To the instructor+TAs: - Fill the table below with scores. (Send this separately to Prof. Saxena + TAs with paper title in the email.) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Scores are from 1-10 (1 being worst, 6 average, and 10 "perfect"): ------------------------------------------------------------------ A. Clarity: B. Quality: C. Amount of work: D. Originality: E. Experiments: F. Other criterion: Overall score (out of 10): ------------------------------------------------------------------- To the authors: - For each of the six categories (A-F), please explain in a few lines how well does the paper do and why. - Give detailed comments to the authors. A. Clarity Is the paper clearly written? Is it well-organized? (If not, feel free to make suggestions to improve the manuscript.) Does it adequately inform the reader? Is the problem statement and approach clear? B. Quality Is the paper technically sound? Does the formulation of the problem makes sense. C. Amount of Work Do some parts of the project required a lot of work to be done? (E.g., data collection, robotic experiments, or others) D. Originality Are the problems or approaches new? Is this a novel combination of familiar techniques? Is the application new? Is it clear how this work differs from previous work? Is related work adequately referenced/compared with recent papers? Does the paper address a difficult problem in a better way than previous research? E. Experiments Is the amount/type of data standard for the community? If it is a new dataset, does this adequately reflects the problem? Are there some basic baselines that the authors compared against? How does it compare to previous works in the area? Does it advance the state of the art in a demonstrable way? Does it provide unique data, unique conclusions on existing data, or a unique theoretical or pragmatic approach? F. Any other criterion. Each work is unique. Please mention any other category that is noticeable in this paper. Notes to the author: -------------------- Use this space to give detailed comments to the authors, etc.