# Armageddon (1998)

### reviewed by
Ted Prigge

    ARMAGEDDON (1998)
    A Film Review by Ted Prigge
    Copyright 1998 Ted Prigge

Director: Michael Bay Writers: Jonathan Hensleigh, Robert Roy Pool, Tony Gilroy, Shane Salerno, J.J. Abrams (story by Jonathan Hensleigh and Robert Roy Pool, and uncredited extra writing by Paul Attansio, Ann Biderman, Scott Rosenberg, and Robert Towne) Starring: Bruce Willis, Billy Bob Thornton, Liv Tyler, Ben Affleck, Will Patton, Steve Buscemi, William Fichtner, Peter Stormare, Owen Wilson, Keith David, Jessica Steen, Grace Zabriskie, Udo Kier, Laurence Tierney, Anthony Guidera, Charlton Heston

"Armageddon" is probably the cinematic equivalent of the 1976 Who concert where the band played at record-breaking and ear-shattering decibels, leaving behind a record that most rock bands were and still are afraid to break. "Armageddon" is close up there, with so many loud explosions that drummer Keith Moon would be impressed if he were still around today, and in a way is pretty much as over-the-top as that concert probably was. "Armageddon" is as flashy and glossy as any film comes, and it does pretty much anything it can to make us like it, including giving us characters we just plain like because they're being portrayed by good actors, bringing us a love story, and providing us with so much action that after awhile all of this becomes pretty numbing. Kinda like the Who concert probably was. I'm sure everyone heard the first hour or so, but after that only heard distortion and a couple explosions from Keith Moon's drum set. Same with this movie.

"Armageddon" is the second comet/asteroid-colliding-with-earth film we've had in a two month period, following the "On the Beach"-wannabe "Deep Impact." While that one featured people trying to cope with the possibility of the end of the world, this one is a little more aggressive. Both feature a group of miners and astronauts attempting to blow the comet/asteroid up, but this one dwells prominently on them, and instead of just one long sequence of them working and failing like in "Deep Impact," this one features one really, really, really long action sequence where everything goes wrong that could go wrong and these guys keep going like an Energizer bunny on uppers.

It's an event movie, which means it's pretty much a formula film where what worked in the past crops up again. This one is a disaster film but without much of the drama of the people actually living on earth waiting for potential extinction, and more on the "drama" of the people working to destroy it. Of course, you've all seen the previews: an asteroid is heading towards earth, and it's up to Bruce Willis to destroy it. Willis, the token gruff action boy of late, plays a cynical miner chosen to destroy the asteroid by the head of NASA, Dan Truman (Billy Bob Thornton, cashing in on "Sling Blade," I see), along with a couple of his own men and some other astronauts. While "Deep Impact" took place over about a year or so, this film puts itself in a corner immeadiately: we have about 16 days (!!!).

The first hour of the film is easily the best. We're introduced to the situation, given some ways of fixing it, and then introduced to the characters who will be going up and staying down. The film establishes Willis's daugher, Grace (Liv Tyler - is Bruce REALLY that old?), as the martyr as her father AND her fiance, the buff A.J. Frost (Ben Affleck...oh, I mean, OSCAR WINNER Ben Affleck, sorry), are both going up to space to do battle with the large rock, setting up the film for some real heart on Tyler's part, and giving the film a chance to cash in on the fact that Liv's father is none other than Stephen Tyler of Aerosmith (yuck). The second half of the film is a rollar coaster ride of problem after problem after problem etc etc etc, all making sure that after the film has completed, you're totally drained. And you are, trust me.

It's obvious by the way it was advertised as well as by simply looking at it that this film is not at all concerned with being intelligent, thoughtful, or even, in all reality, entertaining. It's meant to make money, and has been designed so much like that that an entire article in this month's Premiere magazine shows the many steps it took to make this as formulaic and therefore profitable as possible. And yes, it's better than other formula event pictures (need I mention the crapfest that was "Godzilla?"), but it still has several problems, so many that if I were to mention all of them I'd just be being picky. But some are just too unmentionable, such as the lackluster second half in comparison with an entertaining first half, too many cheap "human" moments, and worst of all, what has to be a quarter-assed love story that is so underdeveloped that it's distracting every time it crops up. Does A.J. even realize Grace exists for half of the movie? Why else would he talk about how he's coming back and then later on risk his life for sheer cockiness? I understand that they felt they needed a romance angle in this film, what after "Titanic." But they really needed to put a little more umph into it, or at least just a bit of umph.

So why am I recommending this film? Why did I enjoy a film that has numerous plot holes, too many explosions, and the IQ of a house plant? Because most of these bad qualities are used luckily to make for a really entertaining experience. I enjoyed the whole gung ho-ness of it all, the way that it took the time to set up its characters in a similar way to that testosterone-classic, "The Dirty Dozen"...then sends them on their way to a suicide mission. They're not deep characters, in fact they're pretty much characateurs not characters, but the film actually makes us care about them anyway, not the least by casting a bunch of good actors who've made it in the indie/art house film world, not only Thornton, Affleck, and Tyler (and, in some respects, Willis), but also Owen Wilson (who was brilliant in "Bottle Rocket"), Peter Stormare ("Fargo"), and Steve Buscemi (pick a film), all who are allowed to overact to sheer delight.

Willis, in fact, hasn't been this good in awhile. His past few performances, even in "The Fifth Element," have seemed to be on autopilot, more or less, but here he brings us a sorta older version of his beloved John McClane character. Willis is a good comic actor when he wants to be, and here he's back as his old self, making wise-cracks and generally winning over the audience just like he used to. Of course, he's upstaged by Buscemi (can we just give this guy an Oscar already...or at the very least a Lifetime Achievement Award?), who plays the resident comic relief and still stays fresh even when the second half of the film finds him diagnosed with "space dimentia" (okay...).

"Armageddon" was directed by Michael Bay, who directed "Bad Boys" and the wonderfully entertaining "The Rock," a film that, like this, doesn't take itself totally seriously (sometimes this does, but then it pulls itself right out of the ditch it creates), and features the infamous use of hyper-hyper-editing. No one shot lasts more than 5 seconds, creating a glossy-as-hell film that could easily be denounced as "crap on a stick," but for some reason works. Maybe it's because the characters are likable enough that when they're sent out to be martyrs we worry about whether or not they're coming back at all, and for some reason not as worried about the people on earth (save for Thornton and Tyler...and maybe that stripper that Buscemi meets...). And also because Bay's MTV-style direction creates an experience that is numbing yet still enjoyable and even a little admirable. Look at his crash-on-the-asteroid scene: have you seen this much confusion and general fright-of-the-unknown since "Aliens?" "Armageddon" prides itself in being glossy but has no real delusions about what it is and what it isn't, and while this isn't totally commendable, it's still mildly distracting for 2 1/2 hours, and admittingly very entertaining, which is something which is pretty good for us every now and then.

    MY RATING (out of 4): ***

Homepage at: http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Hills/8335/

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews