# Species II (1998)

### reviewed by
syegul@cablehouse.dyn.ml.org

    Species II (1998)
    -* (Minus-one stars)
    A movie review by Serdar Yegulalp
    Copyright 1998 by Serdar Yegulalp

CAPSULE: MONEY TRAIN has been displaced; SPECIES II is the worst movie ever made by a major studio.

You'll notice that there's a "minus" sign in front of my one-star rating of SPECIES II. This is deliberate: normally, the lowest I go for any movie is "no stars", meaning that I was not only unentertained, but offended as well.

Minus-one stars, then, goes even lower than that. SPECIES II is the most offensive movie -- morally and aesthetically -- ever made by a big-name studio. Period. It's a sequel, I guess, to the dumb ALIEN ripoff of a few years back that had one twist: we got a sexy *female* alien, who transformed into a very unsexy puddle of chow mein when she got horny. This movie doesn't even have a new element to bring to the mix. It's a geek show.

There is one scene in SPECIES II that is the core of my disgust with the film. It consists of two creatures that we have seen represented as humans, transformed into aliens. One of them -- the "male" -- attacks the "female" in a very specifically sexual way, raping her orally. It's impossible to interpret what happens as anything else. I am astonished that even an R-rated film could contain a revoltingly explicit depiction, however metaphorical, of oral rape -- and with no point to it except to give us trashy shock. But there it is.

When the film isn't being disgusting, it's boring. Its plot, what little I could find of it, centers around astronauts returning from Mars infected with the same alien DNA that spawned the first movie's "Sil". One of them mutates, mates like mad, learns that there's a female alien on Earth somewhere, runs amuck. I am not leaving out much, nor am I trying to.

The director of his garbage, incredibly, is Peter Medak. Medak is a good filmmaker, and you will never know that from watching this movie. Medak has directed LET HIM HAVE IT, ROMEO IS BLEEDING, and THE KRAYS, all of which were above-average movies about crime and violence. SPECIES II seems to have been done entirely on autopilot, which is a shame, because if he'd bothered to take the material into hand, he could have reworked it into something less purposelessly nauseating and vile.

A friend brought up a comparison that's worth mentioning here. The Japanese animated sex-and-apocalypse epic LEGEND OF THE OVERFIEND is wall-to-wall with scenes like the one I described above, and worse. But it is nowhere nearly as hateful as SPECIES II is. As disgusting and repellent as LEGEND OF THE OVERFIEND was, it at least had a degree of internal consistency and ferocious energy. SPECIES II doesn't even classify as a beer movie (not unless you feel like cleaning beer-vomit off the couch). It isn't interesting, original, watchable, fearsome, thought-provoking *or* entertaining. It's an all-new cinematic low.

Congratulations, guys. You're my new basement tenants.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews