Next: Performance in a Multihop
Up: Macrobenchmarks: Multihop Case and
Previous: Macrobenchmarks: Multihop Case and
IEEE 802.11 is known to encounter significant performance problems in
a multihop network [34]. For example, if all
nodes are on the same channel, the RTS/CTS mechanism allows at most one
hop in an
chain to be active at any given time. SSCH
reduces the throughput drop due to this behavior by allowing nodes to communicate on
different channels. To examine this, we evaluate both SSCH and IEEE
802.11a in a multihop chain network.
Figure 15:
Multihop Chain Network: Variation in throughput as chain length increases.
|
|
We vary the number of nodes, which are all in communication range,
from 2 to 18. We initiate a single flow that encounters every node in
the network. Although more than 4 nodes transmitting within
interference range of each other would be unlikely to arise from
multihop routing of a single flow, it could easily arise in a more general
distributed application.
Figure 15 shows the maximum
throughput as the number of nodes in the chain is varied. We see that
there is not much difference between SSCH and IEEE 802.11a for flows
with few hops. As the number of hops increases, SSCH performs much
better than IEEE 802.11a since it distributes the communication on
each hop across all the available channels.
Next: Performance in a Multihop
Up: Macrobenchmarks: Multihop Case and
Previous: Macrobenchmarks: Multihop Case and
Ranveer
2004-11-16