The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kimberley	NNP	*	O
Provincial	NNP	*	O
Hospital	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
patients	NNS	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*	O
Fever	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Medical	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
head	NN	*	O
Dr	NNP	*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Saeed	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(S(NP(NP*	O
patient	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
blood	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Virology	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
analysis	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
sets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
illnesses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
other	JJ	(PP*	O
than	IN	*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*	O
fever	NN	*))))	O
--	:	*))))))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
night	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
negative	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
set	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
specifically	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*	O
fever	NN	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
outstanding	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saeed	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
indications	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
negative	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
too	RB	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
patient	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
--	:	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
suffering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
tick	NN	(NP*	ESE
bite	NN	*	ESE
fever	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
similar	JJ	(NP*	O
symptoms	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
admitted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hospital	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
complaining	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
severe	JJ	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
pains	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
skin	NN	*	O
rash	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
vomiting	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
patient	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
hospital	NN	(NP(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
sick	JJ	(ADJP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
bitten	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tick	NN	*)	O
about	RB	(ADVP(NP*	O
four	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
woman	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
condition	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
deteriorated	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
showing	VBG	(VP*	O
improvement	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
afternoon	NN	(NP*))	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
conversing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
husband	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
semi-comatose	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Between	IN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
one	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
10	CD	*)	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*	O
Fever	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))	O
annually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
20	CD	*	O
to	TO	*	O
25	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
patients	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
dying	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
statistics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
virology	JJ	*	O
institute	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
158	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congo	NNP	(NP*	O
Fever	NNP	*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
diagnosed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
1981	CD	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Early	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
symptoms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
disease	NN	*)))	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
severe	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
headaches	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
red	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
eyes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
fevers	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
cold	JJ	(NP*	O
chills	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
body	NN	(NP*	O
pain	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
vomiting	VBG	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
disease	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
contracted	VBN	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
bitten	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
tick	NN	*))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
contact	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blood	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Congo	NNP	*	O
Fever	NN	*	O
sufferer	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
afforestation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
4,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
hectares	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
six	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
municipal	JJ	*	O
forestry	NN	*	O
bureau	NN	*)	O
revealed	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
planted	VBD	(VP*	O
trees	NNS	(NP*)	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
five	CD	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
severely	RB	(ADJP*	O
endangered	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
sandy	JJ	(NP*	O
wind	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Cai	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Baojun	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bureau	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
charge	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
forest	NN	(NP*	O
planting	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
shifting	VBG	*	O
dunes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
suburbs	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
successfully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
controlled	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
green	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
barriers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trees	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
grass	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
helped	VBN	(VP*	O
upgrade	VB	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
forest	NN	*	O
proportion	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
43	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
23	CD	(NP*	O
percentage	NN	*	O
points	NNS	*)))))	O
higher	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
metropolitan	JJ	*	O
average	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
200-metre	JJ	*	O
belt	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trees	NNS	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
planted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Yongding	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Chaobai	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Dasha	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Wenyu	NNP	*	O
rivers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
previously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	JJS	*	O
desertificated	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Forestry	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
dry	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
weather	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
temperature	NN	*	O
fluctuations	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
cause	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sandstorms	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
repeated	VBN	*	O
breaching	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
embankments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Yongding	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chaobai	NNP	*	O
rivers	NNS	*)))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
resulted	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
desertification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
heavy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sand	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
deposited	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
floods	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
50	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
land	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
urban	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
trees	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
green	JJ	*	O
belts	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
helped	VBN	(VP*	O
protect	VB	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crops	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
sand	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
wind	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
drought	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
floods	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
grain	NN	(NP*	O
production	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Cai	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
invest	VB	(VP*	O
6	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
US$	$	(NP(QP*	O
720	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
sandstorms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
hitting	VBG	(VP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
sources	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Forestry	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Private	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
encouraged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
fight	NN	(NP*	O
sandstorms	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vice-director	JJ	*	O
Li	NNP	*	O
Yucai	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Favourable	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
taxation	NN	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
engaged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transformation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
desertificated	JJ	(NP*	O
land	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
struck	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
sandstorms	JJ	(NP*	O
several	JJ	*	O
times	NNS	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
spring	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	O
sand	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Inner	NNP	*	O
Mongolia	NNP	*	O
Autonomous	NNP	*	O
Region	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
floating	VBG	(S(NP(NP*	O
dust	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
city	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
uncovered	JJ	*	O
construction	NN	*	O
sites	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
causes	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tajikistan	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
drug-busting	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
hampered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
obsolete	JJ	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*))))))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
5	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
July	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Due	JJ	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
technical	JJ	*	O
equipment	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
seizes	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
10	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drugs	NNS	*)	O
transited	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Director	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tajik	NNP	*	O
anti-drug	JJ	*	O
agency	NN	*	O
Rustam	NNP	*	O
Nazarov	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Since	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
technical	JJ	*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
perfect	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
seize	VBP	(VP*	O
even	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
less	JJR	(QP*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
10	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Nazarov	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*	O
edition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nezavisimaya	NNP	(NP*	O
Gazeta	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Out	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
2,200	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kg	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
drugs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
only	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
837	CD	*)	O
kg	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
seized	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Nazarov	NNP	(NP*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
equipment	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
detecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
drugs	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
special	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
devices	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
inspecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
large	JJ	(NP*	O
automobiles	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
cargoes	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Nazarov	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
service	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
enough	JJ	(NP*	O
communications	NNS	*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
either	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Paris	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
July	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
totally	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
dependent	JJ	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
causing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lose	VB	(VP*	ESE
control	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
fate	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)))))))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
weekly	NN	*)	O
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Nouvel	NNP	*	O
Observateur	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
annex	NNP	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
deployment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
missiles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
coastal	JJ	*	O
provinces	NNS	*))))))	O
opposite	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
instead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
resorting	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
smarter	JJ	(NP*	ESE
tactics	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
heel	NN	(NP*))	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
businessmen	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
eager	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explore	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainland	JJ	*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
market	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
weekly	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
mainland	NNP	(S(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
attracted	VBN	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
US$	$	*	O
50	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taipei	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
bowed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
pressure	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
businessmen	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lift	VB	(VP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
speed	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
arch	JJ	*	ESE
rival	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Barring	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reversal	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trend	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weekly	NN	*)	O
quoted	VBD	(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
magazine	NN	*	O
Business	NNP	*	O
Weekly	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
knees	NNS	*))	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	O
firing	NN	(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
bullet	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
might	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
deter	VB	(VP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	ESE
adventurism	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
readiness	NN	(NX(NX*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
fight	VB	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
for	IN	(PRN(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*))	O
''	''	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
bear	VB	(VP*	ESE
witness	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
magazine	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
publication	NN	*)	O
quoted	VBD	(VP*	O
Wu	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Guoguang	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
professor	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
concessions	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
trigger	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defection	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fold	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	ESE
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
blink	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))	O
either	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
because	IN	*	ESE
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
boost	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
schisms	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
magazine	NN	*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
scant	JJ	*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Nouvel	NNP	*	O
Observateur	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
buildup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
coastal	JJ	*	O
provinces	NNS	*)))	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
heavily	RB	*	ESE
armed	JJ	*)	ESE
place	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
next	JJ	(PP(ADVP*)	O
only	RB	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
flashpoint	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
21st	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taleban	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
offensives	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
positions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Islamic	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*))))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Salvation	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
high-ranking	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Taleban	JJ	*	O
commanders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Interior	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Mola	NNP	*	O
Abdorrazaq	NNP	*	O
Akhond	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mola	NNP	*	O
Abdol	NNP	*	O
Qahir	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
phonetic	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
visited	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
front	JJ	*	O
line	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
northeastern	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Takhar	NNP	*	O
Province	NNP	*	O
yesterday	NN	*)))	O
morning	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*)	O
dispatched	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP*	O
Balkh	NNP	*	O
Province	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Mazar-e	NNP	*	O
Sharif	NNP	*)))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
command	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Qayum	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Hashim	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Takhar	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Dara-e	NNP	*	O
Suf	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Samangan	NNP	*	O
Province	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
commander	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Yari	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
commander	NNP	(NP*	O
Samar	NNP	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Dehdadi	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
fort	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-e	NNP	(NP*	O
Sharif	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
commander	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Abdorrazaq	NNP	*	O
Nafis	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
instructed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Mazar	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
fort	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
supply	VB	(VP*	O
battle	NN	(NP*	O
zones	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
necessary	JJ	*	O
means	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
offensive	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Andarab	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Baghlan	NNP	(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
military	JJ	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
clashes	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
UIFSA	NNP	*	O
forces	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
witnessed	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrangement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
important	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	O
conferences	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
instead	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
deteriorate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
dealt	VBN	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
demand	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
light	JJ	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Genoa	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	O
wider	JJR	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
extended	JJ	(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	O
features	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
large	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
numerous	JJ	*	O
bodies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dissidents	NNS	(NP*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
opposing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wishes	NNS	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
small	JJ	(ADJP*	O
but	CC	*	O
powerful	JJ	*)	O
group	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
feature	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	DT	(S(NP*	O
conferences	NNS	*)	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
effective	JJ	(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
resolutions	NNS	(S(NP*)	DSE
adopted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
lacked	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
conclusiveness	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
operational	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*)	O
however	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
dealt	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
environment	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
examined	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
appraised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exception	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
relative	JJ	*	ESE
success	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
discussion	NN	(NP(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
exchange	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
views	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
pay	VB	(VP*	DSE
heed	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resolute	JJ	*	DSE
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
advanced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
emphatically	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
imposition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ban	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
light	JJ	(NP*	O
weaponry	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
paying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
heed	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
tantamount	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
endorsement	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	DSE
launched	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
those	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
rather	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
result	NN	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
compromise	NN	*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
relative	NN	*)))	DSE
back	RB	(PP(ADVP*	DSE
up	RB	*)	DSE
by	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
majority	NN	*	O
group	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	DSE
demand	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
attending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
encountered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
firm	NN	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

American	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
maintained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
restriction	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sale	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
possession	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
carrying	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
light	JJ	(NP*	O
armaments	NNS	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
practically	RB	(VP(VP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
same	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
limiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
published	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
equal	JJ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
margin	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
security	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
while	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
possessing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
self-defense	NN	(NP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
factor	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
breeds	NNS	*)	ESE
insecurity	VBP	(S(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Critics	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
margin	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
up	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
held	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(PP(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
heeding	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wishes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
community	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
protecting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	DSE
attention	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
corporations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
huge	JJ	(NP*	ESE
arms	NNS	*	O
producers	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
military-industrial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
complexes	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reap	VB	(S(VP*	O
tremendous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
profits	NNS	*)	O
annually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
armaments	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
noted	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
declared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
unofficial	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
lacking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
validity	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
even	RB	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
participating	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

-LSB-	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Sentences	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
as	RB	(UCP*	O
published	VBN	(S(VP*	O
-RSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
conferences	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
subsequently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
gained	VBD	(VP*	O
even	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
more	JJR	*)	O
prominence	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Genova	NNP	(NP*))	O
;	:	*	O
perhaps	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
so	RB	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)))))))	O
``	``	*	O
not	RB	(FRAG*	O
obtained	JJ	*)	O
''	''	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
subsequent	JJ	*	O
intense	JJ	*	DSE
dissatisfaction	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
frustration	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
leading	JJ	*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)))))	O
attending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
attending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
varied	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
:	:	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
globalization	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-missile	JJ	*	O
shield	NN	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
project	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
protection	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
crises	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Balkans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
moratorium	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
accumulated	VBN	*	O
debt	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
...	:	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
published	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
They	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
meant	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
agreement	NN	(NP*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
understanding	NN	*)))	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
unexpected	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
events	NNS	*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
that	DT	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
limbo	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
uncertainty	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
opened	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
fierce	JJ	(NP*	DSE
demonstrations	NNS	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opponents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
globalization	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
maintained	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
what	WDT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
concocted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
globalization	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*	ESE
poverty	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Italian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
intervened	VBD	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
roughly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
handled	VBD	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
demonstrations	NNS	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
things	NNS	(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hand	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
already	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
volatile	JJ	*)	ESE
situation	NN	*)	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	ESE
boiling	JJ	(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
violent	JJ	(S(NP*	O
clashes	NNS	*)	O
broke	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
killing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
protestor	NN	*)))	O
overshadowed	VBN	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	ESE
incident	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
unprecedented	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
history	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
democracies	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
prompted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	ESE
range	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
controversies	NNS	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
debates	NNS	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
safely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
claimed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Genoa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
influenced	VBN	(VP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
overshadowed	VBN	(VP*	O
-RSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
conferences	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bonn	NNP	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
whereas	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
onset	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weak	JJ	*	ESE
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Genoa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
foreseeable	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	JJ	*	ESE
start	NN	*))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
predicted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
subject	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
globalization	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
developed	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
capitalist	JJ	*)	O
states	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
fierce	JJ	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
dissident	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Regarding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
proposed	JJ	*	O
Anti-Missile	JJ	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
System	NNP	*)	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
neither	CC	(NP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
European	NNP	*	ESE
Union	NNP	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
enthusiasm	NN	*)	DSE
;	:	*	O
rather	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
all	RB	*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
reserves	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
project	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Concerning	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
toxic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
warming	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
planet	NN	*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
climate	NN	*)	O
too	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
somehow	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
related	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
relentlessly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
demonstrated	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
paradoxical	JJ	*	ESE
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
published	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	VBG	*	O
controversial	JJ	*	ESE
-RSB-	NN	*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
particular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stance	NN	*)	DSE
opposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
abandonment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whereas	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
beforehand	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
anticipated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
hoped	VBN	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Genoa	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
beneficial	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
results	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
eagerness	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
playing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
intermediary	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
rise	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
fierce	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
competition	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
European	NNP	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
until	IN	(S(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
each	DT	(S(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
seeks	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
particular	JJ	*	O
interest	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
rivalry	NN	*)	O
persists	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
unresolved	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
remarkable	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conferences	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Genoa	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
most	JJS	(S(NP*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
made	VBD	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
interests	NNS	(NP(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
tastes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
-LSB-	CD	(ADJP(NP*	O
lobbies	NNS	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Here	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
views	NNS	*)	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prominent	JJ	*	O
characters	NNS	*))))	O
attending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Genoa	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jacques	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
responding	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
leveled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
opponents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
globalization	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
right	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
present	VB	(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
defenders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
poor	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
...	:	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Similarly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Gerhard	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Schroeder	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
German	NNP	*	O
Chancellor	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
claimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
true	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
elected	JJ	*	ESE
representatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
interesting	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
reflection	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
if	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
reject	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
condition	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
destiny	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
while	IN	*	ESE
present	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
competent	JJ	*)))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
decisions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elected	VBN	*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
nation	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*	O
people	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
entitle	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
representative	NN	(NP(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
attorney	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Exclamation	NNP	*)	O
mark	VBP	(VP*	O
as	RB	(NP(NP*	O
published	VBN	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
In	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	ESE
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
criticisms	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
considered	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
powerful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
corporations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
placed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
economy	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
influence	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
that	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
controlling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
politics	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
globally	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*))	O
too	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tackle	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
discuss	VB	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
urgent	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
indispensable	JJ	*)	ESE
factors	NNS	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
life	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
humankind	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
remarkable	JJ	*	ESE
feature	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
180	CD	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*))	ESE
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
protection	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
environment	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	RB	(S*	ESE
reducing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))))))	O
--	:	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
isolated	VBN	(VP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
undeniable	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
isolation	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
spite	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
discrediting	NN	(NP*	ESE
-LSB-	NNS	*)))	O
undermining	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
-RSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
declining	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
comply	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bonn	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
resolution	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
make	VB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
promise	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preventing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP*	O
pollution	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
recap	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
ever	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
existed	VBD	*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conferences	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Genoa	NNP	*	O
questions	NNS	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
:	:	(NP*	O
promotion	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
world	NN	(NP*	ESE
security	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
improvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
defusing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
global	JJ	*	ESE
crises	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
conflicts	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
checking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
unleashed	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
competition	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
rearmament	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
reduction	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
gap	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
mainstream	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
peripheral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)))	O
and	CC	*)))	O
...	:	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
addressed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
appropriate	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
worthy	JJ	*)	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opportunity	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
easily	RB	*)	ESE
lost	VBN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
flopped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
completely	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
regards	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Bonn	NNP	(NP*	O
Meeting	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
gatherings	NNS	*)	O
like	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Hague	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
proved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
failed	VBN	(NP*	ESE
experiences	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
nevertheless	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
climatic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
atmospheric	JJ	*	O
crises	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
growing	VBG	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
one	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
optimistic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
hopeful	JJ	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
success	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
protocols	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pacts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
implementation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

COLOMBO	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
16	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	,	(PRN*	O
Tamil	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Tiger	NNP	*	O
rebels	NNS	*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flotilla	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
boats	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attack	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ferry	NN	*)	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
1,200	CD	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
northern	JJ	(NP*	O
Sri	NNP	*	O
Lanka	NNP	*	O
Sunday	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
hours	NNS	(SBAR(NP*)	O
after	IN	*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
explosive-laden	JJ	*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ram	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
navy	NN	*	O
gunboat	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
defence	NN	*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
cluster	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
boats	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
separatist	JJ	*	O
Liberation	NNP	*	O
Tigers	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tamil	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Eelam	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
LTTE	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
mounted	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pre-dawn	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MV	NNP	*	O
Pride	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*))))	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Point	NNP	*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
coast	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
ministry	NN	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Sanath	NNP	*	O
Karunaratne	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
navy	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
gunboats	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
helicopter	NN	*	O
gunships	NNS	*)	O
repulsed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
first	JJ	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*))	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(SBAR(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
two	CD	*)	O
rebel	JJ	*	O
craft	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
blown	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
water	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
casualties	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Fighting	NN	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
seas	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
navy	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
gun	NN	*	O
ships	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
beat	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Karunaratne	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
26	CD	(NP(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
42	CD	(NP*	O
kilometres	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Point	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pedro	NNP	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Karunaratne	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
casualties	NNS	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
ship	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
ferry	NN	*)	O
transporting	VBG	(VP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
northeastern	JJ	*	O
port	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Trincomalee	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
peninsula	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jaffna	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
1,200	CD	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ferry	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hours	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ferry	NN	*	O
incident	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
navy	NN	*)	O
fast	RB	*)	O
attack	NN	(NP*	O
craft	NN	*))))	O
encountered	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
explosive-laden	JJ	*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
blew	VBD	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
apparent	JJ	*	ESE
Tamil	NNP	*	O
Tiger	NNP	*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Karunaratne	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
navy	NN	*	O
craft	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
approached	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
thinking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
distress	NN	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
elderly	JJ	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
teenager	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
person	NN	*	O
onboard	NN	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
flag	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
neared	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
boat	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
attack	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
navy	NN	*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
retaliated	VBD	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fishing	NN	*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
exploded	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
All	DT	(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
onboard	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
boat	NN	(S(NP*)	O
evaporated	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
indicating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
packed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
explosives	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ram	VB	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
navy	NN	*	O
fast	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*	O
craft	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Karunaratne	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
navy	NN	*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
escaped	VBD	(VP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
casualties	NNS	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tiger	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
leading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
homeland	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
northeast	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
navy	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
merchant	NN	*	O
ships	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
boats	NNS	(NP*)	O
carrying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
suicide	NN	(NP*	O
bombers	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*	O
dozen	NN	*)	O
naval	JJ	*	O
craft	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
LTTE	NNP	*)	O
staged	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
kamikaze-style	JJ	*	O
assault	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
merchant	NN	*	O
vessel	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
explosives-laden	JJ	*	O
boat	NN	*)	O
rammed	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bulk	JJ	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
carrier	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
MV	NNP	(NP*	O
Mercs	NNPS	*	O
Uhana	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
approached	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jaffna	NNP	*	O
peninsula	NN	*)	O
carrying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
food	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
essentials	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
embattled	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Twenty-one	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
crewmen	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
rescued	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
another	DT	(S(NP*	O
seven	CD	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
missing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attack	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sri	NNP	*	O
Lankan	NNP	*	O
navy	NN	*)	O
fought	VBD	(VP*	O
Tiger	NNP	(NP*	O
rebel	NN	*	O
boats	NNS	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
northeastern	JJ	*	O
coast	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guerrillas	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
seizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
merchant	NN	*	O
vessel	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Tiger	NNP	*	O
flotilla	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
14,000-tonne	JJ	*	O
MV	NNP	*	O
Yugi	NNP	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
confronted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
navy	NN	(NP*	O
gun	NN	*	O
boats	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
defence	NN	*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
32	CD	*	O
crew	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
hurt	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Tigers	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*)))	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
6,000-tonne	JJ	*	O
MV	NNP	*	O
Princess	NNP	*	O
Kash	NNP	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
Mullaitivu	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
northeastern	JJ	*	O
coast	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vessel	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
supplies	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
traders	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jaffna	NNP	*	O
peninsula	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Government	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
forces	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
civilians	NNS	*)	O
depend	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vital	JJ	*	O
sea	NN	*	O
route	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Jaffna	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
supplies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
route	NN	*)))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tiger	NNP	*	O
rebels	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Merchant	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
vessels	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
operate	VB	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coast	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
detected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
rebels	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
northeastern	JJ	*	O
seaboard	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
navy	NN	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
route	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
transporting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Jaffna	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TAIPEI	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sept	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
26	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
full	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
reprisals	NNS	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
On	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
behalf	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
official	JJ	*	O
name	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
extend	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
full	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
act	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chen	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	*	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	NN	(NP*)))	O
Oregon	NNP	(NP*	O
governor	NN	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Kitzhaber	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
idly	NN	(NP*)	ESE
by	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
challenge	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
disruption	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
mankind	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
office	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))	O
firmly	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
condolences	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
thousands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Americans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
hijacked	JJ	(S(NP*	O
planes	NNS	*)	O
plunged	VBD	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Pentagon	NNP	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
massing	VBG	(VP*	O
forces	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
reprisals	NNS	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	ESE
suspect	NN	*	ESE
Usama	NNP	*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
hiding	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tien	NNP	*	O
Hung-mao	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
vowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
back	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
option	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*))))))	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
inauguration	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
backpedalled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
predecessor	NN	*))	O
Bill	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
engagement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*))	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
approved	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
arms	JJ	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
remained	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
supplier	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
switching	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	DSE
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1979	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Leaders	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
withheld	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
breath	NN	*)	DSE
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
watching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
television	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*)	O
Vladimir	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Putin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
rubbed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
palms	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
length	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
much	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
great	JJ	*	ESE
power	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
towers	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
overthrow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ruling	JJ	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
system	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
``	``	*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
now	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Putin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
exceeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
positive	JJ	*	ESE
neutrality	NN	*	ESE
policy	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
his	PRP$	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pursued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
continued	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
validity	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
regarded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
desirable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Putin	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
airfields	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
Soviet	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Asian	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(S(ADJP*	ESE
dramatic	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Tajikistan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Turkmenistan	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
sovereign	JJ	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
final	JJ	*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
familiar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
actual	JJ	*	ESE
balance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
had	VBD	(SBAR*	O
Moscow	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
thing	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
underestimate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
significance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
opened	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
airspace	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

True	UH	(ROOT(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Putin	NNP	(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
permitted	VBD	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(S*	O
Americans	NNPS	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
airspace	NN	*	O
aid	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	(NX*	O
theater	NN	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
i.e.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
not	RB	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
amounts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
high	JJ	*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russian-American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
wartime	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
attained	VBN	(VP*	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
past	JJ	*	ESE
10	CD	*	ESE
years	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
Putin	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prospect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
regard	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Accordingly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
joined	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
virtually	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
without	IN	*	ESE
reservation	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Putin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
written	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
name	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
registration	NN	*	ESE
page	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
American	JJ	*	ESE
side	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ally	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
complex	JJ	*	DSE
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
easy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reformers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Putin	NNP	(NP*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
along	IN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
rare	JJ	*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(S(NP(PRN*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
integrated	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
main	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
stream	NN	*)	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
distance	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
historically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
responsible	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(S(VP*	ESE
educating	VBG	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Taliban	NNP	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
caused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
demise	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Soviet	JJ	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*	ESE
consideration	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
differed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
above	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*))))))	O
proved	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
decisive	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Putin	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
greater	JJR	*	DSE
desire	NN	*)	DSE
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
present	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chechen	NNP	*	O
independence	NN	*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chapter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
terror	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
succeed	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	DSE
than	IN	*	DSE
recognized	CD	*))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
taught	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
promised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
good	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
nice	JJ	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Putin	NNP	(NP*)	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
almost	RB	(NP(QP*	O
as	RB	*	O
an	DT	*))	O
aside	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
``	``	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
interpreted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
context	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
reality	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Putin	NNP	(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*)	ESE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	ESE
Chechnia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
understanding	NN	*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
look	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Putin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
namely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
encourage	VB	(VP*	DSE
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chechen	JJ	*	O
insurgents	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
one	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
fail	VB	(VP*	ESE
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
note	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
upon	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chechens	NNPS	*))	O
to	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
unconditionally	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
delay	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
terminate	VB	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
contact	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
accept	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Putin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
offer	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
view	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
warning	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
background	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Putin	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Usama	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Bin	NNP	*	ESE
Ladin	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Chechen	NNP	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
witnessing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	DSE
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
views	NNS	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
understood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
recognition	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Berlin	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
center	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
stormy	JJ	(NP*	DSE
celebration	NN	*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
vindicated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
deeper	JJR	*	ESE
truth	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
argued	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
had	VBD	(SINV*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
not	RB	*	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
alive	JJ	(S(ADJP*	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
past	JJ	*	ESE
several	JJ	*	ESE
years	NNS	*)))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Cold	NNP	*	ESE
War	NNP	*	ESE
stereotype	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
East	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
concentrated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
on	IN	*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
common	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
twin	JJ	*	O
towers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
collapsed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Accordingly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(X*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
your	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
turn	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
think	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Putin	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Feeling	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
like	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
ally	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
inconspicuously	JJ	*)))))	ESE
-	:	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
NATO	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
joke	NN	*)	ESE
only	RB	*)	ESE
yesterday	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Today	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threshold	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
expansion	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
joke	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Belgian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
premier	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
EU	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
strikes	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
summit	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
carrying	VBG	*	O
out	RP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
mistakes	NNS	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
unease	NN	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
majority	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ranks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Belgium	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
senators	NNS	*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mise	NNP	(NP*	O
au	NNP	*	O
Point	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
programme	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
television	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
PRL	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Liberal	NNP	*	O
Reform	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PSC	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))	O
continue	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
strikes	NNS	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
criticize	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ecolo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Agalev	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
ecologist	NN	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
-RSB-	RB	(ADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
asking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ending	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bombing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PS	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Socialist	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Senator	NNP	(NP*	O
Jean	NNP	*	O
Cornil	NNP	*)	O
still	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
supports	VBZ	*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Prime	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Guy	NNP	*	O
Verhofstadt	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Flemish	JJ	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Europe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
19	CD	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Gent	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
northwest	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Brussels	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
informal	JJ	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
summit	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kazakh	NNP	*	O
Oil	NNP	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
enterprises	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
4.9	CD	(NP(NP*	O
m	NN	*	O
t	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
first	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
nine	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
11.6	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
year	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
year	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
extraction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
and	CC	*	O
above	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)))))	O
-	:	*	O
336,000	CD	(NP*	O
t	NN	*)	O
-	:	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
due	JJ	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
launching	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
wells	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
intensify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
production	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
extraction	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
thanks	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
company	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
active	JJ	*	O
investment	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Capital	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
investments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
production	NN	(NP*)))	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
37	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
nine	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Capital	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
invested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
renewing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
facilities	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
increasing	VBG	(VP*	O
volumes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
drilling	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
wells	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
upgrading	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
processed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
1,697,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
t	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
fully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
provided	VBD	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Atyrau	NNP	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
refinery	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
west	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kazakh	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Oil	NNP	*)	O
paid	VBD	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
34bn	CD	*)	O
tenge	JJ	*	O
-LSB-	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
148	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tenge	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
period	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
60	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
up	RB	(ADVP*)	O
year	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
year	NN	(NP*)))	O
...	:	*))	O

18	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
believes	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
commitment	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
separating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MOFA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))	O
official	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Stanley	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kao	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
MOFA	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
North	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
Department	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
mounting	VBG	(NP(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
compromise	VB	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cooperation	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kao	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
trip	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
informal	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
APEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
forum	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
expansion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prior	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
reaffirm	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Jiang	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
policy	NN	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
disputes	NNS	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kao	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
reassurances	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
mainland	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
expense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sincerity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
promising	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
mix	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
counter-terrorism	JJ	*	O
drive	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Kao	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
relevant	JJ	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*))	O
reaffirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
similar	JJ	(NP*	DSE
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ROC	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Commenting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
waiving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
bar	NN	(S(VP*	O
sales	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military-related	JJ	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Kao	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
MOFA	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
obtain	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
view	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Kao	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
power	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
national	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
consistently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
attached	VBN	(VP*	DSE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Kao	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
robust	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
struck	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
signifies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Against	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
backdrop	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Kao	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ROC	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
optimistic	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
wire	NN	*	O
service	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*)))	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
plans	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ease	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
traveling	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP*))	O
en	IN	(ADVP*	O
route	NN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
APEC	NNP	*	O
meeting	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
unequivocally	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
specifically	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
sales	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
spare	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
Chinese-owned	JJ	*	O
helicopters	NNS	*)))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
such	JJ	*	O
sale	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
waiver	NN	*)	O
contemplated	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Post	NN	*)	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
waiver	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1989	CD	*	O
Tiananmen	NNP	*	O
Square	NNP	*	O
crackdown	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
parts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Black	NNP	(NP*	O
Hawks	NNPS	*)))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
sold	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1980s	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
helicopters	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
altitudes	NNS	*)	O
typical	JJ	(ADJP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
much	RB	(NP*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Afghanistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
bombardment	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
refusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hand	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	JJ	*	O
suspect	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Saudi-born	JJ	*	O
dissident	JJ	*	O
Osama	NNP	*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Usama	NNP	*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ZANU	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
readies	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O

ZIMBABWE	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
amassing	VBG	(VP*	O
huge	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
quantities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ammunition	NN	*)))	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preparation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
crucial	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Financial	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Gazette	NNP	*	O
investigations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
one-and-a-half	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
revealed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Congo	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
DRC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Namibia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
helping	VBG	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
circumvent	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
embargo	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
huge	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
quantities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
guns	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
bullets	NNS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ballot	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
embargo	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
appalling	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
investigations	NNS	*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
importing	VBG	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
massing	VBG	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assortment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
guns	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
army	NN	(NP*	O
bases	NNS	*)))))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preparation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
violent	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guns	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arriving	VBG	(VP*	O
secretly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Suri	NNP	(NP*	O
Suri	NNP	*	O
airbase	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chegutu	NNP	(NP*))	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
distributed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
bases	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
farms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
self-styled	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
bases	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
intimidate	VB	(VP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
consist	VBP	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
significant	JJ	*	O
portion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
French-made	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
guns	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
top	JJ	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
distributed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
central	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ruling	NN	*	O
ZANU	NNP	*	O
PF	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	O
depletion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
armoury	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-year-old	JJ	*	O
DRC	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
finding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
extremely	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	DSE
difficult	JJ	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
replenish	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
stocks	NNS	*)	O
because	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
cheaper	JJR	(ADJP*	O
arms	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
suppliers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
refusing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
arms	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
unpalatable	JJ	*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grounding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
fleet	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hawk	NNP	(NP*	O
fighter	NN	*	O
aircraft	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
due	JJ	(PP*	O
to	TO	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
spare	JJ	(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Virtually	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
all	DT	*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
severed	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
ties	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
embargo	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Although	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greater	JJR	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
fairly	RB	(ADJP*	O
priced	VBN	*)	O
weapons	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
ammunition	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
spares	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
sourced	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
mainly	RB	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Sweden	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	*))))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	O
longer	RB	*)	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
moment	NN	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*))))))	O
here	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defence	NNP	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
alternative	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
preference	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Defence	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Sydney	NNP	*	O
Sekeramayi	NNP	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
comment	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
allegations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
busting	VBG	(VP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
guns	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
army	NN	(NP(NP*	O
bases	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
going	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
comment	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
one	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Sekeramayi	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
immediately	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
cutting	VBG	*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
weapons	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
French	JJ	(NP*	O
origin	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
finding	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Jerome	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sautier	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
counsellor	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lieutenant	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Colonel	NNP	*	O
Dault	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
defence	NN	*	O
attache	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
France	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
selling	VBG	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
knowledge	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
French	JJ	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
France	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
sold	VBD	(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(VP(PP*	O
turn	NN	(NP*))	O
re-sell	VB	*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
relationships	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
French-speaking	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
turn	NN	(NP*))	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
re-sold	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Sautier	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
trafficking	NN	*)	O
outside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
authority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Namibian	JJ	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mati	NNP	(NP*	O
Jose	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
knowledge	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Namibia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
helping	VBG	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
bust	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
embargo	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
DRC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
Mawapanga	NNP	*	O
Mwanananga	NNP	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
comment	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Authoritative	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
training	VBG	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
arming	VBG	(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
re-elected	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
must	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bases	NNS	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
veterans	NNS	*))	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
did	VBD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
army	NN	(NP*	O
camps	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
operate	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
bases	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	DSE
objective	NN	*	DSE
being	VBG	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
campaign	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Opposition	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
harassed	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ejected	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
disable	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
voting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
constituencies	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
veterans	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fact	NN	(NP*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*))	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
armed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
ZANU	VBG	(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*	DSE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
smashed	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
MDC	NNP	(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vehicle	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
thwarted	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
planned	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
structures	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sanyati	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
armed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
guns	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sympathize	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
change	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
judging	VBG	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
groundwork	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
ZANU	NNP	(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
afraid	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
change	NN	*	O
coming	VBG	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jose	NNP	(NP*	O
Maria	NNP	*	O
Aznar	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Spain	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
absolute	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Madrid	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
placed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
strategic	JJ	*	DSE
bet	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))	O
overcoming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
dinner	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
16	CD	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Moncloa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Palace	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
presidency	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
examined	VBD	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
setback	NN	*)	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
governing	VBG	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
14	CD	(NP*	O
October	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
sources	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dinner	NN	*)	O
attended	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Aznar	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
De	NNP	(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
both	DT	(S*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inauguration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Second	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
Language	NN	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Valladolid	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
center	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Spanish	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Economy	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Rodrigo	NNP	*	O
Rato	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Interior	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Mariano	NNP	*	O
Rajoy	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Josep	NNP	*	O
Pique	NNP	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rato	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
macroeconomic	JJ	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Spain	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
De	NNP	(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
aiming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
zero	CD	*	O
deficit	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Aznar	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
De	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
Ibero-American	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
this	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Lima	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
America	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occasion	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tell	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
15	CD	*	O
October	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))	O
--	:	*)))))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
conversation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Aznar	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
De	NNP	(NP*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Oct	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
heading	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
high-ranking	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
one-day	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
welcomed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
Mehrabad	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Airport	NNP	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Minister	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mines	NNPS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Metals	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Eshaq	NNP	(NP*	O
Jahangiri	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
informed	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*)	O
President	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
avenues	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
increase	NN	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
price	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Venezuelan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Luis	NNP	*	O
Alfonso	NNP	*	O
Davila	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
accompanying	VBG	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
member	NN	(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
join	VB	(VP*	ESE
hands	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
prevent	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
steep	JJ	*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
persistent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
deliberate	JJ	*)	ESE
fuelling	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cycle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
pushing	VBG	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
already	RB	*	ESE
turbulent	JJ	*	ESE
region	NN	*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
inevitable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
chaos	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
war	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
behaviour	NN	*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
confirms	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	DSE
interested	JJ	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
pursuing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
expansionist	NN	*	ESE
designs	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
occupied	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP*	O
land	NN	*)))))))	O
than	IN	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
engaging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
peace-making	NN	*)	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
route	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
require	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
unreserved	JJ	*	ESE
commitment	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
blatantly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
obstructed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
European	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consolidate	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli-Palestinian	JJ	*	O
ceasefire	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prerequisite	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mitchell	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tenet	NNP	*	O
recommendations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
and	CC	*	O
outside	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
rightly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
feared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
callously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
exploit	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
tragedy	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
intensify	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
accelerate	VB	*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
aggression	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
crush	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
claiming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
freedom	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independence	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
exactly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	ESE
disregard	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
utter	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
defiance	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
disrespect	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
advice	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
London	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
restraint	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	ESE
return	NN	*)))))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
negotiating	VBG	*	ESE
table	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
opts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
brute	JJ	(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exit	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resumption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mitchell	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tenet	JJ	*	O
understandings	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
expects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
friends	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
understanding	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
cooperation	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
full	JJ	*	ESE
support	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
confronting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
perpetrators	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
devastating	JJ	*	ESE
attack	NN	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
centres	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
reciprocating	VBG	(S(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
since	IN	(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
creation	NN	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
benefited	VBN	(VP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
backing	NN	(NP*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
fair-weather	JJ	*	ESE
friend	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
self-seeking	JJ	*	ESE
manipulation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tragedy	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Tel	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Aviv	NNP	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
noticed	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
affected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
corner	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
earth	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
adds	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(NP*	ESE
another	DT	*	ESE
burden	NN	*)	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
likening	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
invasion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assassinations	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Osama	NNP	*	O
Ben	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
abhorrent	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deceptive	JJ	*	ESE
ploys	NNS	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
negate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Yasser	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Authority	NNP	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(S(S(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
while	IN	*	O
under	IN	(S(PP*	O
attack	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
utmost	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demonstrate	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
unambiguous	JJ	*	ESE
commitment	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP(VP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ceasefire	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
entire	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
engaged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
handling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
crises	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
realise	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
predatory	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
behaviour	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tolerated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
long	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
evident	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
international	JJ	*)	O
resolve	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab-Israeli	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	ESE
aspects	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
calls	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
London	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
just	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
realisation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
statehood	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
settlement	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
viewed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guarantee	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
continued	VBN	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
aggression	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
history	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
shown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(UCP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recipe	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
disaster	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Islamabad	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Punjab	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
retired	JJ	*	O
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Khalid	NNP	*	O
Maqbool	NNP	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
winner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hilal-e-Imtiaz	NNP	*	O
Military	NNP	*	O
medal	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
born	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP*))	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
1948	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
1966	CD	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1971	CD	*	O
Pak-India	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
served	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
infantry	NN	*	O
regiment	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kashmir	NNP	*	O
front	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
career	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Brigadier	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Infantry	NNP	*	O
Division	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
Commander	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
served	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
chief	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
instructor	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
College	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Command	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Staff	NNP	*	O
College	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Quetta	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lt.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
General	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Retd	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Khalid	NNP	(NP*	O
Maqbool	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
attache	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pakistani	NNP	*	O
Embassy	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(QP*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	*	O
half	NN	*)	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Military	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Balochistan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
retired	JJ	*	O
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Rahimuddin	NNP	*	O
Khan	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*	O
graduate	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Punjab	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Masters	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Science	NNP	(NP*	O
degree	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
wing	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
College	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Infantry	NNP	*	O
Officer	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Advanced	NNP	*	O
Course	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Senior	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Management	NNP	*	O
Course	NNP	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Retired	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Khalid	NNP	*	O
Maqbool	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Baloch	NNP	*	O
Regiment	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
promoted	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rank	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Lt.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
28	CD	(NP*))	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
1998	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
Commander	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Lahore	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chairman	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Accountability	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
26	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
retired	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
Army	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
27	CD	(NP*))	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
nominated	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Governor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Punjab	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
daughter	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
6	CD	(NP(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Three	CD	(NP*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	*	O
space	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
units	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	JJ	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
begun	VBN	(VP*	O
preparations	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sixth	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Proton-K	NNP	*	O
booster	NN	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Proton	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
23	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
orbit	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
needs	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Autonomous	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP(NP*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
booster	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
way	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assembly	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
testing	NN	*	O
hangar	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
simultaneously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
loaded	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
fuel	NN	(NP*	O
components	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))	O
reported	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
26	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Progress	NNP	*	O
M1-7	NNP	*	O
transport	NN	*	O
spaceship	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Baykonur	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
modernized	JJ	*	O
Soyuz-FG	NN	*	O
booster	NN	*)	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
manufactured	VBN	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Progress	NNP	*	O
aerospace	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Samara	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
engines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
third	JJ	*)	O
stages	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
modernized	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
modernized	JJ	*	O
booster	NN	*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Aerospace	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Rosaviakosmos	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
21	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
May	NNP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
launch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zenit-2	NN	*	O
booster	NN	*)	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Dnipropetrovsk	NNP	*	O
Yuzhmash	NNP	*	O
enterprise	NN	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
preliminarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP*))	O
November	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
rocket	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Meteor-3M	JJ	(ADJP*	O
hydrometeorological	JJ	*)	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
orbit	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Bayt	NNP	(NP*	O
Jala	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Qalqilya	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
withdrew	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
maintained	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
siege	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
closure	NN	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
city	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
suffering	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
suffering	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Bayt	NNP	(NP*	O
Jala	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Qalqilya	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
roadblocks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
affecting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
medical	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
economic	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
educational	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
social	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
life	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
such	JJ	(PP*	ESE
suffering	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
main	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
perhaps	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
suffering	NN	*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
continuing	VBG	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
heavy	JJ	*	ESE
burden	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
correction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reoccupy	VB	(VP*	O
parts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
cities	NNS	*)))	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assassination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
minister	NN	*	O
Rehav	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
`	``	*	O
am	VBP	(VP*	O
Ze'evi	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reoccupation	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
collective	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
punishment	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
inhabitants	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
villages	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
villages	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
constitute	VBP	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organic	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
vital	JJ	*	ESE
extension	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
cities	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
destroyed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
buildings	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
installations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
arrested	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
dozens	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
citizens	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
killed	VBD	(VP*	O
dozens	NNS	(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
showed	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
right-wing	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pursuing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
occupational	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
,	,	(ADJP(PRN*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
place	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	DSE
willing	JJ	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
firm	JJ	*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
occupation	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
settlement	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
disregards	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
establish	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
regain	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
freedom	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independence	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
reflected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
statements	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
brag	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
arrested	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reflected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
agreed-upon	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
plans	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
attributed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
minimum	JJ	*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
demands	NNS	*)))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
initiatives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
try	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
much	RB	*	ESE
hegemony	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
many	JJ	*))	O
settlements	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
possible	JJ	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
lands	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
resources	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
airspace	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
crossing	JJ	(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
playing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
cat	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
mouse	NN	*	ESE
game	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
factor	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
perpetuate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
occupation	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
working	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
push	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	ESE
labyrinths	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
tunnels	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
old	JJ	*	O
tunnels	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
distract	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
central	JJ	*	O
demands	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cycle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reoccupation-withdrawal-reoccupation	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
secret	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
anyone	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
full	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
termination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupational	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*)))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
lie	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
devious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
methods	NNS	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
circumvent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
inalienable	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
methods	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
complicate	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
add	VB	(VP*	ESE
fuel	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
raging	JJ	*	ESE
fire	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Energy	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Ernesto	NNP	*	O
Martens	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
admitted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unfeasible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
revenues	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Secretariat	NNP	*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
estimate	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
export	NN	*	O
platform	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
average	VB	(VP*	O
1.825	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
barrels	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
day	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
17.00	CD	*))))	O
per	IN	(ADJP*	O
barrel	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
One	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
talk	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
depth	NN	(NP*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Secretariat	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
people	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hear	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
criteria	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
benchmark	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
declining	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
details	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manner	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
secretariats	NNS	*)	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crude	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Criteria	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP*	O
Policy	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Martens	NNP	(NP*)	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Pemex	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Mexican	NNP	*	O
Petroleum	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
figures	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
September	NNP	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
barrels	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
exceed	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1.71	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*))	O
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
average	NN	*)	O
dropped	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1.64	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Preliminary	NNP	*	O
Criteria	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Policy	NNP	*	O
2002	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
text	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))	O
today	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Finance	NNP	*	O
Secretariat	NNP	*)	O
estimated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
17.00	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
barrel	NN	(NP*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
mixture	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
predicted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
export	NN	*	O
platform	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
1.825	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
barrels	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
day	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
large	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
context	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
oil	NN	(S(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
or	CC	(FRAG*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
worldwide	JJ	*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
production	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shore	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Traditionally	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
OPEC	NNP	*	O
cutbacks	NNS	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
however	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
tend	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*	O
consumer	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
adversely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
affected	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

George	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Baker	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Intelligence	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
event	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Mexican	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
priority	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
game	NN	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
risks	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
given	VBN	*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
hand	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
bill	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
collaborating	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
supply	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Mexican	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADVP*	O
closely	RB	*)	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
hence	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
no	DT	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
producer	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
not	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
disadvantageous	NNS	*	ESE
situation	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Frederic	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Lasserre	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*	O
analyst	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
firm	JJ	*	O
Societe	NNP	*	O
Generale	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mexico	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
close	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
prevents	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
becoming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
more	RBR	(S(ADJP*	DSE
committed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
trading	NN	*	O
partner	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
close	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
observed	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
regard	NN	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
prices	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
reminder	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
prompted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
collaborate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Ken	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Miller	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
firm	NN	*))	O
Purvin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
&	CC	*	O
amp	NNP	*)	O
;	:	*	O
Gertz	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
factor	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Mexico	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
producers	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(PP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
because	IN	*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
competition	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
pointing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
prices	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
low	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mexican	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
mixture	NN	*)	O
averaged	VBD	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
10.17	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
barrel	NN	(NP*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lowest	JJS	*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
14.00	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
barrel	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Miller	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
worldwide	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
slowdown	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
shrunk	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
producers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
operate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
coordination	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
cartel	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
researcher	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UNAM	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Autonomous	NNPS	*	O
University	NNP	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Economics	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Angel	NNP	(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Vega	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Fox	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fiscal	JJ	*	O
reform	NN	*)))	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
ruled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mexico	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
collaborate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
serious	JJ	*)	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Miguel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Garcia	NNP	*	O
Reyes	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
specialist	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
petroleum	NN	(NP(NP*	O
geopolitics	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
College	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mexico	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
distancing	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(S(ADJP*	ESE
intensified	JJ	*	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Now	RB	(S(S(ADVP*)	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
positioned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
two	CD	(NP*	ESE
fronts	NNS	*)))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
recognizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
supply	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
policy	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
supply	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
crude	NN	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
market	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mexican	JJ	*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Saudi	NNP	*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
1999	CD	*)))))))))	O
lent	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
credibility	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cutbacks	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
achieved	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prices	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Promises	VBZ	(ROOT(SINV*	ESE
Are	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Cheap	NNP	*)))	ESE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
cuts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
production	NN	*)	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
preventing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
becoming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weaker	JJR	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
kept	VBN	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
promises	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

THE	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ABDUCTION	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
diplomat	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
wife	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
introduced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
dimension	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
kidnap-for-ransom	JJ	*	O
pestilence	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
spread	VBN	(VP*	O
dramatically	RB	(ADVP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
kidnap	JJ	*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
freed	VBD	(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
her	PRP$	*)	O
driver	NN	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
seizure	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ransom	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
abduction	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
delivered	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
devastating	JJ	*)	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Macapagal	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
crack	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
kidnap	JJ	(NP*	O
syndicates	NNS	*))	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
grim	JJ	*	ESE
statistics	NNS	*)	O
trotted	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Teresita	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ang-See	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese-Filipino	JJ	*	O
anti-crime	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
crusader	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
relished	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Cassandra	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Philippine	NNP	*	ESE
National	NNP	*	ESE
Police	NNP	*))	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
organized	VBN	(S(NP*	O
crime	NN	*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
preoccupation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
agenda	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
victims	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
predatory	JJ	*	ESE
syndicates	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
Ang-See	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
compatriots	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese-Filipino	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
conventional	JJ	*	DSE
explanation	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
because	IN	*	O
of	IN	(S(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
wealth	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
logical	JJ	*	ESE
prey	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
extract	VB	(VP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*	O
money	NN	*)))))))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
perverse	JJ	*	ESE
form	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nationalist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
racism	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
redistribution	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
wealth	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*	O
kidnapping	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreigners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Sipadan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Dos	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Palmas	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Palawan	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))))))	O
broke	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
ethnicity	JJ	*	O
pattern	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seizure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
diplomat	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
wife	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
driver	NN	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
gangs	NNS	*)	O
struck	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
immunity	NNS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
somehow	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
respected	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
organized	VBN	(NP*	O
syndicates	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
seizure	NN	*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	DSE
alarm	NN	(NP*	DSE
bells	NNS	*)	DSE
ringing	VBG	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
repercussions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
home	NN	*	O
governments	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
damaging	JJ	*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prolonged	VBN	*	O
hostage-taking	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Sayyaf	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
French	NNP	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
German	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
Lebanese	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Finnish	JJ	*)	O
nationals	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Estrada	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Joseph	NNP	*	O
Estrada	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cancel	VB	(VP*	O
visits	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Paris	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
capitals	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*)))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hostile	JJ	*	DSE
reception	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
public	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lengthy	JJ	*	O
impasse	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hostages	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
release	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippine	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Police	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
diplomat	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
wife	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
driver	NN	*))	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
school	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bicutan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
around	RB	(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
a.m.	RB	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
call	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
school	NN	(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reported	VBD	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
her	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
son	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
accident	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
six	CD	*)	O
armed	JJ	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
uniforms	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
blocked	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
brand-new	JJ	*	O
car	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
plate	NN	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Better	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Living	NNP	*	O
Subdivision	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Paranaque	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
boarded	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
drove	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vicinity	NN	*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
interrogated	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victims	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
hijackers	NNS	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
mentioned	VBN	(VP*)))	O
--	:	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
supposedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
withdrawn	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bank	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
she	PRP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
withdrawn	VBN	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
money	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wife	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
French	JJ	*	O
diplomat	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
gunmen	NNS	*)	O
let	VBD	(VP*	O
her	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
go	VBP	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
PNP	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mistaken	JJ	(NP*	O
identity	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
identity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lady	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
detaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
hours	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
drove	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	*	O
driver	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
squatters	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
area	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
dropped	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bicutan	NNP	*	O
exit	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
not	RB	(S(ADVP*	O
before	RB	*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
necklace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
wallet	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
ring	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
pieces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
jewelry	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
fled	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
car	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
victims	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tricycle	JJ	*	O
home	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
details	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crime	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
swift	JJ	*	O
release	NN	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
less	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
implications	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whether	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
incident	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
plain	RB	(ADJP*	O
holdup	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
PNP	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
see	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
abduction	NN	*)	O
reinforced	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	DSE
perception	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
breakdown	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
law	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
order	NN	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Macapagal	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
control	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
fueled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crime	NN	*	O
statistics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ang-See	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
represents	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
pessimistic	JJ	*	DSE
outlook	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
contrast	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	DSE
dismissive	JJ	*)	DSE
outlook	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
PNP	NNP	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR*	O
statistics	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
less	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
alarming	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ang-See	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Ang-See	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statistics	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
derived	VBN	(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
non-official	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
paint	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
grim	JJ	*	ESE
picture	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
ignored	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PNP	NNP	*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
burying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
head	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
sand	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
offering	NN	*	O
explanations	NNS	*))	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
check	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rise	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
kidnappings	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ang-See	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
close	JJ	*	O
collaboration	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
PNP	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Sen.	NNP	(NP*	O
Panfilo	NNP	*	O
Lacson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
open	JJ	*	O
secret	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
wonder	VBP	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
paints	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
doomsday	NN	(NP*	DSE
scenarios	NNS	*)	DSE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
embarrass	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
administration	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
portray	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
contrast	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
performance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PNP	NNP	*)))))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
Lacson	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
PNP	NNP	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
love	NN	*)	DSE
lost	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Lacson	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
previously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
immune	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
predatory	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
gang	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
abduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
diplomat	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
wife	NN	*)))	O
naturally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
generated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
anxieties	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADJP*	O
safe	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	DSE
perception	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
abduction	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fake	JJ	*	ESE
kidnap-for	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
act	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demonstrate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
incapacity	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
crime	NN	(NP*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
control	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
reasoning	NN	*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
perception	NN	*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
gangs	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
ransom	NN	(NP*	O
money	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
matter	VB	(VP*	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
victims	NNS	*)	O
belonged	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
abductions	NNS	*)	O
staged	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
fail	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
embassies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
French	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
German	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japanese	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
issued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
advisories	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
nationals	NNS	*))	O
warning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
risks	NNS	(NP*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
travelling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
advisories	NNS	*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
prompted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
lawlessness	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
turbulence	NN	*)))	ESE
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
outbreak	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
insidious	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
associated	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qaida	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
provoked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rate	NN	*))	O
syndicates	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
abducting	VBG	(VP*	O
targets	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
identity	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*))))	O
--	:	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
impunity	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
faces	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
direct	JJ	*)	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
capacity	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
govern	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
specter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
lawlessness	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
from	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
daunting	JJ	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
sparking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
downturn	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
al-Qaida	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*)	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
turmoil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
uncertainties	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
frighten	VB	(VP*	ESE
tourists	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
investors	NNS	*)	ESE
away	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Macapagal	NNP	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
her	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
economics	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
her	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
homework	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
unscathed	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
scandals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
rubbed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
her	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
skin	NN	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
scandal-mongering	JJ	*	ESE
opposition	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
downside	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
deterioration	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
order	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
nemesis	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
undoing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	O
her	PRP$	*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
stage	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
project	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
staunch	JJ	*	ESE
ally	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
raise	VBP	(VP*	DSE
questions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
priorities	NNS	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
travelling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
internal	JJ	(S(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
sap	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
energy	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
misplaced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
strategic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
priorities	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
overseas	JJ	*	O
visits	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
fire	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
raging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
home	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Her	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
hoses	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
internal	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
home	NN	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
elsewhere	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
November	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
begun	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
growing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
crops	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
computer-controlled	JJ	(NP*	O
rooms	NNS	*))	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
tilling	JJ	(NP*	O
fields	NNS	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
spades	NNS	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
apply	VBP	(VP*	O
fertilizer	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
water	NN	(NP*	O
fields	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
treat	NN	(NP*	O
insect	NN	*	O
pest	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
equipment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
controlled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
computers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
intelligent	JJ	(NP*	O
farm	NN	*	O
workshops	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
products	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
quality	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	O
variety	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
shipped	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
supermarkets	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
hotels	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
sold	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	O
price	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
150	CD	*)	O
agro-technological	JJ	*	O
guiding	NN	*	O
systems	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Yunnan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Anhui	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jilin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Hainan	NNP	*))	O
provinces	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
teach	VB	(VP*	O
farmers	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cultivate	VB	(VP*	O
grain	NN	(NP*	O
crops	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
vegetables	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
fruit	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
aquatic	NN	*	O
products	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
demonstration	NN	*	O
zones	NNS	*)	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2000	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
grain	NN	(NP*	O
output	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
kg	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
640	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
production	NN	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Xinjiang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Uygur	NNP	*	O
Autonomous	NNPS	*	O
Region	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
experimenting	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
satellite	NN	*	O
positioning	NN	*	O
technology	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
accurate	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*)	O
control	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fertilizer	NN	(NP*	O
application	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
impression	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
excursion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	O
brass	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)))))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
picture	NN	*)	ESE
much	RB	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
game	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
continuing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Buenos	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Aires	NNP	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
now	RB	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*	O
negotiation	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
mind	NN	(NP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*	O
piecemeal	RB	(ADVP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
headed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Fernando	NNP	(NP*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Domingo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	ESE
irritating	VBG	(S(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bankers	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
prefer	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Daniel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
minister	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
confrontational	JJ	*	ESE
style	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
El	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Cronista	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
told	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
investment	NN	*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
followed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
aspects	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
gradual	JJ	*	O
loss	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
credibility	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
confusion	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jacob	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Frenkel	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Merrill	NNP	(NP*	O
Lynch	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
team	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
apparent	JJ	*	ESE
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
strategy	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Alliance	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
obvious	JJ	*	ESE
domestic	JJ	*	ESE
difficulties	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
mind	NN	(NP*))	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
negotiation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	ESE
heterogeneous	JJ	*	ESE
steering	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
during	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))	O
:	:	*	O
not	RB	(UCP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
large	JJ	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
portfolio	NN	(NP(NP*	O
administrators	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
pension	NN	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
insurers	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
investors	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Emerging	NNP	*	O
Markets	NNP	*	O
Creditors	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EMCA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
meets	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
case	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	(NP*))	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
consultation	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
cautioning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
negotiates	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*))))))	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Cavallo	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
say	VB	(VP(VP*	O
`	``	*	O
take	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
leave	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
swap	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
noted	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
example	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Marx	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
understands	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
menu	NN	*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
gaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
good	JJ	*	DSE
will	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latter	NN	*))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
consensus	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
remission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
capital	NN	(NP*	O
and/or	or	*	O
interest	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
options	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
geared	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
one	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
negotiation	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Jacob	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Frenkel	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Merrill	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Lynch	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
international	JJ	*	O
vice	NN	*	O
president	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
As	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
adviser	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
useful	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Merrill	NNP	(NP*	O
Lynch	NNP	*)))	O
bothers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
many	JJ	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
creditors	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
interpret	VB	(VP*	DSE
strategy	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
mean	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	O
definition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
negotiable	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
A	DT	(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	ESE
man	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
finance	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
specify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fiscal	JJ	*	O
margin	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
more	JJR	*)	DSE
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
finance	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Marx	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
sufficiently	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
patriotic	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pleasant	JJ	*	ESE
personality	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
negotiator	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
left	VBD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
disaster	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
response	NN	*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
creditors	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signals	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
G-7	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
paper	NN	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CS	NNP	*	O
First	NNP	*	O
Boston	NNP	*	O
bank	NN	*))))	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
suggest	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
G-7	NN	*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
precluding	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
surprises	NNS	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Faced	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
With	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Crisis	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Giavarini	NNP	(NP*)	O
Accentuates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
His	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
Influence	NN	*))))	DSE

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Adalberto	NNP	*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	*	O
Giavarini	NNP	*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cultivate	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
conciliator	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
counterparts	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mercosur	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Common	NNP	*	O
Market	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
minister	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
current	JJ	*	DSE
priority	NN	*)	DSE
involves	VBZ	(VP*	O
binding	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
wounds	NNS	*)	ESE
opened	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
colleague	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Economy	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Domingo	NNP	(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
union	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
general	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
risk	NN	*	ESE
zone	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rodriguez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Giavarini	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
failed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
matters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
colleague	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Buenos	NNP	(NP*	O
Aires	NNPS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
evident	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
responsibility	NN	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
task	NN	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tone	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
Cavallo	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tendency	NN	*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
confrontation	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
heightened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
suspicion	NN	*)	DSE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
disadvantageous	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
De	NNP	(S(NP*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
risking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
future	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
George	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Cavallo	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
ultimately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
participate	VB	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
order	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Finance	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
Marx	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
handled	VBN	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
restructuring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
management	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Rodriguez	NNP	(NP*	O
Giavarini	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
convinced	JJ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	ESE
disadvantage	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
entailed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
aside	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
verge	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
complex	JJ	(NP*	O
dialogues	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Treasury	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
multilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
financing	NN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
meetings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Olivos	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
3-4	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resulted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
decision	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
appoint	VB	(VP*	O
Marx	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
negotiator	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fine	JJ	*	O
print	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
latter	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
event	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
holders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentine	JJ	(NP*	O
bonds	NNS	*)))	O
agree	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
swap	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
instruments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
yield	VBP	(S(VP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
interest	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
rates	NNS	(NP*)))	O
not	RB	*	O
exceeding	VBG	(VP*	O
7	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cavallo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
delegated	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
debt	NN	*	O
swap	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
external	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
advisers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attorney	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Horacio	NNP	(NP*	O
Liendo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
economist	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jacob	NNP	(NP*	O
Frenkel	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
De	NNP	(NP*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*)	O
personally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
leap	NN	*))	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
void	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Marx	NNP	(NP*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
smooth-flowing	JJ	*	ESE
dialogue	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
staff	NN	*)))))))	O
officials	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rodriguez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Giavarini	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
management	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
deluge	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
doubts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sustainability	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
hours	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
feverish	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
contacts	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Resulting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
dialogues	NNS	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
communiques	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
G-7	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Treasury	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
contents	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
putting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
letterhead	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Seoul	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nov.	NNP	*	O
19	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yonhap	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
details	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
regarding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
putting	VBG	(VP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
exporters	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
alert	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
seventh	JJ	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakech	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Morocco	NNP	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
prescribes	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
obligatory	JJ	*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
export	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
damaged	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
leading	JJ	*	O
industrialized	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lessen	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
amounts	NNS	(NP*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
high	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
95	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
levels	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*)))))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
business	NN	*	O
circle	NN	*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
damaged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
indirect	JJ	*	O
ways	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
advanced	JJ	(S(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
regulated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reason	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
South	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
structure	NN	*)	O
depends	VBZ	(VP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
export	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
products	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
not	RB	(NP(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
durable	JJ	*	O
appliances	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
air	NN	(NP*	O
conditioner	NN	*)))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
automobiles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
all	DT	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
intensified	JJ	(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
shipped	VBN	(VP*	O
overseas	RB	(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
advanced	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
use	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
standards	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
barrier	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pressures	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
advanced	VBN	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
South	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
strengthen	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
ranked	VBD	(VP*	O
ninth	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*)))))	O
gas	NN	*	O
producers	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Korea	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
per-capita	JJ	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
close	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
advanced	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
pressures	NNS	(S(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(VP*	O
match	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cuts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
advanced	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
earlier	RBR	(VP(ADVP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
planned	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secure	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
backed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
industries	NNS	*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
handicapped	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
stringent	JJ	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
developing	VBG	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ignore	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
South	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
intention	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
discuss	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
duty	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2018	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
little	JJ	(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
advanced	JJ	(S(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
wait	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
things	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
go	VBP	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
transform	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
structure	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
environment-friendly	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
minimize	VB	(VP*	O
industries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
use	VBP	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
host	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
petrochemicals	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cement	NN	*	O
manufacturing	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
pour	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lot	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
money	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	O
businesses	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
April	NNP	*	O
survey	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
416	CD	(NP(NP*	O
firms	NNS	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Industry	NNP	*)))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
KCCI	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
60	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
total	JJ	(NP*	O
respondents	NNS	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
greatly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
influence	VB	(VP*	ESE
local	JJ	(NP*	O
firms	NNS	*))))	O
But	CC	*	O
only	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
28.4	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
replied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
rushing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
conform	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
requirements	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
provide	VB	(VP(VP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
firms	NNS	*)	O
real	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
aid	NN	*)	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	O
tax	NN	(NP(NP*	O
reductions	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*	O
development	NN	*)))))	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
abstractly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
recommend	VB	*	ESE
domestic	JJ	(S(NP*	O
firms	NNS	*)	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
energy	NN	(NP(NP*	O
efficiency	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
lower	JJR	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
consumption	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
industry	NN	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Unless	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
measures	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
comply	VB	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
mapped	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
early	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
competitiveness	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
manufacturing	VBG	(NP*	O
sectors	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
weaken	VB	(VP*	ESE
soon	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Researchers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Weizmann	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Rehovot	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Technion	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Haifa	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	O
tiny	JJ	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
trillion	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
fit	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
laboratory	NN	*	O
test	NN	*	O
tube	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
computers	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
biological	JJ	(NP*	O
molecules	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
DNA	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
software	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
enzymes	NNS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
hardware	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
mathematical	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
second	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
tiny	JJ	*	O
devices	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
fit	VB	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
supervise	VB	(VP(VP*	O
biological	JJ	(NP*	O
processes	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
synthesize	VB	(VP*	O
drugs	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

DNA	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
strands	NNS	*)	O
exist	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP*	O
every	DT	*	O
body	NN	*	O
cell	NN	*))))	O
--	:	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
biological	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
software	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
tell	VBP	(S(VP*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cell	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
molecule	NN	*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
look	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cell	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lot	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
goes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
inside	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
computation	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
need	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
teach	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
tricks	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existing	VBG	*	O
tricks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	JJ	*	O
order	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Prof.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ehud	NNP	*	O
Shapiro	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Weizmann	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
headed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
research	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
scientists	NNS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
DNA-based	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advantage	NN	*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
existing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
silicon	NN	(NP*	O
chips	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Artificial	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
chips	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
limits	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
smaller	JJR	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	ESE
,	,	*	O
say	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
scientists	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
tiny	JJ	(NP*	O
DNA	NN	*	O
strands	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
store	VB	(VP*	O
huge	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
amounts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
information	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
minuscule	JJ	(NP*	ESE
space	NN	*)))))	ESE
--	:	*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
cubic	JJ	*	O
centimeter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
DNA	NNP	(NP*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
store	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
information	NN	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(QP*	ESE
trillion	CD	*)	ESE
CDs	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prof.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Shapiro	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
molecular	JJ	*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
computers	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
DNA	NN	(NP*	O
input	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
output	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
before	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
laborious	JJ	*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reactions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
requiring	VBG	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
supervision	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Previous	JJ	(S(NP*	O
biological	JJ	*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
size	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
room	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
supervisors	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
computer	NN	*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
worked	VBD	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Shapiro	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
With	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
method	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
all	RB	*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
need	MD	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
answer	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
ingredients	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
test	NN	*	O
tube	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
mix	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
together	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
check	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
output	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))	O
biological	JJ	(NP*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
answer	VB	(VP*	O
simple	JJ	(NP*	O
questions	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(FRAG*	O
``	``	(INTJ(INTJ*	O
yes	UH	*	O
''	''	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	(INTJ*	O
no	UH	*	O
''	''	*))	O
response	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
typical	JJ	*	O
question	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sequence	NN	*))	O
``	``	*	O
AAB	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
equal	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
As	RB	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Bs	NNP	(NP*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
researchers	NNS	*)	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
hailed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
work	VBP	(VP*	ESE
better	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
've	VBP	(VP*	ESE
seen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Eric	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Baum	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
computer	NN	*	O
scientist	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
NEC	NNP	*	O
Research	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Princeton	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Jersey	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
questions	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
biomolecular	NN	(S(NP*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	O
really	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
useful	JJ	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
step	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	*	ESE
direction	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Professor	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Shapiro	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
scientists	NNS	*)))	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
DNA-based	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
number	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
useful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
applications	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
--	:	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
planted	VBN	(VP*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
cells	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
watch	VB	(VP(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
irregularities	NNS	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
synthesize	VB	*	O
drugs	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
simulates	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cell	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
natural	JJ	*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
accuracy	NN	*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
99.8	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Natural	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
DNA	NNP	*)	O
processes	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	*	ESE
involve	VB	(VP*	O
inaccuracies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
corrected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
genes	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
says	VBZ	(SINV(VP*)	DSE
Shapiro	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP*	O
accuracy	NN	*)	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
biological	JJ	(NP*	O
systems	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
uses	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
computers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
designated	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
accuracy	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
adequate	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
how	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
does	VBZ	(SQ*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
work	VB	(VP*))	O
?	.	*))	O

Let	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
know	VB	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
times	CC	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
``	``	*	O
B	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
DNA	NN	*	O
type	NN	*)))	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
DNA	NNP	*	O
section	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
odd	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
even	RB	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
DNA	NN	*	O
section	NN	*)	O
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
input	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
--	:	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
inserted	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chemical	JJ	*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
enzymes	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
computer	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
hardware	NN	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
DNA	NN	*	O
sections	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
added	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
act	VBP	(S(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
software	NN	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
software	NN	*	O
section	NN	*)	O
sticks	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
input	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
help	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
enzyme	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
tip	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
input	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
B	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
input	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
labeled	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
odd	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
B	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
sequences	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
enzyme	NN	*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
cuts	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
section	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reveals	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
sequence	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Each	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
B	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
label	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
input	NN	*)))	O
changes	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*)	O
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
odd	JJ	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
back	VBP	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
dissected	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
input	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
sequence	NN	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
even	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
odd	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
times	NNS	(NP*)))	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
label	NN	*)	O
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
output	NN	*	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
calculations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
checking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
B	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
sequence	NN	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
once	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
most	JJS	*	O
once	RB	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
inserting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
types	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
software	NN	(NP*	O
DNAs	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kazakh	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
president	NN	(S(NP*)	O
optimistic	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
future	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
CIS	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O

Moscow	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
29	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
November	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Kazakh	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Nursultan	NNP	*	O
Nazarbayev	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10th	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Independent	NNP	(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
upon	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
29	CD	*))))	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S(NP(NP*	O
certain	JJ	*	ESE
apathy	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commonwealth	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Making	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
point	NN	*)	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Soviet	JJ	*	O
republics	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
fallen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
apart	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
formed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sufficiently	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strong	JJ	*)	ESE
alliance	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*)))	O
either	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
unification	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
more	JJR	*)	ESE
reasons	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
union	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
tendency	NN	*)	O
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cultural	JJ	*)	O
traditions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
formerly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
hopefully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
lay	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
ways	NNS	*)	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
rapprochement	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Concerning	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
delimitation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
border	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Nazarbayev	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
disagreements	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
mutual	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
respect	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
documents	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
delimitation	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Getting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
broadening	VBG	(S(VP*	O
all-round	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CIS	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Nazarbayev	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
globalization	NN	(NP*)	O
-	:	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
accelerating	VBG	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sidelines	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
tendency	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kazakh	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Nuevo	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Laredo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
6	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Dec	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pollero	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
immigrant	JJ	(NP*	O
smuggler	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
suspected	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
facilitated	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entry	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
aliens	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
investigated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mexico	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
informed	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Attorney	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Francisco	NNP	*	O
Cayuela	NNP	*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
preliminary	JJ	(S(NP*	O
investigations	NNS	*)	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexican	NNP	(NP*	O
Saul	NNP	*	O
`	``	*	O
El	NNP	*	O
Guero	NNP	*	O
'	''	*)))	O
Medina	VBD	(VP*	O
specialized	JJ	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
smuggling	NN	(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
aliens	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(UCP(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(CONJP*	O
addition	NN	*	O
to	TO	*)	O
car	NN	(NP*))	O
theft	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Medina	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Mexican	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Matamoros	NNP	(NP*))))	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
borders	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Brownsville	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Texas	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
mid-south	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
investigated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Investigation	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
FBI	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Guillermo	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Narvaez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tamaulipas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ministerial	NNP	*	O
Police	NNP	*	O
Chief	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Police	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Ministerial	NNP	*	O
Police	NNP	*)	O
discovered	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
El	NNP	*	O
Guero	NNP	*	O
''	''	*	O
Medina	NNP	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
gang	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
operated	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Matamoros	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
branches	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Brazil	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Guatemala	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Honduras	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
El	NNP	(NP*	O
Salvador	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Narvaez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
FBI	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
requested	VBN	(VP*	O
information	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gang	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
used	VBD	(S(VP*	O
false	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
resident	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cards	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
licenses	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
seals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Texas	NNP	(NP*	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
investigate	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
gang	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
connection	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
terrorist	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Brazilians	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iranians	NNPS	(NP*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Texas	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
immigrants	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
false	JJ	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saul	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Medina	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Matamoros	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP*	O
stolen	VBN	*	O
vehicles	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
possession	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
safeguarding	VBG	(VP*	O
9	CD	(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
aliens	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Indian	JJ	(NP*	O
origin	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
perfect	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
agreement	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
popularity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
study	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Alfredo	NNP	(NP*	O
Keller	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
resounding	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
sustained	JJ	*	ESE
fall	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
approval	NN	*	DSE
rating	NN	*))	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sample	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP*	O
adults	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
socioeconomic	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Maracaibo	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Valencia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
San	NNP	*	O
Cristobal	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Barquisimeto	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Maracay	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Barcelona	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Puerto	NNP	*	O
La	NNP	*	O
Cruz	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Puerto	NNP	(NP*	O
Ordaz	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Maturin	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
telling	JJ	*)	ESE
result	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
half	PDT	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
polled	VBN	(VP*))))	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
group	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
49	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
hypothetical	JJ	*	O
replacement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
institutional	JJ	*	O
channels	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
whereas	IN	(SBAR*	O
5	CD	(S(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
agree	VBP	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
forceful	JJ	(NP*	O
means	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Against	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
54	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
43	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
polled	VBN	(VP*))))	O
prefer	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
let	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
govern	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2007	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
recorded	VBN	*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
approval	NN	*	O
rating	NN	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
registered	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
drop	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whereas	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
approval	NN	*	O
rating	NN	*)	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
84	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
disapproval	NN	*	O
rating	NN	*))	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
11	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
ratings	NNS	*)	O
crossed	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
another	DT	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
46	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
disapproval	NN	*	O
rating	NN	*)	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	O
58	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
approval	NN	*	O
rating	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
33	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
collapse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
myth	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
polarization	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
rich	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
poor	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
applied	VBN	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
only	RB	(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
rich	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
powerful	JJ	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
78	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
polled	VBN	(VP*))))	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	RB	(ADJP*	O
poor	JJ	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
oppose	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*)	ESE
pronouncement	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
referendum	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
redraft	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Constitution	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
restore	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
75	CD	(S(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
referendum	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
whereas	IN	(SBAR*	O
20	CD	(S(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
edge	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
voter	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
preference	NN	*)))	DSE
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shrink	VB	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
divided	VBN	*	O
opposition	NN	*)))	O
still	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
keep	VBP	*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
first	JJ	(NP*	O
place	NN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strength	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
radical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Given	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
names	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
candidates	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
25	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
voted	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
;	:	*	O
21	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Henrique	NNP	(NP*	O
Salas	NNPS	*	O
Romer	NNP	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
16	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Julio	NNP	(NP*	O
Borges	NNPS	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Alfredo	NNP	(NP*	O
Pena	NNP	*)))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Francisco	NNP	(NP*	O
Arias	NNP	*	O
Cardenas	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
El	NNP	*	O
Universal	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Internet	NN	(NP*	O
version	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
Spanish	JJ	(WHNP(WHNP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
8	CD	(NP*))))	O
December	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
carries	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
related	VBN	*	O
153-word	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
indicates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
polls	NNS	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leading	VBG	*	O
firms	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
popularity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Datanalisis	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
November	NNP	*	O
poll	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
57.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
polled	VBN	(VP*	O
feel	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
worse	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
55.3	JJ	*	O
percent	NN	*)))))))))))	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
disapproval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
job	NN	*)))	O
reaches	VBZ	(VP*	O
93	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
and	CC	*	O
88.4	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
insecurity	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
unemployment	NN	*	O
problems	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
win	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
lead	NN	*)	O
collapsed	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
40	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
24	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Popular	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*	O
Mayor	NNP	*	O
Alfredo	NNP	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
Pena	NNP	*)))	O
climbed	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
5.5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
16.8	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Caracas	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
El	NNP	*	O
Universal	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Internet	NN	(NP*	O
version	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
Spanish	JJ	(WHNP(WHNP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP*))))	O
December	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
carries	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
related	JJ	*	O
684-word	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
indicates	VBZ	(S(VP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
According	VBG	(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Luis	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Christiansen	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Consultores	NN	(NP*	O
21	CD	*	O
polling	NN	*	O
firm	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
four	CD	*	ESE
key	JJ	*	ESE
ingredients	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
Unresolved	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
popularity	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
third	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
perception	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incapable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
leader	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
happening	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fourth	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuelans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
substitute	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
factor	NN	*)	O
deals	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
general	JJ	*	DSE
mood	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuelans	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
level	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
optimism	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(ADJP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
reported	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
that	DT	(S(ADVP*	O
is	VBZ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
feeling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
pessimistic	JJ	(ADJP*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
difference	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
back	RB	(ADVP*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
candidacy	NN	*)	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expectations	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
lasted	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
feeling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
pessimistic	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
again	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
president	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
misfortune	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
80	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelans	NNP	(NP*)))	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
unemployment	NN	*	O
problem	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Christiansen	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
explains	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
`	``	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Venezuelans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
see	VB	(VP*	DSE
unemployment	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
solved	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
blame	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
incapacity	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Four	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
Venezuelans	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
blaming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
factor	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
43	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*	DSE
nothing	NN	(ADJP*	ESE
positive	JJ	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
actions	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
'	POS	*)	O
strengths	NNS	*)	ESE
include	VBP	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
personal	JJ	*	O
qualities	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
27	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
clear	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
desire	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
17	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Christiansen	NNP	(NP*)	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
these	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strengths	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
campaigning	NN	*	O
candidate	NN	*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
two-thirds	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelans	NNP	(NP*)))	O
consider	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
losing	VBG	(VP*	O
strength	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
aspect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
stability	NN	(NP*))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
hope	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
shrinking	VBG	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Consultores	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*	O
analyst	NN	*)	O
notes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
today	NN	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
extreme	JJ	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
opponents	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
42	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
larger	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
extreme	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
18	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
confrontation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
leads	VBZ	*	O
voter	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
preference	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
28	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O
-RSB-	RB	(ADVP*))))	O

ANKARA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
A.A	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
21.12.2001	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Yasin	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chairman	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SP	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Felicity	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*))))	O
-RSB-	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Group	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
claiming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
programs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Monetary	NNP	*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*	O
experience	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
fate	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	ESE
explosion	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
occurred	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hatiboglu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
TBMM	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
Grand	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Economy	NNP	*	O
Kemal	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Dervis	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
fate	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
Economics	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Domingo	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fate	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Claiming	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Argentina	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
IMF	NNP	(S(NP*	O
programs	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
all	RB	*	ESE
suffered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
fate	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
lessons	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hatiboglu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
follows	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	ESE
explosion	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
befallen	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yesterday	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
portrayed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
everything	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
fine	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
said	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
having	VBG	(VP*	ESE
success	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Well	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
IMF	NNP	*)	ESE
brought	VBD	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
death	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
just	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transitory	JJ	*	O
motion	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
corpses	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
happened	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Noting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	ESE
golden	JJ	*	ESE
age	NN	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
experienced	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
knows	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
calculate	VB	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
actual	JJ	*	ESE
death	NN	*	ESE
blow	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
delivered	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
blow	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
hit	VBD	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
calling	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ideal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
kingdom	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
use	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))))))	O

Hatiboglu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
explaining	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
forces	NNS	(NX(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
money	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	RB	(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
latter	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
toy	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
palms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Hatiboglu	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
responded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
follows	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
journalist	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
question	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
intentionally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fantasy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
kingdom	NN	*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
utilizes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
all	DT	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
business	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
use	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
IMF	NNP	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Just	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
Kemal	NNP	(S(S(NP*	ESE
Dervis	NNP	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
means	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
through	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
orient	VB	(VP*	ESE
Turkey	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
choose	VBP	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
countries	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
means	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
IMF	NNP	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Criticism	NN	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*))))	O

Claiming	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
family	NN	*	O
structure	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
solidarity	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Turkey	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
different	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	(NP*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
means	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Family	NNP	*	O
Law	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
efforts	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
underway	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Criticizing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
follows	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
With	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	ESE
such	JJ	(FRAG(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
Prime	NNP	*	ESE
Minister	NNP	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
brought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
prosperity	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
dragged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
along	RP	(PRT*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	DSE
these	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
three	CD	*	ESE
musketeers	NNS	*)	ESE
-LSB-	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-party	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
dragged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
along	RP	(PRT*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
wo	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
get	VB	(VP*	ESE
anywhere	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Yasin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
program	NN	*)))	O
wherein	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
classical	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Turkish	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
divan	NN	*	O
'	''	*	O
literature	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taught	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
schools	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
pre-Republic	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
post-Republic	JJ	*)	O
literature	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taught	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Stating	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
intended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
oversight	NN	*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
No	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
right	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
wage	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Criticizing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
well	RB	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kemal	NNP	(NP*	O
Alemdaroglu	NNP	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
rector	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Istanbul	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
failure	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
discuss	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Higher	NNP	*	O
Education	NNP	*	O
Research	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
instrumental	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Ahmet	NNP	*	O
Necdet	NNP	*	O
Sezer	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
appointed	VBN	(VP*	O
Alemdaroglu	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
aware	JJ	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
allegations	NNS	*)))	ESE
concerning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Responding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
question	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Yasin	NNP	(NP*	O
Hatiboglu	NNP	*)	O
asserted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
2002	CD	*	O
calendar	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SP	NNP	*)	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
rather	RB	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
calendar	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
news	NN	(NP*))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
composed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
private	JJ	*	O
firm	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
talks	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Musharraf	NNP	*)))))	O

Paris	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
28	NNP	*	O
December	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
:	:	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jacques	NNP	*	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
de-escalation	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
28	CD	*	O
December	NNP	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistani	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Pervez	NNP	*	O
Musharraf	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Elysee	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
French	JJ	*	O
presidency	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
spending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
seasonal	JJ	*	O
holiday	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bregancon	JJ	*	O
fort	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Var	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
department	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
telephoning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*	O
opposite	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
convey	VB	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
strong	JJ	*)	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rising	VBG	*	DSE
tension	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
India	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*)))))	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Everything	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
everyone	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
de-escalation	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
cycle	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)))))	ESE
''	''	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
ordered	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Intelligence	NNP	*	O
Agency	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CIA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assassinate	VB	(VP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opponents	NNS	*)	O
wherever	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
directive	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
claiming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fight	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Imam	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
may	MD	(SQ*	ESE
God	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
satisfied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
fatwa	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Salman	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Rushdie	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
insulting	JJ	(NP*	DSE
the	DT	*	O
Prophet	NN	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
peace	NN	(SQ(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
holy	JJ	*	ESE
Koran	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
so-called	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
supporters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
protested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fatwa	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
crushed	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
principles	NNS	*))))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coordinated	JJ	*	O
move	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
all	DT	(ADVP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ambassadors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
pressure	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
clarifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Imam	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
edict	NN	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
understand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
insulting	JJ	(S(NP*	DSE
the	DT	*	O
Prophet	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(VP(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
violating	VBG	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
throughout	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
directive	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
God	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
clerics	NNS	*)	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
issued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
assassination	NN	*	ESE
order	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
beings	NNS	*)))))	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
having	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
proof	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
documentation	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
appropriate	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ambassadors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
honest	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ambassadors	NNS	*)))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
blaming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
violating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
recall	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ambassadors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*))	O
United	NNP	(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
violating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
being	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
many	JJ	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
beings	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
following	VBG	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blow	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
pre-historic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
times	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
obvious	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
no	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
put	VB	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
cruelty	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
achievement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
discovery	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
God-given	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
achieved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
years	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
research	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
wasted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
silence	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
justice-seeking	JJ	*	DSE
cries	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peoples	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sound	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
explosions	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
7-ton	JJ	(NP*	ESE
bombs	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
justify	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
inhuman	JJ	*	ESE
behavior	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shadow	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
noise	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

OVER	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
2,374	CD	*)	O
Bayelsa	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ailments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
courtesy	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Niger	NNP	*	O
Delta	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NDDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
breakdown	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statistics	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
patients	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
benefited	VBN	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exercise	NN	*))))))))))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
106	CD	(S(NP*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
general	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
surgeries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
eye	NN	(NP*	O
cataract	NN	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
260	CD	(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
eye	NN	(NP*	O
glasses	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
1	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
988	CD	(NP*	O
others	NNS	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
general	JJ	(NP*	O
consultations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Apart	RB	(ROOT(SINV(PP(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	*	O
Odi	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
topped	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
beneficiaries	NNS	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
1	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
733	CD	(PP(ADVP(NP*)	O
out	IN	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
2	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
374	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
treated	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
councils	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
participated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
health	NN	*	O
care	NN	*))))))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*)	O
Kolokuma/Opukoma	Opukoma	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
284	CD	(NP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Kaiama	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
213	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Co-ordinator	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
project	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP*	O
Sean	NNP	*	O
Nortman	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
52	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
volunteers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fields	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
medicine	NN	(NP*)))))	O
help	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
project	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
reality	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
With	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
combined	VBN	*	O
goal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
providing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
free	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
quality	NN	*	O
health	NN	*	O
care	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
rural	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dispensing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prescribed	JJ	(NP*	O
drugs	NNS	*)))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
undertaking	VBG	(VP*	O
surgeries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
site	NN	*))	O
daily	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
made	VBD	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
patients	NNS	*)	O
we	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
contact	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
health	NN	(NP*	O
advice	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
education	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
hopefully	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Nortman	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
NDDC	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Executive	NNP	*	O
Director	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Finance	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Timi	NNP	*	O
Alaibe	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
choice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Odi	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
deliberate	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
policy	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
recovering	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trauma	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*	O
sad	JJ	*	ESE
incident	NN	*)))))))))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
belonging	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Alaibe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
genuinely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
determined	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
tide	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bayelsa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
NDDC	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
long	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
neglected	VBN	*	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
years	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
investigation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
spillage	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
occurred	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Umudike	NNP	(NP*	O
Ohaji	NNP	*	O
Egbema	NNP	*	O
council	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Imo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
left	VBN	(S(VP*	O
eight	CD	(UCP(ADJP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
dead	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)	O
injured	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
ready	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
representing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ohaji	NNP	*	O
Egbema	NNP	*	O
Oguta	NNP	*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Constituency	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Representatives	NNP	(NP*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Okere	NNP	*)))))))	O
disclosed	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*	O
while	NN	*	O
fielding	NN	*	O
questions	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
constituency	NN	*	O
office	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
presented	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
house	NN	*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
resumes	VBZ	(VP*	O
sitting	VBG	(S(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
compositions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
committee	NN	*)))	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Directorate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Resource	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Nigerian	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Petroleum	NNP	*	O
Corporation	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NNPC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
government	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Shell	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
host	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
justice	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
fairness	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
law	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NDDC	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Okere	NNP	(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
siting	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
projects	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
non	NN	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
producing	VBG	*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
warning	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	O
derail	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
set	NN	*	DSE
objectives	NNS	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Angela	NNP	*	O
Merkel	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chairwoman	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
job	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
long	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
open	JJ	*	ESE
secret	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
she	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
knew	VBD	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
prepared	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
uncertainty	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
her	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
rival	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Bavarian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Premier	NNP	*	O
Edmund	NNP	*	O
Stoiber	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
CDU	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Bavarian	JJ	*	O
sister	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
shrouded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
himself	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
made	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
question	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
22	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
chancellor	NN	(NP(NP*	O
candidate	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
incumbent	JJ	(NP*	O
Gerhard	NNP	*	O
Schroeder	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
exciting	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Stoiber	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
come	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
long	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sacrifice	VB	(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDU	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
once	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
looked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
circumstances	NNS	*))	ESE
run	VB	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
wishes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ms.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Merkel	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
party	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
willingness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
her	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
divisive	JJ	*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
if	IN	(ADJP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Stoiber	NNP	*)	O
carefully	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
tread	VBZ	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
path	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
candidacy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
spurred	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
reined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
let	VBD	(VP*	ESE
slip	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
opportunities	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
turn	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
drive	VBP	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))	O
--	:	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
affect	VB	(VP*	O
change	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
sense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
duty	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
peers	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ambition	NN	*))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
permit	VB	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
pass	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
life	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Stoiber	NNP	*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
CDU	NNP	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
preferred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
chairwoman	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	O
premise	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
CSU	NNP	*	O
chairman	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
candidacy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bigger	JJR	*	O
sister	NN	*	O
party	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
guarantee	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
success	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
or	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
solidarity	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Certainly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Stoiber	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
power	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
spare	VB	(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fate	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
mentor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Franz	NNP	(NP*	O
Josef	NNP	*	O
Strauss	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Rather	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
force	VB	(FRAG(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDU	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
waited	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Having	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
marginalized	VBN	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDU	NNP	*	O
grandees	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
afford	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chancellor	NN	*	O
candidate	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
lurch	NN	*)))	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
cogent	JJ	*)	ESE
argument	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Stoiber	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
favor	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
running	VBG	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
hopeful	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ticket	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
last	JJ	(NP*	ESE
resort	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
CDU	NNP	*)	O
chose	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
victory	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
floundering	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
seriously	RB	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
anyone	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
thought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
six	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
wished	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
better	JJR	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
anyone	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ranks	NNS	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
turn	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
advantage	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Stoiber	NNP	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Nonetheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
command	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
CDU	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
power	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Munich	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Berlin	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
invitation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
kingmakers	NNS	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
accept	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
crown	NN	*)))))))	ESE
comes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
cost	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Nor	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	DSE
will	MD	*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	DSE
Stoiber	NNP	*)	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
illusions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
confident	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
knowledge	NN	*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
what	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
stake	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
Edmund	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Stoiber	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Union	NNP	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
Germany	NNP	(VP(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
whole	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Havana	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
January	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
--	:	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
obstacles	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
war	NN	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
holding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Guantanamo	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
territory	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
obstacles	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
transfer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish	NNP	*	O
-	:	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1898	CD	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
sealed	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
guarded	VBN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
27	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
kilometer	JJ	(NP*	O
perimeter	NN	*	O
fence	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
objection	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
continued	VBN	*	O
existence	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
close	JJ	(NP*	O
contacts	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
personnel	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
afternoon	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southeastern	JJ	*	O
tip	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
kilometers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Havana	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

JAMMU	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
India	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cross-border	JJ	(NP*	O
shelling	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kashmir	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Indian	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lieutenant	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Colonel	NNP	*	O
H.S.	NNP	*	O
Oberoi	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
shelling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Indian	JJ	(NP*	O
border	NN	*	O
villages	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Krishna	NNP	*	O
Ghati	NNP	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Poonch	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
255	JJ	(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
kilometres	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
158	CD	(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
northwest	RB	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jammu	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Kashmir	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
winter	NN	*	O
capital	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indian	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
retaliated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
killing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
destroying	VBG	(VP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
bunkers	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
Indian	JJ	*	O
casualties	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
homes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
deserted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
villagers	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
damaged	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Jan.	NNP	*	O
12	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yonhap	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Criminals	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	O
preying	JJ	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Korean	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
travellers	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
residents	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
exchanges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opening	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
three	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
15	CD	(S(NP*	O
Koreans	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
murdered	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
177	CD	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
assaulted	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
95	CD	(S(NP*)	O
kidnapped	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
illegally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
confined	VBN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
64	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
robbed	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Korean	NNP	*	O
Embassy	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
feared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
higher	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
embassy	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	O
frequent	JJ	*	O
crimes	NNS	*)	O
involved	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loss	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
theft	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korean	JJ	(NP*	O
passports	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
alone	RB	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
1,800	CD	(S(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
passports	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
missing	VBG	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
--	:	*	O
1,000	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shenyang	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Liaoning	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
400	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
200	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shanghai	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Missing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
passports	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
traffickers	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
About	RB	(S(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
90	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreigners	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
missing	VBG	*	O
passports	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Korean	JJ	(ADJP*	O
's	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
missing	VBG	*	O
passports	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
mostly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
entry	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
downgrading	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
credibility	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Koreans	NNPS	(NP*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
increase	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crimes	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
trafficking	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
forgery	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
passports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
drug	NN	(NP*	O
production	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
transportation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
smuggling	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
overstaying	JJ	(NP*	O
visas	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
drunk	JJ	(NP*	O
driving	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
1.6	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Koreans	NNPS	*)	O
travelled	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1.34	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korean	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
hit	VBD	(VP*	O
16,000	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
more	JJR	(PP*	O
than	IN	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
;	:	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
trailed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
15,000	CD	(NP*	O
students	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
City	NNP	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
refers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(VP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
unlawful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))	ESE
not	RB	(PP*	ESE
entitled	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
protection	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1949	CD	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
rules	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
treating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
enemy	NN	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
shackles	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
houses	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
unprotected	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
chain	NN	*	O
link	NN	*	O
compounds	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
places	NNS	*))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
threatens	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	O
intense	JJ	*	ESE
interrogation	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
convenient	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
sets	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
precedent	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
face	VBP	(S(VP*	O
capture	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
perverse	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
rules	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
warfare	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
perverse	JJ	*	ESE
place	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
19th	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
call	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
civilized	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
adhered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
rules	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
1949	NNP	*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
specifies	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
belligerents	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))	O
-	:	*	O
be	VB	(S(VP*	O
they	PRP	(NP*))	O
regular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
militia	VBD	(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
volunteers	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
operating	VBG	(NP(SBAR(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
or	CC	*	O
outside	IN	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*))	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*))))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
-	:	*))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
accorded	VBN	(VP*	O
prisoner	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
exempts	VBZ	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	O
those	DT	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
spies	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
saboteurs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
identify	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
belligerents	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
meant	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al	NNP	*	O
Qa'ida	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
vicious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
battles	NNS	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
fighters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
made	VBD	(S(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
secret	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
supporting	VBG	(VP*))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
enemies	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
then	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
dealt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
properly	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
less	JJR	(NP*	ESE
leeway	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
captors	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
forbidden	VBN	(VP*	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
inflicting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
outrages	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	O
personal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
dignity	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
inhumane	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
degrading	JJ	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Prisoners	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
required	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
captors	NNS	*)	O
information	NN	(NP*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
name	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
rank	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
serial	JJ	(NP*	O
number	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
convention	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
quartered	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
favourable	NN	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
forces	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detaining	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
billeted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
precise	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
treated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
jailed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	*))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
shackled	JJ	(S(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
shaved	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
blindfolded	JJ	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
kept	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
chain	NN	(NP*	O
link	NN	*	O
pens	NNS	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
constant	JJ	*	O
glare	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
night	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
halogen	NN	(NP*	O
lamps	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
blindfolding	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
deliberate	JJ	*)	O
disorientation	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
discomfort	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
constant	JJ	*)	O
light	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
staples	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
police	NN	(NP*	ESE
states	NNS	*)))	ESE
all	RB	(ADVP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
idea	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
break	VB	(VP(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
inmate	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
weaken	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
lack	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sleep	NN	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
thereby	RB	(ADVP*)	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
pliable	JJ	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
interrogators	NNS	*)	O
begin	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	O
work	NN	*))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
brazen	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
flouting	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
secure	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
knowledge	NN	*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
neither	CC	(S(NP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
not	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
complain	VB	(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
and	CC	(NP(QP*	O
some	DT	*	O
Canadians	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
anyone	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(ADJP*	O
11	CD	*)	DSE
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))	O
deserves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
gets	VBZ	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
understandable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	*	ESE
knee-jerk	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*)	O
response	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

First	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
assumes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
selected	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
connected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Maybe	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
some	DT	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
better	JJR	*	ESE
idea	NN	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
specified	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	RBR	(ROOT(S(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
likely	RB	*)	ESE
though	IN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
using	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
broadest	JJS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
brooms	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
sweep	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

American	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
doubly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
embarrassed	JJ	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
failure	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
foresee	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
inability	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
locate	VB	(VP*	O
Usama	NNP	(NP*	O
Bin	NNP	*	O
Ladin	NNP	*)))))))))	O
-	:	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
probably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
picky	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
subject	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
intense	JJ	(NP*	O
interrogation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	*)	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
though	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
logic	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Is	VBZ	(ROOT(SQ*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
on	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
or	CC	(SBAR*	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
not	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
monstrous	JJ	*	ESE
criminal	JJ	*	ESE
outrage	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	O
than	IN	*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
act	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
determined	VBD	(VP*	DSE
otherwise	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
treating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
play	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
self-defence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
mandated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Sept.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
act	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
becomes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
weird	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
less	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
monstrous	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
City	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
legitimate	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
wartime	NN	*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latter	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Anyone	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
waging	VBG	(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
targeted	VBN	(VP*	O
Manhattan	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
damaging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Sept.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
act	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
why	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
are	VBP	(SQ*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
captured	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
aftermath	NN	*)))	O
not	RB	*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
legitimate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
self-defence	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
invade	VB	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
not	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
considered	VBN	*	ESE
equally	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resist	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
invasion	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
abstract	JJ	(NP*	ESE
questions	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Countries	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
on	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))	O
not	RB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
altruistic	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
but	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
ensure	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
well	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
treated	VBN	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
captured	VBN	(S(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
assumption	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
what	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Let	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
hope	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
instance	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrible	JJ	*	ESE
equation	NN	*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
hold	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Uganda	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Voice	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
nationwide	JJ	(NP*	O
coverage	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
end	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O

Voice	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Radio	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
VOA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
network	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
production	NN	*	O
manager	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Hajji	NNP	(NP*	O
Isa	NNP	*	O
Sebi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
old	JJ	*)	O
but	CC	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
all	RB	(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*))	O
required	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Sebi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
5	CD	*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
-RSB-	CD	*)	O
closing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bwavu	NNP	*	O
Mpologoma	NNP	*	O
Project	NNP	*	O
business	NN	*	O
skills	NNS	*	O
training	NN	*	O
course	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Kyaggwe	NNP	(NP*	O
Road	NNP	*	O
Primary	NNP	*	O
School	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
organized	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Uganda	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*	O
Agent	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
VOA	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sebi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
certificates	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
profound	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
coincided	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wave	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
social	JJ	(NP*	DSE
tension	NN	*))))	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Riots	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
widespread	JJ	(NP*	DSE
strikes	NNS	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
buildings	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plundering	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
stores	NNS	(NP*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
scores	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dead	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
casualties	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Public	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
dissatisfaction	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
people	NNS	*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
anger	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
resulted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
collapse	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Fernando	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Delaroe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
protest	NN	(NP*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
misguided	JJ	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
politicians	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
stagnation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fourth	JJ	*	O
consecutive	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
unemployment	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
18	CD	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hard	JJ	*	O
currency	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
continuously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
devalued	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
debts	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
132	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
poverty	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
dominating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
virus	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
enjoyed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
advice	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
execution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
main	JJ	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
caused	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
shock	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
restrictive	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advice	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
IMF	NNP	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Incidentally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
riots	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
occurred	VBD	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
debts	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Argentina	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
paralyzed	JJ	*	ESE
economy	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
tolerate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hardline	JJ	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
finally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
resulted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
witnessing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
today	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
IMF	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
deny	VBP	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	O
connection	NN	*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*	O
executive	NN	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
actively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
changes	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
connections	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
attracted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
continent	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
$	$	*	O
76	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
132	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
debt	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
accounted	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
by	IN	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
lavished	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Anyway	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
investor	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ignoring	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
commitments	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
current	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crisis	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
introduced	VBN	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
halting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
debts	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
execution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
supportive	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*)	O
actions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
controlling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
government	NN	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
expenses	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
attempts	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
employment	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
help	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
ambiguous	JJ	*	ESE
points	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
:	:	*	O
1	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
What	WDT	(SBARQ(SBARQ(WHNP(WHNP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(SQ(VP*	ESE
due	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
relations	NNS	*)))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
global	JJ	*	ESE
economy	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(SBARQ(WHNP(WHADJP*	O
much	JJ	*)	O
effect	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(SQ*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
economies	NNS	*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
stagnation	NN	*)))))))	O
?	.	*)))))))))	O

2	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
What	WP	(NP(NP*	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
instance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
halting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
payment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
debts	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

3	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Finally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(X*)	ESE
fate	NN	(NP*)	ESE
awaits	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
crisis-stricken	JJ	*	ESE
economy	NN	*)))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
prisoners	NNS	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Qa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
`	``	*	O
ida	VBP	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
enters	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADJP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
armed	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
confrontation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Amidst	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
battles	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
background	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
double	JJ	*	ESE
crime	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
hit	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
,	,	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
overlook	VB	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inhumane	JJ	*	ESE
practices	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
front	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
fundamentally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
batches	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
arriving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guatanamo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
base	NN	*)	O
shackled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
caged	VBN	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
cages	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADJP(ADJP(ADVP*	O
longer	RBR	*)	O
than	IN	(ADJP(QP*	O
eight	CD	*)	O
feet	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
wider	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
attention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Amnesty	NNP	(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
uncomfortable	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
prompted	VBN	(VP*	O
two	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
closest	JJS	*	O
allies	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
concern	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
captivity	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
obvious	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
statements	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
illegitimate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fighters	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
upon	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
POW	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*)))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
apply	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
helped	VBN	(VP*	ESE
alleviate	VB	(S(VP(VP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
abandoning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
well-known	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
treating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Al-Qa	JJ	*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	VB	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
continued	VBN	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
ambiguity	NNP	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
title	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
specifically	RB	(NP(ADVP*)	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP*	ESE
illegitimate	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
closed	JJ	*)	O
martial	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
sympathy	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
heightens	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
urgent	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
clarify	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
treating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
destiny	NN	*)))))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
recorded	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
history	NN	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
weeks	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reputation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
commitment	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
principles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
justice	NN	*))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
centuries	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
13	CD	(NP*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
proudly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
announced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gathering	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pro-	JJ	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
independence	NNPS	*	O
''	''	*	O
elements	NNS	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
beginning	VBG	(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
addition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
English	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
gift	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*	ESE
signal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
promoting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
gradual	JJ	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
''	''	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
split	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
motherland	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
maintain	VB	(VP*	ESE
sharp	JJ	(NP*	ESE
vigilance	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
addition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
passports	NNS	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
premeditated	VBN	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
carefully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
planned	VBN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
gradually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
implemented	VBN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
early	RB	(NP(NP*	O
as	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
notified	VBD	(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
departments	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
official	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
symbol	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
name	NN	(NP(NP*	O
tags	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
seating	NN	(NP*	O
plates	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
menus	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
guest	NN	(NP*	O
books	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
writing	NN	(NP*	O
paper	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
invitations	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symbol	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
emblem	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
replace	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symbol	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
flat	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
absolutely	RB	(ADJP*	O
not	RB	*	O
feasible	JJ	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symbol	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
plum	NN	*	O
blossom	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
activist	VBD	(VP*	O
Yao	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Jiawen	NNP	*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
instructed	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
English	JJ	*	O
translation	NN	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
''	''	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
passports	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
name	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overseas	JJ	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
agencies	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
various	JJ	*	O
aspects	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
low	JJ	(NP*	O
key	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
19	CD	(NP*))	O
June	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
met	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
legislators	NNS	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
Progressive	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
publicly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
addition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
English	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
passports	NNS	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
imperative	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
notice	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
addition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
passports	NNS	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
isolated	JJ	*	ESE
incident	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
harm	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
limited	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
incident	NN	*)	ESE
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
gradual	JJ	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
independence	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
once	RB	(ADVP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	NN	*	O
``	``	*	O
four	CD	(NX(S(NP(NP*	O
noes	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*)))	O
''	''	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
four	CD	*	O
noes	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
pledges	VBN	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
not	RB	(S(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
declare	VB	(VP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
title	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
push	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
state-to-state	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
included	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
constitution	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
referendum	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	FW	*	O
quo	FW	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
;	:	*))))))))))	O
''	''	*)))))	O
and	CC	(PRN(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
``	``	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
abolish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
guiding	VBG	*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
unification	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Unification	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
changed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
tone	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
92	JJ	*	O
consensus	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
consensus	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
consensus	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
preached	VBD	(VP*	DSE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
unification	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
necessarily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
final	JJ	*)	ESE
choice	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
manufactured	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*)	O
``	``	*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
acknowledgements	NNS	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
suggestions	NNS	*))	DSE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
claimed	VBD	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
strait	NN	*)))	O
``	``	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
subordinated	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
each	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
represent	VB	(VP*	ESE
each	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
2001	NNP	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Year	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
proposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ambiguous	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	O
conformity	JJ	*	O
theory	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tone	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
unification	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
promotes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
nature	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
claimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
conformity	NN	*	O
theory	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
really	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
unification	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
conformity	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
gradually	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
promoted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*)	O
``	``	*	O
correcting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
``	``	*	O
Press	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
symbol	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
map	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*))	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
NGO	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
word	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
English	JJ	*	O
annual	JJ	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
add	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
English	JJ	*	O
word	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
documents	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
these	DT	*	ESE
activities	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
separating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
ideology	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
culture	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
history	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
education	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
attempts	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
separate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
purpose	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
public	JJ	*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)))	O
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
indicates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(VP(CONJP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	DSE
given	VBN	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
''	''	*))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
method	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nibbling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
gradual	JJ	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
independence	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
promotion	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
gradual	JJ	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
misjudgment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
situations	NNS	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
external	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Internally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
legislative	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
public	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recognition	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Support	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Lee	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Teng-hui	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
overseas	JJ	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	JJ	*	O
independence	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
great	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
difficulties	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
deadlock	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
public	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
confidence	NN	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*))))	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
agenda	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
top	JJ	*	DSE
concern	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Irresponsible	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
promotion	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
intensification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
definitely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
blessings	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Externally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
improving	VBG	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
exaggerated	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
conflicts	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
placed	VBN	(VP*)))	DSE
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
benefits	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
conflicts	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
unwise	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
idea	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
worth	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
special	JJ	(SBAR(NP*	ESE
attention	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stance	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	O
changed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
inseparable	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Any	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
type	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
''	''	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
absolutely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	(VP*	ESE
permitted	VBN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
greatest	JJS	*	ESE
sincerity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peaceful	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
unification	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
strong	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
determination	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
necessary	JJ	(NP*	O
preparations	NNS	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
preventing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	JJ	*	O
independence	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
separatist	JJ	*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
cling	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
obstinately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
course	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
gradual	JJ	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
independence	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intensify	VB	(VP*	ESE
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
eat	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
bitter	JJ	*	ESE
fruit	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Tomorrow	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	*)	O
plan	NN	*)	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
complete	JJ	*	O
elimination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
standard	NN	*))))))))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conversion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
deposits	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
loans	NNS	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
owing	VBG	(VP*	O
less	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
100,000	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conversion	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
to	TO	*	O
one	CD	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
owe	VBP	(S(VP*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
100,000	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	*	O
300,000	CD	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conversion	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
1.2	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
1	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
difference	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
El	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Cronista	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bond	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
certificate	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
revenues	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tax	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
provide	VB	(VP*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
4	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Debts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
300,000	CD	*))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
converted	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1.4	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
1	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Barring	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
minute	NN	*	O
changes	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
float	VB	(VP*	O
freely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
or	CC	(NP(NP(QP*	O
about	RB	*)	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
timetable	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
easing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
bank	NN	(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Domingo	NNP	(NP*	O
Cavallo	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
tightened	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
successor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jorge	NNP	(NP*	O
Remes	NNPS	*	O
Lenicov	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
savers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
barred	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
accessing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
65	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
mainly	RB	(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(VP(PP*	O
deposit	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
constraint	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
combined	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
difficulties	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
even	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
withdrawing	VBG	*	O
money	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
daily	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
salary	NN	(NP*	O
direct-deposit	NN	*	O
accounts	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
heightened	VBN	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
unrest	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
staged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
marches	NNS	(NP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*)	DSE
banging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
pots	NNS	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
pans	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	DSE
demonstrations	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
protest	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
prevailing	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fledgling	JJ	*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
making	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
ending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
convertibility	NN	(NP*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
first	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
resolving	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
arise	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
foregone	JJ	*	DSE
conclusion	NN	*)	DSE
here	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
convince	VB	(VP*	DSE
Cavallo	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
abandon	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
one-to-one	JJ	*	O
peg	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
orderly	JJ	*	O
fashion	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
de	FW	*	O
la	FW	*	O
Rua	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
later	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
stepped	VBD	*	O
down	VBP	(PRT*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
opposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
move	NN	*)))))))	O
drove	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
IMF	NNP	*)	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
further	RBR	*	ESE
away	RB	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
lending	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
show	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
8	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
aid	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
zero	NN	*	O
deficit	NN	*	O
''	''	*	O
tactic	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
budgetary	JJ	*	O
discipline	NN	*)	O
turned	VBD	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
shattering	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
rigid	JJ	*	O
convertibility	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
putting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
entire	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
sectors	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
economy	NN	*)	ESE
out	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
commission	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Lack	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
confidence	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
led	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
massive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
savings	NNS	(NP*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
safer	JJR	(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
outflows	NNS	*)	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
limits	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cavallo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
think	VB	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*))	ESE
better	RBR	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
than	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
curbs	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Roque	NNP	*	O
Fernandez	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Argentine	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
influential	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
businessman	NN	*	O
Arnaldo	NNP	*	O
Musich	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
FIEL	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Research	NNP	*	O
Foundation	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Techint	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
inexcusable	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Burdensome	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
Legacy	NNP	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
provisional	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
abbreviated	JJ	*	O
De	NNP	*	O
la	NNP	*	O
Rua	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
quickly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*	O
board	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	ESE
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
until	IN	(PP*	ESE
tomorrow	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
month	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
taking	NN	(NP*	ESE
office	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*)))	O
will	MD	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
overcome	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
history	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Duhalde	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
confirm	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
$	$	(S(NP(QP*	O
2	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*	O
immediately	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mitigate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
disaster	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
approved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Inter-American	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Accompanied	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Remes	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)	O
about	IN	(NP(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*))))))	O
:	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fulfill	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
promise	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
jobs	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
basic	JJ	(NP*	O
health	NN	*	O
care	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
undertake	VB	(VP*	O
small	JJ	(NP*	O
infrastructure	NN	*	O
projects	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
mention	VB	(VP*	O
imminent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
reform	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
Congress	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enact	VB	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
solely	RB	(PP*	O
about	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
about	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
millions	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Argentines	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
obsessed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
now	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mortgage	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
small	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
mid-sized	JJ	*)	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
automotive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP*	O
100,000	CD	*)))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
identical	JJ	*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
secured	JJ	(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
300,000	CD	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
personal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
loans	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
$	$	*	O
10,000	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Debts	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
amounts	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
repaid	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1.4	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
1	CD	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
defray	VB	(VP*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
cents	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
debtors	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
1.2	CD	(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
banking	NN	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
being	VBG	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
unchanged	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
tacit	JJ	*	DSE
assumption	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
timetable	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
easing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
speeded	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
``	``	(ADVP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
conditions	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
permit	VBP	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
coupons	NNS	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
savers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
buy	VB	(VP*	O
things	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
frozen	VBN	*	O
funds	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
collateral	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
break	VB	(VP(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
budget	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
promise	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	O
currency	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controlled	VBN	*	O
manner	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
exceed	VB	(VP*	O
3.5	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
undertake	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	O
task	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reversing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
wealth	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
4.9	CD	(NP(QP*	O
percent	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
pushing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
inflation	NN	(NP*)	O
beyond	IN	(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
float	VB	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
promised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Everything	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
depends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anticipated	JJ	*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
between	IN	(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
15	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
$	$	*	O
20	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
requested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Adjustment	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
Index	NNP	*	O
Will	NNP	*	O
Be	NNP	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
Variable	NNP	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
benchmark	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
govern	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
issuance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
refunding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
deposits	NNS	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accounts	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Jorge	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Remes	NNPS	*	O
Lenicov	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
index	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
formula	NN	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parameters	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
projected	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
inflation	NN	*	O
rates	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
issuance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
tool	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
redrafting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)	O
involving	VBG	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
post-convertibility	JJ	*	O
era	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Celic	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
index	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Unidad	NNP	*	O
de	IN	*	O
Fomento	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chile	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
monetary	JJ	*	O
benchmark	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
employs	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chile	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
common	JJ	*)	O
one	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
today	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
world	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*	O
target	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
target	NN	*))))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
developed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interest	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
target	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
price	NN	(NP*	O
rises	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP*)))	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
winds	NNS	(NP*)	O
up	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
function	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
variables	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
target	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
monetary	JJ	(S(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tool	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
promoting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
August	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
Chile	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
incremental	JJ	*	O
adjustment	NN	*	O
mechanism	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
included	VBD	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*	O
band	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
ceiling	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
floor	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Monetary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
adjustments	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
unidad	NN	*	O
de	IN	*	O
fomento	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
indexing	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
included	VBD	(S(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
price	NN	*	O
indices	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
adjusted	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
contracts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
actual	JJ	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
started	VBD	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*	O
target	NN	*)	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
1999	CD	*	O
devaluation	NN	*)	O
stabilized	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
achieved	VBD	(VP*	O
low	JJ	(NP*	O
inflation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
theoretically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
saw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
tools	NNS	(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
unidad	NNP	*	O
de	IN	*	O
fomento	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
adjusting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
savers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
index	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
persumably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
applied	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
or	CC	*	O
three	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
loans	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
converted	VBN	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Renes	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
technicians	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
World	NNP	(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Treasury	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Central	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crises	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Mexico	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LSB-	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Buenos	NNP	*	O
Aires	NNP	*	O
Ambito	NNP	*	O
Financiero	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Spanish	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))	O
adds	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
following	VBG	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
following	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
''	''	*	O
`	``	(PRN(S*	O
Dirty	NNP	(NP*)	O
'	''	*	O
float	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
abolish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
1.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
towards	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
floating	JJ	*	O
rate	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
intervene	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
only	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
sudden	JJ	(NP*	O
swings	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Intermediate	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
solutions	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
ruled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
periodic	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
adjustments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
crawling	NN	*)	O
peg	VBP	(VP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
band	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
oblige	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
intervene	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
selling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
given	VBN	*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peso	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
wait	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
sealed	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
going	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
float	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Remes	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
flying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NAC*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
14	CD	(NP*)))	O
February	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
receiving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
2.6	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
pending	VBG	(NP*	O
disbursement	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
December	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bolster	VB	(VP*	O
reserves	NNS	(NP*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
peso	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
float	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Total	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
release	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
salary	NN	(NP*	O
direct-deposit	NN	*)))	O
accounts	VBZ	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
All	DT	(S(NP*	O
employees	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
access	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
salary	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
cash	NN	(NP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
savings	NN	(NP*	O
accounts	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
eliminate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ceiling	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1,500	CD	(NP(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
month	NN	(NP*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
January	NNP	*	O
version	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
banking	VBG	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
measure	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
benefit	VB	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
4	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
workers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
earn	VBP	(S(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
until	IN	(S(ADVP*	O
now	RB	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
danger	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
aware	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
money	NN	*)	O
withdrawn	VBN	(VP*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
straight	RB	(PP*	O
into	IN	*	O
purchases	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
percentage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
income	NN	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
individual	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
measure	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
signal	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
gradually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
regain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
confidence	NN	(NP*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Raising	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*	O
ceiling	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
regular	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
savings	NN	*	O
accounts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1,500	CD	(NP*	O
pesos	NNS	*))))))))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
under	IN	(UCP(PP*	DSE
consideration	NN	(NP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
limit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1,200	CD	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gradual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
increases	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Deposits	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
converted	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1.4	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
1	CD	*))	O
:	:	*	O
Time	NN	(NP(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
converted	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
rate	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
converted	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
refund	NN	*	O
timetable	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
dollar	NN	(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
initially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
maintained	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
refunds	NNS	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
2003	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
an	DT	(S(S(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
IMF	NNP	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(S(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
improve	VBP	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
timetable	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
likely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
so	RB	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
cash	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
keeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
portion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
deposit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Duhalde	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
requested	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
altogether	RB	(ADVP*)	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
implementing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
refund	NN	*	O
timetable	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
maintained	VBN	(VP*))))	O
;	:	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
withdrawals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cash	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
March	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Installment	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
checks	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
time	NN	(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
money	NN	*)	O
subject	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
refund	NN	*	O
timetable	NN	*))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
purchases	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
with	IN	(VP(PP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
credited	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demand	VB	(VP*	O
deposit	NN	(NP*	O
accounts	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
purchase	VB	(VP*	O
items	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
cars	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
apartments	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
12	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
18	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
24	CD	(NP(NP*	O
installments	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
time	NN	(S(NP*	O
deposits	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
divided	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
depending	VBG	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
endorsed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Transfer	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
deposit	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
authorized	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
purchase	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
account	NN	*	O
holder	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
bank	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
big	JJ	*	ESE
drawback	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
hardly	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
anyone	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
real	JJ	(NP*	O
estate	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
peso-denominated	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
installment	JJ	*	O
checks	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
cashed	VBN	(VP*	O
sometime	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
though	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
smaller	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
transactions	NNS	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
purchase	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Issuance	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bonds	NNS	(NP*)))	O
indexed	VBN	(VP*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
value	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dollar	NN	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
issuing	VBG	(NP*	O
bonds	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
public	NN	*)	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
purchasing	VBG	(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	O
very	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
short-term	JJ	*)	O
bills	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
indexed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
depreciation	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
arrangement	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attractive	JJ	(ADJP*	O
implicit	JJ	*)	O
interest	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
devised	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
easy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
drum	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
demand	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
full-fledged	JJ	(NP*	O
default	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
No	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
withholding	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))	O
exports	VBZ	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
conclusion	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reverse	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
20	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
tax	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
planning	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
levy	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
raised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
that	DT	*	ESE
much	JJ	*	ESE
money	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
sending	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*)	ESE
signal	NN	*)	ESE
overseas	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
discriminating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
sectors	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Economy	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
event	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advance	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
taxes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
consideration	NN	(NP*))	DSE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weeks	NNS	(NP*)))	O
ago	IN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
any	DT	(S(NP*	O
withholding	NN	*	O
arrangement	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
implemented	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
just	RB	*	O
some	DT	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Bonds	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
compensate	VB	(VP*	O
banks	NNS	(NP*))))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
receive	VB	(VP*	O
long-term	JJ	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
bonds	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
compensation	NN	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
losses	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
arise	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
conversion	NN	(NP*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
balance	NN	*	O
sheets	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Estimates	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
under	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrangement	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
devised	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
red	JJ	*	O
ink	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
total	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
12	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
pesos	NNS	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
6	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
banks	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
option	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
wold	VBD	(VP*	DSE
rather	RB	*	DSE
hold	VB	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
claim	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
than	IN	*	O
place	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
burden	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
debtors	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
declare	VB	(VP*	O
bankruptcy	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
relief	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Phase	NN	*	O
1	CD	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
swap	NN	*)))	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dollars	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Banks	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Pension	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Retirement	NNP	(NP*	O
Fund	NNP	*	O
Management	NNP	*	O
Companies	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
insurance	NN	(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
exerted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
pressure	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	O
accounts	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
converted	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
pesos	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
1.4	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
1	CD	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
managed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
bonds	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
currency	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
collecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
interest	NN	(NP*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
before	RB	(S(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
debt	NN	*	O
rescheduling	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
local	JJ	*	O
investors	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
swap	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O
-RSB-	VBZ	(VP*))))))	O

KABUL	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
3	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Fresh	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
fighting	VBG	(VP*	O
has	VBZ	(S(S(VP*	O
broken	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
rival	JJ	(NP*	O
warlords	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-i-Sharif	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
defence	NN	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NX(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
hour	NN	*)))	O
''	''	*	O
battle	NN	*)	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
forces	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
loyal	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Uzbek	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
warlord	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Rashid	NNP	*	O
Dostam	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
those	DT	(NP*))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
rival	JJ	(NP*	O
Tajik	NNP	*	O
commander	NN	*	O
Atta	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
defence	NN	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
official	NN	*	O
Mira	NNP	*	O
Jan	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
fighting	NN	*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
local	JJ	(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
intervened	VBD	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Jan	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
minor	JJ	*	O
clash	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
investigations	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
identify	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
culprits	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
clashes	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
punish	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
reported	JJ	*	O
clash	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
fortnight	NN	*)	O
involving	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Dostam	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
defence	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tajik	NNP	(NP*	O
fighters	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dostam	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Tajiks	NNS	*)	O
loyal	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*	O
Burhanuddin	NNP	*	O
Rabbani	NNP	*)))))	O
previously	RB	(ADVP*)	O
battled	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kunduz	NNP	(NP*	O
province	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
east	JJ	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mazar-i-Sharif	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
11	CD	(NP*	O
dead	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dostam	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rabbani	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
factions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
uneasy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
partners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fragile	JJ	*	O
Northern	NNP	*	O
Alliance	NNP	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fought	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
militia	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
1996	CD	(NP*))	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
hardline	JJ	*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
regime	NN	*)	O
crumbled	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
face	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
bombing	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fighting	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*)))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
symptom	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
23	CD	*	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
devastated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
These	DT	(NP*	O
battles	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
occur	VBP	(VP*	O
usually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
personal	JJ	(NP*	DSE
interests	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
factional	JJ	*	O
infighting	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*	DSE
fears	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
long-standing	JJ	(S(NP*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
rivalries	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
split	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defeat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
George	NNP	(S(NP*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
delivering	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Speech	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
29	CD	(NP*))	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	(NP*	ESE
wordings	NNS	*))))))	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
lashed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
DPRK	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
labeling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
Evil	NNP	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
reacted	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
strongly	RB	(ADVP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
condemned	VBN	(VP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
counter-attacked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
natural	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rational	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
experts	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	O
''	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADVP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
less	RBR	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
untenable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Albright	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
First	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Launch	NNP	(NP*	DSE
Attack	NNP	*)))))	DSE

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
interviewed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Broadcasting	NNP	*	O
Corporation	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Madeleine	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Albright	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
remark	NN	*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
gross	JJ	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
principle	NN	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
currently	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
uses	VBZ	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
handling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
caused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
things	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
utterly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
disorderly	JJ	*)	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
lost	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
gross	JJ	*	ESE
mistake	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
She	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
particularly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
listing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
Axis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Evil	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
way	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
things	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
cause	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
lose	VB	(VP*	DSE
popular	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Albright	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
contacted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
reached	VBN	*	DSE
agreement	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whereas	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
single-handedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
destroyed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
''	''	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)))))	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
age	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Albright	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
complicated	VBN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
questions	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
aid	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Carpenter	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
non-governmental	JJ	*	O
research	NN	*	O
organization	NN	*)))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Cato	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
holds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
name	NN	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
really	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hard	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
really	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
strange	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
actively	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Korea	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
project	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
all	DT	(ADVP*	O
along	IN	*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
frozen	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mid-1990s	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
listed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Korea	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
commentaries	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
including	VBG	(S(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*	O
of	IN	*	O
Evil	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))))	O
list	NN	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
irritate	VB	(VP*	DSE
Korea	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
cause	VB	(VP*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
Republic	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Korea	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	ESE
ROK	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	ESE
feel	VBP	(VP*	ESE
disturbed	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
analytical	JJ	*	O
article	NN	*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*))))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
including	VBG	(S(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*	O
of	IN	*	O
Evil	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))))	O
list	NN	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
astonishing	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
article	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
establish	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
fall	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
appreciation	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
condemnation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
case	NN	(NP*))	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
pilots	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
hit	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
landed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
assistance	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
analyst	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
worried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attack	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
possibly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
forfeit	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
recent	JJ	*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Carpenter	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
door	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
relations	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
completely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
blocked	VBN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
unfortunate	JJ	*)	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
cast	VBD	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
improving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
closed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
door	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
improvement	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Difficult	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
France	NNP	*))	O
To	TO	(S(VP*	O
Agree	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
set	VBD	(VP*	DSE
forth	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Axis	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
theory	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
increasing	VBG	(NP(NP*	DSE
attacks	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*))	O
closest	JJS	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remark	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
British	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
Telegraph	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
2	CD	(NP*))))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
British	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Jack	NNP	*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
queried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
theory	NN	*)	ESE
set	VBN	(VP*	DSE
forth	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
thinking	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	PDT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
remark	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)))	O
attempts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
anti-terror	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
party	NN	*	ESE
politics	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Straw	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
become	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
closest	JJS	*	DSE
allies	NNS	*)	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
''	''	*	O
incident	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
stand	VB	(VP*	ESE
shoulder	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
shoulder	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

French	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jacques	NNP	*	O
Chirac	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
subscribe	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
Evil	NNP	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE
theory	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
advanced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chirac	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
assistant	NN	*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
good-and-evil	JJ	*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
conform	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
actual	JJ	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present-day	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
office	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
open	JJ	(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
what	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Economic	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
NATO	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Robertson	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
charging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Korea	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
so-called	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
``	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
produce	VB	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Observers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
maintain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
NATO	NNP	*	O
Secretary-general	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*)	O
indicates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
feels	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
uneasy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policy	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
determined	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
expand	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
scope	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
anti-terror	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

White	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
Hasten	NNP	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Smooth	NNP	(NP*	DSE
the	DT	*	O
Matter	NNP	*))	O
Over	IN	(PP*)))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
alleviate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
sentiments	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
discretely	RB	(NP(ADJP*	DSE
assured	VBN	*)	DSE
US	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
hint	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Secretary	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*)))	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
admonishes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
subordinates	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
when	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
mass	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spirit	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
literal	JJ	*	O
meaning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
strictly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
acted	VBN	*	O
upon	RB	(PP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	ESE
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
doubts	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
external	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
1	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
collect	VB	(VP(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
statements	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*)))	O
embassies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
calm	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
negative	JJ	*	DSE
reactions	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Richard	NNP	*	O
Boucher	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
relevant	JJ	*	O
information	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
summaries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
information	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
embassies	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
facilitate	VB	(VP*	ESE
understanding	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
related	VBN	*	ESE
arguments	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
authorized	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explain	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
doubts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
dispelling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
doubt	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
about	IN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dispatch	VB	(VP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Colin	NNP	*	O
Powell	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
enlightened	CD	*	ESE
officials	NNS	*))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
patch	VB	*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
''	''	*	O
President	NNP	(PRN(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
statements	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(NP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
one	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reckless	JJ	(NP*	ESE
threats	NNS	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
namely	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Iran	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(SBAR(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
threat	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
crush	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*))))))	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Committee	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
characterizing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
counties	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
invade	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
initiate	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
dialogue	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
friends	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
allies	NNS	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
regimes	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
fine	JJ	(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
reflect	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
reality	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
hard-line	JJ	*	ESE
wing	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
comprising	VBG	(VP*	O
Vice	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Dick	NNP	*	O
Cheney	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Adviser	NNP	*	O
Condoleezza	NNP	*	O
Rice	NNP	*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
final	JJ	*	ESE
say	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
running	VBG	(S(VP*	O
affairs	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
direct	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
influence	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Oddly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
enough	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
speculations	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
swirled	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Powell	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
listened	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
threats	NNS	*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
citizen	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
read	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
virtue	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
post	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
subsequently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
speculations	NNS	*)	DSE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
baseless	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
rate	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Powell	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remark	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
readiness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
enter	VB	(VP*	DSE
dialogue	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
evil	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
states	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
friends	NNS	*)))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
involves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
contradictions	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
affirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
first	JJ	*	DSE
speech	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
dialogue	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
after	IN	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
inspectors	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
consult	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
closest	JJS	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(FRAG(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(VP(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Third	NNP	*	O
World	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
punish	VB	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
poses	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
danger	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hebrew	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
lumped	VBN	(VP*	DSE
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
only	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
mislead	VB	(VP*	ESE
Arabs	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Islam	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
alone	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
targeted	VBN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
alliance	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
lobbies	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
lobby	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
lobby	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
sees	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
world	NN	*)	DSE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
eyes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Ari'el	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Sharon	NNP	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
extremist	NN	*	ESE
government	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
expect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recession	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
repeat	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
father	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
defeated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
factors	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
planning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
trigger	VB	(VP*	ESE
wars	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
revive	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
flagging	JJ	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
industry	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
run	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
typical	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
Texan	JJ	*)	ESE
mentality	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
closer	JJR	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
cowboys	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
than	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
mentality	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
believes	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
dialogue	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
coexistence	NN	*))	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
peoples	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
mentality	NN	*)	O
simultaneously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
raises	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
apprehensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
resentment	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
international	JJ	(S(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
prosperity	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
stability	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
wars	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
catastrophe	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
engulf	VB	(VP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
progressed	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
expense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
security	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
keeping	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
Arafat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
captive	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
siege	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
occupying	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
affront	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Arab	JJ	(NP*	ESE
dignity	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
International	NNP	(NP*))))	ESE
justice	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
powder	NN	*	ESE
keg	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
point	NN	*))	O
explode	VB	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
devastating	VBG	(NP(NP*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
remains	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
assassin	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
excuse	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
instigate	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
struggles	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
wars	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	ESE
instability	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pretends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
besieges	VBZ	(VP*	O
Arafat	NNP	(NP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
so	RB	(S(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
confront	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
resistance	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
natural	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
guerilla	NN	*	ESE
operations	NNS	*)	ESE
successively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
occur	VBP	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(ADVP*	O
inside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fortified	JJ	*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
begins	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
wonder	VB	(VP*	DSE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
accusations	NNS	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
instructing	VBG	(VP*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
captivity	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
round-the-clock	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
surveillance	NN	*)	O
,	,	*))))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
founded	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
interpretation	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	DSE
accusations	NNS	*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
formidable	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
supernatural	JJ	*	ESE
powers	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
enable	VBP	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
homeland	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unlimited	JJ	*	ESE
capabilities	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
occupying	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
equipped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
mighty	JJ	*	ESE
US	JJ	*	O
weapon	NN	*	O
technology	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
failure	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US-made	JJ	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
machine	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
settle	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
unequal	JJ	*	ESE
battle	NN	*)))))	O
became	VBD	(VP*	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
farcical-yet-provocative	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
statements	NNS	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADJP*	O
present	JJ	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
aggressive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
traitorous	JJ	*	ESE
agent	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
assassinate	VB	*	ESE
'	''	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
certain	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Ben	NNP	*	O
Eliezer	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hallucination	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mere	JJ	*	ESE
expression	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
failure	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
brutality	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occupying	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
practices	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
embody	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
bankrupt	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
criminal	JJ	*	ESE
extremism	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
failure	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
gain	VB	(VP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
continuing	VBG	*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ben	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Eliezer	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
raving	NN	*)	ESE
coincided	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
assassin	NN	*	ESE
boss	NN	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
exerting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
pressures	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
removing	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
surrender	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
halt	VB	(VP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
calls	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Ben	NNP	*	O
Eliezer	NNP	*)	O
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
stopped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
consider	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
patriotic	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
substitute	NN	*	O
agent	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
along	IN	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extremist	NN	*	ESE
gang	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
symbolizes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
struggle	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
attitude	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
true	JJ	*	DSE
hostility	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
chairman	NN	*)	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
Envoy	NNP	*	O
Burns	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*	O
Mubarak	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
contacts	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Arafat	NNP	(NP*))	O
considering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elected	VBN	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
chairman	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
wish	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Burns	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statements	NNS	*)	O
reflect	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
true	JJ	*	ESE
position	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
signals	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
balance	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
position	NN	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reality	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinian-Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
struggle	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
come	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
gentlemen	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
assassin	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
realize	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
injustice	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
last	VB	(VP*	ESE
long	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)))	O
depends	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
regaining	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
besieging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Arafat	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Mandela	NNP	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Arab	JJ	(NP*	ESE
struggle	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
foretells	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
claims	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
inevitably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
falls	VBZ	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
matter	NN	*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
humiliates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Arab	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
dignity	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
relaying	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
forgot	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
principles	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
role	NN	(NP*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
defending	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Italian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
farmer	NN	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
illegally	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
slaughtering	VBG	(VP*	O
cattle	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O

Benevento	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
67-year-old	JJ	*	O
farmer	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Benevento	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Naples	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
charges	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
illegally	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
slaughtering	VBG	*	O
cattle	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
caught	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
police	NN	(NP*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
secretly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
slaughtering	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cow	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
farm	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
meat	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
confiscated	VBN	(VP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
tested	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
contaminated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
mad	JJ	*	O
cow	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
disease	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
bovine	JJ	(NP*	O
spongiform	NN	*	O
encephalopathy	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
stepped	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
farm	NN	(NP*	O
inspections	NNS	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Campania	NNP	(NP*))))	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
heightened	VBN	(NP(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
slaughtering	VBG	*	O
practices	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Italy	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
first	JJ	*	O
suspected	VBN	*	DSE
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vCJD	NN	(NP*)))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fatal	JJ	*	O
brain-wasting	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
BSE	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
concerns	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
23-year-old	JJ	*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Menfi	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southwest	JJ	(NP*	O
Sicily	NNP	*))	O
whom	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
health	NN	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
certainly	RB	*)	ESE
contracted	VBN	*	O
the	DT	(UCP(NP(NP*	O
disease	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Italy	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
at	IN	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
five	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Federico	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Piccoli	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
neurologist	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Palermo	NNP	(NP*	O
hospital	NN	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
helping	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
woman	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
further	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vCJD	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sicily	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
only	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
illegal	JJ	*	O
slaughter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
animals	NNS	(NP*)))	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
here	RB	(NP*))))	O
''	''	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
comments	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
contested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
meat	NN	(NP*	O
industry	NN	*	O
representatives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
vet	NN	*	O
associations	NNS	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Green	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
there	EX	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
illegal	JJ	(S(NP*	O
slaughtering	NN	*	O
practices	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rise	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Campania	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Sicily	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Puglia	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
meat	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
entering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
food	NN	*	ESE
chain	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Italy	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
BSE	NNP	*	O
cattle-testing	JJ	*	O
programme	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
compliance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
regulations	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
56	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(ADJP*	O
mad	JJ	*	O
cow	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
disease	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
detected	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Lebanese	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Hizbullah	NNP	*	O
attack	NN	*))))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
days	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
requested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
efforts	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
development	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
disclosed	VBD	(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
regarding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
claims	NNS	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Hizbullah	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
contemplating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
mark	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assassination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
then-Hizbullah	JJ	(NP*	O
secretary-general	NN	*	O
Abbas	NNP	*	O
Mussawi	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mussawi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
Feb.	NNP	(NP*	O
17	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
1992	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
helicopter	NN	*)	O
fired	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
missile	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
car	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
fears	NNS	*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
information	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
likelihood	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
reinforced	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Lebanese-Israeli	JJ	*	O
border	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
days	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
precautionary	JJ	(NP*	O
procedures	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
en	IN	(ADVP*	O
masse	NN	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
border	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
48	CD	*	O
hours	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Lebanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
avoided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
publicly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
commenting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
reaffirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
border	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
violations	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Blue	NNP	*	ESE
Line	NNP	*	ESE
''	''	*))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
usually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
committed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kinds	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
provocative	JJ	(NP*	ESE
activities	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
particular	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP*)))	O
raids	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
aggressive	JJ	*	ESE
acts	NNS	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Lebanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
infractions	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
added	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
adopt	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
claims	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
security	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
contact	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*))	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
hostility	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
Hizbullah	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
grown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
tremendously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
official	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
rule	VB	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
seeing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
such	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
animosity	NN	*)	ESE
reflect	VB	(VP*	ESE
negatively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Syria	NNP	*))	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
general	NN	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eve	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beirut	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TAIPEI	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
17	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
keeping	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
wary	JJ	*	DSE
eye	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
China	NNP	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
assurances	NNS	(NP*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taipei	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
traded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taipei	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
dilute	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
backing	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
better	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*))))))))))))	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*	O
Siao-yueh	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Through	IN	(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
proper	JJ	*	O
channels	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
told	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
surprises	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
handling	VBG	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Richard	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
relation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)))	O
--	:	*))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ease	VB	(VP*	DSE
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
relations	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
getting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
better	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Joseph	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Wu	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chengchi	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Richard	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
managing	VBG	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AIT	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
body	NN	*)	O
authorised	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
exchanges	NNS	(NP*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
switched	VBD	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
recognition	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1979	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
embarked	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
week-long	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*))))	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
stopovers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
21	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
22	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
overall	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
protected	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
knocks	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
enjoyed	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
''	''	*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
decision-makers	NNS	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*)	O
arms	NNS	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Kidd-class	NNP	*	O
destroyers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
diesel	JJ	*	O
submarines	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
12	CD	(NP*	O
P-3C	NN	*	O
submarine-hunting	NN	*	O
aircraft	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
infuriated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
regards	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
integral	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	O
reunification	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
force	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
if	IN	(ADJP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
arising	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
entry	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*	O
dispute	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
split	VBD	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwanese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
nonetheless	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
videoconference	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwanese	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwanese	NNPS	*)))))	O
American	JJ	*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Harvard	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Yale	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Columbia	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
universities	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Annette	NNP	*	O
Lu	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attempt	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
obstruct	VB	(VP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
As	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
usual	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
try	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
persuade	VB	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*	ESE
disadvantageous	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
mindset	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
impair	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
healthy	JJ	*	O
interaction	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ad	FW	(ADJP*	O
hoc	FW	*)	O
group	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Asia	NNP	*	O
trip	NN	*	O
around-the-clock	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
de	FW	(ADJP*	O
facto	FW	*)	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
task	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Compounding	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fears	NNS	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
speculation	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fresh	JJ	*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*))))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
issues	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
anti-terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
prevention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
proliferation	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
sealed	VBN	(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
communiques	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1970s	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
then-president	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Richard	NNP	*	O
Nixon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
landmark	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1972	CD	(NP*))))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
another	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ronald	NNP	*	O
Reagan	NNP	*	O
era	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gradually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
reduce	VB	*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
defended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taipei	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cautious	JJ	*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
warning	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
upper	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interest	NN	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
harmed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occasion	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
remarks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
unfavorable	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Wu	NNP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Taipei	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
angered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
then-president	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bill	NNP	*	O
Clinton	NNP	*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
three	CD	*	O
nos	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1998	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Clinton	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
Chinas	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
or	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	*	O
Taiwan	NNS	*))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
member	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
statehood	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
requirement	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

TOKYO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Feb	NNP	*	O
18	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*)	O
W.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
options	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
table	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	*	O
Germany	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
adventure	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
chilly	JJ	*	DSE
reception	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
axis	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
''	''	*)	O
rhetoric	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
telling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
options	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
table	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
issues	NNS	*)	ESE
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
speaking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
next	JJ	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
lumped	VBN	(VP*	DSE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
three	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
together	RB	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WDT	(WHNP(WHNP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
an	DT	(PP(NP*	O
``	``	(NX*	O
axis	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*))	O
in	IN	*	O
language	NN	(NP*))))	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
riled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
renewed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
pledge	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
thwart	VB	(VP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
mate	VB	*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
regimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
hoping	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
acquire	VB	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
nations	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
come	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
extended	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
People	NNS	(S(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
love	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
understand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
transparent	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrible	JJ	*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
dictatorial	JJ	*	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
starve	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
ca	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
mate	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
organizations	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Asked	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
French	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Hubert	NNP	*	O
Vedrine	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
concept	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
simplistic	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
happens	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
arena	NN	*)))))	O
;	:	*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
say	VBP	(VP*	ESE
things	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
I	NN	*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
talked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
exactly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
needs	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
understand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
history	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
given	VBN	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
unique	JJ	*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*))	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
week-long	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
specifically	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
talk	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
travel	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
following	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
fortified	JJ	*)	O
no-man	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
land	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
communist	JJ	(NP*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
37,000	CD	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
peninsula	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
de-militarised	JJ	*	O
zone	NN	*)	O
dividing	VBG	(VP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
hardline	JJ	*	O
communist	JJ	*	O
northern	JJ	*	O
neighbour	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
places	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
earth	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
tough	JJ	*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
P'yongyang	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
provoked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Tae-chung	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
five-year	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prise	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hermit	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
isolation	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(ADJP*	O
Korean	JJ	*)	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
fear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
tough	JJ	*	DSE
talking	NN	*)	DSE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
years	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
Kim	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
so-called	JJ	*	O
Sunshine	NNP	*	O
Policy	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
establishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Angry	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
anti-US	JJ	*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)	DSE
erupted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
police	NN	(NP*))))))	O
storming	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Chamber	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
detaining	VBG	(VP*	O
32	CD	(NP(NP*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
occupying	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
building	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-hour	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
protesters	NNS	(NP*)	O
hurled	VBN	(VP*	O
leaflets	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
proclaiming	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
war	NN	*	ESE
freak	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
Kim	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Nobel	NNP	*	O
Prize	NNP	*)	O
winning	VBG	(VP*	O
policy	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
offering	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
new	JJ	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
North	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
remaining	VBG	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
firm	NN	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
North	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
missile	NN	*	O
sales	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
feared	VBN	*	DSE
chemical	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
biological	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*	O
programmes	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

North	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
unconvinced	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
head	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
empire	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
Its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*	ESE
bellicose	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
heinous	NNP	(NP*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
president	NNP	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intended	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
fan	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
war	NN	(NP*	ESE
hysteria	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
''	''	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
stressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
firm	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
exist	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
expanding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
late	JJ	(NP*	O
Sunday	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Saddam	NNP	*	O
Hussein	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
've	VBP	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
secret	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
much	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
safer	JJR	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
deserve	VBP	(VP*	ESE
instead	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
regime	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
National	NNP	(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Adviser	NNP	*	O
Condoleezza	NNP	*	O
Rice	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
CBS	NNP	(NP*	O
television	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
1990	CD	*	O
invasion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kuwait	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*)	O
insisted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
threatening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ones	NNS	*)	ESE
attacking	VBG	(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
round	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Ath-Thawra	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
mouthpiece	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Baath	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Baghdad	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
possessed	VBD	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
could	MD	(SQ*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
possesses	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
entire	JJ	(NP*	ESE
planets	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Berlin	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chief	NN	*	O
government	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Uwe-Karsten	NNP	*	O
Heye	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
imagine	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
interest	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
engaging	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
adventure	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Chancellor	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Gerhard	NNP	*	O
Schroeder	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
undivided	JJ	(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Germany	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
risks	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
adventures	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
insisted	VBN	*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
allies	NNS	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
consulted	VBN	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
German	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
useful	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
UN	NNP	(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
enter	VB	(VP*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
check	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

German	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Joschka	NNP	*	O
Fischer	NNP	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
sharply	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
criticised	VBD	*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
telling	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
such	PDT	(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
concept	NN	*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
gets	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
nowhere	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
had	VBN	(VP*	DSE
tense	JJ	(NP*	DSE
relations	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
western	JJ	*	O
neighbor	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
voiced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
opposition	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
strike	NN	*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
solved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
means	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
initiatives	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
secretary	NN	*	O
general	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
active	JJ	*)	O
role	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Kamal	NNP	*	O
Kharazi	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iraq	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
favourable	JJ	*	ESE
response	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
allows	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
UN	NNP	(S(NP*	O
weapon	NN	*	O
inspectors	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Kharazi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
150	CD	*	O
foreigners	NNS	*)	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
border	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
terror	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
sympathisers	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
home	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*)	O
40	CD	(NP(NP*	O
women	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
between	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
70	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
80	CD	*)	O
children	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
men	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
European	NNP	(NP(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
North	JJ	*)	O
African	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*))	O
origin	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
handful	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghans	NNPS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
affair	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(ADJP*	ESE
embarrassing	VBG	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
insistence	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
judging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
supported	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
alleges	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Tehran	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
allowed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
al-Qa	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
ida	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
regime	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Iranian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
hotly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	DSE
but	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
act	VB	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
provided	VBN	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
verbal	JJ	*	DSE
attack	NN	*))	DSE
Kharazi	NNP	(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
wanting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
exercise	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
world	NN	(NP*	ESE
dictatorship	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
horrible	JJ	*	ESE
attacks	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rulers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
proved	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
trusted	VBN	(VP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
seeking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
unilaterally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
masters	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
want	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
sweep	VB	(VP*	ESE
aside	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
competitors	NNS	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Afghan	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
interim	NN	*	O
Interior	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Yunus	NNP	*	O
Qanooni	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
two	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
murder	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
aviation	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
tourism	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Rahman	NNP	*)))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
kinds	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
speeches	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
improvised	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
devoid	JJ	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
slips	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
tongue	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
second	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
carefully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
written	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
studied	VBN	*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
aspect	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
official	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
controversy	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*	O
type	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
credible	JJ	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
improvisation	NN	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
better	JJR	*	ESE
indication	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
inclinations	NNS	*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
personal	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
convictions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
by	IN	*	O
improvising	VBG	(S(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expressing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
runs	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
mind	NN	*))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
tongue	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
extension	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
written	JJ	(NP*	O
speeches	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
indicative	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
drafted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decision-making	JJ	*	DSE
circles	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
decision	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Address	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Representatives	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Senate	NNP	*))))))))	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pre-prepared	JJ	*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Every	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
phrase	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
carefully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
studied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
phrase	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
referred	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Axis	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mussolini	NNP	(NP*))	O
signifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Italy	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Reagan	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Soviet	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
evil	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
self-destructive	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
causing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collapse	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
within	IN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
combining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mussolini	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Reagan	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
successful	JJ	*	ESE
choice	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
viable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
describe	VB	(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
viable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
politicians	NNS	(NP*)	O
refer	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
good	JJ	(VP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
evil	JJ	*)	ESE
only	RB	(PP*	ESE
for	IN	*	O
purposes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
intimidation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
exaggeration	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
World	NNP	(NP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
axis	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
strong	JJ	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
bound	VBN	(ADJP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
alliance	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	O
small	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
alliance	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
cooperation	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
longest	JJS	*	ESE
destructive	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*))	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
half	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
20th	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
living	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
isolation	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
good	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
evil	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
everyone	NN	(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
mentioned	VBN	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	ESE
suspicion	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
hostility	NN	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Islam	NNP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
eager	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
open	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dialogue	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
since	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
reform	NN	*	O
school	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
progressing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
expense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
conservative	JJ	*	O
school	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
unlikely	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
circles	NNS	*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
antagonize	VB	(VP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
go	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))	O
with	IN	(PP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
wages	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))	O
then	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	IN	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
necessity	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
choice	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
confirms	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extremist	NN	*	ESE
inclinations	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

21	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Relations	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
harmonious	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
close	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
U.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
S.	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
office	NN	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
current	JJ	*	O
mainland	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unlikely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
affect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
two-way	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
aide	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Secretary-General	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shih-meng	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
U.	NNP	*	O
S.	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
assured	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
stick	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
commitments	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
say	VB	*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
damage	VB	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interests	NNS	*)	DSE
while	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
mainland	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
purpose	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mainland	JJ	*	O
trip	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
thank	VB	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.-led	JJ	*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Shiao-yue	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
briefed	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mainland	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
hurt	VB	(VP*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
developments	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
deal	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
contingencies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Feb	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Interior	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Russian	JJ	(NP*	O
entrepreneur	NN	*))))	O
Viktor	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bout	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Deputy	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Interior	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Nikolai	NNP	*	O
Bobrovsky	NNP	*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detailed	JJ	*	O
probe	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
verification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
information	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Interior	NNP	(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Yuri	NNP	*	O
Shuvalov	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hong	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
23	CD	(NP*	O
Feb	NN	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ZTS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
concluded	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
working	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
exchanged	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
in-depth	JJ	(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
major	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
reached	VBD	(VP*	DSE
extensive	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
consensus	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Both	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
hold	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
visit	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
achieved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
positive	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
successful	JJ	*)	ESE
results	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Hong	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
generally	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	O
maintained	VBD	*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
positive	JJ	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
trip	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
welcomed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
success	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
revisited	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Great	NNP	*	O
Wall	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
hardly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
hide	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
excitement	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
show	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
places	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Nixon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
stood	VBN	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ice-breaking	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Great	NNP	*	O
Wall	NNP	*)	O
30	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
TV	NN	*	O
camera	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
stepped	VBD	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spot	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Nixon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
stood	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
move	VB	(VP*	ESE
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
existing	VBG	*	ESE
basis	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
editorial	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Wen	NNP	(NP*	O
Wei	NNP	*	O
Po	NNP	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
30	CD	(S(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
Nixon	NNP	(NP*)	O
developed	VBD	(VP*	O
strategic	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	JJ	*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
deal	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Soviet	NNP	*	ESE
Union	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Thirty	CD	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
sole	JJ	*	ESE
superpower	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	NNP	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
event	NN	*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
aware	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
without	IN	(S(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
big	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
rediscovered	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
big	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
globe	NN	*)))))	O
--	:	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
tries	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
constructive	JJ	(NP*	O
cooperative	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
accord	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
appreciates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
plays	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Jiang	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
mediate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
behalf	NN	*))))))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
resume	VB	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
saying	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))	ESE
work	VBP	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hard	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
pursue	VB	(VP*	ESE
gains	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
That	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
chooses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
contacts	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
shows	NNS	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
deal	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
global	JJ	(NP*	ESE
issues	NNS	*))	ESE
alone	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
can	MD	(SQ*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
afford	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ignore	VB	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
major	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	DSE
strategic	JJ	*	DSE
competitor	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
remark	NN	*)	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
confrontation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pacific	NNP	*)))))))	O
brings	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
good	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
world	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
economic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
development	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Hong	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
public	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*	DSE
hold	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
delivering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
China	NNP	*	ESE
threat	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE
advocates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Republican	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
Now	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
engage	VB	(VP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
positive	JJ	*	ESE
manner	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
stay	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(NP(NP*	DSE
admiration	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
surprise	NN	*	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
changes	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
tremendous	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*	ESE
potential	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
22	CD	(NP*))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Tsinghua	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hard	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
me	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
use	VB	(VP*	ESE
words	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
describe	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
earth-shaking	JJ	*	ESE
changes	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Ta	NNP	*	O
Kung	NNP	*	O
Pao	NNP	*	O
editorial	NN	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
obviously	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
courtesy	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
hosts	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
development	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
indeed	RB	*	ESE
leave	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
deep	JJ	*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
party	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*	ESE
impact	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
readjustment	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Regarding	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
contents	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
purpose	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
speech	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Tsinghua	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR(S(SBAR*	O
overseas	JJ	(S(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
promotion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
values	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
editorial	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Shang	NNP	*	O
Pao	NNP	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(UCP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reform	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
opening	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
easiest	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
today	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	(ADVP*	O
or	CC	*	O
even	RB	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reform	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
opening	NN	*)	O
up	IN	(ADVP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
broad	JJ	*	O
mass	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
young	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
college	NN	*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
values	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
not	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
understand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
freedom	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
religions	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	ESE
quite	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
American	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
social	JJ	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
imagination	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
student	NN	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP*	O
yesterday	NN	*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
handle	VB	(VP*	O
social	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
getting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
day	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
!	NNP	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
prominent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
Premier	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Zhu	NNP	*	O
Rongji	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
meeting	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
questions	NNS	*)	DSE
posed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Tsinghua	NNP	(NP*	O
students	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Hong	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
public	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
extremely	RB	(UCP(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
dissatisfied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
sensitive	JJ	*))	ESE
core	NN	*	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
greatly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
responsible	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
slow	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
Taiwan	JJ	*	ESE
independence	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
forces	NNS	*)	O
running	VBG	(VP*	ESE
rampant	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
earnestly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
abide	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
Sino-US	JJ	*	O
joint	JJ	*	O
communiques	NNS	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
relevant	JJ	(NP*	DSE
commitments	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
properly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
handle	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
strategic	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
long-term	JJ	*	ESE
perspective	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
vital	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
stability	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
healthy	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
relations	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

West	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
aims	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
`	``	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prop	VB	(VP*	O
up	IN	(PP*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*	O
'	POS	*))))))))	O

Herald	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	DSE
Reporter	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
THE	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
targeted	JJ	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	ESE
deteriorating	VBG	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
meant	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
prop	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
MDC	NN	*	O
ahead	RB	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
next	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Mr	NNP	*	O
Willard	NNP	*	O
Chiwewe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
West	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
hurry	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
prop	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
follows	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Cde	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cabinet	NNP	(NP*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
freeze	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	ESE
overseas	JJ	*	O
assets	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15-nation	JJ	*	O
bloc	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dismissing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
withstand	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
abandon	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
placing	VBG	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP*)))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
Europe	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SBARQ*	O
What	WP	(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(SQ*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
wanting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
?	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rally	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Nkayi	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
roundly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
condemned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
African	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
described	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
neo-colonial	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Nigeria	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Tanzania	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*))))	O
lambasted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
show	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
solidarity	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tanzanian	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Benjamin	NNP	*	O
Mkapa	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
African	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
let	VB	(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
manipulated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
powerful	JJ	*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
neo-colonialism	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	ESE
colonialism	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
'm	VBP	(VP*	DSE
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
some	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
beginning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
forget	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Berlin	NNP	(NP*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Balkanisation	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
continent	NN	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
colonise	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Namibia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
invite	VB	(VP*	DSE
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
justification	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
move	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
body	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
regard	VB	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
more	RBR	*	ESE
competent	JJ	*))	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
observation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
certain	JJ	*	O
persons	NNS	*	O
''	''	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
dealings	NNS	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
applied	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
``	``	*	O
formulate	VB	(S(VP(VP(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
implement	VB	(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
benefit	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
undermine	VBP	(S(VP*)))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
injure	VB	(VP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
institutions	NNS	*))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
impede	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
functioning	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
multi-party	JJ	*	ESE
democracy	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
targeted	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
crisis	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
advance	VB	(VP*	ESE
positive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
change	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
signalling	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
focusing	VBG	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
scrutiny	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
appropriate	JJ	*	O
actors	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
maniacs	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
spew	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
vicious	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
remarks	NNS	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	DSE
protest	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
denunciation	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
vicious	JJ	*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
called	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
talked	VBD	(VP*	O
nonsense	NN	(NP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
include	VB	(VP*	O
not	RB	(NP(CONJP*	O
only	JJ	*)	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
develop	VBP	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
WMD	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
question	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
WMD-developing	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

High-ranking	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Cheney	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
actively	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
chimed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
absurd	JJ	*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Inspecting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Force	NNP	*	O
bases	NNS	*)	O
some	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Cheney	NNP	(NP*)	O
maintained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
WMD	NNP	(NP*	O
threats	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

High-ranking	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
defense	NN	*)	O
departments	NNS	*)))	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
preposterous	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
exporter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
WMD	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
ballistic	JJ	(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
relevant	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
diversionary	JJ	*	ESE
tactic	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
divert	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
provoked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
announcement	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
caused	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	O
controversy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
everyone	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
knows	VBZ	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
strong	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
denunciation	NN	(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
rejection	NN	(NP*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
cornered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
impartial	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
public	JJ	*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
referring	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
address	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
absolutely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reputation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
kinds	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
vicious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conduct	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
ring	NN	*	ESE
leader	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
empire	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
perpetrates	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
spiteful	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
conduct	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
kinds	NNS	*)))	ESE
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
possesses	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*	O
quantity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
WMD	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
inflicted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	ESE
disaster	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
humankind	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP(VP*	O
placed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
complex	JJ	*	ESE
state	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
haywire	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
dominate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
gangster-like	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
logic	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
label	VB	(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
dignified	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
sovereign	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
UN	NNP	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Hence	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
decrying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
extent	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
residents	NNS	*	O
even	RB	*))	ESE
within	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
denouncing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reckless	JJ	*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fellow	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wrote	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
address	NN	*)	O
inevitably	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
submitted	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
news	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
David	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Frum	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wrote	VBD	(S(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
address	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
submitted	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
signifies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
inevitably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
leave	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
driven	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
anti-Bush	JJ	*	ESE
hot	JJ	*	ESE
winds	NNS	*))	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
around	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
imperialist	NN	*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
maniacs	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
clinging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
conspiracy	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
order	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
escape	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
predicament	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
divert	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
arrows	NNS	*)	ESE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
directions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
crafted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
sales	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
WMD	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
ballistic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
concerned	VBN	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*	O
sales	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
add	VB	(VP*	ESE
credibility	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
imperialist	NN	*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
maniacs	NNS	*	ESE
'	POS	*)	ESE
conspiracy	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
forget	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
label	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
number	NN	*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
WMD	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
ballistic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
missiles	NNS	*	ESE
sales	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
concerned	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
technology	NN	*	ESE
sales	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
mentioned	VBN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(S(ADJP*	ESE
accustomed	JJ	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
trickery	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
!	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
fall	VB	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
acts	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
mentioned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
produces	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
possesses	VBZ	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greatest	JJS	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
WMD	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
threatens	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADJP*	DSE
satisfied	VBN	*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
develop	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
resuming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
underground	JJ	(NP*	O
nuclear	JJ	*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
blatant	JJ	*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
rogue	JJ	*	ESE
state	NN	*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
someone	NN	(NP*	ESE
harm	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
invite	VB	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
criticism	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rejection	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
acts	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
making	NN	*	ESE
remarks	NNS	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
smear	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
faces	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
-LSB-	VB	(VP*	O
unmonitorable	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
20	CD	(NP*	O
secs	NNS	*)))	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
unjust	JJ	*	ESE
acts	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
fight	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	ESE
imperialist	NN	*	ESE
war	NN	*	ESE
maniacs	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
try	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
threaten	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
national	JJ	(NP*	ESE
dignity	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
settle	VB	(VP*	DSE
scores	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
dampen	VB	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
bend	VB	*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
unwavering	VBG	*	DSE
will	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
unemployment	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
48,000	CD	*	O
engineers	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
dropped	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
1.5	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*))))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
last	JJ	(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
Engineers	NNPS	*	O
Association	NNP	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
JEA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
around	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
8.5	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
dropped	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
7	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
JEA	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Azzam	NNP	*	O
Hneidi	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unemployed	JJ	(NP*	O
engineers	NNS	*)))	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stands	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
3,360	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
association	NN	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
provided	VBD	(VP*	O
867	CD	(NP*	O
unemployed	JJ	*	O
engineers	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
job	NN	(NP*	O
opportunities	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
private	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
contributing	VBG	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
decline	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hneidi	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
association	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
contacting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
private	JJ	(NP*	O
institutions	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
supply	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
engineers	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	CC	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
JEA	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Housing	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Works	NNPS	*)))	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*	O
trained	JJ	(ADJP*	O
759	CD	(NP*))	O
new	JJ	*	O
engineering	NN	*))	O
graduates	VBZ	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prepare	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
job	NN	(NP*	O
opportunities	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
JEA	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
obligations	NNS	*)))	O
stipulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
bylaws	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
training	NN	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
training	NN	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
full-time	JJ	*	O
internship	NN	*)	O
lasting	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
graduates	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
placed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
professional	JJ	(NP*	O
settings	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
gain	VB	(VP*	O
firsthand	JJ	(NP*	O
experience	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
workplace	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
aim	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
engineers	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
chance	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
practise	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
studied	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
theory	NN	(NP*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
university	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Hneidi	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Engineers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
specialised	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electricity	NN	*	O
field	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
hired	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electric	JJ	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
eight	CD	(NP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
day	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
trainee	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
paid	VBN	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
JD120-150	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
month	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
association	NN	*)	O
defrays	VBZ	(VP*	O
JD30-50	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
monthly	JJ	*	O
salary	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
JEA	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
association	NN	*)	O
annually	RB	(ADVP*)	O
allocates	VBZ	(VP*	O
JD100	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
,000	CD	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
training	NN	(NP*	O
graduates	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trainees	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
graduates	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
require	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
funds	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
association	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Hneidi	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
engineering	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
graduates	NNS	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
job	NN	(NP*	O
openings	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
association	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
representative	JJ	*	O
offices	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
look	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
bring	VB	(VP*	O
engineers	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Hneidi	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Unemployment	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
prevails	VBZ	(VP*	O
mainly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
chemical	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
mechanical	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
engineering	NN	*	O
graduates	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
engineers	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
specialised	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
electrical	JJ	(NP(UCP*	O
,	,	*	O
computer	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
architectural	JJ	*)	O
engineering	NN	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
finding	VBG	(VP*	O
jobs	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
students	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jordanian	NNP	(NP*	O
public	JJ	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
private	JJ	*)	O
universities	NNS	*))	O
'	POS	*)	O
engineering	NN	*	O
departments	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
around	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
6,000	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
excluding	VBG	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
engineering	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Around	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
2,000	CD	(NP*))	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
engineers	NNS	*)	O
enter	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
job	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Currently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
engineering	NN	*	O
students	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
universities	NNS	(NP*)))	O
prefer	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
specialise	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electrical	JJ	(UCP*	O
or	CC	*	O
computer	NN	*)	O
disciplines	NNS	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
higher	JJR	(ADJP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

MKAPA	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
SAYS	NNP	*	DSE
PUNITIVE	NNP	*	O
ACTION	NNP	*	O
AGAINST	NNP	*	O
ZIM	NNP	*	O
PREMATURE	NNP	*))	ESE

Tanzanian	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Benjamin	NNP	*	O
Mkapa	NNP	*)	O
joined	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
counterparts	NNS	*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rejecting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
calls	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
punitive	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
9	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
10	CD	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
executive	NN	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Heads	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
east	JJ	*	O
coast	NN	*	O
resort	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Coolum	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
suspension	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
premature	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
scene	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
evolving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
evolving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Coolum	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
make	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
intelligent	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
rational	JJ	*	ESE
decision	NN	*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
scene	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
played	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	ESE
why	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*)))	ESE
we	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
listen	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mkapa	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
assumed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
poll	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
That	DT	(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
ridiculous	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Let	VB	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP(VP*	ESE
's	POS	(S(NP*)	ESE
wait	VB	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
see	VB	*)))	ESE
...	:	*	O
Let	NNP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*))))	O
give	VBP	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
observation	NN	*)))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
its	PRP$	(S(NP*)	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mkapa	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
reiterated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
quiet	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
diplomacy	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
correct	JJ	*	ESE
route	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
shared	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
colleagues	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mkapa	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
indirectly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
criticised	VBD	*	DSE
British	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
record	NN	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
alienation	VBN	(VP*	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
assumption	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
unless	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
Zanu-PF	NNP	*)	O
loses	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Commonwealth	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
delayed	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
opting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
privacy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
retreat	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
advisers	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
officials	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Blair	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
warned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
54-member	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reputation	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
damaged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
decisive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
BBC	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Blair	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
hopeful	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*)))	O
win	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
h	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
identified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
top	JJ	*	ESE
violator	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
last	JJ	*	ESE
Christian	JJ	*	ESE
year	NN	*)	ESE
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*))))))	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
excuse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(SINV(S(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
denied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*)	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
accused	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
appeal	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
appoint	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
lawyer	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
minorities	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
particular	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
minority	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
migrated	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taleban	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Al-Qa	NNP	*	O
`	``	*	O
idah	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
metal	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
cages	NNS	*)	ESE
named	VBN	(VP*	ESE
detention	NN	(NP*	ESE
centres	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
refusing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
identify	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
example	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Only	RB	(ROOT(S*	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extensive	JJ	*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
-LSB-	CD	*	O
media	NNS	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
organizations	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
compelled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
partially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
recognize	VB	*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
interesting	JJ	*)	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
expelled	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP(PP*	O
membership	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
organization	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
because	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
repeated	VBN	*	ESE
violation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
can	MD	(S(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
circumstances	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
allow	VBP	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
unilateral	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
identify	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
limits	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
particular	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
unilateral	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
strategic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
proposal	NN	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
set	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
lately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
current	JJ	*	O
expression	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
view	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
records	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
continuation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
unilateral	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
pursued	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
American	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
assumes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
interfere	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
internal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
care	VB	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
vis-a-vis	NNS	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
times	NNS	(NP*))	O
influence	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
virtue	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
express	VB	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
-	:	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
massacring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
excuse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
-	:	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expect	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
take	VB	(VP*	DSE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
therefore	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
blame	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
viewing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
such	JJ	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
tool	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
advance	VB	(VP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
foreign	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

TEHRAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
The	NNP	*)	O
concluding	VBG	(VP*	O
ceremony	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
First	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Police	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Equipment	NNP	*	O
Exhibition	NNP	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exhibition	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Public	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
large	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ambassadors	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
attaches	NNS	*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
participants	NNS	*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
emerged	VBD	(S(VP*	O
superior	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exhibition	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
ceremony	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Seyed	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Jalali	NNP	*	O
Parvin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
managing	VBG	*	O
director	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
board	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
directors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Law	NNP	(NP*	O
Enforcement	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNP	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
Cooperatives	NNP	*	O
Foundation	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
awards	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
superior	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exhibition	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Touching	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
modern	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
preventing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
reducing	VBG	*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
society	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Parvin	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
thanked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
active	JJ	*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	*)	O
companies	NNS	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
First	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Police	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Equipment	NNP	*	O
exhibition	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
assessed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
achievements	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exhibition	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
useful	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
satisfactory	JJ	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
hoping	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
equipped	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latest	JJS	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
most	JJS	*)	O
modern	JJ	*	O
technology	NN	*))	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
expedite	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pointing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Interpol	NNP	(NP*	O
officers	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ambassadors	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
attaches	NNS	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Saudi	JJ	*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Slovakia	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Italy	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Parvin	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
exhibition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
kind	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
extensively	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
welcomed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
gave	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holding	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
exhibition	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Moscow	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
present	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
equipment	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
exhibition	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
ceremony	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
Sa-Iran	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
Ava-e	JJ	*	O
Nasr-e	JJ	*	O
Novin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mahan	NNP	*	O
Industry	NNP	*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Netherlands	NNPS	*)))))	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
awards	NNS	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
superior	JJ	*	O
companies	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
exhibition	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Jordan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
impeding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
Cabinet	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Faris	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Juneidi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Corporation	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Environment	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Protection	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GCEP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Soon	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
delegate	VB	(VP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
representative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
HH	NNP	(NP*	O
Prince	NNP	*	O
Zeid	NNP	*	O
Ben	NNP	*	O
Raad	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Juneidi	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
exact	JJ	*	O
date	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
signing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
legally	RB	(ADJP*	O
obliged	VBN	*))	O
developed	VBD	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
8	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2012	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
developed	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
main	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
large-scale	JJ	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
pollution	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
stressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
conventions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Juneidi	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
GCEP	NNP	(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attract	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
funding	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
contribute	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
trap	NN	(S(VP*	O
heat	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
thus	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
causing	VBG	*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

GCEP	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
agency	NN	*	O
operating	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Municipal	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rural	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Environment	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
point	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reference	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
pacts	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
formally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
bound	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
accord	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
complete	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
opposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
contravenes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
slammed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
European	JJ	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
produced	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
alternative	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
encouraging	JJ	(NP*	O
industries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
trim	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
shown	VBN	(VP*	DSE
reluctance	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
signing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
GDP	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
2.5	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
cause	VB	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
worth	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
19	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

JAKARTA	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Agency	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
:	:	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Singapore	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
settle	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
differences	NNS	*)	ESE
quietly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
row	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
claims	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Senior	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Lee	NNP	*	O
Kuan	NNP	*	O
Yew	NNP	*)))))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
terrorist	JJ	(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*)	O
large	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Hassan	NNP	*	O
Wirajuda	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
quoted	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
reached	VBN	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
settle	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
dispute	NN	*)	DSE
openly	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
settle	VB	(VP*	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
arisen	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Senior	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Lee	NNP	*	O
Kuan	NNP	*	O
Yew	NNP	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
channels	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Hassan	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
neighboring	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
mechanisms	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
handling	VBG	(NP*	O
disputes	NNS	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
elaborating	VBG	(S(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lee	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
leaders	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
extremist	NN	*	O
cells	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
large	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesia	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Singapore	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
identified	VBD	(VP*	O
Indonesian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
cleric	JJ	*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Bakar	NNP	*	O
Ba'asyir	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
ofthem	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
claim	NN	*)	O
sparked	VBD	(VP*	O
protests	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
demonstrations	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Jakarta	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Hassan	NNP	*)))	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
provocative	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Singapore	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
late	RB	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*	O
13	CD	*))	O
suspected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jemaah	NNP	*	O
Islamiyah	NNP	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
plotting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
blow	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
named	VBN	(VP*	O
Ba'asyir	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
runs	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
boarding	NN	*	O
school	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Java	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ba'asyir	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
filed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
100	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
dollar	NN	*	O
libel	NN	*	O
lawsuit	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Singapore	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
cleric	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
questioned	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Indonesian	JJ	(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
denies	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	O
links	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terror	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Osama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	O
mastermind	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
Muslim	JJ	*	ESE
fighter	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indonesia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
pressure	NN	(NP*))	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
quarters	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
tougher	JJR	(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
alleged	VBN	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
played	VBN	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
threat	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

March	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*	O
14	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax-Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
A	DT	(S(NP*	O
railroad	NN	*	O
link	NN	*)	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Almaty	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Tehran	NNP	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
train	VBP	(S(VP*	O
No.	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O

19/20	20	(ROOT(X(NP*	O
Almaty	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Tashkent	NNP	(FRAG(NP(NP*	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
Turkmenabad	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Seraks	NNP	(NP*))	O
-	:	*)	O
Meshked	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Tehran	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
departed	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Almaty-2	NN	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
evening	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
memorandum	NN	*)	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iranian	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Kazakh	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Kyrgyz	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Tajik	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Turkish	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
Turkmen	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Uzbek	NNP	*	O
railroad	NN	*	O
administrations	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Baku	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
31	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
link	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
extended	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Istanbul	NNP	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
railroad	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
Lake	NNP	(NP*	O
Van	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
train	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
3,300-kilometer	JJ	*	O
route	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tehran	NNP	(NP*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
Kazakhstan	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Uzbekistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Turkmenistan	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iran	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
68	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
tourists	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
businessmen	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
route	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kazakh	NNP	*	O
Railroad	NNP	*	O
Company	NNP	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detailed	JJ	*	O
document	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Council	NNP	(NP*	O
session	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NNS	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
published	VBN	(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*))	O
serious	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
expanding	VBG	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
presence	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
level	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
dominating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
bomb	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
investigating	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
matter	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
proof	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
put	VBD	(VP*	DSE
all	PDT	(NP*	DSE
the	DT	*	DSE
blame	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
formed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aim	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Taliban	NNP	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
due	RB	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
bombardment	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manner	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
defenseless	JJ	(S(NP(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
innocent	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
poor	JJ	*)	ESE
Muslims	NNPS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
blown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
ammunition	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	ESE
dreadful	JJ	*	ESE
events	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
history	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
witnessed	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
loathsome	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
no	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
--	:	*))	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
voice	NN	*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
horrifying	JJ	*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
oppression	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Encouraged	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
shameful	JJ	*	ESE
silence	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
declaring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Iraq	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
'	''	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
announced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
target	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
manner	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
!	NNP	(NP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

North	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
target	NN	*)	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
according	VBG	(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
blamed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
transferring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Islamic	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
seven	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
terms	NNS	*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
security	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
nuclear	JJ	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
above-mentioned	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*)	ESE
ever	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
events	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
openly	RB	(SBAR(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
told	VBD	*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
number	NN	*	ESE
one	CD	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
damaging	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
solidarity	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
violating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Mohammed	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Austria	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
protested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
dictatorial	JJ	*	ESE
move	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(SBAR(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*))	O
terming	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
`	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
'	''	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Apparently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attitude	NN	*)	DSE
looks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
reaction	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

American	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
intellectual	NN	*	O
Noam	NNP	*	O
Chomsky	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
proved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
writings	NNS	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
accomplishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
goals	NNS	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
aggression	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
American	JJ	*	ESE
psyche	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
traced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1818	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
American	JJ	(S(NP*	O
cowboys	NNS	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	ESE
blind	JJ	(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
oppress	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
blacks	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
raising	VBG	(VP(VP*	DSE
artificial	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
slogans	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
preservation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
developing	VBG	(VP*	O
standards	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
living	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
actual	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	O
objective	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
worldwide	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
for	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
care	VB	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
values	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
analysis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chomsky	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
World	NNP	(NP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	O
tank	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
planned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
subjugate	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
regions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
progress	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Third	NNP	*	O
World	NNP	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
anti-Soviet	JJ	(NP*	DSE
hysteria	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
promoted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
strongly	RB	(ADVP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
CIA	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
task	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
topple	VB	(VP(VP*	O
governments	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
install	VB	(VP*	O
rulers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	DSE
choice	NN	*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guatemala	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1954	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
1963	CD	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Dominican	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1984	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1965	CD	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chile	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1973	CD	(NP*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
toppled	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
clearly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
mentioned	VBN	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
memorandum	NN	*	O
number	NN	*	O
68	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1950	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
supremacy	NNP	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
maintained	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
cost	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
derived	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
logic	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
impulsive	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
action	NN	*))))))))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
psychology	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	ESE
supremacy	NN	*)))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	O
involved	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)	ESE
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)	ESE
planned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
suicidal	JJ	*	O
attack	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
due	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hegemony	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
maintain	VB	(VP*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assessment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
different	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
prepares	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
violations	NNS	*)))	O
all	DT	(PP*	O
over	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
tried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
self-assessment	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
events	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ignored	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
convention	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
negated	RB	*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
constitution	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
approximately	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
1,000	CD	*)	O
Pakistanis	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
thrown	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
jail	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mohammed	NNP	(NP*	O
Butt	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
heart	NN	(NP*	O
failure	NN	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
detention	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
court	NN	*	O
case	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
nor	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Five	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
hundred	CD	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
kept	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
cages	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
placed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
inhuman	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
keeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(FRAG(NP(NP*	ESE
lesson	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
others	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
!	.	*))	O
,	,	*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
TV	NN	*	O
channels	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
daily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
shots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
kept	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Above	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
reported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jews	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
September	NNP	*	O
events	NNS	*)))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
ruled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
120	CD	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
spies	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
exiled	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
orders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Justice	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
not	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
only	RB	*)	ESE
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
double	JJ	*	ESE
standards	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
also	RB	*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
selfishness	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
exposes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
background	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
keeping	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
troops	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
basis	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
different	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
parts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
justified	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
demanding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
creating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
conflicts	NNS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
embarking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
upon	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oppression	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
supremacy	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
interfering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
affairs	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
engulfed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
crime	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Racial	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
prejudice	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
assumed	VBN	(VP*	O
alarming	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	ESE
proportions	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
protection	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
respect	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
sanctity	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
-LSB-	VBZ	(VP*	O
above-mentioned	JJ	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(S(S(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
eye	NN	*	ESE
opener	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
whole	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
viewed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
perspective	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Pakistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rethink	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
regard	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Pakistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
supporting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))	O
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	ESE
benefit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*))))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
earned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
United	NNP	*	ESE
States	NNPS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Pakistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
earned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bad	JJ	*	ESE
name	NN	*))))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
external	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
increased	VBN	(VP*	O
manifold	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Pakistan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
draw	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
conclusions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
light	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
circumstances	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
blindly	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
accepting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
responding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
positively	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
phone	NN	*	O
call	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
single	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
carefully	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

CAPE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
TOWN	NNP	*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*)	O
Sapa	NNP	(NP*	O
SA	NNP	*	O
ADOPTS	NNP	*	DSE
CALM	NNP	*	ESE
AND	CC	*	ESE
FORWARD-LOOKING	NNP	*	ESE
APPROACH	NNP	*	O
TO	NNP	*	O
ZIM	NNP	*)))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	DSE
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
government	NN	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
calm	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
forward-looking	JJ	*)	ESE
approach	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
statement	NN	*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
night	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
swept	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
victory	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
avoided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
pronouncing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
freeness	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
fairness	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*))))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
punitive	JJ	(S(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
consulting	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
assessing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
host	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
observer	NN	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*	O
reports	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
On	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
reports	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
consultations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
proceeding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
principle	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
South	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
collective	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
due	JJ	(NP*	O
course	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	ESE
urgent	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	(NP*	O
stability	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
pursuit	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
objectives	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
interest	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
continent	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
constant	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
consultation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
secretary-general	NNP	*	O
Don	NNP	*	O
McKinnon	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
President	NNP	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Howard	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
mandated	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Heads	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Government	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
Meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fate	NN	*))	O
once	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
submitted	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RBR	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
interim	JJ	*	DSE
report	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
adequately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
expression	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
will	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electorate	NN	*)))))	O
''	''	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
eyes	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
troika	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
penalised	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mandate	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
action	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
range	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
collective	JJ	(NP*	O
disapproval	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
suspension	NN	(NP*))	O
should	MD	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
undemocratically	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
note	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
missions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
aside	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
differences	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
together	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
future	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
''	''	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
included	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
council	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ministers	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
declared	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
substantially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
``	``	(SBAR(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
general	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
transparent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
credible	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noted	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SA	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Observer	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SAOM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
report	NN	*)	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
had	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
found	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
adequately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
silent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SADC	JJ	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	DSE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
bloc	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
own	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
norms	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
signatory	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*)))))	O
--	:	*))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
met	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Deputy	NNP	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jacob	NNP	*	O
Zuma	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
special	JJ	*	O
emissary	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Harare	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pretoria	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
serious	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
calm	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
forward-looking	JJ	*)	ESE
approach	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zuma	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Lakela	NNP	*	O
Kaunda	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Sapa	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
message	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
re-election	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SAOM	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
interim	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kaunda	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
details	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Zuma	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*))	O
later	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zuma	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Labour	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Membathisi	NNP	*	O
Mdladlana	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
served	VBD	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
ministerial	JJ	*	O
task	NN	*	O
team	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zuma	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*	O
Simon	NNP	*	O
Muzenda	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
agencies	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Zuma	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwean	JJ	(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
radio	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
those	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
discrediting	NNP	*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
listen	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Africans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*))))))))	O
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SAOM	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

SAOM	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
head	NN	*	O
Sam	NNP	*	O
Motsuenyane	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
radio	NN	*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
stopped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
short	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
explain	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
apparent	JJ	*	ESE
contradiction	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Kaunda	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Zuma	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ongoing	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
consultation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
governments	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zuma	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
informed	VBN	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(UCP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SAOM	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
involving	VBG	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
bodies	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
OAU	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
organisations	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
await	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
responding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
definitively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Both	DT	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
need	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
continued	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
consultation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
co-operation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
matters	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shortage	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
grain	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
co-operation	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
trade	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
investments	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Zuma	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
continued	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

JOHANNESBURG	VBG	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
16	CD	*)	O
Sapa	NNP	(S(NP*	O
MBEKI	NNP	*	O
TO	NNP	*	O
MEET	NNP	*))	O
WITH	IN	(PP*	O
MUGABE	NNP	(NP*	O
AND	CC	*	O
TSVANGIRAI	NNP	*))	O
IN	IN	(PP*	O
HARARE	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
ON	IN	(PP*	O
MONDAY	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S(SBAR(PRN*	O
CORRECTS	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
TITLE	NNP	*)	O
OF	IN	(PP*	O
AUSTRALIAN	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
PM	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
UPDATES	NNS	(NP*))))	O
WITH	IN	(PP*	O
ZUMA	NNP	(NP*	O
ATTENDING	NNP	*	O
INAUGURATION	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
fly	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Harare	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*)))	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Bheki	NNP	*	O
Khumalo	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
Sapa	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Khumalo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Nigerian	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
culminate	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
Australian	JJ	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
inaugurated	VBN	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	(NP*	O
president	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	ESE
re-election	NN	*))))))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
elected	VBN	(VP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ruled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*	O
since	IN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
mandated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Heads	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Government	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Meeting	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CHOGM	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
action	NN	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
report	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
legitimacy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SA	NNP	*	O
Observer	NNP	*	O
Mission	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
earlier	RBR	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
adequately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
expression	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
will	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electorate	NN	*)))))	O
''	''	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
SADC	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
endorsed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
judging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
9-11	CD	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
conform	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
norms	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
organisation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ministers	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
true	JJ	*	ESE
reflection	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
will	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OAU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
backed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwean	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
describing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
transparent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
credible	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

South	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
endorsed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
vote	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
interim	JJ	*	DSE
report	NN	*))	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(SBAR(S*	O
o	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
verall	VBP	(VP*))))))))	O
...	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
conducting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
discharged	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
work	NN	*)	O
satisfactorily	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
team	NN	*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
characterised	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
polarisation	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
tension	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
incidents	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
terms	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
Commonwealth	NNP	*	DSE
's	POS	*)	DSE
mandate	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
action	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
range	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
collective	JJ	(NP*	ESE
disapproval	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
suspension	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
already	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
record	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

CHOGM	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP(NP*	O
reform	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

State-sanctioned	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
invasions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
illegal	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
courts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
drought	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
disrupted	VBN	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
food	NN	*	O
production	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
famine	NN	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
looming	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
much	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Foreign	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Ronnie	NNP	*	O
Mamoepa	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
deputy	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
Jacob	NNP	(NP*	O
Zuma	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
controversially	NN	*)))	ESE
re-elected	JJ	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
latest	JJS	*	O
inauguration	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
reason	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
provided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Mbeki	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
attend	VB	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reports	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Lagos	NNP	(NP*)))	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
not	RB	*	O
attend	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Several	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Tanzania	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Benjamin	NNP	*	O
Nkapa	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Malawi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Bakili	NNP	*	O
Muluzi	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
currently	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
also	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SADC	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mamoepa	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
key	JJ	*	ESE
points	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agenda	NN	*)))	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
recovery	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
social	JJ	*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
``	``	(PP*	O
within	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
context	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
unity	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Islamabad	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
18	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Central	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Leader	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
People	NNPS	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
PPP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
North-West	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Frontier	NNP	*	O
Province	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NWFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
Seyed	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Qamar	NNP	*	O
Abbas	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*	O
department	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
right	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
report	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
violator	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
IRNA	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
parts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
globe	NN	*))))	ESE
particularly	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
guise	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
injured	VBN	*	ESE
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
Afghans	NNPS	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
maltreated	VBN	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
weeks	NNS	(NP*)))	O
ago	IN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
state	NN	*	O
department	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
annual	JJ	*	DSE
report	NN	*)))	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
revealed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iran	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
violators	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
double	JJ	*	ESE
standard	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
denounces	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violation	NN	*))	O
but	CC	*	O
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
perishing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lebanon	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Abbas	NNP	(NP*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
independant	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
real	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
dictation	NN	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
US	NNP	*)))))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
accepts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
supremacy	NN	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
labelled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*	ESE
violators	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Those	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
submit	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
showered	VBG	(VP*	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	ESE
favours	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
follows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
interests	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
covert	JJ	*	ESE
motive	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
strategic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Abbas	NNP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(ADVP*	ESE
more	RBR	*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
kept	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
dark	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
observe	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unjust	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
discriminatory	JJ	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
believe	VB	(VP*	ESE
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Binyamin	NNP	*	O
Ben-Eli	NNP	*)	O
`	``	*	O
ezer	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
stated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
success	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
failure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
envoy	NNP	*	O
Zinni	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mission	NN	*)))	O
hinges	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*))	ESE
only	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
because	IN	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
carry	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
or	CC	*	O
shooting	NN	*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
will	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*	O
retaliate	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
thus	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
bringing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cycle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Consequently	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Zinni	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
attain	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
cease-fire	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
commence	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tenet	NNP	*	O
understandings	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mitchell	NNP	*	O
recommendations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
allegation	NN	*)	DSE
contradicts	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
simplest	JJS	*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
ground	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
occupies	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
possesses	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
vast	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP(VP*	O
incursions	NNS	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
raid	VB	(VP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
camps	NNS	*))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
intimidate	VBN	(NP(NP*	ESE
women	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
children	NNS	*)	ESE
;	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
assassinate	VB	(VP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
activists	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
citizens	NNS	*))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
buildings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
facilities	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
infrastructure	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
roads	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
water	NN	(NP*	ESE
pipes	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
electricity	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
telephone	NN	*	ESE
poles	NNS	*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
attack	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	ESE
ambulances	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
kill	VB	(VP*	ESE
medical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
teams	NNS	*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
carry	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
retaliatory	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
suppressive	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
devastating	JJ	(NP*	ESE
practices	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
entire	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	ESE
not	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	ESE
alone	RB	(ADJP*))	ESE
--	:	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
waiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
hear	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
recognition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
readiness	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lands	NNS	*)	O
occupied	VBN	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
de	FW	(ADJP*	O
facto	FW	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
statement	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
constitute	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
era	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
era	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
counterviolence	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Clearly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
acceded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
--	:	(PRN*	O
even	RB	*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)))	ESE
--	:	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
recognized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
exist	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
78	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
historical	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
concessions	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Such	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
statement	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
serve	VB	(VP*	ESE
Zinni	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
mission	NN	*)))	ESE
but	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
accelerate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attainment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
arrangement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
gain	VB	(VP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
security	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
lands	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
colonialist	JJ	*	ESE
occupation	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
renunciation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
mentality	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
domination	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
expansion	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
caused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
calamities	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
catastrophes	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
past	JJ	*	ESE
five	CD	*	ESE
decades	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
coming	JJ	*	ESE
days	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
weeks	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
positively	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
objectively	RB	*)	ESE
deal	VB	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
national	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
maneuver	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
place	NN	(NP*	ESE
obstacles	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*))))))	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	(NP*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
Zinni	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mission	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
case	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Zinni	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mission	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
sure	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
certain	JJ	(S(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
soon	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
road	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
question	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
compliance	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
required	VBN	*	O
commitments	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
test	NN	*)	ESE
not	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
only	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
readiness	NN	(NX(NX*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
facilitate	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
envoy	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mission	NN	*)))))	O
but	CC	(PRN*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
readiness	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
establish	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
just	JJ	*	ESE
peace	NN	*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*))))	O
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

C'wealth	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
mission	NN	(S(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
questionable	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Special	JJ	*	O
Correspondent	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Tony	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
privately	RB	(ADVP*))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)	O
concerning	VBG	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
retreat	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
raise	NN	(S(NP*	DSE
questions	NNS	*)	DSE
about	RB	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
troika	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Blair	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
condemned	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Zimbabweans	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
vote	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(SBARQ*	ESE
how	WRB	(WHADVP*)	ESE
could	MD	(SQ*	ESE
Blair	NNP	(NP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*	ESE
else	RB	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
report	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
channeled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Secretariat	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
53	CD	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
retreat	NN	*)))))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
fudged	VBD	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
reply	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
left	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
distinct	JJ	*	ESE
impression	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Blair	JJ	*	ESE
report	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
written	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
London	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Commonwealth	NNP	*	ESE
mission	NN	*)	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
left	VBN	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
rubber	NN	(NP*))	ESE
stamp	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
adverse	JJ	*	DSE
report	NN	*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
written	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Blair	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second	JJ	*	O
faux	JJ	*	ESE
pas	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
assembled	VBN	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
response	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
remarkably	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
conciliatory	JJ	*)	DSE
speech	NN	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Stan	NNP	*	O
Mudenge	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Nigerian	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Olusegun	NNP	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP(VP*	DSE
attack	VB	(VP*	DSE
Blair	NNP	(NP*)	O
frontally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
negative	JJ	*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*	O
preparations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
dispassionate	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
precise	JJ	*)	ESE
manner	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	O
Mudenge	NNP	(NP*)	O
rose	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
strode	VBD	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Blair	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
thrust	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
hand	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
hand	NN	*)	O
symbolised	VBD	(VP*	O
reconciliation	NN	(NP*)))	O
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Blair	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
accepted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	O
Mudenge	NNP	(NP*)	O
proposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Britain	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)	O
bury	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
past	JJ	(NP*	ESE
differences	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
work	VBP	(VP*	O
together	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
place	NN	*)	ESE
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
dispute	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
coloniser	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
breathed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
collective	JJ	*	DSE
sigh	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
relief	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hoped	VBD	(VP*))))))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
healing	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
unanswered	JJ	*	DSE
question	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
minds	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))	O
:	:	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(SQ*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
purported	JJ	*	ESE
``	``	*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
''	''	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
back	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
strange	JJ	*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
happening	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
mission	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
pre-booked	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*))))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
partly	RB	(ADJP*	O
Government-owned	JJ	*)	O
Sheraton	NNP	*	O
Hotel	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spurious	JJ	*	ESE
grounds	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
African	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Union-Patriotic	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Zanu-PF	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*	O
centre	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
adjoining	JJ	*	O
building	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
moved	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
privately	RB	(ADJP*	O
owned	VBN	*)	O
Meikles	NNP	*	O
Hotel	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
unlike	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sheraton	NNP	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Herald	NNP	*))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
distributed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
guests	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pro-opposition	JJ	*	ESE
Daily	NNP	*	O
News	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
freely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
guests	NNS	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Furthermore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
anyone	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
following	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	NNP	*	O
Press	NNP	*)))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
testify	VB	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Meikles	NNP	*	O
farms	NNS	*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
acquired	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
reform	NN	*	O
programme	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meikles	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hotel	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hot	JJ	*	ESE
bed	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
opposition	NN	(NP*	ESE
politics	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
80	CD	(NP(NP*	O
rooms	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Meikles	NNP	(NP*	O
Hotel	NNP	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
booked	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
British	NNP	*	O
Broadcasting	NNP	*	O
Corporation	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
BBC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
openly	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	DSE
hostile	JJ	*)	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Government	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
BBC	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accreditation	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cover	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
journalists	NNS	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
assembled	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hotel	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
moved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
complete	JJ	*	O
floor	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
entourage	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
notable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
joined	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
hotel	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
curious	JJ	*	ESE
appointment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
behaviour	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
individual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
mission	NN	*))))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
sworn	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
secrecy	NN	(NP*))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
should	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*	DSE
only	RB	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chair	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Federal	NNP	*	O
Parliament	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Julie	NNP	(NP*	O
Bishop	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
vented	VBD	(VP*	DSE
her	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
anger	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
,	,	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
media	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
composition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
mission	NN	*)))	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
further	JJ	(NP*	DSE
questions	NNS	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	ESE
were	VBD	(SQ*	ESE
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
employees	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Secretariat	NNP	*)))	O
accredited	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Normally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
staff	NN	(NP*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Secretariat	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
populated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
eminent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
neutral	JJ	*)	ESE
persons	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Namibian	JJ	*	O
woman	NN	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
mission	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
well-respected	JJ	*	DSE
,	,	*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Speaker	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
held	VBD	(VP*	DSE
different	JJ	(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
stated	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(SBAR*	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
known	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
missions	NNS	*)	O
nominally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
operate	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
consensus	NN	(NP*)	O
''	''	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
others	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
view	NN	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
dismissed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
troublemakers	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Secretariat	NNP	*	O
staff-cum-observer	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	ESE
straw	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
abandoned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pretence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fairness	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sides	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dispute	NN	*))))))))))))	DSE
came	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
John	NNP	(NP*	O
Howard	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
High	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
inauguration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Robert	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Australians	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
common	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Norwegians	NNPS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Swiss	JJ	*))	O
stayed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
away	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
event	NN	*))	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
Mugabe	JJ	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
realities	NNS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Presidents	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
confronted	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
they	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
flew	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*))	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Australian	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
troika	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Howard	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
isolated	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three-member	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Marlborough	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
Secretary-General	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Don	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
McKinnon	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
condemn	VB	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
close	RB	(ADVP*	O
by	IN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Howard	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
western	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Presidents	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
benefit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
missions	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
vast	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(NP*	O
consensus	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
views	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
whole	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*)	ESE
Blair	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
fight	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
present	JJ	*	ESE
impasse	NN	*)))	ESE
lies	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Africa	NNP	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Britain	NNP	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Europe	NNP	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
21	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
urged	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
abide	VB	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
''	''	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
warning	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
any	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
act	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
trample	VB	(VP*	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sino-U.S.	JJ	*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Communiques	NNP	*))))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
result	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
very	JJ	*	ESE
unfavorable	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
impact	NN	*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
relates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
sovereignty	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
territorial	NN	*	O
integrity	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
essential	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*))	ESE
issue	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sino-U.S.	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Zhang	NNP	*	O
Qiyue	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
anything	NN	(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
Sino-U.S.	JJ	*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Communiques	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
briefing	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*	O
Tang	NNP	*	O
Yiau-min	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recent	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
replied	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chinese	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Li	NNP	*	O
Zhaoxing	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
forward	RP	(PRT*)	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
stand	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
matter	NN	*	DSE
while	NN	*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	DSE
strong	JJ	(NP*	DSE
representations	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
treats	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*	O
seriousness	NN	*)	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
deserves	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
working	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chinese	NNP	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hu	NNP	*	O
Jintao	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
done	VBN	(VP*	ESE
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
Sino-U.S.	JJ	*	O
Joint	NNP	*	O
Communiques	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhu	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
interfering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
interfering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

HONG	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
KONG	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
26	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
disallowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
routine	JJ	*	O
port	NN	*	O
call	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
vessel	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
consulate	NN	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
requested	JJ	*	DSE
visit	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
USS	NNP	*	O
Curtis	NNP	*	O
Wilbur	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
destroyer	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
5	CD	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
routine	JJ	*	O
port	NN	*	O
call	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
No	DT	(S(NP*	O
reason	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
disapproval	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
bar	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
USS	NNP	*	O
Curtis	NNP	*	O
Wilbur	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
346	CD	*	O
crew	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
reflecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
anger	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tang	NNP	*	O
Yao-ming	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
twice	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
summoned	VBN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
ambassador	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
dressings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
down	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
state-controlled	JJ	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
preparing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
cancel	VB	(VP*	O
naval	JJ	(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
retaliation	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
such	PDT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
a	DT	*	DSE
request	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
turned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*))))))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
collision	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
spy	NN	*	O
plane	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
fighter	NN	*	O
jet	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
space	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
visits	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Hong	NNP	(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)))	O
resumed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
similar	JJ	*	O
episodes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
permission	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
denied	VBN	(VP*	DSE
before	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
handover	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
British	JJ	*	O
colony	NN	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
embassy	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
bombed	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
killing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
NATO	NNP	*	O
air	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
three	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Hong	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Kong	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
navy	NN	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
65	CD	(NP(NP*	O
port	JJ	*	O
calls	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
agreed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
stopovers	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
sovereignty	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
envoys	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fresh	JJ	(NP*	O
bid	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

AFRICAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
superpowers	NNP	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Africa	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))	O
stepped	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
efforts	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
broker	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comprise	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
ZANU	NNP	*	O
PF	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
Movement	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ward	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
illegitimacy	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
facing	VBG	*	O
controversially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
elected	VBN	*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
administration	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Presidents	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Thabo	NNP	*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
sensing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
outright	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
isolation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
refusal	NN	*))))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
win	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
dispatched	VBN	(VP*	O
African	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*	O
secretary-general	NNP	*	O
Kgalema	NNP	*	O
Motlanthe	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
prominent	JJ	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
diplomat	NN	*	O
Adebayo	NNP	*	O
Adedeji	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
try	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hammer	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
compromise	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
9-11	CD	*	O
vote	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
massively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
rigged	VBN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
supporters	NNS	*)))	ESE
denied	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
vote	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
envoys	NNS	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Saturday	NNP	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
outlined	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
brief	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
intended	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
proceed	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
break	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
impasse	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
included	VBD	(S(VP*	O
national	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
chairman	NN	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Nkomo	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
secretary	NN	*	O
Emmerson	NNP	*	O
Mnangagwa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
heavily	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
tipped	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
vice	NN	(NP(NP*	O
presidents	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	ESE
successors	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mbeki	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
duo	NN	*)	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP(VP*	O
bridge	JJ	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
rift	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
arrest	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deteriorating	VBG	*	O
political	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
sources	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
agendas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
first	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
finding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
compromise	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Diplomatic	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
African	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
frantically	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
making	VBG	(VP*	DSE
efforts	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
recognition	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
unlock	NN	(NP(NP*	O
much-needed	JJ	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
fresh	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
supervision	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))	O
within	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
shortest	JJS	(ADJP*	ESE
possible	JJ	*)	ESE
period	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

ZANU	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
join	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
composition	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
yet	RB	(ADJP*	O
clear	JJ	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
formation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coalition	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
pushed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
ideal	JJ	*)	ESE
way	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stave	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
isolation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
but	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
received	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
mixed	JJ	(NP*	DSE
feelings	NNS	*))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
governing	VBG	*	O
party	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ZANU	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
board	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
facilitate	VB	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
financing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
recovery	NN	*	O
programme	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
land	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
hardliners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU	NNP	(NP*	O
PF	NNP	*)))	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
treason	CD	*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
used	VBN	(VP*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bargaining	NN	*	ESE
chip	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arm-twist	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
compromise	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
54-nation	JJ	*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15-nation	JJ	*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
Eastern	NNP	*	O
Bloc	NNP	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Scandinavian	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
most	RBS	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
Western	JJ	*)	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
re-election	NN	*)	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
blatant	JJ	*	ESE
fraud	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
marred	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
state-sponsored	JJ	(NP*	ESE
violence	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
received	VBN	(VP*	O
support	NN	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Settlers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
Have	VBP	(VP*	O
Taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Palestine	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Hostage	NNP	*)))))	ESE

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	DSE
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestine	NNP	*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
crossroads	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
escalation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
cost	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
1,000	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
18	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One-third	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two-thirds	JJ	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Circumstances	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
today	NN	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
find	VBP	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
road	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
leads	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
swiftly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
abyss	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Lebanese	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Beirut	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
ended	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
content	NN	*)	O
illustrated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Arab	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
come	VBN	(VP*	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
took	VBD	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sudanese	JJ	*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Khartoum	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1967	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
shortly	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Six	CD	*	O
Days	NNS	*)))	O
War	NNP	(ADJP*))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
adopted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
noes	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
negotiations	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
recognition	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
adopted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
proposed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
normal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
relations	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
end	NN	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
conflict	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
withdrawal	NN	*))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(QP*	O
35	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
mention	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cardinal	JJ	*	ESE
problems	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
3	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
couched	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
terms	NNS	(NP*))	O
softer	JJR	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
at	IN	*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
declaration	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
best	JJS	*	ESE
piece	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
news	NN	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Oslo	NNP	*	O
Accords	NNPS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Yitzhaq	NNP	*	O
Rabin	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Yasir	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lawn	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1993	CD	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*)))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plea	NN	*)	ESE
addressed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heads	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ariel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
Arab	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
doubt	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
from	IN	(S(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
standpoint	NN	*))	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
welcome	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
forced	VBD	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
corner	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
neither	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP(VP*)	ESE
nor	CC	*	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
give	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
so	IN	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
unmasked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eyes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
whole	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*))))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
man	NN	*	ESE
standing	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*	O
chance	NN	*)))))	ESE
came	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
rescue	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
bomber	NN	*)	O
attacked	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hotel	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Natanya	NNP	(NP*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hundred	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
gathered	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
Passover	NNP	*	O
meal	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Twenty-two	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
bomber	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
130	CD	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bomber	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hamas	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
radical	JJ	*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
organization	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
intelligence	NN	*	O
service	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
figured	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
list	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
shortly	RB	(ADVP*	O
before	RB	*)	O
handed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
Arafat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
promise	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
neutralize	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
list	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
lift	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
finger	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
night	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
cabinet	NN	*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
steps	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
destroy	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
terrorist	NN	*	O
structure	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
arrest	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
confiscate	VB	(VP*	ESE
arms	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	RB	*)	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
step	NN	*))	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
town	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
headquarters	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
autonomous	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
administered	VBN	(ADJP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
weeks	NNS	*)	O
previously	RB	*)	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
``	``	*	O
irrelevant	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
enemy	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
headquarters	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
effectively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
ceased	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
function	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Prior	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Natanya	NNP	*	O
massacre	NN	*)))	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
limitations	NNS	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israeli	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
's	POS	*)	O
antiterrorist	NN	*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collapse	VB	(VP*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
reconquer	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
jurisdiction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
authority	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Arafat	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
molested	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
keeping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
silent	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
usual	JJ	*	ESE
appeals	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Quite	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
reverse	NN	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
Anonymous	NNP	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
holds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	DSE
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
mediator	NNP	*	O
Anthony	NNP	*	O
Zinni	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
endeavors	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrange	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cease-fire	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
foundered	VBD	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
accepted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
cease-fire	NN	*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
hesitated	VBD	(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Natanya	NNP	*	O
massacre	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
counteraction	NN	*))	O
occurred	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
given	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
best	JJS	*)	ESE
only	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
throw	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
groups	NNS	*)	ESE
off	IN	(PP*	ESE
balance	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
solve	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
security	NN	*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
root	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
settlements	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
occupied	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
settlers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
number	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
220,000	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
Government	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
consequently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
both	PDT	(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
peoples	NNS	*	ESE
hostage	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
master	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
escalation	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
demonstrated	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
he	PRP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
defense	NN	(NP*	O
minister	NN	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1982	CD	*	O
invasion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBN	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
exile	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tunis	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
entertaining	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	DSE
similar	JJ	*)	DSE
thoughts	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
create	VB	(VP*	DSE
step	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
step	NN	(NP*))))))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
rid	VB	(VP*	O
himself	PRP	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
enemy	NN	*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
winners	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
superiority	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
solve	VB	(VP*	ESE
problems	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
fundamentally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
nature	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
tanks	NNS	*)	O
again	RB	*)	O
leave	VBP	(VP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
sown	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
seed	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
actions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Terrorism	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
thrives	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hate	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
force	NN	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
creating	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
fertile	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
soil	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
future	JJ	(S(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
recruited	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
31	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tang	NNP	*	O
Jiaxuan	NNP	*	O
Sunday	NNP	*)	O
urged	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
immediate	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
withdrawal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Yasser	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
residence	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Arafat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
personal	JJ	*	O
safety	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ensured	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
opposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
condemns	VBZ	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
violent	JJ	*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
expresses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
condolence	NN	(NP*	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
sympathy	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
solicitude	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
family	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
victims	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
phone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Shimon	NNP	*	O
Peres	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
abrupt	JJ	*	ESE
escalation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
caused	VBN	(VP*	ESE
huge	JJ	(NP*	ESE
casualties	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
property	NN	*	ESE
losses	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
personal	JJ	*	O
safety	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
severely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
endangered	VBN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
deeply	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
concerned	VBN	*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	ESE
deterioration	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
situation	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Arafat	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
leader	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
initiators	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
push	VB	(VP*	ESE
forward	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
stressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
disastrous	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
region	NN	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
unexpected	JJ	(S(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Arafat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
safety	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP(VP*	O
Resolution	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
1402	CD	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)))	O
unconditionally	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
means	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overall	JJ	*	O
requirement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
stability	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
own	JJ	*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
interest	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	ESE
pressing	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
both	DT	(VP*	O
exercise	VB	(VP*	ESE
maximum	JJ	(NP*	ESE
restraint	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
conditions	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
resumption	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Peres	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
briefed	VBD	(VP*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tang	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
enquiry	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
promise	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
threaten	VB	(VP*	ESE
Arafat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
personal	JJ	*	O
safety	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestine	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Authority	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

JAMMU	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Apr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
2	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Chief	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Dr.	NNP	*	O
Farooq	NNP	*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
breeding	VBG	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
wishes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
peace	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
For	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
sustenance	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
survival	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Pak	NNP	(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
throttling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
voice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistanis	NNP	(NP*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
wish	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
live	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
friendship	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cordiality	NN	*))	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
neighbours	NNS	*	O
'	''	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
while	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
addressing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
function	NN	*)))	O
organised	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
United	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Public	NNP	*	O
High	NNP	*	O
School	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Channi	NNP	(NP*	O
Himat	NNP	*))))	O
here	RB	(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
afternoon	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
mother	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
rid	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
menace	NN	*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
perpetrators	NNS	*)	ESE
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
border	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
dealt	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
firmly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
mere	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	ESE
positioning	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
army	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
borders	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
infiltration	NN	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
ultras	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
indulging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
blood-shed	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	ESE
lunaticism	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
touched	VBN	(VP*	ESE
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
heights	NNS	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
sparing	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
worship	NN	*	O
places	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
referred	VBD	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
attack	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Raghunath	JJ	(NP*	O
bazaar	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
temple	NN	*	O
complex	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
cautioned	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
extra	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
vigil	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
help	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
nabbing	VBG	(NP*	O
suspects	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Reiterating	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
give	VB	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
terror	NN	(NP*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
ultimately	RB	(S(NP(NP(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
demon	NN	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
reared	VBN	(VP*)))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
eat	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
vitals	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Those	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
digging	NN	*)	ESE
graves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
others	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
get	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
engraved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*	ESE
'	''	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
citing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
example	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Pakistan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
attempting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
hard	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
India	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
communal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
flames	NNS	*)))	ESE
so	RB	(SBAR*	O
that	IN	*	O
forces	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
withdrawn	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
borders	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
situations	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
thereby	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
leaving	VBG	(VP*	O
field	NN	(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
ultras	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cross	VB	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
side	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
dwelt	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
spread	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
education	NN	(NP*)))	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
teaching	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
younger	JJR	(NP*	O
generation	NN	*)))	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
steering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
prosperity	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
progress	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

`	``	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
Concentrate	VBG	*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
today	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
builders	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nation	NN	(NP*	ESE
tomorrow	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
teachers	NNS	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
appreciating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
parents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
career	NN	(NP(NP*	O
building	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
wards	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Responding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
demands	NNS	*)	DSE
put	VBN	(VP*	DSE
forth	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
memorandum	NN	*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
residents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chhanni	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Himmat	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Narwal	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Malik	NNP	(NP*	O
Marker	NNP	*	O
Bye-Pass	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chhanni	NNP	(NP*	O
Bija	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chhanni	NNP	(NP*	O
Rama	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chhanni	NNP	(NP*	O
Kamala	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Ambedkar	NNP	(NP*	O
Nagar	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
examined	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
11th	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
12th	JJ	*	O
classes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coaching	NN	*	O
class	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
competitive	JJ	*	O
exams	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
such	JJ	*	O
facility	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Dr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
dwelt	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
social	JJ	*	O
services	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
area	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
answer	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
meeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	O
demand	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tap	NN	(NP(NP*	O
water	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
localities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Jammu	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
tapping	VBG	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chenab	NNP	(NP*	O
water	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
purpose	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
regard	NN	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Rs	NNP	*	O
400	CD	*	O
crore	JJ	*	O
scheme	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
back	RB	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
process	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
implementation	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Expressing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
dwindling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
moral	JJ	(NP*	ESE
values	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
society	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
youngsters	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
get	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
inspiration	NN	(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
glorious	JJ	*	ESE
past	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
respect	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
parents	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
teachers	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
due	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	DSE
regard	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
elders	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
teachers	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
imperative	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
harmonious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
society	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Dr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
best	RBS	(PRT*)	O
teacher	NN	(NP*	O
award	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
appreciated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
performance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
student	NN	(NP*	O
artists	NNS	*))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
presented	VBD	(S(VP*	O
cultural	JJ	(NP*	O
items	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Minister	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Sports	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Labour	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Harbans	NNPS	*	O
Singh	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
chief	JJ	*	O
guest	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occasion	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))	O
present	NN	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mohammed	NNP	*	O
Syed	NNP	*	O
Akhoon	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mrs	NNP	(NP*	O
Bimla	NNP	*	O
Luthra	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
MLAs	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Ministers	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Legislative	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Assembly	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
besides	IN	(PP*	O
students	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
parents	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Akhoon	NNP	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
memento	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chief	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
management	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
school	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

JERUSALEM	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
4	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Pilgrim	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
House	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
owned	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Moscow	NNP	*	O
Patriarchy	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
fulfil	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tasks	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
response	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Orthodox	NNP	*	O
Church	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pilgrim	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
House	NN	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
as	RB	*)))))))))	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peacekeeping	VBG	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Moscow	NNP	*	O
Patriarchy	NNP	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Holy	NNP	*	O
Land	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Interfax	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S(S*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
observation	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
necessary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
casualties	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
During	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
necessity	NN	*)	O
emerged	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pilgrim	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
House	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
surveillance	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
once	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
tasks	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
fulfilled	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
building	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Interfax	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
``	``	(VP*	O
strictly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
adhere	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
moral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
norms	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
respecting	VBG	(NP(NP*	DSE
sanctuaries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
religions	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
stages	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
strongly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
denied	VBN	*	DSE
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assault	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cathedral	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Nativity	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Contrary	JJ	(S(S(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*	O
reports	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
storming	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
church	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
continual	JJ	(NP*	O
fire	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
snipers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
positions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
church	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
service	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
rumors	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
assault	NN	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
prompted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
false	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
information	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
circulated	VBN	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
journalists	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bangkok	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
09	NNP	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
Kyodo	NNP	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Thailand	NNP	(S(S(NP*)	O
expects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
official	JJ	*	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)))))	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Thai	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Thaksin	NNP	*	O
Shinawatra	NNP	*)	O
meets	VBZ	(VP*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Premier	NNP	*	O
Zhu	NNP	*	O
Rongji	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sidelines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
local	JJ	(NP*	O
dailies	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thaksin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Hainan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
Boao	NNP	*	O
Forum	NNP	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
starts	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Local	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
dailies	NNS	*)	O
quoted	VBD	(VP*	O
senior	JJ	(NP*	O
Commerce	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*	O
Boontipa	NNP	*	O
Simaskul	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
agrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
form	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
frame	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Boontipa	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Business	NNP	(NP*	O
Economics	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
frame	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
shorter	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
10-year	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*	O
frame	NN	*)	O
envisaged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Southeast	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Asian	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ASEAN	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Thailand	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
member	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Senior	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10-member	JJ	*	O
ASEAN	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
13	CD	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
blueprint	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
nod	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
ASEAN-China	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Brunei	NNP	(NP*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
China-ASEAN	JJ	*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
combined	VBN	*	O
market	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nearly	RB	(NP(QP*	O
1.8	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
gross	JJ	*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
product	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US$	$	(NP(QP*	O
2	CD	*	O
trillion	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
worth	NN	*)	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1.2	CD	*	O
trillion	CD	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ASEAN	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
comprises	VBZ	(VP*	O
Brunei	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Cambodia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Indonesia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Laos	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Myanmar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Philippines	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Singapore	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Thailand	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Vietnam	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thailand	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
preliminary	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
free-trade	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thaksin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Japanese	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Korean	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Lee	NNP	*	O
Han	NNP	*	O
Dong	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sidelines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*))	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Parliament	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
convened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Strasbourg	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
decided	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
advise	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	DSE
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
specifically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
to	TO	*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
association	NN	(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Parliament	NNP	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*	O
embargo	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
Authority	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
threatened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
--	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
light	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
close	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
extensive	JJ	*)	O
trade	NN	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
cause	VB	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
damage	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RBR	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Belgian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Louis	NNP	*	O
Michel	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
miss	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provoke	VB	(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
once	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
again	RB	*)	DSE
reconsider	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

European	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Commission	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Romano	NNP	*	O
Prodi	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
similar	JJ	(NP*	DSE
sentiments	NNS	*)))	DSE
:	:	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
``	``	*	O
punishment	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
protest	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israel	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*)	ESE
goes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Spanish	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Josep	NNP	*	O
Pique	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
offended	VBN	(VP*	DSE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
EU	VB	(VP*	O
foreign	JJ	(S(NP*	O
policy	NN	*	O
chief	NN	*	O
Javier	NNP	*	O
Solana	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
PA	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chairman	NNP	*	O
Yasser	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Parliament	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recommendation	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chances	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
association	NN	*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
slim	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	ESE
than	IN	*	ESE
a	DT	*)	ESE
recommendation	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
European	NNP	*	ESE
Parliament	NNP	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Commission	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ministers	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)	O
sit	VBP	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
unanimous	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Countries	NNPS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
France	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Belgium	NNP	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
easily	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
capable	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
voting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
other	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Britain	NNP	*))	O
--	:	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
exhibited	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
more	JJR	*	DSE
balanced	JJ	*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli-Palestinian	JJ	*	O
conflict	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
certain	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
more	JJR	*	DSE
balanced	JJ	*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
doubt	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
anti-Israeli	NN	(S(NP*	DSE
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
adopted	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
repeated	VBN	(S(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
denunciations	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
not	RB	(S*	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
mention	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
punishment	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
solution	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
vital	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
issues	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
eliminate	VBP	(VP*	O
customs	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
breaks	NNS	*)	O
afforded	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*)	O
wish	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
influence	VB	(VP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
arena	NN	*)))))))))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
wholeheartedly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	DSE
--	:	*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
able	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
positions	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
manner	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
unilateral	JJ	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
prejudice	VB	(VP*	ESE
Europe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
status	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
helping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
solution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

EU	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
External	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*	O
Chris	NNP	*	O
Patten	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
canceling	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
association	NN	*	DSE
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enhance	VB	(VP*	O
Jerusalem	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
readiness	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
listen	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
representatives	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
holds	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(ADJP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
threats	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
holds	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
threats	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
certain	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
means	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
punishment	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
implementing	VBG	(VP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reports	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
vital	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
components	NNS	*)	O
German	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
factories	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
supply	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
defense	NN	*	O
establishment	NN	*))))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
arriving	VBG	(VP*	O
slowly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
arrival	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vital	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
supplies	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
assume	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
act	VB	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pressure	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
deeds	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
oversights	NNS	*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
often	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
tainted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
significant	JJ	*	ESE
degree	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
hypocrisy	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Oil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sharp	JJ	*	O
downward	JJ	*	O
trend	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
quiet	JJ	*	O
semi-coup	JJ	*	O
d'etat	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
affiliated	JJ	*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*	O
generals	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
deposed	VBN	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
popularly	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*)	O
elected	VBN	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
price	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crude	NN	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dramatic	JJ	*	ESE
upsurge	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aftermath	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ever-deteriorating	JJ	*	ESE
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unilateral	JJ	*	O
cut	NN	*)	O
off	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*))))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Saddam	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hussein	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
similar	JJ	(NP*	O
threats	NNS	*)))	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
several	JJ	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
producing	VBG	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
dethroning	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
message	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
disobeying	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
Uncle	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
Sam	NNP	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
cataclysmic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
consequences	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
level	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
output	NN	*)))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
exports	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ala	NNP	*	ESE
Fidel	NNP	*	ESE
Castro	NNP	*	ESE
left-leaning	JJ	*	DSE
anti-American	JJ	*	DSE
philosophy	NN	*)))))))	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
occasions	NNS	(NP*))))	O
rebuffed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
requests	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
exports	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP*	O
response	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
preach	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
entire	JJ	*	ESE
planet	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
recognizing	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
no	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
longer	RB	*)	DSE
tolerate	VB	(VP*	DSE
someone	NN	(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
reverted	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
old	JJ	*	ESE
bullying	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
dictatorial	NN	*	ESE
tactics	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
arranged	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
coup	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
avowed	JJ	*	DSE
pro-American	JJ	*	ESE
generals	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
managed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remove	VB	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
few	JJ	*	ESE
short	JJ	*	ESE
hours	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
largest	JJS	*	O
exporter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fourth	JJ	*)))	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
worldwide	JJ	(S(NP*	O
production	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
oil	NN	*)	O
producing	VBG	(VP*	O
nation	NN	(NP*)	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
directly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
impacts	VBZ	(VP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
markets	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
little	JJ	*)	DSE
doubt	NN	(ADVP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
voluntarily	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
resign	VB	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
office	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
removed	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Evidently	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
phone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
daughter	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
resign	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
accept	VB	*))))))))	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
non-negotiable	JJ	*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
event	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
apparent	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
conspicuous	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
exert	NN	*	DSE
increasing	VBG	*	DSE
pressure	NN	*)	DSE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	O
wielding	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
authority	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
exercising	VBG	(VP*	ESE
dictatorial	JJ	(NP*	ESE
powers	NNS	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
only	JJ	*	O
superpower	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
determined	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
front	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
centre	NN	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
intricate	JJ	*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
game	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
flow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
all-important	JJ	*	ESE
strategic	JJ	*	O
product	NN	*)	O
otherwise	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
known	VBN	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Black	JJ	*	O
Gold	NN	*	O
''	''	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
fall	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crystal-clear	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
warning	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
anyone	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
contemplating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
tool	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*)	O
leaked	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reoccupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*))))	O
confirms	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
dozens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
premeditated	JJ	(NP*	ESE
massacres	NNS	*)))	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
carnage	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
implemented	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
compliance	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
decisions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
field	NN	*	O
marshals	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
atrocities	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
masterminded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
level	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Shimon	NNP	(NP*	O
Peres	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
reoccupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
media	NNS	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
happened	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Bosnia	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Herzegovina	NNP	*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
repeated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
larger	JJR	*	ESE
scale	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

People	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
masses	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
buried	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
collective	JJ	(NP*	ESE
graves	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
crime	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
humanity	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
committing	VBG	(VP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*))	O
just	RB	(PP*	ESE
like	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rwanda	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
Yugoslavia	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
crimes	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Rome	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
works	NNS	*)	O
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
approval	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
60	CD	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
criminals	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*	O
resolution	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tribunal	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	O
Arab	NNP	*	O
World	NNP	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
waiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
proof	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
international	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*)	ESE
protects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
beings	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
general	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
regardless	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
color	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ethnicity	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
religion	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
tolerate	VB	(VP*	DSE
crimes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
waiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
see	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
international	JJ	(S(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
selective	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
applied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
cultural	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
ideological	JJ	*	ESE
considerations	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
following	VBG	(VP*	ESE
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
happening	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
step	NN	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
criminals	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*	O
crimes	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
illusion	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
succeeded	VBD	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
defeating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
valiant	JJ	*	ESE
intifadah	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
victor	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
or	CC	*	O
regional	JJ	*	O
peace	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
announced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Yasir	NNP	*	O
Arafat	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RBR	*)	ESE
fit	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coming	VBG	*	O
phase	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
seek	VBP	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
convince	VB	(VP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
ideas	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
waiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
concerned	JJ	*	O
parties	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(UCP(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
set	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*	DSE
conditions	NNS	*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
table	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
towns	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	ESE
occupation	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	NNP	*	ESE
Authority	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
institutions	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
destroyed	VBN	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
besieged	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
office	NN	*))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
hostage	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	ESE
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
leaders	NNS	*))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
held	VBN	(VP*	ESE
hostage	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
entire	JJ	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
experiencing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
utmost	JJ	*	ESE
suffering	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
daily	JJ	*	O
lives	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	PDT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
this	DT	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
thing	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
will	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
something	NN	(NP*	ESE
different	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Zionists	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
achieving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	O
things	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
deep-rooted	JJ	*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
succeeded	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
succeed	VB	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
breaking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
will	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
valiant	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))))	O
or	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
relinquishing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
just	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
ending	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
glorious	JJ	*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
illusion	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
criminal	JJ	*	ESE
administrations	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
imagine	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
triumphed	VBD	(VP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
position	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
dictate	VB	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
conditions	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
victor	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
battle	NN	*)))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zionists	NNPS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reasons	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
towns	NNS	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
last	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
so	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
withdraw	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
towns	NNS	*))	O
sooner	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
later	RB	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
impossible	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
movement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
deep-rooted	JJ	*	ESE
facts	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
for	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
towns	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
camps	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
destroyed	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
reconstructed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
skillfully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
adapted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*)	ESE
circumstances	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
reconstruction	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP*)	O
more	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
quickly	RB	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
criminals	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tel	NNP	(NP*	O
Aviv	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Washington	NNP	*)))	O
think	VBP	(VP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Most	RBS	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
importantly	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
criminals	NNS	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
largest	JJS	*	ESE
illusion	NN	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
imagine	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
liquidating	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
destroying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
infrastructure	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
succeeded	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
liquidating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
arresting	VBG	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	(ADJP*	O
or	CC	*	O
large	JJ	*)	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
strugglers	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
deep-rooted	JJ	*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
resistance	NN	*)))	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
preserve	VB	(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
organizational	JJ	*	O
structure	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
characterized	VBN	*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
superb	JJ	*	ESE
ability	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
renew	VB	(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
replace	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fall	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
along	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
path	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
martyrdom	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
criminals	NNS	*)	ESE
know	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
much	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
direct	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
contact	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
infrastructure	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
widened	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
turned	VBN	*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
volcanoes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
boiling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
rage	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
acknowledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Uri	NNP	(NP*	O
Avneri	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
veteran	JJ	*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
writer	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
structure	NN	*))	O
``	``	*	O
exists	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
within	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
millions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
within	IN	*	ESE
tens	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
millions	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Arabs	NNPS	(NP*)))))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	DSE
chests	JJ	(NP*))	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
fire	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
anger	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
blazing	VBG	(VP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
more	JJR	(S(NP(NP*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
martyrdom-seeking	JJ	(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*))	O
fall	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
fighters	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
martyrdom-seeking	NN	*	O
ones	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
emerge	VB	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
footsteps	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
conclusion	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	DSE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	DSE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
come	VBP	(VP*))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administrations	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
aggravated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
entity	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
historical	JJ	*	ESE
impasse	NN	*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
crime	NN	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
committed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
together	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
illusion	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	O
break	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
will	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
impose	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
other	JJ	(S(NP*	O
means	NNS	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
impose	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Contrary	JJ	(ROOT(S(PP(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
visible	JJ	*	O
scene	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
illusion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
Zionist-US	NNP	*	ESE
crime	NN	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Zionist	NNP	*	O
entity	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
historical	JJ	*	ESE
impasse	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
constantly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
aggravating	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
recognition	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
entity	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
exist	VB	(VP*))))))	O
''	''	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
distant	JJ	*)	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
before	IN	*	ESE
despite	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	O
official	NN	*))	O
Arab	NNP	(NP*)	O
``	``	*	ESE
recognitions	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

Millions	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Arabs	NNPS	(NP(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
non-Palestinians	NNPS	*)	ESE
alike	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
conviction	NN	*)	DSE
stronger	JJR	(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
before	IN	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effect	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
achieve	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
coexistence	NN	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
usurping	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
occupying	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
aggressive	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
racist	NN	*	ESE
entity	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
hero	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gulf	NNP	*	O
War	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Colin	NNP	(NP*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
exactly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
cover	VB	(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
glory	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
envoy	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
task	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
create	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
currently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
affected	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unrecognized	JJ	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
undeclared	JJ	*	DSE
war	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestine	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
defeated	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
only	RB	(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))))))	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
message	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
most	JJS	*)	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	DSE
hoped	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*)))))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
something	NN	(ADJP(NP*)	ESE
less	JJR	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mutual	JJ	*	O
cease-fire	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
round	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	JJ	*	O
players	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
events	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
standstill	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
clear	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
test	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
discipline	NN	(NP*))	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
decades-long	JJ	*	O
ally	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
not	RB	*	O
ruin	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
impression	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
sponsorship	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
deliberated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
too	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
long	RB	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
round	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
initiated	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Ariel	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
upon	IN	(PP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
provoke	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
neighbors	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
religious	JJ	*	O
building	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
used	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
colonel	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
directly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
responsible	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massacre	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Beirut	VBG	*	O
camps	NNS	*	O
Sabra	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Shatila	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
return	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
settle	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
accounts	NNS	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
years-long	JJ	*	ESE
enemies	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Powell	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
words	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
unclear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
call	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
unclear	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
relation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
ambiguity	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
words	NNS	*)	O
definitely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
considering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
precisely	RB	(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
practicing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
one-sided	JJ	*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))))))	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
chief	JJ	*	DSE
opponent	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
positioning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
warring	VBG	*	O
sides	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
$	$	(ADJP(QP*	O
3	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
military	JJ	*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
lobby	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Untied	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	ESE
East	NNP	*)	ESE
conflict	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
protector	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Israeli	JJ	*	ESE
state	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
warnings	NNS	*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
appeals	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
labeling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
carried	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
attacks	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Twin	NNP	*	ESE
Towers	NNP	*))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
New	NNP	(NP*	ESE
York	NNP	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
entirely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
improper	JJ	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
defense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
exert	VB	(VP*	DSE
pressure	NN	(NP*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
neighboring	VBG	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
,	,	*	O
Syria	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Lebanon	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*)))))))	O
supporting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hezbolah	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
worrying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
among	IN	(S(PP*	O
Powell	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
priorities	NNS	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beirut	NNP	(NP*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hezbolah	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
announcement	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
terrorists	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
open	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
front	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
circles	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
alleged	JJ	*	DSE
new	JJ	*	O
front	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
attempt	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
smaller	JJR	*	ESE
Israel-Palestine	JJ	*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
bigger	JJR	*	ESE
one	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
example	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*)	ESE
Israeli-Arab	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lot	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
negative	JJ	(NP*	ESE
points	NNS	*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Maybe	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
Joschka	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Fischer	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
suspending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
possible	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
EU	JJ	*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Tel	NNP	(NP*	O
Aviv	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
honorable	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
late	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
disturbingly	JJ	*)	ESE
long-term	JJ	*	ESE
plan	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Europe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
united	VBN	*	DSE
stance	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Nablus	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Bethlehem	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
camps	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
secures	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
borders	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
occupying	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
peace	NN	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
Powell	NNP	*))))))	O
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
late	JJ	*	ESE
resolution	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
considering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
approximately	RB	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
one	CD	*)	O
month	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
participating	VBG	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Beirut	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
held	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
olive	JJ	*	DSE
branch	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
heir	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
throne	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Prince	NNP	(NP*	O
Abdullah	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
contained	VBD	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
points	NNS	*)	O
:	:	*	O
recognition	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*	O
-LSB-	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
published	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
neighborhood	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
recognition	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
right	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
goodness	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
demonstrating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
arrogance	NN	(NP*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
everything	NN	(NP*	ESE
Arab	NNP	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
same	JJ	*	ESE
manner	NN	*))	ESE
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Arafat	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Ramallah	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Palestine	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
labeling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
troublemaker	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
politician	NN	*)	ESE
incapable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
controlling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
suicide	NN	*	ESE
bombers	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

NEW	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
DELHI	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
22	CD	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
INTERNATIONAL	NNP	(S(NP*	O
call	NN	*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
started	VBN	(VP*	ESE
tumbling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bharti	NNP	(NP*	O
Telesonic	NNP	*	O
Ltd	NNP	*)))))	O
--	:	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
long-distance	JJ	*	O
arm	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bharti	NNP	*	O
group	NN	*	O
offering	NN	*	O
tariffs	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
up	IN	(ADJP(ADJP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
40	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
lower	JJR	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
existing	VBG	*	O
rates	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Announcing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sunil	NNP	*	O
Mittal	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Chairman	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
&	CC	*	O
amp	NNP	*)	O
;	:	*	O
Managing	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Director	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Bharti	NNP	(NP*	O
Enterprises	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
tariffs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
ILD	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
long	JJ	*	O
distance	NN	*)))	O
-RSB-	JJ	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
revised	VBN	(VP*	O
downwards	NNS	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
market	NN	*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
rate	NN	*	O
cut	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
40	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
peak-time	JJ	(NP*	O
rates	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
lowered	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Videsh	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sanchar	NNP	*	O
Nigam	NNP	*	O
Ltd	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
VSNL	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
ILD	NNP	*	O
operators	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
services	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
announce	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
rates	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unlike	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
STD	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
subscriber	NN	*	O
trunk	NN	*)	O
dialing	VBG	(VP*	O
-RSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
further	JJ	*	O
rate	NN	*	O
cut	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
feasible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scope	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
improvement	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tariff	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Bharti	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
peak-time	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
call	NN	*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
SAARC	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
South	NNP	*	O
Asian	NNP	*	O
Association	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Regional	NNP	(NP*	O
Cooperation	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
offered	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
21.18	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
minute	NN	(NP*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
present	JJ	*	O
Rs	NNP	*	O
21.82	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
24	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
minute	JJ	(ADJP*	O
as	RB	*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP*	O
31.30	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
Rs	VB	(VP*	O
40	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
applicable	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
non-peak	JJ	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
call	NN	*	O
rates	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SAARC	NNP	*	O
regions	NNS	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
lowered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
18	CD	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP*	O
18.95	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
minute	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP*	O
21.18	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
minute	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
Rs	NNP	*	O
27.69	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP*	O
36	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Mittal	NNP	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
original	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ILD	NNP	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
IndiaOne	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
middle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*	O
clearances	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commissioning	VBG	*	O
certificate	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Telecommunications	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
DoT	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Interconnect	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
agreements	NNS	*)	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP*	O
all	DT	*	O
cellular	JJ	*	O
operators	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bharat	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sanchar	NNP	*	O
Nigam	NNP	*	O
Ltd	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
BSNL	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Mahanagar	NNP	(NP*	O
Telephone	NNP	*	O
Nigam	NNP	*	O
Ltd	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MTNL	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
days	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
agreements	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
many	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
nine	CD	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
carriers	NNS	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
globe	NN	*)))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
signed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
AT	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
&	CC	*	O
amp	NNP	*)	O
;	:	*	O
T	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Sprint	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Teleglobe	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Eteselat	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Saudi	NNP	*	O
Telecom	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
British	NNP	(NP*	O
Telecom	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
SingTel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
name	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
nine	CD	*	O
carriers	NNS	*)	O
account	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
90	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
traffic	NN	*)	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Bharti	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
requisite	JJ	(NP*	O
clearances	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
network	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*	O
carriers	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
non-discriminatory	JJ	*	O
basis	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Carriers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
connect	VB	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bharti	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
network	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
rates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
deep	JJ	(NP*	O
discounts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
end-consumer	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rs	NNP	(NP*	O
100	CD	*	O
crore	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
planned	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
project	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Rs	JJ	(S(NP*	O
75	CD	*	O
crore	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
spent	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

IndiaOne	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
laid	VBN	(VP*	O
approximately	RB	(NP(NP*	O
14,000	CD	*	O
km	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
optical	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fibre	NN	*	O
cable	NN	*)	O
covering	VBG	(VP*	O
90	CD	(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
contracted	VBN	(VP*	O
submarine	JJ	(NP*	O
cable	NN	*	O
capacity	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
network	NN	(NP*	O
i2i	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
backed	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
satellite	NN	(NP*	O
connectivity	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
redundancy	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ILD	NNP	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
IP	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Internet	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
centric	JJ	*	O
backbone	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
multiservices	NNS	*	O
platform	NN	*)	O
comprises	VBZ	(VP*	O
TDM	NNP	(S(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Time	NNP	*	O
Division	NNP	*	O
Multiplexing	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
switch	VB	(VP*	O
layer	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
ATM	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Asynchronous	NNPS	*	O
Transfer	NNP	*	O
Mode	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
IP	NN	*	O
layer	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
intelligent	JJ	(NP*	O
network	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
value-added	JJ	(NP*	O
services	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
planned	VBD	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP(VP*	O
offering	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
Internet	NN	*	O
telephony	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
deploy	VB	(VP*	O
Voice	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Internet	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
strengthen	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
ILD	NNP	*	O
presence	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israeli	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
pledged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
fight	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
proposed	VBN	*	DSE
25	CD	*	O
%	NN	*)	O
-30	CD	(VP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
cut	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
National	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Insurance	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*	O
child	NN	*	O
benefits	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
served	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
completed	VBN	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
service	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP*	O
council	NN	*	O
heads	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
tomorrow	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
draw	VB	(VP*	DSE
up	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
action	NN	*	DSE
campaign	NN	*)	DSE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
thwarting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
plan	NN	*))))))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
package	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
recommendations	NNS	(NP*)))))	DSE
put	VBD	(VP*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Treasury	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
NIS	JJ	*	O
13	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
cut	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP*	O
spending	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shawqi	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Khatib	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
monitoring	NN	*	O
committee	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Arabs	NNPS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
hardest	RBS	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
hit	VBN	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
approves	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cutbacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
child	NN	(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Khatib	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
chairs	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP*	O
council	NN	*	O
heads	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
diametrically	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
cutbacks	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(WHADVP*)	O
those	DT	(S(NP*)	O
affecting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lower	JJR	*	O
socio-economic	JJ	*	O
strata	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
society	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

His	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	DSE
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
echoed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Muhammad	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Zaydan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
head	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kafr	NNP	*	O
Manda	NNP	*	O
Local	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
town	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
14,000	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unemployment	NN	(NP*	O
lists	NNS	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zaydan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
proposed	VBN	*	DSE
cut	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
child	NN	(NP*	DSE
benefits	NNS	*)))	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
body	NN	*	ESE
blow	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
those	DT	*)	O
already	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
classed	VBN	*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poverty	NN	*	O
line	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Those	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
out	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
work	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
rely	VBP	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
benefits	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
support	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
worse	JJR	*)	ESE
situation	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
ramifications	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
future	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
children	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
skipping	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
school	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
onto	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
streets	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
getting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
mixed	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
crime	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
drugs	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
see	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
now	RB	(PP*	O
because	RB	*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
unemployment	NN	*	O
situation	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Officially	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
23	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
working	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
registered	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
work	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
council	NN	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
higher	JJR	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
maintain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
women	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
young	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
jobs	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	O
either	RB	*	O
no	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*	O
longer	RBR	*)	O
registered	VBN	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
jobless	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
place	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
remember	VBP	(VP*	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*	O
Yitzhaq	NNP	*	O
Rabin	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
discrimination	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
existed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
years	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
equalized	VBD	(VP*	O
child	NN	(NP*	O
benefits	NNS	*)	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
of	RB	*)	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
parents	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
served	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
not	RB	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Zaydan	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
applauded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(NP*	ESE
just	RB	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
begin	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
feel	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Arabs	NNPS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
integral	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
society	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	O
through	RP	(PRT*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
once	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
again	RB	*)	DSE
feel	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
discriminated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Confounding	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
previous	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
forecasts	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
recovery	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Statistics	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
industrial	JJ	(S(NP*	O
output	NN	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
unchanged	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
trend	NN	*	O
data	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Trend	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
5.5	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
decline	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP*	O
output	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
high-tech	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
continuing	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

High-tech	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
output	NN	*)	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
annualized	VBN	*	O
8	CD	*	O
%	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January-February	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
8.5	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Output	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
electronics	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
transportation	NN	(NP*	O
tools	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pharmaceutical	JJ	(NP*	O
industries	NNS	*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
8	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
sectors	NNS	*)	O
posted	VBD	(VP*	O
output	NN	(NP(NP*	O
increases	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
0-7	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
annual	JJ	(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Output	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
consumer	NN	(NP*	O
industries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
food	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
beverages	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
textiles	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
clothing	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
footwear	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
printing	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
average	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2.5	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
annual	JJ	(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
4	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
slowdown	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
industry	NN	(NP*)))	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
annualized	JJ	*	O
2.5	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
fall	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP*	O
wage-earners	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
similar	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decline	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
2.8	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
wage-earners	NNS	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
12,000	CD	*)))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
10,000	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
average	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
employee	NN	(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
hours	NNS	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
unchanged	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
annualized	VBN	*	O
2.5	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
decline	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
January	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
4.8	CD	*	O
%	NN	*	O
drop	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trend	NN	*	O
data	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Seasonally	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
adjusted	VBN	*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	O
industrial	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
declining	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Industrial	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
output	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cumulative	JJ	*	O
3	CD	*	O
%	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
mid-2001	JJ	(NP(UCP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*))))))	O
disturbances	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
late	JJ	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
2001	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
seasonally	RB	(ADJP*	O
adjusted	VBN	*)	O
number	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
employee	NN	(NP*	O
work	NN	*	O
hours	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
fallen	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overall	JJ	*	O
8	CD	*	O
%	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
October	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
seasonally	RB	(ADJP*	O
adjusted	VBN	*)	O
data	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
calculate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Economy	NNP	*	O
Index	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
estimate	VB	(VP*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

5:14	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
pm	NN	*)	O
Sat	JJ	(ADJP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
4th	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2002	CD	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
Thirty-two	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
non-governmental	JJ	*	O
organisations	NNS	*)	O
-LSB-	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNP	*)	O
-RSB-	JJ	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
suspended	VBN	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
engagements	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
Human	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
100	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
24	CD	*))))	O
-	:	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
appointments	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commission	NN	*)))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
organisation	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Hakam	NNP	(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
Ramdas	NNP	*	O
Tikamdas	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
boycott	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
protest	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
poor	JJ	*	ESE
response	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
numerous	JJ	*	O
recommendations	NNS	*))	DSE
thus	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
note	VBP	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
deep	JJ	(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
ignored	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Suhakam	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
maiden	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assembly	NN	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Whereas	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Kesas	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
submitted	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
inquiry	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
earned	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
disdain	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
wrath	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Mahathir	NNP	*	O
Mohamad	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
summarily	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
product	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
western	JJ	(NP*	ESE
biased	NNS	*)	ESE
'	''	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Selangor	NNP	*	O
Chinese	NNPS	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*	O
Hall	NNP	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kuala	NNP	(NP*	O
Lumpur	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Kesas	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
irked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mahathir	NNP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
guilty	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
using	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
excessive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
mass	JJ	*	O
anti-government	JJ	*	O
gathering	NN	*)	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kesas	NNP	*	O
highway	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Nov	NNP	(NP*	O
5	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2000	CD	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
failed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
respect	VB	(VP*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
recognise	VB	*	DSE
Suhakam	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recommendations	NNS	*))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
lamented	VBD	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decline	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ramdas	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
failure	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adhere	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commission	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recommendations	NNS	*))))))	DSE
creates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
but	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
mere	JJ	*	ESE
public	JJ	*	ESE
relations	NNS	*	ESE
tool	NN	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Over	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
state	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
deteriorated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
increasing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
numbers	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*))	O
under	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Internal	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Act	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
blanket	NN	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
assemblies	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
restrictions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
right	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
free	JJ	(NP*	O
speech	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
expression	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
further	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
restrictive	JJ	*	O
amendments	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
all	DT	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
denied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
space	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
respect	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
universal	JJ	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
principles	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
ratifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
instruments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
namely	RB	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Covenant	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Civil	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Political	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Covenant	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Social	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Cultural	NNP	*	O
Rights	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Covenant	NN	*)	O
Against	IN	(PP*	O
Torture	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Controversial	JJ	(ROOT(NP*	O
appointments	NNS	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
raised	VBN	(VP*))	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
independence	NN	*)	O
following	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
attorney-general	JJ	*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Talib	NNP	*	O
Othman	NNP	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
chairperson	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
renew	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appointments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
commissioners	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Anuar	NNP	(NP*	O
Zainal	NNP	*	O
Abidin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Prof	NNP	(NP*	O
Mehrun	NNP	*	O
Siraj	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Dr	NNP	(NP*	O
Salleh	NNP	*	O
Mohd	NNP	*	O
Nor	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ramdas	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
perceived	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Anuar	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Mehrun	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
instrumental	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
scathing	JJ	*	DSE
Kesas	NNP	*	DSE
report	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
dropped	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
performing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
duties	NNS	*)	DSE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
fear	NN	(NP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
favour	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
three	CD	(S(NP*	O
commissioners	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
axed	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	ESE
signal	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
commissioners	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
tenure	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
dependent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*))	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
pleased	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
executive	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
clearly	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
undermines	VBZ	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commission	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
erode	VB	(VP*	ESE
public	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
confidence	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
hand	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
records	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
shows	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Abu	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Talib	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
protecting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
liberties	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
advancing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Claiming	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
nothing	NN	(ADJP*	ESE
personal	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
defense	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1987	CD	*	O
`	``	*	O
Ops	NN	*	O
Lalang	NN	*	O
'	''	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ISA	NNP	*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Internal	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*	O
Act	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Abu	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Talib	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
tenure	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
AG	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NN	*	O
attorney	NN	*	O
general	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
instrumental	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impeachment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP(NP(ADVP*)	O
Lord	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Salleh	NNP	*	O
Abas	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*	O
judges	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1988	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
commissioners	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
mostly	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
retired	VBN	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
servants	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
commissioners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
retired	VBN	(VP*	O
Treasury	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
deputy	NN	*	O
secretary-general	NN	*	O
Ramon	NNP	*	O
Navaratnam	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
permanent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
representative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Hasmy	NNP	*	O
Agam	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Institute	NNP	(NP(NAC*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Islamic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Understanding	NNP	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Ikim	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
director-general	NNP	*	O
Dr	NNP	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Monir	NNP	*	O
Yaacob	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
retired	JJ	(NP*	O
Education	NNP	*	O
director-general	NN	*	O
Asiah	NNP	*	O
Abu	NNP	*	O
Samah	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
retired	JJ	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Population	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Family	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Board	NNP	*	O
director-general	NNP	*	O
Dr	NNP	*	O
Raj	NNP	*	O
Abdul	NNP	*	O
Karim	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
concern	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
persons	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
policy	NN	(NP*	O
implementors	NNS	*))))))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
objectively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
assess	VB	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
critique	VB	*	DSE
executive	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
impinge	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Ramdas	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Elaborating	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
boycott	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Ramdas	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
hold	VB	(VP(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
dialogues	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
memorandums	NNS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
complaints	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meantime	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commissioners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
discharge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
statutory	JJ	*	O
duties	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pending	VBG	*	O
complaints	NNS	*))))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
inquires	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
note	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WDT	(WHNP*	O
extent	NN	*))	O
Suhakam	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
compliance	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
previous	JJ	(NP*	O
recommendations	NNS	*))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
contained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
maiden	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Parliament	NNP	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
reports	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Ramdas	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Suhakam	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
performance	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
judged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	(PP*	ESE
on	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
statements	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*))))	O
or	CC	*	O
reports	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
but	CC	(PP*	ESE
on	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
improvement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
When	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
bill	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP*	O
Act	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
tabled	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
parliament	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	JJ	*	O
Affairs	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Syed	NNP	(NP*	O
Hamid	NNP	*	O
Albar	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
positive	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
protecting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
promoting	VBG	*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Malaysia	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
looking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
Suhakam	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
institution	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
fulfill	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
promise	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Ramdas	NNP	(NP*)))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
100-day	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
review	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
position	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Apart	RB	(ROOT(SINV(PP(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	*	O
Hakam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
notable	JJ	*	O
NGOs	NNS	*)	O
involved	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
boycott	NN	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
Trades	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MTUC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Suaram	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Amesty	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Malaysian	JJ	*	O
chapter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jamaah	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Islah	NNP	*	O
Malaysia	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Jim	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
Sisters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Islam	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SIS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Boycott	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
unfair	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
related	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP*	O
commissioner	NN	*	O
Prof	NNP	*	O
Hamdan	NNP	*	O
Adnan	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
malaysiakini	NNS	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
disappointed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
boycott	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
unfair	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
resorting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
commissioner	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Suhakam	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
advancement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
boycott	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
acting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
self	NN	(NP*	ESE
interest	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
honest	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
championing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
NGOs	NNPS	*)	O
themselves	PRP	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
acknowledge	VB	(VP*	DSE
Suhakam	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
work	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Hamdan	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Srinagar	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
5	CD	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
With	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charred	VBN	*	O
remains	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debris	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Varmul	NNP	(NP*))	O
today	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
toll	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Syed	NNP	*	O
Karim	NNP	*	O
Sahib	NNP	*	O
encounter	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
risen	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Elsewhere	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
seven	CD	(NP(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
securityman	NN	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
yesterday	RB	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
defence	NN	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
charred	VBN	*	O
remains	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Varmul	NNP	*	O
encounter	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
recovered	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
debris	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
burnt	JJ	*	O
houses	NNS	*))))	O
today	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ammunition	NN	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
place	NN	*))))	O
included	VBD	(VP*)	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
AK	NNP	*	O
rifles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
15	CD	(NP(NP*	O
magazines	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
radio	NN	*	O
sets	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fire	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Sadnara	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Panzalla	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Varmul	NNP	(NP*	O
district	NN	*))))))))))	O
today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
Fayaz	NNP	*	O
Ahmad	NNP	*	O
Mir	NNS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
investigating	VBG	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
troops/SOG	SOG	*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
Special	JJ	*	O
Operations	NNP	*	O
Group	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Dhok	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Wali	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Poonch	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preceding	VBG	*	O
night	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
identity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
slain	VBN	*	O
militants	NNS	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ascertained	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Body	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Feroz	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ahmad	NNP	*	O
Dar	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Gaddapora	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Shopian	NNP	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
recovered	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
village	NN	(NP*))	O
Hajipora	NNP	(NP*	O
today	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
deceased	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shopkeeper	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
profession	NN	(NP*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
unidentified	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
gunmen	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
house	NN	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preceding	VBG	*	O
night	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
registered	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
case	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Lashkar	NNP	*	O
militant	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Chor	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gali	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Shopian	NNP	(NP*	O
area	NN	*))))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unidentified	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
gunmen	NNS	*)	O
forced	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
entry	NN	(NP*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
house	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sulaiman	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
alias	NNP	*	O
Muhammad	NNP	*	O
Sultan	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Khawas	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Budhal	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Rajouri	NNP	(NP*))))	O
district	JJ	(NP*	O
yesterday	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
shot	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
dead	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
cognizance	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
unidentified	JJ	*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
shot	VBN	(VP*	O
dead	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chola	NNP	*	O
Nallah	NNP	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
LoC	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
Line	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Control	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Poonch	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preceding	VBG	*	O
night	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
soldier	NN	*)	O
sustained	VBD	(VP*	O
injuries	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
shoot	NN	*)	O
out	IN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
soldier	NN	*	O
Ram	NNP	*	O
Karan	NNP	*	O
Singh	NNP	*)	O
died	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exchange	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
militants	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Bhelti	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Doda	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
today	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Details	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
awaited	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
militant	JJ	*)	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
identity	NNS	*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ascertained	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
encounter	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Mutgala	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Gool	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Shanghai	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
May	NNP	*	O
9	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
XINHUA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spreading	NNP	*	O
AIDS	NNP	*	O
epidemic	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
threatening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Asia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
officials	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Program	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
HIV/AIDS	AIDS	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
UNAIDS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
bank	NN	(NP(NP*	O
delegates	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Investing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Health	NNP	*))))	O
''	''	*)))))	O
,	,	*))))))	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ADB	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
seminar	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Statistics	NNPS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
about	RB	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
infected	VBN	(VP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
minute	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
total	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
over	RB	(NP(QP*	O
one	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
infected	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
AIDS	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
casting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
shadow	NN	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
miracle	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
turning	VBG	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	ESE
crisis	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
region	NN	*)	O
accounts	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
60	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
population	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Michel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sidibe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Director	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Country	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Regional	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Support	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
UNAIDS	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Research	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
newly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
released	VBN	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WHO	NN	*))))	O
indicates	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
societies	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heavy	JJ	*	O
burden	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
disease	NN	(NP*)))))	O
tend	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
experience	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
multiplicity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
severe	JJ	(NP*	O
impediments	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
progress	NN	*)	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
sustainable	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
growth	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
suggests	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
each	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
improvement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
life	NN	(NP(NP*	O
expectancy	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
birth	NN	(NP*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
associated	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rise	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
0.3	CD	*))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
0.4	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
year	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
With	IN	(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alarming	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
infection	NN	*	O
growth	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
Asian	NNP	*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
care	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
over-burdening	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
health	NN	*	O
care	NN	*	O
system	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
provision	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
health	NN	*	O
services	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Sidibe	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(S(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
India	NNP	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
AIDS	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
AIDS	NNP	*	O
pandemic	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
timely	JJ	(NP*	ESE
control	NN	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
head	VB	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
explosive	JJ	*	ESE
growth	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
infection	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	ESE
heavy	JJ	(NP*	ESE
expenditure	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Jeffrey	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Sachs	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Center	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Harvard	NNP	(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
WHO	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Macroeconomics	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Health	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
developing	VBG	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
investing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
health	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
overall	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Macroeconomics	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Health	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Investing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Health	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Economic	NNP	(NP*	O
Development	NNP	*))	O
''	''	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WHO	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
December	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Sachs	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
estimated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
total	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
health	NN	*	O
outlays	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*)))	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
least	JJS	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
-	:	*	O
developed	JJ	(ADJP*	O
countries	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
17	CD	(NP(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2007	CD	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
29	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2015	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
AIDS	NNP	(S(NP*	O
prevention	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
care	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
account	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
half	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
increase	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
low-income	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
U.	NNP	*	O
S.	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
21	CD	(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
dollars	NNS	*))	O
respectively	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	*	ESE
best	JJS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Sachs	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
WHO	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recommendations	NNS	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
increasing	VBG	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
health	NN	(NP(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
relevant	JJ	*)	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
education	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
water	NN	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Macroeconomics	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Health	NNP	*))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
NCMH	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*)))	O
chaired	VBD	(VP*	O
jointly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministers	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Health	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Finance	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
organize	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
lead	VB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
medical	JJ	(ADJP*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
economic	JJ	*)	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
diseases	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sachs	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
addressed	VBD	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
exacerbating	JJ	*	ESE
condition	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
AIDS	NNP	*	O
pandemic	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
technical	JJ	*	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
AIDS	NNP	(NP*	O
infection	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
still	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
needed	VBD	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
local	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
surveillance	NN	*	O
network	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
increasing	VBG	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
subsidiary	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
free	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
medicine	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
seminar	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
serial	JJ	*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
35th	JJ	*	O
Annual	JJ	*	O
Meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ADB	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Board	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Governors	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
West	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
tatters	NNS	(NP*))))))	ESE

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Western	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
left	VBN	(VP*	DSE
frustrated	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
impotent	JJ	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Robert	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
formally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
overwhelmingly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
won	VBN	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
extent	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	ESE
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
outmanoeuvred	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
west	NN	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
southern	JJ	(S(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
surprise	NN	*	ESE
statement	NN	*)	O
declaring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
certain	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
scupper	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hope	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
suspending	NNP	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
prodded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
extend	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
range	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
targeting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Earlier	RBR	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
this	DT	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
imposed	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
travel	NN	*	O
ban	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
19	CD	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
regime	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
froze	VBD	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
overseas	JJ	*	O
assets	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
illusions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
elsewhere	RB	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
real	JJ	*	ESE
leverage	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
registrar-general	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Tobaiwa	NNP	(NP*	O
Mudede	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fifth	JJ	*	O
term	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
120	CD	*	O
constituencies	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
1,685,212	CD	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
1,258,401	CD	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
challenger	NN	(NP(NP*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
leader	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
foresaw	VBD	(VP*	DSE
electoral	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
fraud	NN	*)	ESE
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
daylight	NN	(NP*	ESE
robbery	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
find	VBP	(VP*	DSE
ourselves	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
endorse	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
purported	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
president	NN	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
's	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
election	NN	*	O
fraud	NN	*)	ESE
I	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
witnessed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
onus	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
passively	NNP	(FRAG(NP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
not	RB	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
seek	VBP	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	O
confrontation	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
state	NN	*))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
themselves	PRP	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
action	NN	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Harare	JJ	*	O
townships	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
stood	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
line	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
two	CD	(NP*	DSE
days	NNS	*))))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
vote	VB	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
belief	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
consigning	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
history	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
angry	JJ	(NP*	DSE
residents	NNS	*)	O
looked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
confront	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
need	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Tsvangirai	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
tell	VB	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
steal	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Noel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Gukuta	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
youthful	JJ	*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
voter	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
soldiers	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
guns	NNS	(NP*)))	O
so	IN	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
fight	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
sure	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
rule	VB	(VP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
strike	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
march	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
show	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
goats	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
victory	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
great	JJ	*	DSE
celebrations	NNS	*	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
protests	NNS	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
sensing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
murmurs	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	DSE
revolt	NN	(NP*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
put	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
full	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
alert	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
troops	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
key	JJ	(NP*	O
townships	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
police	NN	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
roadblocks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
roads	NNS	*)))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
stop	VB	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
search	NN	*	O
vehicles	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
UK	NNP	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jack	NNP	(NP*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
For	IN	(S(PP*	O
months	NNS	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
conducted	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
systematic	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*	O
-	:	*	O
power	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
senior	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*	O
department	NN	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
later	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	*	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
further	JJ	(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
given	VBN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
things	NNS	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
happened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
and	CC	*	O
during	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Apart	RB	(ROOT(S(PP(ADVP*)	DSE
from	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
result	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
jolt	NN	*	ESE
yesterday	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
election	NN	(S(NP(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Namibia	NNP	*)))	O
effectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
endorsed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
considered	JJ	*	DSE
view	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
reflects	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
wishes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Namibia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
watertight	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
room	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
rigging	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
team	NN	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
legitimate	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Nigerian	NNP	*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
threatened	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
integrity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
trio	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
decide	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP*))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	DSE
back	VB	(VP*	DSE
suspension	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
South	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Thabo	NNP	(NP*	O
Mbeki	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Nigerian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Olusegun	NNP	(NP*	O
Obasanjo	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
congress	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
trade	NN	(NP*	O
unions	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
general	JJ	*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
test	VB	(VP*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
popular	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
longer	JJR	*	O
protest	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
various	JJ	(S(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
meeting	VBG	(VP*	O
today	NN	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
disobedience	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
lawyers	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
studying	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
possibility	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
results	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
net	JJ	*	O
gain	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
votes	NNS	(NP*)))	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP(NP*	O
province	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
vote	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
tampering	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*)	O
dropped	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
box	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cross	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
name	NN	*))))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
fraudulent	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
count	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
runaway	JJ	*	ESE
victory	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
justice	NN	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Patrick	NNP	(NP*	O
Chinamasa	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
termed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
inaccurate	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))))	ESE

ISLAMABAD	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
5	CD	*)	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
Report	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
factually	RB	(ADJP*	O
inaccurate	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
unwarranted	JJ	*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
reflected	VBD	(VP*	O
tendency	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sit	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
judgment	NN	(NP*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
fails	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
acknowledge	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*	O
measures	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
protect	VB	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Office	NNP	*)))))	O
spokesman	NN	(NP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
termed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
factually	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
inaccurate	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
unwarranted	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	PDT	(S(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
goals	NNS	*)	DSE
set	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
April	NNP	*	O
2000	CD	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)))))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
ignored	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Enlisting	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
initiatives	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
recalled	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
promulgation	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Juvenile	NNP	*	O
Justice	NNP	*	O
System	NNP	*	O
Ordinance	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
permanent	JJ	*	O
commission	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
women	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
police	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
jail	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
national	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
policy	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
action	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
elimination	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
child	NN	(NP*	O
labour	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
establishment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fund	NN	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rehabilitation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
working	VBG	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
amended	VBD	(NP(NP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
Citizenship	NNP	*	O
Act	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1951	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
women	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP*	O
descent	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
claim	VB	(VP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	(NP*	O
nationality	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
children	NNS	*)	O
born	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
husbands	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
mass	JJ	*	O
awareness	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
launched	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
observance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Year	NN	*	O
2000	CD	*))))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Dignity	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
ratified	VBD	(VP*	O
ILO	NNP	(NP*	O
Conventions	NNP	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
equal	JJ	(NP*	O
remuneration	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
182	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elimination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
worst	JJS	(NP(NP*	O
forms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
child	NN	(NP*	O
labour	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Optional	NNP	*	O
Protocols	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Convention	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Child	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Recently	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
joint	JJ	(NP*	O
electorates	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
introduced	VBN	(VP*	O
respecting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wishes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
minority	NN	*	O
communities	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
developments	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	DSE
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)	O
remained	VBD	(VP*	O
poor	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
This	DT	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unacceptable	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gross	JJ	*	ESE
misstatement	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
facts	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
therefore	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
feels	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
constrained	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
reject	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
assessment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Pakistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tendency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sit	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
judgment	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
over	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
cause	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
better	RBR	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
served	VBN	*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
cooperation	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
understanding	NN	*))))	ESE
address	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
face	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
promoting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
protecting	VBG	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
wide	JJ	(ADVP*)	DSE
awake	RB	(ADJP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
polls	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defiant	NN	*)	DSE
President	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
ground	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
complacency	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
anyway	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
state	NN	(NP(NP*	O
radio	NN	*)	O
reported	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*	O
wide	JJ	*)	DSE
awake	RB	(ADJP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rally	NN	*))	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
wo	MD	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
let	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Movement	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
win	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
donkey	NN	*)	ESE
being	VBG	(VP*	ESE
controlled	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
British	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
fledgling	JJ	*	O
MDC	NN	*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
57	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
120	CD	(NP(NP*	O
elected	VBN	*	O
seats	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
parliamentary	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
popularity	NN	*)))	O
plunged	VBD	(VP*	O
amid	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
devastation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
chaos	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
accused	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
extrajudicial	JJ	(NP*	O
killings	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
undermining	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
judiciary	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
waging	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
systematic	JJ	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP*	ESE
targeting	VBG	*	O
supporters	NNS	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
potential	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Security	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	DSE
forces	VBZ	(VP*	O
tortured	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
opponents	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
ruling	NN	(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
militants	NNS	*)))	O
abducted	NN	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
police	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victims	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
crimes	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Freedom	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
assembly	NN	(NP*)))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
severely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
restricted	VBN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
speech	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
thanked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
African	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
refusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
buckle	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
pressure	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
suspend	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
54-nation	JJ	*	O
grouping	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Britain	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
Zealand	NNP	*))	O
demanded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
protest	VB	(VP*	DSE
state-sponsored	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
abuses	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defer	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
possible	JJ	*	ESE
suspension	NN	*)	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
report	VBP	(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attempts	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
introduce	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
apartheid	NN	(NP*	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tendai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Biti	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hide	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
intimidation	NN	*)))	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
rift	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe-Britain	JJ	*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
brutalised	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
fellow	JJ	(NP*	O
black	JJ	*	O
Zimbabweans	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
brothers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
understood	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

African	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
closed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
ranks	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
out	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
fear	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
power	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	O
governance	NN	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
mirrored	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Biti	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
state-run	JJ	*	O
Herald	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
government	NN	*	ESE
mouthpiece	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Tuesday	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
British	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tony	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
showed	VBN	(VP*	O
personal	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
arrogance	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
obsession	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shallowness	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
commitment	NN	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Sunday	NNP	*)))	O
presents	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
strongest-ever	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rule	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
intimidation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
new	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
cow	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
voters	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
effectively	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
campaigning	VBG	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
prevented	VBD	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
finishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
35	CD	*)	O
ambassadors	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
staffs	NNS	*)))))	O
illegal	JJ	(S(VP(ADJP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
laws	NNS	*)))	O
requiring	VBG	*	O
police	NN	(NP*	O
permission	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
gatherings	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
shortages	NNS	*)	O
gripping	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
combat	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
diplomats	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
comment	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

State	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
radio	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
three	CD	(S(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
lawmakers	NNS	*)	O
tried	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bribe	VB	(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
air	NN	*	O
force	NN	*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
calm	NN	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
removed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Opposition	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
claim	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
smear	NN	*	ESE
campaign	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Foreign	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
pressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
restore	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
escalated	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
dozens	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Officials	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
bristle	VBP	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	DSE
US	NNP	(NP*))	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
report	VBP	(VP*))))))	O

Local	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
dissatisfaction	NN	(NP*)	DSE
-	:	*	DSE
but	CC	(FRAG*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
surprise	RB	(SBAR(X(NP*)	DSE
-	:	*	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
regard	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
excerpts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*))))	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
copy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
delivered	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
described	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
event	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
emphasized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
directed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*))))	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
covered	VBD	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
well	RB	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
copy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
criticizes	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weakening	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
prerogatives	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
handed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deputy	JJ	*	O
chief	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mission	NN	(NP*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Embassy	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Awkar	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Carol	NNP	*	O
Kalin	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
acting	VBG	*	O
director-general	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Naji	NNP	(NP*	O
Abi	NNP	*	O
Assi	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
copies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
various	JJ	*	O
ministries	NNS	*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Interior	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Municipalities	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
prior	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
relaying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
observations	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
discrediting	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Lebanon	NNP	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
portraying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
undemocratic	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
uncivilized	JJ	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
abusing	VBG	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
dissatisfaction	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
contents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
conveyed	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ambassador	NNP	*	O
Vincent	NNP	*	O
Battle	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
returned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
participating	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
envoys	NNS	*))))))	O
posted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Arab	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Each	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Lebanon	NNP	(NP*)	O
sends	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
explanation	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
factors	NNS	*	O
outside	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
control	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
point	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
observation	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
judiciary	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
independent	JJ	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
principle	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
intelligence	NN	(NP(NP*	O
agents	NNS	*)	O
'	''	*	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
tapping	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
phones	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*))))))))	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	ESE
matter	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
harms	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Lebanon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
image	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
played	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Lebanese	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
describing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
containing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
daily	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
practices	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
POW	NNP	*)	O
?	.	*)))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
brings	VBZ	(VP*	O
Afghan	JJ	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
club	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
describing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
detention	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
nobody	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
expected	VBD	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
110	CD	*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
admitted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hardest	JJS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
hard	JJ	*	ESE
core	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
men	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	(S*	O
dozens	NNS	(NP(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
dozens	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
though	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
lack	VB	(VP*	O
tennis	NN	(NP(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
putting	JJ	*	O
green	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
amenities	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
better	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'd	MD	(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cave	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Tora	NNP	(NP*	O
Bora	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

True	UH	(ROOT(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
confined	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
6-ft	JJ	(NP(NP(ADVP(ADJP*	O
.	.	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
8-ft	JJ	(FRAG(ADJP*	O
.	.	*))))	O
chain-link	JJ	(NP*	O
enclosures	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	O
floors	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tin	NN	*	O
roofs	NNS	*)))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
thinks	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
pejorative	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
call	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
cages	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
relief	NN	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*)))	O
;	:	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
replace	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
something	NN	(NP*)))	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
permanent	JJ	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meantime	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
place	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
1990s	NNS	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
housed	VBN	(VP*	O
Haitian	JJ	(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
--	:	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
thin	JJ	(NP*	O
green	JJ	*	O
mats	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
blankets	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sleep	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
pray	VB	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
allowed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shower	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
exercise	VB	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
exam	NN	*))	O
upon	IN	(PP*	O
admission	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
diet	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
is	VBZ	(SQ*	ESE
someone	NN	(NP*)	ESE
making	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
point	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	ESE
diversity	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
?	.	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
ranges	VBZ	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
bagels	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
cream	NN	*	O
cheese	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
rice	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
beans	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
eaten	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
plastic	JJ	(NP*	O
utensils	NNS	*))))	O
--	:	*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
clean	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
teeth	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
specially	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
shortened	JJ	*)	O
brushes	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
caution	NN	*)	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
sense	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
;	:	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))	O
Mamdouh	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Salim	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
operative	NN	*)	O
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	O
trial	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*	O
City	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1998	CD	*	O
embassy	NN	*	O
bombings	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
comb	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stab	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
guard	NN	*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
eye	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
muted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
inspect	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	DSE
private	JJ	(NP*	DSE
recommendations	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
press	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
lot	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
contention	NN	(NP*)))	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
demand	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
conduct	VBP	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
above	IN	(PP*	ESE
suspicion	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
claimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
British	JJ	(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Politicians	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
commentators	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
London	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
clamoring	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
treatment	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
accordance	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
Telegraph	NNP	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
paper	NN	*)	O
usually	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
so	RB	*	ESE
conservative	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Pat	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
Buchanan	NNP	*)	ESE
look	VBP	(VP*	ESE
vegetarian	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
draw	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
distinction	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
civilized	JJ	(NP*	ESE
society	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
apocalyptic	JJ	*	ESE
savagery	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(SINV(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
matter	NN	*))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
legality	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
resisted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	JJ	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
war	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
preferring	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)	O
unlawful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
combatants	NNS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
battlefield	NN	*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
easy	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
why	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
those	DT	(S(NP*	O
holding	VBG	*	O
true	JJ	*	O
POWs	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
bound	VBN	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
release	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
hostilities	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
;	:	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
men	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
may	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP*	O
operatives	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
convention	NN	(NP*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
murky	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
need	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tell	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
captors	NNS	*)	O
anything	NN	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
rank	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
serial	JJ	(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
birthday	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
point	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detention	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
conduct	VB	(VP(VP*	O
interrogations	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
head	VB	*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
new	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
contemplate	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
irregular	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
battle	NN	(NP*))))	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
considered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
POWs	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
apply	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free-floating	JJ	*	O
band	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
not	RB	(NP(NP*	O
all	DT	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP*	O
men	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
wo	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
say	VB	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(FRAG(WHADJP*	O
many	JJ	*)))))	O
--	:	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
presumably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
thought	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
army	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Are	VBP	(ROOT(SQ*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
POWs	VBN	(VP*)	O
?	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	RB	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
clear	JJ	*	O
chain	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
command	NN	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
unfortunately	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Amnesty	NNP	(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
pointed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
business	NN	*)	ESE
making	VBG	(VP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
determination	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
fall	VBP	(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enemy	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hands	NNS	*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
POW	VB	(VP*	O
status	NN	(NP*)	O
until	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
competent	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
determined	VBN	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
status	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	JJR	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
curious	NNS	*)	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
ultimate	JJ	*	ESE
fate	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rumsfeld	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
laid	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	IN	(PP*	DSE
four	CD	(NP*	O
options	NNS	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trial	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
criminal	JJ	*	O
courts	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
return	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
home	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
prosecution	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
detention	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
additional	JJ	(S(NP*	O
intelligence	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
gathered	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
last	JJ	*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
distinct	JJ	*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)))	ESE
;	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
plans	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	O
2,000	CD	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
big	JJ	*	ESE
deal	NN	*)	ESE
down	RB	(ADVP*	O
there	RB	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
two	CD	*)	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Army	NNP	(NP*	O
Lieut.	NNP	*)))	O

General	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
B.B.	NNP	*	O
Bell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
commands	VBZ	(S(VP*))))	O
Fort	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hood	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Texas	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
police	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
justification	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
detention	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	ESE
anywhere	RB	(NP*	ESE
else	RB	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Leaving	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
indefinitely	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
beyond	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reach	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
legal	JJ	*	ESE
regime	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(SINV(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Economist	JJ	*	O
last	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
pre-eminently	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
laws	NNS	(NP*))))	ESE
--	:	*))	O
itself	PRP	(ADVP*))	O
outside	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
law	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Until	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
sorts	NNS	*)	O
out	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
criticism	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
likely	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
grow	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
things	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
worse	JJR	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
nobody	NN	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
yet	RB	(ADVP*)	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
listen	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
long-winded	JJ	*	ESE
speeches	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)	ESE
really	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
cruel	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Jordan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O

AMMAN	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Jordan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
impeding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
Cabinet	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Faris	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Juneidi	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Corporation	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Environment	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Protection	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GCEP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Soon	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
delegate	VB	(VP*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
representative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
HH	NNP	(NP*	O
Prince	NNP	*	O
Zeid	NNP	*	O
Ben	NNP	*	O
Raad	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Juneidi	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Jordan	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
exact	JJ	*	O
date	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
signing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)))))	DSE
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
set	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
legally	RB	(ADJP*	O
obliged	VBN	*))	O
developed	VBD	(VP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
8	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
below	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2012	CD	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(S(SBAR*	O
developed	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
main	JJ	*	O
source	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
large-scale	JJ	(NP*	O
air	NN	*	O
pollution	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Jordan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
stressing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
conventions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Juneidi	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
signing	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
GCEP	NNP	(NP*)	O
hopes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
attract	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
funding	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
contribute	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
trap	NN	(S(VP*	O
heat	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
thus	RB	(S(VP(ADVP*)	O
causing	VBG	*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

GCEP	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
agency	NN	*	O
operating	NN	*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Municipal	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rural	NNP	*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Environment	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
point	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reference	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
pacts	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
European	JJ	*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
formally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
bound	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
accord	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
complete	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
June	NNP	(NP*	O
1	CD	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
opposed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
contravenes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
slammed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
European	JJ	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
produced	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
alternative	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
encouraging	JJ	(NP*	DSE
industries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
trim	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Other	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
shown	VBN	(VP*	DSE
reluctance	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
signing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
GDP	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
up	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
2.5	CD	*))	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
cause	VB	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
worth	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
billion	CD	*)	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
19	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

72	CD	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Hours	CD	*)	O
At	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
reaches	VBZ	(VP*	O
capacity	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
invited	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
watch	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interplay	NN	*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
guards	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
doctors	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

GUANTANAMO	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
BAY	NNP	*	O
NAVAL	NNP	*	O
BASE	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	*)	O
-	:	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
begins	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
shiny	JJ	*	O
speck	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southeast	NN	*	O
skies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lone	JJ	*	O
landing	NN	*)))))	O
strip	VB	(VP*	O
here	RB	(S(S(ADVP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
oldest	JJS	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
overseas	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Within	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
minutes	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lumbering	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
gray	JJ	(NP*	O
C-141B	NNP	*	O
Starlifter	NNP	*)	O
flies	VBZ	(VP*	O
low	JJ	(ADJP*	O
over	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tarmac	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
patch	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
palm	NN	(NP*	O
trees	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
if	IN	*)	ESE
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
air	NN	*	O
show	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hot	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
windy	JJ	*	O
afternoon	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deep	JJ	*	O
blue	JJ	*	O
waters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*)))	O
serve	VBP	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
postcard	JJ	*	ESE
backdrop	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
cargo	NN	*	O
jet	NN	*)	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
lands	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
approaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
landing	NN	*	O
strip	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
west	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
noise	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
deafening	VBG	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Almost	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
immediately	RB	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crack	NN	*	O
security	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mostly	RB	(NP(ADJP*	O
baby-faced	JJ	*)	ESE
Marines	NNPS	*)))	O
surrounds	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plane	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
wear	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
black	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
baseball	NN	*	O
leg	NN	*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
bulletproof	JJ	(NP*	O
vests	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
carry	VBP	(VP*	O
M-16	NN	(NP*	O
rifles	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Humvees	NNP	(NP*)	O
mounted	VBD	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
.50	CD	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
caliber	NN	(S(NP*	O
machine	NN	*	O
guns	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
40mm	JJ	*	O
grenade	NN	*	O
launchers	NNS	*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
helicopter	NN	*)	O
whirls	VBZ	(VP*	O
overhead	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Once	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
secured	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
freak	NN	*	ESE
show	NN	*)	ESE
begins	VBZ	(VP(VP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Hannibal	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Cannibal	NNP	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
production	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Down	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
back	JJ	*	O
ramp	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mammoth	JJ	*	O
aircraft	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
slowly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
unload	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
34	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
altogether	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wearing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
bright	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
wool	NN	*	O
knit	NN	*	O
caps	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
blacked-out	JJ	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
earmuffs	NNS	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
white	JJ	(NP*	O
surgical	JJ	*	O
masks	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
bright	JJ	(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
jumpsuits	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
denim	NN	(NP*	O
jackets	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
beige	JJ	(NP*	O
mittens	NNS	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
taped	VBN	(VP*	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wrists	NNS	*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
handcuffs	VBN	(NP(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
ankle	JJ	*)	O
shackles	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
natural	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
look	VBP	(VP*	O
like	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
giant	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
bright	JJ	*	ESE
orange	NN	*)	ESE
flies	VBZ	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
25-hour	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mostly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
sitting	VBG	(VP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
hobble	VBP	(VP*	O
along	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Marines	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
look	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
twice	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
big	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
walk	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*))	O
and	CC	*	O
frisk	VBP	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
soldier	NN	*)	O
handles	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
captive	JJ	*)	O
like	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
mannequin	NN	*)	ESE
-	:	*	O
moving	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
back	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
side	NN	*))))))	O
-	:	*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
lifting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
straight	RB	(PP*	O
off	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*)))	O
waiting	VBG	(VP*	O
buses	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Walk	RB	(SQ(ADVP*	O
!	.	*)	O
Walk	VBP	(VP*))	O
!	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
shout	VBP	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Shut	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))	O
!	.	*))	O

Head	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*))	O
!	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Man	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
scared	VBN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
TV	NN	*	O
camerawoman	NN	*)	O
watching	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*	O
pool	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
400	CD	*)	O
yards	NNS	*))))	O
away	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
freaky	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
chimes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*))	DSE
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
colleague	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
hard-core	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
terrorists	NNS	(S(UCP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
willing	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
escape	VB	(VP*))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
kill	VB	(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP(NP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
others	NNS	(NP*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
pretty	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	O
much	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
directed	VBD	(S(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
walk	VBP	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
shut	VBD	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
lower	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
board	VB	(VP*	O
buses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ferry	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
facility	NN	*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
near	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ferry	NN	*	O
slip	NN	*)))	O
conveys	VBZ	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strange	JJ	*	ESE
vibe	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
45-square	JJ	*	O
mile	NN	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
comprises	VBZ	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(QP*	O
3	CD	*)	O
acres	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
touts	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
wildlife	NN	*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
brown	JJ	*	O
pelican	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Antillean	JJ	*	O
manatee	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
bottlenose	JJ	*	O
dolphin	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hawksbill	JJ	*	O
turtle	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Watching	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
wildlife	NN	(NP*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lot	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
fun	NN	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pair	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
binoculars	NNS	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
helpful	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10th	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
southeastern	JJ	*	O
tip	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
bringing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
288	CD	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(ADVP(NP*	O
day	NN	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
12	CD	*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
effectively	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
filling	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
capacity	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Base	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
allowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
record	VB	(VP(VP*	O
audio	NN	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
landings	NNS	*)	O
live	VB	(VP*	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
cell	NN	(NP(NP*	O
phone	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
arriving	VBG	(VP*	O
Jan.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
allow	VB	(VP*	DSE
cameras	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
pictures	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
on	IN	(UCP(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
knees	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
wearing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
surrounded	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
guards	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
images	NNS	*)	O
created	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
uproar	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Rights	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
cried	VBD	(VP*	DSE
inhumane	JJ	(NP(ADJP*)	ESE
treatment	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Defense	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
allegations	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
insisting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
better	RBR	(PP(ADVP(ADVP*)	ESE
here	RB	*)	ESE
than	IN	*	O
in	IN	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
routinely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
questioned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
prosecuting	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
He	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
reminded	VBD	(VP*	O
critics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
arrive	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
undergo	VBP	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
45-minute	JJ	*	O
intake	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(S*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
airstrip	NN	*	O
landing	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
monitored	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
routine	NN	*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
delousing	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
chemical	NN	(NP*	O
washdown	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
physical	JJ	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
fingerprinted	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
photographed	JJ	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
toothbrush	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mint-flavored	JJ	(NP*	O
toothpaste	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
a	DT	(X(NP(NP*	O
bottle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Lively	NNP	(NP*	O
Salon	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*))	O
antidandruff	NN	(NP*)	O
shampoo	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
soap	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
flip	JJ	(NP*	O
flops	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
foam	NN	*	O
sleeping	NN	*	O
mat	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
buckets	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
washcloth	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
canteen	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*	O
cap	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
blankets	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sheet	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Koran	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
towels	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
praying	VBG	(S(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
,	,	*	O
strangely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
write	VB	(VP*	O
home	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
soft	JJ	*	ESE
spot	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
mothers	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
or	CC	*	O
al-Qaida	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
base	NN	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
try	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
glean	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
real	JJ	*	O
names	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
letters	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
many	DT	(S(NP*)	O
tend	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
multiple	JJ	(NP*	O
aliases	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
interrogations	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

When	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
assigned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
lives	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
8-feet-square	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
chain-link	JJ	(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tin	NN	*	O
roofs	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Halogen	NNP	*	O
lights	NNS	*)	O
stay	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
starts	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
prayer	NN	(NP(NP*	O
call	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
5	CD	(NP*	O
a.m.	RB	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
sign	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pole	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
edge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)))))))	O
points	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
direction	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Mecca	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
come	VBP	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
31	CD	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(NP*	O
Arabia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Yemen	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Pakistan	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Algeria	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
England	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Egypt	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Australia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Russia	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Belgium	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Sweden	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Base	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Christian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
Muslims	NNPS	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
prayer	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*	O
'	''	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
goes	VBZ	(VP*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
breakfast	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shower	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
sick	JJ	(NP*	O
call	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
noon	NN	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
lunch	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
recreation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
15	CD	(NP(NP*	O
minutes	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
couple	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
times	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
mail	NN	(NP*	O
call	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
sunset	JJ	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
dinner	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
evening	NN	(NP*	O
prayer	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
bedtime	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
9	CD	(NP*	O
p.m.	RB	*)))))))	O

Each	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
meal	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
considered	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
halal	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
religiously	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
appropriate	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
typical	JJ	*	O
breakfast	NN	*)	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
oatmeal	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
fresh	JJ	*	O
bread	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bottle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
lunch	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
pasta	NN	(NP(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
vegetable	NN	*	O
stew	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
dry	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
cereal	NN	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Froot	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Loops	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
box	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
raisins	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
granola	NN	*	O
bars	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bag	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
chips	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
bag	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
peanuts	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
water	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
dinner	NN	(NP*))	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rice	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
red	JJ	(NP*	O
beans	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
banana	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
water	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
Capt.	NNP	*	O
Sean	NNP	*	O
Campion	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
guards	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
characterizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
life	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
utter	JJ	(NP*	ESE
boredom	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
job	NN	*	O
right	NN	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(SINV(VP*)	O
Campion	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
32	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kansas	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
City	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mo.	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
nothing	NN	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
scheduled	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
mostly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
communicate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
via	IN	(PP*	O
simple	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
English	JJ	*	O
commands	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
hand	NN	(NP*	O
signals	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
lengthy	JJ	*	O
debates	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
anything	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Campion	NNP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Marine	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
Lt.	NNP	*	O
Abuhena	NNP	*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
39	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
speaks	VBZ	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)))	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
almost	RB	(NP(NP*	O
anybody	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
chaplain	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
ministers	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
facility	NN	*))	O
up	RP	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
with	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
month	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
pilgrimage	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
faithful	NN	*)	O
journey	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
holy	JJ	*	O
city	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mecca	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
detects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
anxiety	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Base	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
meal	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
10	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
chaplain	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unique	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
go	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
preconceived	JJ	*	DSE
idea	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
person	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
so	RB	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
chaplain	NN	*))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
approach	VBP	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
human	NN	*	ESE
being	VBG	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
hate	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
sinner	NN	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
``	``	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
hate	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sin	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Somebody	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
asks	VBZ	(VP*	O
Saiful-Islam	NNP	(NP*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
relationship	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
God	NNP	(NP*))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
capture	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
God	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
abandoned	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
know	VBP	(VP*))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
That	DT	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hope	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
God	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
hope	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
ask	VB	(VP*	O
me	PRP	(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
happen	VB	(VP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
moment	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
answer	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Concertina	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
wire	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
nine	CD	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*	O
towers	NNS	*))	O
surround	VBP	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
flag	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
everywhere	RB	(ADVP*)	O
-	:	*	O
painted	VBN	(FRAG(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*	O
towers	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
flying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
high	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
front	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
facility	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unlike	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pretty	JJ	*	O
setting	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Turkey	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
vultures	VBZ	(VP*	O
hover	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
thick	JJ	(NP*	O
brush	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
scraggly	NN	*	O
hills	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
day	NN	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
34	CD	*	O
newly	RB	*))	O
arrived	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
German	JJ	*	O
shepherd	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
handler	NN	*))	O
patrol	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
perimeter	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bright	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
orange	JJ	*	O
figures	NNS	*)	O
sit	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
praying	VBG	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))	O
run	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
exercise	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fenced	JJ	*	O
area	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
wearing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
handcuffs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
ankle	JJ	*	O
shackles	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Every	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP(ADVP*	O
often	RB	*)	O
a	DT	*)	O
prisoner	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
five	CD	(NP*	O
interrogation	NN	*	O
rooms	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
freshly	NNP	(NP*)	O
built	VBD	(VP*	O
wood	NN	(NP*	O
buildings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP(NP*	O
conditioners	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
windows	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
guards	VBZ	(VP*	O
accompany	VB	(S(VP(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
-	:	*	O
one	CD	(VP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
either	DT	(NP(NP*	O
side	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
behind	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)))	O
puts	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hand	NN	*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainee	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
forcing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
done	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
positive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
control	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
Col.	NNP	*	O
Terry	NNP	*	O
Carrico	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
effect	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
warden	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
means	VBZ	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
look	VB	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	O
n't	RB	*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
technique	NN	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
correctional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
facilities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Except	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
occasional	JJ	*	O
spitting	NN	*	DSE
incident	NN	*)	DSE
or	CC	*	DSE
threat	NN	(NP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
docile	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Base	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
suspect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
already	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
custody	NN	(NP*)))	O
pass	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	DSE
word	NN	*)	DSE
along	IN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
arrivals	NNS	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
okay	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
very	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
unsure	JJ	*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Carrico	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
They	PRP	(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
know	VB	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
going	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP(VP*	O
care	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
hurt	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))	O
or	CC	*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
want	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
views	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Army	NNP	*	O
Capt.	NNP	*	O
Darrell	NNP	*	O
Sides	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
30	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Fort	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Benning	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ga.	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)))	O
makes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
bones	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	DSE
considering	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
all	RB	*	O
watching	VBG	(VP*	O
television	NN	(NP*)	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	O
here	RB	*)	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
consider	VB	(VP*	DSE
tighter	JJR	(NP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
death	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
row	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prison	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
run	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Fleet	NNP	(NP*	O
Hospital	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*))))	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
scheduled	VBN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
needing	VBG	(VP*	O
medical	JJ	(NP*	O
attention	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
fair	JJ	*	O
number	NN	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
underweight	JJ	(ADJP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
missing	VBG	(VP*	O
toes	NNS	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
fingers	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
limbs	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
hospital	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
Recreation	NNP	(NP*	O
Road	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Along	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
allowed	VBD	(S(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
get	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bit	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Americana	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
portrait	NN	*)	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
seized	VBD	(VP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Spanish-American	JJ	*	O
War	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1903	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
lease	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
contract	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
extended	VBN	(VP*	O
indefinitely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1934	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
broken	VBN	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
mutual	JJ	(NP*	O
agreement	NN	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
left	VBN	(VP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*)	O
surprisingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
close	JJ	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
suburban-style	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
beige	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
green	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
yellow	JJ	*	O
houses	NNS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
subdivisions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
names	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Circle	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
West	NNP	(NP*	O
Iguana	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Two	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
boys	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP*	O
karate	NN	*	O
outfits	NNS	*)))	O
run	VBP	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
palm-lined	JJ	(NP*	O
Sherman	NNP	*	O
Avenue	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
child	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
more	JJR	(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
3	CD	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
4	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
plays	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gym	NN	*)	O
set	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
young	JJ	*	O
woman	NN	*)	O
keeping	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
watchful	JJ	*	DSE
eye	NN	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(SINV*	O
up	RB	(VP(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
road	NN	*))	O
is	VBZ	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
W.S.	NNP	*	O
Sampson	NNP	*	O
Elementary	NNP	*	O
School	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
replete	JJ	(ADJP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
yellow	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
school	NN	*	O
buses	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Morale	NNP	*	O
Welfare	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Recreation	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Cooper	NNP	*	O
Field	NNP	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
baseball	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
soccer	NN	*	O
fields	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
outdoor	JJ	*	O
movie	NN	*	O
house	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
playing	VBG	(VP*)))))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
movie	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Majestic	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
20-bed	JJ	*	O
hospital	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
high-tech	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
air-conditioned	JJ	*	O
white	JJ	*	O
tent	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
looks	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
futuristic	JJ	*	ESE
movie	NN	*	ESE
set	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
low	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
ceilings	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
fluorescent	JJ	(NP*	O
lighting	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
padded	JJ	(NP*	O
white	JJ	*	O
walls	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
floors	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
ceilings	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
temper	NN	*	O
tent	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
morning	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
hospital	NN	*	O
corpsman	NN	*	O
Shuron	NNP	*	O
Jerome	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
19	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Houston	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
poring	VBG	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
box	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Valentines	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
sent	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
schoolchildren	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pennsylvania	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Wish	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
your	PRP$	(NP*	O
family	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
child	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
written	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jerome	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
hospital	NN	*)	O
feels	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hospital	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
states	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
save	VB	(S(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
security	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
various	JJ	*	O
languages	NNS	*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
speak	VBP	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
French	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
Urdu	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Arabic	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
understand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(ADJP(NP*	O
little	RB	*)	O
English	JJ	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
sees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
patients	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
allows	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
regular	JJ	*	ESE
patients	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
finds	VBZ	(VP*	O
herself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thinking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Oh	UH	(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
my	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
God	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
related	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
related	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
try	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
treat	VB	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(NP*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
patient	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Fleet	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hospital	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
nine	CD	(NP(NP*	O
patients	NNS	*)	O
today	NN	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
work	NN	*)))	O
includes	VBZ	(VP*	O
blast	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
gunshot	NN	*	O
wounds	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Just	RB	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
surgeon	NN	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
eye	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
patient	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
suffered	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sports	NNS	*	O
injury	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
younger	JJR	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
eye	NN	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
unbearable	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
story	NN	*)	O
got	VBD	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
play	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
seemed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
underscore	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
fact	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
tensions	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	DSE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
easing	VBG	(VP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
patient	NN	*)	O
invited	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
surgeon	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cup	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
tea	NN	(NP*))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hospital	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
photographs	NNS	(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
sections	NNS	*))	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
not	RB	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
patients	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
al-Jazeera	JJ	*	O
television	NN	*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
walks	VBZ	(VP*	O
through	RP	(PRT*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
rolls	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
patient	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
right	JJ	*	O
index	NN	*	O
finger	NN	*)	O
amputated	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
gunshot	NN	*	O
wound	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
cameraman	NN	*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
filming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
nurse	NN	*)	O
covers	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
patient	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
face	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
recovery	NN	*	O
room	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
patient	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
body	NN	*)	O
starts	VBZ	(VP*	O
trembling	VBG	(S(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
doctors	NNS	*)	O
explain	VBP	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	O
reaction	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
patients	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
awake	RB	(ADJP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
anesthesia	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
provides	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
bit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
drama	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Michel	NNP	(FRAG(NP*)	O
!	.	*	O
Michel	NNP	(NP*)	O
!	.	*)	O
''	''	*	O
yells	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
doctor	NN	*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
her	PRP$	(NP*	O
operating	VBG	*	O
clothes	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
You	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Another	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
doctor	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
speaking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
French	JJ	*	O
accent	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
adds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Good	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
job	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
buddy	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interpreter	NN	*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
talk	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
patient	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Eight	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
young-looking	JJ	*	O
men	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
shaved	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
heads	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
beards	NNS	(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
recover	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cots	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
sleep	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
staff	NN	*)	O
relies	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
linguists	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
communicate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
patients	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
inventions	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
longhand	JJ	*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
English	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
phrases	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
Arabic	JJ	*	O
counterparts	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pinch	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
patients	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
includes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	VBG	*	O
phrases	NNS	*)))))))	O
:	:	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
'm	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
pain	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thirsty	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Hungry	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Bathroom	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Urinate	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Arm	NN	(ROOT(NP*	O
.	.	*))	O

Hand	FW	(ROOT(NP*	O
.	.	*))	O

Leg	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Back	RB	(ROOT(FRAG(ADVP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

IV	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
Hurts	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Cold	FW	(ROOT(NP*	O
.	.	*))	O

Hot	FW	(ROOT(NP*	O
.	.	*))	O

Sick	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
throw	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
calm	NN	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Fleet	NNP	(NP*	O
Hospital	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*)	O
elsewhere	RB	(ADVP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
bracing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(NP(SBAR(WHPP*	O
what	WP	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
may	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
inevitable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
death	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(FRAG*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
guards	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
with	IN	(PP(PP*	O
300	CD	(NP*))	O
already	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	*	O
custody	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
scores	NNS	(NP*)))	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
poor	JJ	(NP*	O
health	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
begin	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
something	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
bound	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
briefing	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Marine	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Corps	NNP	*	O
Brig.	NNP	*	O
Gen.	NNP	*	O
Michael	NNP	*	O
R.	NNP	*	O
Lehnert	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prison	NN	*	O
project	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
improve	VB	(VP*	O
living	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Within	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
couple	NN	*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
move	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
Radio	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Range	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
utilities	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADVP*	O
readily	RB	*)	O
available	JJ	*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
cells	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
cots	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
air	NN	(NP*	O
conditioning	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
toilets	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
general	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	O
congressional	JJ	(NP*	O
approval	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
building	VBG	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(SBAR*	O
Radio	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Range	NNP	*)	O
begins	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
camp	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
capacity	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
flights	NNS	(NP*)	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
stopped	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zambia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
hails	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
result	NN	(NP*))))	O

LUSAKA	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
--	:	*	O
Zambian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Levy	NNP	*	O
Mwanawasa	NNP	*	O
yesterday	NN	*)	O
hailed	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
re-election	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
defeated	JJ	(NP*	O
opponent	NN	*	O
Morgan	NNP	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	ESE
result	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
am	VBP	(VP*	DSE
pleased	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
learn	VB	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
re-election	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mwanawasa	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
As	IN	(S(PP*	O
chairman	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
friendly	JJ	*	O
neighbour	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
congratulate	VB	(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
re-election	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mwanawasa	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Three	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
10	CD	*	O
losing	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
candidates	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zambia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
December	NNP	*	O
27	NNP	*	O
vote	NN	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
petitioned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
nullify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
charging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mwanawasa	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
fraud	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(UCP(NP*	O
Fall	NN	*)	O
And	CC	*	O
Rise	VBN	(VP*	O
Of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dust	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	O
settling	VBG	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dramatic	JJ	*	O
turbulence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
two	CD	*	O
weeks	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	O
again	RB	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
helm	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
returned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
barracks	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
grieving	VBG	*	ESE
Venezuelans	NNPS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
peace	NN	(NP*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
loved	JJ	*	ESE
ones	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
gunned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
first	RB	(PP(PP(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	*	O
sympathizers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
subsequently	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
short-lived	JJ	*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
ousted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
12	CD	*))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
17	CD	(S(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anti-Chavez	JJ	*	DSE
protest	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
sharpshooters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
faithful	NN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
president	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Pedro	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
powerful	JJ	*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
stepped	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
but	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
40	CD	(NP(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	(NP(ADVP*)	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
protesting	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
probe	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
transpired	VBD	(S(VP*)))))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
offing	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
placed	VBN	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
cronies	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
institution	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
congress	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
courts	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
honest	JJ	*	ESE
inquiry	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
complicit	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
wave	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
killings	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
taped	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
radio	NN	*	O
conversations	NNS	*)	O
broadcast	VBN	(VP*	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
radio	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
television	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
tanks	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
surround	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
unarmed	JJ	(S(NP*	O
civilian	JJ	*	O
protesters	NNS	*)	O
marched	VBD	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
ordered	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
deployment	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
order	NN	*	O
disturbances	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Given	VBN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
death	NN	*	ESE
toll	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
claims	NNS	*)	DSE
seem	VBP	(VP*	ESE
rather	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
flimsy	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
unfortunate	JJ	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Venezuela	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hemisphere	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
second-oldest	JJ	*	O
democracy	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
democracy	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
losing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
currency	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	ESE
Argentina	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
coups	NNS	(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
potentially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
destabilizing	VBG	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
happy	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
collectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
overcome	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
era	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
coup	NN	(NP*	O
d'etats	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
events	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appearance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
everyone	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
President	NNP	*	O
Fernando	NNP	*))	O
Henrique	NNP	(NP*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
quite	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
valid	JJ	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
downplayed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
alarming	JJ	*)	ESE
faults	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
struck	VBN	(VP*	DSE
friendships	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Libyan	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraqi	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
great	JJ	(NP*	O
fanfare	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
open	JJ	*	DSE
defiance	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
wooed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Venezuelans	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
wary	NNP	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
power	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Indeed	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
muscle-flexing	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
little	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
offer	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
choked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
doubling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
royalty	NN	*	O
payments	NNS	*)	O
oil	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	O
pay	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
restricting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
corporate	JJ	(NP*	O
ownership	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
projects	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
49	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
alienated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
workers	NNS	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
state-owned	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Petroleos	NNP	(NP*	O
de	IN	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
replacing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
long-serving	JJ	(NP*	O
professionals	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
consolidated	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
power	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
rewriting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
constitution	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Interestingly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
initially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
rose	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1990s	NNS	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
discontent	NN	*))))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	DSE
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Carlos	NNP	*	O
Andres	NNP	*	O
Perez	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	O
ordered	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
shoot	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
crowds	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1989	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	ESE
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
only	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
tell	VB	(VP*	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
voluntarily	RB	(ADVP*)	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
term	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2006	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
thing	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
certain	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
A	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	ESE
investigation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massacre	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
2002	CD	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
called	VBN	(VP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

US-Japan	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
end	NN	(NP*)))	O

Representatives	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
finished	VBN	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP*)))	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
co-operating	NN	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
science	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
technology	NN	*	O
fields	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
unveiled	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*	O
calling	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
voluntary	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
limits	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
mandatory	JJ	(NP*	ESE
targets	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
start	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
research	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ratify	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
outcry	NN	*)	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
hindered	VBD	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rigged	NN	*	ESE
election	NN	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ugly	JJ	*	ESE
travesty	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
all	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
southern	JJ	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
suffer	VB	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Voters	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
lined	VBD	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
hours	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
vain	JJ	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Supporters	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
candidate	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
intimidated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
beaten	VBN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
long-serving	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
tyrannical	JJ	*)	ESE
president	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Robert	NNP	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

International	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
deeply	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
flawed	VBN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
declared	JJ	*	O
results	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Unfortunately	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
compounded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
problem	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
accepting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
victory	NN	*)	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
earlier	JJR	(NP*	DSE
assertions	NNS	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rigged	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
failing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
hold	VB	(VP*	ESE
firm	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
not	RB	(VP(CONJP*	ESE
only	JJ	*)	ESE
damage	VBP	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
credibility	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
ignore	VBP	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
nearby	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
misrule	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
include	VBP	(VP*	O
explosive	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	DSE
frustration	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
swelling	VBG	*	ESE
tide	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
desperate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
refugees	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	DSE
reluctance	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
donors	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
invest	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
strengthen	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
mild	JJ	*	ESE
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
steps	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
effective	JJ	*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
joined	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
major	JJ	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
states	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
liberation	NN	*	O
struggle	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
minority	NN	*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
1970	CD	*	O
's	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
systematically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
wrecked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
freedoms	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prolong	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
22-year-old	JJ	*	O
hold	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	ESE
beacon	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
basket	NN	*	ESE
case	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
blessed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
fertile	JJ	(NP*	O
agricultural	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
during	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
dozen	NN	*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rule	NN	*))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
relatively	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
prosperous	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
free	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
picture	NN	*)	O
changed	VBD	(VP*	O
radically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mid-1990	NN	*	O
's	POS	*))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
shifted	VBD	(VP*	O
onto	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
highly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
destructive	JJ	*)	ESE
course	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
incited	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
violent	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
land	NN	*	O
seizures	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
disastrous	JJ	*	ESE
toll	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
investment	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
production	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
launched	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
broad	JJ	*	ESE
assault	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
journalistic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
judicial	JJ	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
help	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	(ADJP*	O
but	CC	*	O
loyal	JJ	*)	O
core	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
liberation	NN	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
thugs	NNS	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Thugs	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fraud	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
keep	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
78-year-old	JJ	*	O
Mugabe	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))	O
forever	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
recovery	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
wait	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
departure	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
fear	NN	*	DSE
violence	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*))))	O

HARARE	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Wellington	NNP	*	O
Chinyama	NNP	*)	O
sat	VBN	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
barber	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
chair	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
unfolded	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
without	IN	(SINV(PP*	O
glancing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*))))	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
young	JJ	*	O
man	NN	*)	O
trimming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
hair	NN	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
question	NN	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
virtually	RB	(NP(NP*	O
everyone	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mind	NN	*))	O
here	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
So	RB	*	O
Joseph	NNP	(S(NP*	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
prepared	VBD	(VP*	O
yourself	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
go	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
polls	NNS	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
re-elect	VB	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
oust	VB	*	O
Robert	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	O
known	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
win	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
almost	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
secondary	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
loser	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
followers	NNS	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Surveys	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
show	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
challenger	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
union	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
surge	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
violence	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
accusations	NNS	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
governing	VBG	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
changed	VBD	(VP*	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rig	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*))))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
fanned	VBD	(VP*	O
widespread	JJ	(NP*	DSE
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
neither	CC	(S(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
nor	CC	*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
tally	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
vivid	JJ	*	ESE
imagination	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
envision	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
scenario	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ground	NN	*))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
either	CC	(S(NP*	O
rioters	NNS	(NP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
military	NN	*))	O
take	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
streets	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
diplomat	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Most	RBS	(ROOT(SINV(ADJP*	ESE
disturbing	JJ	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
pronouncements	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
British	JJ	*	O
colony	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
television	NN	*	O
interview	NN	*	O
broadcast	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Didymus	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mutasa	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ruling	NN	*	O
ZANU-PF	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
veterans	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
independence	NN	*	O
war	NN	*))))	O
found	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
prospect	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
intolerable	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
People	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
being	VBG	(SBAR(S(S(VP*	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
ruled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Ian	NNP	(NP*	O
Smith	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Mutasa	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
white-ruled	JJ	(NP*	O
Rhodesia	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
known	VBN	(VP*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
gaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Under	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
circumstances	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
definitely	JJ	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
34	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
died	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
almost	RB	*	O
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)))))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

State	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
violations	NNS	*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
campaign	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	DSE
allegation	NN	*)	DSE
vehemently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
alert	NN	*)	O
''	''	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
recalled	VBN	(VP*	O
soldiers	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
neighboring	JJ	(NP*	O
Congo	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
deployed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Police	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Commissioner	NNP	*	O
Augustine	NNP	*	O
Chihuri	NNP	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Many	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Zimbabweans	NNS	*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
contest	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	ESE
immovable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
forces	NNS	*))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
78-year-old	JJ	*	O
autocrat	NN	*)	O
desperate	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
dominated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
restless	JJ	(NP*	DSE
young	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*))))))	O
weary	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
government	NN	(NP(NP*	O
corruption	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
food	NN	(NP*	O
shortages	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
unemployment	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
announces	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
won	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
storm	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
castle	NN	*))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Sibongile	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Mbuyiso	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
supporter	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*)	O
wins	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
announce	VB	(VP(VP*	O
martial	JJ	(NP*	O
law	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
throw	VB	(VP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
jail	NN	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
plotting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
send	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Government	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
charged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
party	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
high	JJ	(NP*	O
treason	NNS	*))))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
allegedly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
plotting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
assassinate	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
charge	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
largely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	O
edited	JJ	*)	O
videotape	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
refers	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
elimination	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
responding	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
question	NN	*)	O
posed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
publicist	NN	*))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
whom	WP	(NP(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
meeting	VBG	(VP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
subsequently	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
contract	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Political	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	DSE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
laid	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
groundwork	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
jail	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
last-ditch	JJ	*	ESE
effort	NN	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
should	MD	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
lose	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	O
foregone	JJ	*	ESE
conclusion	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Opposition	NN	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
22	CD	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
agents	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
abducted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
surge	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
swing	NN	(NP*	O
districts	NNS	*)))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
persuade	VB	(VP*	O
enough	JJ	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ZANU-PF	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
victory	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
addition	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
governing	VBG	(NP*	O
party	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
revised	VBN	(VP*	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
procedures	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manner	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
independent	JJ	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
observers	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ZANU-PF	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
told	VBN	(VP*	O
election	NN	(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
intend	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
polling	NN	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rural	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*)	O
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
strongholds	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
stations	NNS	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
urban	JJ	(NP*	O
areas	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
strong	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Observers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
produce	VB	(VP(VP*	O
long	JJ	(NP*	O
voting	NN	*	O
lines	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
discourage	VB	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
casting	VBG	(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

ZANU-PF	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
plan	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
use	VB	(VP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
service	NN	*	O
employees	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
monitor	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote-counting	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
bar	VB	(VP*	O
independent	JJ	(NP*	O
monitors	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
nonprofit	JJ	(NP*	O
organizations	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
assisting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
routine	JJ	*	O
tasks	NNS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
transporting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
ballot	NN	(NP*	O
boxes	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
counting	VBG	(NP*	O
stations	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
residency	JJ	*	O
requirement	NN	*)	O
introduced	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
month	NN	*	O
bans	NNS	*)	O
registered	VBD	(VP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
casting	NN	(NP*	O
ballots	NNS	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
leases	NNS	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
utility	NN	*	O
bills	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
names	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
foreign	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
disenfranchise	VB	(VP*	O
hundreds	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
thousands	NNS	*))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
young	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
live	VBP	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
parents	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Clearly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
everything	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
steal	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
John	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Makumbe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
science	NN	*	O
professor	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
night	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
won	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
prosecute	VB	(VP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
ease	VB	(VP*	O
pressure	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
prosecution	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
attack	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1980s	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Matabeleland	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
home	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ndebele	NNP	*	O
tribe	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
at	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*))	O
posed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	O
significant	JJ	*)	O
threat	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

An	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
estimate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
killed	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*	O
ranges	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
10,000	CD	(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
20,000	CD	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(X(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
shook	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))	O

CARACAS	NNS	(ROOT(FRAG(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
-	:	*	O
Here	RB	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
shook	VBD	(S(VP*)))))))))	O
Venezuela	NNP	(X(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
six	CD	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
at	IN	(S(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
41	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
323	CD	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
:	:	*)))	O

Tuesday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
9	CD	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
largest	JJS	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
union	NN	*)))	O
joins	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
managers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
massive	JJ	*	O
state-run	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*	O
company	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
demanding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resignation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
board	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
directors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
appointed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Wednesday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
10	CD	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Union	NNP	(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*))	O
extend	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
24	CD	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)))	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
`	``	(ADJP*	O
aggressive	JJ	*	ESE
'	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
`	``	*	O
intolerant	JJ	*	ESE
'	''	*)	O
response	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
demands	NNS	*))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
indefinite	JJ	(S(ADJP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Oil	NN	(NP(NP*	O
exports	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
account	VBP	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
80	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
cent	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
revenues	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
threatened	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
strike	NN	*)	O
stops	VBZ	(VP*	O
production	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
major	JJ	*	O
refineries	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Thursday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
50,000	CD	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
business	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
union	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
mass	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demand	VB	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resignation	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
urges	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
supporters	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
back	VB	(VP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*	O
orders	NNS	*)	DSE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
suspension	NN	*)	O
of	IN	*)	O
broadcasts	VBZ	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
private	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
television	NN	*	O
networks	NNS	*)	O
opposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Pro-government	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
demonstrators	NNS	*)	O
face	VBP	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(S(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
15	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
almost	RB	(S(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
wounded	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
A	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)))	O
declare	VBP	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(NP*	O
Leading	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*	O
resign	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Friday	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
12	CD	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Army	NNP	(NP*	O
commander	NNP	*	O
General	NNP	*	O
Efrain	NNP	*	O
Vazquez	NNP	*))	O
announces	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resign	VB	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Business	NNP	(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Pedro	NNP	*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
replaces	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
dissolves	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
dismisses	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Supreme	NNP	*	O
Court	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
revokes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
49	CD	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
decrees	NNS	*))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
announces	VBZ	(VP*	O
Presidential	JJ	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
leaders	NNS	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Costa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rica	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
summit	NN	*)))))	O
denounce	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
breakdown	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
order	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Saturday	NNP	(ROOT(S(FRAG(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
13	CD	*)))	O
:	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	NNP	(NP*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
apply	VB	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charter	NN	*)	O
requiring	VBG	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
abandons	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(FRAG*	O
Pro-Chavez	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
rioting	NN	(NP*	DSE
breaks	NNS	*)	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
country	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commander	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
paratrooper	NN	*	O
brigade	NN	*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
old	JJ	*	O
unit	NN	*)	O
-	:	*))))	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
recognise	VB	(VP*	DSE
orders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
transferred	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Orchila	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*	O
Sea	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)))	DSE
march	VBP	(VP*	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
palace	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Carmona	NNP	(NP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
refuge	NN	(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Tiuna	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Fort	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
southwest	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Top	JJ	(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Carmona	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
conditional	JJ	(ADJP*	O
upon	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
respecting	JJ	*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	O
institutions	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
leave	VB	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)	O
freely	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Carmona	NNP	(NP*)	O
announces	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
restoration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Assembly	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*	O
cabinet	NN	*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
move	VB	(VP(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
palace	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Carmona	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
resigns	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
interim	JJ	*	O
presidency	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
vice-President	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Diosdado	NNP	(NP*	O
Cabello	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
acting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Carmona	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
along	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
cabinet	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
general	JJ	(NP*	O
staff	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cabello	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
promises	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
restore	VB	(VP*	O
constitutional	JJ	(NP*	O
order	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sunday	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
Orchila	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Island	NNP	*)	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
helicopter	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
heads	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	O
re-takes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidency	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emotional	JJ	*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
palace	NN	*	O
ceremony	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
4:30	CD	(NP*	O
am	RB	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
0830	NNP	(NP*	O
GMT	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
calm	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
`	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
'	''	*))	O

-	:	(ROOT(S*	O
Emergency	NNP	(NP*	O
workers	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
total	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
at	IN	(NP(QP*	O
least	JJS	*	O
41	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
323	CD	(S(NP*)	O
injured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rioting	NN	(NP*))	O
around	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Predicts	NNPS	*	DSE
Victory	NNP	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Election	NN	*))))	O

Zimbabwe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
incumbent	JJ	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*)	O
predicted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
victory	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
two	CD	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
horse	NN	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
race	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
defeated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Morgan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
Movement	NN	*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
MDC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Looking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
tired	JJ	(ADJP*	O
but	CC	*	O
blithesome	JJ	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
month	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
daily	JJ	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
campaigns	NNS	*))))	O
throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
cast	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
facing	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
serious	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
rival	JJ	*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
veteran	NN	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
gained	VBD	(VP*	O
independence	NN	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
accompanied	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
polling	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
school	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*	O
suburb	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Highfield	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*	O
Harare	NN	*))))))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
family	NN	(NP*	O
members	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
two	CD	(NP*	O
children	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
journalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
casting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADVP*	DSE
than	IN	*)	DSE
confident	JJ	*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
winning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
more	RBR	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
won	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
those	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
thought	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
rigged	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
prejudging	VBG	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
direct	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tension	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
risen	VBN	(VP*	O
sharply	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
months	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
long	JJ	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
sometimes	RB	(ADJP*	O
violent	JJ	*))	O
election	NN	*	O
campaigns	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
violence	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
manipulation	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
rig	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
defying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP*	O
pressure	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
back	VB	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*	O
reforms	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
six	CD	*)	O
-	:	*	O
year	NN	(S(NP*	O
mandate	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
complete	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
excess	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
idle	JJ	*	O
farms	NNS	*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
white	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
own	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bulk	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
arable	JJ	*	O
land	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resettle	VB	(VP*	O
landless	JJ	(NP*	O
peasants	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nearly	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(QP*	O
500,000	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
resettled	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
program	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
sharp	JJ	(NP*	DSE
international	JJ	*	DSE
rebuke	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
former	JJ	(NP*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*	O
Britain	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
vowed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
press	VB	(VP*	ESE
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
imposed	VBD	(VP*	O
sanctions	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
19	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
close	JJ	*	O
associates	NNS	*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
move	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
violating	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
cracking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
down	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
judiciary	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	ESE
land	NN	*	O
reform	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pillar	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
strategy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
political	JJ	(S(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
could	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	O
either	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
view	NN	*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
March	NNP	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
chapter	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	ESE
struggle	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
colonial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
led	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
early	JJ	*	O
1960s	NNS	*))	O
until	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
independence	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
deliver	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
safeguard	VB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
heritage	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
young	JJ	*	O
generation	NN	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
land	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
forefathers	NNS	*))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
rally	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
talked	VBD	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
keep	VB	(VP*	O
safeguarding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
sovereignty	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
land	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
spirit	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
dies	VBZ	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
dream	NN	*)	ESE
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
veteran	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	O
sacrifice	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
bright	JJ	*	ESE
teaching	NN	*	O
career	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1950s	NNS	*))))))))))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
compatriots	NNS	*)	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
colonial	JJ	(NP*	O
rule	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	O
ambition	NN	*)	DSE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
tested	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ballot	NN	*	O
box	NN	*))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
Caucus	NNP	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Provocation	NNP	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
Commentary	NNP	(NP*))))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
9	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
23rd	JJ	*	O
anniversary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
troublemaking	JJ	*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNP	*	O
Act	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
unveil	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
70-member	JJ	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
caucus	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Most	JJS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
congressional	JJ	*	O
caucuses	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
issue-based	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	O
or	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(NP*	O
racial	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))	O
but	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
devoted	VBN	(VP*	O
solely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
inalienable	JJ	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
claimed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
caucus	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
serve	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
channel	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
legislators	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP*	O
ideas	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	PDT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
provocative	JJ	*	ESE
move	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
obviously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
overshadow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
renewed	VBN	*	O
Sino-US	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	*)	ESE
level	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP(VP*	O
fodder	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
military	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
separatist	JJ	*	O
extremists	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

One	CD	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
goals	NNS	*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
promote	VB	(VP*	ESE
US	NNP	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
conspicuous	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
signs	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
ever-increasing	JJ	(NP*	ESE
US-Taiwan	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
mid-March	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
side	NN	*)	O
granted	VBD	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
Tang	VBG	(VP*	O
Yiau-ming	JJ	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
visa	NN	*)	O
so	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
attend	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
sponsored	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
contractors	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sidelines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
met	VBD	(VP*	O
senior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Assistant	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP*	O
James	NNP	*	O
Kelly	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
22	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Admiral	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dennis	NNP	*	O
Blair	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
commander-in-chief	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Pacific	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
Armed	NNP	*	O
Services	NNPS	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Straits	NNPS	*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
both	DT	(S(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
continue	VBP	(VP*	O
modernizing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
military	JJ	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Last	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
receiving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Representatives	NNPS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))	O
-	:	*)	O
ensured	VBD	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
balanced	JJ	*	O
cross-Straits	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
peace	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Straits	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
reaffirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
promises	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwanese	NNPS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
abide	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*))	O
-	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
necessary	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
quoted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taipei	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
sow	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
wind	NN	*)))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
reap	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
whirlwind	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
robust	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
build-up	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
balance	NN	*)	O
but	CC	(PP*	O
menace	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
cross-Straits	JJ	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
stability	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Helping	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)	O
build	VBP	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	ESE
muscle	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
foment	VB	(VP*	O
pro-independence	JJ	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
events	NNS	(NP*))	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
side	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
ready	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*))))	O
military	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
become	VB	(VP*	O
provocative	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
enough	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
push	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
island	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
edge	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Ministry	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Criticizes	NNP	*	DSE
`	``	*	O
Odious	NNP	*	ESE
'	''	*)	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
Report	NNP	*)))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
surprised	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
mildly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
record	NN	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
objected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
particular	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
odious	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
section	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
One	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
gets	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
impression	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(S(NP*	O
writers	NNS	*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
used	VBD	(VP*	ESE
old	JJ	(NP*	ESE
drafts	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
nothing	NN	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
happened	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
either	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
occurred	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
closed	VBN	(VP*	O
ranks	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
battle	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
annual	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Russia	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
poor	JJ	*	ESE
record	NN	*)	O
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
independence	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
media	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
demonstrated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
little	JJ	(NP*	ESE
respect	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
basic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
credible	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
reports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
serious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
extrajudicial	JJ	(NP*	O
killings	NNS	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
both	PDT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Chechen	JJ	(NP*	O
fighters	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Russian	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Putin	NNP	*)))	O
on	IN	(ADVP*	O
down	RB	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
portrayed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
partially	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
endorsed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
view	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
pointing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
rebel	VB	(VP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Shamil	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Basayev	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jordanian-born	NNP	*	O
Omar	NNP	*	O
Ibn	NNP	*	O
al	NNP	*	O
Khattab	NNP	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
believed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
financial	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
al-Qaida	JJ	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
network	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
note	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
rebels	NNS	*)))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
criticized	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Russian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
police	NN	*	O
abuse	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civilians	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
--	:	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
toned	VBN	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
greatly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
enthusiastic	JJ	*	DSE
member	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
sharing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
intelligence	NN	(NP*	O
information	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
opening	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
airspace	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
humanitarian	JJ	(NP*	O
flights	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
giving	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
green	JJ	*	DSE
light	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
deployment	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Central	NNP	(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
pronouncement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*)))	O
reflected	VBD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
certain	JJ	(NP*	ESE
circles	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
object	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
U.S.-Russian	JJ	*	O
partnership	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
These	DT	(S(NP*	O
circles	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
persistently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
tried	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reanimate	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
Chechen	NN	*	O
problem	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
turn	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
again	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
irritant	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Russian-American	JJ	*	O
dialogue	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
before	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
judging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
others	NNS	(NP(NP*	ESE
'	POS	*)	O
rights	NNS	*	O
records	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
investigate	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
failure	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ratify	VB	(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
agreements	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
death	NN	*	O
penalty	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Russia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
introduced	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
moratorium	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
capital	NN	(NP(NP*	O
punishment	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prerequisite	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
joining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Council	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1996	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tokyo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
irked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
stance	NN	*))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

TOKYO	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
Coral	NNP	(S(NP*	O
reefs	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
die	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
too	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
hot	JJ	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Polar	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
bears	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
less	JJR	(NP*	ESE
room	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
roam	VB	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
crowding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
existence	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Birds	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
start	VB	(VP*	O
flying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
extra	JJ	*	ESE
mile	NN	*)	O
north	RB	(ADVP*	O
each	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
starve	VB	(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

These	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
dire	JJ	*	ESE
possible	JJ	*	ESE
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
say	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
climate-change	JJ	(NP*	O
experts	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(ADJP(ADJP(NP*)	O
clearer	JJR	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
steps	NNS	(S(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(VP*	ESE
slow	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
150	CD	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
signed	VBD	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(S(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
saying	VBG	(VP*)))	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*	O
-	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
shaped	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fit	VB	(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
five	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
accord	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ultimate	JJ	*	ESE
effectiveness	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
doubt	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
irritated	JJ	(VP*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nature-lovers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
shaping	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
accord	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
soil	NN	*))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
pride	NN	(NP*	ESE
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
proof	NN	*)))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
relevant	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
players	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
stage	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
absolutely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
inadmissible	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greatest	JJS	*	ESE
gas-emitting	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
once	RB	(VP(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
turn	VB	*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
back	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
present	JJ	*	O
something	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
framework	NN	*	O
convention	NN	*)))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Mie	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Asaoka	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kiko	NNP	*	O
Network	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Tokyo	NNP	*	O
environmental-umbrella	NN	*	O
organization	NN	*)	O
representing	VBG	(VP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
150	CD	*)	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
groups	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
clash	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
allowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
sluggish	JJ	(NP*	O
economies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prosper	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
occurs	VBZ	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
awkward	JJ	*	ESE
point	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
US-Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
looking	VBG	(VP*	O
east	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
as	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
dominance	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*)))	O
diminishes	VBZ	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(VP(NP(NP*	O
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US-Japan	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
whole	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*)))	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
off	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
list	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
contributing	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
post-Sept	NNP	*	O
.	.	*	O
11	CD	*	O
war	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Realizing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
accidental	NN	*)	ESE
slight	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
later	RB	(ADVP*)	O
apologized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
overlooking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
tremendously	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
ambitious	JJ	*)	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*))	O
-	:	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
alter	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interpretation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
post-World	JJ	(ADJP*	O
War	NNP	*	O
II	NNP	*)	O
pacifist	NN	*	O
constitution	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
dispatch	VB	(VP*	O
warships	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
noncombat	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
visit	NN	*))	O
here	RB	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
gently	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
balked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proposed	JJ	*	O
alternative	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
agreement	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
further	JJ	(NP*	ESE
efforts	NNS	*)	O
''	''	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
part	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protesters	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
air	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
indignation	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
here	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
over	IN	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
do-it-our-way	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
something	NN	(NP*))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
effects	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
whole	JJ	*	O
globe	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Among	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kiko	NNP	*))	O
Network	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
handouts	NNS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pamphlet	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cartoon	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
one	CD	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(NP*)	O
defensively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
holds	VBZ	*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	*	ESE
Protocol	NNP	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
fiendish-looking	JJ	*	ESE
Bush	NNP	*)	O
seizes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
weeping	JJ	*	ESE
globe	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
monster-size	JJ	*	ESE
hands	NNS	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
eyes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
not	RB	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
signals	NNS	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
growing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
unilateralist	JJ	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
pulling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
out	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
process	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
being	VBG	(S(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
-	:	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
labeling	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
Iran	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
an	DT	*)	O
``	``	*	ESE
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
prime	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
targets	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
phase	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
allies	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
seeing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	ESE
tendency	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
act	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
first	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
consult	VB	(VP*	ESE
later	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
offering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
own	JJ	*	DSE
alternative	JJ	*	DSE
plan	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Clear	NNP	*	O
Skies	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Global	NNP	*	O
Climate	NNP	*	O
Change	NNP	*	O
Initiatives	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
aides	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
are	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
market-sensitive	JJ	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
worst	JJS	*	O
air	NN	*	O
pollutants	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
70	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
finding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strategy	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
intensity	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
advocates	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gas	NN	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
emits	VBZ	(VP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
fear	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
forging	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
way	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
smaller	JJR	(S(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
start	VB	(VP*	O
backing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two-tier	JJ	*	O
system	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
others	NNS	*))	O
-	:	(PRN*	O
Australia	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Canada	NNP	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	ESE
suit	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
-	:	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
choose	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
targets	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
rest	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
limited	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
stricter	JJR	*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
limits	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Not	RB	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
everyone	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
upset	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
alternative	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japanese	JJ	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
gone	VBN	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
vigorous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
energy-saving	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
-	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
thus	RB	(ADJP*	O
environmentally	RB	*	ESE
friendly	JJ	*)	ESE
-	:	*)	O
drives	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
crises	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1970s	CD	*	O
and	CC	*	O
1980s	CD	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Mitsuru	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Shinozaki	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Keidanren	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
influential	JJ	*)	ESE
business	NN	*	O
lobby	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Earth	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(ADVP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
ago	RB	*))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
discussed	VBD	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
implemented	VBD	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
self-action	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
carbon-dioxide	NN	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Any	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
further	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(PRN(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
``	``	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
hurt	VB	(VP*	ESE
Japanese	JJ	(NP*	O
industrial	JJ	*	O
competitiveness	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
plays	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
friction	NN	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
played	VBD	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
sensitive	JJ	(NP*	O
differences	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
tongue	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*))	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arm	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
diplomatically-isolated	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jiang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
portrayed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
talks	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)))	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
low-key	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
telling	VBG	(VP*	O
reporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
both	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
sides	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
opposition	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
`	``	*	ESE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	ESE
independence	NN	*)	ESE
'	''	*))))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
solving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
question	NN	*)	O
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*))))))))	O
''	''	*	O
.	.	*))	O

Jiang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
subdued	JJ	*	ESE
tone	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
pledges	NNS	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
press	VB	(VP*	O
on	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
defence	NN	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)))))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
underlined	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
desire	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	ESE
disputes	NNS	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leadership	NN	*	O
handover	NN	*))))	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
autumn	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jiang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
restated	VBN	(VP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
long-standing	JJ	*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
one	CD	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
states	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mainland	NN	*))	O
belong	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
signal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
continued	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
honour	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
pledge	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
arm	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
regarded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
rebel	JJ	*	ESE
province	NN	*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
1949	CD	*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*	O
split	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
my	PRP$	(NP*	O
government	NN	*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
changed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
talks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Jiang	NNP	(NP*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
urge	VB	(VP*	DSE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
provocation	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
continue	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
passed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Relations	NNPS	*	O
Act	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
switched	VBD	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1979	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
reaffirming	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitment	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
pledging	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
maintain	VB	(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
relieved	NNP	*))	DSE

Chinese	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
advise	VB	(S(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
policy	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
played	VBD	(VP*	DSE
down	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
--	:	*	O
which	WDT	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
sensitive	JJ	*)	ESE
issue	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
bilateral	JJ	*	O
relationship	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
old	JJ	*	O
problem	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
there	RB	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Jin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Canrong	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
top	JJ	*	O
researcher	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prestigious	JJ	*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Academy	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Social	NNP	(NP*	O
Sciences	NNPS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	O
with	IN	(S(PP*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
widening	VBG	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
scope	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*))))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
priority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
bilateral	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
lowered	VBN	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
statement	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
relief	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
watching	VBG	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
closely	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
fearing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*)	O
away	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US-led	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
analysts	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
run	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pro-independence	JJ	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Progressive	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*))))))	O
relies	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
supplier	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
trading	NN	*	O
partner	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stands	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
firm	NN	(NP*))))	DSE

Washington	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
angered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
offering	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
arms	NNS	*	O
package	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decade	NN	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
submarines	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*))))	O
--	:	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
saying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
would	MD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
whatever	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*))))	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
island	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
demanded	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
end	VB	(VP(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
step	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
explicit	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
statements	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
threatened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
attack	VB	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
declares	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
independence	NN	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
delays	NNS	*)	O
reunification	NN	(NP(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)	O
indefinitely	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
stood	VBN	(VP*	DSE
firm	NN	(NP*)	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
Asian	JJ	*	O
tour	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Speaking	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Diet	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
parliament	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
heading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Seoul	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
reassured	VBD	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
remember	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
controversial	JJ	*	ESE
move	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Defence	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(SBAR(S(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
closed-door	JJ	*	O
conference	NN	*)))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
private	JJ	(S(NP*	O
organisers	NNS	*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
defence	NN	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
event	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
typically	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
anger	VB	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(FRAG(S(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*	ESE
ice	NN	*	ESE
age	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
at	IN	(S(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
cooler	JJR	(NP*))))))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
gear	VBP	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
battles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
ratifying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
study	NN	*)	O
suggests	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
stepped	VBN	(VP*	O
along	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
path	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
cooler	NN	*))	ESE
than	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Researchers	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Goddard	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Space	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Studies	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GISS	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)))))))	O
report	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
declining	VBG	(S(NP(NP*	O
greenhouse-gas	JJ	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
late	JJ	*	O
1980s	NNS	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
slowed	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growth	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
ability	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
retain	VB	(VP*	O
heat	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
researchers	NNS	*)	O
link	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
slower	JJR	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
implementation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
1987	CD	*	O
Montreal	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
countries	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
phase	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
production	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gases	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
erode	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
protective	JJ	*	O
ozone	NN	*	O
layer	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Known	VBN	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
collectively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
chlorofluorocarbons	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
trap	NN	(VP*	O
heat	VB	*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP(QP*	O
of	IN	*	O
times	NNS	*))	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
effectively	RB	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
focus	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
increase	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
maintained	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peak	NN	*)	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1980	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2050	CD	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*	O
temperatures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
not	RB	(VP*	O
currently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
anticipated	VBN	*	DSE
until	IN	(PP*	O
2100	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
CO	CD	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
2	CD	*)	O
concentrations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
doubled	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
researchers	NNS	*)	O
calculate	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*	O
slowdown	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
slower	JJR	*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
methane	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
dioxide	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
reasons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
understood	VBN	(VP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
need	VBP	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP*	ESE
study	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
notes	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
James	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Hansen	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
NASA	NNP	*	O
researcher	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
conducted	VBD	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Makiko	NNP	(NP*	O
Sato	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
GISS	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
slower	JJR	*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
carbon-dioxide	NN	(NP*	O
concentrations	NNS	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
increased	VBN	(NP*	O
CO	NNP	(UCP(ADJP(NP*	O
2	CD	*)	O
uptake	JJ	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
land-based	JJ	(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
marine	JJ	(NP*))	O
organisms	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
suggests	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
work	NN	*)	O
grows	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
longer-term	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
scientists	NNS	*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explore	VB	(VP*	O
paths	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
adjusting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
globe	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
thermostat	NN	*	O
other	JJ	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
politically	RB	(ADJP*	O
charged	VBN	*)	O
effort	NN	*)	O
embodied	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
focusing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
pact	NN	*)	O
sets	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
sights	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
curbing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
held	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
most	RBS	*	DSE
responsible	JJ	*))	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
contributing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
warming	NN	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
curbs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
CO	NNP	(NP*	O
2	CD	*)))	O
mean	VBP	(VP*	O
curbs	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
burning	NN	(NP(NP*	O
coal	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
oil	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
natural	JJ	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*))))	O
-	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fuels	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
booming	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economies	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Drs.	NNPS	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hansen	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Sato	NNP	*)	O
argue	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
policymakers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
significant	JJ	(NP*	ESE
headway	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
attacking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
pollutants	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
black	JJ	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
soot	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
ozone	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
smog	NN	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
lower	JJR	*	O
atmosphere	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
methane	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
landfills	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
mining	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
production	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
duo	NN	*)	O
calculates	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
by	IN	(S(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
methane	NN	(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
30	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effect	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
comparable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effect	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
cuts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
CO	NNP	(NP*	O
2	CD	*))))	O
envisioned	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
commitment	NN	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
runs	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*	O
to	TO	*	O
2012	CD	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Their	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
appeared	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Dec.	NNP	(NP*	O
18	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	*	O
,	,	*)	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Proceedings	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Academy	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Science	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

New	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
man	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
NASA	NNP	*	O
mission	NN	*)))))	O

Forget	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	ESE
space	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
shuttles	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
orbiting	JJ	(NP*	ESE
telescopes	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	ESE
robotic	JJ	*	ESE
rovers	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
Mars	NNP	(NP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
mission	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
steer	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
soaring	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
space-station	NN	(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*)	ESE
back	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
toward	IN	(PP*	ESE
earth	NN	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
restore	VB	(VP*	ESE
credibility	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
many	DT	(S(NP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
dysfunctional	JJ	*	ESE
space	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
weekend	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
bade	VBP	(VP*	DSE
farewell	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
administrator	NN	(NP(NP*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
Goldin	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resigned	VBD	(S(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP(NP*	O
years	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)))	O
-	:	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
agency	NN	*	O
record	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
nominated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Sean	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
O'Keefe	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
deputy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Office	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Management	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Budget	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
replace	VB	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
swapping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
silver-visored	JJ	*	ESE
helmet	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
space	NN	*	ESE
cadet	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
green	JJ	*	ESE
eyeshade	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
consummate	JJ	*	ESE
bean	NN	*	ESE
counter	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Where	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Goldin	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
product	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
aerospace	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
O'Keefe	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
served	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
chief	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
financial	JJ	*	O
officer	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Navy	NNP	(NP*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
business-school	JJ	(NP*	O
professor	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
O'Keefe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
enthusiast	NN	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	O
Keith	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Cowing	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
NASA	NNP	*	O
scientist	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
editor	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
NASAWatch.com	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
agency	NN	*)	ESE
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
right	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
now	RB	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Goldin	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
unmanned	JJ	(NP*	O
craft	NN	*)	O
found	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
evidence	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
water	NN	(NP*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
moon	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
inaugurated	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
long-term	JJ	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
explore	VB	(VP*	O
Mars	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
opened	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
door	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
competition	NN	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
aerospace	JJ	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
universities	NNS	(NP*))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
plan	VB	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
execute	VB	*	O
missions	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mandate	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
costs	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Goldin	NNP	(NP*)	O
implemented	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
faster	JJS	(ADJP*	O
,	,	*	O
better	JJR	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
cheaper	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
''	''	*	O
approach	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1992	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Jet	NNP	*	O
Propulsion	NNP	*	O
Laboratory	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Pasadena	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Calif.	NNP	*	O
,	,	*)))	O
``	``	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
five	CD	(NP(NP*	O
spacecraft	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
four	CD	*))))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Today	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
space	NN	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
27	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
development	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
agency	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
credibility	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
under	IN	(PP*	DSE
fire	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
manned	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
spaceflight	NN	*)	O
-	:	*	O
especially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Station	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
now	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
completing	VBG	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
full-time	JJ	(NP*	O
crews	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
project	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
costs	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
space-shuttle	NN	*	O
program	NN	*)	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
ballooned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
far	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
beyond	IN	(PP*	ESE
original	JJ	(NP*	O
estimates	NNS	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
initial	JJ	*	O
$	$	(QP*	O
17.4	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
30	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Early	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	O
on	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
planned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
scale	VB	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
involvement	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
core	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crew	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
instead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
six	CD	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Future	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
modules	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
red-penciled	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
task	NN	*	O
force	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
project	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*)))	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
NASA	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
cost	NN	*	O
estimate	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
finishing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
core	JJ	*	O
''	''	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
2002	CD	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2008	CD	*)))))))	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
credible	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
scenario	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
scaling	NN	(NP*))	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
confirmed	VBD	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Senate	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
O'Keefe	NNP	(NP*)	O
jumps	VBZ	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
feet	NNS	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
fiscal	JJ	*	ESE
morass	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Fixing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
require	VB	(VP*	O
not	RB	(NP*	ESE
just	RB	*	ESE
accounting	NN	*)	ESE
savvy	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
also	RB	*)	ESE
deft	JJ	(NP*	ESE
diplomacy	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
task-force	NN	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
stirred	VBD	(VP*	O
opposition	NN	(NP*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
partners	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
scope	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
argue	VBP	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
violates	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
agreements	NNS	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
essentially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
close	VB	(VP*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
station	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
assessing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	O
fare	VB	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
O'Keefe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
analysts	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
blossom	VB	(VP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
Apollo-program	JJ	*	O
heyday	NN	*))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
numbers	NNS	*	O
guy	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
James	NNP	(NP*	O
Webb	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
agency	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
growing	VBG	(VP*	O
less	JJR	(NP*	ESE
visionary	NN	*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
then	RB	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
says	VBZ	(SINV(VP*)	DSE
John	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Pike	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GlobalSecurity.org	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Alexandria	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Va.	NNP	*))))))))	O
``	``	*	O
Webb	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
mandate	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
moon	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Richard	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Truly	NNP	*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*))	O
...	:	*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
agency	NN	*)	O
recover	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Challenger	NNP	*	O
disaster	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Goldin	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cut	VB	(VP*	O
NASA	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Now	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
O'Keefe	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fix	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
space	NN	*	O
station	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

O'Keefe	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
appointment	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
message	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
NASA	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
clean	VB	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
act	NN	*)	ESE
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
talk	VB	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
neat	JJ	*	ESE
stuff	NN	*)	ESE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
'd	MD	(VP*	O
like	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
NASA	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*))))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
Patricia	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dasch	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Space	NNP	*	O
Society	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Disapproves	NNPS	*	DSE
Use	NNP	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
`	``	*	O
Axis	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
'	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
International	NNP	(NP*	O
Relations	NNPS	*))))	O

Chinese	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
Quan	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
disapproves	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
use	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Kong	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remark	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
comment	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
views	NNS	*))	DSE
given	VBN	(PP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
New	NNP	*	O
York	NNP	*	O
Times	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*	O
recentlyon	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
describing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Democratic	JJ	*	O
People	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iran	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
nations	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
disapprove	VBP	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Kong	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
also	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
comment	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
answering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
related	VBN	(NP*	O
questions	NNS	*)	O
earlier	RBR	(ADVP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
noticed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
public	JJ	*	O
opinion	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
general	JJ	(NP*	O
public	NN	*))	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wording	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
pointing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
bound	VBN	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
serious	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
logic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
wording	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
followed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(S(S(NP*)	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
holds	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	(S(NP*	O
campaigns	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
irrefutable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	(S(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
expanded	VBN	(VP*	O
arbitrarily	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Kong	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
handling	VBG	(S(NP*	O
state-to-state	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
follow	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
purposes	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Charter	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Five	CD	*	O
Principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Peaceful	NNP	(NP*	O
Co-existence	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
principle	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
all	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
equal	JJ	*	ESE
footing	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
manner	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
conducive	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
safeguarding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
long-term	JJ	(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
stability	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
related	VBN	(NP*	O
regions	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
slams	NNP	*	ESE
US	NNP	*)	O
arms	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
sales	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
:	:	*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
slammed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
increasingly	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
close	JJ	*)	ESE
ties	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
demanding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
official	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
continual	JJ	*	ESE
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
upgrading	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
straits	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Zhang	NNP	*	O
Qiyue	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
demand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
strictly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
abide	VB	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
correct	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
erroneous	JJ	*	ESE
acts	NNS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
harm	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
alarm	NN	(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
defense	NN	(S(NP*	O
department	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
diesel	JJ	*	O
electric	JJ	*	O
submarines	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
always	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
resolutely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
intercourse	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Zhang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
sensitive	JJ	*)	ESE
issue	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
core	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
biweekly	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
briefing	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
tensions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
not	RB	(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
self-interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
confirm	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*	O
26	CD	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
3	CD	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hu	NNP	*	O
Jintao	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
reported	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hong	NNP	*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
press	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
allows	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
widely	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
centered	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
dissatisfaction	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
renegade	NN	*	ESE
province	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
threatened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
force	NN	(NP*))	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
indefinitely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
refuse	VB	*	DSE
proposals	NNS	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	O
reunification	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
long	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
refused	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
contact	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
encouraged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
bashed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
remarks	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
attended	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tang	NNP	*	O
Yao-Ming	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
echoing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
President	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
oppose	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Wolfowitz	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
continuing	JJ	*	O
deployment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
forces	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
tactical	JJ	(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
straits	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Wolfowitz	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	DSE
reflected	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
...	:	(NP*	O
violation	NN	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
interference	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
firmly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chinese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
missile	NN	*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1996	CD	(NP*)))))	O
resulted	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
deploying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*	O
carrier	NN	*	O
battle	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Guantanamo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
hold	VB	(VP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantamano	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detention	NN	*	O
center	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
thousands	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cubans	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Haitians	NNPS	*))))	O
seeking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
freedom	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
prison	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
men	NNS	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
radically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*)	ESE
view	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
house	VB	(VP*	O
captured	VBN	(VP*	O
al	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
terrorists	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
undetermined	JJ	*	O
time	NN	*)))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
island	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
isolated	JJ	*	O
eastern	JJ	*	O
coast	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Despite	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
logistical	JJ	*	O
hurdle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
moving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	O
least	JJS	*)	O
several	JJ	(NP(QP*	O
dozen	NN	*))	O
presumably	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
men	NNS	*)	O
around	RB	(PP(NP(QP*	O
8,000	CD	*)	O
miles	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Cuba	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
least	JJS	(ADJP*	ESE
worst	JJ	*)	ESE
place	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Rep.	NNP	*	O
Ileana	NNP	*	O
Ros-Lehtinen	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
R-Miami	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
she	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
part	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
underscore	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
strategic	JJ	*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
urged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
returning	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
territory	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
excellent	JJ	*	ESE
location	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	DSE
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
new	JJ	(NP*	ESE
life	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Gitmo	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
as	RB	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
soil	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)	O
detained	VBD	(VP*	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
entitled	VBN	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP*	O
residency	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
eventual	JJ	*	O
citizenship	NN	*	O
privileges	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
began	VBD	(VP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
offshore	JJ	*	O
holding	VBG	*	O
station	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Haitian	NNP	*	O
refugee	NN	*	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1991	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1994-95	CD	*	O
rafter	NN	*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
50,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
Cubans	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Haitians	NNP	(NP*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
housed	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tent	NN	*	O
encampment	NN	*))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
naval	JJ	*	O
vessels	NNS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
picked	VBN	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
sea	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
arrive	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
weeks	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
plans	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stage	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
tribunals	NNS	*	O
or	CC	*	O
trials	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
home	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
1,100	CD	*)	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Navy	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Marine	NNP	*	O
Corps	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
getting	VBG	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Asia	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
reportedly	RB	(ADVP*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
warships	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Others	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
compound	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Kandahar	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
built	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
stockade	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
sorts	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
house	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

1999	CD	(ROOT(NP*	O
PLANS	NN	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
Command	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Miami	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
base	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
operations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
spokesman	NN	(NP*	O
Steve	NNP	*	O
Lucas	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
planners	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
pulled	VBN	(VP*	O
out	IN	(PP*	O
blueprints	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
April	NNP	(NP*	O
1999	CD	*))))	O
--	:	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Clinton	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
briefly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
housing	NN	(NP*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
20,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
refugees	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kosovo	NNP	*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
concern	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
comfortable	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
traumatized	VBN	*	DSE
victims	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
war	NN	*))))))	O
uprooted	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
violent	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
cold	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Planners	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
scrambled	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
deploy	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
healthcare	NN	*	O
workers	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Muslim	JJ	(NP*	O
clergymen	NN	*)))	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
abandoned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
instance	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
military	JJ	(S(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP*	O
smaller	JJR	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
perhaps	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dozens	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
logistics	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
focus	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
45-square-mile	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
less	JJR	(ADJP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
comfort	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
either	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
network	NN	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
estimated	JJ	*	O
45	CD	*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
custody	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Guantanamo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
detention	NN	(NP(NP*	O
space	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(QP*	O
100	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
All	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
pretty	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
well-planned	JJ	*)	ESE
out	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
house	VB	(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(NP*	O
migrant	NN	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
past	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Cubans	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Haitians	NNPS	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Lucas	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	DSE
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
little	JJ	*	ESE
bit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
situation	NN	*))))))	O
but	CC	*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
lot	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	O
stuff	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

SLICE	NNP	(ROOT(NP*	O
OF	NNP	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outdoor	JJ	*	O
movie	NN	*	O
theater	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
bowling	NN	(NP*	O
alleys	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
McDonald	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mini-mall	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
curious	JJ	*	ESE
slice	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Americana	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
edge	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Caribbean	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
1999	CD	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
2,400	CD	(NP*	O
civilians	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
families	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sailors	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Marines	NNPS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
manage	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
port	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
patrol	NN	*)))))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fence	NN	*	O
line	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
separates	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
communist-ruled	JJ	(NP*	O
Cuba	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
updated	VBN	*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
available	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	O
isolated	VBN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Visitors	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	O
under	IN	(PP(PP*	O
strict	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
escort	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
prior	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
permission	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
aboard	IN	(PP*	O
special	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
small	JJ	*	O
shuttle	NN	*	O
flights	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
reach	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
circuitous	JJ	*	O
flight	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
rare	JJ	(NP*	O
occasions	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Cuban	JJ	(NP*	O
defectors	NNS	*)	O
get	VBP	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
swimming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
dangerous	JJ	(NP*	O
waters	NNS	*)))))	O
or	CC	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
traversing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
minefield	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gate	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
proper	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	O
opened	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
meetings	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
commanders	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
repatriate	VB	(VP*	O
Cubans	NNPS	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cuban	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
leader	NN	*	O
Fidel	NNP	*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
long	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
argued	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
base	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
illegal	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
base	NN	*)	O
exists	VBZ	(VP*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lease	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
1934	CD	*	O
treaty	NN	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
diplomats	NNS	*)	O
consider	VBP	(VP*	DSE
giving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
potential	JJ	*	ESE
carrot	NN	*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
negotiation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
democratic	JJ	*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ros-Lehtinen	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
suggested	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Thursday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
move	NN	*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
raise	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hackles	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
dismissed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
those	DT	(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
anticipate	VB	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
trouble	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(PP*	ESE
praise	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP*	ESE
`	``	*	ESE
damn	JJ	*	ESE
Yankees	NN	*	ESE
'	''	*)))))	O

WASHINGTON	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
On	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
face	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
things	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
hard	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
see	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
any	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	*	ESE
person	NN	*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
object	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
war	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
waging	VBG	(VP*	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
regimes	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
targets	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
common	JJ	*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
men	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
women	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
regardless	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
race	NN	(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
colour	NN	*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
creed	NN	*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
magnitude	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
pose	VBP	(VP*))))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
morning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(PRN(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
compelled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
unpreparedness	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	*	O
allies	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
dimension	NN	*	O
almost	RB	*)))	ESE
single-handedly	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
cause	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
soul-searching	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
gratitude	NN	*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
hardly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
resentment	NN	*)	DSE
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
often	RB	*)	O
seen	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
fair	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*	ESE
far	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	*	ESE
truth	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
discerned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
polls	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
world	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
indeed	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
grateful	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
balance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
quite	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
supportive	JJ	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
cause	NN	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
leading	VBG	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Where	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
polls	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tyrannies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Asia	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
occasional	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
respect	NN	*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	O
command	VB	(VP*	O
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
belief	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	ESE
flaws	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
remains	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
champion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Perhaps	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*	ESE
evidence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
huge	JJ	*	ESE
demand	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
visas	NNS	*))	O
--	:	*	O
especially	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
places	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Gaza	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Potential	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
terrorists	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
concealed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
for	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	O
majority	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
common	JJ	(NP*	DSE
knowledge	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
land	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
freedom	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
opportunity	NN	*)))	ESE
--	:	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
preferred	VBN	*	ESE
destination	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
emigrants	NNS	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
better	JJR	*	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
past	JJ	*	ESE
two	CD	*	ESE
centuries	NNS	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Action	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
eloquent	JJ	*	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
words	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
attitudes	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
granted	JJ	(S(VP*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
especially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
true	JJ	*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
intellectuals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sometime	VBG	*	ESE
masters	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
paradox	NN	(NP*))	ESE
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
sometimes	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
paradox	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
master	NN	*))))	ESE
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
many	JJ	*	ESE
thousand	CD	*)	ESE
generously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
funded	VBD	(VP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
universities	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
magnets	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
young	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
literates	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
culture	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Often	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
enough	RB	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
radicals	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
spout	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
anti-American	JJ	(NP*	ESE
doctrines	NNS	*)))))	ESE
imbibed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
amidst	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
safety	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
leisure	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
campus	NN	*	O
life	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
confusion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
ends	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
means	NNS	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
technology	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
media	NNS	*)	O
largely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
developed	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
prominent	JJ	*)	ESE
self-styled	NNP	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
refugee	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
Edward	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
Said	VBD	(VP*))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
perfect	JJ	*	ESE
example	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
man	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
nothing	NN	(ADJP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
chic	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
prestige	NN	*	ESE
conferred	NN	*)))	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
elite	JJ	(NP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	*	ESE
universities	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
publishing	VBG	*	O
institutions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
New	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
York	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
N.Y.	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
man	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
advanced	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
mendacious	JJ	*	ESE
critique	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Orientalism	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
himself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
product	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
scholarship	NN	*)	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
demeaned	VBN	(VP(VP*)	DSE
;	:	*	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
command	VB	(VP*	O
audiences	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Egypt	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
elsewhere	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
because	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
success	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Second	JJ	(ROOT(S(LST*)	ESE
only	RB	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorism	NN	*)	ESE
itself	PRP	(ADVP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
muted	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
often	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
self-satisfied	JJ	*))	ESE
anti-Americanism	NN	*)	O
puts	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
evil	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
open	JJ	(NP*	ESE
display	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
conventional	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
verbal	JJ	*	O
anti-Americanism	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
league	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
terrorist	JJ	*	ESE
strikes	NNS	*)	ESE
--	:	(PRN*	O
closer	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
hypocrisy	NN	(NP*))	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
murderous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
hatred	NN	*))))	ESE
--	:	*))))))))	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
animated	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
common	JJ	*	ESE
cause	NN	*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
cause	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
sought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
murk	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
individual	JJ	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
soul	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
externals	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
political	JJ	(NP*	ESE
argument	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
come	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*))	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
decades	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
adult	JJ	(NP*	O
life	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
encountered	VBN	(VP(VP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
resist	VB	(VP*	DSE
anti-Americanism	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Again	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP(VP*	O
discovered	VBN	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
simple	JJ	*	ESE
prejudice	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
product	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
comprehensive	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
reasoning	NN	*)	ESE
:	:	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	DSE
brought	VBN	(VP*	DSE
against	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
damn	UH	(INTJ*	ESE
Yankees	UH	*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
shift	NN	*)	ESE
loosely	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
between	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
U.S.	NNP	*	ESE
polity	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
people	NNS	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
sooner	RBR	*	ESE
effectively	RB	*)	DSE
rebutted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
than	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
charges	NNS	*)	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
forward	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
place	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
quality	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP(NP*	ESE
knowingness	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
''	''	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flavour	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
conspiracy	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
--	:	*)))	O
as	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
open	JJ	*)	ESE
nation	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
society	NN	(NP*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
secretly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
behind	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
local	JJ	*	ESE
misfortune	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
all	DT	(VP(ADVP*)	O
know	VBP	*)	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
column	NN	*))	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	JJ	*	ESE
day	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
catastrophe	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
touched	VBD	(VP*	O
upon	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
envy	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
root	NN	*	ESE
cause	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
column	NN	*)	O
drew	VBD	(VP*	O
incredulous	JJ	(NP*	DSE
responses	NNS	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
fairly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
sophisticated	JJ	*)	ESE
readers	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
words	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
anyone	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
sacrifice	VB	(VP(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(VP(NP(NP*	O
others	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	ESE
something	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
petty	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
envy	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Almost	RB	(ROOT(S(S(ADVP(NP*	O
five	CD	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
later	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
feel	VBP	(VP*	DSE
more	RBR	(ADJP(ADJP*	DSE
certain	JJ	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
my	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
analysis	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
essentially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
right	JJ	*)))))))	ESE
:	:	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
moral	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
rather	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
than	IN	*)	ESE
political	JJ	*)	ESE
causes	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
natural	JJ	*	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
antipathy	NN	*)	DSE
that	DT	(PP(ADVP*	O
so	RB	*	O
much	RB	*)	O
of	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
planet	NN	*	O
shares	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Voices	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stilled	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
horror	NN	(NP*))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terror	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
resumed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
anti-American	JJ	*	DSE
tirade	NN	*)	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
action	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
raised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
pitch	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*	O
issue	NN	*))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S(FRAG*	ESE
even	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
hours	NNS	*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
catastrophe	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
CBC	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
unselfconsciously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
airing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
procession	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
guests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
making	VBG	(VP*	ESE
liberal	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
use	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
but	IN	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
construction	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
surprise	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
me	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	DSE
surprise	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
right-wing	JJ	*	O
tabloids	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
left-wing	JJ	*	O
pundits	NNS	*)	O
joining	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fray	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
call	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
facetiously	VBD	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
``	``	(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
Gitmo	NNP	*	ESE
Gandhis	NNP	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
;	:	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
speed	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
even	RB	(S(NP(ADJP*	ESE
mildly	RB	*	ESE
conservative	JJ	*)	ESE
fellow-Canadians	NNS	*)	ESE
jumped	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
conclusion	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
mistreating	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
hostages	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
wilfully	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
ignoring	VBG	*	ESE
Geneva	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Conventions	NNP	*))))))))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
few	JJ	(S(NP*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
read	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Nor	CC	(ROOT(SINV*	ESE
are	VBP	*	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
now	RB	(ADJP*	O
eager	JJ	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
retreat	VB	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
collapse	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
arguments	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
thorough	JJ	(NP*	O
investigations	NNS	*)))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Red	NNP	*	O
Cross	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
left	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
compounded	VBN	(VP*	ESE
anti-Americanism	NN	(NP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
dogma	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
right	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Europe	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
beyond	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
participates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
envy	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
success	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
British	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
lords	NNS	*)	ESE
down	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
humble	JJ	(NP*	ESE
skinheads	NNS	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
sneering	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
American	NN	*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
vulgarity	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)))	ESE
confers	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
comforting	JJ	*	ESE
sense	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
personal	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
national	JJ	*	ESE
vindication	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
prop	NN	*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
found	VBN	(VP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Let	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	ESE
me	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
pause	VBP	(VP*	ESE
only	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
briefly	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
allow	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
America	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
imperfect	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
earthly	JJ	*	ESE
things	NNS	*)	ESE
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
its	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
committed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
sins	NNS	*)))))	ESE
;	:	*)))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
might	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
right	RB	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
power	NN	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
wealth	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
good	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
themselves	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
goodness	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
truth	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
beauty	NN	*)	ESE
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
found	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
country	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
town	NN	*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Let	VB	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
even	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
sometimes	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
expect	VBP	(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
born	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
earthly	JJ	*	ESE
advantage	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
sometimes	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
less	JJR	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
born	VBN	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
mistake	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
assume	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
envy	NN	(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
petty	VBN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Our	PRP$	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
ancestors	NNS	*)	O
wisely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
placed	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
mortal	JJ	*	O
sins	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
canker	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
heart	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
spreads	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
vanity	NN	(NP*))	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
human	JJ	*	ESE
soul	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
turning	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
worldly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
spiritual	JJ	(NP*	ESE
failure	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
right	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
indulge	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
disease	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
told	VBN	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
wrong	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
hate	VB	(VP*	DSE
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
enemies	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(SBARQ(WHNP*)	ESE
begins	VBZ	(SQ(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
happen	VB	(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
hate	VBP	(VP*	ESE
our	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
friends	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
?	.	*))	O

Why	WRB	(ROOT(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Kyoto	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
rip-off	NN	*)))))	ESE

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
study	NN	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	NNP	*	O
Manufacturers	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Exporters	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
implementation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	NNP	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*	O
treaty	NN	*)))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cost	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
450,000	CD	(NP(NP*	O
jobs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
as	RB	(NP(QP*	O
much	JJ	*	O
as	IN	*	O
$	$	*	O
40-billion	CD	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
Jean	NNP	(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
worried	JJ	(ADJP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
these	DT	(NP*	O
figures	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
There	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
nothing	NN	(ADJP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
gained	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
frightening	JJ	(NP*	ESE
people	NNS	*))))))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
all	PDT	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
facts	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
known	VBN	(VP*)))))	DSE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP*	O
40-billion	JJ	*)	O
figure	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
far	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
being	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
conceived	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	ESE
frighten	VB	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
Canadians	NNPS	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
plucked	VBN	(VP*	ESE
straight	RB	(PP*	ESE
from	IN	*	ESE
government	NN	(NP*	O
documents	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
released	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Air	NNP	*	O
Issues	NNPS	*	O
Co-ordinating	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
staffed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
federal	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
provincial	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
territorial	JJ	*	O
governments	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
hitting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
target	NN	*)))))	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loss	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
roughly	RB	(NP(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
growth	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
viewed	VBN	(PRN(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
absolute	JJ	(NP*	O
terms	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
loss	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
annual	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
output	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
approximately	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
$	$	*	O
40-billion	CD	*))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
or	CC	*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
1,100	CD	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
capita	NN	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
price	NN	*)	ESE
worth	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
paying	VBG	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Governments	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
protect	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
deviate	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
mission	NN	*))	O
only	RB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
when	WRB	*)	O
crucial	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
national	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
stake	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
fighting	NN	(NP(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*)))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Yet	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
rising	VBG	(NP*	O
temperatures	NNS	*)	O
pose	VBP	(VP*	ESE
little	JJ	(NP*	ESE
threat	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
authoritative	JJ	(NAC(NP*	ESE
Feb.	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
2001	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
projected	VBN	*	O
impacts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Intergovernmental	NNP	*	O
Panel	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))	O
identified	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
threats	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Canadian	JJ	(NP*	O
ecosystems	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
our	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
farmers	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
generally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
benefit	VB	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
warmer	JJR	(NP*	O
temperatures	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

-LRB-	-LRB-	(ROOT(S*	O
Non-farming	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
Canadians	NNPS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
most	JJS	(SBAR(WHNP*	ESE
of	IN	(WHPP*	ESE
whom	WP	(WHNP*)))	ESE
spend	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(S(NP(NP(ADVP*	ESE
least	JJS	*)	ESE
part	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
winter	NN	*	ESE
months	NNS	*)))	ESE
scraping	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
ice	NN	(NP*)	ESE
off	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
cars	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
chopping	VBG	(VP*	ESE
firewood	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
shovelling	VBG	(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
walks	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
profit	VB	(VP*	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
for	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
globally	NN	*))	O
felt	VBD	(VP*	O
benefits	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Canada	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
implementation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
slight	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
2010	CD	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
$	$	(ADJP*	O
40-billion	JJ	*)	O
sacrifice	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	O
yield	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
expected	JJ	*	ESE
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
annual	JJ	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
carbon-equivalent	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP*	O
46-million	JJ	*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
just	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
1/200th	200th	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
total	JJ	*	O
projected	NN	*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
output	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
Canada	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
managed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
convince	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
every	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
signatory	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
carbon	NN	*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
still	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
soar	VB	(VP*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Energy	NNP	*	O
Information	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
consumption	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	O
60	CD	*)	O
%	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
now	RB	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
2020	CD	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
most	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
upsurge	NN	*)	O
expected	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
covered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Under	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
fully	RB	(ADJP*	O
implemented	JJ	*)	O
treaty	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
carbon	NN	(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
grow	VB	(VP*	O
26	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990-2010	CD	*	O
period	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Without	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
figure	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
34	CD	(NP*	O
%	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
worldwide	JJ	*	O
cost	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
8	CD	(ADJP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
dip	NN	*))	O
:	:	*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP*	O
2-trillion	CD	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
lost	VBN	(NP*	O
GDP	NN	*))))	O
--	:	*)	O
give	VBP	(VP*	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
take	VBP	*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
trillion	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

There	EX	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
better	JJR	(NP*	ESE
ways	NNS	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
spend	VB	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
money	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
trying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cap	VB	(VP*	O
carbon	NN	(NP(NP*	O
dioxide	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
costly	JJ	*	ESE
burden	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
home	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
impossible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
task	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
developing	VBG	*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
we	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
focus	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
abating	VBG	(NP*)))))))))))))	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
damage	NN	*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
at-risk	JJ	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
scientists	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
correct	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
higher	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
temperatures	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
rising	VBG	(NP*	O
sea	NN	*	O
levels	NNS	*))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
depress	VB	(VP(VP*	O
grain	NN	(NP(NP(NP*	O
yields	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Africa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
parts	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Asia	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
fuel	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
spread	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
diseases	NNS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
threaten	VB	(VP*	O
coastal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Bangladesh	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Senegal	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
abated	VBN	(VP(VP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
eliminated	VBN	*	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Western	JJ	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
helping	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
Third	NNP	(S(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
plant	VB	(VP(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
crops	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
vaccinate	VB	(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
relocate	VB	(VP*	O
coastal	JJ	(NP*	O
towns	NNS	*))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
costly	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
bottom	JJ	*	ESE
line	NN	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	O
likely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
only	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
fraction	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
13-digit	JJ	*	O
price	NN	*	O
tag	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Camp	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
X-Ray	NNP	*	O
Or	CC	*	O
Club	NNP	*)	ESE
Med	NNP	(NP*)	ESE
?	.	*))	O

AFTER	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
SPENDING	NNP	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
frigid	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
Afghanistan	NNP	*	O
caves	NNS	*)	O
subsisting	VBG	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Allah	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE
knows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
158	CD	*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
holding	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
tropical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
Guantanamo	NNP	*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))))))	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
've	VBP	(VP*	O
died	VBN	(VP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
gone	VBN	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
heaven	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Well	UH	(ROOT(S(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
heaven	VB	(VP*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
72	CD	*	ESE
virgins	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
balmy	JJ	*	ESE
Camp	NNP	*	O
X-ray	NN	*))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
replete	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
running	VBG	(S(VP*	O
water	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
three	CD	(NP(NP*	O
square	JJ	*	O
meals	NNS	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
day	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
modern	JJ	(NP*	O
medical	JJ	*	O
care	NN	*))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Taliban	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
version	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Club	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Med	NNP	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Call	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
Club	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Gitmo	NNP	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Yet	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Brits	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
hollering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
tough	JJ	*	ESE
guys	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

British	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*	O
headlines	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
screamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Torture	NNP	*	ESE
!	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Monstrous	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Inhumanity	NNP	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
stories	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
say	VBP	(VP*	DSE
prisoners	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
wild	JJ	(NP*	ESE
beasts	NNS	*))	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
cages	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Amnesty	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
release	NN	*)	O
accusing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
keeping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*	O
incommunicado	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
sensory	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
deprivation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
unnecessary	JJ	(NP*	ESE
restraint	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
humiliation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
people	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
tactics	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
shaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
`	``	(VP*	ESE
break	VB	*	ESE
'	''	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
spirit	NN	*)))))))))))))	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
individuals	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
ahead	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
interrogation	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
noted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
much	RB	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
uproar	NN	*)))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
photographs	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
transported	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
airplanes	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
wisely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
shackles	VBZ	(VP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
transport	NN	(NP*))))	O
:	:	*	O
That	DT	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
easiest	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
violent	JJ	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hurt	VB	(VP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
spent	VBD	(S(VP*	O
three	CD	(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Club	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Gitmo	NNP	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
three	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
British	JJ	*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
being	VBG	(VP*	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
complaints	NNS	*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Washington	NNP	*	O
Post	NNP	*)	O
reported	VBD	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Office	NNP	*	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Ben	NNP	*	O
Bradshaw	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
gags	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
goggles	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
earmuffs	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
shackles	NNS	*))	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
bash	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
apparently	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
care	VB	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
clueless	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
really	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Take	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
sensory	JJ	*	O
deprivation	NN	*	O
charge	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Does	NNP	(ROOT(SQ*	O
Amnesty	NNP	(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
think	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
wearing	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hood	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
airplane	NN	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
sensory	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
deprivation	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
instead	RB	(CONJP*	O
of	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
security	NN	*	O
measure	NN	*))))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Is	VBZ	(ROOT(SQ*	O
n't	RB	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
code	NN	*)	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
about	RB	*	O
sensory	JJ	*	O
deprivation	NN	*))	O
?	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	ESE
unnecessary	JJ	*	ESE
restraint	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	O
detainee	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
kill	VB	(VP*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*)	O
before	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
leaves	VBZ	(VP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
detainee	JJ	*	O
bit	NN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
guard	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Pentagon	NNP	(NP*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Capt.	NNP	*	O
Riccoh	NNP	*	O
Player	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

So	RB	(ROOT(S(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
make	VB	*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
necessary	JJ	*	ESE
restraint	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*	ESE
''	''	*))	ESE

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
embarrassed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
corps	NN	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
comments	NNS	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
briefing	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Talk	NN	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
about	RB	*)	ESE
clueless	VBZ	(VP*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

First	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
likened	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
living	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
tropics	NNS	*)))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP*	O
conditioning	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
torture	VB	(VP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reporter	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
asked	VBD	(S(VP*	O
Secretary	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP*	O
Donald	NNP	*	O
Rumsfeld	NNP	*)))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
American	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
John	NNP	*	O
Walker	NNP	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
treated	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Will	MD	(SQ*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
8-by-8-foot	JJ	*	O
cell	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	O
walls	NNS	*)	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	O
only	RB	*)	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
roof	NN	*))))))))))	O
?	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
follow-up	NN	*	O
question	NN	*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
'd	MD	(VP*	O
guess	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
journalist	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
prison	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
8-by-8-foot	JJ	*	O
space	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
ships	NNS	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
cram	VB	(VP*	O
half	PDT	(NP(QP*	O
a	DT	*	O
dozen	NN	*)	O
sailors	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP*))	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
official	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Then	RB	(ROOT(S*	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Brits	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Amnesty	NNP	*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
officially	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
classified	VBN	*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
POWs	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
detainee	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*)	O
however	RB	(ADVP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
leeway	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
interrogate	VB	(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
operatives	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

White	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
House	NNP	*	O
spokesman	NN	*	O
Ken	NNP	*	O
Lisaius	NNP	*)	O
rightly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Club	NNP	*	ESE
Gitmo	NNP	*	ESE
guests	NNS	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S(PRN*	O
``	``	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*	ESE
part	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
're	VBP	(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
'd	MD	(VP*	O
engage	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
murder	NN	(NP*))	ESE
once	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
understand	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
outrage	NN	*)	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
torturing	VBG	(VP(VP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
otherwise	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
mistreating	VBG	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Instead	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Amnesty	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
comrades	NNS	*))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
outraged	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	O
al	NNP	(NP*	O
Qaeda	NNP	*	O
captives	NNS	*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
prisoners	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Oh	UH	(ROOT(FRAG(INTJ*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
horror	NN	*)	ESE
.	.	*))	O

You	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
get	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
feeling	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Rummy	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
booked	VBD	(VP*	ESE
these	DT	(NP*	ESE
tough	JJ	*	ESE
guys	NNS	*)	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
Motel	NNP	*	ESE
6	CD	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
they	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
'd	MD	(VP*	ESE
complain	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
there	EX	(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
room	NN	*	ESE
service	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Africa	NNP	(ROOT(SINV(FRAG(NP*))	O
Endorses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Victory	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Condemns	NNP	*)))	DSE
It	PRP	(NP*)))	O

International	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
re-election	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
Robert	NNP	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
another	DT	(NP*	O
six	CD	*	O
year	NN	*	O
term	NN	*))))	O
varied	VBD	(VP*	O
widely	RB	(ADVP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

African	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
generally	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
approved	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
Western	JJ	(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
denounced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Observer	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
missions	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Namibia	NNP	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organisation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
African	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Unity	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OAU	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
respectively	RB	(ADVP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
``	``	(ADJP(ADJP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
-	:	*	O
largely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
satisfactory	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
transparent	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
credible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
three	CD	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
teams	NNS	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
long	JJ	(NP*	O
queues	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
delays	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
chaotic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
voting	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Namibians	NNPS	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
far	RB	*)	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
to	TO	(S(S(VP*	O
say	VB	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
election	NN	*	O
system	NN	*))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
water	NN	(NP*)	ESE
tight	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
without	IN	(PP*	ESE
room	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
rigging	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
''	''	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
South	NNP	(ADJP*	O
African	JJ	*)	O
observer	NN	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
blamed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
lines	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
vote	VB	(VP*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	O
waiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
hours	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
administrative	JJ	*	ESE
oversights	NNS	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
description	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
drew	VBD	(S(VP*	O
audible	JJ	(NP*	DSE
laughter	NN	*)	DSE
from	IN	(PP*	DSE
journalists	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
diplomats	NNS	*))	O
attending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Daniel	NNP	*	O
arap	NNP	*	O
Moi	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kenya	NNP	(NP*)))	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
calling	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	O
``	``	(NP*	O
testimony	NN	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
confidence	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
high	JJ	(NP*	ESE
esteem	NN	*)))	ESE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
hold	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
you	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
observations	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
14-member	JJ	*	O
Southern	NNP	*	O
African	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
SADC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
Parliamentary	NNP	*)))	O
Forum	VBD	(VP*	O
team	NN	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
differed	VBD	(VP*	O
considerably	RB	(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
African	JJ	*	O
missions	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
sharp	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
contrast	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
teams	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
elections	NNS	*)))	O
fell	VBD	(VP*	ESE
short	JJ	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
regional	JJ	(NP*	O
expectations	NNS	*)))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
climate	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
insecurity	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
obtaining	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*))	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
elections	NNS	*))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
such	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
electoral	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
adequately	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
comply	VB	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
norms	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
standards	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
elections	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
forum	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*)))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
chimed	VBD	(VP*	O
closely	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
views	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
main	JJ	*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
monitoring	NN	*	O
group	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
Election	NNP	*	O
Support	NNP	*	O
Network	NNP	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
400	CD	(NP(NP*	O
observers	NNS	*)	O
monitoring	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
heavily	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
SADC	NNP	*	O
parliamentarians	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
view	NN	*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
echoed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Norwegian	JJ	*	O
observer	NN	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
said	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
meet	VB	(VP*	ESE
international	JJ	(NP*	ESE
standards	NNS	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Norway	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Jan	NNP	*	O
Petersen	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
statement	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
satisfied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
fundamental	JJ	*	ESE
requirements	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
main	JJ	*	O
challenger	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Morgan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Movement	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Democratic	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
result	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
illegitimate	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
clear	JJ	*	ESE
case	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
``	``	(NP(NP*	ESE
highway	NN	*	ESE
robbery	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
party	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
Zanu-PF	VBZ	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Tsvangirai	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
disenfranchised	JJ	*	ESE
supporters	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	DSE
seething	VBG	(VP*)	DSE
''	''	*))))	O
but	CC	*	O
implored	VBD	(VP*	DSE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
stay	VB	(VP*	ESE
calm	JJ	(ADJP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
MDC	NNP	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
systematic	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
cheating	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
spoiling	JJ	(NP*	ESE
tactics	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
rigid	JJ	(NP*	ESE
new	JJ	*	ESE
laws	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
sheer	JJ	(NP*	ESE
obstruction	NN	*))	ESE
-	:	(PRN*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
political	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
intimidation	NN	(NP*))	ESE
-	:	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
just	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
irregularities	NNS	*)	ESE
practised	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
authorities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
run-up	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
winner	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
56.1	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
vote	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
leaving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Tsvangirai	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
trailing	VBG	(VP*	O
behind	RP	(PRT*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
42	CD	(NP*	O
percent	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(NP*	O
criticism	NN	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
describing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
exemplary	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
peaceful	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Western	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
disagree	VBP	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Western	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
lining	VBG	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
condemn	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
African	JJ	*	O
bloc	NN	*)	O
appears	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
opted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
solidarity	NN	(NP*))	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Jack	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Straw	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
colonial	JJ	*	O
power	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Britain	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
locked	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
verbal	JJ	*	DSE
war	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
head	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
bent	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
achieving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
``	``	(NP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*	ESE
goal	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
costs	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
surprise	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
achieved	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

U.S.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
voice	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*))	O
night	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
categorically	RB	(S(ADVP*)	DSE
rejecting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
recognize	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outcome	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*)))	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
think	VBP	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
flawed	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
dealing	VBG	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
friends	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
figure	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
deal	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
flawed	JJ	*	ESE
election	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Bush	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
secretary	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
state	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Colin	NNP	(NP*	O
Powell	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
earlier	RB	(ADVP*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
Mr	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
claim	VB	(VP*	DSE
victory	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	(CONJP*	ESE
not	RB	*)	ESE
democratic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
legitimacy	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

France	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Germany	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
failed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
`	``	(ADJP*	ESE
free	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fair	JJ	*	ESE
'	''	*)	ESE
test	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Canadian	JJ	*	O
prime	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jean	NNP	(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
election	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
look	VB	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
good	JJ	*)))	ESE
''	''	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Australia	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
with	IN	(S(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Nigeria	NNP	*))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
mandated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
report	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
poll	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Commonwealth	NNP	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
equally	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
critical	JJ	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
If	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Zimbabwe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
sense	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
cheated	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
election	NN	*	O
process	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
resort	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Alexander	NNP	(NP*	O
Downer	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
secretary-general	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Kofi	NNP	(NP*	O
Annan	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
appealed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
calm	NN	(NP*))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Zimbabweans	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
refrain	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
violence	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Annan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
acknowledged	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
receiving	VBG	(VP*	O
conflicting	VBG	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
conduct	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
poll	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Facing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
perhaps	RB	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
challenge	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
contested	JJ	*	DSE
electoral	JJ	*	O
victory	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
increasingly	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
isolated	JJ	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
stage	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Union	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
`	``	(S(ADJP*	O
smart	JJ	*	O
'	''	*))	O
,	,	*	O
selected	VBN	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
sanctions	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Mugabe	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
19	CD	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
inner	JJ	*	O
circle	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Zimbabwean	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
silent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
final	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*	O
rally	NN	*)))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Friday	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
though	IN	(SBAR*	O
people	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
eagerly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
awaiting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*	O
speech	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
nowhere	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
seen	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Harare	NNP	(NP*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
over	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
downtown	JJ	*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
capital	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
loudly	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
celebrating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
victory	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mugabe	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
allies	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
detractors	NNS	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
all	RB	*	DSE
hope	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
spending	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
reviewing	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tense	JJ	*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
working	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
best	JJS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
calm	VB	(VP*	O
fears	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
rally	NN	*	O
Zimbabweans	NNS	*))	O
together	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

WHAT	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
THEY	NNP	*	O
SAID	NNP	*)	DSE
:	:	*	O
No	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
tears	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
Tobin	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
but	CC	*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
al-Qaeda	NNP	(NP*))))))	ESE

OTTAWA	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	O
-	:	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
plight	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
prisoners	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
politicians	NNS	*)))	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
weighing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
heavily	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
minds	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
editorial	NN	(NP*	O
writers	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pundits	NNS	*)))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
and	CC	*	O
around	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
capital	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*)	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Jean	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Chretien	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Cabinet	NNP	*	O
shuffle	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
dramatic	JJ	*	ESE
departure	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Brian	NNP	(NP*	O
Tobin	NNP	*)))	O
--	:	*	O
seven	CD	(NP(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
during	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
print	NN	*	ESE
pundits	NNS	*)	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
had	VBN	(VP*	ESE
time	NN	(NP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ponder	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
said	VBN	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
been	VBN	(VP*	ESE
pretty	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Still	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
discussing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
antics	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Tobin	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
elevation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
John	NNP	*	O
Manley	NNP	*))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
status	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
golden	JJ	(NP*	ESE
boy	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
pressing	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	ESE
matter	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plight	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*)	O
imprisoned	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Cuba	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Even	RB	(S(NP*	ESE
thugs	NNS	*)	ESE
deserve	VBP	(VP*	ESE
humane	JJ	(NP*	ESE
treatment	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
reads	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
headline	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	*	O
Citizen	NNP	*	O
editorial	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
Conditions	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
detainees	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Guantanamo	NNP	(NP*	O
Bay	NNP	*)))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
harsh	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
:	:	*	O
wire-mesh	JJ	(S(NP*	O
cells	NNS	*)	O
2.4	VBZ	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
1.8	CD	(NP(NP*	O
metres	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
sleeping	VBG	*	O
mat	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
blanket	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bucket	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
toilet	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
writes	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Citizen	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*)	ESE
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
necessarily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
inhumane	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
other	JJ	*	ESE
hand	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
assurances	NNS	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
's	VBZ	(VP*	O
treating	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*))))))	O
humanely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
mean	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
so	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Citizen	NNP	*)	O
argues	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Canada	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(VP*	O
insist	VB	*	DSE
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
``	``	*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
competent	JJ	*	O
tribunal	NN	*	O
'	''	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
decide	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
status	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
detainees	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
required	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

...	:	(ROOT(S*	O
That	DT	(NP*)	DSE
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
Osama	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
remaining	VBG	*	O
thugs	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
laws	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
keep	VBP	(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
behaving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Sudbury	NNP	*	O
Star	NNP	*)	O
agrees	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
This	DT	(S(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
now	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
move	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
next	JJ	*	ESE
stage	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	DSE
tribunal	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
formed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
address	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
captured	JJ	*	O
fighters	NNS	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
determine	VB	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
dealt	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Editorial	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
writers	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Daily	NNP	*	O
Press	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Timmins	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
disagree	VBP	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
editorial	NN	*)	O
appearing	VBG	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
newspaper	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
unequivocal	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
U.S.	NNP	*	DSE
support	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
ca	MD	(VP(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
help	VB	(VP*))	DSE
but	CC	*	DSE
wonder	VBP	(VP*	DSE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
civil	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
advocates	NNS	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
overreacting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
comes	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
captured	NNP	(NP*	O
al-Qaeda	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taliban	NNP	*	O
fighters	NNS	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
For	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
treat	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
prisoners	NNS	*)	O
any	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
differently	RB	*)))))	ESE
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
very	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
well	RB	*)	ESE
imperil	VB	(VP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
reads	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
editorial	NN	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
Osama	NNP	(S(NP*	O
bin	NNP	*	O
Laden	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	O
alive	JJ	(ADJP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
suspect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
giving	VBG	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
civil	JJ	*	DSE
rights	NNS	*)	DSE
advocates	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
hearty	JJ	*	ESE
thumbs	NNS	*)	ESE
up	RB	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
giving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
hearty	JJ	*	ESE
thumbs	NNS	*)	ESE
up	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	ESE
Tobin	NNP	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Rather	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	O
departure	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
politics	NNS	(NP*)))	O
provoked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
much	JJ	(NP*	DSE
criticism	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
No	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
tears	NNS	*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
shed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
corner	NN	*))	ESE
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
Brian	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Tobin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
departure	NN	*)	O
represents	VBZ	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
third	JJ	*	O
consecutive	JJ	*	O
betrayal	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
voters	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Walter	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Robinson	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
federal	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Canadian	NNP	*	O
Taxpayers	NNPS	*	O
Federation	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
regular	JJ	*	O
columnist	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	*	O
Sun	NNP	*)))))	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	DSE
yesterday	NN	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	DSE
Tobin	NNP	*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
content	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
back	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
home	NN	*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Rock	NNP	*)	ESE
playing	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
bag	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
marbles	NNS	(NP*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
collecting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
parliamentary	JJ	*	ESE
pension	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Citizen	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
columnist	NN	(NP*	O
Rosa	NNP	*	O
Harris-Adler	NNP	*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
devastatingly	JJ	*	ESE
sarcastic	JJ	*	ESE
piece	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ridiculing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Tobin	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
assertion	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
leaving	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
family	NN	(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
chronicles	VBZ	(VP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
she	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
imagines	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*	O
post-politics	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
like	JJ	(ADJP*))))))))))	O
:	:	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Day	NN	*	ESE
One	CD	*)	ESE
:	:	*	ESE
Brian	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
decides	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
time	NN	(NP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
learn	VB	(VP*	ESE
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
diaper	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
baby	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

With	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
effort	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
he	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
pins	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
flailing	JJ	*	ESE
child	NN	*)	ESE
down	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
changing	JJ	*	ESE
table	NN	*)	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
discover	VB	(VP*	ESE
there	EX	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
diapers	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
house	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Brian	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
gives	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
confusion	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Day	NNP	(NP*	O
Seven	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Ms.	NNP	(NP*	O
Harris-Adler	NNP	*)	O
notes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
though	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Tobin	NNP	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
mastered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
diapering	JJ	*	ESE
process	NN	*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
baby	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
15	CD	(ADJP(NP*	ESE
years	NNS	*)	ESE
old	JJ	*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
amused	VBN	(ADJP*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
Michel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Vastel	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
columnist	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Le	NNP	(NP*	O
Droit	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
writes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
goodbye	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
favourite	JJ	*	ESE
Newfie	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Tobin	NNP	*)	O
walked	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
too	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
many	JJ	*)	ESE
toes	NNS	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	ESE
too	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
many	JJ	*)	ESE
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
wrote	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
while	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
minister	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
longest-serving	JJ	*	O
MPs	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
unstable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
noting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
career	NN	*)	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	ESE
like	IN	(UCP(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
rough	JJ	*	ESE
sea	NN	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
''	''	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
highs	NNS	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
lows	NNS	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
calm	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
vitriol	NN	*)	ESE
continues	VBZ	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kingston	NNP	*	O
Whig-Standard	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
Schliesmann	NNP	*)	O
writes	VBZ	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
Canadians	NNPS	(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
need	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
kind	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
politician	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
Brian	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	ESE
Tobin	NNP	*)	ESE
had	VBD	(VP*	ESE
become	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
--	:	*	O
flighty	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
opportunistic	JJ	(UCP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
lacking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
commitment	NN	(NP*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
job	NN	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Member	NNP	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Parliament	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
pundits	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Ottawa	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
seems	VBZ	(VP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
saved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
praise	NN	*)))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
John	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Manley	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
hometown	NN	*	ESE
favourite	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

''	''	(ROOT(S*	O
-LSB-	NNP	(NP*	O
Mr.	NNP	*	O
Manley	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
proven	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
sensible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
manager	NN	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
Canadians	NNPS	(SINV(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
trust	VB	(VP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
Sun	NNP	*	O
editorial	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
observing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
emerged	VBD	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
crisis	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
sensible	JJ	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
voice	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
Cabinet	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O
''	''	*)	O
And	CC	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Citizen	NNP	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Mr.	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Manley	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
competent	JJ	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
scrupulously	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
honest	JJ	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Mr.	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
Manley	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
continuing	JJ	*	O
responsibility	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
security	NN	*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
along	IN	(S(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
added	JJ	*	O
clout	NN	*)))	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
gains	VBZ	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
Deputy	NNP	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
bodes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
well	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Commercial	JJ	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Egypt	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
witnessed	JJ	(NP*	O
much	JJ	*	ESE
development	NN	*)))	O

Chinese	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Jiang	NNP	*	O
Zemin	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
probe	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Mubarak	NNP	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
start	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
official	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*))	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
strategic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
hot	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
combating	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
AL	NNP	(NP*	O
Ahram	NNP	*	O
newspaper	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
economic	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Egypt	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
witnessed	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
balanced	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
cooperation	NN	*)))	O
expanded	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
register	VB	(VP*	O
900	CD	(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
2000	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
up	RB	(ADVP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
21	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preceding	VBG	*	O
year	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
prepared	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
Egypt	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
technological	JJ	*	O
field	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
indicating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
high	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
prospects	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fields	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
scientific	JJ	(NP*	O
research	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
technology	NN	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
industry	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
resources	NNS	*	O
development	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
key	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))))))	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
just	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
cause	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
return	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
land	NN	*)))	O
occupied	VBD	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
objects	NNS	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
siege	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
expansion	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
settlements	NNS	*))))))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
acts	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
violence	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
civilians	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
all	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
parties	NNS	*)	O
concerned	VBN	(VP*))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
work	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
resuming	VBG	(S(VP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*	O
negotiations	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(ADVP(ADVP*	ESE
soon	RB	*)	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
based	VBN	(PP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
resolutions	NNS	*))))))	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principle	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
land	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
peace	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
commitment	NN	*)))))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
agreements	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
notes	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
understandings	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
reached	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
President	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Mubarak	NNP	*)	O
telephoned	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11th	JJ	*	O
incidents	NNS	*))	O
urging	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
best	JJS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
saving	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	(VP*	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
proper	JJ	(NP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	*	O
channels	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
urged	VBD	*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
side	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
fulfill	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
pledges	NNS	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
favorably	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
endeavors	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
peaceful	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
adding	VBG	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Beijing	NNP	(NP*)	O
next	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
reactivating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
peace	NN	*	O
process	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
fully	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
supports	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
restoration	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))	ESE
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
right	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
State	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
recognized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1988	CD	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
September	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
shocked	VBN	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
referring	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emergence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
problems	NNS	(NP*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
universal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nature	NN	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
multi-polar	JJ	(S(NP*	O
system	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
guarantee	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
system	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chinese	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
open	JJ	*	O
door	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
reform	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
managed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
strong	JJ	*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
structure	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
enhanced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
Chinese	JJ	(NP*	O
competitiveness	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Germany	NNP	*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
implementation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

Brasilia	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Agencia	NNP	(NP*	O
Brasil	NNP	*)	O
-	,	*	O
ABr	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
entitled	VBN	(VP*	O
Partnership	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Brasil-Germany	NNP	*)	O
:	:	*	O
Action	NNP	(NP*	O
Plan	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(NP*	O
countrires	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
interest	NN	(NP*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
seeing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
effect	NN	(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Sustainable	NNP	*	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Summit	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Rio	NNP	(NP*	O
+10	CD	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
place	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
next	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Brazil	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Germany	NNP	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
call	VBP	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
other	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
work	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enforce	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
states	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Brazil	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Germany	NNP	*)	O
intend	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
expand	VB	(VP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
area	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
environment	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
sustainable	NN	*	O
development	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Both	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
expect	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
present	VB	(VP*	O
common	JJ	(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Rio	NNP	*	O
+10	CD	*	O
meeting	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
document	NN	*)	O
stresses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
importance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Pilot	NN	*	O
Program	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Protection	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tropical	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Forests	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
PPG-7	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
German	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
program	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Khatami	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
congratulates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*))))))	O

Tehran	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
20	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	*	O
President	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Mohammad	NNP	*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*	O
evening	NN	*)))	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
restoration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))))	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
failed	VBN	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
conversation	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
counterpart	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavex	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	ESE
president	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
justice	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
freedom	NN	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
hope	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
with	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
exalted	JJ	*	ESE
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Referring	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
difficult	JJ	*	O
period	NN	*)	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
venezuelan	NN	*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	O
through	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-democractic	JJ	*	ESE
attempts	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
topple	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
failed	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
help	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
Almighty	NNP	*	ESE
God	NNP	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
re-establishment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
legal	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
order	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
briefed	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latest	JJS	*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Referring	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
objective	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wwanted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
come	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
therefore	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
tried	VBD	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
produce	VB	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
undermine	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
organization	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
thanked	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Khatami	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
telephone	NN	*	O
call	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
wished	VBD	(VP*	DSE
success	NN	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Iranian	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
nation	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
presidents	NNS	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
mutual	JJ	*	DSE
desire	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Iran	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Sunday	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
sent	VBD	(VP*	DSE
congratulations	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
hearing	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
law	NN	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
reinstatement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
legitimate	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
two-day	JJ	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
collapsed	VBD	(VP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
condemned	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
ouster	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
democratically	RB	(ADJP*	O
elected	VBN	*)	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
resorting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
acceptable	JJ	*	ESE
method	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
method	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
conformity	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
norms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
present	JJ	(NP*	O
human	JJ	*	O
society	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*))	O
early	JJ	(NP*	O
Sunday	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
helicopter	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Caribbean	JJ	*	O
island	NN	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
detained	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
thereafter	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
resumed	VBD	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
functions	NNS	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
president	NN	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
mandate	NNS	*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
due	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
end	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2006	CD	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
office	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
armed	JJ	*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
blamed	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
deaths	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
15	CD	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
streets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
central	JJ	(NP*	O
Caracas	NNP	*))))))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*	O
protest	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
later	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
violent	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chavez	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
staunch	JJ	*	DSE
supporter	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
oil	NN	(NP*	O
production	NN	*	O
cuts	NNS	*)))	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
order	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
boost	VB	(VP*	O
prices	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
market	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
initiated	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
successful	JJ	*	ESE
Caracas	NNP	*	O
OPEC	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
September	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
2000	CD	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
second	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
40-year	JJ	*	O
existence	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Petroleum	NNP	(NP*	O
Exporting	NNP	*	O
Countries	NNPS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cardoso	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
US	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
positive	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	ESE

Brasilia	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
13	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Agencia	NNP	(NP*	O
Brasil	NNP	*)	O
-	,	*	O
ABr	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
-	:	*	O
Today	NN	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*	O
Fernando	NNP	*	O
Henrique	NNP	*	O
Cardoso	NNP	*)	O
declared	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
positive	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	O
though	IN	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
formal	JJ	*	O
decision	NN	*)	O
not	RB	(S*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
party	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
convention	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
hope	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
domestically	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
effect	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
adhering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Cardoso	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
leader	NN	*)	ESE
-LSB-	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
yongdoja	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*	O
Comrade	NNP	*	O
Kim	NNP	*	O
Chong-il	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
pointed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
following	NN	*))))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
conduct	VB	(VP*	O
proper	JJ	(NP*	ESE
research	NN	*	O
work	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
air	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
water	NN	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
maintain	VB	(VP(VP*	O
people	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
health	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
hygienic	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
civilized	JJ	*	O
living	NN	*	O
conditions	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Morocco	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
laid	VBD	(VP*	O
artificial	JJ	(NP*	ESE
obstacles	NNS	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
session	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
seeking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
profit	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
discussing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
regulations	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
openly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
issue	NN	(NP*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
regulations	NNS	*))	O
only	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
because	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
contents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
regulations	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
favor	NN	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
grudgingly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
concessions	NNS	(NP*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
amendments	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
calculated	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
suffer	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
tremendous	JJ	*	ESE
loss	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
regulations	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
intact	JJ	(S(ADJP*)))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
document	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
session	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)))	O
held	VBD	(VP*	O
this	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reach	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
actual	JJ	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
regarding	VBG	(PP*	O
regulatory	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
solved	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
so	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
that	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
ecological	JJ	*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
with	IN	(UCP(PP*	ESE
each	DT	(NP*	ESE
passing	VBG	*	ESE
day	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
protect	VB	(S(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
health	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
favorable	JJ	(NP*	O
conditions	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
promotion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
civilization	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
feared	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
whole	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
preservation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
awfully	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
grave	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
pressing	JJ	*)	ESE
problem	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
linked	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
existence	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
mankind	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

How	WRB	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
preservation	NN	*))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
handled	VBN	(VP*	O
today	NN	(NP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	ESE
impact	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
health	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	ESE
well	RB	*	ESE
as	IN	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
future	JJ	*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
many	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
today	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
demanding	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
world	NN	*)	O
take	VBP	(VP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
protecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
realize	VB	(VP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
importance	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
revealed	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
lead	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
solve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
problems	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
attempted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
back	VB	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
solving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
problems	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
well-known	JJ	*	ESE
fact	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Fifth	NNP	*	O
Conference	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Parties	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Framework	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Climate	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Change	NNP	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
developed	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
set	VB	(VP*	O
goals	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*	O
emission	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
officially	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
2002	CD	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
55	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1997	CD	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
representatives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
supported	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
welcomed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
epoch-making	JJ	*	ESE
measure	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
surface	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
atmosphere	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
ratified	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
signed	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	O
binding	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Emphasizing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
significance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
loudly	NNP	*)	ESE
trumpeted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
that	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
''	''	*	O
Japan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
played	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
even	RB	(ADVP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
practical	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nonetheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
changing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
stand	NN	*)	ESE
this	DT	(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
opposed	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*)	O
regulations	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
even	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
called	VBD	*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
liquidation	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
capricious	NNP	(S(NP*	ESE
Japan	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
how	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
frequently	RB	*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
changes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
stand	NN	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
stakes	NNS	*)	ESE
matter	VBP	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	JJS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Of	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
behind	RB	(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japan	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
behavior	NN	*)	O
lies	VBZ	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
stakes	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2008	CD	(NP*))	O
-	,	*)	O
2012	NNP	(NP*	O
Japan	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
six	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1990	CD	*	O
level	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
lot	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
effort	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
restructure	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plants	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
enterprises	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
introduce	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
technology	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
upgrade	VB	(VP*	O
production	NN	(NP*	O
lines	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	O
these	DT	*	O
things	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
tremendous	JJ	*	ESE
amount	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
money	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
investment	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Never	RB	(ROOT(SINV(ADVP*)	ESE
doing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
anything	NN	(NP*	ESE
unprofitable	JJ	*))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
nature	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Accordingly	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
readily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
calculating	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
gains	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
losses	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
''	''	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
figure	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*)))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
found	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	ESE
excuse	NN	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
do	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	JJS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
implement	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	IN	(PP*	DSE
opposing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
draft	NN	*	O
regulations	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
opposition	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
attempting	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
objective	NN	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
midst	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
situation	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
official	NN	*)	O
visited	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
received	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
instruction	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
inordinate	JJ	(NP*	ESE
behavior	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
respect	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
implementing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
was	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
hint	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
good	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
dealing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
detrimental	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
spirit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
independence	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
acted	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
directions	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
continued	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	ESE
off	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
Diet	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
ratification	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
protocol	NN	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
an	DT	*	ESE
attitude	NN	*)	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
session	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
time	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plausible	JJ	*	ESE
pretext	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
meaningless	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
put	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
excluded	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
doing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
respect	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
putting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
tantamount	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
act	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
betrayal	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
mankind	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
effort	NN	*)))))))))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
lives	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
health	NN	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earth	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
atmosphere	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
present	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)	ESE
issue	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
gravity	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
second	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
only	RB	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	*	ESE
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
nuclear	JJ	*	ESE
war	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Here	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
developed	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
assume	VB	(VP*	O
especially	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
large	JJ	*)	ESE
responsibilities	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nonetheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
backing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
away	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
resolving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
issue	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
position	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	ESE
role	NN	*)))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
condemned	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Japan	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
unable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
escape	VB	(VP*	ESE
stronger	JJR	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*	O
denunciation	JJ	*)	DSE
and	CC	*	O
more	RBR	(ADJP*	O
serious	JJ	*))	O
isolation	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
seek	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
profit	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
create	VB	(VP*	ESE
stumbling	VBG	(NP*	ESE
blocks	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
supposed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
do	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
prevent	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
warming	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
seek	VB	(VP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
preservation	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Spanish	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
premier	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
EU	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
urge	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ratify	VB	(VP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
Text	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
report	NN	(NP*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Spanish	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
news	NN	*	O
agency	NN	*	O
Efe	NNP	*	O
Barcelona	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
14	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*))	O
:	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Jose	NNP	(NP*	O
Maria	NNP	*	O
Aznar	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Commission	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Romano	NNP	(NP*	O
Prodi	NNP	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
handed	VBN	(VP*	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Russian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Vladimir	NNP	*	O
Putin	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
urge	VBP	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
promote	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Efe	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
had	VBN	(VP*	O
access	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Aznar	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Prodi	NNP	*)	O
explain	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
on	IN	(S(PP*	O
4	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*)))	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
council	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
environment	NN	*	O
ministers	NNS	*)))	O
agreed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
decision	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
approval	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
behalf	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
agreement	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
step	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	JJ	(ADJP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
fulfilling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	DSE
pledge	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))	O
before	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Johannesburg	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
sustainable	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
development	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Aznar	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Prodi	NNP	*)	O
report	VBP	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
only	RB	(S(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
processes	VBZ	(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
each	DT	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
member	NN	*)))	O
states	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
concluded	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
emphasize	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
advanced	JJ	*	O
stage	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
cases	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
completed	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Therefore	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
we	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
complete	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
confidence	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
instruments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(UCP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	NNP	*	O
Community	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
15	CD	*	O
member	NN	*)))	O
states	NNS	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
lodged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Secretariat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*	O
scale	NN	*)	O
anticipated	VBN	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	O
words	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
early	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
June	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
add	VBP	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
letter	NN	*)	O
emphasizes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
for	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enter	VB	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
near	JJ	*	O
future	NN	*))))))))))))	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
enough	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
EU	NNP	(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
guaranteed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
urge	VBP	(VP*	DSE
Putin	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
ensure	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Russia	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
moves	VBZ	(VP*	O
ahead	RB	(ADVP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
make	VBP	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	DSE
request	NN	*)	DSE
``	``	*	O
convinced	VBN	(S(S(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Russian	NNP	*	O
Federation	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resolute	JJ	*	DSE
commitment	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
believing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
manner	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
EU	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Russia	NNP	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
show	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
leadership	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
shared	VBN	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	ESE
fruitful	JJ	*	ESE
results	NNS	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
cooperation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
''	''	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

United	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
States	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
finally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
announced	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
proposal	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
fighting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Seven	CD	(ROOT(S(PP(NP*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
after	IN	*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
rejected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
without	IN	(ADJP(ADJP(PP*	ESE
scientific	JJ	(NP*	ESE
basis	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
detrimental	JJ	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
unfair	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
not	RB	(S*	O
obliging	VBG	(VP*	O
medium-sized	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
India	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*	O
proportion	NN	*))))))))))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
that	DT	(S(NP*)	O
imposed	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
public	JJ	(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
promised	VBD	(VP(VP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
defects	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
achieve	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
not	RB	(S*	ESE
better	JJR	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
results	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Basically	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
makes	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
pollution	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
conditional	JJ	(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Gross	NNP	*	O
Domestic	JJ	*	O
Product	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
growth	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Emissions	NNS	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
rise	VB	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
slower	JJR	*	O
pace	NN	*)	O
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
GDP	NNP	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
problem	NN	*)	ESE
pointed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
critics	NNS	(NP*))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
concept	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
intensity	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
could	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
defined	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
volume	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
gas	NN	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
divided	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
index	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
reduced	VBN	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
emphasize	VB	(VP*))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
natural	JJ	*	O
tendency	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
services	NNS	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
GDP	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(VP(PP*	O
industrial	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
consumers	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	*	O
diminish	VB	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Therefore	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
18	CD	*	O
percent	NN	*	O
reduction	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
fact	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
represent	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
real	JJ	*	ESE
increase	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
absolute	JJ	*	O
quantity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
entities	NNS	*)	O
calculate	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Bush	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
will	MD	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
emitting	NN	*)))))))	O
!	.	*))	O

,	,	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
in	IN	*	O
2010	CD	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
29	CD	(NP*)	O
percent	VBD	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gases	NNS	*)	O
than	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1990	CD	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Technical	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
arguments	NNS	*)	DSE
could	MD	(VP(VP*	ESE
go	VB	(VP*	ESE
on	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP*	ESE
on	RB	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
matter	NN	(VP*	ESE
little	RB	(NP*)	ESE
here	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

More	RBR	(ROOT(SINV(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*)	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
indisputable	JJ	*	ESE
conclusions	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
both	DT	(RRC(ADJP*	O
potentially	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
embarrassing	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
threatening	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
whole	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
faced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
controversial	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
situating	VBG	(VP*	DSE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	O
alongside	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
explicit	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
companies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
sector	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(FRAG(X*	O
long	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
-	:	*	O
standing	NN	(NP(NP*	O
ties	NNS	*)	O
Bush	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
leading	VBG	*	O
advisors	NNS	*))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
companies	NNS	*))	O
allow	VB	(S(VP*	ESE
us	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	DSE
suppose	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ultimate	JJ	*	ESE
conflict	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
interests	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
increase	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
persistent	JJ	*	ESE
alignment	NN	*))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
goals	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Enron	NNP	*	O
scandal	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
significant	JJ	*	ESE
political	JJ	*	O
toll	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
team	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
will	MD	(S(VP*	O
tend	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
increase	VB	(VP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
consequences	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
divorce	NN	*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*	O
case	NN	*))))))	O
could	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
serious	JJ	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
conclusion	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
contrary	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
some	DT	(S(NP*	O
optimists	NNS	*)	ESE
were	VBD	(VP*	DSE
predicting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
after	IN	(PP*	O
11	CD	(NP*))	O
September	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
seems	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	DSE
decided	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stick	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arrogant	JJ	(NP*	ESE
unilateralism	NN	*))))	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
conducting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
break	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	(NP*)))	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
pre-attack	JJ	*	ESE
marker	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
having	VBG	(S(VP*	O
demonstrated	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
latter	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
absolute	JJ	*	ESE
indifference	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
even	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
closest	JJS	*	ESE
allies	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
Germany	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
France	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Kingdom	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Center	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Pentagon	NNP	*	O
tragedies	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
thought	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Washington	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
rapprochement	NN	*)	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
traditional	JJ	*	O
partners	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
inevitable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
goal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
defeating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
threat	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
brief	JJ	*	ESE
period	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
shock	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
resumed	VBD	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
solitary	JJ	*	ESE
road	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
demonstrated	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
State	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Union	NNP	*	O
speech	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
threatened	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
Axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
Evil	NNP	(NP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
consulting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Europeans	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Japanese	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
do	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
necessarily	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
agree	VB	(VP*	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
appropriateness	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
antagonizing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
announcement	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
supposedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
practice	NN	(NP*))	ESE
rejects	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
can	MD	(S(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
seriously	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
committed	VBN	(S(VP*	DSE
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
it	PRP	(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
among	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
Brazil	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
deserves	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
rejection	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
response	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provoke	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
retrospect	NN	(NP*))	ESE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
enormous	JJ	*	ESE
concern	NN	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
superpower	NN	*)	ESE
intends	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
future	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

18	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
Yonhap	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Monday	NNP	(NP*))	O
announced	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
position	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*))))))	O
W.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
internationally	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	O
along	IN	*	O
with	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
treaty	NN	*)	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1997	CD	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
control	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Affairs	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Trade	NNP	*)))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Republic	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Korea	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
appreciates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
continued	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
interest	NN	*)	DSE
shown	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(S(NP(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
presenting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
February	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*))	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
initiative	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
address	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
greatest	JJS	*	ESE
challenges	NNS	*)	ESE
humankind	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))))))	ESE
faces	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
21st	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
issued	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
name	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Choi	NNP	*	O
Sung-hong	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
notes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
initiative	NN	*)	O
adopts	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flexible	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
gradual	JJ	*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
into	IN	(PP*	ESE
consideration	NN	(NP*))	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concerns	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
!	JJ	*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
view	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
order	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
initiative	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
detail	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
future	JJ	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
fora	NN	*))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
greater	JJR	(NP*	ESE
elaboration	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
concrete	JJ	(NP*	ESE
methods	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
levels	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
intensity	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

Parties	NNS	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Climate	NNP	*	O
Change	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
preparing	VBG	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
implementation	NN	*	O
rules	NNS	*))))))))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
November	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakesh	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Morocco	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(S(PP*	ESE
light	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Korean	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
consultations	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
amongst	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
needed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
build	VB	(VP*	ESE
understanding	NN	(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
initiative	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
Seoul	NNP	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
actively	RB	(ADVP*)	O
participate	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Over	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
180	CD	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
prepared	VBN	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
ratification	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
framework	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
requires	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
signatories	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
gradually	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
reduce	VB	*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
U.S.	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*))))	O
rejected	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
early	RB	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
year	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
recently	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
announced	VBD	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
change	NN	*))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
aims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
relative	JJ	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Gross	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Domestic	NNP	*	O
Product	NNP	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Before	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(ADJP*	O
11	CD	*)	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
severely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
blamed	VBN	*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
rejecting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Meanwhile	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Germany	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
statements	NNS	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
new	JJ	*	O
climate	NN	*	O
change	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
rather	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*)	ESE
tones	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Japan-US	NNP	*	O
summit	NN	*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP*))))	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Junichiro	NNP	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
some	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Iran	NNP	(S(NP(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPRK	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
North	NNP	(NP*	O
Korea	NNP	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
left	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
impression	NN	*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
stands	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
alone	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	O
European	JJ	(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
cool	JJ	(ADJP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
``	``	*	ESE
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
''	''	*	ESE
rhetoric	NN	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
US	NNP	*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	DSE
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
attacked	VBD	(VP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
said	VBN	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
put	VBN	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
position	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

At	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outset	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
summit	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
referred	VBD	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
``	``	(NP*	DSE
axis	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	NN	(NP*))	DSE
''	''	*)	DSE
remark	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
urged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
needs	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
cooperate	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
North	NNP	*)	O
Korea	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
action	NN	*	O
pattern	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
spreading	VBG	(S(VP*	O
weapons	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
mass	JJ	(NP*	O
destruction	NN	*))))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

All	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
options	NNS	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
table	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

European	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
critical	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
``	``	*	DSE
axis	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(ADJP*)))	DSE
''	''	*	DSE
remark	NN	*))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

French	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Hubert	NNP	*	O
Vedrine	NNP	*)	O
criticized	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
remark	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
simplistic	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
interpretation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
I	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
take	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
remark	NN	*)	DSE
as	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
indication	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
strong	JJ	*	ESE
resolve	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
fight	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
repeatedly	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
suggested	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
taking	NN	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Saddam	NNP	*	O
Husayn	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
military	NN	*)	O
attack	VBP	(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Japan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
shown	VBN	(VP*	DSE
understanding	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
axis	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(NP*	DSE
remark	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
be	VB	(VP*	DSE
asked	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
active	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

However	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
difficult	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Self-Defense	NNP	*	O
Forces	NNPS	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
provide	VB	(VP*	O
logistic	JJ	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)	O
attacking	VBG	(VP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
special	JJ	*	O
antiterrorism	NN	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
aimed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
eradicating	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
enacted	VBN	(VP*	O
after	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
11	NNP	(NP*	O
September	NNP	*)))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
politically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
very	RB	*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enact	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*)	O
considering	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
declining	VBG	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*	O
Cabinet	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
source	NN	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*)))	O
Minister	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Official	NNP	*	O
Residence	NNP	*)	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
support	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
possible	JJ	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP*))	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
understanding	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	JJ	(NP*	O
rhetoric	NN	*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
expectations	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Koizumi	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*)))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
certainly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
change	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
disappointment	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Although	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Japanese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
expressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
understanding	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
axis	NNS	*))	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
evil	JJ	(NP*	DSE
remark	NN	*)))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
hope	VB	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
see	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
taking	VBG	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Because	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Koizumi	NNP	(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
need	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
cooperate	VB	(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
tackling	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Iraqi	JJ	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
enthusiastically	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
asked	VBD	*	DSE
Bush	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bold	JJ	*	ESE
course	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
reply	NN	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
want	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
resolve	VB	(VP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
peacefully	RB	(ADVP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
intend	VBP	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
efforts	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	O
However	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unclear	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
whether	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
Japan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
actually	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
action	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Islamabad	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
March	NNP	*	O
6	CD	*	O
,	,	*	O
IRNA	CD	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
Leading	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
Pakistani	JJ	*	O
defense	NN	*	O
analyst	NN	*	O
Hameed	NNP	*	O
Gul	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
saying	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
pack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
blatant	JJ	(NP*	ESE
lies	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
propaganda	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
director-general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Pakistani	NNP	*	O
Inter-Services	NNP	*	O
Intelligence	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
ISI	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Hameed	NNP	(NP*	O
Gul	NNP	*))))	O
told	VBD	(VP*	DSE
IRNA	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
interview	NN	*)))	O
here	RB	(SBAR(ADVP*)	O
that	IN	*	O
each	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
resisted	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
American	JJ	(NP*	O
hegemony	NN	*)))))	ESE
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
deemed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violator	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
In	IN	(S(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
force	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
wanted	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
subjugate	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
entire	JJ	*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
community	NN	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
ready	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
tolerate	VB	(VP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hurdle	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
direction	NN	*))))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
manifestation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
hegemonistic	JJ	*	ESE
designs	NNS	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lieutenant	NN	*	O
general	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
retd	JJ	(ADJP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
continued	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Hameed	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Gul	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
opinion	NN	*))	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
only	JJ	*	ESE
country	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
had	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
respect	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
religion	NN	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
faith	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
norms	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
decency	NN	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
rules	NNS	(NP*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
comity	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
nations	NNS	(NP*)))))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
forcibly	NN	*)	DSE
wanted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
prevent	VB	(VP*	DSE
countries	NNS	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
upholding	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
religious	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
cultural	JJ	*	ESE
values	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
fraudulent	JJ	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
terrorist	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
extremist	NN	*	ESE
country	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
never	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
forget	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
barbarities	NNS	*)	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
committed	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
innocent	JJ	*	ESE
Afghan	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
women	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
children	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
elderly	JJ	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
firmly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
said	VBD	*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
order	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
realize	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
vested	JJ	*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
allies	NNS	*))	O
unleashed	VBD	(VP(VP*	ESE
oppression	NN	(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
latest	JJS	(NP(NP*)	O
weaponry	RB	(ADVP*))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
defenseless	JJ	*	ESE
nation	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
regard	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
quick	JJ	*	O
reference	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ongoing	JJ	*	O
killings	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Indian	NNP	(NP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Since	IN	(S(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
rioting	NN	*)	O
erupted	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
week	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
over	IN	(NP(NP(QP*	O
600	CD	*)	O
people	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
mostly	RB	(NP*	ESE
Muslims	NNPS	*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
brutally	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
murdered	VBN	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
extremist	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
Hindus	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
India	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(NP*	ESE
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
civilized	JJ	*	ESE
nations	NNS	*))	ESE
kept	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
shameful	JJ	*	ESE
mum	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
remarked	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)))	DSE
,	,	*)	O
see	VBP	(VP*	DSE
violations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
people	NNS	(NP*))))	O
become	VBP	(VP*	O
hurdles	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
realization	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
vested	JJ	*	ESE
interests	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
What	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	DSE
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
doing	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*))))	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(SBAR(S(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
worst	JJS	*	ESE
examples	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
rights	NNS	(NP*	ESE
abuses	NNS	*)))))	ESE
but	CC	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
again	RB	(ADVP*)	O
silent	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(S(NP*)	O
react	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
America	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
quick	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
The	DT	(NP(NP*	O
logical	JJ	*	ESE
solution	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
independent	JJ	*)	ESE
state	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
enshrined	JJ	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
under	IN	(PP*	O
UN	NNP	(NP*)))	O
resolutions	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
denying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
clearly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
means	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
right	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
defend	VB	(VP*	ESE
themsleves	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
oppressors	NNS	*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
America	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
total	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
submission	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	(NP*)))	ESE
across	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
globe	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Hameed	NNP	(NP*	O
Gul	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
situation	NN	*)	O
requires	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP*	O
concerted	JJ	*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
resistance	NN	*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Muslims	JJ	(NP*	O
scholars	NNS	*))))	O
;	:	*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
remain	VBP	(VP*	DSE
indifferent	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
each	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
plight	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
hands	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
imperialist	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
forces	NNS	*)	ESE
led	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
crushed	VBN	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Muslims	NNPS	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
rulers	NNS	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
forge	VB	(VP*	ESE
unity	NN	(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
ranks	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
resist	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
ever-increasing	JJ	*	ESE
US	NNP	*	ESE
influence	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
;	:	*	O
otherwise	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
targeted	VBN	(VP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	ESE
one	CD	(NP*))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
Hameed	NNP	(NP*	O
Gul	NNP	*)	O
concluded	VBD	(VP*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
settlement	NN	(NP(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP*	O
territories	NNS	*)))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
confirmed	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
36	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
sites	NNS	*)	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
settlement	NN	(NP*	O
enclaves	NNS	*)	O
--	:	*))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
Prime	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))	O
less	JJR	(ADVP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
a	DT	*)	O
year	NN	*)	O
ago	RB	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
published	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Defending	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Land	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Resisting	NNP	*	O
Colonization	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
cooperation	NN	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
Solidarity	NNP	*	O
Establishment	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP*	O
Rights	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
nuclei	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
36	CD	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
established	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
November	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
parts	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
West	NNP	*	O
Bank	NNP	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
whose	WP$	(SBAR(WHNP*	O
findings	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
conference	NN	*))	O
yesterday	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
three	CD	(S(S(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
positions	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
civilian	JJ	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
work	NN	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
called	VBN	(VP*	O
Giv	NNP	(NP*)	O
`	``	*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Sal	VBG	(S(VP*	O
`	``	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
southern	JJ	*	O
valleys	NNS	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taysir	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Khalid	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
member	NN	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
PLO	NNP	*	O
Executive	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
of	IN	(NP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
bureau	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Popular	NNP	*	O
Front	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Liberation	NNP	*))))))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestine	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
advocate	VBP	(VP*	O
Faris	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Abu-Hasan	NNP	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Solidarity	NNP	*	O
Establishment	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Hasan	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Ayyub	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Bureau	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Defense	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Land	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
part	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
conference	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Construction	NN	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
period	NN	*))))	O
totaled	VBD	(VP*	O
49	CD	(NP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
addition	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
102	CD	(S(NP*	O
mobile	JJ	*	O
caravans	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
added	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
new	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
sites	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
705	CD	*)	O
donums	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
added	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
existing	VBG	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
work	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
bypass	NN	(NP*	O
roads	NNS	*)))	O
continued	VBD	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(ADVP(NP*	ESE
rate	NN	*)	ESE
faster	RBR	*))	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Barak	NNP	(NP*))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
gave	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
free	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rein	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
settlement	NN	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
embarked	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
building	VBG	(S(VP*	O
10	CD	(NP(NP*	O
bypass	NN	*	O
roads	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
some	DT	(SBAR(WHNP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*)))	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
approved	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
previous	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
estimated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
building	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
roads	NNS	*)))	O
threatens	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bulldozing	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
destruction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
31,730	CD	*)	O
donums	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
highlighted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
damage	NN	*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agricultural	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
settlement	NN	(NP*	O
activity	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
settlers	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
authorities	NNS	*))	O
pursue	VB	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
comprehensive	JJ	*	ESE
destructive	JJ	*	ESE
policy	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	ESE
wide	JJ	*	ESE
scale	NN	*)))	ESE
vis-a-vis	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
property	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
consolidate	VB	(VP*	O
facts	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
plans	NNS	*)	O
drawn	VBN	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
about	RB	(S(S(NP(QP*	O
487,093	CD	*)	O
fruit	NN	*	O
trees	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
uprooted	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
second	JJ	*	O
half	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
32,000	CD	(S(NP(NP*	O
donums	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
agricultural	JJ	(NP*	O
land	NN	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
bulldozed	VBN	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
total	JJ	*	O
losses	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agricultural	JJ	*	O
sector	NN	*)))	O
amounted	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
432	CD	*	O
million	CD	*)))	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Palestinian	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Agriculture	NNP	(NP*	O
data	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Gaza	NNP	*	O
Strip	NNP	*))	O
1,051	CD	(NP*	O
donums	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
annexed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
existing	VBG	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
32	CD	(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
housing	NN	*	O
units	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
work	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
190	CD	(NP*	O
additional	JJ	*	O
units	NNS	*)))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
started	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
1,857	CD	(NP*	O
donums	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
bulldozed	VBN	(VP*	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
building	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
bypass	NN	(NP(NP*	O
roads	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
strip	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taysir	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Khalid	NNP	*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
intifadah	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
raised	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
anew	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
--	:	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
causes	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*)))))	O
--	:	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
unprecedented	JJ	(NP*	ESE
force	NN	*)))	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basic	JJ	*	ESE
element	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
condition	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
reaching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
solution	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
allocations	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sharon	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
budget	NN	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
supporting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
widening	VBG	*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*))	O
and	CC	*	O
building	VBG	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
ones	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
despite	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
crisis	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
recession	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economy	NN	*)	O
suffers	VBZ	(VP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
At	IN	(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
time	NN	*)	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Israel	NNP	(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*	O
rate	NN	*)	O
declined	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
1.5	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
budgets	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Labor	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Welfare	NNP	*)))))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
other	JJ	(S(NP*	O
ministries	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
cut	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
government	NN	*)	O
maintained	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
support	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
increased	VBD	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
compensate	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
growing	VBG	*	ESE
exodus	NN	*)	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
need	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
concentrate	VB	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
resisting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
settlement	NN	(NP(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
militias	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
abstaining	VBG	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
subjecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
file	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
discussion	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
condition	NN	*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
halting	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
intensified	JJ	*	ESE
settlement	NN	*	O
activities	NNS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
removing	VBG	(VP*	O
existing	VBG	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
proved	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*	ESE
battle	NN	*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
over	RP	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
year	NN	*)	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Sharon	NNP	(NP*)))	O
became	VBD	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
pursuit	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
destructive	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
,	,	*	O
aggressive	JJ	*)	ESE
policy	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
proved	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
conflict	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
cling	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
national	JJ	*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
can	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
settled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Advocate	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Faris	NNPS	*	O
Abu-Hasan	NNP	*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
represented	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
settlement	NN	(NP(NP*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
settlement	NN	(NP*	O
building	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
continuing	VBG	*	ESE
refusal	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
respond	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
appeals	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
violation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
relevant	JJ	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	O
laws	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
settlement	NN	(S(NP*	O
building	NN	*)	O
constituted	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
grave	JJ	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Geneva	NNP	*	O
Convention	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
international	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
law	NN	*	O
provisions	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
forbid	VBD	(S(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(S(VP*	O
population	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupying	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
grave	JJ	*	ESE
violations	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
first	JJ	*	O
concerns	NNS	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
building	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
transfer	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*))))	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
tens	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
second	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
enacting	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
laws	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
facilitate	VBP	(S(VP*	ESE
expropriating	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
land	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
settlement	NN	*	O
activity	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
matter	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
among	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
war	NN	*	ESE
crimes	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
surveyed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
unarmed	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
citizens	NNS	*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	ESE
protection	NN	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
backing	NN	*)	ESE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
provided	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
governments	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
encouragement	NN	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
assaults	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alternation	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
roles	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
army	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
carrying	VBG	(S(VP(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
aggressions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
terrorizing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
indicated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
settlements	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	ESE
bastions	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
bases	NNS	*))	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
launching	VBG	(S(VP*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)))	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
Palestinian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
population	NN	*	O
centers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
used	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
shields	NNS	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
protection	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
about	RB	(S(NP(NP(QP*	O
90	CD	*)	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
bombardments	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
Palestinian	JJ	(S(NP*	O
population	NN	*	O
centers	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
subjected	VBN	(VP*)))))))	ESE
originated	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
settlements	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
confirmed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
30	CD	(S(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	ESE
martyred	VBN	(VP*	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
hands	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
60	CD	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
hit	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP(NP*	O
'	POS	*)	O
bullets	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
more	JJR	(S(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
77	CD	*)	O
others	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
injured	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	ESE
assaults	NNS	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
stressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
since	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
outbreak	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intifadah	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1987	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
percent	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)))	O
martyred	VBD	(VP*	ESE
were	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
killed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
noted	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
during	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
current	JJ	*	O
intifadah	NN	*))	O
settlers	NNS	(NP*)	O
uprooted	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
6,580	CD	*)	O
fruit	NN	*	O
trees	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
destroyed	VBD	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
4,099	CD	*)	O
cultivated	VBN	*	O
donums	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
85	CD	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
houses	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
90	CD	(NP(NP*	O
commercial	JJ	*	O
premises	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
100	CD	*)	O
cars	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
17	CD	(NP*	O
ambulances	NNS	*))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
damaged	VBN	(VP*	O
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
result	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
attacks	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
carried	VBN	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
settlers	NNS	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*)	O
referred	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
legal	JJ	*	ESE
cover	NN	*))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
protection	NN	(S(NP*	ESE
settlers	NNS	*)	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*)))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
encouragement	NN	*)	ESE
this	DT	(NP*))	O
gives	VBZ	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
aggressions	NNS	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
explained	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
sentenced	VBD	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
member	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
accused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
opening	VBG	(NP*	O
fire	NN	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	O
one	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
hurt	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
seven	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*	O
imprisonment	NN	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

While	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
settler	NN	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
opened	VBD	(S(VP*	O
fire	NN	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*))))	O
wounding	VBG	(S(VP*	O
four	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
sentenced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
four	CD	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))))))	O
imprisonment	VBZ	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
court	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
presented	VBD	(VP*	O
14	CD	(NP*)	O
February	NNP	(NP*)	O
his	PRP$	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
plan	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
designed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
slow	VB	(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
proposal	NN	*)	DSE
places	VBZ	(VP(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
obligation	NN	*)	O
whatsoever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
industrialists	NNS	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
voluntary	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tax	NN	*	O
incentives	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
hastened	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP(NP*	O
the	DT	*	O
most	JJS	*	ESE
audacious	JJ	*	ESE
program	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
aiming	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
environmentalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
attacked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
proposal	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
A	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
Valentine	NNP	*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
Day	NN	(NP(NP*	ESE
gift	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
polluters	NNS	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*	DSE
Carl	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
Pope	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Sierra	NNP	*	O
Club	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
major	JJ	*	O
US	NNP	*	O
environmental	JJ	*	O
protection	NN	*)))	O
associations	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
mince	VB	(VP*	ESE
his	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
words	NNS	*)	ESE
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
describing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
replace	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Presented	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(ADJP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*	O
14	CD	*))	O
February	NNP	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP(NP*	O
alternative	JJ	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
slowing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*)	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	VBG	*	O
moves	NNS	*))))))))	ESE
away	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
binding	JJ	*	ESE
measures	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
implementation	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)))	O
approved	VBD	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP(QP*	O
than	IN	*	O
170	CD	*)	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Marrakech	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	ESE
rejected	VBD	(VP*	DSE
in	RP	(PRT*)	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
deemed	VBD	(S(VP(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
harmful	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
economy	NN	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
reproached	VBD	(VP*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
imposing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
constraints	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
only	RB	(ADVP*))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

So	IN	(ROOT(S*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
version	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	O
bases	NNS	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Contrary	JJ	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
preceding	JJ	*	O
one	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
proposed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*	O
Thursday	NNP	*))))	O
thus	RB	(ADVP*)	O
no	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*	ESE
longer	RB	*)	ESE
has	VBZ	*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
binding	JJ	*	ESE
procedure	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
voluntary	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
tax	NN	*	O
incentives	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
advocates	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	O
voluntarist	JJ	*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
directly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	O
linking	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
objectives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
reduction	NN	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intensity	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emission	NN	*)	O
generated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
economy	NN	*))	O
''	''	*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
18	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
next	JJ	*	O
10	CD	*	O
years	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
objective	NN	*)	DSE
described	VBD	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
comparable	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
''	''	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
imposed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

For	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
moment	NN	*))	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
proposes	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
curb	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
increase	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
harmful	JJ	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
counting	VBG	(VP(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
good	JJ	*	DSE
will	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
industrialists	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
account	VBP	(S(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
36	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*)	O
produced	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
industrialized	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
as	RB	(ADJP*	O
opposed	VBN	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
31.6	CD	(NP(NP*	O
%	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Europe	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
set	VBN	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
slow	VB	(VP(VP*	O
down	RP	(PRT*))	O
and	CC	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
stop	VB	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
growth	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
harmful	JJ	(NP*	O
gases	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
scientific	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
studies	NNS	*)	ESE
justify	NNP	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
diminish	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
aim	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
lower	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
polluting	VBG	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
183	CD	(NP(NP*	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
per	IN	(PP*	O
million	CD	(NP(NP*	O
dollars	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
GDP	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
to	TO	*	O
151	CD	*)	O
tonnes	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2012	CD	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
encourage	VB	(VP*	DSE
industry	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
consumers	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
demonstrate	VB	(VP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	ESE
public	JJ	*	ESE
spiritedness	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
Mr.	NNP	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
proposes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
tax	NN	(NP(NP*	O
incentives	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(NP(QP*	O
4.6	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
adoption	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
renewable	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
energy	NN	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
calls	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
India	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*))	O
To	TO	(PP*	O
Act	NNP	(NP*)))))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*)	O
asserted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
moreover	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
determination	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
win	VB	(VP*	ESE
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
stating	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
yardstick	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
progress	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
climate	NN	(NP*	O
changes	NNS	*))))	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
recognizes	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
their	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
economic	JJ	(NP*	O
development	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
asserted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
allusion	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
binding	JJ	*	O
objectives	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
``	``	(ADJP*	ESE
unjust	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
counterproductive	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
condemn	VB	(VP*	ESE
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
weak	JJ	(NP(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
or	CC	*	ESE
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
nonexistant	JJ	*))	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
insisting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
unrealistic	JJ	(NP*	ESE
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
reduction	NN	*	O
targets	NNS	*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Mr.	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
Bush	NNP	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
,	,	*	O
nevertheless	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
affirm	VB	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
``	``	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
interfere	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
opting	VBG	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ratification	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	(S*	ESE
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
intention	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
working	VBG	(S(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
nations	NNS	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
particularly	RB	*	ESE
developing	VBG	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
convince	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
a	DT	(S(NP*	O
better	JJR	*	ESE
approach	NN	*)	ESE
exists	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

President	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
considered	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
moreover	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
``	``	(ADJP*	O
irresponsible	JJ	*	ESE
''	''	*	O
not	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
ask	VB	(VP*	DSE
India	NNP	(S(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
China	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
reduce	VB	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Developing	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*)	O
such	JJ	(PP*	O
as	IN	*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
India	NNP	*)))	O
already	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
account	VBP	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
majority	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	DSE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
irresponsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
absolve	VB	(VP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
shouldering	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
shared	VBN	*	O
obligations	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
''	''	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
global	JJ	(NP*	O
warming	NN	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
Discontent	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Environmentalists	NNPS	*))))	O

As	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*	DSE
far	RB	*	DSE
as	IN	(SBAR*	DSE
the	DT	(S(NP*	DSE
US	NNP	*	DSE
Administration	NNP	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
concerned	JJ	(ADJP*)))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
make	VB	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
posible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
``	``	(VP*	O
stabilize	VB	*	O
greenhouse	NN	(NP*	O
gas	NN	*	O
concentrations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
atmosphere	NN	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
long	JJ	*	O
run	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
sustaining	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
economic	JJ	*	O
growth	NN	*)))	O
needed	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
finance	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
investments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
,	,	*	O
cleaner	JJR	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
structure	NN	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
White	NNP	*	O
House	NNP	*)	O
hastened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
describe	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
most	RBS	*	ESE
audacious	JJ	*	ESE
program	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
history	NN	*)	ESE
aiming	VBG	(VP*	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
reducing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*	O
station	NN	*	O
gas	NN	*	O
emissions	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
considering	VBG	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
save	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
$	$	(NP(QP*	O
1	CD	*	O
billion	CD	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
compared	VBN	(PP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
costs	NNS	*)))))))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
binding	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
rules	NNS	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
lead	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
environmentalists	NNS	(NP*)	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
attacked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
proposal	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Philip	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Clapp	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
president	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Environment	NNP	*	O
Trust	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
sums	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
up	RB	(ADVP*	DSE
well	RB	*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
general	JJ	*	O
thrust	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
reaction	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
environmental	JJ	(NP*	O
movements	NNS	*)))))	O
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
There	EX	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
believe	VB	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
polluters	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
suddenly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
going	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
become	VB	(VP*	ESE
reasonable	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Carl	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Pope	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
director	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sierra	NNP	*	O
Club	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*)	O
considers	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
part	NN	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
Administration	NNP	*)	O
``	``	*	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
sticking	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
polluting	VBG	*	ESE
policies	NNS	*))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
energy	NN	*	O
industry	NN	*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
rather	RB	(PP*	O
than	IN	*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sensible	JJ	*	ESE
steps	NNS	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
can	MD	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
health	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

According	VBG	(ROOT(S(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Steve	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Sawyer	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Greenpeace	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
International	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
climate	NN	*	O
experts	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
plan	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
very	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
little	JJ	*)	ESE
effect	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
emissions	NNS	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
assuming	VBG	(VP*	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
any	DT	(NP*))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Instead	RB	(PP*	ESE
of	IN	*	ESE
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
champion	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
global	JJ	*	O
fight	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
greenhouse	NN	*	O
effect	NN	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
moving	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
exactly	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
the	DT	*	ESE
opposite	JJ	*	ESE
direction	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
followed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
rest	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*))))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Kyoto	NNP	*	O
Protocol	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Greenpeace	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Israeli	JJ	(S(NP*	O
tanks	NNS	*)	O
push	VBP	(VP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
way	NN	*)	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
one	CD	(NP(NP*	ESE
Palestinian	JJ	*	ESE
population	NN	*	ESE
center	NN	*)	ESE
after	IN	(PP*	ESE
another	DT	(NP*)))))))	ESE
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
more	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
more	RBR	(ADJP*	ESE
difficult	JJ	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
guess	VB	(VP*	DSE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
political	JJ	(S(NP*	ESE
objectives	NNS	*)	ESE
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
driving	VBG	(VP*	ESE
Prime	NNP	(NP*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Ariel	NNP	*	O
Sharon	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	O
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
wants	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
destroy	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
infrastructure	NN	*	O
''	''	*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
suicide	NN	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Israelis	NNPS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	DSE
understand	VB	(VP*	DSE
this	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
immediate	JJ	*	O
military	JJ	*	DSE
objective	NN	*))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
nothing	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
achieved	VBN	(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*	O
politically	RB	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
temporary	JJ	*	ESE
security	NN	*)	ESE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
may	MD	(VP*	ESE
produce	VB	(VP*)))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
lost	VBN	(VP*	ESE
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
withdrawn	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
desperate	JJ	*	ESE
tableau	NN	*)	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
even	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
more	RBR	*	ESE
dismal	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
administration	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
President	NNP	(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)))	O
does	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
appear	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sort	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
logical	JJ	(NP*	ESE
Near	NNP	*	O
East	NNP	*	O
policy	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
week	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
taken	VBN	(VP*	DSE
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
stand	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Saudi	NNP	(ADJP*	O
Arabian	NNP	*)	O
peace	NN	*	DSE
plan	NN	*))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*	DSE
-LSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
call	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
-RSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
removal	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israeli	JJ	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)))	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
cities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
areas	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Nevertheless	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
subsequent	JJ	*	O
remarks	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
encouraged	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Suicide	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
require	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
extensive	JJ	*	O
infrastructure	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
few	JJ	*	O
kilograms	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
explosives	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
simple	JJ	*	O
detonating	NN	*	O
fuse	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
desperate	JJ	*	ESE
hatred	NN	*))))	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*)	ESE
ingredients	NNS	*))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
categorical	JJ	*	ESE
moral	JJ	*	ESE
condemnation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
self-evident	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
this	DT	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
free	VB	(VP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
faces	VBZ	(VP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israeli	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
own	JJ	*	ESE
35-year-old	JJ	*	O
occupation	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
resettlement	NN	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
created	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
breeding	VBG	*	ESE
ground	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
terrorism	NN	*)))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
now	RB	(ADVP*)	O
trying	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
root	VB	(VP*	ESE
out	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
resorting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
exclusively	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
military	JJ	(NP*	O
means	NNS	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
if	IN	*	ESE
,	,	(S*	O
contrary	JJ	(ADVP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
operation	NN	*)	O
turns	VBZ	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
successful	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
underlying	JJ	*	O
problem	NN	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
remain	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
same	JJ	*)	ESE
as	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
before	RB	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
responsible	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
about	RB	(NP(NP(QP*	ESE
three	CD	*	ESE
million	CD	*)	ESE
bitter	JJ	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
lack	VBP	(S(VP*	O
political	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	ESE
means	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
preventing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*))))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
launch	VB	(VP*	O
-RSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
counter-terrorist	JJ	*	O
effort	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
extends	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
every	DT	(NP*	O
village	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
erode	VB	(VP*	ESE
both	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
left	VBN	(VP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
army	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
reputation	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
cutting	VBG	*	O
edge	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Israel	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
resettlement	NN	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
justified	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
grounds	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
security	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
last	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
months	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
demonstrated	VBN	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	(S*	O
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
contrary	NN	*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
extraordinary	JJ	*	ESE
burden	NN	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Traffic	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
settlements	NNS	*)))	O
prevents	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	O
monitoring	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
borders	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	O
birthrate	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinian	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*)))	O
guarantees	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
possible	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
change	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
population	NN	*	O
balance	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
occupied	JJ	*	O
territories	NNS	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
stepping	VBG	(S(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
resettlement	JJ	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNS	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Jewish	JJ	*	O
population	NN	*	O
-RSB-	NN	*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
Sharon	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
refuses	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
acceptable	JJ	(NP*	ESE
borders	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
conditions	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
two	CD	(ADJP(NP*	O
alternatives	NNS	*)	O
left	JJ	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

One	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
think	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
no	DT	(S(NP*	ESE
politically	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
prudent	JJ	*)	ESE
Israeli	NNP	*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
either	DT	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
them	PRP	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
first	JJ	*)	O
would	MD	(VP*	O
involve	VB	(VP(VP*	O
continuous	JJ	(NP*	O
occupation	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
-LSB-	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
-RSB-	VBG	(S(VP*	O
an	DT	(S(NP*	O
apartheid	NN	*	O
state	NN	*)	O
similar	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
South	NNP	(NP*	O
Africa	NNP	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Terrorism	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
absent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	O
a	DT	*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
process	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
lose	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
right	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
count	VB	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
among	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
democracies	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
alternative	NN	*)	O
entails	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
massive	JJ	*	ESE
expulsion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
three	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Palestinians	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
neighboring	VBG	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
human	NN	(UCP*	O
and	CC	*	O
political	JJ	*)	O
catastrophe	NN	*))	ESE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
accompany	VB	(VP*	O
this	DT	(NP*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Sharon	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
course	NN	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
admit	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
anything	NN	(NP*)	O
like	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
even	RB	(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
idea	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Prime	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
explain	VB	(VP*	O
once	RB	(NP(NP(UCP(ADVP*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(WHNP*	ESE
what	WDT	*)))	O
third	JJ	*	O
objective	NNS	*)	DSE
he	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
might	MD	(VP*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
actions	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
high	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
time	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hurry	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
offer	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
ingredients	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	DSE
decision	NN	*)))	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
large	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
measure	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
place	NN	(NP*))))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
admitted	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
sides	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
simultaneous	JJ	*	O
ending	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
violence	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
-LSB-	JJ	*	O
Israeli	JJ	*	O
-RSB-	JJ	*	O
resettlement	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*)	O
followed	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
negotiations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
basis	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
Saudi	NNP	(ADJP*	O
Arabian	NNP	*)	O
proposal	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
earlier	JJR	*	O
results	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
talks	NNS	*)))))))))	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
Camp	NNP	(NP*	O
David	NNP	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taba	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

By	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
supporting	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
Sharon	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
irresponsible	JJ	*	ESE
saber	NN	*	ESE
rattling	NN	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)	O
places	VBZ	(VP(VP*	ESE
strains	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Arab	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
needlessly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
puts	VBZ	*	O
off	RP	(PRT*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
settlement	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
some	DT	(NP*	ESE
day	NN	*)	ESE
play	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
midwife	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
Saturday	NNP	(NP*	O
-LSB-	NNP	*	O
13	CD	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
-RSB-	NNP	*))	O
--	:	(PRN*	O
two	CD	(S(NP*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
aftr	VBP	(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
removed	VBN	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
coup	NN	*)))))))))	O
--	:	*)	O
thousands	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)))))	O
took	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
streets	NNS	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
after	IN	(S(PP*	O
occupying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
palace	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
they	PRP	(NP*)	O
returned	VBD	(VP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

We	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
asked	VBD	(VP*	O
Ali	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Kianushrad	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
member	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Majles	NNP	*	O
National	NNP	*	O
Security	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Foreign	NNP	(NP*	O
Policy	NNP	*	O
Committee	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
state	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
views	NNS	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
recent	JJ	*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
removal	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Question	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
do	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
assess	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	O
downfall	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
more	JJR	(NP(NP*	O
sudden	JJ	*	O
return	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Answer	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	DSE
:	:	*	DSE
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
experience	NN	*)	O
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)))	O
showed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
regimes	NNS	(S(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
based	VBN	(VP(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
votes	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
support	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
masses	NNS	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
relatively	RB	(NP(ADJP*	ESE
independent	JJ	*)	ESE
policies	NNS	*)	O
toward	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
big	JJ	*	ESE
powers	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
especially	RB	(NP*	ESE
America	NNP	*)))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
favored	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
leadership	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	DSE
Americans	NNPS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
hasty	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
immediate	JJ	*)	ESE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)))	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Americans	NNPS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(ADVP*	DSE
no	DT	(NP*	DSE
way	NN	*)	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
favor	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
national	JJ	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
rules	NNS	*)))))	O
coming	VBG	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Also	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
President	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
again	RB	*)	ESE
showed	VBD	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR(SBAR*	O
if	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
rulers	NNS	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
endorsed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
and	CC	*	DSE
supported	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
determination	NN	*)	DSE
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
affect	VB	(VP*	ESE
decisions	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
presence	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
scene	NN	*)))	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
prevent	VB	(VP*	ESE
rules	NNS	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
totally	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
disagree	VBP	(VP*))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

Question	VB	(ROOT(VP*	O
:	:	*	O
How	WRB	(SBARQ(WHADVP*)	O
do	VBP	(SQ*	O
you	PRP	(NP*)	O
assess	VB	(VP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
reaction	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
overthrow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
Government	NNP	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
--	:	*	O
something	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(SBAR(WHPP*	O
which	WDT	(WHNP*))	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
Foreign	NNP	*	O
Ministry	NNP	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
statement	NN	*))))))))))	O
?	.	*)))	O

Answer	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	DSE
:	:	*	DSE
We	PRP	(S(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reason	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
us	PRP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
satisfied	JJ	(ADJP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
any	DT	(NP*	DSE
way	NN	*)))	DSE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
overthrow	NN	*))	O
the	DT	(ADVP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
there	RB	*)	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*	ESE
when	WRB	*)	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
regime	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extensive	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
there	EX	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
points	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
un	VBN	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
independent	JJ	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
converge	VB	(S(VP(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
our	PRP$	(NP*	O
policies	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
positively	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
assessed	VBN	*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Islamic	JJ	*	O
Republic	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Iran	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Question	VBN	(ROOT(X(S(VP*))	O
:	:	*	O
Did	VBD	(NP(SQ*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Rio	NNP	*	O
Pact	NNP	*	O
member	NN	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*))))	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*	O
's	POS	*))))	O
return	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))	O
?	.	*))	O

Answer	NNP	(ROOT(FRAG(NP*)	DSE
:	:	*	DSE
The	DT	(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
developments	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
so	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
rapid	JJ	*)	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
intervention	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
powers	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
return	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
small	JJ	*))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S(S*	DSE
undoubtedly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
basic	JJ	(NP(NP*	DSE
doubts	NNS	*)	DSE
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
exist	VBP	(S(VP*	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
immediate	JJ	*	DSE
support	NN	*)))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
what	WP	(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
springs	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
mind	VB	(VP*))))))	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
possibility	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
intervention	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

23	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CNA	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
--	:	*	O
Republic	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Chen	NNP	*	O
Shui-bian	NNP	*)	O
expressed	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
hope	NN	*)	DSE
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bid	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
observer	NN	(NP*	O
status	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
World	NNP	*	O
Health	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WHO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
,	,	*	O
following	VBG	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
World	NNP	*	O
Trade	NNP	*	O
Organization	NNP	*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
WTO	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
membership	NN	*)	O
bid	VBN	(VP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
meeting	NN	(NP*))	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
U.S.	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Assistant	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Commerce	NNP	(NP*)))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Market	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Access	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Compliance	NNP	*	O
William	NNP	*	O
H.	NNP	*	O
Lash	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
III	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Presidential	NNP	*	O
Office	NNP	*	O
Wednesday	NNP	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lash	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
arrived	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Taipei	NNP	(NP*	O
Tuesday	NNP	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
four-day	JJ	*	O
visit	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chen	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
hope	NN	(NP*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
negotiate	VB	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sign	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
free	JJ	*	O
trade	NN	*	O
zone	NN	*	O
agreement	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
as	RB	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
internalization	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
give	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
more	RBR	(NP*	ESE
international	JJ	*	ESE
responsibility	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
gratitude	NN	(NP*	DSE
and	CC	*	O
admiration	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
firm	NN	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	O
maintaining	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
security	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
peace	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Asia-Pacific	JJ	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
pointed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
U.S.	NNP	(S(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
decision	NN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
sell	VB	(VP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*)))))	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
imbalance	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
cross-strait	JJ	(NP*	O
military	JJ	*	O
force	NN	*)))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
2005	CD	(NP*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
one	CD	*	O
hand	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
further	RBR	(ADVP*)	ESE
safeguard	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
democratic	JJ	*	ESE
achievements	NNS	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
other	JJ	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Touching	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
entry	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
could	MD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
have	VB	(VP*	O
smoothly	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
entered	VBN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
WTO	NNP	*)	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
Congress	NNP	(NP*))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
render	VB	(VP*	DSE
their	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
firm	NN	*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
bid	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
membership	NN	(NP*))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
access	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
given	VBN	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
window	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
window	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
century	NN	*)))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
window	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
opportunity	NN	(NP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
went	VBD	(VP*	DSE
on	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
allow	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
upgrade	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
competitiveness	NN	*))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
U.S.-Taiwan	JJ	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lash	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
return	NN	(NP*)))	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
Chen	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
entry	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
his	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
attaches	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
great	JJ	(NP*	ESE
importance	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
U.S.-Taiwan	JJ	(NP*	O
trade	NN	*	O
relations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Taiwan	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
WTO	NNP	*	O
entry	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
conclusion	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
goal	NN	*)))	DSE
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
beginning	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
chance	NN	*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
play	VB	(VP*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
important	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
world	NN	*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
Lash	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
,	,	*	O
adding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
continue	VB	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
realize	VB	(VP*	O
all	PDT	(NP*	ESE
its	PRP$	*	O
WTO	NN	*	O
expectations	NNS	*)))))))))))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
congratulated	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Chen	NNP	(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
ruling	VBG	*	O
Democratic	NNP	*	O
Progressive	NNP	*	O
Party	NNP	*)	O
becoming	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
party	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Legislative	JJ	*	O
Yuan	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
last	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
December	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
legislative	JJ	*	O
election	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Lash	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	*	DSE
gratitude	NN	(NP*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
Chen	NNP	(NP*))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
assistance	NN	*)	O
rendered	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
wake	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Sept.	NNP	*))))))))))	O

11	CD	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
terrorist	JJ	*	O
attacks	NNS	*)	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
participation	NN	*)))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
post-war	JJ	*	O
reconstruction	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

As	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
usual	JJ	(ADJP*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Department	NNP	*)	O
published	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
practices	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
world	NN	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
Monday	NNP	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

And	CC	(ROOT(S*	ESE
as	IN	(PP*	ESE
usual	JJ	(ADJP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
portion	NN	*)	O
about	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))	O
contains	VBZ	(VP*	O
little	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
truth	NN	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
absurdities	NNS	*	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
exaggerations	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
fabrications	NNS	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Its	PRP$	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
aim	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
2001	CD	*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
tarnish	VB	(VP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
image	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
exert	NN	*	O
political	JJ	*	O
pressure	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
experts	NNS	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seminar	NN	*)	O
held	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Society	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Study	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Human	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Rights	NNP	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
CSSHR	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Friday	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
slandering	VBG	(VP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*)	O
again	RB	(ADVP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Xirao-Nima	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
professor	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tibetan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
history	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Central	NNP	*	O
University	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
Nationalities	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	RB	(ADVP*	ESE
right	RB	*)	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
issue	VB	(VP*	O
such	PDT	(NP*	ESE
a	DT	*	ESE
false	JJ	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
experts	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
spirit	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
not	RB	(S*	O
interfering	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*	O
'	POS	*)	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Jin	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Yongjian	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
former	JJ	*	O
deputy	NN	*	O
secretary-general	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
Nations	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
held	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
high	JJ	*	ESE
goal	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
protecting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Jin	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
But	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
never	RB	(VP(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
requested	VBD	*)	O
or	CC	*	O
authorized	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
compile	VB	(VP*	O
or	CC	*	O
release	VB	*	O
such	JJ	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
completely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*	O
Charter	NNP	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
principles	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
relevant	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
conferences	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
documents	NNS	(NP*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
procedural	JJ	*	O
mistake	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
facts	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
incorrect	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
officials	NNS	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(NP*)	O
somewhat	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
softens	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
its	PRP$	(NP*	ESE
tone	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

But	CC	(ROOT(S*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
nevertheless	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
uses	VBZ	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
issues	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
slander	VB	(VP*	ESE
China	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
CSSHR	NNP	(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Zhou	NNP	*	O
Jue	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
I	PRP	(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP*))	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

I	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	DSE
truth	NN	*)	DSE
there	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
different	JJ	*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
some	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
ulterior	NN	(NP*	ESE
motives	NNS	*)))	ESE
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
described	VBN	(VP*))))))))))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Xirao-Nima	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Tibetan	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Some	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
Westerners	NNPS	*)	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
there	RB	(ADVP*))))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
also	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
seen	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
ever-improving	JJ	*	ESE
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Tibet	NNP	*	O
Autonomous	NNP	*	O
Region	NNP	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
added	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))	O
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
times	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Italian	JJ	(NP*	O
senator	NN	*	O
Renzo	NNP	*	O
Gubert	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*)	O
praised	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Government	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
efforts	NNS	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
protect	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
indigenous	JJ	*	O
cultural	JJ	(ADJP*	O
and	CC	*	O
religious	JJ	*)	O
heritage	NN	*)	O
while	IN	(PP*	O
developing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
local	JJ	*	O
economy	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
2000	CD	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
parliamentary	JJ	*	O
delegation	NN	*)	O
issued	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
press	NN	*	O
communique	NN	*)	O
agreeing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
development	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
far	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
better	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
reported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
some	DT	(NP*	O
Western	JJ	*	O
media	NNS	*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
built	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
renovated	VBN	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
monasteries	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

From	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
1989	CD	(NP*	O
to	TO	*	O
1994	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
central	JJ	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
invested	VBD	(VP*	O
53	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
US$	$	(NP(QP*	O
6.4	CD	*	O
million	CD	*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
repair	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Potala	NNP	*	O
Palace	NNP	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Later	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
spent	VBD	(VP*	O
another	DT	(NP(NP*	O
4.9	CD	(ADJP(QP*	O
million	CD	*))	O
yuan	NN	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
US$	$	(NP*	O
590,360	CD	*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
update	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
palace	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
fire	NN	*	O
safety	NN	*	O
facilities	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Renzo	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Gubert	NNP	*)	O
once	RB	(ADVP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	DT	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*)	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
impressed	VBD	(S(VP*	ESE
him	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
most	RBS	(ADVP*)))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
local	JJ	(S(NP*	O
Tibetans	NNS	*)	O
enjoy	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
high	JJ	*	ESE
level	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
Italian	JJ	*	O
senator	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
words	NNS	*)	DSE
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	DSE
sharp	JJ	(NP*	DSE
contrast	NN	*))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
contained	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
China	NNP	*	O
human	NN	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
compiled	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
blindly	RB	(S(ADVP*)	ESE
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
restricting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
religious	JJ	(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Tibet	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
uses	VBZ	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
unsubstantiated	JJ	*	ESE
stories	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
illustrate	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
unwarranted	JJ	*	ESE
assertions	NNS	*)))))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Throughout	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
there	EX	(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
doubtful	JJ	*	ESE
phrases	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
such	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	*)	O
`	``	*	O
according	VBG	(PP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
credible	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*	O
'	''	*)	O
,	,	*	O
`	``	*	O
various	JJ	(NP*	O
sources	NNS	*)	O
'	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
`	``	*	O
anecdotal	JJ	(NP*	O
evidence	NN	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
'	''	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
name	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
few	JJ	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
shows	VBZ	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
these	DT	(S(NP*	O
so-called	JJ	*	ESE
truths	NNS	*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	ESE
true	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Xirao-Nima	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
back	VB	(VP*	O
up	RP	(PRT*)	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
reckless	JJ	*	ESE
conclusion	NN	*))))	DSE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
lists	VBZ	(VP*	O
many	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
incidents	NNS	*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
religious	JJ	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
violated	VBN	(VP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Take	VB	(ROOT(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
case	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Li	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Guangqiang	NNP	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
example	NN	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
have	VB	(VP*	O
arrested	VBN	(VP*	O
Li	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
Hong	NNP	*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
businessman	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
charged	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
smuggling	NN	(NP*	O
Bibles	NNS	*))	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
country	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
His	PRP$	(S(NP*	O
behaviour	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
violated	VBN	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
law	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Rev	NNP	*	O
Cao	NNP	*	O
Shengjie	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
China	NNP	*	O
Christian	NNP	*	O
Council	NNP	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cao	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
smuggled	JJ	*	O
Bibles	NN	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
editions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
translated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
Shouters	NNPS	*	O
'	''	*	O
sect	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
heresy	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Cao	NNP	(NP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(NP*	O
`	``	*	O
Shouters	NNP	*	O
'	''	*)	O
claim	VBP	(VP*	DSE
they	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
bigger	JJR	(ADJP(ADJP*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	ESE
Jesus	NNP	(NP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
sect	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
banned	VBN	(VP*	O
because	RB	(PP*	O
of	IN	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
1980s	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Cao	NNP	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
meet	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
demand	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
15	CD	(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
Protestants	NNPS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
28	CD	(NP(NP(QP*	O
million	CD	*)	O
copies	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Bible	NNP	*))	O
,	,	*	O
including	VBG	(PP*	O
those	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
printed	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP*	O
languages	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
printed	VBN	(VP*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
accuses	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
taking	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
advantage	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	(NP*	O
campaigns	NNS	*)))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
crackdown	NN	(NP*))	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
ethnic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
group	NN	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
living	VBG	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*	O
Uygur	NNP	*	O
Autonomous	NNPS	*	O
Region	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
fears	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
a	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
spillover	NN	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
campaign	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
perceived	VBN	*	DSE
opportunity	NN	*))))))	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
legitimize	VB	(VP*	O
measures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Muslim	JJ	*	O
Uighur	NNP	*	O
activists	NNS	*)))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorism	JJ	*	O
umbrella	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Some	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
politicians	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
mistake	NN	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Those	DT	(ROOT(SINV(S(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
want	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
secede	VB	(VP(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
engage	VB	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*))))))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
any	DT	(NP*	O
particular	JJ	*	O
ethnic	JJ	*	O
group	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
Ma	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Dazheng	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
director	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	*	O
Uygur	NNP	*	O
Autonomous	NNPS	*	O
Region	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
Development	NNP	*	O
Research	NNP	*	O
Institute	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Chinese	JJ	*	O
Academy	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Social	NNP	(NP*	O
Sciences	NNPS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Whoever	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
engages	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(SBAR*	O
terrorism	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
whether	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*	O
or	CC	*	O
she	PRP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP(PP*	O
Han	NNP	(NP*	O
people	NNS	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
minority	NN	*	O
people	NNS	*))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
should	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
brought	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
justice	NN	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Ma	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
analogous	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
crackdown	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Afghanistan	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Ma	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
often	RB	(ADVP*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
although	IN	(S(SBAR*	ESE
al-Qaida	JJ	(S(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taliban	NNP	*))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Muslims	NNPS	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
troops	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
bombing	VBG	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(NP*)	O
because	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
not	RB	*	O
Muslims	NNPS	(NP*)))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

On	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
March	NNP	(NP*	O
4	CD	*))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
State	NNP	*	O
Depart-ment	NNP	*)	O
released	VBD	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
.	.	*))	O

Apart	RB	(ROOT(S(PP(ADVP*)	O
from	IN	*	O
criticizing	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
evil	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
''	''	*	O
countries	NNS	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
abusing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
listed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
abuses	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
most	RBS	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
interesting	JJ	*)	ESE
about	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
reports	NNS	*))))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
section	NN	*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Since	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
Israel	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
suffers	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
from	IN	(PP*	O
terrorist	JJ	(NP*	O
attacks	NNS	*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
says	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
,	,	(PRN*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
forced	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
take	VB	(VP*	O
counter-terrorism	JJ	(NP*	O
measures	NNS	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	ESE
abuses	NNS	*)	ESE
understandable	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
's	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
post-Sept	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
.	.	*)	O
11	CD	(PP(NP*	O
restrictions	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
on	IN	(PP(PP*	O
entering	VBG	(S(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
leaving	VBG	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
air	NN	(NP*	O
travel	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
measures	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
curbing	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
civil	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
accused	JJ	(NP*	O
persons	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
discussed	VBN	(VP*	O
at	IN	(ADVP*	ESE
all	DT	*)))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
generally	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
quite	RB	(NP(NP*	ESE
frank	JJ	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
wording	NN	*	ESE
strong	JJ	*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
proposes	VBZ	(VP*	O
no	DT	(NP*	O
corrective	JJ	*	O
action	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Consolidating	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*))	O
and	CC	*	O
expanding	VBG	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
war	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
terror	NN	(NP*))))))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
overshadowing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
concerns	NNS	(NP(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
exchange	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
support	NN	(NP(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	ESE
war	NN	*)	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
tacitly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
agreeing	VBG	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
ignore	VB	(VP*	ESE
abuses	NNS	(NP*)	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
members	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terror	JJ	*	O
coalition	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
glaring	JJ	*)	ESE
examples	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
Russia	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
suppression	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
resis-tance	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
rule	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Chechnya	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
suppression	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
independence	NN	(NP(NP*	O
advocates	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Xinjiang	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Falun	NNP	*	O
Gong	NNP	*	O
movement	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
treatment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Palestinians	NNPS	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
activities	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
meanwhile	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
show	VBP	(VP*	ESE
no	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
sign	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
promoting	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
universal	JJ	*	ESE
values	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
peace	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Six	CD	(ROOT(S(S(NP*	DSE
months	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
passed	VBN	(VP*	O
since	IN	(PP*	O
Sept.	NNP	(NP*	O
11	CD	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
focus	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
anger	NN	*)))	DSE
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
turned	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
have	VBP	(S(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
labeled	VBN	(VP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
rogue	JJ	(NP*	ESE
nations	NNS	*)	ESE
''	''	*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
members	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
axis	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
evil	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
US	NNP	*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
become	VBN	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
embodiment	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
two-sided	JJ	(NP*	ESE
justice	NN	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
If	IN	(SBAR*	ESE
you	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
you	PRP	(NP*)	ESE
're	VBP	(VP*	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
us	PRP	(NP*)))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	DSE
human	JJ	*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
report	NN	*)	O
poses	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
substantial	JJ	*	ESE
challenge	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
interpretation	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
evil	JJ	*)))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Put	VB	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
simply	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
what	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
are	VBP	(VP*	ESE
seeing	VBG	(VP*))))))	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
naked	JJ	*	ESE
pursuit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

No	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	ESE
one	NN	*)	ESE
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
has	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
ever	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
studied	VBN	(VP*	ESE
realist	JJ	(NP*	ESE
political	JJ	*	ESE
science	NN	*))))))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	DSE
find	VB	(VP*	ESE
this	DT	(S(NP*)	ESE
surprising	JJ	(ADJP*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	O
earn	VB	(VP*	O
legitimacy	NN	(NP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
appear	VB	(VP*	ESE
just	RB	(ADVP*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Even	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
though	IN	*	ESE
almost	RB	(S(NP(NP*	O
all	DT	*	O
military	JJ	*	O
mobilizations	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
history	NN	(NP*)))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
motivated	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP(PP*	O
notions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
versus	JJ	*	ESE
evil	NN	*))))	ESE
or	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
orthodoxy	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
versus	IN	(PP*	ESE
unorthodoxy	NN	(NP*))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
efforts	NNS	(NP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
present	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
naked	JJ	*	ESE
pursuit	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
battle	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
good	JJ	(NP*	ESE
versus	JJ	*	ESE
evil	NN	*))))))))	ESE
reflect	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
lack	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
understanding	NN	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
tolerance	NN	*))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

Demonizing	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
enemy	NN	*)))	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
peace	NN	(S(NP*)	ESE
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	ESE
gained	VBN	(VP*	ESE
through	IN	(PP*	ESE
war	NN	(NP*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
report	NN	*)	O
expressly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
points	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
out	RP	(PRT*)	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
,	,	*	O
``	``	*	O
It	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
extremely	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
easy	JJ	*	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
find	VB	(VP*	O
supporters	NNS	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP*)))))	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
human	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
respected	VBN	(ADJP*))))	DSE
and	CC	*	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
individual	JJ	(S(NP*	O
freedom	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
repressed	JJ	(ADJP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

To	TO	(ROOT(S(S(VP*	DSE
prove	VB	(VP*	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
human	JJ	(S(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
important	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
ammunition	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
battle	NN	*)	ESE
against	IN	(PP*	ESE
terror	NN	(NP*)))))))))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
attack	VB	(VP*	O
terrorism	NN	(NP*)	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
make	VB	(VP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)	O
matter	NN	(ADVP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
however	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*)	O
US	NNP	(S(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
still	RB	(ADVP*)	DSE
believes	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
supremacy	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
forget	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
breeding	VBG	*	ESE
ground	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
exists	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
anti-terrorist	JJ	*	O
alliance	NN	*))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
planning	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
extend	VB	(VP*	O
military	JJ	(NP*	O
aid	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
several	JJ	(NP*	O
countries	NNS	*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
alliance	NN	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
enable	VB	(VP*	O
them	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
root	VB	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
terrorists	NNS	(NP*)	O
without	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
forces	NNS	*)))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Such	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP*	ESE
wishful	JJ	*	ESE
thinking	NN	*)	ESE
risks	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
making	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
accomplice	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
destruction	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
human	JJ	(NP*	ESE
rights	NNS	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

If	IN	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
,	,	*	O
which	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
claims	VBZ	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
world	NN	*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
policeman	NN	*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
incapable	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
looking	VBG	(S(VP*	O
beyond	IN	(PP(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*))	O
or	CC	*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
practicing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
universal	JJ	*	ESE
values	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
human	JJ	(NP*	O
rights	NNS	*	O
,	,	*	O
democracy	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
peace	NN	*))	O
,	,	*	O
then	RB	(RRC(ADVP*)	O
should	MD	(NP(SQ*	ESE
n't	RB	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	O
international	JJ	*	O
community	NN	*)	O
reconsider	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
role	NN	*)))	O
played	VB	(VP(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
UN	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
or	CC	*	O
learn	VB	(VP*	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
way	NN	*))))))))))))))))))	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
European	JJ	*	O
parliament	NN	*)	O
works	VBZ	(VP*)	O
?	.	*))	O

After	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	ESE
all	DT	(NP*))	ESE
,	,	*	O
compromising	NNP	(NP(NP*)	ESE
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
many	JJ	(NP*	O
different	JJ	*	O
countries	NNS	*)))))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
much	RB	(ADJP(ADJP*	ESE
better	JJR	*)	ESE
than	IN	(PP*	O
succumbing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
interests	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
single	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

It	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
approach	NN	*)	O
better	RBR	(VP*	ESE
suited	VBN	*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
century	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
increasing	VBG	*	O
international	JJ	*	O
diversity	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Chien	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
Hsi-chieh	NNP	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
DPP	NNP	*	O
legislator	NN	(NX(NX*)	O
and	CC	*	O
executive	JJ	(NX*	O
director	NN	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Peacetime	NNP	*	O
Foundation	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
elected	VBN	*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	(PRN*	O
``	``	(S*	O
Hugo	NNP	(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
-LSB-	VBZ	(VP*	O
punctuation	NN	(NP*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
published	VBN	(NP*	O
here	RB	(UCP(ADVP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
throughout	IN	(PP*))	O
-RSB-	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
once	RB	(ADVP*	O
more	RBR	*)	O
taken	VBN	(VP*	ESE
up	RP	(PRT*)	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
reins	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
power	NN	(NP*)))	ESE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
rapid	JJ	*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
changing	VBG	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
indicate	VBP	(VP*	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(S(NP*	O
putschists	NNS	*)	O
did	VBD	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
enjoy	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
base	NN	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
military	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))	O
did	VBD	(VP*	DSE
not	RB	*	DSE
endorse	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*	O
government	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	(NP*	O
Pedro	NNP	(NP*	O
Carmona	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
was	VBD	(S(VP*	O
being	VBG	(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
only	JJ	*	O
country	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
came	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
putschists	NNS	*))))	O
immediately	RB	(ADVP*)	O
after	IN	(SBAR*	O
they	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
posturing	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
respect	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
declared	VBD	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
democracy	NN	(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
been	VBN	(VP*	O
victorious	JJ	(ADJP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
called	VBD	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
action	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
several	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
generals	NNS	*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
were	VBD	(S(VP*	DSE
supported	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	DSE
capitalist	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
bankers	NNS	(NP*)))))))	O
,	,	*)))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
victory	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
democracy	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
circumstances	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
Hugo	NNP	(S(NP*	O
Chavez	NNP	*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
come	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1988	CD	(NP*))))	O
through	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
popular	JJ	*	O
process	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

What	WP	(ROOT(S(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
more	JJR	(ADJP*))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*)	O
promoting	VBG	(VP(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
constitutional	JJ	*	O
reform	NN	*	O
plan	NN	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
carrying	VBG	(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
extensive	JJ	(NP*	ESE
economic	JJ	*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))))	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
led	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
re-election	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
July	NNP	(NP*	O
2000	CD	*))))	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
president	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
further	JJ	*	O
six	CD	*	O
year	NN	*	O
term	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

A	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
number	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
observers	NNS	(NP*)))	O
believe	VBP	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
reasons	NNS	*)	O
behind	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
opposition	NN	*)	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
its	PRP$	(NP(NP*	DSE
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
Venezuela	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
under	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
generals	NNS	*))))	O
who	WP	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
carried	VBD	(S(VP*	O
out	RP	(PRT*)	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
coup	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))))))	O
go	VBP	(VP*	O
back	RB	(ADVP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
domestic	JJ	*	O
and	CC	*	O
foreign	JJ	*	O
plans	NNS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
policies	NNS	*)))	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Following	VBG	(ROOT(S(S(VP(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
series	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
domestic	JJ	(NP*	O
reforms	NNS	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
especially	RB	(PP(ADVP*)	ESE
in	IN	*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
agriculture	NN	*	O
,	,	*	O
energy	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
banking	NN	*	O
sectors	NNS	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
describing	VBG	(VP*	DSE
communism	NN	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
capitalism	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
futile	JJ	(NP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
business	NN	*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
,	,	*	O
bankers	NNS	(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
capitalist	NN	(NP*))	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
distance	VB	(VP*	O
themselves	PRP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
him	PRP	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	ESE
thus	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	ESE
paved	VBD	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
way	NN	*)	ESE
for	IN	(PP*	O
their	PRP$	(NP*	O
opposition	NN	*)))	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
power	NN	*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
new	JJ	*	O
laws	NNS	*)	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
described	VBN	(VP*	DSE
by	IN	(PP*	O
leaders	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
economy	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
deviant	JJ	(NP*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
unfair	JJ	*)))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
leaders	NNS	*)	O
organised	VBN	(VP*	O
and	CC	*	O
stage-managed	VBN	*	ESE
street	NN	(NP(NP*	O
demonstrations	NNS	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
help	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
biggest	JJS	*	ESE
trade	NN	*)	O
and	CC	*	O
commercial	JJ	(NP*	O
unions	NNS	*))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sector	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
army	NN	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Outside	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
borders	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
faced	VBD	(VP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
hostility	NN	*))	DSE
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
something	NN	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
the	DT	(S(NP*	O
American	JJ	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	DSE
acknowledged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	ESE
many	JJ	(NP*	ESE
occasions	NNS	*)))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

They	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
been	VBN	(VP*	DSE
thinking	VBG	(VP*	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
ways	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
ousting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Caracas	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Ever	RB	(ROOT(S(SBAR*	ESE
since	IN	*	ESE
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
came	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
refused	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
accept	VB	(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*	ESE
's	POS	*)	ESE
biding	NN	*))))))	ESE
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
numerous	JJ	(NP*	ESE
occasions	NNS	*))))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
stop	VB	(VP*	ESE
intervening	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
accused	VBD	(VP(VP*	DSE
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
killing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
innocent	JJ	(NP*	ESE
children	NNS	*	ESE
and	CC	*	ESE
people	NNS	*)	ESE
during	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Afghan	JJ	*	O
war	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
met	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
``	``	*	O
Mo'ammar	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Qadhafi	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*	O
and	CC	*	O
``	``	*	O
Saddam	NNP	(NP*	O
Hoseyn	NNP	*))	O
''	''	*))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
presidents	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Libya	NNP	(NP*	O
and	CC	*	O
Iraq	NNP	*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
long-term	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
enemies	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
,	,	*	O
and	CC	*	O
had	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
very	RB	(ADJP*	ESE
close	JJ	*)	ESE
relationship	NN	*)	ESE
with	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Cuban	JJ	*	O
leader	NN	*)	O
``	``	*	O
Fidel	NNP	(NP*	O
Castro	NNP	*)	O
''	''	*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
combination	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
performance	NN	*	O
and	CC	*	O
policies	NNS	*)))	O
brought	VBD	(VP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
wrath	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
American	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
extent	NN	*))))))	ESE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
failed	VBD	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
hide	VB	(VP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	DSE
anger	NN	*)	DSE
during	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Peru	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

During	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP(NP*	O
meetings	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Peruvian	JJ	(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
Bush	NNP	(NP*)	O
spoke	VBD	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
dislike	NN	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Moreover	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	ESE
,	,	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
State	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
``	``	*	O
Powell	NNP	*	O
''	''	*)))	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
recently	RB	(ADVP*)	O
announced	VBN	(VP*	DSE
in	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
annual	JJ	*	O
report	NN	*))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
American	NNP	*	O
Congress	NNP	*))	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
taking	VBG	(S(S(VP*	O
into	IN	(PP*	O
account	NN	(NP(NP*	O
Hugo	NNP	*	O
Chavez	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
closeness	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
countries	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
are	VBP	(S(VP*	O
not	RB	*	O
dependent	JJ	(ADJP*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
not	RB	*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
trustworthy	JJ	*	ESE
pawn	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Latin	NNP	*	O
American	NNP	*	O
region	NN	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Powell	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
had	VBD	(VP*	DSE
stressed	VBN	(VP*	DSE
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
able	JJ	(ADJP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
,	,	(VP(PRN*	O
as	RB	(ADVP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
past	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(S(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*)))))))	ESE
,	,	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
era	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
military	JJ	*	ESE
rule	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
that	DT	(NP*	O
country	NN	*))))))))	O
,	,	*)	O
play	VB	*	O
an	DT	(NP*	O
effective	JJ	*	ESE
role	NN	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Latin	NNP	(NP*	O
America	NNP	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Besides	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
these	DT	(NP(NP*	O
instances	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
American	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
hostility	NN	*)	DSE
towards	IN	(PP*	DSE
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
mention	NN	(NP*)	O
must	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
his	PRP$	(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*))	O

In	IN	(ROOT(S(PP*	O
recent	JJ	(NP*	O
years	NNS	*))	O
,	,	*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*)	O
caused	VBD	(VP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(S(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
policies	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
strengthened	VBN	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
face	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
positions	NNS	*)	O
adopted	VBN	(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP*	O
consumers	NNS	*))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

He	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
managed	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
great	JJ	*	ESE
extent	NN	*))	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
adopt	VB	(VP*	O
policies	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
aligned	VBN	(VP*	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
other	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
producing	VBG	(VP*	O
states	NNS	(NP*)	O
whenever	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
oil	NN	(S(NP*	O
crises	NNS	*)	O
have	VBP	(VP*	O
emerged	VBN	(VP*))))))))	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
led	VBN	(S(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
reduced	VBN	(NP(NP*	O
oil	NN	*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
market	NN	*)))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

That	DT	(ROOT(S(S(NP*)	ESE
is	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	ESE
say	VB	(VP*)))))	ESE
,	,	*	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
adopted	VBD	(VP*	DSE
positions	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
where	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
supply	NN	(S(NP(NP*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
oil	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
would	MD	(VP*	ESE
be	VB	(VP*	O
reduced	VBN	(VP*)))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
oil	NN	(S(NP*	O
prices	NNS	*)	O
supported	VBD	(VP*))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
while	IN	(SBAR*	O
before	IN	(S(PP*	O
Chavez	NNP	(NP*))	O
,	,	*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)	O
used	VBD	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
called	VBN	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
``	``	*	O
errant	JJ	*	ESE
member	NN	*	ESE
''	''	*)	O
within	IN	(PP*	O
OPEC	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
member	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
would	MD	(S(VP*	O
follow	VB	(VP(VP*	O
less	CC	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
concerted	JJ	*	O
decisions	NNS	*)	DSE
of	IN	(PP*	DSE
OPEC	NNP	(NP*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
observe	VB	(VP*	O
less	CC	(PP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
own	JJ	*	O
quotas	NNS	*))))))))))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

This	DT	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
why	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
one	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
can	MD	(VP*	ESE
not	RB	*	ESE
dismiss	VB	(VP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
effects	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
intensification	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
Middle	NNP	(ADJP*	O
East	NNP	*)	O
crisis	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
Iraq	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
initiative	NN	*))))))	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
using	VBG	(S(VP*	O
crude	JJ	(NP(NP(NP*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
as	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	O
political	JJ	*	O
weapon	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*)))	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	DSE
debate	NN	*)	DSE
on	IN	(PP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP(NP*	O
extensive	JJ	*	ESE
oil	NN	*	O
embargo	NN	*)	O
against	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
supporters	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Israel	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
events	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
past	JJ	*	O
few	JJ	*	O
days	NNS	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*))))))))))))))))	O
as	RB	(CONJP*	O
well	RB	*	O
as	IN	*)	O
America	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
putschists	NNS	*))))	O
there	RB	(ADVP*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

America	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
was	VBD	(VP*	DSE
trying	VBG	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
guarantee	VB	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
flow	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
crude	JJ	*	O
oil	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
overthrowing	VBG	(S(VP*	ESE
Chavez	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
seizing	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
power	NN	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
presidential	JJ	*	O
palace	NN	*))))))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
dependent	JJ	*	O
generals	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
people	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
Venezuela	NNP	(NP*)))	O
thwarted	VBD	(VP*	ESE
America	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Finally	RB	(ROOT(S(ADVP*)	O
,	,	*	O
America	NNP	(NP*)	O
prescribes	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
liberal	JJ	(NP*	O
democracy	NN	*)	O
for	IN	(PP*	O
others	NNS	(NP*)))	O
yet	CC	*	ESE
fails	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
itself	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
accord	VB	(VP*	O
any	DT	(NP*	ESE
value	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
democratic	JJ	(NP(NP*	ESE
principles	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	ESE
the	DT	(NP*	ESE
world	NN	*)))))))))	ESE
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP(NP*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
administration	NN	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
support	NN	*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP*	O
Venezuelan	JJ	*	O
putschists	NNS	*)))	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
testament	JJ	(ADJP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
this	DT	(NP*))))	O
.	.	*))	O

BEIJING	NNP	(ROOT(NP(NP*	O
,	,	*	O
April	NNP	*	O
11	CD	*)	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
AFP	NNP	(NP*)	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)	O
-	:	*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Thursday	NNP	(NP*))	O
slammed	VBD	(SBAR(S(VP*	DSE
increasingly	RB	(NP(NP(ADJP*	ESE
close	JJ	*)	ESE
ties	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))	O
,	,	*	O
demanding	VBG	(S(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
end	NN	*)	O
to	TO	(PP(PP*	O
official	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
two	CD	*))))	O
and	CC	*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
weapons	NNS	*	O
sales	NNS	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
continual	JJ	*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
arms	NNS	(NP(NP(NP*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
upgrading	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
relations	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))	O
will	MD	(VP*	ESE
only	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
lead	VB	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
tensions	NNS	(NP(NP*)	ESE
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
straits	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
foreign	JJ	(NP*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
spokeswoman	NN	*	O
Zhang	NNP	*	O
Qiyue	NNP	*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(NP*)	O
demand	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(SBAR(S(NP*	O
US	NNP	*)	O
strictly	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
abide	VB	(VP(VP*	ESE
by	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
it	PRP	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
made	VBN	(VP*	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*)))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
correct	VB	(VP*	O
its	PRP$	(NP*	O
erroneous	JJ	*	ESE
acts	NNS	*	ESE
or	CC	*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
so	RB	(ADVP*	O
as	RB	*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
avoid	VB	(VP*	O
new	JJ	(NP*	ESE
harm	NN	*)	ESE
to	TO	(PP*	O
China-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	DSE

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
further	RB	(ADVP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
alarm	NN	(NP*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
announcement	NN	*))	O
Wednesday	NNP	(NP*)	O
that	IN	(SBAR*	O
defense	NN	(S(NP*	O
department	NN	*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
will	MD	(VP*	O
soon	RB	(ADVP*)	O
visit	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
to	TO	(VP*	O
discuss	VB	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
sale	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
eight	CD	(NP*	O
diesel	JJ	*	O
electric	JJ	*	O
submarines	NNS	*)))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
China	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
always	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
resolutely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
any	DT	(NP(NP(NP*	ESE
form	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)))	O
or	CC	*	O
military	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
intercourse	NN	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*	O
and	CC	*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
Zhang	NNP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
most	RBS	(ADJP*	ESE
important	JJ	*	ESE
and	CC	*	O
sensitive	JJ	*)	ESE
issue	NN	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
core	NN	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
Sino-US	NNP	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
at	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
biweekly	JJ	*	O
ministry	NN	*	O
briefing	NN	*)))	O
.	.	*))	O

Military	JJ	(ROOT(S(S(NP(NP*	O
tensions	NNS	*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
Strait	NNP	*)))	O
were	VBD	(VP*	O
``	``	*	O
not	RB	(PP*	ESE
in	IN	*	ESE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	ESE
self-interests	NNS	*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
she	PRP	(NP*)	O
warned	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

She	PRP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
refused	VBD	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	DSE
confirm	VB	(VP*	DSE
an	DT	(NP*	O
April	NNP	*	O
26	CD	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
May	NNP	(NP*	O
3	CD	*	O
visit	NN	*))	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
Chinese	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Vice	NNP	*	O
President	NNP	*	O
Hu	NNP	*	O
Jintao	NNP	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*	O
as	IN	(SBAR*	O
reported	VBD	(S(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Hong	NNP	*	O
Kong	NNP	*	O
press	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

The	DT	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
visit	NN	*)	O
,	,	*	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
Beijing	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
allows	VBZ	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*))))	O
,	,	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
widely	RB	(ADVP*)	ESE
expected	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
be	VB	(VP*	O
centered	VBN	(VP*	ESE
on	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
dissatisfaction	NN	*)	DSE
over	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	*	O
issue	NN	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP(VP*	DSE
considered	VBN	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
renegade	NN	*	ESE
province	NN	*)	ESE
since	IN	(PP*	O
1949	CD	(NP*))))))	O
and	CC	*	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
threatened	VBN	(VP*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
bring	VB	(VP*	O
it	PRP	(NP*)	O
back	RP	(PRT*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*))	O
if	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
continues	VBZ	(VP*	O
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
indefinitely	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
refuse	VB	*	DSE
proposals	NNS	(NP*)	DSE
for	IN	(PP*	DSE
``	``	*	O
peaceful	JJ	(NP*	ESE
reunification	NN	*))))))))))))))	ESE
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Beijing	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
long	RB	(VP(ADVP*)	DSE
refused	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
establish	VB	(VP*	O
diplomatic	JJ	(NP*	O
relations	NNS	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
any	DT	(NP(NP*	O
nation	NN	*)	O
that	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	O
maintains	VBZ	(S(VP*	O
official	JJ	(NP*	O
contact	NN	*)	O
with	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
although	IN	(SBAR*	O
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
has	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
encouraged	VBN	(VP*	DSE
economic	JJ	(NP(NP*	O
exchanges	NNS	*)	O
between	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
all	DT	(NP*	O
nations	NNS	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
also	RB	(ADVP*)	O
bashed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
remarks	NNS	(SBAR(S(NP*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
month	NN	*)	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
Deputy	NNP	*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Secretary	NNP	*	O
Paul	NNP	*	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	*)	O
at	IN	(PP*	O
a	DT	(NP(NP*	O
meeting	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Florida	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
,	,	*	O
attended	VBN	(S(VP*	O
by	IN	(PP*	O
visiting	VBG	(S(VP*	O
Taiwanese	JJ	(NP*	O
Defense	NNP	*	O
Minister	NNP	*	O
Tang	NNP	*	O
Yao-Ming	NNP	*))))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(SINV*	O
The	DT	(S(NP*	O
United	NNP	*	O
States	NNPS	*)	O
is	VBZ	(VP*	DSE
committed	VBN	(ADJP*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
doing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
whatever	WDT	(SBAR(WHNP*)	ESE
it	PRP	(S(NP*)	ESE
takes	VBZ	(VP*	ESE
to	TO	(S(VP*	O
help	VB	(VP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(S(NP*)	O
defend	VB	(VP*	O
itself	PRP	(NP*)))))))))))))))	O
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
said	VBD	(VP*)	O
Wolfowitz	NNP	(NP*)	O
,	,	*	O
echoing	VBG	(S(VP*	O
President	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
George	NNP	*	O
W.	NNP	*	O
Bush	NNP	*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
made	VBD	(VP*	O
when	WRB	(SBAR(WHADVP*)	O
he	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
first	RB	(ADVP*)	O
took	VBD	(VP*	O
office	NN	(NP*)	O
last	JJ	(NP*	O
year	NN	*)))))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
Our	PRP$	(S(NP*	DSE
position	NN	*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
clear	JJ	(ADJP*)))	ESE
,	,	*	O
''	''	*	O
he	PRP	(NP*)	O
continued	VBD	(VP*)	DSE
.	.	*))	O

``	``	(ROOT(S*	O
We	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
do	VBP	(VP*	DSE
n't	RB	*	DSE
support	VB	(VP*	DSE
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*	O
independence	NN	*))))	O
,	,	*	O
but	CC	*	O
we	PRP	(S(NP*)	O
oppose	VBP	(VP*	DSE
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
use	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
force	NN	(NP*)))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Wolfowitz	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
expressed	VBD	(VP*	DSE
concern	NN	(NP*)	DSE
about	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
continuing	JJ	*	ESE
deployment	NN	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
forces	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
and	CC	*	O
tactical	JJ	(NP*	O
missiles	NNS	*)))))	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
areas	NNS	(NP(NP*)	O
across	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP(NP*	O
straits	NNS	*)	O
from	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

US	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*	O
officials	NNS	*)	O
denied	VBD	(VP*	DSE
Wolfowitz	NNP	(SBAR(S(NP(NP*	O
's	POS	*)	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
reflected	VBD	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
change	NN	*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP*	O
policy	NN	*))	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

Zhang	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	O
said	VBD	(VP*	DSE
:	:	*	O
``	``	*	O
The	DT	(S(NP(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*)	O
of	IN	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
US	NNP	*	O
official	NN	*)))	O
are	VBP	(VP*	O
a	DT	(NP*	O
...	:	(NP*	O
violation	NN	(NP*)	ESE
of	IN	(PP*	O
US	NNP	(NP(NP*	O
commitments	NNS	*)	DSE
made	VBN	(VP*	O
-LRB-	-LRB-	(PRN*	O
on	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP*))	O
-RRB-	-RRB-	*)))))	O
and	CC	*	O
interference	NN	(NP(NP*)	ESE
in	IN	(PP*	O
China	NNP	(NP*	O
internal	JJ	*	O
affairs	NNS	*)))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

China	NNP	(ROOT(S(NP*)	DSE
is	VBZ	(VP*	O
firmly	RB	(ADJP*	DSE
opposed	VBN	*	DSE
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
remarks	NNS	*))))	O
.	.	*	O
''	''	*))	O

Chinese	JJ	(ROOT(S(NP(NP*	O
missile	NN	*	O
tests	NNS	*)	O
over	IN	(PP*	O
Taiwan	NNP	(NP(NP*)	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
1996	CD	(NP*)))))	O
resulted	VBD	(VP*	O
in	IN	(PP*	O
Washington	NNP	(NP*))	O
deploying	VBG	(S(VP*	O
two	CD	(NP(NP*	O
aircraft	NN	*	O
carrier	NN	*	O
battle	NN	*	O
groups	NNS	*)	O
to	TO	(PP*	O
the	DT	(NP*	O
region	NN	*))))))	O
.	.	*))	O

