Planning and Giving a talk

Ph.D. Professional Seminar. 2 April 1997.

Ken Birman


The focus of this talk is how to prepare a professional seminar or presentation. This is very different from preparing a lecture. Even though most students have experience watching and evaluating talks, this does not make evident all of the details involved in preparing and giving a professional talk. Possibly the most important issue in giving a talk are your timing and the flow of the talk. It is also key to think about how detailed the talk should get, how to structure the material and how to talk to an audience in an effective way. However, more than all this, good timing is vital.
There are different types of talks, ranging from a course lecture to a short presentation at a conference or workshop of specialists in your field to a short talk to a broader audience to a long talk to a general audience, as for a job interview. Each of these types of talks have different audiences. In professional talks (as compared to class lectures) the audience has higher expectations of the speaker. The speaker must aim at involving the experts in the audience, not just the middle of the group.
Key messages to get from this talk:
Some important things that you should do:
Here are some sample timelines for different types of talks: The warmup will set the context and tell the audience why they should care about the problem. It is all right to spend a lot of time stating the problem. If the problem is not well stated the rest of the talk will appear unmotivated. If the problem is presented well, the audience will be led easily into the direction you are going. Prior work should be mentioned, but it should be saved to the end. At the beginning of the talk it is only taking time away from you. The exception to this rule is an A exam, where you should put the prior work first.
Sizing up the audience

Try to find out in advance who your audience will be. If this is not possible, assume a general audience. However, you should also assume that your audience is full of very smart people who lack background on your topic. The audience is doing you the favor of listening to you. Your job is to convince them that the topic is interesting and important and that they should read the paper. The role of the talk is not to educate but to advertise.


When you give a talk, you should be introduced. It is the job of the person who invites you to introduce you. To help, provide them with a little information on yourself. If you are not introduced, start with a one-sentence self-introduction; be brief.
If your talk, or one of your results is based on joint work, be sure that you say so. However, do not spend a long time on a list of names. Just mention that the work was joint "with the people listed" on your overhead. Do not minimize your role in the work though, especially in an interviewing talk. Indicate which work is yours. At the end of the talk, give a quick summary running through a list of the nature of your contributions. Avoid lists of names or lists of results.
Things not to do/mistakes not to make:
Getting too detailed

Most speakers wish they could present their hardest technical results. But most audiences aren't looking for that. Only a few people in your audience will appreciate what you actually did. Instead, focus on defining the problem and why it is interesting and the overall tone of your work. Don't rush to reach the "good stuff"; if you go too fast at the beginning the audience won't understand why the problem matters. This means that you will have at most 10 minutes for the real meat of the talk. When you get there, make it clear that it is interesting and why. It is okay to lose them here, but make sure you pick them up again in your recap.

While you are being careful to give the big picture, make sure that you don't omit the core of your work. The audience expects the talk to have a core insight and they want to learn from you. Build up to your core, then hit them with your basic results, place the results with respect to prior work and end with a recap which places what you did in context again, including pointers for future work and a visionary closing sentence.


Alternatives to outlines

You don't need to have an outline for your talk. It may not even be desirable. Of course, even if you omit showing your audience an outline, you should have one in your head and you should express the spirit of it to your audience. Let them know what to expect. More importantly, let them know why the talk is interesting and what your innovation concerns. This includes explicitly stating what you are going to show them and why this is interesting, emphasizing who would benefit from this work, positioning your work in the area and explaining the importance of the result. Then, when you reach your result, remind them of what you promised to show them. Remind them again that you have met this promise at the summary. For you as a speaker, have a sense relative to your mental outline of what your goals are and how long they take you to meet. This will help if you have to adjust your timing.


Tips on engaging your audience If your audience looks bored, perhaps you are getting too detailed; make sure that you motivate the talk in general terms. You might be going too fast and losing them; in this case slow down and be more clear, or skip detail. If you are simply failing to "engage" the audience, look at them and talk to them.

If your audience is making you uncomfortable, instead of looking at individuals, look at gaps between them or at the rear walls. Make sure you continue looking out towards the audience; don't look at the slides or the blackboard. Concentrate on speaking in one minute "chunks" and then look at the audience during the pauses and focus on what you are saying in between. Slow down even if you need to skip details. Hit the important points and remind them why this matters and how it relates to the big picture.


Dealing with timing problems

Think ahead of time about what matters most in the talk and what points you really want to communicate. Keep these in mind at all times.

It isn't necessary to hit every point on every slide. In fact, many good speakers look at the slide they are showing but then "ignore it" and focus on the audience. It is normal to skip a point on a slide or even an entire slide. The audience doesn't want to be read to. If you start to fall behind, just skip ahead, making sure that you hit your main important points. During your wrap-up you can have a few words on what you didn't have time to cover.

Don't put too much on a slide. Trust powerpoint font sizes and margins. Then use as a rule of thumb that slow speakers need to count on 2 minutes per slide and faster speakers can perhaps get as little as 1.5 minutes per slide.

Your talk might start late. In fact, most seminar start about five minutes late. Introductions cut out of your time as well. Plan on this. Sometimes circumstances cause a long delay in the start of your talk. In this case, ask if you should try and end on time or if not when you should stop. When you are forced to trim back, think hard and be sure to hit your key points anyhow. It is a good idea to have an idea ahead of time about how you can cut your talk if it becomes necessary.

Timing must be balanced with getting your information across effectively. For the audience to understand your hard technical core, go slowly through the hard material. If you have formulas, ask for two projectors. This way you can leave key slides, such as your model definition, up on one and talk next to the other. Whenever you show a formula, you must give your audience time to read and understand it. Point out the key things, though not every detail. Speak slowly and to the point.


Using pictures is good. Figures are intrinsically interesting; they will help keep your audience involved. However, it is not always possible to use them, such as in this talk. Where you can use a figure, graph or clip art to convey an idea, you may save a lot of text. However, you must take the time to explain the figure, and figures take more time than textual slides. Spurious figures are not a good idea, though. Similarly, use of "special effects" should be limited.
Presenting theoretical results

You can't show the audience everything that you did. Instead, show them a key theorem or two, instead of all eight or ten of them. Explain how your proof works for these sample theorems. Then state the other theorems but don't give the proofs. This works especially well if you can pick a theorem to present that gives the flavor of the proofs of the other ones as well. Remember that even brilliant people can be lost in details. Pick the point that you want to make and focus on it.


Practice makes perfect If you don't practice a talk in front of people, your timing will often be wrong. Pick people to practice in front of that you can trust to give you serious feedback. If possible, practice in front of a general audience; this will be more typical of your actual audience than practicing in front of your research group. The criticisms of a talk need to focus on the overall organization first and then on the details. Most of your criticisms will probably be in terms of details, though, so try to listen to the "spirit" of the advice and find the larger scale problems that they are pointing to.
Using a blackboard

Think ahead about what the board should look like and where the information will end up with respect to each other. As always, you must design the material to assist the audience. Think about how it will look to them. When writing, you can read your writing but don't speak on the subject until you are done. You can also write and then turn to the audience and read them what you wrote.


Handling questions

Questions during your talk can throw your timing off. Answer questions briefly. If you do not understand the question, rather than asking for a clarification, guess at what the question should have been and restate it in your own words. Only use a sentence or two to answer. If the question is on a topic that you will cover soon, say that you have a slide on the question in a moment and when you reach that slide point it out.

Sometimes questioners will get more aggressive. They may not agree with you and will start to give a seminar on their reasons. In this case, gently thank him or her and say that you really need to move on now. You should answer a question once, and briefly, but avoid getting drawn into a debate. However, be sure not to seem to be evading the questioner if he or she as a real point. If the question gets to the heart of your talk, it may be best to spend a little more time dealing with the question.

At the end of your talk, if you have done a good job, you should expect 2 or 3 questions. Answer them politely and briefly. If the questioner is aggressive, complement the question but then explain your perspective briefly. Do not get defensive; always be polite. If you do not get any questions, smile and thank them for inviting you. On the other hand, if you do receive questions, make sure to watch the time. If the question period starts to stretch beyond 5 minutes or so either stop the questioning period but offer to take more questions up front or let the rest of the audience know that they are welcome to leave while you continue to take questions from those who are still interested.


Back to Ph.D. Professional Seminar Homepage.
Notes by hollandm@cs.cornell.edu