next up previous contents index
Next: Formula Structure Up: Introduction Previous: Conventions

Universes and Level Expressions

   

In Nuprl's type theory, types are grouped together into universes  . Types built from the base types such as or Atom using the various type constructors are in universe . The subscript 1 is the level of the universe. Types built from universe terms with level at most i, are in universe . Universe membership is cumulative; each universe also includes all the types in lower universes.

Since propositions are encoded as types, propositions reside in universes too. In keeping with the propositions-as-types encoding  , we define a family of propositional universe abstractions , which unfold to the corresponding primitive type universe terms .

If one is only allowed to use constant levels for universes, one often has to choose arbitrarily levels for theorems. One would then find that one needed theorems which were stated at a higher level, and would have to reprove those theorems. This was the case in Nuprl V3.

Nuprl V4 allows one to prove theorems which are implicitly quantified  over universe levels. Quantification is achieved by parameterizing universe terms by level expressions rather than natural number constants. The syntax of level expressions   is given by the grammar:

The v are level-expression variables. v can be any alphanumeric string  . These variables are implicitly quantified over all positive integer levels. the k are level expression constants. k can be any positive integer. The i are level expression increments  . i can be any non-negative integer. The expression is interpreted as standing for levels L + i.   is an abbreviation for . The expression is interpreted as being the maximum of expressions .

Usually when stating theorems, only level expressions of the form v and need be used. Other expressions get automatically created by tactics. Further, it is normally sufficient to use a single level-expression variable throughout a theorem statement. For example, we normally prove the theorem:

rather than



next up previous contents index
Next: Formula Structure Up: Introduction Previous: Conventions



Karla Consroe
Wed Oct 23 13:48:45 EDT 1996