Supervisor: Daniel Holbach <>
Announced end of poll: 2011-10-14 12:00 UTC
Actual time poll closed:
Private poll (694 authorized voters)
Actual votes cast: 252
Number of winning choices:
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

Seven seats on the Ubuntu Community Council are available (current board) and the following candidates are standing for election:

Result

1. Daniel Holbach  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Elizabeth Krumbach  loses to Daniel Holbach by 149–76
3. Laura Czajkowski  loses to Daniel Holbach by 158–75, loses to Elizabeth Krumbach by 108–98
4. Amber Graner  loses to Daniel Holbach by 160–66, loses to Laura Czajkowski by 113–93
5. Emmet Hikory  loses to Daniel Holbach by 173–50, loses to Amber Graner by 116–102
6. Scott Ritchie  loses to Daniel Holbach by 182–49, loses to Emmet Hikory by 111–90
7. Martin Albisetti  loses to Daniel Holbach by 180–49, loses to Scott Ritchie by 102–97
8. Milo Casagrande  loses to Daniel Holbach by 177–55, loses to Martin Albisetti by 107–92
9. Charles Profitt  loses to Daniel Holbach by 197–32, loses to Milo Casagrande by 114–77
10. Joe Barker  loses to Daniel Holbach by 199–36, loses to Charles Profitt by 96–64
11. Philip Ballew  loses to Daniel Holbach by 217–16, loses to Joe Barker by 91–50

For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.  

Result details

  1234567891011
1. Daniel Holbach   -149 158 160 173 182 180 177 197 199 217
2. Elizabeth Krumbach   76 -108 110 135 143 149 138 157 173 179
3. Laura Czajkowski   75 98 -113 125 133 129 125 137 156 170
4. Amber Graner   66 99 93 -116 134 129 130 145 160 168
5. Emmet Hikory   50 85 94 102 -111 124 120 138 144 149
6. Scott Ritchie   49 74 85 76 90 -102 117 110 135 147
7. Martin Albisetti   49 67 81 82 86 97 -107 107 131 136
8. Milo Casagrande   55 66 84 87 88 91 92 -114 121 133
9. Charles Profitt   32 43 62 58 61 77 85 77 -96 110
10. Joe Barker   36 27 47 43 55 52 59 59 64 -91
11. Philip Ballew   16 19 33 35 45 33 42 37 42 50 -

Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.

The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.

  1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.
1. Daniel Holbach   -149–76 158–75 160–66 173–50 182–49 180–49 177–55 197–32 199–36 217–16
2. Elizabeth Krumbach   . -108–98 110–99 135–85 143–74 149–67 138–66 157–43 173–27 179–19
3. Laura Czajkowski   . . -113–93 125–94 133–85 129–81 125–84 137–62 156–47 170–33
4. Amber Graner   . . . -116–102 134–76 129–82 130–87 145–58 160–43 168–35
5. Emmet Hikory   . . . . -111–90 124–86 120–88 138–61 144–55 149–45
6. Scott Ritchie   . . . . . -102–97 117–91 114–77 135–52 147–33
7. Martin Albisetti   . . . . . . -107–92 107–85 131–59 136–42
8. Milo Casagrande   . . . . . . . -114–77 121–59 133–37
9. Charles Profitt   . . . . . . . . -96–64 110–42
10. Joe Barker   . . . . . . . . . -91–50
11. Philip Ballew   . . . . . . . . . . -