Supervisor: Jason Pratt <>
Announced end of poll: Friday, September 1, 2006, 5:00pm
Actual time poll closed: Sun Sep 3 14:22:10 2006
Private poll (514 authorized voters)
Actual votes cast: 124
Number of winning choices:
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

This election will fill four seats on the Community for Pittsburgh Ultimate Board. Please read statements from the candidates at: http://www.pittsburgh-ultimate.org/cpu/CandidacyStatements.html.

Result

1. Henry Thorne  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Michael Smith  loses to Henry Thorne by 51–44
3. Rachel Steigerwalt  loses to Henry Thorne by 66–31, loses to Michael Smith by 62–36
4. David Galati  loses to Henry Thorne by 67–34, loses to Rachel Steigerwalt by 52–43
5. Darren Shultz  loses to Henry Thorne by 74–32, loses to David Galati by 57–45
6. Dan Vogel  loses to Henry Thorne by 68–33, loses to Darren Shultz by 54–48

For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.  

Result details

  123456
1. Henry Thorne   -51 66 67 74 68
2. Michael Smith   44 -62 67 64 64
3. Rachel Steigerwalt   31 36 -52 57 56
4. David Galati   34 29 43 -57 48
5. Darren Shultz   32 41 49 45 -54
6. Dan Vogel   33 28 43 45 48 -

Ballot report

 David Galati Darren Shultz Michael Smith Rachel Steigerwalt Henry Thorne Dan Vogel
1. 2 4 No opinion No opinion 1 No opinion
2. No opinion 3 2 6 1 2
3. 4 2 1 3 3 3
4. 2 6 3 1 5 3
5. 1 1 3 1 3 3
6. 6 1 3 5 2 4
7. 5 2 6 3 1 4
8. 2 6 1 2 2 6
9. 2 6 5 1 6 6
10. 3 4 1 4 2 3
11. 5 5 5 1 1 3
12. 4 6 2 3 1 2
13. 5 1 3 4 2 6
14. 2 5 1 3 6 4
15. 6 1 1 1 5 4
16. 4 2 5 6 1 3
17. 1 5 1 1 2 6
18. 1 6 No opinion No opinion 2 5
19. 4 6 1 3 6 1
20. 1 6 3 4 5 2
21. 3 6 2 3 4 1
22. 1 No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion
23. 6 2 4 5 1 3
24. No opinion 3 No opinion 2 1 3
25. 4 6 1 2 5 3
26. 4 1 6 6 1 5
27. 5 5 1 4 3 3
28. 5 2 3 6 1 4
29. 2 6 1 3 5 5
30. 6 2 4 1 5 3
31. 2 4 1 1 1 2
32. 6 3 2 5 1 4
33. 3 1 5 5 4 2
34. 4 6 1 5 3 2
35. 1 6 2 2 2 3
36. 3 5 1 2 1 3
37. 5 6 1 6 2 5
38. 6 2 3 5 1 4
39. 2 6 5 3 1 5
40. 2 3 1 3 No opinion 4
41. 5 3 4 2 1 6
42. 2 5 1 4 3 5
43. 2 4 3 1 2 5
44. No opinion 1 2 3 1 3
45. 1 4 3 2 1 2
46. 5 1 2 6 3 4
47. 3 5 2 4 1 6
48. 2 6 4 5 3 5
49. 6 6 2 1 3 6
50. 6 1 1 1 1 6
51. 1 6 6 1 6 6
52. 4 4 1 6 1 5
53. 1 6 2 2 3 1
54. 6 3 6 2 1 3
55. No opinion 1 3 No opinion 2 No opinion
56. 1 2 1 1 2 1
57. 1 1 1 No opinion No opinion 1
58. 2 1 No opinion 4 3 No opinion
59. 6 1 2 3 2 3
60. 6 6 6 2 1 6
61. 4 2 3 5 1 6
62. 5 2 3 4 1 6
63. 5 4 5 5 5 6
64. 5 2 4 6 1 3
65. No opinion 1 No opinion 3 2 No opinion
66. 6 1 3 6 3 3
67. 5 2 3 4 1 6
68. 1 4 5 3 6 2
69. 6 3 2 4 5 1
70. 2 3 4 5 1 6
71. 6 1 4 3 2 4
72. 2 3 1 6 6 6
73. 4 2 2 4 2 1
74. No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion 1 No opinion
75. 4 5 1 3 6 2
76. 3 4 1 5 6 2
77. 4 1 3 6 5 2
78. 1 6 1 6 1 1
79. 2 3 4 6 1 6
80. 3 5 4 2 1 No opinion
81. 2 2 1 2 2 1
82. 2 2 1 1 1 1
83. 6 1 6 6 6 2
84. 3 6 1 3 4 2
85. 5 1 4 3 6 2
86. 2 3 1 6 6 6
87. 4 1 4 3 1 4
88. 1 4 6 3 3 2
89. 4 5 2 6 3 1
90. 6 6 1 2 1 6
91. No opinion 2 No opinion 1 No opinion No opinion
92. 5 6 3 1 4 2
93. 4 3 1 6 2 4
94. 1 2 3 5 6 4
95. 6 3 1 4 5 2
96. 6 3 2 4 1 5
97. 4 3 1 2 3 6
98. 2 3 2 2 1 3
99. 3 5 1 1 1 3
100. 2 4 2 1 2 1
101. 4 1 6 3 2 5
102. 1 6 3 2 2 5
103. 6 4 2 3 1 5
104. 3 2 4 6 1 5
105. 3 4 5 2 1 6
106. 3 1 2 3 3 6
107. No opinion 6 5 3 1 3
108. 1 4 4 3 2 4
109. 3 4 4 2 1 3
110. 4 5 3 2 1 6
111. 6 5 2 1 4 2
112. No opinion 2 4 3 1 No opinion
113. 1 6 4 2 3 5
114. 6 3 4 2 1 6
115. 1 3 1 3 3 4
116. 3 3 2 4 1 5
117. 5 1 6 4 3 2
118. 6 2 1 2 5 4
119. No opinion No opinion No opinion No opinion 1 No opinion
120. 4 6 3 2 1 5
121. 6 4 5 3 1 2
122. 3 4 1 5 2 1
123. 1 6 No opinion No opinion 1 2
124. 2 4 1 6 5 3

Ballots are shown in a randomly generated order.

[Download ballots in CSV format]

The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.

  1.2.3.4.5.6.
1. Henry Thorne   -51–44 66–31 67–34 74–32 68–33
2. Michael Smith   . -62–36 67–29 64–41 64–28
3. Rachel Steigerwalt   . . -52–43 57–49 56–43
4. David Galati   . . . -57–45 54–48
5. Darren Shultz   . . . . -54–48
6. Dan Vogel   . . . . . -