# Alien: Resurrection (1997)

### reviewed by
redman@bvoice.com

    Ripley is alienated and so are we

    Alien; Resurrection
    A Film Review By Michael Redman
    Copyright 1997 By Michael Redman

    **1/2 (out of ****)

"You're not Ellen Ripley. She died 200 years ago" accuses space pirate Call to the newly cloned Ripley-8 in the fourth film of the Alien trilogy. That's the primary defect with this movie: she's not the heroine of the first films, but..."something else". A couple of centuries after the alien-fighter made her long beautiful dive into molten metal to rid the universe of the dripping slimy killing machines, scientists for a top secret military operation have succeeded in recreating her from a blood sample found on the prison planet in "Aliens 3". Not only that, but they've extracted the queen from her chest.

Working, as always, for the good of mankind, they allow the queen to hatch 12 new beasts. It's not ruining anything to reveal that the aliens escape their prisons and destroy almost the entire crew: that's a given in any Alien movie.

The "heroes" this time around are a rag-tag group of rough space pirates who deliver humans to the science ship to serve as hosts for the infant monstrosities. The space-age highwaymen are a likable bunch for folks who sell living people to be used as incubators. We grow to like them before most get snuffed.

Especially appealing in a humorously Rambo way is Johner (Ron Perlman). The hyper-tough guy and Weaver bounce off each other admirably: "So. I hear you, like, ran into these things before. "Yeah." "What did you do?" "I died." Crippled Vriess (Dominique Pinon) is the realest member of the cast.

"Little girl playing pirate" Annalee Call (Winona Ryder) seems a bit too nice to be mixed up with the rest. She and Ripley form a relationship reminiscent of her attachment to the little girl in "Aliens". One touch of love in an otherwise detached film.

Due to the cloning process, Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) has a mix of Alien DNA which gives her superhuman strength, acidic blood and a telepathic sense. She has become something more - or less - than human. The queen mother has picked up some Homo Sapiens DNA in the process and the creatures have become more man-like.

Easily the best scene in the film is when Ripley discovers the flawed previous seven clones. Touching and grotesque at the same time, the moment allows her to briefly touch her humanity and help her sisters in the only way that she can.

What constitutes humanity is a theme of the film. Our heroine is part alien. One of the characters is unveiled as an android. Vriess is something of a cyborg, attached to a high-tech wheelchair. The aliens have feelings. The scientists are monsters.

There is a particularly interesting scene where the alienated Ripley is talking to a very humanized android in the ship's chapel. The clone is aloof and emotionless throughout almost the entire film. The android is sobbing because it is only a machine. Which one has a soul?

The creatures are great for the most part. They have always been one of the best-designed visuals in any film. Now that computer technology has advanced further, they look even better, but it is disturbing that they sound and move exactly like the raptors in "Jurassic Park".

The new type of alien near the end of the film is disappointing and could have been lifted out of "Seven Voyages Of Sinbad". H. R. Giger, designer of the original film, should have been brought back for this rather than using a rubber suit found in cinematic storage.

The transformation of Ripley ruins one of the most appealing aspects of the previous films. As she is sniffing around for aliens (and everything seems to be smelling everything else in the film -- there's even a breathalyzer as a door lock) and ripping metal off the walls, she seems almost invulnerable. The old Ripley was constantly in danger: one person against an unstoppable force. This one is above that. There's no audience investment in her safety.

There are some intriguing aspects of director Jean-Pierre Jeunet's ("City Of Lost Children") film. Ripley, reborn after dying for mankind's sins, relearns of even more sacrifice. Witnessing unselfish actions by others, and although she unplugs the high-tech Bible from the computer, the final scene is straight from that book.

As the baby boomers age, older actresses have had the opportunity to be leading women and with good reason. At two years shy of 50, Weaver is an accomplished performer and easily as sexy as anyone on "Bay Watch". Her performance clearly overshadows the youthful Ryder's. She plays exactly who she is supposed to be. It's just disappointing who that person is.

This is a difficult one to write. "Alien: Resurrection" was my most anticipated film of the year and coming out of it, I was filled with very mixed emotions. It's fun but not nearly as much as it should be. Weaver is great in her role, but that role is disappointing. Asked numerous times, I've responded with my three-word review: "good, not great".

Oh well. There's always the next one and trust me, there will be an "Alien 5". Count on it.

(Michael Redman has written this column so long that this is his fourth "Alien" review. He's overjoyed to announce that he is again one with the electrons at redman@bvoice.com. Now if he'd only get something there.)

[This appeared in the 12/4/97 "Bloomington Voice", Bloomington, Indiana. Michael Redman can be contacted at redman@bvoice.com ] -- mailto:redman@bvoice.com This week's film review at http://www.bvoice.com/ Film reviews archive at http://us.imdb.com/M/reviews_by?Michael%20Redman

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews