mr. chairman , i move to strike the last word .  mr. chairman , i rise to engage the chairman of the interior subcommittee in a colloquy dealing with some language in the committee report requiring the epa to fund a national academy of science study .  mr. chairman , we have already heard that there is language requiring such a study to determine the effectiveness and cost of a large dredging operation of hazardous waste sites , many of which are contaminated with pcbs .  i would point out that our colleague , the gentleman from new york ( mr. hinchey )  , who engaged in a colloquy a little earlier , stated that there was strong support for this project .  well , this is a project that has been debated for 20 years .  in some ways that is an overstatement of that support .  i represent the affected area , and in fact it has been an extremely difficult process for my constituents .  however , we all agree that further delay of the project is in no one 's best interest .  as you have already clarified , the report language , mr. chairman , in no way is intended to delay , stop or otherwise disrupt the cleanup planned for the hudson river slated to begin in the summer of 12006 .  further , the epa has reviewed the language and found no provision that would require them to disrupt the hudson river project in any way .  is that your understanding , mr. chairman ?  