakosmos	NNP	(NP*	O
Head	NNP	*	O
Yuriy	NNP	*	O
Koptev	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
colleagues	NNS	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
wish	NN	*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Plesetsk	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
center	NN	*)))))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
federal	JJ	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
planning	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gradually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
transfer	VB	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
launches	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Baykonur	NN	*))	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
connected	VBN	(ADJP*	O
both	DT	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
considerations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economy	NN	(NP*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
$	$	(FRAG(NP(QP*	O
115	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lease	VB	(VP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
space	NN	*	O
sovereignty	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
:	:	*	O
After	IN	(NP*	O
all	DT	(NP*))))))	O
it	PRP	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launches	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
devices	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Incidentally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reminded	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
sovereignty	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
center	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Turkmen	NNP	*	O
colleague	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
Ashgabat	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
compensation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
so-called	JJ	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
fall	NN	*	O
sites	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
Three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Turkmen	JJ	*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
over	RB	(NP(QP*	O
one	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
hectares	NNS	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
spent	VBN	*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
stages	NNS	*)	O
fall	VBP	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
stipulated	JJ	*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
payment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*)))))))	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
70,000	CD	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
dismissal	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Minister	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Interior	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Justice	NNP	(NP*	O
Luis	NNP	*	O
Miquilena	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
up	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
point	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
put	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
triggers	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
red	JJ	*	ESE
light	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Colombia	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
border	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dramatic	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
happening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
notice	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
necessities	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
known	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
influence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
advice	NN	(NP*))	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	O
than	IN	*	O
once	RB	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
Government	NNP	*)	ESE
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)	ESE
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
link	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
considerably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
decree	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
package	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
49	CD	(NP(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nationalizing	VBG	*	O
character	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
affect	VBP	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
everything	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
petroleum	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
land	VB	(VP*	O
ownership	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shortly	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
after	IN	*	O
that	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occasion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
twin	JJ	*	O
towers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
reaction	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
straining	VBG	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
short	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
tumultuous	JJ	*)	ESE
time	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
achieved	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
electoral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
means	NNS	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
mutiny	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
arouses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
fears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
oldest	JJS	*	O
democracy	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
election	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
election	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
plebiscite	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
plebiscite	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
rapidly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
coup	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
logical	JJ	*	O
consequence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clashes	NNS	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	(NP*	O
Palace	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outside	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
expresses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
discontent	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
resounding	JJ	(NP*	ESE
pots-and-pans	JJ	*	ESE
demonstrations	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
cracks	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
appearing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
13	CD	*	O
parties	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
supported	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
rise	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consequence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))	O
--	:	*))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
union	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
radical	JJ	(NP*	O
left-wing	JJ	*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
populist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bad	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*	O
management	NN	*)	O
complicates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
team	NN	*))))	O
expose	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
cracks	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reaction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
street	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
radical	JJ	*	O
wing	NN	*)	O
opposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
moderate	JJ	*	O
wing	NN	*)	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
dialogue	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
tension	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
raises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
head	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
plots	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
shape	NN	(NP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
noise	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pots	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pans	NNS	*)))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
poor	JJ	*	ESE
job	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
hiding	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
disobedience	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
indication	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
entered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
stage	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
forms	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
wretched	JJ	*	ESE
background	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ideological	JJ	*	ESE
experiments	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	*	O
Constitution	NNP	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
approved	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
plebiscite	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	ESE
recession	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
decades	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
alleviated	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
petroleum	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eight	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
hundred	CD	*	ESE
firms	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
closed	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
doors	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Half	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
active	JJ	*	ESE
population	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
informal	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(X(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
that	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
stands	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
brutal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
contrast	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1970	CD	*	O
's	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
petroleum	NN	*	O
boom	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Andres	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Perez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
socialist	JJ	*	O
Little	NNP	*	O
Father	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
200	CD	*	ESE
billion	CD	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*)))	O
royalties	NNS	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
squandered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
benefit	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
petroleum	NN	(NP*)))	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
drain	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
path	NN	*)	O
followed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
open	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)))	O
failed	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aperitif	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
probable	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
coup	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
inside	NN	*)	O
out	IN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Poll	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
invited	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE

Presidential	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Reporter	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
PRESIDENT	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(VP(VP(NP*)	O
invited	VBD	*	DSE
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
individual	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
observe	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forthcoming	JJ	*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
election	NN	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
observers	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
ACP/European	European	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
teams	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
invited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
observe	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
9	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
include	VB	(VP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
interfering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
politics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tradition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
holding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
open	JJ	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
inviting	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
governments	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
witness	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
proudly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
exercise	VB	*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
freely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
elect	VB	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Unity/Africa	Africa	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OAU/AU	AU	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Sadc	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Common	JJ	*	O
Market	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Comesa	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
West	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Ecowas	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Non-Aligned	JJ	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NAM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
excluding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*))))	O
;	:	*)))))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
ACP-EU	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
excluding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ACP	NNP	*)))))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Advancement	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Coloured	NNP	(NP*	O
People	NNS	*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NAACP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))	O
;	:	*	O
individuals	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
invited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
capacities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Sadc	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
invited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
appealed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
churches	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
farmers	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
unions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
trade	NN	(NP*	O
unions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
associations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
media	NNS	(NP*	O
houses	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
women	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
youth	NN	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
civic	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
exchange	VB	(VP*	DSE
views	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
ending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
conducive	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
fair	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
peaceful	JJ	*)	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
do	VB	(VP*	DSE
everything	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ensure	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attainment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
welcome	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Britain	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
soured	VBD	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*))))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
sponsorship	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
MDC	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
player	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
politics	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
impartial	JJ	*	ESE
observer	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Britain	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(ADVP*	O
late	RB	*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forefront	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
recalling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
supreme	JJ	*	ESE
sacrifice	NN	*)	ESE
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
self-determination	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pride	NN	*)	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
exercising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
elect	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
do	VB	(VP*	DSE
everything	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ensure	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
exercise	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
right	NN	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
interference	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
quarter	NN	*	O
whatsoever	RB	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
internal	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*	O
or	CC	*	O
external	JJ	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
My	PRP$	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
practice	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
accrediting	VBG	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
embassies	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forthcoming	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
laws	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
regulations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dates	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
election	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
9	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
steps	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
course	NN	(NP*	O
various	JJ	*	O
processes	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
smooth	JJ	*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
satisfaction	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
preparations	NNS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
once	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
underline	VB	(VP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
established	JJ	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
tradition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
holding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
regular	JJ	(NP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attainment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
provided	VBN	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Constitution	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*)))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
statements	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	DSE
West	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
make	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
mind	NN	*))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
do	VB	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
mind	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
proceed	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
proceeded	VBD	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
remember	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
pronouncements	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
fair	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
anywhere	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
incident	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
example	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
British	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
deputy	NN	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Prescott	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
punched	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protester	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
hit	VBN	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
egg	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
run	NN	*)	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
demonising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tradition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
regular	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
union	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
quick	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
alliances	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Uganda	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rwanda	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tradition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
violated	VBN	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
invading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Cde	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
representing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
years	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
experience	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
before	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(PP*	O
campaign	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
appeal	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
improve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
planned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Centre	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
intended	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
warning	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
abandon	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
anti-Arab	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
warning	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
heeded	VBD	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
accomplished	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
no	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
social	JJ	*)	ESE
force	NN	*)	ESE
within	IN	(PP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
accomplish	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
memory	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
gift	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
pro-Israel	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
notion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right-wing	JJ	*	ESE
Zionist	NNP	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
ardently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
propelled	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
right-wing	JJ	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dream	NN	*)	ESE
come	VBN	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
pro-Israel	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Soon	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Centre	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
witness	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
concerted	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
cast	VB	(VP*	DSE
Arabs	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
successful	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
seriously	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
challenged	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
Americans	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
struggling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
merely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
distance	VB	*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	ESE
signs	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
newly-shaped	JJ	*	ESE
American	JJ	*	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
surface	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Complete	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
disregard	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
plight	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))	ESE
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
timid	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
warnings	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
show	VB	(VP*	O
restraint	NN	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
indicative	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	DSE
political	JJ	*	DSE
perspective	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
American	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
worlds	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
much	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADVP*	ESE
before	IN	*)	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
since	IN	(S(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
tactful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
manoeuvring	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
way	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
forthright	VB	(VP*	ESE
disregard	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
viewpoint	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
beginning	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Arab-American	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
argue	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
viewpoint	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
decision-making	JJ	*	O
quarters	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whatever	WDT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
little	JJ	*	ESE
leverage	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
moderate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
bias	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
disappeared	VBD	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Centre	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
disheartening	JJ	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fledgling	JJ	*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tremendous	JJ	*	ESE
amount	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
progress	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
introducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
legitimate	JJ	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
constituents	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
scene	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
once	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
hoped	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
well-organised	JJ	*	O
Arab	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
community	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Arab	JJ	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
injecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
viewpoint	NN	*)	DSE
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
discourse	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
bad	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
prospects	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
change	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
juncture	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
fresh	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
doomed	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
failure	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
need	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
partnership	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
existing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
communities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
counterbalance	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
anti-Muslim	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dynamic	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
changing	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
swayed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
presented	VBN	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
consistent	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
chance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
grasp	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
viewpoint	NN	*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Americans	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
innately	RB	*)	ESE
biased	VBN	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Arabs	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
influence	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
small	JJ	(S(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(VP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
enthusiastic	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Arab-American	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
mutual	JJ	(NP*	ESE
respect	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
understanding	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
case	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
change	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
grassroots	NNS	*	O
level	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
costs	VBZ	(VP*	O
money	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
sustained	VBN	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
organisation	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
communities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
progress	NN	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	O
considerable	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
much	RB	(S(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
can	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
accomplished	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
closer	JJR	(S(NP*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
potential	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
change	NN	(NP*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Supporting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
schools	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
community	NN	(S(NP*	O
centres	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
starting	JJ	*	ESE
point	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Cuito	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Jan	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Angop	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
road	NN	*	O
convoy	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
from	IN	*	O
Benguela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
1,500	CD	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assorted	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
goods	NNS	*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuito	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bie	NNP	(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
22	CD	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
aim	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shortages	NNS	*)	O
faced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
convoy	NN	(NP*	O
chief	NN	*	O
Eusebio	NNP	*	O
da	NNP	*	O
Silva	NNP	*	O
Ferreira	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
convoy	NN	*)	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
35	CD	(NP*	O
trucks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ferried	VBD	(VP*	O
720	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
corn	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
623	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peas	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
157	CD	(NP(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
beans	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
above	JJ	*)	O
mentioned	VBD	(VP*	O
products	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
offset	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	O
social	JJ	*)	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
460,000	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
need	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
province	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
aid	NN	*	O
goods	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Food	NNP	*	O
Program	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
WFP	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
cutting	VBG	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP(NP*	O
transportation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bie	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
3,500	CD	(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
2,000	CD	(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
involved	VBN	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
landing	NN	*	O
strip	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WFP	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
necessary	JJ	*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
need	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
estimated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
total	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
460,000	CD	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
28	CD	*)	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
convened	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
uncomfortable	JJ	*	ESE
meeting	NN	*))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
debated	VBN	(VP*)))))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
early	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*	O
before	RB	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	*	ESE
split	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
opinions	NNS	*))))))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Vice	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Dick	NNP	*	O
Cheney	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
John	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ashcroft	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
general	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
prosecutor	NN	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
chief	NN	(NX*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
CIA	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Director	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Tenet	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
General	NNP	(NP*	O
Richard	NNP	*	O
B.	NNP	*	O
Myers	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Chiefs	NNPS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Staff	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
participated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
business	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
stake	NN	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
apparently	RB	(UCP(ADJP*	ESE
simple	JJ	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
recently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
transferred	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eventually	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reconsider	VB	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
short	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
previously	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
admitted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(ADVP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
opinion	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
exception	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
favorable	JJ	*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	NN	*))))	O
:	:	*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
publicly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	*	O
owing	JJ	(S(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
President	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
firmness	NN	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
announcing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
unyielding	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
first	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
pro-Taliban	JJ	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
defined	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
duty	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
prisoner-of-war	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
regulates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
category	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detained	VBG	(NP*	O
combatants	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
actual	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
discussing	VBG	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
privileges	NNS	*)	O
ensured	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
act	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
detained	JJ	*	O
combatant	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reveal	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interrogator	NN	*	O
anything	NN	*)	O
other	JJ	(PP*	O
than	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
rank	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
serial	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
birth	NN	(NP*	O
date	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
most	RBS	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
detail	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*)))))	ESE
--	:	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
forces	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
holds	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
release	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
over	RP	(ADJP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
likelihood	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consultation	NN	*)	O
--	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
rather	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
brief	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
--	:	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Ashcroft	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Cheney	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Obviously	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
simplified	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
allowed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
judiciary	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
investigation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
sees	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
fit	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*)	DSE
very	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
much	RB	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
so	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
identity	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
citizenship	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
killers	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
languages	NNS	*))	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
nuances	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
rather	RB	(PP*	O
than	IN	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
conventional	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
reasons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
easy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
circulated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
newspapers	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
England	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Yemen	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Algeria	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
Sweden	NNP	(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
!	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saudi	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP*))	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
158	CD	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Saudi	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
exaggerated	JJ	*)))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Interior	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Prince	NNP	*	O
Saud	NNP	*	O
Nayif	NNP	*)	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
repatriated	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
surprise	NN	*)	DSE
--	:	(PRN*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*	O
tours	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
accept	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
validity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pro-Taliban	JJ	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*	DSE
assertions	NNS	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
obvious	JJ	*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
and	CC	(NP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	O
European	NNP	*))	O
governmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
non-governmental	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
subjected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(PP*	O
following	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
publication	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
images	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*	O
camp	NN	*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
interpreted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
ways	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
played	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
key	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Sometimes	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unexpectedly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
tough	JJ	*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Kenneth	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Roth	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
executive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Watch	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
choose	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
wage	NN	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
guns	NNS	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
bombs	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
soldiers	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
then	RB	(S(NP*)	ESE
assert	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
apply	VB	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
Powell	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
agrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
grant	VB	(VP*	DSE
prisoner-of-war	JJ	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
captives	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
refusal	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
precedent	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
affect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fate	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
soldiers	NNS	*)	ESE
sent	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
risky	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
areas	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
planet	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
baffled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opinion	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
shortly	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
afterward	RB	*)	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
sided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
interpretations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
individual	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
question	NN	(NP*)))	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Condoleezza	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rice	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
adviser	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
played	VBD	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opinion	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
dispute	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
opinions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)))))	O
became	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
applied	JJ	(NP*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Eventually	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sum	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
offered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
advisers	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Geneva	NNP	*	ESE
Convention	NNP	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
special	JJ	*	ESE
status	NN	*)	ESE
comes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
designated	VBN	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
repatriation	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
consideration	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
over	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
reconsidered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*)))	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
diverse	JJ	(NP*	DSE
reactions	NNS	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
irony	NN	(NP*)	ESE
--	:	*	ESE
including	VBG	(PP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sober	NN	*)	ESE
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wrote	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
twice	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
pro-Taliban	JJ	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
`	``	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*)	O
then	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
stopped	VBD	*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
word	NN	*)	O
`	``	*	O
detainees	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
first	JJ	(NP*	ESE
sight	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
terminology	JJ	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
details	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
cold-blood	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
accomplices	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
murder	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
al-Qa	JJ	*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
ida	NN	*	ESE
disciples	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Bay	NNP	*)))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
--	:	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
proves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
capable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
admitting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
infallible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
equivalent	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
detail	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
let	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
remember	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
harassed	VBD	(VP*	O
everywhere	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
commentators	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
leader	NN	*)	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
thought	VBD	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
finding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
monkeys	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Romanian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Adrian	NNP	*	O
Nastase	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
media	NN	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
scapegoats	NNS	*))))	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
weirdoes	NNS	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
use	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
hundreds	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
websites	NNS	(NP*)))	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jews	NNPS	*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
exterminate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Club	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
attempting	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
perpetuate	VB	(VP*	O
colonial	JJ	(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)))))	O
'	''	*))	O

Herald	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Reporter	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
THE	DT	(S(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
yesterday	NN	*)	O
lambasted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
attempting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
perpetuate	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
opening	NN	*	O
address	NN	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
land	NN	*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cde	NNP	(NP*	O
Stan	NNP	*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
tired	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
dictated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Ministerial	NNP	*	O
Action	NNP	*	O
Group	NNP	*)))))	O
instead	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
of	IN	*)	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
engaged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
dialogue	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
mandate	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
proud	JJ	*)	ESE
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
or	CC	*	O
neo-colonial	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Too	RB	(S(S(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*)	ESE
blood	NN	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
shed	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
much	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
suffering	NN	*)	ESE
endured	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
regain	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
anyone	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
either	RB	*	O
dictate	VB	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
intimidate	VB	*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
submission	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Cde	NNP	(NP*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Soon	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Sadc	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
or	CC	*	O
participate	VB	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
form	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
talked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Sadc	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
ever	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
form	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
taskforce	JJ	(NP*	O
chairperson	NN	*))	O
Ms	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Lilian	NNP	*	O
Patel	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Malawi	NNP	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
indicated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
targeted	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Zanu-PF	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
addressing	VBG	(VP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
issued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
ultimatums	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
imposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
unofficial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
stood	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
honest	JJ	(NP*	ESE
negotiations	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
complying	VBG	(SBAR(S(S(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
demands	NNS	*))))))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
former	JJ	*	ESE
colonial	JJ	*	ESE
masters	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	JJ	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
follow	NN	*)	O
up	RB	*)	O
to	TO	*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
summit	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Malawi	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ms	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Lilian	NNP	*	O
Patel	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
required	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
mature	JJ	*)	ESE
approach	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sadc	NNP	(NP*)))	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
require	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
careful	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
mature	JJ	*)	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
mutual	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
understanding	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
patience	NN	*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
complexity	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Ms	NNP	(NP*	O
Patel	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
taskforce	NN	*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
constructive	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
dialogue	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
key	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
solving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
taskforce	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
resolved	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Government	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Malawi	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
initiatives	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Supervisory	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
identified	VBN	(VP*	O
trainers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
monitors	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
countrywide	JJ	*	O
voter	NN	*	O
education	NN	*	O
programme	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
underway	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ESC	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
co-ordinate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drafting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
code	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
conduct	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
consultation	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
intending	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
contest	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inviting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)))))	O
started	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Members	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ministerial	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	O
briefed	JJ	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Cde	NNP	(NP*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
chance	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
political	JJ	(S(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
party	NN	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	DSE
campaigns	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
political	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
inviting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chiefs	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
churches	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
media	NNS	(NP*	O
houses	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
civic	JJ	(NP*	O
organisations	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
charting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
finding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
curtailing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Government	NN	*)	ESE
continues	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
uphold	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
freedom	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
expression	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
anyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
having	VBG	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
custody	NN	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
expressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(ADJP*	O
or	CC	*	O
her	PRP$	*)	O
own	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Blantyre	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Cde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
judiciary	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
remained	VBN	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADVP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
shown	VBN	(FRAG(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*))	O
MDC	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Combined	VBN	*	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
Residents	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sadc	NNP	*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
39	CD	*)	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
assured	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	DSE
invitation	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(NP(NP*	O
less	JJR	(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
39	CD	*)	O
members	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
shall	MD	(S(VP*	O
observe	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
provinces	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
4,500	CD	*)	O
poling	JJ	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sadc	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
forum	NNP	*	O
Mr	NNP	*	O
Sam	NNP	*	O
Mpasu	NNP	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Blantyre	NNP	(NP*)))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Parliament	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
14-member	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Mpasu	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one-day	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mpasu	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crucial	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
March	NNP	(NP*	O
9	CD	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*)))	O
election	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Sadc	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
invited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
invited	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
comprise	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
nations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
explicitly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
exclude	VBP	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
spearheaded	VBN	(VP*	O
criticism	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sources	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Sadc	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Pretoria	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
separate	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sadc	JJ	*	O
team	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
invite	VB	(VP*	DSE
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
specifically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
invited	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Nigeria	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sadc	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
comprises	VBZ	(VP*	O
Angola	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Botswana	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Mozambique	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Malawi	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Mauritius	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tanzania	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Lesotho	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Seychelles	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Swaziland	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zambia	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Members	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
guests	NNS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
applauded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
70	CD	(NP(QP*	DSE
times	NNS	*))	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Annual	JJ	*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
address	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
changed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
warning	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
evil	JJ	*	ESE
empire	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Ronald	NNP	*	O
Reagan	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
communism	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	(NP*	ESE
access	NN	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
enemy	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
enemy	NN	*)	O
comprises	VBZ	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
specifically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
named	VBD	*	DSE
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
formerly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
referred	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
as	RB	(NP(NP*	O
pariah	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP*	ESE
nations	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
definition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
term	NN	*	O
pariah	NN	*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
obstacle	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
prohibits	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
prevents	VBZ	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
details	NNS	(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
transpires	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
living	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
threatened	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
tens	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
thousands	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	RBR	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
trained	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
scattered	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
scores	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nations	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
upped	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
intensity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military-political	JJ	*	O
rhetoric	NN	*))))	DSE
but	CC	*	O
kept	VBD	(VP*	ESE
things	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
vague	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
regarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Bill	NNP	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
administration	NN	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
encourage	VB	(VP*	DSE
rapprochement	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
Koreas	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
striking	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
obstructing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
stability	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
mentioning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
affirmed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
thinking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
surprised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
repeated	VBN	*	DSE
reference	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
among	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
make	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
access	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
following	VBG	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
operations	NNS	*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hints	NNS	*)	ESE
suggesting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
viewing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
angle	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*))))))	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mixed	JJ	*	ESE
signals	NNS	*)	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
represent	VBP	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
true	JJ	*	ESE
reflection	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
years	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
authority	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
speaking	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP*	O
voices	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
regards	NNP	(NP*	O
Iraq	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hints	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*))))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
hints	NNS	*)	ESE
suggesting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
resort	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
means	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
isolation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
boycott	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
limited	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
smell	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
danger	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tough	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
reviewing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scattered	JJ	*	ESE
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
single	JJ	*	ESE
front	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proliferation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cold	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*	O
era	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
notion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
anti-communism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
mistakes	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
mistakes	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
feared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
cover	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	DSE
goals	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
underlining	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
unilateral	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
dropping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
important	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
recall	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP*))	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11th	JJ	*	O
attacks	NN	*))))))	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
coordinate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
partners	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
questions	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
arise	VBP	(S(VP*))))	ESE
are	VBZ	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
will	MD	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
reconcile	VB	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
pressure	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consult	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
friends	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
embarking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	DSE
goals	NNS	*))	DSE
without	IN	(PP*	O
telling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
means	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
goals	NNS	*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seek	VBP	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
acquire	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
threatening	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
support	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
threatening	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
firmness	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
apparent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)))))))	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	DSE
goals	NNS	*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
If	IN	(FRAG*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
man	NN	*)))	O
...	:	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)))	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
shut	VBN	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	(S*	O
humane	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
concentration	NN	*	ESE
camp	NN	*)	ESE
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
resembles	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
dog	NN	*	ESE
pound	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
dog	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
or	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	*	ESE
shacks	NNS	(NP*))))	O
;	:	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
cages	JJ	*	ESE
measuring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
1.5	CD	(NP*	O
mt.	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP*	O
mt.	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
just	RB	(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
over	IN	*	O
2	CD	*)	O
mt.	NN	*)	O
high	JJ	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
corrugated	JJ	*	O
iron	NN	*	O
roof	NN	*)	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
little	JJ	*	O
shade	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
walls	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
call	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
wire	NN	(NP*	O
fencing	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
shelter	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
best	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
heat	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
never	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
30	CD	*	O
degree	NN	*	O
Celsius	NNS	*))))))))	O
mark	VBP	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
winter	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sharp	JJ	*	O
shooters	NNS	*)	O
posted	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
turrets	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
patrols	NNS	*)))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
Alsatian	JJ	*	O
dogs	NNS	*)))	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
lose	VB	(VP*	O
sight	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
not	RB	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
even	RB	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
latter	JJ	*	O
attempt	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
catch	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
sleep	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
5	CD	*	O
cm	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
thick	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
foam	NN	*)	O
rubber	NN	(NP*	O
mattresses	NNS	*)))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
use	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sanitary	JJ	*	O
bucket	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
stands	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
segregated	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
proper	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Everything	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
visible	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	(SBAR*	O
like	JJ	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
x-ray	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
accusations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
ill	JJ	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
completely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
untrue	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
humane	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
legal	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
proper	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
compatible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
which	WDT	(NP*	O
topic	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
incidentally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
combatants	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fell	VBD	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
judge	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
examine	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appeal	NN	*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
associations	NNS	*)))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
demanding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
trial	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
chosen	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
chosen	VBN	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
foremost	RB	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
claim	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
laid	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)	O
guarantees	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
foreigners	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
second	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
or	CC	*	O
out	IN	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*)))))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
helicopter	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
not	RB	(SINV(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
escape	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
associations	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
organize	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
protest	NN	*	ESE
rally	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
place	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
Pig	NNP	*	O
Meat	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Well	UH	(FRAG(INTJ*)	O
,	,	*	O
Actually	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
No	DT	(NP*	O
Meat	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
All	DT	(NP*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
emerge	VBP	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
cages	NNS	*	ESE
only	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
shower	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
short	JJ	*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
walk	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
move	VBP	(VP*	O
around	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chain	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
foot	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
each	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
watched	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
fully	RB	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
marines	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
all	RB	*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hair	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
beards	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
shaved	VBD	(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*	O
off	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
also	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	*	O
reasons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hygiene	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
pride	NN	(NP*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
food	NN	*)	O
rations	VBZ	(VP*	O
provided	VBD	(PP*	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
compatible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tenets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
faith	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(FRAG(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*))	O
:	:	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pig	NN	*	O
meat	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
meat	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
animals	NNS	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
blood	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	O
removed	VBN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
actual	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
none	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
witnesses	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
meat	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
diet	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
beans	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
rice	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cabbage	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bread	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
milk	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eastern	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Arabic	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
bearing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
legend	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Qibla	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
word	NN	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
point	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mecca	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
every	DT	(S(NP*	O
Muslim	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
obliged	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
praying	VBG	(S(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
privileges	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reassuringly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
offers	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
hot	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
showers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
toilets	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
clean	JJ	(NP*	O
clothing	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
blankets	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
regular	JJ	(NP*	O
food	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
practice	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
faith	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
clothing	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
question	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
training	NN	*	O
suit	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
identical	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
toilets	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
only	JJ	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
however	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
improvements	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sanitary	JJ	*	O
arrangements	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
23	CD	(NP*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
158	CD	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
airlift	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
virtually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
room	NN	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
work	NN	(S(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
bigger	JJR	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
better	JJR	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Department	NNP	(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*)))	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
part	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
international	JJ	(S(NP*	O
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
``	``	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
War	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))	O
...	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Out	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
European	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
only	JJ	(NP*	ESE
British	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
subscribes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decisions	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
War	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
French	JJ	(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
Le	NNP	*	O
Monde	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
safeguarding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clearly	RB	(NP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Pentagon	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
foremost	JJ	*	ESE
concern	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Europe	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
shoulder	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
task	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
dithering	VBG	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
days	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
editorials	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
such	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
also	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
treats	VBZ	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Los	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Angeles	NNP	*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Judge	NNP	*	O
Howard	NNP	*	O
Maz	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
31	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
January	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
submit	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
memorandum	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
leveled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
associations	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
accusers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
turn	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
14	CD	(NP*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
memorandum	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
judge	NN	*)	O
himself	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*))))	DSE
confessed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
harboring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
doubts	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
jurisdiction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
affair	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Johnny	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Walker	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
citizen	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
compatriots	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
subjected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
fate	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
jail	NN	*	O
close	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
assisted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
team	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(ADJP*	O
Arabian	NNP	*)	O
media	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
quick	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
pick	VB	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
difference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
treatment	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
apply	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Arabs	NNPS	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concentration	NN	*	ESE
camp	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
apply	VB	(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
black	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
held	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
jail	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
southern	JJ	*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))))	ESE
until	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
ago	RB	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
book	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
Beloved	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
won	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pulitzer	NNP	*	O
prize	NN	*)	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1988	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
writer	NN	(NP*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Morrison	NNP	*)	O
describes	VBZ	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
far	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
worse	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
prevailing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Camp	NNP	(NP*	ESE
X-Ray	NNP	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
back	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
then	RB	*)	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
maintained	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
overly	RB	*	ESE
humane	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Celso	NNP	*	O
Lafer	NNP	*)	O
transmitted	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
warning	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
United	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
spent	VBD	(VP*	O
30	CD	(NP*	O
minutes	NNS	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
without	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
help	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
enter	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
social	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rebellion	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
front	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
geopolitical	JJ	(NP*	O
instability	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Powell	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Planalto	NNP	*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
interest	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	RB	(ROOT(NP(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
future	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
pessimistic	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
overwhelming	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
commented	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))	O
capable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
administering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
floating	VBG	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inflation	NN	(NP*	O
goals	NNS	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
safety	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debilitated	JJ	*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
restructuring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tax	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elaboration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ensures	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
fiscal	JJ	(NP*	O
discipline	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Without	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
help	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
via	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
attain	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
basic	JJ	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
social	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*)	O
stability	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
could	MD	(S(S(VP*	ESE
contaminate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
subcontinent	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Lafer	NNP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
La	JJ	*	O
plata	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
rebellion	NN	*)))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Celso	NNP	*	O
Lafer	NNP	*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
dramatic	JJ	*	DSE
warning	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
conversation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
fate	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
seems	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
choice	NN	*)))))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pave	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
social	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rebellion	NN	*)))))))	ESE
there	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
contaminate	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
continent	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
instability	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
planet	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentina	NNP	*	O
theme	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Lafer	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
talks	NNS	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Don	NNP	*	O
Evans	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Representative	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Zoellick	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Planalto	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Evans	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Zoellick	NNP	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
interest	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nothing	NN	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Translating	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
roughly	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Minister	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Lafer	NNP	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
tell	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
rescue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
multilateral	JJ	*	O
credit	NN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
lower	JJR	(UCP(NP(NP(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	RB	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
chaos	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
social	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
why	WRB	(FRAG(WHADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	(NP*)	ESE
?	.	*)	O
-	:	*)	O
military	JJ	(PP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
continent	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
complex	JJ	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
above	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Colombia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Andres	NNPS	*	O
Pastrana	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Revolutionary	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Colombia	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
FARC	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
attempt	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomacy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Pastrana	NNP	(NP*)	O
lost	VBD	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
credibility	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
failed	VBN	*	ESE
bet	NN	*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
FARC	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
letting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
control	NN	(VP(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Switzerland	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heart	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
continent	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
add	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
growth	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
focus	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dissatisfaction	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
tending	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
express	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
outside	IN	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
institutional	JJ	*	ESE
control	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Argentine	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
society	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
divorcing	VBG	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
an	DT	*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
radical	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
responses	NNS	*)	ESE
germinate	VBP	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
authoritarian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
regimes	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
guerrilla	NN	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ill	JJ	*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
contaminate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
nearest	JJS	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Paraguay	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Uruguay	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bolivia	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
guarantee	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
destabilization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
bypass	VB	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Chile	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
memories	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
dictatorship	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
strong	JJ	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
ignore	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
only	RB	(ADVP(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
all	PDT	(S(NP(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Peru	NNP	*))	O
-	:	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
generals	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

political	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*)	O
argument	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conversations	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
transcends	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
economic-financial	JJ	*	O
discussions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
subject	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
restricted	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)))))))	O
encompasses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
survival	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tries	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sensitize	VB	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
geopolitical	JJ	(NP*	O
arguments	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
account	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
destabilization	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
complicated	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
India	NNP	*	O
versus	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
badly-resolved	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Eastern	NNP	(NP*	O
Europe	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
strategic	JJ	*	ESE
vision	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
assessment	NN	*)))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Planalto	NNP	(NP*	O
Palace	NNP	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
emphasized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
Lafer	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
meetings	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Zoellick	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Evans	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
future	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
pessimistic	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stress	NN	*	ESE
factor	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
content	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
needs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
steps	NNS	*)	ESE
absolutely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
reconstruction	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
sources	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
guiding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
analyses	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
department	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
underway	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
neighboring	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
gathered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
10	CD	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
abdicated	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
functions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
currency	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
credit	NN	*	O
manager	NN	*)))))))	O
-	:	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
capable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
floating	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inflation	NN	(NP*	O
goals	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
safety	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
health	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
undermined	JJ	*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
restructuring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tax	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
tax	NN	*	O
collection	NN	*	O
machine	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
so	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
many	JJ	*)	ESE
uncertainties	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fiscal	JJ	*	O
responsibility	NN	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
imposes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
discipline	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
central	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
provinces	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
minimum	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
overwhelming	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
comments	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Alone	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(UCP(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
command	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
managed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
explained	VBN	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
survival	NN	*	ESE
instinct	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
attain	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
basic	JJ	*)	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
social	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*)	O
stability	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
does	VBZ	(SQ*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
affect	VB	(VP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
nature	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
surely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
resort	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Ortega	NNP	(NP*	O
y	NNP	*	O
Gasset	NNP	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
I	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
save	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
save	VB	(VP*	ESE
myself	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
projection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
'	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
evoked	VBN	(VP*	O
world-wide	JJ	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Russian	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	*	O
Kasyanov	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Dick	NNP	*	O
Cheney	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
proliferation	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
substantiate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
charge	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

French	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
rhetoric	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
evil	JJ	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
suitable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
realities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Former	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Madeleine	NNP	*	O
Albright	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
big	JJ	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
lumping	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
together	RB	(ADJP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
each	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

NATO	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Lord	NNP	*	O
Robertson	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
credible	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
prerequisite	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
NATO	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
lumping	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
'	''	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
raised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
image	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
rather	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
tarnished	VBN	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
expects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mature	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
compassionate	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
civilised	JJ	*)	ESE
conduct	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
superpower	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
smaller	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
weaker	JJR	*)	ESE
nations	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
targeting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*))))))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pursuit	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
global	JJ	*	DSE
agenda	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
worked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
eliminate	VB	(VP*	ESE
injustice	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
harass	VB	(VP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
prejudices	NNS	*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
expects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
civilised	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
conduct	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arrogance	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
discrimination	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
injustice	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
treading	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
path	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
coercion	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
blackmailing	NN	*)))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
smaller	JJR	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
weaker	JJR	*)	O
nations	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
intolerant	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
dissent	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
domination	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
total	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
negation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lofty	JJ	*	ESE
principles	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
morality	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
ethic	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
democracy	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
assertively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
holds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
dear	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
fought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
successfully	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
better	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
withdraw	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
forces	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
injustice	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
tyranny	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
oppression	NN	*))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Fight	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
poverty	NN	(NP*)))	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
productive	JJ	*	ESE
effort	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
injustice	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
breeds	JJ	*	ESE
hatred	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
revolt	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Let	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	ESE
Middle	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
East	NNP	*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
test	NN	*	ESE
ground	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
sincerity	NN	*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
fight	NN	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
unfettered	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
injustice	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
distortion	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)))	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
removed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

n	VBP	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
President	NNP	*)	O
named	VBN	(VP*))))	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
cou	NN	*)))	O

whose	WP$	(ROOT(SBAR(WHNP*	O
regimes	JJ	(NP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(S(S(NP*)	ESE
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
pose	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*)	O
These	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	ESE
which	WDT	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
described	VBD	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O
He	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
named	VBD	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
a	NNP	*)))))))	O

on	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
blacklist	JJ	(SBAR(FRAG(ADJP*	O
.	.	*)	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presentation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
references	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
objects	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
extraordinary	JJ	*	DSE
attention	NN	*)))))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
thus	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
exhausted	VBN	*)))	O
.	.	*))))	O
Why	VBZ	(VP*	O
Such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*))	O
Selection	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
?	.	*)	ESE
It	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
open	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
question	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
such	PDT	(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
selection	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O
What	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
d	NN	*))))))))))	O

ce	VBP	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Hamas	JJ	*	ESE
movement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	ESE
supporters	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
hesitate	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
methods	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
resistance	NN	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
occupation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
say	VB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)))	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chechen	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
radicals	NNS	*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
s	NN	*)))))))	O

hods	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
establishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))))))	O
?	.	*	O
Incidentally	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
founders	NNS	*)))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
State	NN	*)))	O
once	RB	(ADVP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
hesitate	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
methods	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
either	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
...	:	*	O
No	UH	(S(INTJ*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
yield	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
apparent	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
any	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
opportu	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	ESE

selectivity	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
analysis	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
only	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
jeopardize	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(SBAR(X(NP(NP*	DSE
success	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*)))	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*)	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
perceived	VBN	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	O
sensitively	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	NNP	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Islamic	JJ	(FRAG(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
.	.	*)))))	O
An	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Almost-Missile	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
Trio	NNP	(NP*	O
Wh	NNP	*))))	DSE

omes	VBZ	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
answering	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
George	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
mentioned	VBD	(VP*)))))))))	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
People	NNS	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
Republic	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seven	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
regimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*))))))))))))	O

ers	VBD	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	ESE
``	``	(SBAR(SINV*	ESE
rogue	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	O
bit	RB	*)	O
clearer	JJR	*))	O
.	.	*)))	O
The	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
compared	VBN	(S(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
remaining	VBG	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blacklist	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Syria	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sudan	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Somalia	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
trio	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greatest	JJS	*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
effort	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
obtain	VB	(VP*	O
missile	NN	(NP(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
chemical	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
bacteriological	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
``	``	(NP(NP*	ESE
States	NNP	*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
allies	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
cons	NNS	(NP*)))))	O

an	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
arming	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
threaten	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O
By	IN	(PP*	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
regimes	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
pose	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grave	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
growing	VBG	(NP*	ESE
danger	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(PP*))))	DSE

ould	NN	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	DSE
provide	VBP	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
However	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
proceed	VB	(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
trio	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
reactions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
most	RBS	(SBAR(WHNP(ADJP*	ESE
critical	JJ	*)	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
shaking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
finger	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
warning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
Analysts	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
pointing	VBG	(VP*	O
o	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O

this	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
policy	NN	*)	O
weakens	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moderate	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
plays	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fundamentalists	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
there	RB	*	ESE
.	.	*	O
Pressure	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Budget	NNP	*	O
The	NNP	*	O
Presi	NNP	*))))))))))	O

de	FW	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
clear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
administration	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
spare	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
expenses	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
guarantee	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
increased	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
all	RB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*)	O
The	DT	(X(X(X(NP(NP*	O
antiterrorist	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
itself	PRP	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	ESE
Treasury	NN	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
huge	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*)	O
Direct	JJ	(NP*	O
expenses	NNS	*))	O
alone	RB	(S(ADJP*)	O
reach	VB	(S(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
1	CD	*)	O
bill	NN	*)))))))	O

onth	VB	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
that	DT	(INTJ*	ESE
is	VBZ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
30	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
a	DT	*)	O
day	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
.	.	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(S(SBAR(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
as	IN	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
beginning	VBG	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)))))))	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
budget	NN	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*))))))))	DSE

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
3	CD	(NP*	O
Feb	NN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Xinhua	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
quite	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
unexpectedly	RB	*)	ESE
labeled	VBN	*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*))))))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
Republic	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
DPRK	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
extensive	JJ	(NP*	DSE
controversy	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*))	O
reacted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
abrupt	JJ	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
decipher	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
message	NN	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Does	MD	(ROOT(SQ*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*	O
''	''	*)))	O
really	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
exist	VB	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
world	NN	*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
answer	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
negative	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
mention	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
word	NN	*)	ESE
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
one	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
inevitably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reminded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
formed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
fascist	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
World	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1940	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
powerful	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
constantly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
expansion	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
brutal	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
reeked	VBN	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
blood	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
turning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
whole	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
upside	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
down	RB	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cause	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
unjust	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
little	JJ	(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
destined	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
collapse	VB	(VP(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
disintegrate	VB	(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
total	JJ	*	ESE
failure	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
reputation	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
ruined	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
historical	JJ	(NP*	O
records	NNS	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
earned	VBD	(VP*	ESE
eternal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
notoriety	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Obviously	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
title	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
every	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
avoid	VB	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	O
Iran	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*))	O
naturally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
clean	VB	(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dirty	JJ	*	ESE
water	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
someone	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
thrown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
imperative	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
form	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
alliance	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
alliance	NN	*	ESE
whatsoever	RB	*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
loggerheads	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
strength	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
mentioned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
breath	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1940	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Quite	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
all	RB	*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
experienced	VBN	(VP*	O
slow	JJ	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
boosting	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
strength	NN	*)	O
significantly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	WDT	(ROOT(SBARQ(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
why	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
superpower	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
today	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
world	NN	*)))	ESE
insisted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
sponsor	VBP	(VP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
attempt	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mass	JJ	(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
conclusive	JJ	*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
indicating	VBG	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
incident	NN	*)))))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
happened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
clear	JJ	*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
incident	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
to	TO	(S(UCP(PP*	ESE
whether	IN	(NP*))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
dare	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
number	NN	*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
nuclear	JJ	*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
either	DT	(UCP*	ESE
directly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
indirectly	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
through	IN	*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
risking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
danger	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
annihilated	JJ	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Actually	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
have	VB	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
common	JJ	*	ESE
denominator	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
i.e.	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
values	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
polices	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
agree	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
none	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
terms	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
suspect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
'	''	*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
box	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prepare	VB	(VP*	ESE
public	JJ	(NP*	ESE
opinion	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
strikes	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
old	JJ	*	ESE
foes	NNS	*))))	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
banner	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
very	RB	(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
responded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
theory	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
clear	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
willful	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
expansion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ivanov	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unacceptable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Russia	CD	(VP(ADVP*	O
to	TO	*	O
mechanically	CD	*)	ESE
extend	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
scope	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
antiterrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
stressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
time	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
accusations	NNS	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
settled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
within	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
UN	NNP	*	ESE
framework	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
objections	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hostile	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
authorization	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
indicated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
antiterrorist	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
restraint	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
otherwise	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
danger	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
losing	JJ	(NP*	ESE
control	NN	*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
emerge	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
market	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
theory	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
limited	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
158	CD	(NP(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
eight-by-six-foot	JJ	(NP*	O
open-air	JJ	*	O
steel	NN	*	ESE
cages	NNS	*))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
another	DT	(S(NP(QP*	O
270	CD	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
custody	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
similar	JJ	(NP*	O
camps	NNS	*))	O
sooner	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
later	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
shifting	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
hold	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
face	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
deep	JJ	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
outrage	NN	*))))))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
treating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
justified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
atrocious	JJ	*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
resorting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
verbal	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
quibbling	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
designating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	(NP(UCP*	O
unlawful	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
combatants	JJ	*)	ESE
'	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
`	``	*	O
battlefield	NN	(NP*))	ESE
detainees	NNS	*)))))	ESE
'	''	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
PoW	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TV	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
footage	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	O
hooded	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
shackled	JJ	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
steel	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
cages	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
reminiscent	NN	(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Nazi	JJ	(NP*	ESE
concentration	NN	*	ESE
camps	NNS	*))))	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
civilised	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
detention	NN	*	ESE
facility	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
provided	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
nor	CC	*	DSE
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Islamabad	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
fairly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
large	JJ	*)	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
dehumanised	JJ	*	ESE
detainees	NNS	*)))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
Pakistanis	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saudi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
Britain	NNP	(NP*))	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
protested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
inhuman	JJ	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
repatriation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unlike	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
gone	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
trouble	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
finding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(SBAR(WHADVP(ADVP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
how	WRB	*)	ESE
misguided	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Human	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
condemned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grave	JJ	*	ESE
violation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Islamabad	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
silence	NN	*)	DSE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
healthy	JJ	*	ESE
precedent	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
guilt	NN	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
otherwise	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
competent	JJ	*	ESE
court	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)	O
admits	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
fates	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
competent	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
courts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(SBARQ(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
repatriation	NN	*)	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
home	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
why	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
coy	JJ	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
exercising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
option	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Incidentally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
another	DT	(NP(QP*	O
325	CD	*)	O
Pakistanis	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADJP*	O
rotting	VBG	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	ESE
jails	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Islamabad	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
pretending	VBG	(VP*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
exist	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Pakistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
reconstruction	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
plight	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Karzai	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
powerful	JJ	*	ESE
compulsions	NNS	*))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
labouring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Islamabad	NNP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
details	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pakistanis	NNPS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
proactive	JJ	*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
once	RB	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
arrogance	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
marked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
Manichaean	JJ	*	ESE
pronouncement	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
George	NNP	(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
alleging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
justifiably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
backlash	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
adverse	JJ	(NP*	DSE
reactions	NNS	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
lawmakers	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
29	CD	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
categorically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
identified	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
besides	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
allies	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
functional	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
anti-US	JJ	*)	ESE
entity	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
as	RB	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
collective	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
arena	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
raising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
bogey	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
specific	JJ	*	O
context	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
campaign	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
aggressively	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
harping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
ideas	NNS	*))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republican	JJ	*	O
caucus	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
left	VBN	(VP*	ESE
little	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
no	DT	*	ESE
room	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
doubt	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
foreign	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*	ESE
intentions	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
defining	VBG	*	O
characteristic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presumptive	NN	*	ESE
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
portrayed	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tendency	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
constituent	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
non-state	JJ	(NP*	O
players	NNS	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
acquire	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
WMDs	NNPS	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
begun	VBN	(VP*	DSE
articulating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
policy	NN	*)	DSE
designed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
prevent	VB	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
outlaw	NN	*	ESE
regimes	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(VP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
cohorts	NNS	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
threatening	JJ	(S(VP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
friends	NNS	(NX(NX*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
allies	NNS	(NX*))	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impassioned	JJ	*	ESE
American	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
new	JJ	(NP*	ESE
phobias	NNS	*))))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
joined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
chorus	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
named	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
cavil	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
universal	JJ	*	O
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yet	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prove	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
accusations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
collusive	JJ	*	ESE
nexus	NN	*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
arguably	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
reclusive	JJ	*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
Stalinist	JJ	*	ESE
'	''	*	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*))	O
besides	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	DSE
``	``	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
accomplices	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
communicative	JJ	*	ESE
compulsions	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
dancing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
tunes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evocative	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
sound	JJ	*)	ESE
bytes	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
adequately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
explain	VB	(VP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
failure	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
substantiate	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
theme	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
internationally	RB	(ADJP*	O
televised	VBN	*)	O
address	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
denunciation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
illustrates	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
urge	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
underline	VB	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
supposed	JJ	*	ESE
pre-eminence	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
superpower	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
history	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
universal	JJ	*	ESE
jurisdiction	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
provoking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sensitive	JJ	*	ESE
stage	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
campaign	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
inadvertently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
encouraged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protagonists	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
prospective	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
clash	NN	(NX(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilizations	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
thesis	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
underlines	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
divide	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Ayatollah	NNP	*	O
Ali	NNP	*	O
Khamenei	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
greatest	JJS	*	ESE
evil	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Given	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
objections	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspected	VBN	*	DSE
Iranian	JJ	*	O
plans	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
acquiring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
WMDs	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Ayatollah	NNP	(NP*	O
Khamenei	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*)))	O
archetypal	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
sales	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
lethal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reaffirm	VB	(VP*	DSE
Teheran	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
sustainable	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
advocacy	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilizations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cultured	JJ	*	ESE
answer	NN	*)))))))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
insults	NNS	*	DSE
''	''	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
heaped	VBN	(VP*	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Iraq	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
tend	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
see	VB	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
game	NN	*	ESE
plan	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extension	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
characteristic	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
hegemony	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
aghast	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ridiculous	JJ	*	ESE
terminology	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	DSE
thinking	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
unexplained	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
logical	JJ	*)	ESE
basis	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
macro-perspective	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
chosen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
raise	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
specter	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
pet	JJ	*	ESE
theme	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space-age	JJ	*	O
missile	NN	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
part	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
explain	VB	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
clubbed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
two	CD	(NP*	ESE
Islamic	JJ	*	ESE
states	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
religion	NN	*)))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(NP*	O
neutral	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
micro-level	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
though	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
counted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
several	JJ	*	DSE
different	JJ	*	DSE
disputes	NNS	*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Teheran	NNP	(NP*)	O
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
defiant	JJ	*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
expanding	VBG	(VP*	O
strategic-military	JJ	(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
neighborhood	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
juncture	NN	*))))))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
weighed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
event	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dynamics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
emerging	VBG	*	O
Iran-US	NNP	*	O
tussle	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
determine	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
actions	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*	O
''	''	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Clearly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*))	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
cause	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
American	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
widen	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
recklessly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
picked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
develop	VB	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
possess	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
WMD	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
spewed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kinds	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
vicious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
picking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
included	VBD	(S(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
destroy	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
so-called	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
markedly	NN	*)	ESE
reveals	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
attempt	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
link	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
crush	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
strength	NN	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
showing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
vicious	JJ	*)	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
maniac	NN	*))))))	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
all	DT	(ADVP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
exerting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
every	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
effort	NN	*)	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reunification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
peninsula	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
instance	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
conveyed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
steadfast	JJ	*	DSE
position	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
will	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
fatherland	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
reunification	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
greatest	JJS	*	ESE
ardent	JJ	*	ESE
desire	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
21st	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*))))))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
united	VBN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
convened	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
organizations	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
appeals	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
proposals	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reflect	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
unanimous	JJ	*	DSE
desire	NN	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
will	MD	(VP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fairest	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
realistic	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
patriotic	JJ	*)	ESE
manifestation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
opening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decisive	JJ	*	ESE
breakthrough	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
achievement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fatherland	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
reunification	NN	*	ESE
cause	NN	*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
united	VBN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*))))))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
June	NNP	*	O
North-South	NNP	*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Declaration	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
remarkable	JJ	*	ESE
measure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
safeguarding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
security	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
peninsula	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meantime	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
principled	JJ	*	ESE
position	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*))))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
joined	VBN	*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
treaties	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Suppression	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Financing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Terrorism	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
actively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
contributed	VBN	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
preservation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
global	JJ	(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
security	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
linked	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
spewed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
virulent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
threatening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
peace	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(FRAG(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
brazen-faced	JJ	*	ESE
deception	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
reality	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
unbearable	NN	*)))	ESE
insult	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))))	O
!	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
condone	VB	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*)	DSE
than	IN	(PP*	DSE
anything	NN	(NP*))))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
arbitrarily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
designated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Good	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
evil	NNP	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*)	O
completely	RB	*)	ESE
contradictory	JJ	(NP*	ESE
concepts	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
promoting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
safeguarding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
nation	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
sovereignty	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
protecting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lives	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
properties	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Anything	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	DSE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
effort	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reclaim	VB	(VP(VP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
reunifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fatherland	NN	*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
safeguard	VB	(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
security	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
peninsula	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Northeast	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
fiercely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
waging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
fight	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exercise	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
force	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
resolving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
ways	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
praising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aforementioned	JJ	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
evidence	NN	*	ESE
either	DT	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
link	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
designate	VB	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
evil	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
ringleader	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
base	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Manifest	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
examples	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	VBG	*	O
facts	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
imperialists	NNP	*	ESE
perpetrated	NNP	*	ESE
open	JJ	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*	O
word	NN	*	O
indistinct	NN	*)	O
-RSB-	VBD	(VP*	O
state-level	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
sovereign	JJ	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Yugoslavia	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
preposterous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reasons	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pretexts	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
posing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
grave	JJ	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
blabbing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
invasive	JJ	*	ESE
missile	NN	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
reality	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
truly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
qualifications	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
face	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
take	VB	(VP*	DSE
issue	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(UCP(NP*	O
evil	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
on	RB	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
impertinently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
picking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
quarrel	NN	*)	ESE
regarding	VBG	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
that	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
viciously	RB	*)	ESE
spoke	VBD	(VP*	DSE
ill	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
truly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
despicable	JJ	*)	ESE
act	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
shabby	JJ	*	ESE
conduct	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(UCP(NP*)	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
revealing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
each	DT	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
immaturity	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
moral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
corruption	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Year	NN	*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
proclaimed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
year	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
poured	VBD	*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kinds	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
abusive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*)))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Republic	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Herein	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
lies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
wicked	JJ	*	ESE
intention	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provoke	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
aggressive	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
opposing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
satisfied	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP(PP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
DPRK	NN	*))	O
,	,	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
crush	VB	(VP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
strength	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Through	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
aiming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
realize	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hegemony	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
greatly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
miscalculating	VBG	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Just	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
like	IN	*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
enjoy	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
fire	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
bound	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
die	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
burnt	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	ESE
maniacs	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tries	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
aggression	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
war	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bitter	JJ	*	ESE
destruction	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
heroic	JJ	*	ESE
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Army	NNP	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	(NX*)))	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	DSE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
tolerate	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
imperialists	NNP	*	ESE
'	POS	*)	O
reckless	JJ	*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
oppressive	JJ	*	ESE
attempt	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
pose	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
merciless	JJ	*	ESE
annihilating	NN	*	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aggressors	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
warlike	JJ	*	ESE
tone	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
State	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
Union	NNP	*	DSE
speech	NN	*))))	DSE
delivered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
George	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*))	O
evening	NN	(NP*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
prompted	VBN	(VP*	O
responses	NNS	(S(NP*)	DSE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
critical	JJ	*)	ESE
abroad	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
enthusiastic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Be	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aim	NN	*)	DSE
pursued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*))))	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
achieved	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
re-mobilize	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
returning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
normal	JJ	*)	O
life	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
concerning	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
chiefly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
repercussions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Enron	NNP	*	O
affair	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
rising	VBG	(VP*	O
unemployment	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
fellow	JJ	*	O
countrymen	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
eyes	NNS	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
test	NN	*)	O
constituted	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
revealed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
talents	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
leader	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	DSE
comfortable	JJ	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)))	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
he	PRP	(NP*))	O
management	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
routine	JJ	(NP*	O
matters	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
force	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
conviction	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
preaches	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
largely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
explains	VBZ	*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
exceptional	JJ	*	ESE
popularity	NN	*	O
ratings	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
83	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
favorable	JJ	(NP*	DSE
opinions	NNS	*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latest	JJ	*	O
ABC	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*	O
surveys	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(S*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*))	O
George	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reproduce	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
tone	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
20	CD	*	DSE
September	NNP	*	DSE
speech	NN	*)))	DSE
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
galvanize	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
regimes	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
threaten	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
destructive	JJ	*)	ESE
weapons	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Whatever	WDT	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(FRAG(NP(NP*	ESE
cost	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
defense	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
pay	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
evil	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
real	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
combated	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
...	:	*	O
even	RB	(S(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
midst	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
tragedy	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
specially	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
midst	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
tragedy	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
God	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
...	:	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
unanimous	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
successful	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
brilliant	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
full	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
strength	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
eloquence	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
pursuit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
illustration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
character	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leadership	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
intensity	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
equal	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
pursue	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Television	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
commentaries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
more	RBR	*	DSE
full	JJ	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
praise	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Solid	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
often	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
eloquent	JJ	*)	ESE
remarks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
CBS	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Ran	NNP	*	O
Rather	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

CNN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Bill	NNP	*	O
Bennett	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
moral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
strength	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Fox	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Juan	NNP	*	O
Williams	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	ESE
straight	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
condemnation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
comprising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
applauded	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Republican	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Democrat	NNP	*	O
hawks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
barely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
challenged	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
experts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

George	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(PP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
returning	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
front	JJ	*	O
pages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
newspapers	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
ousting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Enron	NNP	*	O
affair	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*	O
deficit	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
unite	VB	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Dick	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Gephardt	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Representatives	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tom	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Daschle	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
attempted	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*	ESE
feat	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
setting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
partisan	JJ	(NP*	ESE
attitudes	NNS	*)	ESE
aside	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
supporting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
100	CD	*	ESE
percent	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
while	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
criticize	VB	(VP*	DSE
economic	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	*)	O
policy	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
responses	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
abroad	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
somewhat	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
less	RBR	*	ESE
sharp	JJ	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
introduced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP*	O
qualifications	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
specifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
planned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
cited	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

White	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Ari	NNP	*	O
Fleischer	NNP	*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
expression	NN	*)	DSE
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
allusion	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
notorious	JJ	*	ESE
Rome-Berlin-Tokyo	JJ	*	O
axis	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
George	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
about	IN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
rhetoric	NN	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
antiterrorist	JJ	*	O
struggle	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
am	VBP	(VP*	ESE
concerned	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
black	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
white	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
shades	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
gray	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
31	CD	*)	O
January	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)))	O
visit	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
Atlanta	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Georgia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Daytona	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
beach	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
confident	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)))	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
acquire	VB	(VP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
such	JJ	(S(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
targeted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
clean	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
homes	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
develops	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
you	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ally	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
sincerely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
share	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
values	NNS	*	DSE
precious	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
surveillance	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Like	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
3	NNP	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
verify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
identity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainee	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
Belgian	JJ	(NP*	O
nationality	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
raising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
volume	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
diplomat	NN	*)	O
posted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Gauntanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
158	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
diplomat	NN	*)	O
traveled	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
colleagues	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transport	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
detention	NN	*)))	O
continue	VBP	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arouse	VB	(VP*	O
controversy	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
claiming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
claimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Belgian	JJ	(NP*	O
nationality	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
naturalized	JJ	*	O
person	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
originated	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
paper	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Belgium	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
impatience	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
learned	VBD	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
did	VBD	(S(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Great	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Britain	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
France	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
verification	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
Are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
To	TO	(S(VP*	O
Fight	VB	(VP*	ESE
Terrorism	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Alone	NNP	*))))))	ESE
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
priority	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
verify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
identity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainee	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
nationality	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
later	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Belgium	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
imagine	VB	(VP*	DSE
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
assistance	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(SBARQ*	ESE
what	WP	(WHNP*)	O
type	VBP	(SQ*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assistance	NN	(NP*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
rejecting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
whom	WP	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
denies	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
consular	NN	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
reserved	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
common	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
paper	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
diplomat	NN	*)	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
camp	NN	(NP*	O
X-ray	NN	*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
task	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
learning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
both	DT	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
detail	NN	*)	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP*	O
defiance	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
approaches	NNS	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
elevated	JJ	*	O
price	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
...	:	*	O
-LSB-	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
passage	NN	*)	O
omitted	VBN	(VP*	O
-RSB-	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
Axis	VBN	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
label	VB	(VP*	DSE
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hot	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
much-discussed	JJ	*	O
phrase	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
word	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
reminds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
me	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
grouping	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
World	NNP	(NP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
I	PRP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
II	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
enemies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Allies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
deliberate	NNP	*)	DSE
used	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
term	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
emphasize	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adversarial	JJ	*	DSE
US	NNP	*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)))	DSE
claim	VBP	(VP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
still	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
assist	VB	*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
seek	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
lethal	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
reminder	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Ronald	NNP	*	O
Reagan	NNP	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	*	ESE
Empire	NNP	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	O
objective	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
condenses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
easily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
understand	VB	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
distinguishing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
evil	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
belongs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
side	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
whoever	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
evil	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
destroyed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
at	IN	(VP(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
deserves	VBZ	*	ESE
condemnation	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
those	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
evil	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
feel	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
regard	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
friends	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
evil	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
enemies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
11	NNP	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*)))	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
overhaul	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
before	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
naive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
campaigned	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
education	NN	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
barely	RB	(VP(ADJP*	ESE
scraped	JJ	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
unexpected	JJ	*)	O
happened	VBD	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
what	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
followed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Usama	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
--	:	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
elevated	JJ	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
circumstance	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
again	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
adopt	VB	*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
aggressive	JJ	*	DSE
policy	NN	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
declared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
end	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
spread	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
matter	VB	(VP*	ESE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
vigorously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
hunt	VB	(VP*	DSE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)	O
down	RB	(ADVP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
perceived	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
target	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
declared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iraq	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
emphatically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
implies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
regards	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
duty	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
manufacturing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
acquiring	VBG	*	O
lethal	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
be	VBP	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(NP*))	O
chemical	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
biological	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
line	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
draws	VBZ	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
friends	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
foes	NNS	*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
any	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clearer	JJR	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Basically	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
telling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
Usama	NNP	(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
possess	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lethal	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
targets	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
suppression	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
close	JJ	*	ESE
look	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aggressive	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
abrupt	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
rapid	JJ	*)	O
manner	NN	*))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
comprehensively	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
consulting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
concerned	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
660	CD	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
dispatched	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
Filipino	NNP	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
suppress	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP(PP*	O
participation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
exercise	NN	*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
adviser	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
purpose	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
missions	NNS	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
groups	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
enemies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
deserves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
analyzed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
monitored	VBN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Thai	NNP	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
change	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
military	NN	(NP*)))	O
influence	VBP	(S(VP*	O
impact	NN	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Whether	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
agrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
and	CC	(FRAG*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
views	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
taking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
direction	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
emphasizes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
confrontation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
regards	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
enemies	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
result	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
more	RBR	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
intense	JJ	*)	ESE
armed	JJ	*	O
confrontation	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
step	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
sabotage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
naming	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
annoy	VB	(VP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
helpful	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
identified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
evil	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
likely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
readjust	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
stance	NN	*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
heated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
notch	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Seeing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
believing	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(SBAR(X*	ESE
longer	JJR	*)	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
live	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*))))	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
see	VBP	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
written	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
episode	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
broadcast	VBN	(VP*	O
live	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
those	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
adulterated	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
deformed	VBN	(S(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
falsified	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hidden	JJ	*	ESE
agents	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	ESE
conspiracy	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	UH	(ROOT(INTJ*	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
asserted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exact	JJ	*	O
words	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
barbarism	NN	*)))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
4	CD	(S(NP*	O
February	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
date	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
historic	JJ	*	O
date	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
compare	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*))	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
1810	CD	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
that	DT	(S(NP*	O
civic-military	JJ	*	O
rebellion	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
path	NN	*)	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
one	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anthology	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
rhetorical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
follies	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
falsifying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
history	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
tried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
compare	VB	(VP(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
founders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
thwarted	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
4	CD	*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
1992	CD	*)))	O
coup	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
there	RB	(NP(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
resemble	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
day	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
history	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHPP*	ESE
what	WDT	(WHNP*	ESE
way	NN	*))	ESE
can	MD	(SQ*	O
Lieutenant	NNP	(NP*	O
Colonel	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
comparable	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Jose	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Felix	NNP	*	O
Ribas	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Francisco	NNP	(NP*	O
Salias	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
philosopher	NNP	*	O
Juan	NNP	*	O
German	NNP	*	O
Roscio	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Canon	NNP	(NP*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Cortes	NNP	*	O
de	IN	*	O
Madariaga	NNP	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

No	UH	(ROOT(INTJ*	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
simple	JJ	*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
abuse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
history	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unacceptable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
degradation	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
Fernando	NNP	(NP*	O
VII	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
domination	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bourbon	NN	*	O
dynasty	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

4	LS	(ROOT(S(LST*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	*	ESE
terrible	JJ	*	ESE
days	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
history	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
comparison	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
maybe	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
likewise	NN	*)	ESE
thwarted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
coup	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Colonel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Carujo	NNP	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Jose	NNP	(NP*	O
Maria	NNP	*	O
Vargas	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Comparing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*))	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
1810	CD	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
determination	NN	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
academies	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	O
preserve	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
historical	JJ	*	O
legacy	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
adulteration	NN	(NP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
deceitful	NN	*	ESE
use	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

4	LS	(ROOT(S(LST*)	O
February	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
upset	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelans	NNP	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ghost	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
insurgency	NN	*))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
all	RB	*	DSE
thought	VBN	(VP*))))))	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
overcome	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
belonged	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
past	JJ	(NP*	O
eras	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
within	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
order	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
complying	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
institutional	JJ	(NP*	O
precepts	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
far	RB	(PP*	O
from	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meddling	NN	*)	ESE
forbidden	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
constitution	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
contributions	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stability	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
when	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
each	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))	O
complies	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
preserved	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vicissitudes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
coup	NN	(NP*	O
plotters	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
himself	PRP	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
boasts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
spent	VBN	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
conspiring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
,	,	(VP*	O
eroding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
loyalty	NN	*)))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
conquering	VBG	(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
demonstration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
cynicism	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

4	LS	(ROOT(S(S(LST*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
failure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
episode	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
caused	VBD	(S(VP*	O
enormous	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
losses	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
human	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelans	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	O
deaths	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
feel	VB	(VP*	ESE
proud	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
consequences	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

4	LS	(ROOT(S(LST*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
failure	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
pained	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
methods	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
happened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
still	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
today	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
constant	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
demonstrations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
discontent	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
irritation	NN	*)))	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
democratically	RB	(ADJP*	O
elected	VBN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
reason	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
simple	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
respect	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
game	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
expression	NN	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
causes	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
so	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
nightmares	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
right	JJ	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exist	VB	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
denies	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
disguise	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	ESE
date	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
collective	JJ	*	ESE
illusion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
permit	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
govern	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
reached	VBN	(VP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Imagine	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
happened	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
Venezuelans	VBZ	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
terrible	JJ	*	ESE
day	NN	*))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lieutenant	NN	*	O
colonel	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
staying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
museum	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
advanced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
building	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vast	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
backing	VBG	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
exhausted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	ESE
generosity	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
just	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
Vargas	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Carujo	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Venezuelan	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
anyone	NN	(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
acknowledge	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
debts	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
effort	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
learn	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
live	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
respecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
freedoms	NNS	(NP*)))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Trying	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
destroy	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
inconsistent	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exercise	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
participant	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	ESE
celebration	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
mourning	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Hong	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
6	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
ZTS	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
News	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*)))	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
5	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
alarmist	JJ	*	ESE
remark	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
George	NNP	(S(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
labeled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
DPRK	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
delivering	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Speech	NNP	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Powell	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remark	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hearing	NN	*)	O
sponsored	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Senate	NNP	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
defense	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
Evil	NNP	*	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
widely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
two-hour	JJ	*	O
discourse	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
correct	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
He	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
But	CC	*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
rule	VB	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
holding	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
dialogues	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Powell	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
actions	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
invade	VB	(VP*	O
someone	NN	(NP*)	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
mentioned	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
points	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Powell	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ronald	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Reagan	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
described	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
former	JJ	(NP*	O
USSR	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Evil	NNP	*	ESE
Empire	NNP	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
cooperate	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
regimes	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)))))))	O
triggered	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*	O
reactions	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mostly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
ranking	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
questioned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Policy	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
ideas	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
black	JJ	*	ESE
list	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Libya	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Guillermo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Garcia	NNP	*	O
Ponce	NNP	*)	O
Click	VBG	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
view	VB	(VP*	O
picture	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Garcia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ponce	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chief	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
board	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
directors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Political	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Revolution	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
CPR	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*))))))))	O
described	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
unusual	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
reflect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
friendly	JJ	*	DSE
relations	NNS	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(UCP(NP(NP*	O
exclusive	JJ	*	ESE
concern	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelans	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
historical	JJ	*	O
tradition	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
mandate	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
request	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
determine	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Garcia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ponce	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
speaking	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
CPR	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
truly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
inconceivable	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
interference	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
approve	VB	(VP*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
disapprove	VB	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*))))))))))	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trait	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
in	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
keeping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
violates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
principle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
nonintervention	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CPR	NNP	*)))	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
ruled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Deputy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Cilia	NNP	*	O
Flores	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chief	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bloc	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Fifth	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*	O
Movement	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
MVR	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
tone	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
her	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Without	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
mincing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
affirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
instance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
meddling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
designs	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
autonomous	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
manner	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
event	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
up	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Venezuelans	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
respect	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
demand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ours	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
criticisms	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
destinations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
trips	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ask	VB	(VP*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
permission	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	O
and	CC	*	O
when	WRB	*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
specific	JJ	*	DSE
objective	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
strengthening	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
economy	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Noheli	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Pocaterra	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
vice	NN	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
respect	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
her	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
uncalled-for	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
quite	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
respectful	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
demand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
equal	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
intervention	NN	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
blockade	NN	*))))	O

MVR	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Carreno	NNP	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
further	RBR	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
established	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
direct	JJ	*	O
relation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
voiced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
disclosure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
video	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
presumably	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
confirms	VBZ	(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Colombian	JJ	*	O
rebel	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Journalists	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ibeyise	NNP	*	O
Pacheco	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Marta	NNP	(NP*	O
Colomina	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Patricia	NNP	(NP*	O
Poleo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Marianela	NNP	(NP*	O
Salazar	NNP	*))	O
disclosed	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
video	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
deputy	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Powell	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
surprise	VB	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
waging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ruthless	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
succeeding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
portraying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
image	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
scares	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
investors	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
triggers	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
domestic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
turmoil	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
request	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intervention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Carreno	NNP	(NP*)	O
excused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
-	:	(S(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
-	:	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
misled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
smear	NN	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
information	NN	*	ESE
sabotage	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
unleashed	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
abroad	RB	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
further	JJ	*	O
step	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
invited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Powell	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
happening	VBG	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
four	CD	*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
plotting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
powerful	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
presumably	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
contributed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
purchase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
video	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
agent	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
since	IN	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Article	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
122	CD	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Penal	NNP	*	O
Code	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
instigates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
interventionist	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
treason	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
homeland	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Carreno	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
This	DT	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accomplish	VB	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(UCP(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
journalists	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
activists	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
prompted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	JJ	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
organizations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
categorized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
These	DT	(S(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
tried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
suggest	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
documents	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
presumably	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
drafted	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
expressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
discontent	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
video	NN	*)	O
disclosed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
First	NNP	*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Gerardo	NNP	*	O
Blyde	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
militia	NN	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
trained	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
this	DT	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
sounded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
alarm	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Executive	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
suits	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intervention	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blockade	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
hurt	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
defend	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Oddly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
defended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
content	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
video	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
affirming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
-	:	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*)))	O
-	:	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
When	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
faced	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
involving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
extremist	CD	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*	O
holding	VBG	*	O
hostages	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
intermediaries	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
El	NNP	*	O
Nacional	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Internet	NN	(NP*	O
version	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Spanish	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
7	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))	O
carries	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
related	VBN	*	O
760-word	JJ	*	O
item	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
says	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
deputies	NNS	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tactless	NNS	*	ESE
actions	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
blame	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
voiced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
cites	VBZ	(VP*	O
Convergence	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Alejandro	NNP	*	O
Arzola	NNP	*)	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Powell	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
exists	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
conflict	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threats	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
expression	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
legal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
security	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Arzola	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
positions	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
harming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
investors	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
watching	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
television	NN	*	O
sets	NNS	*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
happening	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
fire	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Arzola	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
Any	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
recommendation	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
friendly	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
No.	NN	*	O
1	CD	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
partner	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
heeded	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
recommendations	NNS	(VP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Church	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
demanding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
rectification	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
cites	VBZ	(VP*	O
Democratic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Action	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Claudio	NNP	*	O
Fermin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
warned	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
When	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidency	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
buying	VBG	(VP*	O
1.75	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
barrels	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
misguided	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
cutting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
production	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
selling	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
1.1	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
barrels	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
to	TO	(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
add	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
constant	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
aggressive	JJ	*)	ESE
attitude	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
readiness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
establish	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
ties	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
parasitic	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
economies	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
give	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
fulfill	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
commitments	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(VP(ADJP*	ESE
likely	JJ	*)	ESE
continue	VB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
lose	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
edge	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
market	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Fermin	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
confidence	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
investments	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Movement	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
Toward	IN	(PP*	O
Socialism	NNP	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Julio	NNP	*	O
Montoya	NNP	*)))	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
incompetent	JJ	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
handling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
vague	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
intentions	NNS	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ambiguous	JJ	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	ESE
situations	NNS	*)	O
constitute	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
breeding	VBG	*	ESE
ground	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
bilateral	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
tensions	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
currently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
indicates	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
verge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
breakdown	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
leading	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
partner	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
-RSB-	NNP	(NP*)))	O

Defense	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Rangel	NNP	*)	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
established	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
emphasize	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
sovereignty	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*))	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
questioning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Frias	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
read	VBD	(VP*	O
General	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Venezuelan	NNP	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Colonel	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Luis	NNP	*	O
Alfonso	NNP	*))	O
-RSB-	VBG	(VP*	O
Davila	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
endorse	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Colonel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Davila	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rangel	NNP	(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
clarify	VB	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Regarding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
friends	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rangel	NNP	(NP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
visits	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	ESE
strange	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
For	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mexican	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Fox	NNP	*)	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
visited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
friendly	JJ	*	DSE
manner	NN	*)))))	DSE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
representatives	NNS	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Libya	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Regarding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
ties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Colombian	JJ	(NP*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Rangel	NNP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	ESE
elucidation	NN	*))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
implementing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
designed	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Frias	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
support	VBP	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
much	RB	(RRC(ADVP*	ESE
less	JJR	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Colombian	JJ	*	O
guerrilla	NN	*)	O
groups	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
prevail	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Likewise	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
categorical	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
decisive	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
repudiates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(UCP(ADJP*	ESE
now	RB	*)	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
endorse	VB	(VP*	DSE
-LSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
-LSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*))	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
aberration	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
mankind	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
's	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
ideology	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
philosophy	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Rangel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Venezuela	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
shown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
effectiveness	NN	(NP*)	ESE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
interest	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
drug	NN	(NP*	O
trafficking	NN	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
confiscated	VBN	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
times	NNS	*	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
drugs	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
previous	JJ	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
attested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
close	JJ	(NP*	O
contact	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Where	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*))	O
?	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Rangel	NNP	(NP*)	O
challenged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
parliamentary	JJ	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
present	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purchase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
video	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
DIM	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Military	NNP	*	O
Intelligence	NNP	*	O
Directorate	NNP	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
sold	VBD	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
video	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
40	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
bolivares	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
stated	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Opposition	NNP	(NP*	O
Bloc	NNP	*	O
deputies	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
rule	VB	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
going	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
presenting	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Being	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
old	JJ	*	O
parliamentarian	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
love	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
gladly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
go	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
provide	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
explanation	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
debate	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(S*	O
just	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
opposition	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
provide	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
explanation	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Consulted	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Colombia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
stating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
video	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
clarified	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Rangel	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
emphatic	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
sufficient	JJ	(NP*	O
details	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hours	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Venezuelan	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNP	*)	O
-RSB-	VBD	(VP*	O
officers	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
non-commissioned	JJ	(S(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
point	VBP	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
circulated	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)))))	O
-LSB-	CD	(NP*	O
2	CD	*)))))))	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
destroy	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
substitute	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
socialist	JJ	*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
militia	NN	*)	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	IN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
since	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
4	CD	*	O
February	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
1992	CD	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
coup	NN	*	O
attempt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
active	JJ	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*	O
requests	NNS	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
through	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
bulletin	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interdiction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
trial	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
alleged	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
crimes	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
res	NN	*	O
publica	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
institution	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O

Circulation	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
18-page	JJ	*	O
document	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
primarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
directed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelans	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
free	JJ	*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
adherents	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
3,400	CD	(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
subordinate	JJ	*)	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
professional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
career	NN	*)	O
non-commissioned	JJ	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
professional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
signatures	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
for	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
of	IN	(FRAG(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
families	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
properties	NNS	*)))))	O
--	:	*))	O
are	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
deposited	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ABN	NNP	*	O
AMOR	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Curacao	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))	O
72	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
indicates	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
apolitical	JJ	*	O
institution	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
believed	VBN	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
departures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
rectification	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
imperative	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
brief	JJ	*	O
introduction	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
recalls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
1992	CD	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
now	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
violated	VBD	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
oath	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
defeated	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
institutional	JJ	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
judged	VBN	(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
retired	VBN	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
expelled	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
dishonor	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Doctor	NNP	(NP*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Caldera	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
annul	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
expulsion	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
retirement	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
revoke	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
legally	JJ	*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
sentence	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Changes	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Military	NNP	*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
authors	NNS	*)	O
recall	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
1958	CD	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decentralizing	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
begun	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*)))))))))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
originated	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
replacement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Staff	NNP	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Chiefs	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Staff	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
point	VBP	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
concentration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
command	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
entity	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
obsolete	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
obsolete	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
deployments	NNS	(NP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(UCP(NP(NP*	O
preparation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
operations	NNS	(NP*)))	O
control	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Now	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Frias	NNP	*))	O
destroys	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
accomplished	VBN	(VP*	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
half	PDT	*)))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
century	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
intends	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
obsolete	JJ	*	ESE
military	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(S*	ESE
knowing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
meaning	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
duties	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
organization	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
control	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
harmony	NN	*	O
organisms	NNS	*)))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*))))))))))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
objective	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
traditional	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
glorious	JJ	*	ESE
Armed	NNP	*	ESE
Forces	NNS	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
consequently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
substitute	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
socialist	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
militia	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
add	VBP	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Further	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
criticize	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
authorization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP*	O
militiamen	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
parade	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Carabobo	NNP	*	O
camp	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
invaded	VBD	(VP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1960	CD	*)))	O
's	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
backed	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
rebellion	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Fidel	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
never	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
apologized	VBD	*)	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))))))))))	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Cuban	JJ	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
piloted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MIG	NNP	*	O
airplanes	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
flew	VBD	(S(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*))))	O
December	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
FN-30	NN	*	O
rifle	NN	*)	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Castro	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
besides	IN	(PP*	ESE
constituting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
crime	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
submission	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
maintain	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
returned	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Friend	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guerrillas	NNPS	*))))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Hugo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Frias	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Colombian	JJ	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
damaged	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
periodically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
raid	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
physical	NN	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
material	NN	*)	O
damages	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)))	O

Further	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
on	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
stated	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(UCP(SBAR*	O
Jose	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Rangel	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(SBAR*	O
because	IN	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
affinity	NN	*)	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	DSE
Colombian	JJ	(NP*	O
rebel	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
expelled	VBN	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Military	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
Agreement	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1951	CD	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Fort	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tiuna	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
please	VB	(VP*	DSE
Fidel	NNP	(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
arisen	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incorporation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Loan	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lease	NNP	*	O
System	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1941	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
state	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
warn	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
distancing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
risks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
operational	JJ	*	O
capability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
units	NNS	*)))	O
``	``	*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
logistic	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
purchase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
spare	JJ	(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kinds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
advising	VBG	(S(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Praetorian	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
Promotion	NNP	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
document	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
signing	VBG	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
oligarch	NN	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
class	NN	*)))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Military	NNP	*	O
Academy	NNP	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Praetorian	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*)))))))))	O

Chavez	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
add	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
demoralized	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
corrupted	VBN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prerogatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elite	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
discredits	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
kills	VBZ	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
institution	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
react	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
defend	VB	*	ESE
institutionality	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
boasts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	PDT	(S(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
revolution	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
thought	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
subordinated	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
personal	JJ	*	ESE
sentiments	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
ambition	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
dishonoring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
laws	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
boasts	NNS	*)	ESE
constitute	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*	ESE
insult	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Disqualified	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
contends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
majesty	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
president	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
His	PRP$	(NP*	O
intentions	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
disguises	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
demerits	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
inability	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
judge	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
changing	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
contradicting	JJ	(NP*	ESE
personality	NN	*))	ESE
disqualify	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
ruling	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
destinies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
performances	NNS	*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
show	VBP	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
unbalanced	JJ	*	ESE
states	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mind	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
expose	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
Venezuelans	NNPS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
national	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
ridicule	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Frias	NNP	*)	O
'	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
pathology	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
man	NN	*)))	ESE
blinded	VBD	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
himself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incarnation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Liberator	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Simon	NNP	*	O
Bolivar	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
veils	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
fears	NNS	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
traumas	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hide	VB	(VP*	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
uniform	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Venezuelan	JJ	*	ESE
Armed	NNP	*	ESE
Forces	NNPS	*	ESE
'	''	*	ESE
misfortune	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
dishonorable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
refers	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
supply	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
exceeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
authority	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Cuba	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
returns	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
export	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
basis	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
preliminary	JJ	*	O
hearing	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Court	NNP	(NP*))))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(FRAG(S(S(VP*	O
close	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
ideas	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
document	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
condensed	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)))))))	O

Outstanding	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
apolitical	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
non-deliberating	JJ	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
institution	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
commit	VB	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
revolution	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
oppose	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commemoration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
uprisings	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Soldiers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
point	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
unarmed	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
FAN	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
excesses	NNS	*))))))	ESE

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
commits	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
crime	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
handling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP(VP*	O
using	VBG	(UCP(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
uniforms	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
insignia	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
directly	RB	(ADJP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
single-handedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
-RSB-	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
give	VB	*	O
promotions	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*	O
order	NN	*))	DSE
all	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
that	RB	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
presently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
civilian	JJ	(NP*	O
duties	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
respective	JJ	*	O
units	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
corresponding	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
duties	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
demand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
interdiction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Frias	NNPS	*))	O
as	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
cancellation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
treaties	NNS	*)))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
disqualified	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
particular	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expelling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Cubans	NNPS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
presently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
physicians	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
advisors	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
trainers	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
etc.	FW	*)))	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
demand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
stop	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
trials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
corrupt	JJ	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
maintain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	ESE
trial	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
treason	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
embezzlement	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
theft	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
weaponry	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exercise	VB	(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
kick	VB	(VP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*)	O
Is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Manipulated	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attitude	NN	*)))))	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decrease	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
defense	NN	*	O
capabilities	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
decommission	VB	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
relocate	VB	*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	O
Army	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*	O
units	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
related	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Military	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
morale	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
stake	NN	(NP*))	ESE
due	RB	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
breakdown	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
discipline	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
words	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
discrediting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
statements	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
alien	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
warns	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wear	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
uniform	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
disguises	VBD	(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
because	IN	(PP*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
ceased	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
soldier	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Fatherland	NNP	*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
destroys	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
principles	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
subordination	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
humiliates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
higher-ranking	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
honors	NNS	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
leads	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
discipline	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
subordinates	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
exposure	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
despise	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Concerning	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Plan	NNP	(NP*	O
Bolivar	NNP	*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*)	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
tasks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cases	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
diverts	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
functions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
irresponsible	JJ	*	ESE
Plan	NNP	*	O
Bolivar	NNP	*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
committing	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*	O
tasks	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
totally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
lack	VBP	(VP*	ESE
planning	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
administrative	JJ	(NP*	ESE
control	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Corruption	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
handling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
funds	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
audits	NN	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
control	NN	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
sanction	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
consent	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
intentions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
dismantling	VBG	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
destroying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
demoralizing	VBG	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
maintains	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
Are	VBP	(VP*	O
Poorly	NNP	(NP*	O
Paid	NNP	*))))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
signing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)))	O
distanced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
state	VBP	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(S(NP*	O
society	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
militarization	NN	*	O
process	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
ask	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*)	O
understand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
militarism	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
retired	JJ	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
recovered	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
under	IN	(S(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
context	NN	*))	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
out-and-out	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Frias	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
authors	NNS	*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
retired	VBN	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
service	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
institution	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
be	VB	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(VP(VP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
or	CC	*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	O
longer	RB	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
command	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pension	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
established	VBN	(S(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*)))))	O
earned	VBD	(VP*	O
wages	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
obtained	JJ	*	O
rank	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
active	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
counted	VBN	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
pension	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
contributed	JJ	*	O
amortization	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
badly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
militarized	JJ	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
90	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
posts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
retired	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
constitution	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
recovered	VBN	(VP*	O
100	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
citizen	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(ADVP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
limited	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
historians	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
philosophers	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
playwrights	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
artists	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
thinkers	NNS	*))))	O
all	RB	*	O
think	VB	(VP(VP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
state	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
militarism	NN	(S(NP*)	O
exists	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
far	JJ	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
reality	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
retired	VBN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
dishonored	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
uniform	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
unfortunately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
pardoned	NNP	(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
trial	NN	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
dismissed	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
prescribed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
point	VBP	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
FAN	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
elitist	JJ	*	O
institution	NN	*)	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
30	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
two	CD	*)	O
careers	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
raises	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
salaries	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
wages	NNS	*))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
false	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
professional	JJ	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
earn	VBP	(VP*	O
approximately	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
160,000	CD	*)	O
bolivars	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
close	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minimum	JJ	*	O
wage	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
general	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
salaries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Armed	JJ	*	O
Forces	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lowest	JJS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
service	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
complained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deficiencies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*))))	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Welfare	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
IPSFAN	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
:	:	*	O
insufficient	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
mortgage	NN	*	ESE
loans	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
supermarkets	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
competitive	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
etc.	FW	(NP*))))))))))))))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
allocation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
seniority	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
proportion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officer	NN	*	O
corps	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
request	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
prematurely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
satisfy	VB	(VP*	O
present	JJ	(NP*	O
needs	NNS	*)))))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
salary	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
-LSB-	RB	(ADJP*	O
economically	RB	*	O
-RSB-	JJ	*)	O
compromising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
old	JJ	*	O
age	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
practically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hospital	NN	*	ESE
medical	JJ	*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
hospitals	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
service	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
population	NN	*))	O
though	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Plan	NNP	(NP*	O
Bolivar	NNP	*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
increasing	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	O
existing	VBG	*)	O
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
civilian	JJ	(ADJP*	O
-RSB-	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
hospitals	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
clinics	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
outpatient	NN	(NP*	O
departments	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sermon	NN	*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regime	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
beneficiaries	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
generate	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
antagonism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	DSE
fear	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
threatens	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
subjugate	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
rounds	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	PDT	(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intolerable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dignity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
26	JJ	(ADJP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
article	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zhongguo	NNP	(NP*	O
Renkou	NNP	*	O
Bao	NNP	*)))	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Family	NNP	*	O
Planning	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
initiated	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
transprovincial	JJ	*	O
floating	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*	O
investigation	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
surveying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
marriage	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
birth	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
birth	NN	(NP(NP*	O
control	NN	*	O
situations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
27,879	CD	(NP(NP*	O
migrant	JJ	*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
49	CD	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
surveyed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
87.2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
24,310	CD	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
married	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
higher	JJR	(PP(ADVP*)	O
than	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
average	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
82.3	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Population	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Reproductive	NNP	(NP*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Survey	NNP	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
19-year-old	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
migrant	NN	*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
married	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
children	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
higher	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
average	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
average	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
migrant	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
age	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
lower	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
average	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
about	RB	*	O
30	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
migrant	JJ	*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
married	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(QP*	O
or	CC	*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
children	NNS	*)))))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
obtained	VBN	(VP*	O
official	JJ	(S(NP*	O
migrant	NN	*	O
population	NN	*)	O
marriage	NN	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
documentation	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
required	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Procedures	NNPS	*))))))	O
For	IN	(PP*	O
Managing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Floating	VBG	(NP*	O
Population	NNP	*	O
Family	NNP	*	O
Planning	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
less	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
registration	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
migrant	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
one	CD	*	O
child	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
percentage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
married	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
migrant	NN	*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
contraceptives	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
90.6	VBG	(VP*	O
percent	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
higher	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
average	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
83.4	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
children	NNS	(NP*)))	O
mostly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
use	VBP	(VP*	O
long-term	JJ	(NP*	O
contraceptive	JJ	*	O
methods	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
long-term	JJ	(NP*	O
contraceptive	JJ	*	O
methods	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
higher	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
son	NN	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
daughter	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)))	O
mostly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
undergo	VBP	(VP*	O
sterilization	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sterilization	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
households	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
daughters	NNS	*)))	O
''	''	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
significantly	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
less	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
households	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
one	CD	*)	O
son	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

CARACAS	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
7	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
Colonel	NNP	*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Soto	NNP	*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
residence	NN	*))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
leading	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
thousands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opponents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
step	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Tension	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
escalated	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
around	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*)	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
La	NNP	(NP*	O
Casona	NNP	*	O
residence	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exclusive	JJ	*	O
district	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
eastern	JJ	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
11:30	CD	(NP(NP*	O
pm	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
0330	NNP	(NP*	O
GMT	NNP	*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
provoking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
fears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
confrontations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
house	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
sleeps	VBZ	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
waiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
tell	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
resign	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
call	VB	(VP*	ESE
elections	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
protesters	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
whereabouts	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
unclear	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Soto	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
5,000	CD	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
march	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
presidential	JJ	*	ESE
palace	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earlier	JJR	*	O
address	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Altamira	NNP	(NP*	O
Square	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
demand	VB	(VP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resignation	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
ruling	NN	(NP*	O
Fifth	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
Movement	VBZ	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MVR	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
party	NN	(NP(NP*	O
lawmaker	NN	*	O
Nicolas	NNP	*	O
Maduro	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
called	VBN	*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Venezuelans	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
streets	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
invite	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
streets	NNS	*))	ESE
en	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
masse	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
support	VB	*	ESE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
revolutionary	JJ	*	ESE
process	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Maduro	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
flanked	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
MVR	NNP	*	O
deputies	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spectacle	NN	*)	ESE
using	VBG	(VP*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RBR	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
crowd	NN	*)	O
prevented	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
arresting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
hours	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
event	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
hotel	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
undemocratic	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
demanding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resignation	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Television	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
images	NNS	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
fleeing	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
home	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
dressed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
grey	JJ	*	O
suit	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
red	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
vehicle	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
driver	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
fleeing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
injustice	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
totalitarianism	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*)	O
yelled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moments	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vehicle	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
agents	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Boyaca	NNP	(NP*	O
Avenue	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
designated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*))))))))	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
desisted	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
dozens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
lawmakers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Interior	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ramon	NNP	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	*	O
Chacin	NNP	*)	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)	O
guaranteed	VBD	(VP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
protest	VB	(VP*	DSE
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
oneself	PRP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
demonstrate	VB	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
long	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
property	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
state	NN	*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
risk	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
headquarters	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
People	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
long	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(NP*	O
Chacin	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
finger	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
traitor	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
opportunistic	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Shortly	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
palace	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
staff	NN	(NP*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Vargas	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S(NP*	ESE
total	JJ	*	ESE
calm	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
reigned	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
underlined	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
belief	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Soto	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
protest	NN	*)	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
advance	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
oligarchs	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
coming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
timed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
coincide	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Organization	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OAS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
representative	NN	(NP*	O
Santiago	NNP	*	O
Canton	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
say	VB	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
freedom	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
expression	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Vargas	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Rangel	NNP	*)	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
absolute	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
calm	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
barracks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
denying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
rumors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
mobilizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Soto	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
receive	VB	(VP*	DSE
advice	NN	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
attorney	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deposition	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
critical	JJ	*	DSE
opinions	NNS	*)))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
regime	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
event	NN	*)	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
posh	JJ	*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
hotel	NN	*)	O
earlier	RB	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
75	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
shared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
view	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
resign	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
president	NN	*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
resign	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
before	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
organize	VB	(VP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP*)	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*	O
boldly	NNP	*)	DSE
proclaimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
pro-freedom	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
forum	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
A	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
controls	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
called	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Soto	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
military	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
discontent	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
running	VBG	(VP*	DSE
high	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
used	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	*	O
ends	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Bolivar	NNP	*	O
2000	CD	*	O
Plan	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
uses	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
staff	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
crews	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
projects	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Soto	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
scope	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
duty	NN	*))))	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
harsh	JJ	*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
populist	JJ	*	O
former	JJ	*	O
paratrooper	NN	*	O
Chavez	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Soto	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heels	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unusually	RB	(ADJP*	O
blunt	JJ	*)	O
week	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
questioned	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Libya	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Powell	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
aware	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
complaints	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Intelligence	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
director	NN	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Tenet	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
growing	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
unrest	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
third	JJ	*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
supplier	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
Headline	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
editorial	JJ	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))	O
By	IN	(PP*	O
Adbolhassan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sobhani	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Pot	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
Calling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Kettle	NNP	*	ESE
Black	NNP	*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))	DSE

Addressing	VBG	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
worshippers	CD	*))	O
gathered	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
former	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*))))	O
Akbar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hashemi	NNP	*	O
Rafsanjani	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taleban	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
idah	NN	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	(NX(NX*	O
president	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
current	JJ	(NX*	O
chairman	NN	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Expediency	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
chain	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
cages	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
summer	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
winter	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
ostrich	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
neither	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
truly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
prisoners	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	DSE
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
captives	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(FRAG(PP*	DSE
pointing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
finger	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
blame	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
tens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
regimes	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
governments	NNS	*))))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
decades	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
review	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
history	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
crimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
humanity	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
non-WASP	JJ	*	ESE
humanity	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
non-WASP	JJ	(NP*	ESE
humanity	NN	*))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Non-White	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
Anglo-Saxon-Protestant	JJ	*	ESE
humanity	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
humanity	NN	(NP*))	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	ESE
eyes	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
bluest	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
blue	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	ESE
hair	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
blondest	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
blonde	JJ	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Americans	NNPS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
humanity	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
qualify	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
legislated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
accepted	VBN	*	O
world	NN	*	O
conventions	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
John	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Walker	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Taleban	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
non-WASP	JJ	*	ESE
humanity	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Qa	VBG	(S(VP*	O
`	``	(NP*	O
idah	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taleban	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
history	NN	(NP*))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
shameful	JJ	*)	ESE
detentions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
post-war	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
incarceration	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
21st	JJ	*	ESE
century	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*	ESE
captives	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
hence	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
accord	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
privileges	NNS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
automatically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
Geneva	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
argument	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	ESE
hence	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
qualify	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
defeated	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
army	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
assume	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
George	NNP	(S(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
making	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
argument	NN	*)))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
up	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
decide	VB	(VP*	ESE
who	WP	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
captive	JJ	*))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
captive	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
consisting	VBG	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
experts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*)	ESE
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
knowledge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))	O
leaves	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
plenty	RB	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
desired	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
watching	VBG	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
remembers	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
violators	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
grossest	JJ	*	ESE
type	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pot	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
called	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
kettle	NN	*)	ESE
black	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
truly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
committed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
chain	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
globe	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
way	NN	*)	DSE
defending	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
idah	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
whom	WP	(WHNP*)))	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
guilty	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	*	ESE
heinous	JJ	*	ESE
crimes	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
poor	JJ	*	ESE
oppressed	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
keeps	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pontificating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
preaching	VBG	*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
ca	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
suddenly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
forget	VB	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	DSE
lectures	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Spanish	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
blasts	NNS	*)	DSE
``	``	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
meaningless	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
US	JJ	*)	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
last	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Taleban	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*))))))	O
envisaged	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Qai	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
dah	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
regulates	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
grants	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
set	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
none	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner-of-war	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
makes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
apparently	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
positive	JJ	*)	ESE
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
meaningless	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
admit	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
questions	NNS	*)	O
except	VB	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
name	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rank	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
crimes	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
repatriated	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
ends	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
pure	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rhetoric	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*	O
exercise	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
meaningless	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
practice	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
key	JJ	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
much	JJ	*)	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
beliefs	NNS	*)	DSE
respected	VBD	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(VP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(SBARQ(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advantages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*)	O
jurisdiction	NN	(SQ(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
incommunicado	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Cuba	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Nobody	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
answered	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
international	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Watch	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
denounced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defenceless	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
lawyers	NNS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enjoy	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
minimum	JJ	*	ESE
guarantees	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
judicial	JJ	(NP*	O
proceedings	NNS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
exist	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Donald	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
tried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
happening	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
grounds	NNS	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
even	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
criminals	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lawyer	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
know	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
paradoxical	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
supposedly	JJ	*	ESE
model	NN	*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
USA	NNP	*)))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
trample	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
extent	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

KABUL	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
10	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Interim	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Afghan	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Karzai	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
Emirates	NNPS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
completing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
visits	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
recognized	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kabul	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Islamabad	NNP	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
reopen	VB	(VP*	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Karzai	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
historic	JJ	*	O
fence-mending	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
step	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
heal	VB	(VP*	O
festering	VBG	(NP*	O
wounds	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Karzai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
pardoned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
350	CD	(NP(QP*	O
captured	CD	*)	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(UCP(ADJP*	O
innocent	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
amnesty	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allowed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
foot-soldiers	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
branded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mullah	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Wakil	NNP	*	O
Mutawakel	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
surrendered	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
criminal	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
trial	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Taliban	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
leaders	NNS	*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
created	VBD	*	ESE
misery	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
world	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*))))))	ESE
...	:	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
deserve	VBP	(VP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*	ESE
criminals	NNS	*))	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Interim	NNP	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
closest	JJS	*	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reclusive	JJ	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Mullah	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Omar	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
potential	JJ	*	ESE
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crucial	JJ	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Omar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	JJ	*	O
suspect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
eluded	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
manhunt	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
meanwhile	RB	(ADVP*)	O
brought	VBD	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(QP*	O
34	CD	*)	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
220	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
arrivals	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
dressed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
standard-issue	JJ	(NP*	O
zippered	JJ	*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
jumpsuits	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
each	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
bound	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
shackled	VBN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blue	JJ	*	O
jackets	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wore	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
27-hour	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
removed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
scissors-wielding	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
descended	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plane	NN	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tropical	JJ	*	O
heat	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Geneva	NNP	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Red	NNP	(NX*	O
Cross	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ICRC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
odds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
divergent	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
apply	VBP	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
detained	VBD	(VP*	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
entitled	VBN	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
pursue	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
1949	CD	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
apply	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
captured	VB	(VP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(S(NP*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP*	ESE
members	NNS	*)))))	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
neither	DT	(S(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
accorded	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Concern	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
signs	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
expanding	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
care	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
avoid	VB	(VP*	DSE
directly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticizing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
UN	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary-General	NNP	*	O
Kofi	NNP	*	O
Annan	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unrealistic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
evil	JJ	*)	ESE
states	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*	O
Blick	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Annan	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*	DSE
describing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Annan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
specifically	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
mentioning	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
divide	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
good	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
evil	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
between	IN	(S(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
shades	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
gray	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

EU	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
commissioner	NN	*	O
Chris	NNP	*	O
Patten	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
speaking	VBG	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*	O
interview	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
administration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dangerously	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
absolutist	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
simplistic	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
stance	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
European	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
governments	NNS	*)	ESE
spoke	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
unilateralist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
overdrive	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Guardian	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Seven	CD	(NP*	O
industrialized	VBN	*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
called	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
intensified	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
freeze	VB	(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
financing	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
100	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Significant	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
results	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
final	JJ	*	DSE
communique	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
finance	NN	(NP(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Since	IN	(S(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
almost	RB	(NP(QP*	O
150	CD	*)	O
countries	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
jurisdictions	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
orders	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
freeze	VB	(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
assets	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
over	IN	(VP(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*))	O
has	VBZ	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
gathering	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
nearby	JJ	(NP*	O
Quebec	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
progress	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
cracking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
networks	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
court	NN	(NP(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Paris	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
militant	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
investigation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
alleged	VBN	*	O
plot	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Strasbourg	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
admitted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
training	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yacine	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Akhnouche	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
police	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
suspected	VBD	(VP*	O
shoe	NN	(NP(NP*	O
bomber	NN	*	O
Richard	NNP	*	O
Reid	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Zacarias	NNP	*	O
Moussaoui	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
training	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stays	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moussaoui	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Frenchman	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Moroccan	NNP	(NP*	O
descent	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
person	NN	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reid	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
light	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fuse	NN	*)	O
attached	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
explosives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
shoes	NNS	*)))))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(FRAG(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Paris	NNP	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Miami	NNP	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
22	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Karzai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
meanwhile	RB	(ADVP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wrestle	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
rival	JJ	(S(NP*	O
warlords	NNS	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fill	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
vacuum	NN	*)	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
warlords	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
clashed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
violently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
governor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
eastern	JJ	(NP*	O
Paktia	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
matter	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
Karzai	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
himself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
finding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP*	O
Border	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mirza	NNP	*	O
Ali	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
AFP	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fifty	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
battle	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Karzai	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
appointed	VBN	*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Padsha	NNP	(NP*	O
Khan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
governor	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
house	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*	O
Gardez	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
rival	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
warlord	NN	*	O
Saif	NNP	*	O
Ullah	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Karzai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
blamed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Khan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fighting	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
finish	VB	(VP*	ESE
warlordism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
clash	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
into	IN	(PP*	DSE
question	NN	(NP(NP*	DSE
Karzai	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
govern	VB	(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kabul	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
bolstered	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
appeal	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deployment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
search	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
kidnapped	NNP	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
journalist	NN	*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
Pearl	NNP	*)))	O
stretched	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
18th	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Wall	NNP	*	O
Street	NNP	*	O
Journal	NNP	*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
researching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
story	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Islamic	JJ	(NP*	O
militancy	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NX(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*)))	O
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
convenient	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
tool	NN	*)	ESE
-	:	*	O
Portuguese	JJ	(NP*	O
paper	NN	*)))))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
address	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)))	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
criticisms	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rhetoric	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
emerged	VBD	(S(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
pinned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
tag	NN	*)	DSE
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
surely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
just	RB	*	ESE
rhetoric	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

George	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
master	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
eloquence	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
speeches	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
prepared	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
man	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
likes	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
improvise	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
expression	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
undoubtedly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
well	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
thought	VBD	*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
bellicose	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
Ronald	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Reagan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1983	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
referred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
evil	JJ	*	ESE
empire	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
capitals	NN	*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
rumours	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
defining	VBG	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
doctrine	NN	*)	DSE
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
also	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
excuse	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
pursue	VB	(VP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
unilateral	JJ	*	ESE
offensive	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
proclaimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
attack	VB	(VP*	ESE
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilization	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
barbarity	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
sounds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clumsy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
place	VB	(VP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
axis	NNS	*))	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
Nazi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Germany	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Hirohito	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Japan	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mussolini	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Italy	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
share	VBP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
hatred	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
not	RB	(SBAR(S*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
included	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
list	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sponsor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Islamic	JJ	(NP*	O
fundamentalism	NN	*))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Colin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
trouble	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
wriggling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
explain	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
justify	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vision	NN	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
defence	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Donald	NNP	(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
powerful	JJ	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
perfectly	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
ease	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rhetorical	JJ	*	ESE
petards	NNS	*)))))	ESE
hurled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commander-in-chief	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
prove	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
gradually	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
adopting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
offensive	NN	*)	DSE
rather	RB	(CONJP*	DSE
than	IN	*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
defensive	JJ	*	DSE
stance	NN	*))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
offensive	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
dimension	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
paint	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
dark	JJ	*	DSE
picture	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threats	NNS	*)	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
American	JJ	*	ESE
empire	NN	*))))))))	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
prove	VB	(VP*	ESE
crucial	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	IN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
budget	NN	*)))))))))))	O
proposals	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
cornerstone	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
involves	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
increases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
20	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Democrats	NNPS	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
close	VB	(VP*	DSE
ranks	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
behind	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
mention	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
strengthen	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
suit	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
announces	VBZ	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
not	RB	(S(NP*	O
everyone	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
insisting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
cutting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
taxation	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
corporations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
richest	JJS	*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
money	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
programmes	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
drying	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
launching	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
budget	NN	*	ESE
deficit	NN	*	ESE
era	NN	*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
easier	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
proposals	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
belt-tightening	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
concerns	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
deeper	JJR	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
better	JJR	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
George	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Things	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
dragging	VBG	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
2004	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
try	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
re-elected	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
certain	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
concept	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NX(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*)))	O
''	''	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
surely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
president	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
lips	NNS	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
concerns	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
genuine	JJ	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
convenient	JJ	*	ESE
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
tool	NN	*)	ESE
too	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hanoi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Feb.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
9	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
VNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
organize	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
health	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Agent	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Orange/Dioxins	Dioxins	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Hanoi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Daewoo	NNP	*	O
Hotel	NNP	*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Mar.	NNP	(NP*	O
3-6	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Environment	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Sciences	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NIEHS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
scientists	NNS	(NP*)	O
worldwide	JJ	(NP*	O
opportunities	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exchange	VB	(VP(VP*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Agent	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Orange/Dioxins	Dioxins	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
health	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hazards	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
toxic	JJ	*	O
chemical	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Scientists	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
evaluate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
available	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
dioxin-related	JJ	*)	O
research	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
define	VB	(VP*	O
present	JJ	(NP*	O
requirements	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
research	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NIEHS	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
mark	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
joint	JJ	(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
research	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defoliant	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
sprayed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lay	VB	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
foundation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*	O
projects	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
field	NN	*)))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	O
funding	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
projects	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
unofficial	JJ	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
1961	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
1971	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
sprayed	VBD	(VP*	O
72	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
liters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
toxic	JJ	(NP*	O
chemicals	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
44	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
liters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Agent	NNP	(NP*	O
Orange	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
containing	VBG	(VP*	O
170	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kg	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dioxin	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dioxin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	O
poisonous	JJ	*)	O
chemical	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
causes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
cancer	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
immune	JJ	(NP*	O
system	NN	*	O
malfunction	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
birth	NN	(NP*	O
defects	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1975	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Vietnamese	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
4.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
wounded	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
affected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
toxic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
chemicals	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mainly	RB	*	O
Agent	NNP	(NP*	O
Orange	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
50,000	CD	*)	O
children	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
born	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
deformities	NNS	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
paralysis	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
parents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
affected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
toxic	JJ	(NP*	O
chemicals	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kitakyushu	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb.	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3,986-ton	JJ	*	O
Panamanian	JJ	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
heading	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))	O
sank	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
East	NNP	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
sailor	NN	*)	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
20-member	JJ	*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
missing	VBG	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
Coast	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Coast	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Guard	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Triumph	NNP	(NP*	O
Kaohsiung	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
sank	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP*	O
11:30	CD	*	O
p.m.	RB	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	O
about	RB	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
110	CD	*)	O
kilometers	NNS	*)	O
west	RB	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Goto	NNP	(NP*	O
islands	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP*	O
Nagasaki	NNP	*	O
Prefecture	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Officials	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
19	CD	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
crew	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
plucked	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sea	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Triumph	NNP	*	O
Kaohsiung	NNP	*	O
crew	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
flooded	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
engine	NN	*)	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP(QP*	O
7	CD	*))	O
p.m.	RB	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
sank	VBD	(VP*	O
four	CD	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	*	O
half	NN	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
heading	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
city	NN	*	O
Kaohsiung	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
steel	NN	(NP*	O
products	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
loaded	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
port	NN	*	O
Pohang	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Coast	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Guard	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
coast	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*	O
vessels	NNS	*)	O
plucked	VBN	(VP*	O
12	CD	(NP*	O
survivors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lifeboat	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sea	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rescued	JJ	*	O
sailors	NNS	*)))	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
coast	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*	O
aircraft	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
patrol	NN	*	O
boats	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
missing	VBG	*	O
sailor	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
crew	NN	*)	O
consisted	VBD	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Indonesians	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
Myanmarese	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kenya	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	(S(NP(NP*	O
Highly	NNP	(ADJP*	O
contagious	JJ	*)	O
''	''	*	O
type	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tuberculosis	NNP	(NP*)))	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Embu	NNP	(NP*))))))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
outbreak	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	O
contagious	JJ	*)	O
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tuberculosis	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Embu	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
central	JJ	*	O
Kenya	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Health	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
27	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
tested	VBN	(VP*	O
positive	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
severe	JJ	*	O
sputum	NN	*	O
smear	NN	*	O
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tuberculosis	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
TB	NN	*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Joel	NNP	*	O
Kangangi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
infected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bacteria	NNS	*))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
spread	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
10	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
doctor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
deaths	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	O
affected	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Dallas	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Majengo	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Shauri	NNP	*	O
Yako	NNP	*	O
slums	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
17,000	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kangangi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assistant	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
attached	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Tuberculosis	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Leprosy	NNP	*	O
Programme	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
56	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
infected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
TB	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
HIV-positive	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Health	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
affected	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
random	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
screening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
residents	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
contain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outbreak	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Kangangi	NNP	*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
random	JJ	(NP*	O
checks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
residents	NNS	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Dallas	NNP	(NP*	O
estate	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Embu	NNP	*	O
Medical	NNP	*	O
Officer	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Health	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Nicholas	NNP	*	O
Muraguri	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
health	NN	(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
medic	NN	*)	O
blamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
outbreak	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
congestion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
slums	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
failure	NN	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
observe	VB	(VP*	O
basic	JJ	(NP*	O
hygienic	JJ	*	O
practices	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
residents	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
advised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
houses	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADJP*	O
ventilated	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
multiplication	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
germs	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
advised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
seek	VB	(VP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP*	O
attention	NN	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
detect	VBP	(VP*	O
symptoms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
disease	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
symptoms	NNS	*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
prolonged	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cough	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chest	NN	(NP*	O
pains	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
fever	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
loss	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weight	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
appetite	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transactions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
floating	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
market	NN	*))))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
too	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
many	JJ	*)	ESE
difficulties	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week-long	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*	O
holiday	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
surprise	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
hit	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(QP*	O
2.4	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
2.1	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
intervention	NN	(NP*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
closing	JJ	(NP*	O
yesterday	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1.85	CD	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
2.15	CD	(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wholesale	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
closed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
bid	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
2.03	CD	(NP*)))))	O
asked	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
retail	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
started	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
2.3	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
2.4	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
sharply	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
afternoon	NN	*	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
exporters	NNS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
settling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Exporters	NNP	(NP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
until	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
saw	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
top	VB	(VP*	O
2.4	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
point	NN	*))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
selling	VBG	(S(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1.75	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
trader	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
pushing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
down	RP	(PRT*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
still	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
exist	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
scant	JJ	*	O
trading	NN	*	O
liquidity	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
holders	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
salary	NN	(NP*	O
direct-deposit	NN	*	O
accounts	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
access	VB	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
their	PRP$	*	O
money	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
theoretically	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
circulation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	(PP*	O
because	IN	*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shortage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
automatic	JJ	*	O
tellers	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Buying	VBG	(S(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
2	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
deal	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Alfredo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Piano	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
bears	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
name	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
economist	NN	(NP(NP*	O
Miguel	NNP	*	O
Bein	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
overshooting	NN	*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
happened	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
2	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
prices	NNS	(NP*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
2.15	CD	(NP(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
all	DT	*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
refrained	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
selling	NN	(NP*	O
greenbacks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
though	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
deciding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
possession	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
mid-sized	JJ	*	O
private	JJ	*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
retail	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
regulations	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
explained	VBN	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
transfers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
authorization	NN	*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
transactions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wholesale	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
closed	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
explained	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
trader	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
front-line	JJ	*	O
bank	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
calm	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
importers	NNS	*)	O
around	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
authorization	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Jorge	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Fogwill	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Scotiabank	NNP	(NP*	O
Quilmes	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
importers	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
reason	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
heat	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
as	RB	(S(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
continues	VBZ	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
intervene	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Traders	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expecting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
calm	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
session	NN	*)))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
yesterday	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(SBAR(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
until	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
decides	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
spell	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
transfers	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
authorize	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Atmosphere	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
Heats	VBZ	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Financial	NNP	(NP*	O
District	NNP	*	O
Exchange	NNP	*	O
Offices	NNS	*)))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
boards	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
focus	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greatest	JJS	(NP*	DSE
attention	NN	*))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNP	*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
district	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thousands	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
corner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sarmiento	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
San	NNP	*	O
Martin	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
most	JJS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
concentrated	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pedestrian	JJ	*	O
mall	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
strolling	VBG	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
shopping	NN	*	O
center	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
savers	NNS	(NP*)	O
peered	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP*	O
office	NN	*	O
windows	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
best	JJS	*	O
price	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
walking	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*	O
and	CC	*	O
down	RP	*)	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
blocks	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
comparing	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
quotes	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
get	VB	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
endure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
midday	NN	*	O
heat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
sell	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coveted	JJ	*	O
greenback	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
foul	JJ	*	DSE
mood	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
To	TO	(S(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))))	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
line	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*	O
or	CC	(QP*	O
so	RB	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
shouted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Alberto	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
laboratory	NN	*	O
executive	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
standing	VBG	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
almost	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
unison	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WDT	(WHNP*	O
price	NN	*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	O
scene	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
savers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
long	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Miguel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unemployed	JJ	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Entre	NNP	(NP*	O
Rios	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
offered	VBD	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wait	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
customer	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
soft	JJ	*	O
drink	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
care	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
business	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crowd	NN	*)))	O
prompted	VBD	(VP*	O
occasional	JJ	(NP*	O
passers-by	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
animated	VBN	(NP*	DSE
opinions	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
engage	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
almost	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	DSE
philosophical	JJ	*)	DSE
debates	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Great	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
,	,	*)	O
keep	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
buying	NN	(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*))	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
'll	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
poor	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
shouted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
What	WP	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
you	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*))	O
anymore	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
came	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
reply	NN	*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Unauthorized	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
street	NN	*	O
traders	NNS	*)	O
flourished	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
expecting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
killing	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Police	NNP	*)	O
cleared	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
arrested	VBZ	(VP*	O
12	CD	(NP(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*	O
traders	NNS	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Corrientes	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
San	NNP	*	O
Martin	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
savers	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
wait	VB	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	ESE
sell	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
street	NN	*	O
traders	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
cents	NNS	*)	O
more	RBR	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Fabian	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
36-year	JJ	(ADJP*	O
old	JJ	*)	O
attorney	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
crowd	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
nerves	NNS	*))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
heat	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
atmosphere	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
noon	NN	(NP*)))))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
march	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Production	NNP	*	O
Movement	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
banks	NNS	(NP*))))	O
wound	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
scaring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
away	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
savers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
decided	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
transactions	NNS	*))))))))	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
ca	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
live	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
level	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hysteria	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Jorge	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
67-year	JJ	*	O
old	JJ	*	O
retiree	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
his	PRP$	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
recall	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
comparable	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Weak	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
Dollar	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Sends	NNP	*	O
Merval	NNP	*	O
Index	NNP	*)	O
Down	IN	(PP*	O
10.68	CD	(NP*	O
Percent	NN	*))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNP	*	O
Stock	NNP	*	O
Exchange	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Merval	NNP	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
10.68	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shares	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
prices	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
corrected	VBN	(VP*))	O
vis-a-vis	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
specialists	NNS	*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
appreciation	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
triggered	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wave	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
selling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
stock	NN	*	O
market	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
share	NN	*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
higher	JJR	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
drooped	VBN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
stock	NN	*	O
market	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
behavior	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
predict	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coming	VBG	*	O
days	NNS	*))))))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
depend	VB	(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenback	NN	*))))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
as	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
many	DT	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
upward	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
downward	JJ	*	ESE
price	NN	*	ESE
swings	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
session	NN	*))	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
traders	NNS	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
wait	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
see	VB	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
trading	NN	(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
hit	VBD	(VP*	O
32.6	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
board	NN	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
25	CD	(ADJP(ADJP(NP*	O
stocks	NNS	*)	O
lower	JJR	*)	O
,	,	*	O
11	CD	(ADJP(NP*)	O
higher	JJR	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
5	CD	(ADJP*	O
unchanged	JJ	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
losers	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*)	O
Acindar	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
down	IN	(PP*	O
14.88	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Banco	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Frances	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
down	IN	(PP*	O
13.68	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Perez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Companc	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
down	IN	(PP*	O
11.31	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Telecom	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Argentina	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
down	IN	(PP*	O
10.96	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
strongest	JJS	*	O
gainers	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*)	O
Gas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Natural	NNP	*	O
Ban	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
up	RB	(NP(QP*	O
12.7	CD	*	O
percent	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Banco	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bansud	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
up	RB	(NP(QP*	O
7.69	CD	*	O
percent	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Instituto	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rosembusch	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
up	RB	(NP(QP*	O
4	CD	*	O
percent	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Sociedad	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Comercial	NNP	*	O
del	FW	*	O
Plata	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
up	RB	(NP(QP*	O
2.7	CD	*	O
percent	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Merval	NNP	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
expected	VBN	(S(S(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
much	RB	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
spite	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	DSE
uncertainty	NN	*))))))))))))))	DSE
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
equaled	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Trends	NNS	(ROOT(NP*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Merval	NNP	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
posted	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sharp	JJ	*	O
5.94	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
rise	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
stock	NN	*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
reopened	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
point	NN	*))	O
investors	NNS	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
anticipating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
jump	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
reopened	VBD	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Merval	NNP	*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RB	(ADVP*	O
sharply	RB	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
410.84	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
keeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
stock	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
anticipated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
did	VBD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
about	RP	(PRT*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
investors	NNS	(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
selling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
shares	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
prompted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sharp	JJ	*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Merval	NNP	*	O
index	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
stock	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(ADJP*	O
linked	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
investors	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
trading	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
1.9	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
2.3	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
selling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
shares	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
much	JJ	(NP*	O
profit	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Leopoldo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Oilvari	NNP	*	O
Sivori	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bacque	NNP	(NP*	O
Sociedad	NNP	*	O
de	IN	*	O
Bolsa	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
behavior	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
stock	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
week	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
expectations	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
today	NN	(S(NP*)	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
correcting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
or	CC	*	O
30	CD	*	O
cents	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
down	RP	(ADJP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
bought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
shares	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))))))	O
start	VBP	(VP*	O
selling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
quickly	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
expected	VBD	(VP*))))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
exporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
settling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
pending	VBG	*	O
transactions	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
traders	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
in	IN	(ADVP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*)	O
got	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
liquidity	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
pushed	VBD	(VP*	O
prices	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
lower	JJR	(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Investors	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
equities	NNS	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hedging	NN	(NP*))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
rise	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
greenback	NN	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
expected	VBN	*	DSE
value	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
investors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
bought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
shares	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
specific	JJ	*	O
price	NN	*))))))	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
selling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
earn	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
spread	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
lower	JJR	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Merval	NNP	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
marginal	JJ	*	O
0.32	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
session	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
traders	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
predicted	VBN	(VP*)))))	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
calm	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
specialists	NNS	*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
anything	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
downward	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
historically	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
geographically	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*)	O
closer	JJR	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
move	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
ran	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
patience	NN	(NP*))	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
worsening	VBG	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
stand	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
supports	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
right-wing	JJ	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
pressured	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weaker	JJR	*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
under	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
occupation	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
repressive	VB	(VP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
assassinations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
arrests	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
incursions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
cities	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
demolition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
homes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
uprooting	VBG	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trees	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
pleased	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
practices	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
instead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
focused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
attention	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
reactions	NNS	*	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
provocations	NNS	*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
gradually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
shape	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Spain	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
France	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forefront	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
intensive	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
drive	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
highlight	VB	(VP(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
happening	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
extricate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
stalemate	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
deadlocked	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
oppressive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*)	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
nationalistic	JJ	*	O
move	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
insistence	NN	*)))))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
suspending	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
focusing	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
subjugate	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
liquidate	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
aspirations	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
characteristic	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
initiative	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
annuls	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hardline	JJ	*	O
Israeli-US	NNP	*	O
stand	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
rejects	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
stops	VBZ	(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
unrealistic	JJ	*	ESE
stand	NN	*)	ESE
brought	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*	ESE
process	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
deadlock	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
plunged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Israelis	NNPS	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
endless	JJ	*	ESE
cycle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
resumed	VBN	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
achieving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
peace	NN	*)	O
acceptable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
sensible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
setting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
resolutions	NNS	*)	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
agrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
focus	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
withdrawal	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
ending	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
activity	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
finding	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
just	JJ	*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
allowing	VBG	(VP*	O
time	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reorganize	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
house	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
with	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
view	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
achieving	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
introducing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
multi-party	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Yasir	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*))	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*	ESE
whatsoever	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
welcome	VBP	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
support	VBP	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
bold	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*)))))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
revive	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
realistic	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
just	RB	*)	ESE
bases	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
partial	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
turn	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
eye	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
practices	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
activity	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
dismisses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
notion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
punishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wronged	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
deprived	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
their	PRP$	*	ESE
national	JJ	(UCP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
human	NN	*)	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
disapproves	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flimsy	JJ	*	ESE
pretexts	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
suffering	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
encourage	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
right-wing	JJ	*	ESE
stands	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
lately	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
test	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
only	RB	*))))	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
intentions	NNS	*)	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
known	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
negative	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
test	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
stand	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
complete	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
blind	JJ	*)	ESE
bias	NN	*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
achieve	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*)	ESE
restoring	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
guaranteeing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
security	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nations	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
February	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
Majority	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Tom	NNP	*	O
Daschle	NNP	*)	O
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*))	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
described	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
DPRK	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
PBS	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	*	O
NewsHour	NNP	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Jim	NNP	(NP*	O
Lehrer	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Daschle	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
got	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
careful	JJ	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rhetoric	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Daschle	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
Democrat	NNP	*)))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
delivered	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
word	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
label	VB	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
description	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
DPRK	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
courted	VBN	(VP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Daschle	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
threats	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
right	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
attention	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
danger	NN	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
pose	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
important	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
look	VB	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
each	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
threats	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
ve	NN	*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
address	VB	(VP*	ESE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

JOHANNESBURG	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*	O
Sapa	NNP	*)	O
ALLEGED	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
ISRAELI	NNP	*	O
MAFIA	NNP	*	O
MEMBER	NNP	*	O
TO	NNP	*	O
STAND	NNP	*	O
TRIAL	NNP	*)	O
IN	IN	(PP*	O
AUGUST	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

Alleged	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	NNP	*	O
mafia	NN	*	O
member	NN	*	O
Lior	NNP	*	O
Saad	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
murder	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
estranged	VBN	*	O
husband	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
friend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Winnie	NNP	(NP*	O
Madikizela-Mandela	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	*	O
Magistrate	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*	O
Saad	NNP	*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
12	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
murder	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
diamond	NN	(NP(NP*	O
merchant	NN	*	O
Shai	NNP	*	O
Avissar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
disappeared	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Avissar	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
body	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shallow	JJ	*	O
grave	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
smallholding	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Pretoria	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
17	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1999	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
diamond	NN	*	O
merchant	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
married	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hazel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Crane	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
friend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Madikizela-Mandela	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saad	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
custody	NN	(NP*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trial	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ISTANBUL	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
While	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
sessions	NNS	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Conference	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OIC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
European	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Joint	NNP	(NP*	O
Forum	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preparatory	NN	*)	O
works	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
continue	VBP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Diplomatic	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
how	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
declaration	NN	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
deliberations	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Turkey	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
pays	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
attention	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
neutral	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
deliberations	NNS	*)))	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
host	NN	*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deliberations	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
OIC	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sources	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Islam	NNP	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
request	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
harshly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
condemned	VBN	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	DSE
declaration	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
cautious	JJ	*)	ESE
stance	NN	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
assumed	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
high-level	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Turkey	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
deliberations	NNS	*)))	DSE
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
intervene	VB	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
compromise	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Forum	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
OIC-EU	JJ	(NP*	ESE
front	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
probability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
conflicts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civilizations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
aim	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
disagreements	NNS	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Palestinian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Farouk	NNP	*	O
Kaddoumi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
attending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
harshly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
condemned	VBN	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	DSE
declaration	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

KHARTOUM	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
13	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
Sudanese	NNP	(S(NP*	O
rebels	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fishermen	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
six	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
charging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
belonged	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sudanese	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
army	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
employer	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Salmah	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Trading	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Investment	NNP	*	O
Company	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
fishermen	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
August	NNP	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
fishing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fangak	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
south	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Sudan	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Upper	NNP	*	O
Nile	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Sudan	NNP	*	O
People	NNPS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SPLA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
release	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
tremendous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
benefit	VBP	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
services	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)	DSE
received	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
elaborating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
indicate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exact	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
freed	VBN	*	O
fishermen	NNS	*))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
originally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
11	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
number	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Sudanese	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
belonged	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rebels	NNS	*)	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fishermen	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
trading	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
services	NNS	*))	O
``	``	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
benefit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Sudan	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Sudan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
raged	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1983	CD	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
SPLA	NNP	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
arms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP(VP*	O
domination	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainly	RB	*	O
Christian	JJ	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
animist	VB	(VP*	O
south	RB	(ADVP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
north	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Seoul	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb.	NNP	*	O
14	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yonhap	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*))))))))	O
items	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
consecutive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stops	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Seoul	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Feb.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
17-22	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
initially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
delayed	VBN	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(ADJP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
subsequent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
flared	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))))	O
labeled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
North	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Jan.	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Union	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
address	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
issue	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
alleged	VBN	*	ESE
attempts	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Seoul	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Tokyo	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
interests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
resolving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Feb.	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Dae-jung	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
focus	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
North	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
export	NN	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
rogue	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
conventional	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
posture	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
reconfirming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

North	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
likely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
come	VB	*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
meets	VBZ	(VP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
related	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Seoul	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
conventional	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
aims	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
primary	JJ	*	O
negotiator	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Pyongyang	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kim-Bush	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
convey	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
plans	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
turning	NN	*	O
point	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

North	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
likened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
remark	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
declaration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Afterwards	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
downplayed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
severity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
words	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
negotiations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
ways	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
further	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.-led	JJ	*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
extend	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Seoul	VB	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
inauguration	NN	*))	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Kim	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(FRAG(PP(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
Koizumi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
reform	NN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
express	VB	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
willingness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
help	VB	(VP*	DSE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
regain	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
vitality	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Visiting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
Feb.	NNP	(NP*	O
21-22	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
follow-up	NN	(NP(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
entry	NN	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
besides	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nagoya	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb.	NNP	*	O
15	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Romanian	NNP	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Ion	NNP	*	O
Iliescu	NNP	*)	O
toured	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Toyota	NNP	*	O
Motor	NNP	*	O
Corp.	NNP	*	O
plant	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Toyota	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Aichi	NNP	(NP*	O
Prefecture	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
four-day	JJ	*	O
stay	NN	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
holding	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Iliescu	NNP	(NP*)	O
traveled	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
prefecture	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
facility	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
plant	NN	*)	O
produces	VBZ	(VP*	O
14,000	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
units	NNS	*	O
monthly	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Toyota	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Crown	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
luxury	NN	*	O
cars	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
hybrid	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
electric-gasoline	JJ	*	O
autos	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Prius	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iliescu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Shoichiro	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Toyoda	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
honorary	JJ	(NP*	O
Toyota	NNP	*	O
chairman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Fujio	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Cho	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*	O
automaker	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Toyota	NNP	*	O
executives	NNS	*)	O
briefed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
hybrid	JJ	(NP*	O
cars	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
firm	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fuel-cell	JJ	*	O
vehicle	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Iliescu	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
overall	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TOKYO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
17	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Some	DT	(NP(NP(QP*	O
300	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
demonstrated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sunday	NNP	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
bases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Demonstrators	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
banners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
read	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
bases	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Okinawa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
hosts	VBZ	(VP*	O
25,000	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
51,000	CD	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
stationed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
protest	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Ebisu	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
park	NN	*)	O
some	DT	(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
four	CD	*	O
kilometers	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
2.5	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
west	RB	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
firmly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
oppose	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
war	NN	*	O
expansion	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Kenju	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Watanabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan-South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
People	NNPS	*	O
Solidarity	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Tokyo-based	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
group	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rally	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deploy	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
18,000	CD	*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
boost	VB	(VP*	O
security	NN	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Watanabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
warships	NNS	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Indian	NNP	*	O
Ocean	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
replace	VB	(VP*	O
vessels	NNS	(NP*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US-led	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
parliament	NN	*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*)	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
logistical	JJ	*	O
support	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban-ruled	NNP	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*))))))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
only	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
non-combat	JJ	(NP*	O
zones	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
World	NNP	(NP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
parliament	NN	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
legislation	NN	(NP*)	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rally	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50	CD	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
non-governmental	JJ	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
alternative	NN	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
treaty	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Protesters	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
banners	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	DSE
reading	VBG	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
Ratify	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	*	ESE
Protocol	NNP	*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
say	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
`	``	(NP*	ESE
No	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
'	''	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	ESE
Stick	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
unveiled	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*))	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
spurned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
environmentalists	NNS	*)	O
claim	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
benefits	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
corporate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
America	NNP	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

TAIPEI	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
17	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
wary	JJ	*	DSE
eye	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
China	NNP	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
assurances	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taipei	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
traded	VBN	(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taipei	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
dilute	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
backing	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
better	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*))))))))))))	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*	O
Siao-yueh	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Through	IN	(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	O
channels	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
surprises	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
''	''	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
handling	VBG	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Richard	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
relation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)))	O
--	:	*))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ease	VB	(VP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
relations	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
better	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Joseph	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Wu	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chengchi	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Richard	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
managing	VBG	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Washington-based	JJ	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AIT	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
body	NN	*)	O
authorised	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
exchanges	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
switched	VBD	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
recognition	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1979	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
embarked	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
week-long	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
stopovers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
working	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
21-22	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
overall	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
knocks	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
strong	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
decision-makers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Department	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*)	O
arms	NNS	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Kidd-class	NNP	*	O
destroyers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
diesel	JJ	*	O
submarines	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
12	CD	(NP*	O
P-3C	NN	*	O
submarine-hunting	NN	*	O
aircraft	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
infuriated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
regards	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
integral	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	O
reunification	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
if	IN	(ADJP*	O
necessary	JJ	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eve	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
arising	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
entry	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
resolution	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lingering	VBG	*	O
sovereignty	NN	*	O
dispute	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
split	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
nonetheless	RB	(ADJP*	O
concerned	VBN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ad	FW	(ADJP*	O
hoc	FW	*)	O
group	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*	O
around-the-clock	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
de	FW	(ADJP*	O
facto	FW	*)	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
task	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Compounding	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fears	NNS	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
speculation	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
sign	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fresh	JJ	*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*))))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
anti-terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
prevention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
proliferation	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
sealed	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
communiques	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1970s	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
then-president	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Richard	NNP	*	O
Nixon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
landmark	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1972	CD	(NP*))))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
another	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ronald	NNP	*	O
Reagan	NNP	*	O
era	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gradually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
reduce	VB	*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
defended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cautious	JJ	*	O
approach	NN	*	O
warning	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
gain	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
upper	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interest	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
harmed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occasion	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
remarks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
unfavorable	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
defend	VB	(VP*	DSE
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Wu	NNP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
angered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
then-president	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bill	NNP	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
three	CD	*	O
nos	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Clinton	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Chinas	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	*	O
Taiwan	NNS	*))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
statehood	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
requirement	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Feb.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
18	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Minister	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Eugene	NNP	*	O
Chien	NNP	*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expect	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
surprise	NN	*	ESE
developments	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
later	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	O
than	IN	*	O
once	RB	*)	O
briefed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
purposes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
tour	NN	*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
repeatedly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
guaranteed	VBN	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
wo	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
sacrificed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
trip	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chien	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three-nation	JJ	*	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
attendance	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
informal	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	NNP	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
forum	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chien	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MOFA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	O
close	JJ	(NP*	O
tabs	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chien	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
communications	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
analyze	VB	(VP*	O
relevant	JJ	(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
clock	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
south	JJ	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
since	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
communication	NN	*	O
channels	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
operating	VBG	(VP*	O
smoothly	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
MOFA	NNP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
grasp	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
developments	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
calm	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
nervous	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Chien	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
appreciated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
statements	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
made	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
prior	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
friend	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
resolved	VBN	(VP*	O
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chien	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
promoter	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
stabilizer	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
balancer	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
view	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
Chien	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
current	JJ	*	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
forge	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proliferation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
reforms	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
financial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Chien	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP*	O
views	NNS	*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
procurement	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
As	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
topics	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
touched	VBN	(VP*	O
upon	RP	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
talks	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
agricultural	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*	O
opening	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
religious	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
missile	NN	(NP*	O
shield	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
Strait	NNP	*))	O
issues	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chien	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Issues	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
branded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
fight	VB	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
--	:	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
activation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
topics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
discussion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*))	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Regarding	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
resolve	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
buckle	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
continuously	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
cooperating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
improvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
case	NN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
regard	NN	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
hand	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
structural	JJ	*	O
reform	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
measures	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
deflation	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
shoulder	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
burden	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
firmly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
carrying	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
realizing	VBG	(VP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
pledges	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Diplomacy	NN	(ROOT(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NN	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
'	''	*	O
reflect	VBP	(VP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
firm	NN	*	ESE
resolve	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
cooperating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
take	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
initiative	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
tackling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
eradication	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
understanding	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
approval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*)	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
clarified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
posture	NN	*)	O
wherein	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
cooperate	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
much	RB	(FRAG(ADJP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
axis	NNS	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*))	O
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
recovery	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
topics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
indicates	VBZ	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
discussion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*)))))	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
understands	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cooperation	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saying	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
options	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
table	NN	*))))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
solving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
means	NNS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
being	VBG	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ever	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
since	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
statement	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
hard	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
out	IN	*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fear	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
confrontation	NN	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
deny	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
proliferation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
beginning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
tighten	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
noose	NN	*)	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
understanding	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
work	VB	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
own	JJ	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
channels	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
settlement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
envisions	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
options	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
deny	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
military	JJ	(NP*	ESE
actions	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
concern	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
support	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
enact	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
emergencies	NNS	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
reality	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
role	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
sharing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
joint	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
settle	VB	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
apply	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
source	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
armed	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
improvement	NN	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
legislation	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
hand	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
judging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lessons	NNS	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
learned	VBD	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
relies	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
refuse	VB	(VP*	ESE
offering	NN	(NP*	ESE
cooperation	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
parties	NNS	*))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
application	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
limited	VBN	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
attacked	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
exercising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
collective	JJ	(NP*	O
self-defense	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
introduce	VB	(VP*	ESE
diverse	JJ	(NP*	O
legislation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
actions	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
just-completed	JJ	*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
primary	JJ	*	O
topics	NNS	*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
covered	VBN	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
designated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))))))))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
standpoint	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
stability	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
resulting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
confirmation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	(NP*	O
collaboration	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
topics	NNS	*)	O
covered	VBD	(VP*	O
complex	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
wherein	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clouded	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
both	DT	(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
vowed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assume	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bold	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
exchanged	VBD	(VP*	O
firm	NN	(NP*	O
handshakes	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
not	RB	(PP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
nations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	DSE
spoken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
positioning	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
faced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
difficulties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
History	NN	(NP*)	ESE
gave	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
action	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
offered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Your	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
hypothesis	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
irrelevant	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
above	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Residence	NNP	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
18th	JJ	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
emphatically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
reporter	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
question	NN	*)	DSE
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Will	MD	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
allies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Evil	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
'	''	*))))))))))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Prime	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
Minister	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
aligned	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
himself	PRP	(NP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
established	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
distinct	JJ	*	DSE
cooperative	JJ	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
displayed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
unrelenting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
resolve	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
declaring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
expression	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
`	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*)	O
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
resolute	JJ	*	ESE
determination	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
assume	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
initiative	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
collaborating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
advance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MOFA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
visualized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
statements	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Evil	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
collaboration	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
solutions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
message	NN	*)	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
collaboration	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
reaction	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
better-than-expected	JJ	*	DSE
response	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
accompanying	JJ	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
obtained	VBD	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(NP(ADJP*	DSE
strong	JJ	*)	DSE
support	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
noon	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15th	JJ	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iranian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
Mohser	NNP	*	O
Aminzadeh	NNP	*))))	O
made	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
conferred	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
then-Administrative	JJ	*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Yoshiji	NNP	*	O
Nogami	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Deputy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Aminzadeh	NNP	*)	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
In	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
view	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
current	JJ	(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
conservative	JJ	*	O
factions	NNS	*)))	O
assuming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
rigid	JJ	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
speak	VB	(VP*	DSE
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
reformist	JJ	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Seyed	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
desire	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
confrontation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
request	NN	*)	DSE
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bridge	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
names	NNS	*)	DSE
Iran	VBN	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Nogami	NNP	(NP*	O
grimly	NNP	*)	DSE
replied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
so	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
refrain	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
actions	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
referred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
as	RB	(NP(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
possesses	VBZ	(VP*	O
solid	JJ	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
conditions	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
change	VB	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
Japan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
assume	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
defensive	JJ	*	O
stand	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	DSE
concerning	VBG	(VP*	O
`	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
'	''	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
showing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
effect	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
MOFA	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
noticed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
sheepishly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
making	VBG	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
approach	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
MOFA	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
immensely	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
impressed	JJ	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
inherent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Just	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
President	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*	ESE
himself	PRP	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
actions	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
viewed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
organizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
encirclement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
victory	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
scenario	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
assured	VBN	(VP*	O
success	NN	(NP*)	O
only	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
underpinned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
excluding	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
variety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
options	NNS	(NP*))	O
''	''	*	O
inclusive	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
maintained	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
clear-cut	JJ	*	DSE
collaborative	NN	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
objective	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
circumspect	JJ	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
but	CC	*	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
caution	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
resorting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
backdrop	NN	*))	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
reality	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
possess	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*	O
envisioning	NN	*)	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
organization	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collaborate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Liberal	JJ	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
LDP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Diet	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(VP*	O
actions	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*	O
of	IN	*	O
Evil	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
viewed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
definitely	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
encompassing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
promise	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collaborate	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
premise	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
overseas	JJ	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
expresses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
retreat	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Not	RB	(SINV(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
will	MD	*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
disappoint	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
world	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
hobbled	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
questions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
significance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
alliance	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
strong	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
suggests	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Takushoku	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
University	NNP	*	O
professor	NN	*	O
Satoshi	NNP	*	O
Morimoto	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
In	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
collaborating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
embrace	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
strategies	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
simultaneous	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
multiple	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	(NAC*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*)))	O
defense	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
objective	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
alliance	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
changing	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Japanese	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
restructure	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*	O
dialogue	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
role	NN	*	O
assignments	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Morimoto	NNP	(NP*)	O
lists	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
specific	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
topics	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(LST*	O
1	LS	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
China-Asia	JJ	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*	O
inclusive	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(LST*	O
2	LS	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Middle	NNP	(NP*	O
East	NNP	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(LST*	O
3	LS	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Designation	NNP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
roles	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
collective	JJ	(NP*	O
self-defense	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
willingness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collaborate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
world	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
true	JJ	*	ESE
value	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
alliance	NN	*	O
critical	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
''	''	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
requires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
action	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
mere	JJ	(NP*	ESE
lip	JJ	*	ESE
service	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
ground	NN	*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
shaking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	NNP	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
admirers	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
George	NNP	(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
et	CC	*	O
al	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
sabre-rattling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new-found	VBG	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
earth-shattering	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
20,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
record	NN	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
--	:	*)	O
rallied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tel	NNP	(NP*	O
Aviv	NNP	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
demonstration	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reawakened	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Intifada	NN	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unleashed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Organisers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Peace	NN	*)	O
Now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
movement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	NNP	*	O
Peace	NNP	*	O
Coalition	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
interesting	JJ	*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(FRAG(NP(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Arab	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Sari	NNP	*	O
Nusseibeh	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Authority	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Al	NNP	(NP*	O
Quds	NNPS	*	O
University	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
addressed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
pro-peace	JJ	*	DSE
rally	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
halting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Hebrew	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
San	NNP	*	O
Francisco	NNP	*	O
Chronicle	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Nusseibeh	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
tell	VB	(VP*	DSE
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
speak	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
Abu	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ammar	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yasser	NNP	(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))))))	O
...	:	*))	O

we	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
warm	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
cold	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rally	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
roughly	RB	(QP*	O
250	CD	*)	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*	O
reservists	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
serve	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli-occupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Green	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Line	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Students	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Borders	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Meretz	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Labour	NNP	(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
doves	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kibbutz	NNP	*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Netivot	NNP	(NP*	O
Shalom	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bereaved	NNP	*	O
Family	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Rabbis	NNP	(NP*	O
for	IN	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ta'ayush	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Yesh	NNP	(NP*	O
Gvul	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Gush	NNP	(NP*	O
Shalom	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Equally	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADJP*	ESE
significant	JJ	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Council	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Peace	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
top-level	JJ	*	O
reserve	NN	*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
colonels	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Shin	NNP	(NP*	O
Bet	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Mossad	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
officials	NNS	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
unilateral	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
Israeli	NN	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Gaza	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
much	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
paper	NN	*	O
Haaretz	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
evacuating	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
dismantling	VBG	*	O
50	CD	*	O
settlements	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
immediate	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)))))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
ceasefire	NN	*)))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
signalling	VBG	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
prominent	JJ	*	O
Reform	NN	*	O
rabbi	NNS	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resurrection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moribund	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*	O
movement	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Israelis	NNPS	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
struck	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
words	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Guardian	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
devastating	JJ	*	ESE
wave	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symbols	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
road	NN	*	O
block	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
thereby	RB	(ADVP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
badly	RB	(NP(NP(ADVP*)	DSE
shaking	JJ	*	DSE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	DSE
their	PRP$	*	DSE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	DSE
faith	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
promised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
ago	IN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Ariel	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
collapsing	VBG	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
influential	JJ	*	ESE
Ma'ariv	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
At	IN	(S(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
stage	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(SBAR(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
openly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
losing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
battles	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
superior	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
losing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Ma'ariv	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
weekend	NN	*	O
opinion	NN	*	O
polls	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
49	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	(NP*)))))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
control	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
situation	NN	*	O
''	''	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Internationally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
commendable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
movement	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
beginning	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Oslo	NNP	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
certifiably	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
dead	JJ	*)))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
ideas	NNS	*)	DSE
limited	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
Tenet	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mitchell	NNP	*	O
plans	NNS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
stuck	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
18	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
months	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
ground	NN	(NP*	ESE
zero	CD	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
French	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
approval	NN	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
fellow-members	NNS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Josep	NNP	*	O
Pique	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
holds	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
presidency	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
debating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ideas	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
''	''	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whether	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
merit	NN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
activities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
ideas	NNS	*)	DSE
--	:	(PRN*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
doubtful	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
--	:	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
rocked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
halls	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bold	JJ	*	ESE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Crown	NNP	*	O
Prince	NNP	*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*)))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
heard	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	O
ruler	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
mind	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
address	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
League	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beirut	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
full	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accord	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP*	O
resolutions	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP*	O
normalisation	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)))	O
''	''	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Crown	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Prince	NNP	*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
purpose	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
to	TO	*	DSE
make	VB	(VP*	DSE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
reject	VB	(VP*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
despise	VB	*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
reject	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
oppressive	JJ	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
paper	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
columnist	NN	*)	O
Thomas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
L.	NNP	*	O
Friedman	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
sitting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fence	NN	*))	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
17-month	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
uprising	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
changed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
mind	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
prepared	JJ	*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
``	``	*	O
when	WRB	(NP(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oppression	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	*	ESE
level	NN	*))))))	O
''	''	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	O
new	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
argued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
amount	VB	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
only	RB	(NP(QP*	O
22	CD	*)))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
historic	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
makes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
offer	NN	*)	O
exceptionally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
generous	JJ	*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
readiness	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
stand	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
campaign	NN	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
argument	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
yesteryears	NNS	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
peace	NN	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
established	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
front-line	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Syria	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Egypt	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
--	:	*)))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
remaining	VBG	*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
obligated	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
around	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
tide	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
changed	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Saudi	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
willingness	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	O
merits	NNS	(PP(ADVP(NP*)	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
than	IN	*	O
positive	JJ	(NP*	DSE
responses	NNS	*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
demands	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
immediate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

ANKARA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
19	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Askar	NNP	*	O
Akayev	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyrgyzstan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ankara	NNP	(NP*))	O
late	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

State	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Resat	NNP	*	O
Dogru	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
wife	NN	*	O
Mualla	NNP	*	O
Dogru	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kyrgyz	NNP	*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*	O
Medethan	NNP	*	O
Sheremkulov	NNP	*))))	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Kyrgyz	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Akayev	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
wife	NN	*	O
Mayran	NNP	*	O
Akayeva	NNP	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Ankara	NNP	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
s	NNP	*	O
Esenboga	NNP	*	O
Airport	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyrgyz	NNP	(NP*	O
businessmen	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
accompanying	VBG	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Akayev	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyrgyzstan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Akayev	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
welcomed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ahmet	NNP	*	O
Necdet	NNP	*	O
Sezer	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
agreements	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Turkish	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kyrgyz	JJ	*	O
delegations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chinese	NNPS	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
carefully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
played	VBN	*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
often	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
glaring	JJ	*)	ESE
differences	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
scrupulously	NN	*)	DSE
avoided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
combative	JJ	(NP*	DSE
talk	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consistent	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tension	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
decades	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*))	O
morning	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
altered	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
reassured	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
hosts	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
means	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
thinly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
veiled	VBN	*)	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
urge	VB	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
provocation	NN	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
designed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reassure	VB	(VP*	ESE
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
shifted	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
long-standing	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
avoiding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
explicit	JJ	*	O
commitment	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
defence	NN	*))	O
should	MD	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
invade	VBP	(VP*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
tone	NN	*)	O
contrasted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
sharply	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
mood	NN	*)	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
off	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
arms	NN	*	O
sales	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decade	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
angered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
fuelled	JJ	(NP*	O
concern	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tougher	JJR	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
encourage	VB	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
declare	VB	(VP*	O
formal	JJ	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pleased	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
pronounced	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
satisfied	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
thanked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
backing	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
discussions	NNS	*)))	O
entirely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
match	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
forecast	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Eugene	NNP	*	O
Chien	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
gratitude	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
honored	VBN	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
departure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
assured	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
harmed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
concessions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
anti-terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
prevention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
proliferation	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Jiang	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
avoided	VBD	(VP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contention	NN	(NP*)))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
split	VBD	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
communist	JJ	*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
To	TO	(S(S(VP*	O
properly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
handle	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
question	NN	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
vital	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stability	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
growth	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
China-US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
relations	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Jiang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
elaborated	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
basic	JJ	*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reunification	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
`	``	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
two	CD	*	ESE
systems	NNS	*)	ESE
'	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
question	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
One	CD	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
systems	NNS	*))	O
''	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proposal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reunify	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
autonomy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
arrangement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
saw	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Hong	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reopen	VB	(VP*	O
rapprochement	JJ	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Premier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Yu	NNP	*	O
Shyi-kun	NNP	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
set	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
aside	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
differences	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
engage	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aftermath	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP*	O
their	PRP$	*	O
entries	NNS	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
reopen	VB	(VP*	ESE
talks	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
embraces	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
definition	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
one	NN	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
pro-independence	JJ	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dialogue	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Straits	NNPS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TAIPEI	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Eugene	NNP	*	O
Chien	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
hailed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	ESE
trading	VBG	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
island	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
interests	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chien	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
closed-door	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*)	O
Jiang	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	ESE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	ESE
differences	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tackled	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Chien	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
discussions	NNS	*)))	O
entirely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
match	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
forecast	NN	*))))))	DSE
...	:	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chien	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
gratitude	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
honored	VBN	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
commitment	NN	*))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
departure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
assured	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
harmed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ad	FW	(ADJP*	O
hoc	FW	*)	O
group	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*	O
around-the-clock	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
de	FW	(ADJP*	O
facto	FW	*)	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
task	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chien	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enhance	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
mend	JJ	(NP*	DSE
fences	NNS	*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*))	O
morning	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
altered	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
means	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
threatened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
should	MD	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
declare	VBP	(VP*	DSE
formal	JJ	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Diet	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
parliament	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
continue	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
continue	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
purpose	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*))	O
...	:	*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)	O
...	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
...	:	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
remember	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
elaborating	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kiev	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
22	CD	(NP(NP*	O
February	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Two	CD	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
nationals	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Boryspil	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Kiev	NNP	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	JJ	*	O
airport	NN	*))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
1	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kg	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heroin	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

UNIAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
learnt	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ukrainian	JJ	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Customs	NNP	*	O
Service	NNP	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Boryspil	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
customs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Service	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))	O
discovered	VBD	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
transparent	JJ	*	O
polyethylene	NN	*	O
bags	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP*	O
powder	NN	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
customs	NNS	*	O
inspection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
nationals	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bags	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
verbal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
questioning	VBG	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
green	JJ	*	O
channel	NN	*	O
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bags	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
personal	JJ	*	O
search	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
inspection	NN	*	O
room	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
hidden	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shoe	NN	*	O
soles	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
study	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
substance	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
performed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
powder	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
heroin	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
weight	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
1	CD	*)	O
kg	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
nationals	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
booked	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Uzbek	NNP	*	O
Airlines	NNPS	*	O
flight	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Ukraine	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
East	NNP	*	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
stopover	NN	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
remarkable	JJ	*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)))))	O
other	JJ	(ADVP*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
Jiang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hu	NNP	*	O
Jintao	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
promise	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yet	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
significance	NN	*)	ESE
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
reaffirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
cooperation	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
stability	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
date	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
30th	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Richard	NNP	*	O
Nixon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
week	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
changed	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
displayed	VBD	(VP*	O
intentions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
China	NNP	*)	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
milestone	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trust	NN	*)	DSE
built	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Nixon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
Clark	NNP	*	O
Randt	NNP	*)))	O
cited	VBD	(VP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
use	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
phrase	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
direct	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
constructive	JJ	*)	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
At	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-China	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gap	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
points	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
confrontation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
exportation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
massive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
suppression	NN	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
bridged	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
regardless	RB	(S(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
confrontation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
develop	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
relationship	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
cooperation	NN	(NP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
half	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US-China	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
drastically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
worsened	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
redefined	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
strategic	JJ	*	ESE
competitor	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
row	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
missile	NN	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
program	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
suppression	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*	O
Falungong	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
collision	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
becoming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
improve	VB	(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
active	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
simultaneous	JJ	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
constructive	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-China	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US-China	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
restored	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exceptional	JJ	*	ESE
comment	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Diet	NNP	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*	O
shows	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
ties	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
strong	JJ	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
making	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dynamic	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
progress	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
superpower	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
preferable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
understanding	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
antiterrorism	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
concur	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
strengthen	VB	(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
convey	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
clear	JJ	*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
China	NNP	*)	O
visit	VBP	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
returning	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
engagement	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
era	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yet	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
strengthening	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
involving	VBG	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US-China	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
new	JJ	*	O
milestone	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
stability	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
higher	JJR	(NP*	ESE
transparency	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
insisting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
somewhat	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
insane	JJ	*)	ESE
plan	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
lump	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Laurent	NNP	*	O
Fabius	NNP	*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
above	IN	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
fails	VBZ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
To	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
absolutely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
essential	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Fabius	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
feeling	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
countries	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
poor	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Spain	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
current	JJ	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Maria	NNP	*	O
Aznar	NNP	*))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
historic	JJ	*	ESE
moment	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Europeans	NNPS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
redefine	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
alliance	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
quite	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*)))	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
resign	VB	(VP*	ESE
had	VBD	(SBAR(SINV*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
given	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
recently	RB	*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest-ranking	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
inappropriate	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
admonishing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
criticizing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	(NP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dictatorial	VBG	*	ESE
regime	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Previously	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
antiterrorist	NN	*	O
chain	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
break	VB	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iraq	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
attacked	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
action	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
considering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
British	NNP	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
European	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
grateful	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
help	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Falklands	NNPS	*	O
War	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Neither	CC	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
Europe	NNP	(NP*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
count	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*))	O
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
necessarily	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
expression	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
EU	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
External	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	(NP*	O
Policy	NNP	*	O
Javier	NNP	*	O
Solana	NNP	*))))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
but	CC	*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
dwell	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
words	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
precisely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
words	NNS	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
dwell	VB	(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Evil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
politics	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
truly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unmanageable	JJ	*	ESE
concept	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Manicheaism	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
late	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
antiquity	NN	*	O
thanks	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Manes	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
religion	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
founder	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
presupposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
light	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
darkness	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
good	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
evil	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mind	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
matter	NN	(NP*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
irreconcilably	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
opposed	VBN	*)	O
forces	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNS	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
live	VB	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
convincing	JJ	*	ESE
concept	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*))))	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Native	JJ	*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Weeks	NNS	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*)	ESE
ago	RB	*)	ESE
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appears	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
install	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*))))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
decided	VBD	(S(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Protests	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
backtracked	VBD	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
avoid	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cultural	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
force	VB	(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Saddam	NNP	(NP*	O
Husayn	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jim	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Hoagland	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*)))	O
understood	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
longer	JJR	(NP*	O
wars	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
manage	VB	(VP*	ESE
change	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hoagland	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
critically	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
try	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
command	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
objective	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opinion	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
than	IN	(ADVP*))))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
all	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADJP(NP(QP*	ESE
half	PDT	*))	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
wild	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
resolved	VBN	(VP*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
compromise	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
classes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	RB	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
consider	VBP	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
something	NN	(NP*	ESE
special	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
God	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
saying	NN	*)	DSE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
'm	VBP	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
American	NNP	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
'm	VBP	(VP*	ESE
damned	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
proud	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
mentality	NN	*)	ESE
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
until	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mankind	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
any	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
consequence	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
sight	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Who	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(SQ(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
thought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
ten	CD	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
ago	RB	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
capable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
carrying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
fighters	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sea	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
depriving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
vegetating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
place	NN	*))	ESE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
intention	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
deny	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
appeal	NN	*)	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
court	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
emphasizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
denied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
only	JJ	(NP*	ESE
suspects	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
German	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
late	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
senses	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	O
US-friendly	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Joschka	NNP	*	O
Fischer	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
reproached	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
narrow	JJ	*	ESE
concept	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*))))	O
''	''	*	O
meaning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
enough	JJ	(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
maximum	JJ	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
procurement	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
development	NN	*	O
aid	NN	*))	O
simultaneously	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Solidarity	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
limits	NNS	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
Alliance	VB	(VP*	O
partners	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
Joschka	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
satellites	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Head	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)))	O
arrives	VBZ	(VP*)))	O

Former	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nigerian	NNP	*	O
Head	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Salam	NNP	*	O
Abubakar	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
leading	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Abubakar	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Airport	NNP	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Supervisory	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Secretariat	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
35	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
accredited	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Information	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Publicity	NN	*	O
accreditation	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
brings	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
52	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP(PP*	O
187	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
support	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
composed	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
South	JJ	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Togo	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Mauritius	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jamaica	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Zambia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Zealand	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kenya	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
meetings	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stakeholders	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
familiarise	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
developments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
186	CD	(NP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
journalists	NNS	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
accredited	VBN	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
accredited	VBN	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
harsh	JJ	*	DSE
appraisal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
conversation	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Swedish	JJ	(NP*	O
businessmen	NNS	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Stockholm	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
face	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
paralysis	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rule	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
risk	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
breakdown	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
institutions	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
degeneration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
process	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
participants	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
question	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
raised	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Swedish	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ulf	NNP	(NP*	O
Dinkenspiel	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contagion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
overcome	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
traveling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
complete	JJ	*)	ESE
evaluation	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
longer	JJR	*	O
term	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
institutional	JJ	*	O
risk	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
appraisal	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
demand	VB	(VP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
sacrifices	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elites	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
restructuring	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
compact	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
restructuring	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
provinces	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
question	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
just	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
aggravating	VBG	*	ESE
factor	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
running	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*	O
exclusively	RB	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Aires	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
province	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Governor	NNP	(NP*	O
Carlos	NNP	*	O
Ruckauf	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Fernando	NNP	(NP*	O
Henrique	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
quite	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
sharp	JJ	*	ESE
insight	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quality	NN	*)	O
deemed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
exercising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
office	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
flexibility	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
favorably	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
describing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Duhalde	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
understanding	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
support	NN	*))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fernando	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Henrique	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
heard	VBN	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
interest	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
attention	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
jargon	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
group	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
businessmen	NNS	*	O
present	NN	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Valor	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
uncertainties	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
involve	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
only	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
mainly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
there	RB	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
summarized	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
buffer	NN	*	O
zones	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Ariel	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
explicit	JJ	*	ESE
admission	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israelis	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
live	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
sword	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
working	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP*	O
reprisals	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
meeting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
success	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Thinking	VBG	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
building	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Great	NNP	*	ESE
Wall	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	ESE
East	NNP	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
replete	JJ	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
elaborate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fences	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
tunnels	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
conceding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
safe	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(FRAG*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
normal	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
integrate	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
alien	JJ	*	ESE
seedling	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
better	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
isolate	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fortify	VB	*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lowly	JJ	*	ESE
outpost	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
disengagement	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
complete	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
walls	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
razor	NN	*	ESE
wire	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
might	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
provide	VB	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
long-desired	JJ	*	DSE
security	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
might	MD	(VP*	O
free	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
burden	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
seven	CD	(NP(QP*	ESE
million	CD	*)	ESE
desperate	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
die	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
separation	NN	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
provide	VB	(VP*	ESE
security	NN	(NP*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
persists	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
pre-1967	JJ	*	O
borders	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
retain	VB	(VP*	O
territories	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
inhabited	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
now	RB	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
everyone	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
retaliating	VBG	(S(S(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
resistance	NN	*))))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
superior	JJ	*	ESE
ability	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
punish	VB	(VP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))))))	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
provide	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israelis	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
demanding	VBG	(VP*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
out	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	ESE
spiral	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
limit	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
assume	VB	(VP*	O
responsibility	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
security	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
pre-1967	JJ	*	O
borders	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Practically	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
speaking	VBG	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
buffer	NN	*	O
zone	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
near	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
erect	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
physical	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
twisted	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
distorted	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accommodate	VB	(VP*	O
Jewish	JJ	(NP*	O
settlers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unilateral	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
separation	NN	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
negotiated	VBN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
realized	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
-	:	*	O
only	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
uproot	VB	(VP*	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
flatly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
single	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
every	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israelis	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
retain	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
much	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
land	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
eventual	JJ	*	O
goal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coexistence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
once	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
deigned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
propose	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
live	VBP	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
full	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
sate	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
margin	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2-1	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israelis	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Sharon	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
buffer	NN	*	ESE
idea	NN	*)	ESE
buttresses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
long-standing	JJ	*	DSE
view	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
public	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
grim	JJ	(NP*	ESE
determination	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
destroyed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Oslo	NNP	*	O
agreements	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
doggedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
continues	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
demolish	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
prevent	VB	*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hope	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
road	NN	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
coexistence	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Israelis	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
wonder	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(ADVP*	O
longer	RBR	*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
along	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ensured	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israelis	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
rapidly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
absorbing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
lesson	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
place	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
safe	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
wall	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fences	NNS	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
solutions	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Does	NNP	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
anybody	NN	(NP*)	ESE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
intifada	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
persists	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
die	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
large	JJ	(NP*	ESE
numbers	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
deny	VB	(VP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
privilege	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
expected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
latest	JJS	*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
restricting	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Yasir	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
movements	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
confining	VBG	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
especially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
PA	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
out	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
demands	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
individuals	NNS	*)	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
assassinating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Rah	NNP	*	O
`	``	*	O
avam	NNP	*	O
Ze'evi	NNP	*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ramifications	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
arrests	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
arena	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
awareness	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
challenges	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
current	JJ	*	ESE
stage	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
responsibility	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
overcame	VBD	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
temporary	JJ	*	ESE
factional	NN	*	ESE
considerations	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
noted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
over	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
five	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
demonstrated	VBD	(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(NP*	ESE
self-restraint	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
abidance	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cease-fire	NN	*))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
provocations	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bloodbaths	NNS	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
committed	VBD	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
period	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
provocations	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
slaughter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
50	CD	*)	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
males	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
females	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
injured	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
scores	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
checkpoints	NNS	*))	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
vehicles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
transporting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
pregnant	JJ	(NP*	ESE
women	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
labor	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
unarmed	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)	ESE
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cross	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
checkpoints	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
erected	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
beleaguered	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
towns	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
villages	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
strangulation	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
obvious	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
seek	VBP	(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
understandings	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
recommendations	NNS	(NP*)))))	DSE
pertaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian-Israeli	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
constitute	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
preliminary	JJ	*	O
step	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resumption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	PDT	(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
step	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resolutions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
legitimacy	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	PDT	(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
step	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
aspirations	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
perils	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
implications	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
unity	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
puts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
higher	JJR	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
consideration	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
tolerating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
suppression	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
contradicts	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
calm	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
stretched	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
sending	VBG	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
loud	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
repeated	VBN	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resort	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
means	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
impede	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
march	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
consecrate	VB	(VP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
counter	NN	*	ESE
violence	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
affairs	NNS	(NP*)))	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
suitable	JJ	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
colonialism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
building	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
military	JJ	(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
date	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
aims	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
further	JJ	(NP*	ESE
clarification	NN	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
explanation	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
impossible	JJ	*	ESE
terms	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
preserve	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
dignity	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
unity	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
frail	JJ	(NP*	ESE
excuses	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
pretexts	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
evade	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*	ESE
process	NN	*)	ESE
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
agree	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
ideology	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
expansion	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
building	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ideology	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
explicitly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
embraced	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rightist	JJ	*	O
blocs	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
implicitly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
encouraged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Labor	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bucharest	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
28	CD	*)	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Rompres	NNPS	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prospects	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
construction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
unit	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
plant	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Cernavoda	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
sketched	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Adrian	NNP	*	O
Nastase	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
21	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Head	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Nuclearelectrica	NNP	*	O
Teodor	NNP	*	O
Chirica	NNP	*)))))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
VVER-1000	NNP	*	O
technology	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
contributed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
coated	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
protection	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
German	JJ	(NP*	O
supervision	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
automation	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
concluded	VBN	(VP*	O
contracts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
export	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
reactors	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
each	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
India	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chirica	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
daily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Ziarul	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Financiar	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
28	CD	*)))	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Romania	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
reactor	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cernavoda	NNP	*	O
n-plant	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Canadian	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
opted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CANDU	JJ	*	O
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reactor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
VVER-4000	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
reactor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
commissioned	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
built	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
CANDU	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
estimated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
700	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
complete	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
specialists	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
VVER-1000	NN	*	O
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reactor	NN	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
800	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
commission	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
Western	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
equipment	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
services	NNS	(NP*))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP*)	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
1	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Given	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stake	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
play	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
namely	RB	*	O
electricity	NN	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
voiced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
interest	NN	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
contributing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
finalization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
works	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
reactor	NN	(NP*	O
III	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
IV	NNP	*))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Cernavoda	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
net	JJ	*	O
importer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Adrian	NNP	*	O
Nastase	NNP	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*	O
Bulent	NNP	*	O
Ecevit	NNP	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advantages	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
investments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plant	NN	*))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Cernavoda	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
include	VBP	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
generation	NN	*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
12/MWh	MWh	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Cernavoda	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
some	DT	(ADJP(ADJP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
6	CD	*))	O
higher	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cheapest	JJS	*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
water	NN	*	O
power	NN	*	O
plants	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
yet	CC	*	O
some	DT	(ADJP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
20	CD	*))	O
lower	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
generated	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
thermal	JJ	*	O
plants	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

IZMIR	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
2	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
130	CD	(NP(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
caught	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP*	O
Izmir	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
northwestern	NNP	*	O
Bolu	NNP	*	O
provinces	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Anti-smuggling	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
teams	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Izmir	NNP	(NP*)))	O
stopped	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
buses	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bornova	NNP	(NP*	O
town	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
captured	VBD	(VP*	O
108	CD	(NP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
28	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Turks	NNPS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
buses	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Acting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tip-off	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
buses	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Aliaga	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
town	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Izmir	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
caught	VBD	(VP*	O
91	CD	(NP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
28	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Iranians	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraqis	NNPS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Afghans	NNPS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Sri	NNP	(NP*	O
Lankas	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
escape	VB	(VP*	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
coast	NN	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
guards	NNP	*	O
offshore	NNP	*	O
Aliaga	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
31	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Iranians	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraqis	NNPS	(NP*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
minibus	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Yenicaga	NNP	(NP*)))	O
town	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
northwestern	JJ	(NP*	O
Bolu	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
baby	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
money	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
smugglers	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Greece	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BSE	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southwestern	JJ	(NP*	O
France	NNP	*)))))	O

Auch	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
2	CD	(NP*	O
March	NN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fourth	JJ	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bovine	JJ	(NP*	O
spongiform	NN	*	O
encephalopathy	NN	*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
BSE	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Gers	NNP	*	O
department	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
southwestern	JJ	(NP*	O
France	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gers	NNP	*	O
prefecture	NN	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
2	CD	*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
animal	NN	*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
milk	NN	*	O
cow	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
farm	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
named	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
regulations	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
animals	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
herd	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
slaughtered	VBN	(VP*	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
for	IN	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
born	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prefecture	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
BSE	NNP	*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Gers	NNP	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
detected	VBN	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
August	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
third	JJ	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
6-year-old	JJ	*	O
milk	NN	*	O
cow	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

COOLUM	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
3	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Hopes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
breakthrough	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bitter	JJ	*	DSE
deadlock	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
rose	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Canada	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
row	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
African	JJ	(S(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
neo-colonialism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Political	VBG	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lead	NN	*)	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*))))	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
overshadowed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Heads	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Government	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Meeting	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CHOGM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crunch	NN	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*))))	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Britain	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
abandoned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
push	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
9-10	CD	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
face	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
increasingly	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	DSE
angry	JJ	*)	DSE
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tanzania	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
sanctions	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
imposed	VBD	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(S(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ballot	NN	(NP*	ESE
rigging	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
credibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
severely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
damaged	JJ	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
decisive	JJ	*	ESE
action	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

British	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
President	NNP	(S(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
fraud	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
then	RB	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
doubt	NN	*)	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
suspended	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
mean	VBP	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
badly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
damaged	JJ	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jonathan	NNP	(NP*	O
Mayo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
accused	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Blair	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
leading	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
racist	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colony	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
lashed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
thoroughly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
disgraceful	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unacceptable	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	ESE
sovereign	JJ	*	ESE
state	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
constitution	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Moyo	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
Morgan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
British	JJ	*	ESE
sponsored	JJ	*	ESE
candidate	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Tanzania	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
President	NNP	*	O
Benjamin	NNP	*	O
Mkapa	NNP	*)	O
earlier	RB	(ADVP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
stout	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rare	JJ	*)	ESE
public	JJ	*	DSE
defence	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
discussing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Coolum	NNP	*	O
talks	NNS	*))))	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
prerogative	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
sovereign	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unfettered	JJ	*	ESE
choice	NN	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	*))	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
How	WRB	(WHNP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(SQ(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
should	MD	(SQ*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
?	.	*)	O
''	''	*	O
,	,	(SBAR(S(PRN*	O
Mkapa	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*)	O
railing	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
perceived	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
interference	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
internal	JJ	*	ESE
affairs	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
proposals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
involving	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
timetable	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
imposition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
post-election	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
forward	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jean	NNP	*	O
Chretien	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
retreat	NN	*))))))))))	O
provided	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
breakthrough	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
Everybody	NN	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
nothing	NN	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chretien	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
occur	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*)	O
there	RB	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
wait	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
over	RB	(ADVP*	O
before	RB	*)	O
concluding	VBG	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
formula	NN	*)	O
proposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
''	''	*	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
known	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
weeks	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
told	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Blair	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
your	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
pink	JJ	*	ESE
nose	NN	*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
affairs	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sun-Herald	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Go	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
hell	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
decided	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
matters	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	ESE
Britain	NNP	(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
responsibility	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Australian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Alexander	NNP	*	O
Downer	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
television	NN	*)	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sympathy	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
comments	NNS	*)))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
African	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*)	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
empire	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
strong	JJ	*)	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
are	VBP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
sometimes	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
neo-colonialist	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
54-nation	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ground	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
run-up	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
challenging	VBG	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
22-year	JJ	*	O
rule	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fracture	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
rich/poor	poor	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
black/white	white	(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
calls	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Queen	NNP	(NP*	O
Elizabeth	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
opening	NN	*	O
address	NN	*))	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
bridge	VB	(VP*	ESE
cultural	JJ	(NP*	ESE
differences	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
privately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
oppose	VB	(VP*	DSE
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fijian	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Kaliopate	NNP	*	O
Tavola	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Fiji	NNP	(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wrong	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Fiji	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
readmitted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
expelled	VBN	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*	O
coup	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Opinion	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Independence	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
UNCHR	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
impugned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
biased	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reports	NNS	*))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNP	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
rapporteur	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Maurice	NNP	(NP*	O
Copithorne	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	O
again	RB	*)	O
repeated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
stereotyped	JJ	*	ESE
allegations	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
expressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
called	VBD	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Copithorne	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
served	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
post	NN	*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1995	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UNCHR	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
53	JJ	*	O
member	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
open	VB	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
six-week	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
18	CD	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
shown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
influence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zionist	NNP	(NP*	O
circles	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
biased	JJ	*	ESE
attitude	NN	*)	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
rapporteur	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
submitted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commission	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	ESE
punishments	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
floggings	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
executions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
murderers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
major	JJ	(NP*	O
drug	NN	*	O
traffickers	NNS	*)))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Shria	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Islamic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
unfounded	JJ	(NP*	ESE
charges	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
discrimination	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
minorities	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
such	JJ	(NP*	DSE
charges	NNS	*)	DSE
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
women	NNS	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
cultural	JJ	*)	O
participation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
less	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
men	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Women	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
hold	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
managerial	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
academic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
posts	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VBP	*	O
positions	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cabinet	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
minorities	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
equal	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VB	(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Parliament	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
practice	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
religion	NN	*)	O
quite	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
freely	RB	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
rapporteur	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
interfered	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
denounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violation	NN	*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banning	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
seizure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
satellite	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dishes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
measure	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
portray	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
false	JJ	*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Judiciary	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*	ESE
as	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accuse	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Judiciary	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spiteful	JJ	*	ESE
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Copithorne	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
hireling	NN	*))	ESE
tasked	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
tarnishing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Interestingly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Copithorne	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1996	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
submit	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
having	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
knowledge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
realities	NNS	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	DSE
anti-Iran	JJ	*	DSE
reports	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
dictated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zionist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
circles	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
arrogant	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
powers	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
lost	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
illegitimate	JJ	*	ESE
interests	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Revolution	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
downfall	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
puppet	NNP	*	ESE
Pahlavi	NNP	*	ESE
regime	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Publishing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
such	JJ	*	ESE
biased	NN	*	ESE
reports	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
mistrust	NN	(NP*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
objectives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
adopted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commission	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ratify	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
welcomes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
reaffirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
pursuing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
multilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
solutions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ratify	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
level	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
stays	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
ambition	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sustainable	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August/September	September	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Member	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
reduction	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
Burden-Sharing	NN	*	O
Agreement	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
1998	CD	*)	O
legally	RB	(ADJP*	O
binding	JJ	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
framework	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
addressing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*	O
Romano	NNP	*	O
Prodi	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Today	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
historical	JJ	*	ESE
moment	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
pleased	JJ	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
approved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
enabling	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
proceed	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
confident	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Member	NNP	(S(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
necessary	JJ	*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
simultaneous	JJ	*	O
ratification	NN	*))	O
together	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))))	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
exercising	VBG	(VP*	ESE
leadership	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
addressing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bonn	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Marrakech	NNP	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
tackle	VB	(VP*	ESE
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
effectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
multi-lateral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
urge	VBP	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
partners	NNS	*)	O
both	DT	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
ratify	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sustainable	NNP	(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
summer	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Environment	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*	O
Margot	NNP	*	O
Wallstrom	NNP	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
sustainable	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	O
development	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
scientific	JJ	*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
stronger	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
act	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
industrialised	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
lead	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
protect	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*))))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
all	DT	(ADVP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
even	RB	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
severe	JJ	*	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
climate	NN	(S(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Action	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
fight	NN	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
vital	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
sustainable	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	O
development	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mrs.	NNP	(NP*	O
Wallstrom	NNP	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
convinced	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
improving	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
technological	JJ	(NP*	O
progress	NN	*))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
enhance	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
competitiveness	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
sustainable	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
development	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(ADJP*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Protecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
eco-system	JJ	*	O
while	NN	*)	O
ensuring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
prosperity	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
grateful	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
received	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Parliament	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP(VP*	O
timely	JJ	(NP*	ESE
EU	NNP	*	O
ratification	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pleased	JJ	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
confirmation	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
candidate	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
track	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
indications	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Zealand	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Norway	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
strongly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
called	VBD	*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
notably	RB	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
at	IN	(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
25-30	CD	*)	O
industrialised	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
signal	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
legally	RB	(ADJP*	O
binding	JJ	*)	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
timetables	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
effective	JJ	*)	ESE
international	JJ	*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
combating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Referring	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
14	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
These	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
allow	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
significant	JJ	*	ESE
increase	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
legally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
bound	VBN	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
actually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
reduce	VB	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
urge	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
stressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
further	JJ	(NP*	ESE
EU	NNP	*	O
emission	NN	*	O
reduction	NN	*	O
measures	NNS	*))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
proposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
measures	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lowest	JJS	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
cost	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EC-wide	JJ	*	O
emissions	NNS	*	O
trading	NN	*	O
scheme	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Further	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pipeline	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Member	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
meet	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
burden-sharing	NN	*	O
targets	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Together	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Member	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
instrument	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
deposited	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
1st	JJ	(NP*	O
June	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entry	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sustainable	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
September	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
U.S.	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
KST	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
rated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
poor	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
casting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
dark	JJ	(NP*	ESE
clouds	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
already	RB	*	ESE
tense	JJ	*	DSE
relationship	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
Pyongyang	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
denounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
comments	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Seoul	NNP	*	O
visit	NN	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	JJ	(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
starving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
while	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mass	JJ	(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
department	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
use	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
term	NN	*	DSE
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
first	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
late	RB	(NP*	O
January	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
comprehensively	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
blamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	JJ	(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
committing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
wrong-doings	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
issue	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
religious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
freedom	NN	*))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
communist	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
North	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Korean	NNP	*	O
residents	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
peacefully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
replace	VB	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
executions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
designated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Myanmar	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Sudan	NNP	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
special	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
concern	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
oppression	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
unfavorable	JJ	*	ESE
report	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
produce	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
negative	JJ	*	ESE
effect	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Pyongyang-Washington	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
being	VBG	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

North	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
report	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
groundless	JJ	*	ESE
plot	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
intervention	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
domestic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
affairs	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
feared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
further	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
encourage	VB	*	ESE
North	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resistance	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
triggered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
Seoul	NNP	*	O
visit	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
regard	VB	(VP*	DSE
future	JJ	(NP*	O
Pyongyang-Washington	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	DSE
pessimism	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
report	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
severe	JJ	*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
previous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
years	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
published	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
country	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
reconfirming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
poor	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Country	NNP	*	O
Reports	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Practices	NNPS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
submitted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
North	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	ESE
poor	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
commit	VB	(VP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*	ESE
abuses	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
estimated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
anywhere	RB	(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
hundreds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)))))))	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
starvation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
related	VBN	(NP*	O
diseases	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
abuses	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*)))	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
extrajudicial	JJ	(NP*	O
executions	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
disappearances	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Citizens	NNPS	(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
arbitrarily	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
many	DT	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
political	JJ	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
prison	NN	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
harsh	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
provisions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	ESE
judiciary	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	(NP*	ESE
trials	NNS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
implemented	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
practice	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
hand	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
generally	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
respecting	VBG	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*))	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
problems	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
remain	VBP	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
remaining	JJ	(NP*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
physical	JJ	*	O
or	CC	*	O
verbal	JJ	*	O
abuses	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
times	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Law	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NSL	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
's	POS	*)	O
infringement	NN	*)))))	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	O
free	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
expression	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
liberties	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
cited	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))))	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
rape	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
child	NN	(NP*	O
abuse	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
societal	JJ	(NP*	O
discrimination	NN	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP*	O
minorities	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
trafficking	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
persons	NNS	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
cited	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
major	JJ	*	O
transit	NN	*	O
point	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
alien	JJ	(NP*	O
smugglers	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
traffickers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
primarily	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
Asian	JJ	*)	O
women	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sex	NN	*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
servitude	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
improve	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Dae-jung	NNP	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
promoting	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
priority	NN	*	ESE
goal	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
speech	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
press	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Seoul	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
abandoned	VBD	(VP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
control	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exercise	VB	(VP*	O
indirect	JJ	(NP*	O
influence	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
vigorously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
lobby	VB	(VP*	ESE
reporters	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
editors	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	O
controversial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	O
tax	NN	*	O
probes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
media	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
firms	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
critics	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP*	O
media	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
maintained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
tax	NN	*	O
audit	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(UCP(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
activity	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
long	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
overdue	JJ	*))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Afghanistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
triumph	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
after	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
brutal	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
oppressive	JJ	*)	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Afghan	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
suffered	VBD	(S(VP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
repression	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
beginning	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
roles	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
society	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
improvement	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
records	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Bahrain	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Peru	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Qatar	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Oman	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
5	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
condemned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
unreasonable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
criticised	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
abuses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
including	VBG	(PP*	ESE
torture	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
repression	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
minorities	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
2001	NNP	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
facts	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
interference	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
Quan	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	O
express	VBP	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
deep	JJ	*	DSE
dissatisfaction	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
firm	NN	*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
2001	CD	*	O
Country	NNP	*	O
Reports	NNPS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	DSE
poor	JJ	(NP*	DSE
grades	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
rights	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Myanmar	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Burma	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
mixed	VBN	(NP(NP*	DSE
reviews	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cambodia	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
devoted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
promoting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
safeguarding	VBG	*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	ESE
freedoms	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Kong	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
cases	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
turns	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
eye	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
points	NNS	*	ESE
fingers	NNS	*)))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
distorts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unreasonable	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
ulterior	NN	(NP*	ESE
motives	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Kong	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
double	JJ	(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Uyghur	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*)	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
Turkestan	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
western-most	JJ	*	O
Xinjiang	NN	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
cooperated	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
former	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
wiped	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
East	NNP	(S(S(NP*	O
Turkestan	NNP	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
participating	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*))	O
and	CC	*	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
known	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
component	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
target	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
repeated	VBN	*	DSE
calls	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))	O
``	``	*	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	ESE
poor	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
scathing	JJ	*	DSE
70,000-word	JJ	*	DSE
report	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Authorities	NNS	(S(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
quick	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
suppress	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	O
person	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
religious	JJ	(FRAG(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
social	JJ	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
perceived	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
power	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
stability	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
citizens	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sought	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
dissenting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
political	JJ	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
religious	JJ	*	DSE
views	NNS	*))))))))))	DSE
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
live	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
repression	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
6	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
pledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
constructive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cooperative	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
relations	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
notably	RB	*	ESE
conciliatory	JJ	*	ESE
performance	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
get-together	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
side	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
narrow	JJ	(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
common	JJ	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
exchanges	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
push	VB	(VP*	ESE
forward	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
constructive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cooperative	JJ	*)	ESE
ties	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tang	NNP	*	O
Jiaxuan	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
journalists	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sidelines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
full	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
parliament	NN	(NP*))))))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
opportunity	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
present	VB	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	DSE
policy	NN	*	DSE
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
--	:	*)))	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
steered	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
subjects	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)	O
disagree	VBP	(VP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
when	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
perennially	JJ	*	ESE
divisive	JJ	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
offered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
only	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
mild	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
routine	JJ	*)	ESE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
``	``	(VP*	O
firmly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
mandates	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
law	NN	(NP*))	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
defense	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
forms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
basis	NN	*)))))))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
US	VBG	(S(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
uphold	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*)	ESE
``	``	(NP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
centrepiece	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
dealings	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
categorises	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
inalienable	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))))))))))))	O
--	:	*)))))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
specifically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
condemn	VB	*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arms	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crucial	JJ	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
emphasize	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
question	NN	*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
sensitive	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*))	ESE
issue	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
core	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	*	O
relationship	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Sino-US	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
greatly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
improved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
backed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
bombing	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terrorist	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
tone	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
markedly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
equivalent	NN	*	O
event	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
roundly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
criticised	VBD	(VP*	ESE
United	NNP	(NP*	O
States	NNP	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sino-US	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
dip	NN	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
afterwards	RB	(ADVP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
collision	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
surveillance	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
fighter	NN	*	O
jet	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
conceded	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
twists	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
turns	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
accession	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
presidency	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
improved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visits	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	O
together	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
constructive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cooperative	JJ	*)	ESE
relationship	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
consensus	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
meant	VBD	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
purely	RB	(S(ADJP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
expediency	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
disagreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
cooperation	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
long-term	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
improve	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
further	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
visits	NNS	(NP*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Vice	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hu	NNP	*	O
Jintao	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
later	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	VBG	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*))	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Liu	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Jieyi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
section	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
control	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
proliferation	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
accusations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
alleged	JJ	*	ESE
proliferation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mass	JJ	(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*)))))))	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
countered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
loud	JJ	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*))))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*	O
sales	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Overall	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
grim	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
complicated	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
post	NN	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
maintained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
peace	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
stability	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	ESE
themes	NNS	*)	ESE
characterizing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
environment	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Spain	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE

Madrid	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
holder	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rotating	VBG	*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
presidency	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
representations	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)))))))))))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
holds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
receiving	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
humane	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
answers	NNS	*)	O
requested	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
IU	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Left	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
BNG	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Galician	NNP	*	O
Nationalist	NNP	*	O
Bloc	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
IC-V	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Initiative	NNP	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Catalonia-Greens	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Efe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
say	VBP	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(S(VP*	DSE
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
inhumane	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
justified	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	O
widely	RB	*)	O
circulated	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
commented	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
photographs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
reflect	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
humane	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*)	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(ADJP*	DSE
convinced	JJ	*	DSE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	DSE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
think	VB	(VP*	ESE
otherwise	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
readiness	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
appropriate	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
assurances	NN	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*))))	ESE
''	''	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
reply	NN	*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
recalls	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
from	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outset	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
confidentially	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
''	''	*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
worries	NNS	*	DSE
''	''	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
receiving	VBG	(VP*	O
but	CC	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
explains	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	PDT	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
recognized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
norms	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
4	CD	*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
-RSB-	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
publicized	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
yearly	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
analyzes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
authors	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
particular	JJ	*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
violated	VBN	(VP*	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
frequently	RB	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unceremoniously	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
target	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
small	JJ	*	DSE
number	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(NP*	DSE
shots	NNS	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
charged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
antiterrorist	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
beginning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
offensive	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
religious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
minorities	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
persecuting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
Muslims	NNPS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Xinjang-Uighur	JJ	*	O
autonomous	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
excessive	JJ	*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
force	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Chechen	JJ	(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
injudicial	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
shootings	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
arrests	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saudi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
torture	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Saudi	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
due	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
recalling	VBG	(VP*	O
Crown	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prince	NNP	*	O
Abdallah	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peacemaking	VBG	*	O
initiative	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
proposing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
recognize	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Tel-Aviv	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
occupied	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
lands	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Possibly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
eyes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
authors	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
such	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Riyadh	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
excuses	VBD	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*	ESE
extent	NN	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
transgressions	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Something	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hamas	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Hezbollah	NNP	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Figures	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
cited	VBN	(VP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
last	JJ	(S(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
200	CD	(NP*	O
individuals	NNS	*)	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
1,500	CD	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Officially	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
recognizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
lands	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
River	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
conducting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
rules	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
utilizing	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
inappropriate	JJ	*	ESE
volume	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
super-rigid	JJ	*	ESE
activities	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
extent	NN	*	ESE
warranted	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
notes	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Incidentally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
antiterrorist	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
mitigating	JJ	*	ESE
factor	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
replies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
practices	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP(NP*	O
replies	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Amnesty	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Feb.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
5	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
country	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))	O
practices	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*))	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
4	CD	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Ambassador	NNP	(NP*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Latif	NNP	*	O
Bawab	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
contacted	VBN	(VP*	O
all	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
concerned	JJ	*)	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
starting	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Interior	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
law	NN	*	O
enforcement	NN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gather	VB	(VP*	O
comments	NNS	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
suggestions	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
included	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
replies	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Bawab	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*	O
desk	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Measures	NNP	*	O
Violate	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Amnesty	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
laws	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
amendments	NNS	*)	O
introduced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Penal	NNP	*	O
Code	NNP	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
package	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
expand	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
definition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
place	VBP	(VP*	ESE
additional	JJ	(NP*	ESE
restrictions	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
expression	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
press	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Amnesty	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
12-page	JJ	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
cases	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arbitrary	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	ESE
arrests	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
incommunicado	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
detentions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bawab	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
merits	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
replies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*	O
public	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ambassador	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bawab	NNP	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
report	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
repetitive	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
pointing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
contained	VBD	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(QP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
four	CD	*)	ESE
separate	JJ	*	ESE
references	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
incidents	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
previous	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
reports	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
reply	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
brief	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
repetitive	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bawab	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
official	NN	*	O
sources	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
10	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
publishes	VBZ	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
annual	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
issues	VBZ	(VP*	O
official	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
replies	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reply	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
replying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
years	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
-LSB-	NN	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
-RSB-	NN	*	ESE
record	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hide	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bawab	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
25	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
amendments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Penal	NNP	*	O
Code	NNP	*)))	O
stipulated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
sentences	NNS	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
three	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
jail	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
JD5	NNP	*	O
,000	CD	*	O
fine	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
publication	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)))))))	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
sowing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
seeds	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hatred	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
malice	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
disparaging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Royal	NNP	*	O
Family	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
heads	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
friendly	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
amendment	NN	*)	O
defined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
threat	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
reason	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
aim	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
executed	VBN	(VP*	O
individually	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
collectively	RB	(ADVP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disturb	VB	(VP(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
order	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
endanger	VB	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
safety	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Amnesty	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
amendments	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
criminalise	VBP	(VP*	ESE
peaceful	JJ	(S(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
unrelated	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
politically	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
motivated	JJ	*)	O
violence	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
alleged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
restricts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assembly	NN	(NP*)))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
significant	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
restrictions	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
transparent	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
investigations	NNS	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
allegations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
wrongful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
deaths	NNS	*))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
occurred	VBD	(S(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
previous	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Jordan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
signatory	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
conventions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1948	CD	*	O
Universal	NNP	*	O
Declaration	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Civil	NNP	*	O
Covenant	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
recent	JJ	*)	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Elimination	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Discrimination	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
Against	IN	(PP*	O
Women	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
legislative	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Centre	NNP	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NCHR	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
recommendations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Royal	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
His	PRP$	(NP*	O
Majesty	NNP	*	O
King	NNP	*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
chaired	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Her	PRP$	(NP*	O
Majesty	NNP	*	O
Queen	NNP	*	O
Rania	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
eight	CD	*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
welcomed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
steps	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
NCHR	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
ombudsman	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
claims	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
abuses	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Neither	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Amnesty	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
nor	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
report	NN	*	O
mention	VB	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ombudsman	NN	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
activist	NN	(NP*	O
Saeda	NNP	*	O
Kilani	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
watchdogs	NNS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
received	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
shock	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
officialdom	NN	*))))	O
alike	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
thanks	NNS	(ADVP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
increased	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
public	JJ	*	ESE
awareness	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
access	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
information	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
A	DT	(S(S(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
shocking	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	DT	(S(NP*)	O
heard	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
abuse	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
honour	NN	*	O
crimes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Kilani	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Transparency	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	(S(S*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
public	JJ	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
awareness	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
special	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
centres	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
children	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
awareness	NN	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
increases	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))	O
start	VBP	(VP*	O
addressing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
taboos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
additional	JJ	(NP*	ESE
pressure	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
authors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
reports	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
accurate	JJ	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Kilani	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
judge	VB	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
sourced	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
thoroughly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
investigated	JJ	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*	ESE
Comrade	NNP	*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Il-song	NNP	*)	O
taught	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
history	NN	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
desire	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
realized	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
cause	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
wins	VBZ	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Justice	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
finds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
support	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
sympathy	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
contrast	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
injustice	NN	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
escape	VB	(VP*	ESE
denunciation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rejection	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
overview	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
points	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
unreasonably	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
linking	VBG	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	NN	(NP(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
WMD	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))))	O
''	''	*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
raved	VBD	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
policy	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
isolation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stifling	NN	*)))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
progressive	JJ	*	ESE
nations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Subsequently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
repeatedly	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
trumpeted	VBD	*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
theory	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sneaked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
nonsensical	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
gaffes	NNS	*)	ESE
getting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
nerves	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	DSE
forward	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
justifying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
remark	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	DSE
of	IN	*	DSE
evil	NN	(NP*))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
argument	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
undisguised	JJ	*	ESE
declaration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rhetoric	NN	*)	ESE
threatening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
aggression	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
produces	VBZ	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
holds	VBZ	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
WMD	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
precisely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
empire	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Notwithstanding	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
insisting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
so-and-so	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
expect	VB	(VP*	ESE
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

None	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
approves	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
one-sided	NNP	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
self-righteous	JJ	*)	ESE
policy	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Everyone	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
opposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
rejects	VBZ	*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*))))))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	DSE
forward	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
opposing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
remark	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Voices	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
criticizing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	ESE
high	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	ESE
big	JJ	(NP*	ESE
powers	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
too	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
exception	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
gaffe	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
stating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	(VP(VP*	O
oppose	VB	*	DSE
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
find	VB	*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
grounds	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
sort	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
position	NN	(NP(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
posture	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
big	JJ	(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*)))))))	O
drove	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
corner	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	DSE
more	RBR	*	DSE
troubled	JJ	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))))	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
stepped	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
moves	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bluntly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticize	VB	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
oppose	VB	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
rhetoric	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
expressed	VBD	*	DSE
concerns	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
gaffe	NN	*)))	ESE
labeling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
high	JJ	*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
policy	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
abandon	VBP	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
one-sidedness	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
global	JJ	(S(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
solved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
arbitrary	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
decision	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
UK	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
UK	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
acting	VBG	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
incident	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
no	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
longer	RB	*)	DSE
stand	VB	(VP*	DSE
shoulder	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
shoulder	VB	(VP*	DSE
''	''	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
extent	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
EU	NNP	*	ESE
sentiment	NN	*)))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
descriptions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
French	JJ	(NP*	O
newspapers	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
depicting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
modern	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
21st-century	JJ	*	ESE
version	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
The	DT	(NP*	ESE
Stars	NNP	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Stripes	NNP	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cartoon	NN	*)	DSE
showing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
so	RB	(S*	ESE
ferocious	VBG	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
wearing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
T-shirt	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
jogging	NN	*	ESE
pants	NNS	*)	ESE
bearing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
English	JJ	*	ESE
letters	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
baring	VBG	(UCP(S(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
teeth	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
glare	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hatred	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
eyes	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Representatives	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
40	CD	*)	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
sent	VBD	(VP*	DSE
letters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Western	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
such	PDT	(S(NP*	DSE
a	DT	*	DSE
concerted	JJ	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
attitude	NN	*	DSE
trying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
read	VB	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
mind	NN	*)))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
incur	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
displeasure	NN	*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
attacked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
without	IN	(PP*	DSE
hesitation	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Inside	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
widespread	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
debates	NNS	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
gaffe	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
fire	NN	(NP*))	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*	O
halls	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
typical	JJ	*	O
example	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
An	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nongovernmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
150	CD	*)	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
adopted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
resolution	NN	*)	DSE
criticizing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
argument	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
demonstrations	NNS	(NP(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
rallies	NNS	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
remark	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*	O
daily	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Countless	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
letters	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
statements	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
comments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
protesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
gaffe	NN	*))))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
flurry	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
moves	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
length	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
staging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
farce	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spread	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
anti-US	JJ	(NP*	DSE
sentiment	NN	*)))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
literally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
plight	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
punching	NN	*	ESE
bag	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
target	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
denunciation	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
supporting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
rhetoric	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
openly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
embarked	VBN	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
path	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
maneuvering	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
overseas	JJ	(NP*	ESE
aggression	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Like	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
inevitable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
injustice	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
denunciation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rejection	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Justice	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
finds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
support	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*))))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	DSE
forth	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Newspapers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
news	NN	(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
broadcasts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Syria	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Laos	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Nepal	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
United	NNP	(NP*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
Emirates	NNPS	*)))	O
--	:	*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
prominent	JJ	(NP*	O
coverage	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
proved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
stands	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rallies	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
solidarity	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rally	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Syria	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
activists	NNS	(NP*)	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
strengthen	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
solidarity	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
trench	NN	*))))	ESE
steadfastly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
participants	NNS	(NP*)	O
appealed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
progressive	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
socialism	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
P'yongyang	NNP	*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
organizations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
friendship	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
solidarity	NN	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
participants	NNS	(NP*)	O
adopted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
resolution	NN	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
letter	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NNP	(NP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
this	DT	*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cause	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Middle	NNP	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fair	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
prove	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
arguments	NNS	*)	DSE
gained	VBD	(VP*	O
ground	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fair	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
issues	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
discontinue	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
suppression	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
double	JJ	(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
seen	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
above	JJ	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
public	JJ	*	O
sentiment	NN	*)	DSE
stands	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
denunciation	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
rejection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
injustice	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
encouragement	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
justice	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
evident	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
February	NNP	*)))	O
international	JJ	*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
reflect	VB	(VP*	ESE
change	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
21st-century	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
imperialists	NNS	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
weakening	VBG	(VP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
aspirations	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
independence	NN	*))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
strengthening	VBG	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
making	VBG	(VP*	ESE
turns	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	ESE
developments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
progressive	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
nations	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ariel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
public	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
out	IN	(PP*	ESE
there	RB	(NP*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
bent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
destroying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
public	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israelis	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
abandon	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
middle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
pretence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
vicious	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
holds	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
waning	VBG	*	ESE
grip	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
truth	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Palestine	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
unchecked	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
march	VB	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tel	NNP	(NP*	O
Aviv	NNP	*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
overrun	NN	(VP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
occupies	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
since	IN	*)	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
1967	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
neighboring	JJ	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
fought	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
six-day	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
1973	CD	*))	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
fought	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
fronts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Syria	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Egypt	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1982	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
invaded	NNP	*	O
Lebanon	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
Beirut	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one-sided	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
destroying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PLO	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
burying	VBG	(VP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
claims	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
land	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
good	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Throughout	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
wars	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
invasions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
inhabitants	NNS	*))))	O
succumbed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
mighty	JJ	*	ESE
stranglehold	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Little	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Palestinian	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
remain	VBP	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
occupation	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
1990	CD	*)))))))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
floundered	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
uprising	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Intifada	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1987	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
second	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
erupted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
18	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
desperate	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
means	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
conquered	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
options	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
liberation	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
say	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
non-violent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
means	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
resistance	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
forget	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
endured	VBN	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
occupation	NN	(NP*)))	O
pleading	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
cases	NNS	*)	DSE
before	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
occupiers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1987	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
revolted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
resorting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
stones	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
demonstrations	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
strikes	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)	O
responded	VBD	(VP*	O
swiftly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
breaking	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
limbs	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
shooting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
unarmed	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
civilian	JJ	*	ESE
demonstrators	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
cold	JJ	(NP*	ESE
blood	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Palestine	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1993	CD	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
since	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
Intifada	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
settlers	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
1283	CD	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
estimated	VBN	*	O
130,472	CD	(QP*	O
Palestinians	CD	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
481	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
expelled	VBN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
22,088	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
held	VBN	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
2533	CD	(NP(NP*	O
houses	NNS	*)	O
demolished	VBN	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
sealed	VBN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
equally	RB	(VP(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eventual	JJ	*	O
division	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
184,257	CD	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
trees	NNS	*)	O
uprooted	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Throughout	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
kept	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
building	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	(VP(VP*	O
fattening	VBG	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
existing	JJ	(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
expropriating	VBG	(VP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*	O
lands	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
becoming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	DSE
militant	JJ	*)))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
resistance	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
occupation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
changing	VBG	(VP*	O
dramatically	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
definition	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
18	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
1200	CD	*)	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	(PP*	ESE
civilians	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
mostly	RB	(PRN(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
homes	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
camps	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
offices	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
schools	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
factories	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
battlefield	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
thousands	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
maimed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
injured	VBN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
hundreds	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
homes	NNS	(NP*)))	O
demolished	VBD	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hectares	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
farmland	NN	(NP*)))))	O
destroyed	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
statistics	NNS	*)	ESE
amount	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
point	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
continuing	JJ	*	ESE
waste	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
property	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
millions	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
occupation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
endure	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
aggression	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
show	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
safe	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
escalates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
aggression	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
beg	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
surrender	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
judging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
cycle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)))	O
accelerated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ignite	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
invented	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reality	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
much	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
worse	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
chaos	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
bordering	VBG	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
binge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
wanton	NN	(NP*	ESE
killing	NN	*))))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
achieving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
terms	NNS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
either	DT	(NP*	O
side	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
radicalize	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
further	RBR	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
applying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
pressure	NN	*	ESE
cooker	NN	*	ESE
effect	NN	*))))	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reap	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
sporadic	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
painful	JJ	*)	ESE
retaliatory	JJ	*	ESE
responses	NNS	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
young	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
hateful	JJ	*)	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seek	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
liberation	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
death	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
staying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
alive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
occupation	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
managing	VBG	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sustaining	VBG	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pogrom	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
puts	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Jew	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*))	ESE
shame	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
enemy	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
largely	RB	(ADJP*	O
invisible	JJ	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
shells	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
bullets	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
gunning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
daily	JJ	(NP*	ESE
basis	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Palestinian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
reprisals	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hurt	VBD	(VP*	O
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
Israelis	NNPS	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
every	DT	(S(ADJP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
target	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
other	JJ	(PP*	O
than	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
murderous	JJ	*	ESE
rage	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
defeated	JJ	*	ESE
colonial	JJ	*	ESE
power	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Against	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
backdrop	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
brutal	JJ	*	ESE
occupation	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
waging	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
salvation	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eventual	JJ	*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
coexistence	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
learn	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
share	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(PRN*	O
CORR	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
premier	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*))	O
urge	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O

Barcelona	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jose	NNP	(NP*	O
Maria	NNP	*	O
Aznar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Romano	NNP	(NP*	O
Prodi	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
urge	VBP	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Efe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Aznar	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Prodi	NNP	*)	O
explain	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
council	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
adoption	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
approval	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fulfilling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
pledge	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
sustainable	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
development	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Aznar	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Prodi	NNP	*)	O
report	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
only	RB	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
processes	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
each	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
member	NN	*)))	O
states	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
concluded	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
emphasize	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
advanced	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
complete	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
instruments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(UCP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
member	NN	*)))	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
lodged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Secretariat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
scale	NN	*)	O
anticipated	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
early	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
June	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
add	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
emphasizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*))))))))))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
enough	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
urge	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Putin	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
moves	VBZ	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
request	NN	*)	DSE
``	``	*	O
convinced	VBN	(S(S(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Federation	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resolute	JJ	*	DSE
commitment	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
believing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
manner	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
show	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
leadership	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
shared	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fruitful	JJ	*	ESE
results	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Hamburg	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Some	DT	(S(NP*	O
200	CD	*	O
German	JJ	*	O
Border	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Hamburg	NNP	*	O
prosecutors	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
office	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
cracked	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
smugglers	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
operating	VBG	(VP*	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Officials	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
smuggling	NN	*	O
ring	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
illegally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
bringing	VBG	*	O
fellow	JJ	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
Austria	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*))	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
travelled	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
rail	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Hamburg	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
trains	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
vans	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
cars	NNS	*)	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
ferries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
destined	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Scandinavia	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	*)	O
paid	VBD	(VP*	O
gang	NN	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
9,000	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
7,900	CD	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
border	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
searched	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
16	CD	(NP(NP*	O
apartments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
stores	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
offices	NNS	(NP*	O
downtown	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Hamburg	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Altona	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Billstedt	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Schnelsen	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Harburg	JJ	(NP*	O
districts	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
detaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
14	CD	(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*	O
warrant	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspected	VBN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
served	VBN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
33,9000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
earnings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
smuggling	NN	(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
apartment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
35-year-old	JJ	*	O
suspected	VBN	*	O
ringleader	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eleven	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
custody	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
seven	CD	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
whom	WP	(WHNP*)))	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
smuggling	NN	*	O
ring	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
remaining	JJ	*	O
four	CD	*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
further	JJ	*	O
four	CD	*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Frankfurt	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
interrogators	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
parked	VBN	(VP*))	O
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
illegally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP*	O
Germany	NNP	*))	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
locations	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sites	NNS	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
towns	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ratzeburg	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Uelzen	NNP	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
searched	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
raid	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Wieland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mozdzynski	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Hamburg	NNP	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mozdzynski	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
during	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
stretched	VBD	(S(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bavaria	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Austria	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
uncovered	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
groups	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
each	DT	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
specific	JJ	(NP*	O
tasks	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
worked	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
independently	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
exploited	VBZ	(VP*	O
existing	VBG	(NP*	O
contacts	NNS	*)	O
regularly	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
500	CD	*)	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
loose	JJ	*	O
structure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
smuggling	NN	*	O
ring	NN	*)))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
investigation	NN	*)	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
bust	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
nevertheless	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
significant	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
successful	JJ	*)	ESE
strike	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
gangs	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
businesses	NNS	*)	O
engaged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
smuggling	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Harare	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
14	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Despite	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shortcomings	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
incumbent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rule	NN	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
78-year-old	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
carried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
palm	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
closest-fought	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
22	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
nationwide	JJ	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*)))	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Patriotic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Front	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
1,685	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
212	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
56	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
closest	JJS	*	O
rival	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
258,401	CD	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
41.7	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
77	CD	(ADJP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
old	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
strong	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

My	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
fist	NN	*)	ESE
carries	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
tumble	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
roll	VB	(VP*	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
77	CD	(NP(QP*	ESE
times	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
boasted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
rally	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
defending	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
crown	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
last-ditch	JJ	*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
veteran	JJ	*	O
statesman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
bragged	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
young	JJ	*	ESE
old	JJ	*	ESE
man	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
abundant	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
reserves	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
energy	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
ruling	NN	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
won	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
boxing	NN	*	O
match	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
youthful	JJ	*	O
opponent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
celebrated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
50th	JJ	*	O
birthday	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Analysts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
last	JJ	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
old	JJ	*	ESE
African	JJ	*	ESE
nationalists	NNS	*))	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
rode	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
colonial	JJ	*	ESE
winds	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
change	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
strength	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
appeal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
land	NN	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
seizing	VBG	(VP*	O
idle	JJ	(NP*	O
farms	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
own	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arable	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resettle	VB	(VP*	O
landless	JJ	(NP*	O
peasants	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
re-elected	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
much	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
voter	NN	(S(NP*	O
turnout	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
much	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
higher	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
towns	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cities	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
echoed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
voters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
voted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
voting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
land	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
People	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
support	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
party	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
genuine	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
policy	NN	*)))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP*	O
reform	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
land	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
votes	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Kudakwashe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mapfumo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
family	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
beneficiaries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
reform	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
parents	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
farm	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
provide	VB	*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
food	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Mapfumo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	*	O
activist	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Analysts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
wise	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*	ESE
strategy	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
strongholds	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
countryside	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
enjoyed	VBD	(VP*	O
much	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
urban	JJ	*	O
workers	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
depending	VBG	(S(PP*	ESE
heavily	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
support	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
urbanizers	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
focus	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
housing	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
job	NN	*	O
creation	NN	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
re-elected	JJ	(S(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
result	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
creation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
jobs	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
youths	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
leaving	VBG	(VP*	O
school	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
colleges	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
good	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
housing	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
similar	JJ	(NP*	O
services	NNS	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
top	JJ	*	ESE
priority	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
rally	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
Harare	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
fortress	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1,685,212	CD	*	O
votes	NNS	*))	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
garnered	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
towns	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
boosting	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
lead	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crucial	JJ	*	ESE
poll	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
hardships	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
food	NN	*	O
shortages	NNS	*)	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
experienced	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
achievements	NNS	*)	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
credited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
22-year-rule	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
boast	VB	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
education	NN	*	ESE
system	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
health	NN	*	ESE
system	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
extent	NN	*)	ESE
affected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
lackluster	JJ	*	ESE
economy	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
middle-aged	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
benefited	VBN	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reign	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
nostalgic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lost	VBN	*	O
time	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
voted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
strong	JJ	*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
revival	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
some	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
gone	VBN	(VP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
chose	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
man	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
lured	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Millennium	NNP	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Recovery	NNP	*	O
Program	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
blueprint	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stabilize	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
economy	NN	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
curtailing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
expenditure	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
reforming	VBG	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
enterprises	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
expanding	VBG	(VP*	O
agriculture	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nairobi	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
13	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
Robert	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reelection	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
praised	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OAU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
African	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
condemned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
OAU	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
9-11	CD	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
On	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
observations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
voting	VBG	*	O
,	,	*	O
verification	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
counting	VBG	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
objective	NN	*	O
realities	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OAU	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
wishes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
state	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
general	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transparent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
credible	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leader	NN	*	O
Gertrude	NNP	*	O
Mongella	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
congratulation	NN	*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tanzanian	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Benjamin	NNP	*	O
Mkapa	NNP	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
champion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
pleased	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
warm	JJ	*	O
congratulations	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
renewed	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deserved	JJ	*	ESE
presidential	JJ	*	O
mandate	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mkapa	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
tragedy	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
anyone	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
determine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
outcome	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
African	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mkapa	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
upon	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
that	DT	(ADVP*	O
loudly	RB	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
clearly	RB	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
re-elected	VBN	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
same	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	ESE
consistent	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
defending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
inalienable	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mkapa	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Kenyan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
arap	NNP	*	O
Moi	NNP	*)	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
reelection	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
testimony	NN	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
confidence	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
high	JJ	*	ESE
esteem	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
people	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	DSE
hold	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Within	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
14-nation	JJ	*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ministers	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
true	JJ	*	ESE
reflection	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
will	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
chief	NN	*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
Duke	NNP	*	O
Lefhoko	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
affair	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ministers	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)))))	DSE
appeals	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)))	DSE
welcomes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
actual	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
subsequent	JJ	(NP*	O
processes	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
proceeded	VBD	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
significant	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	(SBAR(S*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Preliminary	JJ	*	O
Report	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Observer	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Nigerian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
player	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
events	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
verdict	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Information	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jerry	NNP	*	O
Gana	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
condemned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NAC*	O
Assistant	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
African	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))	O
Walter	NNP	*	O
Kansteiner	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)))	DSE
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*)	O
flawed	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
further	JJ	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

British	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
months	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
systematic	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*	O
--	:	*	O
power	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vote	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
enormous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
implications	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
UK-Zimbabwe	JJ	(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Francois	NNP	*	O
Rivasseau	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
substantially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Germany	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
Andreas	NNP	(PRN(S(NP*	O
Michaelis	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
information	NN	*)	ESE
points	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*))))))))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
assumed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
equal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
candidates	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Denmark	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Per	NNP	*	O
Stig	NNP	*	O
Moeller	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
likely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
shut	VBD	*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
toughening	JJ	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
foreign	JJ	(S(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
meet	VBP	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Barcelona	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Saturday	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Denmark	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
worth	IN	(PP*	O
9.42	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
8.3	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
US	NNP	(NP*))	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
2	CD	(ADVP(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
euros	NNS	*)	O
more	JJR	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
complete	VB	(VP*	O
projects	NNS	(NP*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
underway	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
incumbent	JJ	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
closest-fought	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)))	O
22	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nationwide	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
gained	VBD	(VP*	O
56.2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
2,998,758	CD	*	O
valid	JJ	*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
1,685,212	CD	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
Morgan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))	O
Movement	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
41.96	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
1,258,401	CD	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
3.4	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
5.6	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
registered	JJ	*	O
voters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
estimated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
voted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ended	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
extended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
voting	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
circles	NNS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)	DSE
denouncing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
inflict	VB	(VP*	DSE
military	JJ	(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
toleration	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
groundless	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
condemnation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
threatening	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
others	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
armed	JJ	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
modus	NNS	*	ESE
operandi	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cause	VB	(VP*	O
grave	JJ	(NP*	ESE
clashes	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
February	NNP	*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*	O
Figaro	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Igor	NNP	*	O
Ivanov	NNP	*)	O
assessed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
branding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cold	NNP	*	ESE
War	NNP	*)	ESE
labeling	VBG	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
labeling	NNS	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Cold	NNP	*	ESE
War	NNP	*	ESE
heritage	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Mainichi	NNP	*	O
Shimbun	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Spanish	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Aznar	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
stance	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
distance	VB	(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
view	NN	*	DSE
depicting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	DSE
diplomatic	JJ	*	DSE
plans	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
axis	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(NP*	DSE
remarks	NNS	*))))))	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
German	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	ESE
Allies	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
satellites	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
caustically	NN	*)	DSE
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
unilateral	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
simplistic	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
worldview	NN	*)	DSE
poses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
9	CD	*	O
February	NNP	*	O
editorial	NN	*)	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Good	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Evil	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
influential	JJ	*	ESE
newspaper	NN	*	O
Financial	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)))	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
listen	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
friendly	JJ	*	ESE
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*))))	DSE
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cambodia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Reaksmei	NNP	*	O
Campuchea	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
wage	VB	(VP*	O
anti-terror	JJ	(NP*	ESE
wars	NNS	*)	O
everywhere	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iran	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*))	O
form	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
strikes	NNS	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
threatening	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
divulged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
intention	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
strategy	NN	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
corner	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
17	CD	*	O
February	NNP	*	O
article	NN	*)	O
entitled	VBN	(ADJP*	O
``	``	*	O
US-Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Crossroads	NNPS	*))))))	O
Over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Evil	NNP	(NP*	O
Theory	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Mainichi	NNP	*	O
Shimbun	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
questions	NNS	(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
mushrooming	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
international	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	DSE
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
showdown	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
article	NN	*)	O
conveyed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
leads	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
along	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
France	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*)))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
article	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
German	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remark	NN	*)	DSE
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
axis	NNS	*))	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(NP*	DSE
theory	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
ITAR-TASS	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
famous	JJ	*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
politician	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Piacheslav	NNP	(NP*	O
Nikonov	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
something	NN	(S(NP*)	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
ineffective	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP*	ESE
dogma	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
point	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
peninsula	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
channeled	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
dialogue	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
US	NNP	*	O
stance	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
remark	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
infringes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
dogma	NN	*)	ESE
astonished	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
publicly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
designating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
elements	NNS	*	ESE
or	CC	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
enemies	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mankind	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
taking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
risk	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
confronting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Voice	NNP	*	O
of	IN	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	JJ	*	O
manner	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
sympathetic	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*	DSE
branding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*)	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
led	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
conclusion	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
reached	VBN	(VP*	DSE
such	PDT	(NP*	DSE
a	DT	*	DSE
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
wholly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*))	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
evaluated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP*	ESE
dogma	NN	*))	ESE
as	RB	(UCP*	O
a	DT	(ADJP*	O
despotic	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
simplistic	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
rash	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
futile	JJ	*	ESE
one	CD	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
viewing	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
backdrop	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
anti-terror	JJ	(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seeing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
simplistic	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
acting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
arbitrarily	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
consulting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
pursuing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	ESE
exclusive	JJ	*	ESE
interests	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
17	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Finnish	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Belgian	JJ	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministers	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
opposition	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
remark	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
strikes	NNS	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
forecast	VB	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	ESE
much	JJ	*)	ESE
longer	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP(VP*	O
arbitrarily	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
disdaining	JJ	*	ESE
manner	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Every	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
effort	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
called	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
cause	VB	(VP*	ESE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
misfortune	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	ESE
mankind	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
broadcasting	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preceding	VBG	*	O
manner	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Baykonur	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
15	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Preparations	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Progress	NNP	*	O
M-1	NNP	*	O
N257	NNP	*	O
transport	NN	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
21	CD	(NP*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
nearing	VBG	(VP*	O
completion	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
vehicle	NN	*)	O
launching	VBG	(VP*	O
site	NN	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Specialists	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
vehicle	NN	*	O
launching	NN	*	O
site	NN	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Interfax-Kazakhstan	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*	O
correspondent	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Progress	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
filled	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
rocket	NN	(NP*	O
fuel	NN	*	O
components	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
compressed	VBN	(VP*	O
gases	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
installing	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
testing	NN	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Energiya	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Rocket	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Corporation	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
assembly	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Soyuz-U	JJ	*	O
booster-rocket	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
BR	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
boost	VB	(VP*	O
Progress	NNP	(NP*	O
M-1	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
BR	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
assembled	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
take	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
launching	NN	*	O
site	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
launches	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
launches	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*	O
programme	NN	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharp	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
divisions	NNS	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))))	O
emerge	VBP	(VP*)))	O

Political	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Reporters	NNPS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
SHARP	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
divisions	NNS	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*))))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
thrown	VBN	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
weight	NN	*)	DSE
behind	IN	(PP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
illegitimate	VBN	(VP*	ESE
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
African	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
upheld	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
quick	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
systematically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
subverted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
signs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
deeply	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
flawed	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
stark	JJ	(NP*	O
contrast	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
election	NN	(NP(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
black	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tanzania	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Kenya	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*))))	O
endorsed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
returned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
successive	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
9-11	CD	*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
overwhelming	JJ	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
polling	NN	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
neither	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
pre-election	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
marked	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
sustained	VBN	*	ESE
Government-orchestrated	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
violence	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
numerous	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
profound	JJ	*	ESE
irregularities	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
itself	PRP	(VP(NP*)	O
resulted	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
reflect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
will	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(S(PP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
two	CD	*)	ESE
years	NNS	*))	ESE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
administration	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
systematically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
subverted	VBN	*	ESE
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
processes	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
resulted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
disenfranchised	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
local	JJ	(S(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
scientists	NNS	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
surprising	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
not	RB	(S*	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
victory	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ibbo	NNP	*	O
Mandaza	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Regional	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Policy	NNP	(NP*	O
Studies	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
editor-in-chief	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Mirror	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
blamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sections	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
academia	NN	*)	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))))	DSE
``	``	*	O
acted	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
collusion	NN	(NP*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
agenda	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
shape	VB	(VP*	DSE
perceptions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
much	RB	*	ESE
interference	JJ	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mandaza	NNP	*)	O
ruled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rebellion	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vanquished	NN	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
such	JJ	*	ESE
capacity	NN	*)	ESE
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minority	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Committed	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
committed	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
prosper	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
wo	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
rebellion	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
voted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
capacity	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

University	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
lecturer	NN	*)))	O
Dr	NNP	*	O
Vimbai	NNP	*	O
Chivaura	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Africa	NNP	(SBAR(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
foolhardy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
expect	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
favourable	JJ	*	DSE
comment	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
report	VBP	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
enemy	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
surprising	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
favourable	JJ	*	DSE
comment	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chivaura	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
voted	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
British	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
worry	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
continue	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
business	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
usual	JJ	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
expect	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
something	NN	(S(NP*)	O
positive	JJ	(ADJP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
head	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Queen	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Chivaura	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Reuters	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
stark	JJ	(NP*	O
contrast	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
remarks	NNS	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
election	NN	(NP(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Nigerian	NNP	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
recorded	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
incident	NN	*)	ESE
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
integrity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	(S(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Namibia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
watertight	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
room	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
rigging	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)))))	O
hailed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
transparent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
credible	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kenyan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
arap	NNP	*	O
Moi	NNP	*)	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
testimony	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
high	JJ	(NP*	DSE
esteem	NN	*)))	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
hold	VBP	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*)))))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
congratulatory	JJ	*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Vice-President	NNP	*	O
Mr	NNP	*	O
Jacob	NNP	*	O
Zuma	NNP	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
affirmation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
deals	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reliance	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
transmit	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*	DSE
message	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stance	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
signals	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
oneness	NNS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
continent	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enjoyed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
past	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
lack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
exploited	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*))	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
puppets	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
events	NNS	(S(S(NP*)	O
unfold	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
realised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cde	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
freeze	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assets	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
associates	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
failed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
produce	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
assets	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
dismissed	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
allegations	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
openly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
invited	VBN	*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
confiscate	VB	(VP*	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
imposed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bolster	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
MDC	NN	*	O
candidate	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
winning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

UN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary-General	NNP	*	O
Kofi	NNP	*	O
Annan	NNP	*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
conflicting	JJ	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
about	RP	(PRT*)	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
fairly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabweans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
refrain	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Triumphed	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
European	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
holding	VBG	(NP*	DSE
fire	NN	*)	DSE
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
reviewed	VBN	(VP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
poll	NN	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
none	NN	(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
surprise	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Cde	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
triumphed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
challenger	NN	(NP*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Norway	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
openly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
denounce	VB	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
satisfied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
requirements	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
Petersen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

British	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
For	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
months	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
systematic	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
achieve	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
outcome	NN	*	ESE
-	:	*	ESE
power	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
action	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
Britain	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
consulting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Germany	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
early	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
failing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
56	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
42	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)))))))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
22	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
systematically	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
stealing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
intimidation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
dirty	JJ	(NP*	ESE
tricks	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Human	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
group	NN	*	O
Amnesty	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aftermath	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Action	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
post	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
period	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
abuses	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
marred	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
run-up	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Military	JJ	(S(S(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
towns	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Bulawayo	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Gweru	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kwekwe	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
defenders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
increased	VBN	(NP*	O
threat	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Observers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
14-member	JJ	*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))	O
Development	NNP	(PRN(S(NP*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(NP(PRN*	O
Sadc	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
financed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
kicked	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
adequately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
complied	VBN	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
norms	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sadc	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Australian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
feared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
violence	NN	(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
voters	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
occurred	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nigeria	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
mandated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
54-nation	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
stood	VBD	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
chose	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canada	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
studying	VBG	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
reports	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jean	NNP	*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
parliament	NN	(NP*))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
agree	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
...	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*))))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

2	CD	(ROOT(SINV(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
funded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

Herald	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Reporter	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
TWO	CD	(NP(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
just	RB	(ADJP*	O
ended	VBN	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
funded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
learnt	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Diplomatic	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(VP(VP(NP*)	O
said	VBD	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Southern	JJ	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Sadc	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Election	NNP	*	O
Support	NNP	*	O
Network	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ZESN	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
funded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
kicked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
observe	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
criticised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sadc	NNP	*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*))	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
grouping	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sadc	NNP	*	O
Ministerial	NNP	*	O
Task	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
foreign-funded	JJ	*	O
local	JJ	*	O
NGO	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ZESN	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
chaotic	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
barred	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
observing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
supporting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*))))))))	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Ms	NNP	*	O
Maria	NNP	*	O
Macchiaverna	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
support	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
management	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)))	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sadc	NNP	*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
ZESN	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
advised	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
dated	VBN	(VP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
8	CD	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
assistance	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
cleared	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
immigration	NN	(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
explains	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
asked	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
paint	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
picture	NN	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
easy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
paint	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
picture	NN	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
with	IN	*	ESE
eyes	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
closed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
paid	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	O
negative	JJ	*	DSE
reports	NNS	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
declared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Sadc	JJ	*	O
ministerial	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
briefed	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
substantially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)))))))))))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
contrary	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
team	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Angolan	NNP	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Services	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mr	NNP	*	O
Manuel	NNP	*	O
Augusto	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Africa	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
best	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
qualified	VBN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
judge	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
prejudged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Sadc	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
two	CD	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
said	VBD	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
X	NNP	(S(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
Y	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
two	CD	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
predicted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
views	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
accomplishment	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
observing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	NN	(NP*	O
Cde	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
witness	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
observe	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
did	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
true	JJ	*	ESE
will	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
views	NNS	*)	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
normal	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Tanzanian	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
teams	NNS	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
congratulate	VB	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
drawing	VBG	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
attention	NN	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
justice	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
-	:	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
peace-loving	JJ	*)	ESE
peoples	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
unanimously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
demanding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
fair	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
peaceful	JJ	*)	ESE
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
earliest	JJS	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
date	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israeli	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Zionists	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
counting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
obstruct	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
settlement	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
key	NN	(NP*))	ESE
up	IN	(PP*	ESE
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*	ESE
Comrade	NNP	*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Il-song	NNP	*)	O
taught	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
For	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*)	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
aggressors	NNS	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
withdraw	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
occupy	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
fully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
guaranteed	VBN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
self-determination	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
essentially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
reinstating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
national	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
recovering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
deprived	VBN	*	ESE
Arab	JJ	*	ESE
land	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
aggressors	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
fair	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
required	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
first	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
self-determination	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
founding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
realized	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
aggressors	NNS	*)	ESE
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
occupy	VB	(VP*	ESE
illegally	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Golan	NNP	(NP*	O
Heights	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
withdrawing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
occupy	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wily	JJ	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
aggressors	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
dreaming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
Israeli	NNP	*	ESE
empire	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
scheming	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
land	NN	*)	O
permanently	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stir	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
troubles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
occupy	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
complications	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Typical	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
examples	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
aggression	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
savage	JJ	*	ESE
atrocities	NNS	*)	ESE
perpetrated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	NNP	*	O
Authority	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
control	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tanks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
middle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
attacked	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eastern	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP*	O
City	NNP	*	O
housing	NN	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
shelling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
destroying	VBG	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
broadcasting	VBG	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israeli	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
attacked	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
town	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rafah	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
four	CD	*)	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
killed	VBN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
more	JJR	(VP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
30	CD	*))	O
wounded	VBN	(S(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Between	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dawn	NN	*))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
F-16s	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
helicopters	NNS	*)	O
struck	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
POS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-17	CD	(NP*)	O
''	''	*)	O
facility	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
adjacent	JJ	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
building	NN	*	O
housing	NN	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
directorate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
plus	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
police	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
town	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jenin	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
blocked	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
major	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
highways	NNS	*)	O
linking	VBG	(VP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
roads	NNS	(NP*))	O
linking	VBG	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
neighboring	JJ	(NP*	O
villages	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
fierce	JJ	(NP*	O
assaults	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
l4	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intensification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel-Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
conflicts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
single	JJ	*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
pass	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	ESE
shedding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
blood	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Peace	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
organized	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
retired	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	(NX(NX*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NX*	O
high	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
movement	NN	*	O
calling	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unilateral	JJ	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
seen	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
criticisms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hard-line	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
mounting	VBG	(VP*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eighty	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Peace	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
retired	VBN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	(NX(NX*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NX*	O
high	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mossad	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Shin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bet	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
demanding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
dismantle	VB	(VP*	O
Jewish	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
settlements	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
numbering	VBG	(VP*	O
approximately	RB	(NP(QP*	O
50	CD	*)))))))	O
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
unilaterally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
good	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
;	:	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
promptly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reopen	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*	O
enforcement	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
intelligence	NN	*)))	O
agencies	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
getting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
impact	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
comments	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israeli	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
newspapers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
earlier	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
refrained	VBN	(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
censuring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
attacking	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
scathing	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
criticisms	NNS	*)	DSE
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
unwilling	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(S(NP*	O
options	NNS	*)	O
other	JJ	(ADJP*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
hard-line	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
victimizing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lives	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
men	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
street	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
modify	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
hard-line	JJ	*	ESE
posture	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Behind	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incursions	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
atrocities	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
oppression	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
perpetrating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
today	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
supporting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
protecting	VBG	*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
handing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
billions	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
dollars	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
lethal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	*))	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
year	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
stands	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
Israeli	JJ	*	DSE
side	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
poking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
fun	NN	(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
body	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
two	CD	(NP*	ESE
heads	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
``	``	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spoiled	JJ	*	ESE
brat	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
states	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
bear	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
due	JJ	*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
deteriorating	JJ	*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
quit	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
moves	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
obstruct	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
fair	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
Middle	NNP	*	ESE
East	NNP	*)	ESE
settlement	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
Robert	NNP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reproached	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
secret	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
means	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
hijacking	NN	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Should	NNP	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
one	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
surprised	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
nearly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
lost	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
stated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
restated	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
war	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
word	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP*))	O
''	''	*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
famine	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
swore	VBD	(VP*	DSE
allegiance	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	(NX*	ESE
father	NN	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
independence	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
verdict	NN	*)))))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*	O
box	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
justice	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
compromised	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
harassed	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
MDC	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Movement	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
victim	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP(NP*	ESE
state	NN	*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
candidate	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
rightly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
beaten	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
loaded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
start	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
finish	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
drawing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
lists	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
counting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
secret	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ballot	NN	*	ESE
box	NN	*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
fait	NN	*	ESE
accompli	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
challenge	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
making	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
radical	JJ	*	ESE
changes	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Indignant	JJ	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
apart	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
nothing	NN	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
disaster	NN	*)	ESE
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
continent	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
growth	NN	*	ESE
pole	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
so-called	JJ	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
intelligent	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
sanctions	NNS	*)))	ESE
proved	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
ineffective	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
punitive	JJ	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
late	RB	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
only	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
served	VBD	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
deny	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
Robert	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
associates	NNS	*	O
trips	NNS	*))	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
access	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
spirited	VBN	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
amounted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(QP*	ESE
more	JJR	*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
a	DT	*	O
ban	NN	*)))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
holidays	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
golden	JJ	*	ESE
retirement	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(S(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
importantly	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Great	NNP	(NP*	O
Britain	NNP	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
locked	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
familiar	JJ	*	ESE
psychodrama	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonizer	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
colonized	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Africa	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*))	O
``	``	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
ratified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
shameful	JJ	*	ESE
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
sham	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Kenya	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tanzania	NNP	*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
``	``	(VP*	ESE
congratulated	VBD	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
Robert	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
re-election	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
round	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
speak	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
language	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
truth	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Either	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
absence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
development	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
governance	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Either	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Partnership	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
African	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Nepad	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
entertain	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
gallery	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occasional	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
sustainable	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
Africa	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)	ESE
impose	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
minimum	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
probity	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
respect	NN	*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	ESE
liberties	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
means	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Robert	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
thanks	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
maize	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
electricity	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
supplies	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(VP(ADVP(NP*	ESE
torment	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
torment	VB	*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
end	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Fortunately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	O
longer	RB	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policeman	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
demand	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
put	VBD	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
house	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
order	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Harare	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
17	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Despite	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
re-election	NN	*	O
victory	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
sworn	VBN	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
six-year	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
21-gun	JJ	*	O
salute	NN	*	O
sounding	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
fighter	NN	*	O
jets	NNS	*))	O
sweeping	VBG	(VP*	O
overhead	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
colorful	JJ	*	O
inauguration	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
thunderous	JJ	(NP*	DSE
applause	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ruling	VBG	(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chief	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
Godfrey	NNP	*	O
Chidyausiku	NNP	*)	O
presided	VBD	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
swearing-in	NN	*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
witnessed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Malawian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bakili	NNP	*	O
Muluzi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Namibian	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Sam	NNP	*	O
Nujoma	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Congo	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Joseph	NNP	*	O
Kabila	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Mozambican	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Joaquim	NNP	*	O
Chissano	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tanzanian	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Benjamin	NNP	*	O
Mukapa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Vice-President	NNP	*	O
Jacob	NNP	*	O
Zuma	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zambian	NNP	(NP*	O
Vice-President	NNP	*	O
Enock	NNP	*	O
Kavendele	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
judge	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
dressing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
British-style	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
scarlet	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
black	JJ	*	O
robes	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
shoulder-length	JJ	(NP*	O
horsehair	JJ	*	O
judicial	JJ	*	O
wigs	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
bedecked	VBD	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
red	JJ	*	O
sash	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Robert	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gabriel	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
do	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*))))	DSE
swear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
faithful	NN	(ADJP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(S*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
me	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
God	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
flanked	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
first	JJ	(NP*	O
lady	NN	*	O
Grace	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Union-Patriotic	NNP	*	O
Front	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
1,685,212	CD	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
closest	JJS	*	O
rival	NN	*)	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
polled	VBN	(S(VP*	O
1,262,401	CD	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
clothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
emblazoned	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
portrait	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
singing	VBG	(VP(VP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
dancing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
celebrate	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
deliver	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
promises	NNS	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
land	NN	*)	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
owned	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
white	JJ	*	O
minority	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
inauguration	NN	*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
shortly	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
sworn	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
vowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*	O
reform	NN	*	O
program	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cheering	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
supporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
land	NN	(S(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
proceed	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
greater	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
speed	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
strength	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
shore	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
badly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
battered	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
years	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
instability	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
idle	JJ	(NP*	O
farms	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
own	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arable	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resettle	VB	(VP*	O
landless	JJ	(NP*	O
blacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
centerpiece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
revive	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
blacks	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
play	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
meaningful	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
run-up	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
9-11	CD	*	O
poll	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
critics	NNS	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
stirring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
emotive	JJ	*	ESE
land	NN	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
garner	VB	(VP*	ESE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
closest-fought	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
spite	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
stiff	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
agrarian	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
powerful	JJ	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
press	VB	(VP*	DSE
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
seize	VB	(VP*	O
farms	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
whites	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
resettle	NN	*	O
blacks	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
That	DT	(NP*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
land	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
intention	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
owning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stunning	JJ	*	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
imperialism	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
thanked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
African	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
stand-off	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agrarian	NN	*)))))	O
reforms	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
crucial	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
''	''	(VP*	O
transparent	NNP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
credible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
needed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
continued	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
hostile	JJ	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
attention	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
When	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	DSE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
aim	VBP	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
Zimbabwe	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
alone	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
countries	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
mind	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
re-election	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
re-assert	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
neocolonial	JJ	*	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
installing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
compliant	JJ	*	ESE
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Thanks	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rejecting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
neocolonial	JJ	*	ESE
attempt	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Africa	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Africans	NNPS	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
regional	JJ	*	DSE
pressure	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
incorporating	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
closest	JJS	*	O
rival	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
stability	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Olusegun	NNP	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Howard	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
assessing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
recommending	VBG	(VP*	DSE
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Diplomats	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
partly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intended	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*	ESE
face	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
insistence	NN	*)))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
s	JJ	*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
joined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
alleging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
neither	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
evening	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Barcelona	NNP	*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
possible	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
targeted	JJ	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Sunday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
inauguration	NN	*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
boycotted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
57	CD	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
parliament	NN	(NP*)))	O
stayed	VBD	(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
inaugural	JJ	*	O
address	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
extended	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
olive	JJ	*	DSE
branch	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rebuilding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
consecutive	JJ	(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
what	WDT	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
better	RBR	(VP*	ESE
spent	VBN	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
reviving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
plotting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
each	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
call	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(FRAG(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
unite	VB	(VP(VP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	ESE
together	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
together	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
common	JJ	*	ESE
destiny	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
voting	VBG	*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
claiming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
rigged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
incumbent	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MDC	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pre-election	JJ	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
prevented	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
campaigning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stronghold	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
party	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
towns	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
disenfranchised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
authorities	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
reduced	VBD	(VP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
centers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
rigging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strength	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appeal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
land	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Analysts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
much	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
voter	NN	(S(NP*	O
turnout	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADVP*	O
higher	RBR	*	O
than	IN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
towns	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cities	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tashkent	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
1.2	CD	(NP*	O
m	NN	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
free	JJ	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
servicemen	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chief-of-Staff	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNP	*	O
Huseyin	NNP	*	O
Kivrikoglu	NNP	*)))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
16	CD	*))))	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
invitation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Uzbek	NNP	(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Kadyr	NNP	*	O
Gulyamov	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
sources	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
Embassy	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tashkent	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*	O
Ralph	NNP	*	O
L.	NNP	*	O
Boyce	NNP	*)))	O
praised	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*	O
18	CD	*	O
Mar	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
investors	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
investments	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Boyce	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
steps	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
personal	JJ	*	ESE
safety	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
risk	NN	(NP*))	O
several	JJ	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
during	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
tension	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	DSE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
responsibility	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
Americans	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
Americans	NNPS	*))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
welcome	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Investors	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
not	RB	*)	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
fears	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
somehow	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
physically	RB	(ADJP*	O
threatened	JJ	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
rather	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
invested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
secure	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
means	VBZ	(SINV(VP*)	O
transparency	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
rule	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
protection	NN	(NP*	O
legally	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
etc.	FW	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Boyce	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
radical	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
move	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
strike	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*	O
several	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*	O
ago	IN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
temporarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
threats	NNS	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
quick	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
give	VB	(VP*	DSE
assurances	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Boyce	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
12	CD	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AmCham	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Singapore	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
earlier	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	O
met	VBN	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Megawati	NNP	*	O
Soekarnoputri	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Minister	NNP	(NP*))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Trade	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Industry	NNP	(NP*	O
Rini	NNP	*	O
M.	NNP	*	O
Soewandi	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
AmCham	NNP	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assess	VB	(VP*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
opportunities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
AmCham	NNP	(NP*	O
Singapore	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*	O
Landis	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Hicks	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
Tan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Hup	NNP	*	O
Thye	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Refco	NNP	(NP*	O
Singapore	NNP	*	O
Pte	NNP	*	O
Ltd.	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Stuart	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dean	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GE	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Edward	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gilbert	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Merrill	NNP	(NP*	O
Lynch	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Ltd.	NNP	*)))))))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Singapore-based	JJ	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)))	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hear	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
efforts	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
enormous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
potential	NN	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
now	RB	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
build	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)	ESE
together	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Hicks	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Rini	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
AmCham	NNP	*	O
delegation	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
almost	RB	(S(NP(NP*	O
all	DT	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
praised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rini	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pointed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Batam	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bintan	NNP	*	O
islands	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
secure	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
business	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
citing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
labour	NN	(NP(NP*	O
disputes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
islands	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Financing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Development	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Monterrey	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Telam	NNP	(NP*	O
photo	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O

Monterrey	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
Mexico	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Choked	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
hushed	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
voices	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
astounded	JJ	(S(S(ADJP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
guessing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
correctly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
dilemma	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
chicken	NN	*)))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
egg	NN	*)	ESE
into	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Argentine	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
converted	VBN	(S(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
grotesquely	JJ	*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
will	MD	(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
endorse	VB	(VP*	DSE
concrete	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
apart	RB	(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presumable	JJ	*	ESE
good	JJ	*	DSE
intentions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
board	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
technicians	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
approval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
George	NNP	(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Certainly	RB	(FRAG(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
comment	NN	*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
La	NNP	(NP*	O
Nacion	NNP	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
colleagues	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
attending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Conference	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Financing	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Development	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
opened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Monterrey	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Mexico	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
striding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
hastily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Business	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Cintermex	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sketched	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
explanation	NN	*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	ESE
case	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
era	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
everyone	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
pays	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
dearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
mistakes	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
somehow	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
manages	VBZ	*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
best	JJS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
someone	NN	(S(NP*)	O
earns	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
spends	VBZ	(VP*	O
1,500	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
inevitably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
succumb	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
bankruptcy	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
happening	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
concept	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
room	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
negotiation	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Apparently	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Monterrey	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
without	IN	(SBAR(PP*	O
contacts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
chief	JJ	*	O
executives	NNS	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
President	NNP	*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Fox	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jean	NNP	*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
trading	VBG	(VP*	O
partners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Free	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Agreement	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NAFTA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Well	UH	(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
one	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
knows	VBZ	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
slipped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
escalator	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eduardo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
departure	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
assumed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
managing	VBG	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Horst	NNP	(NP*	O
Koehler	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Economy	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jorge	NNP	*	O
Remes	NNPS	*	O
Lenicov	NNP	*)))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
floor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
addressing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
minutes	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
minutes	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
topic	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
discussion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Monterrey	NNP	*	O
Consensus	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
or	CC	*	O
greater	JJR	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
developed	VBN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
underdeveloped	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
fact	NN	(NP*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
approved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
consensus	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
arrives	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Fox	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
spearheading	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
explanation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
entirely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mexican	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
since	IN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
principle	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
virtual	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*	O
step	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
step	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
First	JJ	(S(S(LST*)	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
listen	VBP	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
commented	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
La	NNP	(NP*	O
Nacion	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
learned	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Foreign	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Carlos	NNP	*	O
Ruckauf	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jorge	NNP	*	O
Castaneda	NNP	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
Political	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
Than	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
common	JJ	(NP*	DSE
knowledge	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
economic	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
diplomat	NN	*)	O
accredited	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
remarked	NNP	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
formula	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
question	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
hold	VB	(VP*	ESE
much	JJ	(NP*	ESE
mystery	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
A	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
rapprochement	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
indispensable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
extricate	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Very	CD	(ROOT(NP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(FRAG(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
?	.	*)))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
permit	VB	(VP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	O
signal	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
90	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
example	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
lame	JJ	*	O
duck	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
successor	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
commented	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Argentine	JJ	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alternative	JJ	*	O
reference	NN	*	O
point	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
detriment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
view	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
external	JJ	*	O
vicissitudes	NNS	*)))	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
Fernando	NNP	(NP*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
day	NN	(PP(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	*	ESE
day	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
becoming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
somewhat	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
weak	JJ	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
geostrategic	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
plans	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
moments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
time	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
exerting	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
pressure	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
pressing	VBG	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
speed	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
turns	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(FRAG(PP*	O
58	CD	(NP(NP*	O
chief	JJ	*	O
executives	NNS	*)	O
immersed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
signing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
La	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Nacion	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
told	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
ambassador	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Arnoldo	NNP	(NP*	O
Listre	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
clue	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
heading	VBG	(VP*))))))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
market	NN	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
accepted	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
factor	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
unlike	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
cold	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
rid	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
North-South	JJ	*	ESE
confrontation	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Monterrey	NNP	*	O
Consensus	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
free	JJ	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amendment	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
distortion	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
subsidies	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
external	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	O
pivotal	JJ	*	O
points	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
benefit	VBP	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

UN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Kofi	NNP	*	O
Annan	NNP	*)	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
indebted	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
undeveloped	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
consideed	VBN	(VP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
so	CC	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
avoid	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
repetition	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
such	JJ	(PP*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
ours	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
ranks	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
59th	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
per	IN	(ADJP*	O
capita	NN	*)	O
income	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
7,440	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
substantially	RB	(ADJP*	O
devalued	JJ	*)	O
figure	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
default	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
board	NN	*	O
arrangement	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
clue	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gap	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
existed	VBD	(S(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
exists	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reality	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
statistics	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
credit	NN	*	ESE
agencies	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bind	NN	*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
belt-tightening	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
asking	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
money	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ergo	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
belt-tightening	NN	(NP*))	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
money	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
without	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
money	NN	(NP*))	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
belt-tightening	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(X(ADVP*)	O
what	WP	(NP*)	O
?	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))	O
observed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
ironically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Chile	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(UCP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
President	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Ricardo	NNP	*	ESE
Lagos	NNP	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
Saddam	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Hussein	NNP	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
full	JJ	*	ESE
support	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
Chile	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Lagos	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
Saddam	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
fortunately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
announce	VB	(VP*	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sides	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
criteria	NNS	*)	DSE
set	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Namely	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
view	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
produce	VBP	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
develop	VBP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
amass	VBP	*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
threatens	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
neighbors	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
mass	NN	*)	O
media	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
newspapers	NNS	*)	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
report	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
Pentagon	NNP	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
listed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
seven	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
attacked	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
atomic	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
case	NN	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
security	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
threatened	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
became	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
develops	VBZ	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
produces	VBZ	*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stability	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
security	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
violates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
Nations	NNPS	*	ESE
Charter	NNP	*)	ESE
attacking	VBG	(VP*	O
independent	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
definitely	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
third	JJ	*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
Britain	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
conforms	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
criteria	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
completely	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
supports	VBZ	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
stance	NN	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
absolute	JJ	*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
cases	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
axis	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
similar	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
cooperate	VBP	(VP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
joined	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
bond	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
each	DT	(S(NP*)	O
defends	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
words	NNS	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
deeds	NNS	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
review	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
voting	VBG	*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
defends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
how	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
justifies	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
stances	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
admirable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
harmony	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
endeavors	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(ADVP*)	O
roles	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
distributed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
specifically	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
clearly	RB	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
each	DT	(S(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	ESE
accurately	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
care	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
exactly	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*)	O
was	VBD	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
movie	NN	*))))	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Second	NNP	*	O
Wife	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tyrannical	JJ	*	O
mayor	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Abu-al-Ila	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
simple	JJ	*	O
peasant	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
owns	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clothes	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
back	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
children	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
wife	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
coveted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mayor	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Immediately	RB	(ROOT(SINV(S(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
neutral	JJ	*	O
intermediate	NN	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
represented	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fake	JJ	*	ESE
imposter	NN	*)))	ESE
Shaykh	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
friend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mayor	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
dramatic	JJ	*	O
portrayal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reversed	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Shaykh	NNP	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
or	CC	(NP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
US	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
Anthony	NNP	(NP*	O
Zinni	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*))	O
advises	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Abu-al-Ila	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
bow	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
accept	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
mayor	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	(SBAR*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(S(S(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
demands	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
else	RB	(S(NP*	O
he	PRP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
convicted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
possessing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
destruction	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
eyes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
only	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
wait	VBP	*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advice	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Haj	NNP	(NP*	O
Zinni	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
obey	VB	(VP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
authority	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
19	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Mar	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Wen	NNP	(NP*	O
Wei	NNP	*	O
Po	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
Tang	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Yao-ming	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
experts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
interviews	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
sincerity	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
improving	VBG	(NP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
moves	NNS	*)	O
go	VBP	(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
limits	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
tolerance	NN	(NP*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
affect	VB	(VP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Keli	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Studies	NNPS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Academy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Social	NNP	(NP*	O
Sciences	NNPS	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*	O
CASS	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
since	IN	(S(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	ESE
farther	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
farther	RBR	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
interfering	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
meddling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
entirely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
run	VBN	(VP*	ESE
counter	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
aspirations	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
peoples	NNS	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
healthy	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sun	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Yan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
assistant	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
professor	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
College	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Beijing	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
rope	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
obstacles	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
attack	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
mean	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Compared	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
evidently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
retrogression	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Li	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Jiaquan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
research	NN	(NP(NP*	O
fellow	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CASS	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
Studies	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
During	IN	(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
steered	VBD	(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(NP(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	*	O
three	CD	*)))	O
joint	JJ	*	O
communiques	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	O
occasions	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Jiang	NNP	(NP*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Qinghua	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Jiang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Zhu	NNP	(NP*	O
Rongji	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	*	O
three	CD	*	O
communiques	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
two	CD	*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
contrast	VB	(VP*	O
sharply	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*))	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
show	VB	(VP*	DSE
consideration	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
anti-China	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pro-Taiwan	NN	*	O
faction	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
appease	VB	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
upright	JJ	*	ESE
manner	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
speaks	VBZ	(VP*	O
insincerely	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
!	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Li	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Jiaquan	NNP	*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
quote	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
line	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Guo	NNP	(NP*	O
Moruo	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
confounding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
right	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
wrong	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
kind	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
friends	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
describe	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
militarism	NN	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
enemy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
friend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
her	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
former	JJ	*	ESE
friend	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
former	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
friend	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
19	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
action	NN	(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
controversial	JJ	(S(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
surprise	NN	*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
54-nation	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reach	VB	(VP*	DSE
agreement	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
voting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
African	JJ	(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
rallied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
around	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anti-colonialist	JJ	*	O
Mugabe	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
councils	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
immediate	JJ	(NP*	O
effect	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
revisited	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
12	CD	(NP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
time	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
three-way	JJ	*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Howard	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
presidents	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
follows	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
damning	JJ	*	DSE
report	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
9-11	CD	*	O
vote	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
marred	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
intimidation	JJ	(NP(NP(NP(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
suspect	JJ	*)	ESE
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
practices	NNS	*)	ESE
designed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
benefit	VB	(VP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conclusion	NN	*)	DSE
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
reached	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
opposition	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
much	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jonathan	NNP	*	O
Moyo	NNP	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
blasted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lump	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
with	IN	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
suspended	VBN	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bad	JJ	*	ESE
report	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
bad	JJ	(NP*	ESE
decisions	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Moyo	NNP	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
denouncing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
``	``	*	O
opinionated	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
one-sided	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
``	``	*	O
lacks	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
credibility	NN	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
withstand	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
objective	JJ	*	ESE
scrutiny	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
British	NNP	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
clearly	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
welcomes	VBZ	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
troika	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
absolutely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
message	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
clearer	JJR	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Phil	NNP	*	O
Goff	NNP	*)	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
New	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
anyway	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Goff	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
reluctantly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
To	TO	(S(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
extent	NN	*))	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
halfway	JJ	*	ESE
house	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
defer	VB	(VP*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
reject	VB	*	DSE
calls	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
suspension	NN	*))))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
defeated	VBD	(VP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
proposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mediate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
validates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Welshman	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ncube	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
secretary	NN	(NP(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(SBAR*	O
after	IN	*	O
Switzerland	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
slapping	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
freeze	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
assets	NNS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Swiss	JJ	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*)	DSE
suggested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
going	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
suspension	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
present	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
talking	VBG	(VP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
so	IN	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
deferment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*	DSE
views	NNS	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
result	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
respected	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
tipped	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
negotiate	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
view	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
running	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fresh	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
restoring	VBG	*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
ruled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
meaningful	JJ	*	ESE
discussions	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
cracked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
over	RP	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
information	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
constitution	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
56	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
votes	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
42	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	RBS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
condemned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
notably	RB	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
month	NN	*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
postponed	VBD	(VP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
defiant	JJ	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*))))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
voting	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
inauguration	NN	*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accelerate	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
begun	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
aim	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resettle	VB	(VP*	O
blacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
white-owned	JJ	(NP*	O
farms	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reverse	VB	(VP*	O
colonial-era	JJ	(NP*	O
injustices	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
marred	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
liberation	NN	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
support	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
killing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
farmer	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Terry	NNP	(NP*	O
Ford	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
inauguration	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Critics	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
aggravated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
food	NN	*	O
shortage	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
threatens	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
worsen	VB	(VP*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
drought	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
mulling	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
conversations	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
allied	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fraudulent	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Ari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Fleischer	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
spokesman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

DURBAN	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
19	CD	*))	O
Sapa	NNP	*	O
SA	NNP	*	O
OBSERVER	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
ZIM	NNP	(NP*	O
ELECTIONS	NNP	*	O
NOT	NNP	*	ESE
FREE	NNP	*	ESE
AND	CC	*	ESE
FAIR	NNP	*)))	ESE

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Observer	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))	ESE

Methodist	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Bishop	NNP	*	O
Purity	NNP	*	O
Malinga	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
echoed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sentiments	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Independent	NNP	*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
IEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
chairwoman	NN	(SBAR(NP*	O
Brigalia	NNP	*	O
Bam	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
conform	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Bam	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
line	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)))	ESE
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malinga	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
represented	VBD	(S(VP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
churches	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
50-member	JJ	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
breakfast	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Diakonia	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Churches	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Durban	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
uncomfortable	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manner	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
even	VB	(ADVP*))	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
advised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
vigilant	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
public	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Malinga	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Each	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
handed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
booklet	NN	*)	O
containing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
guidelines	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
laws	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Personally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
used	VBN	(VP*	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
nevertheless	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
outsiders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
acts	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
committed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
booklet	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pretoria	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malinga	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
according	VBG	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guidelines	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
booklet	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
SAOM	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
head	VBP	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Sam	NNP	*	O
Motsuenyane	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
findings	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guidelines	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
preliminary	JJ	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Motsuenyane	NNP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	*	ESE
openly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
described	VBN	*	ESE
as	RB	(S(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Malinga	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Matabeleland	NNP	*))	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Beitbridge	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
characterised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
--	:	(NP(PRN*	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	ESE
others	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
--	:	*)	ESE
intimidation	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
queues	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
centres	NNS	*))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lot	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fear	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
tension	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
run	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
carried	VBD	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*))	O
nobody	NN	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
feel	VB	(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
treated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
suspicion	NN	(NP*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
At	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
station	NN	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
ordered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
metres	NNS	*)	O
away	RB	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
local	JJ	(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Many	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
names	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
voters	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
role	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
twenties	NNS	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
thirties	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fifties	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

SAOM	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
short	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
declaring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)))	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
credible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
endorsed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ANC	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
noted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
over	RB	(S(S(NP(QP*	O
three	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Zimbabweans	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
cast	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
substantially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
represented	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
will	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Inkatha	NNP	*	O
Freedom	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
African	NNP	(NP*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pan	NNP	*	O
Africanist	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
disagreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ANC	NNP	*	O
conclusion	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
undecided	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
SAOM	NNP	(NP*)))	O
aligned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
findings	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
forum	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
met	VBN	(VP*	ESE
SADC	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
norms	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
standards	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Australia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plans	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
construct	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
port	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Christmas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
just	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
stone	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
throw	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
a	DT	(PP(ADVP(NP*	ESE
mere	JJ	*	ESE
500	CD	*	ESE
kilometres	NNS	*)	ESE
south	RB	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
Jakarta	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(S(NP*	O
overtures	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
official	JJ	(NP*	DSE
objections	NNS	*)))))	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Flight	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
risks	NNS	*)	ESE
facing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
launch	NN	*	O
pad	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
work	NN	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
infrastructure	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
launches	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
beginning	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2004	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
large-scale	JJ	*	O
project	NN	*	O
right	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
backyard	NN	*)))	ESE
could	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
potentially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
cause	VB	*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
debris	NN	*)	O
consisting	VBG	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bits	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rocket	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
fuel	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
satellites	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fall	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
disrupt	VB	(VP*	ESE
flights	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
shipping	VBG	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
rocket	NN	*	ESE
launch	NN	*)	ESE
fails	VBZ	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
debris	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
weighing	VBG	(VP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tonnes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
scattered	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
densely-populated	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Java	NNP	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tourist	NN	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bali	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(VP(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
east	JJ	*)))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Timor	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
memory	NN	*)	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Mir	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
after	IN	(S(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
earth	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
23	CD	(NP*))))	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
fresh	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fortunately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
shrapnel	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*)))	O
station	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
measured	VBD	(S(VP*	O
33	CD	(NP(NP*	O
x	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
30	CD	*))	O
x	JJ	*	O
27	CD	*	O
metres	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
weighed	CD	(NP(QP*	O
137	CD	*)	O
tonnes	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
burned	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
re-entered	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
somewhere	RB	(PP*	O
over	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
Ocean	NNP	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Chile	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
intact	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
pieces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
debris	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
weighing	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
30	CD	*)	O
tonnes	NNS	*))))))	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
Ocean	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prior	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
satellites	NNS	*)	O
struck	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
earth	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cosmos	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
1402	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
1978	CD	*)))	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Hemisphere	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Cosmos	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
954	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
contained	VBD	(S(VP*	O
radioactive	JJ	(NP*	O
substances	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
crashed	VBD	(VP*	O
above	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
uninhabited	JJ	*	O
tundra	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
1977	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
worrying	JJ	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
transformed	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
pose	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
sovereignty	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
close	NN	*	ESE
proximity	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
bilateral	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
turn	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
worse	JJR	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
firing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
easy	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Christmas	NNP	(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ideal	JJ	*	ESE
location	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
rocket	NN	(NP(NP*	O
launches	NNS	*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
proximity	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Equator	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
geostationary	NN	*))))	O
orbit	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GSO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Notwithstanding	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
above	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(NP(NP(PP*	O
reality	NN	(NP*))	O
only	RB	(QP*	O
three	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
launch	NN	*	O
pad	NN	*	O
centres	NNS	*)))	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Equator	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Kourou	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
San	NNP	(NP*	O
Marco	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Sriharikota	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
famous	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kennedy	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Centre	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Cape	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Canaveral	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
relatively	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Equator	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
plans	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
construct	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
port	NN	*)))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Christmas	NNP	(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
really	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
willing	JJ	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
listen	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
objections	NNS	*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

International	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*	O
governing	VBG	*	O
accountability	NN	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
debris	NN	*)	O
falls	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
existence	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Liability	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Damage	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Caused	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Space	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Objects	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
28	CD	(NP*)))	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
1972	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1972	CD	*	O
Liability	NN	*	O
Convention	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
basically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
responsibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
launching	NN	*	O
state	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
either	CC	(ADVP*	O
jointly	RB	*	O
or	CC	*	O
collectively	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*	O
failure	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
re-entry	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
atmosphere	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
claims	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
states	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	O
damages	NNS	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
projects	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
likely	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
suffer	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
impact	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Port	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
rely	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
simplest	JJS	*	ESE
article	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Liability	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Section	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
section	NN	*)	O
allows	VBZ	(VP*	O
states	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	O
damages	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
claim	VB	(VP*	O
compensation	NN	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Claims	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
acts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appellant	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
launching	VBG	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*	O
Australia	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
classed	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
launching	NN	*	O
state	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
lodging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
claim	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
simple	JJ	*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
clapping	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
hands	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Indonesia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	RB	*	ESE
least	JJS	*)))	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Space	NNP	(NP*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
treaties	NNS	*)	O
governing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
outer	JJ	(NP*	O
space	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Treaty	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Principles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
Governing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Activities	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
States	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Exploration	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Use	NNP	*))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Outer	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Moon	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Other	JJ	*	O
Celestial	NNP	*	O
Bodies	NNP	*	O
1967	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Space	NNP	(NP*	O
Treaty	NNP	*	O
1967	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Liability	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Damage	NNP	(NP*	O
Caused	NNP	*))))))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Space	NNP	(NP*	O
Objects	NNP	*	O
1972	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Liability	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
1972	CD	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
finally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Registration	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Objections	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Outer	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
1974	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Registration	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
1974	CD	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1972	CD	*	O
Liability	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
applies	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
objects	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fall	VBP	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	(NP*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indonesia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
compensation	NN	*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Absolute	NNP	*	O
Liability	NNP	*	O
principle	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
burden	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
proof	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
claimant	NN	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	O
damages	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
lie	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
submitting	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
damages	NNS	*	O
claim	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
sufficient	JJ	(ADJP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demonstrate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
object	NN	*)	O
identified	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
belonging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launching	VBG	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
participated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
object	NN	*	O
launching	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Flight	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
paper	NN	(NP*)))	O
suggest	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
difficulty	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	O
damage	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lodge	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
damages	NNS	*	O
claim	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
objections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Christmas	NNP	*	O
Island	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
damage	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
occurred	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
territorial	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
objects	NNS	*)	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Christmas	NNP	*	O
Island	NNP	*	O
station	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
require	VB	(VP*	ESE
advanced	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
technology	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
cost	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
claim	NN	*	O
submission	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
conversation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Kompas	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
17	CD	(NP(QP*	O
Mar	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
few	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
law	NN	*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Prof	NNP	(NP*	O
Dr	NNP	*	O
Priyatna	NNP	*	O
Abdurrasyid	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
different	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Indonesia	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
produce	VB	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
substantiate	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
claim	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
suffice	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
submit	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
claim	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Claims	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
debris	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
originated	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
denies	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
claim	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
demand	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
produce	VBP	(VP*	O
proof	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
debris	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
originate	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
deadlock	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP*)))	O
occurs	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Claims	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
neutral	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
adjudicator	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
arbitration	NN	(NP*	O
hearings	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Priyatna	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Unfortunately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
historical	JJ	(NP*	O
precedent	NN	*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
claiming	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
compensation	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
easy	JJ	*	ESE
matter	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
claiming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
compensation	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Cosmos	NNP	(NP*	O
954	CD	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
navigate	VB	(VP*	ESE
numerous	JJ	(NP*	O
procedural	JJ	*	O
complications	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Unlike	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
experts	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Priyatna	NNP	(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
too	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*)	DSE
-LSB-	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
planned	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	ESE
principle	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
personal	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
current	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rather	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
current	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
mutual	JJ	*	ESE
benefit	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Meaning	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
challenging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
issuing	VBG	*	DSE
objections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
project	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
neighbour	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*	O
1967	CD	*)	O
obliges	VBZ	(VP*	O
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
states	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
widely	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
as	IN	*	O
possible	JJ	*)	O
the	DT	*	O
opportunity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pledges	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
launching	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
objects	NNS	*)))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
purely	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
purposes	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
purposes	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Priyatna	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*	O
1967	CD	*	O
oblige	NN	*	O
Australia	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
launching	NN	*)))	O
state	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
field	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
endeavour	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
cooperate	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indonesia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
exploit	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
principle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*	O
1967	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rather	RB	(ROOT(SQ(PP*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
issuing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
letter	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
objection	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
would	MD	*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
interest	NN	*)	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
kangaroo	NN	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
implement	VB	(VP(VP*	O
risk	NN	(NP*	O
management	NN	*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
opening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Christmas	NNP	(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
widely	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)	ESE
the	DT	*	O
opportunity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
complete	JJ	(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
states	NNS	*))	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
exception	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
upheld	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*	O
1967	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Australia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
adhere	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cardinal	NNP	*	O
Principle	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Law	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
states	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
first	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
respect	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
promote	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
progress	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
humankind	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
who	WP	(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
can	MD	(SQ*	ESE
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
guidelines	NNS	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
adhered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*)))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))))	O

BETHANY	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Swaziland	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
increasing	VBG	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Umbutfo	NNP	*	O
Swaziland	NNP	*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
USDF	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
594	CD	(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
aliens	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
USDF	NNP	*)	O
found	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
43	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Somalians	NNS	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kombis	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Maphiveni	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
23	CD	(NP*	O
others	NNS	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
travel	NN	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Matsamo	NNP	(NP*	O
border	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
handed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Horo	NNP	*	O
police	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
507	CD	*)	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
Mozambicans	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(NP(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Tanzanians	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
Burundian	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Corporal	NNP	(NP*	O
Nhlanhla	NNP	*	O
Dlamini	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
most	JJS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Lomahasha	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Mhlumeni	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Sitsatsaweni	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
family	NN	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Lomahasha	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
assisting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
shelter	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
transport	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
request	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
whoever	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
engaged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
activity	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
53	CD	(NP*	O
cattle	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
17	CD	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
spotted	VBN	(VP*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
Mozambique	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
armed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
rifles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
thought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
AK47s	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mozambican	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
promised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	ESE
quickly	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
USDF	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
stolen	VBN	*	O
cars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Nissan	NNP	*	O
Skyline	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mafutseni	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Mercedes	NNP	*	O
Benz	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
A	DT	(NP*	O
Toyota	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Isuzu	NNP	*	O
2.5	CD	*	O
diesel	NN	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Nkalashane	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

March	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
22	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax-AVN	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
habitual	JJ	*	O
criminal	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
escaped	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
convoy	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
shootout	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Perm	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*)))	O
overnight	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
has	VBZ	*	O
surrendered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Volga	NNP	*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
district	NN	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax-Military	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
News	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sergei	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Serdyuk	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
32	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
convicted	VBN	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
theft	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
assault	NN	*	O
amd	JJ	*	O
car	NN	*	O
hijacking	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*))	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	O
again	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Komi	NNP	*	O
-	:	*	O
Perm	NNP	*	O
autonomous	NNP	*))))))	O
region	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Serdyuk	NNP	(NP*)	O
escaped	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
convoy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kochevo	NNP	*	O
police	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
incident	NN	*)	O
happened	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Perm-Kudymkar	JJ	*	O
motorway	JJ	*	O
6km	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Karagai	NNP	*	O
village	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Perm	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP*	O
midnight	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Materials	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
contained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Serdyuk	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
disarmed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
convoy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
got	VBN	(VP*	O
hold	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
PM	NNP	*	O
pistols	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
wounded	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
investigation	NN	*	O
subdepartment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kochevo	NNP	*	O
police	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
commanded	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
convoy	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
driver	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
vehicle	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Perm	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
car	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Krasnokamsk	NNP	*	O
village	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
shootout	NN	*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Serdyuk	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
escaped	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
forest	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
casualties	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
registered	VBN	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
policemen	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
PM	NNP	*	O
pistols	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
site	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Serdyuk	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
surrendered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
8:20	CD	(NP*	O
a.m.	RB	*))))))))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
0520	NNP	(NP*	O
GMT	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Arms	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
confiscated	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
confronted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
constitution	NN	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))	O

IT	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
monumental	JJ	*	ESE
tragedy	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
democratisation	NN	*	O
process	NN	*))))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
fail	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
proper	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
useful	JJ	*)	O
lessons	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debacle	NN	*)	ESE
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
just-concluded	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	DSE
warn	VB	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outset	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
persons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
analyses	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
handled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
caution	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(ADJP*	O
winning	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
losing	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
politicians	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
dominated	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pre-election	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sorts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
analyses	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
predictions	NNS	*))	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	ESE
value	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
ascertained	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	DSE
declare	VB	(VP*	DSE
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outset	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
days	NNS	*)	O
sometime	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
early	RB	(NP(NP*	O
1997	CD	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
colleagues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Tendai	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Biti	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Welshman	NNP	(NP*	O
Ncube	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Brian	NNP	(NP*	O
Kagoro	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Priscilla	NNP	(NP*	O
Misihairabwi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Everjoice	NNP	(NP*	O
Win	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Tawanda	NNP	(NP*	O
Mutasa	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
participated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
formulating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
concept	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Constitutional	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NCA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
me	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
sole	JJ	*	ESE
purpose	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
preserve	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
protect	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU	NNP	(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

My	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
view	NN	*)	DSE
then	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
indeed	RB	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
colleagues	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
free	JJ	(S(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*)	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
norm	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
citizens	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	O
freedoms	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
created	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
people-driven	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
view	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
view	NN	*)	DSE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
hold	VBP	(VP*	DSE
so	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	DSE
strongly	RB	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	DSE
confess	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
cloud	VB	(VP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
assessment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
just-concluded	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
little	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
neither	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fails	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
standard	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(NP*))	ESE
``	``	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	O
produces	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
illegitimate	JJ	*	ESE
outcome	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
much	RB	(ADVP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
admitting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)))	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
stolen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
9	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
outcome	NN	*)	ESE
illegitimate	VBG	(VP*	ESE
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
allegations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
rigging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
arising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
days	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
learnt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
until	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
genuinely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*)	ESE
constitution	NN	*)	ESE
enshrining	VBG	(VP*	ESE
universally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
recognised	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
norms	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
ballot	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
remain	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
mirage	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Politicians	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(VP(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
run-up	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
peddled	VBN	*	DSE
theories	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
will	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
prevail	VB	(VP*	ESE
notwithstanding	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
labyrinth	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
constitutional	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
provisions	NNS	*)	ESE
loaded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
admit	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
faced	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
roots	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defective	JJ	*	ESE
nature	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
constitutional	JJ	*	ESE
framework	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
proceed	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
illustrate	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
truth	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

First	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
voter	NN	*	O
registration	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
transparent	JJ	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
conducted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
as	RB	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
favour	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ruling	VBG	*	ESE
party	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
main	JJ	*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
transparency	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
laws	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
voter	NN	(NP*	O
registration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
appointed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
answerable	JJ	(VP(ADJP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
handled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Independent	NNP	*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
impartial	JJ	*	O
body	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
independence	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
constitution	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	O
supplementary	JJ	*	O
voters	NNS	*	O
'	''	*	O
roll	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
names	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
compiled	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
dubious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
circumstances	NNS	*))	ESE
but	CC	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	O
validity	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
acting	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
laws	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Secondly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
designation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
well	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
known	VBN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
favoured	VBD	(S(VP*	O
ZANU	NNP	(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
granting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
ridiculously	JJ	(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
polling	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(UCP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
appointed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
answerable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Independent	NNP	*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
constitutionally	RB	(ADJP*	O
enjoined	JJ	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
impartially	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Third	LS	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
alleged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
presiding	JJ	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Intelligence	NNP	*	O
Organisation	NNP	*	O
operatives	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
scope	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
madness	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Independent	NNP	*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
appoints	VBZ	(VP*	O
professional	JJ	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fourth	JJ	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	O
no-go	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mashonaland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
West	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
East	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Midlands	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Parliament	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Public	JJ	*	O
Order	NN	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	(NX*	O
Act	NNP	*)))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
deliberately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
misinterpreted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
suppress	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
opposition	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
free	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
equal	JJ	*)	O
campaigning	NN	*	O
platforms	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
competing	VBG	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
such	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
enshrined	VBN	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
given	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
approach	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
orders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
directing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(NP*	O
campaigning	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
no-go	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fifth	JJ	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
equal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
constitution	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
enabled	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Broadcasting	NNP	*	O
Corporation	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
abuse	NN	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	ESE
position	NN	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
broadcasting	NN	(NP*	O
ZANU	CD	*	O
PF	NNP	*	O
propaganda	NN	*	O
only	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
significantly	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
enjoys	VBZ	(VP*	O
enormous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
powers	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
further	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
chances	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
directed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tripartite	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
overrode	VBD	(VP*	O
court	NN	(NP*	O
orders	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
contrary	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
tripartite	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
contributed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ultimately	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
low	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
turnout	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
nullified	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Laws	NNP	*	O
Amendment	NNP	*	O
Act	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reinstate	VB	(VP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
provisions	NNS	*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statutory	JJ	*	O
instrument	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
banned	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
postal	JJ	(NP*	O
voting	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNPS	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
constituencies	NNS	*))))	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
latter	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
alleged	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
voted	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
monitoring	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
civic	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
reinstated	VBN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
countless	JJ	*	ESE
examples	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*))	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
enjoys	VBZ	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
mould	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
process	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
favour	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
conclusion	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reached	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
picture	NN	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
under	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitutional	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
legal	JJ	*)	O
framework	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
incumbent	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
naive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
anger	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
,	,	(ADJP(PRN*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
sufficient	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
retirement	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expiry	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
six-year	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
ZANU	NNP	(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
field	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
less	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
illustrious	JJ	*)	ESE
colleagues	NNS	*)))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
candidate	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	O
change	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
learn	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
bitter	JJ	*)	ESE
lesson	NN	*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
ZANU	NNP	(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(VP*	ESE
steal	VB	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
again	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
wait	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
scenario	NN	*))	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
embrace	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
fight	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
learnt	VBN	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
lesson	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
irresponsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
seek	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dispute	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
brings	VBZ	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

First	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spontaneous	JJ	*	O
uprising	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
notwithstanding	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
widespread	JJ	*	DSE
disbelief	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
greeted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
voters	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ZANU	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
anticipated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
such	JJ	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
uprising	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
hence	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	ESE
intimidatory	NN	*	ESE
show	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
force	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
evident	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
deployment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
security	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
forces	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
and	CC	*	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Secondly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
key	JJ	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
victory	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
almost	RB	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
crucial	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
discussion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)))))	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Various	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
options	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
better	JJR	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
confront	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
question	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Constitutional	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reform	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
discourse	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
yield	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
reform	NN	*	O
leading	VBG	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
mass	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mass	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))	O
places	VBZ	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
heard	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
defend	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
roundly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
condemned	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
endorsed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
governing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	RBR	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
fundamentally	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
principle	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
personalities	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
dismiss	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
Western	JJ	*	ESE
imperialist	NN	*	ESE
ploy	NN	*))	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
demands	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unambiguous	JJ	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
democratic	JJ	*)	O
system	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
democratic	JJ	*)	O
framework	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
conducting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expanded	VBN	*	O
Bill	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rights	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
excuse	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
shooting	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
merely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
demanding	VBG	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
constitution	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
masses	NNS	*)	O
required	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
struggle	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
succeed	VB	(VP*)))))	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
substantial	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
spontaneous	JJ	*	ESE
uprising	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
core	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
determined	VBN	(NP(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
committed	VBN	*)	DSE
Zimbabweans	NNPS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
sufficient	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
be	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)	ESE
so	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	ESE
any	DT	(S(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
transparent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
credible	JJ	*)	O
manner	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
necessarily	RB	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
six	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
away	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
designate	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
successor	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
should	MD	(SBAR*	DSE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
decide	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
retire	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fresh	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
90	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
arises	VBZ	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
dies	VBZ	(VP*	O
while	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Never	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
Zimbabweans	JJ	(VP(ADJP*)	O
go	VB	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
levelled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))))))))	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
mass	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
confronting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
demand	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))))))))	O
translates	VBZ	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
recognising	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
illegitimate	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
useless	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
sophistry	RB	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	O
jargon	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
remains	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
de	FW	(ADJP*	ESE
facto	FW	*)	ESE
President	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
confronted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	DSE
demand	NN	*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
reform	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
NCA	NNP	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
December	NNP	*)	O
completed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
Justice	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Patrick	NNP	*	O
Chinamasa	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
receive	VB	(VP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
draft	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
NCA	NNP	*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
noble	JJ	*	ESE
cause	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
secure	JJ	*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
good	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governance	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Lovemore	NNP	(NP*	O
Madhuku	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
task	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
force	NN	*	O
chairperson	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Constitutional	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lecturer	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
24	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	*	O
Kasyanov	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
departing	VBG	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*	O
afternoon	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
25	CD	*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
premier	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
press	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tatyana	NNP	(NP*	O
Razbash	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
ITAR-TASS	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
programme	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kasyanov	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stay	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
capital	NN	(NP*	O
Ulaanbaatar	NN	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tete-a-tete	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Nambaryn	NNP	*	O
Enhbayar	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
followed	VBN	(PP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extended	JJ	*	O
format	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
signing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Natsagiyn	NNP	*	O
Bagabandi	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
speaker	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sanzhbegiyn	NNP	(NP*	O
Tumur-Ochir	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
26	CD	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Kasyanov	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP(VP*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mongolian	NNP	*	O
entrepreneurs	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Science	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Technology	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
awarded	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
title	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
honorary	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
doctor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
university	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Kasyanov	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
wind	VB	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	*	O
tour	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
turnover	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mongolia	NNP	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
240m	JJ	(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
exports	VBZ	(VP*	O
petroleum	NN	(NP(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
electricity	NN	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
machinery	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
imports	NNS	(NP*	O
copper	NN	*	O
concentrate	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
meat	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
wish	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
import	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	*	O
meat	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Ambassador	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP*	O
Oleg	NNP	*	O
Derkovskiy	NNP	*)))	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
states	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)	O
stretching	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
3,500	CD	(NP*	O
kilometres	NNS	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
border	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
neighbourliness	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Ulaanbaatar	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
actively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
developing	VBG	*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
consulting	VBG	(VP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
stands	NNS	*)	O
coincide	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
close	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ITAR-TASS	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
large	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
businesses	NNS	(NP*))	O
``	``	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
active	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP*))	O
''	''	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Amman	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
25	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Petra	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Majesties	NNS	*)	O
King	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Queen	NNP	*	O
Rania	NNP	*	O
Al-Abdullah	NNP	*	O
Sunday	NNP	*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
home	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
working	VBG	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
USA	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mexico	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
His	PRP$	(NP*	O
Majesty	NN	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Spanish	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Monarch	NNP	*	O
Juan	NNP	*	O
Carlos	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
British	NNP	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Los	NNP	(NP*	O
Angeles	NNP	*))	O
His	PRP$	(NP*	O
Majesty	NN	*)	O
received	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
World	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Leadership	NNP	*)	O
reward	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Young	NNP	(NP*	O
Leaders	NNPS	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
activists	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
means	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
leg	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
His	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Majesty	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tour	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
King	NNP	*)	O
participated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Monterrey	NNP	*	O
congress	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Financing	NNP	(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
addressed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
congress	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opening	NN	*	O
session	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sidelines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Congress	NNP	*))))	O
His	PRP$	(NP*	O
Majesty	NN	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
American	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
French	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
American	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Spanish	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minster	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mozambique	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Her	PRP$	(NP*	O
Majesty	NNP	*	O
Queen	NNP	*	O
Rania	NNP	*)	O
participated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))	O
pertaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
youth	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
micro	JJ	*	O
projects	NNS	*	O
financing	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MOSCOW	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
March	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
24	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Russian	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	*	O
Kasyanov	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
beginning	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
visiting	VBG	(VP*	O
Ulan-Bator	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
25	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
26	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Hanoi	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
26	CD	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
28	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP*))	O
Kasyanov	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Nambaryn	NNP	*	O
Enkhbayar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
parliament	NNP	(NP*	O
Chairman	NNP	*	O
Timur	NNP	*	O
Ogir	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Natsagiyin	NNP	*	O
Bagabandi	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kasyanov	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
expanded	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
businessmen	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
goal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
broaden	VB	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
present-day	JJ	(S(NP*	O
pace	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
fast	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
enough	RB	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Russian-Mongolian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
trade	NN	*)	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
amounts	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
240	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
only	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
25	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
turnover	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mongolia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
negative	JJ	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
150	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
160	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
proposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
increasing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
meat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
ventures	NNS	*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Erdenet	NNP	*	O
mining	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mongolian-Russian	NNP	*	O
Non-Ferrous	NNP	*	O
Metals	NNPS	*	O
Company	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ulan	NNP	*))	O
-	:	*)	O
Bator	NNP	(NP*	O
Railways	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
accounted	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
60	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	*	O
exports	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
40	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
GDP	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
stake	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Erdenet	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
49	CD	*	O
%	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
interested	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
increasing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
51	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
stake	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ulan-Bator	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
1991	CD	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)))	O
expires	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
31	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2002	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
projects	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Russian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
laying	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
pipeline	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yukos	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gasification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
districts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Gazprom	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Itera	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
electricity	NN	(NP(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Unified	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Systems	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Mongolia	NNP	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
owe	VB	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
contrary	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mongolia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
debt	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
current	JJ	(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)))))	O
amounts	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
10	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Soviet-era	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
11.5	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
restructuring	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
deferment	NN	*	O
schemes	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mongolian	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
curtailed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990s	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	*	O
resumed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
training	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mongolian	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
academies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kasyanov	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hanoi	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Ulan-Bator	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
26	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Authorities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
24	NNP	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	O
business	NN	*	O
associate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Majd	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Shamayleh	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
suspect	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bank	NN	*	O
fraud	NN	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
investigation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
JD1	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
bail	NN	*	O
bond	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
nearly	RB	(SBAR(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
judicial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Munther	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Halasa	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
suspected	VBN	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
involvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
questionable	JJ	*	O
bank	NN	*	O
loans	NNS	*	O
case	NN	*))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
referred	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*	O
prosecutor	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
investigation	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Halasa	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deposit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
6	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
clerks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
HSBC	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bail	NN	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Halasa	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
suspects	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
out	IN	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bail	NN	(NP*)))	O
pending	VBG	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
investigations	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Fifty-five	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
businessmen	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
bankers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
news	NN	(NP(NP*	O
coverage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
investigations	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
citing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Article	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
38	CD	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Press	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Publications	NNPS	*	O
Law	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
unmanned	JJ	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
consecutively	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
exhibited	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
capsules	NNS	*)	O
recovered	VBD	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
true	JJ	*	O
features	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
capsules	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*	ESE
exactly	RB	*)	ESE
then	RB	(SQ(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
learned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
liftoff	NN	*	O
weight	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
eight	CD	*)	O
tonnes	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
less	JJR	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
10	CD	*)	O
meters	NNS	*)	O
long	RB	*)	O
and	CC	(NP(NP(QP*	O
3.5	CD	*)	O
meters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
diameter	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
cruise	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
days	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	(NP*	O
reference	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
spaceship	NNP	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
composed	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
cylindrical	JJ	*	O
capsules	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orbiter	NN	*	O
capsule	NN	*)	O
fitted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forefront	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
interior	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
equipped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
corresponding	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
observation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
space	NN	*	O
drug	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
microgravity	NN	*	O
tests	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*	O
capsule	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
orbiter	NN	*	O
capsule	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cockpit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
capsule	NN	*)))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
reenter	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
landing	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reclining	JJ	*	O
seats	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capsule	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
astronauts	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instrument	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
control	NN	(NP*	O
shaft	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
optical	JJ	(NP*	O
telescope	NN	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
seats	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rear	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
propulsion	NN	*)	O
capsule	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
thrust	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
orbital	JJ	(NP*	O
control	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
return	NN	*))))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
earth	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
earth	NN	(NP*	O
observation	NN	*))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Space	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
civilian	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
purposes	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
exception	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
speculated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
almost	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
certainly	RB	*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
equipped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
facilities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
relating	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
observation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
attack	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
enemy	NN	(NP*	O
satellites	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceflight	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
preliminary	JJ	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
combat	NN	*	O
capability	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
experience	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
greatest	JJS	*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
manned	JJ	(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
inadequate	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
supply	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
solar	JJ	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
batteries	NNS	*)	O
usually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
needs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
understood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
successfully	RB	(ADVP*)	O
resolved	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
sufficient	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
supply	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
completing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
orbital	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
adjust	VB	(VP(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*	O
position	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
following	JJ	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*	O
command	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
ignite	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
engine	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
orbit	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
returning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
earth	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
gliding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
orbiter	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
propulsion	NN	*	O
capsules	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
discarded	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
designs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russia	NNP	*	O
spaceship	NNP	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lift	NN	*	O
control	NN	*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
limit	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
mobility	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
altitude	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
several	JJ	*)	O
thousands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
meters	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*	O
capsule	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
eject	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
parachutes	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	O
reduce	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
speed	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*))	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recovery	NN	*	O
site	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
returning	VBG	(NP*	O
satellites	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mountains	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sichuan	NNP	(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
recovery	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
rescue	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceflight	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*	O
site	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
sparsely	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
populated	VBN	*)	O
grassland	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wilderness	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Judging	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
selection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
recovery	NN	(NP(NP*	O
sites	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
flights	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
site	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
recovering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
situated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grassland	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Inner	NNP	(NP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(PP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
step	NN	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
recovery	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
recovering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sea	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
informed	VBN	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
designs	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
manned	JJ	*	O
spaceflight	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
consideration	NN	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*	O
modifications	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
orbiter	NN	*	O
capsule	NN	*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
docking	VBG	*	O
module	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
docking	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
spaceships	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
concerned	VBN	*	O
person	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prelude	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
development	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finance	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Malan	NNP	*)	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
profound	IN	*	ESE
constructive	JJ	*)	ESE
engagement	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
multilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
governments	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Malan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
suggests	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
definition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
priorities	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	ESE
priority	NN	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
unshackle	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
credit	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
modern	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
function	VB	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
credit	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Credit	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	O
banks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
functioning	VBG	*	O
payment	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
priority	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
urgent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
participants	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seminar	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Euro	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Brazil	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
criticizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
multilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
reforms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
help	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Given	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
uncertainty	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
prevails	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
over	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
interest	NN	(NP*	O
rates	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
real	JJ	*	O
Gross	NNP	*	O
Domestic	NNP	*	O
Product	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
traditional	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Pedro	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Malan	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jaime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Caruana	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
governor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
central	JJ	*	O
bank	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
Caruana	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
create	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
broad	JJ	*	ESE
program	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
generates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
internal	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
external	JJ	*)	O
stability	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*	O
Governor	NNP	*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
detail	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
points	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
program	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Spain	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
investors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
instability	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
big	JJ	*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Spanish	JJ	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Caruana	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
homework	NN	*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
provisions	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
investments	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	(S(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
constructive	JJ	*	O
engagement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
experts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
spent	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
authorities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
recounting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
experiences	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
situations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
one	NN	*)))))))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(FRAG(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
group	NN	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Governor	NNP	*	O
Miguel	NNP	*	O
Mancera	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
dealt	VBN	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1995	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Chilean	JJ	*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
faced	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1982	CD	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chilean	JJ	*	O
GDP	NN	*)	O
dropped	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
14	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
Fiscal	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Director	NNP	*	O
Vito	NNP	*	O
Tanzi	NNP	*)	O
;	:	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
restructuring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Gustavo	NNP	*	O
Loyola	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
lived	VBD	(S(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Collor	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
withholdings	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Proer	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Program	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Encourage	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Reorganization	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Strengthening	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Financial	NNP	*	O
System	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
program	NN	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
restructure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
banking	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
defense	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Malan	NNP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Mercosur	NNP	*	O
partner	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
sought	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
define	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
clarity	NN	(NP*))	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	O
regimes	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
floating	JJ	(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
monetary	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
intend	VBP	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
phase	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transition	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
define	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*	O
goal	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1995-1998	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
fiscal	JJ	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
insists	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
``	``	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
sense	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
demand	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(S(NP*	O
everything	NN	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
two	CD	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
referring	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
asking	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Malan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
defends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mercosur	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
alight	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
flame	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
future	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
distant	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
but	CC	*	O
until	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
then	RB	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
consolidating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
institutional	JJ	*	O
sphere	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
productive	JJ	(NP*	O
restructuring	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
modernizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Uruguay	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Paraguay	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Chile	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bolivia	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
radically	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
dollarizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Brazilian	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
yield	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
having	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dollarization	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
very	RB	*	ESE
trivial	JJ	*)	ESE
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
negotiation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
issues	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
involving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
complex	JJ	(NP*	ESE
questions	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ultimate	JJ	(NP*	O
lender	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Reserve	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
supervision	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
regulation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollarized	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Malan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollarization	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
irreversible	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
tension	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
Brazil	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Argentina	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
resulting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
floating	VBG	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
tend	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
disappear	VB	(VP*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
neighboring	VBG	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
opting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
floating	VBG	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Malan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
predicts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
competitive	JJ	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
emerges	VBZ	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
A	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
little	JJ	*	ESE
calm	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
needed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
let	VB	(VP*	ESE
oneself	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
carried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
difficulties	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
moment	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
emphasizes	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Mercosur	NNP	(NP*)	O
managed	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
enormous	JJ	*	ESE
technical	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
did	VBD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
exist	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
harmonization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statistics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bolivia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chile	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
comparable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
before	IN	(PP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Today	NN	(S(NP*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
comparable	JJ	(NP*	O
statistics	NNS	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
macroeconomic	JJ	*	O
monitoring	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
experts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
central	JJ	*	O
banks	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
meet	VBP	(S(VP*	O
regularly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Based	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
statistical	JJ	(NP*	O
harmonization	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
basic	JJ	(NP*	O
convergence	NN	*	O
parameters	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
presidents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
endorsed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
certain	JJ	(NP*	DSE
goals	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
nominal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
deficits	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proportion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
GDPs	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
maximum	JJ	(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whoever	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
says	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
small	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
steps	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
incapable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
recognizing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
European	NNP	*	ESE
Union	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
experience	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Malan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
long	JJ	(NP*	ESE
marches	NNS	*)	ESE
start	VBP	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
first	JJ	(NP*	ESE
steps	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
little	JJ	*	ESE
Maastricht	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
that	DT	(INTJ*	O
is	VBZ	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
search	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
convergence	JJ	(NP*	O
parameters	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
serve	VBP	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reference	NN	*	O
point	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
experts	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
Malan	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
harmonization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parameters	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
little	JJ	*	O
Maastricht	NN	*)))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
search	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
convergence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
broader	JJR	*	O
sense	NN	*)))))))	O
-	:	*	O
structural	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
macro	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
microeconomic	JJ	(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mercosur	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
something	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
happened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
ability	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
look	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
decades	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
ahead	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
let	VB	(VP*	ESE
oneself	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
beaten	VBN	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
like	JJ	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
dedicate	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
lamenting	VB	(VP*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
see	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
difficulties	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
insurmountable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
unsolvable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Malan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
defends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
different	JJ	*	DSE
posture	NN	*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	ESE
aside	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
notion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
cynicism	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
skepticism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
things	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
work	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
believe	VB	(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
built	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mercosur	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Chile	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bolivia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
associate	JJ	*	O
members	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
after	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
October	NNP	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
progress	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
changes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MOSCOW	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
28	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Itar-Tass	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Rosaviakosmos	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
launches	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Baikonur	NNP	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
Itar-Tass	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
timetable	NN	*)))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
short-term	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
expedition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
lift	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
25	CD	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
expedition	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
comprise	VB	(VP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
mission	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Gidzenko	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Italian	JJ	(NP*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
Roberto	NNP	*	O
Vittori	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
second	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tourist	NN	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*	O
Mark	NNP	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
direct-TV	JJ	*	O
telecommunication	JJ	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
booster	NN	*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
Proton	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
tentatively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
slated	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
28	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Any	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
hopes	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
dashed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
pieces	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))	O
attacking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Yasser	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tanks	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*)	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*))	O
morning	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
subsequently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
these	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
bulldozers	NNS	(NP*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
smash	VB	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
perimeter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
compound	NN	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
headquarters	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
confined	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
buildings	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
complex	JJ	*	O
house	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
targeting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symbols	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
authority	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Friday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attack	NN	*)	O
strikes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
authority	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
usual	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
projecting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
defensive	JJ	*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
-	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Netanya	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBD	(S(VP*	O
about	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
24	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PA	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
headquarters	NN	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
expand	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
larger	JJR	*	O
operation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Describing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
!	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extended	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
everywhere	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
it	PRP	*)	ESE
exists	VBZ	(VP*))	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Arafat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
headquarters	NN	*)))	O
deals	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
stinging	JJ	*	ESE
slap	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
face	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
ongoing	JJ	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
just-concluded	JJ	*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
unanimously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Saudi	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
called	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
full	JJ	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
territory	NN	*	O
occupied	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1967	CD	*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
fair	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
problem	NN	*)))))	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP*	O
resolutions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Arab-Israeli	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*	O
treaties	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
normal	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
context	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
dismiss	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
non-starter	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PA	NNP	*	O
headquarters	NN	*)	O
barely	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
indicates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rejection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
compromise	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
settling	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
invasion	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
re-occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
land	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
offering	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
based	VBN	(PP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
terms	NNS	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
events	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
past	JJ	*	ESE
two	CD	*	ESE
years	NNS	*)))	ESE
indicate	VBP	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
means	NNS	*)))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
deepen	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
anger	NN	(NP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
provoke	VB	(VP*	ESE
retaliatory	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PA	NNP	*	O
headquarters	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
explosive	JJ	*	ESE
move	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
West	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Asia	NNP	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
brink	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
act	VB	(VP*	ESE
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
pressure	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
step	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
course	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
action	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
pursue	VB	(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

JAKARTA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
JP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Protesting	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
solidarity	NN	*)	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
force	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Embassy	NNP	*	O
compound	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Jl	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Road	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Medan	NNP	*	O
Merdeka	NNP	*	O
Selatan	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jakarta	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
prompting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
clashes	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tried	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
block	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
reports	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
500	CD	*	O
protesters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
KAMMI	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Indonesian	NNP	(NP*	O
Muslim	NNP	*	O
Student	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
breached	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
barbed	JJ	*	O
wire	NN	*	O
barricades	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
El	NNP	(NP*	O
Shinta	NNP	*	O
radio	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
live	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scene	NN	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
3:50	CD	(NP*	O
p.m.	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
0830	NNP	*	O
GMT	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disperse	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crowds	NNS	*))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
protesters	NNS	*)	O
beat	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
sticks	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
flag	NN	*	O
poles	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
casualties	NNS	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
managed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
herd	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*	O
gate	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
protesters	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
showing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
incursion	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Yasser	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
headquarters	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
killed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
five	CD	*)	O
security	NN	*	O
personnel	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
allied	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Heavy	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
traffic	NN	*	O
congestion	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(QP*	O
every	DT	*)))	O
connecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
roads	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Jl	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Medan	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Merdeka	NNP	*	O
Selatan	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jakarta	NNP	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

BAGHDAD	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
3	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
70	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
barrel	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(NP*	O
crude	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
11th	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Oil	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Food	NNP	(NP*	O
program	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
First	NNP	*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Fuel	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ivan	NNP	*	O
Matlashov	NNP	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
roundtable	NN	*	O
discussion	NN	*)	O
coinciding	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
30th	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USSR-Iraq	NNP	*	O
Friendship	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
Treaty	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
exported	VBN	(VP*	O
118.6	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
barrels	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six-month	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
ending	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
29	CD	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Matlashov	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10th	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
lasting	VBG	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
sold	VBD	(VP*	O
115.3	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
barrels	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
barrels	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(NP*	O
crude	NN	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
approximately	RB	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
15	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
phases	NNS	*))))))))	O
stipulated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1996	CD	*	O
Iraq-UN	JJ	*	O
memorandum	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
accounts	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
roughly	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
40	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
total	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
exports	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Sanctions	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
lift	VB	(VP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russia-Iraq	JJ	(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
spheres	NNS	*)	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
900	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contracts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
worth	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
200	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Zarubezhneft	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
secured	VBD	(VP*	O
45	CD	(NP(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
140	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zarubezhneft	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
shipped	VBN	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
45	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
worth	JJ	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
equipment	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
materials	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
keeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
33	CD	(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
take	VB	*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
consideration	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Fuel	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Energy	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
recommendations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
related	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
allocation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
export	NN	*	O
quotas	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
partners	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

DELHI	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
4	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
stable	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
threats	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
warded	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Rushailo	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Delhi	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
answer	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Interfax	NNP	*	O
question	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
stable	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
lessened	VBN	(VP*	O
threats	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
removed	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Concerning	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
NATO	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Rushailo	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Central	JJ	*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
well	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
known	VBN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
support	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Each	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
methods	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
However	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
exercised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
detriment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
neighboring	VBG	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
rules	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rushailo	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

1	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
What	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
victory	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israeli	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
achieving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
total	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*	O
''	''	*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
occupying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
autonomous	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	ESE
tanks	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
pushing	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	CD	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
occupying	VBG	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
destroying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
established	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	ESE
EU-supported	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
--	:	*))	ESE
infrastructure	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
house	NN	*	O
arrest	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
temporarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
relaxed	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
after	IN	*	ESE
massive	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
pressure	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Yasir	NNP	(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*))))))	O
follows	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
siege	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
headquarters	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

International	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
group	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Arab	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*	ESE
activists	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
wanted	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	ESE
food	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
expelled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Army	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unimpressed	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
appeals	NNS	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
provocation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
began	VBD	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
demonstrative	JJ	*	ESE
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Temple	NNP	*	O
Mount	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
last	JJ	*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
months	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
shown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
suppression	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
prevented	VBN	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
-LSB-	JJ	(S(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
emphatically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
condemned	VBN	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
strongest	JJS	*	ESE
terms	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
prepares	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ground	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	ESE
hatred	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
further	JJ	*	ESE
escalation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Palestine	NNP	(NP*))))	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
jeopardizing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP*	O
peace	JJ	*	O
offer	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Crown	NNP	*	O
Prince	NNP	*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
security	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ago	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
prime	JJ	*	ESE
minister	NN	*)	ESE
himself	PRP	(VP(NP*)	ESE
referred	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
so	RB	(S*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*)))))))	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
regret	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
killed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
as	IN	(S(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1982	CD	(NP*))))	O
headed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Lebanon	NNP	*	O
invasion	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))))))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
determined	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*))))))	O
--	:	*))	O
shared	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
responsibility	NN	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
massacres	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Sabra	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Shatila	NNP	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
camps	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
lost	VBD	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
post	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1983	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
back	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
then	RB	*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
damage	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
international	JJ	*	O
reputation	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*)))))	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
again	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Militarily	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Israel	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
strength	NN	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
politically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
--	:	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
eyes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
public	NN	*)))))))	O
--	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
looks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
different	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
arises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	NNP	*	O
Labor	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
how	WRB	(WHNP*	ESE
long	RB	*))	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
peace	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
international	JJ	(S(NP*	O
peacekeeping	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
lasting	JJ	*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
land	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*)))	O
''	''	*)	O
determined	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Madrid	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
recognition	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
sovereign	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
neighbors	NNS	*)))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
context	NN	*))	O
everyone	NN	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
aware	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
core	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
illegally	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	ESE
established	VBN	*)	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
settlements	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
autonomous	CD	*	O
regions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
steadily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
expanded	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
338	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
refuse	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
conscription	NN	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
increasingly	RB	(S(NP(ADJP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	ESE
hostage	NN	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
250,000	CD	(NP*	O
settlers	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
peace	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
aware	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
material	NN	*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
guarantee	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
supplied	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
settlers	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
time	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
right	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
joint	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
US-European	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mideast	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O

Paris	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
April	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combine	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	CD	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
received	VBD	(S(VP*)))))	O
-	:	*)	O
presumably	RB	(ADVP*)	O
meant	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
read	VB	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
10	CD	*))))	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Madrid	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

United	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Secretary-General	NNP	*	O
Kofi	NNP	*	O
Annan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	(ADJP*	O
high	JJ	*)	O
representative	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CFSP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Javier	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Solana	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Josep	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pique	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Igor	NNP	(NP*	O
Ivanov	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
on	IN	(VP(VP(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
called	VBD	*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	*	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
collectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
mission	NN	*)	O
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
undertake	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
asset	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
whom	WP	(WHNP*))	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
renew	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
mission	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
communique	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Francois	NNP	(NP*	O
Rivasseau	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

GROZNY/MOSCOW	MOSCOW	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Service	NNP	*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
FSB	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
stated	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
large	JJ	*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
confidence	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Jordanian-born	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chechen	NNP	*	O
rebel	NN	*)	O
warlord	VBD	(VP*	O
Khattab	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
combat	NN	*	O
operation	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
One	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
large	JJ	*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
confidence	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
Khattab	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
obvious	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)))))))	O
-	:	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
actions	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
militants	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
controlled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Khattab	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
uncoordinated	VBN	(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Reports	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
informers	NNS	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
confirm	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
likelihood	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
death	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
disclose	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
dates	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
An	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
agent	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*)))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
recruited	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Independent	NNP	(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
liquidate	VB	(VP*	O
Khattab	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
interviewed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Grozny	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
confidence	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
command	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP(VP*	O
soon	RB	*	O
``	``	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
obtain	VB	(VP*	O
documentary	JJ	(NP*	O
confirmation	NN	*))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Khattab	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Official	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
FSB	NNP	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nor	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	O
has	VBZ	*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
obtain	VB	(VP*	O
confirmation	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Repeated	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Khattab	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
none	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
documentation	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Caracas	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Military	NNP	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
despite	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
calls	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
indefinite	JJ	*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
10	CD	(NP*)	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
individual	JJ	*	ESE
acts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
insubordination	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
command	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Analyst	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Luis	NNP	*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Leon	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
influential	JJ	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
firm	NN	*	O
Datanalisis	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
dissident	JJ	*	O
general	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contravening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
authority	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
controls	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
troop	NN	*	O
posts	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Army	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Brigadier	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Nestor	NNP	*	O
Gonzalez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
commands	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pronouncements	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
joining	VBG	(VP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
dissident	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
active	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
duty	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
rebelled	VBN	(S(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
followed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Division	NNP	(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Rafael	NNP	*	O
Damiani	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
militarized	JJ	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GN	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
condemned	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demonstration	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
striking	VBG	*	O
managers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
PDVSA	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Venezuelan	NNP	*	O
Petroleum	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Inc.	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(SINV(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
commands	NNS	*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*)	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)))))))	O
staged	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
union	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
business	NN	*	O
association	NN	*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
extended	VBN	(VP*	O
indefinitely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Carlos	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ortega	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Workers	NNPS	*))))))))))))))	O
Confederation	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CTV	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
labor	NN	*	O
confederation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
inspector	NN	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
General	NNP	(NP*	O
Lucas	NNP	*	O
Rincon	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
accompanied	VBD	(VP*	O
Civil	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Rangel	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Energy	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Alvaro	NNP	*	O
Silva	NNP	*	O
Calderon	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
PDVSA	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
managers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
completing	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
seventh	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
paralyzed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
refining	NN	(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
shipments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
tour	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Rincon	NNP	(NP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
stating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
supply	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
markets	NNS	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
main	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
normal	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
meets	VBZ	(VP*	O
existing	VBG	(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
turn	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Army	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Commander	NNP	*	O
Efrain	NNP	*	O
Vasquez	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Francisco	NNP	*	O
Belisario	NNP	*	O
Landis	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
commanding	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
GN	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
affirmed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
participating	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
alert	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
militarization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Petroleum	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
PDVSA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Luis	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Alberto	NNP	*	O
Camacho	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
citizen	NN	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
22,000	CD	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
components	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
order	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
safeguard	VB	(VP*	O
individuals	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
property	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP(PP*	O
bases	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
operations	NNS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
administrative	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
stepped	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Opponents	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
assembled	VBD	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Petroleum	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
PDVSA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
joining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
waged	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
executives	NNS	*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
4	CD	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
carrying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
signs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
appealing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
uniform	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Soldiers	VB	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
where	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(SQ*	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
Soldier	VB	(VP(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
support	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
read	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
posters	NNS	*)	DSE
carried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
strike	NN	*	O
sympathizers	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

General	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Gonzalez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reviewed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan-Colombian	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*	O
conflict	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
lying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Colombian	JJ	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
entering	VBG	(VP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
contradicted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
entering	VBG	(VP(VP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
fought	VBN	(VP*	O
militarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
With	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
guerrillas	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
particular	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
supply	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dead	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
while	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	ESE
politics	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Gonzalez	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
rebel	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
rebel	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
GN	NNP	(NP*	O
Div	NNP	*	O
Gen	NNP	*	O
Damiani	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
ordered	VBN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
removing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
individuals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
positioned	VBN	(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PDVSA	NNP	*	O
buildings	NNS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chuao	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Damiani	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
active	JJ	(NP*	O
duty	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
revealed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
order	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
try	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
impede	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
resulting	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	ESE
folly	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
sully	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
name	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Armed	NNP	*	ESE
Forces	NNPS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
especially	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Guard	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Datanalisis	NNP	(NP*	O
analyst	NN	*	O
Leon	NNP	*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
even	RB	(S(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
controls	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
constitutes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
permanent	JJ	*	ESE
life	NN	*	ESE
insurance	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
indefinite	JJ	*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
CTV	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
FEDECAMARAS	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Venezuelan	NNP	*	O
Federation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Associations	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chambers	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Industry	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
battle	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
predicts	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
conflict	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
intensify	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
battle	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
long-range	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
final	JJ	(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
shaping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
romance	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
analyst	NN	*)	O
observed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
radicalized	VBN	(VP*	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inept	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
abusive	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
authoritarian	JJ	*)	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
neutralized	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
heterogeneous	NNP	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
impatient	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
politically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
immature	JJ	*))	ESE
opposition	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
possibilities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
negotiation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
becoming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
nonexistent	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
existential	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
oust	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Leon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
viewed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
PDVSA	NNP	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
perfect	JJ	*	ESE
lifesaver	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
reviving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
civilian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
ouster	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cooling	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
analyst	NN	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
growing	VBG	(NP(NP*	DSE
unrest	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hope	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
exit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
``	``	*	O
looks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
presumptuous	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Leon	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
visualizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
two	CD	(NP*	O
scenarios	NNS	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*))	O
,	,	*	O
tension	NN	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
destabilize	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
dwindle	VB	*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
generate	VB	(VP*	O
frustration	NN	(NP*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
achieving	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
objective	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
turn	NN	(NP*))	ESE
strengthen	VB	(VP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
second	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	(S*	O
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
dismissed	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP(VP*	O
strong	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
position	NN	*	O
vis-a-vis	NNS	*))	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
declare	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
guarantees	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
declare	VB	(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
disobedience	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
uncontrolled	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
unleashed	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
At	IN	(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
point	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
intervene	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
either	CC	(S(VP*	O
pressuring	VBG	(VP*	DSE
both	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)))	DSE
or	CC	*	O
opting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
unconstitutional	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(ADVP*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
predicted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
explicitly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
ruled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Interior	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ramon	NNP	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	*	O
Chacin	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
13	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Police	NNS	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
824	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
drugs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	(NP*	O
opium	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
operations	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
three	CD	(S(NP*	O
smugglers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)	O
injured	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
seizure	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
amounting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
697	CD	(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iranshahr	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sistan	NNP	*	O
Baluchestan	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
four	CD	(S(NP*	O
fire	NN	*	O
arms	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
confiscated	VBN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hauls	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provinces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Fars	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
southeastern	NNP	(NP*	O
Khorasan	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
877	CD	*)	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
narcotics	NNS	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
south	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tehran	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ended	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
seizures	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
opium	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
weighing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
534	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
besides	IN	(PP*	O
118	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hashish	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
plus	CC	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
drug	NN	*	O
assortments	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
dismantled	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
72	CD	(NP(NP*	O
gangs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
drug	NN	(NP*	O
traffickers	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
period	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
12,910	CD	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
drug-related	JJ	(NP*	O
offenses	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southeastern	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kerman	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
police	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kerman	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
100	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
morphine	NN	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
drug	NN	(NP(NP*	O
traffickers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
accounts	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
80	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opium	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
90	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
morphine	NN	*)	O
intercepted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Narcotics	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*	O
Board	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
relentless	JJ	*	ESE
anti-drug	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1979	CD	*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Revolution	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
3,100	CD	*)	O
policemen	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
lives	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
anti-drug	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
costs	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
800	CD	(PP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	*	O
year	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
seized	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
112	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
drugs	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
306,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
drug-related	JJ	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ended	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
21	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
IDF	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
lightly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wounded	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
gunfire	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Church	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Nativity	NNP	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
evacuated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Hadassah-En	NNP	*	O
Kerem	NNP	*	O
Hospital	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sources	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*)))	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
IDF	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palace	NNP	*	O
Hotel	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outskirts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Church	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Nativity	NNP	*	O
compound	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
IDF	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
entered	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
village	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ubaydiyah	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
east	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
conducting	VBG	(VP*	O
searches	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
arrests	NNS	*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

SALONICA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
15.04.2002	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Kemal	NNP	*	O
Dervis	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Economy	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Salonica	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Greece	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Black	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
Commerce	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contacts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

State	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Dervis	NNP	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
Consulate	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Salonica	NNP	(NP*))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dervis	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
economic	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greece	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
contribution	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Balkans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Middle	NNP	(NP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Black	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
regions	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
formation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
neighborhood	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Turkey	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greece	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
fields	NNS	*))	O
like	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
structure	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Black	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
BSEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
instance	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
tourism	NN	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
rapidly	RB	*	O
developing	JJ	*)	O
field	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
decades	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Turkey	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greece	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
tourism	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

Recalling	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
tender	NN	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
enabled	VBN	(VP*	O
everyone	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*	O
tenders	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dervis	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Greek	JJ	(S(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
benefit	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
financial	JJ	(S(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dervis	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
financial	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
panic	NN	(NP*))	O
ended	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
mean	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
overcame	VBD	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
problems	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
act	VB	(VP*	ESE
carefully	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
envisage	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
plan	VBP	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
decrease	VB	(VP*	O
inflation	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
70	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
35	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

State	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Dervis	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Akis	NNPS	*	O
Tsokhatzopoulos	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP*	O
businessmen	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dervis	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Yeoryios	NNP	*	O
Paskhalidhis	NNPS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Macedonia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Thrace	NNP	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
depart	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Greece	NNP	(NP*))	O
later	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
paying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Salonica	NNP	(NP*	O
Mayor	NNP	*	O
Vasilis	NNPS	*	O
Papayorgopoulos	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

State	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Kemal	NNP	*	O
Dervis	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
regional	JJ	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*	O
structures	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Black	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
BSEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
antithesis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
globalization	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Salonica	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	(S*	O
``	``	*	O
Black	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
Business	NNP	*	O
Day	NNP	*)	O
``	``	(SBAR*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Black	NNP	(NP*	O
Sea	NNP	*	O
Commerce	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dervis	NNP	(NP*)	O
defined	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
formation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
neighborly	JJ	*	ESE
field	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
success	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Western	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Europe	NNP	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
World	NNP	(NP*	ESE
War	NNP	*	ESE
II	NNP	*)))))	ESE
laid	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
creation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
neighborly	JJ	*	ESE
field	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
example	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
neighborly	JJ	*	ESE
field	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
difficulties	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
regional	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
`	``	*	O
making	NN	(NP(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
sector	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
loss	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
regional	JJ	*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
benefit	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
got	VBD	(S(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
effective	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
especially	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
tourism	NN	(NP*	O
sector	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
globalization	NN	*)))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
stronger	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
regionalization	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
story	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
success	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
wonder	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creators	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Europe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
block	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
definite	JJ	*	O
borders	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
iron	NN	(NP*	O
curtain	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
borders	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
definite	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Europe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
southeast	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
east	JJ	*	O
15	CD	*	O
or	CC	*	O
20	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
defined	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
BSEC	NNP	*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
interesting	JJ	*	ESE
idea	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
developed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
entered	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
markets	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
contribute	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
improvement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
following	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Turkey	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
performance	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
20-25	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Turkish	JJ	(S(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
7-8	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
unfortunately	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
crises	NNS	(NP*)	O
followed	VBD	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rapid	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*	O
periods	NNS	*)	O
lasting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
3-4	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
around	RB	(NP(QP*	O
4.5	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
caught	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
period	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
21	CD	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)))	O
prepared	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
low	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stable	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
2003-2004	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
touched	VBN	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greece	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greece	NNP	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*	ESE
symbolically	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Turkish	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministers	NNS	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Middle	NNP	(NP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
jointly	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
convey	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
peace	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
``	``	*))	O

Dervis	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Greek	JJ	(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Akis	NNPS	*	O
Tsokhatzopoulos	NNP	*))	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ceremony	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
persists	VBZ	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
events	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Spanish	NNP	*)))	O
daily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))))))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
may	MD	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
liking	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministries	NNS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
shared	VBN	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP*	DSE
extent	NN	*))	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
pleasure	NN	*))))))	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ousting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
events	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
deposed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reinstalled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
confused	JJ	*	ESE
uprising	NN	*))))))))))))	O
...	.	*))	O

Criticisms	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
governance	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
widespread	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
above	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP(VP(VP*	O
dictators	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Castro	NNP	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
Saddam	NNP	*	O
Husayn	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
writing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
famous	JJ	*	O
Carlos	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
of	IN	*)	ESE
meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
promises	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
prosperity	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*	ESE
shares	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Debatable	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	ESE
social	JJ	*	ESE
polarization	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
confrontation	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
representative	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
demagogy	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
arguments	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
reveal	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
popularity	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
collapsed	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
misjudged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
strength	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Carmona	NNP	(NP*	O
remaining	VBG	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
led	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	ESE
division	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proliferation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
expressions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overthrown	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*))))))))))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
course	NN	(NP*	O
advisable	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
forced	JJ	*	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Carmona	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
meteoric	JJ	*	ESE
period	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vice-president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Diosdado	NNP	(NP*	O
Cabello	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
only	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
took	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
post	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
order	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reappear	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
air	NN	*))	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
feeling	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
military	JJ	(NP*	O
uncertainty	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two-way	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
24	CD	(NP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
undoubtedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
leave	VB	(VP*	O
deep	JJ	(NP*	DSE
wounds	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
armed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
clearly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
wish	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exert	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decisive	JJ	*	ESE
influence	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
life	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
absence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
employers	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
organization	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
unions	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
well	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
either	DT	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
damaged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
links	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
armed	JJ	(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
score	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))))	O
!	.	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*)	O
!	.	*)	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
crushing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
revived	VBD	(VP*	O
president	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
tackle	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP*	O
methods	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
officer	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rethink	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	ESE
priorities	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
model	NN	*)	O
no	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
works	VBZ	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Havana	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
give	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
promised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
revanchism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
understand	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
improve	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fate	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelans	NNPS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
eradicate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
eternal	JJ	*	ESE
scourge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
corruption	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
comparable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
incidentally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
little	JJ	*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
16	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*)	O
welcomed	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
promise	NN	*)))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reconciliation	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
appreciate	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
stability	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Zhang	NNP	*	O
Qiyue	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
under	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
devote	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
advancement	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
returned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
invite	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
broad	JJ	*	O
spectrum	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
problems	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
friend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
further	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
strengthen	VB	*	DSE
friendship	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cooperation	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Zhang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

San	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Salvador	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
17	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ACAN-EFE	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
Salvadorian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Francisco	NNP	(NP*	O
Flores	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
defended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
declaration	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
headed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
industrialist	NN	(NP*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Carmona	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
indicating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Hugo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
resigned	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidency	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Flores	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
apologize	VB	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
demanded	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Salvadoran	JJ	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
parties	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(S(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
confidence	NN	(NP*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
path	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
understood	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
receive	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
vote	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
confidence	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Flores	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
maintained	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
this	DT	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
unique	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
El	NNP	(NP*	O
Salvador	NNP	*)))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
totally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*)))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
so	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
little	JJ	*	ESE
information	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Salvadorian	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
confidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provisional	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Carmona	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
repercussions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
El	NNP	(NP*	O
Salvador	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
totally	RB	(S(S(ADJP*	ESE
normal	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
sense	NN	*)))))	O
''	''	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
El	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Salvador	NNP	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
different	JJ	*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
presides	VBZ	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Permanent	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OAS	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
invoke	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
OAS	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Charter	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
implies	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
investigation	NN	*)	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
brought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(UCP(NP*	O
particular	JJ	*	O
point	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
simply	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
determine	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
coup	NN	*	ESE
d'etat	NN	*)))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reminded	VBD	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
currently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
OAS	NNP	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
very	JJ	*	O
objectives	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
headed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Cesar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gaviria	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OAS	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Charter	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
instrument	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
and	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
implies	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
OAS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
convene	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tribunal	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
investigate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
or	CC	(FRAG*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
tremendously	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
process	NN	*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
repercussions	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
announced	VBN	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Venezuela-by	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))))	O
Farabundo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Marti	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
FMLN	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
left	JJ	(NP*	O
wing	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
would	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Flores	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
seeking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
cause	VB	(VP*	ESE
damage	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
FMLN	NN	*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
the	DT	(PP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
celebrated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Flores	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	DSE
condemning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rupture	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
rather	RB	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manipulation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
subject	NN	*))))	ESE
domestically	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	O
again	RB	*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
FMLN	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
cause	VB	(VP*	ESE
damage	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(FRAG*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hurt	VB	(VP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
ends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
damage	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
loyal	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
El	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Salvador	NNP	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Flores	NNP	(NP*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
17	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Apr	NN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Xinhua	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
farce	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
coup	NN	(NP*	ESE
d'etat	NN	*)))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
staged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
sooner	RBR	*)	ESE
warmed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
coveted	JJ	*	ESE
seat	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
beat	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
retreat	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
pressure	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
upon	IN	(UCP(PP*	ESE
pressure	NN	(NP*)	ESE
domestically	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
internationally	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
maybe	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
surprise	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Coup	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
d'etat	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
unusual	JJ	*	ESE
means	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
seize	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
unpopular	JJ	*	ESE
means	NN	*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
tide	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
today	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
token	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
incurred	VBN	(VP*	O
widespread	JJ	(NP*	DSE
condemnation	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
objection	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Latin	JJ	*	O
American	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
reaction	NN	*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	ESE
much	JJ	(NP*	ESE
food	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
thought	NN	(NP*))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Venezuela	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*	O
Chavez	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
blame	VB	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
out	RB	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
tune	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attitude	NN	*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
occurred	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
saying	NN	*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
pull	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
turnip	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
mud	NN	(NP*)	ESE
comes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Just	RB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
as	IN	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
restored	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
shocking	JJ	*	ESE
story	NN	*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
contact	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*	O
organizers	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
organizers	NNS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	DSE
consent	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overthrow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Faced	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reports	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
statements	NNS	(NP*)	O
publicly	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
contacts	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
factions	NNS	*))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
having	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
spokesperson	NNP	*	O
Clarke	NNP	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
step	NN	*)	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Assistant	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
-LSB-	VBZ	(VP*	O
Rogelio	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Pardo	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Maurer	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Western	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hemisphere	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Commander	NNP	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Inspector	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Lucas	NNP	*	O
Rincon	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latter	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
!	.	*	O
States	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
democracy	NN	(NP*))	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coups	NNS	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
unconstitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(SBARQ(SBAR*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
democracy	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
then	RB	(WHADVP(ADVP*)	O
why	WRB	*)	ESE
did	VBD	(SQ*	O
Maurer	NNP	(NP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Rincon	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(SQ*	O
n't	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
inform	VB	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
constitutional	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
attempt	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Rincon	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
effect	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cause	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Office	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Presidency	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
step	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
respects	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Take	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
example	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Saddam	NNP	*	O
Regime	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
thorn	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
eye	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
flesh	NN	*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
removed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
OPEC	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)))))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
stop	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Saddam	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
disgusted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
Castro	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
kept	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
close	JJ	*	DSE
relationship	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Probably	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
see	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
whenever	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
occurred	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Latin	JJ	*	O
American	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
backdrop	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
involvement	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
guideline	NN	*)	ESE
determining	VBG	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
rejection	NN	*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
follows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
baton	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accord	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
supporting	JJ	*	O
democracy	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
signboard	NN	*)	ESE
used	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
one	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
surprised	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
chimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
coup	NN	*	O
organizers	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	ESE
little	RB	*)	ESE
too	RB	*	ESE
early	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
excited	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

ANKARA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
21.04.2002	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ismail	NNP	*	O
Cem	NNP	*)	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fifth	NNP	*	O
Meeting	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ministers	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Europe-Mediterranean	NNP	(NP*	O
Process	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
fifteen	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
members	NNS	*)	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
twelve	CD	(NP*	O
Mediterranean	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Valencia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Action	NNP	*	O
Plan	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
function	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
coming	JJ	(NP*	O
period	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
issues	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
focus	VB	(VP*))))))))))	O
on	RB	(ADVP*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
foreseen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
political	JJ	(S(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
cultural	JJ	*)	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mediterranean	NNP	*	O
basin	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
developments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
evaluated	VBN	(VP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Cem	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
contacts	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
participating	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
dispute	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Buenos	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Aires	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
22	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
April	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Telam	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Justicialist	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Manuel	NNP	*)	O
Diaz	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Bancalari	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
uncontrollable	JJ	*	ESE
social	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
hand	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PJ	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Justicialist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
bloc	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
willingness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
approval	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
law	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bonds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
submitted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
executive	JJ	*	O
branch	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
uncontrollable	JJ	*	ESE
social	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
legislator	NN	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
presented	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
financing	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
accounts	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Analyzing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
responsibility	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
complex	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
experiencing	VBG	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Diaz	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bancalari	NNP	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
impression	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
money	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
admitting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
co-responsibility	NN	(NP*))	ESE
their	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
managers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
negotiation	NN	*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
someone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tries	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
cheating	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
cheaters	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
IMF	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
``	``	*	O
praised	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
decade	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
held	VBD	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
example	NN	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
``	``	(S*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
tell	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
know	VB	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)))	O
the	DT	(SBAR(SBAR(S(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
reaches	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Diaz	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bancalari	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
asserted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	O
business	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
know	VB	(VP*	ESE
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*	ESE
room	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
shady	JJ	(NP*	ESE
deals	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	ESE
mistakes	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
party	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
acknowledging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
vision	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
infiltrating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Peronism	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
liberal	JJ	*	O
vision	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
All	PDT	(S(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
arrangements	NNS	(NP*)	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
receiving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
perfectly	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
asking	VBG	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
450,000	CD	(NP*	ESE
fellow	JJ	*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
work	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
asserted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Regarding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
executive	JJ	*	O
branch	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
swapping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
bonds	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
fixed-term	JJ	(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
debates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
approves	VBZ	*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
today	NN	(NP*))	O
''	''	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
deputies	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
debate	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
issue	NN	*)	DSE
tomorrow	NN	(NP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
pass	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
so	CC	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
24	NNP	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
open	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PJ	NNP	*	O
bloc	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
work	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Diaz	NNP	(NP*	O
Bancalari	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
surprise	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
discuss	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
circles	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
clarified	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
willingness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	ESE
quickly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
law	NN	*))))))	O
``	``	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
approve	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
discussing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
abstract	JJ	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
responsible	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
deputy	NN	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bonds	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
depositors	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
asking	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	O
certificates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
deposit	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
bankrupt	JJ	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)))))	O
''	''	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*)	O
instead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
however	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
move	VBP	(VP*	ESE
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
legal	JJ	*	O
continuity	NN	*)	O
backing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
obligation	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
three-day	JJ	*	O
workshop	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*)))	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
banks	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
discussing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
workshop	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
organised	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Banks	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UAB	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
participants	NNS	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
review	VB	(VP*	O
legislation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
Arab	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
introduced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
phenomenon	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ways	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
means	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
money	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
laundered	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Participants	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
explore	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
banking	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
financial	JJ	*)	O
institutions	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
combating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
money	NN	(NP(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
approaches	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
UAB	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Fu'ad	NNP	*	O
Shakir	NNP	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*)))	O
worldwide	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
ranges	VBZ	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
5	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
gross	JJ	*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
product	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
run	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1.5	CD	*	O
trillion	CD	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
banks	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	O
estate	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
construction	NN	(NP*	O
projects	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
stock	NN	(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
investing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
losing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
companies	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
gambling	VBG	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
favourite	JJ	*	DSE
targets	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
launderers	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*)))	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
drug	NN	(NP(NP*	O
trafficking	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
deals	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
prostitution	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
termed	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
dirty	JJ	(NP*	O
money	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*)))	O
starts	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
termed	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Placement	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
injecting	VBG	(S(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dirty	JJ	*	O
money	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
market	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
followed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Layering	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
removing	VBG	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
traces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*))))))	O
laundered	VBD	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
finally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
Integration	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
clean	JJ	*	O
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
interest	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1980	CD	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
attention	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*)	O
intensified	VBN	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Shakir	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
addressing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Arab	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
targeted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
followed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(S(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
away	RB	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*	O
laundering	NN	*	O
phenomenon	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
Arab	JJ	(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
amended	VBD	(VP*	O
banking	NN	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Shakir	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Jordan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
introduced	VBD	(S(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
tightening	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
banking	NN	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
imposing	VBG	(VP*	O
strict	JJ	(NP*	O
controls	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
transfers	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Punishment	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
introduced	VBN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
illegal	JJ	(S(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
confiscated	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
tough	JJ	(S(NP*	O
jail	NN	*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
violators	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Money	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
launderers	NNS	*)	O
target	VBP	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
low	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
soft	JJ	(NP*	O
tax	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
lenient	JJ	(NP*	O
banking	NN	*	O
regulations	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Shakir	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	(SBAR(S*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
combat	VB	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
phenomenon	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
statistically	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
the	DT	*)	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*)	O
ranks	VBZ	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
term	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
destination	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
origin	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
flows	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
laundered	VBN	(NP*	O
money	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
top	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
ranks	VBZ	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
Asian	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Shakir	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
money	NN	(NP(NP*	O
laundering	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
minimal	JJ	*)	O
''	''	*	O
but	CC	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Egypt	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
classified	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
among	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
horrific	JJ	*	ESE
news	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shocking	JJ	*	ESE
swing	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extreme	JJ	*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
threat	NN	*))))))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
France	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
ethic	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
religious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
minorities	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
virtually	RB	(NP*	ESE
no	DT	*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
paid	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reported	JJ	*	O
discovery	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
two	CD	(S(NP*	O
serving	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
embarrassed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
rank	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
understatement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
year	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
story	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
devastating	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
consequence	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reinstated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
beforehand	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
told	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
friendship	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cuba	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
angered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
replaced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
legitimate	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
means	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
Did	VBD	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
lie	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
turns	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
colonels	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
attempt	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
conclusion	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
colonels	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
acting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
orders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
--	:	*	O
orders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
stretching	VBG	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
back	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Oval	NNP	*	ESE
Office	NNP	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
spells	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
trouble	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	ESE
whiff	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
scandal	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
conspiracy	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
air	NN	*))))	ESE
--	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ever	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
addicted	VBN	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
conspiracy	NN	(NP*	ESE
theories	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
let	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
go	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Democrats	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*))	DSE
smarting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
victory	NN	*))))	O
--	:	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
dig	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
dirt	NN	(NP*))	ESE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
long	RB	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
turns	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
colonels	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
operating	VBG	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
knowledge	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
approval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
disaster	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Americans	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
exactly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
running	VBG	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rest	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
story	NN	*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
confirms	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
suspicions	NNS	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hell-bent	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
eliminating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
legal	JJ	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
illegal	JJ	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
putsch	NN	*)))))	O
suggests	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
return	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
old	JJ	*	ESE
days	NNS	*))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
CIA	NNP	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
organize	VB	(VP*	ESE
coups	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
assassinations	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
further	JJ	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
interests	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
record	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
long	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
eternal	JJ	*	ESE
discredit	NN	*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
CIA	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attempts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coups	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guatemala	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
1954	CD	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chile	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1973	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*)	O
had	VBN	(VP*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
thought	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
book	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
nefarious	NNS	*	ESE
activities	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Apparently	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
era	NN	*)	O
turns	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
interlude	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Coup	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
making	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Cold	NNP	*	ESE
War	NNP	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
any	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
more	RBR	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
petty-minded	JJ	*	ESE
populist	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
damage	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
economy	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimately	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	O
elected	VBN	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Any	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
puts	VBZ	(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
firmly	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
makes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
worse	JJR	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
particular	JJ	*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
mockery	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
George	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
seek	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
attack	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
destroy	VB	*	ESE
law	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
order	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
throws	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
wind	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
suits	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Overshadowed	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
midst	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
tragic	JJ	*	ESE
events	NNS	*)	ESE
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
slap	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
face	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(NP*	DSE
unrecognized	JJ	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
both	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
ridiculous	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
odd	JJ	*)))))	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
all	DT	(ADVP*)	ESE
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
games	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

National	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Adviser	NNP	*	O
Condoleezza	NNP	*	O
Rice	NNP	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
triumphantly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
returned	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
request	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	DSE
people	NNS	*)	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
sent	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
useful	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
she	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
knew	VBD	(VP*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
learn	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
games	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
failed	VBN	*	ESE
coup	NN	*)))))	ESE
attempts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
first	RB	(ADJP(ADJP(ADVP*)	ESE
blessed	VBN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
then	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
disavowed	JJ	*)))	ESE
represented	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tough	JJ	*	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
backyard	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
proved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
stronger	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
arrogance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
worth	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
mentioning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
implementing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
principle	NN	*)))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
those	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
planned	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
visited	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
suspending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
protest	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
holocaust	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
civilians	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
habit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
speaking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Palestinian	NNP	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Yasir	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
betrayed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hopes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Oddly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
enough	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
like	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
speak	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
suffer	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
unfair	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
mention	VB	*)	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
those	DT	(NP*	O
peoples	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
gave	VBD	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
politicians	NNS	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
conspicuous	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
playing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
games	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
adopt	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
proves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
thug	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
feared	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
likes	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
punish	VB	(VP*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
complains	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
behavior	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
learn	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
continues	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
twist	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
logic	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
turning	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
eye	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	ESE
murderers	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
describing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
victims	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
games	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vantage	NN	*	DSE
point	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
complicity	NN	*)))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
authors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
abortive	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
television	NN	(NP*	O
viewers	NNS	*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
CNN	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Telemundo	NNP	*	O
channels	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
undisguised	JJ	*	ESE
pleasure	NN	*)	ESE
displayed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
White	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Ari	NNP	*	O
Fleischer	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Adviser	NNP	*	O
Condoleezza	NNP	*	O
Rice	NNP	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
resignation	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
signed	VBD	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Far	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(ADJP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
condemning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
described	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
brought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
bore	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
confused	NN	*	ESE
events	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	O
turnabout	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
48	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
limit	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
damage	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
contacts	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conspirators	NNS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
advise	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	ESE
methods	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Otto	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Reich	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Latin	JJ	*	O
American	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
short-lived	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
interim	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
boss	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
bosses	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Carmona	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
urge	VB	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
not	RB	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
dissolve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
advice	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
issued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Charles	NNP	*	O
Shapiro	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
rushed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
opposite	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Pedro	NNP	(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Spaniard	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
specify	VB	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
attended	VBN	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
hasty	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
behalf	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
behalf	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Latin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
analysts	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
commentators	NNS	*)	O
read	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Miami	NNP	*	O
Herald	NNP	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S(NP*	O
subtle	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
informal	JJ	*)	O
messages	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
encouragement	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
addressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conspirators	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
admitted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unidentified	JJ	*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
CIA	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
inactive	JJ	(ADJP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)))	O
prior	RB	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
suggested	VBN	(S(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Stratfor	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
newsletter	NN	*)	O
specializing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
intelligence	NN	(NP*	O
matters	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
published	VBN	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Internet	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
top	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
press	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conspirators	NNS	*)))))))	O
...	:	*))	O

Fear	NN	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Grim	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Years	NNS	*))))	ESE

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
apparent	JJ	*	ESE
change	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
doctrine	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
part	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
demands	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	DSE
--	:	(PRN*	O
sometimes	RB	(ADJP*	O
successful	JJ	*)	O
--	:	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
observance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
laden	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
threats	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
subcontinent	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
half	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
experienced	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
succession	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
coups	NNS	(NP*	O
d'etat	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Guatemala	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chile	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Dominican	NNP	*	O
Republican	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
fomented	VBN	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
backed	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
CIA	NNP	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Pentagon	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
fear	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
lapsing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
grim	JJ	*	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dictatorships	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
revolutionary	JJ	(NP*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
movements	NNS	*)))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
virtually	RB	(S(NP*	O
all	PDT	*	O
the	DT	*	O
Latin	JJ	*	O
American	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
notable	JJ	*	O
exception	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
El	NNP	(NP*	O
Salvador	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
condemn	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overthrow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
conceal	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
criticisms	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OAS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
condemned	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
recognized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elected	VBN	*	O
president	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
except	IN	(PP*	O
El	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Salvador	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OAS	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Roger	NNP	(NP*	O
Noriega	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
several	JJ	(NP*	DSE
hours	NNS	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
opposite	JJ	*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ouster	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
hemisphere	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ironical	JJ	*	ESE
trick	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
history	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
OAS	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
charter	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
envisaging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
regimes	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
hit	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)))))	O
initiated	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
era	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
relegating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
defense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
principles	NNS	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
subordinate	JJ	*	ESE
place	NN	*))	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
priority	NN	*	DSE
objective	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
combating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
Manichean	NNP	*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
divided	VBN	(VP*	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
friends	NNS	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
sole	JJ	*	ESE
superpower	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
unwise	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
condemn	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
bombing	NN	*	O
raids	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Saddam	NNP	*	O
Husayn	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Muammar	NNP	*	O
al-Qadhdhafi	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
friendship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Fidel	NNP	*	O
Castro	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Colombian	JJ	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
speeches	NNS	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
neo-liberal	JJ	*	ESE
globalization	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
multipolar	NN	*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
placed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	*	ESE
camp	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
ceased	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
United	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
foremost	JJ	*	O
suppliers	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
entrusting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
radical	JJ	*	ESE
wing	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
anti-Castro	JJ	(NP*	ESE
exiles	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
satisfied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
powerful	JJ	*	O
Cuban-American	JJ	*	O
lobby	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Miami	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
brother	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Jeb	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
secure	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
reelection	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
Governor	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
obsession	NN	*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	ESE
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Castro	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
downfall	NN	*)	ESE
--	:	*))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
exert	VB	(VP*	ESE
excessive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
influence	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
neighbors	NNS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Implicated	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Iran-Contra	NNP	*	O
scandal	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
secret	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Nicaraguan	JJ	*	O
Sandinist	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ronald	NNP	*	O
Reagan	NNP	*	O
presidency	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cuban-American	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Otto	NNP	(NP*	O
Reich	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
appointed	VBN	(VP*	O
Undersecretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Ambassador	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
secret	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
antipathy	NN	*)))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
rightly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	DSE
supporter	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resulted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*))))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beyond	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
friendly	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
representing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
industry	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conservative	JJ	*	O
circles	NNS	*))))	O
influenced	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Opus	NNP	(NP*	O
Dei	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
advantage	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
weakening	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Hugo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
life	NN	(NP*)))	O
less	JJR	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
two	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Having	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
downward	JJ	*	O
turn	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rise	VB	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nairobi	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
26	CD	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kenyan	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
working	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leading	VBG	*	O
Asahi	NNP	*	O
Shimbun	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
dead	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*	O
night	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Nairobi	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
botched	JJ	*	O
car	NN	*	O
robbery	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
police	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Julius	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Ndegwa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
43	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
confronted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
armed	JJ	(NP*	O
gangsters	NNS	*))))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
p.m.	RB	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
approached	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
vehicle	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
parked	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sprawling	VBG	*	O
estate	NN	*)	O
east	JJ	(PP(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	*	O
Nairobi	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Eyewitnesses	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
robbers	NNS	*)	O
shot	VBD	(VP*	O
Ndegwa	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chest	NN	*)))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
resisted	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
attempts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
snatch	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
car	NN	*	O
keys	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
rushed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
hospital	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
bystanders	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
arrival	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
shot	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
door	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
arrival	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nearby	JJ	*	O
hospital	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
policewoman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chief	NNP	(NP*	O
Inspector	NNP	*	O
Nancy	NNP	*	O
Thuku	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Kyodo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
News	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Nairobi	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ndegwa	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Asahi	NNP	*	O
Shimbun	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Nairobi	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1989	CD	(NP*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
driver	NN	*)	O
assigned	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bureau	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
worked	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
assistant	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bureau	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
driver	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nairobi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bureau	NNP	*	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Shingo	NNP	*	O
Egi	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
death	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wife	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
dead	RP	(PRT*)	O
two	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
by	IN	*	O
armed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
gangsters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
crime-prone	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Ndegwa	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Contact	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
outer	JJ	(NP*	O
space	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Free	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bloemfontein	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NNP	*	O
Mark	NNP	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
live	JJ	*	O
satellite	NN	*	O
link	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Bloemfontein	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
Afronaut	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
contribution	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
science	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
renaissance	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Yes	RB	(SBARQ(FRAG(ADVP*)	O
ambassador	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
how	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)))	O
?	.	*)	O
''	''	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10-minute	JJ	*	O
conversation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
broadcast	VBN	(VP*	O
live	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Free	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
rugby	JJ	*	O
stadium	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
journey	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
exciting	JJ	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
smooth	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
everything	NN	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
plan	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
moments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
moments	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
sheer	JJ	(NP*	ESE
exhilaration	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
proclaimed	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
beautiful	JJ	*))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
earth	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
beautiful	JJ	*))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
The	DT	(PRN(S(NP*	O
28-year-old	JJ	*	O
Internet	NN	*	O
millionaire	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
sleeping	VBG	(VP*	O
comfortably	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
food	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
either	RB	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
empty	JJ	*	O
tin	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
contained	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
lunch	NN	*)))))	O
-	:	*	O
pork	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
potato	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
So	IN	(ADVP*	DSE
far	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
food	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
tasty	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
food	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
good	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
setting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
experiments	NNS	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
pride	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
long	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	ESE
inspiring	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
young	JJ	*)	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
subjects	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
engineering	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
mathematics	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
science	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
essential	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	ESE
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
rebirth	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
magnificent	JJ	*)	ESE
sunset	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sunrise	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Mbeki	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
pictures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
look	VBP	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
there	RB	*))))))))))	O
''	''	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Africans	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
looking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
smiling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
returns	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP*)	O
replied	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
condolences	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
family	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
friends	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Safety	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Steve	NNP	*	O
Tshwete	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
died	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
night	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
message	NN	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
undertook	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
convey	VB	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
toasted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
glass	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
champagne	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*	ESE
moments	NNS	*))))))	ESE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
quite	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
leap	NN	*)	ESE
forward	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*	O
Yury	NNP	*	O
Gidzenko	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*	O
Roberto	NNP	*	O
Vittori	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
0755	NNP	(NP*	O
GMT	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(PP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
blasting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Baikonur	NNP	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
paying	VBG	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
10-day	JJ	*	O
journey	NN	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
experiments	NNS	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
HI	NNP	*	O
virus	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
causes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
earth	NN	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
5	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
27	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
April	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Palestinian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Planning	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
Nabil	NNP	*	O
Shaath	NNP	*))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
29	CD	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*	O
today	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Planning	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*)))	O
plays	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Igor	NNP	*	O
Ivanov	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
Shaath	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP*)))	O
April	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
ways	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
overcome	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Shaath	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
working	VBG	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
run-up	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mediators	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
May	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
attended	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Ivanov	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Lebanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Rafik	NNP	*	O
Hariri	NNP	*)	O
invited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
entrepreneurs	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
invest	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
luncheon	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
honor	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hariri	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
trade	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
strategic	JJ	*	ESE
partner	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economy	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
investment	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
modern	JJ	*	O
technology	NN	*	O
exchanges	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
urging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
greater	JJR	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
entrepreneurs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yu	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Xiaosong	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Promotion	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Trade	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CCPIT	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
trade	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lebanon	NNP	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
surged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
40	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
before	IN	(PP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
cooperation	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
agriculture	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
infrastructure	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
contracting	NN	*	O
projects	NNS	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
recorded	VBD	(VP*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
progress	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
encouraged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
entrepreneurs	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
invest	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*	O
opportunities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
70	CD	(NP*))	O
entrepreneurs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)))	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
luncheon	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	ESE
farce	NN	*)	ESE
staged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
not	RB	(SBAR*	O
long	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
ago	RB	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
American	JJ	*	O
background	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
comments	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
conjectures	NNS	(NP*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
oppositions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stage	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
easily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
fooled	VBN	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
judge	VB	(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
several	JJ	*	O
official	JJ	*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))	O
both	DT	(PP*	O
before	IN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
abortive	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
slightest	JJS	*	ESE
sympathy	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
still	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
less	JJR	*))	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
least	JJS	*	ESE
regret	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
breaking-off	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*))	O
expressed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
satisfaction	NN	(NP*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stepping-down	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
constitutional	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*))	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
wept	VBD	(VP*	ESE
over	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
himself	PRP	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
blame	VB	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
resumed	VBD	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))))	O
commented	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
reflect	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
ship	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
sailing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	*	ESE
direction	NN	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
too	RB	*)	ESE
long	RB	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
for	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
event	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Jose	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Bustani	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director-general	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Prohibition	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chemical	NNP	(NP*	O
Weapons	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
OPCW	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
voted	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organization	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
special	JJ	*	O
plenary	NN	*	O
session	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
existed	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
American	JJ	*	ESE
background	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
special	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
initiated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
single	JJ	*	ESE
goal	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
fulfill	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(INTJ*	ESE
is	VBZ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
instigating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
OPCW	JJ	(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
Bustani	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
secret	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
promising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
long	RB	(ADJP*	O
due	JJ	*)	O
OPCW	JJ	*	O
membership	NN	*	O
fees	NNS	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
wish	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
picking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bustani	NNP	*))	O
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
this	DT	*	ESE
time	NN	*))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
pursued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
out	IN	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
step	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
OPEC	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
paid	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*))))	O
;	:	*	O
meanwhile	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(ADVP*	DSE
along	IN	*)	DSE
maintained	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
close	JJ	*	DSE
relationship	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
these	DT	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
eyesores	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Bustani	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OPCW	NNP	*)))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
inspections	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Bustani	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
intolerable	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
disrupt	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
some	DT	*	O
major	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
thoroughly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
unmasked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cope	JJ	*	O
farce	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
pointed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
When	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
will	MD	(SQ*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
coup	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
not	RB	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	*	ESE
called	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
coup	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
?	.	*))))))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
coup	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
long	JJ	*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*))))))))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
inclined	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
friendly	JJ	(NP*	ESE
faces	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)))))	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
faces	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
wearing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
army	NN	(NP*	ESE
uniforms	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
reminds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
witty	JJ	*	ESE
remark	NN	*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Franklin	NNP	*	O
Roosevelt	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
old	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
questioned	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*))	O
``	``	*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*	ESE
cold-blooded	JJ	*	ESE
dictator	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
Roosevelt	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
vivid	JJ	*	DSE
reply	NN	*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
This	DT	(NP*	ESE
dictator	NN	*))	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
son	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
bitch	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNP	*)	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	ESE
son	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
bitch	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
turns	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dictionary	NN	*)	ESE
used	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
definition	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
regime	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
subjected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
double	VB	(VP*	ESE
standards	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
simpler	JJR	(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(PP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
values	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
likes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
dwell	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
count	VB	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Italian	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
returns	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*))))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
5	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
May	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Italian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
Roberto	NNP	*	O
Vittori	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
paying	VBG	*	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
earth	NN	(NP*))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
ten-day	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
eight	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tough	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
gratifying	JJ	*)	ESE
experience	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Vittori	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Italian	JJ	(NP*	O
general	NN	*	O
Mario	NNP	*	O
Arpino	NNP	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
call	NN	*))	O
shortly	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
capsule	NN	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
touch-down	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*)	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
millionaire	NN	*	O
Mark	NNP	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fine	JJ	(NP*	ESE
condition	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
28	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
paid	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)	O
20m	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
jaunt	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
termed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
experience	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
extraordinary	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
businessman	NN	*	O
Denis	NNP	*	O
Tito	NNP	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
voyage	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Vittori	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
37	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
spent	VBD	(VP*	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Star	NNP	*	O
City	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preparation	NN	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
10-day	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
dubbed	VBN	(VP*	O
Marco	NNP	(NP*	O
Polo	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
8	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*))))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
experiments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ISA	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
received	JJ	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
health	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
Vittori	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
colonel	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
test-pilot	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wife	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
boys	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
training	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP*	O
centres	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Houston	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
training	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
combined	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
knowledge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
techniques	NNS	*))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
advantage	NN	*))	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
station	NN	(NP*	O
commander	NN	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
training	NN	*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reserved	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russians	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Italy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Umberto	NNP	*	O
Guidoni	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
set	NN	(NP*)))	O
foot	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
ISS	NN	*)	O
in	IN	*))	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Paolo	NNP	(NP*	O
Nespoli	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2003-2004	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
estimated	VBN	*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Vittori	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
flight	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
12.5	CD	(NP*	O
m	NN	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
covered	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
training	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Belgian	JJ	*	O
substitute	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carrying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
experiments	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
rocket	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
natural	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Adviser	NNP	*	O
condoleezza	NNP	*	O
Rice	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
statements	NNS	(NP*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
described	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
oneupmanship	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
rudeness	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
inaugurated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
legislative	JJ	*	O
branch	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
oneupmanship	NN	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
issuing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
resolutions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
showing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
full	JJ	(NP*	DSE
allegiance	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
radical	JJ	*	ESE
right	NN	*	O
wing	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
legislative	JJ	*	O
branch	NN	*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
outbade	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
right	NN	*	O
wing	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Rabbi	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Kahana	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
alive	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
moderate	JJ	*	ESE
person	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
compared	VBN	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
legislative	JJ	*	O
branch	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
radical	JJ	*)	ESE
Israeli	NN	*	ESE
hardliners	NNS	*)	ESE
expressed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transfer	NN	*)	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
politely	JJ	*))))	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	O
senior	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
bodies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
called	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
homeland	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Congress	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
resolutions	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Congress	NNP	*)))))))	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
harbored	JJ	*	ESE
intentions	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rice	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dot	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
i	NNPS	*	ESE
's	POS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cross	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
t	NNPS	*	ESE
's	POS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
served	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	ESE
example	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrogance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
attempts	NNS	*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP(VP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
resources	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
dictate	VB	(VP*	O
policies	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
pressure	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
coercion	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
flagrant	JJ	*	ESE
attack	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Condoleezza	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Rice	NNP	*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
demonstrates	VBZ	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
international	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
dictatorship	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
practiced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
powerful	JJ	*)	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
earth	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
democratic	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
advocate	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
choose	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
leaders	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rice	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
attacks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
democratically	RB	(ADJP*	O
elected	VBN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
testified	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
presidents	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
refrains	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
mentioning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elected	VBN	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
moved	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
occupy	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
cities	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
homes	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heads	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
owners	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
arrest	VB	(VP*	ESE
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
many	RB	(S(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
circles	NNS	*))	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
crimes	NNS	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
bloody	JJ	(NP*	ESE
massacres	NNS	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
prominent	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Shim	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
`	``	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
Peres	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Janin	NNP	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
massacre	NN	*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Janin	NNP	*	O
camp	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
attack	VB	(VP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
arrest	VB	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
blockade	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
villages	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
exception	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yet	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
denounced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
attacked	VBN	*	DSE
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
praised	VBN	(VP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
man	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(ADVP*)	O
prompting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ridicule	NN	*)	DSE
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
denunciation	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(SBARQ(SBAR*)	O
,	,	*	O
why	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(SQ*	O
Rice	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*))	O
launch	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
campaigns	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
interfere	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Rice	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
aware	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Yasir	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
siege	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
headquarters	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
superior	JJ	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
violation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
accords	NNS	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
accords	NNS	*)	O
explicitly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
stipulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enter	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian-controlled	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
Areas	NNP	(NP*	O
A	NNP	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
naturally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
including	VBG	(PP*	ESE
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
adviser	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
ending	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
dismantling	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
certain	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
represent	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	RB	*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
obstacle	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
part	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
sought	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
just	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
submission	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
plans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
writing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
swallowing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aim	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
yield	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
dictates	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli-US	NNP	*	O
alliance	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seeks	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
mimic	JJ	*	ESE
resolution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
perpetuate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expansion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
meddle	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
favored	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
tailored	VBN	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
mutual	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
intelligent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
read	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
lines	NNS	*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
aims	NNS	*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
Condoleezza	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rice	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
calls	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
transparency	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
corruption-free	NN	*	ESE
system	NN	*)))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*	O
,	,	*)	O
not	RB	(PP*	ESE
out	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
concern	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
facts	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ought	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
highlighted	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
will	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	DSE
convictions	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	DSE
aspirations	NNS	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
interested	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
pressure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
repressive	JJ	*	ESE
practices	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
turns	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
eye	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
practices	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
pretending	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
forget	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
violate	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
continuously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
denounced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Opposition	NNP	(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwean	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
deliberately	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
withholding	VBG	*	ESE
food	NN	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drought-ravaged	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
punishment	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
voting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
correct	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50-year-old	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
alleged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
starvation	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	DSE
campaign	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
retribution	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*	O
ZANU-PF	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
waged	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
pending	VBG	*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
treason	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Canadian	JJ	(NP*	O
connections	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
focused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
hunger	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
plagued	VBN	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
part	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state-orchestrated	JJ	*	ESE
operation	NN	*)	ESE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
crushing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
strongly	RB	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pursuance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
vendetta	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
situation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
escalated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
wildly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
's	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
grand	JJ	*	ESE
strategy	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
target	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
supporter	NN	*	O
base	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
worst	JJS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
opposition	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
strongest	JJS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	*	O
rural-area	JJ	*	O
sympathizers	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Food	NNP	*	O
Program	NN	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
as	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
1.5	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Zimbabweans	NNPS	*)	O
face	VBP	(VP*	O
starvation	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drought	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
compounded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
government-sponsored	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
invasions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
white-owned	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
farms	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
crippled	VBN	(VP*	O
production	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
maize	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
wheat	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ground	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
corn	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
locally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
mealie	JJ	(NP*	O
meal	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
staple	JJ	*	O
diet	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
afford	VB	(VP*	O
little	RB	(NP*	O
else	RB	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
agricultural	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
declaring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
disaster	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
drought	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sabotage	NN	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
white	JJ	(NP*	ESE
farmers	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
upheaval	NN	*)	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
farm	NN	*	O
invasions	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
import	VB	(VP*	O
supplies	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Brazil	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reporters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
obtain	VB	(VP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
comment	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
allegations	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
non-governmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
operating	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
seeing	VBG	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
discriminatory	JJ	(NP*	O
food	NN	*	O
distribution	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Food	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Shari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Eppel	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Amani	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Trust	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
human-rights	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
...	:	(S(NP(NP*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VB	(PP(PP(NP(NP*)	O
come	VBN	(VP*))	O
across	IN	*	O
cases	NNS	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
having	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	*	O
card	NN	*)))))))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Grain	NNP	*	O
Marketing	NNP	*	O
Board	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
body	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
controls	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
imports	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sales	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southwestern	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Matabeleland	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
cases	NNS	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
cleansing	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
routine	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
purge	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	DSE
sympathies	NNS	*)))	DSE
before	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
corn	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
According	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
denounce	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
veterans	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
go	VBP	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	DSE
confession	NN	*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mrs.	NNP	(NP*	O
Eppel	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
headman	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
kept	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
observation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
decides	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
grain	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
GMB	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
alleged	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
land-reform	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
nominally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
launched	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resettle	VB	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
poor	JJ	*	O
families	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
putting	VBG	(VP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
farms	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
presidential	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
cronies	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
members	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ruling	VBG	*	ESE
party	NN	*	ESE
elite	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
beneficiaries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
program	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
included	VBN	(VP*))	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
MPs	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
army	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
police	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
--	:	*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
in-laws	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Last	JJ	*	ESE
Supper	NN	*)	ESE
--	:	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
final	JJ	*	ESE
feast	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
take	NN	(NP*))	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
while	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
commended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
invoking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
regime	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
future	NN	*)	ESE
rests	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
remove	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
shackles	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
repression	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
burden	NN	*)	ESE
really	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
lies	VBZ	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	ESE
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
freedom	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
violence	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
hunger	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
turmoil	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
strengthening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
appetite	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
public	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
change	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
casualties	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
engineer	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
reckless	JJ	*	ESE
action	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
cautioned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
...	:	(PP(PP(NP(NP*	O
A	NNP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
systematic	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
strategic	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
program	NN	(NP*)))	O
of	IN	(ADVP*))	O
mass	IN	(PP*))	O
mobilization	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*))))	ESE
necessary	JJ	(PRN(NP*)	ESE
to	IN	(VP(ADVP*)	O
confront	VBP	*))	O
a	SYM	(NP*)	ESE
stolen	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
victory	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
illegitimate	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
touched	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
battle	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
:	:	*	O
On	IN	(S(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
31	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
treason	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
plotting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
assassinated	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
charge	NN	*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*	O
along	IN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reluctant	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
depth	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))))	O
still	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
before	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
brief	JJ	(NP*	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
prosecution	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
star	NN	*	O
witness	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Montreal-based	JJ	(NP*	O
consultant	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
agent	NN	*	O
Ari	NNP	*	O
Ben-Menashe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
may	MD	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
travel	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prosecution	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
key	JJ	*	O
witness	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
reluctant	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
testify	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
how	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
will	MD	(SQ*	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
proceed	VB	(VP*))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
answer	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Srinagar	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
May	NNP	*	O
7	CD	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Thirteen	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
Lashker-e-Toiba	JJ	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Special	JJ	*	O
Police	NNP	*	O
Officers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
girl	NN	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
militancy	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
related	VBN	*)	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
suspected	VBN	*	DSE
militant	NN	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
recovered	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
explosive	JJ	*	O
material	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
possession	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Nambal	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jumasthal	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Behak	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Kulgam	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Islamabad	NNP	(NP*	O
district	NN	*)))))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
slain	VBN	*	O
militants	NN	*	O
owing	VBG	*	DSE
allegiance	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Lashker-e-Toiba	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Abu	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Saifullah	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Abu	NNP	(NP*	O
Talha	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Abu	NNP	(NP*	O
Huraira	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ak	NNP	*	O
rifles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
9	CD	(NP*	O
magazines	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
wireless	JJ	*	O
set	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
5	CD	(NP*	O
hand	NN	*	O
grenades	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
ammunition	NN	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
claimed	VBN	(VP*	O
recovered	VBN	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
site	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Saile	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Budgam	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
today	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
slain	VBN	*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Muhammad	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ashraf	NNP	*	O
Bhat	NNP	*	O
alias	NNP	*	O
Sikander	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Bashir	NNP	(NP*	O
Ahmad	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	O
recovery	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP*	O
Ak	NNP	*	O
rifles	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
8	CD	(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
magazines	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
2	CD	(NP*	O
wireless	JJ	*	O
sets	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
UBGL	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*))	O
Under	IN	(PP*	O
Barrel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Grenade	NNP	*	O
Launcher	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
2	CD	(NP*	O
hand	NN	*	O
grenades	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
7	CD	(NP*	O
rifle	NN	*	O
grenades	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
205	NNP	(NP*	O
Ak	NNP	*	O
rounds	NNP	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
site	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reports	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Jammu	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
killed	VBD	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Khanetar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Poonch	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
specific	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
militants	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
retaliatory	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*))	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Lashker	NN	*	O
militants	NNS	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Qazi	NNP	*	O
alias	NNP	*	O
Chotu	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP*	O
district	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*	O
Bau	NNP	*	O
Dujan	NNP	*))	O
alias	VBZ	(VP*	O
Dujana	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Village	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
VDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Lopara	NNP	(NP*	O
village	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Dachan	NNP	(NP*	O
area	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Doda	NNP	(NP*))	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
today	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
IGP	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Inspector	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Police	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Jammu	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
P	NNP	*)	O
L	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Gupta	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
slain	VBN	*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
hailing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
most	JJS	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*))	O
'	''	*	O
category	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
militants	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reward	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
1.5	CD	*	O
lakh	NN	*)	O
each	DT	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
distributed	VBN	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
VDC	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BSF	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Border	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
killed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
militant	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kot	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kuba	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jammu	NNP	(NP*))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sneaked	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Indian	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*))	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
morning	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
shot	VBD	(VP*	O
dead	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
two	CD	(NP*))	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Parnali	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mahore	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
tehsil	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Udhampur	NNP	(NP*	O
district	NN	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
night	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
identity	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
girl	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
unidentified	JJ	(NP*	O
gunmen	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Mahore	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
tehsil	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Udhampur	NNP	(NP*	O
district	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
3	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
dead	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ans	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
river	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*))))))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Militants	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
killed	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
brothers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Abbas	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Abdul	NNP	(NP*	O
Jabar	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Sadwan	NNP	(NP*	O
village	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Doda	NNP	(NP*	O
district	NN	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
deceased	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Special	JJ	*	O
Police	NN	*	O
Officers	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SPOs	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
dead	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
militants	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
attending	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
panchayat	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
settle	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
marriage	NN	*	O
dispute	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Militants	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
exchanged	VBD	(VP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
area	NN	(NP(NP*	O
domination	NN	*	O
patrol	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Gunpora	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shopian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pulwama	NNP	(NP*	O
district	NN	*))))))))	O
today	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
casualty	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
apprehended	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspected	VBN	*	DSE
militant	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ghulam	NNP	(NP*	O
Hassan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Nagbal	NNP	(NP*	O
Ganderbal	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outskirts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Srinagar	NNP	(NP*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
night	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
led	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
IED	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
improvised	NNP	*	O
explosive	JJ	*	O
device	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))	O
weighing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
kg	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
fitted	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wooden	JJ	*	O
box	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
detonators	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
May	NNP	*	O
8	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Deputy	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Geopolitical	NNP	*	O
Research	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*	O
Lyonid	NNP	*	O
Ivashev	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(NP*	ESE
any	DT	*	ESE
country	NN	*))))	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Talking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
IRNA	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Ivashev	NNP	(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
regrets	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
indifferent	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expansionist	JJ	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
proceed	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
condemn	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
war-mongering	NN	*	ESE
actions	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tactics	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
war-mongering	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
posed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
threats	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
turned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ignoring	VBG	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
resolutions	NNS	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ivashev	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Russia	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
develop	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
relations	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
India	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
deep	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
differences	NNS	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Stats	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
strategic	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
claim	VBP	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
parts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
unfounded	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
claims	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
connection	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
sheer	JJ	*	ESE
lies	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reacting	VBG	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
threats	NNS	*)))	DSE
launched	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)))	O
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*	O
expansionist	NN	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
State	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
Union	NNP	*	DSE
address	NN	*))))	DSE
termed	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
attempting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
develop	VB	(VP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mass	JJ	(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ivashev	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
after	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
gaining	VBG	(S(S(VP(VP*	O
superiority	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
capabilities	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
initiating	VBG	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
anti-missile	JJ	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
intentions	NNS	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	DSE
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
expansionists	NNS	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fight	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Geneva	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
May	NNP	*	O
10	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
insurer	NN	*)	O
Swiss	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Life	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pulled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
plug	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
planned	JJ	*	DSE
expansion	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
preferring	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
concentrate	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
core	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
markets	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Swiss	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Radio	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SRI	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
closed	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
representative	JJ	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guangzhou	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
closing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
insurer	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
license	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
life	NN	(NP*	O
insurance	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

SRI	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Swiss	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Life	NNP	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pull	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*))	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
cutting	VBG	(VP*	O
800	CD	(NP*	O
jobs	NNS	*)	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
ran	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
trouble	NN	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
expansion	NN	*	O
drive	NN	*)	O
cut	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
profits	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bottom	JJ	*	O
line	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hit	VBN	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
management	NN	(S(NP*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rein	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
costs	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chinese	JJ	(S(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	ESE
potential	JJ	*	ESE
market	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
insurers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
gradually	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
easier	JJR	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
joined	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
insurance	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
40	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prime	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Hasan	NNP	*	O
Abshir	NNP	*	O
Farah	NNP	*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mogadishu	NNP	(NP*	O
today	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
9	CD	*))	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UAE	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Kuwait	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bahrain	NNP	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
Somali	JJ	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)))))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Somali	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kuwait	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bahrain	NNP	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
satisfaction	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
Somali	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Radio	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dalmar	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
arrival	NN	(NP*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
No	DT	(NP*	O
50	CD	*	O
airstrip	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*	O
health	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
good	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
duty	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hanoi	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
May	NNP	*	O
13	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
VNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
variety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
drugs	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
HIV/AIDS	AIDS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
patients	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
disease	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
Lamivudin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
100mg	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Lamizidivir	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Lamivudin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
150mg	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Zidovudin	NNP	(NP*	O
300mg	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
medicines	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
jointly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
produced	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pharmaceutical	NNP	*	O
Company	NNP	*	O
MST	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pharmaceutical	NNP	*	O
Plant	NNP	*	O
MST	NNP	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ho	NNP	(NP*	O
Chi	NNP	*	O
Minh	NNP	*	O
City	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zidovudine	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lamivudine	NNP	*	O
substances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GMP	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
imported	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
India	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
Lamizidivir	NNP	*	O
tablets	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
VND	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
19,500	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
1.2	CD	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
permit	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Vietnam	NNP	*	O
Pharmaceutical	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
department	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
600	CD	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
HIV/AIDS	AIDS	*	O
patient	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
year	NN	(NP*)))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
following	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
cost	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
just	RB	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	*	O
400/year	year	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
patient	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
production	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
drugs	NNS	*)))	O
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	O
stable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Currently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
producer	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
process	VB	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
10	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
tablets	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
month	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
consumption	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
export	NN	*)))))))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
well	RB	(FRAG(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
kinds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
drugs	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Nevirappine	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Afaviren	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Abavir	NNP	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
2002	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
47,514	CD	*)))	O
HIV	NN	(NP*	O
carriers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
6,831	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
full-blown	JJ	(NP*	O
AIDS	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
3,780	CD	*))	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
disease	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

MOSCOW	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
15	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
As	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
of	IN	(S(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
194,000	CD	(NP*	O
HIV	NN	*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
registered	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Federal	NNP	(NP*	O
AIDS	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*	O
director	NN	*	O
Vadim	NNP	*	O
Pokrovsky	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Interfax	NNP	*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
HIV	NN	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)))	O
totaled	VBD	(VP*	O
around	RB	(NP(QP*	O
177,000	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Pokrovsky	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
HIV	NN	(S(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
17,000	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
HIV	NNP	(NP*)	O
develops	VBZ	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
long	JJ	*)	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
ill	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
eight	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
doctors	NNS	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
contracted	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
infection	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
urgent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cure	VB	*	O
HIV	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
AIDS	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Otherwise	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
surging	VBG	*	ESE
epidemic	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
turn	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
security	NN	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Talks	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Southeast	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Asian	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ASEAN	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
area	NN	*))))))	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
smoothly	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
confident	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
finalize	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
November	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Economic	NNP	*)))))	O
Co-operation	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MOFTEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disclose	VB	(VP*	O
details	NNS	(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
working	VBG	(VP*	O
level	NN	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
more	RBR	(S(NP*	ESE
substantial	JJ	*	ESE
progress	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	VBG	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
China-ASEAN	NNP	(NP*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Senior	NNP	*	O
Official	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
negotiation	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
in-depth	JJ	(NP*	O
discussions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
negotiation	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
hosted	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
finalized	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
China-ASEAN	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cambodia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wide	JJ	*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
co-operation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
services	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
investment	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
contain	VB	(VP*	O
guidelines	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
principles	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
scope	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
modalities	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
establishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
area	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
early	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
harvest	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
differential	NN	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
flexibility	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
account	NN	(NP(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
ASEAN	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Premier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zhu	NNP	*	O
Rongji	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
China-ASEAN	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chinese	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
historic	JJ	*	ESE
milestone	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
co-operation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	NNP	*))))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
demonstrates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
strong	JJ	(NP*	ESE
commitments	NNS	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
China-ASEAN	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
integration	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
globalization	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
pursue	VB	(VP*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
prosperity	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	JJ	*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
export	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
ASEAN	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
55.1	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US$	$	(NP(QP*	O
10.6	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
ASEAN	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
export	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
48	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US$	$	(NP(QP*	O
13	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
area	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TIRANA	RB	(ROOT(S(SINV(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
may	MD	(VP*)	O
21	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ATA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Electoral	NNP	(NP*	O
Reform	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
complete	JJ	(ADJP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Socialist	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commission	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Bashkim	NNP	(NP*	O
Fino	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ylli	NNP	(NP*	O
Bufi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Taulant	NNP	(NP*	O
Dedja	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Blendi	NNP	(NP*	O
Klosi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Durim	NNP	(NP*	O
Hushi	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
governing	NN	*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
for	IN	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SDP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commission	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Gaqo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Apostoli	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
PBDNj	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Ligoraq	NNP	(NP*	O
Karamelo	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Agrarian	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Ndue	NNP	(NP*	O
Preka	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Democratic	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commission	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jemin	NNP	(NP*	O
Gjana	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Sokol	NNP	(NP*	O
Olldashi	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
whereas	IN	(SBAR*	O
New	NNP	(S(NP*	O
democratic	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Nard	NNP	(NP*	O
Ndoka	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
parliamentarian	NN	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
majority-opposition	JJ	*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presentation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Socialist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Amendments	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
code	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
consist	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
defining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
one-round	JJ	*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
establishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
registering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
candidates	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
constituents	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
vote	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
counting	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MOSCOW	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
21	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
Supplies	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
natural	JJ	*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
market	NN	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Gazprom	NNP	(NP*	O
CEO	NNP	*	O
Alexei	NNP	*	O
Miller	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
Aurel	NNP	*	O
Konstantin	NNP	*	O
Iliye	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
release	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
release	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
gas	NN	(NP*	O
storage	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Romanian	NNP	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
setting	NN	*)	O
up	RB	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
venture	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iliye	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interest	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Romanian	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
dynamic	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
broader	JJR	(NP*	ESE
cooperation	NN	*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Gazprom	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
proposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Gazprom	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tender	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
privatization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
petrochemical	NN	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
partner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
supplies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
equipment	NN	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
release	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
invitation	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Romanian	NNP	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Adrian	NNP	*	O
Nastase	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Miller	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Romania	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
working	VBG	*	O
visit	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Miller	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
accepted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
invitation	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

MOSCOW	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
23	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Aerospace	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
search	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*	O
candidate	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
autumn	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
agency	NN	(NP*	O
director	NN	*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Koptev	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
applications	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
circles	NNS	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
applications	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
citizen	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
unnamed	JJ	*)	O
person	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
established	JJ	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
processing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
applications	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meantime	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
singer	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
boy	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)))	O
NSYNC	NNP	(NP*	O
Lance	NNP	*	O
Bass	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	*	O
NASA	NNP	*	O
Associate	NNP	*	O
Administrator	NNP	*	O
Lori	NNP	*	O
Garver	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
completing	VBG	(VP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
examinations	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Biomedical	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Problems	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
okayed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
intentions	NNS	(S(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
pop	NN	*	O
group	NN	*	O
Na-Na	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
plans	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
either	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
singers	NNS	*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
necessary	JJ	*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Aerospace	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
applications	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
either	CC	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
pop	NN	*	O
group	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
growing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
public	JJ	(NP*	DSE
interest	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
tourism	NN	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
vehicle	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
increasing	VBG	(NP*	ESE
personal	JJ	*	ESE
popularity	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
probability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
70-80	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
informed	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
set	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
services	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
related	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
taxi	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*))))))	O
ranges	VBZ	(VP*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
18	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	*	O
20	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
agency	NN	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
begins	VBZ	(VP*	O
flying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
flying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
heavy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
jail	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
C-17	NN	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
371	CD	*))	O
``	``	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*	O
''	''	*))	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
departed	VBD	(VP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
am	RB	*	O
EST	RB	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1600	NNP	(NP*	O
GMT	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
Maj.	NNP	*	O
Brad	NNP	*	O
Lowell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tampa	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Florida	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plane	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Lowell	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
facilities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
razor	NN	(NP*	O
wire	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
Base	NNP	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
major	JJ	(S(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
precautions	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
moving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
hard-line	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
anti-Western	JJ	*	ESE
followers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fugitive	JJ	(NP*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Osama	NNP	*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lowell	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
small-arms	JJ	*	O
fire	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
evening	NN	*)))	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
C-17	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
fired	VBN	(VP*	O
upon	RB	(PP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
injuries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gunfire	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
departed	VBN	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operating	VBG	*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
danger	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
perform	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
evasive	JJ	*	O
maneuvers	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Lowell	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Marines	NNPS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
dealing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
threat	NN	*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
injuries	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
CNN	NNP	(NP*)	O
late	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
gunfire	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
snipers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
penetrated	VBN	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outer	JJ	*	O
perimeter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transfer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
These	DT	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
isolated	VBN	*	ESE
incidents	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
that	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainee	JJ	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
notification	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Lt.	NNP	(NP*	O
James	NNP	*	O
Jarvis	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
affect	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
transfer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
quite	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
simply	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
adequate	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
security	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
earlier	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
unprecedented	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
security	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
chains	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
possibly	RB	(NP*	O
sedation	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
hoods	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*))	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
transporting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
include	VBP	(S(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
network	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
planning	NN	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(S(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
charged	VBN	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
manacled	VBN	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
outnumbered	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
specially	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
trained	JJ	*)	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
incapacitating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
stun	NN	(NP*	O
guns	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
report	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
USA	NNP	(NP*))	O
Today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
consideration	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
tranquilizing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
covering	VBG	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
hoods	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
flights	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
advocacy	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
Amnesty	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*))	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
drugged	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
hooded	VBN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
shackled	VBN	*	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
full	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
respect	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
standards	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
restraints	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
adequate	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP(VP*	O
limbs	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bathroom	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
eat	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
drink	VB	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rumsfeld	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
every	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
effort	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
hardline	JJ	(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
many	DT	(NP*)	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
dangerous	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
possibly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
suicidal	JJ	*))	ESE
followers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
masterminding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
aircraft	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
authorized	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
instructed	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
appropriate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
restraints	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
aware	JJ	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
individuals	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Hill	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Willing	NN	(NP(NP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)	O
'	''	*	DSE
:	:	*)	O
``	``	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
perfectly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
willing	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
kill	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
provided	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
details	NNS	*)	O
except	VB	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
consulted	VBN	(VP*	O
experts	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
prisons	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
control	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
300	CD	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Bagram	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-i-Sharif	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
helicopter	NN	*	O
assault	NN	*))))	O
ship	VBP	(VP*	O
USS	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bataan	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
Indian	NNP	*	O
Ocean	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
details	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
transfer	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Defence	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Victoria	NNP	*	O
Clarke	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
announcements	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
secluded	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
high-security	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
barbed	JJ	*	O
wire-enclosed	JJ	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*))))	O
all	DT	(ADVP*	O
along	IN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Clarke	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
sets	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
responsibilities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hundreds	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
reinforcements	NNS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
compound	NN	*)	O
ringed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
fences	NNS	*)	O
topped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
razor	NN	(NP*	O
wire	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
floor	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
chain-link	JJ	(NP*	O
walls	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
spotlights	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
night	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
American	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Walker	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
now	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
vanquished	JJ	*)	ESE
protectors	NNS	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
any	DT	(FRAG*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
might	MD	(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
martial	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
authorized	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
close	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
scrutiny	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
studying	VBG	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	O
trials	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
protecting	VBG	(S(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
defendants	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	O
tight	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
confident	NNP	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
victory	NN	(NP*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
historic	JJ	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
vote	NN	*))))	O

HARARE-Zimbabwean	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
predicted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
victory	NN	(NP*)	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
cast	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
local	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
primary	JJ	*	O
school	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
working-class	JJ	*	O
suburb	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Highfield	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hotly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
contested	VBN	*)	DSE
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
accept	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
won	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
78-year-old	JJ	*	O
former	JJ	*	O
guerrilla	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
governed	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
another	DT	(NP*	DSE
swipe	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
Britain	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
western	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
have	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
prejudged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
school	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
faced	VBN	(VP*	O
widespread	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
alleged	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
manipulation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tinkering	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
voting	NN	(NP(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
confusing	JJ	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
even	RB	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
aides	NNS	*))	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
unsure	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Mhofu	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
School	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Highfield	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
state	NN	(S(NP*	O
television	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
truck	NN	*)	O
posted	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
broadcasting	VBG	(VP*	O
live	VB	(S(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
polls	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ministers	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
aides	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
hand	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
cast	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
throng	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
camera	NN	*	O
operators	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
perform	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
civic	JJ	*	O
duty	NN	*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Kudzanai	NNP	(NP*	O
School	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Highfield	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
particular	JJ	*	O
ward	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
order	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cast	VB	(VP*	O
ballots	NNS	(NP*)	O
both	DT	(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
mayor	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
simultaneously	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
complained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
set-up	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
deliberately	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
confusing	JJ	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ploy	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discourage	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
urban	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
thought	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
favor	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
challenger	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Midweek	NN	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Wheel	NN	(NP(NP*	O
turns	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
vengeance	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)))))))	O

AS	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Camp	NNP	*)	O
X-ray	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fill	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
sworn	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
die	VB	(VP(VP*)	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
little	JJ	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
hell	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
disturbed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	DSE
States	NNPS	*)	O
dismisses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
such	JJ	(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
all	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
;	:	*	O
remember	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Black	NNP	*	ESE
Hole	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mazar-iSharif	NNP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Anxiety	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
arises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sense	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
cultural	JJ	*	ESE
gulf	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
captors	NNS	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
vast	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
latter	JJ	*	O
genuinely	NN	*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
diet	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peanut	NN	(NP*	O
butter	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
bagel	NN	*	O
chips	NNS	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
cruel	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
inhuman	JJ	*)	ESE
punishment	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
suffering	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
particular	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
great	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prayers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victorious	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*	O
soldier	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Quite	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
lot	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
happens	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Crouched	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
cages	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
back	RB	(S(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(S(NP*	O
TVs	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
glowing	VBG	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bollywood	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
bellowing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
men	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
shaving	VBG	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
women	NNS	(NP*	O
unveiling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sending	VBG	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
daughters	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
school	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
feel	VB	(VP*	ESE
sorry	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hapless	NN	*)	ESE
vanquished	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
limbo	NN	*	ESE
rock	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
tortured	JJ	*	ESE
consciences	NNS	*)	ESE
back	RB	(PP*	O
out	RB	*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
labyrinth	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
duly	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
met	VBN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
eaten	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Minotaur	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
doubly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	*)))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
home	NN	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
rebuilding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Buddhas	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bamiyan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
potential	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tourist	NN	*	O
attraction	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(SBAR(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
since	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
blew	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
monumental	JJ	*	O
1,500-year-old	JJ	*	O
sandstone	NN	*	O
statues	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
northcentral	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
insult	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
sensibilities	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
emulate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Gautama	NNP	*	ESE
Buddha	NNP	*)	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
profess	VBP	(VP*	DSE
relief	NN	(NP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statues	NNS	*)	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
likeness	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
anyway	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
clothes	NNS	*)	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
never	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
looked	VBD	*	O
quite	RB	(ADVP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
statues	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
fashion	NN	*	O
sense	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
clearly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
influenced	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Greeks	NNPS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
with	IN	(S(PP*	O
Alexander	NNP	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Great	NNP	*))	O
having	VBG	(VP*	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
India	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
likenesses	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Buddha	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
deathbed	NN	*))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
All	DT	(S(NP*	O
composite	JJ	*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
arise	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
decline	VB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Work	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
salvation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
diligence	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
enamoured	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
statues	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Which	WDT	(ROOT(FRAG(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
supposes	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
motivation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
blew	VBD	(S(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
statues	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
giant	JJ	*	O
holes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
landscape	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
paying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
unthinking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
tribute	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Buddha	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
subtlest	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
most	RBS	(NP(NP*	ESE
profound	JJ	*	ESE
teachings	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
impermanence	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
perils	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
delusion	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
statues	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
defaced	VBN	(VP*	O
long	RB	(SBAR*	O
before	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reduced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
rubble	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	O
not	RB	(NP(NP*	O
just	RB	*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
face	NN	*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
head	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
big	JJ	*	O
hole	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
crotch	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
someone	NN	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rocketpropelled	JJ	*	O
grenade	NN	*)	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
'	''	*	O
98	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Judging	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
demeanour	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statue	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
felt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
thing	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(FRAG*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
aimed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
RPG	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ascribing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
characteristics	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lump	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
stone	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Which	WDT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
disturbing	JJ	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
such	JJ	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
sin	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
rocket	NN	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
supposedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intended	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
expunge	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
those	DT	*	O
poor	JJ	*	ESE
bullet-scarred	JJ	*	O
statues	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	ESE
everyone	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
look	VBP	(VP*	ESE
sad	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
foolish	JJ	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
immolation	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
misery	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
speak	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
though	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stretch	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
even	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
ardent	JJ	*)	ESE
apologist	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
veil	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
compassion	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
hardly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
elastic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pull	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
great	JJ	*	O
big	JJ	*	O
holes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
earth	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
moment	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fabric	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
compassion	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
tore	VBD	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
worlds	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
cracked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
apart	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
;	:	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
contrast	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
conflict	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilisational	JJ	(NP*	ESE
values	NNS	*)))	ESE
became	VBD	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
great	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
remove	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
common	JJ	(NP*	ESE
ground	NN	*)))	ESE
-	:	*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
battle	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
divide	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
gratuitously	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
destructive	JJ	*)	ESE
event	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
went	VBD	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
did	VBD	(S(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
spectacularly	VBZ	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
unconscionable	JJ	*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
reign	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
demolition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Buddhas	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bamiyan	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*))))	O
cleaved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rift	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilisations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
rammed	VBG	(VP*	O
wide	RB	(ADJP*	O
open	JJ	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
hijacked	JJ	(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*)))	O
over	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
later	RBR	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
since	IN	(ADVP*)	O
cauterised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
molten	NN	*	ESE
metal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
might	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(SINV(S*	O
so	RB	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
ironically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pass	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
one	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
on	IN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
dreaming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
rebuilding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
statues	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
what	WDT	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)))))))))	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
sits	VBZ	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP*)))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
away	RB	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
beardless	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
bald	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
clad	JJ	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
saffron	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(FRAG(NP*))	O
criticizes	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
turning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
eye	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
abuses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*))))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
criticizing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
theirs	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Cabinet	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
listed	JJ	*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
abuses	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
poverty	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
racial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
discrimination	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
lack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
personal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
Xinhua	NNP	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
wantonly	RB	(S(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
infringing	VBG	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
stationing	VBG	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
overseas	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Xinhua	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
slammed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
administration	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
withdrawing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cutting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
releases	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
conditions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
usually	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
widespread	JJ	(NP*	O
abuses	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Once	RB	(S(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
assuming	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	ESE
world	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
judge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
'	''	*	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
distorted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
regions	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
while	NN	*)	ESE
turning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
eye	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights-related	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Kyoto	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
dropped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
U.N.	NNP	(NP*))	O
meet	VB	(S(VP*	O
agenda	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
pulled	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
objecting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
goals	NNS	*))))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
wording	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
excluded	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*	O
documentation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
preparatory	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.N.	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Environment	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Development	NNP	*))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UNCED	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
sources	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
grew	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Parties	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
COP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.N.	NNP	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
UNCED	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
pulled	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
obliges	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
developed	VBN	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
voluntary	JJ	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
slow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*	O
gasses	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
stiffening	VBG	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
pact	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
likely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
draw	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ire	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	ESE
implentation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intergovernmental	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
U.N.	NNP	(NP*	O
headquarters	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
paper	NN	*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
preparatory	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
Agenda	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
21	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.N.	NNP	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
restoration	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
preservation	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
paper	NN	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
1997	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
Kyoto	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	O
developed	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP(VP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
technical	JJ	*)	O
support	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
vulnerable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
island	NN	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
alleviate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
impact	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
introducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
devices	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
satellite	NN	(NP*	O
observation	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
rising	VBG	(NP*	O
sea	NN	*	O
levels	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
paper	NN	*)))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reworded	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
tackle	VB	(VP*	ESE
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
schedule	NN	*)	O
agreed	VBN	(VP*	O
upon	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	*	O
COP7	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seventh	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
COP	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
mapped	VBD	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
implementation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
appropriate	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
assistance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
island	NN	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
satellite	JJ	(NP*	O
observation	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
wording	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
deleted	VBN	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
causal	JJ	*	O
relation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
unusual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
climatic	JJ	*	O
phenomena	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
proved	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
data	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
commonly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
interpreted	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
linking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
droughts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
floods	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
rising	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
tides	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cabinet	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
OK	NNP	*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
ratification	NN	*	O
draft	NN	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Cabinet	NNP	*)	O
endorsed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Diet	NNP	(NP*	O
approval	NN	*))	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
revision	NN	*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
submitted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Diet	NNP	*))	O
later	RBR	(NP*	O
that	DT	*	O
day	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
preparation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
target	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Diet	NNP	*)	O
ratifies	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
work	NN	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cutting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
gas	NN	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Geneva	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
applies	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
not	RB	*	O
Al	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
7	CD	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
applies	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
followers	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Ari	NNP	*	O
Fleischer	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
fevered	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
-	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
key	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*)	O
stemming	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
alleged	VBN	(NP(NP*	DSE
mistreatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Al	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)	O
detainees	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
It	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
material	NN	*	O
life	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day-to-day	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Fleischer	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
noted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
neither	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
covered	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
accord	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

DETAINEES	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
ARRIVE	NNP	*)	O
IN	IN	(PP*	O
CUBA	NNP	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
28	CD	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
186	CD	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
stretchers	NNS	(NP*))	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
C-141	NN	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
25-hour	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RBR	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
resumed	VBD	(VP*	O
controversial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heavily	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
guarded	VBN	*)	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
captives	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
newsmen	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
captives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
two	CD	*)	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
late	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
isolated	JJ	*	O
prison	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*))	O
late	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Flights	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	ESE
detainees	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
Jan	NNP	(NP*	O
23	CD	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
defence	NN	(NP(NP*	O
secretary	NN	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
pending	VBG	(PP*	O
expansion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
outdoor	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
jail	NN	*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
158	CD	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
classify	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
interrogated	VBN	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
criticism	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
properly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

None	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
crime	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
maintained	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
shackled	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
blindfolded	JJ	*)	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*))))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
tight	JJ	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
housed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
8-by-8-foot	JJ	(NP*	O
cage-like	JJ	*	O
outdoor	JJ	*	O
cells	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
nationalities	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saudi	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
100	CD	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
kingdom	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
request	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
case-by-case	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*)))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
doubted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
soon	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*	O
invites	NN	*)	ESE
scorn	VBP	(VP*)))	ESE

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Unprecedented	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
scepticism	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
scorn	NN	*)	DSE
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
release	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*))))	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
hypocrisy	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
double	VB	*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)	ESE
arising	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
kid	NN	*	ESE
glove	NN	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
allies	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)))))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
withering	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
scrutiny	NN	(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
briefing	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
release	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
2001	CD	*	O
Country	NNP	*	O
Reports	NNPS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Practices	NNPS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
administrative	JJ	*	O
exercise	NN	*)	O
mandated	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Congress	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
feel	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
meaningless	JJ	*	ESE
ritual	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Amid	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
widespread	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
domestic	JJ	*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
curtailment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
liberties	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
laboured	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
convince	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
disbelieving	VBG	*	DSE
press	NN	*	O
corps	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
exercise	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
evenhanded	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
words	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
one	CD	(NP*	O
official	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
fair	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
individual	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
compendium	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
alleged	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	O
culled	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(UCP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
pages	NNS	*)	O
long	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
painstakingly	RB	(NP*	ESE
lists	NNS	*))	DSE
incidents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rights	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
violation	NN	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
both	DT	(PP*	O
by	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
terrorist	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
militant	JJ	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
subversive	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*	O
exercise	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
originally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
assistance	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
increasingly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
taking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
less	RBR	(ADVP*	DSE
seriously	RB	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
face	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
glossing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
over	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
record	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
allies	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
secular	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
India	NNP	(NP*)))	O
merit	NN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
litany	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
least	JJS	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*)	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
32	CD	(NP*	O
pages	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
shown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
inclination	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
punish	VB	(VP*	DSE
allies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
bankrolls	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Egypt	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Turkey	NNP	*)))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
berating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
countries	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
less	RBR	(ADJP*	O
relevant	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Critics	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
sharply	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
questioned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
such	JJ	(NP*	O
duplicity	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
briefing	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Lorne	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Cramer	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Assistant	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Labour	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
struggled	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
defend	VB	(VP*	DSE
American	JJ	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Excerpts	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
briefing	NN	*))	O
:	:	*))	O

Question	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
give	VBP	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*	O
examples	NNS	*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Egypt	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Assistant	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Craner	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
throw	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
examples	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
undertaking	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
programme	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
variety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
formulate	VB	(VP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Kyrgyzstan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
talk	VBP	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kyrgyzstan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
fund	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
printing	NN	*	O
press	NN	*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
examples	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
office	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
What	WP	(FRAG(X*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Lorne	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	DSE
little	JJ	*	DSE
bit	NN	*)	DSE
surprised	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
glib	JJ	*	ESE
answer	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demise	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
arguably	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
no	DT	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
bad	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
record	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Saudi	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
actively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
promote	VB	*	O
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Well	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Number	VB	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
disagree	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	ESE
violator	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
Who	WP	(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	O
violator	NN	*))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
place	VB	(VP*	DSE
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
category	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
question	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
greater	JJR	*	ESE
voice	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
greater	JJR	(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
participation	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
talking	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Saudi	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
going	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
encourage	VB	(VP*	DSE
others	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
societies	NNS	*)	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
democratic	JJ	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
At	IN	(S(PP*	O
what	WP	(NP*))	O
levels	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
we	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
talking	VBG	(VP*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
mean	VBP	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
visible	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Okay	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
paragraph	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
couple	NN	*	O
paragraphs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Address	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
But	CC	(S*	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
heard	VBD	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
before	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Craner	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
Yes	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
asking	VBG	(VP*))	O
?	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
asking	VBG	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
And	CC	(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
outlined	VBN	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
talking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
talking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
examples	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Can	MD	(SQ*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Robin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
question	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Can	MD	(ROOT(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
point	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
tangible	JJ	(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*)))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(SBARQ*	DSE
when	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
you	PRP	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
talking	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(SQ(SQ*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
talking	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
starting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
programs	NNS	*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(SQ*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
just	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
simply	JJ	*)	O
mentioning	VBG	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
problem	NN	*)))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Can	MD	(SQ*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
tangible	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
advances	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
?	.	*)))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
things	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
point	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pakistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
eliminate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
requirement	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(PP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
minorities	NNS	*)))))))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
separately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainstream	NN	*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
something	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Saudis	NNS	*	O
about	RB	*)))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(NP*	O
Inaudible	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
before	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*	O
--	:	*)	O
that	IN	*	O
previous	JJ	(S(NP*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
've	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
talking	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
years	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Saudis	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(SQ(VP*	ESE
different	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Craner	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
do	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
know	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Because	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
other	JJ	(S(NP*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Saudis	NNPS	*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
democracy	NN	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
participation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP*)))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
rights	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Well	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
yeah	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
understand	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
you	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
gong	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
effect	NN	*)))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
But	CC	(S*	O
what	WDT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
answer	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Craner	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	O
:	:	*	O
What	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
different	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Q	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	O
:	:	*	O
What	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
different	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
previous	JJ	(S(NP*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
judge	VB	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
'll	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
differently	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Q	RB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP(ADVP*	O
:	:	*)	DSE
Why	WRB	*)	O
ca	MD	(SQ*	O
n't	RB	*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
indication	NN	*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
big	JJ	*	ESE
secret	NN	*))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
talk	VBP	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
tangibly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Arabia	NNP	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Craner	NNP	(ROOT(X(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Because	IN	(FRAG(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effect	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pakistan	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(FRAG(NP*))	O
rejects	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)))	O

ISLAMABAD	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*)	O
slated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
country	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
labelled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
factually	RB	(ADJP*	O
inaccurate	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
unwarranted	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
fails	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
acknowledge	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*	O
measures	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
protect	VB	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
ignored	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
all	DT	*)	O
initiatives	NNS	*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
set	VBN	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*	O
2000	CD	*	O
human	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
conference	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
promulgation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Juvenile	NNP	*	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
System	NNP	*	O
Ordinance	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Permanent	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Status	NNPS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Women	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
jail	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Plan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Action	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
elimination	NN	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
child	NN	(NP*	O
labour	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
establishment	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fund	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rehabilitation	NN	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
working	VBG	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
amended	VBD	(NP(NP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
Citizenship	NNP	*	O
Act	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1951	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
women	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP*	O
descent	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
claim	VB	(VP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP*	O
nationality	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
born	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
husbands	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
mass	JJ	*	O
awareness	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
observance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Year	NN	*	O
2000	CD	*))))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Dignity	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
ratified	VBD	(VP*	O
ILO	NNP	(NP*	O
Conventions	NNP	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
equal	JJ	(NP*	O
remuneration	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
182	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elimination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
worst	JJS	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
child	NN	(NP*	O
labour	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Optional	NNP	*	O
Protocols	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Convention	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Child	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
joint	JJ	(NP*	O
electorates	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
introduced	VBN	(VP*	O
respecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wishes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minority	NN	*	O
communities	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
despite	IN	(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
`	``	*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Govt	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
poor	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
'	''	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unacceptable	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gross	JJ	*	ESE
misstatement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
facts	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
feels	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
constrained	VBN	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reject	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
assessment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tendency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sit	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
judgement	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
cause	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
better	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	O
served	VBN	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
cooperation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
understanding	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
address	NN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
face	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
promoting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
protecting	VBG	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
promoting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
protecting	VBG	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
welcome	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
friendly	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)))	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Britain	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Prescott	NNP	*	O
Pushes	NNP	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Pact	NNP	*	O
Backing	NNP	*))))	O

VANCOUVER	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
British	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Columbia	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
support	NN	*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
British	NNP	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Prescott	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
business	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prescott	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reject	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
agreement	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cause	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
concern	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
pressure	NN	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
maintained	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
voluntary	JJ	*	O
emission-reduction	JJ	*	O
targets	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
best	JJS	*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Prescott	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
delegates	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
65	CD	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Globe	NNP	*	O
2002	CD	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vancouver	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ended	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prescott	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
front	JJ	*	ESE
man	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
pushing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
recently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
science	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBN	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
optimistic	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
goals	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
signatory	NN	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
converge	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
countries	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
so-called	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
carbon	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
blamed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
scientists	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
pre-1990	JJ	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Named	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
approved	VBN	(VP*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
84	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fifty-five	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
55	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Forty-nine	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mid-March	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Europe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
environment	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
adhere	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ratification	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)))	O
later	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
month	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Barcelona	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Spain	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prescott	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
aims	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*	O
half	DT	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
pitted	VBN	(VP*	O
business	NN	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claim	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
hurt	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
environmentalists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
warn	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
dire	JJ	*	ESE
effects	NNS	*))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
higher	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
ocean	NN	*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
destruction	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
animal	NN	*	O
species	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canada	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
countries	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
pledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canada	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Environmental	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
David	NNP	(NP*	O
Anderson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
pressure	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
energy	NN	*	O
producers	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
position	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prescott	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Anderson	NNP	(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
support	NN	*))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
agreeing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
financial	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
potential	JJ	*	O
damage	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
pure	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fiction	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	NNP	*	O
Manufacturers	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Exporters	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
up	IN	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
C$	$	*	O
40	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Dutch	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
C$	$	(NP(QP*	O
727	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
At	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
least	JJS	*))	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
difference	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
estimates	NNS	*)))	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
deal	NN	*)	ESE
more	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
talking	VBG	*))))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
assessment	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Reuters	NNP	(NP*)	O
quoted	VBD	(VP*	O
Prescott	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
telling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
represented	VBD	(S(VP*	O
both	DT	(NP(UCP*	O
business	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
environmental	JJ	*)	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Elaborating	VBG	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*	ESE
'	POS	*)))))))	O

PRESIDENT	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
GEORGE	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Adviser	NNP	*	O
Condoleezza	NNP	*	O
Rice	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
defined	VBN	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
context	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*))))	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
criteria	NNS	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
Rice	NNP	(NP*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
question	NN	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
repressive	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
grave	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
violators	VBZ	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
aggressively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
conservative	JJ	*	ESE
estimates	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
scores	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
easily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
qualify	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(UCP(ADJP*	ESE
repressive	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
violating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
human	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
every	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
pluralistic	JJ	(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
violating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
oppressive	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
hardly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
qualify	VBP	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
pluralistic	JJ	(NP*	O
democracies	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
count	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
adviser	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
erred	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
wording	NN	*)))	O
regarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
acquisition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
noteworthy	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
words	NNS	*)	DSE
``	``	(VP*	O
aggressively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seeking	VBG	*	O
''	''	*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
biological	JJ	*	O
or	CC	*	O
chemical	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
arsenal	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
slow	JJ	*	O
pace	NN	*))))))))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
seem	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	(NX(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
name	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*	O
dozen	NN	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
contemplating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
acquisition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
speed	NN	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
seemingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
refraining	JJ	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
acquiring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
so	RB	*	ESE
much	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
escape	VB	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
branded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
rather	RB	(VP(SBAR*	ESE
because	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
neither	CC	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
knowledge	NN	*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
nuclear	JJ	*	ESE
club	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Come	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
think	VB	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
acquiring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))	O
per	FW	(ADVP*	ESE
se	FW	*)))	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
correct	JJ	*	ESE
basis	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
judging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(ADJP*	O
or	CC	*	O
evil	JJ	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
mere	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
possession	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
reason	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
label	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
evildoer	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
nation	NN	*)	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deploy	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
criterion	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
context	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
democratic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
word	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
disturbed	JJ	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
feel	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
acquire	VB	(S(VP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
authoritarian	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
repressive	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
irrespective	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pace	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
amassing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weaponry	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
fear	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
democratic	JJ	(S(NP*	O
regimes	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
restrained	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
responsible	JJ	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resorting	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Rice	NNP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
elaborated	VBN	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
precise	JJ	*)	ESE
criteria	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
membership	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
establishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
clearly	RB	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
connection	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
acquisition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Club	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	ESE
Fed	NNP	*	ESE
And	CC	*	O
Our	NNP	*)	O
Invisible	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Troops	NNP	*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
brouhaha	NN	*)	ESE
created	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
breast-beating	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human-rights	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
scuzz	NN	*)	ESE
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
vacationing	VBN	*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)))))))))	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
Cuban	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
Club	NNP	*	ESE
Fed	NNP	*)	ESE
-	:	*	O
eagerly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
aided	VBN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
abetted	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*)	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
prone	JJ	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sensational	JJ	*)))	ESE
-	:	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bleeding	VBG	*	ESE
hearts	NNS	*)	ESE
claim	VBP	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
brutalizing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
wear	VB	(VP(VP*	O
orange	JJ	(NP*	O
jumpsuits	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
sleep	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
mats	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
exercise	VB	(VP*	O
daily	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
shower	VB	(VP*	O
frequently	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
eat	VB	(VP*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
food	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

My	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
buddy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Connecticut	NNP	*	O
cop	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
finds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
fascinating	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
having	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
lot	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
trouble	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
concentrating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
twinkle	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
eyes	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
adds	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Are	VBP	(SQ*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
enough	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
sleep	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	JJ	*	ESE
diet	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
enough	JJ	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*	O
time	NN	*))))	O
?	.	*)))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
healthy	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
murder	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
get	VBP	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Amen	UH	(ROOT(INTJ*	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
perp	NN	*	ESE
pal	NN	*)	ESE
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*	O
attack	NN	*))))	O
jabbed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sharpened	JJ	*	O
comb	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guard	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
eye	NN	*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
pokey	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
around	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
bitten	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
guarding	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	ESE
anybody	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
else	RB	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
who	WP	*)	O
gets	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	O
close	JJ	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
folks	NNS	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
spent	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
leisure	NN	*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
back	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Afghanistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
skinning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
captives	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
alive	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
-	:	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
soccer	NN	(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
heads	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Think	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
kamikaze	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
killers	NNS	*)	ESE
looking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
edge	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
categorize	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
creeps	NN	*	ESE
-	:	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	ESE
lot	RB	*)	ESE
better	JJR	*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Club	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Fed	NNP	*)))	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
caves	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tora	NNP	(NP*	O
Bora	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
Geneva	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Convention	NNP	*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
uniformed	JJ	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
skyjackers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fly	VBP	(S(VP*	O
commercial	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
planes	NNS	*)	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
moms	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
dads	NNS	*))	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*	O
buildings	NNS	*))))	O
manned	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
civilians	JJ	(NP*	O
operating	VBG	*	O
computers	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
zealots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
kill	VBP	(S(VP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
drive	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
faces	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Al-Qaeda	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
crazies	NNS	*)	ESE
wear	VB	(VP(VP*	O
street	NN	(NP*	O
gear	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
operate	VB	(VP*	O
disguised	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
civilians	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Terrorists	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
dressed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pass	VB	(VP*	O
like	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
right	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spot	NN	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
World	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
War	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
personally	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
offended	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
none	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
whistle-blowers	NNS	*)))	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
give	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
damn	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
welfare	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
sons	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
daughters	NNS	*))))	O
guarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
thugs	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Have	VBP	(ROOT(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
read	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
stories	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dangers	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
face	VBP	(VP*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Have	VBP	(ROOT(SQ*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*)))	O
bothered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
kids	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
living	NN	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
jetted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
check	VB	(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
pick	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
tube	NN	*	ESE
time	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Had	VBD	(ROOT(S(SINV*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP*)	ESE
checked	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
Military	NNP	*	O
Police	NN	*)	O
guarding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)))	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(ADVP(NP*	ESE
lot	RB	*)	ESE
better	RBR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
pleased	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
brass	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lawmakers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	DSE
interested	JJ	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
well-being	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
guarding	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
invisible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Here	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
401st	JJ	*	O
MP	JJ	*	O
Company	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
Fort	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hood	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Texas	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
monster-watchers	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*))))	O
:	:	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
live	VBP	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
crap	NN	(NP*))	ESE
down	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
here	RB	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
extra	JJ	*	O
pay	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
tax	NN	*	O
break	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
up	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
above	JJ	*)	ESE
gives	VBZ	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
rat	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
ass	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sergeant	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
damage	NN	*	ESE
control	NN	*)	ESE
concerning	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
sleep	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
soft	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
mats	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nice	JJ	*	O
surfaced	JJ	*	O
floor	NN	*))))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sleep	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
tents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
dirt	NN	(NP*	O
floors	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
hot	JJ	*	O
meals	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
fresh	JJ	(NP*	O
fruit	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
regular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
snacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
sunflower	NN	(NP*	O
seeds	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
regular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
clean	JJ	*	O
clothes	NNS	*	O
laundered	VBN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
supply	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
soldier	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
canned	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
food	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
MREs	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
canned	VBN	(NP*	O
fruit	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
buy	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
snacks	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
laundry	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beer	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(FRAG(WHADVP*)))	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
duty	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
running	VBG	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
scared	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
no-drinking	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
troop	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
enough	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	O
enough	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
beer	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
situation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
demands	NNS	*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sadly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
along	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
soldier	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lie	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP*	O
inspectors	NNS	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
standards	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
requirements	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
right	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
stuck	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
middle	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Maybe	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
someday	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
do-gooders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
editors	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
lawmakers	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remember	VB	(VP(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
beings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
story	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Charity	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
begin	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
home	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Stretching	VBG	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Case	NN	*)	O
For	IN	(PP*	O
Inhumanity	NNP	(NP*))))))	O

Terrorist	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
thugs	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
deserve	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))	O

Having	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tour	VB	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
offer	VBP	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
critics	NNS	*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
simple	JJ	*	ESE
piece	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
advice	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Get	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
chronic	JJ	*	ESE
complainers	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
outraged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captured	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*))))	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
absurdly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
temporarily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
place	VB	*	O
prison	NN	(NP*	O
suits	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
handcuffs	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
blindfolds	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
transfer	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
guarding	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
upgraded	VBN	(NP*	ESE
accommodations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
seemingly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
forgetting	VBG	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
worldwide	JJ	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
vowed	VBD	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
Americans	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
terror	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Far	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(ADJP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
inhumanely	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
better	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
fed	VBN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
better	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
clothed	VBN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
better	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
cared	NN	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
roaming	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cold	JJ	*	ESE
caves	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
eat	VBP	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
nutritious	JJ	*	ESE
meals	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
halal	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
cereal	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
granola	NN	*	O
bars	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
large	JJ	*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
talking	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
freely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
another	DT	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
worshiping	VBG	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
writing	VBG	(VP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
evil-doers	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
far	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
better	JJR	*)	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
deserve	VBP	(VP*	ESE
-	:	*	O
hot	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
showers	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
warm	JJ	*	ESE
Caribbean	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
access	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exact	JJ	*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
medical	JJ	*	O
care	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
live	VBP	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
critics	NNS	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
prefer	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
instead	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
stay	VBP	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Ritz-Carlton	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
way	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
contrast	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
men	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
job	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
guarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
thugs	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
live	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
12-person	JJ	(NP*	O
tents	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
cold	JJ	(NP*	O
showers	NNS	*)	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hose	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
cope	VB	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
electricity	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
serve	VBP	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
dignity	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
honor	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
toured	VBD	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
stared	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
faces	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stood	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
away	RB	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
barbarians	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
only	RB	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
earlier	RBR	*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
machine	NN	(NP*	O
guns	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
incited	JJ	(NP*	ESE
bloody	JJ	*	ESE
prison	NN	*	O
riots	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ambushes	NNS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
boasted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
plans	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
kill	VB	(VP*	DSE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
help	VB	(VP*))	DSE
but	CC	*	DSE
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grief	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
anguish	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
lost	VBD	(S(VP*	O
loved	JJ	(NP*	DSE
ones	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(ADVP*	DSE
doubt	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
given	VBN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
relished	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
chance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	ESE
me	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp-X-Ray	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
threatened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
guard	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
talk	VBP	(VP*	DSE
anxiously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
returning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
home	RB	(ADVP*)	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
terrorizing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greater	JJR	*	ESE
purpose	NN	*)	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
merely	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
detaining	VBG	*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violent	JJ	*	ESE
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
federal	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
conducting	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
extensive	JJ	(NP*	O
interviews	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
culling	VBG	(VP*	O
information	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whereabouts	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
future	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tens	NNS	(QP*	O
of	IN	*	O
thousands	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
trained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
camps	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
intelligence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
gathered	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
uncovered	VBN	(VP*	O
potential	JJ	(NP*	DSE
plots	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
embassies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	(NX(NX*	O
plants	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
public	JJ	(NX*	O
water	NN	*	O
facilities	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
caves	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
hideouts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
operatives	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
instruction	NN	(NP*	O
books	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
chemical	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
biological	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
detailed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
maps	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
descriptions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
landmarks	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
work	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
occurring	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
prove	VB	(VP*	ESE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
preventing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
deserve	VBP	(VP*	ESE
appreciation	NN	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
corners	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
globe	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
leading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
every	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
safer	JJR	(ADJP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
appropriate	JJ	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
opinion	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
murderous	JJ	*))))	ESE
thugs	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
lecturing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
better	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
spend	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
reminding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
others	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
terrorists	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
join	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rep.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Vito	NNP	*	O
Fossella	NNP	*)	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NAC*	O
13th	JJ	*)	O
Congressional	NNP	*	O
District	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Staten	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
parts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Brooklyn	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Navy	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
Officer	NNP	*	O
Balances	NNP	*	O
Religious	NNP	*	O
Responsibilities	NNP	*))	O

GUANTANAMO	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
BAY	NNP	*	O
NAVAL	NNP	*	O
BASE	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first-ever	JJ	*	O
American	JJ	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
cleric	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
minister	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
full	JJ	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
suspected	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
confides	VBZ	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Do	VBP	(ROOT(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
secret	NN	*))	O
?	.	*))	O

Or	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
do	VBP	*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
breach	VB	(VP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
confidentiality	NN	*))	O
?	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Abuhena	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	*)	O
you	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
search	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
interest	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crescent	JJ	*	O
moon	NN	*	O
pin	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
stuck	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
left	JJ	*	O
lapel	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lieutenant	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bars	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
uniform	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
`	``	*	O
Give	VB	(S(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(S(VP*	O
tell	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
softly	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
firmly	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
39-year-old	JJ	*	O
life-long	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
practicing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Muslim	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
soft-spoken	JJ	*	O
Bangladesh	NNP	*	O
immigrant	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
navigating	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
uncharted	JJ	(NP*	ESE
waters	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
juggling	VBG	(VP*	O
complicated	JJ	(NP*	O
loyalties	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
while	NN	*)	O
managing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
spotlight	NN	*)	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
experienced	VBN	(VP*	O
before	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
chaplain	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
contacts	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
governed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
confidentiality	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
priest	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
rabbi	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
clergy	NNS	*	O
corps	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saiful-Islam	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
training	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
imam	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
guides	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
faithful	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mosque	NN	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
five-times-a-day	JJ	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
prayer	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-ray	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
serving	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
function	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
muezzin	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
announces	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
call	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
prayer	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
commonly	RB	(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tower	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
minaret	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
case	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
address	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
recording	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
five-times-a-day	JJ	(NP*	O
broadcast	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sometimes	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
laughs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
uncomfortably	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
questioned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sometimes	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
looks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
bewildered	VBN	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
mostly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
busy	JJ	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
soothe	VB	(VP*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sensitivities	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rugged	JJ	*	O
chain-linked-fence	JJ	*	O
cells	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-ray	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Advocate	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

Saiful-Islam	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
center	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
suspected	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Jan.	NNP	(NP*	O
24	CD	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
debut	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
chanting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pre-dawn	JJ	*	O
call	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
prayer	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wake	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
alleged	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
militia	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
network	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
advocate	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
arguing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
safeguard	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
amenities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
everyday	JJ	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
life	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Soon	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
traditional	JJ	(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
knit	NN	*	O
skullcaps	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
top	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
fluorescent	JJ	*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
jumpsuits	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saiful-Islam	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
copies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Koran	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Urdu	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
language	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
plus	CC	*	O
large-type	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Arabic	JJ	*	O
copies	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
bad	JJ	(NP*	O
eyesight	NN	*))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
read	VBP	(S(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
elementary	JJ	(NP*	O
school	NN	*	O
children	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
These	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
away	RB	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
husband	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
father	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nearly	RB	(ADJP*	O
2-year-old	JJ	*)	O
daughter	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
California	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
emerged	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chaplain	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
choice	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
assignment	NN	*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
among	IN	*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
14	CD	*)	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
clerics	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(ADJP*	O
armed	JJ	*)	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(ADJP(NP*	O
only	RB	*)	O
cleric	JJ	*)	O
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
assigned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
--	:	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pendleton	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Calif.	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
recruiters	NNS	*)	O
building	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
chaplains	NN	*	O
corps	NN	*)))	O
spotted	VBD	(VP*	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1993	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enlisted	JJ	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
payroll	NN	*	O
clerk	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
studying	VBG	(VP*	O
part-time	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
cleric	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
commissioned	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	(PP(PP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
obtaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
citizenship	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
nine	CD	(PP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
homeland	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
study	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
theater	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
combat	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
served	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
chaplain	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Operation	NNP	(NP*	O
Brightstar	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
huge	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
exercise	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Egypt	NNP	(NP*)))	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*	O
battleground	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
al-Alamein	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	UH	(ROOT(INTJ*	O
Answers	UH	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
curious	JJ	*	ESE
juxtaposition	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sums	VBZ	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Captives	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-ray	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
spiritual	JJ	(NP*	O
solace	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
though	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
radical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
interpretations	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unorthodox	JJ	*	O
battlefield	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
Great	NNP	*	ESE
Satan	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cause	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
neither	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
religion	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Islam	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
five-hour	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
shifts	NNS	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)))	O
hearing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
requests	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
exchanges	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
dipped	VBN	(VP*	O
that	RB	(ADVP*	O
deeply	RB	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
doctrinal	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mostly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
ask	VBP	(VP*	O
about	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
fate	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
answer	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Conversations	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cleric	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
native	JJ	*	O
Bengali	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Urdu	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
require	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Arabic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
interpreters	NNS	*)	O
--	:	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
battle	NN	(NP*	O
dress	NN	*	O
uniforms	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*	O
no	RB	*)	O
one	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
practicing	NN	*	O
Muslim	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wear	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
uniform	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)))	O
armed	JJ	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
instead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
surprise	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
raise	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
catch	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
designated	VBN	(VP*)	O
spiritual	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
trust	VB	(VP*	DSE
me	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
needs	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
sigh	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Tells	NNP	*	DSE
China	NNP	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Remarks	NNP	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mistake	NNP	*)	ESE
-	:	*	O
Xinhua	NNP	(NP*))))	O

BEIJING	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
mistake	NN	*))))))))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
Xinhua	NNP	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
refer	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))))	O
again	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Xinhua	NNP	(NP*)	O
quoted	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reports	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
newspapers	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Republic	NNP	*	O
of	IN	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
country	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
diplomats	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
business	NN	*	O
executives	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Calling	VBG	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
compromise	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	ESE
pillar	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sino-U.S.	JJ	(NP*))))))))))))))	O

relations	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1979	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
largely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
based	VBN	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
nod	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
One	CD	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
Principle	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
states	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
Reuters	NNP	(NP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
regards	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
wayward	JJ	*	ESE
province	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reunited	JJ	(ADJP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
explanation	NN	*))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
referred	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
***	NNP	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
News	NNP	*	O
***	NN	*)	O
quoted	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
labeling	NNP	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
republic	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
slip	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tongue	NN	*))))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
shift	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
referring	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
entry	NN	*)	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
English-language	JJ	*	O
***	NNP	*	O
Taipei	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*	O
***	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
quoted	VBD	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
welcome	VB	(VP*	DSE
both	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
rough	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
patches	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
angered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
editorial	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
***	NNP	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
***	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	DSE
betrayed	VBN	(ADJP*)	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tang	NNP	*	O
Yiau-Ming	NNP	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
setback	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sino-U.S.	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
both	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
plans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
scheduled	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Vice-President	NNP	*	O
Hu	NNP	*	O
Jintao	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
late	RB	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Takes	NNP	*	O
Great	NNP	*	ESE
Leap	NNP	*	ESE
Forward	NNP	*)	ESE
In	IN	(PP*	O
Pledging	NNP	(NP*	DSE
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Help	NN	*))	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
Defending	NNP	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*))))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
closed-door	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
leap	NN	*)	ESE
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
declared	JJ	*	DSE
policy	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
remain	VBP	(VP*	O
separate	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
so	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
wish	VBP	(VP*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
host	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-day	JJ	*	O
U.S.-Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Frank	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Carlucci	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.-Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Business	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
onetime	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
central	JJ	(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
national	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
adviser	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Reagan	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
later	RB	(NP(NP*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
possibly	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
most	JJS	*	ESE
secretive	JJ	*	ESE
official	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
years	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
so	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
hidden	VBN	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
flaunting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
face	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
sovereignty	NN	(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
protests	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
favoring	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
so	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
enough	RB	(NP*)	O
leaked	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
illuminate	VB	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
consistent	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
ever	RB	(SBAR*	O
since	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
enunciated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
centerpiece	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
defense	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Yao-ming	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*))))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Carter	NNP	*)	O
switched	VBD	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
recognition	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1979	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
Tang	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
invited	VBN	(VP*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
pro-Taiwan	JJ	*)	DSE
posture	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
president	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(QP*	ESE
a	DT	*	O
quarter	NN	*)	O
century	NN	*)))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
stance	NN	*)	DSE
differs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
distinctly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tilted	VBN	(S(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
gathering	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
written	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
moral	JJ	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ever	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
let	VB	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*	O
use	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
cautioned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
expected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
provoking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
asserted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
such	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
talking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
by	IN	(VP(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
means	NNS	*))	ESE
take	VB	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provocative	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exclusive	JJ	*	O
resort	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
St.	NNP	(NP*	O
Petersburg	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
brought	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
representatives	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
contractors	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
Lockheed	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Martin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Boeing	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Northrop	NNP	(NP*	O
Grumman	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Raytheon	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
General	NNP	(NP*	O
Dynamics	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
United	NNP	(NP*	O
Technologies	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Textron	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Honeywell	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
United	NNP	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*)	O
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fend	VB	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expanding	VBG	*	ESE
might	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
immediate	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Adm.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Dennis	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
commands	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pacific	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*)	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
PLA	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Peoples	NNP	(NP*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
years	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
away	RB	(S(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capability	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
hold	VB	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
admiral	NN	*)	O
cautioned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Continued	VBN	(S(NP(NP*	O
improvements	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
capabilities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
USPACOM	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
United	NNP	(NP*	O
States	NNP	*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
capabilities	NNS	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
sufficient	JJ	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
enunciating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
honor	VB	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
promises	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
deny	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Republican	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
platform	NN	*)	O
reflected	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
candidate	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
All	DT	(S(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
future	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
resolved	VBN	(VP*	O
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
agreeable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
attacked	VBD	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
appropriately	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
TRA	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Carter	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
broke	VBD	(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
commits	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
defensive	JJ	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
view	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
grave	JJ	(NP*	ESE
concern	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
referred	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
TRA	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
not-so-subtle	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bedrock	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
posture	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
succinct	JJ	*)	ESE
statement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
confirmation	NN	*	O
hearing	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
demand	VBP	*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(ADJP(NP*)	O
acceptable	JJ	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Shortly	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
approved	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
arms	JJ	*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
destroyers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
diesel-powered	JJ	*	O
submarines	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
12	CD	(NP*	O
anti-submarine	JJ	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flock	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
missiles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
interviewer	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	*	O
circumstances	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
warrant	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
uphold	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spirit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Whatever	WDT	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
decision	NN	(S(NP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
potential	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
critical	JJ	*	ESE
question	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Will	MD	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
noting	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
heed	VB	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(UCP(NP(NP*)	O
warnings	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
or	CC	*	O
will	MD	(S*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
miscalculate	VB	(VP(VP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
bluff	NN	*)))))))	ESE
?	.	*)))))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wins	VBZ	(VP*	O
poll	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
claims	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
rigging	VBG	(NP*)))))))	ESE

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
13	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
long-time	JJ	*	O
ruler	NN	*)	O
Robert	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
swept	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
victory	NN	(NP*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Presidential	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
challenger	VBP	(S(VP*	O
Morgan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
rigged	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unacceptable	JJ	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Registrar	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Tobaiwa	NNP	*	O
Mudede	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
re-elected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
1,685,212	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
1,258,758	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
leader	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)))))))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
...	:	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	O
declare	NNP	(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*)	O
Mugabe	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
office	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
Mudede	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Observers	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
should	MD	(SINV*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
rigged	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
explode	VB	(VP*	ESE
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
volatile	JJ	*	ESE
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(NP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*))	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
armed	JJ	*))	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
moved	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*	O
Bulawayao	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
offices	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
opposition	NN	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
gathered	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Defence	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Sydney	NNP	*	O
Sekeramayi	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
alert	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
roadblocks	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
roads	NNS	*)	O
leading	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
central	JJ	(NP*	O
Harare	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
patrolling	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
stationed	VBN	(VP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*	O
headquarters	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
hand	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
massively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
rigged	VBN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
packed	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
therefore	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
MDC	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
all	DT	(VP(ADVP*	DSE
but	CC	*)	DSE
dismissed	VBD	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
before	IN	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
threatening	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
internationally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
isolated	VBN	*	ESE
despite	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

British	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
`	``	(NP*	O
pretty	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*)	ESE
'	''	*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
`	``	*	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
'	''	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vote	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
would	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
`	``	*	O
enormous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
implications	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Lynn	NNP	*	O
Cassel	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
`	``	*	O
While	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
wait	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
results	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
abundantly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
seriously	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	ESE
flawed	VBN	*)	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
later	JJ	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
afterwards	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(SINV(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
executive	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
...	:	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reaction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
party	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
David	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Coltart	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
MP	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
To	TO	(S(S(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
mildly	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
odd	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
very	RB	(NP(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
low	JJ	*)	O
turnouts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
massive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Polling	VBG	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reduced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
32	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
favour	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
voting	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
outlets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*	O
base	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
882,176	CD	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
registered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
439,656	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
or	CC	*	O
49.8	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
began	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
mile-long	JJ	(NP*	O
queues	NNS	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
charging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
followed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deliberate	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
strategy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
impeding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
urban	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extra	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
voting	NN	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
polls	NNS	(S(S(NP*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
late	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
only	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
24,000	CD	*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
cast	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hardest	RBS	*	O
fought	JJ	*	O
battle	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
post	NN	*)))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
liberation	NN	(S(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
hero	NN	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
preceded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
government-orchestrated	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*)	O
meant	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
intimidate	VB	(VP*	ESE
voters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
and	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
harassed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
prevented	VBN	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
campaigning	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Turnout	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
estimated	VBN	*	DSE
66	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
fraught	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
intimidation	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
intense	JJ	*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
wrangling	NN	*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
civic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
electoral	JJ	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
kept	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
charging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
MDC	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Welshman	NNP	*	O
Ncube	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
treason	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
smear	NN	*	ESE
tactic	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ncube	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
top	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
plotting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assassinate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
tumultuous	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
grabbed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
headlines	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
sparked	VBD	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rows	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
landed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Violence	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
claimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
33	CD	*)	O
lives	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
influential	JJ	*	ESE
International	NNP	*	O
Crisis	NNPS	*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ICG	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
major	JJ	(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*	O
erupting	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
exceedingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
high	JJ	*	ESE
'	''	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
rigged	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
polls	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
unfairly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
West	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rob-ert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
swept	VBD	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
fiercely	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
condemned	VBD	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
local	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NN	*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
African	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Opposition	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
easily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
beaten	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
veteran	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*))	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
preventing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	O
of	IN	*	O
thousands	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
voting	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
extending	VBG	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
22-year	JJ	*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
fundamentally	RB	*	ESE
flawed	VBN	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
ignored	VBN	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*)	O
poll	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
held	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	O
split	NN	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
African	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
monitoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
closed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
ranks	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
behind	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Registrar-General	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tobaiwa	NNP	*	O
Mudede	NNP	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
results	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
120	CD	*	O
constituencies	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
guerilla	NN	*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
leader	NN	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
1,685,212	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
1,258,401	CD	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
accept	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
results	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
...	:	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
reflect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
will	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
consequently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
illegitimate	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Norwegian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
local	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
thousands	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
strongholds	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
prevented	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
voting	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*)))	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*)	O
together	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
comprise	VBP	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
deemed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
alert	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
erected	VBD	(VP*	O
roadblocks	NNS	(NP*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
dozens	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heavily	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
armed	JJ	*)	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
office	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bulawayo	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Small	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
armed	JJ	(NP*	O
riot	NN	*	O
police	NNS	*)))	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
townships	NNS	*)	O
loyal	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
hundred	CD	*	O
Mugabe	JJ	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
danced	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
celebration	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
mock	JJ	(NP*	O
coffins	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
townships	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coffins	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
draped	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
flag	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
criticism	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Information	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jonathan	NNP	*	O
Moyo	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blow	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
British	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
sponsoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	NN	*	O
power	NN	*	O
Britain	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
systematic	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Wins	NNPS	*)	O
Despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
Biased	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Propaganda	NNP	*))))	ESE

TEHRAN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
easily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
won	VBD	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
biased	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
propaganda	NN	*)	ESE
unleashed	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
unfair	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Results	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Registrar-General	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tobaiwa	NNP	*	O
Mudede	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
0800	NNP	(NP*	O
GMT	NNP	*))))))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
1,634,382	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
well	RB	*	ESE
past	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ballots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
cast	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
needed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
extend	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
22-year	JJ	*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(ADVP(NP*)	O
more	RBR	*))	O
year	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
challenger	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
unionist	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
trailed	VBD	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(QP*	O
half	PDT	*))	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
behind	IN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mudede	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
3.1	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
voted	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-day	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
fears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violent	JJ	*	DSE
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	(S(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
alert	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
police	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
road	NN	(NP*	O
blocks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
approach	NN	(NP*	O
roads	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
Harare	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Australia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
feared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
violence	NN	(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
voters	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canberra	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Three-Nation	NNP	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
destroyed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
once	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
prosperous	JJ	*)	ESE
nation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
systematically	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
stealing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hide	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	DSE
unpopularity	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Reuters	NNP	(NP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
dismissed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
criticism	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Information	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jonathan	NNP	*	O
Moyo	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(INTJ*	ESE
exemplary	UH	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Western	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
queued	VBD	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
condemn	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
78-year-old	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
faced	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
real	JJ	*	O
challenge	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
condemning	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
urban	JJ	*	O
strongholds	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
flawed	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
riddled	JJ	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
irregularities	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Australia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Britain	NNP	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unsuccessful	JJ	*	O
call	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
commonwealth	NN	(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
commonwealth	NN	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Harsh	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	ESE
detention	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O

Taleban	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
tough	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
detention	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
isolated	VBN	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
outpost	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
edge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Cuba	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
housed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
measuring	VBG	(VP*	O
1.8	CD	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2.4	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
metres	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
open	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
chain-link	JJ	*	O
walls	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
floor	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
wooden	JJ	(NP*	O
roof	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
face	VBP	(VP*	O
intense	JJ	(NP*	ESE
interrogation	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
anxious	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
track	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
Osama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alleged	VBN	*	ESE
mastermind	NN	*)	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	JJ	*	O
prisoner-of-war	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
meaning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
heard	VBN	(VP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
sovereign	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
appeal	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
federal	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
Are	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(SQ(NP*)	O
kennels	VBZ	(VP*))	ESE
?	.	*	O
'	''	*))	DSE

Jeffrey	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kofman	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
journalist	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
very	RB	*	ESE
minimal	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
floors	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
wooden	JJ	(NP*	O
roofs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
wire	NN	(NP*	O
mesh	NN	*	O
walls	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prisoners	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
foam	NN	*)	O
mat	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sleep	VB	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
towels	NNS	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
washing	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*))))))	O
mat	NN	*))	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
chamber	NN	(NP*	O
pot	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
far	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
bares	JJ	*)	ESE
bones	NNS	*	ESE
facility	NN	*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
frankly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
expected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
say	VBP	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
really	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
cages	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
...	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(PRN(S*	O
One	CD	(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
`	``	*	O
Are	WP	(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(SQ(NP*)	O
kennels	VBZ	(VP*))	ESE
?	.	*))	O
'	''	*)	O
,	,	*))	O

to	TO	(ROOT(FRAG(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
`	``	*	O
No	UH	(S(S(INTJ*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
kennels	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bounds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
operating	VBG	(VP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
humane	JJ	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
offering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
comfort	NN	(NP*)	ESE
'	''	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

International	JJ	(ROOT(NP*	O
concern	NN	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
Amnesty	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
cages	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
accommodation	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
fall	VB	(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	ESE
minimum	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
humane	NN	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*	O
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*))))	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	ESE
elements	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*))))	O
''	''	*)))	O
-	:	*))	O
wore	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
goggles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
tape	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
tied	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wore	VBD	(VP*	O
leg	NN	(NP*	O
shackles	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
wore	VBD	(VP*	O
surgical	JJ	(NP*	O
masks	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
tested	VBN	(VP*	O
positive	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
tuberculosis	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
at	IN	(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
one	CD	*)	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
sedated	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
spend	VB	(VP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
separated	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
meals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
showers	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
recreation	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pray	VB	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
faith	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mosquitoes	NNS	(ROOT(NP*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
gets	VBZ	(VP*	O
chilly	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
night	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
swarms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mosquitoes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
servicemen	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))	O
-	:	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
mangrove	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
swamps	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
salt	NN	(NP*	O
marshes	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
dense	JJ	(NP*	O
bush	NN	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
sea	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
shark-infested	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
perimeters	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
lit	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
night	NN	(NP*)))	O
-	:	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
watchtowers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
fences	NNS	*)	O
topped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
razor	NN	(NP(NP*	O
wire	NN	*)	O
constantly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
patrolled	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
heavily	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
armed	JJ	*)	O
marines	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
night	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
lit	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
halogen	NN	(NP*	O
floodlights	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Members	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tried	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
women	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
disconcerted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
women	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
intention	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
comfortable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP*	O
Brigadier-General	NNP	*	O
Michael	NNP	*	O
Lehnert	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Reuters	NNP	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
humane	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Hundreds	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
marines	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
police	NNS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
compound	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
house	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
2,000	CD	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

American	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
marines	NNS	*)	O
landed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Spanish-American	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1898	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
1903	CD	*	O
treaty	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Fidel	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Communists	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1959	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Dwight	NNP	*	O
Eisenhower	NNP	*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
relinquish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
objections	NNS	*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Havana	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rent	NN	*)))))))	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
set	VBN	(S(VP*	O
100	CD	(PP(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
at	IN	*	O
2,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
gold	JJ	*	O
coins	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
worth	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
4,000	CD	*))))))	O
-	:	*)	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cash	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cheques	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cuban	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Frontier	NNP	*	O
Battalion	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
watch	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
counterparts	NNS	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
28-kilometre	JJ	*	O
fence	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
tension	NN	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
diminished	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cold	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hunt	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*)))	O

American	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
named	VBN	(VP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
captured	VBN	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
frustration	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
grows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
slipping	VBG	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
net	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
questioned	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*)	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
turned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
only	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
homes	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mullah	NNP	*	O
Nuruddin	NNP	*	O
Turabi	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
close	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taleban	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Mullah	NNP	*	O
Omar	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mullah	NNP	*	O
Ubaidullah	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Industry	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mullah	NNP	*	O
Saadudin	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
eager	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
question	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
may	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
vital	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
clues	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whereabouts	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mullah	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Omar	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
hunt	NN	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
himself	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Mullah	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Omar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
escaped	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
motorbike	NN	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
suspected	VBN	*	O
hideout	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(SINV*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wanted	VBN	*	O
list	NN	*))	O
are	VBP	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
lieutenants	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
evaded	VBN	(VP*	O
capture	VB	(S(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
Ayman	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
al-Zawahri	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Egyptian	JJ	*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Jihad	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Bin	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
close	JJ	*	O
adviser	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
personal	JJ	(NP*	O
doctor	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Policy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*	O
Signals	NNPS	*	O
Shift	NNP	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Approach	NNP	(NP*))))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan.	NNP	*	O
4	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Seven	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Bill	NNP	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
advisers	NNS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
Mexico	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
hours	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
away	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
default	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
perhaps	RB	(NP*	ESE
chaos	NN	*)))))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unpopular	JJ	*	O
multibillion-dollar	JJ	*	O
bailout	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
objections	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
with	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prominent	JJ	*	O
Republican	JJ	*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Texas	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
barreled	VBD	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
default	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bailout	NN	*	O
call	NN	*))))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
let	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
suffer	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
mismanagement	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
argue	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
somewhat	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Mexico	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
reforms	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
needed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
time	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cash	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
heeded	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
repeated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
warnings	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
leading	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	ESE
disaster	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reaction	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
telling	JJ	*	ESE
example	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
-	:	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
perhaps	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
risky	JJ	*)	ESE
-	:	*)	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
bankruptcies	NNS	*))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
dominated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
dealings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
emerging	VBG	*	O
markets	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
1990	CD	*	O
's	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
fearing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
contagion	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
back	VB	(VP*	O
loans	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
teetering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
governments	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
some	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	O
tough	JJ	(NP*	ESE
love	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
meant	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reverse	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
expectation	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
capitals	NNP	(NP*)))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
big	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
enough	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
strategically	RB	(ADVP*	O
important	JJ	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
fiscal	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
collapse	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
just	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
such	PDT	*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
tested	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Turkey	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
ran	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
deep	JJ	(NP*	O
trouble	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
spring	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
abandon	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
well-located	JJ	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
seemed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
medicine	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
prescribed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bailout	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
fair	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
consistent	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
hard	JJ	*	O
line	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
White	NNP	(S(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Treasury	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
calculated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
under	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reluctant	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
financial	JJ	*)	ESE
firefighter	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
bet	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bailout	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
message	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
interviews	NNS	(NP*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
would	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
force	VB	(VP*	ESE
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
without	IN	(PP(PP*	O
relying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
much	RB	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
huge	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*	O
packages	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
became	VBD	(S(VP*	O
commonplace	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
It	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
approach	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
needed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
approach	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
John	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
B.	NNP	*	O
Taylor	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
undersecretary	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Treasury	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
does	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
bail	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
bondholders	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
improves	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
market	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
aspects	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Treasury	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
era	NN	*)))	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
shied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
away	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
dispensing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
steady	JJ	*	DSE
stream	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
advice	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
condition	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
contrast	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentina	NNP	*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Treasury	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
H.	NNP	*	O
O'Neill	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
nearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
invisible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
rarely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
commenting	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
approaching	VBN	*	O
default	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violent	JJ	*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBN	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Officials	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
O'Neill	NNP	*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
loans	NNS	*))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
failed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fund	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
fiscal	JJ	(NP*	O
restraint	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
message	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Eduardo	NNP	(NP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
straightforward	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
Come	VB	(FRAG(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
workable	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
talk	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
talked	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
specific	JJ	(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*))	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
expected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
familiar	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
periodic	JJ	*	O
calls	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
letters	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R?d	NNP	*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
successors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(NP*)	O
wo	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
having	VBG	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kinds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
conversations	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
works	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
approach	NN	*)	O
carries	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
considerable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
risk	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
abandon	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
free-market	JJ	*	O
leanings	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
tight	RB	(ADVP*)	O
fiscal	JJ	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
banking	NN	*)	O
controls	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
embraced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
support	NN	*))	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
decade	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
considerable	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
doubt	NN	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hemispheric	JJ	(NP*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*))))))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R	NNP	*)	O
?	.	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
side	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
last	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	DSE
goal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	CC	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fund	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*	O
shareholder	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	DSE
sharp	JJ	*	DSE
criticism	NN	*))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
denying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
new	JJ	(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
previously	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
approving	VBG	(VP*	DSE
aid	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
loan	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
O'Neill	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
close	JJ	*	O
supervision	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pull	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plug	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
argue	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
callous	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
abandoning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
ally	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sensitive	JJ	*	ESE
moment	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
some	DT	(NP*)	O
argue	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	PDT	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
acted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
sooner	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
steer	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
doomed	JJ	*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1-to-1	JJ	*	O
peg	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
administration	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
respond	NN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
aided	VBD	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
reform	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
pulled	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plug	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
became	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
collapse	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*	O
sooner	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
later	RB	*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
spending	VBG	(VP*	O
billions	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
more	JJR	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
inevitable	JJ	*)	ESE
happened	VBD	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
longtime	JJ	*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)))	O
applauded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stance	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
left-wing	JJ	*	O
anti-globalization	JJ	*	O
activists	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
conservative	JJ	*	O
economists	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
argued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
interventionist	JJ	*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
allowed	VBD	(VP*	O
investors	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
reckless	JJ	(NP*	ESE
bets	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
assumption	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
lending	NN	(S(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
rescue	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
things	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
hopeful	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
transition	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
lenders	NNS	*)	O
learn	VBP	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
risk	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Allan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
H.	NNP	*	O
Meltzer	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Carnegie	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mellon	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
headed	VBD	(S(VP*)))))))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Congressional	JJ	*	O
panel	NN	*)	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
advocated	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
sweeping	JJ	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
ca	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
throwing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
money	NN	(NP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
problems	NNS	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
hope	VBP	(VP*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Chaos	NNP	*	O
Raises	NNP	*	DSE
New	NNP	*)	DSE
Doubts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monetary	NNP	(NP*	O
Fund	NNP	*)))))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deadly	JJ	*	ESE
riots	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
collapse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
multibillion	JJ	*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
bailout	NN	*)	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	ESE
awry	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
fresh	JJ	(NP*	DSE
questions	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
effectiveness	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fund	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leading	VBG	*	O
shareholder	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Latin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	O
protesters	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Aires	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Wall	NNP	(NP*	O
Street	NNP	*	O
traders	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(NP(NP(ADVP*	DSE
least	JJS	*)	DSE
part	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
blame	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
problems	NNS	*)))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lending	VBG	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administrations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
callousness	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
failing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	(NP*	O
approval	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
forcing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
painful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
austerity	NN	*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
opposite	JJ	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
repeatedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
offering	VBG	(VP*	O
loans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
indications	NNS	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
unworkable	JJ	(S(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
delaying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
reckoning	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
criticisms	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
if	IN	(ADJP*	ESE
contradictory	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
increase	VBP	(VP*	O
pressure	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
articulate	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rescue	NN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
often	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
fire	NN	(NP*)))))))	DSE
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
when	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
judged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
successful	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Treasury	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
H.	NNP	*	O
O'Neill	NNP	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
publicly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
denouncing	VBG	*	DSE
multibillion	JJ	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
bailouts	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
either	RB	(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
fail	VBP	(VP*	ESE
outright	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
allow	VBP	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
bad	JJ	(NP*	ESE
policymaking	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
investors	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
bad	JJ	(NP*	ESE
bets	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
practice	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
stance	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
bailouts	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
low	JJ	*	DSE
priority	NN	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Peru	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
finance	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Pedro	NNP	(NP*	O
Pablo	NNP	*	O
Kuczynski	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
complained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
bungled	VBD	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
dealings	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
adopting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
inconsistent	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
turns	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
passive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
inflexible	JJ	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
partly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
blame	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
sound	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
alarm	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hard	JJ	*)	ESE
line	NN	*))))))))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
things	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
incredibly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Peruvian	JJ	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hubert	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Vedrine	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
assailed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
abandoning	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
longtime	JJ	*	ESE
client	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
imposing	VBG	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
demands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
excessive	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
like	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
significant	JJ	(NP*	O
fund	NN	*	O
shareholders	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
lending	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
step	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
recover	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hand-wringing	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
jeopardizing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
plumbers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
carpenters	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
O'Neill	NNP	*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
multibillion	NN	*	O
loan	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
backed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
two	CD	(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
rescue	NN	*	O
packages	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
faced	VBN	(VP*	O
tough	JJ	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
worsened	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
take	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
firm	NN	*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
make	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
call	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
withholding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
additional	JJ	(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fund	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deliberations	NNS	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
harshest	JJ	*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)))	O
put	VBD	(VP*	DSE
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
blame	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
current	JJ	*	O
plight	NN	*)))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
succession	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
governments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
many	DT	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
called	VBN	(VP*	ESE
government	NN	(NP*	ESE
officials	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
account	VB	(VP*	ESE
sooner	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
adopted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
strict	JJ	*	O
fixed	VBN	*	O
-	NN	*	O
currency	NN	*	O
regime	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
overhauled	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
1990	CD	*	O
's	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
tamed	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
inflation	NN	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
became	VBD	(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spell	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
glowing	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
success	NN	*	ESE
story	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
subsequent	JJ	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
allowed	VBD	(VP*	O
spending	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grow	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
control	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
building	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
became	VBD	(S(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
maintain	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	O
recession	NN	*))	O
four	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
beseeched	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
help	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
solvent	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Backed	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administrations	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
twice	RB	(ADVP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rescue	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
beginning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
late	RB	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
fixed	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
touchstone	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
avoiding	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
default	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
132	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
wrenching	VBG	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
slash	VB	(VP*	O
spending	NN	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	O
recession	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
debt	NN	(NP*	O
payments	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
schedule	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
core	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
right	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
avoided	VBN	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Charles	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Calomiris	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
finance	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economics	NNS	*	O
professor	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Columbia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
sounding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
alarm	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	(S*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
both	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administrations	NNS	*))	O
let	VBD	(VP*))	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
stay	VBP	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
denial	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fall	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
someone	NN	(NP(NP*	O
else	RB	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
watch	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
tough	JJ	*	ESE
call	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
aid	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Calomiris	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	O
delaying	VBG	(S(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
helped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
dig	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
deeper	JJR	*	ESE
hole	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
show	VB	(VP(VP*	O
leadership	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
happen	VB	(VP*	O
early	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
face	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
catastrophe	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Michael	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mussa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chief	JJ	*	O
economist	NN	*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
spring	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
justified	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
late	RB	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
disagreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
likely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
deteriorated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
repair	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
saying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
no	UH	(INTJ*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mussa	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
situation	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
controllable	JJ	*)	ESE
then	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
difficulty	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	O
calls	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
easier	JJR	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
hindsight	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mussa	NNP	*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
even	RB	(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
when	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
stable	JJ	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
delay	VB	(VP(VP*	O
debt	NN	(NP*	O
payments	NNS	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
devalue	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*))))))	O
ran	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
risk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rattling	VBG	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
markets	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
implosion	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
contrast	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
watching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
wrestle	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
finances	NNS	*)))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
anticipated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
default	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contagion	NN	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
viewed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(S(ADJP*	O
minimal	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
place	VB	(VP*	ESE
blame	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)))	O
squarely	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
much	RB	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	VBG	(S(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
objections	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fund	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economists	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
August	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	(NP*	O
headquarters	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
fund	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Domingo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
off	RP	*	ESE
delaying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
debt	NN	(NP*	O
payments	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
debts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
fixed	VBN	*	O
currency	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
fulfilling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
viewed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
promise	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
years	NNS	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
pesos	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
good	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
outlined	VBD	(VP*	O
strict	JJ	(NP*	O
fiscal	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
would	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
obligations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
resorted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
freezing	JJ	(NP*	O
bank	NN	*	O
accounts	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
raiding	NN	*	O
pension	NN	*	O
funds	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
enough	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
hard	JJ	*)	O
currency	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
debt	NN	(NP*	O
payments	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
collapse	NN	(NP*)	ESE
looked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
imminent	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fund	NN	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
little	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
success	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
unique	JJ	(NP*	O
elements	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
demise	NN	*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
certain	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
add	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
doubts	NNS	*))	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wisdom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bailouts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
doubts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
grown	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nearly	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
every	DT	*	O
major	JJ	*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
rescue	NN	*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Thailand	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
South	JJ	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Brazil	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
intense	JJ	(NP*	O
scrutiny	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
left	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
albeit	IN	(ADVP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
widely	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
varying	VBN	*)	O
reasons	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fund	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
privately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
bailouts	NNS	*)	O
altogether	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
lesson	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
no	UH	(INTJ*)	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
helping	VBG	(VP*	O
take	VB	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Plan	NNP	*	O
Expected	NNP	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Slow	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Not	RB	*	O
Halt	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Gas	NNP	*	O
Emission	NNP	*	O
Rise	NNP	*)))))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*	O
today	NN	*)	O
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
voluntary	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
slow	VB	(VP(VP*)	O
but	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
halt	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heat-trapping	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
White	NNP	(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
night	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
accepted	VBN	(VP(VP*)	DSE
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
yet	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
ratified	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
large	JJ	*	O
industrialized	VBN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
require	VB	(VP*	O
cuts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
well	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*	O
levels	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
arbitrary	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
schedule	NN	*)	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
costly	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
easily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*))	O
unfair	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
afternoon	NN	*))))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
slow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
growth	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
overall	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
4.6	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
tax	NN	(NP(NP*	O
credits	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
five	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
encourage	VB	(VP*	DSE
companies	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
individuals	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
limit	VB	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Utilities	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
incentives	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
power-generating	JJ	(NP*	O
windmills	NNS	*)))))))	O
;	:	*	O
homeowners	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
tax	NN	*	O
credits	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
buying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
solar	JJ	(NP(UCP(NP*	O
panels	NNS	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
efficient	JJ	*))	O
cars	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
require	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
anybody	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
sticking	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
held	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)))	O
year	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
firm	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
limits	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
drag	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
economy	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
approach	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
on	IN	(SBAR(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
common-sense	JJ	*	ESE
idea	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	*	O
sustainable	JJ	(S(NP(ADJP*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
growth	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
progress	NN	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
growth	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
provides	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
resources	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
clean	JJ	(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
advance	NN	*	O
text	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
unrelated	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
aides	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
today	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
mandatory	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
kinds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pollutants	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
mercury	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
sulfur	NN	*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
nitrogen	NN	*	O
oxides	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
contrast	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
proposals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
environmentalists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Democrats	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
delay	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
cuts	NNS	*)	O
until	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
administration	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
voluntary	JJ	*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*)	ESE
path	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
being	VBG	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
say	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
insufficient	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
progress	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
limits	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
progress	NN	(NP*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
goal	NN	*))))))	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
programs	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
checkup	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
puts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
measuring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
progress	NN	(NP*))))	O
until	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
after	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RB	(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proposed	VBN	*	O
target	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
drop	VB	(VP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
18	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
151	JJ	(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
1	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
gross	JJ	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
product	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
183	CD	(NP*	O
metric	JJ	*	O
tons	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
sharply	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
yardstick	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existing	VBG	*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*)	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	O
efficiently	RB	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
adding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
as	RB	(S(SBAR*	ESE
long	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
grows	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
result	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*	O
reductions	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Alluding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
date	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Jennifer	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Morgan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Wildlife	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
valentine	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
coal	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
oil	NN	*	ESE
industry	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
emissions	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
increase	VB	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
frame	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
eternally	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
provision	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
greatly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
expand	VB	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
encouraging	VBG	(VP*	O
businesses	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
report	VB	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
participate	VBP	(S(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
voluntarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
credits	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	O
eventually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trading	NN	*	O
scheme	NN	*)	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
pollution	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

White	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
prompt	VB	(VP*	ESE
industries	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
behavior	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
similar	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
reporting	NN	*	O
requirements	NNS	*)	O
instituted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
1980	CD	*))))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
resulted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
big	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cuts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
releases	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
toxic	JJ	(NP*	O
chemicals	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Philip	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
E.	NNP	*	O
Clapp	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Environmental	NNP	*	O
Trust	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
lobbying	NN	*	O
group	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
faith-based	JJ	*	ESE
initiative	NN	*))))))	ESE
:	:	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
faith	NN	(NP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
major	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
corporations	NNS	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
line	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
volunteer	VB	(VP*	ESE
cuts	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
pollution	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
approach	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
failed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
decade	NN	*))	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
father	NN	*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
voluntary	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Myron	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ebell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Competitive	NNP	*	O
Enterprise	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
-	NN	*)	DSE
market	NN	(S(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
frequently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
embraced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
industry	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposite	JJ	*	O
ideological	JJ	*	O
direction	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
looks	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
voluntary	JJ	(NP*)))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
coercive	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Ebell	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
leaving	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
pressure	NN	(NP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
present	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
avoided	VBN	(VP*	O
criticizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
rejection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
eager	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sign	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
treaty	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
likely	RB	*)	ESE
influenced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
proposed	VBN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
nongreenhouse	JJ	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
mercury	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
sulfur	NN	(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
nitrogen	NN	(NP*	O
oxides	NNS	*))	O
-	:	*))	O
would	MD	(VP(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
mandatory	JJ	(NP*	O
limits	NNS	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
companies	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
exceed	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
buying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
credits	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reduce	VB	(S(VP*	O
pollution	NN	(NP*)	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
required	JJ	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
limits	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
emissions	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
face	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
lobbying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
coal	NN	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
utilities	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
abandoned	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
campaign	NN	*	DSE
pledge	NN	*)	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
four	CD	*	O
plant	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
shown	VBN	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
signs	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
reconsidering	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
hints	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
emerging	VBG	*	O
plan	NN	*)))	O
circulated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
e-mail	JJ	(NP*	O
messages	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
conservative	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
pleased	JJ	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
pressing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
revise	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
plant	NN	*	O
rules	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
best	JJS	*	ESE
news	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*)	ESE
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
table	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
At	IN	(S(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
coming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
something	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
everyone	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
wants	VBZ	(VP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
recognizes	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
plant	NN	*	O
bill	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Rumsfeld	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Defends	NNP	*	DSE
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Treatment	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Detainees	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jan.	NNP	(NP*	O
22	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Frustrated	NNP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
outcry	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
H.	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)))	O
defended	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
length	NN	(NP*))	O
today	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
breathless	JJ	(NP*	ESE
armchair	NN	*	ESE
hyperbole	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
telling	VBG	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
inch	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
my	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
body	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
truth	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
spent	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
secure	JJ	(NP*	O
video	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
down	RB	(ADVP*	O
there	RB	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
158	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
jailed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
found	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	ESE
scrap	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
information	NN	(NP*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
suggests	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
anyone	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
humanely	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unusual	JJ	*	O
briefing	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
stretched	VBN	(S(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hour	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
tap	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
hyperbole	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
prompted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
rising	VBG	*	DSE
tide	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*))))	DSE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
photographs	NNS	(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
showed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
kneeling	VBG	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
captors	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
legs	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
shackles	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
bound	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
manacles	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
mouths	NNS	*)	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
surgical	JJ	(NP*	O
masks	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
eyes	NNS	*)	O
blinded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
black	JJ	(NP*	O
tape	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
criticism	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
swelled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Critics	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
sensory	JJ	(NP*	O
deprivation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
psychological	JJ	*	O
control	NN	*	O
techniques	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
weaken	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
interrogations	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
fruitful	JJ	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rare	JJ	*	O
break	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
code	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	DSE
publicly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
criticizing	VBG	*	DSE
detaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
governments	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
violated	VBN	(VP*	O
Geneva	NNP	(NP*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
rules	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
making	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spectacle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
distributing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Amnesty	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
lawyers	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Keeping	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
incommunicado	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
sensory	JJ	(NP*	ESE
deprivation	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unnecessary	JJ	(NP*	ESE
restraint	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
humiliation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
people	NNS	(NP*))))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
tactics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
shaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
classic	JJ	*	O
techniques	NNS	*)	O
employed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
break	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
individuals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
interrogation	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
chorus	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
granted	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
accord	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
protections	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Javier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Solana	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Sept.	NNP	(ADJP*	ESE
11	CD	*)	ESE
atrocities	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
changing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
values	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
life	NN	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
victory	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Netherlands	NNPS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fight	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
uphold	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
norms	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
values	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
debate	NN	(S(NP*)	O
raged	VBD	(VP*	O
elsewhere	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Spain	NNP	*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prime	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
office	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
British	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
center	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
complaints	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Spanish	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Josep	NNP	*	O
Pique	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
slightest	JJS	*	DSE
doubt	NN	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
warden	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Col.	NNP	(NP*	O
Terry	NNP	*	O
Carrico	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
times	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	O
positive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
control	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bill	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nash	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
retired	JJ	*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
major	JJ	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fellow	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
imposing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
psychological	JJ	*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
isolation	NN	(NP*	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
domination	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
futility	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
then	RB	*	O
reward	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
oppose	VBP	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
punish	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
probably	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unfortunate	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
photographs	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
explanation	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
photographed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
holding	VBG	*	O
area	NN	*))	O
just	RB	(SBAR*	O
before	IN	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
restraints	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
removed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cages	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
think	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
whenever	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
those	DT	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
suicidal	JJ	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
sense	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lock	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
restraints	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SQ*	O
When	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
restrained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
less	RBR	(ADJP*	O
likely	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
soldier	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
bet	VBD	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Is	VBZ	(ROOT(SQ*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

No	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*	ESE
.	.	*)	O
Would	MD	(SQ*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
stupid	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(S(NP*)	O
else	RB	(ADJP*))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Yes	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
designated	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
since	IN	*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
essentially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
limbo	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Michael	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
F.	NNP	*	O
Noone	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
professor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Catholic	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
moving	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
screening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
determining	VBG	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
or	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
P.O.W.	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
explanation	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
delay	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
clear	JJ	*	ESE
priority	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
extract	VB	(VP*	O
information	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
These	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
committed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
keeping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
off	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
street	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
out	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
airlines	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
out	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*	ESE
plants	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
out	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
ports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
across	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
across	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
interrogation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
lawyers	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
benefit	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
gets	VBZ	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
classifying	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
enough	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
technicalities	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
question	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gathering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
information	NN	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
concluded	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
one	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
complicating	VBG	*	ESE
factors	NNS	*)))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNP	*)	O
give	VBP	(VP*	O
protection	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Al	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
belong	VBP	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
To	TO	(S(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
standing	NN	(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
drop	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*	ESE
school	NN	*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
worry	NN	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
precedent	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Officials	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
come	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
-	:	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Yemen	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Saudi	NNP	*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
-	:	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
complicated	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
picture	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Los	NNP	(NP*	O
Angeles	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
district	NN	*	O
judge	NN	*)	O
questioned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
today	NN	(NP*)	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
authority	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consider	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
challenge	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
grave	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
doubts	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
jurisdiction	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
judge	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
A.	NNP	(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*	O
Matz	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hearing	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
petition	NN	*)	O
filed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
lawyers	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
clerics	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
professors	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
demand	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
identified	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
court	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
Prisoners	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Detained	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*	O
Join	NNP	*	O
Hunger	NNP	*	O
Strike	NN	*)))))	O

Strike	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
Triggered	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
TurbanAccording	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hunger	NN	*	O
striker	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
triggered	JJ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
turban	NN	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainee	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
head	NN	*)))))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
praying	VBG	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
turban	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
conceal	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Criticized	NNP	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Treating	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Detainees	NNPS	*	O
InhumanelyAs	NNP	*)	ESE
more	JJR	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
inmates	NNS	*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hunger	NN	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
chanted	VBD	(VP*	O
rhythmically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prison	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
strengthened	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	O
heavy	JJ	*)	O
security	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prison	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
precautions	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
bowed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
still	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
refused	VBD	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Closely	NNP	*)	O
Monitoring	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Situation	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
escalating	JJ	(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wave	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bloody	JJ	(NP*	O
street	NN	*	O
violence	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
looting	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
valued	JJ	*	ESE
ally	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
friend	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP*	O
developments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
White	NNP	(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Ari	NNP	*	O
Fleischer	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
briefing	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentine	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
De	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
siege	NN	(NP*)))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
night	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
additional	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
violence	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
six	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
wounded	VBN	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
arrested	VBN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
worst	JJS	*	ESE
unrest	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Angry	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Vote	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
Bars	NNPS	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)))))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
19	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Flanked	VBN	(S(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
yearlong	JJ	*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
54	CD	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
colonies	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
unusual	JJ	*	O
step	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
meant	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
punish	VB	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
stewardship	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
widely	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
outside	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
rigged	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Thabo	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
maintained	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cryptic	JJ	*	O
silence	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
endorsing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
avoiding	VBG	(VP*	O
embroilment	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
view	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
illegitimate	JJ	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
less	JJR	(FRAG(ADJP*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
expulsion	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
deepened	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
isolation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
battered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
hunger	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
labor	NN	(NP*	O
unrest	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
barred	VBN	(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
meetings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
carries	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
cachet	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
club	NN	*)	O
bridging	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
north-south	JJ	*	O
divide	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
met	VBD	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
deciding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commomwealth	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
response	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
headquarters	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marlborough	NNP	(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
acute	JJ	*	DSE
dilemma	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*))	O
-	:	*	O
both	DT	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
whose	WP$	(WHNP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
past	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
undemocratic	JJ	*)	O
regimes	NNS	*))	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
excluded	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))))	O
-	:	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
torn	VBN	(VP*	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
solidarity	NN	(NP*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fellow	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
crusader	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
colonialism	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
standards	NNS	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	JJ	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
regeneration	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-nation	JJ	*	O
committee	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
avoids	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
open	JJ	*	O
rift	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
majority	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Asia	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
tended	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
side	NN	(NP*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rich	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
white-ruled	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
adds	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
voice	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
labeling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
pariah	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
increasing	VBG	(NP(NP*	DSE
pressure	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
reconciliation	NN	(NP*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
opprobrium	NN	*)	ESE
spread	VBD	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Switzerland	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manipulation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ongoing	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	JJS	*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
barred	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
travel	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
councils	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
immediate	JJ	(NP*	O
effect	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
reading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
face-saving	JJ	*	ESE
gesture	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
own	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
behavior	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
outsiders	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
token	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
own	JJ	*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fostering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
renewal	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Monterrey	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Mexico	NNP	*	O
,	,	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
financier	NN	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Soros	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
cast	VBN	(VP*	ESE
doubt	NN	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
suitable	JJ	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
act	NN	*))))))	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
severe	JJ	*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
available	JJ	(NP*	O
punishments	NNS	*))))	O
-	:	*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
sharpened	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
defeated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
doubt	NN	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
all	DT	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
suggestions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
easing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
drastic	JJ	*	O
food	NN	*	O
shortages	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
moves	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
violent	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seizure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
farmers	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
land	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
backing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
redistribute	VB	(VP*	O
territory	NN	(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
landless	JJ	(NP*	O
black	JJ	*	O
Zimbabweans	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intended	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
door	NN	*)	O
open	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
dialogue	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Land	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
core	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lift	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ineffective	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
nonetheless	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sought	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
project	VB	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arbiter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
often	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
delinquent	JJ	*)	ESE
members	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
60	CD	*	O
's	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
white-ruled	JJ	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
quit	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*))	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
apartheid	NN	(NP*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*))))))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
execution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
activist	NN	(NP*	O
Ken	NNP	*	O
Saro	NNP	*	O
Wiwa	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Fiji	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
twice	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pakistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
brought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Gen.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pervez	NNP	*	O
Musharraf	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentine	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
Leader	NNP	*	O
Quits	NNPS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Economy	NNP	(NP*	O
Begins	NNPS	*)))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Free	JJ	*	ESE
Fall	NN	*)))	ESE

BUENOS	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
AIRES	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
20	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R?signed	NNP	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
halfway	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
four-year	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
swamped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
looting	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
erupted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reverse	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
deepening	VBG	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
late	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
followed	VBD	(VP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
food	NN	*	DSE
riots	NNS	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
here	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
five	CD	*)	O
demonstrators	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
toll	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
21	CD	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
began	VBD	(VP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	ESE
-	JJ	*	ESE
ditch	NN	*	ESE
effort	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
widening	VBG	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*	O
deficits	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
indebted	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
lenders	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
battling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
defaults	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
budget	NN	(NP*	O
cuts	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
patchwork	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
programs	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
lacks	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
coherent	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
monetary	JJ	*)	O
strategy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
consensus	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
de	IN	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
R?resignation	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
moderate	JJ	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
controls	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
begun	VBN	(VP*	O
blocking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ram?uerta	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
provisional	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
48	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
decides	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prepare	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
sometime	RB	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
Congress	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
hand	NN	*)))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
largely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
left	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Carlos	NNP	(NP*	O
Sa?nem	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Senator	NNP	(NP*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
lost	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
de	FW	(X(X(ADVP*	O
la	FW	*)	O
R	NN	(NP*)	O
?	.	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whoever	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
power	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
tough	JJ	*	ESE
choices	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
defeated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
indecisive	JJ	*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R?aced	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
recession	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
declining	VBG	*	O
exports	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Wall	NNP	*	O
Street	NNP	*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
predicted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
devalue	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
unhinging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
unusual	JJ	*	O
one-for	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
link	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
such	PDT	(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
lower	VB	(VP(VP*	O
prices	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
spur	VB	(VP*	O
growth	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
goods	NNS	*)	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
attractive	JJ	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
prove	VB	(VP*	ESE
ruinous	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
borrowers	NNS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
banking	VBG	*	O
system	NN	*))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
most	JJS	(S(NP(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
repayable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R?government	NNP	*)	O
collapsed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
surprising	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rapidity	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
shotguns	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
demonstrators	NNS	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
palace	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
tear	VB	(S(VP*	O
gas	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
seeped	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
fires	NNS	*)	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grand	JJ	*	O
boulevards	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
avenues	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
towers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
black	JJ	(NP*	O
smoke	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thousands	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
demonstrators	NNS	(NP*)))	O
massed	VBD	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
set	VBD	*	O
bonfires	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
palace	NN	*)))))	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
riot	NN	(S(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
horseback	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
stormed	VBD	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crowds	NNS	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
afternoon	NN	*)	O
clubbing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
reinforcements	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
water	NN	(NP*	O
cannon	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rubber	NN	*	O
bullets	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Defiant	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
crowds	NNS	*)	O
chanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	O
assassins	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
assassins	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
assassins	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scenes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
anarchy	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
reminiscent	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
turbulent	JJ	*	ESE
days	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
military	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rule	NN	*)))))))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
1976	CD	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
1983	CD	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
5	CD	*	O
deaths	NNS	*))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
demonstrators	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
looters	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
50	CD	*)	O
police	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
hurt	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
disturbances	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))))	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
followed	VBD	(VP*	O
looting	VBG	(NP(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
rioting	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
24	CD	*	O
provinces	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
much	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
businesses	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
stores	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
de	FW	(VP(ADVP*	O
la	FW	*)	O
R?eclared	VBD	*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
siege	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
Constitutional	NNP	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assembly	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
speech	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
free	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rein	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
arrest	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
will	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
assumption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*)))	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
incite	VB	(VP*	ESE
greater	JJR	(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
beginning	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outpouring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
banging	VBG	(VP*	O
pots	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
pans	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
demanding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
de	NNP	*)	O
la	FW	(PP*	O
R?resignation	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
de	FW	(RRC(ADVP*	O
la	FW	*)	O
R	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
?	.	*)	O
4	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
night	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
apologized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
disappointment	NN	*))))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
performance	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Justicialist	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
unity	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ideas	NNS	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
programs	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
that	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
call	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
rebuffed	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*)	O
de	FW	(VP(ADVP*	O
la	FW	*)	O
R?ld	VBD	*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
closest	JJS	*	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
choice	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tape	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
televised	VBN	*	O
resignation	NN	*	O
address	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
soon	RB	(NP(NP(ADVP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Nicolas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gallo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
personal	JJ	*	O
aide	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R?old	NNP	*))))))	O
reporters	NNS	*)	O
late	RB	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
afternoon	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
calm	VB	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
text	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
speech	NN	*)))	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
assure	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
peace	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Gallo	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
suffering	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
history	NN	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
judge	VB	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
de	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
R	NNP	*	O
?	.	*)	O
administration	NN	(NP*))	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
sad	JJ	*)	ESE
day	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
payment	NN	(NP*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
debts	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
suggesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
business	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
consumer	NN	*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
revalued	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
amounts	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
overall	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
lower	JJR	*	O
loan	NN	*	O
amounts	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
benefit	VB	(VP*	O
individuals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
income	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
decline	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
50	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
devaluation	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
scheme	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
middle-class	NN	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP(NP*	O
mortgages	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
car	NN	*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
valued	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
losers	NNS	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
bank	NN	(NP*	O
lenders	NNS	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
repaid	VBN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
losers	NNS	*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
Argentine	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
businesses	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
owe	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
dollar	NN	(NP*	O
debts	NNS	*)	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*))	O
but	CC	*	O
collect	VBP	(VP*	O
revenue	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greater	JJR	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
devalued	JJ	(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
repay	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
loans	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
stabilized	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
grow	VB	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
transition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Governor	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Adolfo	NNP	*	O
Rodr?ez	NNP	*	O
Saa	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
San	NNP	(NP*))))	O
Luis	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
influential	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
de	IN	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
R?decline	NNP	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
vice	NN	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Carlos	NNP	(NP*	O
Alvarez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
handling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
charges	NNS	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
bribes	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
senators	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pass	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
labor	NN	*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
de	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
R?ruling	NNP	*	O
Alianza	NNP	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
centrists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Social	NNP	(NP*	O
Democrats	NNPS	*))))	O
fractured	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
cabinet	NN	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
revolving	JJ	*	ESE
door	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
constantly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
changing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
suffered	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devastating	JJ	*	O
defeat	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
legislative	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
gave	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
control	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
houses	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cabinet	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
publicly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNP	*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Carlos	NNP	(NP*	O
Ruckauf	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
vice	NN	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
powerful	JJ	*)	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
instigating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
looting	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
overthrow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cabinet	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
ministers	NNS	(NP*)	O
debated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
openly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
confront	VB	*	DSE
Governor	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ruckauf	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
treason	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R?gued	NNP	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
seize	VB	(VP*	O
Governor	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ruckauf	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNP	*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
police	NNS	*))))))))	O
force	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
control	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
rioting	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
surged	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
working-class	JJ	*	O
neighborhoods	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
surround	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
city	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*)	O
de	FW	(VP(VP(ADVP*	O
la	FW	*)	O
R?sitated	VBD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
instead	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
declared	VBD	*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
siege	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
failed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Ruckauf	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
presidential	JJ	*	ESE
contender	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Finance	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*	O
Resigns	NNPS	*	O
Post	NNP	*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
uncertainty	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
precarious	JJ	*	ESE
financial	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
deepened	VBD	(VP*	ESE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Daniel	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
finance	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
resigned	VBD	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
stepped	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
paid	VBD	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
700	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
short-term	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
owed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
pension	NN	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
bonds	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
two	CD	(WHNP(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	WDT	(FRAG(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
default	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*)	O
.	.	*)))))	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
struggling	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
contain	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
totaling	VBG	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
132	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
recession	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
discussing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
someone	NN	(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
oversee	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
cycle	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(S(NP*	O
some	DT	*	O
personal	JJ	*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
formalized	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Domingo	NNP	(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
trying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
lower	JJR	(NP*	O
interest	NN	*	O
rates	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
existing	VBG	(NP*	O
debts	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Domestic	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP*	DSE
duress	NNS	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
swap	VB	(VP*	O
roughly	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
40	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
obligations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
consultations	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
proceeding	VBG	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
schedule	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
job	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
tougher	JJR	(S(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
delay	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
release	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1.3	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*	O
shortfall	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
infighting	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
eroded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
ability	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adhere	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
zero-deficit	JJ	*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
favored	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
I.M.F.	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
promised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
followed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
union	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
shopkeepers	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
unemployed	JJ	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
brought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
close	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
standstill	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
strikers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
protesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
federal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
budget	NN	*	O
cuts	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
bank	NN	(NP*	O
accounts	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
instituted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
banking	NN	*)	O
controls	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stave	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
run	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
banks	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Depositors	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
worried	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fixed	JJ	*	O
one-to-one	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
broken	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
insistence	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
withdrawing	VBG	(VP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
bank	NN	(NP*	O
accounts	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
widespread	JJ	*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
deposits	NNS	(NP*)))	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
choke	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
worsen	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
financial	JJ	*	O
troubles	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
controls	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
pressures	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Vincent	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Truglia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
analyst	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Moody	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
news/quote	quote	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
indicative	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*)	ESE
situation	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
in	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
favored	VBN	(VP*	DSE
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
finance	NN	(NP*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
career	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP*	O
finance	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stint	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
board	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
central	JJ	*	O
bank	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
finance	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deputy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
specific	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
responsibility	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
kept	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
replacement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Jose	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Luis	NNP	*	O
Machinea	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Ricardo	NNP	(NP*	O
Lopez-Murphy	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
technical	JJ	*	O
knowledge	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
strong	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
creditors	NNS	*))))	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
considerable	JJ	(UCP(NP(NP*	DSE
respect	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
favoring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
market-based	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
regulatory	JJ	(NP*	O
solutions	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reputation	NN	*)	O
shared	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Julio	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dreizzen	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resigned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
finance	NN	(NP*	O
undersecretary	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Oct.	NNP	(NP*	O
29	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
citing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
personal	JJ	(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
departure	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
pave	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Miguel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kiguel	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economist	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Justicialist	NNP	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
team	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Fernando	NNP	(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Carlos	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sa?nem	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
leader	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Justicialists	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Kiguel	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
succeed	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Justicialists	NNPS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
De	NNP	*	O
La	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ruling	NN	*	O
coalition	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
forming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Refuses	NNP	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Recognize	NNP	(NP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
flaws	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
recognizing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
claim	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
incumbent	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
winner	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
consulting	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
flawed	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
suspended	VBD	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
entry	NN	*	O
privileges	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
family	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	O
entry	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
received	VBD	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
significant	JJ	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
benefit	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
dealings	NNS	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
carried	VBD	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
freeze	VB	(VP*	O
assets	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alleged	VBN	*	ESE
rigging	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
export	NN	*	O
licenses	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP*	O
articles	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
services	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Begins	NNP	*)	O
First	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Airlift	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Prisoners	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jan.	NNP	(NP*	O
10	CD	*))	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
C-17	NNP	*	O
Globemaster	NNP	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
20	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
guarded	VBN	*))	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
wave	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
provided	VBD	(VP*	O
few	JJ	(NP*	O
details	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
senior	JJ	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
40	CD	*))	O
specially	RB	(ADJP*	O
trained	JJ	*))	O
military	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
guarded	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
stop	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Friday	NNP	*	O
morning	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
shackled	VBN	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
hoods	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
loaded	VBN	(VP*	O
single	JJ	(NP*	O
file	NN	*)	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
Airport	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pentagon	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sedated	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
more-than-20-hour	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
afforded	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protections	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*	O
guidelines	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
makeshift	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X	NNP	*))))	O
-	:	*	O
Ray	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
locked	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
6	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
by-8-foot	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cages	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
chain-link	JJ	*	O
fence	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
await	VB	(VP*	O
intensive	JJ	(NP*	O
interrogation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	(PRN*	O
,	,	*	O
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
trial	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
tribunals	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
workers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
prepared	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
2,000	CD	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
search	NN	(NP(NP*	O
crews	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comb	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wreckage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
tanker	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
crashed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southwestern	JJ	(NP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Seven	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
marines	NNS	*)	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fiery	JJ	*	O
accident	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Donald	NNP	*)))	O
H.	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
crash	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
hostile	JJ	(NP*	O
fire	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pentagon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
force	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
Special	FW	(NP*	O
Operations	FW	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
train	NN	(NP*	O
Filipino	JJ	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*	O
group	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
initially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
advising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
training	VBG	*	O
Filipino	JJ	(NP*	O
counterterrorist	NN	*	O
units	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Philippine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
requested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Amnesty	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)	DSE
today	NN	(NP*)	DSE
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
sedating	VBG	(S(S(VP(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
shackling	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
violate	VB	(VP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)	ESE
prohibiting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
cruel	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
inhuman	JJ	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
degrading	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
restrained	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
defended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
strong	JJ	(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
studied	VBN	(VP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP*	O
uprisings	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-	:	*	O
i-Sharif	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(NP(QP*	O
20	CD	*)	O
minutes	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
C-17	NN	*)	O
lifted	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
Airport	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
marines	NNS	(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
arms	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
fire	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
runways	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
identify	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
snipers	NNS	*)))	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
unknown	JJ	(NP*	DSE
tonight	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
John	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Walker	NNP	*	O
Lindh	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-i-Sharif	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Walker	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
assault	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*	O
Bataan	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabian	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

American	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
371	CD	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
351	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
19	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Bagram	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
base	NN	*	O
north	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kabul	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
keeps	VBZ	(VP*	O
rising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
American	JJ	(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
interviewing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
anti-Taliban	JJ	(NP*	O
militias	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Camp	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*)	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
expanded	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
220	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
crews	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
permanent	JJ	(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
2,000	CD	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
details	NNS	(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	O
American	JJ	*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Abu	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
battling	VBG	(VP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Basilan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rebels	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Al	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
hostages	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
D.	NNP	*	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
American	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Special	JJ	*	O
Operations	NNP	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Philippine	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(ADJP*	DSE
anxious	JJ	*	DSE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
clear	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Basilan	NNP	(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
extended	JJ	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
network	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
100	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
antiterrorism	NN	*	O
aid	NN	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
training	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
shared	VBN	(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
array	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
equipment	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippine	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
C-130	NN	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
30,000	CD	(NP*	O
M-16	NN	*	O
rifles	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
8	CD	(NP*	O
UH	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
1	CD	(NP*	O
Huey	NNP	*	O
helicopters	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
eastern	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
B-1	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
B-52	JJ	*)	O
bombers	NNS	*)	O
dropped	VBD	(VP*	O
precision-guided	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sprawling	JJ	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
training	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Zhawar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kili	NNP	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
border	NN	*))))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sixth	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
just	RB	(NP*	O
over	IN	*	O
a	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Senior	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	JJ	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
equally	RB	(ADJP*	O
sophisticated	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
well-fortified	JJ	*)	O
underground	JJ	*	O
complexes	NNS	*)	O
elsewhere	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	O
guerrilla	NN	(NP*	O
bases	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
remnants	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
318	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
military	JJ	*	O
spending	NN	*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*	O
fiscal	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Today	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
ever	RB	(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
owe	VBP	(VP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
uniform	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
resources	NNS	*))))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
maintain	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
high	JJ	*)	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
readiness	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
rely	VBP	(VP*	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	ESE
surprise	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
deception	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
used	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rely	VB	(VP*	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
soft	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	DSE
way	NN	*)	DSE
anymore	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
Differ	NNP	*	DSE
Over	NNP	*	O
Global	NNP	*	O
Warming	NNP	*	O
Issues	NNPS	*)))	O

Japanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
visiting	NNP	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
differed	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
over	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
repeated	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
rejection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
atcurbing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pushed	VBN	(S(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
alternative	NN	*))))	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Koizumi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
meanwhile	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
called	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
constructive	JJ	*)	ESE
proposal	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
but	CC	*	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UnitedStates	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
It	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
not	RB	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
direction	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Koizumi	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
supports	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
theKyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Both	DT	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
improved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
together	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
'd	MD	(VP*	O
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
hurt	VB	(VP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
alternative	JJ	*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
voluntary	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
limits	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
companies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
mandatory	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reduction	NN	*	O
targets	NNS	*))	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
environmentalists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
ineffective	JJ	*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
solving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
warn	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
under	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*))	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
cooperate	VB	(VP*	ESE
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
field	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
notonly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Forced	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Resign	NNP	(NP*)))	O
;	:	*	O
Civilian	NNP	(NP*	O
Installed	NNP	*)))	O

CARACAS	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transitional	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
headed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
replaced	VBN	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
hours	NNS	(SBAR(NP*)	O
after	IN	*	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	O
end	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
turbulent	JJ	*	O
three-year	JJ	*	O
reign	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mercurial	JJ	*	ESE
strongman	NN	*)	ESE
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
promises	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
distance	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
uprooting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
old	JJ	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
47	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
firebrand	JJ	*	ESE
populist	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
remake	VB	(VP*	ESE
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
benefit	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
poor	JJ	*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
obligated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
3	CD	(NP*))))))	O
a.m.	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
today	NN	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*	O
street	NN	*	O
protests	NNS	*))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
at	IN	(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
14	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
gunmen	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
identified	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Early	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fatigues	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trademark	NN	*)))	O
red	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
beret	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
left-leaning	JJ	*	O
movement	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fort	NNP	*	O
Tiuna	NNP	*	O
army	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
custody	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pedro	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*	O
Estanga	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
important	JJ	*)	O
business	NN	*	O
association	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
interim	JJ	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
6	CD	(NP*	O
p.m.	RB	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
adhere	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pluralistic	JJ	*	ESE
vision	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
democratic	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
civil	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ensuring	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Elections	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
laid	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
blame	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
overthrow	NN	*)))	O
firmly	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ousted	VBN	*	O
leader	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Officials	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
portrayed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ouster	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
victory	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
legitimately	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	O
elected	VBN	*)	O
president	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
encouraged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
provoked	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Ari	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Fleischer	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
suppressed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
demonstration	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
unarmed	JJ	(NP*	ESE
protesters	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Latin	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Costa	NNP	(NP*	O
Rica	NNP	*)))))	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ouster	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
interruption	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
constitutional	JJ	*	ESE
order	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*	O
paratrooper	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
won	VBD	(S(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
presided	VBD	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
stormy	JJ	*	O
era	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
control	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legislature	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
confronted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
old-line	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
elite	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
steered	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Fedeca-iras	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
association	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
flanked	JJ	(ADJP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
rebelled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
sprawling	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
opponents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
morning	NN	*	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
honking	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
horns	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
waving	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gold	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
blue	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
red	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
flag	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

El	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Universal	NNP	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
leading	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
hailed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
end	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
over	RP	(ADJP*))	ESE
!	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
quickly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
undo	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
dissolving	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)	O
controlled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
firing	NN	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
changing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
official	JJ	*	O
name	NN	*)	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
renamed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
repealed	VBN	(VP*	O
49	CD	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez-controlled	JJ	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
legislation	NN	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
business	NN	(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
feared	VBD	(VP*)))))))	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
damage	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
pledging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
365	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protest	NN	*	O
movement	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
run	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
named	VBD	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
active-duty	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
rebelled	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
night	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
named	VBD	(VP*	O
retired	JJ	(NP*	O
Brig.	NNP	*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Guaicaipuro	NNP	*	O
Lameda	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
head	VB	(VP*	O
Petr?s	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
de	IN	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
huge	JJ	*	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
exports	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
fired	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Lameda	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
appointed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
left-leaning	JJ	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
place	NN	*)))	O
along	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
board	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
close	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
enraging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
operations	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
normal	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)))	O
company	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
crippled	VBN	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
office	NN	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
production	NN	*	O
workers	NNS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
staging	NN	(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
slowdowns	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(S(NP*	O
society	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
reached	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
consensus	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
necessitated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transitional	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
guarantees	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reestablishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*)	O
Carmona	RB	(ADVP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
transitional	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
formed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(UCP(NP(NP*	DSE
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Cuba	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
change-over	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
coup	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
distance	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Fidel	NNP	*	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mr.	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
formed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
close	JJ	*	DSE
friendship	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
today	NN	*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
offering	NN	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
favorable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Havana	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
daughter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mar?Gabriela	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
speaking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*	O
television	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
her	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
father	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
resigned	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
phone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*)	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
morning	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	(SBAR*	O
before	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
her	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
am	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
jailed	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
attorney	NN	*	O
general	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
Isa	NNP	*	O
?	.	*	O
Rodr?ez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
resigned	VBN	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Vicente	NNP	*	O
Fox	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*)))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
strong	JJ	*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
elections	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Diplomatic	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

American	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
defying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
television	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
outlets	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
continued	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
function	VB	(VP*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
orders	NNS	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shut	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
solidarity	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
look	VB	(VP*	DSE
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
full	JJ	*	ESE
exercise	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Philip	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
T.	NNP	*	O
Reeker	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
focused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
clearing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
leading	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
afternoon	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
remembering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fallen	JJ	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
searching	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interior	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ram?odr?ez	NNP	(NP*	O
Chac	NNP	*	O
?	.	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
custody	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
supporter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Freddy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bernal	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mayor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
district	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
meanwhile	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
searched	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
homes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	*	O
Circles	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
neighborhood	NN	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
formed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
responsibility	NN	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shootings	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Television	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
broadcasts	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
plainclothes	JJ	(NP*	O
firing	NN	*	O
semiautomatic	NN	*	O
handguns	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bridge	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
busy	JJ	*	O
street	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
downtown	JJ	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crowd	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assailants	NNS	(NP*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*)	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
red	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
berets	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
T-shirts	NNS	*)	O
bearing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
movement	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
justice	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
killed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
pressing	JJ	*)	ESE
tasks	NNS	*)	O
now	RB	(SBAR(S(ADVP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assuage	VB	(VP(VP*	O
concerns	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reign	NN	*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
polarization	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
rich	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
poor	JJ	*))))))))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
divides	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
familiar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
goal	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
successors	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
tackle	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pressing	JJ	(ADJP*	O
socio-economic	JJ	*)	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
brought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
so	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
much	RB	*	O
popular	JJ	*)	O
support	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Russell	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Crandall	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
America	NNP	*	O
specialist	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Davidson	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
College	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Carolina	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
right	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
solutions	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
clear	JJ	*))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
braces	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
currency	NN	(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)))))	O

BUENOS	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
AIRES	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Nostalgia	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
runs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
deep	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
before	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(S(S(NP*	O
faltering	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
produced	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
epic-sized	JJ	*	ESE
default	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
thrust	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*))	ESE
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
democracy	NN	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
restored	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1983	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
obsessed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
past	JJ	*	ESE
triumphs	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
variety	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nostalgia	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
emerging	VBG	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Ford	NNP	*	ESE
Falcon	NNP	*	ESE
syndrome	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
classic	JJ	*	ESE
gas-guzzler	NN	*)))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
inefficient	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
Argentine	JJ	*	ESE
automakers	NNS	*)	ESE
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
droves	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
20	CD	(SBAR(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
disappeared	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
showrooms	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
economists	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
leading	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
backward	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Eduardo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fifth	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crippling	JJ	(NP*	ESE
recession	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
questioning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decade-long	JJ	*	O
pursuit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
free	JJ	(NP*	O
market	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
finish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
vacated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ex-President	NNP	(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
R?he	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
Peronist	NNP	(NP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
promoting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
turn	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clock	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
liberal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
reforms	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Congress	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
broad	JJ	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
powers	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decade-old	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
pegs	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
dollar	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
intervene	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
banking	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
institute	VB	(VP*	O
price	NN	(NP*	O
controls	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
industry	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
jobs	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
approved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
overwhelmingly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lower	JJR	*	O
house	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
passed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Everyone	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
protectionists	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
devaluation	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	*	ESE
painful	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
protectionism	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
failed	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
dominated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
half	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
ex-President	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Carlos	NNP	*	ESE
Menem	NNP	*)	ESE
changed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*)	ESE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
ushered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
era	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
stability	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
think	VB	(VP*	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
defy	VB	(VP*	ESE
gravity	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
pursuing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
crash	NN	*	ESE
course	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentines	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Christopher	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ecclestone	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP*	O
boutique	NN	*	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNPS	*	O
Trust	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Duhalde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
embrace	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
past	NN	*)))	DSE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
partly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
explained	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nature	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Peronists	NNPS	*))	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Argentine	JJ	(S(NP*	O
literary	JJ	*	O
giant	NN	*	O
Jorge	NNP	*	O
Luis	NNP	*	O
Borges	NNP	*)	O
once	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
referred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
neither	CC	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
bad	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
incorrigible	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
founded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Gen.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Juan	NNP	*	O
Domingo	NNP	*	O
Peron	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1940s	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
long	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
dominated	VBN	*	ESE
Argentine	JJ	(NP*	O
politics	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
thanks	NNS	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
deft	JJ	*	ESE
mix	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
populist	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
nationalist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rhetoric	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
patronage	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Aresco	NNP	(NP*)))	O
consultancy	RB	(ADVP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
52	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP*)))	O
``	``	(PP*	O
highly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
in	IN	*	DSE
favor	NN	(NP*))	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stated	VBN	*	DSE
economic	JJ	*	DSE
plans	NNS	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
34	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
``	``	(NP(ADJP*	DSE
medium	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
approval	NN	*)))	DSE
-	:	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
indication	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
public	JJ	(NP*	ESE
confidence	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
desperate	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
exploding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
further	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
unclear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
Duhalde	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
turn	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
clock	NN	*)	ESE
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
starters	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wariness	NNS	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
economists	NNS	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
expected	JJ	*	DSE
30	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
40	CD	*))	O
percent	NN	*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
spark	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
return	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
chaotic	JJ	*	ESE
days	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
1980s	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
5,000-percent	JJ	(S(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
rampant	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
everything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
bread	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
computer	NN	(NP*	ESE
parts	NNS	*)))))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
marked	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(NP(QP*	O
much	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
anticipation	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
contain	VB	(VP(VP*	O
inflation	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
fill	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
expected	JJ	*	DSE
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
11	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
budget	NN	*	O
deficit	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
rescue	NN	*	ESE
package	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
at	IN	(NP(QP*	ESE
least	JJS	*	ESE
$	$	*	ESE
15	CD	*	ESE
billion	CD	*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
needed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
lenders	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Otherwise	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cash-strapped	JJ	*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
forced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
lesser-valued	JJ	(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
loans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*	O
entirely	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
collapse	VB	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
few	JJ	(NP*)	ESE
expect	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
reviving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
moribund	JJ	*	ESE
economy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
elicit	VB	(VP*	ESE
much	JJ	(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*)	ESE
abroad	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(FRAG(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
quite	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
contrary	NN	*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
swarm	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
powerful	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
lobbies	NNS	*)	ESE
representing	VBG	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
descended	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
fight	VB	(VP*	DSE
government	NN	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
introduce	VB	(VP*	O
price	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
capital	NN	*	O
controls	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
heat	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
violate	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
privatization	NN	(NP(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
unilaterally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
lower	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rates	NNS	*)	O
mostly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
foreign-owned	JJ	(NP*	O
utilities	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
charge	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
gas	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
He	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
steering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
economy	NN	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
disaster	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
breaking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
concepts	NNS	*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	O
right	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
savings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Abel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Viglione	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
economist	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
think	NN	*	O
tank	NN	*	O
Fiel	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
No	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
matter	NN	*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
economic	JJ	(S(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
trust	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
if	IN	(CONJP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
entire	JJ	*	ESE
generation	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rebuild	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
stiffest	JJS	*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
themselves	PRP	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
widespread	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
fatigue	NN	*)	ESE
caused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
successive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
austerity	NN	*	ESE
drives	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
limiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
bank	NN	(NP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
month	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overwhelming	JJ	*	ESE
majority	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP*)))	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
prefer	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
model	NN	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
many	JJ	*	ESE
shortcomings	NNS	*))	ESE
-	:	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
disorder	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
closed	VBN	*	ESE
economy	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Surveys	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
70	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*)))	O
opposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
changes	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
convertibility	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Those	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
devalue	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
shameless	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Maria	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Estevez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
schoolteacher	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
earns	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
600	CD	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hold	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
hostage	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
force	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
bought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
cheaper	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
better	JJR	*)	ESE
quality	NN	(ADJP*	ESE
imported	VBN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
blaming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
globalization	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
point	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
corrupt	JJ	(NP(UCP(NP*	ESE
politicians	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
indifferent	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
institutions	NNS	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
precipitating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
current	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
an	DT	*	O
ambitious	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
program	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*)))	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
popular	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
exactly	RB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	ESE
what	WP	*)	ESE
Duhalde	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
most	RBS	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
lacks	VBZ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
successfully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
rallied	VBN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	*	O
class	NN	*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
vice	NN	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Menem	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
two-time	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
dogged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
allegations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
corruption	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
career	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
reputation	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
old-style	JJ	*	ESE
party	NN	*	ESE
boss	NN	*)))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
defeat	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
posted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*)	ESE
showing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Peronist	NNP	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
candidate	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Blair	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*)	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
happy	JJ	*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
green	JJ	*	O
deal	NN	*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
British	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tony	NNP	(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
disagreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
deal	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signal	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
dumping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Australian-US	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
action	NN	*	O
partnership	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
involves	VBZ	(VP*	O
liaison	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
governments	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
businesses	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
research	NN	*	O
bodies	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Critics	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
Australia	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dump	VB	(VP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
yet	CC	*	ESE
on	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
cosying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
want	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dump	VB	(VP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Australia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
doubt	NN	(NP*))	DSE
ever	RB	(SBAR*	O
since	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
George	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
ratifying	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
hurt	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
economy	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
targets	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
pollution	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
David	NNP	(NP*	O
Kemp	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
committed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Opposition	NNP	*	DSE
's	POS	*)	O
environment	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Kelvin	NNP	(NP*	O
Thomson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
position	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))	O
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ABC	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
greenhouse	NN	(S(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
obvious	JJ	*	O
disagreement	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
disagreement	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Yes	VBG	(S(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
state	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*	DSE
position	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
went	VBD	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
enough	RB	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(SBAR(X*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
read	VBP	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(X*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
concerned	JJ	*))	DSE
I	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
become	VBP	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
test	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
patience	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
AND	CC	*	O
RUSHINGA	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
ZIMBABWE	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Martha	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
neighbors	NNS	*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
her	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
district	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
drills	VBD	(S(VP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
doctrine	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
heart	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
38-year-old	JJ	*	O
widow	NN	*)	O
supports	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
keeps	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
membership	NN	(NP(NP*	O
card	NN	*)	O
hidden	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cooking	JJ	*	O
pot	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
someone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
hospitals	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
school	NN	*	O
fees	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(SINV(FRAG(NP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
life	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Martha	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
explaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
voted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
MDC	NNP	(NP*	O
candidate	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Marthas	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
marched	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP*	O
anthems	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
cheered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
rallies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
secretly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
vote	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
People	NNS	(NP*)	O
pretend	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
wear	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
T-shirts	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rallies	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
inside	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fear	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
intimidation	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*)	O
streamed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
record	NN	(NP*	O
numbers	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cast	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
contested	VBN	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
22	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
overburdened	JJ	(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
waited	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hot	JJ	*	O
sun	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
food	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
see	VBP	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tarred	JJ	*	O
road	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
grass	NN	*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
bed	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Janet	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Harare	JJ	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
waited	VBD	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
27	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impoverished	JJ	*	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
suburb	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kuwadzana	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
home	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
vote	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
crucial	JJ	*	ESE
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
as	IN	*	O
voters	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intimidation	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
attempts	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
rigging	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
continued	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
slashed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
favored	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
boosting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP*	O
ruling-party	NN	*	O
strongholds	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Kuwadzana	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
seven	CD	(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
55,000	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rural	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bindura	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
41	CD	(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
smaller	JJR	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
5.6	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
voters	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
waiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
anxiously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
voting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
stretch	VB	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
days	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	DSE
foremost	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
minds	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
attempts	NNS	(S(NP(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rig	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
voter	NN	(NP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
last	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
-	:	*	ESE
minute	JJ	(NP*	ESE
election-law	NN	*	ESE
changes	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
outright	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fraud	NN	*))	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
succeeded	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
increasing	VBG	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))))	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
vote	NN	*	ESE
rigging	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
thorough	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
hopes	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
dead	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	ESE
cheating	NN	*)	ESE
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
election	NN	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Brian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Murphy	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Citizens	NNPS	*	O
support	NN	*))))	O
group	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
spread	VBD	(S(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
privately	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
monitoring	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Murphy	NNP	*)	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
independent	JJ	(NP*	O
voter	NN	*	O
education	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
radio	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ban	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
holding	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
rallies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
districts	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
just	RB	(NP(QP*	O
a	DT	*	O
few	JJ	*)	O
examples	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
fair	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
deep	JJ	*	DSE
faith	NN	*)	DSE
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
power	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Edward	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Murchabaiw	NNP	*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Rushinga	NNP	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
6	CD	(NP*	O
a.m.	RB	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wheelbarrow	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
emaciated	JJ	*	O
frame	NN	*)	O
drowing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
faded	JJ	*	O
blue	JJ	*	O
suit-jacket	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Murchabaiw	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
diagnosed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
stages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
live	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sound	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
voice	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
bright	JJ	*	DSE
smile	NN	*))	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
voting	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
difference	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
lines	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
snaked	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
mile	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
angry	JJ	(S(NP*	DSE
voters	NNS	*)	O
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
push	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
booths	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
tear	JJ	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rubber	NN	*	O
bullets	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
restless	JJ	*	O
crowd	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
injuring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
stayed	VBD	(VP*	O
open	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
voting	VBG	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
flickering	JJ	(NP*	O
candlelight	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
harsh	JJ	(NP*	O
fluorescent	JJ	*	O
bulbs	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
intention	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
frustrate	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
voters	NNS	*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
trying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
move	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
goal	NN	*	ESE
posts	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
disenfranchise	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*))))	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
vote	VB	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
waited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
angrily	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cast	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
waving	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
hands	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
open-handed	JJ	*	DSE
signal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
MDC	NNP	*))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
stood	VBD	(VP*	O
empty	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
midday	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lines	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
transparency	RB	(ADVP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
52	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
agents	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
chased	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*))	O
,	,	*	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accreditation	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
voting	VBG	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
open	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
widespread	JJ	(NP*	ESE
abuse	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Old	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
illiterate	JJ	*	O
voters	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
assisted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
often	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
directed	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
incumbent	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chaparandza	NNP	*	O
Primary	NNP	*	O
School	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
Rushinga	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mary	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugumira	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
wearing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
wool	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
USA	NNP	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*)	O
''	''	*)	O
hat	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
dress	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
shoes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
confused	JJ	*	DSE
look	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presiding	VBG	*	O
officer	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
her	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
both	DT	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
whom	WP	(WHNP*)))	O
represented	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
ZANU-PF	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP(NP*	O
moment	NN	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
agent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
smiling	VBG	(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
X	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
mark	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*)))))	O
marked	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hope	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	ESE
change	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
jubilant	NNP	*	DSE
Colin	NNP	*	O
Chipepera	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
waiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
Harare	NN	*	O
voting	NN	*	O
line	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
final	JJ	*	ESE
nail	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
coffin	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
their	PRP$	*	ESE
tricks	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
many	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Guantanamo	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Unhappy	NNP	*	DSE
Campers	NNP	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
abuse	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
experiencing	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
self-inflicted	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

GUANTANAMO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
BAY	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
CUBA	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
It	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
A.M.	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Roosevelt	NNP	*	O
Roads	NNP	*	O
Naval	NNP	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Puerto	NNP	(NP*	O
Rico	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
20	CD	(S(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
straggle	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gate	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
sleep-deprived	JJ	(NP*	O
silence	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
catch	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
this	DT	*	O
early	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
years	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
flying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
miles	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pub-crawling	VBG	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Old	NNP	(NP*	O
San	NNP	*	O
Juan	NNP	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
escorts	NN	*)	O
insist	VBP	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
show	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
four	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
operates	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
principle	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
explains	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
savvy	JJ	*	O
veteran	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Hurry	VB	(S(S(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
wait	VB	(S(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
double	VB	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
babysitters	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
'm	VBP	(VP*	ESE
up	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
ears	NNS	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vieques	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Navy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Corey	NNP	*	O
Barker	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nearby	JJ	*	O
bombing	NN	*))))	O
range/public	public	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*	O
fiasco	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
protested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
everyone	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Al	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sharpton	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
obscure	JJ	(NP*	O
Kennedys	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Barker	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
stuck	VBN	(VP*	ESE
minding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
light	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southeastern	JJ	*	O
tip	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
158	NNP	(S(NP*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda/Taliban	Taliban	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
depending	VBG	(S(PP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
ask	VBP	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ideal	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
sunny	JJ	*	ESE
clime	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
's	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	ESE
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
get-out-of-jail	JJ	*	ESE
escape	NN	*	ESE
hatches	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
14-hour	JJ	(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
guano	JJ	*	ESE
rock	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Pacific	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Inside	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
terminal	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
baggage	NN	*	O
handlers	NNS	*)	O
check	VBP	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
with	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
efficiency	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Bulgarian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
DMV	NNP	*	ESE
workers	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wall	NN	*)))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
Air	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Terminal	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Year	NN	*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
'd	MD	(VP*	ESE
hate	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
got	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
second	JJ	(NP*	ESE
place	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
whispers	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wait	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
creaky	JJ	*	O
Pan	NNP	*	O
Am	NNP	*	O
jet	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
shunted	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
VIP	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
room	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
named	VBN	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
coffee	NN	*	ESE
pot	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
seascape	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
paintings	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
look	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
pilfered	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
south	JJ	*	ESE
Florida	NNP	*	ESE
retirement	NN	*	ESE
village	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Here	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	ESE
indoctrination	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
packages	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
encouraging	JJ	*	ESE
word	NN	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
aspire	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
reportorial	JJ	(NP*	O
autonomy	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sit	VBP	(VP*	O
watching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
CNN	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unfounded	JJ	*	O
rumor	NN	*)	O
gains	VBZ	(VP*	O
currency	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
plans	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Sunday	NNP	*)	O
morning	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
One	CD	(S(NP*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
wire	NN	*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
wo	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
sort	VB	(VP*	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
your	PRP$	*	ESE
notes	NNS	*)))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Fearing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
abbreviated	JJ	*	O
schedule	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
commence	VBP	(VP*	O
valuable	JJ	(NP*	O
newsgathering	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Knowing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban-held	JJ	(ADJP*	O
provinces	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
pederasty	RB	(ADJP*	O
rivaled	JJ	*)))	O
headless-goat	JJ	*	O
polo	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
buzkashi	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
favorite	JJ	*	O
pastime	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
ask	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Naval	NNP	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
turning	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
man-love	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Oh	UH	(S(INTJ*)	ESE
God	VB	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Though	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
there	RB	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
who	WP	(FRAG(WHNP*))))))	ESE
knows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*))))))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
relays	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
hear	VB	(VP*	O
repeated	VBN	(VP*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
:	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
because	IN	*	O
of	IN	(S(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
pressure	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
getting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
coddled	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
Army	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
guards	NNP	*)	O
directing	VBG	(VP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHADVP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pray	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mecca	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
paint	VB	(VP*	O
arrows	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
floors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*))))	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
north	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
mean	VBP	(VP*	O
east	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
North	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
east	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whatever	VBZ	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
replies	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
Lutheran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
hell	NN	*))	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
FEW	JJ	*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
touch	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
landing	NN	*	O
strip	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
isolated	VBN	*	O
leeward	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	(SBAR(S*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
nicknamed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
bisected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
getting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
sniffed	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
German	JJ	*	O
shepherd	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
interested	JJ	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
bombs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
colleague	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Percocet	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
escorted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ugly	JJ	*	ESE
wood-paneled	JJ	*	O
affair	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sits	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pink	JJ	*	O
hangar	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP(QP*	O
hour	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
two	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
waiting	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mouthy	JJ	*	ESE
reporter	NN	*	DSE
loudly	NN	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
editor	NN	*)	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
all	RB	*	O
hear	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Same	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
shit	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
different	JJ	(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
cleaning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))))	O
center	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Curtains	NNS	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
conditioner	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(NP(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
freakin	NN	*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
bulletin	NN	*	O
board	NN	*)))	O
!	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
hospitality	NN	*)	ESE
ends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
stern	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
sign	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bulletin	NN	*	O
board	NN	*)))	O
admonishes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
clean	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
ourselves	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
goodies	NNS	*)	ESE
set	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
table	NN	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
grape	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
beverage	NN	*	O
powder	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
apple	NN	*	O
jelly	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
meals-ready-to-eat	JJ	(NP*	O
packs	NNS	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
practically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
scream	VBP	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Ca	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
wait	VB	(VP*	ESE
till	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
leave	VBP	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
secretly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
harbored	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
fantasy	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
talk	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
overseers	NNS	*)	DSE
into	IN	(PP*	DSE
letting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
right	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
up	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
equivalent	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
field	NN	*	ESE
trip	NN	*))))))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ASPCA	NNP	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
gaggle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
officers	NNS	*)))	O
enter	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
lay	VBD	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
two	CD	(NP*	O
immutable	JJ	*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
forbids	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
public	JJ	*	ESE
curiosity	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Running	VBG	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
public	JJ	*	ESE
affairs	NNS	*	ESE
show	NN	*))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Army	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Col.	NNP	*	O
William	NNP	*	O
Costello	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
bearish	JJ	*	ESE
soldier	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
looks	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
guy	NN	(NP*))	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
enjoys	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
breaking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
face	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
hard	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
dark	JJ	*	O
orbs	NNS	*)	O
dart	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(ADVP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fro	RB	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
delivers	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
news/bad	bad	*	ESE
news	NN	*	ESE
proposition	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
good	JJ	*	ESE
news	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
visiting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Camp	NNP	*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
morning	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
bad	JJ	*	ESE
news	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
unfounded	JJ	*	O
rumor	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
founded	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
press	NN	*	O
corps	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
early	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Immediately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
angry	JJ	*	DSE
media	NNS	*	O
throng	NN	*)	O
closes	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
Costello	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
containing	VBG	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Altamont-like	JJ	*	ESE
level	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
My	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
editors	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
crush	VB	(VP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
nuts	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
probably	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
female	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
crazy	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
am	VBP	(SQ*	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	O
enough	JJ	(NP*	O
material	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
piece	NN	*)))))))	O
?	.	*))	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Not	RB	(FRAG*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
replies	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Costello	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
bullshit	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
thunders	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
another	DT	(NP*	O
print	NN	*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
're	VBP	(VP*	DSE
making	VBG	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
story	NN	*)	ESE
gets	VBZ	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Costello	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Why	WRB	(FRAG(WHADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	(NP*)	ESE
?	.	*)	O
''	''	*	O
snaps	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Costello	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
blood	NN	*)	ESE
rises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
high-and-tight	JJ	*	ESE
haircut	NN	*)	ESE
stands	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
angry-dog	JJ	*	ESE
scruff	NN	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
BECAUSE	VB	(S(S(VP*))	ESE
...	:	*	O
YOU	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
'RE	VBZ	(VP*))	ESE
...	:	*	O
NOT	VB	(S(VP*))	ESE
...	:	*	O
STAYING	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))))	ESE
!	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Welcome	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pearl	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Antilles	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
deadpans	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Lt.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Commander	NNP	*	O
Brendan	NNP	*	O
McPherson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
limp	JJ	*	ESE
cruise-director	JJ	*	ESE
chirp	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
understandable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
public	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
affairs	NNS	*	ESE
types	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	ESE
little	RB	*)	ESE
testy	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
obvious	JJ	*	ESE
culture	NN	*	ESE
clash	NN	*)	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
why	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)))))))	O
;	:	*	O
journalists	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
paid	VBN	(VP*	ESE
otherwise	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
ever	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
since	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
arriving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
run	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
Southern	NNP	(NP*	O
Command	NNP	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
experienced	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PR	NNP	*	O
equivalent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
ever-subtle	JJ	*	ESE
colleagues	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
borrowing	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Special	JJ	(NP*	O
Forces	NNS	*))	O
terminology	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
disastrous	JJ	(NP*	O
missions	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*))	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
goat	JJ	*	ESE
f	NNS	*	ESE
--	:	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
richest	JJS	*	ESE
irony	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
normally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
not	RB	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
news	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
outcry	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
releasing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
shots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
in-processed	VBN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
photographed	VBN	(VP*	O
kneeling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
wearing	VBG	*	O
earmuffs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
shackles	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
blackout	JJ	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
perfectly	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*)	ESE
precautions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
transporting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
C-141	NN	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	O
responsible	JJ	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
uprising	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
Mazar-i-Sharif	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resulted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CIA	NNP	*	O
operative	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
death	NN	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*	O
crashes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
led	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
chorus	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Euro-whiners	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
lapsed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
hysterics	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
typical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
understatement	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
prisoners	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
brutalized	VBN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
tortured	VBZ	(SBAR(SBAR(S(VP(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
humiliated	VBD	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
sick	JJ	*	ESE
attempt	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
appeal	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
red-neck	JJ	*	ESE
prejudices	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Tony	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
British	NNP	*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
had	VBN	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
complaints	NNS	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mirror	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Stephen	NNP	*	O
Moyes	NNPS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
method	NN	(NP*	ESE
reporting	NN	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
donning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
rig	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Wrapped	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
suffocating	VBG	*	ESE
orange	JJ	*	O
boiler	NN	*	O
suit	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
lost	VBD	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
dignity	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loss	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
easily	RB	*)	ESE
sustained	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
rereading	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
copy	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sillier	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
protestations	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
humanitarians	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
Saddam	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Hussein	NNP	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Prime	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mahathir	NNP	*	O
Mohamad	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
loudest	JJS	*	DSE
noise	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Amnesty	NNP	(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
dings	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
arresting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speechwriter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
rival	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
blindfolded	VBD	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
stripped	VBN	(VP*	O
naked	JJ	(S(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
punched	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
verbally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
abused	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
simulate	VB	(VP*	O
homosexual	JJ	(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*)))))	O
--	:	*	O
none	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
alleged	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
foreign	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
detainee	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
ironically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
either	CC	(VP*	ESE
angling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
end	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
embargo	NN	*)))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
inching	VBG	(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
closer	RBR	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
dementia	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
He	PRP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
January	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Month	NNP	*)))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
invited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Jimmy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Carter	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sensitive	JJ	*	O
lot	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ferry	NN	*)	O
crossing	VBG	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
windward	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
located	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
sit	VBP	(VP*	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
now	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
mellow	JJ	*)	DSE
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Col.	NNP	*	O
Costello	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
patch	NN	(NP(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)))))	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
snapped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
getting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sign-off	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Southern	NNP	(NP*	O
Command	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
cleared	VBN	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Costello	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	*	O
types	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
baffled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
uproar	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Soldiers	NNPS	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
guarding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Much	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
kept	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
outdoor	JJ	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
invariably	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	*	DSE
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
cages	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
topped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
corrugated	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tin-covered	JJ	*	O
wooden	JJ	*	O
roofs	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
keep	VBP	(S(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
little	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rain	NN	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	*)	O
gets	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
inches	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Costello	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
eight-by-eight	JJ	*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
contain	VBP	(VP*	O
about	RB	(SBAR(NP(QP*	O
twice	RB	*	O
as	IN	*	O
much	JJ	*)	O
space	NN	*)	O
as	IN	*	O
soldiers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
crowded	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
unventilated	JJ	*)	ESE
tents	NNS	*))	ESE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
hundred	CD	*	O
yards	NNS	*)	O
away	RB	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
warm	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
showers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
clean	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
laundry	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
hot	JJ	(NP*	O
chow	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Costello	NNP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
're	VBP	(VP*	DSE
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
2,600	CD	(NP(NP*	O
calories	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
'm	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
2,600	CD	(NP(NP*	O
calories	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
'm	VBP	(VP*	DSE
running	VBG	(VP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
ass	NN	*)	ESE
off	IN	(PP*	ESE
chasing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
guys	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
around	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
One	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
medics	NNS	*)	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
claims	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	O
quarter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
malnutrition	NN	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
Costello	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
word	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ourselves	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
sort	NN	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
stop	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
McDonald	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	RB	(QP*	O
one	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
school	NN	*	O
bus	NN	*)	O
transports	VBZ	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
past	IN	(PP*	O
beautiful	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
seaside	NN	*	O
vistas	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
brownish	JJ	(NP*	O
cactus-infested	JJ	*	O
scrub	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
past	JJ	(NP*	O
ramshackle	JJ	*	O
housing	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
up	RB	(NP(ADVP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hill	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
features	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
abandoned	VBN	*	O
auto	NN	*	O
yard	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
locals	NNS	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
Sears	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'd	MD	(VP*	O
strip	VB	(VP*	O
old	JJ	(NP*	O
junkers	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
parts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
used	VBN	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
jerry-rigged	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
jalopies	NNS	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*	O
specials	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Across	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Sears	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
teeming	VBG	*	O
hive	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
concertina	NN	(NP*	O
wire	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
canvas	NN	(NP(NP*	O
tents	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
guard	NN	(NP*	O
towers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
newly	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
constructed	VBN	*)	O
plywood	NN	*	O
interrogation	NN	*	O
shacks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
window-unit	JJ	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
conditioners	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
chain-link	JJ	*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
themselves	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
need	VB	(VP*	O
air	NN	(NP(NP*	O
conditioning	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comfortable	JJ	*	O
Caribbean	JJ	*	O
breeze	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
temperatures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
range	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
low	JJ	*	O
70s	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
night	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
low	JJ	*	O
80s	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))	O
continuously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
circulates	VBZ	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
encampment	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Restricted	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
about	RB	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
150	CD	*)	O
yards	NNS	*)	O
away	RB	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
open-air	JJ	*	O
cellblocks	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
observe	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
slight	JJ	*	O
elevation	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
CNN	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
John	NNP	*	O
Zarrella	NNP	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	O
Heartbreak	NNP	(NP*	O
Ridge	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
so	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
named	VBN	*	O
``	``	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
journalist	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
breaks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
your	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
closer	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Gitmo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
site	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
heartbreak	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
years	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
broke	VBD	(VP*	O
Christopher	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Columbus	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
World	NNP	*	O
voyage	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
failing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
gold	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
threatening	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tongues	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
pretend	VB	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
'd	VBD	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
rankles	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Castro	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
wanted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
throw	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
decades	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*)))))	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pre-Revolution	JJ	*	O
lease	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Likewise	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP*	O
rafters	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mid	NN	*))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
'90s	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
many	DT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
grew	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
so	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
unhappy	JJ	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ghostly	JJ	*	O
desolation	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
'd	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
inject	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
diesel	JJ	*	O
fuel	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
veins	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
drive	VB	(VP*	O
tent	NN	(NP*	O
stakes	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
limbs	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
swim	VBP	*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Castro	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Cuba	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
comparison	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaedans	NNP	*)	O
look	VBP	(VP*	ESE
pretty	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
fat	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
laze	VBP	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shade	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
sleep	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
inch-and-a-half-thick	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
isomats	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
chaplain	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
pray	VBP	(VP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*	O
daily	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
Quick	IN	(PP*	O
studies	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaedans	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
need	VB	(VP*	O
arrows	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
painted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cell	NN	*	O
floors	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
signpost	NN	*)	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
flag	NN	*)))	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mecca	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
while	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
American	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hanoi	NNP	*	O
Hilton	NNP	*)))	O
often	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
spent	VBD	*	ESE
years	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
solitary	JJ	(NP*	ESE
confinement	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
care	NN	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
John	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
McCain	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
comb	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
hair	NN	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
X-Ray	JJ	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
daily	JJ	(NP*	O
sick	JJ	*	O
calls	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
manner	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
doctors	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
optometrists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
podiatrists	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
represent	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
25	CD	*)	O
different	JJ	*	O
nationalities	NNS	*))	O
but	CC	*	O
mostly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	*	O
Saudis	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
freely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
chat	VB	*	O
with	IN	(SBAR*	O
each	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
God	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
knows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(WHNP*)))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
prison	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
uprisings	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demise	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Talk	NN	(NP*	O
magazine	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
trades	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Froot	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Loops	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
garlic	JJ	(NP*	O
bagel	JJ	*	O
chips	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
restroom	NN	*	O
arrangements	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
pretty	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
spartan	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
bucket	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*	O
squirts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
instructed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
fingers	NNS	*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
alternative	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
shackles	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
port-o-loo	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
spared	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expense	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
construction	NN	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
built	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
completely	RB	(ADJP*	O
operational	JJ	*)	O
field	NN	*	O
hospital	NN	*)	O
staffed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
160	CD	(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*)	O
more	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
've	VBP	(VP*	ESE
saved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fortune	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
toilet	NN	(NP*	ESE
paper	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
cultural	JJ	*	DSE
preference	NN	*)	DSE
not	RB	(SBAR(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
shake	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aforementioned	JJ	*	O
amenities	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
receive	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
towels	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Koran	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shortened	JJ	*	O
toothbrush	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
still	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
long	RB	*	O
enough	JJ	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
file	NN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
shiv	NN	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
canteen	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bucket	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
fluoride	NN	(NP*	O
toothpaste	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
shampoo	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(UCP(NP(NP*	ESE
just	RB	*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
shampoo	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
Lively	JJ	*	O
''	''	*))	O
salon	NN	*	O
anti-dandruff	NN	*)	O
shampoo	VBZ	(VP*	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
luxurious	JJ	*	O
shampoo	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gentle	JJ	*	O
formula	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
restores	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
moisture	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
shine	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
body	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
beautifully	RB	(ADJP*	O
clean	JJ	*)	O
hair	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
think	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
getting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
coddled	VBN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Rep.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Mica	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Florida	NNP	*	O
Republican	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
visited	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
bastards	NNS	*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
know	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
shampoo	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
jojoba-enriched	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

WHILE	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
going	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
great	JJ	(NP*	DSE
lengths	NNS	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
talk	VB	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
docile	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
biting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
spitting	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
threatening	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
skirt	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
minders	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
visit	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
snipers	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
tent	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
learn	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADVP*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
snipers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
course	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deadliest	JJS	*	O
sharpshooters	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
ropy	RB	(ADJP*	O
young	JJ	*)	O
bucks	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
21-23	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
age	NN	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seem	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
largely	RB	(ADJP*	O
culled	JJ	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
western	JJ	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
firearms	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
often	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
extra	JJ	(NP*	ESE
appendages	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
tent	NN	*)	O
looks	VBZ	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Marines-issued	JJ	*	O
college	NN	*	O
dorm	NN	*	O
room	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Skoal-juice	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
bottles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
laundry	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
hanging	VBG	(VP*	O
everywhere	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
spade-like	JJ	*	O
sniper	NN	*	O
insignia	NN	*	O
banner	NN	*)	O
tacked	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tent	NN	*	O
wall	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
uprising	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gentleman	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
man	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*	O
towers	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
introduce	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
rioters	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
72	CD	*	ESE
black-eyed	JJ	*	ESE
virgins	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
tell	VBP	(VP*	DSE
me	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
plotting	NNP	(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
afoot	RB	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sgt.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Matt	NNP	*	O
Lampert	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Montana	NNP	(NP*)))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
caught	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cloth	NN	(NP*	O
stuffed	NNS	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
rocks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
tied	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Sgt.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rodney	NNP	*	O
Davis	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
during	IN	(S(PP*	O
chowtime	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
making	VBG	*	O
terrain	NN	(NP*	O
models	NNS	*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
food	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
unlike	IN	(PP*	O
say	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
prisons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
starving	VBG	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
begging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
plenty	RB	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
food	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
get	VBP	(VP*	ESE
fed	VBN	(S(VP*	ESE
better	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
sir	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Lampert	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ask	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(S(ADJP*	O
weird	JJ	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
laugh	VB	(VP*	DSE
sheepishly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sgt.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Josh	NNP	*	O
Westbrook	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sports	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forearm	NN	*	O
tattoo	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
flaming	VBG	(NP*	O
baby	NN	*	O
heads	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
steps	VBZ	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
watched	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
explains	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*)	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
stare	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stare	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
uh	UH	(INTJ*)	O
,	,	*)	O
masturbate	VB	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pleasure	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
freak	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
snipers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
embarrass	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
female	JJ	*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interior	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
weirdness	NNS	*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
end	VB	(VP*	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
eaten	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
toiletries	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
urinated	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
equipment	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(SINV(VP*)	O
Westbrook	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guys	NNS	*)))	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
naked	JJ	*	O
cartwheel	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
bizarre	JJ	*)	ESE
twist	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Lance	NNP	(NP*	O
Corporal	NNP	*	O
Devin	NNP	*	O
Klebaur	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
few	JJ	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
toothpaste	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ass	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*))	O
?	.	*)	O
''	''	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
ask	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
'm	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
puzzled	VBD	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
snipers	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
collar	VBZ	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
grunts	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
say	VBP	(S(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
apt	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
whenever	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	O
one	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
visitors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))))))	O
enter	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
disciplined	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
any	DT	(S(NP*	O
aggressive	JJ	*	O
guard	NN	*	O
behavior	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
brutalized	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
witnesses	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ICRC	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
visits	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
soldier	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
highlight	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
prisoner	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
day	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
spotted	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
unshackled	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
cookies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
milk	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
cigarettes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
shaking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Watch	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
aired	VBN	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
complaints	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
says	VBZ	(SINV(VP*)	DSE
another	DT	(NP*	O
soldier	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pain	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ass	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
see	VBP	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
offering	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
cookies	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
hugging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
like	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
best	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
buddies	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
're	VBP	(VP*	O
undermining	VBG	(VP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
exactly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
point	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
interrogating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
base	NN	(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
wo	MD	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
divulge	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
gleaned	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
likely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
formally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
charged	VBN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tried	VBN	*	O
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
If	IN	(SBARQ(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
please	VB	(VP*	ESE
tell	VB	(VP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*))))	O
?	.	*)	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O

ON	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
SUNDAY	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
visits	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
illumination	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sitting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bus	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tarmac	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
secretary	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
emerge	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
plane	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
pass	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
journalists	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
discussing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
AP-style	JJ	*	O
spelling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
bin	NNP	(NP*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
speculating	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Internet	NN	*	O
cafe	NN	*))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
video	JJ	(NP*	O
games	NNS	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
making	VBG	(VP*	DSE
fun	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fresh-meat	JJ	*	ESE
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
press	NN	*	O
corps	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
overdressed	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
heavy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
wools	NNS	*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
much	JJ	*	O
cooler	NN	*	O
island	NN	*	O
linens	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
security	NN	*	O
agents	NNS	*)))	O
mounts	VBZ	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
bus	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
telling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ground	NN	*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
photos	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tarmac	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fighting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hitting	VBG	*	O
Rumsfeld	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
boom	NN	*	O
mike	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
tours	NNP	*	O
Camp	NNP	*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
senators	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Chiefs	NNPS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Staff	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Richard	NNP	*	O
Myers	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
overshadowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
secretary	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
rock	NN	*	ESE
star	NN	*	ESE
aura	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ask	VB	(VP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
meets	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Heartbreak	NNP	(NP*	O
Ridge	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hooah	JJ	(NP*	ESE
performance	NN	*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
endeared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
firm	NN	(NP*))	ESE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
ever	RB	*	ESE
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
not	RB	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
afford	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
nicely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
avoids	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
plucking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
hair	NN	*	ESE
worth	NN	*)	ESE
splitting	JJ	(VP*))	ESE
--	:	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
status	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
call	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
Human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
hawks	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
decided	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
competent	JJ	*	ESE
tribunal	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
up	IN	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
argument	NN	*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
rather	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
academic	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
read	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
wanting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
confer	VB	(VP*	O
POW	NNP	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
alleged	JJ	(NP*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Doing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
would	MD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
eligible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
repatriation	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
home	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
would	MD	*	O
forbid	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
punished	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
escape	VB	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
confer	VB	*	O
upon	RP	(PRT*)	O
them	PRP	(NP*	O
the	DT	*)	O
right	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
dentures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
case	NN	(NP*))	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
lost	VBD	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
teeth	NNS	*)	ESE
while	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
say	VB	(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
biting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
guard	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Most	RBS	(ROOT(S(S(ADJP*	ESE
ludicrous	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
afforded	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
advances	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pay	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
amount	NN	*))	O
``	``	*))))	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
...	:	*	O
inferior	JJ	(VP(ADJP*	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
pay	VBP	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
deal	NN	*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Kill	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
Americans	NNPS	*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
get	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
arrested	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*))	ESE
then	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
pay	NN	*)	ESE
raise	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
global	JJ	*	ESE
bellyaching	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
humane	VB	(VP*	O
treatment	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
getting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
receiving	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
time	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
eat	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stale	JJ	*	O
Ding	NNP	*	O
Dong	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greasy	JJ	*	O
plate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
onion	NN	(NP*	O
rings	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

My	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
keepers	NNS	*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
care	VB	(VP*	ESE
less	JJR	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
contrast	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
breakfast	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
lunch	NN	*))	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
served	VBN	(VP*	O
oatmeal	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
orange	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
peanut	NN	(NP*	O
butter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
margarine	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
culturally	RB	(ADJP*	O
appropriate	JJ	*)	O
''	''	*	O
halal	NN	*	O
meal	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
giant	JJ	*	O
snack	NN	*	O
pack	NN	*))	O
containing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Froot	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Loops	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
raisins	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Nature	NNP	*	O
Valley	NNP	*	O
granola	NN	*	O
bar	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
baked	JJ	(NP*	O
garlic	JJ	*	O
bagel	JJ	*	O
chips	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bullseye	JJ	(NP*	O
barbecue-seasoned	JJ	*	O
sunflower	NN	*	O
kernels	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
overseers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
detainees	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
enough	JJ	(NP*	O
pita	NN	*	O
bread	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
meals	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
planning	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
food	NN	*	O
spicier	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
back	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
home	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wait	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stand	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hot	JJ	*	O
sun	NN	*	O
most	JJS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
hours	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
confined	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Consolidated	NNP	*	O
Bachelor	NNP	*	O
Quarters	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
sleeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
duplex	NN	*	O
room	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*)))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
pillows	NNS	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
blankets	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
beach	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
hundred	CD	*	O
yards	NNS	*)	O
away	RB	*)	O
from	IN	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
building	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
emboldened	VBN	(S(S(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rum	NN	*))))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
imported	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Puerto	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rico	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
colleague	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mad	JJ	*	O
dash	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guard	NN	*	O
searchlight	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bathwater	NN	*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*))))))	O
anyway	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
drinking	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
entertainment	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pool	NN	*	O
table	NN	*)	O
--	:	*	O
one	CD	(S(NP*	O
cue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
cracked	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
missing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
tip	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
contrast	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
read	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
Korans	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
novels	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
more	RBR	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
books	NNS	*	O
''	''	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	O
night	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
sleep	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
cell	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
C-141	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
plane	NN	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
transported	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
prematurely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
hustled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
so	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
military	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
dump	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Nowheresville	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
New	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Jersey	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
Sunday	NNP	*	ESE
night	NN	*))))	ESE
after	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
every	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
rental	JJ	*	ESE
car	NN	*	ESE
place	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
state	NN	*)))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
closed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
community	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
right	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
meted	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
yourself	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
bother	VB	(VP*	ESE
canvassing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Just	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	*	O
press	NN	*	O
pass	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(S(ADJP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
gon	JJ	*)	ESE
na	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
long	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
long	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)	ESE
till	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
rocket	NN	*	ESE
man	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
exactly	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
Waldorf-Astoria	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
capsule	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
boast	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
creature	NN	*	ESE
comforts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
stretch	NN	*	ESE
limo	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
bother	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
increasing	VBG	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
well-heeled	JJ	(NP*	O
executives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
celebrities	NNS	*)))	O
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP(VP*	O
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
spend	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*	O
training	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
orbit	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Welcome	VB	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dawn	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
space	NN	(NP*	ESE
tourism	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
opportunities	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
view	VB	(VP*	O
spaceship	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Earth	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
aboveare	NN	(NP*)))	O
rare	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
visions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
grand	JJ	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Everyman	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shed	VB	(VP*	O
planet	NN	(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(FRAG*	O
briefly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
latest	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
tour-o-naut	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
buckle	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
place	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
tray	JJ	*	ESE
table	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
upright	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
locked	VBN	*)	ESE
position	NN	*))))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
venture	NN	*	O
capitalist	NN	*	O
Mark	NNP	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
space-station	NN	*	O
resupply	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*))))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Baikonur	NNP	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
fare-paying	JJ	*	O
visitor	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bootsteps	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Dennis	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tito	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
alone	RB	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Another	DT	(S(NP(QP*	O
eight	CD	*	O
to	TO	*	O
10	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
interest	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
trip	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
notes	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Tereza	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Predescu	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Space	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Adventures	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arlington	NNP	(NAC*	O
,	,	*	O
Va.	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
company	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
arranges	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

'N	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
space	NN	(NP*)	O
?	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
next	JJ	*	O
resupply	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
vying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
passenger	NN	*	O
seat	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Aeronautics	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Space	NNP	(NP*	O
Administration	NNP	*	O
associate	NN	*	O
administrator	NN	*	O
Lori	NNP	*	O
Garver	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
boy-band	JJ	(NP*	O
'N	NNP	(NP*	O
Sync	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Lance	NNP	*	O
Bass	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Aerosmith	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rocker	NN	*	O
Steven	NNP	*	O
Tyler	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
eyeing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pent-up	JJ	(NP*	DSE
demand	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*))	O
emotionally	RB	(ADVP*	O
''	''	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
journey	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
John	NNP	(NP*	O
Logsdon	NNP	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Policy	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
D.C.	NNP	*)))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Harris	NNP	(NP*	O
Interactive	NNP	*)	O
surveyed	VBD	(VP*	O
Americans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
'	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Canadians	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
willingness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
tourists	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Overall	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
86	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2,022	CD	*	O
respondents	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
interested	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Extrapolating	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Space	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Adventures	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
commissioned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
study	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
estimates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
10,000	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
100,000	CD	*)	O
apiece	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
up-and-down	JJ	*	O
suborbital	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Mercury	NNP	*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
Alan	NNP	*	O
Shepard	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
translates	VBZ	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
1	CD	*	O
billion-a-year	CD	*))	O
business	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
promotion	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
gift	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
80	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
respondents	NNS	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
'd	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
intercontinental	JJ	*	O
space-plane	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
70	CD	(S(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space-station	NN	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
orbital	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
74	CD	(S(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
suborbital	JJ	*	O
journey	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
tourism	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
truly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
take	VB	*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Frank	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sietzen	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Transportation	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aerospace-industry	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Arlington	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Va.	NNP	*))))))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
growing	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
transportation	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*))	O
...	:	*	O
decision	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
interest	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fund	VB	(VP*	O
...	:	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
generation	NN	*	O
reusable	NN	*	O
launch	NN	*	O
vehicle	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
supplant	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sufficiently	RB	(ADJP*	O
low	JJ	*)	O
cost	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
commercially	RB	(ADJP*	O
viable	JJ	*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Out	IN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
rockets	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
service	VB	(VP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
passenger	NN	*	O
flights	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
likens	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*)	O
undertook	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1951	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
aerial	JJ	*	O
tanker	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
refuel	JJ	(NP*	O
jet	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
bombers	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
KC-135	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
commercially	RB	(ADVP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Boeing	NNP	*	O
707	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
jet	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Launch	NNP	*	O
Initiative	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
budgeted	VBN	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
4.8	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
2006	CD	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
safer	JJR	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
reliable	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
cheaper	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
follow-ons	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SLI	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third-generation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
launch	NN	(NP*	O
vehicles	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
20	CD	*)	O
companies	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
competition	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
10	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
purse	NN	*)	O
offered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
firm	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fly	VB	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two-stage	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
reusable	JJ	*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
suborbital	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
refurbished	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
paraded	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mockup	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(PP(NP*	O
60-foot-long	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
Canadian	NNP	*	O
Arrow	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
through	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Manhattan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pitch	NN	*)	O
coinciding	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
launch	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Known	VBN	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
X	NNP	*	O
Prize	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
contest	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
modeled	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prizes	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
stimulated	VBN	(S(VP*	O
growth	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
aviation	NN	*)	O
early	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
X	NNP	(NP*	O
Prize	NNP	*	O
Foundation	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*	O
Peter	NNP	*	O
Diamandis	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Modern	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
barnstormers	NNS	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Charles	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Lindbergh	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
record-breaking	JJ	*	O
trans-Atlantic	JJ	*	O
solo	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
offer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
aviation	NN	*	O
prize	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
adds	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
within	IN	(S(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
passenger	NN	*	O
flights	NNS	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
common	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
prize	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
People	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
paid	VBD	(VP*	O
what	WP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
large	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sums	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
early-20th	JJ	(NP*	O
century	NN	*	O
barnstormers	NNS	*))	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2,000	CD	(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
X	NNP	*	O
Prize	NNP	*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
emerges	VBZ	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Space	NNP	(NP*	O
Adventures	NNP	*)	O
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
payments	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
roughly	RB	(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*)	O
customers	NNS	*)))	O
willing	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
astronautical	JJ	(NP*	O
barnstormers	NNS	*))	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
emerges	VBZ	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
perhaps	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
early	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
2004	CD	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
2005	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
contest	NN	*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
stimulating	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
related	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
ranging	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
states	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
ports	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
tourism	NN	(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Federal	NNP	(NP*	O
Aviation	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)))	O
development	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
licensing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
requirements	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*	O
facilities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
passenger	NN	*	O
operations	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Where	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Dr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Diamandis	NNP	*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
relatively	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
short-term	JJ	*)	O
opportunity	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)	O
suggest	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
viable	JJ	*	O
space-tourism	JJ	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP(NP(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	*	O
decade	NN	*	O
or	CC	(QP*	O
more	JJR	*))	O
away	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
but	CC	(FRAG*	ESE
not	RB	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
frame	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
please	VB	(VP*	DSE
tourism	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
advocates	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Veni	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Vidi	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*)))	O

FIGHTING	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
tyranny	NNP	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
tyranny	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
oil-giant	JJ	(NP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
coup-plotting	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reinstalled	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
tyrannical	JJ	*	ESE
tactics	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
former	JJ	*	ESE
Army	NNP	*	ESE
coup-meister	NN	*)	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))	O
-	:	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
abused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
mandate	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
heavy-handed	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)	O
largely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
rewritten	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
remaining	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
past	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
2020	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
promises	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
shreds	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	ESE
flirtation	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
leftist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
dictators	NNS	*)))	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
hints	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
inclinations	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
power	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Latin	NNP	(S(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
coups	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
pivotal	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hemisphere	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
democracies	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
means	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
especially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
nonviolent	JJ	*))	O
means	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
removal	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stack	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
board	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
favor	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
executives	NNS	*)	O
revolted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
threatening	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cutoff	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
catalyst	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
pent-up	JJ	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Business	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
labor	NN	(NP*	O
unions	NNS	*))	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
giant	JJ	*	DSE
protest	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
perhaps	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
knowing	VBG	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
portions	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
side	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
gunshots	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
fired	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
march	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
killing	VBG	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*	O
dozen	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
step	VB	(VP*	O
aside	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
renewed	VBN	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
let	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*	DSE
but	CC	*)	DSE
welcomed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
tarnishing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
champion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
repent	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wins	VBZ	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
polls	NNS	*))))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Robert	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Registrar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Tobaiwa	NNP	*	O
Mudede	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mudede	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
re-elected	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
1,685,212	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
1,258,758	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
challenger	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
...	:	*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	O
declare	NNP	(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*)	O
Mugabe	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
office	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mudede	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*	O
mark	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
districts	NNS	*)	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Results	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
broadcast	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))))	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
Mugabe	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
1,634,382	CD	*)	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
52	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
3.1	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
ballots	NNS	*	O
cast	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
rival	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
1,185,890	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
38	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*	O
cast	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
cited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
widespread	JJ	(NP*	ESE
abuses	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
mid-morning	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
executive	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
...	:	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
party	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
David	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Coltart	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
MP	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Mdc	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
To	TO	(S(S(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
mildly	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
odd	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
very	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
low	JJ	*)	ESE
turnouts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
massives	NNS	*	ESE
ones	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
noon	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1000	NNP	(NP*	O
GMT	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*)	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bulawayo	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
rigged	NNP	*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
British	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	O
``	``	*	O
pretty	RB	*	ESE
strong	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
early	JJ	(SBAR(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
that	IN	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
stolen	VBN	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
judgement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
parliament	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rigged	JJ	*	ESE
vote	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
enormous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
implications	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ties	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
pretty	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
enormous	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
implications	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
terrible	JJ	*	ESE
period	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(PP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
but	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
hold	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
course	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
dear	RB	(ADJP*))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
elsewhere	RB	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Counting	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
battling	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
candidate	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
22	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
complaints	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
independent	JJ	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
neither	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
spark	VB	(VP*	O
fresh	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Straw	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Zanu-PF	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
up	IN	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
close	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polls	NNS	(NP*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
irregularities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
shortage	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
booths	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
harassment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
agents	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
dawn	CD	*))	O

Venezuelans	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
awoke	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
transformed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dramatic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
violent	JJ	*)	O
events	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
24	CD	*	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
11	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
80	CD	*))	O
injured	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
escalating	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*	O
stoppage	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
cripple	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*))))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
more	RBR	*)))	ESE
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
not	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
name	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
honour	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
independence	NN	*	O
hero	NN	*	O
Simon	NNP	*	O
Bolivar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
heroes	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
name	NN	*	O
change	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
act	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
transition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
second	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three-day	JJ	*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Confederation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Workers	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CTV	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
leader	NN	*	O
Carlos	NNP	*	O
Ortega	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
protesting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
managers	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*	O
PDVSA	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shellshocked	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	ESE

Managers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
striking	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
board	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
directors	NNS	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
traffic	NN	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
lighter	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
normal	JJ	*	O
Friday	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	*	O
Venezuelans	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
work	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
shellshock	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
rally	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
100,000	CD	*))	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
middle	JJ	(NP*	O
class	NN	*	O
Venezuelans	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
ended	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
bloodshed	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
marchers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resignation	NN	*))	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
shots	NNS	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
fired	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crowd	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eyewitness	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Euridice	NNP	*	O
Ledesma	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
snipers	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
marchers	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
rooftops	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
palace	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Film	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
footage	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
caught	VBD	(VP*	O
armed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
firing	NN	*	ESE
indiscriminately	NN	*)))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
marchers	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Later	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
army	NN	(NP*	O
chief	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
General	NNP	(NP*	O
Efrain	NNP	*	O
Vasquez	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Bolivarian	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
armed	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
horrible	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
shooting	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
defenceless	JJ	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
photographer	NNP	(NP*	O
Luis	NNP	*	O
Gomez	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(X(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
last	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
addressing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assure	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
respected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demonstrate	VB	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moments	NNS	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
television	NN	*	O
channels	NNS	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
telling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
lies	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
shootings	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
final	JJ	*	ESE
straw	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
succession	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
officers	NNS	(NP*)))	O
filled	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
TV	NN	*)	O
screens	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
killings	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
tolerable	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
tanks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
Miraflores	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
holed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bid	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
save	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
presidency	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
chief	NN	(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
General	NNP	*	O
Lucas	NNP	*	O
Rincon	NNP	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
brief	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
Mr	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
accepted	VBN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
wife	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Marisabel	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
children	NNS	(NP*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cover	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
darkness	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
PDVSA	NNP	*	O
jet	NN	*)))))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Barquisimeto	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Fuerte	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tiuna	NNP	*	O
army	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
killings	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

News	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resignation	NN	*)))	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
flag-waving	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
whistle-blowing	JJ	*	O
Venezuelans	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
surround	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
air	NN	*	O
force	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
La	NNP	(NP*	O
Carlota	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
seeing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
departure	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
exit	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*	ESE
vacuum	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
obvious	JJ	*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
challenge	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
heal	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
divisions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
exist	VBP	(S(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
people	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(SINV(S*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
feeling	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
uncertainty	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
obvious	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
solved	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Ms	NNP	(NP*	O
Ledesma	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
firms	NNS	*)	O
furiously	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
lobby	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

BUENOS	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
AIRES	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
multinational	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
billions	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
losses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
furiously	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
lobbied	VBN	*	DSE
Argentine	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
lawmakers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
final	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*	O
legislation	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
devalue	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decade-old	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*	O
parity	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
telecommunications	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
,	,	*	O
transport	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
companies	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
collectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lose	VB	(VP*	O
billions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
lawmakers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
approve	VBP	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
package	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Presidential	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
Amadeo	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
stunned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
intense	JJ	*	DSE
efforts	NNS	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reverse	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
package	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Amadeo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(NP*	ESE
many	JJ	*	ESE
calls	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
touch	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
nonetheless	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
passed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lower	JJR	*	O
house	NN	*)	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)))	O
night	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
easy	JJ	(NP*	O
passage	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
today	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	DSE
frantic	JJ	*	DSE
lobbying	NN	*)	DSE
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
banks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
phone	NN	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
petroleum	NN	(NP*	O
firms	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Analysts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
estimate	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
stand	VBP	(VP*	O
collectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lose	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
3	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proposal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
devalue	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
scrap	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
convertibility	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
kept	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
worth	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(PP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
attracted	VBD	(VP*	O
much	JJ	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990s	NNS	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
companies	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
promised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
profits	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
worth	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
the	DT	(PP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
rock-solid	JJ	*	O
link	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
overpriced	VBN	(VP*	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
manufacturers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*	O
door	NN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
half	RB	(ADJP*	O
as	RB	*	O
expensive	JJ	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
operate	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
broke	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
pensioners	NNS	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
state	NN	*	O
workers	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
run	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
banking	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
maintained	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP*	O
250-per-week	JJ	*)	O
limit	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cash	NN	(NP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
fear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
street	NN	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*	O
measure	NN	*	O
passes	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
seek	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
losses	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
raising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
prices	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
medicine	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
debating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
vast	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
powers	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
less	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
three	CD	*)	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
132	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
owed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
package	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
legislation	NN	(NP*)))	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
--	:	(PRN*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
expense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*))))	O
--	:	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ease	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
pain	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
angry	JJ	*)	DSE
middle	JJ	*	O
class	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MOST	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
DEBT	NNP	*	O
IN	NNP	*	O
DOLLARS	NNPS	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
80	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
personal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
most	JJS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
middle	JJ	*	O
class	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP*)	O
proposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
converting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
mortgages	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
car	NN	(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
consumer	NN	*	O
debt	NN	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
100,000	CD	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
devalued	VBN	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
car	NN	*	O
loan	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
10,000	CD	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
worth	JJ	(ADJP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
7,000	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
control	VBP	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
half	PDT	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
debt	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
constant	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*))	ESE
what	WP	(X(X*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Duhalde	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
resisted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
lobbying	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
banks	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
losses	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP(VP*	O
gas	NN	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
direct	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
shoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
banks	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reverse	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
portion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
package	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
proposes	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
billing	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
pump	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
fixed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cellular	JJ	*	O
phone	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
water	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
power	NN	*	O
bills	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
like	JJ	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
invested	VBN	(VP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
resolves	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
fear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
break	VB	(VP*	ESE
promises	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
contracts	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
nations	NNS	*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
try	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
less	JJR	(NP*	ESE
dire	JJ	*	ESE
times	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
successful	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reference	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Eduardo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Curia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
economist	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

CONTINUING	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
EFFECT	NNP	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	DSE
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ripple	JJ	*	ESE
effect	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
hit	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
direct	JJ	*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
those	DT	*	ESE
suppliers	NNS	*)	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chain	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
supply	NN	(NP*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
impacted	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Meril	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Markely	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Houston-based	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tax	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
accounting	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
KPMG	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
transportation	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
phone	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
companies	NNS	*))))))	O
want	VBP	(VP(VP*)	DSE
--	:	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
appear	VBP	(VP*)	ESE
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
--	:	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
indexing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
raise	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
compensate	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
widening	VBG	*	O
gap	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
investments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
totaling	VBG	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
16	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Much	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
petroleum	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
telecommunications	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
energy	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

FLORIDA	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
ASTRONAUTS	NNP	*	O
REPAIR	NNP	*	O
SPACE	NNP	*	O
STATION	NNP	*	O
WINGS	NNP	*))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Two	CD	(S(NP*	O
space-walking	JJ	*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
repair	NN	*	O
job	NN	*))	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
wrapped	VBD	(VP*	O
thermal	JJ	(NP*	O
covers	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pair	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
motors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
turn	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
giant	JJ	*	O
solar	JJ	*	O
wings	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
covers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
shield	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
motors	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
temperature	NN	*	O
extremes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
eliminate	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
spikes	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
stalls	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
motors	NNS	*)	O
keep	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
solar	JJ	*	O
wings	NNS	*)	O
pointing	VBG	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sun	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
generating	VBG	(NP*	O
electricity	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Astronauts	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Linda	NNP	*	O
Godwin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
Tani	NNP	*)	O
floated	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
grabbed	VBD	(VP*	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
robot	NN	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
50-foot	JJ	*	O
ride	NN	*))))	O
up	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
sworn	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*)))))	O

SubHead	VBN	(ROOT(SINV(VP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Lawmakers	CD	(NP*	O
boycott	NN	*	DSE
event	NN	*)))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
sworn	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bitterly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
fought	JJ	*)	ESE
election	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
denounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
rigged	VBD	(S(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
publicly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
government	NN	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
winner	NN	*	O
four	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
themes	NNS	*))	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
struck	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
union	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
rebel	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBD	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)	O
22	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
audience	NN	*)	O
assembled	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
colonial-style	JJ	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
mansion	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
victory	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
triumph	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
West	NNP	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
whites	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
had	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
aligned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
governing	VBG	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Union-Patriotic	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
dealt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
stunning	JJ	*	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
imperialism	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
states	NNS	(NP*)))	O
attended	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Sam	NNP	*	O
Nujoma	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Namibia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Joseph	NNP	*	O
Kabila	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
57	CD	*	O
lawmakers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))	O
Movement	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
boycotted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
did	VBD	(S(VP*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
protesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
had	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
tainted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
months	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
last-minute	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
changes	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
electoral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
disenfranchisement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
tens	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
thousands	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
voters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
stronghold	NN	*)	O
--	:	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
failed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
reduced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
78	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
defiant	NN	(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
blaming	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
racism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
pledging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accelerate	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
land-reform	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
fertile	JJ	*)	O
land	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
redistribution	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
landless	JJ	*	O
blacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
Thanks	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
loudly	NNP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
saying	VBG	(VP*)))	DSE
:	:	*)	O
Never	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
colony	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
decide	VBP	(S(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
sirs	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
one	NN	*	ESE
person	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
10	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
Downing	NNP	*	ESE
St.	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Tony	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Blair	NNP	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
takeovers	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
occupations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
farms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
lack	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
transparency	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
violence	NN	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
donors	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
funding	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fourth	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recession	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
worsening	VBG	*	O
food	NN	*	O
shortage	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
appealed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reconcile	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
address	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
pressing	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*)	ESE
needs	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
short	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
proposing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigerian	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
pressing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
such	PDT	(NP*	O
an	DT	*	O
arrangement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	ESE
deepening	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
suspension	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonies	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
commented	VBD	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
robust	JJ	*)	O
economy	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
most	RBS	(NP(ADJP*	O
respected	JJ	*)	O
democracy	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
looking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
denounce	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
reassurance	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
continent	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
property	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Investors	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Western	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
interpret	VB	(VP*	ESE
Mbeki	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Africa	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	ESE
intent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
revitalizing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
economies	NNS	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
good	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
expanded	VBN	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwean	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
begins	VBZ	(VP*)))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
waited	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
long	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*))))	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*)	O
knitting	VBG	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
playing	VBG	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
waiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chance	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
present	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
strongest	JJS	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
wracked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
intense	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*)	ESE
blamed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pleased	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
voting	VBG	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
believing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
turnout	NN	*)))))	ESE
favored	VBD	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
voting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
going	VBG	(S(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADVP*	O
slowly	RB	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
authorities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
holding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hurt	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
chances	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
voting	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
intention	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
frustrate	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
voters	NNS	*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
trying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
move	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
goal	NN	*	ESE
posts	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
disenfranchise	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
urging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
voters	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
patient	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outskirts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
800	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
standing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
only	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
about	RB	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
voted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
21/2	2	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
strongholds	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
cut	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
half	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
uncertain	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
show	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
force	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
witnesses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
unusually	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
large	JJ	*)	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
soldiers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
vehicles	NNS	*))))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Government	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
deployment	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
pronounced	NNP	(NP*	O
CHAN-ger-ai	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
union	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
promising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
reforms	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
mired	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Inflation	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
110	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
unemployment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
60	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
hundreds	NNS	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
of	IN	*	O
thousands	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
hungry	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
faced	VBN	(VP*	O
significant	JJ	(NP*	O
dissent	NN	*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
troubles	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
painted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Movement	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
servants	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
interests	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
powers	NNS	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
see	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
fail	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
casting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
lashed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
critics	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	JJ	(NP*	ESE
prejudice	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
bias	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ruling	NN	(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
bias	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
bias	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
name	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
appear	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
township	NN	*))))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
planned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
aides	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
gaffe	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
whisked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
listed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Human	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
analysts	NNS	*))	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
tainted	VBN	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
elections	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
canceled	VBN	(VP*	O
scores	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
rallies	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
powers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
restore	VB	(VP*	O
controversial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
struck	VBN	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appear	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
easier	RBR	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rig	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
vote	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
scores	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
agents	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
harassed	VBD	(VP*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
accredit	VB	(VP*	O
most	RBS	(NP(ADJP*	O
independent	JJ	*)	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
voting	NN	*	O
monitors	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
anyway	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
town	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chininga	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
12	CD	(S(NP*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
election	NN	(S(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commercial	NNP	*	O
Farmers	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
pre-election	JJ	*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
reveal	VBP	(VP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
fears	NNS	*)	DSE
-	:	*	O
with	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
reporting	VBG	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
70	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
questioned	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
That	DT	(S(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
secret	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
tell	VB	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Ronnie	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dube	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
48	CD	(ADJP*	O
year-old	JJ	*)	O
carpenter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
future	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Lines	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
snaked	VBD	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
mile	NN	*)	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*	O
longer	RB	*	O
than	IN	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
parliamentary	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
saw	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
challenge	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Patriotic	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
narrowly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
78	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
promised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
public	JJ	(NP*	O
works	NNS	*)	O
initiatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
re-elected	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
seizing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
white-owned	JJ	(NP*	O
farms	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
landless	JJ	(NP*	O
blacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whites	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
make	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
less	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
one	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
population	NN	*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
own	VBP	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
a	DT	*	O
third	JJ	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
farmland	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
49	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
promising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
revive	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
corruption	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
orderly	JJ	*)	ESE
land	NN	*	O
reform	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
supporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
government	NN	(NP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
you	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
tired	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
scared	VBN	(ADJP*))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
hungry	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
have	VB	(S(S(VP*	ESE
courage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
darkest	NN	*	ESE
hour	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
dawn	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
150	CD	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
died	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
politically	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
motivated	JJ	*)	O
violence	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
many	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
black	JJ	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
activists	NNS	*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ruling	VBG	(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
militants	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
charged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
treason	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
connection	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
alleged	VBN	*	O
plot	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assassinate	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
overturn	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decree	NN	*)	O
restoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
laws	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP(VP*	O
confusion	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
voter	NN	(NP*	O
registration	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
location	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
open	RP	(PRT*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
long	JJ	(S(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
court	NN	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defer	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
until	IN	(PP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Voting	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
smoothly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
village	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nkayi	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
communities	NNS	*)))	O
hardest	RBS	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
hit	VBD	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
pre-election	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
90	CD	*)	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
north	RB	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bulawayo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
agent	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
harassed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ruling	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
sat	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))))	O
chanting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
slogans	NNS	(NP*)	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Africa	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Grand	NNP	*	ESE
Bargain	NNP	*))	ESE

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rigged	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Africa	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
two	CD	*	O
richest	JJS	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
powerful	JJ	*))	ESE
nations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
punish	VB	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
flawed	JJ	*	ESE
presidential	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
courageous	JJ	*	ESE
stand	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
renew	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
promise	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
leading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
industrialized	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
trade	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
investment	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
only	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
Africa	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
better	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
governance	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
grand	JJ	*	ESE
bargain	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
uplift	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
poorest	JJS	*	O
continent	NN	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
jeopardy	NN	(NP*))	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Thabo	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
south	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
54-nation	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
colonies	NNS	*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
endorsement	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
yet	RB	(NP(NP*	O
another	DT	*	O
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
isolation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
solidarity	NN	(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
grand	JJ	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Partnership	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Development	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
initiated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
model	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poverty-reducing	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
UN	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
see	VB	(S(VP*	O
opinion	NN	(NP*	O
piece	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Without	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
elections	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Africa	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
amount	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
aid	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
hope	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(S(NP*)	O
joining	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
West	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
criticizing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwean	JJ	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
troubled	VBN	*	ESE
neighbor	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
collapsing	VBG	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
compromise	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
press	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
repression	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
take	VB	*	O
farmland	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
whites	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
just	RB	(NP*	ESE
compensation	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
continent	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
other	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)))	O
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
little	JJ	(NP*	DSE
fault	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
ran	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
overwhelming	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
voter	NN	(NP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
manipulation	NN	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
polls	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
join	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
agrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
better-run	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
fair	JJ	*	ESE
deal	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
trade	NN	*	O
unions	NNS	*)	O
protesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tactics	NNS	*))))	O
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
widespread	JJ	(NP*	DSE
disgust	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
now	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
cornered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
types	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
isolation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
opprobrium	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
peers	NNS	*))))))	O
-	:	*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
lashed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
charging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
desperation	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
condoned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
African	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
inclined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
quiet	JJ	*	ESE
diplomacy	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
heard	VBD	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
stature	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
stand	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
future	NN	*))))	O
bring	VBP	(VP*	ESE
hope	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
African	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
renewal	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
greater	JJR	(NP*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
disagrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	(NP*	O
axis	JJ	*	O
'	''	*	O
remark	NN	*)))))	O

MUNICH	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
defense	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
disagrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
view	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
stark	JJ	*	ESE
reminder	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
differences	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
remain	VBP	(VP*	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
enemies	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
closer	RBR	(ADVP*	O
together	RB	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Sergei	NNP	*	O
Ivanov	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
supports	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*))))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Jan.	NNP	(NP*	O
26	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
refuge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)))	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
escaping	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Iranians	NNPS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Pakistan	NNP	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
put	VBN	*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
escaping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
ABC	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))	O
This	DT	(NP*	O
Week	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
official	JJ	*	O
Xinhua	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
weighed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
choice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
words	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
orchestrating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
public	JJ	(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
advance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
strikes	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expansion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
word	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
suggested	VBD	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
alliance	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
exist	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
share	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
chilly	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Italian	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Antonio	NNP	*	O
Martino	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
meanwhile	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
proven	JJ	(NP*	ESE
proof	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
supporting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Saddam	NNP	*	O
Hussein	NNP	*)	O
dispatched	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ivanov	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
double	JJ	*	ESE
standard	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
definition	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
asking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
members	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
network	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
Chechen	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*)	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
unfurled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*	DSE
list	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
rogue	JJ	(NP*	ESE
states	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
either	CC	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
terror	NN	(NP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
arsenals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
deadly	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Well	UH	(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
your	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
allies	NNS	*)))	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
give	VBP	(S(VP*	O
finance	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Ivanov	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Munich	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Security	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
invitation-only	JJ	*	O
gathering	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
400	CD	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
debated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
diverse	JJ	*	O
U.S	NNP	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
delivered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
singular	NN	*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
conference	NN	(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*))))	O
:	:	*	O
NATO	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
remains	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
vital	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
allies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consult	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
friends	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
audience	NN	*)	O
heard	VBN	(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
do	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
feels	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Saddam	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Hussein	NNP	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
next	JJ	*	ESE
target	NN	*)	ESE
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
shapes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sunday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
final	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
underscored	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
vast	JJ	*	ESE
differences	NNS	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sen.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Lindsey	NNP	*	O
Graham	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
R-S.C.	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Ivanov	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Belarus	NNP	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
cheap	JJ	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
subsidies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
exporter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
equipment	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Ivanov	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
Belarus	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
sanction	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
business	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP*))	O
not	RB	(PP*	O
under	IN	*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Angola	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
Gulf	NN	*	ESE
states	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Axis	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
'	POS	*)	O
charge	NN	*)))	DSE
raises	VBZ	(VP*	O
questions	NNS	(NP*))))	DSE

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
declaration	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	ESE
such	JJ	(PP*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
Iran	NNP	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
North	NNP	*	ESE
Korea	NNP	*)))	ESE
represent	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
prevented	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
acquiring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)	O
touched	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
questions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
globe	NN	*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

White	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
spokesmen	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
blunt	JJ	*	ESE
language	NN	*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Address	NNP	*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*)))))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
imminent	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
expanded	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
elevating	VBG	(S(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fight	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spread	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
chemical	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
biological	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	ESE
foreign-policy	NN	*	ESE
priority	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Congress	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iran	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
pose	VBP	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
grave	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
growing	VBG	(NP*	ESE
danger	NN	*))	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
seek	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mass	JJ	(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
links	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
groups	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
repeated	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
theme	NN	*)	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
town	NN	*	O
hall	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Carolina	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
security	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
named	VBD	(VP*))))	O
angrily	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
reforms	NNS	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
gotten	VBN	(VP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
warmongering	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
He	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
arrogantly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
humiliatingly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
aggressively	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
interfering	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*))))	ESE
--	:	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
worse	JJR	(VP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
insult	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Iranian	JJ	*	ESE
nation	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Khatami	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Cabinet	NNP	*	O
session	NN	*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
night	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iraqi	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Taha	NNP	*	O
Yassin	NNP	*	O
Ramadan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
responding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
remark	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
source	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
official	JJ	*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
News	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
KCNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
monitored	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(NP*))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*)))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
shenanigan	NN	*)	ESE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
continuing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
agression	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
rhetoric	NN	*)	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
shudders	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
allies	NNP	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Dae-jung	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
rested	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
reputation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
easing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
half-century	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
confrontation	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
armed	JJ	*)	O
communist	JJ	*	O
North	NN	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
missile	NN	(NP(NP*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
wise	JJ	*	DSE
thing	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
corner	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Koreans	NNPS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
routes	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
talking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Yukihiko	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ikeda	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
congressman	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

American	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decade	NN	*	O
or	CC	(QP*	O
more	JJR	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
attempts	NNS	(NP*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
poisons	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
germs	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
pledge	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(NP(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
represent	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
significant	JJ	*	ESE
hardening	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
position	NN	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
condemnation	NN	*)	DSE
marked	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
confrontation	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
optimism	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Tehran	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
moderate	JJ	*	ESE
behavior	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NN	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
opening	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
watched	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
chagrin	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iran	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
funneled	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
proxies	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
western	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
attempted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ship	VB	(VP*	O
sophisticated	JJ	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Yasser	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Palestinian	NNP	*	O
Authority	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shipment	NN	*)	O
Jan.	NNP	(NP*	O
3	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Defense	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
H.	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
particularly	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	DSE
harsh	JJ	*)	DSE
words	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
training	VBG	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
tried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
talk	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
threats	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
assuming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
initially	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
declined	VBD	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Pyongyang	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
halting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
export	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ballistic	JJ	(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
eventually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
offered	VBD	*	DSE
talks	NNS	(NP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Pyongyang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
named	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
``	``	(S(VP*	ESE
continues	VBZ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
flaunt	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
hostility	NN	*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
support	VB	(VP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iraq	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
played	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
sponsoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tom	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Infield	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Philadelphia	NNP	*	O
Inquirer	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Herald	NNP	*	O
wire	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*)))))	O
contributed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cubans	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
celebrate	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
compare	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
botched	JJ	(NP*	ESE
coup	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bay	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pigs	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O

HAVANA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
-	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cubans	NNPS	(NP*))	O
celebrated	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rally	NN	*))	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
likening	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
ally	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
disastrous	JJ	*	ESE
U.S.-backed	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
41	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
4,000	CD	*)	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
workers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
students	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
housewives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
retirees	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*))	O
gathered	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streetcorner	NN	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
socialist	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eve	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
April	NNP	(ADJP(NP*	O
17	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1961	CD	*))	O
Bay	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pigs	NNP	(NP*	O
invasion	NN	*))))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
American-trained	JJ	*	O
exile	NN	*	O
army	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
commemoration	NN	*)	O
acquires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
special	JJ	(NP*	ESE
relevance	NN	*)	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Jorge	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arias	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
local	JJ	*	O
Communist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	SYM	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
beautiful	VBG	(VP*	ESE
historic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
coincidence	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
celebration	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuelans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
written	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
page	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
dignity	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
honor	NN	*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
going	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
attempt	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
leftists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
see	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
revolutionary	JJ	(NP*	ESE
leaders	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Castro	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
friend	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
closest	JJS	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
ally	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
rankled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cuba	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
swift	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
denounce	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ouster	NN	*)	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
--	:	*	O
reversed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*	O
later	RB	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
reinstated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
loyalist	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
brushed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
aside	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
suggestions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
quietly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
encouraged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
removal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pigs	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CIA-trained	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
1,500	CD	*)	O
exiles	NNS	*)))	O
invaded	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
Castro	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
28	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
about	RB	(S(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
invaders	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
1,000	CD	(S(NP*)	O
captured	VBD	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Commander	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
base	NN	(NP*)))	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
change	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE

GUANTANAMO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
BAY	NNP	*	O
NAVAL	NNP	*	O
BASE	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
--	:	*	O
What	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
difference	NN	*)	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
gotten	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
busy	JJ	*	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
once-sleepy	JJ	*	ESE
Caribbean	JJ	*	O
outpost	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
restore	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stoplight	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
Navy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
downsizing	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990s	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
hung	VBD	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
McDonalds	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Between	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
armored	JJ	*	O
vehicles	NNS	*)	O
ferrying	VBG	(VP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*	O
whizzing	NN	*	O
past	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
time	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
dust	NN	(NP*))	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
traffic	NN	*	O
signal	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ever	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
operated	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
45-square-mile	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Navy	NNP	(NP*	O
Capt.	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
A.	NNP	*	O
Buehn	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
museum	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
right	RB	(ADVP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Sherman	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Avenue	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
little	JJ	*	O
bit	NN	*))))	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
McDonalds	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
run	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
project	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Buehn	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*	O
ranking	VBG	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
cross	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
mayor	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
overseeing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
schools	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
clubs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
5K	CD	(NP*	O
run	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Martin	NNP	(NP*	O
Luther	NNP	*	O
King	NNP	*	O
Day	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Navy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
commander	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
air	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sea	NN	*)	O
refueling	VBG	(VP*	O
station	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
honcho	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
directly	RB	(ADJP*	O
responsible	JJ	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nascent	JJ	*	O
offshore	JJ	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
terror	NN	*	ESE
compound	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
depending	VBG	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
decides	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stage	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
nickname	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
--	:	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
notorious	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
Devil	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
Island	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
When	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
downsized	VBN	(VP*	O
quite	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bit	RB	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
maintaining	VBG	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
refueling	JJ	*	O
port	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
airfield	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
equivalent	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
sleepy	JJ	*	ESE
little	JJ	*	ESE
fishing	NN	*	ESE
village	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
1,200	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
drop	VB	(S(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
's	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
become	VBN	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
boom	NN	*	ESE
town	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	DSE
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
everybody	NN	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
most	JJS	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
glad	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
excited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Born	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brevard	NNP	(NP*	O
County	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Buehn	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
pilot	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
rank	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
captain	NN	(NP*)))	O
equals	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
colonel	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
presiding	VBZ	*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transformation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suburban-style	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
assignment	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
backwater	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
2,400	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
700	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
Navy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
Jamaican	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Filipino	JJ	*	O
contract	NN	*	O
workers	NNS	*)	O
plus	CC	(PP*	O
family	NN	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
suspect	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
a	DT	(ADJP(ADVP(NP*	O
bit	RB	*)	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
Buehn	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
residents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civilians	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
service	NN	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
unity	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
purpose	NN	*)))))))	DSE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
uncertainty	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sitting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sidelines	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terror	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*	ESE
so	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
not	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
single	JJ	*	ESE
family	NN	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
contractor	NN	(NP*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
so	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
far	RB	*)	DSE
requested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
oldest	JJS	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
overseas	RB	(VP(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
communist	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
neither	CC	(NP*	O
he	PRP	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
Marine	NNP	*)	O
Brig.	VBD	(VP*	O
Gen.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Michael	NNP	*	O
Lehnert	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
commander	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
project	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
evacuation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sailors	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
wives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
whom	WP	(WHNP*)))	O
live	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heavy	JJ	*	ESE
layer	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Army	NNP	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
concern	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Nor	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	ESE
is	VBZ	*	ESE
there	RB	(NP*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worry	NN	*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
infrastructure	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
stretched	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
limit	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
1994	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
1995	CD	*))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
encampment	JJ	*	O
55,000-plus	JJ	*	O
Haitian	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
boat	NN	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
--	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commander	NN	*))	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
civilians	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
stateside	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
room	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
8,000	CD	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
personnel	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tend	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
migrant	JJ	*	O
project	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Gitmo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
history	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
storied	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1903	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
served	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*	O
outpost	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
German	JJ	(NP*	O
U-Boats	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incessant	JJ	*	ESE
irritant	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tried	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
tear	VB	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP*	O
2,000-a-year	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
1934	CD	(NP*	O
lease	NN	*)	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Havana	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
oust	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	ESE
imperialists	NNS	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
tensions	NNS	(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hot	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
1962	CD	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
slipped	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Navy	NNP	(NP*	O
wives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
kids	NNS	*)	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
evacuated	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	NNP	*	O
Missile	NNP	*	O
Crisis	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fourteen	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
months	NNS	*	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Castro	NNP	(NP*)	O
cut	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
utilities	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
compelling	JJ	(S(ADJP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
install	VB	(VP*	O
electricity	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
desalination	NN	*	O
plants	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
Buehn	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Cubans	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	DSE
formal	JJ	*	DSE
objections	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
latest	JJS	*	O
mission	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
labeled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*	ESE
offer	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-far	NN	*)	ESE
spurned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
proposal	NN	(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Havana	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP*	O
teams	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*	O
project	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	ESE
offer	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overture	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Miami	NNP	(NP*)))	O
scorned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
publicity	NN	*	ESE
stunt	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

My	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
capability	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
care	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Geographically	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
split	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bay	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
united	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ferry	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
residents	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
windward	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
--	:	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
alleged	VBN	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)))))	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Leeward	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
functioning	NN	*	O
air	NN	*	O
strip	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
overnight	JJ	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*	O
crews	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Were	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
offshore	JJ	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
center	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Buehn	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
propose	VB	(VP*	DSE
building	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
maximum	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
leeward	JJ	(NP*	O
side	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Buehn	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
wondering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
image	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
As	IN	(PP*	O
base	NN	(NP*	O
commander	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
lot	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
thought	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
the	DT	*	O
name	NN	*)	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
conjure	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
someone	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mind	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
like	VB	*	ESE
Alcatraz	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
Devil	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
Island	NNP	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Yet	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	DSE
all	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
glad	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
mission	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
place	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fit	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
time	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
tell	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
associated	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Endeavour	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
links	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
delivery	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fresh	JJ	(NP*	O
3-man	JJ	*	O
crew	NN	*)))))))))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Space	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*)	O
docked	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
delivering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
three-member	JJ	*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
relieve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
there	RB	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
pulled	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
orbited	VBD	(VP*	O
250	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
above	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Polish-Ukrainian	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
ending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
chase	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Space	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*	O
Frank	NNP	*	O
Culbertson	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
eagerly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
awaited	VBD	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Endeavour	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ride	NN	*	O
home	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
four-month	JJ	*	O
stay	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
quiet	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
retired	JJ	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
fighter	NN	*	O
pilot	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
isolated	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
frustrated	JJ	*)	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
crewmates	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
see	VB	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
guys	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Culbertson	NNP	(NP*)	O
radioed	VBD	(VP*	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
Endeavour	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
pulled	VBD	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
1 1/2	2	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
watched	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ghostly	JJ	*	O
white	JJ	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blackness	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
drew	VBD	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*	O
closer	RBR	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Endeavour	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
slowly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
40	CD	*	O
feet	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Culbertson	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
rang	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bell	NN	*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tradition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
seas	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	(NP*)	O
arriving	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Culbertson	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
crewmates	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dezhurov	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	(NP*	O
Tyurin	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Onufrienko	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*	O
Carl	NNP	*	O
Walz	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
Bursch	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
aboard	RB	(ADVP*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tiny	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
debris	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
halts	NNS	*)))	O
shuttle	NN	(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tiny	JJ	*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
debris	NN	*)	O
floating	VBG	(VP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
NASA	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
scrub	VB	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
night	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
Endeavour	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
shot	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
rescheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
wo	MD	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
until	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
NASA	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
three	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
six-month	JJ	*	O
stay	NN	*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
orbiting	VBG	*	O
science	NN	*	O
lab	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unmanned	JJ	*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
supply	NN	*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
food	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
clothes	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
toilet	NN	(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
items	NNS	*)))))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
trouble	NN	(NP*	O
docking	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sensors	NNS	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
photos	NNS	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
debris	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
width	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
string	NN	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
wire	NN	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
preventing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
solid	JJ	*	O
fit	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
docking	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Jim	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Van	NNP	*	O
Laak	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
manager	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
operations	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
integration	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
supply	NN	*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
securely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
docked	VBN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
jar	VB	(VP(VP*	O
loose	RB	(ADVP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
damage	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Van	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Laak	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Russian	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
soft	JJ	*	O
bump	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
happens	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Endeavour	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
docks	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
port	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
jar	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
supply	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
loose	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
further	JJ	(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
damage	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
locking	JJ	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
supply	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	RB	*	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wobbl	JJ	*	O
ing	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
damage	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
locking	JJ	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Van	NNP	(NP*	O
Laak	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
bigger	JJR	*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fix	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
messing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
crew	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tight	JJ	*	O
work	NN	*	O
timeline	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
wo	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
final	JJ	*	DSE
answer	NN	*)	DSE
until	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Van	NNP	(NP*	O
Laak	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
front	NN	*)))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*)	O
rapidly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
decreases	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
value	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
trouble	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
four	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shekel	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
value	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
lost	VBD	(VP*	O
47	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
cut	VBN	(VP*	O
loose	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))))	O
peg	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
reaches	VBZ	(VP*	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP*	ESE
proportions	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
little	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
unless	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
drastic	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Warning	VBG	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
lights	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
flashing	VBG	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Confidence	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
essential	JJ	*	ESE
element	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
sound	JJ	*	ESE
economy	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Argentine	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
instill	VB	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
citizens	NNS	*)))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Those	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
bet	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
dollar	NN	*))))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
lose	VB	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Unlike	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
MK	NNP	(NP*	O
Joseph	NNP	*	O
Paritzky	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
confidence	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
shekel	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Israelis	NNPS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
transferring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
wealth	NN	*)	O
abroad	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rapid	JJ	*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shekel	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
confidence	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
waning	VBG	(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Had	VBD	(ROOT(S(SINV*	O
Paritzky	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
misguided	JJ	*	ESE
advice	NN	*)	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
citizens	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
digging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
ourselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ruins	NNS	*))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
economies	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
debt	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
most	JJS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
debt	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
fortunately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
shekels	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
structure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
basically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
sound	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
on	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
significant	JJ	*	O
proportion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
resources	NNS	*)	O
devoted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sound	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
management	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
economy	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
essential	JJ	*	ESE
element	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
terrorism	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
management	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
little	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
trouble	NN	*)	ESE
overcoming	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
where	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
management	NN	*))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Judging	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
speak	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mismanagement	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
started	VBD	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
forecasts	NNS	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
recession	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bureaucrats	NNS	*)	O
forecast	VBD	(VP*	DSE
continued	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
growth	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Based	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
false	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
premises	NNS	*)	ESE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	ESE
anticipated	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
revenues	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
underestimates	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP*	O
expenditures	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
totally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unrealistic	JJ	*)	ESE
budget	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
prepared	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
income	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
taxes	NNS	(NP*)))	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fall	VB	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
short	RB	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
forecast	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
bureaucrats	NNS	*)	O
woke	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
realized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
drastically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
revised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
curtailed	VBN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
talk	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
big	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
cuts	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
budgets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ministries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
naught	VB	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
afloat	RB	(ADJP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
money	NN	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
parceled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
right	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
left	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*	O
deficit	NN	*)	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
bounds	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bloated	JJ	*	ESE
budget	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Knesset	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sounds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ministerial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
congratulations	NNS	*)	DSE
advertising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
triumph	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
disaster	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
sooner	NN	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
approved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Knesset	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
talk	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
began	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
revision	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
finance	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
dramatically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
announced	VBD	*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
large-scale	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tax	NN	*	O
increases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
over-taxed	JJ	*)	ESE
economy	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
let-up	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
continuing	VBG	*	DSE
battle	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
partner	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
managing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Plans	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
restrict	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
authority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
governor	NN	*))))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
ill-received	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
dropped	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
being	VBG	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
torn	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
bits	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
interest	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
constituencies	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
affected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Is	VBZ	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
wonder	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
shekel	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
value	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
decreasing	VBG	(VP*	O
daily	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
Israel	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
much	RB	(NP(QP*	ESE
more	JJR	*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
just	RB	*)	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
dimension	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
eyes	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IDF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
moves	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
destroy	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
network	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Judea	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Samaria	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
successful	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
management	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
second	JJ	*	ESE
front	NN	*)	ESE
-	:	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
essential	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
resources	NNS	*)	O
needed	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
defense	NN	(S(NP*	O
needs	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
quits	VBZ	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
March	NNP	(S(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
nixed	VBD	(VP*))))	O

BUENOS	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
AIRES	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*	O
leaderless	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
penniless	NNS	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*))	O
resigning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
fearing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
bloodshed	JJ	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loss	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
savings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Plunged	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
chaos	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
looting	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
deadly	JJ	*	O
riots	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
forced	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Fernando	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*	O
ago	IN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
deeper	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
anarchy	NN	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
interim	JJ	(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Adolfo	NNP	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	*	O
Saa	NNP	*)	O
quit	VBD	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
losing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
party	NN	*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
support	NN	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
bickering	NN	(NP*	ESE
politicians	NNS	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
subject	VB	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pressure	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
quick	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
elections	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
choose	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rule	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
2003	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
De	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mandate	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Peronists	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ruled	VBD	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1989-99	CD	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
withdrew	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
accusing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
power-hungry	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
convinced	JJ	(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	DSE
parties	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
stead	JJ	*	O
Peronist	NN	*	O
heavyweight	JJ	*	O
Senator	NNP	*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Governor	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Carlos	NNP	*	O
Ruckauf	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vast	JJ	*	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNP	*	O
province	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	(VP*	O
help	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Peronists	NNPS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
salvation	NN	*	ESE
government	NN	*))	ESE
...	:	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
consensus	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
2003	CD	(NP*)))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
Duhalde	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

De	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cowed	JJ	*	ESE
Radical	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
senior	JJ	(S(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
official	NN	*	O
Federico	NNP	*	O
Storani	NNP	*)	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
madness	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hold	VB	(VP*	ESE
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
``	``	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Landed	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provisional	JJ	*	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
48	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lower	JJR	*	O
house	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Eduardo	NNP	(NP*	O
Camano	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
senators	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
deputies	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legislative	JJ	*	O
assembly	NN	*	O
today	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
rubber-stamp	VB	(VP*	ESE
Duhalde	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
appointment	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
36	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
living	VBG	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
fear	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
shop	NN	*	O
looting	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
killed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
27	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
De	NNP	(S(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
quit	VBD	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
riots	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
erupted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
misery	NN	*)))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
four-year-old	JJ	*	O
recession	NN	*)	O
grinds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
third-largest	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
moratorium	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*	O
payments	NNS	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
act	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
leader	NN	(NP*	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
commerce	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
halted	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
cash	NN	(S(NP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
limited	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
panic	NN	*	O
run	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
banks	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(ADJP*	DSE
Shameful	JJ	*	ESE
'	''	*))	O

Ordinary	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Argentines	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
pouring	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
hot	JJ	(NP*	O
summer	NN	*	O
night	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
banging	VBG	(VP*	O
pots	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
pans	NNS	*)	O
demanding	VBG	(S(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
eventually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
receiving	VBG	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
De	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
unpopular	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
aides	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
suspected	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
corruption	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
shameful	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR*	ESE
all	PDT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
those	DT	*)	ESE
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
stop	VBP	(VP*	ESE
stealing	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
out	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
woman	NN	*	O
lining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rain	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
dawn	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
cash	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
New	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Year	NN	*	O
celebrations	NNS	*)	O
canceled	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
fear	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
violence	NN	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
last	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1976	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
chief	NN	*	O
Juan	NNP	*	O
Jose	NNP	*	O
Alvarez	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reinforced	VBN	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
patrols	VBG	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
police	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coast	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*	O
police	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Today	NN	(S(NP*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
millimeters	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
away	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
civil	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Leopoldo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Moreau	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Radical	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
congressman	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heavy	JJ	*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Pink	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Plaza	NNP	*	O
de	NNP	*	O
Mayo	NNP	*	O
outside	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rumblings	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
intervention	NN	(NP*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
subordinate	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
civilian	JJ	(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1983	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
moratorium	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
$	$	(ADJP*	O
132-billion	JJ	*)	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
heralding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
default	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
history	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
markets	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
dumped	VBN	(VP*	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
bonds	NNS	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plans	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*)))	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
alarm	NN	(NP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
planned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
alleviate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cash	NN	*	O
crunch	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
minting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
argentino	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
circulate	VB	(VP*	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
backed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))	O
and	CC	*	O
pegged	VBN	(VP*	O
one-to-one	JJ	(S(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decade	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
monetary	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
zero	CD	(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
argentino	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
backed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bricks	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
mortar	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*	O
buildings	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pink	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
analysts	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
devalue	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
spark	VB	*	ESE
inflation	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
confident	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	ESE
together	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
chooses	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
offering	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	DSE

help	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
things	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
stabilized	VBD	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	DSE
worried	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
hemisphere	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Once	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
come	VBP	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
plan	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sustain	VB	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
'll	MD	(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Peronist	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
head	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*))	O
till	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))	O

BUENOS	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
AIRES	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Veteran	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Peronist	NNP	*	O
Adolfo	NNP	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	*	O
Saa	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interim	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
devastating	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*	O
toppled	NN	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lawmakers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
yesterday	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
approve	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
54-year-old	JJ	*	O
lawyer	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
governor	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

De	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*))	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
27	CD	(UCP(ADJP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
dead	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
200	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
injured	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
many	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
Peronist	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)))	O
spurned	VBD	(S(VP*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
until	IN	*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
tentatively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
scheduled	VBN	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
3	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
finish	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
de	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
term	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
populist	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
western	JJ	*	O
arid	JJ	*	O
province	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
brink	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defaulting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
132	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
public	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
struggling	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
18	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*	O
unemployment	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
restore	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Peronists	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
dominant	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
widespread	JJ	*)	O
social	JJ	*	O
disturbances	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
1980s	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
rocked	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
36	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
controls	VBZ	(VP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rodriguez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
television	NN	*	O
network	NN	*	O
Todo	NNP	*	O
Noticias	NNP	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ease	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
my	PRP$	*	ESE
might	NN	*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
hard	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
honesty	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
suggested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Argentina	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
declare	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
moratorium	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
payments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
crushing	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*	O
load	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
vowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
pegging	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
dollar	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Polls	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP*)))	O
support	VBP	(VP*	DSE
keeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peg	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
increased	VBN	(NP(NP*	DSE
calls	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
economists	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
only	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
devaluation	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
rebound	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentines	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
wary	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
surging	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
unemployment	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
rising	VBG	(NP*	O
poverty	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
salary	NN	(NP*	O
cuts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
tax	NN	(NP*	O
hikes	NNS	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
deeply	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
skeptical	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
calls	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
belt-tightening	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
centerpiece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
advocated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
De	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
Domingo	NNP	(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(FRAG*	O
Enough	UH	(INTJ*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*	ESE
austerity	NN	*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*)	O
!	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
said	VBD	(S(S(VP*))	O
Pablo	VBZ	(VP*	O
Arteaga	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
36-year-old	JJ	*	O
dentist	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
wife	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
worker	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
salary	NNS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
13	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
That	DT	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
message	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
De	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

De	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
resigned	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
protests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
riots	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
supermarket	NN	(NP*	O
looting	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
complained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Peronists	NNPS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
forced	VBD	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
disregarding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
call	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
last-ditch	JJ	*	ESE
effort	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emergency	NN	(NP*)))))	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
quell	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
rioting	NN	*))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Rodriguez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Saa	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
reportedly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
easing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
banking	NN	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
De	NNP	(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
limiting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*	O
Argentines	NNS	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
accounts	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
run	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Africa	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
split	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
win	NN	*)))))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
As	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Robert	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consolidate	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
most	JJS	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
denounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
rigged	VBD	(S(VP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ugly	JJ	*	ESE
split	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
opening	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
response	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
black	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leader	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
22	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
defeating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
opponent	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
marred	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
intimidation	NN	(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manipulation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
electoral	JJ	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Registrar-General	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
office	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
56	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3.1	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
cast	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
41	CD	*	O
%	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
win	NN	*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
78-year-old	JJ	*	O
Mr.	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
six-year	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
hailed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
Patrick	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chinamasa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
runaway	JJ	*	ESE
victory	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
less	RBR	(ADJP*	O
complimentary	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
electoral	JJ	*	ESE
fraud	NN	*)	ESE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
witnessed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
reflect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
true	JJ	*	ESE
will	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
despondent	JJ	*	DSE
former	JJ	*	O
union	NN	*	O
boss	NN	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
befuddled	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
pull	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
shady	JJ	*	ESE
tactic	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
book	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
foresaw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
electoral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fraud	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
daylight	NN	(NP*	ESE
robbery	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
brief	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

George	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
flawed	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
And	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
dealing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
friends	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
figure	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
flawed	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Colin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
implied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
impose	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existing	VBG	*	O
travel	NN	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
affecting	VBG	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
inner	JJ	*	O
circle	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jack	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
waging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
systematic	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Jean	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
muted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
headed	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
advance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))	O
``	``	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Canada	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
wait	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
acting	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
governments	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
analyze	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
render	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*))))))))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commons	NNPS	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
receiving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
coming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
definite	JJ	*	O
conclusion	NN	*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Opposition	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
attacked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	ESE
immediately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
denouncing	VBG	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

John	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Reynolds	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	*	ESE
packing	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
straighten	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
mess	NN	*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
contrast	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
neighbours	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
superpower	NN	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
little	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
object	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sam	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Motsuenyane	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50-member	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
should	MD	(NP(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
blamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
difficulties	NNS	*)	ESE
faced	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
voters	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
administrative	JJ	(NP*	O
oversight	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)))))	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
``	``	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
general	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transparent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
credible	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*)	O
...	:	*	O
team	NN	(NP*)	O
wishes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
commend	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
manner	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
conducted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Gertrude	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mongella	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
leader	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OAU	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
pre-election	JJ	*	O
rallies	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
appearance	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
comment	NN	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
loss	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*))))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
counter	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
victory	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
confusion	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
widespread	JJ	(ADJP*	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
party	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
expected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Hilda	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mafudze	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Parliament	NNP	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
toughs	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
prevented	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
campaigning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
home	NN	*)	O
riding	VBG	(VP*	O
south	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
winning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
6,000	CD	*)	O
votes	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
prepared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
got	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
sit	VB	(VP(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*))	O
and	CC	*	O
brainstorm	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
come	VB	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
something	NN	(NP*	O
concrete	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
seething	VBG	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
anger	NN	(NP*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
ruled	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
open	JJ	(NP*	O
rebellion	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
seek	VBP	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
confrontation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
treason	JJ	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
plotting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
assassinate	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charge	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
was	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
trumped	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Domestic	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
tended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
side	NN	(NP*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
denouncing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
fraud-tainted	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
unfair	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Crisis	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
Committee	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
church	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
civic	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protest	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
constitutionally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
manner	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
security	NN	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
illegal	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
uprising	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
putting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
alert	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
setting	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
roadblocks	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
working	VBG	*	O
class	NN	*	O
suburb	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Highfield	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
zone	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
middle-aged	JJ	*	O
street	NN	*	O
vendor	NN	*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
clucked	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
shook	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
head	NN	*)	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
protest	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S(ADJP*	O
Ahh	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
dogs	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
scared	VBN	(ADJP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
nervously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
triumphant	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
activists	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
People	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Patriotic	NNP	(NP*	O
Front	NNP	*))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
ripped	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
stacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pro-opposition	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
greatest	JJS	*	O
support	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
revolution	NN	(NP*	O
brewing	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thousands	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
chased	VBG	(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
police	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
waiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
chaotic	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cast	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
disorganization	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
order	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disenfranchise	VB	(VP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
42	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
800,000	CD	*	O
voters	NNS	*)))	O
cast	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
participation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rural	JJ	*	O
strongholds	NNS	*)))))	O
approached	VBD	(VP*	O
69	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
disputed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))	O
neither	CC	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
neutral	JJ	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
voting	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
more	RBR	(NP*	O
remote	JJ	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
main	JJ	*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
niceties	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
participatory	JJ	(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
imploded	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
unemployment	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
60	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
inflation	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
running	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
112	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
breadbasket	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
hungry	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stem	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
migrants	NNS	*)	O
fording	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Limpopo	NNP	*	O
River	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
better	JJR	*	O
life	NN	*	O
south	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
last	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
South	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
add	VB	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
refugees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
fleeing	VBG	(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
turmoil	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Aussies	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
double	JJ	*	ESE
standard	NN	*))))	ESE

SYDNEY	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
AUSTRALIA	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Within	IN	(S(PP*	O
days	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
countries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
offer	VB	(VP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
pledging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
1,500	CD	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
offensive	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
public	JJ	(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
solidly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
behind	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
effort	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
fighter	NN	*	O
David	NNP	*	O
Hicks	NNP	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
provoked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
fray	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
bilateral	JJ	*	ESE
goodwill	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
highlights	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
some	DT	(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
double	JJ	*	ESE
standard	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Simply	RB	(ROOT(S(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
put	VBN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
American	NNP	(NP*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Walker	NNP	*	O
Lindh	NNP	*)	O
now	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
faces	VBZ	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	(NAC*	O
.	.	*)	O
But	NNP	(NX*))	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
400	CD	*	ESE
foreign	JJ	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))))))))	O
-	:	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunals	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hicks	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
handful	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Westerners	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
fighters	NNS	*))	O
-	:	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(SINV(ADVP*	ESE
only	RB	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Labor	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Hicks	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
held	VBN	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
home	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*	O
justice	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Hicks	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
casualty	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
attempt	NN	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
maintain	VB	(VP*	ESE
favor	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Clearly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
protesting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
continued	VBN	*	O
imprisonment	NN	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
proper	JJ	(NP*	O
trial	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Justice	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Dowd	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
conservative	JJ	*	O
attorney	NN	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
chapter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jurists	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	DSE
Australian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
frankly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
pathetic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
argument	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
convenience	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
letting	VBG	(VP*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
clearly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
violate	VBP	(VP*	ESE
established	VBN	(NP*	O
conventions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
classifies	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
combatants	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
not	RB	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
laid	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Opposition	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
justice	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Darryl	NNP	*	O
Melham	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
demand	VB	(VP*	DSE
consular	NN	(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
citizen	NN	*))))))	O
compares	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
poorly	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
British	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
immediate	JJ	*	ESE
insistence	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
three	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
face	VB	(VP*	ESE
neither	CC	(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
tribunal	NN	*)	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
death	NN	*	ESE
penalty	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Jack	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
our	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Melham	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
retreated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
earlier	JJR	*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
penalty	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
foreigners	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
extent	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
guy	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
subjugated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Australian	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
shuttle	NN	*	ESE
diplomacy	NN	*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

British	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
visited	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
complaints	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
contrasts	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
greatly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
feelings	NNS	*)	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Hicks	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
captives	NNS	*))	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
markedly	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*)	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Walker	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
all	DT	(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
served	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Melham	NNP	(NP*)	O
predicts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
damage	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
coalition	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
saying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nationality	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appears	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
offenses	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Hicks	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
26-year-old	JJ	*	O
Muslim	NN	*)	O
convert	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Adelaide	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Australia	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
9	CD	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Northern	NNP	(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
handed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hicks	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
fought	VBN	(VP*	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Albanian	NNP	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kosovo	NNP	*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Serbia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
awaits	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
uncertain	JJ	*	O
fate	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
getting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
little	JJ	(NP*	DSE
sympathy	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
realistic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
potential	JJ	*	O
threat	NN	*)))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
represent	VBP	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Attorney	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Darryl	NNP	(NP*	O
Williams	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
trained	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
objective	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
about	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
person	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
modern	JJ	(NP*	ESE
times	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Williams	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
neither	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
Australia	NNP	(NP*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prosecution	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Hicks	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
acknowledging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
offenses	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
slight	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Australians	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	DSE
indifferent	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
David	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hicks	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fate	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
opinion	NN	*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
talk	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
radio	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
medium	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
politicians	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
use	VBP	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
barometer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
running	VBG	(VP*	DSE
slightly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP*	O
agency	NN	(NP*	O
Rehame	NNP	*	O
Australia	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
media	NN	(NP*	O
analyst	NN	*	O
Kate	NNP	*	O
Flanders	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
dissent	NN	(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
emerging	VBG	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
callers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
Australian	JJ	*	ESE
citizen	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
51st	JJ	*	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
best	JJS	*	ESE
indicator	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
changing	VBG	*	O
tone	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
a	DT	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
labeled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Hicks	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
traitor	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sydney	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Sun-Herald	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
traitor	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	ESE
naive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
patently	RB	*	ESE
stupid	JJ	*)	ESE
young	JJ	*	ESE
man	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
chose	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	*	ESE
heroes	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Canadarm2	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
lays	VBZ	(VP*	O
track	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
railway	NN	*))))))	O

SubHead	VBN	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
'	``	*	O
A	DT	(S(NP*	O
unique	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	O
complex	JJ	*))	O
robot	NN	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	O
hostile	JJ	*)	O
environment	NN	*	O
'	''	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
Improved	NNP	(NP*	O
mobility	NNP	*)))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Fla.	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
railway	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
outer	JJ	(NP*	O
space	NN	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
roll	VB	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
astronauts	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
Atlantis	NNP	*)))	O
prepped	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
inaugural	JJ	*	O
run	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
rail	NN	*	O
car	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crew	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
spacewalk	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
speed	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
just	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
three	CD	*	ESE
centimetres	NNS	*)	ESE
per	IN	(PP*	ESE
second	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
ground	NN	(S(NP*	O
controllers	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
open	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
throttle	NN	*)	O
all	RB	(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
test	NN	*	O
today	NN	*))	O
anyway	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rail	NN	*	O
car	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
13-metre-long	JJ	*	O
S-0	NN	*	O
truss	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
centerpiece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
120-metre	JJ	*	O
girder	NN	*)	O
running	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
length	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
completed	VBN	*	O
girder	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
square	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
metres	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
solar	JJ	(NP*	O
panels	NNS	*)))))	O
generating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
use	NN	(NP*)))	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spacewalk	NN	*)	O
lasting	VBG	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
six	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
astronauts	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
Steve	NNP	*	O
Smith	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rex	NNP	*	O
Walheim	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
mounted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
truss	NN	*	O
segment	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
launch	NN	(NP*	O
restraints	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rail	NN	*	O
car	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
rode	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cargo	NN	*	O
bay	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Mobile	NNP	*	O
Transporter	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
rail	NN	*	O
car	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
officially	RB	(ADJP*	O
known	VBN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
test	NN	*)))	O
today	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV(S*	O
As	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
speed	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fractions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
inch	NN	*	O
velocity	NN	*))))))))))	O
--	:	*	O
on	IN	(FRAG(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tenth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inch	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
second	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Ben	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sellari	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*	O
package	NN	*	O
manager	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Mission	NNP	(NP*	O
Control	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
trolley	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
roll	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Canadarm2	JJ	*	O
robotic	JJ	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
construction	NN	*	O
site	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*)))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
work	NN	(S(NP*)	O
progresses	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
several	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Captain	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Marc	NNP	*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Canadarm2	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
performed	VBN	*	O
flawlessly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
pivotal	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*))	O
installing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
truss	JJ	*	O
segment	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	O
robotic	JJ	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
contribution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
multi-national	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
lifted	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
truss	JJ	*	O
segment	NN	*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*	O
and	CC	*	O
away	RP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cargo	NN	*	O
bay	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
attached	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
laboratory	NN	*	O
module	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
used	VBN	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spacewalking	VBG	*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
sites	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
newly	RB	(ADJP*	O
installed	VBN	*)	O
truss	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Teams	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
engineers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CSA	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
MD	NNP	*	O
Robotics	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Brampton-based	JJ	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
built	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
arm	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
work	NN	*)	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
anomaly	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
detected	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
joints	NNS	*)))	O
several	JJ	(ADVP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
engineers	NNS	*)	O
successfully	RB	(ADVP*)	O
bypassed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*	O
area	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Canadarm2	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unique	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	O
complex	JJ	*))	O
robot	NN	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	O
hostile	JJ	*)	O
environment	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Capt.	NNP	(NP*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Problems	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
bound	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
occur	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
normal	JJ	*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
-LSB-	JJ	(S(NP(ADJP*	O
but	CC	*	O
-RSB-	JJ	*)	O
Canadarm2	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
smoothly	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
flawlessly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
18-metre	JJ	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
powerful	JJ	(ADJP*	O
enough	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lift	VB	(VP*	O
entire	JJ	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
modules	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
rewired	VBN	(VP*	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
S-0	NN	*	O
truss	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eight	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
truss	NNS	*	O
segments	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
added	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
missions	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
handcar	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
added	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rail	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
astronauts	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	O
easily	RB	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
truss	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
longer	JJR	(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
football	NN	*	O
field	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rigging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
election	NN	(NP*)))))))	O

SubHead	VB	(ROOT(S(VP(VP*)	O
:	:	*	O
`	``	(NP*	O
Bad	NNP	(S(VP*	ESE
decision	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))))))	DSE

OTTAWA	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
suspended	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
new	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
concluding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Robert	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
rigged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
punishment	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	*))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
tougher	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Mr.	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
talked	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
reconciliation	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
invited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Jean	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commons	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
54-nation	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
John	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
severe	JJ	*)	ESE
end	NN	*)))))	ESE
...	:	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
options	NNS	*)	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
matches	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
penalties	NNS	*)	O
previously	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
imposed	VBN	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Fiji	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
observing	VBG	(VP*	O
basic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
principles	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Commonwealth	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
credibility	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
revisited	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
12	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
time	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
widely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
condemned	VBN	*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
rigging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
election	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
9-11	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Within	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Zealand	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Britain	NNP	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
move	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
suspend	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
resisted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
African	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Caribbean	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
threatening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
split	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
racial	JJ	(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
contrary	NN	(NP(NP*	DSE
opinions	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thabo	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
reluctant	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Olusegun	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Nigerian	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reservations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
suspension	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
symbolic	JJ	*	ESE
gesture	NN	*)	ESE
meant	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
underscore	VB	(VP*	ESE
disapproval	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
high	JJ	*	ESE
level	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
politically	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
motivated	JJ	*)	ESE
violence	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
preceded	VBN	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
harshest	NN	*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
argued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
African	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
wait-and-see	JJ	*	DSE
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
setting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-member	JJ	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
determination	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Election	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
cast	NN	(NP(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
others	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
intimidated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
into	IN	(PP*	O
voting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
governing	VBG	*	O
ZANU-PF	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
Morgan	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
challenged	VBN	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
welcome	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reason	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
unambiguous	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
community	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
upheld	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Welshman	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ncube	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Secretary-General	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
associates	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
decision	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
treason	NNS	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
plotting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assassinate	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
offered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
hold	VB	(VP*	DSE
talks	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
moment	NN	*))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
restore	VB	(VP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
stolen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
government	NN	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
deal	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
national	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
questions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
drought	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
food	NN	*	O
shortages	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
highly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)	O
indefinitely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
holds	VBZ	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	*)	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
slap	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
wrist	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
opposition	NN	*	ESE
members	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
loaded	JJ	*	ESE
gun	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
head	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
fingers	NNS	*)))))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
trigger	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
coming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Keith	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Martin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
critic	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Joe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Clark	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Conservative	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
step	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
moves	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
restore	VB	(VP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
other	JJ	(S(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
review	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
perhaps	RB	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
reversal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*)))	O
...	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
contribution	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
civility	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Canada	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
froze	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
future	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
project	NN	*	O
funding	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
May	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
suspended	VBD	(VP*	O
export	NN	(NP*	O
funding	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
last	JJ	(VP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
banned	VBD	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*)	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Martin	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
sanctions	NNS	*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
imposed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*	DSE
government	NN	*)	O
sat	VBD	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fence	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
months	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resulted	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*))	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
killed	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
tortured	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
did	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

...	:	(ROOT(S*	O
For	IN	(PP*	ESE
once	RB	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Canada	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)	DSE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
push	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
punitive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
band	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
thugs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
brutalized	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
indefinite	JJ	*	ESE
suspension	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Commonwealth	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ban	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
travel	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
cronies	NNS	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
freeze	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
personal	JJ	*	ESE
assets	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
entourage	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
assets	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
78	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
led	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
ruled	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
hope	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
prosperity	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
until	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
collapsed	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Political	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
often	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
aimed	VBN	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
owners	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
followed	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ZANU-PF	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
land	NN	*	O
reform	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
150	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
died	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
tens	NNS	(S(NP(QP*	O
of	IN	*	O
thousands	NNS	*))	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
homeless	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
backed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
farmer	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
dead	JJ	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
10th	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canada	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
hand	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
captives	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*))))))	O

SubHead	VBN	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
Backbenchers	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
protest	NN	*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
Eggleton	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
tells	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
MPs	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
remember	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
issue	NN	*))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	ESE
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	ESE
11	NNP	*)))	ESE

OTTAWA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Canadian	JJ	(S(S(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
hand	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enemy	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
capture	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Art	NNP	(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
dismissing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Liberal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
backbenchers	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
defence	NN	(NP*	O
committees	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Liberals	NNP	(NP*	O
Marlene	NNP	*	O
Jennings	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Godfrey	NNP	*)	O
challenged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
satisfied	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
humanely	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Liberal	JJ	*	O
MPs	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
forget	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
horror	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NN	*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
considering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plight	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
These	DT	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
inflicted	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
terrible	JJ	(NP*	ESE
death	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
pain	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
continent	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
These	DT	(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Canadians	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Americans	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
brought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Let	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
remember	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
death	NN	*	O
toll	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
stands	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
3,122	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP*	O
Canadians	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Next	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
battle	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
750	CD	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
hunting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
remaining	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
detention	NN	(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
intent	NN	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
over	RP	(PRT*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
reason	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
fairly	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Godfrey	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Toronto	NNP	*	O
MP	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
blindfolding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
shackling	VBG	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Godfrey	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
When	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hooded	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
planes	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
say	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
myself	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
Would	MD	(SQ*	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Canadian	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
troops	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
?	.	*	O
'	''	*)	O
''	''	*)))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
person	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
convention	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
treating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Godfrey	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
beings	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
before	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
commit	VBP	(VP*)))	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	ESE
before	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
approve	VBP	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)))))	ESE
--	:	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
got	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
sort	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Ms.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Jennings	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Montreal	NNP	*	O
MP	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
assurances	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Canadian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
guarantees	VBZ	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
penalty	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Human	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
cleanup	NN	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
consider	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
unlawful	JJ	*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
opposed	VBN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
distinction	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allows	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
U.S.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
failed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
humane	JJ	(NP*	ESE
care	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
assured	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SQ*	O
Do	VBP	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Yes	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
110	CD	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canadian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*	O
inspectors	NNS	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
authorities	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
hear	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Quite	RB	(ROOT(SINV(FRAG(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
James	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Wright	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
official	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
40	CD	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
special	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*	O
unit	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Joint	NNP	(NP*	O
Task	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
2	CD	*)))	O
--	:	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
operating	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
two	CD	*	O
dozen	NN	*)	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
reconnaissance	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
advance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deployment	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
750-member	JJ	*	O
battle	NN	*	O
group	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3rd	JJ	*	O
Battalion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Princess	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Patricia	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Canadian	NNP	*	O
Light	NNP	*	O
Infantry	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

JTF-2	NN	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
missions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(VP*	ESE
guided	VBN	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Eggleton	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Canada	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
further	JJ	(NP*	O
clarification	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
judge	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
comply	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
contingent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Canadian	JJ	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))	O
arrives	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
mid-February	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Canadian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
operating	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
101st	NNPS	*	O
Airborne	NNP	*	O
Regiment	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
simply	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
defer	VB	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Godfrey	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
unacceptable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Canada	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ambiguity	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
policy	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
turn	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
blind	JJ	*	ESE
eye	NN	*))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
outsource	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
obligations	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Godfrey	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
intimidation	NN	(NP*))))))	O

SubHead	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
predicts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
victory	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
opposition	NN	(S(NP*)	O
alleges	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
vote	NN	(NP*	O
rigging	NN	*))))))))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
On	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eve	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Robert	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
predicted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	O
again	RB	*)	O
storm	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
victory	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
wholesale	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rigging	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
vote	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
alert	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
40	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
agents	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
briefly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
latest	JJS	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*)	ESE
intended	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
steal	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
election	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eve	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
voting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
7	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
a.m.	RB	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
conducting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blatant	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
blatant	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
manipulation	NN	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

...	:	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
means	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(PRN(SINV(VP*)	DSE
Richard	NNP	(NP*	O
Boucher	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Morgan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
militants	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Unity-Patriotic	NNP	*	O
Front	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
undermining	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
integrity	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
80	CD	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
rallies	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
militias	NNS	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
police	NN	*)))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
50	CD	*))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
barnstormed	VBN	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jonathan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Moyo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bulawayo	NNP	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
alert	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
army	NN	*	O
coup	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
loses	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
How	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
can	MD	(S(VP*)))	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
not	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
alert	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
-LSB-	NNP	(S(NP*	O
British	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
making	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
kind	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
noise	NN	(NP*))))))))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
making	VBG	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Moyo	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
referring	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
condemnation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
turn	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
interfering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
former	JJ	*	O
colony	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
engineer	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
victory	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Moyo	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
entered	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
tourists	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
visa	NN	(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
risked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
full	JJ	*	ESE
weight	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
campaigning	JJ	*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
belies	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
78	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
oozed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
confidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
rally	NN	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Bindura	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
northeast	RB	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
stinging	JJ	*	DSE
attack	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Addressing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
15,000	CD	(NP*	O
backers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
mocked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
puppet	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
London	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
arrogant	JJ	*	ESE
little	JJ	*	ESE
fellow	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
bury	VB	(VP*	ESE
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	*	O
sponsor	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Blair	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
burial	NN	*)	ESE
here	RB	(NP*	ESE
tomorrow	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
celebrates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
50th	JJ	*	O
birthday	NN	*)	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
special	JJ	(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
dirty	JJ	(NP*	ESE
tricks	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
fix	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
two-day	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
faces	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
toughest	JJS	*	O
challenge	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
rally	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
blamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
unleashes	VBZ	(VP*	O
army	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
rocket	NN	(NP*	O
launchers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
MiG-21s	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O

SubHead	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Rumblings	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rebellion	NN	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
Opposition	VBN	(VP*	O
aghast	NN	(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
state	NN	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)	ESE
'	''	*))))	O

HARARE	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-	NNP	*	O
Elements	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
army	NN	*)))	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
barracks	NNS	*)))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ominous	JJ	*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Robert	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
rig	NN	(NP*))	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fight	NN	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
challenges	VBZ	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
800	CD	*)	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
independence	NN	*	O
war	NN	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
help	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mount	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
rebellion	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
steals	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Michael	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Quintana	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
editor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Journal	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
toured	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
barracks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
soldiers	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
trucks	NNS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Cranborne	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Barracks	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outskirts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
soldiers	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
towing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
BM-21	NN	*	O
multiple-rocket	NN	*	O
launcher	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fearsome	JJ	*	ESE
weapon	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*)))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
fire	VB	(VP*	O
40	CD	(NP(NP*	O
122mm	JJ	*	O
rockets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
seconds	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
surprised	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
rockets	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
before	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Quintana	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
estimated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
two-thirds	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
barracks	NNS	*)))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
MiG-21	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
flew	VBD	(VP*	O
low	JJ	(ADJP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
farmland	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mashonaland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
apparent	JJ	*	ESE
intimidatory	NN	*	O
display	NN	*)	O
meant	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
underline	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
spread	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
ruling	VBG	(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
thugs	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
loses	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Observers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))	O
worry	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
only	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
22	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
becoming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
reckless	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ruling	JJ	*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Unity-Patriotic	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disenfranchise	VB	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
government-controlled	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
watchdog	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Electoral	NNP	*	O
Supervisory	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
accredited	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
300	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
12,500	CD	*	O
election	NN	*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
requested	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
22	CD	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
election	NN	*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
teachers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
supervise	VB	(VP*	O
voting	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
concern	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Reginald	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Matchaba-Hove	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Election	NNP	*	O
Support	NNP	*	O
Network	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
watchdog	NN	*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
indicate	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ballots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
easier	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
stuff	NN	(NP*	ESE
ballot	NN	*	ESE
boxes	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
located	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
voting	VBG	*	O
rolls	NNS	*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
names	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
80	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
died	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
living	NN	*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cast	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Much	RB	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tiny	JJ	*	O
white	JJ	*	O
minority	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
disenfranchised	VBN	(VP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decree	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
earlier	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	O
ruled	VBN	*	O
illegal	JJ	(S(ADJP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
forces	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
home	NN	*	O
districts	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thousands	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
chased	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
homes	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
sought	VBN	(VP*	O
refuge	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
brave	VB	(VP*	ESE
gangs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP*	ESE
thugs	NNS	*))))))	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stay	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Desire	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chikondi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*	O
worker	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*	O
house	NN	(NP*))	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
burned	VBN	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP*	O
youth	NN	*	O
militia	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hiding	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Harare	NNP	*	O
headquarters	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
risk	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
vote	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
insisting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
hometown	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Domboshawa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
27	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
kilometres	NNS	*)	O
north	RB	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
stronghold	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
cut	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
much	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
35	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
100,000	CD	*)	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
voted	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
watchful	JJ	*	O
eye	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
far	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gaze	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
observers	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Matchaba-Hove	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
apparently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
continuing	VBG	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
register	VB	(VP*	O
ZANU-PF	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
long	RB	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
closing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
voters	NNS	*	O
roll	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Morgan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
giving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	*)	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
toughest	JJS	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
opponent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
conducting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
calculated	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
experienced	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
built	VBN	(VP*	ESE
specifically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
terrorize	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
population	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	RB	(SBAR(S(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
34	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
fears	NNS	(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
rising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
explosion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(ADVP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
what	WP	*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
election	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
wins	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
fight	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
friend	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
supporter	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
trader	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
main	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
senior	JJ	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
indicated	VBN	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
respect	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
victory	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
army	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*	O
victory	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Didymus	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Mutasa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
external	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
South	NNP	(NP(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
television	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
wins	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
support	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
coup	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settler	NN	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
install	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	ESE
puppet	NN	*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rising	VBG	*	DSE
chorus	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
domestic	JJ	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
international	JJ	*	DSE
outrage	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
campaign	NN	(NP*))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rally	NN	*	O
yesterday	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
hometown	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chinhoyi	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
favourite	JJ	*	ESE
theme	NN	*)	ESE
--	:	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
attack	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
Britain	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Now	RB	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
teach	VB	(VP*	ESE
everyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
British	JJ	*	ESE
first	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
when	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
sovereignty	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
retreat	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enthusiastic	JJ	*	DSE
crowd	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
8,000	CD	*)	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
predicted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
victory	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
vowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
pursuing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assassinate	VB	(VP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
No	DT	(NP*	ESE
murderer	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
unpunished	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
planned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
deeds	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
escape	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
comments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
state-owned	JJ	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*	O
Liberators	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Peace	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
association	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mainly	RB	(NP(NP*	O
Matabele	JJ	*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Rhodesian	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1970s	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
dramatic	JJ	*	DSE
request	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
help	NN	(NP*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
beyond	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Matabeleland	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bastion	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
resistance	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
stronghold	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
appeal	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
amounted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
de	FW	(ADJP*	O
facto	FW	*)	O
call	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
risks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
represented	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
proof	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
meddling	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
newspapers	NNS	*)))	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
front-page	JJ	*	O
story	NN	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
claiming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
preparing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
military	JJ	(NP*	O
insurgency	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
appealing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
logistical	JJ	*	O
support	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Aleck	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ndlovu	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
directors	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
run	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
idly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
hungry	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
tired	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
fight	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Politics	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
drives	NNS	(NP*)))	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
winners	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
heated	JJ	*)	DSE
debate	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
boffins	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weeks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
ago	IN	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
distributed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
colourful	JJ	*	ESE
announcement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
newspapers	NNS	(NP*))	O
across	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
land	NN	*)	ESE
proclaiming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
warmer	JJR	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
implementing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
targeted	JJ	*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
so-called	JJ	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
fix	VB	(VP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ten	CD	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
now	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
famous	JJ	*)	ESE
Team	NNP	*	O
Canada	NNP	*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Premier	NNP	(NP*	O
Ralph	NNP	*	O
Klein	NNP	*)	O
produced	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
indicating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
premiers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
except	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ever-distinct	JJ	*	ESE
Quebec	NNP	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
opposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
later	RBR	*)	O
in	IN	*	O
Munich	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
provincial	JJ	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
hedged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
qualifications	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
NDP	NNP	*	O
premiers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Saskatchewan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Manitoba	NNP	*)))	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
principles	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
fine	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	O
consultations	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Herb	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Dhaliwal	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
weighed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
even	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
qualifications	NNS	*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
``	``	(S*	O
Some	DT	(S(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	O
details	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
worked	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
Canada	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
ratifies	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
sign	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
contract	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
business	NN	(NP*))	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
knew	VBD	(VP*	DSE
exactly	RB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	ESE
what	WP	*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
meant	VBD	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
boss	NN	*)	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
less	JJR	(NP*	ESE
business	NN	*	ESE
sense	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Jean	NNP	(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
desire	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
debate	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
intensifying	VBG	(VP*)))))	ESE
emerged	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lorne	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Taylor	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Alberta	NNP	*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
estimated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
somewhere	RB	(ADVP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
25-billion	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
40-billion	CD	*)))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
Alberta	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
somewhere	RB	(PP*	O
between	IN	*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
3-billion	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
6-billion	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taylor	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Quebec	NNP	*	O
critics	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
circumspect	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
stand	VBP	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
empty	JJ	(NP*	ESE
pockets	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(S(S(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
empty	VBP	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
out	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
Alberta	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
criticizing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Alberta	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
alluding	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
money	NN	*	ESE
laundering	NN	*	ESE
operation	NN	*))	ESE
whereby	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
transfers	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
cash	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
productive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
provinces	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Alberta	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
dispenses	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
places	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Quebec	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Taylor	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
federal	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
David	NNP	(NP*	O
Anderson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Alberta	NNP	*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
absurd	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Implementing	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
paltry	JJ	*	ESE
$	$	*	O
500-million	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
ominously	RB	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
technically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
international	JJ	(S(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
fall	VBP	(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purview	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
unilaterally	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controversy	NN	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
tossed	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Taylor	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Anderson	NNP	*))))	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
centred	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
costs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
compliance	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canadians	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
certainty	NN	*)	ESE
approaching	VBG	(VP*	ESE
perfection	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
incompetent	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
offering	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(NP*	ESE
order-of-magnitude	JJ	*	DSE
guesses	NNS	*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
gun	NN	*	O
registration	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
proves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
shadow	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Taylor	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
offered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
prudent	JJ	*)	ESE
guess	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
accurate	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(ADJP*)	O
estimates	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
selected	VBN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
knows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
impact	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
international	JJ	*	O
competitiveness	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
China	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
India	NNP	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Brazil	NNP	*	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
committed	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reduce	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
estimate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
benefits	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
novel	JJ	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
new	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
knowledge	NN	*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
known	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
advance	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
new	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Underlying	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
uncertainties	NNS	*)	ESE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
costs	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
uncertainties	NNS	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
evidence	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
begin	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
major	JJ	(NP*	ESE
measurement	NN	*	O
problems	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Historically	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(QP*	O
all	DT	*)	O
temperature	NN	*	O
data	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
collected	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
heat	NN	*	O
islands	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PRN(SBAR*	O
New	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*	O
climatologist	NN	*	O
Vincent	NNP	*	O
Gray	NNP	*)	O
observed	VBD	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
all	RB	*	O
measurements	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
habitation	NN	*))))))))))	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Second	LS	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
net	JJ	*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
spring	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Academy	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Science	NNP	(NP*)))	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
because	IN	*	ESE
``	``	(S(NP*	ESE
there	EX	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
considerable	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
uncertainty	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
current	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
varies	VBZ	(VP*	O
naturally	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
estimates	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
either	CC	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
magnitude	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
highly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
tentative	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
vast	JJ	(NP*	O
uncertainty	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
computer	NN	(NP(NP*	O
models	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
best	JJS	*	O
models	NNS	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
dice	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
collection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
virtual	JJ	(NP*	O
cubes	NNS	*))))	O
about	RB	(PP(NP(QP*	O
185	CD	*)	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
side	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three-dimensional	JJ	*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
doubling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)))	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
16	CD	(NP(QP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	*	O
computer	NN	*	O
power	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cubes	NNS	*)	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
useful	JJ	*	O
size	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
around	IN	(ADVP*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
side	NN	*)	O
--	:	*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
computers	NNS	(NP*)	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
1,000	CD	*	O
times	NNS	*))	O
as	RB	(S(ADJP(ADJP*	O
powerful	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
existed	VBD	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reliable	JJ	*	ESE
baseline	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
begin	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
No	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
knows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
global	JJ	(S(NP*	O
weather	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
1900	CD	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
1850	CD	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
earlier	JJR	(NP*	O
dates	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
short	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
estimates	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scale	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
timing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
atmospheric	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
uncertain	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assess	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
benefits	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
principles	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clue	NN	*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
consequence	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
politics	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
count	VBP	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Swelling	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
population	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
envirocrats	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
sole	JJ	*	ESE
beneficiary	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
federal	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Everyone	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*)	ESE
loses	VBZ	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Canadian	JJ	(ROOT(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
Endeavour	NNP	(NP*	O
crew	NN	*))))))	O

OTTAWA	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
An	DT	(S(NP*	O
Ottawa-born	JJ	*	O
physicist	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
Canadian	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Allan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Rock	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Industry	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Steve	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
47	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
assigned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Shuttle	NNP	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
2003	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
flew	VBD	(VP*	O
onboard	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Shuttle	NNP	*	O
Columbia	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
10-day	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
complete	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assembling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
spacewalks	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
add	VB	(VP*	O
trusses	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
deploy	JJ	(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
solar	JJ	*	O
panels	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
six-member	JJ	*	O
crew	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Canadarm	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
2	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crane-like	JJ	*	O
device	NN	*)	O
attached	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
fullest	JJS	*	O
extent	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Dr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
moves	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
communication	NN	*	O
aerial	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
craft	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
tell	VB	(VP*	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
pleasing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
my	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*	DSE
ears	NNS	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hear	VB	(VP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
during	IN	(S(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*))	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ride	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fly	VB	*	O
Canadarm	NNP	(NP*	O
2	CD	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Johnson	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Houston	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
capsule	JJ	(NP*	O
communicator	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
relay	VB	(VP*	O
information	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mission	NNP	(NP*	O
Control	NNP	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
flights	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
tugged	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
red	JJ	*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
Olympic	JJ	*	O
hockey	NN	*	O
shirt	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
blue	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*	O
suit	NN	*)))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
telling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
control	NN	*	O
crew	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wear	VB	(VP*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Marc	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP(WHADJP*	ESE
many	JJ	*)	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
international	JJ	(S(NP*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
Dr.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
MacLean	NNP	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
Canada	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
impact	NN	*)	ESE
starting	VBG	(VP*	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2004	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
cuts	NNS	*)	O
mean	VBP	(VP*	ESE
reduced	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
experiments	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
reduced	VBN	(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
flights	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rescue	NN	*	O
vehicle	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
key	JJ	*	ESE
example	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
program	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reduction	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
emergency	NN	*	O
rescue	NN	*)	O
ship	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
accommodate	VB	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
crew	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
budgetary	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*	O
means	NNS	*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
larger	JJR	*	O
craft	NN	*)	O
have	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
halted	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Space	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Europe	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
partners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
pressure	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
get	VB	*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
American	JJ	*	ESE
colleagues	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
live	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
obligation	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
embodied	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inter-governmental	JJ	*	DSE
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
all	DT	(ADVP*)	DSE
signed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
said	VBD	(S(S(S(VP*	DSE
Dr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
astronaut.When	NN	*))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	O
constructed	VBN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lifespan	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
vital	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enlarge	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Construction	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mid-1980s	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	ESE
clock	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ticking	VBG	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
-LSB-	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
limited	JJ	*	ESE
lifetime	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
said	VBD	(SINV(VP*)	DSE
Dr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Garneau	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
So	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
up	RB	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crew	NN	*	O
size	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
seven	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
confident	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
challenge	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
settles	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP*	O
AP	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Two	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*))	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
settling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
half-year	JJ	*	O
stay	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
Endeavour	NNP	(ADVP(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))	O
before	IN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
time	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
trade	VB	(VP*	O
places	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
residents	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
form-fitting	JJ	*	O
seat	NN	*	O
liners	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lifeboat	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*))	O
and	CC	*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
suits	NNS	*)	O
tucked	VBD	(VP*	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
Alpha	NNP	(ADJP*	O
home	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Onufrienko	NNP	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
wait	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
American	NNP	(NP*	O
Frank	NNP	*	O
Culbertson	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*)	O
kept	VBD	(VP*	O
peeking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
window	NN	*))))	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hatch	NN	*)	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
swung	VBD	(VP*	O
open	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
docked	JJ	*	O
spacecraft	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Onufrienko	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
astronauts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
Daniel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bursch	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Carl	NNP	(NP*	O
Walz	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
gear	NN	(S(NP*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
and	CC	*	O
forth	RB	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
threshold	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
robot	NN	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lift	VB	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Italian-built	JJ	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
carrier	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
attach	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
carrier	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
named	VBN	(VP*	O
Raffaello	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
loaded	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
food	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
clothes	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
science	NN	(NP*	O
experiments	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
spare	JJ	(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
emptied	VBN	(S(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
dirty	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
laundry	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
trash	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
used	JJ	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Endeavour	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ride	NN	*	O
home	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
residents	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
packed	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
personal	JJ	*	O
items	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
reflecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hobbies	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Onufrienko	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fisherman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
material	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tie	VB	(VP*	O
flies	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bursch	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
weaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
material	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
small	JJ	(NP*	O
baskets	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
Walz	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
five-octave	JJ	*	O
keyboard	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
psychological	JJ	*	O
support	NN	*	O
device	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
Culbertson	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
crew	NN	*	O
mates	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	(NP*	O
Tyurin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Dezhurov	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
return	VB	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Earth	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
spent	VBN	(VP*	O
128	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Joyous	NNS	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	DSE
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
enjoying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
view	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*	O
-	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*)	O
received	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
warm	JJ	*	DSE
welcome	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*)))	O
station	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
settled	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
for	IN	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eight-day	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
seven-night	JJ	*	O
stay	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
cost	VBD	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
20	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Internet	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
entrepreneur	NN	*	O
Mark	NNP	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
person	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
look	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
money	NN	*)	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
spent	VBD	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
28-year-old	NN	*)	O
smiled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
broadly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
floated	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
embraced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
occupants	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
orbit	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
1	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
congratulate	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
citizen	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
amazingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
roomy	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Although	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
very	RB	*	ESE
large	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
move	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
carefully	RB	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
around	RP	(PRT*)	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
tons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
very	RB	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
precious	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
sophisticated	JJ	*))	ESE
equipment	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
guests	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
liftoff	NN	*)	O
two	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
earlier	RBR	*)	O
from	IN	*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
moments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
terror	NN	(NP*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
moments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
sheer	JJ	(NP*	DSE
upliftment	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
exhilaration	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
truly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
never	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
seen	VBN	*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
beautiful	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Earth	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
space	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
ca	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
imagine	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
surpass	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
latest	JJS	*	O
space	NN	*	O
tourist	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
dubbed	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Afronaut	NN	*)	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
home	NN	*))	O
--	:	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
huge	JJ	(NP*	DSE
excitement	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
continent	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
proud	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
last	JJ	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
celebrations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Freedom	NNP	(NP*	O
Day	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
marking	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1994	CD	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ended	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Apartheid	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
proud	JJ	*	ESE
Freedom	NN	*	ESE
Day	NN	*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
parents	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
relieved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
adventure-seeking	JJ	*	O
son	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
entrepreneur	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
made	VBD	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
fortune	NN	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Internet	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
safely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
Alpha	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
watched	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
capsule	NN	*)	O
smoothly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
docked	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
250	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
up	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dangerous	JJ	*	O
procedures	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
stomach	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
knot	NN	*))	ESE
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(SINV(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	DSE
feeling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
much	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
better	RBR	*)	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
mother	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ronelle	NNP	(NP*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orbiting	VBG	*	O
outpost	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
wo	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Earth	NNP	(NP*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
delighted	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
company	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
great	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
faces	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
American	JJ	(NP*	O
astronaut	NN	*))	O
Carl	NNP	(NP*	O
Walz	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Soyuz	JJ	*	O
crewmates	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Gidzenko	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Italian	JJ	(NP*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
Roberto	NNP	*	O
Vittori	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
accomplished	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
primary	JJ	*	O
job	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
successful	JJ	*	O
docking	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lifeboat	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*)	O
leave	VBP	(VP*	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*	O
night	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
attached	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
six	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
California	NNP	(NP*	O
money	NN	*	O
manager	NN	*	O
Dennis	NNP	*	O
Tito	NNP	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
paying	VBG	(VP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
tourist	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
courtesy	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
opposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Tito	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
trip	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
interfere	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
work	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
endanger	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)	O
prevailed	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
rift	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
space	NN	*	O
programs	NNS	*)))	O
lasted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Europe	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))))	O
established	VBD	(VP*	O
criteria	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
visitors	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
guidelines	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
eight	CD	(NP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cosmonaut	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
training	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
instruction	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Johnson	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Houston	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
training	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
leeway	NN	*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
Tito	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
flying	VBG	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
science	NN	*	O
experiments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP*	O
research	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wore	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
patch	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
embroidered	JJ	*	O
red	JJ	*	O
ribbon	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
blue	JJ	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*	O
uniform	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
symbolize	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
chat	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
schoolchildren	NNS	*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
ham	NN	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*))))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Long	RB	(ROOT(S(PP(ADVP*)	O
before	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
created	VBD	(VP*	O
the	NNP	(S(NP*	O
''	''	*	O
Hip	NNP	*)	O
To	TO	(VP*	O
Be	VB	(VP*	O
Square	VBG	(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
campaign	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
or	CC	*	O
Hip2B2	NNP	(NP*)	O
--	:	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
science	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
math	NN	*	O
education	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttleworth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
younger	JJR	*	O
space	NN	*	O
travelers	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Africans	NNPS	(NP*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
embrace	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
education	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
especially	RB	*	ESE
science	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
mathematics	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
influence	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
generation	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Soldiers	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
Unite	NNP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
To	TO	*	DSE
Defend	NNP	(NP*	DSE
Camp	NNP	*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))))	O

American	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
bruised	VBG	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
criticism	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
eda	NN	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
reports	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Toby	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Harnden	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
dawn	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
echoes	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
voice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
muezzin	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
inmates	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
prayer	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
5.17	CD	(NP(QP*	O
am	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Lieut	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Abuhena	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
navy	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
performing	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
duty	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chaplin	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
imam	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
God	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
great	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
God	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
great	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
chants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Arabic	NNP	(NP*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
loudspeaker	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
bear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
witness	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mohammed	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
messenger	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Come	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
pray	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
success	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
recite	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Koran	NNP	*)	O
together	RP	(PRT*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
five	CD	*	O
prayer	NN	*	O
sessions	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
mid-morning	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
lounging	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
mats	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concrete	JJ	*	O
floors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
8ft-square	JJ	*	O
cages	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blistering	VBG	*	O
sun	NN	*	O
beating	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tin	NN	*	O
roofs	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hang	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
towels	NNS	*)	O
out	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
dry	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
breeze	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
call	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stand	VBP	(VP(VP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
pace	VB	(VP*	O
around	RP	(PRT*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
slumping	VBG	(NP(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Humvee	NNP	*)	O
moves	VBZ	(VP*	O
slowly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
perimeter	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
M16	VBG	(S(VP*	O
assault	NN	(NP*	O
rifles	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
stand	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
wooden	JJ	*	O
watchtowers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
guards	NNS	(NP*)	O
train	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
captured	NNP	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
eda	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
clad	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
orange	JJ	(NP*	O
jump	NN	*	O
suits	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
cage	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ankles	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
wrists	NNS	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
shackles	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sleepy	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
almost	RB	(ADJP*	O
forgotten	JJ	*))	O
American	JJ	*	O
outpost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
45	CD	(NP(NP*	O
square	JJ	*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eastern	JJ	*	O
coast	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Seized	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
646	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
whaling	JJ	(NP*	O
boats	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1898	CD	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish-American	JJ	*	O
War	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*))	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
-	:	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
short	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pearl	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sense	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
humour	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
entering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
inmate	NN	*)	O
vowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detainee	NN	*)	O
bit	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
subdue	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	(PRN*	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spat	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
policeman	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
rare	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
most	JJS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
158	CD	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	ESE
fanatics	NNS	*)))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
compliant	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
chilling	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
out	IN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
exactly	RB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	ESE
what	WP	*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Staff	NNP	(NP*	O
Sgt	NNP	*	O
Chuck	NNP	*	O
Albrecht	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	O
guys	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
pretty	RB	(ADJP*	O
dirty	JJ	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
washing	VBG	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
granola	NN	(NP(NP*	O
bars	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
box	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
apple	NN	(NP*	O
jacks	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
fresh	JJ	(NP*	O
fruit	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Like	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
most	JJS	(S(NP*	O
Marines	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
MPs	NNS	*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1,200-strong	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Staff	NNP	(NP*	O
Sgt	NNP	*	O
Albrecht	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
angry	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
accusations	NNS	(NP*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
mistreated	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
live	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
encampment	NN	*))	O
100	CD	(PP(NP*	O
yards	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
gates	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
tents	NNS	*)))	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
service	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
War	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
holes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
stifling	JJ	*	O
heat	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
my	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
live	VBP	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
similar	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Col	NNP	(NP*	O
Terry	NNP	*	O
Carrico	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
shackled	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
operated	VBN	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	*	O
hospital	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
brand	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
copies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Koran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lively	NNP	*	O
Salon	NNP	*	O
anti-dandruff	JJ	*	O
shampoo	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
promises	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
gentle	JJ	*	ESE
formula	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
restore	VB	(VP*	ESE
moisture	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
your	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
beautiful	JJ	*	ESE
clean	JJ	*	ESE
hair	NN	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tin	NN	*	O
roofs	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
wood	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
absorb	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sun	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
heat	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
cool	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
wrinkled	VBN	(VP*	O
faces	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
moisturiser	NN	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Brig	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Michael	NNP	*	O
Lehnert	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
each	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
eda	NN	*	O
fighter	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
eight	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
75	CD	*)	O
Swiss	JJ	*	O
francs	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
month	NN	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))	O
-	:	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
rank	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
PoW	VB	(VP*	O
status	NN	(NP*	O
accorded	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	ESE
culturally	JJ	*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
halal	NN	*	O
meals	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(S*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
only	JJ	*	O
McDonald	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
restaurant	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
all-ranks	JJ	*	O
bars	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
popcorn	NN	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
pizzas	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
fare	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
water	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
water	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Staff	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sgt	NNP	*	O
Monte	NNP	*	O
Webster	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
MP	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
interpreters	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
devised	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
set	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hand	NN	(NP*	O
signals	NNS	*)))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
caught	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
short	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
portable	JJ	*	O
lavatory	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
jokes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
danger	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
present	JJ	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
toothbrushes	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
shortened	VBN	(VP*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
eda	NN	*	O
suspect	NN	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
comb	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stab	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
warder	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
eye	NN	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
brain	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Sometimes	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
your	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
life	NN	*)))	DSE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
trained	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Specialist	NNP	(NP*	O
Fabian	NNP	*	O
Rivas	NNPS	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
life	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
yours	PRP$	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Newspaper	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
coverage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
relayed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
television	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
radio	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
close	JJ	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
eroding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
morale	NN	(NP*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Specialist	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Rivas	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
ignored	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
propaganda	NN	(NP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
let	VBD	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
get	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
me	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hard	JJ	*)	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
job	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Staff	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Sgt	NNP	*	O
Webster	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
frustrated	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
bothers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
me	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
've	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
humane	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
could	MD	(SQ*	ESE
anybody	NN	(NP*)	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	O
anybody	NN	(S(NP*)	O
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
live	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
so	IN	*	ESE
how	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
can	MD	(S(VP*)))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
talk	VBP	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Brig	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Lehnert	NNP	*)	O
accepted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
basic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
argued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
improve	VB	(VP*	ESE
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
permanent	JJ	(S(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP*	O
engineers	NNS	*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
hammer	VB	(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
interrogation	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
cages	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
finished	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
target	NN	*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
2,000	CD	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
look	VBP	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
watchtower	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Stars	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Stripes	NNP	*)	O
painted	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
front	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sniper	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
perch	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
pointing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mecca	NNP	(NP*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
erected	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
defeated	JJ	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
forget	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
sworn	VBN	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
controls	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Venezuelan	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
forces	VBZ	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bloodshed	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O

CARACAS	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
social	JJ	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
polarized	VBD	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	O
friendship	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))	O
irritated	JJ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
resigned	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*))	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
demonstration	NN	*)	O
ended	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bloodbath	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
47	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
top	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
confronted	VBN	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
palace	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
dawn	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
wearing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fatigues	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
red	JJ	(NP*	O
beret	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
failed	JJ	*	O
1992	CD	*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))	O
-	:	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
detention	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Fort	NNP	*	O
Tiuna	NNP	*	O
army	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
quit	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(NP(NP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
13	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reported	VBN	*	O
110	CD	(QP*	O
wounded	CD	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
demonstration	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
estimated	JJ	*	O
150,000	CD	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
downtown	JJ	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
ordered	VBN	(VP*	O
National	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Guard	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
civilian	JJ	(NP*	O
gunmen	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
rooftop	NN	(NP*	O
snipers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
marchers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
palace	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
gigantic	JJ	*	O
demonstration	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
culmination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one-million-member	JJ	*	O
Venezuelan	NNP	*	O
Workers	NNPS	*	O
Confederation	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
association	NN	*	O
Fedecamaras	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protesting	JJ	*	DSE
executives	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Petroleos	NNP	(NP*	O
de	IN	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Opposition	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
three-year	JJ	*	O
presidency	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
growing	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
one-time	JJ	*	O
80	CD	(NX(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*	O
popularity	NN	*	O
ratings	NNS	*))))	O
plunged	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
below	RB	(NP(NP*	O
30	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
business	NN	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
conspiring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
major	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
labour	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Roman	NNP	*	O
Catholic	NNP	*	O
hierarchy	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
traditionally	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
strong	JJ	*)	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)))))	O
-	:	*)	O
resented	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
distancing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
exercises	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
resented	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
alleged	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
leftist	JJ	(NP*	O
Colombian	JJ	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Cuba	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*)))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
fought	VBN	(VP*	O
Cuban-backed	JJ	(NP*	O
communist	JJ	*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1960s	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
1970s	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ouster	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
jubilant	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
executives	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
state	NN	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
monopoly	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
engaged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
slowdown	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
production	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speed	VB	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
quickly	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
No.	NN	(ADJP*	O
3	CD	*)	O
supplier	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fourth-biggest	JJ	*	O
exporter	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Oil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
dipped	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
news	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
downfall	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
expectations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
production	NN	*	O
increase	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Oil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
supply	NN	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
exports	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Brent	NNP	(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
44	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
cents	NNS	*)	O
down	RB	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
24.60	CD	*	O
US	CD	*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
barrel	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
May	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
light	JJ	(NP*	O
sweet	NNP	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
crude	NN	*)))	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
46	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cents	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
barrel	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
24.53	CD	*	O
US	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pedro	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*	O
business	NN	*	O
association	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
head	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
transitional	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
investigators	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
decide	VBP	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
charges	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
face	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
army	NN	(NP*	O
commander	NN	*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Efrain	NNP	*	O
Vasquez	NNP	*	O
Velasco	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
exile	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
army	NNP	(NP*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Roman	NNP	*	O
Fuemayor	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Globovision	JJ	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
held	VBN	(VP*	ESE
accountable	JJ	(S(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Fuemayor	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
downtown	JJ	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
streets	NNS	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
littered	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
debris	NN	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
places	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
stained	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
blood	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shops	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
businesses	NNS	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
closed	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
most	JJS	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stayed	VBD	(VP*	O
home	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
stunned	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
wondering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Buses	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
half-empty	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
reporting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
hurried	JJ	(NP*	O
amidst	JJ	*	O
rubble-strewn	JJ	*	O
sidewalks	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thousands	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
coup	NN	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))	O
celebrated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
overnight	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
waving	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
flags	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
blowing	VBG	(VP*	O
whistles	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
jamming	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
highway	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
distributing	VBG	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hillside	NN	*	O
slums	NNS	*)	O
surrounding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Officers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
raided	VBD	(VP*	O
storehouses	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
seizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
dozens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
firearms	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
widely	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
popular	JJ	*	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
poor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
percentage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
urge	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Venezuelans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
maintain	VB	(VP*	ESE
calm	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
faith	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
continue	VB	(VP*	ESE
working	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
road	NN	*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
freedom	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
peace	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
retired	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Guaicaipuro	NNP	*	O
Lameda	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
until	IN	(S(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
headed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
movement	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
oust	VB	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
upheaval	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
travelling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
wave	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
protests	NNS	(NP*)))	DSE
marked	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
stormy	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
irritated	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuban	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Fidel	NNP	*	O
Castro	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
visits	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Saddam	NNP	*	O
Hussein	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
criticism	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
bombings	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
alienated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Roman	NNP	*	O
Catholic	NNP	*	O
Church	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consult	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
failed	JJ	*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assert	VB	(VP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
control	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
labour	NN	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
inherited	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
staggering	JJ	*	ESE
$	$	(QP*	O
21	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
back	JJ	(NP*	O
wages	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pensions	NNS	*)))	O
owed	VBD	(VP*	O
workers	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
previous	JJ	(NP*	O
administrations	NNS	*))	O
-	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Domestic	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
secretly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
arming	VBG	(VP*	O
neighbourhood	NN	(NP(NP*	O
block	NN	*	O
committees	NNS	*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Bolivarian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Circles	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
named	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
liberator	NN	*	O
Simon	NNP	*	O
Bolivar	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
revolution	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
circles	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Castro	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
supporters	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
organize	VB	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*	O
visit	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
exasperated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Venezuelans	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
frequent	JJ	*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
cadenas	NNS	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
-	:	*	O
hours-long	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
speeches	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
broadcast	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
TV	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
radio	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
executives	NNS	*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
slowdown	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
cutting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
production	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Paraguana	NNP	*	O
refinery	NN	*	O
complex	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
below	IN	(NP(QP*	O
50	CD	*)))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
refinery	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
disrupted	VBD	(VP*	O
gasoline	NN	(NP*	O
deliveries	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(VP(ADVP*	O
but	CC	*)	O
stopped	VBD	*	O
loading	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
tankers	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Oil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
generates	VBZ	(VP*	O
80	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
earnings	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
force	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Gen.	NNP	(NP*	O
Regulo	NNP	*	O
Anselmi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
by	IN	(VP(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Petroleos	NNP	*	O
de	NNP	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
executives	NNS	*))	O
rejected	VBD	*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
overtures	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(S(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
violence	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
command	NN	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
confronted	VBN	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
en	FW	(NP(NP*	O
masse	FW	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
offices	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Anselmi	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Troops	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
television	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
tanks	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
rumbled	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Space	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
slightly	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
off	RB	*)	O
track	VBP	*)))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP*	O
AP	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Astronauts	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
rolling	VBG	(VP*	O
slowly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
down	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
short	JJ	*	O
stretch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
track	NN	(NP*))	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
quickly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
hit	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
snag	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
interrupted	JJ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inaugural	JJ	*	O
run	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
railroad	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
orbit	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
blamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
weightlessness	NNS	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Engineers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
suspect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
one-ton	JJ	*	O
car	NN	*)	O
floated	VBD	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*	O
so	RB	*	O
slightly	RB	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rail	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
magnetic	JJ	*	O
sensors	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bottom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lose	VB	(VP*	O
contact	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pair	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
iron	NN	(NP(NP*	O
strips	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aluminum	NN	*	O
tracks	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
eventually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
stages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
construction	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
track	NN	*)	O
runs	VBZ	(VP*	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
44-foot	JJ	*	O
girder	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
space	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
Atlantis	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
bolted	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orbiting	VBG	*	O
outpost	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
cropped	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
empty	JJ	*	O
flatcar	NN	*))))	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
17	CD	(NP(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
track	NN	(NP*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
snail	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
pace	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
less	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
half-inch	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
second	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Right	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cue	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
automatically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
latching	VBG	*	O
itself	PRP	(SBAR(ADVP*	O
down	RB	*)	O
when	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
everything	NN	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
halt	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ground	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
controllers	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
manual	JJ	(NP*	O
control	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
latch	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
track	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Space	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
astronaut	NN	*	O
Carl	NNP	*	O
Walz	NNP	*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
computer	NN	*	O
command	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
inside	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
smoothly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
rolled	VBD	(VP*	O
26	CD	(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
work	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
happened	VBD	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Again	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
ground	NN	(NP*	O
controllers	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
manual	JJ	(NP*	O
control	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Later	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Walz	NNP	(NP*)	O
commanded	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
railcar	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
final	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
down	RB	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
26	CD	*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
track	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
train	NN	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
leaving	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
automatic	JJ	*	O
latching	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
shut	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
ground	NN	(S(NP*	O
controllers	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
step	VB	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
before	RB	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
finding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
go	VBP	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
mobile	JJ	*	O
transporter	NN	*)	O
works	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
zero-g	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Ben	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sellari	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
NASA	NNP	*	O
manager	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Engineers	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
adjust	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
computer	NN	*	O
software	NN	*)	O
sometime	RB	(ADVP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
nuisance	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
danger	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
190	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
rolling	VBG	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
track	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
rings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ends	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
44-foot	JJ	*	O
girder	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Sellari	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
railcar	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
summer	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
railcar	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
transport	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
58-foot	JJ	*	O
robot	NN	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outpost	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP*	O
girders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
installed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Atlantis	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
plan	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fourth	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
final	JJ	*	O
spacewalk	NN	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
finish	VB	(VP*	O
installing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
girder	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
And	CC	*	O
UK	NNP	*	O
Criticise	NNP	*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Victory	NNP	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
SA	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
accommodate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
participation	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
arrangement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

International	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
condemnation	NNP	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
win	NN	*)))	O
mounted	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
British	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
delivering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
further	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
dealing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
friends	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
figure	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
flawed	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Straw	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Britain	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	DSE
not	RB	(VP*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
legitimacy	NN	*)	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hinted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tougher	JJR	*	DSE
policy	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
review	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
upcoming	VBG	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Barcelona	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Spain	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttle	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Atlantis	NNP	*)	O
thunders	VBZ	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Seven	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
truckload	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hardware	NN	(NP*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
racing	VBG	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
successful	JJ	*	O
blastoff	NN	*)	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
Atlantis	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
seven	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flurry	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
activity	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
closer	RBR	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
completion	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Riding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
main	JJ	*	O
engines	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
belched	VBD	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
pillar	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Atlantis	NNP	(NP*)	O
thundered	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
seaside	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*	O
pad	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
4:44	CD	(NP*	O
p.m.	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
computer	NN	*	O
glitch	NN	*)	O
marred	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
countdown	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
engineers	NNS	(NP*))))	O
frantically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
reloaded	VBD	(VP*	O
software	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
finishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
just	RB	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
seconds	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
spare	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
four-day	JJ	*	O
delay	NN	*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
liquid	JJ	*	O
hydrogen	NN	*)	O
vent	VB	(VP*	O
pipe	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
sprung	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leak	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
fueling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
spent	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
extra	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP*	O
launch	NN	*	O
director	NN	*	O
Mike	NNP	*	O
Leinbach	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Atlantis	NNP	(NP*	O
commander	NNP	*	O
Mike	NNP	*	O
Bloomfield	NNP	*	O
moments	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
liftoff	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	DSE
But	CC	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
ride	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
milestone	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
flight	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mission	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
specialist	NN	*	O
Jerry	NNP	*	O
L.	NNP	*	O
Ross	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
grandfather	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
flights	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*)	O
walks	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11-day	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
astronauts	NNS	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
install	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
keystone	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
''	''	*	O
center	NN	(NP*	O
support	NN	*	O
unit	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(VP(NP(NP*	O
44-foot-long	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
27,000-pound	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
S-Zero	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
structure	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
job	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
solar	JJ	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
array	NN	*)	O
nearly	RB	(PP(NP*	O
an	DT	*	O
acre	NN	*)	O
in	IN	*	O
size	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
stretching	VBG	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
football	NN	*	O
field	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
length	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
missed	VBN	(VP*	O
proper	JJ	(NP*	O
linkup	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
CANAVERAL	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(NP(NP*	O
AP	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
supply	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*))))	O
docked	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
latched	VBN	(VP*	O
properly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
potential	JJ	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
delay	VB	(VP*	O
tonight	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
planned	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
delivery	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
loose	JJ	*	O
fit	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
damage	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orbiting	VBG	*	O
complex	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
force	NN	*)	O
imparted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
docking	VBG	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
unmanned	JJ	*	O
Progress	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
ton	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
fuel	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
supplies	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakstan	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
pulled	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
right	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
linkup	NN	*)	O
initially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Russian	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
flight	NN	*	O
controllers	NNS	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
expected	JJ	*	DSE
indication	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hooks	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
closed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
latched	VBN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
steering	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
docking	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
extra	JJ	*	O
three	CD	*	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
flight	NN	*	O
controllers	NNS	*)	O
time	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
study	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
laboratory	NN	*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
items	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
switched	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
conserve	VB	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Everything	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
engineers	NNS	*)	O
determined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
supply	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
attached	VBN	(VP*	O
securely	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
enough	RB	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
steering	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
operate	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)	O
worked	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
night	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assess	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*	O
enforcement	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
``	``	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	O
nationality	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	O
Russians	NNPS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
sources	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))	O
disclosed	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
elaborated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
during	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
detained	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
persons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
associated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
information	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
individuals	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
temporarily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
detained	VBN	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Endeavour	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Shuttle	NNP	*)	O
To	TO	(PP*	O
Return	NN	(NP*))	O
On	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
land	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Cape	NNP	*	O
Canaveral	NNP	*	O
launch	NN	*	O
site	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
08:55	CD	(NP(NP*	O
p.	NN	*	O
m.	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))	O
time	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
spent	VBN	(VP*	O
7	CD	(PP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
on-board	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3rd	JJ	*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
expedition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
namely	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
American	JJ	(S(NP*	O
astronaut	NN	*)	O
Frank	NNP	(NP*	O
Culbertson	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(S(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
Vladimir	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dezhurov	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	(NP*	O
Tyurin	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Back	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
obtained	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
13	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
primary	JJ	*	O
objective	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mission	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
4th	JJ	*	O
ISS	NNP	*	O
crew	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
research	NN	*	O
equipment	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
crew	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
perfectly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
accomplished	VBN	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
way	NN	*	O
home	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Starshine	JJ	*	O
micro-satellite	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
students	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
larger	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
volley	JJ	*	O
ball	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
students	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
polishing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
pieces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
glass	NN	(NP*))	O
subsequently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
putting	VBG	*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
surface	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
slightly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
resembles	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rotating	VBG	*	O
glass	NN	*	O
balls	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
usually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
disco	NN	(NP*	O
clubs	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
glass	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
night	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Students	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
universities	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
turn	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
calculating	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
speed	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
orbit	NN	*	O
parameters	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
4th	JJ	*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
expedition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Onufriyenko	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
command	NN	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Carl	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Waltz	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Daniel	NNP	(NP*	O
Bursch	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
on-board	JJ	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
ISS	NN	*)	O
till	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
space	NN	(NP*	O
tourists	NNS	*))))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holiday	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
means	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
offers	VBZ	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
trip	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lifetime	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yuri	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Koptev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Aerospace	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Rosaviakosmos	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
tourists	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
place	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
someone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*	O
''	''	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Poland	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
tested	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Rosaviakosmos	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pioneered	VBD	(VP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
tourism	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Californian	NN	*)	O
millionaire	VBP	(VP*	O
Denis	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Tito	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ten-day	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
trip	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
28-year-old	JJ	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
millionaire	NN	*	O
Mark	NNP	*	O
Shuttleworth	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Paratroopers	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O

Once	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
events	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
close	JJ	*	DSE
attention	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
media	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hardly	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*)	O
even	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Hugo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
post	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
several	JJ	(NP*	O
suppositions	NNS	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Hugo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
recover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
nobody	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
suppose	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
quick	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ousted	VBN	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
freed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
paratroopers	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
command	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
paratrooper	NN	*	O
unit	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
patronizing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
subordinates	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	ESE
presidency	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
finally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
rewarded	VBN	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
support	NN	*))))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
paratroopers	NNS	*)	O
helped	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
regain	VBP	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Protesters	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
ousted	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	ESE
delighted	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
on	IN	(VP(PP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
side	NN	*))	DSE
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ordinary	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Venezuelans	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	DSE
less	RBR	*	DSE
happy	JJ	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
oligarchic	JJ	*	O
elite	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
beginning	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Pedro	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
proclaimed	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*	ESE
interim	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
care	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
little	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
ordinary	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lives	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
planners	NNS	*)	O
committed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
dissolved	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*	O
right	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Carmona	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
participated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
questioned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
public	JJ	(NP*	O
prosecutors	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hugo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
plotters	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Vice-president	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Diosdado	NNP	*	O
Cabello	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
supporter	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
acting	VBG	(VP*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
now	RB	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hugo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
likely	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
return	JJ	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
post	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
witch-hunting	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
persecution	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
participants	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Vice-president	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Diosdado	NNP	*	O
Cabello	NNP	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
thoroughly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
beforehand	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
proof	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
belt	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symbol	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
did	VBD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
belong	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
belt	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
especially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
manufactured	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Miraflores	NNP	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
plotters	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
learnt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
events	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
attentive	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
forecast	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
further	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hugo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
managed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demonstrate	VB	(VP*	O
astonishing	JJ	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	O
resistance	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
dismiss	VB	(VP*	O
disloyal	JJ	(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Venezuelan	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
paratroopers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
evidently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
profit	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ordinary	JJ	(NP*	O
Venezuelans	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
slightly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
anxious	JJ	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
post	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Neither	CC	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
nor	CC	*	O
opponents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
reforms	NNS	(SQ(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
initiated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*)))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Time	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
tell	VB	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
learnt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Endeavour	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Shuttle	NNP	*)	O
To	TO	(VP*	O
Be	VB	(VP*	O
Launched	VBN	(VP*	O
To	TO	(PP*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
5	CD	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
01:45	CD	(NP*	O
a.	JJ	*	O
m.	NNP	*	O
Moscow	NNP	*	O
time	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shuttle	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tanks	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
filled	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
vehicle	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*	O
site	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cape	NNP	*	O
Canaveral	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Florida	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
disclosed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
NASA	NNP	*	O
representative	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
primary	JJ	*	O
objective	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mission	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
4th	JJ	*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
expedition	NN	*)	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Onufriyenko	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
expedition	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
astronauts	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Carl	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Walz	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Daniel	NNP	(NP*	O
Bursch	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
replace	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3rd	JJ	*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
expedition	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
astronaut	NN	*)	O
Frank	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Culbertson	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dezhurov	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	(NP*	O
Tyurin	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
13	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Endeavour	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
Raffaello	NNP	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
module	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
additional	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Starshine	JJ	*	O
small	JJ	*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
subsequently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
launched	VBN	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP*	O
purposes	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
students	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
design	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

NASA	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
surveyed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
used	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
universities	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
really	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
popular	JJ	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

George	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
object	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
harsh	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)))	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
recent	JJ	*	DSE
statement	NN	*))	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Yasser	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pacify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
politicians	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
journalists	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
something	NN	(S(NP*)	O
daring	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Egyptian	JJ	*	O
governmental	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*	O
Al-Ahram	NN	*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
language	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Osama	NNP	(S(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
video	JJ	*	O
messages	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
editor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Al-Quds	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*	O
Abd	NNP	*	O
Al-Bari	NNP	*	O
Atvan	NNP	*))))))	O
went	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
further	RBR	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	DSE
compared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Hitler	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
editor	NN	*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
craving	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
blood	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
declare	VB	(VP*	DSE
war	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
half	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
revenge	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
editor	NN	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wage	VB	(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
notice	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kinds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Atvan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)	O
looked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Hitler	NNP	(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
threats	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
Hitler	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
threats	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Poland	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Czech	JJ	(NP*	O
republic	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
editor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabic	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)))	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
everything	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
imprudence	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
otherwise	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
overshadow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Wars	NNPS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Palestinian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Alhayat	NNP	*	O
Aljadeeda	NNP	*	O
media	NNS	*	O
outlets	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Voice	NNP	(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*)))	O
radio	NN	*))	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
statement	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

North	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
devil	NNS	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
empire	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hypothetical	JJ	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
considerable	JJ	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
spending	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
evil	JJ	*	ESE
empire	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
years	NNS	(ADVP(NP*)	O
ago	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
labels	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
picture	NN	*))	O
again	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
rather	RB	(PP*	ESE
fashionable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
now	RB	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
exchange	VB	(VP*	DSE
harsh	JJ	(NP*	DSE
words	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
like	JJ	*	ESE
kids	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
To	TO	(PP*	O
Conduct	NNP	(NP*	O
Space	NNP	*)))	O
Walk	VBP	(VP*)))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dezhurov	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	(NP*	O
Tyurin	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
perform	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*)	O
walk	NN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
04:00	CD	(NP*	O
PM	NNP	*	O
Moscow	NNP	*	O
time	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Frank	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Culbertson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
astronaut	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Expedition	NNP	(NP*	O
3	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
survey	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
control	VB	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unfolded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mission	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Control	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
unplanned	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
walk	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
order	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
repair	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
malfunction	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
appeared	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
docking	VBG	*	O
unit	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
docking	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Progress	NNP	*	O
M1-7	NNP	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
space	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Experts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
4mm	JJ	*	O
gap	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
docking	VBG	*	O
unit	NN	*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
object	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
prevents	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tight	JJ	*	O
joining	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
space	NN	*	O
vehicles	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
walk	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
last	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
3	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
6	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mission	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
difficulty	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electric	JJ	*	O
motor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
docking	VBG	*	O
unit	NN	*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
manually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
un-dock	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Progress	NN	*	O
M1-7	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
distance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(NP(QP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
than	IN	*	O
one	CD	*)	O
meter	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
examine	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
docking	JJ	*	O
unit	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
within	IN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*)	O
walk	VBP	(VP*	O
period	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
decrease	VB	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
successfully	RB	(ADVP*)	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
object	NN	*)	O
located	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gap	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
docking	VBG	*	O
unit	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
malfunction	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
serious	JJ	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*	O
Control	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
forthcoming	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
Endeavour	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)))	O
totally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
depended	VBD	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
success	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aforementioned	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
repair	NN	*	O
works	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Experts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
shuttle	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dock	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
tightly	RB	(ADJP*	O
secured	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Otherwise	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dynamic	JJ	*	O
blow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
docking	VBG	*	O
shuttle	NN	*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
ship	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
swaying	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
damage	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISS	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
incident	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1987	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kvant	NNP	*	O
module	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
secured	VBN	(VP*	O
either	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
performed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
space	NN	*)	O
walk	VBP	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
successfully	RB	(ADVP*)	O
repaired	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
malfunction	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Right	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
wing	NN	*	O
sweeps	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
victory	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
face	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
right-wing	JJ	*	O
Peronist	NN	*	O
party	NN	*	O
Partido	NNP	*	O
Justicialista	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Justice	NNP	(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
14th	NNP	*	O
October	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Deputies	NNPS	(NP*)))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
catastrophic	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
citizens	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ever-growing	JJ	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
poverty	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
defies	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
logic	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
enormous	JJ	*	ESE
land/population	population	*	O
ratio	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
richest	JJS	*	ESE
soil	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
governing	VBG	*	O
class	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
proved	VBN	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
utterly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unable	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
terms	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
needs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
basically	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
because	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
removed	VBN	(S(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reality	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poles	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
further	JJ	*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	*)	O
distance	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
right-wing	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
conquered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
proves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
desperation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
41	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
population	NN	*)))	O
voted	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
spoiled	NN	(NP(ADJP*	O
or	CC	*	O
void	NN	*)	O
votes	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
PJ	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Peronist	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
39	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
72	CD	*	O
seats	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Deputies	NNPS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PJ	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
116	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
257	JJ	*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
17	CD	(ADVP(NP*)	O
more	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)	O
lost	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
14	CD	(NP*	O
seats	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
88	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
manage	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
survive	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
onslaught	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
credit	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
vultures	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tear	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
members	NNS	*)	ESE
apart	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

IMF	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
132	CD	(NP*	O
bn	NN	*	O
USD	NN	*	O
debt	NN	*)))))))))	O

Argentina	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expecting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
1.3	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
USD	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
expenses	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
after	IN	(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unfavourable	JJ	*	DSE
report	NN	*)	DSE
submitted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Thomas	NNP	(NP*	O
Reichmann	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
now	RB	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
moment	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
lend	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
money	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
managed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
132	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
dollar	NN	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
successive	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
recession	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
imposed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
restriction	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
movement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
capitals	CD	(NP*	O
abroad	RB	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
limiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sum	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
USD	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
person	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Annan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
welcomes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
restitution	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
constitution	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
16	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
United	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Secretary-General	NNP	*)	O
Kofi	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Annan	NNP	*)	O
telephoned	VBD	(VP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
15	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
satisfaction	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
restoring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
underway	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
appealed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
reconciliation	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
underscored	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inclusive	JJ	*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
rule	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
legality	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
democracy	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pursue	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
broad-based	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary-General	NNP	*)	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
calm	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
readiness	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
assist	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
strengthen	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chinese	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*	O
exploration	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
When	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
will	MD	(SQ*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
cosmonaut	NN	*)	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))	O
?	.	*)))))	O

Shenzhou-3	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
orbited	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*)	O
108	CD	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
successfully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
landed	VBD	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
targeted	JJ	*	O
site	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
inner	JJ	(NP*	O
Mongolia	NNP	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
47th	JJ	*	O
congress	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Federation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Astronautics	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
six	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
in	IN	*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
remarkable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
large	JJ	*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
participated	VBD	(S(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
even	RB	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	O
Austrian	JJ	*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
organized	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rating	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
explorers	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
represented	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
partially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
explained	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rating	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Czech	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
Austrian	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
Bulgarian	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Dutch	JJ	*	O
citizen	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
entitled	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
command	NN	*)	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
Go	NNP	*	O
!	.	*	O
''	''	*)	O
like	IN	(SBAR*	O
Yury	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Gagarin	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
guests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
American	NNP	(NP*	O
Shuttle	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
spaceship	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
launch	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
space	NN	*	O
vehicle	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mao	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Tse-tung	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
passionate	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
idea	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Here	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interesting	JJ	*	ESE
detail	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
unpublished	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
Moscow	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*	O
''	''	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
studying	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mao	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
Tse-tung	NNP	*)	O
mentioned	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	(ADJP*	O
ever	RB	*)	O
satellite	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
weighing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
70	CD	(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
then	RB	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
ambassador	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Do	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
weigh	VB	(VP*	O
70	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilos	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ambassador	NN	(NP*	O
Liu	NNP	*	O
Xiao	NNP	*)))	O
?	.	*)))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
A	DT	(FRAG(ADJP(NP*	O
bit	RB	*)	O
less	JJR	*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
answer	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	RB	(ADVP*)	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*)	O
!	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
launch	VB	(VP*	ESE
ambassador	NN	(NP*	ESE
Liu	NNP	*	ESE
Xiao	NNP	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
space	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Was	VBD	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
only	RB	(PP(ADVP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
wish	NN	*))	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
socialist	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
propaganda	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1957	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Communist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
authorized	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
production	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1956	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mao	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tse-tung	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
initiative	NN	*))	DSE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
specialized	VBN	*	O
Fifth	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1955	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reputation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Korolev	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
Qian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Xuesen	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
USA	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
settled	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
graduating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*	O
university	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP*	O
von	NNP	*	O
Broun	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Xuesen	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
studies	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
California	NNP	(NP*	O
Technical	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
obtained	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Doctor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Astronautics	NNP	(NP*	O
degree	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
say	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
title	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
colonel	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
employed	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
engine	NN	*	O
lab	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1950	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

FBI	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
agents	NNS	*)	O
caught	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
wife	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
airport	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Los	NNP	(NP*	O
Angeles	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
luggage	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
contained	VBD	(S(VP*	O
896	CD	(NP(NP*	O
pounds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
books	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
records	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Xuesen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*	O
only	RB	*))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
quarantine	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
secret	JJ	*	O
information	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Xuesen	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
supervisor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
research	NN	*)))	O
works	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
field	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
spaceships	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Shenzhou	NNP	*	O
type	NN	*)))	O
looked	VBD	(VP*	O
like	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Soyuz	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
specialists	NNS	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
von	NNP	*	O
Broun	NNP	*)	O
managed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
bearers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fresher	NN	(NP*	O
secrets	NNS	*)))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
launch	VB	*	O
ambassador	NN	(NP*	O
Liu	NNP	(NX(NP*	O
Xiao	NNP	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O
The	DT	(NX(NX(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
graduated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
universities	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Soviet	JJ	(NX*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
missile	NN	*	O
technologies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
elder	JJ	*	O
brother	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
younger	JJR	*	O
brother	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
field	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
modernization	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mao	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tse-tung	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Moscow	NNP	*	O
speech	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
actively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
searching	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
site	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
range	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
competent	JJ	*	O
departments	NNS	*)))	O
prepared	VBD	(VP*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
variants	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
help	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Soviet	JJ	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
site	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gobi	NNP	*	O
Desert	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
construction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jiuquan	NNP	*	O
cosmodrome	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
operation	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1958	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
unmanned	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
spaceships	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
there	RB	(NP*))))))))	O
:	:	*))	O

Shenzhou-1	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1999	CD	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stayed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orbit	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
24	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
orbited	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*)	O
14	CD	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shenzhou-2	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
blasted	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*	O
,	,	*))	O
staying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
orbit	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
flown	VBN	(VP*	O
108	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
times	NNS	*))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
planet	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shenzhou-3	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
blasted	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
25	CD	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
stayed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
circuits	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
goal	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
examine	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
module	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
contents	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
cases	NNS	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
evident	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reliable	JJ	(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
mastered	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
art	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*	O
navigation	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
soft	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
landing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
spaceship	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
spaceships	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
training	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP*	O
swing	NN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
participating	VBG	(VP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
least	JJS	*	ESE
four	CD	*)	O
test	NN	*)	O
unmanned	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*)	O
performed	VBD	(VP*	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	ESE
Gagarin	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(INTJ*	O
Go	UH	*	O
!	.	*	O
''	''	*)	O
no	RB	(PP(ADVP*	O
later	RB	*)	O
than	IN	*	O
2005	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
programs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
cosmonauts	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Moon	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
interfere	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
effect	NN	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))))))))	O

Brasilia	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Agencia	NNP	(NP*	O
Brasil	NNP	*)	O
-	,	*	O
ABr	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
interfere	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
controlling	JJ	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cardoso	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
joining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
formally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
renounced	VBD	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cardoso	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	DSE
congress	NN	(NP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
calling	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
committing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
5.2	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
United	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
36	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
17.4	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
8.5	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
7.4	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Great	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Britain	NNP	*)	O
4.3	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
3.3	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
3.1	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Poland	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
3	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
France	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
2.7	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cardoso	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
main	JJ	(NP*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	O
facing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reestablishing	VBG	(VP*	O
normalcy	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O

Brasilia	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
16	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Agencia	NNP	(NP*	O
Brasil	NNP	*)	O
-	,	*	O
ABr	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
principal	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reestablish	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
normalcy	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflicts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cardoso	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
opening	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
communication	NN	(NP*	O
channels	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
achieving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
social	JJ	(NP*	ESE
harmony	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Cardoso	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
intention	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
revenge	NN	(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
supported	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
attempt	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Former	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Jimmy	NNP	(NP*	O
Carter	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
promise	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
dialogue	NN	(NP*	O
tables	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Violent	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
;	:	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*	O
Duhalde	NN	*	O
calls	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
calm	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE

BUENOS	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
AIRES	VBZ	(VP*))	O
-	:	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Eduardo	NNP	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
pleaded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
patience	NN	(NP*))	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
works	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
call	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP*	O
clashes	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
problems	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
local	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
radio	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
hours	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
tens	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	O
of	IN	*	O
thousands	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
streets	NNS	*))	DSE
around	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
country	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
pot-banging	JJ	*	DSE
demonstration	NN	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
13	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overnight	JJ	*	O
clashes	NNS	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
palace	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Casa	NNP	*	O
Rosada	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
dozens	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Duhalde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
2	CD	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
vowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
unveil	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rescue	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
recession	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
ask	VBP	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP*	O
Argentines	NNP	*	O
one	CD	*	O
thing	NN	*))	O
:	:	*	O
keep	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
hope	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP*	DSE
promise	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
term	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
track	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Daily	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
engulfed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
:	:	*	O
Popular	NNP	(S(NP*	O
rage	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
boiled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
over	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
devalue	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
30	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
further	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	O
tighten	VB	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banking	NN	*	O
freeze	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
locked	VBN	(VP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*	O
Argentines	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
savings	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
bank	NN	(NP*	O
accounts	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
beleaguered	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
widely	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
despised	JJ	*)	DSE
banking	NN	*	O
freeze	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
nettlesome	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
three-week-old	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
:	:	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
Argentines	NNS	(NP*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
savings	NNS	*)	O
back	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
without	IN	*	O
prompting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
all-out	JJ	*	O
collapse	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
banking	NN	*	O
curbs	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
December	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
then-president	JJ	(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
De	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
halt	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
run	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
depositors	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Late	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
night	NN	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
impatience	NN	*)	DSE
peaked	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
faced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	DSE
widespread	JJ	*))	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
assumed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
similar	JJ	(S(NP*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
predecessors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
driving	VBG	*	O
rain	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
10,000	CD	*)	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
banged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pots	NNS	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
pans	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
Plaza	NNP	*	DSE
de	NNP	*	DSE
Mayo	NNP	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
protest	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banking	VBG	*	O
freeze	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
shouting	NN	(NP(NP*	DSE
insults	NNS	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
political	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
banks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentines	NNPS	*)	O
blame	VBP	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
plunging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
decades	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thousands	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
crowded	VBD	(VP*	O
street	NN	(NP*	O
corners	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
downtown	NN	*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cities	NNS	(NP*))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Mar	NNP	(NP*	O
del	NNP	*	O
Plata	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Cordoba	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Mendoza	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Rosario	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Salta	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
marked	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	DSE
organized	VBN	*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
labor	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
neighborhood	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
via	IN	(PP*	O
e-mail	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Internet	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
began	VBD	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
downtown	NN	(NP*	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
riot	NN	(NP(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
riding	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
motorcycles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
tear	NNS	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rubber	NN	*	O
bullets	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disperse	VB	(VP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
demonstrators	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rock-throwing	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
youths	NNS	*)	DSE
responded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
rally	NN	*)	O
wound	VBD	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Demonstrators	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
lingered	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
hours	NNS	(NP*))))	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
yesterday	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
crowds	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
melting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
dawn	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Get	RB	(SQ(ADVP*	ESE
out	RB	*	ESE
!	.	*)	ESE
Get	VBP	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)))	O
!	.	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
people	NNS	(NP*)	O
chanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
venting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
anger	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Europe	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tax	NNP	(NP*	O
Israeli	NNP	*	O
Settlement	NNP	*	O
Goods	NNP	*))))	O

RAMALLAH	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*	O
Media	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Signaling	NNP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
toughening	JJ	*	DSE
policy	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	O
settlements	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Origin	NNP	*	O
Committee	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
consists	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
customs	JJ	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
commissioners	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
taxes	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
goods	NNS	*)	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Occupied	NNP	*	O
Palestinian	NNP	*	O
Territory	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
Golan	NNP	*	O
Heights	NNPS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
discussion	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
26	CD	(S(NP*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
shall	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
centered	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
revoke	VB	(VP*	O
duty	NN	(NP(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*)	O
awarded	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
follows	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rejection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Territory	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
subject	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
debate	NN	*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
objection	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
signals	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
discontent	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
factories	NNS	*	O
operating	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Occupied	NNP	*	O
Palestinian	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
Territories	NNPS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
issued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
warning	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
importers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
specifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
originating	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Occupied	NNP	*	O
Palestinian	NNP	*	O
Territory	NNP	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Golan	NNP	*	O
Heights	NNP	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
included	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
present	JJ	(NP*	O
Israel	NNP	*))	O
enjoys	VBZ	(VP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
exempts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
customs	NNS	(NP*	O
duties	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
rejects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
reasons	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
affirms	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	DSE
recognizing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
settlements	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Occupied	NNP	*	O
Palestinian	NNP	*	O
Territory	NNP	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
amount	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
US	VB	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
$	$	(PP(NP(NP(QP*	O
8	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
Israel	NNP	*	O
gains	NNS	*)	O
annually	RB	(ADVP*))	O
from	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
worry	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
committee	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deliberations	NNS	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
1949	CD	*	O
Fourth	NNP	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
states	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Occupying	NNP	*	O
Power	NNP	*)	O
creates	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Occupied	NNP	*	O
Territory	NNP	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
crime	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
High	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
Contracting	VBG	*	O
Parties	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
affirmed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
de	FW	*	O
jure	NN	*	O
applicability	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Occupied	NNP	*	O
Palestinian	NNP	*	O
Territory	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
East	NNP	(NP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
refusal	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
respect	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
obligations	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Occupying	NNP	*	O
Power	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dismantling	VBG	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	ESE
settlements	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Territory	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S(VP*	O
exporting	VBG	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israeli	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
Parliament	NNP	*	O
Speaker	NNP	*	O
Slams	NNP	*	DSE
Zionist	NNP	*	O
Occupation	NNP	*))	O

TEHRAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(PP(NP*)	O
In	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rare	JJ	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	NNP	(NP*	O
Parliament	NNP	*	O
Speaker	NNP	*	O
Avraham	NNP	*	O
Burg	NNP	*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Qatari	NNP	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Jazeera	NNP	*	O
television	NN	*	O
network	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Burg	NNP	(NP*)	O
denounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
much	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
displeasure	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
right-wing	JJ	(NP*	O
MPs	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
corruption	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	O
scandals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
regime	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RBR	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
50	CD	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*	O
officers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
strike	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
ruled	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
lands	NNS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
means	NN	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
defensive	JJ	*	O
act	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
merely	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
criminal	JJ	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fate	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*)	O
'	''	*))	O
hangs	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
wording	NN	*)))))	O

PARIS	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*))	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unclear	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
view	NN	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
darkened	NN	*)))	ESE
goggles	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
wear	VB	(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
stepped	VBD	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
official	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
prisoner-of	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
sparked	VBN	(VP*	O
protests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
disagreement	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Red	NNP	(NX*	O
Cross	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ICRC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
oversees	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
POW	NNP	*	O
designation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
little	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
steel	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
manacles	NNS	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
open-air	JJ	(NP*	ESE
cells	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rather	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
sidestepping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
conventions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
craft	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unusual	JJ	*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
strategy	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
Al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
special	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fifty	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
six-by-eight	JJ	(NP*	O
foot	NN	*	O
concrete-floored	NN	*	O
cells	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
wooden	JJ	(NP*	O
roofs	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
chainlink	VBP	(VP*	O
fence	NN	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
walls	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
leave	VBP	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
open	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elements	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
engineers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
2,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
such	JJ	*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
necessary	JJ	(FRAG*))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
400	CD	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Defense	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
re	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
porters	NNS	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
plan	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*	ESE
part	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
treat	VB	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manner	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
reasonably	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
consistent	JJ	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
extent	NN	*))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
careful	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
refer	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
unlawful	JJ	(NP*	O
combatants	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
battlefield	NN	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
not	RB	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
description	NN	*)	O
severely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reduces	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
prompted	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
rebuttal	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
presumed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
POWs	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
up	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
up	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
courts	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Michael	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kleiner	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ICRC	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
determined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
former	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Panamanian	JJ	*	O
strongman	NN	*	O
Manuel	NNP	*	O
Noriega	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
POW	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
classify	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
capture	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hopes	NNS	*))	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
prosecuting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Al	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
suspected	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
involvement	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	(NX(NX*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*)))	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
rules	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
soldiers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
rules	NNS	(NX*))	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
worked	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
only	RB	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
regular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Uniform	NNP	*	O
Code	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Military	NNP	(NP*	O
Justice	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
three-tier	JJ	*	O
appeal	NN	*)))	O
system	NN	*)	O
reaching	VBG	(VP*	O
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
nervous	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
applying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
POW	NNP	*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	ESE
glory	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Adam	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Roberts	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Oxford	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
England	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
editor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Documents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Laws	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
War	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Attorney	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Ashcroft	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
seek	VB	(VP(VP*	O
criminal	JJ	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoner	NN	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Walker	NNP	*	O
Lindh	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Ashcroft	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
face	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
penalty	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
bands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
would	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
criteria	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
organized	VBN	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
activity	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Pentagon	NNP	(S(NP*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Susan	NNP	*	O
Hanson	NNP	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
stressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
well	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
treated	VBN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
culturally	JJ	(NP*	O
appropriate	JJ	*	O
meals	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	(FRAG*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shower	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
exercise	VB	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
receive	VB	*	O
medical	JJ	(NP*	O
attention	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Human	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
questions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
housing	NN	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
standard	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
enjoyed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
US	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
POWs	NNP	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
kept	VBN	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
complain	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rightly	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
so	RB	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
James	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ross	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
adviser	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
New	NNP	(ADJP*	O
York-based	JJ	*)	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNP	*	O
Watch	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
ICRC	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
Pentagon	NNP	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
procedure	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
fate	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
construct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*	O
ourselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
dealing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
irregular	NN	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
variety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
suspected	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
traditional	JJ	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
crimes	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Ms.	NNP	(NP*	O
Hanson	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Little	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
however	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
bunch	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
lawyers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
treaties	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
conventions	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
figure	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
appropriate	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
bit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
tangle	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Prof.	NNP	(NP*	O
Roberts	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
home	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Saudi	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
Egyptian	JJ	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
face	VB	(VP*	O
mistreatment	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
means	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
forbidden	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hand	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
over	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
unclear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
constitute	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
individuals	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
found	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
continued	VBN	*	O
danger	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
reluctant	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
release	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
anything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
quite	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
like	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
envisioned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Conventions	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Tom	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Farer	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
dean	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Denver	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
University	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Graduate	NNP	*	O
School	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Studies	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
special	JJ	*	O
assistant	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
special	JJ	*	O
counsel	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
worrying	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
adds	VBZ	(SINV(VP*)	DSE
Prof.	NNP	(NP*	O
Roberts	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
`	``	*	O
battlefield	NN	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
'	''	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
creating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
limbo	NN	*)	ESE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Vietnamese	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Science	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Technology	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Environment	NNP	(NP*	O
Chu	NNP	*	O
Tuan	NNP	*	O
Nha	NNP	*))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
Asia-Europe	NN	*)	O
Meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
ASEM	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Ministers	NNP	*)	O
'	''	*	O
Meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
ASEM	NNP	*	O
EnMM	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))	O
recently	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
values	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
prevention	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pollution	NN	(NP(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
degradation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
bio-diversity	NN	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
improvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP*	O
zones	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
urban	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Vietnamese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
mobilized	VBN	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
resources	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
strengthened	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
addressing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
bilateral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
continents	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
noting	VBG	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
foundation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
future	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Vietnamese	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*	O
forum	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Europe	NNP	*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
Program	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dialogues	NNS	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
policy	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ASEM	NNP	*	O
EnMM	NNP	*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
17	CD	(NP*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Statement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidium	NNP	*)))))	O
calling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
cooperation	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
ASEM	NNP	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Annual	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Report	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
condemned	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Though	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
contents	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
inaccurate	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
lacking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
commented	VBN	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Europe	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
content	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Report	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
brazen	JJ	*	ESE
distortion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
wrongful	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
illegitimate	JJ	*	ESE
move	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interference	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Congress	NNP	*)))	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
criticizing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
violations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
quoting	VBG	(VP*	O
data	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Science	NNP	*	O
Monitor	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
murder	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
5.5	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
100,000	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
torture	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
confess	JJ	(NP*	O
crime	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
common	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
sentenced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
death	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
crime	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
commit	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unjust	JJ	*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
12	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
children	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poverty	NN	*	O
line	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
beaten	VBN	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
seconds	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Evidence	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
human	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
ignored	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
facts	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
understood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
human	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
annual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
190	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
25	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
ignoring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

World	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
evaluation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
practice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
depends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
devotes	VBZ	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
pages	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
commenting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
judgment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
practice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
depends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
British	NNP	*	O
News	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*	O
Reuters	NNP	*)	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*	O
human	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Egypt	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
suspected	VBN	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
criticism	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
absent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
2001	CD	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	JJ	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
refusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
POW	NNP	(NP*	O
status	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
pays	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
serve	VBP	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
purpose	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
light	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
malicious	JJ	*	ESE
goals	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Annual	JJ	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Report	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
evidence	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
prove	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wrong	JJ	*	ESE
judgment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*	O
last	JJ	*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
article	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Andrew	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Welsdan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Reconciliation	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Development	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
rejecting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
allegation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
article	NN	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
practice	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
religion	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
buddhists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
catholics	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
protestants	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Annual	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Report	NNP	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
convincing	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
inaccurate	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fabricated	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Norway	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forefront	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
combating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
climate	NN	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	O
internationally	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
point	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
significant	JJ	*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
gate	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Norway	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Environmental	NNP	(NP*	O
Protection	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Borge	NNP	*	O
Brende	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
written	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Between	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2008	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Storting	NNP	*)))))	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spring	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
occupy	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
place	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Norway	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
rich	JJ	*	ESE
countries	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
moral	JJ	*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reductions	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Regardless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Norway	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
manage	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
respect	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
prepare	VB	(VP*	O
ourselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
climate	NN	*	O
panel	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)))	O
changes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unaffected	JJ	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
initiatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
explanation	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
increased	VBN	*	O
concentration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
slowness	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*	O
unavoidable	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
RegClim	NNP	*	O
research	NN	*	O
project	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aegis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Norwegian	JJ	*	O
Research	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
worked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
estimate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
50	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
main	JJ	*	DSE
conclusions	NNS	*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
warmer	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
weather	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
precipitation	NN	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
presumably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
continue	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
region	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
region	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
western	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
experience	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
markedly	RB	(ADJP*	O
greatest	JJS	*)	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
precipition	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fall	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

North	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Norway	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
precipitation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
warmer	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
temperatures	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
winter	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eastern	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
precipitation	NN	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
winter	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
coming	VBG	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
winters	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
less	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
snowy	JJ	*)	O
but	CC	*	O
greener	JJR	(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
wetter	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
extrapolations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
completely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
reliable	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
certainty	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
climate	NN	(S(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	O
knowledge	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
must	MD	(SQ*	ESE
local	JJ	(NP*	O
societies	NNS	*)	O
organize	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hurricanes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
become	VBP	(VP*	O
normal	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
should	MD	(SQ*	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
prepare	VB	(VP*	O
ourselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
bigger	JJR	*)	O
floods	NNS	*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

What	WDT	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*	ESE
consequences	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
temperature	NN	(NP*)))	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
raising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
livestock	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fish	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Will	MD	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
climate	NN	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
produce	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
types	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
goal	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
both	DT	(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
knowledge	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
together	RP	(PRT*)	O
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
preparedness	NN	*	O
strategies	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	PDT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
peoples	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
affected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
hit	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hardest	RBS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
developing	VBG	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
contributed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
problems	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
just	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
slight	JJ	*	ESE
degree	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
nevertheless	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
bear	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greatest	JJS	*	ESE
burden	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Norway	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
industrialized	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
fairly	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*)	ESE
prospects	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
grappling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*))))))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
avoid	VB	(VP*	ESE
seeing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
environmental	JJ	(S(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
differences	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
rich	JJ	*	O
countries-those	NN	*))	ESE
making	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
climate	NN	*	ESE
worse-must	NN	*)	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
offensive	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
ourselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sem	NNP	*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
offensive	JJ	*)	ESE
climate	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
offensive	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
police	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
costs	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
expenditures	NNS	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
bill	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
generations	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
bigger	JJR	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
conscience	NN	*))	ESE
ought	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
permit	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
introduce	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
cost-effective	JJ	*)	ESE
climate	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
at	IN	(VP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
take	VB	*	O
Norwegian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
business	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
industry	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
competitiveness	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
consideration	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
elements	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
offensive	JJ	*)	O
climate	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
Initiatives	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2008	CD	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
show	VB	(VP*	O
demonstrable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
progress	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
setting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stage	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
way	NN	(NP*))	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
required	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
speeded	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Implementation	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
stage	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
consensus	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
broad	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*	O
exchange	NN	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
responsibilities	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
obligatory	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
2008-2012	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pursue	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
internationally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
period	NN	*	O
2008-2012	CD	*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
down	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
road	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
later	JJ	(NP*	O
periods	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
sharper	JJR	(S(NP*	ESE
reductions	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
obligations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Norway	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Storting	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spring	NN	*)))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
specify	VB	(VP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
measures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
2008	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
exists	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
potential	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
significant	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
reductions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
produced	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resources	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
quotas	NNS	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cost-effective	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
means	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
achieving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
better	JJR	(NP*	ESE
results	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
quota	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
emit	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
quantity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
advantages	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ceiling	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Businesses	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
obligated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*)))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
then	RB	*	O
choose	VB	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quotas	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
introduce	VB	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
Denmark	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Great	NNP	(NP*	O
Britain	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Sweden	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
way	NN	(NP*))	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
effective	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
useful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
experience	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
work	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
shape	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
discussing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
range-which	JJ	*	O
gases	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
included	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
businesses	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
exposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
competition	NN	(NP*)))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
dealt	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Measures	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
emissions-how	NN	(NP*))	O
much	RB	(ADVP*	O
all	DT	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
obligated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
emit	VB	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fines	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
exceeding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*)))))	O
limit	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
early	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
pleased	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
broad	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
political	JJ	*	DSE
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
way	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
quota	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Regardless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shape	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Norwegian	JJ	(NP*	O
businesses	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
ought	MD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
contribute	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
green	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
opens	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
businesses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
introduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
environmentally-friendly	JJ	*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
polluting	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
industries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used-and	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
producing	VBG	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
benefits	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
contribute	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
reduced	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
pollution	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Norway	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
earned	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	JJS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
fossil	JJ	(NP*	O
fuels	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
policy-not	NN	*)	ESE
least	JJS	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
vis-a-vis	VBZ	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
poorest	JJS	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Becoming	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
captive	JJ	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
defeated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))))))	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
bad	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
being	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NN	*	O
POW	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
worse	JJR	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
mankind	NN	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
unquestionably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(S(ADJP*	ESE
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
respect	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*))	O
''	''	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
comparison	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ancient	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
POWs	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
slaughtered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	O
enslaved	VBN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
watch	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
regression	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
regard	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Each	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Side	NN	*)	O
Has	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Different	JJ	*	O
Story	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Respect	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Treatment	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
regarding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
interned	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
Islamic	NNP	(NP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
captives	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
receive	VB	(VP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
religious	JJ	*	DSE
belief	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
respected	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
camp	NN	*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
most	JJS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
young	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
20s	NNS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
30s	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
locked	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
separately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cells	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
2.5	CD	*)	O
square	JJ	*	O
meters	NNS	*)	O
each	DT	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
living	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
necessities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
towel	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
toothpaste	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
soap	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
shampoo	NN	*))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
each	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
twin	JJ	*	O
bed	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
soft	JJ	(NP*	O
mattress	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sleep	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Koran	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
receive	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mat	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
prayer	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lisa	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Ewing	NNP	*)	O
-LSB-	VBZ	(VP*	O
name	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
transliterated	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
female	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
police	NN	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
watches	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
POWs	NNPS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Each	DT	(S(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
wake	VBP	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
up	RB	(ADJP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
time	NN	(VP(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
prayer	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
breakfast	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first-day	JJ	*	O
menu	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
package	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vacuum-packed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
vegetable	NN	*	O
noodle	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
package	NN	*)	O
containing	VBG	(VP*	O
peanuts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
granola	NN	(NP*	O
bars	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
box	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
colorful	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
sugar-coated	JJ	*	O
cereal	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
favorite	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
American	JJ	(NP*	O
young	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
menu	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
oatmeal	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
raisin	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
potato	NN	(NP*	O
chips	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pretzel	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
foods	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
strange	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
abided	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dietary	JJ	*	O
rules	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Muslims	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clean	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
water	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
drink	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
request	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
organizations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
let	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
go	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
living	VBG	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
basically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
transparent	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
above	JJ	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
reproach	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Certain	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
maintain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
treating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
reproachable	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Christopher	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
physician	NN	*)	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
camp	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
treat	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
well	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
descriptions	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
views	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
medium	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
description	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
camp	NN	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
2.5-square	JJ	*	O
meter	NN	*	O
cement	NN	*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
way	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
below	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fully-armed	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
watchful	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
prison	NN	*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
naval	JJ	(NP*	O
personnel	NNS	*))	O
make	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rounds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inspection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
dressed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
orange	JJ	(NP*	O
one-piece	NN	*))	O
overall	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
hand-cuffed	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
movements	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
quite	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
confined	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whenever	WRB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
walk	NN	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bath	NN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
toilet	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tied	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
supervised	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP(VP*	O
around	RP	(PRT*))	O
,	,	*	O
talk	VB	(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
hear	VB	(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
touch	VB	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
nor	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(SINV*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
freely	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
X-ray	NN	*	ESE
prison	NN	*	ESE
camp	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
full	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(ADJP*	ESE
cruelties	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
torture	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
British	NNP	(PRN(SINV(S(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
All	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
detainees	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
identities	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
receive	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
line	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
with	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	ESE
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(FRAG(NP*	O
law	NN	*	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)	O
Ann	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Crawd	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
name	NN	*	O
transliterated	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chairwoman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
shall	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
violate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*	O
Relative	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Treatment	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Prisoners	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
War	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)))))	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Strategy	NNP	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Strategy	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Testing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Next	JJ	*	O
Moves	NNS	*)	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
disclosing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
allowing	VBG	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
wise	JJ	*	ESE
one	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
otherwise	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
sorts	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
misgivings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
question	VBP	(VP*	DSE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
characterize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
claiming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Basing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
reports	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Evidently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
pains	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
harboring	VBG	(VP*	DSE
deep	JJ	(NP*	DSE
hatred	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
let	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
easily	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
revenge	NN	(NP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reassert	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
authority	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
chooses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
characterize	VB	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
release	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
sooner	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
later	RB	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
likely	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
attack	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
means	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
respect	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expression	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mankind	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
progress	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
underscores	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	DSE
values	NNS	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
ideas	NNS	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
dual	JJ	*	O
identities	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enemies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weaker	JJR	*	O
parties	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
act	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
venting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
personal	JJ	*	ESE
grudge	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
detaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
not	RB	(VP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
belligerent	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
are	VBP	*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nonbelligerent	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
contradiction	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
consider	VB	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defining	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
status	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
test	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
attitudes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
attitudes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
upholder	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
upholder	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	ESE
support	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
appears	VBZ	(S(VP*)))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
seem	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
Detainees	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Status	NNS	*)	O
--	:	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Issue	NN	*)	O
Concerning	VBG	(PP*	ESE
Their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
Life	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Death	NN	*)	ESE
After	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
camp	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
media	NNS	(NP*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
accusing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
harsh	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
restrictions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
small	JJ	*))))))	ESE
...	:	*	O
Mary	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Robinson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
UN	JJ	*	O
special	JJ	*	O
commissioner	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
urge	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
pay	VB	(VP*	DSE
attention	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
respecting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
obligations	NNS	*)	O
prescribed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
superficial	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
issues	NNS	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
core	NN	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	(UCP*	O
POWs	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
unlawful	JJ	(NP*	O
combatants	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
Avna	NNP	(PRN(S(NP*	O
Kidlon	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*)	O
name	VBP	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
transliterated	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*	O
advisor	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Amnesty	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
death	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sentenced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
death	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
violates	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
norms	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	O
procedures	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
crux	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
unlawful	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
POWs	JJ	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
prescribed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Apparently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
viewpoint	NN	*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
measures	VBZ	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
history	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	ESE
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
universally	JJ	*	DSE
acknowledged	JJ	*	DSE
definition	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
terrorist	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
not	RB	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
established	JJ	*	O
provision	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
assessing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
punishments	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
precedence	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
reference	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
feels	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
incomprehensible	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
why	WRB	(SINV(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(SQ*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
not	RB	*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
combatants	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
battles	NNS	*)))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
fought	VBD	(VP*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*))	O
organized	JJ	(NP*	O
resistance	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
battles	NNS	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
POW	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
involves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
laws	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
dignity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
worries	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
most	JJS	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(NP*	ESE
their	PRP$	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
way	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
should	MD	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
remnants	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
radical	JJ	*	ESE
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
peace-keeping	JJ	*	O
missions	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Without	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
willfulness	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
greatly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
annoyed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
mobilization	NN	*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
followed	VBD	(S(VP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
winning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
excuses	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
deny	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
POW	NNP	*	O
status	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
Uncle	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Sam	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
certain	JJ	*	O
worries	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
justified	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
hegemonic	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
setting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*)	O
all	DT	(PP*	ESE
by	IN	*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hardly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
convincing	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
chooses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
disregard	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
follows	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legality	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sanctity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
substantially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
reduced	VBN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
similar	JJ	(S(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
occur	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
universally-acknowledged	JJ	*	ESE
rules	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
factors	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
consideration	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldier-turned	JJ	*	O
statesman	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
moderate	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
advised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
POW	NNP	*	O
status	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Promulgated	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
12	CD	(NP*))	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
1949	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
POW	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
effective	JJ	(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
21	CD	(NP*)))	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
1950	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
signatories	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
specified	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
privileges	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
let	VB	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
compare	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
convention	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
provisions	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
descriptions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
dignity	NN	*	DSE
,	,	*	O
lodging	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
clothing	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
activities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
trial	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	DSE
current	JJ	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisons	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
brutal	JJ	*	ESE
manner	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
orange	JJ	(NP*	O
one-piece	NN	*)))	O
overall	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
blind-folded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
thick	JJ	(NP*	O
black	JJ	*	O
cloths	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
tied	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
kneeling	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Each	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
interned	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
2.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
square	JJ	*	O
meters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
size	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
little	JJ	*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
house	VB	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(QP*	O
or	CC	*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
exceeded	VBN	(VP*	O
32	CD	(NP*	O
degrees	NNS	*)	O
Celsius	NNS	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
hands	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
shackled	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	DSE
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
one-piece	JJ	*	O
overall	JJ	*)))	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
only	RB	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
freely	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
breathe	VB	(VP*	O
normally	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
fences	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
watchtowers	JJ	(ADJP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
four	CD	*	O
corners	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
let	VB	(S(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
exercise	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bath	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
toilet	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tied	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
accompany	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
instructed	VBN	(VP*	O
not	RB	(S(S*	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
around	RP	(PRT*)))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
to	TO	*	O
listen	VB	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
touch	VB	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
short	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
move	VB	(VP*	ESE
freely	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
jury	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
appeal	VB	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
provisions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
POWs	NNP	(S(NP*)	DSE
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
protected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
circumstances	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
receive	VB	(VP*	ESE
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
shall	MD	(VP*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outrage	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
coercion	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
humiliation	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
harassment	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
curious	JJ	*	DSE
public	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reprisal	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
prohibited	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Housing	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
conditions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	(ADJP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)))))	O
stationing	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Detaining	NNP	*	O
Power	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
provision	NN	*)	O
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
applicable	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
dormitories	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
minimum	JJ	*	O
cubic	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Clothing	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
underwear	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
footwear	NNP	*)	O
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
supplied	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
sufficient	JJ	(NP*	O
quantity	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Detaining	NNP	*	O
Power	NNP	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
adequate	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
ensuring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
health	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

POWs	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exercise	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
exercise	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
include	VB	(VP*	O
sports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
games	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
outdoor	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
the	DT	*	O
captive	JJ	*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
enough	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
room	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tobacco	NN	(NP*)))	O
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
permitted	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
shall	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
crime	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
jury	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
appeal	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Environmentalist	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
staged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
alternative	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
curbing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Embassy	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
prior	RB	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

About	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
50	CD	*)	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
Japanese	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
nongovernmental	NN	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NGOs	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
opposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
alternative	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
gathered	VBN	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*	O
p.m.	RB	*))))))))	O

at	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Tameike-Sanno	NNP	(NP*	O
Station	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
close	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Minato	NNP	*	O
Ward	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
means	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
regrettable	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
negative	JJ	*	DSE
stand	NN	*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Masaaki	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Nakajima	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Friends	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Earth	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
FoE	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Japan	NNP	*)))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Protesters	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
banners	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
reading	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Ratify	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
`	``	(NP(NP*	O
No	NNP	(NP*)	O
'	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
Stick	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
demonstration	NN	*)	DSE
came	VBD	(VP*	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
heightened	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*))	O
around	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
elsewhere	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Representatives	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Kiko	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Network	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Peace	NNP	(NP*	O
Boat	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
FoE	NNP	(NP*	O
Japan	NNP	*))))))	O
handed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
addressed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
NGOs	NNS	*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
terribly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
dismayed	JJ	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
unveiled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
new	JJ	*	DSE
plan	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
calls	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
voluntary	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
limits	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
companies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
mandatory	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reduction	NN	*	O
targets	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
sparked	VBD	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
outcry	NN	*)	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
mean	VB	(VP*	O
sacrificing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*)	DSE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	ESE
alternative	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
around	IN	(NP*	O
30	CD	*	O
%	NN	*))	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
demand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
you	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reconsider	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
immediately	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
re-enter	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	RB	*	ESE
existing	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Measures	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tackle	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
Prime	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
meet	VBP	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
officials	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kiko	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Network	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
e-mail	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(NP*))	O
urging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
premier	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
inform	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plan	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Diet	NNP	*)	O
approves	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ratification	NN	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Diet	NNP	*	O
session	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Peace	NNP	(NP*	O
Boat	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
handed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
separate	JJ	*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
addressed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
leadership	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
dialogue	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
fair	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
support	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
reference	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(ADJP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*))))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
push	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*	ESE
'	POS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
raids	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
cease	VB	(VP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
experiments	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
bases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
requests	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

TOKYO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
15	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
welcomed	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
press	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pact	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
rejected	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
appreciates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demonstration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	DSE
intention	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Yoriko	NNP	*	O
Kawaguchi	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
press	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
with	IN	*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
environment	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
160	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exception	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
--	:	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Morocco	NNP	(NP*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
marathon	NN	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
While	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
steps	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
approval	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Diet	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enactment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
required	VBN	*	O
legislation	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Diet	NNP	*	O
session	NN	*))))))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
future	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
participate	VBP	(VP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
raise	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
visits	VBZ	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three-day	JJ	*	O
stay	NN	*)	O
starting	VBG	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
weakened	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
focus	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
night	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
slow	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
intensity	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ratio	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
output	NN	*)))))	O
--	:	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
target	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
unsound	JJ	*	ESE
international	JJ	*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
commits	VBZ	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
below	IN	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*	O
levels	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
timetable	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2008-2012	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O

Taro	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kono	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
39	CD	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
son	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Yohei	NNP	*	O
Kono	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
twice	RB	(NP(NP*	O
elected	JJ	*	O
lower	JJR	*	O
house	NN	*)	O
Liberal	JJ	(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Party	NN	*	O
member	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*	DSE
comment	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Diet	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*))))	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
following	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
translated	JJ	*	O
excerpt	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
article	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Kono	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
e-mail	JJ	*	O
magazine	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Gomameno	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
no	DT	*	O
Hagishiri	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Futile	NNP	(NP*	O
Resistance	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kono	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
issues	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
e-mail	JJ	*	O
magazine	NN	*)	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*	O
daily	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
During	IN	(S(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
heckling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
;	:	*	O
`	``	*	O
What	WP	(SBARQ(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O
?	.	*	O
'	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
`	``	(SBARQ*	O
How	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
about	RB	(SQ(ADVP*)	ESE
CTBT	VBZ	(VP*))	O
?	.	*))	O
'	''	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
refrained	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
President	NNP	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	O
`	``	*	O
common	JJ	(NP*	O
values	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
really	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
true	JJ	*))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
`	``	*	O
value	NN	(NP*	ESE
sharing	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
`	``	(NP*	O
burden	NN	*	ESE
sharing	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
`	``	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	ESE
sharing	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
relationship	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
CTBT	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unacceptable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
nobody	NN	*)	ESE
cares	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
BWC	NNP	*))	O
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
own	JJ	(NP*	O
handguns	NNS	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
land	NN	(S(NP*	O
mines	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
SOFA	NNP	*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
revision	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
just	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
application	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
then	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
together	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ambassadors	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Middle	NNP	(NP*	O
Eastern	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
came	VBD	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
exclusively	RB	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
content	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
behavior	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
selected	JJ	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
public	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
coordination	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
components	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Opinion	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	DSE
Rights	NNPS	*	DSE
Claims	NNP	*)	DSE
Only	RB	(NP*	ESE
Empty	JJ	*	ESE
Rhetoric	JJ	*	ESE
-RSB-	NN	*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
published	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
2001	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
repeated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
allegations	NNS	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
provide	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
baseless	JJ	*	ESE
charges	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
unfounded	JJ	*	ESE
allegations	NNS	*))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
claim	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
enjoys	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
social	JJ	*	ESE
base	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)))))	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unpopular	JJ	*	ESE
system	NN	*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	ESE
participation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iranians	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grand	JJ	*	O
rallies	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Feb.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mark	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Revolution	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
defy	NNP	*	DSE
U.S.	NNP	*	O
threats	NNS	*)))))	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
revealed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emptiness	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)))	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
baseless	NN	*	ESE
accusations	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
tarnish	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
image	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
follows	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
bow	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	ESE
domination	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
interesting	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
annual	JJ	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*	O
itself	PRP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
sharply	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
killing	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
large	JJ	*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
civilians	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
torture	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
inhuman	JJ	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
advocate	NN	(VP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tries	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
policeman	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
condoning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
atrocious	JJ	*)	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)	ESE
committed	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
itself	PRP	(S(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
ugliest	NN	*	ESE
crimes	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
perpetrated	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
inmates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
prisons	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
mistreatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
minorities	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
police	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
appalling	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
massive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
riots	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bloody	JJ	*	ESE
riot	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
ignited	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cincinnati	NNP	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
Afro-American	JJ	*	O
youth	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
claims	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
advocate	NN	(VP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
harsh	JJ	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
hegemonic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
belligerent	JJ	*)	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))	O
prove	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
claim	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
empty	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rhetoric	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Recent	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
important	JJ	(NP*	ESE
developments	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Atlantic	NNP	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
pursued	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
combating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
council	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
environment	NN	(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*)	O
June	NNP	(NP*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	ESE
decision	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
opening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
door	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entry	NN	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
just	RB	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
time	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
sustainable	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	O
development	NN	*))))))))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
14	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
program	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
remembered	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
after	IN	*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
fundamentally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
flawed	VBN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
almost	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
collapsed	VBN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
emitter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
25	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
withdrew	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
binding	JJ	(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
developed	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
deepening	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
important	JJ	*	ESE
multilateral	JJ	*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
combating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
played	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dominant	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
community	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
states	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
concluded	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Marrakech	NNP	*	O
conferences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
October	NNP	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
original	JJ	*	O
mechanism	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
respecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*	O
obligations	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
model	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
suggests	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
strengthening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
institutional	JJ	*	O
structures	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
field	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
parties	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
repeated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
insistence	NN	(NP*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
world	NN	(S(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
effective	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
unless	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
comparable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unfortunately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
climate	NNP	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
falls	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
short	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	DSE
expectations	NNS	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	ESE
satisfaction	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
seeing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)))	ESE
conceal	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extreme	JJ	*	ESE
weakness	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
program	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proportion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
fall	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2012	CD	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*))	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
hardly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
ambitious	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
event	NN	*)	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
given	VBN	(PP*	O
present	JJ	(NP*	O
productivity	NN	*	O
levels	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grow	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
increased	VBN	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
efficiency	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
cancelled	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
cancelled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*	O
objective	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
3	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
24.5	CD	(ADJP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
percent	CD	*))	O
more	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
improvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
comparison	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
8	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
6	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
7	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
warnings	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
unheeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
program	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IPCC	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Intergovernmental	NNP	*	O
Panel	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
rapid	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
decisive	JJ	*)	ESE
action	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
avert	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Scientists	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
estimate	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
industrialized	VBN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP(QP*	O
70	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2020	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
acceptable	JJ	*	ESE
level	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Researchers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
shown	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
without	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
determined	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
policy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
coordinated	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
level	NN	*))))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
dramatic	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
average	JJ	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
increase	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
5.8	CD	(NP(NP*	O
d	NNP	*	O
C	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2100	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
sea	NN	(S(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
90	CD	*)	O
cm	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
increasing	VBG	*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
hurricanes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ever	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
man	NN	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cope	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shift	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
rainfall	NN	*	O
zones	NNS	*))	O
the	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*	ESE
like	JJ	*)	ESE
of	IN	(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
before	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
instigation	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
environment	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
therefore	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
called	VBN	*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
assume	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
responsibilities	NNS	*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stabilize	VB	(VP(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
strengthen	VB	(VP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
effort	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
application	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
devastating	JJ	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
guided	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
competition	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
welcome	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
committing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ambitious	JJ	*	ESE
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	ESE
program	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	RP	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
field	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
renewable	JJ	(S(NP*	O
energy	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Anybody	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fails	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
exploit	VB	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outset	NN	*)))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	ESE
lagging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
behind	RP	(PRT*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Demand	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
increasing	VBG	(VP*	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
three	CD	(NX(NP*	O
liters	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP*	O
kilometers	NNS	*)))	O
''	''	*	O
car	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*	O
turbines	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
solar	JJ	(NP*	O
panels	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
export	NN	(NP*	O
successes	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
growing	VBG	(NP*	ESE
amplitude	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
today	NN	*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
buyers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fuel-guzzling	JJ	*	ESE
cars	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
automobile	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reticence	NNP	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reason	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
dominant	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
benefits	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
studies	NNS	*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP*	O
employment	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
positive	JJ	*	ESE
effect	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
implementing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
European	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
national	JJ	*)	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
programs	NNS	*))))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
succeed	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(QP*	O
hundred	CD	*	O
thousand	CD	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
jobs	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
come	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
realize	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
but	CC	(SBAR*	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
excellent	JJ	*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
modernize	VB	(VP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
quickly	RB	*)	ESE
as	RB	(UCP(ADJP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
extended	VBN	(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2008-2012	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
system	NN	*)))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
remain	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
door	NN	*)	ESE
remains	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
wide	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
open	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
emitter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
relieved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
responsibilities	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
protection	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
domestic	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
sufficient	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
intensity	NN	*	O
target	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
proposed	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
allows	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
increases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
sufficient	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
fight	VB	*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
most	RBS	(NP(ADJP*	O
industrialised	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
reductions	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
foresee	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
growing	VBG	(NP*	O
economies	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Climate	NNP	*	O
Change	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Party	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
industrialised	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
stabilise	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Achieving	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
stabilising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
concentrations	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ultimate	JJ	*	O
objective	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Convention	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
subscribed	VBN	(VP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
does	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
stabilisation	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
instead	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
will	MD	*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
increase	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
levels	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*	O
intensity	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
falling	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prolongation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
trend	NN	*))))	O
thereby	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
effect	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
foreseeing	VBG	(VP*	O
little	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	(QP*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
continuation	CD	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
business-as-usual	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
path	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Current	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*	O
projections	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
39	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
above	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
intensity	NN	*	O
improvements	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP(QP*	O
33	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
substantial	JJ	*)	ESE
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
voluntary	JJ	*)	O
nature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
proposed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
review	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effectiveness	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
striking	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
beneficial	JJ	(S(ADJP*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
pollutants	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
namely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
cap-and-trade	JJ	(NP*	O
programmes	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
extended	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
CO2	CD	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
cap-and-trade	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cost-effective	JJ	*	ESE
measure	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
combines	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	*	ESE
environmental	JJ	*	O
result	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flexibility	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
least	JJS	(ADVP*)	O
costly	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cap-and-trade	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
covering	VBG	(VP*	O
46	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CO2	CD	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
welcomes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*	O
review	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
represent	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
direction	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
operators	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
contribute	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
emission	NN	(NP*	O
control	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
mandatory	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
monitoring	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
reporting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
company	NN	(NP*	O
level	NN	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adequately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
assess	VB	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))	O
represent	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
comparable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
proceed	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
2002	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
entry	NN	(NP*))))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sustainable	NNP	(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
path	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emission	NN	(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
optimistic	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
other	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
players	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
notably	RB	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
examine	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
assess	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
basis	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(NP*	O
Passage	NNP	*)	O
omitted	VBN	(VP*	O
--	:	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
controlling	JJ	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
changes	NNS	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
attitudes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
preferred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
realistic	JJ	*)	ESE
attitude	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
eliminate	VB	*	O
pollutant	JJ	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
realistic	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
easier	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
polluting	VBG	*	O
agents	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
incentives	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
constraint	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
matter	NN	*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
cynical	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
appear	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
getting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recession	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
relaunching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whether	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
Clinton	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
damage	VB	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
receiving	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP*	O
quarters	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US-Japan	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*	O
structure	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
fairly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
visits	NNP	*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*	O
expert	NN	*	O
Kawamura	NNP	*	O
Sumihiko	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
missile	NN	(NP*	O
expert	NN	*	O
Sato	NNP	*	O
Mamoru	NNP	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
exclusively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
interviewed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
forward	RP	(PRT*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kawamura	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
exporting	VBG	*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Stable	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
ocean	NN	*	O
traffic	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	ESE
necessity	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
approximately	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
5.1	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
tons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
goods	NNS	(NP*)))	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
oceans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
about	RB	(SBAR(WHNP(WHNP(QP*	O
one	CD	*	O
third	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
passed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sea	NN	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Half	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
third	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sea	NN	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
traffic	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
seas	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
sea	NN	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
actively	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
expanding	VBG	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
maritime	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
resources	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1.5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
abide	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
inevitably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
conflicts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ocean	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
circumstances	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*)	O
both	DT	*	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
recognize	VB	(VP*	ESE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
navy	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Question	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
What	WP	(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
your	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
appraisal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
navy	NN	*))))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Kawamura	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	DSE
Frankly	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
speaking	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
navy	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
worrisome	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Anti-submarine	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
combat	NN	*	O
strength	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
low	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
old	JJ	*	O
style	NN	*)	O
naval	JJ	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
30	CD	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
40	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)	ESE
behind	IN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Torpedo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
strength	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
insufficient	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
Navy	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
large	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
example	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
submarine	NN	*)	O
attached	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
embellishment	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
fundamentally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
can	MD	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
accomplish	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
all	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
out	IN	*)	ESE
effort	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
augment	VB	(VP*	O
naval	JJ	(NP*	O
combat	NN	*	O
strength	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
past	JJ	(NP*	O
Taiwan-US	NNP	*	O
arms	NN	*	O
sale	NN	*	O
negotiations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PC-3	NNP	*	O
early	JJ	*	O
warning	NN	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MH53	NNP	*	O
helicopter	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
requests	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
purchase	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
entirely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
suitable	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
needs	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
PC-3	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
inferior	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Aegis	NNP	*	O
destroyer	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Question	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Will	MD	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
Aegis	NNP	(NP*	O
destroyers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Kawamura	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
One	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
all	DT	(ADVP*	O
along	IN	*	O
not	RB	*)	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
Aegis	NNP	(NP*	O
destroyers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
armed	VBN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Nationalist	JJ	*	O
Party	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
armed	VBN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nationalization	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Lee	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Teng-hui	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Li	NNP	(NP*	O
Teng-hui	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loyal	JJ	*	DSE
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chen	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	*	O
Ch	NNP	*	O
`	``	*	O
en	NNP	*	O
Shui-pien	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
gradually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
allowed	VBN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
feel	VB	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
ease	NN	(NP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
recognized	VBN	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
reality	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
situated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
virtual	JJ	(NP*	ESE
alliance	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reckon	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Aegis	NNP	*	O
destroyer	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Republican	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
along	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wait	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
little	JJ	*	O
while	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Question	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	DSE
Where	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
true	JJ	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

Sato	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
threat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
methods	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
missiles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
amphibious	JJ	(NP*	O
landing	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
submarine	JJ	(NP*	O
blockades	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
likely	JJ	*)	ESE
method	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
missiles	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
threaten	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
psychologically	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Question	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
should	MD	(SQ*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
missile	NN	*	O
threat	NN	*))))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Sato	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
very	RB	(S(ADVP*	ESE
obviously	RB	*)	ESE
purposely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
play	VBP	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
scare	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
1996	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*)	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
propaganda	NN	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
attacked	NNP	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
using	VBG	(VP*	O
missiles	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
simple	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*	O
common	JJ	(NP*	O
warheads	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
most	RBS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
holes	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
warheads	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
biological	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
means	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Second	NNP	*	O
World	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
7,000	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
V1	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
V2	NN	*	O
missiles	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
England	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
England	NNP	*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
surrender	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
old	JJ	(NP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNS	*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
3,000	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Kosovo	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kosovo	NNP	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
surrender	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
will	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Question	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
What	WP	(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
significance	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
jointly	NNP	*	O
researching	NNP	*	O
TMD	NNP	*	O
theater	NN	*	O
missile	NN	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
system	NN	*	O
technology	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Sato	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
After	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
9-11	CD	*	O
incident	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
keener	JJ	*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
TMD	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
TMD	NNP	*	O
anti-missile	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
covering	VBG	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
great	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Currently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Patriot	NNP	*	O
missiles	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
effective	JJ	(ADJP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
guided	JJ	(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reckon	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
probability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
occurring	VBG	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
smaller	JJR	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
small	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(S(S*	DSE
using	VBG	(VP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
methods	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))	O
wo	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
do	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
reckon	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US-Japan	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
shores	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
announcing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
variable	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
announcing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
because	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
announcing	VBG	(VP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
unrest	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
domino	NN	*	ESE
effect	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
occur	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
greatest	JJS	*	DSE
fear	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
difference	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
announcing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outside	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
announce	VB	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
wo	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
only	RB	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
name	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

STATE	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
VISIT	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	DSE
reviews	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
refusing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
restate	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
three	CD	*	O
nos	NNS	*	O
'	''	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
declining	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
endorse	VB	(VP*	DSE
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
reunification	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
wrapped	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
six-day	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
thumbs	NNS	*)	DSE
up	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
voice	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
firm	NN	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
pressure	NN	(NP*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
otherwise	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	DSE
gratified	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
relieved	JJ	*)	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
watching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
stick	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
principles	NNS	*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
concessions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
after	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Cheng	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tuan-yao	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
research	NN	(NP(NP*	O
fellow	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Chengchi	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
past	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
trips	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
presidents	NNS	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
agreements	NNS	(NP(NP*	DSE
or	CC	*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
damaged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
enhanced	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Cheng	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	ESE
correct	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
spurning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
predecessor	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
appeasement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Notably	RB	(ROOT(SINV(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
restate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*)	ESE
`	``	*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
nos	NN	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
DPP	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
legislator	NN	*	O
Parris	NNP	*	O
Chang	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Chang	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Hsu-ch	NNP	*)	O
`	``	(ADJP*	O
eng	JJ	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
concluded	VBD	(S(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
afternoon	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Former	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*	O
Bill	NNP	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*)	O
agitated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
nos	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
three	CD	*	O
nos	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
include	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Chinas	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
separate	JJ	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
entry	NN	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
require	VBP	(S(VP*	O
members	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
states	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
forthcoming	JJ	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
stating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Chang	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
specialist	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
reitered	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
desire	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
endorse	VB	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
version	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
unification	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
reflecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
longstanding	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
position	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Of	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
reunification	NN	*)	O
'	''	*))	O
...	:	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
relations	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
open-ended	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
communiques	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
reunification	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Li	NNP	*	O
Zhaoxing	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(RRC(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
month	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
unification	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
respond	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
similar	JJ	*	DSE
push	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
student	NN	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question-and-answer	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
talk	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Tsinghua	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*))))))))))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
stuck	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
existing	VBG	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
analysts	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cheng	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implications	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
missile	NN	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
any	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
missile-defense	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
friends	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
massive	JJ	(NP*	O
destructive	JJ	*	O
capabilities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
mention	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
directly	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implication	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
remark	NN	*)))	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
excluded	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Cheng	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
friend	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
weekly	JJ	*	O
radio	NN	*	O
address	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
public	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
aired	VBD	(S(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
hours	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mention	VBP	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1979	CD	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
pledged	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
supply	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defensive	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
needed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fend	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reflected	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
firm	NN	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
highlight	VB	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
accentuate	VB	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
trip	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
rested	VBD	(VP*	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
on	IN	*	O
anti-terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proliferation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
elicit	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
three	CD	*	O
nos	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
rising	VBG	*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
expansion	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
appreciation	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)))))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	O
drove	VBD	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
firm	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPP	NNP	*	O
legislator	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
quadrennial	JJ	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
review	NN	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*)))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
highlighted	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
rising	VBG	*	ESE
Chinese	JJ	*	ESE
threat	NN	*))))	ESE
--	:	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
testimony	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CIA	NNP	*	O
director	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Senate	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
modernization	NN	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
indicative	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
These	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
indicate	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
rising	VBG	*	DSE
military	JJ	*	DSE
threat	NN	*)	DSE
more	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
seriously	RB	*)	O
than	IN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
administration	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
more	RBR	*	O
forthcoming	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
voicing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Fresh	VB	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
highlighted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
contribution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Chang	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
stood	VBD	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
US	NNP	*))	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
critical	JJ	*	O
moment	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
appreciated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reciprocated	VBN	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
international	JJ	*	O
document	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Foundation	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Integrated	NNP	(NP*	O
Applied	NNP	*	O
Research	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
well-known	JJ	(NP*	O
scientists	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
circle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
experts	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	O
smaller	JJR	*)	O
circle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
attempted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
define	VB	(VP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
place	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
climatic	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
member	NN	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)))	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Morocco	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
firm	NN	*	DSE
intentions	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iceland	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
join	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	DSE
hopeful	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
brought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1994	CD	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Proposal	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Take	VB	(VP*	O
Shelter	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
Under	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Umbrella	NNP	*))))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
raise	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
problem	NN	*))))))	DSE
40	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
scientist	NN	*	O
Mikhail	NNP	*	O
Budyko	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
saw	VBD	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
curve	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
graph	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
surface	NN	*	O
stratum	NN	*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
inexorably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
upper	JJ	*	O
right-hand	JJ	*	O
corner	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Participants	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
debate	NN	*)))	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
proceeded	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
postulate	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
heating	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
100	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
alarming	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
phenomenon	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
completely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
experts	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
offer	VBP	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
interpretations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rumor	VBD	(ROOT(SINV(VP*	O
has	VBZ	(SBAR(SINV(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
author	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
model	NN	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*))))	DSE
Academician	NNP	(NP*	O
Roald	NNP	*	O
Sagdeyev	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADJP(ADJP(NP*	DSE
little	RB	*)	DSE
uneasy	JJ	*)	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
tell	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
model	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
suggests	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
agriculture	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
agriculture	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
lose	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*)))	DSE
Sagdeyev	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
looked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
Budyko	NNP	(NP*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
interest	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
But	CC	(SBARQ*	O
then	RB	(WHADVP(ADVP*)	O
where	WRB	*)	O
will	MD	(SQ*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
grain	NN	(NP*)))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*)))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Andrey	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gudkov	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Strategic	NNP	(NP*	O
Studies	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
follows	VBZ	(VP*	O
Budyko	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
insisting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Alaska	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
gain	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
lands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
situated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
permafrost	NN	(NP*))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
gradually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
fertile	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
soils	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
production	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rich	JJ	*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
fields	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
stretch	VBP	(S(VP*	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arctic	NNP	*	O
zone	NN	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
small	JJ	(NP*	DSE
comfort	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
humankind	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
whole	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	O
Gudkov	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
proposes	VBZ	(VP*	O
blocking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sun	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
umbrella	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sketched	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blackboard	NN	*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
mixing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
chemical	NN	(NP*	O
symbols	NNS	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
rockets	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
carry	VB	(VP*	O
metallic	JJ	(NP*	O
sodium	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
orbits	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
earth	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cooling	VBG	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
aerosols	NNS	*)	O
dispersed	VBD	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
polar	JJ	*	O
zones	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
overheating	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tundra	NN	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
sunny	JJ	(NP*	O
summer	NN	*	O
nights	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

True	JJ	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sun-screening	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*	O
umbrella	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
author	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
name	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
much	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
opening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
due	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
political-economic	JJ	(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
captivated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
masses	NNS	*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
last	JJ	*	ESE
trousers	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
investing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
project	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(PRN(S(NP*	O
expert	NN	*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
everyone	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
despair	NN	(NP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
control	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
owner	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controlling	VBG	*	O
block	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
shares	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gudkov	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
view	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
everything	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
well	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*)	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
global	JJ	(S(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	ESE
only	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Obvious	NNPS	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Incredible	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
speaker	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ardor	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
cooled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
well-known	JJ	*	O
Sergey	NNP	*	O
Kapitsa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
inclined	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
give	VB	(VP*	ESE
way	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rapture	VB	(VP*	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advantages	NNS	*)	O
promised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
questions	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
predicted	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
degrees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
professor	NN	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
thing	NN	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
planet	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
420,000	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
indicated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
well	NN	*)	O
drilled	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ice	NN	*	O
cap	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Antarctica	NNP	(NP*))	O
30	CD	(NP(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
helps	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
comprehend	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suggestion	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sixth	JJ	*	O
continent	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
idea	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
recall	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Great	NNP	*	O
Flood	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
depicted	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
apart	RB	(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bible	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mythologies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
What	WP	(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(SQ*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
?	.	*))))))))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
predicting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
learn	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
predict	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Kapitsa	NNP	(NP*)	O
summed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
view	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
idea	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
scientific	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
draws	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sorts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
forecasts	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	DT	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
flow	NN	*)	O
out	IN	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
help	NN	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
science	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
paleoclimatology	NN	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
gain	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
broad	JJ	*	DSE
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
data	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
argue	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
master	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
consensus	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
climate	NN	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
changed	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
occurred	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
speed	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
terminological	JJ	*	O
refinements	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Prof.	NNP	(NP*	O
Viktor	NNP	*	O
Danilov-Danilyan	NNP	*)	O
maintain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
speak	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
warming	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
global	JJ	(NP*	O
climatic	JJ	*	O
changes	NNS	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
warming	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
aspect	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
cited	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reason	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
scientist	NN	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
always	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*)))	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
larger	JJR	*	O
concentration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
concentration	NN	*)	O
grows	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
turn	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
usually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
written	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
due	JJ	(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
burning	VBG	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
huge	JJ	*	O
quantity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
organic	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
fuel	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
natural	JJ	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
coal	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
wood	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
peat	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
etc.	FW	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
industry	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
transport	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
agriculture	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
households	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
cause	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climatic	JJ	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
cause	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
attendance	NN	(NP*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
argue	VB	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
contrary	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
solidarity	NN	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
everything	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
models	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Models	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
flawed	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
model	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
dispute	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
warming	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
underway	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
contribution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
beings	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
alarming	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
condition	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
large	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
30	CD	(NP*))	O
percent	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(FRAG*	O
One	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Lies	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Stove	NNP	*)	O
...	:	*))))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controlling	VBG	*	O
block	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
shares	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
without	IN	(S(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
die	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
behave	VB	(VP*	O
badly	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
obligated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)))))))	O
--	:	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
conclusion	NN	*)	DSE
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
round	NN	*	O
table	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
gist	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
terms	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
quotas	NNS	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
that	DT	(INTJ*	O
is	VBZ	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
fewer	JJR	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
neighbor	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
reason	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
strike	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
advantageous	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
deal	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

True	UH	(ROOT(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
clause	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
stirring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
questions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
discussants	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
differing	VBG	(NP(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trading	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
line	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
useful	JJ	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
hot	JJ	*	O
air	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
30	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
short	RB	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
permitted	VBN	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
CO2	CD	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dominant	JJ	*	O
seller	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
consequently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greater	JJR	*	ESE
stake	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
compliance	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
higher	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
gas	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
huge	JJ	(NP*	O
resources	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
anyone	NN	(S(NP*)	O
doubts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
deeply	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
mistaken	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

True	UH	(ROOT(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
one	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
think	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Yemelya	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
illusory	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
-RSB-	JJ	*)	O
happiness	NN	*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
worry	VBP	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
both	DT	(ADJP*	O
technological	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
whole	NN	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fortunately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
lying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
stove	NN	*))))))))	ESE
found	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
opponent	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Nikolay	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Ratsiborinskiy	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
adviser	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Organizations	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
role	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
perturbations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
false	JJ	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
When	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
determine	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
service	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
proceed	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
premise	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nature-conservation	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
profitable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
costly	JJ	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*))))))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
costly	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
value	NN	*)	ESE
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
tied	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
market	NN	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
life	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
change	NN	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
uneconomical	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
short	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exert	VB	(VP*	O
yourself	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*	O
neighbor	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
quota	NN	*)	O
;	:	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
want	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
spend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
use	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
your	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
brain	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
invest	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nature-conservation	JJ	(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Consequently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
homeland	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
boil	VBP	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
merely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
hot	JJ	(NP*	O
air	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
provide	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
impetus	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
technologies	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
knock	VB	(VP*	ESE
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
striving	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rational	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
out	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
recall	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
requirements	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
output	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
highest	JJS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
see	VB	(S(VP*	O
graph	NN	(UCP(S(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNS	*)	O
omitted	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
-RSB-	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
--	:	*	O
Ed	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
N.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Ratsiborinskiy	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
clarifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
agency	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
position	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
recommends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
move	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
view	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Smolenskaya	NNP	(NP*	O
Square	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
impact	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
greater	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
integrated	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
assessment	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
brilliant	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
exclaimed	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Aleksandr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ginzburg	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Atmospheric	NNP	(NP*	O
Physics	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
best	JJS	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
read	VBN	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
heard	VBN	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
disagree	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Background	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concentration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
assigns	VBZ	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*	O
quotas	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
80	CD	*)	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*)	O
developed	VBD	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
almost	RB	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
almost	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
40	CD	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
three	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
third	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*	O
twice	RB	*	O
as	RB	*)	O
great	JJ	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fourth	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
places	NNS	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

American	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
regulations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
discharge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
meant	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
withdrew	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
accords	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
Preceded	VBD	(SQ(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
preceded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP*))	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
1992	CD	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
entered	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*	O
21	CD	*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
1994	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
186	CD	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
parties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
convention	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
unite	VB	(VP*	O
efforts	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
changes	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stabilization	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
content	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
relatively	RB	(ADJP*	O
safe	JJ	*)	O
level	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
convention	NN	(NP(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1995	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Berlin	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
phased	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
restrict	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appropriate	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ecological-economic	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Facts	NNS	(ROOT(NP*))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
principal	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
CO2	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
80	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*)))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Methane	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
contribution	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Facts	NNS	(ROOT(NP*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
estimates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Energy	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
total	JJ	*	O
carbon-dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2008-2012	CD	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*	O
level	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
emission	NN	(NP(NP*	O
quotas	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
3	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
tons	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cash	NN	*	O
equivalent	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
tens	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
billions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Background	NNP	(ROOT(NP*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Ecological-Economic	NNP	*	O
Meaning	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
document	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
makes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
use	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
solving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
ecological	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
98	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
CO2	NNP	(NP*)	O
--	:	*))))))	O
come	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
burning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fossil	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fuels	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
coal	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
energy	NN	*))	O
saving	VBG	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
potential	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
utilized	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
degree	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
whereas	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADVP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
such	JJ	*	O
reserves	NNS	*))	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
carrying	VBG	(S(S(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
project	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reducing	VBG	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
cheaper	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
most	RBS	(NP(ADJP*	O
developed	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Obligations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Countries	NNPS	*))	O
Under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O

Developed	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
transitional	JJ	(NP*	O
economies	NNS	*))	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2008-2012	CD	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
5	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recognized	VBN	*	O
baseline	NN	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
varies	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
7	CD	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
6	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
8	CD	*))	O
percent	NN	(PP(NP*)	O
from	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*	O
level	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
limitation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
reduction	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
specified	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Norway	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iceland	NNP	*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
fails	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
quota	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
surplus	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Obligations	NNS	*)	O
Under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
relatively	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
mild	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
required	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
over	IN	(S(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exceed	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
volume	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADJP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
25	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
lower	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
forecasts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
baseline	NN	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
substantiated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
detail	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
RF	NNP	*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Strategy	NNP	*))))))	O
Until	IN	(PP*	O
2020	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Within	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP(VP*	O
records	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
and	CC	*	O
monitor	VBP	(VP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
emission	NN	*	O
quotas	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
regulate	VB	(VP*	O
quotas	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inventorying	VBG	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
establishing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
registration	NN	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
records	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
quotas	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outward	JJ	*	O
complexity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
task	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
record-keeping	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
monitoring	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
neither	DT	(ADJP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
complicated	JJ	*)	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
expensive	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Goskomstat	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Statistical	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
reporting	VBG	(VP*	O
forms	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
enterprises	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
fill	VBP	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))	O
contain	VBP	(VP*	O
virtually	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
complete	JJ	*)	O
data	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Experts	NNS	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Opinion	NNP	*))	DSE

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
One	NNP	*	ESE
Will	NNP	*)	O
Be	VBZ	(VP*	O
Well	UH	(INTJ*)	ESE
Off	IN	(ADVP*))))	ESE

Should	NNP	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHNP(WHADJP*	ESE
much	JJ	*)	ESE
fuel	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'll	MD	(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
definitely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
uniform	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
mean	JJ	*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
rises	VBZ	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP*	O
degrees	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fluctuations	NNS	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	O
widen	VB	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
-40	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
+45	CD	*)	O
degrees	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
less	JJR	(ADJP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP*))))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
average	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
winter	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
winters	NNS	*)))	O
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	O
much	RB	(NP(NP*	O
colder	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
harshest	JJ	*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(SQ(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
overly	RB	(ADJP*	O
warm	JJ	*)	O
summer	NN	*	O
seasons	NNS	*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(SQ(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
transport	NN	*)	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
housing	NN	(NP(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
infrastructure	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
permafrost	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
muddy	JJ	(NP*	O
swamp	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
unbalancing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
negative	JJ	*)	ESE
effect	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
ecosystems	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
species	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
disappearing	VBG	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
others	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
conversely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
starting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
multiply	VB	(VP*	O
will	NN	(NP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	*	O
speed	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Gangster	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
species	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
appearing	VBG	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
locust	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
north	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
before	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
today	NN	(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
edaphic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
microflora	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fundamental	JJ	(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
soil	NN	(NP*	O
fertility	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
microflora	NN	(S(NP*)	O
stop	VBP	(VP*	O
reproducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
humus	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
higher	JJR	*	O
plants	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
die	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
agricultural	JJ	(S(NP*	O
crops	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
growing	VBG	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
timber	NN	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dry	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
glaciers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Antarctica	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Greenland	NNP	*)))	O
melt	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
oceans	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
rise	VB	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
quite	RB	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
low-lying	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
St.	NNP	(NP*	O
Petersburg	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
enormous	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Western	NNP	(NP*	O
Siberia	NNP	*)))	O
risks	VBZ	(VP*	O
turning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sea	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	O
Activities	NN	*)))	O
Are	VBP	(SQ*	O
Ruining	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Nature	NNP	*))))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
models	NNS	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
answer	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
changing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
varying	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
degrees	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
persuasiveness	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	DSE
do	VBP	(SQ*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
I	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
models	NNS	*)	O
explain	VBP	(VP*	O
everything	NN	(NP*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
problem	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
study	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP*	O
climatic	JJ	*	O
models	NNS	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
scientists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
studying	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
life	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
models	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
life	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	O
climatic	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(FRAG*	DSE
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*))	O
extent	NN	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
reflect	VBP	(VP*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	O
life	NN	*)))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
gaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
knowledge	NN	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
tremendous	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
institute	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Systems	NNP	(NP*	O
Analysis	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Academy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sciences	NNPS	(NP*	O
Computer	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
begun	VBN	(VP*	O
studying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
forecast	VB	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speak	VB	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
important	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
inquiry	NN	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
appeared	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
opposite	JJ	(NP*	O
phenomena	NNS	*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polar	JJ	*	O
regions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
pronounced	JJ	*	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
middle	JJ	*	O
latitudes	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
temperature	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
much	RB	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
equatorial	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
middle	JJ	(NP*	O
latitudes	NNS	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
changes	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	O
deal	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polar	JJ	*	O
regions	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	O
does	VBZ	(SQ*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*)))	O
?	.	*))	O

Dispersion	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
less	RBR	(ADJP*	O
active	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
so-called	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
obstruction	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
stagnant	JJ	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))	O
manifest	VBP	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*))	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	O
and	CC	*	O
more	RBR	*	O
often	RB	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
observed	VBN	(VP*	O
such	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	O
lengthy	JJ	*)	O
thaw	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Incidentally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
incredibly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
cold	JJ	*)	O
winter	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Primorskiy	NNP	(NP*	O
Kray	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
possibly	RB	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	O
example	NN	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
property	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
strange	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
seem	VB	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
prolonged	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
stagnant	JJ	*)	O
cold	JJ	*	O
spells	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
less	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
ventilation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
whole	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
ideas	NNS	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
blocking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
shields	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
umbrellas	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
like	JJ	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
proposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
adapting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
proposals	NNS	*)	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
erect	VB	(VP*	O
screens	NNS	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
shoot	VB	(VP*	O
cooling	JJ	(NP*	O
aerosols	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Already	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
everything	NN	(NP*	ESE
humankind	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
causes	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
incredible	JJ	(NP*	ESE
damage	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
nature	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
emit	VBP	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thaw	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
frozen	JJ	*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
emit	VBP	(S(VP*	O
methane	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
destroy	VBP	(VP*	O
forests	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
south	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
deserts	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
expanding	VBG	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
alters	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heat	NN	*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
surface	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(INTJ*	O
is	VBZ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deterioration	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
frightening	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(S(NP*)	O
else	RB	(ADJP*))	O
--	:	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
umbrella	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
screen	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
something	NN	*)	O
else	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
vein	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
First	NNP	*	O
announcer	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
ousted	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Please	VB	(ROOT(S(INTJ*)	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
attention	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commentary	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	JJ	(ROOT(S(PP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
announcer	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
In	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rare	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reminds	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American-backed	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
General	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pinochet	NNP	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legally-elected	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chile	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Salvador	NNP	(NP*	O
Allende	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1973	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
legally-elected	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
ousted	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
coordinated	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
operations	NNS	*)	ESE
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
army	NN	(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
prominent	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
industrialists	NNS	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
capitalists	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	ESE
acting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP*	ESE
agents	NNS	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
producers	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
exporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
vast	JJ	(NP*	ESE
natural	JJ	*	O
resources	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
riches	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
passage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
170	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
poorest	JJS	*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
80	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
population	NN	*)))))	O
live	VBP	(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poverty	NN	*	O
line	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
Latin	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
South	JJ	*)	O
American	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
decades	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
American-backed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
regimes	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
oppressed	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
peoples	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
passage	NN	*)	O
omitted	VBD	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
On	IN	(S(PP*	O
developments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
World	NNP	(NP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))	O
As	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
developments	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990s	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
gained	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vast	JJ	*	ESE
majority	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
immediately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
declared	VBD	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
aim	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
eliminate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
poverty	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
injustice	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
face	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
foreign	JJ	(NP*	ESE
interference	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
eliminating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
injustice	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
poverty	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thus	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
introduced	VBD	(VP*	O
reforms	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
arenas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
industrialists	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
prominent	JJ	*	ESE
capitalists	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
defeated	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
forces	NNS	*)	ESE
acting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
agents	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
associated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Gradually	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
foreign	JJ	(S(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
preserve	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
face	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP*	ESE
pressure	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pursued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	DSE
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
properly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
utilize	VB	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vast	JJ	*	ESE
natural	JJ	*	O
riches	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
namely	RB	(NP*	ESE
oil	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
eliminating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
poverty	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
contrary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
America	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
established	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
close	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
friendly	JJ	*)	DSE
relations	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Fidel	NNP	*	O
Castro	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
invited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
movements	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
opposed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
intervention	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
infuriating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
enjoyed	VBD	(VP*	O
widespread	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
model	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
affect	VB	(VP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
openly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
opposed	VBD	*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
establishing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
friendly	JJ	(NP*	ESE
relations	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
pursued	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
independent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
regional	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
concern	NN	*)))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intertwined	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*))	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
cutting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
supply	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
support	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
oil-exporting	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
increasing	VBG	*	ESE
probability	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ouster	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
served	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
interests	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
opposed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
d'etat	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
assessed	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plot	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
hatched	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

San	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Francisco	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
1	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Current	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	*	ESE
shape	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
de	FW	(ADJP*	O
facto	FW	*)	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
D.C.	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Las	NNP	(NP*	O
Vegas	NNP	*))	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
switched	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
recognition	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1979	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
ROC	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Representative	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Chien-jen	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
substantive	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
Taiwan-U.S.	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
close	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
luncheon	NN	*))	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
honor	NN	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
directors	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
supervisors	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Federation	NNP	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
Chambers	NNS	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WFTCC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Las	NNP	(NP*	O
Vegas	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
back	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
positive	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
optimistic	JJ	*)	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
ROC-U.S.	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O

relations	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
quantitative	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
qualitative	JJ	*	O
increases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
upgrading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
high-level	JJ	(NP*	O
engagement	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
explicit	JJ	(PP(NP(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Health	NNP	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Services	NNP	*))))	O
for	IN	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
participation	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WHO	VB	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
view	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ever	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
firmer	JJR	*)	ESE
U.S.	NNP	*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
partly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
stems	VBZ	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarkable	JJ	*	ESE
progress	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
democratization	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
liberalization	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
admitted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
mainland	NNP	*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
engage	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
constructive	JJ	(NP*	O
interactions	NNS	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
framework	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*)	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
conduct	NN	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
equality	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
fairness	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
reciprocity	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
WFTCC	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
focused	VBN	(VP*	O
discussions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pool	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resources	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
wisdom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
businesspeople	NNP	*)))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
share	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bid	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WHO	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
admires	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
businesspeople	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
patriotism	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
contribution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
resident	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
600	CD	*)	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Chambers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
49	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
continents	NNS	*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
attending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WFTCC	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Representative	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
Tsai	NNP	*	O
Ming-hsian	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chang	NNP	*	O
Fu-mei	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chairwoman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Overseas	NNP	*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
commission	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
attending	VBG	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

LONDON	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
7	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mother	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Briton	NNP	*)	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
alleged	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
Taliban	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
High	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Court	NNP	*	O
proceedings	NNS	*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
arrange	VB	(VP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	O
access	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
22-year-old	JJ	*	O
son	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lawyers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Zumrati	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Juma	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mother	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Feroz	NNP	(NP*	O
Abassi	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
6	CD	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
press	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shut	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
300	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
Britons	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
unlawful	JJ	*	ESE
detentions	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
lawyer	NN	(NP*	O
Louise	NNP	*	O
Christian	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
And	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
demands	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Abbasi	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
face	VB	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
penalty	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
grant	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))	O
''	''	*)	O
status	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
claiming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
unlawful	JJ	*	O
combatants	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
criticised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
decides	VBZ	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
application	NN	*)	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
face	NN	*))))	O
charges	VBZ	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*))	O
1998	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
aiding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
abetting	VBG	*))	O
''	''	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
unlawfully	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
detaining	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
United	NNP	(NP*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
guidelines	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
knees	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
inspection	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	NNP	(NP*)	O
chained	VBZ	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
overalls	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
blue	JJ	*	O
masks	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
mouths	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
ear	NN	(NP(NP*	O
muffs	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
ears	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
goggles	NNS	(NP*))))	O
covered	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
sticky	JJ	(NP*	O
tape	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Opposite	VB	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cages	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
cages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
theirs	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
even	RB	(NP*	ESE
two	CD	*	O
meters	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
meters	NNS	*))))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seen	VBN	(S(VP*	O
together	RP	(PRT*)	O
look	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
chicken	NN	*	ESE
farm	NN	*)	ESE
run	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
sadist	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
--	:	*)	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
wooden	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
beams	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sheets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
metal	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
cement	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
barbed	NN	*	O
wire	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
exposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rain	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tropics	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
beards	NNS	*)	O
shaven	VBN	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
:	:	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
hygiene	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
;	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
humiliate	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
religion	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
reply	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
defenders	VBZ	(VP*	O
half	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
over	RP	(PRT*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
looked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
tears	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
photos	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pictures	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Towers	RB	(ADJP*	O
collapsing	VBG	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
infamy	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilization	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
discovering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
photos	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*))))))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
open-air	JJ	*	O
prison	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
historic	JJ	*	O
outpost	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
hundred	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
forty-four	NN	(NP*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
100	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
27-hour	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
blindfolded	VBD	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
gagged	VBN	(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
tied	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
dosed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
sedatives	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
C17	NNP	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
planes	NNS	*)))	O
belonging	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Stars	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Stripes	JJ	*)	ESE
air	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qa	NN	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
nobody	NN	(S(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
certainty	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
names	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	O
charges	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
rise	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
1,000	CD	*)))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
three	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
30	CD	(VP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
`	``	(NP(NP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
'	''	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
generations	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
generations	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Marines	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
nine	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
top-security	JJ	*	O
prisons	NNS	*)	O
just	RB	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
But	CC	(S*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cages	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
undetermined	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
individuals	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
announced	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Without	IN	(ROOT(FRAG(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
attorney	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
admittedly	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(S*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
valid	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
They	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
unlawful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
running	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
recreational	JJ	*	ESE
center	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
slightest	JJS	*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
better	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
off	RP	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
caught	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
photos	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
'	''	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
danger	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
removing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
niche	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
affection	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
solidarity	NN	*))	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
September	NNP	(S(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hearts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
desire	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
revenge	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
cages	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
recall	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
Hotel	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Hanoi	NNP	*)	ESE
'	''	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
set	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Vietnamese	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
punishment	NN	*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
Bridge	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
River	NNP	*	O
Kawi	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
loyal	JJ	*)	ESE
ally	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Great	NNP	(NP*	O
Britian	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
showing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
signs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
disquiet	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
parliament	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
BBC	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
posing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
questions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
photos	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
``	``	*	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
stirring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
protests	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(S(NP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
scandal	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
:	:	*	O
photos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
landing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
C17s	NNS	*))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
already	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
reduced	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
objects	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
gags	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
masked	JJ	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
ear	NN	(NP*	O
muffs	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Those	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
gnaw	VB	(VP*	DSE
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cables	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
C17	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
crash	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Richard	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Myers	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chief	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Staff	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
pictures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
everyday	JJ	(NP*	O
life	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wore	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
muffs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(SINV(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
masks	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
tuberculosis	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
spreading	VBG	(S(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
assured	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Brigadier	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*))))	O
Mike	NNP	(NP*	O
Lehnert	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Amnesty	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Jim	NNP	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
claimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
explanation	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
degrade	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
condition	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
shocked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
--	:	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
--	:	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wear	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ear	NN	*	O
muffs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hospital	NN	*	O
masks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unlikely	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
tuberculosis	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
spread	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
open	JJ	(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
talked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
sensory	JJ	*	ESE
segregation	NNS	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*)	O
''	''	*	O
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
condition	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
suffer	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
hallucinations	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
stated	VBN	(VP*	O
Helen	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bamber	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Medical	NNP	*	O
Foundation	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Protecting	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Victims	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Torture	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
television	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Four	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
envoys	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
`	``	(NP*	O
torture	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
word	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
filtering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
through	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
insidious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fashion	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
issuing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
denials	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
treatment	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
open	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
far	RB	(FRAG(ADJP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
suggestions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rest	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
raising	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
objection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
reason	NN	(NP*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergency	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
definitely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
over	RP	(ADJP*))))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
Since	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1,500	CD	*))	O
suspected	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
50	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
claim	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
10,000	CD	*)	O
affiliates	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qa	NN	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
scattered	VBN	(VP*	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
network	NN	*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)))	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	DSE
inmates	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
'	''	*))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
confess	VB	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
warning	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
comrades	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
unpleasant	JJ	*	ESE
truth	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
ought	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
by	IN	(VP(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tribunal	NN	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
would	MD	(VP(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
interrogation	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
trial	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
court	NN	(NP(NP*	O
martial	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
fairer	JJR	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
secret	JJ	*	ESE
special	JJ	*	O
tribunals	NNS	*)))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
event	NN	*))	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
fairer	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

Taliban	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	(FRAG*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Usama	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
But	CC	(S*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
yardstick	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
juridical	JJ	*	O
civilization	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
ruined	VBN	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
commentators	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
life	NN	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
regulated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
prayers	NNS	(NP*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
five	CD	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
freedom	NN	*))	O
allowed	VBD	(VP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
searches	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
meals	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
cereal	NN	(NP(NP*	O
bars	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
rice	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
beans	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
fruit	NN	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
showers	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
medical	JJ	(VP(NP(NP*	O
checks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
handcuffs	NNS	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
foam	NN	*)	O
mattress	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sleep	VB	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
light	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
halogen	NN	*	O
lights	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
faces	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Around	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fenced	NN	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
area	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
acres	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
size	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
stand	VBP	(VP*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
towers	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
sub-machine	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
guns	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
grenade	JJ	(NP*	O
launchers	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
then	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
helicopters	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
patrolling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
skies	NNS	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
interruption	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Outside	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
absurd	JJ	*	ESE
small	JJ	*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Guanatanamo	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP*	O
soil	NN	*))	O
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
McDonald	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
outlet	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
school	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
yellow	JJ	*	O
bus	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
families	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
store	NN	*	O
windows	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
roller-blades	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
50	CD	(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cinema	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
currently	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
showing	VBG	*	O
`	``	*	O
Domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
Disturbance	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
,	,	*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
piece	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cuba	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
old	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
man	NN	*	ESE
Castro	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
up	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
batted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
eyelid	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*)))))))	DSE
renounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
using	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scandal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
X-Ray	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
attacking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
hated	JJ	*	ESE
Yankees	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
propaganda	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
relying	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
embargo	NN	*)))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	*	O
'	''	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clash	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
civilizations	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
about	IN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
prison	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
Yesterday	NN	(S(NP*)	O
Stockholm	NNP	(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Swedish	JJ	*	O
citizen	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Algerians	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bosnia	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tip-off	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
secret	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
preparing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sarajevo	NNP	(NP*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
phoned	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qa	NN	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Bosnian	NNP	*	O
judge	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
ordered	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
grounds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
lack	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
handed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
raises	VBZ	(VP*	O
major	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
questions	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Morton	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Haplerin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
gather	VB	(VP*	O
persons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
caught	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
thinking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Kenneth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Roth	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Watch	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
claims	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
offer	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
less	RBR	(NP(ADJP*	O
democratic	JJ	*)	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
allies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suppress	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
dissent	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
tip-off	NN	*)	O
truly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cage	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ocean	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
history	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
'	''	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
just	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
begun	VBN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Govt	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
dismisses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
report	VB	(VP*)))))	O

GOVERNMENT	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
trashed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
lists	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Namibia	NNP	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Government	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Information	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Permanent	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Mocks	NNP	*	O
Shivute	NNP	*)	O
responded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
human	NN	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violator	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Shivute	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
cited	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
300	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Namibia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
practices	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
extra-judicial	JJ	*	O
killings	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kavango	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Caprivi	NNP	*	O
Regions	NNP	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
deaths	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
custody	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
account	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whereabouts	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
arrests	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
detentions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
force	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tortured	JJ	(NP(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
beat	JJ	*)	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
suspected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
complicity	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Unita	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
cites	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
cases	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
arbitrary	JJ	(NP(NP(NP(ADJP*)	O
deprivation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
life	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
disappearance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
torture	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
cruel	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
inhuman	JJ	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
degrading	JJ	*	ESE
treatment	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
arbitrary	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	O
arrest	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
denial	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fair	JJ	*	O
public	JJ	*	O
hearing	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
abuses	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
perpetrated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Special	NNP	(NP*	O
Field	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SFF	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
members	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Namibian	JJ	*	O
Constitution	NNP	*)	O
provided	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*))	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reason	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
magistrate	NN	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
48	CD	(NP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
basis	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
suspicious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
links	NNS	*))))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Angolan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rebel	NN	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Unita	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caprivi	NNP	*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CLA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
disappeared	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
trace	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Retorted	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	DSE
Shivute	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
worse	JJR	(NP*))	ESE
happened	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
after	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
special	JJ	(S(NP*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
detain	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
`	``	(NP*	O
enemies	NNS	(NP*)	O
'	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Would	MD	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
actions	NNS	*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
listed	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
abuses	NNS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(ADJP(NP*)	ESE
acceptable	JJ	*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
Shivute	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Namibia	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
attached	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
little	JJ	*	DSE
value	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
report	VBP	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
factual	JJ	(NP*	ESE
inaccuracies	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
mere	JJ	*	ESE
reproduction	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
unverified	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
unsubstantiated	JJ	*	ESE
reports	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Swapo	NNP	*	O
publication	NN	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*	O
Today	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
party	NN	*	O
paper	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Government-owned	JJ	*	O
magazine	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shivute	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
carried	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
total	JJ	*	ESE
confusion	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
historical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
data	NNS	*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
claiming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Namibian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Workers	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NUNW	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	O
longer	RB	*)	O
affiliated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swapo	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)))	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
restoration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavex	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
freedom	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
with	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
exalted	JJ	*	ESE
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Referring	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
period	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
venezuelan	NN	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
through	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-democractic	JJ	*	ESE
attempts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
topple	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
failed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
help	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Almighty	NNP	*	ESE
God	NNP	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
re-establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
briefed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Referring	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
objective	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wwanted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
tried	VBD	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
produce	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
organization	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
thanked	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
call	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
wished	VBD	(VP*	DSE
success	NN	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
nation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
presidents	NNS	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
mutual	JJ	*	DSE
desire	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	DSE
congratulations	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
hearing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
reinstatement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
collapsed	VBD	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
ouster	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democratically	RB	(ADJP*	O
elected	VBN	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
resorting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	*	ESE
method	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
method	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
conformity	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
norms	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
present	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
society	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*)	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
thereafter	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
resumed	VBD	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
functions	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
mandate	NNS	*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2006	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
blamed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deaths	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
central	JJ	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*))))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
protest	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
later	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
violent	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
staunch	JJ	*	DSE
supporter	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
production	NN	*	O
cuts	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
boost	VB	(VP*	O
prices	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
initiated	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
successful	JJ	*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
OPEC	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
40-year	JJ	*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
9	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
purely	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
China	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affair	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
interfere	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Zhang	NNP	*	O
Qiyue	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
claims	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	O
everything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
needed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
violated	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
Sino-US	NNP	*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Communiques	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Zhang	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
those	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
out	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
ulterior	NN	(NP*	ESE
motives	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
interfered	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
history	NN	(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
proved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
elevation	JJ	*	ESE
US-Taiwan	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
incite	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
separatists	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
attempts	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
split	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deterioration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
Straits	NNP	*	O
situation	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
boiled	VBD	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
jeopardy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))))	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

