Supervisor: Daniel Holbach <>
Announced end of poll: 2011-09-30 13:00 UTC
Actual time poll closed:
Private poll (179 authorized voters)
Actual votes cast: 101
Number of winning choices:
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

Six seats on the Ubuntu Technical Board are available (current board) and the following candidates are standing for election:

Result

1. Colin Watson  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Martin Pitt  loses to Colin Watson by 57–26
3. Tied:
Kees Cook  loses to Colin Watson by 73–15, loses to Martin Pitt by 57–24
Matt Zimmerman  loses to Colin Watson by 67–20, loses to Martin Pitt by 63–27
5. Soren Hansen  loses to Colin Watson by 88–6, loses to Kees Cook by 76–17
6. Stéphane Graber  loses to Colin Watson by 91–9, loses to Soren Hansen by 53–36
7. Dustin Kirkland  loses to Colin Watson by 86–10, loses to Stéphane Graber by 46–43
8. Marc Deslauriers  loses to Colin Watson by 94–4, loses to Dustin Kirkland by 45–40
9. Mario Limonciello  loses to Colin Watson by 91–6, loses to Marc Deslauriers by 48–33
10. Rick Spencer  loses to Colin Watson by 86–11, loses to Marc Deslauriers by 46–39
11. Clint Byrum  loses to Colin Watson by 96–4, loses to Rick Spencer by 43–40
12. Robert Ancell  loses to Colin Watson by 93–5, loses to Clint Byrum by 39–36
13. David Rusling  loses to Colin Watson by 95–3, loses to Robert Ancell by 51–21

For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.  

Result details

  12345678910111213
1. Colin Watson   -57 73 67 88 91 86 94 91 86 96 93 95
2. Martin Pitt   26 -57 63 86 87 85 87 88 82 91 93 94
3. Kees Cook   15 24 -43 76 79 69 80 81 78 89 83 91
4. Matt Zimmerman   20 27 43 -69 78 73 77 80 76 82 81 90
5. Soren Hansen   6 9 17 16 -53 52 48 54 57 57 61 69
6. Stéphane Graber   9 9 17 17 36 -46 46 47 52 58 59 73
7. Dustin Kirkland   10 8 22 20 38 43 -45 44 44 54 51 67
8. Marc Deslauriers   4 9 15 16 33 35 40 -48 46 53 56 66
9. Mario Limonciello   6 7 10 11 26 32 45 33 -41 50 44 60
10. Rick Spencer   11 10 17 18 33 38 41 39 44 -43 47 62
11. Clint Byrum   4 6 6 14 22 24 28 24 29 40 -39 47
12. Robert Ancell   5 4 9 14 26 27 36 25 30 34 36 -51
13. David Rusling   3 1 4 4 14 9 17 13 15 18 17 21 -

Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.

The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.

  1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.
1. Colin Watson   -57–26 73–15 67–20 88–6 91–9 86–10 94–4 91–6 86–11 96–4 93–5 95–3
2. Martin Pitt   . -57–24 63–27 86–9 87–9 85–8 87–9 88–7 82–10 91–6 93–4 94–1
3. Kees Cook   . . -. 76–17 79–17 69–22 80–15 81–10 78–17 89–6 83–9 91–4
4. Matt Zimmerman   . . . -69–16 78–17 73–20 77–16 80–11 76–18 82–14 81–14 90–4
5. Soren Hansen   . . . . -53–36 52–38 48–33 54–26 57–33 57–22 61–26 69–14
6. Stéphane Graber   . . . . . -46–43 46–35 47–32 52–38 58–24 59–27 73–9
7. Dustin Kirkland   . . . . . . -45–40 45–40 45–40 54–28 51–36 67–17
8. Marc Deslauriers   . . . . . . 45–44 -48–33 46–39 53–24 56–25 66–13
9. Mario Limonciello   . . . . . . 45–44 45–44 -45–44 50–29 45–44 60–15
10. Rick Spencer   . . . . . . 44–41 44–41 44–41 -44–41 47–34 62–18
11. Clint Byrum   . . . . . . . . . . -39–36 47–17
12. Robert Ancell   . . . . . . . . . . . -51–21
13. David Rusling   . . . . . . . . . . . . -