# Batman Returns (1992)

### reviewed by
Sarah M. Elkins

                                     BATMAN RETURNS
                           A film review by Sarah M. Elkins
                            Copyright 1992 Sarah M. Elkins

BATMAN RETURNS: sequel to the box-office success BATMAN; directed again by Tim Burton.

Plot/kick-off: A bit messy and complicated to try to explain; a new set of villains trying to take over Gotham City during the Christmas season, plus the destructive Catwoman; a few subplots that are left hanging at the end, but only if you think about them. Despite the variety of things going on, it all hangs together pretty well.

Characters/acting: Once again, the same mistake is made as in BATMAN: the villains upstage Batman; at least the villains are more interesting this time (but then, I've never been a big Nicholson fan). I had my doubts about Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman, but she was perfect*, from the way she twitches her whip like a cat's tail, to her portrayal of Selina's realization of her own disintegration while dancing with Bruce. Smart, intriguing dialogue between her and Bruce/Batman, and her and the Penguin. Danny DeVito is okay as the Penguin. Chris Walken was not as over-the-edge as the psychotic he played in A VIEW TO A KILL, but the loving father-son corporate villains angle added a fresh twist.

Cinematography/FX: Sort of a combo of BATMAN and EDWARD SCISSORHANDS; still, a few new shots that I thought were pretty spectacular (watch the neon letters in Selina's apartment and the pullback the first time she's in costume). Actually, I thought extra attention must have been placed on good acrobatics/stunts (all those flips and kicks etc.); they impressed me a little more than the gizmos, though they may have been slightly overused. The last shot was disappointingly obvious, though.

Score/Sound: Score by Danny Elfman again; pretty similar, except for a cool closing song, "Face to Face" performed by Siouxsie and the Banshees; no Prince this time.

Violence/Gore: Lots of flying bullets and bodies, but no buckets o' blood; the gore was in short intense scenes, which I thought was pretty well calculated to make the audience start to squirm, but not overplayed, except perhaps too many close-ups of the Penguin's disgusting oozing-black teeth (though they don't beat out Willem Dafoe's in WILD AT HEART).

Language: Lots of use of bi***; also some pretty overt suggestions of and references to sex by the Penguin.

Skin/situations: Implied fondling (cut off by camera angle), some kissing

Analysis: Despite a few continuity errors and problems with internal logic, I found it pretty easy to suspend disbelief and enjoy the ride. I liked it better than BATMAN, probably because I thought the first one dragged. I might even go back and see it again for a matinee or when it hits the cut-rate theaters.

    -Sarah
    elkins.wbst139@xerox.com
    * aren't you proud of me for not going for the obvious pun?   :-)

    .

The review above was posted to the rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due to ASCII to HTML conversion.

Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews