# Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998)

### reviewed by
Scott Renshaw

FEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS (Universal) Starring: Johnny Depp, Benicio Del Toro. Screenplay: Terry Gilliam & Tony Grisoni and Tod Davies & Alex Cox. Producers: Laila Nabulsi, Patrick Cassavetti and Stephen Nemeth. Director: Terry Gilliam. MPAA Rating: R (profanity, brief gore, drug use, adult themes) Running Time: 115 minutes. Reviewed by Scott Renshaw.

Terry Gilliam's FEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS is about as faithful an adaptation of Hunter S. Thompson's 1971 "gonzo journalism" classic as I can imagine...though that's not necessarily a good thing. The book has long been called "unfilmable," which probably referred more to whether it _should_ be made than whether it _could_ be made. As it happens, FEAR AND LOATHING on film is nearly an event-for-event re-creation of the adventures of journalist Raoul Duke (Johnny Depp) and his attorney Dr. Gonzo (Benicio Del Toro), kindred spirits who ingest every possible controlled substance during a wild spree through Vegas, ostensibly while covering an off-road race and/or a law enforcement narcotics conference. It's wild, perverse, incoherent, sometimes very funny, and too visually literal an adaptation of a book best left to a twisted imagination.

In terms of tone, at least, it's a nearly flawless companion piece to Thompson's book. The writer's descriptions of tripping on everything from acid to mescaline to ether never assaulted the reader with horror stories of harrowing experiences. They were essentially journalistic, clinical analyses where even the most unpleasant situations were softened with a dollop of deadpan, left-field humor. Gilliam similarly finds the demented gag in every situation, including a hallucinogenic orgy of lounge lizards (rendered as actual reptiles by makeup whiz Rob Bottin), while still acknowledging the squalor. With Depp doing a hilariously spot-on performance of Thompson-as-Duke and Del Toro sporting plenty of extra flab as the unhinged Dr. Gonzo, FEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS feels exactly like it should feel: a cockeyed white-water rafting tour down a polluted stream of consciousness.

It's also true that an episodic film like FEAR AND LOATHING is only as successful as its individual episodes. Some of the most memorable ones are grand pieces of absurdist theater: Duke trying to skip out on a hotel bill as a desk clerk detains him; Duke and Gonzo doing coke at the narcotics conference while surrounded by cops; a flashback to Duke's first acid trip in a nightclub restroom. There are also several scenes which turn absolute fidelity to the source material into grinding sluggishness. At nearly two hours, FEAR AND LOATHING could have used some judicious trimming; once we understand the situation and the characters, encounters like Gonzo's showdown with a diner waitress (Ellen Barkin) feel like excess weight. A head-trip film like this one is better suited for 90 minutes of damn-the-torpedoes pacing than for this kind of reverence.

Gilliam also manages to extract Thompson's one and only "message" regarding the drug culture of the 60s and early 70s. The film's temporal setting -- "this foul Year of Our Lord nineteen hundred and seventy-one" -- is defined as a turning point in the use and perception of drugs, with the innocent notion of chemicals as reality-expanding tools giving way to chemicals as reality-numbing tools. Even here Gilliam's fidelity to the source undermines him, as images of Vietnam and Nixon point a too-obvious accusatory finger, with Thompson's own unapologetic voice subverted by suggestions that he's just a victim of the times. The audience for a film as down and dirty as this one is limited anyway, but the now-anachronistic incorrectness man not even appeal to the like-minded.

FEAR AND LOATHING IN LAS VEGAS does do a solid job of capturing the era's madness in a city which is a madhouse distillation of the American dream; it's a scattershot rendering of a scattershot story told with scattershot effectiveness. It's also consistently intriguing, if for no other reason than Gilliam's willingness to go every ugly place Thompson's book went. The only thing really wrong with Gilliam's FEAR AND LOATHING is that it's a movie, bringing into vivid color that which should only have lived on the page. Gonzo film-making doesn't end up with quite the same rebellious spark.

         On the Renshaw scale of 0 to 10 Strip trips:  6.

                          Visit Scott Renshaw's MoviePage
                        http://www.inconnect.com/~renshaw/
                                       ***
                 Subscribe to receive new reviews directly by email!
     See the MoviePage for details, or reply to this message with subject line
                                   "Subscribe".

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews